Next Article in Journal
Evaluation of Thermally Treated Calotropis Procera Fiber for the Removal of Crude Oil on the Water Surface
Next Article in Special Issue
An Electrically Rechargeable Zinc/Air Cell with an Aqueous Choline Acetate Electrolyte
Previous Article in Journal
Building Better Batteries in the Solid State: A Review
Previous Article in Special Issue
Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of a Novel Al-Ion and a Li-Ion Battery for Stationary Applications
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Materials
Volume 12
Issue 23
10.3390/ma12233893
materials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
Correction to Materials 2019, 12(19), 3270.
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Correction

Correction: Salgado Delgado, M.A., et al. Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of a Novel Al-Ion and a Li-Ion Battery for Stationary Applications. Materials 2019, 12, 3270

by
Mario Amin Salgado Delgado
1,*,
Lorenz Usai
1,
Linda Ager-Wick Ellingsen
1,
Qiaoyan Pan
2 and
Anders Hammer Strømman
1
1
Industrial Ecology Program, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, E1-Høgskoleringen 5, 7491 Trondheim, Norway
2
ACCUREC Recycling GmbH, Bataverstraße 21, DE-47809 Krefeld, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2019, 12(23), 3893; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ma12233893
Submission received: 7 November 2019 / Accepted: 21 November 2019 / Published: 25 November 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Materials for Residential Electrochemical Energy Storage Systems)
Versions Notes
The authors wish to make the following corrections to this paper [1]: We have omitted the contribution of the co-author Dr. Linda Ager-Wick Ellingsen.
The authors would like to apologize for any inconvenience caused to the readers by this change.

Reference

  1. Salgado Delgado, M.A.; Usai, L.; Pan, Q.; Strømman, A.H. Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of a Novel Al-Ion and a Li-Ion Battery for Stationary Applications. Materials 2019, 12, 3270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Delgado, M.A.S.; Usai, L.; Ellingsen, L.A.-W.; Pan, Q.; Strømman, A.H. Correction: Salgado Delgado, M.A., et al. Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of a Novel Al-Ion and a Li-Ion Battery for Stationary Applications. Materials 2019, 12, 3270. Materials 2019, 12, 3893. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ma12233893

AMA Style

Delgado MAS, Usai L, Ellingsen LA-W, Pan Q, Strømman AH. Correction: Salgado Delgado, M.A., et al. Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of a Novel Al-Ion and a Li-Ion Battery for Stationary Applications. Materials 2019, 12, 3270. Materials. 2019; 12(23):3893. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ma12233893

Chicago/Turabian Style

Delgado, Mario Amin Salgado, Lorenz Usai, Linda Ager-Wick Ellingsen, Qiaoyan Pan, and Anders Hammer Strømman. 2019. "Correction: Salgado Delgado, M.A., et al. Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of a Novel Al-Ion and a Li-Ion Battery for Stationary Applications. Materials 2019, 12, 3270" Materials 12, no. 23: 3893. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ma12233893

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop