Next Article in Journal
Development and Vertical Tests of CEPC 650-MHz Single-Cell Cavities with High Gradient
Next Article in Special Issue
Combining H-Adaptivity with the Element Splitting Method for Crack Simulation in Large Structures
Previous Article in Journal
Magnetic Properties of Collagen–Chitosan Hybrid Materials with Immobilized Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticles (SPIONs)
Previous Article in Special Issue
Fatigue Crack Initiation Change of Cast AZ91 Magnesium Alloy from Low to Very High Cycle Fatigue Region
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Investigation of the Fatigue Stress of Orthotropic Steel Decks Based on an Arch Bridge with the Application of the Arlequin Method

by Cheng Cheng 1, Xu Xie 1,* and Wentao Yu 2
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Submission received: 7 November 2021 / Revised: 2 December 2021 / Accepted: 8 December 2021 / Published: 12 December 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Fatigue Crack Growth in Metallic Materials)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The paper can be published after the corrections have been made. Please send the paper again after the authors make corrections.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment. The corrections in the revised manuscript are address in red.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The authors of the submitted paper deal with an analysis of stress in bridge construction. They focused on the investigation of fatigue stress of an orthotropic steel deck on an arch bridge by computer simulation by use of the Arlequin method. They present results on a selected model and discuss the validity of the presented method of the calculation.

Using the computer modelling of many engineering tasks can be very helpful. The manuscript is well written but I suggest a minor revision, as follows:

1) It seems that the solved model was validated only numerically. In this case, the shell authors explain in more detail why they did not perform verification also using experimental methods.

2) In the manuscript, Figure 8 is missing. There is probably an error in the numbering of figures.

3) Line 207: It is not clear to me what the abbreviation IIW means.

4) The format of References shall be checked. The guidelines for authors have to be adhered to precisely.

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment. The corrections in the revised manuscript are address in red.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop