Next Article in Journal
Crystallization Behavior and Mechanical Properties of Poly(ε-caprolactone) Reinforced with Barium Sulfate Submicron Particles
Previous Article in Journal
Computer Aided Design Modelling and Finite Element Analysis of Premolar Proximal Cavities Restored with Resin Composites
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Materials
Volume 14
Issue 9
10.3390/ma14092367
materials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effect of Multiple Reflows on the Interfacial Reactions and Mechanical Properties of an Sn-0.5Cu-Al(Si) Solder and a Cu Substrate

by
Junhyuk Son
1,2,
Dong-Yurl Yu
1,2,
Yun-Chan Kim
1,3,
Shin-Il Kim
1,
Min-Su Kim
1,
Dongjin Byun
2 and
Junghwan Bang
1,*
1
Micro-Joining Center, Korea Institute of Industrial Technology, 156 Gaetbeol-ro, Yeonsu-gu, Incheon 406-840, Korea
2
Department of Material Science and Engineering, Korea University, Anam-dong, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul 136-713, Korea
3
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Seoul National University of Science and Technology, Seoul 01811, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2021, 14(9), 2367; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ma14092367
Submission received: 25 March 2021 / Revised: 25 April 2021 / Accepted: 27 April 2021 / Published: 2 May 2021
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
In this study, the interfacial reactions and mechanical properties of solder joints after multiple reflows were observed to evaluate the applicability of the developed materials for high-temperature soldering for automotive electronic components. The microstructural changes and mechanical properties of Sn-Cu solders regarding Al(Si) addition and the number of reflows were investigated to determine their reliability under high heat and strong vibrations. Using differential scanning calorimetry, the melting points were measured to be approximately 227, 230, and 231 °C for the SC07 solder, SC-0.01Al(Si), and SC-0.03Al(Si), respectively. The cross-sectional analysis results showed that the total intermetallic compounds (IMCs) of the SC-0.03Al(Si) solder grew the least after the as-reflow, as well as after 10 reflows. Electron probe microanalysis and transmission electron microscopy revealed that the Al-Cu and Cu-Al-Sn IMCs were present inside the solders, and their amounts increased with increasing Al(Si) content. In addition, the Cu6Sn5 IMCs inside the solder became more finely distributed with increasing Al(Si) content. The Sn-0.5Cu-0.03Al(Si) solder exhibited the highest shear strength at the beginning and after 10 reflows, and ductile fracturing was observed in all three solders. This study will facilitate the future application of lead-free solders, such as an Sn-Cu-Al(Si) solder, in automotive electrical components.

1. Introduction

The use of Pb-bearing solders has been restricted due to international environmental regulations, such as legislation for end-of-life vehicles (ELVs) and waste electric and electronic equipment (WEEE) [1,2]. Such Pb-bearing solders have been replaced by Sn-Ag-Cu solder in electronic products, for which the usage environment is relatively less severe [3]. However, the development of more reliable soldering materials is required for automotive engine rooms and transmissions, where the temperature reaches 150 °C, and vibrations ranging from 3 G to 20 G are produced during driving. Sn-Ag-Cu, Sn-Cu, Sn-Zn, Sn-Sb, and Sn-Au solders have been considered as solder candidates for application in automobiles [4,5,6,7]. However, Sn-Ag-Cu and Sn-Ag solders have low reliability because of the Ag3Sn intermetallic compounds (IMCs) that affect their thermal shock resistance and their vibration life [8]. In addition, the use of Sn-Zn solder has been restricted owing to the voids and low wettability caused by the oxidation problem [9]. Sn-Sb solder can be used at high temperatures owing to its relatively high melting point, but its continuous use is unpredictable because the harmfulness of Sb has yet to be verified. The use of Sn-Au has been restricted because of the increase in the price of Au. Sn-Cu solder is inexpensive and has a high melting point and appropriate mechanical strength, but the growth of IMCs at the Sn-Cu/Cu interface occurs much faster than at the interfaces of other lead-free solders [10]. Meanwhile, solder joints are generally subjected to the reflow process more than two times due to repeated mounting and rearrangement [11,12,13]. In the reflow process, the formation of IMCs at the solder/substrate interface is essential. However, the excessive growth of IMCs may cause thermal aging and the occurrence of brittle cracks during cycling [14,15]. Therefore, research on the formation and growth of IMC layers in multiple reflows or thermal aging environments is essential [16,17]. In this regard, studies have been conducted to improve microstructures and mechanical properties by adding small amounts of trace elements to Sn-Cu solder with relatively high melting points [18,19,20,21,22]. The addition of trace elements can reduce the diffusion velocity of IMCs by lowering the activity of Cu and Su elements or by blocking the diffusion path of atoms in liquid–solid reaction conditions [23,24]. In this study, ecofriendly Sn-0.5Cu-(0.01, 0.03 wt%)Al(Si) solder compositions with a melting point of 230 °C were developed as high-reliability soldering materials, whose thermal reliability and solder joint properties were analyzed in terms of the Al(Si) content. The insides of the solders were also analyzed, and the interfacial reactions in the solder joints were observed to evaluate the applicability of the developed materials in high-temperature soldering for automotive electronic components.

2. Materials and Methods

Pure Sn (99.9%, MKE Co., Ltd., Yongin, Gyeonggi-do, Korea), Cu (99.9%, MKE Co., Ltd.), and Al(Si) alloys were used as raw materials to prepare the SC-0.01Al(Si) and SC-0.03Al(Si) solders. Instead of pure Al, a commercial Al 4047 alloy (MKE Co., Ltd.) was used due to workability and oxidation problems that could arise with pure Al during the casting process. First, pure Sn and Cu were melted in a vacuum furnace filled with argon gas at 500 °C to prepare an Sn-0.5Cu alloy, which was then cooled in air. Then, the Sn-0.5Cu alloy and Al(Si) alloy were heated to 900 °C and mixed for 20 min. After being furnace-cooled to 600 °C, the mixed alloy was kept at 600 °C for 10 min, after which it was air-cooled to 50 °C. In addition, the prepared solder alloy was homogenized at 600 °C for 1 h. The prepared solder alloy was subjected to inductively coupled plasma (ICP) analysis, the results of which are shown in Table 1. The solder balls were manufactured by punching a solder alloy after cold rolling. The punched solder alloy was immersed in a silicone oil bath system at 300 °C to form a perfectly round ball, then cooled in a rosin mildly activated (RMA)-type flux. The silicone oil bath system was used to minimize the oxidation of the solder balls during the process. The solder ball manufacturing process of the manufactured solder alloy is shown in Figure 1.
The melting points of the solders with the addition of Al(Si) were measured and compared using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) analysis. After stabilizing 10 mg of the solder balls at 50 °C, their melting points were measured by increasing the temperature to 250 °C at a rate of 10 °C/min and decreasing it at a rate of 10 °C/min. To compare the changes in the solder joints during multiple reflows, a printed circuit board (PCB) flux that was treated with organic solderability preservative (OSP) Cu was applied in small quantities [25], and then the Sn-0.7Cu(SC07), Sn-0.5Cu-0.01Al(Si)(SC-0.01Al(Si)), and Sn-0.5Cu-0.01Al(Si)(SC-0.03Al(Si)) solder balls were mounted and soldered. Figure 2 shows a schematic diagram of the solder ball coupon fabrication. The solder joint properties were then evaluated by repeating the reflow process up to ten times. Figure 3 shows the reflow temperature profiles of the SC07, SC-0.01Al(Si), and SC-0.03Al(Si) solders. The Al(Si)-added solder proceeded to reflow at a temperature that was 5 °C higher than that of the SC07 solder.
The microstructures and interfacial IMCs as a result of the multiple reflows and Al(Si) addition were observed using field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM), energy dispersive spectrometry (EDS), electron probe microanalysis (EPMA), and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). After being polished with SiC paper and an Al2O3 polishing solution to observe the interfacial IMCs and the internal microstructure of the solder, it was etched with a solution of 95% C2H5OH, 3% HNO3, and 2% HCl (in vol.%). The following equation was used to calculate the thickness of the IMC layer [26]:
HIMC = HSEM × NIMC/NSEM,
where HSEM is the actual height of the SEM image and NIMC and NSEM are the number of pixels in the IMC layer and the entire SEM image, respectively. To increase the reliability of the thickness measurements of the IMC layer, the IMC thickness was calculated as an average of 20 SEM images.
The hardness of the solder was measured with a Vickers hardness tester (HM-220A). A load of 300 g was applied and held for 10 s. To measure the hardness, 1 cm3 of each solder was prepared and the measurement surface was polished. The average value was calculated by taking 10 measurements for each solder. A bonding strength tester (DAGE-BT4000) that was equipped with a 5 kg load cell was used to evaluate the mechanical properties according to the number of reflows. In this experiment, the test was conducted on a hot plate set to 25, 125, 150, and 175 °C to observe changes in the bonding strength as a function of the temperature. The shear height was 50 µm and the shear speed was 250 µm/s, and 22 shear strengths were measured and averaged per solder composition. Figure 4 shows a schematic of the shear strength measurement and measurement conditions.

3. Results

Figure 5 shows the hardness of the SC07, SC-0.01Al(Si), and SC-0.03Al(Si) solders after the as-reflow [27]. The hardnesses of the SC-0.01Al(Si) and SC-0.03Al(Si) solders were approximately 4% and 7% higher than those of the SC07 solder. This appears to be because the Al and Al-Cu IMCs dispersed inside the solders blocked the propagation of cracks that occurred during the hardness test [28].
Figure 6 shows the results of measuring the melting points of the three solders using DSC. The melting points were measured to be approximately 227.5 °C for the SC07 solder, 230.2 °C for SC-0.01Al(Si) solder, and 231.4 °C for the SC-0.03Al(Si) solder. Considering that the process temperature of the SC07 solder alloy was 227 °C, the melting point of SC-0.01Al(Si) was approximately 3 °C higher, and that of SC-0.03Al(Si) was 4 °C higher. The addition of Al(Si) appears to have slightly increased the melting points of the solders through reduced supercooling [29,30].
Figure 7 shows the SEM images of the solder joints of each solder after multiple reflows. In the as-reflow specimen of the SC07 solder, the total IMCs grew significantly compared with the SC-0.01Al(Si) and SC-0.03Al(Si) solders, and no Cu3Sn was observed using SEM. Elongated, scallop-shaped Cu6Sn5 IMCs were observed in the SC07 solder, and round, scallop-shaped Cu6Sn5 IMCs were observed as the Al(Si) content increased. After 10 reflows, the total IMCs of the Sn-0.7Cu solder had grown the most significantly. This appears to have occurred because the Al compounds present near the grain boundary or interface inhibited the formation and growth of interfacial IMCs by blocking the diffusion of Sn and Cu atoms [31,32]. Cu3Sn IMCs were similarly observed in all three solders.
Figure 8 shows the IMC thicknesses of the SC07, SC-0.01Al(Si), and SC-0.03Al(Si) solders as a function of the number of reflows. The total IMC thicknesses at the beginning were found to be 2.8 µm for the SC07 solder, ≈1.79 µm for the Sn-0.5Cu-0.01Al(Si) solder, and ≈1.52 µm for the Sn-0.5Cu-0.03Al(Si) solder. The total IMC thicknesses of the SC-0.01Al(Si) and SC-0.03Al(Si) solders were approximately 36% and 46% lower, respectively, than those of the SC07 solder. The IMC thicknesses increased as the number of reflows increased for all three solders. After 10 reflows, the total IMC thicknesses were found to be 4.7 µm for the SC07 solder, ≈4.02 µm for SC-0.01Al(Si), and ≈3.25 µm for SC-0.03Al(Si). In addition, the Cu3Sn IMCs increased as the number of reflows increased, but there was no significant difference according to the Al(Si) content. Cu6Sn5 IMCs are grown by the mutual diffusion and reaction of Cu/Sn, whereas Cu3Sn IMCs are grown via reactions in Cu/Cu6Sn5 IMCs [33]. It appears that the addition of Al(Si) interfered with the mutual diffusion of Cu/Sn, but it did not affect the reaction of Cu3Sn that occurs in Cu/ Cu6Sn5 IMCs.
Figure 9 shows the microstructures of the SC07, SC-0.01Al(Si), and SC-0.03Al(Si) solders as a function of the number of reflows. The inside of the solders was composed of β-Sn dendrites, eutectic areas, and some large precipitated IMCs [34]. After the as-reflow, the inside of the solders was composed of β-Sn areas surrounded by eutectic areas containing Cu6Sn5 IMCs, and β-Sn areas surrounded by refined eutectic areas were observed as the Al(Si) content increased. Even after 10 reflows, the Cu6Sn5 IMCs were more finely distributed inside the solders as the Al(Si) content increased, indicating that Al(Si) inhibited the coarsening of the Cu6Sn5 IMCs. Even a minute amount of Al(Si) effectively facilitated the formation of the refined β-Sn + Cu6Sn5 network. No Al(Si) was observed using SEM because its content level was quite low. Therefore, the Al(Si) inside the solders was observed using TEM and EPMA.
Figure 10 shows the observations of the inside of the solders using EPMA after 10 reflows. The Cu6Sn5 IMCs of the SC07 solder were coarser than those of the SC-0.01Al(Si) and SC-0.03Al(Si) solders. In addition, finely distributed Cu6Sn5 IMCs were observed inside the solders. Al or Al IMCs were observed inside the solders containing Al(Si) and their amounts increased as the Al(Si) content increased. According to Koo et al., it was found that when Al was added to Sn-0.7Cu, the solidification temperature increased [35]. In the liquid phase, the Al or Al IMC phase was first formed and served as a nucleation site during coagulation. As a result, the particle size of the β-Sn was refined.
Thermodynamic calculations and experiments have shown that the ternary Sn-Al-Cu system has a large stable liquid miscibility gap [36,37], through which Al-Cu IMCs should traverse through Al-added solder alloys during soldering. According to a report by Kotadia et al., when Al was added to the SAC305 solder, Al2Cu IMCs were observed after the reflow [38]. Figure 11 shows the TEM image of the SC-0.03Al(Si) solder and the selected area electron diffraction (SAED) patterns after 10 reflows. In Figure 11b,c, Al-Cu IMCs and Cu-Al-Sn IMCs were observed. The SAED patterns are consistent with the reported crystal structures of Al2Cu IMCs and Cu3(Al0.75Sn0.25) IMCs [35,38].
Figure 12 shows the shear strength according to the shear temperature and the number of reflows. For all the solders, the shear strength decreased as the shear temperature increased. It has been generally reported that tensile strength decreases and the ductility of an alloy increases as the temperature increases [39,40]. Under all conditions, the solders containing Al(Si) exhibited higher shear strength than the SC07 solder, and the reduction in shear strength increased as the number of reflows increased. The addition of Al(Si) appears to have increased the shear strength owing to the finer β-Sn particles. According to the Hall–Petch relationship, fine β-Sn particles exhibit higher strength [41]. In addition, the shear strength of the SC-0.03Al(Si) solder was slightly higher than that of the SC-0.01Al(Si) solder. This appears to be because the Al2Cu IMCs or Cu3(Al0.75Sn0.25) IMCs that were formed in larger quantities in the SC-0.03Al(Si) solder acted as new reinforcing particles and interfered with dislocations in a manner similar to that of Cu6Sn5 IMCs.
Figure 13 shows the fracture surfaces of the solder joints during the shear test. In general, fracture occurs at the interface or in the solder region with the lowest strength in the solder ball shear test [42]. In addition, the mechanical properties of the solder joint may be significantly degraded if IMCs with excessive thicknesses are formed between the solder and the substrate [43]. In this study, however, cracks always occurred inside the solders, regardless of the shear temperature or the number of reflows. In addition, the elongation of the inside of the solders increased as the shear temperature increased.

4. Conclusions

In this study, the microstructural changes and mechanical properties of SC07, SC-0.01Al(Si), and SC-0.03Al(Si) solders were investigated according to the number of reflows. The results of this study can be summarized as follows:
  • In the DSC analysis, the melting points were measured to be approximately 227.5 °C for the SC07 solder, 230.2 °C for the SC-0.01Al(Si) solder, and 231.4 °C for SC-0.03Al(Si) solder. The addition of Al(Si) appears to have slightly increased the melting points of the solders through reduced supercooling.
  • The cross-sectional analysis revealed that the IMCs of the SC-0.03Al(Si) solder grew less under all reflow conditions. No Cu3Sn IMCs were observed at the beginning, but they were grown and attained similar thicknesses in all three solders after 10 reflows.
  • When the inside of the solders was analyzed, it was found that the IMCs were the most finely dispersed inside the SC-0.03Al(Si) solder, and they were also the most finely dispersed inside the solder after 10 reflows.
  • The EPMA and TEM analysis results showed that Al-Cu IMCs and Cu-Al-Sn IMCs were observed inside the solders containing Al and Si, and their amounts increased as the Al content increased.
  • The highest shear strength was obtained for the SC-0.03Al(Si) solder. For all solders, the shear strength decreased with increasing shear temperature. When the fracture surfaces were analyzed, ductiles fracture was observed in all three solders. The addition of Al appears to have increased the solder strength by finely distributing the IMCs inside the solder.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.S. and D.-Y.Y.; methodology, D.B. and J.B; investigation, D.-Y.Y. and Y.-C.K.; data curation, J.S. and M.-S.K. and S.-I.K.; writing—original draft preparation, J.S. and M.-S.K.; writing—review and editing, Y.-C.K. and S.-I.K.; All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Industry Technology Innovation Program (20011659) funded by the Ministry of Trade, Industry & Energy (MOTIE, Korea).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Kang, S.K. Lead (Pb)-free solders for electronic packaging. J. Electron. Mater. 1994, 23, 701–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Leng, E.P.; Ding, M.; Ling, W.T.; Amin, N.; Ahmad, I.; Lee, M.Y.; Haseeb, A.S.M.A. A study of SnAgNiCo vs Sn3.8AgO.7Cu C5 lead free solder alloy on mechanical strength of BGA solder joint. In Proceedings of the 2008 10th Electronics Packaging Technology Conference, Singapore, 9–12 December 2008; pp. 588–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Zhang, S.; Yang, M.; Wu, Y.; Du, J.; Lin, T.; He, P.; Huang, M.; Paik, K.W. A study on the optimization of anisotropic conductive films for Sn-3Sg-0.5Cu-based flex-on-board application at a 250 °C bonding temperature. IEEE Trans. Compon. Packag. Manuf. Technol. 2018, 8, 383–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Dias, M.; Costa, T.A.; Silva, B.L.; Spinelli, J.E.; Cheung, N. Microelectronics reliability a comparative analysis of microstructural features, tensile properties and wettability of hypoperitectic and peritectic Sn-Sb solder alloys. Microelectron. Reliab. 2018, 81, 150–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Reeve, K.N. Beta-tin grain formation in aluminum-modified lead-free solder alloys. J. Electron. Mater. 2018, 47, 61–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wang, J.X.; Xue, S.B.; Han, Z.J.; Yu, S.L.; Chen, Y.; Shi, Y.P.; Wang, H. Effects of rare earth Ce on microstructures, solderability of Sn–Ag–Cu and Sn–Cu–Ni solders as well as mechanical properties of soldered joints. J. Alloys Compd. 2009, 467, 219–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Gancarz, T.; Bobrowski, P.; Pawlak, S.; Schell, N.; Chulist, R.; Janik, K. Wetting of Sn-Zn-Ga and Sn-Zn-Na alloys on Al and Ni substrate. J. Electron. Mater. 2018, 47, 49–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Limaye, P.; Labie, R.; Vandevelde, B.; Vandepitte, D.; Verlinden, B. Creep behavior of mixed SAC 405/ SnPb soldered assemblies in shear loading. In Proceedings of the 2007 9th Electronics Packaging Technology Conference, Singapore, 10–12 December 2007; pp. 703–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lin, K.L.; Liu, P.C.; Song, J.M. Wetting interaction between Pb-free Sn-Zn series solders and Cu, Ag substrates. In Proceedings of the 2004 Proceedings. 54th Electronic Components and Technology Conference (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37546), Las Vegas, NV, USA, 4 June 2004; pp. 1310–1313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Cho, M.G.; Kang, S.K.; Shih, D.Y.; Lee, H.M. Effects of minor additions of Zn on interfacial reactions of Sn-Ag-Cu and Sn-Cu solders with various Cu substrates during thermal aging. J. Electron. Mater. 2007, 36, 1501–1509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ha, S.S.; Jang, J.K.; Ha, S.O.; Yoon, J.W.; Lee, H.J.; Joo, J.H.; Kim, Y.H.; Jung, S.B. Effect of multiple reflows on interfacial reaction and shear strength of Sn–Ag electroplated solder bumps for flip chip package. Microelectron. Eng. 2010, 87, 517–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Koo, J.M.; Jung, S.B. Effect of substrate metallization on mechanical properties of Sn–3.5Ag BGA solder joints with multiple reflows. Microelectron. Eng. 2005, 82, 569–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kim, K.H.; Koike, J.; Yoon, J.W.; Yoo, S. Effect of plasma surface finish on wettability and mechanical properties of SAC305 solder joints. J. Electron. Mater. 2016, 45, 6184–6191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Deng, X.; Sidhu, R.S.; Johnson, P.; Chawla, N. Influence of reflow and thermal aging on the shear strength and fracture behavior of Sn-3.5Ag solder/Cu joints. Metall. Mater. Trans. A Phys. Metall. Mater. Sci. 2005, 36, 55–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Chan, Y.C.; So, A.C.K.; Lai, J.K.L. Growth kinetic studies of Cu–Sn intermetallic compound and its effect on shear strength of LCCC SMT solder joints. Mater. Sci. Eng. B 1998, 55, 5–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Deng, X.; Piotrowski, G.; Williams, J.J.; Chawla, N. Influence of initial morphology and thickness of Cu6Sn5 and Cu3Sn intermetallics on growth and evolution during thermal aging of Sn-Sg solder/Cu joints. J. Electron. Mater. 2003, 32, 1403–1413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Park, J.M.; Kim, S.H.; Jeong, M.H.; Park, Y.B. Effect of Cu-Sn intermetallic compound reactions on the Kirkendall void growth characteristics in Cu/Sn/Cu microbumps. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2014, 53, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Son, J.; Yu, D.Y.; Kim, M.S.; Ko, Y.H.; Byun, D.J.; Bang, J. Nucleation and morphology of Cu6Sn5 intermetallic at the interface between molten Sn-0.7Cu-0.2Cr solder and Cu substrate. Metals 2021, 11, 210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Fan, J.; Liu, Z.; Zhai, H.; Wang, X.; Wang, Y.; Li, Y. Microelectronics reliability effect of Co content on the microstructure, spreadability, conductivity and corrosion resistance of Sn-0.7Cu alloy. Microelectron. Reliab. 2020, 107, 113615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ramli, M.I.I.; Salleh, M.A.A.M.; Abdullah, M.M.A. The effect of Ni and Bi additions on the solderability of Sn-0.7Cu solder coatings. J. Electron. Mater. 2020, 49, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lv, Y.; Yang, W.; Mao, J.; Li, Y.; Zhang, X.; Zhan, Y. Effect of graphene nano-sheets additions on the density, hardness, conductivity, and corrosion behavior of Sn–0.7Cu solder alloy. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2020, 31, 202–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Mohammadi, A.; Mahmudi, R. Elevated-temperature mechanical properties of lead-free Sn-0.7Cu- x SiC nanocomposite solders. J. Electron. Mater. 2018, 47, 1721–1729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Bang, J.; Yu, D.Y.; Ko, Y.H.; Son, J.H.; Nishikawa, H.; Lee, C.W. Intermetallic compound growth between Sn-Cu-Cr lead-free solder and Cu substrate. Microelectron. Reliab. 2019, 99, 62–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Chen, X.; Zhou, J.; Xue, F.; Bai, J.; Yao, Y. Microstructures and mechanical properties of Sn-0.1Ag-0.7Cu-(Co, Ni, and Nd) lead-free solders. J. Electron. Mater. 2014, 44, 725–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ramirez, M.; Henneken, L.; Virtanen, S. Oxidation kinetics of thin copper films and wetting behaviour of copper and Organic Solderability Preservatives (OSP) with lead-free solder. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2011, 257, 6481–6488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Yang, M.; Li, M.; Wang, C. Interfacial reactions of eutectic Sn3.5Ag and pure tin solders with Cu substrates during liquid-state soldering. Intermetallics 2012, 25, 86–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Bang, J. Characteristics of Interfacial Reaction between Sn–Cu Solder Alloys with Trace Elements and Cu. Ph.D. Thesis, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  28. Leong, Y.M.; Haseeb, A.S.M.A. Soldering characteristics and mechanical properties of Sn-1.0Ag-0.5Cu solder with minor aluminum addition. Materials 2016, 9, 522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Kantarc, A.; Kalay, Y.E. Effects of Al and Fe additions on microstructure and mechanical properties of SnAgCu eutectic lead-free solders. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2014, 593, 79–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Nurulakmal, K.M.A.S.A.M.S. Effect of Al addition to bulk microstructure, IMC formation, wetting and mechanical properties of low-Ag SAC solder. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2016, 27, 489–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wang, Y.; Biegler, L.T.; Patel, M.; Wassick, J. Parameters estimation and model discrimination for solid-liquid reactions in batch processes. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2018, 187, 455–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Lee, H.Y.; Sharma, A.; Kee, S.H.; Lee, Y.W.; Moon, J.T.; Jung, J.P. Effect of aluminium additions on wettability and intermetallic compound (IMC) growth of lead free Sn (2 wt.% Ag, 5 wt.% Bi) soldered joints. Electron. Mater. 2014, 10, 997–1004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Chen, S.W.; Chen, C.M.; Liu, W.C. Electric current effects upon the Sn\Cu and Sn\Ni interfacial reactions. J. Electron. Mater. 1998, 27, 1193–1198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Choe, C.; Noh, S.; Chen, C.; Kim, D.; Suganuma, K. Influence of thermal exposure upon mechanical/electrical properties and microstructure of sintered micro-porous silver. Microelectron. Reliab. 2018, 88–90, 695–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Koo, J.; Lee, C.; Hong, S.J.; Kim, K.S.; Lee, H.M. Microstructural discovery of Al addition on Sn–0.5Cu-based Pb-free solder design. J. Alloys Compd. 2015, 650, 106–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Phase Diagrams and Thermodynamic Properties of Ternary Copper-Metal Systems, 1st ed.; International Copper Research Association: New York, NY, USA, 1979.
  37. Mirković, D.; Gröbner, J.; Schmid-Fetzer, R. Liquid demixing and microstructure formation in ternary Al–Sn–Cu alloys. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2008, 487, 456–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Kotadia, H.R.; Panneerselvam, A.; Mokhtari, O.; Green, M.A.; Mannan, S.H. Massive spalling of Cu-Zn and Cu-Al intermetallic compounds at the interface between solders and Cu substrate during liquid state reaction. J. Appl. Phys. 2016, 111, 074902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Wang, K.; Wang, F.; Huang, Y.; Qi, K. Comprehensive properties of a novel quaternary Sn-bi-Sb-Ag solder wettability, interfacial structure and mechanical properties. Metals 2019, 9, 791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Eid, E.A.; Fouda, A.N.; Duraia, E.-S.M. Effect of adding 0.5 wt% ZnO nanoparticles, temperature and strain rate on tensile properties of Sn–5.0 wt% Sb–0.5 wt% Cu(SSC505) lead free solder alloy. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2016, 657, 104–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Hansen, N. Hall–Petch relation and boundary strengthening. Scr. Mater. 2004, 51, 801–806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Hu, X.; Xu, T.; Keer, L.M.; Li, Y.; Jiang, X. Shear strength and fracture behavior of reflowed Sn3.0Ag0.5Cu/Cu solder joints under various strain rates. J. Alloys Compd. 2017, 690, 720–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Yoon, J.W.; Noh, B.I.; Lee, Y.H.; Lee, H.S.; Jung, S.B. Effects of isothermal aging and temperature-humidity treatment of substrate on joint reliability of Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cu/OSP-finished Cu CSP solder joint. Microelectron. Reliab. 2008, 48, 1864–1874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Materials 14 02367 g001 550
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the solder ball manufacturing process.
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the solder ball manufacturing process.
Materials 14 02367 g001
Materials 14 02367 g002 550
Figure 2. Schematic diagram of the solder ball coupon fabrication.
Figure 2. Schematic diagram of the solder ball coupon fabrication.
Materials 14 02367 g002
Materials 14 02367 g003 550
Figure 3. Reflow profiles of the SC07, SC-0.01Al(Si), and SC-0.03Al(Si) solders.
Figure 3. Reflow profiles of the SC07, SC-0.01Al(Si), and SC-0.03Al(Si) solders.
Materials 14 02367 g003
Materials 14 02367 g004 550
Figure 4. Schematic diagram and test conditions for the shear tests.
Figure 4. Schematic diagram and test conditions for the shear tests.
Materials 14 02367 g004
Materials 14 02367 g005 550
Figure 5. Hardness of the SC07, SC-0.01Al(Si), and SC-0.03Al(Si) solders [27].
Figure 5. Hardness of the SC07, SC-0.01Al(Si), and SC-0.03Al(Si) solders [27].
Materials 14 02367 g005
Materials 14 02367 g006 550
Figure 6. DSC results for the SC07, SC-0.01Al(Si), and SC-0.03Al(Si) solders.
Figure 6. DSC results for the SC07, SC-0.01Al(Si), and SC-0.03Al(Si) solders.
Materials 14 02367 g006
Materials 14 02367 g007 550
Figure 7. SEM images showing the interfacial IMCs of the solder joints after the as-reflow, 5 reflows, and 10 reflows.
Figure 7. SEM images showing the interfacial IMCs of the solder joints after the as-reflow, 5 reflows, and 10 reflows.
Materials 14 02367 g007
Materials 14 02367 g008 550
Figure 8. Plots of the IMC thickness versus the number of reflows: (a) total IMC thicknesses and (b) Cu3Sn IMC thicknesses.
Figure 8. Plots of the IMC thickness versus the number of reflows: (a) total IMC thicknesses and (b) Cu3Sn IMC thicknesses.
Materials 14 02367 g008
Materials 14 02367 g009 550
Figure 9. Secondary electron SEM images showing the microstructures of the solder balls under various reflows.
Figure 9. Secondary electron SEM images showing the microstructures of the solder balls under various reflows.
Materials 14 02367 g009
Materials 14 02367 g010 550
Figure 10. EPMA electron mapping of various solder joints after 10 reflows [27].
Figure 10. EPMA electron mapping of various solder joints after 10 reflows [27].
Materials 14 02367 g010
Materials 14 02367 g011 550
Figure 11. (a) TEM bright-field image of the interfacial microstructure for the SC-0.03Al(Si) solder joint. Selected area electron diffraction patterns for (b) Al2Cu and (c) Cu3(Al0.75Sn0.25) [27].
Figure 11. (a) TEM bright-field image of the interfacial microstructure for the SC-0.03Al(Si) solder joint. Selected area electron diffraction patterns for (b) Al2Cu and (c) Cu3(Al0.75Sn0.25) [27].
Materials 14 02367 g011
Materials 14 02367 g012 550
Figure 12. Shear strength of solder joints under various reflows at (a) 25 °C, (b) 125 °C, (c) 150 °C, and (d) 175 °C.
Figure 12. Shear strength of solder joints under various reflows at (a) 25 °C, (b) 125 °C, (c) 150 °C, and (d) 175 °C.
Materials 14 02367 g012
Materials 14 02367 g013 550
Figure 13. Fracture surfaces of the solder joints under various shear speeds: (a) as-reflow and (b) 10 reflows.
Figure 13. Fracture surfaces of the solder joints under various shear speeds: (a) as-reflow and (b) 10 reflows.
Materials 14 02367 g013
Table
Table 1. Composition of the manufactured solder alloys.
Table 1. Composition of the manufactured solder alloys.
Solder AlloySn (wt.%)Cu (wt.%)Al (wt.%)Si (wt.%)
SC-0.01Al(Si)Bal.0.65270.01400.0014
SC-0.03Al(Si)Bal.0.66200.03070.0030
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Son, J.; Yu, D.-Y.; Kim, Y.-C.; Kim, S.-I.; Kim, M.-S.; Byun, D.; Bang, J. Effect of Multiple Reflows on the Interfacial Reactions and Mechanical Properties of an Sn-0.5Cu-Al(Si) Solder and a Cu Substrate. Materials 2021, 14, 2367. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ma14092367

AMA Style

Son J, Yu D-Y, Kim Y-C, Kim S-I, Kim M-S, Byun D, Bang J. Effect of Multiple Reflows on the Interfacial Reactions and Mechanical Properties of an Sn-0.5Cu-Al(Si) Solder and a Cu Substrate. Materials. 2021; 14(9):2367. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ma14092367

Chicago/Turabian Style

Son, Junhyuk, Dong-Yurl Yu, Yun-Chan Kim, Shin-Il Kim, Min-Su Kim, Dongjin Byun, and Junghwan Bang. 2021. "Effect of Multiple Reflows on the Interfacial Reactions and Mechanical Properties of an Sn-0.5Cu-Al(Si) Solder and a Cu Substrate" Materials 14, no. 9: 2367. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ma14092367

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop