Next Article in Journal
Ceramic and Composite Polishing Systems for Milled Lithium Disilicate Restorative Materials: A 2D and 3D Comparative In Vitro Study
Previous Article in Journal
A Novel Manufacturing Concept of LCP Fiber-Reinforced GPET-Based Sandwich Structures with an FDM 3D-Printed Core
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effect of Waste Basalt Fines and Recycled Concrete Components on Mechanical, Water Absorption, and Microstructure Characteristics of Concrete
 
 
Review
Peer-Review Record

Photoactive Cements: A Review

by Dominika Dudek and Magdalena Janus *
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Submission received: 11 July 2022 / Revised: 29 July 2022 / Accepted: 3 August 2022 / Published: 5 August 2022

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The review article entitled “Photoactive cements: A review”, presents a short and comprehensive overview of modified cements with photocatalytic activity. Some statements need to be considered prior to further consideration in the journal of Materials and after addressing the reviewer’s major concerns:

(1)    The whole manuscript needs further grammar polish such as: CO2 and TiO2 (the number are not subscript), Mxen, with With, and other grammar mistakes.

(2)    Please provide a section on the photocatalytic mechanisms of TiO2 or as general.

(3)    Please add part b) in section 2.3. including examples using a different type of photocatalyst.

(4)    There are long paragraphs throughout the whole manuscript please divided them.

Author Response

Dear Reviewer

Thank you very much for your comments:

Reviewer: The whole manuscript needs further grammar polish such as: CO2 and TiO2 (the number are not subscript), Mxen, with With, and other grammar mistakes.

Answer: We fixed all editorial errors. In the case of MXen, it should be MXene. This is the name of Ti3C2, we put this formula in to the manuscript.

Reviewer:  Please provide a section on the photocatalytic mechanisms of TiO2 or as general.

Answer: Very general mechanism of photocatalysis was placed in the section 2

Reviewer: Please add part b) in section 2.3. including examples using a different type of photocatalyst.

Answer: Part b) to section 2.3 was added

Reviewer: There are long paragraphs throughout the whole manuscript please divided them.

Answer: To long paragraphs were divided

Reviewer 2 Report

This manuscript present a detailed review for photoactive cement. The manuscript is in a good structure.

However, it is advised that in the review paper, the authors should have copyright clearance/admission for the use of figures from other publications even when these figures are cited properly. It can usually be completed with publishers' setup (for example, RightsLink for Elsevier) or author's approval. 

Author Response

Dear Reviewer

Thank you very much for your comments:

This manuscript present a detailed review for photoactive cement. The manuscript is in a good structure.

However, it is advised that in the review paper, the authors should have copyright clearance/admission for the use of figures from other publications even when these figures are cited properly. It can usually be completed with publishers' setup (for example, RightsLink for Elsevier) or author's approval. 

We obtained the appropriate approvals from publishers under the drawings and placed the information RightsLink for Elsevier

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

No further comments.

Back to TopTop