Next Article in Journal
Effect of the Composition of Hybrid Sands on the Change in Thermal Expansion
Next Article in Special Issue
Extraction Optimization and Structural Characteristics of Chitosan from Cuttlefish (S. pharaonis sp.) Bone
Previous Article in Journal
Controlling the Surface Morphology of ZnO Nano-Thin Film Using the Spin Coating Technique
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Materials
Volume 15
Issue 17
10.3390/ma15176179
materials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Effects of Endic Anhydride Grafted PPC on the Properties of PHBV Blends

by
Qing Zhang
*,
Yongguang Gao
,
Huiyuan Liu
,
Shili Shu
and
Wei Chen
College of Chemistry, Tangshan Normal University, Tangshan 063000, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2022, 15(17), 6179; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ma15176179
Submission received: 10 August 2022 / Revised: 30 August 2022 / Accepted: 31 August 2022 / Published: 5 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Development and Application of Functional Polymer Materials)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Poly(β-hydroxybutyrate-co-β-hydroxyvalerate) (PHBV) was modified with endic anhydride grafted poly(propylene carbonate) (EA–PPC), and then PHBV/EA–PPC composite polymers were prepared by melt blending under the catalysis of stannous octoate (Sn(Oct)2). The blends were characterized by an electronic universal testing machine, cantilever impact testing machine, and differential scanning calorimeter (DSC), as well as dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) and field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM). Effects of the amount of Sn(Oct)2 on the mechanical properties, thermal properties, and morphology of the blends were discussed. The results showed that the addition of Sn(Oct)2 promoted the transesterification reaction between PHBV and EA–PPC, and the compatibility between PHBV and PPC was greatly improved. When the amount of Sn(Oct)2 was 3 wt%, the impact strength and elongation at break of the PHBV/EA–PPC blend increased from 3.7 kJ/m2 and 4.1% to 5.9 kJ/m2 and 387.5%, respectively, and there was no significant decrease in tensile strength. Additionally, four esterification reaction mechanisms for PHBV/EA–PPC blends were proposed.

1. Introduction

Among the polymer materials obtained by microbial fermentation, the most commercialized ones are currently polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs) [1,2,3]. PHAs are a family of linear biopolyesters composed of hydroxyalkanoate (HA) units, which are generally obtained by microorganisms under the condition of an imbalance of nutrients such as carbon and nitrogen, and can be stored in cells as energy and a carbon source [4,5,6]. Poly(β-hydroxybutyrate-co-β-hydroxyvalerate) (PHBV) is one member of the PHA family and its structure contains randomly arranged 3-hydroxybutyrate (HB) and 3-hydroxyvalerate (HV) segments. The structure is shown in Scheme 1a [4]. Because the segment structures of HB and HV are very similar, the phenomenon of isodimorphism can be seen during the crystallization of PHBV, resulting in a high crystallinity. Moreover, there is a serious post-crystallization phenomenon, which brings great difficulty to the processing [7,8]. PHBV exhibits excellent biocompatibility, optical activity, piezoelectricity, gas barrier properties, etc. [9,10,11,12]. It has been widely used in many fields such as packaging materials, tissue engineering materials, and sustained-release materials. However, the low glass transition temperature of PHBV causes its secondary crystallization during storage at room temperature, resulting in increased brittleness [13,14]. The low impact resistance and poor processability, resulting from its very high crystallinity, delay its commercial applications on a large scale [10,15,16,17]. Therefore, PHBV must be modified to broaden its applications. A series of studies have been performed to enhance its flexibility and mechanical properties, where PHBV was blended with various fillers [18,19,20] or compounded with various thermoplastic polymers [21,22,23].
Polypropylene carbonate (PPC) is an environmentally friendly and biodegradable aliphatic polycarbonate obtained by alternating copolymerization of carbon dioxide and propylene oxide. The production process can consume a large amount of the greenhouse gas carbon dioxidec [24,25]. Its structure is shown in Scheme 1b. There are ether bonds on the main chain of PPC, so the molecular chain is easy to rotate around the ether bond, which makes PPC very flexible with excellent tensile toughness, very high elongation at break, but poor strength [26,27]. Based on the complementarity of the mechanical properties of PHBV and PPC, melt blending PPC with PHBV will not only enhance the toughness of PHBV but also modify the low strength and bad thermal stability of PPC. However, the interfacial compatibility of PHBV and PPC is poor [28], and simple blending cannot effectively improve the mechanical properties of composites, so they need to be compatibilized.
In the present work, endic anhydride grafted poly(propylene carbonate) (EA–PPC) was prepared by grafting PPC with endic anhydride (EA), and the EA–PPC acted as an in situ interfacial compatibilizer. Stannous octoate (Sn(Oct)2) is a widely used catalyst and had been proved to be more efficient than some other catalysts for catalyzing the transesterification between PLA and other polyesters [29,30,31]. PHBV/EA–PPC blends were prepared by melt transesterification under the catalysis of Sn(Oct)2, and their properties were characterized. Effects of the amount of catalyst on the thermal properties, mechanical properties, and morphology of the blends were discussed.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

PHBV (Y1000P) and PPC (PPC101) were commercially obtained from Tianan Biomaterials Co., Ltd. (Ningbo, China) and Nanyang Zhongju Tianguan Low Carbon Technology Co., Ltd. (Nanyang, China), respectively. Endic anhydride (an endo isomer) with a full name of bicyclo [2.2.1]hept-5-ene-2,3-dicarboxylic anhydride) (analytical reagent) (AR), Sn(Oct)2 (AR), chloroform (AR), potassium hydroxide (KOH) (AR), and phenolphthalein (AR) were purchased from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co, Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Polyethylene wax (PE wax) was supplied by Qingdao Sino New Material Co., Ltd. (Qingdao, China). All reagents were used without any further purification.

2.2. Preparation Procedures

2.2.1. Preparation of EA–PPC

PPC was dried in a vacuum drying oven at 50 °C for 12 h before use. The dried PPC and EA were premixed in a high-speed disperser for 5 min at a mass ratio of 99:1 and then added to the mixing chamber of a torque rheometer to be melt-blended for 8 min at a temperature of 145 °C and a rotational speed of 40 rpm. After the torque value reached an equilibrium, we stopped the motor to obtain EA–PPC. The samples were pelletized after cooling and placed in a desiccator for use.

2.2.2. Blend Preparation of PHBV Composites

PHBV, PPC, and PE wax were dried in a vacuum drying oven at 50 °C for 24 h before use. The dried raw materials were weighed and premixed in a high-speed mixer for 5 min according to the formulations listed in Table 1. The premixed blends were poured into the mixing chamber of the torque rheometer for 8 min under a temperature of 175 °C and a rotational speed of 40 rpm. After the torque value reached an equilibrium, the motor of the torque rheometer was stopped to obtain PHBV/PPC blends. Then, the resulting blends were pelletized after cooling. Next, the blend pellets were added to the barrel of a microinjection molder and injected into standard splines for testing. The temperature of the mold zone and the injection zone were set to 50 and 185 °C, respectively. The injection time and the holding time were 5 s and 40 s, respectively.
PHBV/EA–PPC blends were also prepared according to the above procedure. Here, the ratio of PHBV and EA–PPC was fixed at 70:30. The dried PHBV, EA–PPC, a certain amount of Sn(Oct)2, and 0.5 g PE wax was mixed in a high-speed disperser. The melting reaction was also carried out in the mixing chamber of the torque rheometer. Finally, the standard splines of the PHBV/EA–PPC blends were obtained for testing.

2.3. Analysis

The grafting degree (Dg) of EA–PPC was determined by referring to the literature [32,33]. EA–PPC was dissolved in 5 wt/v% chloroform and then precipitated three times with excess ethanol to remove free EA. The purified EA–PPC was dried in a vacuum oven at 50 °C for 24 h and then placed in a desiccator for use. A total of 0.8 g of dried EA–PPC was dissolved in 100 mL of chloroform. The EA–PPC/chloroform solution was titrated with 0.01 mol L−1 KOH/ethanol solution with phenolphthalein as an indicator. A blank experiment for neat PPC was performed according to the same procedure. The Dg was calculated with the following formula.
D g   ( % ) = ( V 1 − V 0 ) × M E A 2 × 10 − 5 × w × 100 %
where V1 and V0 (mL) are the volumes of KOH solution consumed by EA–PPC and PPC, respectively. MEA (g mol-1) and w (g) are the molecular weight of MA and the weight of EA–PPC, respectively.
Tensile properties were carried out using a CMT4202 universal testing machine (Shenzhen, China) according to ASTM D638, at a test speed of 10 mm/min. Specimens were dumbbell-shaped with dimensions of 75 mm × 4 mm × 1 mm. Izod impact properties of notched samples were determined with an XJU-22 impact tester (Suzhou, China) according to ASTM D-256 standard.
TGA analyses were performed with a PerkinElmer TGA 4000 thermogravimetric analyzer (Waltham, MA, USA) at a heating rate of 10 °C/min from 20 to 550 °C under a nitrogen atmosphere.
DSC measurements were carried out on a PerkinElmer DSC 4000 instrument (Waltham, MA, USA) under a nitrogen atmosphere. The heating and cooling rates were all set to 10 °C/min. The crystallinity degree (χc) was calculated through the following formula [21]:
χ c ( % ) = Δ H m Δ H m 0 × ω P H B V × 100 %
where Δ H m is the melting enthalpy of the PHBV blend, Δ H m 0 is the melting enthalpy of 100% crystalline for PHBV (146 J/g) [34], and ω P H B V is the weight fraction of PHBV in the sample. Δ H m was derived from the second heating DSC curve.
DMA analyses were determined by a DMA Q800 TA Instruments (New Castle, DE, USA) in single cantilever mode on rectangular samples with the dimension of 40 mm × 10 mm × 4 mm. The test frequency was set at 1 Hz, and the samples were heated from −30 to 80 °C at a heating rate of 2 °C/min.
The morphology of the fractured surfaces of specimens was observed with a ZEISS Sigma 300 FESEM (Schnelldorf, Germany) with an accelerating voltage of 10 kV. The samples were sprayed with gold.

3. Results

3.1. Mechanical Properties of PHBV Blends

Table 1 presents the mechanical property data of PHBV, PPC, and PHBV/PPC blends with or without the transesterification catalyst Sn(Oct)2. Neat PHBV exhibited high rigidity with a tensile strength of 39.6 MPa, but poor impact strength and low elongation at break at the values only of 3.7 kJ/m2 and 4.1%, respectively, indicating it was a relatively stiff and brittle polymer. On the other hand, PPC was a ductile polymer with up to about 483.7% of elongation at break but a low tensile strength of 13.8 MPa. The tensile strength, impact strength, and elongation at break of the PLA/PPC blends were also low when PHBV and PPC were blended directly without the catalyst in different proportions. Even after adding Sn(Oct)2, the toughness of blends was still not improved. This was because the ungrafted PPC underwent extensive thermal degradation and chain scission during the melt processing at 175 °C, which was a drag on the mechanical properties of PHBV/PPC blends. In such a case, the terminal hydroxyl groups of PPC were capped by grafting the EA moieties, and then the zipper-type thermal degradation was effectively inhibited. The route for end-capping of PPC with EA is shown in Scheme 2. EA–PPC was obtained by the alcoholysis and acidolysis reaction of hydroxyl and carboxyl groups at both ends of the PPC chain with an equivalent amount of EA, respectively. The Dg of EA on the PPC chain was 0.26%, which was obtained from the titration test. The improved thermal stability of EA–PPC is demonstrated by thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) in Figure 1. From Figure 1 we can see that the onset decomposition temperature (the temperature at 5% weight loss) of EA–PPC shifted to a higher value (213.6 °C) compared with that of neat PPC (162.5 °C).
Sn(Oct)2 was used as a catalyst for the transesterification of PHBV and EA–PPC, and the effect of Sn(Oct)2 dosage on the mechanical properties of PHBV/EA–PPC blends was investigated. Here, PHBV was blended with EA–PPC in a weight ratio of 70/30, and the amount of catalyst was varied from 0 to 5 parts (wt%). Figure 2 shows the mechanical properties of PHBV/EA–PPC blends with different amounts of the catalyst, and the relevant data are summarized in Table 2.
Due to the toughness of PPC, the elongation at break of EA–PPC was also as high as 458.1%, while the tensile strength was only 13.2 MPa. Compared with neat PHBV, although the tensile strength of the PHBV/EA–PPC blends decreased, the impact strength and elongation at break were greatly improved. With the increase of Sn(Oct)2 content, the tensile strength, impact strength, and elongation at break of the blends all showed a trend of increasing first and then decreasing. As shown in Figure 2a and Table 2, when the Sn(Oct)2 content was increased to 3 parts, the tensile strength of the blends increased to 36.8 MPa, which was not significantly reduced compared with neat PHBV. With 3 parts of the catalyst, the impact strength and elongation at break reached 5.9 kJ/m2 and 387.5%, respectively (Figure 2b,c). However, after the amount of Sn(Oct)2 exceeded 3 parts, the tensile strength, impact strength, and elongation at break of blends all decrease gradually, especially the elongation at break, which decreased obviously. This was because an appropriate amount of catalyst could effectively catalyze the transesterification reaction between PHBV and EA–PPC, which increased the interfacial compatibility and enhanced the interaction between molecular chains at the interface of the two polymers so that the external stresses can be absorbed and transferred effectively between the polymers. Although the addition of excess catalysts increased the degree of transesterification, the scission of the macromolecular chains also occurred at the same time. So, quantities of PHBV and PPC oligomers were generated during the blending process, resulting in a decrease in the mechanical properties of the blends.

3.2. Thermal Properties of PHBV/EA–PPC Blends

Figure 3a,b show the DSC cooling curves and secondary heating curves of the PHBV/PPC blends at a cooling rate of 10 °C/min and a heating rate of 10 °C/min, respectively. The effect of Sn(Oct)2 content was investigated and the relevant data are summarized in Table 3.
It can be seen that no crystallization peak appeared on the DSC cooling curve of EA–PPC, and there was also no melting peak, while only the glass transition process could be observed on the second heating curve. This was attributed to the fact that EA–PPC is an amorphous polymer. The crystallization temperature (Tc) of neat PHBV was 120.6 °C, and only the crystallization peak of PHBV appeared in the cooling curves of PHBV/EA–PPC blends. With the increase in Sn(Oct)2 content, the crystallization temperature of PHBV/PPC blends shifted gradually to a lower value. When the amount of Sn(Oct)2 was 1, 2, 3, and 4 parts, compared with the neat PHBV, the crystallization temperature of blends decreased by 5.9, 11.4, 15.4, and 17.5 °C, respectively. The addition of Sn(Oct)2 enhanced the interaction between PHBV and EA–PPC, and more flexible EA–PPC chains were introduced into the PHBV molecules. On one hand, the flexible and amorphous EA–PPC in the blends acted as a “solvent” to “dilute” the nuclei of PHBV. On the other hand, it destroyed the stereoregularity of the PHBV molecular chain and then inhibited the crystallization of PHBV in the blends. In order to further verify the effect of Sn(Oct)2 on the crystallization ability of the blends, the crystallinity ( χ c ) of PHBV in the blends was calculated from the second heating curve of DSC (Figure 3b) and is listed in Table 3. One can see that the crystallinity of the blends decreased with the increase in the amount of Sn(Oct)2.
The glass transition temperature (Tg) and melting endothermic peak temperature (Tm) of neat PHBV were 6.3 and 171.7 °C, respectively. For the blend P70/EP30 without Sn(Oct)2 added, the DSC curve showed two distinctive Tg values, which corresponded to the respective Tg value of the two components, indicating that the compatibility of PHBV and EA–PPC was poor, and there was an obvious interface between them. As the amount of Sn(Oct)2 increased, the difference between the two Tg values decreased gradually, until the amount reached 3 parts (P70/EP30/S3 blends). At this point, the Tg values of two components merged into one, which represented that compatibility of the two components was improved via adding Sn(Oct)2 as a catalyst for the transesterification between PHBV and EA–PPC. For the PHBV blends, Tg increased compared to neat PHBV, which solved the problem of the secondary crystallization of PHBV during storage at room temperature. The Tm of the PHBV blends presented a decreasing trend with the increasing amount of Sn(Oct)2. This was because the low-temperature crystallization of polymer chains made the crystallization not perfect, and then the imperfect crystals will melt at lower temperatures. The lowering of Tm was beneficial for the broadening of the processing window of the blends.
The glass transition of the blends could also be identified from the DMA thermograms. Figure 4 depicts the damping factor (tan δ) of neat PHBV, EA–PPC, and PHBV/EA–PPC blends with various amounts of Sn(Oct)2 as a function of temperature. Marked and broad peaks were observed in Figure 4, which resulted from the transition in molecular mobility, representing the Tg of the polymers. It can be seen from Figure 4a that the maximum peaks are located at 10.2 and 41.6 °C, corresponding to the Tg of PHBV and EA–PPC, respectively. For PHBV/EA–PPC blends with less than 3 parts (wt%) of Sn(Oct)2, the curves showed two peaks, in which the peak at the lower temperature corresponded to the Tg of PHBV, and the peak at the higher temperature corresponded to the Tg of EA–PPC. With the increase in the amount of Sn(Oct)2, the distance between the two peaks gradually decreased until they merged into one, which was consistent with the DSC results.

3.3. SEM Analysis

To further explore the effect of catalytic transesterification on the behavior of tensile fracture during the tensile test, SEM characterization was performed on the tensile-fractured surfaces of P70/EP30 blends without Sn(Oct)2 and P70/EP30/S3 blends with 3 parts (wt%) of Sn(Oct)2, as shown in Figure 5.
In the absence of Sn(Oct)2 (Figure 5a), spherical EA–PPC particles could be distinguished from the smooth brittle failure surface, and there was a clear boundary between the dispersed phase EA–PPC and the continuous phase PHBV matrix, presenting a typical “sea-island” structure. This indicated that the transesterification of PHBV and EA–PPC hardly occurred without Sn(Oct)2, leading to poor compatibility, weak interfacial adhesion, and a distinct phase interface between PHBV and EA–PPC. As one can see from Figure 5b, when the Sn(Oct)2 content was 3 parts (wt%), the tensile-fractured surface of P70/EP30/S3 blends exhibited a “sea-sea” structure and an obvious ductile fracture. This was because Sn(Oct)2 catalyzed the reactive sites between PHBV and EA–PPC, and then the reaction rate of transesterification between the two polymers was improved significantly. The resulting copolymers and oligomers could be used as in situ compatibilizers and plasticizers for the blends, respectively, which increased the free volume among the polymer chains and improved the toughness. The blends softened by EA–PPC can be stretched synchronously with the tensile process, and the plastic deformation spread over the surface of ductile failure. The external stress could be absorbed and transferred effectively before the final fracture, resulting in increased impact strength and elongation at break.

3.4. Formation Mechanism of PHBV/EA–PPC Blends

According to the research on the transesterification reaction mechanism in other polymer blends [35,36,37], we speculated that the reaction between PHBV and EA–PPC was a transesterification reaction, as shown in Figure 6. There were mainly four types of transesterification reactions that occurred. The first was that the terminal hydroxyl group of PHBV conducted a nucleophilic attack on the carbonyl carbon of EA–PPC to carry out an alcoholysis reaction under the catalysis of Sn(Oct)2. The C-O bond of EA–PPC was broken and the PHBV segment was introduced to generate PHBV/EA–PPC copolymer and PPC segment. The second type was that the terminal carboxyl group of PHBV attacked nucleophilically the carbonyl carbon of EA–PPC, during which an acid hydrolysis reaction occurred. Similarly, the C-O bond was broken to introduce the PHBV segment, generating the PHBV/EA–PPC copolymer segment with different structural units from the first one. Unlike the previous two types of reaction modes, the nucleophilic reagent was EA–PPC instead of PHBV in the third one. In this case, the terminal carboxyl group of EA–PPC launched a nucleophilic attack on the carbonyl carbon of PHBV, which made the C-O bond of PHBV cleave, and then the PPC segment was introduced to the PHBV chain while leaving the remaining PHBV segments. The last way was direct transesterification, also known as the esterolysis reaction [38]. The O of the ester group in PHBV attacked the C of the carbonate group in the PPC chain, and meanwhile, the O of the carbonate group in PPC attacked the C of the ester group in the PHBV chain, forming two new block copolymers at the same time. Carbonate functional groups were less electrophilic than the ester functional groups. Therefore, the third type of reaction was probably the main mechanism by which the transesterification took place. Regardless of the way in which the transesterification occurred, the resulting copolymer can act as an in situ compatibilizer for PHBV and PPC and then improve the compatibility between them.

4. Conclusions

PHBV was blended with EA–PPC via melted transesterification under the catalysis of Sn(Oct)2 to obtain the PHBV/EA–PPC blends. Effects of Sn(Oct)2 dosage on the mechanical properties, thermal properties, and morphology of the blends were investigated. The results demonstrated that EA–PPC can improve effectively the toughness of PHBV and reduce its crystallinity. For the P70/EP30/S3 blend, it exhibited the best toughness. Compared with neat PHBV, the impact strength and elongation at break increased by 59.5% and 93.5 times, respectively, while there was no significant decrease in tensile strength. With the increase in the amount of Sn(Oct)2, the difference between the two Tg values decreased until they merged into one, representing the improved compatibility between PHBV and EA–PPC. In addition, the Tc, Tm, and χ c of the blends decreased with the increase in the amount of Sn(Oct)2. It was proved that the resulting copolymer and PHBV (EA–PPC) oligomer produced by the melt transesterification reaction played the role of in situ compatibilizer and plasticizer, respectively.

Author Contributions

Q.Z. and Y.G. performed the preparation work, analyzed the results, and wrote the manuscript. H.L. and S.S. carried out the structural characterization and performance testing. S.S. and W.C. analyzed and discussed the results. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was financially supported by the Program of Tangshan Normal University (2022C44) and the Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province (B2021105001).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Sample Availability

Samples of the compounds are not available from the authors.

References

  1. Phukon, P.; Saikia, J.P.; Konwar, B.K. Bio-plastic (P-3HB-co-3HV) from Bacillus circulans (MTCC8167) and its biodegradation. Colloid Surf. B 2012, 92, 30–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Nanda, M.R.; Misra, M.; Mohanty, A.K. The effects of process engineering on the performance of PLA and PHBV blends. Macromol. Mater. Eng. 2011, 296, 719–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Zhao, H.; Cui, Z.; Wang, X.; Turng, L.S.; Peng, X. Processing and characterization of solid and microcellular poly(lactic acid)/polyhydroxybutyrate-valerate (PLA/PHBV) blends and PLA/PHBV/Clay nanocomposites. Compos. Part B Eng. 2013, 51, 79–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zhang, K.; Mohanty, A.K.; Misra, M. Fully biodegradable and biorenewable ternary blends from polylactide, poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-hydroxyvalerate) and poly(butylene succinate) with balanced properties. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2012, 4, 3091–3101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Zheng, T.; Zhang, Z.; Shukla, S.; Agnihotri, S.; Clemons, C.M.; Pilla, S. PHBV-graft-GMA via reactive extrusion and its use in PHBV/nanocellulose crystal composites. Carbohyd. Polym. 2019, 205, 27–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Zubir, N.H.M.; Sam, S.T.; Zulkepli, N.N.; Omar, M.F. The effect of rice straw particulate loading and polyethylene glycol as lasticizer on the properties of polylactic acid/polyhydroxybutyrate-valerate blends. Polym. Bull. 2018, 75, 61–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Anderson, A.J.; Dowes, E.A. Occurense, metabolism, metabolic role, and industrial use of bacterial polyhydroxyalkanoates. Microb. Rev. 1990, 54, 450–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Kunioka, M.; Tamaki, A.; Doi, Y. Crystalline and thermal-properties of bacterial copolyesters poly (3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) and poly(3-hydroxy-butyrate-co-4-hydroxybutyrate). Macromolecules 1989, 22, 694–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Liu, Q.; Shyr, T.W.; Tung, C.H.; Deng, B.; Zhu, M. Block copolymers containing poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) and poly(ε-caprolactone) units: Synthesis, characterization and thermal degradation. Fiber Polym. 2011, 12, 848–856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Tao, J.; Song, C.; Cao, M.; Hu, D.; Liu, L.; Liu, N.; Wang, S. Thermal properties and degradability of poly(propylene carbonate)/poly(b-hydroxybutyrate-co-b-hydroxyvalerate) (PPC/PHBV) blends. Polym. Degrad. Stabil. 2009, 94, 575–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Li, J.; Sun, C.R.; Zhang, X.Q. Preparation, thermal properties, and morphology of graft copolymers in reactive blends of PHBV and PPC. Polym. Compos. 2012, 33, 1737–1749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Avella, M.; Martuscelli, E.; Raimo, M. Properties of blends and composites based on poly(3-hydroxy)butyrate (PHB) and poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-hydroxyvalerate) (PHBV) copolymers. J. Mater. Sci. 2000, 35, 523–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Li, J.; Lai, M.F.; Liu, J.J. Effect of poly(propylene carbonate) on the crystallization and melting behavior of poly(β-hydroxybutyrate-co-β-hydroxyvalerate). J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2004, 92, 2514–2521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Bugnicourt, E.; Cinelli, P.; Lazzeri, A.; Alvarez, V. Polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA): Review of synthesis, characteristics, processing and potential applications in packaging. Express Polym. Lett. 2014, 8, 791–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Brandl, H.; Bachofen, R.; Mayer, J.; Wintermantel, E. Degradation and applications of polyhydroxyalkanoates. Can. J Microbiol. 1995, 41, 143–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Hankermeyer, C.R.; Tjeerdema, R.S. Polyhydroxybutyrate: Plastic made and degraded by microorganisms. Rev. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 1999, 159, 1–24. [Google Scholar]
  17. Wang, J.; Wang, Z.; Li, J.; Wang, B.; Liu, J.; Chen, P.; Miao, M.; Gu, Q. Chitin nanocrystals grafted with poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) and their effects on thermal behavior of PHBV. Carbohyd. Polym. 2012, 87, 784–789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Carli, L.N.; Crespo, J.S.; Mauler, R.S. PHBV nanocomposites based on organomodified montmorillonite and halloysite: The effect of clay type on the morphology and thermal and mechanical properties. Compos. Part A-Appl. S 2011, 42, 1601–1608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhao, H.; Cui, Z.; Sun, X.; Turng, L.S.; Peng, X. Morphology and properties of injection molded solid and microcellular polylactic acid/polyhydroxybutyrate-valerate (PLA/PHBV) blends. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2013, 52, 2569–2581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Nagarajan, V.; Mohanty, A.K.; Misra, M. Sustainable green composites: Value addition to agricultural residues and perennial grasses. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2013, 1, 325–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zembouai, I.; Kaci, M.; Bruzaud, S.; Benhamida, A.; Corre, Y.M.; Grohens, Y. A study of morphological, thermal, rheological and barrier properties of Poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-Co-3-Hydroxyvalerate)/polylactide blends prepared by melt mixing. Polym. Test. 2013, 32, 842–851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Pal, A.K.; Wu, F.; Misra, M.; Mohanty, A.K. Reactive extrusion of sustainable PHBV/PBAT-based nanocomposite films with organically modified nanoclay for packaging applications: Compression moulding vs. cast film extrusion. Compos. Part B-Eng. 2020, 198, 108141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Voronova, M.I.; Gurina, D.L.; Surov, O.V. Properties of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate)/polycaprolactone polymer mixtures reinforced by cellulose nanocrystals: Experimental and simulation studies. Polymers 2022, 14, 340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Feng, Y.; Ashok, B.; Madhukar, K.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, J.; Reddy, K.O.; Rajulu, A.V. Preparation and characterization of polypropylene carbonate bio-filler (eggshell powder) composite films. Int. J. Polym. Anal. Charact. 2014, 19, 637–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Demirel, Y. Sustainability and economic analysis of propylene carbonate and polypropylene carbonate production processes using CO2 and propylene oxide. J. Chem. Eng. Process Technol. 2015, 6, 1000236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Muthuraj, R.; Mekonnen, T. Recent progress in carbon dioxide (CO2) as feedstock for sustainable materials development: Co-polymers and polymer blends. Polymer 2018, 145, 348–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Haneef, I.N.H.M.; Buys, Y.F.; Shaffiar, N.M.; Shaharuddin, S.I.S.; Nor Khairusshima, M.K. Miscibility, mechanical, and thermal properties of polylactic acid/polypropylene carbonate (PLA/PPC) blends prepared by meltmixing method. Mater. Today Proc. 2019, 17, 534–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Hedrick, M.M.; Wu, F.; Mohanty, A.K.; Misra, M. Morphology and performance relationship studies on biodegradable ternary blends of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate), polylactic acid, and polypropylene carbonate. RSC Adv. 2020, 10, 44624–44632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Punyodom, W.; Meepowpan, P.; Girdthep, S.; Limwanich, W. Influence of tin(II), aluminum(III) and titanium(IV) catalysts on the transesterification of poly(L-lactic acid). Polym. Bull. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Sadik, T.; Becquart, F.; Majesté, J.C.; Taha, M. In-melt transesterification of poly(lactic acid) and poly(ethyleneco-vinylalcohol). Mater. Chem. Phys. 2013, 140, 559–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Brutman, J.P.; Delgado, P.A.; Hillmyer, M.A. Polylactide Vitrimers. ACS Macro Lett. 2014, 3, 607–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Yao, M.J.; Mai, F.; Deng, H.; Ning, N.Y.; Wang, K.; Fu, Q. Improved thermal stability and mechanical properties of poly(propylene carbonate) by reactive blending with maleic anhydride. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2011, 120, 3565–3573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zhang, Z.H.; Shi, Q.; Peng, J.; Song, J.B.; Chen, Q.Y.; Yang, J.L.; Gong, Y.M.; Ji, R.H.; He, X.F.; Lee, J.H. Partial delamination of the organo-montmorillonite with surfactant containing hydroxyl groups in maleated poly(propylene carbonate). Polymer 2006, 47, 8548–8555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Li, L.Z.; Huang, W.; Wang, B.J.; Wei, W.F.; Gu, Q.; Chen, P. Properties and structure of polylactide/poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) (PLA/PHBV) blend fibers. Polymer 2015, 68, 183–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Zhou, L.Y.; Zhao, G.Y.; Jiang, W. Effects of catalytic transesterification and composition on the toughness of poly (lactic acid)/poly (propylene carbonate) blends. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2016, 55, 5565–5573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Patel, R.; Ruehle, D.A.; Dorgan, J.R.; Halley, P.; Martin, D. Biorenewable blends of polyamide-11 and polylactide. Polym. Eng. Sci. 2014, 57, 1523–1532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Liu, C.; Lin, S.; Zhou, C.; Yu, W. Influence of catalyst on transesterification between poly(lactic acid) and polycarbonate under flow field. Polymer 2013, 54, 310–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Pilati, F.; Marianucci, E.; Berti, C. Study of the reactions occurring during melt mixing of poly(ethy1ene terephthalate) and polycarbonate. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1985, 30, 1267–1275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Materials 15 06179 sch001 550
Scheme 1. Structures of (a) PHBV and (b) PPC.
Scheme 1. Structures of (a) PHBV and (b) PPC.
Materials 15 06179 sch001
Materials 15 06179 sch002 550
Scheme 2. End-capping of PPC with EA.
Scheme 2. End-capping of PPC with EA.
Materials 15 06179 sch002
Materials 15 06179 g001 550
Figure 1. TGA curves of PPC and EA–PPC.
Figure 1. TGA curves of PPC and EA–PPC.
Materials 15 06179 g001
Materials 15 06179 g002 550
Figure 2. Mechanical properties of PHBV/EA–PPC blends: (a) tensile strength, (b) impact strength, and (c) elongation at break.
Figure 2. Mechanical properties of PHBV/EA–PPC blends: (a) tensile strength, (b) impact strength, and (c) elongation at break.
Materials 15 06179 g002
Materials 15 06179 g003 550
Figure 3. DSC curves of neat PHBV, EA–PPC, and PHBV/EA–PPC blends with various amounts of Sn(Oct)2: (a) cooling, (b) the second heating.
Figure 3. DSC curves of neat PHBV, EA–PPC, and PHBV/EA–PPC blends with various amounts of Sn(Oct)2: (a) cooling, (b) the second heating.
Materials 15 06179 g003
Materials 15 06179 g004 550
Figure 4. DMA of neat polymers (a) and PHBV/EA–PPC blends (b).
Figure 4. DMA of neat polymers (a) and PHBV/EA–PPC blends (b).
Materials 15 06179 g004
Materials 15 06179 g005 550
Figure 5. SEM micrographs of tensile-fractured surfaces: (a) P70/EP30 and (b) P70/EP30/S3 blends.
Figure 5. SEM micrographs of tensile-fractured surfaces: (a) P70/EP30 and (b) P70/EP30/S3 blends.
Materials 15 06179 g005
Materials 15 06179 g006 550
Figure 6. Formation mechanism of PHBV/EA–PPC blends. (i) terminal hydroxyl group of PHBV attacked carbonyl carbon of EA–PPC, (ii) terminal carboxyl group of PHBV attacked carbonyl carbon of EA–PPC, (iii) terminal carboxyl group of EA–PPC attacked carbonyl carbon of PHBV, (iv) direct transesterification.
Figure 6. Formation mechanism of PHBV/EA–PPC blends. (i) terminal hydroxyl group of PHBV attacked carbonyl carbon of EA–PPC, (ii) terminal carboxyl group of PHBV attacked carbonyl carbon of EA–PPC, (iii) terminal carboxyl group of EA–PPC attacked carbonyl carbon of PHBV, (iv) direct transesterification.
Materials 15 06179 g006
Table
Table 1. Mechanical properties data of PHBV/PPC blends.
Table 1. Mechanical properties data of PHBV/PPC blends.
SamplesPHBV
(wt%)		PPC
(wt%)		Sn(Oct)2
(wt%)		Tensile Strength (MPa)Impact Strength (kJ/m2)Elongation at Break (%)
PHBV1000039.63.74.1
PPC0100013.86.2483.7
PH80/P208020028.24.09.8
PH70/P307030026.94.312.4
PH60/P406040021.74.513.1
PH80/P20/S18020128.44.110.3
PH70/P30/S17030127.24.512.8
PH60/P40/S16040122.14.613.5
Table
Table 2. Data for the mechanical properties of PHBV/EA–PPC blends.
Table 2. Data for the mechanical properties of PHBV/EA–PPC blends.
SamplesTensile Strength (MPa)Impact Strength (kJ/m2)Elongation at Break (%)
PHBV39.63.74.1
EA–PPC13.26.0458.1
P70/EP3030.24.0129.6
P70/EP30/S1 a32.74.7290.3
P70/EP30/S236.55.6332.1
P70/EP30/S336.85.9387.5
P70/EP30/S431.54.8102.7
P70/EP30/S529.14.364.2
a P70/EP30/S1 stands for the blend in which the ratio of PHBV/EA–PPC/Sn(Oct)2 was 70:30:1.
Table
Table 3. Data for the thermal properties of PHBV/EA–PPC blends.
Table 3. Data for the thermal properties of PHBV/EA–PPC blends.
SamplesTc (°C)Tg (°C) from DSCTg (°C) from DMATm (°C) χ c   ( % )
PHBV120.66.39.2171.769.8
EA–PPC-34.540.3--
P70/EP30119.36.4/34.39.8/40.2171.267.1
P70/EP30/S1114.712.3/34.013.4/38.3169.848.6
P70/EP30/S2109.223.7/33.924.1/38.0166.640.5
P70/EP30/S3105.233.837.5164.327.4
P70/EP30/S4103.133.5-161.726.2
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, Q.; Gao, Y.; Liu, H.; Shu, S.; Chen, W. Effects of Endic Anhydride Grafted PPC on the Properties of PHBV Blends. Materials 2022, 15, 6179. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ma15176179

AMA Style

Zhang Q, Gao Y, Liu H, Shu S, Chen W. Effects of Endic Anhydride Grafted PPC on the Properties of PHBV Blends. Materials. 2022; 15(17):6179. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ma15176179

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Qing, Yongguang Gao, Huiyuan Liu, Shili Shu, and Wei Chen. 2022. "Effects of Endic Anhydride Grafted PPC on the Properties of PHBV Blends" Materials 15, no. 17: 6179. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ma15176179

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop