Next Article in Journal
Special Issue of Materials focusing on “Finite Element Analysis and Models of Sustainable Manufacturing Processes”
Next Article in Special Issue
The Role of the Built-In Electric Field in Recombination Processes of GaN/AlGaN Quantum Wells: Temperature- and Pressure-Dependent Study of Polar and Non-Polar Structures
Previous Article in Journal
Analysis of Efficiency of Thermoelectric Personal Cooling System Based on Utility Tests
Previous Article in Special Issue
Modeling of the Point Defect Migration across the AlN/GaN Interfaces—Ab Initio Study
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Development of Quaternary InAlGaN Barrier Layer for High Electron Mobility Transistor Structures

by
Justinas Jorudas
1,*,
Paweł Prystawko
2,
Artūr Šimukovič
1,
Ramūnas Aleksiejūnas
3,
Jūras Mickevičius
3,
Marcin Kryśko
2,
Paweł Piotr Michałowski
4 and
Irmantas Kašalynas
1,5,*
1
Terahertz Photonics Laboratory, Center for Physical Sciences and Technology (FTMC), Saulėtekio al. 3, LT-10257 Vilnius, Lithuania
2
Institute of High Pressure Physics PAS (UNIPRESS), ul. Sokołowska 29/37, 01-142 Warsaw, Poland
3
Institute of Photonics and Nanotechnology, Vilnius University, Saulėtekio al. 3, LT-10257 Vilnius, Lithuania
4
Lukasiewicz Research Network-Institute of Microelectronics and Photonics, al. Lotników 32/46, 02-668 Warsaw, Poland
5
Institute of Applied Electrodynamics and Telecommunications, Vilnius University, Saulėtekio al. 3, LT-10257 Vilnius, Lithuania
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 29 December 2021 / Revised: 25 January 2022 / Accepted: 28 January 2022 / Published: 31 January 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Growth and Characteristics of Nitride Semiconductor Layers)

Abstract

:
A quaternary lattice matched InAlGaN barrier layer with am indium content of 16.5 ± 0.2% and thickness of 9 nm was developed for high electron mobility transistor structures using the metalorganic chemical-vapor deposition method. The structural, morphological, optical and electrical properties of the layer were investigated planning realization of microwave power and terahertz plasmonic devices. The measured X-ray diffraction and modeled band diagram characteristics revealed the structural parameters of the grown In0.165Al0.775Ga0.06N/Al0.6Ga0.4N/GaN heterostructure, explaining the origin of barrier photoluminescence peak position at 3.98 eV with the linewidth of 0.2 eV and the expected red-shift of 0.4 eV only. The thermally stable density of the two-dimension electron gas at the depth of 10.5 nm was experimentally confirmed to be 1.2 × 1013 cm−2 (1.6 × 1013 cm−2 in theory) with the low-field mobility values of 1590 cm2/(V·s) and 8830 cm2/(V·s) at the temperatures of 300 K and 77 K, respectively.

1. Introduction

Currently, III-nitride high electron mobility transistor (HEMT) structures based on the AlGaN/GaN heterostructure are extensively used in various applications such as gas sensors [1,2], THz detectors [3,4,5,6] and emitters [7,8], and high-power microwave devices [9,10,11,12]. A combination of InN and AlN alloys with very different bandgaps, lattice and spontaneous polarization constants can be used to implement a wide range of electric and optic properties in the heterostructure [13,14,15]. In particular, the lattice-matched (LM) InAlN/GaN heterostructures are very attractive for the development of HEMTs as they possess no degradation due to mechanical stress and exhibit high chemical and thermal stability, demonstrated at up to 1000 °C [16,17]. The use of thinner LM-InAlN barrier allows for the achievement of much higher two-dimensional electron gas (2DEG) densities than that in standard AlGaN/GaN HEMT structures with the same barrier thickness [18]. Moreover, barrier-layer scaling in InAlN/GaN HEMT structures down to 3 nm was demonstrated, exhibiting thermal stability (up to 1000 °C) of the barrier interface with a GaN buffer and with surface metals, used for electric contacts [19]. All of the reported features of the LM-InAl(Ga)N/GaN HEMT structures were found to be very attractive for high power GaN-based electronic [11,20,21,22] and plasmonic devices [23,24]. In particular, optimal conditions for the excitation of 2D plasmons in standard AlGaN/GaN HEMT structures up to the room temperature were revealed recently [25]. Among other aspects, a shallow depth and a high density of 2DEG in grating-gated heterostructures allow for efficient plasmonic device operation in the THz regime [26]. In this work, the quaternary LM-InAlGaN barrier layer with indium content of 16.5 ± 0.2% and thickness of only 9 nm was developed for GaN-based heterostructures on sapphire substrate and investigated studying material structural properties, optical and electrical characteristics of the test devices.

2. Samples

The heterostructure was developed on 2″ diameter 430 µm thick single-side polished sapphire substrate. The layers with a nominal thickness of 0.5 nm of GaN cap, 8.7 nm of InxAl1–xN barrier, 1.2 nm of Al0.66Ga0.34N spacer, 600 nm of undoped GaN channel, and 3.2 µm GaN:C buffer on 25 nm low temperature GaN nucleation layer were grown along the polar c-axis using the metalorganic chemical vapor deposition (MOCVD) method in a Close Coupled Showerhead (CCS) Flip Top 3 × 2 inch reactor (Aixtron, Herzogenrath, Germany). A schematic diagram of the heterostructure layers is also discussed in Section 3.3. Of note, if the thickness of the AlN spacer is larger than 1 nm, its role in the formation of 2DEG layer is not as significant due to the polarization discontinuity with the barrier, which was estimated to be of 0.73 eV from the effective conduction band offset between the LM-InAlN and GaN [18]. Moreover, the target of a ~9 nm thickness of the barrier was chosen as optimum for high values of 2DEG density and mobility [19], with an expectation for higher transconductance values due to the short distance between the transistor gate and a 2DEG channel.
The AFM image of an as-grown heterostructure was measured with Dimension 3100 AFM instrument (Veeco, TX, USA). The results are shown in Figure 1. The RMS roughness over the whole image area (4 × 4 µm2) was found to be 1.2 nm. The threading dislocation density (TDD) was estimated over the area of 2 × 2 µm2, counting the pits, which are seen as the black color points in Figure 1. The value of TDD was around 2 × 109 cm−2.
The sheet resistance was measured by the microwave single-post dielectric resonator QWED SiPDR (QWED, Warsaw, Poland). At room temperature, the as-grown heterostructure demonstrated sheet resistance values of 350 ± 1 Ω/sq.
Mesas for test devices were fabricated using inductively coupled plasma reactive ion etching (ICP-RIE) (Oxford Instruments, Bristol, UK) via Cl plasma. For ohmic contacts, Ti/Al/Ni/Au metal stack of thicknesses 30/90/20/150 nm were deposited and annealed in nitrogen ambient for 30 s at 850 °C. Schottky contacts were formed of 25/150 nm Ni/Au stack. The set of the test devices consisted of Van der Pauw (VdP) structures, transmission line method (TLM) resistor array, HEMTs and Schottky barrier diodes (SBDs). Furthermore, test devices were left with an unpassivated nitride surface. More details about the device processing have been reported elsewhere [12,27].
Test TLM structures were used to estimate the resistance of ohmic contacts and the sheet resistance of the 2DEG layer. Their values were found to be of 1 Ω mm and 385 Ω/sq., respectively. The ideality factor and Schottky barrier height were determined from forward biased current-voltage characteristics of the SBDs applying the thermionic emission model [28], demonstrating the values of about 2.3 and 0.7 eV, respectively.

3. Results

3.1. Secondary-Ion Mass Spectrometry (SIMS) of the Heterostructure

A SIMS analysis of as-grown heterostructure was performed in order to determine impurity density and distribution of atomic fractions in the layers. In this work SIMS depth profiles were performed employing the SC Ultra instrument (CAMECA, Gennevilliers, France) under ultra-high vacuum. The amount of residual oxygen, carbon, and silicon impurities in the GaN channel layer were found from the calibrated SIMS data to be of (3.7 ± 1.3) × 1016 cm−3, (5.1 ± 0.3) × 1016 cm−3, and (1.0 ± 0.6) × 1016 cm−3, respectively. The amount of these impurities was close to that obtained by the low-frequency noise and THz electroluminescence spectroscopy methods in the AlGaN/GaN HEMT on sapphire [27,29].
Figure 2 demonstrates the very uniform distribution of each atomic fraction along the growth direction of the heterostructure layers. A small fraction of Ga was found in the barrier, which occasionally occurs during the growth of the InAlN barrier in MOCVD reactor [30,31,32]. However, the CCS tools are known to accumulate the gallium-containing material on the inlet showerhead flange upstream the substrates. This deposit can be the unintentional source of the gallium incorporated into the main barrier layer grown and enhanced by TMIn and hydrogen carrier gas delivery [30].

3.2. X-ray Diffraction (XRD) Analysis of the Heterostructure

The crystal quality, layer thicknesses and composition of as-grown heterostructure were investigated by HR-XRD analysis (Malvern Panalitycal X’pert MRD, Almelo, Netherlands). The XRD results of as-grown heterostructure are shown in Figure 3. With the assumption that the Ga concentration was 6%, other concentrations were found to be of 16.5 ± 0.2% In (error coming from fitting of the simulation) and 77.5 ± 0.2% Al. To calculate the fitted curve the dynamical diffraction theory was used. Errors coming from uncertainty of elastic constants were negligible as the layer was not strained. Additionally, lattice constant, a, of the quaternary barrier was calculated with Nextnano++ software (Nextnano GmbH, München, Germany). The lattice matching to GaN with deviation of a Δ = ( ( a B a r i e r a G a N ) / a G a N ) × 100 % was found to be as small as −0.03%. Moreover, a single layer of 30 nm thick InAl(Ga)N was grown on the GaN template using the same growth conditions as for the investigated heterostructure. The XRD experiment confirmed that the barrier layer is lattice matched to GaN.
It is worth discussing the algorithm used in our work for the development of the LM barrier layers. Our method to assess the InAlN (In = 18%, AlN = 82%) barrier composition the path was as follows:
(i).
we made expected calculations of the gas-phase with surplus indium and aluminum precursors only, without flowing the gallium,
(ii).
we grew 30–50 nm thick calibration samples on GaN/Sapphire increasing the growth temperature and checking for lattice-matching to GaN in-plane lattice compatibility by HR-XRD,
(iii).
we applied the preferred high growth temperature and the growth rate to the HEMT final structure, growing a 9 nm thick LM-InAlGaN barrier.
We assumed that some gallium was incorporated into the barrier as expected from similar studies in literature while using the CCS reactors [30]. Therefore, the density of 2DEG and the band gap of barrier layer were experimentally investigated and simulated using Nextnano++ software (see details in next sections). Based on the Nextnano++ results, much higher 2DEG density for nominal ternary composition was expected, therefore, in simulation of HR-XRD data, we iteratively added Ga to the barrier, removing some In and Al but keeping the original Al/In ratio. In this way, the polarization influence on actual 2DEG concentration was decreased until a reasonable agreement between simulation and measurement values were obtained.

3.3. Band Diagram of the Heterostructure

Nextnano++ software was used to calculate the bandgap, lattice constant, 2DEG density in the heterostructure using the layers thicknesses from the growth protocol and quaternary barrier composition from the XRD analysis. The results of modeling are shown in Figure 4. It has been shown that for the best lattice-matching the Al/In ratio should be 4.63 [33,34]. The composition of the modeled quaternary heterostructure demonstrated a very similar Al/In ratio of 4.70. Furthermore, its bandgap of 4.36 eV (Figure 4a) was found to be very close to that of ternary InxAl1–xN barrier with an In fraction of 18% with EG = 4.39 eV (not shown). Finally, the calculated 2DEG density in the quaternary heterostructure was found to be of about 1.6 × 1013 cm−2.

3.4. Two-Dimensional Electron Gas (2DEG)

The carrier density, mobility, and sheet resistance of the 2DEG were determined in Hall experiment using Van der Pauw structures at two temperatures, 77 K and 300 K. The sheet carrier density at both temperatures was 1.2 × 1013 cm−2, with an uncertainty of 3%. Meanwhile, the mobility increased with the decrease in temperature from 1590 cm2 V−1 s−1 at 300 K to 8830 cm2 V−1 s−1 at 77 K, resulting in the change in sheet resistance from 320 Ω/sq. to 60 Ω/sq., respectively. A small difference in the 2DEG density between calculated 1.6 × 1013 cm−2 and measured 1.2 × 1013 cm−2 values can be explained by the heterostructure material sensitivity to the device fabrication steps such as chemical treatment, ion plasma etching, metal electrode deposition, and non-controlled surface unintentional passivation [12,27].

3.5. Schottky Contact to 2DEG

The capacitance-voltage (C-V) characteristics of the fabricated Schottky contacts to the 2DEG layer were measured on the EPS150 probe station (Cascade Microtech, Beaverton, OR, USA) using precision impedance analyzer Agilent 4294A (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Typical C-V characteristic of the circular SBD with 5 µm separation between ohmic-Schottky contacts and 80 µm diameter of inner Schottky pad are shown in Figure 5a. Data linear extrapolation to abscissa allowed us to determine the pinch-off voltage, Vp–o, which was found at −1.74 V. The C-V results allowed us to estimate the dependence of carrier density, N, on the distance from the surface, W, employing the method described elsewhere [35]. The position of the 2DEG under the Schottky contact was found to be 10.5 nm from surface, which is very close to the nominal value of 10.4 nm defined from the growth protocol. It is worth noting that the high 2DEG density was achieved with a barrier thickness of only 9 nm. This is less than a half of the AlGaN barrier layer thickness, which usually varies from 20 to 25 nm in standard AlGaN/GaN HEMT structures [12,27].

3.6. Photoluminescence of the Heterostructure

The photoluminescence (PL) spectra of as-grown heterostructure were measured using an optical parametric oscillator (OPO, Ekspla NT342B, Vilnius, Lithuania) for the excitation, generating four ns-pulses with peak power density of about 200 kW/cm2 and 3 MW/cm2 at the selected wavelength of 300 nm and 250 nm, respectively. Measured PL spectra are shown in Figure 6. At the excitation wavelength of 300 nm (black line in Figure 6), electron recombination in GaN barrier was probed only, demonstrating a Lorentz-shape band at the position of 3.42 eV with full width at half maximum (FWHM) of 90 meV. At the excitation wavelength of 250 nm, the broad band centered at around 3.98 eV with FWHM = 200 meV was measured in the PL spectrum (red line in Figure 6), revealing the contribution of InAlGaN barrier [36,37].
The results of the PL measurements (see Figure 6) demonstrate a 0.40 eV red-shift from the expected bandgap energy of the quaternary barrier (see Figure 4a). Such a red-shift of the PL peak was sufficiently small in comparison to the Stokes shifts reported for similar heterostructures with InAlN barrier exhibiting values in the range of 0.4–1 eV [36,37,38,39,40]. Various explanations of the Stokes shift were proposed such as the introduction of sub-band edge states near the band edge minima which induce strain and related alloy composition fluctuations [41], local variations of the number of Al and In atoms surrounding nitrogen atom [42] or radiative recombination between the electrons in the triangular quantum well (2DEG) and photoexcited holes efficiently transferred from InAlN to GaN via sub-band-gap states [37].
Taking into account the energy levels of the barrier conduction band in the vicinity of Al0.66Ga0.34N spacer (237 meV) and of 2DEG (−162 meV) with respect to the barrier bandgap (4.36 eV), the modified bandgap was estimated to be of about EPL = 3.96 eV, which is close to the measured PL peak position at 3.98 eV. Additionally, the evaluation of the transition energies in c-plane grown heterostructure is somehow affected by carrier confinement and the built-in electric field. Therefore, the developed quaternary heterostructure requires a more detailed investigation of photo-carrier transport and a direct comparison of PL spectra with the results of other methods able to determine the bandgap of barrier layer such as a photoluminescence excitation (PLE), cathode photoluminescence (CL), and reflection modulated spectroscopy.

3.7. Application of the Heterostructure for Electronic Devices

The SBDs were processed without surface passivation and investigated in the reverse bias regime in order to find the breakdown fields. The results are shown in Figure 7. For the 5 µm contact separation, SBD breakdown occurred at the electric field of 0.43 MV/cm (Figure 7 solid line). For the largest contact separation of 40 µm, the breakdown field value decreased to 0.05 MV/cm (Figure 7 dashed line). The breakdown of the SBD was found to occur via the surface defects and threading dislocations, both of which create shunting paths for the leakage current, the value of which before the breakdown (at (−200)–(−230) V) was up to 2.14 mA/mm. Furthemore, the SBDs with larger contact separation had a larger active area, which includes more defect and threading dislocations [43,44,45,46]. We would think that large leakage currents could cause a thermal breakdown of the device.
The HEMTs were also processed and studied on the wafer in DC and RF regimes using the Süss Microtech probe station PM8 (FormFactor Inc., Livermore Inc., Livermore, CA, USA). For the RF measurements the G-S-G (ground–signal–ground) high frequency probes, an E8364B PNA Network Analyzer (Keysight Technologies, Santa Rosa, CA, USA), and E5270B Precision IV Analyzer with IC-CAP software were used (Keysight Technologies, Santa Rosa, CA, USA). The two-step open-short de-embedding method was implemented, and small signal S-parameters were obtained. The unity current gain–cut-off frequency (fT) and the unity maximum unilateral power gain frequency (fmax) were found from de-embedded S-parameter frequency characteristics.
Each HEMT was developed in G-S-G device configuration with WCh = 2 µm × 200 µm, Lds = 12 µm and Lg = 5 µm. The results for HEMTs characterization in DC and RF regimes are shown in Figure 8. Output characteristics demonstrate (see Figure 8a) the effect of very low pinch-off voltage, where the channel is fully closed at Vgs = −2 V. The highest output drain current was recorded at Vds = 6 V and Vgs = 1 V, reaching up to 200 mA/mm, which deteriorate with further increase in drain voltage due to excess heat accumulation in the conductive channel. The transfer curve for the same device at Vds = 5 V is shown in Figure 8b. Large leakage currents were observed both in the drain and gate contacts under negative gate bias. The Ion/Ioff ratio for the HEMT was limited to the value of 26 dB. The small-signal transconductance values for this device were measured to be up to 117 mS/mm at Vgs = +0.6 V. The results of RF characterization are shown in Figure 8c. The highest fT and fmax values at Vds = 5 V and Vgs = 0.2 V were estimated to be up to 0.95 GHz and 4.5 GHz, respectively. The figure of merit value fT × Lg for the investigated HEMT was of 4.3 GHz × µm, which is about two times lower than 10 GHz × µm, reported for the scaled HEMTs made of similar InAl(Ga)N/GaN heterostructures [10,47]. The difference can be explained by a simplified design of our transistors due to the usage of standard UV photolithography instead of e-beam lithography.

4. Conclusions

A quaternary LM InAlGaN barrier layer with an indium content of 16.5 ± 0.2% and thickness of only 9 nm has been developed for high electron mobility transistor structures by metalorganic chemical vapor deposition method. A detailed analysis of the structural, morphological, optical and electrical properties revealed the composition of the barrier layer to be 16.5 ± 0.2% of In, 77.5 ± 0.2% of Al, and 6% of Ga, and allowed us to explain the origin of barrier photoluminescence peak position observed at 3.98 eV with the linewidth of 0.2 eV and the expected red-shift of 0.4 eV only. The thermally stable density of the two-dimension electron gas at the depth of 10.5 nm was experimentally confirmed to be of 1.2 × 1013 cm−2 (1.6 × 1013 cm−2 in theory) with low-field mobility values of 1590 cm2/(V·s) and 8830 cm2/(V·s) at the temperatures of 300 K and 77 K, respectively. The fabricated Schottky barrier diodes allowed us to determine the pinch-off voltage to be −1.74 V and breakdown field to be 0.4 MV/cm for this heterostructure. The HEMTs fabricated of this heterostructure were tested both in dc and rf regimes and show similar performance to the standard AlGaN/GaN HEMTs, considering that a substantially thinner barrier layer was used. Overall, the results presented in our work indicate that the developed heterostructure with quaternary LM-InAlGaN barrier is a promising candidate for microwave power electronic and plasmonic devices operating in the THz range.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, P.P. and I.K.; investigation, J.J., P.P., A.Š., R.A., J.M., M.K., P.P.M. and I.K.; data curation, J.J., P.P. and I.K.; writing—original draft preparation, J.J. and I.K.; writing—review and editing, J.J., P.P., R.A. and I.K.; visualization, J.J. and I.K.; supervision, P.P. and I.K.; project administration, I.K.; funding acquisition, P.P. and I.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The work was supported by the Research Council of Lithuania (Lietuvos mokslo taryba) under the “TERAGANWIRE” project (Grant No. S-LL-19-1), by the National Science Center of Poland (Grant No. 2017/27/L/ST7/03283), by “International Research Agendas” program of the Foundation for Polish Science co-financed by the European Union under the European Regional Development Fund (Nos. MAB/2018/9), and partially supported by the Polish National Center for Research and Development through projects No. WPC/20/DefeGaN/2018 and No. TECHMATSTRATEG-III/0003/2019.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ahn, J.; Kim, D.; Park, K.-H.; Yoo, G.; Heo, J. Pt-Decorated Graphene Gate AlGaN/GaN MIS-HEMT for Ultrahigh Sensitive Hydrogen Gas Detection. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 2021, 68, 1255–1261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Nguyen, V.C.; Kim, K.; Kim, H. Performance Optimization of Nitrogen Dioxide Gas Sensor Based on Pd-AlGaN/GaN HEMTs by Gate Bias Modulation. Micromachines 2021, 12, 400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Sun, J.; Feng, W.; Ding, Q.; Zhu, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Li, X.; Qin, H.; Zhang, J.; Li, X.; Shangguan, Y.; et al. Smaller Antenna-Gate Gap for Higher Sensitivity of GaN/AlGaN HEMT Terahertz Detectors. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2020, 116, 161109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Yang, L.; Yao, W.; Liu, Y.; Wang, L.; Dai, Y.; Liu, H.; Wang, F.; Ren, Y.; Wu, Z.; Liu, Y.; et al. Low Capacitance AlGaN/GaN Based Air-Bridge Structure Planar Schottky Diode with a Half through-Hole. AIP Adv. 2020, 10, 045219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Bauer, M.; Ramer, A.; Chevtchenko, S.A.; Osipov, K.Y.; Cibiraite, D.; Pralgauskaite, S.; Ikamas, K.; Lisauskas, A.; Heinrich, W.; Krozer, V.; et al. A High-Sensitivity AlGaN/GaN HEMT Terahertz Detector With Integrated Broadband Bow-Tie Antenna. IEEE Trans. Terahertz Sci. Technol. 2019, 9, 430–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Jorudas, J.; Malakauskaitė, J.; Subačius, L.; Janonis, V.; Jakštas, V.; Kovalevskij, V.; Kašalynas, I.; Malakauskaite, J.; Subacius, L.; Janonis, V.; et al. Development of the Planar AlGaN/GaN Bow-Tie Diodes for Terahertz Detection. In Proceedings of the 2019 44th International Conference on Infrared, Millimeter and Terahertz Waves (IRMMW-THz), Paris, France, 1–6 September 2019; pp. 1–2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. El Fatimy, A.; Dyakonova, N.; Meziani, Y.; Otsuji, T.; Knap, W.; Vandenbrouk, S.; Madjour, K.; Théron, D.; Gaquiere, C.; Poisson, M.A.; et al. AlGaN/GaN High Electron Mobility Transistors as a Voltage-Tunable Room Temperature Terahertz Sources. J. Appl. Phys. 2010, 107, 24504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Janonis, V.; Pashnev, D.; Grigelionis, I.; Korotieiev, V.; Balagula, R.M.; Minkevicius, L.; Jorudas, J.; Alexeeva, N.; Subacius, L.; Valušis, G.; et al. Electrically-Pumped THz Emitters Based on Plasma Waves Excitation in III-Nitride Structures. In Terahertz Emitters, Receivers, and Applications XI; Razeghi, M., Baranov, A.N., Eds.; SPIE: Washington, DC, USA, 2020; Volume 11499, p. 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Romanczyk, B.; Mishra, U.K.; Zheng, X.; Guidry, M.; Li, H.; Hatui, N.; Wurm, C.; Krishna, A.; Ahmadi, E.; Keller, S. W-Band Power Performance of SiN-Passivated N-Polar GaN Deep Recess HEMTs. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2020, 41, 349–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Shinohara, K.; Regan, D.C.; Tang, Y.; Corrion, A.L.; Brown, D.F.; Wong, J.C.; Robinson, J.F.; Fung, H.H.; Schmitz, A.; Oh, T.C.; et al. Scaling of GaN HEMTs and Schottky Diodes for Submillimeter-Wave MMIC Applications. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 2013, 60, 2982–2996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hassan, A.; Savaria, Y.; Sawan, M. GaN Integration Technology, an Ideal Candidate for High-Temperature Applications: A Review. IEEE Access 2018, 6, 78790–78802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Jorudas, J.; Šimukovič, A.; Dub, M.; Sakowicz, M.; Prystawko, P.; Indrišiūnas, S.; Kovalevskij, V.; Rumyantsev, S.; Knap, W.; Kašalynas, I. AlGaN/GaN on SiC Devices without a GaN Buffer Layer: Electrical and Noise Characteristics. Micromachines 2020, 11, 1131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kuzmík, J. InAlN/(In)GaN High Electron Mobility Transistors: Some Aspects of the Quantum Well Heterostructure Proposal. Semicond. Sci. Technol. 2002, 17, 540–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kuzmík, J.; Kostopoulos, A.; Konstantinidis, G.; Carlin, J.F.; Georgakilas, A.; Pogany, D. InAlN/GaN HEMTs: A First Insight into Technological Optimization. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 2006, 53, 422–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kuzmík, J. Power Electronics on InAlN/(In)GaN: Prospect for a Record Performance. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2001, 22, 510–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Maier, D.; Alomari, M.; Grandjean, N.; Carlin, J.-F.; Diforte-Poisson, M.-A.; Dua, C.; Delage, S.; Kohn, E. InAlN/GaN HEMTs for Operation in the 1000 C Degrees Regime: A First Experiment. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2012, 33, 985–987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Medjdoub, F.; Carlin, J.-F.; Gonschorek, M.; Feltin, E.; Py, M.A.; Ducatteau, D.; Gaquiere, C.; Grandjean, N.; Kohn, E. Can InAlN/GaN Be an Alternative to High Power/High Temperature AlGaN/GaN Devices? In Proceedings of the 2006 International Electron Devices Meeting, San Francisco, CA, USA, 11–13 December 2006; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Gonschorek, M.; Carlin, J.-F.; Feltin, E.; Py, M.A.; Grandjean, N.; Darakchieva, V.; Monemar, B.; Lorenz, M.; Ramm, G. Two-Dimensional Electron Gas Density in Al1−xInxN/AlN/GaN Heterostructures (0.03 ≤ x ≤ 0.23). J. Appl. Phys. 2008, 103, 093714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Medjdoub, F.; Alomari, M.; Carlin, J.F.; Gonschorek, M.; Feltin, E.; Py, M.A.; Grandjean, N.; Kohn, E. Barrier-Layer Scaling of InAlN/GaN HEMTs. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2008, 29, 422–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Liu, Y.; Jiang, H.; Arulkumaran, S.; Egawa, T.; Zhang, B.; Ishikawa, H. Demonstration of Undoped Quaternary AlInGaN/GaN Heterostructure Field-Effect Transistor on Sapphire Substrate. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2005, 86, 223510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wang, R.; Li, G.; Karbasian, G.; Guo, J.; Song, B.; Yue, Y.; Hu, Z.; Laboutin, O.; Cao, Y.; Johnson, W.; et al. Quaternary Barrier InAlGaN HEMTs With FT/Fmax of 230/300 GHz. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2013, 34, 378–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Lecourt, F.; Agboton, A.; Ketteniss, N.; Behmenburg, H.; Defrance, N.; Hoel, V.; Kalisch, H.; Vescan, A.; Heuken, M.; de Jaeger, J.-C. Power Performance at 40 GHz on Quaternary Barrier InAlGaN/GaN HEMT. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2013, 34, 978–980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Shur, M.S. Terahertz Plasmonic Technology. IEEE Sens. J. 2021, 21, 12752–12763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Shur, M.; Aizin, G.; Otsuji, T.; Ryzhii, V. Plasmonic Field-Effect Transistors (TeraFETs) for 6G Communications. Sensors 2021, 21, 7907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Pashnev, D.; Korotyeyev, V.V.; Jorudas, J.; Kaplas, T.; Janonis, V.; Urbanowicz, A.; Kašalynas, I. Experimental Evidence of Temperature Dependent Effective Mass in AlGaN/GaN Heterostructures Observed via THz Spectroscopy of 2D Plasmons. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2020, 117, 162101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Pashnev, D.; Kaplas, T.; Korotyeyev, V.; Janonis, V.; Urbanowicz, A.; Jorudas, J.; Kašalynas, I. Terahertz Time-Domain Spectroscopy of Two-Dimensional Plasmons in AlGaN/GaN Heterostructures. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2020, 117, 051105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Sai, P.; Jorudas, J.; Dub, M.; Sakowicz, M.; Jakštas, V.; But, D.B.; Prystawko, P.; Cywinski, G.; Kašalynas, I.; Knap, W.; et al. Low Frequency Noise and Trap Density in GaN/AlGaN Field Effect Transistors. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2019, 115, 183501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Schroder, D.K. Contact Resistance and Schottky Barriers. In Semiconductor Material and Device Characterization; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2005; pp. 127–184. [Google Scholar]
  29. Grigelionis, I.; Jorudas, J.; Jakštas, V.; Janonis, V.; Kašalynas, I.; Prystawko, P.; Kruszewski, P.; Leszczyński, M. Terahertz Electroluminescence of Shallow Impurities in AlGaN/GaN Heterostructures at 20 K and 110 K Temperature. Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 2019, 93, 280–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kim, J.; Lochner, Z.; Ji, M.-H.; Choi, S.; Kim, H.J.; Kim, J.S.; Dupuis, R.D.; Fischer, A.M.; Juday, R.; Huang, Y.; et al. Origins of Unintentional Incorporation of Gallium in InAlN Layers during Epitaxial Growth, Part II: Effects of Underlying Layers and Growth Chamber Conditions. J. Cryst. Growth 2014, 388, 143–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Naresh-Kumar, G.; Vilalta-Clemente, A.; Pandey, S.; Skuridina, D.; Behmenburg, H.; Gamarra, P.; Patriarche, G.; Vickridge, I.; di Forte-Poisson, M.A.; Vogt, P.; et al. Multicharacterization Approach for Studying InAl(Ga)N/Al(Ga)N/GaN Heterostructures for High Electron Mobility Transistors. AIP Adv. 2014, 4, 127101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Hiroki, M.; Oda, Y.; Watanabe, N.; Maeda, N. Unintentional Ga Incorporation in Metalorganic Vapor Phase Epitaxy of In-Containing III-Nitride Semiconductors. J. Cryst. Growth 2013, 382, 36–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Rahimzadeh Khoshroo, L.; Ketteniss, N.; Mauder, C.; Behmenburg, H.; Woitok, J.F.; Booker, I.; Gruis, J.; Heuken, M.; Vescan, A.; Kalisch, H.; et al. Quaternary Nitride Heterostructure Field Effect Transistors. Phys. Status Solidi C 2010, 7, 2001–2003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Ketteniss, N.; Khoshroo, L.R.; Eickelkamp, M.; Heuken, M.; Kalisch, H.; Jansen, R.H.; Vescan, A. Study on Quaternary AlInGaN/GaN HFETs Grown on Sapphire Substrates. Semicond. Sci. Technol. 2010, 25, 75013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Schroder, D.K. Carrier and Doping Density. In Semiconductor Material and Device Characterization; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2005; pp. 61–125. [Google Scholar]
  36. Butté, R.; Carlin, J.-F.; Feltin, E.; Gonschorek, M.; Nicolay, S.; Christmann, G.; Simeonov, D.; Castiglia, A.; Dorsaz, J.; Buehlmann, H.J.; et al. Current Status of AlInN Layers Lattice-Matched to GaN for Photonics and Electronics. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2007, 40, 6328–6344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Liuolia, V.; Marcinkevičius, S.; Billingsley, D.; Shatalov, M.; Yang, J.; Gaska, R.; Shur, M.S. Photoexcited Carrier Dynamics in AlInN/GaN Heterostructures. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2012, 100, 242104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Gonschorek, M.; Simeonov, D.; Carlin, J.-F.; Feltin, E.; Py, M.A.; Grandjean, N. Temperature Mapping of Al0.85In0.15N/AlN/GaN High Electron Mobility Transistors through Micro-Photoluminescence Studies. Eur. Phys. J. Appl. Phys. 2009, 47, 30301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Marcinkevičius, S.; Liuolia, V.; Billingsley, D.; Shatalov, M.; Yang, J.; Gaska, R.; Shur, M.S. Transient Photoreflectance of AlInN/GaN Heterostructures. AIP Adv. 2012, 2, 042148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Marcinkevičius, S.; Sztein, A.; Nakamura, S.; Speck, J.S. Properties of Sub-Band Edge States in AlInN Studied by Time-Resolved Photoluminescence of a AlInN/GaN Heterostructure. Semicond. Sci. Technol. 2015, 30, 115017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Mouti, A.; Rouvière, J.-L.; Cantoni, M.; Carlin, J.-F.; Feltin, E.; Grandjean, N.; Stadelmann, P. Stress-Modulated Composition in the Vicinity of Dislocations in Nearly Lattice Matched AlxIn1−xN/GaN Heterostructures: A Possible Explanation of Defect Insensitivity. Phys. Rev. B 2011, 83, 195309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Schulz, S.; Caro, M.A.; Tan, L.-T.; Parbrook, P.J.; Martin, R.W.; O’Reilly, E.P. Composition-Dependent Band Gap and Band-Edge Bowing in AlInN: A Combined Theoretical and Experimental Study. Appl. Phys. Express 2013, 6, 121001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Wahab, Q.; Ellison, A.; Henry, A.; Janzén, E.; Hallin, C.; di Persio, J.; Martinez, R. Influence of Epitaxial Growth and Substrate-Induced Defects on the Breakdown of 4H–SiC Schottky Diodes. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2000, 76, 2725–2727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Muzykov, P.G.; Bolotnikov, A.V.; Sudarshan, T.S. Study of Leakage Current and Breakdown Issues in 4H–SiC Unterminated Schottky Diodes. Solid State Electron. 2009, 53, 14–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Lee, K.-Y.; Capano, M.A. The Correlation of Surface Defects and Reverse Breakdown of 4H-SiC Schottky Barrier Diodes. J. Electron. Mater. 2007, 36, 272–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Saito, W.; Kuraguchi, M.; Takada, Y.; Tsuda, K.; Omura, I.; Ogura, T. Influence of Surface Defect Charge at AlGaN–GaN-HEMT Upon Schottky Gate Leakage Current and Breakdown Voltage. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 2005, 52, 159–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Gaska, R.; Shur, M.S.; Hu, X.; Yang, J.W.; Tarakji, A.; Simin, G.; Khan, A.; Deng, J.; Werner, T.; Rumyantsev, S.; et al. Highly Doped Thin-Channel GaN-Metal–Semiconductor Field-Effect Transistors. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2001, 78, 769–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. AFM image of the as-grown heterostructure.
Figure 1. AFM image of the as-grown heterostructure.
Materials 15 01118 g001
Figure 2. SIMS profile of Ga, In, and Al in the heterostructure under study.
Figure 2. SIMS profile of Ga, In, and Al in the heterostructure under study.
Materials 15 01118 g002
Figure 3. Experimental HR-XRD curve (blue line) and the best fit (red line) of the heterostructure with quaternary barrier composition of 16.5 ± 0.2%, 77.5 ± 0.2%, and 6% for In, Al, and Ga, respectively, and thickness of 8.6 nm.
Figure 3. Experimental HR-XRD curve (blue line) and the best fit (red line) of the heterostructure with quaternary barrier composition of 16.5 ± 0.2%, 77.5 ± 0.2%, and 6% for In, Al, and Ga, respectively, and thickness of 8.6 nm.
Materials 15 01118 g003
Figure 4. Band diagram (a) and 2DEG distribution (b) in the heterostructure calculated using the barrier composition determined from XRD measurements. A schematic representation of the heterostructure layout is provided above the figures.
Figure 4. Band diagram (a) and 2DEG distribution (b) in the heterostructure calculated using the barrier composition determined from XRD measurements. A schematic representation of the heterostructure layout is provided above the figures.
Materials 15 01118 g004
Figure 5. (a) Capacitance-voltage (at 1 MHz) measurements for circular SBD with Ø80 µm inner Schottky contact pad which is separated from outer ohmic contact by 5 µm. (b) Measured distribution of carrier density in the heterostructure. The position of 2DEG was found at 10.5 nm as marked by dashed vertical line.
Figure 5. (a) Capacitance-voltage (at 1 MHz) measurements for circular SBD with Ø80 µm inner Schottky contact pad which is separated from outer ohmic contact by 5 µm. (b) Measured distribution of carrier density in the heterostructure. The position of 2DEG was found at 10.5 nm as marked by dashed vertical line.
Materials 15 01118 g005
Figure 6. PL spectra of the heterostructure measured using different excitation wavelength and peak power density of 300 nm and 200 kW/cm2 (black line) and 250 nm and 3 MW/cm2 (red line), respectively.
Figure 6. PL spectra of the heterostructure measured using different excitation wavelength and peak power density of 300 nm and 200 kW/cm2 (black line) and 250 nm and 3 MW/cm2 (red line), respectively.
Materials 15 01118 g006
Figure 7. Breakdown of two SBDs with contact spacings of 5 µm (solid line) and 40 µm (dashed line). Current was limited to 1 mA level. Inset–microscope image of the SBD with diameter of central Schottky contact and distance to ohmic contact being of 80 µm and 40 µm, respectively.
Figure 7. Breakdown of two SBDs with contact spacings of 5 µm (solid line) and 40 µm (dashed line). Current was limited to 1 mA level. Inset–microscope image of the SBD with diameter of central Schottky contact and distance to ohmic contact being of 80 µm and 40 µm, respectively.
Materials 15 01118 g007
Figure 8. (a) Output characteristics, (b) transfer characteristics and (c) fT and fmax frequencies measured for the same HEMT with Lg = 5 µm and Lds = 12 µm.
Figure 8. (a) Output characteristics, (b) transfer characteristics and (c) fT and fmax frequencies measured for the same HEMT with Lg = 5 µm and Lds = 12 µm.
Materials 15 01118 g008
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jorudas, J.; Prystawko, P.; Šimukovič, A.; Aleksiejūnas, R.; Mickevičius, J.; Kryśko, M.; Michałowski, P.P.; Kašalynas, I. Development of Quaternary InAlGaN Barrier Layer for High Electron Mobility Transistor Structures. Materials 2022, 15, 1118. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ma15031118

AMA Style

Jorudas J, Prystawko P, Šimukovič A, Aleksiejūnas R, Mickevičius J, Kryśko M, Michałowski PP, Kašalynas I. Development of Quaternary InAlGaN Barrier Layer for High Electron Mobility Transistor Structures. Materials. 2022; 15(3):1118. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ma15031118

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jorudas, Justinas, Paweł Prystawko, Artūr Šimukovič, Ramūnas Aleksiejūnas, Jūras Mickevičius, Marcin Kryśko, Paweł Piotr Michałowski, and Irmantas Kašalynas. 2022. "Development of Quaternary InAlGaN Barrier Layer for High Electron Mobility Transistor Structures" Materials 15, no. 3: 1118. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ma15031118

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop