Next Article in Journal
Superinfection by PHYVV Alters the Recovery Process in PepGMV-Infected Pepper Plants
Next Article in Special Issue
Molecular Basis of the Ternary Interaction between NS1 of the 1918 Influenza A Virus, PI3K, and CRK
Previous Article in Journal
Comment on Liberski, Gajos, Sikorska, and Lindenbaum: “Kuru, the First Human Prion Disease” Viruses 2019, 11, 232
Previous Article in Special Issue
Development of Antibodies with Broad Neutralization Specificities against HIV-1 after Long Term SHIV Infection in Macaques
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Viruses
Volume 12
Issue 3
10.3390/v12030285
viruses-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The Interactions Between HBV and the Innate Immunity of Hepatocytes

by
Fayed Attia Koutb Megahed
1,2,
Xiaoling Zhou
1,* and
Pingnan Sun
1,*
1
Stem Cell Research Center, Research Center for Reproductive Medicine, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Infectious Diseases and Molecular Immunopathology, Shantou University Medical College, Shantou 515041, China
2
Department of Nucleic Acid Researches, Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology Research Institute, General Autority-City of Scientific Researches and Technological Applications, Alexandria 21934, Egypt
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Viruses 2020, 12(3), 285; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/v12030285
Submission received: 15 February 2020 / Revised: 2 March 2020 / Accepted: 3 March 2020 / Published: 5 March 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Viral Evasion or Suppression of Host Immunity)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection affects ~350 million people and poses a major public health problem worldwide. HBV is a major cause of cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Fewer than 5% of HBV-infected adults (but up to 90% of HBV-infected infants and children) develop chronic HBV infection as indicated by continued, detectable expression of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) for at least 6 months after the initial infection. Increasing evidence indicates that HBV interacts with innate immunity signaling pathways of hepatocytes to suppress innate immunity. However, it is still not clear how HBV avoids monitoring by the innate immunity of hepatocytes and whether the innate immunity of hepatocytes can be effective against HBV if re-triggered. Moreover, a deep understanding of virus–host interactions is important in developing new therapeutic strategies for the treatment of HBV infection. In this review, we summarize the current knowledge regarding how HBV represses innate immune recognition, as well as recent progress with respect to in vitro models for studying HBV infection and innate immunity.

1. Introduction

Chronic infection with hepatitis B virus (HBV) is the main cause of liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) worldwide. Although there is a prophylactic vaccine to prevent HBV infection, HBV still infects ~350 million people and contributes toward viral hepatitis-associated morbidity and mortality. The HBV genome consists of a partially double-stranded DNA molecule approximately 3.2 kb long that replicates via an RNA intermediate [1,2,3]. Basically, the innate immune system responds to viral infection in three phases. Firstly, various sensors in the cytoplasm recognize pathogen-associated molecular patterns, such as foreign DNA or RNA, and send a warning message to initiate proinflammatory and antimicrobial responses by activating a multitude of intracellular signaling pathways, including adaptor molecules, kinases, and transcription factors. The second phase involves the proteins of the downstream signaling pathways transmitting the danger message to the nucleus to activate effector elements. Finally, the consequently up-regulated effectors (i.e., inflammatory factors or interferon (IFN)-stimulated genes) degrade exogenous viral elements such as viral DNA, RNA, and proteins [4].
It is widely accepted that the adaptive immune responses play vital roles in the clearance of HBV infection. Early innate immune response is essential for the following induction of adaptive immunity. Restoring or boosting innate immunity linked to adaptive immunity may help eradicate chronic HBV infection. However, the role of innate immunity during HBV infection appears not to be well understood, which can be attributed to the fact that the recruitment of patients in the very early, asymptomatic phase of HBV infection is very difficult [5,6]. HBV belongs to the hepadnavirus family and acts as a “stealth” virus because it does not induce obvious innate immune responses such as type I and II interferons (IFNs) in the early stage of infection [7]. Moreover, many in vitro cell and animal models have proved that the target cells (hepatocytes) do not recognize HBV efficiently through known innate immune signaling in the acute infection of HBV, indicating the possibility of an HBV immune evasion mechanism [8]. In addition, HBV also has the ability to suppress functions of innate immune cells [9,10].
In this review article, we summarize the recent knowledge and debate regarding HBV and innate immunity signaling pathways in hepatocytes, the different HBV proteins that target innate immunity, and different advanced in vitro cell models for the study of virus–host interactions. Collation of such information will provide new insights into novel therapeutic treatments for chronic hepatitis B infection (CHB).

2. Genetic Organization, Life Cycle, and Global Epidemiology of HBV

HBV is a member of the hepadnavirus family. The genetic organization HBV is shown in Figure 1. It has a relaxed partially double-stranded circular DNA genome of about 3200 bases with four main overlapping open reading frames (ORFs) encoding surface protein (pre-S/S), pre-core/core (pre-C/C), transcriptional co-activator (X), and DNA polymerase (P) genes [11]. The preS/S ORF encodes three different, enveloped structural proteins termed large (L), middle (M), and small (S) proteins. The S protein (HBsAg) consists of 226 amino acids (aa), and the M protein has an extra N-terminal extension of 55 aa, whereas the L protein has a further N-terminal extension of 108 or 119 aa depending on the HBV genotype. The preC/C ORF codes for two distinct products: the core protein forming the nucleocapsid protein shell (hepatitis B core antigen (HBcAg)) and the precore protein that derives from in-frame alternative initiation sites. The X ORF encodes the small regulatory X protein, which is essential for viral replication. The P ORF encodes protein P, the viral DNA polymerase [12]. HBV relies on protein P, which is also a specialized reverse transcriptase (RT), to replicate its genomic DNA via an RNA intermediate [13]. Protein P consists of four domains: a terminal protein that is covalently linked to the DNA primer during negative-strand DNA synthesis, a spacer domain that is tolerant to mutations, the RT domain, and the ribonuclease H (RNase H) domain [14].
After entry into hepatocytes, the HBV genome is delivered into the nucleus where it is repaired to form covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA) that serves as a template for the pregenomic RNA (pgRNA) and subgenomic RNAs for translation to HBV proteins (including the viral polymerase protein (Pol), HBsAg, hepatitis B X protein (HBx), the core protein, and the precore protein [15]). The precore protein contains the entire sequence of the core protein plus an amino-terminal extension of 29 amino acids (i.e., the “precure” sequence) [16]. The first 19 amino acids of the precore protein constitute a signal peptide that directs the precore protein to the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) for secretion. This signal peptide is removed by the signal peptidase, located in the ER lumen, to generate the 22-kDa precore protein derivative p22, which is further cleaved at its carboxy terminus by furin protease in the Golgi. The secreted pre-core protein derivative is known as the e antigen called HBeAg. After the formation of the viral core particle, the HBV pgRNA is reverse-transcribed by the viral DNA polymerase that is also packaged to become the circular and partially double-stranded DNA genome. Finally, the core particles subsequently interact with HBsAgs in intracellular membranes for the formation of mature viral particles, which are then released from infected hepatocytes to infect other cells as shown in Figure 2 [17].
Globally, chronic hepatitis B infection affects around 350 million people worldwide (3.61% of the global population), resulting in 600,000 deaths annually from cirrhosis, liver failure, and hepatocellular carcinoma [18]. The number of affected individuals is the highest in the Western Pacific region (defined by the World Health Organization as the 37 countries including China, Japan, South Korea, the Philippines, and Vietnam), with 95.3 million infected (prevalence estimates of 5.26%), and Africa, with 75.6 million infected (prevalence estimates of 8.83%), accounting for nearly 70% of all chronic hepatitis B infection cases globally [19]. The percentages of liver cirrhosis and HCC caused by HBV infection are 30% and 45% worldwide, respectively [20], while the percentages in China are 60% and 80% [21].

3. HBV Infection and Host Innate Immunity

Innate immunity is the first line of defense against microbial pathogens, including viruses. Viral infection triggers the induction of type-I interferons (e.g., IFN-α and IFN-β) and other proinflammatory cytokines through two distinct signaling pathways [22].
One of these pathways utilizes a subfamily of Toll-like receptors (TLR3, 7, 8, and 9) to detect HBV nucleic acids in the endosome after the endocytosis of viral particles. These TLRs are localized in the endosomal membranes of specialized cell types, such as plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs) [23], and they recruit the adaptor protein MyD88 or Toll-Like receptor adaptor molecule 1 (TRIF) to activate protein kinases, including the inhibitor of nuclear factor kappa B kinase (IKK) complex (consisting of IKKα, IKKβ, and NEMO/IKKγ) and the IKK-related kinases (TANK Binding Kinase 1 (TBK1) and inhibitor of nuclear factor kappa B kinase subunit epsilon (IKKε)). The IKK complex phosphorylates the nuclear factor kappa B subunit 1 (NF-κB) inhibitor (IκB) and targets IκB for degradation by the ubiquitin proteasome pathway, thereby allowing NF-κB to enter the nucleus to induce a large array of genes involved in immune and inflammatory responses [24]. TBK1 and IKKε phosphorylate IFN-regulatory factors, IRF3 or IRF7, resulting in its dimerization and nuclear translocation [25]. The nuclear IRFs, NF-κB, and other transcription factors form an enhanceosome complex to activate the expression of interferons [26], which are then secreted to bind to their receptors on HBV-infected as well as neighboring non-infected cells. The engagement of interferon receptors activates the Janus kinase (JAK)-signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) signaling pathway to induce interferon-stimulated genes (ISGs), which suppress HBV replication and assembly (Figure 3) [27].
The other HBV/innate immunity signaling pathway utilizes the retinoic acid inducible gene I (RIG-I) to detect HBV double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) in the cytosol [28]. RIG-I binds to HBV dsRNA through its C-terminal RNA helicase domain and mediates the activation of IKK and TBK1/IKKε through its N-terminal caspase activation and recruitment domains (CARD). The adaptor protein that links RIG-I to IKK and TBK1/IKKε activation is the recently identified mitochondrial antiviral signaling protein (MAVS), also known as IPS-1, VISA, or CARDIF. MAVS contains an N-terminal CARD domain that interacts with the tandem CARD domains of RIG-I and a C-terminal transmembrane domain that localizes it to the mitochondrial outer membrane [29]. Cell culture studies have suggested that MAVS/IPS-1 is required for interferon induction by cytosolic DNA [30].
The production of pro-inflammatory cytokines and IFNs and the activation of natural killer (NK) cells is frequently observed during the early phase of viral infections. Previously, HBV was considered as a “stealth virus” that could establish persistent infection in hepatocytes by evading the host innate immune system [31]. Using an experimentally infected chimpanzee model, HBV was unable to interfere with host cellular gene transcription and induce ISG expression in the liver [7]. However, by quantification of serum cytokines, a study which enrolled 21 HBV-infected patients during the pre-symptomatic phase indicated that HBV infection did not elicit strong production of IFNs and interleukin (IL)-15, but did induce the production of the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 [32]. In addition to this observation, another study suggested that many cytokines are weakly induced during acute HBV infection. After initiation of viral expansion and before the peak of viremia, IFN-α, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, IL-15, IL-10, IL-6, and IL-1β levels were detectable in serum samples from about half of HBV patients [33].
On the other hand, in another study Mutz et al. elucidated the interactions between HBV and innate immunity to better understand the mechanisms of immune activation in HBV infection and reported that HBV does not trigger the IFN response of hepatocytes or interfere with the innate immune-sensing functions of hepatocytes, and nor does it inhibit the IFN-stimulated pathways of hepatocytes based on absence of interferon and cytokine production [34]. On the other hand, macrophages can be activated by high-titer HBV to mount an immune response against HBV mainly through production of inflammatory cytokines like TNF-α and IL6 [35]. In contrast, several other studies have reported that HBV replication can inhibit those aforementioned pattern-recognition receptor (PRR) functions. One study showed that HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B patients had downregulated TLR2 expression in the hepatocyte plasma membrane [36]. Other studies based on heterologous overexpression of viral proteins and/or host sensors have also addressed this issue, but have yielded conflicting results [37,38]. Similarly, contradictory data exist regarding whether HBV infection suppresses the cellular response to IFN. One study demonstrated the inhibition of signal transducer and activator of transcription 1 (STAT1) nuclear import by HBV polymerase, and showed that HBsAg and/or HBx protein interfered with the STAT1 signaling [39].
In conclusion, these studies indicate that HBV can target the TLR system and thus attenuate the anti-HBV responses of the innate immune system, which implies that HBV does not affect at least some aspects of the innate immunity system. HBV, particularly HBx protein, was reported to disrupt RIG-I-mediated IFN-β induction by downregulating MAVS [40,41]. HBx was recently reported to act as a deubiquitinating enzyme which deubiquitinated RIG-I and other molecules including TNF receptor associated factor 3 (TRAF3), IRF3, and IKKi. It attenuated the interaction between RIG-I and TRAF3 that plays an important role in IFN induction, and finally dampened type I IFN induction [42]. In addition, HBV proteins also interfere with JAK-STAT signaling and ISG expression. For example, HBV polymerase was shown to inhibit nuclear translocation of STAT1 [43] and HBV precore/core proteins inhibited myxovirus resistance A (MxA) gene expression via their interaction with the MxA promoter [44]. All these findings provide evidence that HBV can counteract the innate immune responses mediated by TLRs or RIG-I in the liver microenvironment, which might be strategies by which HBV escapes the surveillance of the host innate immune system. The different HBV protein contributions in induction of cellular innate immunity are summarized in Table 1.

3.1. Hepatitis B e Antigen (HBeAg)

TLR expression on Kupffer cells, peripheral monocytes, and hepatocytes is reduced in HBeAg-positive CHB compared with patients with HBeAg-negative CHB [36]. However, HBV cDNA plasmids encoding the G1896A precore stop codon mutation (which abrogates production of HBeAg) have no effect on TLR2 expression [51]. More recently it has been shown that HBeAg directly interacts with key adapters in the TLR2 pathway [52]. The expression of IFN-α and IFN-β mRNA was down-regulated in stably transformed HBeAg-positive HepG2 cells as compared to an HBeAg-negative HepG2 cell line [53]. Thus, it can be concluded that HBeAg protein downregulates TLR innate immunity signaling pathway.

3.2. HBV Core Protein (HBcAG) and Hepatitis B Splice Protein (HBSP)

HBV core protein interfered with IFN-β expression through binding to the IFN-β promoter as a transacting silencer in murine fibroblasts [54]. Subsequently, Rosmorduc et al. showed that HBV core protein, encoded by spliced pgRNA, down-regulated IFN-inducible MxA protein expression, with MxA being an important antiviral protein kinase [55]. Further to these findings, Soussan et al. showed that in addition to the core and precore protein, the most frequently detected spliced pgRNA also encodes a novel protein termed HBSP that may down-regulate MxA [56]. Thus, it can be concluded that HBcAg and HBSP down-regulates IFN-inducible MxA protein expression.

3.3. Hepatitis B Virus X Protein (HBx)

Previous reports have also shown that HBx promotes MAVS ubiquitination to trigger its proteasome-mediated degradation through the Lys136 site, and that MAVS K136R elicits a higher level of IFN-β activation compared with wild type MAVS, suggesting that the MAVS Lys136 site could be the ubiquitination site targeted by the ubiquitin E3 ligase RNF125 [40], enabling MAVS proteins to undergo proteasomal degradation by RNF125-mediated ubiquitin conjugation [57]. PSMA7 is a subunit of the proteasome that regulates the activity of this complex associated with HBX, suggesting that HBX may modulate the function of the proteasome by interacting with PSMA7. PSMA7 may regulate host innate immune signaling by destabilizing MAVS, raising the possibility that HBX may be potentially bridged by PSMA7 on the mitochondrial outer membrane to exert its inhibitory effect on innate immune response [40]. In addition, another research group has proposed a new model where the HBx protein blocks tripartite motif containing 22 (TRIM22) transcription, leading to a decrease in interferon (IFN)-induced TRIM22 expression [48].

3.4. Hepatitis B Virus Polymerase Inhibits Innate Immunity (HBV Pol)

Three observations are worthy of mention to discuss the impact of HBV Pol on IFN signaling. First, previous data indicated the inhibitory effect of HBV Pol on IRF signaling and to a lesser extent on NF-κB signaling, which also contributes to IFN-β production. Second, abundant detection of HBV Pol in the nonencapsidated state indicates that HBV Pol could contribute to viral pathogenesis or immune evasion. Lastly, HBV Pol has been previously identified as one of the viral proteins that confers resistance to IFN treatment [45]. Previous studies have shown that HBV polymerase is a potent inhibitor of IFN-β induction in human hepatocytes, and its expression leads to inhibition of promoter activity and transcription of IFN-β and antiviral immunity in the PH5CH8 primary hepatocytic cell line. In addition, it has been demonstrated that HBV polymerase interferes with IFN-β induction at the TBK1/IKKε level, expression of HBV polymerase inhibits Sendai virus (SeV)-induced endogenous IRF3 phosphorylation, dimerization, and nuclear translocation, and RNA helicases of the DEAD-box protein family (DDX3) may be involved in the inhibition of IFN-β induction by HBV polymerase [46].

4. Conflicts Regarding HBV and Innate Immunity

In the current review, we set out to elucidate the interactions between HBV and innate immunity to better understand the mechanisms of immune activation in HBV infection. Previously, HBV was considered a “stealth” virus that did not interfere with the innate immune-sensing functions of hepatocytes. However, data obtained from recent studies suggest that circulating innate immune cells, as well as liver cell populations, can sense and respond to HBV infection, which enables the innate immune system to detect and restrict the invading virus. In addition, it is worth noting that HBV induced IFN responses in hepatocytes are relatively weak as compared with other viral infections, which is consistent with the observations from the studies obtained in chimpanzee [7] and mouse models [35]. The previous reports highlight that HBV is recognized by host PRRs and thus induces innate immune responses that decrease HBV replication and expansion. However, the specific PRRs and intracellular signaling pathways involved in HBV recognition and inhibition still require further investigation. An in-depth understanding of immune mechanisms induced by distinct components of HBV will provide the opportunity to characterize the immunopathogenesis of HBV infection and develop immune based therapeutic strategies for HBV infection [58,59].
In contrast, several other studies have reported that HBV replication can inhibit those aforementioned PRR functions. One study showed that HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B patients have downregulated TLR2 expression on hepatocytes [60]. One study demonstrated inhibition of STAT1 nuclear import by HBV polymerase [39] and another reported that the HBsAg and/or HBx protein interfered with the STAT1 signaling [52]. By stimulating ex vivo-culture liver biopsies with different TLRs ligands and SeV, it was observed that induction of the innate immune response, as measured by IFN and ISG expression, did not differ between HBV-infected and non-infected samples, suggesting that HBV infection neither induces nor interferes with the innate immune response, which is consistent with the observed lack of innate immune response during acute HBV infection in experimentally infected chimpanzees and the apparent sensitivity of HBV to TLR-mediated induction of innate immunity as such, in contrast to many other viruses including hepatitis C virus (HCV) and hepatitis A virus (HAV). These results support the hypothesis that HBV behaves like a “stealth virus” by staying under the radar of the pathogen detection system [61].
We believe that contradictory reports are mainly related to three aspects. The first is the infection stage. It is important to find evidence of innate immune responses in the early phase of acute hepatitis B infection even though no innate immune responses are observed in patients with chronic HBV. The second aspect is related to the experimental models. It is critical how similar the innate immunity pathways are in these models and primary human hepatocytes (PHH). The third aspect relates to the HBV genotypes. There are differences in innate immunity response among different HBV genotypes.

5. In Vitro Models to Study HBV Infection and Innate Immunity

To date, HBV research has been hampered by a distinct lack of robust infectious model systems that both support productive HBV infection and accurately mimic virus–host interactions. Hepatoma-derived cell lines support HBV replication and particle assembly following the transfection of cloned viral genomes [62,63]. After differentiation, differentiated hepatic cells derived from a human hepatic progenitor cell line (HepaRG) become susceptible to HBV, indicating expression of the HBV receptor in the differentiated HepaRG and the differentiation-dependent expression of an HBV receptor. It took a long time until Wenhui Li’s group from Beijing discovered the human sodium taurocholate cotransporting polypeptide receptor (NTCP) to be the long sought-after HBV receptor [64]. This finding was confirmed and consistent with the pronounced induction of NTCP that is unique to the hepatocyte membrane and expression upon differentiation of HepaRG cells [65]. Prior studies have shown that primary human hepatocytes support HBV infection, although infection is usually not robust even upon supplementation of cell-culture medium with dimethyl sulfoxide or polyethylene glycol [65]. Moreover, primary human hepatocytes rapidly lose their hepatic phenotype shortly after isolation from the in vivo microenvironment [66]. Several drawbacks have been found in these in vitro HBV infection models. In the case of HepaRG cells, for example, it is impossible to evaluate the effects of genetic background on HBV infection using HepaRG cells. There is a restricted availability of primary human hepatocytes (PHHs), although PHHs isolated from young children can proliferate in humanized chimera mice [66]. Besides the efforts in generating HBV-susceptible cell lines, independent approaches have involved the generation of hepatocyte like cells (HLCs) through the differentiation of stem cells from diverse origins, such as human embryonic stem cells (hESCs), human induced-pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs), liver-resident hepatic progenitor cells, or bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells [67,68,69,70].
However, there is thus an urgent need for a novel in vitro HBV infection model. Recently, human hepatocyte-like cells differentiated from hESCs and hiPSCs have gained much attention not only due to their promise for regenerative medicine, but also due to their potential for modeling drug metabolism and pathogen infection in vitro [71,72,73,74]. For example, human hepatocyte-like cells differentiated from these stem cells can be stably supplied due to the indefinite proliferation potential of hESCs and hiPSCs. Influences on the genetic background of the cells can be evaluated because iPS cells are established from various types of somatic cells. In addition, genome editing technology makes gene knockout and gene replacement possible in hESCs and hiPSCs [75]. The protocols established for the production of HLCs from hESCs usually consist of three crucial steps: (1) endodermal induction, (2) hepatic specification, and (3) hepatocyte maturation. So far, a gain in susceptibility to HBV has not been a criterion for the functionality of HLCs. In a former study, Shlomai and co-workers showed for the first time that HBV can infect hiPSC-derived HLCs. They demonstrated that expression of NTCP becomes strongly induced during hepatic maturation, which correlates with a gain in susceptibility to HBV. This finding demonstrates the potential of human hiPSC-derived HLCs for in vitro studies of HBV biology. Importantly it opens the door for generating HBV-susceptible cells from individual groups of patients and individuals with certain genetic polymorphisms [76]. We thus consider that iPS-HCLs are promising as an alternative in vitro model of infection by hepatotropic pathogens, including HBV. Different in-vitro HBV cell models, their HBV infection efficiencies, innate immunity pathways, advantages, and limitations are summarized in Table 2.

6. Conclusions

The innate immune system is the first line of host defense against HBV infection and plays an important role in anti-HBV. HBV only triggers little innate response in host cells after infection and has evolved escape strategies from the innate immune system. HBV proteins, including HBx, HBV polymerase, HBs, HBc, and HBe, block TLRs, the Jak-Stat pathway (type I/III IFN response), TBK1/IKKε (the effector kinase of the IRF-3/NF-κB pathway), and cytokines.
Current evidence obtained from experiments has highlighted the importance of innate immunity in the early control of HBV spread. However, how HBV succeeds to avoid innate immune recognition has still not been fully clarified. The recent development of varied novel models, such as HepaRG cells, stem-cell derived hepatocytes, and liver organoids, may greatly contribute to clarifying the interaction between HBV and host innate immunity. Given the central role that innate immunity plays in antiviral responses, the enhancement of HBV-induced innate immunity may provide fundamental insights into the therapy of HBV. We believe that a better understanding of HBV–host interactions will be achieved by using these novel models, eventually leading to effective treatment strategies for hepatitis B.

Author Contributions

Conception and literature review: F.A.K.M., X.Z., and P.S. Writing of the manuscript: F.A.K.M. and X.Z. Revision of the manuscript: X.Z. and P.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81571994, 81570567, and 81870432); the Scientific Research Foundation for the Returned Overseas Chinese Scholars, State Education Ministry; and the Li Ka-Shing Shantou University Foundation.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Xiaoyu Zhao and Xiaoqiang Yang from Shantou University Medical College for useful help in drawing figures.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Global prevalence, treatment, and prevention of hepatitis B virus infection in 2016: A modelling study. Lancet Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2018, 3, 383–403. [CrossRef]
  2. Schweitzer, A.; Horn, J.; Mikolajczyk, R.T.; Krause, G.; Ott, J.J. Estimations of worldwide prevalence of chronic hepatitis B virus infection: A systematic review of data published between 1965 and 2013. Lancet 2015, 386, 1546–1555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Stanaway, J.D.; Flaxman, A.D.; Naghavi, M.; Fitzmaurice, C.; Vos, T.; Abubakar, I.; Abu-Raddad, L.J.; Assadi, R.; Bhala, N.; Cowie, B.; et al. The global burden of viral hepatitis from 1990 to 2013: Findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet 2016, 388, 1081–1088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Takeuchi, O.; Akira, S. Innate immunity to virus infection. Immunol. Rev. 2009, 227, 75–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Bertoletti, A.; Ferrari, C. Innate and adaptive immune responses in chronic hepatitis B virus infections: Towards restoration of immune control of viral infection. Gut 2012, 61, 1754–1764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Chang, J.; Block, T.M.; Guo, J.T. The innate immune response to hepatitis B virus infection: Implications for pathogenesis and therapy. Antivir. Res. 2012, 96, 405–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Wieland, S.; Thimme, R.; Purcell, R.H.; Chisari, F.V. Genomic analysis of the host response to hepatitis B virus infection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101, 6669–6674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Thomsen, M.K.; Nandakumar, R.; Stadler, D.; Malo, A.; Valls, R.M.; Wang, F.; Reinert, L.S.; Dagnaes-Hansen, F.; Hollensen, A.K.; Mikkelsen, J.G.; et al. Lack of immunological DNA sensing in hepatocytes facilitates hepatitis B virus infection. Hepatology 2016, 64, 746–759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Shi, C.C.; Tjwa, E.T.; Biesta, P.J.; Boonstra, A.; Xie, Q.; Janssen, H.L.; Woltman, A.M. Hepatitis B virus suppresses the functional interaction between natural killer cells and plasmacytoid dendritic cells. J. Viral Hepat. 2012, 19, e26–e33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Yang, Y.; Han, Q.; Zhang, C.; Xiao, M.; Zhang, J. Hepatitis B virus antigens impair NK cell function. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2016, 38, 291–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Miller, R.H.; Kaneko, S.; Chung, C.T.; Girones, R.; Purcell, R.H. Compact organization of the hepatitis B virus genome. Hepatology 1989, 9, 322–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Seeger, C.; Mason, W.S. Hepatitis B virus biology. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2000, 64, 51–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Summers, J.; Mason, W.S. Replication of the genome of a hepatitis B—Like virus by reverse transcription of an RNA intermediate. Cell 1982, 29, 403–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Das, K.; Xiong, X.; Yang, H.; Westland, C.E.; Gibbs, C.S.; Sarafianos, S.G.; Arnold, E. Molecular modeling and biochemical characterization reveal the mechanism of hepatitis B virus polymerase resistance to lamivudine (3TC) and emtricitabine (FTC). J. Virol. 2001, 75, 4771–4779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Yang, H.C.; Kao, J.H. Persistence of hepatitis B virus covalently closed circular DNA in hepatocytes: Molecular mechanisms and clinical significance. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 2014, 3, e64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Hu, J.; Liu, K. Complete and Incomplete Hepatitis B Virus Particles: Formation, Function, and Application. Viruses 2017, 9, 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Tsai, K.N.; Kuo, C.F.; Ou, J.J. Mechanisms of Hepatitis B Virus Persistence. Trends Microbiol. 2018, 26, 33–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Terrault, N.A.; Bzowej, N.H.; Chang, K.M.; Hwang, J.P.; Jonas, M.M.; Murad, M.H. AASLD guidelines for treatment of chronic hepatitis B. Hepatology 2016, 63, 261–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Collaborators, G.B. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 301 acute and chronic diseases and injuries in 188 countries, 1990–2013: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet 2015, 386, 743–800. [Google Scholar]
  20. Goldstein, S.T.; Zhou, F.; Hadler, S.C.; Bell, B.P.; Mast, E.E.; Margolis, H.S. A mathematical model to estimate global hepatitis B disease burden and vaccination impact. Int. J. Epidemiol. 2005, 34, 1329–1339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Wang, F.S.; Fan, J.G.; Zhang, Z.; Gao, B.; Wang, H.Y. The global burden of liver disease: The major impact of China. Hepatology 2014, 60, 2099–2108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Sun, Q.; Sun, L.; Liu, H.H.; Chen, X.; Seth, R.B.; Forman, J.; Chen, Z.J. The specific and essential role of MAVS in antiviral innate immune responses. Immunity 2006, 24, 633–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Hari, A.; Flach, T.L.; Shi, Y.; Mydlarski, P.R. Toll-like receptors: Role in dermatological disease. Mediat. Inflamm. 2010, 2010, 437246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Tu, D.; Zhu, Z.; Zhou, A.Y.; Yun, C.H.; Lee, K.E.; Toms, A.V.; Li, Y.; Dunn, G.P.; Chan, E.; Thai, T.; et al. Structure and ubiquitination-dependent activation of TANK-binding kinase 1. Cell Rep. 2013, 3, 747–758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Ning, S.; Pagano, J.S.; Barber, G.N. IRF7: Activation, regulation, modification and function. Genes Immun. 2011, 12, 399–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Honda, K.; Takaoka, A.; Taniguchi, T. Type I interferon [corrected] gene induction by the interferon regulatory factor family of transcription factors. Immunity 2006, 25, 349–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Pervolaraki, K.; Rastgou Talemi, S.; Albrecht, D.; Bormann, F.; Bamford, C.; Mendoza, J.L.; Garcia, K.C.; McLauchlan, J.; Hofer, T.; Stanifer, M.L.; et al. Differential induction of interferon stimulated genes between type I and type III interferons is independent of interferon receptor abundance. PLoS Pathog. 2018, 14, e1007420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Liu, Y.; Olagnier, D.; Lin, R. Host and Viral Modulation of RIG-I-Mediated Antiviral Immunity. Front. Immunol. 2016, 7, 662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Pourcelot, M.; Arnoult, D. Mitochondrial dynamics and the innate antiviral immune response. FEBS J. 2014, 281, 3791–3802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. McWhirter, S.M.; Barbalat, R.; Monroe, K.M.; Fontana, M.F.; Hyodo, M.; Joncker, N.T.; Ishii, K.J.; Akira, S.; Colonna, M.; Chen, Z.J.; et al. A host type I interferon response is induced by cytosolic sensing of the bacterial second messenger cyclic-di-GMP. J. Exp. Med. 2009, 206, 1899–1911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Cheng, X.; Xia, Y.; Serti, E.; Block, P.D.; Chung, M.; Chayama, K.; Rehermann, B.; Liang, T.J. Hepatitis B virus evades innate immunity of hepatocytes but activates cytokine production by macrophages. Hepatology 2017, 66, 1779–1793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Dunn, C.; Peppa, D.; Khanna, P.; Nebbia, G.; Jones, M.; Brendish, N.; Lascar, R.M.; Brown, D.; Gilson, R.J.; Tedder, R.J.; et al. Temporal analysis of early immune responses in patients with acute hepatitis B virus infection. Gastroenterology 2009, 137, 1289–1300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Stacey, A.R.; Norris, P.J.; Qin, L.; Haygreen, E.A.; Taylor, E.; Heitman, J.; Lebedeva, M.; DeCamp, A.; Li, D.; Grove, D.; et al. Induction of a striking systemic cytokine cascade prior to peak viremia in acute human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection, in contrast to more modest and delayed responses in acute hepatitis B and C virus infections. J. Virol. 2009, 83, 3719–3733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Mutz, P.; Metz, P.; Lempp, F.A.; Bender, S.; Qu, B.; Schoneweis, K.; Seitz, S.; Tu, T.; Restuccia, A.; Frankish, J.; et al. HBV Bypasses the Innate Immune Response and Does Not Protect HCV From Antiviral Activity of Interferon. Gastroenterology 2018, 154, 1791–1804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Hosel, M.; Quasdorff, M.; Wiegmann, K.; Webb, D.; Zedler, U.; Broxtermann, M.; Tedjokusumo, R.; Esser, K.; Arzberger, S.; Kirschning, C.J.; et al. Not interferon, but interleukin-6 controls early gene expression in hepatitis B virus infection. Hepatology 2009, 50, 1773–1782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Ma, Z.; Cao, Q.; Xiong, Y.; Zhang, E.; Lu, M. Interaction between Hepatitis B Virus and Toll-Like Receptors: Current Status and Potential Therapeutic Use for Chronic Hepatitis B. Vaccines 2018, 6, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Dansako, H.; Ueda, Y.; Okumura, N.; Satoh, S.; Sugiyama, M.; Mizokami, M.; Ikeda, M.; Kato, N. The cyclic GMP-AMP synthetase-STING signaling pathway is required for both the innate immune response against HBV and the suppression of HBV assembly. FEBS J. 2016, 283, 144–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Liu, Y.; Li, J.; Chen, J.; Li, Y.; Wang, W.; Du, X.; Song, W.; Zhang, W.; Lin, L.; Yuan, Z. Hepatitis B virus polymerase disrupts K63-linked ubiquitination of STING to block innate cytosolic DNA-sensing pathways. J. Virol. 2015, 89, 2287–2300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Wu, M.; Xu, Y.; Lin, S.; Zhang, X.; Xiang, L.; Yuan, Z. Hepatitis B virus polymerase inhibits the interferon-inducible MyD88 promoter by blocking nuclear translocation of Stat1. J. Gen. Virol. 2007, 88, 3260–3269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Wei, C.; Ni, C.; Song, T.; Liu, Y.; Yang, X.; Zheng, Z.; Jia, Y.; Yuan, Y.; Guan, K.; Xu, Y.; et al. The hepatitis B virus X protein disrupts innate immunity by downregulating mitochondrial antiviral signaling protein. J. Immunol. 2010, 185, 1158–1168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kumar, M.; Jung, S.Y.; Hodgson, A.J.; Madden, C.R.; Qin, J.; Slagle, B.L. Hepatitis B virus regulatory HBx protein binds to adaptor protein IPS-1 and inhibits the activation of beta interferon. J. Virol. 2011, 85, 987–995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Han, Q.; Zhang, C.; Zhang, J.; Tian, Z. The role of innate immunity in HBV infection. Semin. Immunopathol. 2013, 35, 23–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Liu, D.; Wu, A.; Cui, L.; Hao, R.; Wang, Y.; He, J.; Guo, D. Hepatitis B virus polymerase suppresses NF-kappaB signaling by inhibiting the activity of IKKs via interaction with Hsp90beta. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e91658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Guo, Y.; Kang, W.; Lei, X.; Li, Y.; Xiang, A.; Liu, Y.; Zhao, J.; Zhang, J.; Yan, Z. Hepatitis B viral core protein disrupts human host gene expression by binding to promoter regions. BMC Genom. 2012, 13, 563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Wang, H.; Ryu, W.S. Hepatitis B virus polymerase blocks pattern recognition receptor signaling via interaction with DDX3: Implications for immune evasion. PLoS Pathog. 2010, 6, e1000986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Yu, S.; Chen, J.; Wu, M.; Chen, H.; Kato, N.; Yuan, Z. Hepatitis B virus polymerase inhibits RIG-I- and Toll-like receptor 3-mediated beta interferon induction in human hepatocytes through interference with interferon regulatory factor 3 activation and dampening of the interaction between TBK1/IKKepsilon and DDX3. J. Gen. Virol. 2010, 91, 2080–2090. [Google Scholar]
  47. Chen, J.; Wu, M.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, W.; Zhang, Z.; Chen, L.; He, J.; Zheng, Y.; Chen, C.; Wang, F.; et al. Hepatitis B virus polymerase impairs interferon-alpha-induced STA T activation through inhibition of importin-alpha5 and protein kinase C-delta. Hepatology 2013, 57, 470–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Slagle, B.L.; Bouchard, M.J. Hepatitis B Virus X and Regulation of Viral Gene Expression. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 2016, 6, a021402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Lim, K.H.; Park, E.S.; Kim, D.H.; Cho, K.C.; Kim, K.P.; Park, Y.K.; Ahn, S.H.; Park, S.H.; Kim, K.H.; Kim, C.W.; et al. Suppression of interferon-mediated anti-HBV response by single CpG methylation in the 5′-UTR of TRIM22. Gut 2018, 67, 166–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Fernandez, M.; Quiroga, J.A.; Carreno, V. Hepatitis B virus downregulates the human interferon-inducible MxA promoter through direct interaction of precore/core proteins. J. Gen. Virol. 2003, 84, 2073–2082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Visvanathan, K.; Skinner, N.A.; Thompson, A.J.; Riordan, S.M.; Sozzi, V.; Edwards, R.; Rodgers, S.; Kurtovic, J.; Chang, J.; Lewin, S.; et al. Regulation of Toll-like receptor-2 expression in chronic hepatitis B by the precore protein. Hepatology 2007, 45, 102–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Lang, T.; Lo, C.; Skinner, N.; Locarnini, S.; Visvanathan, K.; Mansell, A. The hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) targets and suppresses activation of the toll-like receptor signaling pathway. J. Hepatol. 2011, 55, 762–769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Wu, S.; Kanda, T.; Imazeki, F.; Arai, M.; Yonemitsu, Y.; Nakamoto, S.; Fujiwara, K.; Fukai, K.; Nomura, F.; Yokosuka, O. Hepatitis B virus e antigen downregulates cytokine production in human hepatoma cell lines. Viral Immunol. 2010, 23, 467–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Twu, J.S.; Lee, C.H.; Lin, P.M.; Schloemer, R.H. Hepatitis B virus suppresses expression of human beta-interferon. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1988, 85, 252–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Rosmorduc, O.; Sirma, H.; Soussan, P.; Gordien, E.; Lebon, P.; Horisberger, M.; Brechot, C.; Kremsdorf, D. Inhibition of interferon-inducible MxA protein expression by hepatitis B virus capsid protein. J. Gen. Virol. 1999, 80((Pt. 5)), 1253–1262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Soussan, P.; Garreau, F.; Zylberberg, H.; Ferray, C.; Brechot, C.; Kremsdorf, D. In vivo expression of a new hepatitis B virus protein encoded by a spliced RNA. J. Clin. Investig. 2000, 105, 55–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Castanier, C.; Zemirli, N.; Portier, A.; Garcin, D.; Bidere, N.; Vazquez, A.; Arnoult, D. MAVS ubiquitination by the E3 ligase TRIM25 and degradation by the proteasome is involved in type I interferon production after activation of the antiviral RIG-I-like receptors. BMC Biol. 2012, 10, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Zhang, X.; Ma, Z.; Liu, H.; Liu, J.; Meng, Z.; Broering, R.; Yang, D.; Schlaak, J.F.; Roggendorf, M.; Lu, M. Role of Toll-like receptor 2 in the immune response against hepadnaviral infection. J. Hepatol. 2012, 57, 522–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Gane, E.J.; Lim, Y.S.; Gordon, S.C.; Visvanathan, K.; Sicard, E.; Fedorak, R.N.; Roberts, S.; Massetto, B.; Ye, Z.; Pflanz, S.; et al. The oral toll-like receptor-7 agonist GS-9620 in patients with chronic hepatitis B virus infection. J. Hepatol. 2015, 63, 320–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Christen, V.; Duong, F.; Bernsmeier, C.; Sun, D.; Nassal, M.; Heim, M.H. Inhibition of alpha interferon signaling by hepatitis B virus. J. Virol. 2007, 81, 159–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Suslov, A.; Boldanova, T.; Wang, X.; Wieland, S.; Heim, M.H. Hepatitis B Virus Does Not Interfere With Innate Immune Responses in the Human Liver. Gastroenterology 2018, 154, 1778–1790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Sells, M.A.; Chen, M.L.; Acs, G. Production of hepatitis B virus particles in Hep G2 cells transfected with cloned hepatitis B virus DNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1987, 84, 1005–1009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Fellig, Y.; Almogy, G.; Galun, E.; Ketzinel-Gilad, M. A hepatocellular carcinoma cell line producing mature hepatitis B viral particles. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2004, 321, 269–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Yan, H.; Zhong, G.; Xu, G.; He, W.; Jing, Z.; Gao, Z.; Huang, Y.; Qi, Y.; Peng, B.; Wang, H.; et al. Sodium taurocholate cotransporting polypeptide is a functional receptor for human hepatitis B and D virus. Elife 2012, 1, e00049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Ni, Y.; Lempp, F.A.; Mehrle, S.; Nkongolo, S.; Kaufman, C.; Falth, M.; Stindt, J.; Koniger, C.; Nassal, M.; Kubitz, R.; et al. Hepatitis B and D viruses exploit sodium taurocholate co-transporting polypeptide for species-specific entry into hepatocytes. Gastroenterology 2014, 146, 1070–1083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Gomez-Lechon, M.J.; Donato, M.T.; Castell, J.V.; Jover, R. Human hepatocytes in primary culture: The choice to investigate drug metabolism in man. Curr. Drug Metab. 2004, 5, 443–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Piryaei, A.; Valojerdi, M.R.; Shahsavani, M.; Baharvand, H. Differentiation of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells into hepatocyte-like cells on nanofibers and their transplantation into a carbon tetrachloride-induced liver fibrosis model. Stem Cell Rev. 2011, 7, 103–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Dolle, L.; Best, J.; Mei, J.; Al Battah, F.; Reynaert, H.; van Grunsven, L.A.; Geerts, A. The quest for liver progenitor cells: A practical point of view. J. Hepatol. 2010, 52, 117–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Sullivan, G.J.; Hay, D.C.; Park, I.H.; Fletcher, J.; Hannoun, Z.; Payne, C.M.; Dalgetty, D.; Black, J.R.; Ross, J.A.; Samuel, K.; et al. Generation of functional human hepatic endoderm from human induced pluripotent stem cells. Hepatology 2010, 51, 329–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Hay, D.C.; Fletcher, J.; Payne, C.; Terrace, J.D.; Gallagher, R.C.; Snoeys, J.; Black, J.R.; Wojtacha, D.; Samuel, K.; Hannoun, Z.; et al. Highly efficient differentiation of hESCs to functional hepatic endoderm requires ActivinA and Wnt3a signaling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 12301–12306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Cayo, M.A.; Mallanna, S.K.; Di Furio, F.; Jing, R.; Tolliver, L.B.; Bures, M.; Urick, A.; Noto, F.K.; Pashos, E.E.; Greseth, M.D.; et al. A Drug Screen using Human iPSC-Derived Hepatocyte-like Cells Reveals Cardiac Glycosides as a Potential Treatment for Hypercholesterolemia. Cell Stem Cell 2017, 20, 478–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  72. Zhou, X.; Sun, P.; Lucendo-Villarin, B.; Angus, A.G.; Szkolnicka, D.; Cameron, K.; Farnworth, S.L.; Patel, A.H.; Hay, D.C. Modulating innate immunity improves hepatitis C virus infection and replication in stem cell-derived hepatocytes. Stem Cell Rep. 2014, 3, 204–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  73. Schwartz, R.E.; Trehan, K.; Andrus, L.; Sheahan, T.P.; Ploss, A.; Duncan, S.A.; Rice, C.M.; Bhatia, S.N. Modeling hepatitis C virus infection using human induced pluripotent stem cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 2544–2548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  74. Wu, X.; Dao Thi, V.L.; Liu, P.; Takacs, C.N.; Xiang, K.; Andrus, L.; Gouttenoire, J.; Moradpour, D.; Rice, C.M. Pan-Genotype Hepatitis E Virus Replication in Stem Cell-Derived Hepatocellular Systems. Gastroenterology 2018, 154, 663–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Hockemeyer, D.; Jaenisch, R. Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells Meet Genome Editing. Cell Stem Cell 2016, 18, 573–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  76. Shlomai, A.; Schwartz, R.E.; Ramanan, V.; Bhatta, A.; de Jong, Y.P.; Bhatia, S.N.; Rice, C.M. Modeling host interactions with hepatitis B virus using primary and induced pluripotent stem cell-derived hepatocellular systems. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, 12193–12198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Schulze-Bergkamen, H.; Untergasser, A.; Dax, A.; Vogel, H.; Buchler, P.; Klar, E.; Lehnert, T.; Friess, H.; Buchler, M.W.; Kirschfink, M.; et al. Primary human hepatocytes—A valuable tool for investigation of apoptosis and hepatitis B virus infection. J. Hepatol. 2003, 38, 736–744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Yoneda, M.; Hyun, J.; Jakubski, S.; Saito, S.; Nakajima, A.; Schiff, E.R.; Thomas, E. Hepatitis B Virus and DNA Stimulation Trigger a Rapid Innate Immune Response through NF-kappaB. J. Immunol. 2016, 197, 630–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Guo, F.; Tang, L.; Shu, S.; Sehgal, M.; Sheraz, M.; Liu, B.; Zhao, Q.; Cheng, J.; Zhao, X.; Zhou, T.; et al. Activation of Stimulator of Interferon Genes in Hepatocytes Suppresses the Replication of Hepatitis B Virus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2017, 61, e00771-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Xia, Y.; Carpentier, A.; Cheng, X.; Block, P.D.; Zhao, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Protzer, U.; Liang, T.J. Human stem cell-derived hepatocytes as a model for hepatitis B virus infection, spreading and virus-host interactions. J. Hepatol. 2017, 66, 494–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Yu, Y.; Liu, H.; Ikeda, Y.; Amiot, B.P.; Rinaldo, P.; Duncan, S.A.; Nyberg, S.L. Hepatocyte-like cells differentiated from human induced pluripotent stem cells: Relevance to cellular therapies. Stem Cell Res. 2012, 9, 196–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  82. Reed, D.M.; Foldes, G.; Gatheral, T.; Paschalaki, K.E.; Lendvai, Z.; Bagyura, Z.; Nemeth, T.; Skopal, J.; Merkely, B.; Telcian, A.G.; et al. Pathogen sensing pathways in human embryonic stem cell derived-endothelial cells: Role of NOD1 receptors. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e91119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  83. Gripon, P.; Rumin, S.; Urban, S.; Le Seyec, J.; Glaise, D.; Cannie, I.; Guyomard, C.; Lucas, J.; Trepo, C.; Guguen-Guillouzo, C. Infection of a human hepatoma cell line by hepatitis B virus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 99, 15655–15660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  84. Schulze, A.; Mills, K.; Weiss, T.S.; Urban, S. Hepatocyte polarization is essential for the productive entry of the hepatitis B virus. Hepatology 2012, 55, 373–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Iwamoto, M.; Watashi, K.; Tsukuda, S.; Aly, H.H.; Fukasawa, M.; Fujimoto, A.; Suzuki, R.; Aizaki, H.; Ito, T.; Koiwai, O.; et al. Evaluation and identification of hepatitis B virus entry inhibitors using HepG2 cells overexpressing a membrane transporter NTCP. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2014, 443, 808–813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  86. Yin, X.; Li, X.; Ambardekar, C.; Hu, Z.; Lhomme, S.; Feng, Z. Hepatitis E virus persists in the presence of a type III interferon response. PLoS Pathog. 2017, 13, e1006417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  87. Sato, S.; Li, K.; Kameyama, T.; Hayashi, T.; Ishida, Y.; Murakami, S.; Watanabe, T.; Iijima, S.; Sakurai, Y.; Watashi, K.; et al. The RNA Sensor RIG-I Dually Functions as an Innate Sensor and Direct Antiviral Factor for Hepatitis B Virus. Immunity 2015, 42, 123–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Israelow, B.; Narbus, C.M.; Sourisseau, M.; Evans, M.J. HepG2 cells mount an effective antiviral interferon-lambda based innate immune response to hepatitis C virus infection. Hepatology 2014, 60, 1170–1179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Li, K.; Chen, Z.; Kato, N.; Gale, M., Jr.; Lemon, S.M. Distinct poly(I-C) and virus-activated signaling pathways leading to interferon-beta production in hepatocytes. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280, 16739–16747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Guo, H.; Jiang, D.; Ma, D.; Chang, J.; Dougherty, A.M.; Cuconati, A.; Block, T.M.; Guo, J.T. Activation of pattern recognition receptor-mediated innate immunity inhibits the replication of hepatitis B virus in human hepatocyte-derived cells. J. Virol. 2009, 83, 847–858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Chen, L.; Xu, Y.Y.; Zhou, J.M.; Wu, Y.Y.; Qun, E.; Zhu, Y.Y. TLR3 dsRNA agonist inhibits growth and invasion of HepG2.2.15 HCC cells. Oncol. Rep. 2012, 28, 200–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  92. Han, Q.; Zhang, C.; Zhang, J.; Tian, Z. Involvement of activation of PKR in HBx-siRNA-mediated innate immune effects on HBV inhibition. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e27931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Viruses 12 00285 g001 550
Figure 1. Genetic organization of the hepatitis B virus (HBV). HBV contains a small, partially double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) of about 3.2 kb. The main four open reading frames (ORFs) are shown: precore/core (preC/C) that encodes the e antigen (HBeAg) and core protein (HBcAg), P for polymerase (reverse transcriptase), Pre-surface/surface (preS/S) including preS1/preS2/S for surface proteins (small (S), middle (M), and large (L)), and X for transcriptional trans-activator protein. The genome contains four promoters, two enhancer regions (Enh1, Enh2), and two direct repeats (DR1, DR2). The outer lines represent the different classes of HBV mRNA transcripts.
Figure 1. Genetic organization of the hepatitis B virus (HBV). HBV contains a small, partially double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) of about 3.2 kb. The main four open reading frames (ORFs) are shown: precore/core (preC/C) that encodes the e antigen (HBeAg) and core protein (HBcAg), P for polymerase (reverse transcriptase), Pre-surface/surface (preS/S) including preS1/preS2/S for surface proteins (small (S), middle (M), and large (L)), and X for transcriptional trans-activator protein. The genome contains four promoters, two enhancer regions (Enh1, Enh2), and two direct repeats (DR1, DR2). The outer lines represent the different classes of HBV mRNA transcripts.
Viruses 12 00285 g001
Viruses 12 00285 g002 550
Figure 2. Life cycle of the HBV shown by green arrows step by step. Mature HBV virions enter hepatocytes through the sodium taurocholate cotransporting polypeptide receptor (NTCP) on the cell membrane (Step 1). After release from the viral envelope, the nucleocapsid is then transported to the nucleus where the genome is repaired to form covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA) (Steps 2, 3 and 4). Using cccDNA as the template, viral RNAs are transcribed and exported into the cytoplasm where they are translated to form the viral proteins (Steps 5, 6 and 7). Additionally, pregenomic RNA (pgRNA) is packaged by core protein, along with the polymerase protein, and the viral genome is replicated through reverse transcription (RT) of the pgRNA to form the - strand, followed by partial synthesis of the + strand (Steps 8 and 9). Mature nucleocapsids can then either be recycled back to the nucleus to maintain a pool of cccDNA, or enveloped and secreted through the endosomal sorting complexes required for transport (ESCRT) pathway (Steps 10, 11 and 12).
Figure 2. Life cycle of the HBV shown by green arrows step by step. Mature HBV virions enter hepatocytes through the sodium taurocholate cotransporting polypeptide receptor (NTCP) on the cell membrane (Step 1). After release from the viral envelope, the nucleocapsid is then transported to the nucleus where the genome is repaired to form covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA) (Steps 2, 3 and 4). Using cccDNA as the template, viral RNAs are transcribed and exported into the cytoplasm where they are translated to form the viral proteins (Steps 5, 6 and 7). Additionally, pregenomic RNA (pgRNA) is packaged by core protein, along with the polymerase protein, and the viral genome is replicated through reverse transcription (RT) of the pgRNA to form the - strand, followed by partial synthesis of the + strand (Steps 8 and 9). Mature nucleocapsids can then either be recycled back to the nucleus to maintain a pool of cccDNA, or enveloped and secreted through the endosomal sorting complexes required for transport (ESCRT) pathway (Steps 10, 11 and 12).
Viruses 12 00285 g002
Viruses 12 00285 g003 550
Figure 3. HBV suppression of type I interferon (IFN) response (Green arrows indicate the related signaling pathways and T-arrows in red indicate blocking the targets). Different HBV proteins block the type I IFN response. For example, hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) inhibits interferon regulatory transcription factor 7 (IFR7) and nuclear factor kappa B subunit 1 (NF-κB) interaction to block NF-κB translocation to the nucleus and block type 1 IFN production. Hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) blocks toll-like receptor 3 (TLR3) binding to toll-like receptor adaptor molecule 1 (TRIF) to suppress the TLR3 pathway. HBV core protein inhibits production of type I IFNs and interferon-stimulated response elements (ISREs). Hepatitis B X protein (HBX) proteins inhibit binding of mitochondrial antiviral signaling protein (MAVS) to mitochondria to block the RIG1-MAVS pathway. HBV polymerase inhibits binding of DEAD-Box Helicase 3 X-Linked (DDX3) to the TBK1/IKKE complex, inhibits the RIG-I pathway, and blocks interferon-stimulated gene factor 3 (ISGF3) to inhibit ISRE production. Abbreviations—TLR3: Toll-like receptor 3, TRIF: Toll-like receptor adaptor molecule 1, TBK1: TANK-binding kinase 1, IKKE: inhibitor of nuclear factor-kB kinase, IRF3: interferon regulatory transcription factor 3, NF-κB: nuclear factor kappa B, dsRNA: double-stranded RNA, dsDNA: double-stranded DNA, MAVS: mitochondrial antiviral signaling protein, RIG-I: retinoic acid-inducible gene I, IRF-7: interferon regulatory transcription factor 7, IFNAR1/2: interferon alpha receptor 1/2, TYK2: tyrosine kinase 2, JAK1: Janus kinase 1, STAT1/2: signal transducer and activator of transcription 1/2, IRF-9: interferon regulatory transcription factor 9, ISGF3: interferon-stimulated gene factor 3, ISRE: interferon-stimulated response element, ISGs: interferon-stimulated genes, OAS1: 2’-5’ oligoadenylate synthetase 1, MX-A: myxovirus resistance A.
Figure 3. HBV suppression of type I interferon (IFN) response (Green arrows indicate the related signaling pathways and T-arrows in red indicate blocking the targets). Different HBV proteins block the type I IFN response. For example, hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) inhibits interferon regulatory transcription factor 7 (IFR7) and nuclear factor kappa B subunit 1 (NF-κB) interaction to block NF-κB translocation to the nucleus and block type 1 IFN production. Hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) blocks toll-like receptor 3 (TLR3) binding to toll-like receptor adaptor molecule 1 (TRIF) to suppress the TLR3 pathway. HBV core protein inhibits production of type I IFNs and interferon-stimulated response elements (ISREs). Hepatitis B X protein (HBX) proteins inhibit binding of mitochondrial antiviral signaling protein (MAVS) to mitochondria to block the RIG1-MAVS pathway. HBV polymerase inhibits binding of DEAD-Box Helicase 3 X-Linked (DDX3) to the TBK1/IKKE complex, inhibits the RIG-I pathway, and blocks interferon-stimulated gene factor 3 (ISGF3) to inhibit ISRE production. Abbreviations—TLR3: Toll-like receptor 3, TRIF: Toll-like receptor adaptor molecule 1, TBK1: TANK-binding kinase 1, IKKE: inhibitor of nuclear factor-kB kinase, IRF3: interferon regulatory transcription factor 3, NF-κB: nuclear factor kappa B, dsRNA: double-stranded RNA, dsDNA: double-stranded DNA, MAVS: mitochondrial antiviral signaling protein, RIG-I: retinoic acid-inducible gene I, IRF-7: interferon regulatory transcription factor 7, IFNAR1/2: interferon alpha receptor 1/2, TYK2: tyrosine kinase 2, JAK1: Janus kinase 1, STAT1/2: signal transducer and activator of transcription 1/2, IRF-9: interferon regulatory transcription factor 9, ISGF3: interferon-stimulated gene factor 3, ISRE: interferon-stimulated response element, ISGs: interferon-stimulated genes, OAS1: 2’-5’ oligoadenylate synthetase 1, MX-A: myxovirus resistance A.
Viruses 12 00285 g003
Table
Table 1. Different cellular innate immunity targets of HBV infection.
Table 1. Different cellular innate immunity targets of HBV infection.
HBV ProteinsCellular Innate Immunity TargetsReferences
PolymeraseRIG-I, TLR3/TBK1, IKKɛ, DDX3/IFN-β, IFN/JAK-STAT[45,46,47]
Hepatitis B virus X proteinRIG-I, melanoma differentiation-associated gene 5 (MDA5)/MAVS/IFN-β/Trim22[40,41,48,49]
Core/precoreIFN/myxovirus resistance A (MxA)[50]
Hepatitis B e antigenTLR2/ MyD88-Adapter-Like (MAL)[51,52]
Table
Table 2. Innate immunity pathways in HBV cell models.
Table 2. Innate immunity pathways in HBV cell models.
Cell ModelsHBV Infection EfficiencyInnate Immunity Pathways PresentAdvantages LimitationsReferences
Primary human hepatocytes (PHHs)Average 50% in the presence of 5% polyethylene glycol (PEG)Low TLR expressionGold standard for investigation of HBV infection; limited availability and unpredictable variability [77,78,79]
Low stimulator of interferon genes(STING) expression
RIG-I/MDA5
NF-κB pathway
IRF pathway
IFN pathway
Human embryonic stem cell (hESC)/human induced-pluripotent stem cell (hiPSC)-derived hepatocytes25–90%Low TLR expressionClose to PHHs depending on differentiation status; can support long-term infection, can be generated from donors with different genetic backgrounds; immature status needs to be improved[72,76,80,81,82]
Low STING expression
NF-κB pathway
IRF pathway
IFN pathway
HepaRG~10% in the presence of PEG, maximum rate is 20%Low TLR expressionClose to PHHs; [78,79,83,84]
Low STING expressionsuitable for drug metabolism and HBV infection; can be differentiated into both biliary cells and hepatocytes; a long period for differentiation is needed (at least two weeks)
RIG-I/MDA5
NF-κB pathway
IRF pathway
IFN pathway
HepG2-NTCP~70% infection efficiency at 4% PEG and 2.5% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO)Poorly characterizedCan be used to screen novel drugs and elucidate host–virus interaction; high concentrations of HBV genome equivalents are needed for a high infection rate[37,64,65,79,85,86,87,88,89,90]
TLR expression
No cyclic GMP-AMP synthase (cGAS)
expression and low STING expression
RIG-I/MDA5
NF-κB pathway
IRF pathway
IFN pathway
Huh7-NTCP~5% infection efficiency at 4% PEG and 2.5% DMSOPoorly characterizedLow HBV infection rate;
defects in some innate immunity pathways 		[37,64,65,79,88,89,90]
TLR expression
No cGAS and STING expression
Both RIG-I/MDA-5 and IFN pathway are present but weaker than HepG2
HepG2.2.15HBV genome integrated the into HepG2 genomeNo cGAS expression and low Can be used to screen anti-HBV drugs Unsuitable for studying HBV entry and uncoating[37,62,86,87,91,92]
STING expression
RIG-I/MDA5
NF-κB pathway
IRF pathway
IFN pathway

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Megahed, F.A.K.; Zhou, X.; Sun, P. The Interactions Between HBV and the Innate Immunity of Hepatocytes. Viruses 2020, 12, 285. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/v12030285

AMA Style

Megahed FAK, Zhou X, Sun P. The Interactions Between HBV and the Innate Immunity of Hepatocytes. Viruses. 2020; 12(3):285. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/v12030285

Chicago/Turabian Style

Megahed, Fayed Attia Koutb, Xiaoling Zhou, and Pingnan Sun. 2020. "The Interactions Between HBV and the Innate Immunity of Hepatocytes" Viruses 12, no. 3: 285. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/v12030285

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop