Next Article in Journal
Immunopathology of RSV: An Updated Review
Next Article in Special Issue
Escalated (Dependent) Oxycodone Self-Administration Is Associated with Cognitive Impairment and Transcriptional Evidence of Neurodegeneration in Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Transgenic Rats
Previous Article in Journal
New Approaches to Multi-Parametric HIV-1 Genetics Using Multiple Displacement Amplification: Determining the What, How, and Where of the HIV-1 Reservoir
Previous Article in Special Issue
Synergistic Impairment of the Neurovascular Unit by HIV-1 Infection and Methamphetamine Use: Implications for HIV-1-Associated Neurocognitive Disorders
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Viruses
Volume 13
Issue 12
10.3390/v13122476
viruses-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Prior Methamphetamine Use Disorder History Does Not Impair Interoceptive Processing of Soft Touch in HIV Infection

by
Amanda Bischoff-Grethe
1,*,
Ronald J. Ellis
2,
Susan F. Tapert
1,
Martin P. Paulus
3,
Igor Grant
1 and
Translational Methamphetamine AIDS Research Center (TMARC)
†
1
Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego 9500 Gilman Drive, MC 0738 La Jolla, San Diego, CA 92093, USA
2
Department of Neurosciences, University of California, La Jolla, San Diego, CA 92093, USA
3
Laureate Institute for Brain Research, Tulsa, OK 74136, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
Members of TMARC are listed in the acknowledgements.
Viruses 2021, 13(12), 2476; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/v13122476
Submission received: 13 November 2021 / Revised: 5 December 2021 / Accepted: 8 December 2021 / Published: 10 December 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue HIV and Drugs of Abuse)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Introduction: Interoception, defined as the sense of the internal state of one’s body, helps motivate goal-directed behavior. Prior work has shown that methamphetamine (METH) use disorder is associated with altered interoception, and that this may contribute to risky behavior. As people with HIV (PWH) may also experience disrupted bodily sensations (e.g., neuropathy), an important question is whether PWH with a history of METH use disorder might exhibit greater impairment of interoceptive processing. Methods: Eighty-three participants stratified by HIV infection and a past history of methamphetamine use disorder experienced a soft touch paradigm that included slow brush strokes on the left forearm and palm during blood-oxygen level-dependent functional MRI acquisition. To assess differences in interoception and reward, voxelwise analyses were constrained to the insula, a hub for the evaluation of interoceptive cues, and the striatum, which is engaged in reward processing. Results: Overall, individuals with a history of METH use disorder had an attenuated neural response to pleasant touch in both the insula and striatum. Longer abstinence was associated with greater neural response to touch in the insula, suggesting some improvement in responsivity. However, only PWH with no METH use disorder history had lower brain activation in the insula relative to non-using seronegative controls. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that while METH use disorder history and HIV infection independently disrupt the neural processes associated with interoception, PWH with METH use disorder histories do not show significant differences relative to non-using seronegative controls. These findings suggest that the effects of HIV infection and past methamphetamine use might not be additive with respect to interoceptive processing impairment.

1. Introduction

The use of methamphetamine (METH) among individuals at risk for HIV transmission has been called a “double epidemic” [1]; it significantly contributes to HIV transmission by enhancing risky behavior [2], and it may be associated with delays in HIV diagnosis and treatment initiation [3]. More important, its continued use in people with HIV (PWH) has been associated with reduced effectiveness of antiretroviral treatment [4] and higher plasma viral load [5,6], possibly due to poor medication adherence [5]. Independently, both HIV infection and METH can alter brain structure [7,8] and function [9,10,11,12], yet very little is known about their interaction. Some neuroimaging studies suggest there is an additive effect, whereby METH exacerbates the effects of HIV infection on brain metabolites [13] or cerebral blood flow [14]. Alternatively, structural neuroimaging studies report that METH use disorder in PWH may provide a mitigation effect [15], as it does not significantly moderate measures of cortical surface area, volume, or thickness [16]. Only one functional neuroimaging study to date has examined the effects of METH use disorder with HIV infection and determined that METH may mitigate the effects of HIV infection on striatal activation during a motor switching task [17]. Thus, despite the relative prevalence of METH use in PWH, little is known about their interaction on brain function.
Interoception, defined as the sense of the physiologic condition of the body, is an important process for maintaining homeostasis [18]. These bodily sensations, such as pain [19], temperature [20], and sensual touch [21,22], are carried by unmyelinated primary afferent C-fibers and involve a distinct neural pathway that includes the lateral spino-thalamic tract, midbrain homeostatic nuclei, the ventromedial thalamus and the posterior insular cortex [23]. These signals are later integrated within the anterior insula cortex [18], which is integrally connected with subcortical [24], limbic [25], and executive control brain systems [26], enabling an individual to assess internal sensations and act upon them. Notably, the ventral anterior and middle insula process social-emotional and sensorimotor information [27], enabling the integration of interoceptive stimuli with an emotional response that will lead to an action or decision [28], suggesting that interoception may have a profound impact on cognitive decision making.
Altered interoceptive neural processing may impair the interpretation of and response to affective stimuli. Prior work in individuals with past METH use disorder histories has demonstrated an attenuated response in the insula to touch anticipation and receipt relative to healthy individuals [29], suggesting that METH may disrupt interoceptive processing. Additionally, the striatum in individuals with prior METH use disorder exhibited lower response to touch anticipation but higher response to touch receipt relative to healthy individuals, demonstrating that reward processing was also perturbed. METH use also affects the release of dopamine and serotonin [30], both of which are integral to the affective touch system [31], as well as dysregulates glutamate transmission within the prefrontal cortex and insula [32,33]. Altered interoception associated with METH may thus be an important process underlying changes in risky and reward-related behaviors.
HIV infection is also associated with decreased dopamine levels [34] and glutamate-evoked toxicity [35], and this may be associated with distal neuropathic pain in PWH [36]. Pro-inflammatory cytokines in the peripheral system may also contribute to distal neuropathic pain through stimulation of unmyelinated C-fibers [37,38,39]. Recent evidence also suggests that the insula may be influenced by peripheral inflammation [40,41], thereby disrupting interoceptive signaling and associated cognitive processes. Importantly, peripheral neuropathy in PWH can persist despite viral suppression with antiretroviral therapy, even in individuals without prior exposure to neurotoxic nucleoside antiretrovirals [42]. Studies have previously reported reduced sensitivity to vibration in PWH [43]; however, no study to date has examined pleasant touch, which also activates C-fibers [44]. Given that allodynia is also a symptom of distal sensory polyneuropathy [45], pleasant touch in PWH could be attenuated or even feel painful. Other studies have reported that substance use increased the risk of distal sensory polyneuropathy in PWH [46]. Given that METH use is associated with an increased risk of HIV infection, their comorbidity could be associated with significantly altered interoceptive processing.
This study is the first to examine whether PWH exhibit an altered interoceptive brain response to pleasant touch, and whether a history of METH use disorder is linked to greater impairment in interoceptive processing that could support exaggerated reward-seeking and risk-taking behaviors seen in comorbid METH dependence and HIV infection. While prior work has established altered insula and striatal response to affective touch in relation to METH use, this has yet to be demonstrated in PWH, nor is it well understood whether PWH with METH use histories will show further attenuation of neural responsivity. A soft touch task previously shown to activate the insula and striatum probed neural response to a pleasant interoceptive stimulus [29]. We hypothesized that, relative to healthy comparison individuals, both PWH and those with METH use disorder histories would show attenuated activation within the insula and striatum in response to the anticipation of and stimulation by pleasant touch. If the effects of METH use disorder and HIV infection are additive, PWH with METH use disorder histories would show further attenuation in the insula and striatum to the anticipation and receipt of pleasant touch relative to the other cohorts. Finally, we hypothesized that a lower neural response to touch would be associated with poorer clinical measures in both PWH and individuals with prior METH use disorder.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Participants

Eighty-seven participants were recruited through the Translational Methamphetamine AIDS Research Center, distributed across four groups: PWH with no history of METH use disorder (HIV+/METH−, N = 20), seronegative controls with a history of METH use disorder (HIV−/METH+, N = 20), PWH with histories of METH use disorder (HIV+/METH+, N = 18), and community controls with neither of the risk factors (HIV−/METH−, N = 29). HIV status was confirmed by MedMira Multiplo rapid test (MedMira Inc., Halifax, NS, Canada). All participants were seronegative for Hepatitis C virus (HCV) as determined by the MedMira Multiplo rapid test. Current CD4 T lymphocyte counts (cells/mL) were determined by flow cytometry at a Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA), or equivalent, certified medical center laboratory. HIV RNA levels were measured in plasma by reverse transcriptase PCR (Roche Amplicor, v. 1.5, lower limit of quantitation 50 copies/mL). CD4 nadir was obtained by self-report, with confirmation by documented prior measurements in a subset of individuals.
All METH+ participants met diagnostic (DSM-IV) [47] criteria for lifetime amphetamine dependence including abuse or dependence in the past 18 months as determined by the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI) [48]. METH− participants did not meet criteria for lifetime or current methamphetamine abuse or dependence. Exclusionary criteria for all groups were DSM-IV criteria for: alcohol dependence in the past year, other substance dependence in the last 5 years, other substance abuse (e.g., cocaine, opioids) within the last year, and remote (i.e., >5 years) but significant history of alcohol or other drug dependence. Given the high comorbidity of alcohol and marijuana abuse and marijuana dependence with methamphetamine use, METH+ individuals with such histories were not excluded.
Participants also were excluded for: positive urine toxicology screen or Breathalyzer for illicit drugs (other than marijuana due to its long-lasting detectability) or recent drinking on the day of scan; MRI contraindication; lifetime history of schizophrenia or other psychotic disorder; previous cerebrovascular events as determined by comprehensive neurological exam; head injury with loss of consciousness >30 min or neurologic complications; demyelinating diseases; or seizure disorder. Participants were recruited from the San Diego area via flyers and advertisements at community events and drug dependence treatment programs. All participants gave written consent prior to enrollment and again prior to scanning. The University of California, San Diego Human Research Protections Program approved all procedures.

2.2. Measures

As part of a larger assessment battery, participants completed the Wide Range Achievement Test-4 as a measure of premorbid intelligence and quality of education (WRAT-4) [49] and a comprehensive neuropsychological test battery [50]. A neurological exam was also included to assess for signs of clinical (bilateral distal vibration, sharp, and touch loss) and self-report symptoms (paresthesias, pain, numbness) of neuropathy, defined as 1 or more signs of a diminished ability to recognize vibration and reduced sharp-dull discrimination. On the scan day, participants also completed the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) [51].

2.3. Imaging Procedures

2.3.1. Soft Touch Paradigm

A soft boar bristle brush (OXO International Ltd., New York, NY, USA) was administered on 4 cm long regions of skin by a trained research assistant. For a given trial, stimulation occurred on either the ventral surface of the left forearm, a region believed to contain dense mechano-receptive C-fibers, and on the palm, where these fibers are absent [21,22,52]. These regions were both pre-measured and pre-marked for consistency, and each soft brush stroke occurred at a velocity of 2 cm/s in a proximal to distal direction, standardized by an audio tone that was routed only to the research assistant’s headphones [29,53,54]. This velocity has been previously shown to activate the posterior insula, and it is within the optimal range (1–10 cm/s) for C-fiber stimulation [52]. The force applied was equal to the brush’s weight.
Participants performed two functional runs of the task as part of a larger functional neuroimaging battery (Figure 1). During each functional run, participants were presented with a left or rightward pointing arrow on a gray rectangular background for 3 s. Participants were asked to quickly respond by pressing either the left or right button of a button box, with the direction corresponding to the direction of the arrow. The background of the arrow would change color to indicate one of three conditions: (1) the baseline condition (gray background), in which no stimulus was expected or administered, and averaging 9 s (three consecutive arrow trials) in duration; (2) anticipation of soft touch of the left forearm (yellow background), lasting 6 s, and which indicated the participant could expect a soft touch of the forearm; and (3) anticipation of soft touch of the left palm (blue background), also lasting 6 sec, indicating the participant should expect a soft touch of the palm. Following the anticipatory periods, the soft touch condition would occur for 3 s, whereby the brush was applied to the previously indicated location for the first 2 s of the trial. Overall, anticipation and soft touch occurred twenty times for each location (palm, forearm).
Response accuracy and reaction time were recorded for all trials. Following the neuroimaging session, participants also completed a visual analog scale (VAS) questionnaire to independently rate pleasantness, unpleasantness, and intensity of the soft touch of the forearm and palm, from “0—not at all” to “10—extremely.”

2.3.2. Image Acquisition

Data were acquired using T2* weighted echo planar imaging (EPI) on one of two scanning systems: a 3T General Electric Signa HDx (Milwaukee, WI, USA) or (252 volumes, TR = 2 s, TE = 30 ms, flip angle = 90°, FOV 24 cm, 64 × 64 matrix, 3.55 × 3.55 mm in-plane resolution with 40 3.0 mm (2.6 mm + 0.3 mm gap) ascending interleaved axial slices) or a 3T General Electric Discovery MR 750 (Milwaukee, WI, USA) (identical parameters as above except 3.75 × 3.75 mm in-plane resolution, 40 3.0 mm ascending interleaved axial slices). To permit activation localization and spatial normalization, the following were acquired: High-resolution T1-weighted FSPGR anatomical images (Signa HDx: flip angle = 8°, 256 × 256 matrix, 172 1 mm sagittal slices, TR = 7.77 s, TE = 2.97 ms, and 0.97 × 0.97 mm in-plane resolution; for MR 750, same as above except TR = 8.1 s, TE = 3.17 ms, 1 × 1 mm in-plane resolution). EPI-based field maps corrected susceptibility-induced geometric distortions. The gradients system and application were not changed during the scanner upgrade, and all post processing and analysis steps were consistent across datasets. Multisite imaging studies suggested that inter-participant variance far outweighs that of site or magnet variance [55]. There were no differences in HIV or METH status, or in other demographic factors based on scanning system employed (see Table 1).

2.3.3. Image Preprocessing

Functional images were preprocessed using Analysis of Functional NeuroImages (AFNI) [56] and FSL [57]. EPIs were slice-time corrected, motion-corrected, and aligned to high-resolution anatomical images using AFNI’s align_epi_anat.py [58]. Movement parameters were visually inspected for extensive motion exceeding 3 mm, and one HIV+/METH+ dataset was subsequently excluded. Time points with isolated head movements not corrected by coregistration were censored. T1-weighted images were skull-stripped using FreeSurfer’s mri_watershed [59] and registered to the MNI-152 atlas using affine transform followed by nonlinear refinement via FSL’s FLIRT and FNIRT [60,61]. Functional data were aligned to standard space, resampled to 3 mm isotropic voxels, and smoothed to a 6 mm FWHM using AFNI’s 3dBlurToFWHM. For each participant, AFNI’s 3dDeconvolve was used to determine activation related to the soft touch paradigm. Four task regressors (anticipation forearm, anticipation palm, soft touch forearm, soft touch palm) were convolved with a modified hemodynamic response function. Six motion regressors and first-, second-, and third-order polynomial trends were included as covariates of no interest. Following deconvolution, the four task-based beta regressors were converted to percent signal change.

2.4. Data Analysis

2.4.1. Behavioral Analysis

Response accuracy and reaction time of each button press were recorded from the onset of arrow presentation. Group level statistical analyses were performed in R (http://www.r-project.org, version 3.6.0, accessed on 26 April 2019) using a linear mixed effects (LME) model, from R’s nlme package [62]. The model HIV × METH × Condition (anticipation, soft touch) × Location (palm, forearm), with Condition and Location as within-subjects factors, was used to examine both response accuracy and reaction time. The VAS predictors for “pleasantness,” “unpleasantness,” and “intensity” were analyzed as dependent measures using linear mixed effects to test for group differences in subjective reports. For all models, post hoc analyses were performed using R’s emmeans to computer linear contrasts [63], the p-values were adjusted using the False Discovery Rate (FDR) [64], and standardized effect sizes were reported.

2.4.2. Regions of Interest

Regions of interest (ROIs) were derived from the Harvard-Oxford atlas [65]. Two bilateral ROIs were defined: an insula ROI, which contained the insula in its entirety, and a striatum ROI that included the caudate, putamen, and nucleus accumbens. These two ROIs were used as search regions for all group level fMRI analyses.

2.4.3. Neuroimaging Analysis

Group level statistical analyses were performed using the nlme package in R (http://www.r-project.org, version 3.6.0, accessed on 26 April 2019) to assess differences in blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) response. Data were analyzed using an HIV × METH × Condition (anticipation, soft touch) + Location (palm, forearm) linear mixed effects approach. Location was treated as a covariate, as prior studies have not demonstrated significant interactions with location [29,53,66,67]. For all analyses, subject was nested within scanner and treated as a random effect, with HIV, METH, Condition, and Location as fixed effects. Intrinsic smoothness was estimated using the spatial autocorrelation function (acf) option in AFNI’s 3dFWHMx. Minimum cluster sizes were calculated with AFNI’s 3dClustSim in order to guard against false positives. For ROI analyses, a peak voxel of p < 0.001 with a cluster threshold of α < 0.025 was required for significance. This approach employs non-Gaussian models and spatial autocorrelation functions and is more robust than traditional methods [68]. A minimum cluster size of 108 μL (4 contiguous voxels) each was required for the insula and the striatum for significance. An exploratory whole brain analysis examined group differences in activation across the whole brain (peak voxel p < 0.001, cluster threshold of α < 0.05, minimum cluster size 324 μL [12 contiguous voxels]) and is presented in the supplement (Supplemental Table S2). As with the behavioral data, R’s emmeans was used for post hoc analyses of significant clusters, and standardized effect sizes (ES) were reported.

2.4.4. Primary Robust Regression Analyses

Within-group Huber robust regressions were conducted in R to examine the relationship of clinical variables related to METH use history (age of first use, days since last use, METH use density (total quantity/total days)) within METH+ participants, and to HIV infection (illness duration in months, current CD4, nadir CD4) within HIV+ participants. Measures were natural log transformed and z-scored prior to regression. Individual regressions were performed against the mean percent signal change for anticipation palm, anticipation forearm, soft touch palm, and soft touch forearm. Significant clusters were determined within regions of interest using AFNI’s 3dClustSim for small volume correction with a peak voxel of p < 0.01. Results were Bonferroni corrected for the number of measures applied to each group, two ROIs, and four conditions (α < 0.0021).

3. Results

3.1. Participant Characteristics

Two participants (1 HIV−/METH−, 1 HIV−/METH+) were excluded due to problems with data acquisition, 1 HIV+/METH+ participant was excluded for psychosis, and 1 HIV+/METH+ participant was excluded for motion, leaving a final sample of 83 participants (28 HIV−/METH−, 19 HIV−/METH+, 20 HIV+/METH−, 16 HIV+/METH+). Study groups did not differ on sex, handedness, or ethnicity (Table 1). The four groups did not differ significantly with respect to age, and no HIV by METH interaction was seen. Participants with METH use disorder history (HIV−/METH+, HIV+/METH+) were significantly less educated than non-dependent participants, F(1, 79) = 5.74, p = 0.02, η p 2 = 0.068. Although there was no main effect of either METH use disorder or HIV diagnosis on WRAT-4 standard scores, the interaction of HIV with METH was significant, F(1, 79) = 6.13, p = 0.015, η p 2 = 0.072, with the HIV−/METH− and HIV+/METH+ groups scoring higher than the other two groups. The HIV+/METH− and HIV+/METH+ groups reported greater frequencies of distal symmetric polyneuropathy (p = 0.013), loss of sensation (p = 0.004), and paresthesia (p = 0.003). Groups did not differ on reports of neuropathic pain (p = 0.11) or dysesthesia (p = 0.11). There was a main effect of METH use disorder history on the BDI-II, such that participants with METH use disorder history scored higher than those with no prior METH use disorder history, F(1, 76) = 18.69, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.20. Individuals with METH use histories tended to have higher frequencies of most substance use disorders, as well as lifetime antisocial personality disorder, whereas all but the HIV−/METH− group had a higher frequency of lifetime major depressive disorder (Supplemental Table S1).
The HIV+/METH− and HIV+/METH+ groups did not significantly differ on infection duration ( η p 2 = 0.02), current CD4 count ( η p 2 = 0.03), or nadir CD4 count ( η p 2 = 0.01). The HIV−/METH+ and HIV+/METH+ groups did not significantly differ on age of first use ( η p 2 < 0.01), total days used ( η p 2 < 0.01), days since last use ( η p 2 < 0.01), total quantity ( η p 2 = 0.05), or use density ( η p 2 = 0.06).

3.2. VAS Scales

There were no significant effects of HIV status, METH status, or their interaction for VAS ratings in relation to pleasantness or unpleasantness of soft touch to either the palm or forearm, or of the intensity of soft touch to the palm, ps > 0.06. However, there was a main effect of HIV on the VAS ratings in relation to intensity of soft touch to the forearm, F(1, 79) = 5.02, p = 0.028, ES = 1.93, such that PWH rated touch as more intense than HIV− participants.

3.3. Behavioral Analyses

There were no significant main effects of HIV diagnosis, METH use disorder history, Condition, or Location with respect to correct responses, nor were any interactions significant (all ps > 0.055). There was a main effect of Condition, F(1, 237) = 25.77, p < 0.001, ES = 4.00, with participants responding more slowly during soft touch receipt than during anticipation. There was also an HIV × METH × Condition interaction, F(1, 237) = 6.05, p = 0.016. Post hoc analyses revealed that the HIV−/METH− had slower reaction times during soft touch receipt relative to anticipation, t(237) = 2.91, p = 0.023, ES = 3.77. This relationship was also seen for the HIV+/METH+ group, t(237) = 4.67, p < 0.001, ES = 8.00. No other significant main effects or interactions were detected.

3.4. Region of Interest Analyses

3.4.1. Main Effect of Condition

There was a main effect of Condition across all participants in the bilateral insula and striatum in their entirety, with an increased BOLD response to soft touch receipt relative to anticipation (Table 2).

3.4.2. HIV × Condition Interaction

An HIV × Condition interaction was detected within the left insula; however, post hoc analyses suggested that participants, regardless of HIV status, showed an elevated response to soft touch receipt relative to anticipation (Table 2, Figure 2).

3.4.3. METH × Condition Interaction

There were several clusters, predominately within the left insula, left dorsal caudate, left putamen, and left ventral striatum, demonstrating a METH × Condition interaction. In all clusters, post hoc analyses demonstrated that both METH− and METH+ individuals showed a greater response to soft touch receipt relative to touch anticipation (Table 2, Figure 3). However, clusters within the left posterior insula, the right anterior insula, and within the left dorsal caudate and posterior putamen additionally revealed that the BOLD response to soft touch receipt in METH+ individuals was attenuated relative to METH− individuals (Figure 3). METH+ individuals also had relatively greater BOLD response than METH− individuals to soft touch anticipation within the right anterior insula.

3.4.4. HIV × METH × Condition

Three clusters showing significant HIV × METH × Condition interactions were identified (Table 2, Figure 4). Within the bilateral anterior insula and the left dorsal middle insula, the HIV−/METH−, HIV+/METH−, and HIV+/METH+ cohorts demonstrated a stronger BOLD response to touch relative to anticipation. In contrast, the HIV−/METH+ group demonstrated this effect only within the left anterior insula, while within the right anterior insula the HIV−/METH+ group showed a greater BOLD response to anticipation relative to touch. Differences stratified by either HIV serostatus or METH use disorder history were also identified for both anticipation and receipt. Within HIV seronegative groups, METH+ exhibited greater BOLD responses to anticipation within the left dorsal middle insula, while METH− responded more strongly to touch receipt within the bilateral anterior insula and left dorsal middle insula. For METH+ groups, individuals who were seronegative for HIV responded more strongly to anticipation within the right anterior insula as well as the left dorsal middle insula, whereas PWH showed a greater BOLD response to touch receipt within the right anterior insula and left middle dorsal insula. Finally, within METH− groups, HIV seronegative individuals exhibited greater BOLD response to pleasant touch within the left anterior insula relation to HIV seropositive individuals. There were no significant findings for the HIV × METH interaction, nor were there significant main effects of either HIV or METH.

3.5. Associations with Clinical Variables

3.5.1. PWH

Huber robust regression suggested that lower CD4 nadir was associated with lower BOLD response within the right anterior insula, extending into the claustrum, to the anticipation of soft touch of the palm, t(34) = 1.72 (Figure 5A). Similarly, lower CD4 nadir was associated with a lower BOLD response within the left putamen to the anticipation of soft touch of the forearm, t(34) = 1.42.

3.5.2. Individuals with a History of METH Use Disorder

Longer abstinence (as measured by days since last use) was associated with a higher BOLD response the left posterior insula to pleasant touch of the palm, t(34) = 7.22 (Figure 5B). A separate cluster within the left anterior insula also suggested that longer abstinence was associated with a higher BOLD response to pleasant touch of the forearm, t(34) = 4.25.

4. Discussion

The present study suggests that PWH with no METH use disorder history exhibit altered neural signals within the insula, a region involved in predicting and interpreting pleasant interoceptive stimuli in comparison to HIV−/METH− individuals. However, METH use disorder history in PWH did not appear to introduce additional interoceptive or reward processing impairment relative to PWH with no METH use disorder history. Rather, PWH with METH use disorder history were not statistically different in terms of touch anticipation and receipt relative to non-using seronegative controls, suggesting that the interaction of HIV infection with METH is not additive. Taken together, these findings support disrupted interoceptive processing, but additionally suggest this effect is minimized in PWH with histories of METH use disorder.

4.1. Significance of Findings

Overall, we did not find significant neural activation differences related solely to HIV status that were independent of METH use disorder history. Rather, for individuals without METH use disorder histories, PWH exhibited reduced neural activation to soft touch receipt in the left anterior insula relative to seronegative controls. Neuroanatomical studies have reported reduced cortical volume in PWH relative to seronegative controls in multiple regions, including the insula [69] and is further exacerbated in association with HIV-associated distal neuropathic pain in PWH [70,71,72]. Others have reported reduced intrinsic resting state activity within the insula in PWH, [73] and, more broadly, reduced functional connectivity between the insula and other regions involved in the salience network [74,75,76,77]. More recent work has reported increased right anterior insula activation to expectation of pain offset PWH with distal neuropathic pain relative to PWH without this condition [78], suggesting abnormal processing of pain relief in those with chronic pain. Our own work has reported greater activation in the anterior insula to risky decisions in PWH relative to HIV seronegative individuals [9]; however, this could have been due to increased activation in the caudate nucleus, anterior cingulate, and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, as these regions are reciprocally connected with the anterior insula [79]. An attenuated response to soft touch could reflect changes in interoceptive awareness. Although PWH, regardless of METH history, reported similar levels of pleasantness relative to seronegative controls, they also reported that pleasant touch felt more intense. Our findings therefore suggest that there could be changes in the interpretation of affective touch that predate neurological symptoms, as the majority of our participants did not meet the threshold for distal polyneuropathy. Additional research is needed to better address this question.
We did detect a two-way interaction of METH use disorder history with Condition, whereby METH+ individuals, regardless of HIV status, demonstrated an attenuated response to soft touch receipt within the left posterior insula, right anterior insula, left dorsal caudate, and left posterior putamen relative to non-using individuals. METH has consistently been linked to deficits in striatal functioning to reward processing and risk behavior [12,80,81], as well as to interoceptive deficits in the insula [29,82,83]. Moreover, others have reported reduced insula activation during other tasks, including cognitive control [84] and decision making [85]. Our findings are consistent with the broader literature of attenuated response to pleasant stimuli in the striatum, supporting a general thesis that METH is associated with an impaired ability to process reward, along with an attenuated insula response that is indicative of an impaired ability to predict the bodily experience to exteroceptive stimuli.
Our results also demonstrated that prior METH use disorder history may interact with HIV serostatus, suggesting a possible synergistic effect on BOLD activation within the insula. The HIV−/METH+ group demonstrated reduced BOLD response to pleasant touch in the bilateral anterior insula and left dorsomedial insula. A similar relationship was found for METH− individuals, as HIV infection was associated with a lower BOLD response in the left anterior insula. However, for individuals with METH use disorder histories, PWH had greater responses to pleasant touch in the right anterior insula relative to seronegative individuals. Moreover, the HIV+/METH+ group was not statistically different from the HIV−/METH− group. Prior work examining brain morphometry has reported smaller cortical and subcortical volume and thinner cortex in PWH relative to seronegative controls, and modest reductions in cortical thickness in individuals with prior METH history, yet no significant differences in their interaction [15,16]. Similarly, others have reported nonsignificant interactions of METH and HIV infection in brain metabolites [13,86] or cerebral blood flow [14] although it has been suggested that effects of HIV and METH could be additive [13,14].
In contrast, others have reported that while main effects of HIV or METH during a complex motor task were associated with attenuated BOLD responses in the striatum and insula, the BOLD activation in the HIV+/METH+ group was more similar to HIV−/METH− [17]. In seronegative individuals, active METH use increases extracellular dopamine due to the reduction of dopaminergic transporters, increases glutamate levels, and activates inflammatory pathways [30]. HIV infection has also been associated with elevated levels of glutamate [87], impaired dopaminergic functioning [88], and inflammation. Little is known about the interaction of METH use disorder with HIV infection on inflammation, although evidence suggests it could be exacerbated, as METH-using PWH show greater cognitive impairment [89]. Both HIV infection and METH use affect the peripheral immune system, typically by elevating inflammatory cytokines and chemokines [90,91], and the comorbid use of METH in the context of HIV may additionally impact immune system homeostasis. Moreover, dopamine also regulates immune functioning, and immune systems can subsequently influence dopamine signaling [92], thereby modulating tactile perception and perceived intensity [93]. However, prolonged abstinence from METH in seronegative individuals has also been shown to largely normalize glutamate levels [94], as well as promote significant recovery of dopaminergic transporters in the brain [95]. As METH abstinence has been linked to lower viral loads in PWH [96], this could suggest some reduction of excess glutamate, which is associated with inflammation, along with less dysregulation of dopaminergic systems. For the purpose of pleasant touch, it is possible that METH abstinence in PWH might lead to modest improvements in dopamine and glutamate function, allowing for neural activity that appears more similar to non-using seronegative controls. Others have suggested that improvements related to prolonged abstinence from METH use are specific to younger PWH, as the combination of prior neurotoxicity coupled with the aging process might be especially impactful [97]. More comprehensive studies are needed to address this question.
Within all PWH, there was a modest association of lower CD4 nadir with lower BOLD responses to soft touch anticipation in the right anterior insula and left putamen. Other studies have linked lower nadir CD4 to altered risk-related neural processing [9,98]. Lower CD4 nadir has also been linked to cortical thinning and reduced cortical gray matter volume [16,99,100,101], although others have reported no associations [102,103]. Our findings provide further support for associations between historical immunocompromise and vulnerability of HIV-related neural injury [104], including for interoception. Among individuals with METH use disorder histories, longer abstinence was associated with higher activation in the insula to receipt of pleasant touch. Other studies of interoceptive processing have not found this association; however, those studies were in recently abstinent individuals [29], suggesting that longer periods of abstinence could lead to improvements in interoceptive neural processing.

4.2. Limitations

This study has several limitations. It is not possible to determine whether findings are related to premorbid traits or whether findings are a consequence of METH exposure or presence of HIV infection. It is also possible that the initiation of METH use relative to HIV seroconversion might play a role [105]. Although our analyses were focused on METH use disorder history in the context of HIV infection, we did not exclude participants for marijuana, alcohol, or nicotine use, as these substances often overlap with METH use. It is possible that MRI eligibility and willingness to participate may have induced sampling bias due to a relatively healthier study population. This study also assessed the anticipatory response to predictable and certain events, and it’s possible the level of predictability may have influenced the anticipatory response. The inclusion of a continuous performance task and an anticipatory phase may also have mitigated our ability to detect meaningful differences related to C-fiber stimulation. Attention [106] and other contextual information, such as visual stimuli or one’s internal motivational state, [107,108,109] can modulate one’s sensory awareness. Finally, smaller sample size, particularly for the HIV+/METH+ group, could mean our results are not generalizable, and larger studies are needed.

5. Conclusions

The present study examined the independent and combined effects of HIV infection and methamphetamine use disorder history on pleasant touch, an interoceptive process. We found that while METH use disorder history, regardless of HIV status, attenuated insular and striatal response to pleasant touch, a reduced response to pleasant touch in PWH was only seen in the insula for the non-using cohort. Finally, HIV+/METH+ individuals did not show statistically significant differences in neural activation from METH− seronegative controls. These findings suggest that METH and HIV may differentially affect interoceptive processing.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://0-www-mdpi-com.brum.beds.ac.uk/article/10.3390/v13122476/s1. Table S1: Statistical comparisons were by means of fisher-exact tests for equality of proportions; Table S2: Significant BOLD activation for the Location (Palm, Forearm) + HIV × METH × Condition (Anticipation, Receipt) linear mixed effects whole brain analysis.

Author Contributions

A.B.-G.: conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, funding acquisition, study performance, writing—original draft, writing—review and editing; R.J.E.: formal analysis, funding acquisition, writing—review and editing; S.F.T.: writing—review and editing; M.P.P.: conceptualization, funding acquisition, study design, writing—review and editing; I.G.: funding acquisition, study design, study performance, writing—review and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Supported by a grant from the National Institute of Health, (P50DA026306). The funding source had no additional input in the study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, writing of the report, or in the decision to submit the article for publication.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Review Board at University of California, San Diego.

Informed Consent Statement

Subjects gave written informed consent for inclusion in the study.

Data Availability Statement

Data will be made available on request.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Stephan J. Jordan and Colm J. Connolly for assisting with data collection and preliminary analyses. The Translational Methamphetamine AIDS Research Center (TMARC) is supported by Center award P50DA026306 from the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) and is affiliated with the University of California, San Diego (UCSD), the Sanford-Burnham Medical Discovery Institute (SBMDI), and the University of California, Irvine (UCI). The TMARC comprises: Administrative Coordinating Core (ACC): Executive Unit: Director: Igor Grant; Co-Directors: Ronald J. Ellis, Scott L. Letendre and Cristian L. Achim; Center Manager: Mariana Cherner; Associate Center Managers: Erin E. Morgan and Jared Young; Data Management and Information Systems (DMIS) Unit: Anthony C. Gamst and Clint Cushman; ACC: Statistics Unit: Florin Vaida, Ian S. Abramson, Reena Deutsch, and Anya Umlauf; ACC Participant Unit: J. Hampton Atkinson, and Jennifer Marquie-Beck, MPH (Unit Manager); Behavioral Assessment and Medical (BAM) Core: Neuromedical and Laboratory Unit (NLU): Scott L. Letendre, and Ronald J. Ellis; BAM Core: Neuropsychiatric Unit (NPU): Robert K. Heaton, J. Hampton Atkinson, Thomas D. Marcotte, Erin E. Morgan, and Matthew Dawson; Neuroimaging (NI) Core: Gregory G. Brown, Thomas T. Liu, Miriam Scadeng, Christine Fennema-Notestine, Sarah L. Archibald, John R. Hesselink, Mary Jane Meloy, and Craig E.L. Stark; Neuroscience and Animal Models (NAM) Core: Cristian L. Achim, (Core Director) and Marcus Kaul; Pilot and Developmental (PAD) Core: Mariana Cherner, and Stuart A. Lipton; Project 1: Arpi Minassian, William Perry, Mark A. Geyer, and Jared W. Young; Project 2: Amanda Bischoff-Grethe, Assawin Gongvatana, Susan Tapert, and Martin Paulus, Project 3: Erin E. Morgan, and Igor Grant; Project 4: Samuel Barnes and Svetlana Semenova, Project 5: Marcus Kaul.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have no conflict of interest to disclose.

References

  1. Halkitis, P.N.; Parsons, J.T.; Stirratt, M.J. A double epidemic: Crystal methamphetamine drug use in relation to HIV transmission among gay men. J. Homosex. 2001, 41, 17–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Vu, N.T.; Maher, L.; Zablotska, I. Amphetamine-type stimulants and HIV infection among men who have sex with men: Implications on HIV research and prevention from a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Int. AIDS Soc. 2015, 18, 19273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Kuchinad, K.E.; Hutton, H.E.; Monroe, A.K.; Anderson, G.; Moore, R.D.; Chander, G. A qualitative study of barriers to and facilitators of optimal engagement in care among PLWH and substance use/misuse. BMC Res. Notes 2016, 9, 229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Ellis, R.J.; Childers, M.E.; Cherner, M.; Lazzaretto, D.; Letendre, S.; the HIV Neurobehavioral Research Center Group. Increased human immunodeficiency virus loads in active methamphetamine users are explained by reduced effectiveness of antiretroviral therapy. J. Infect. Dis. 2003, 188, 1820–1826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Moore, D.J.; Blackstone, K.; Woods, S.P.; Ellis, R.J.; Atkinson, J.H.; Heaton, R.K.; Grant, I.; the HNRC Group; the TMARC Group. Methamphetamine use and neuropsychiatric factors are associated with antiretroviral non-adherence. AIDS Care 2012, 24, 1504–1513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Feldman, M.B.; Thomas, J.A.; Alexy, E.R.; Irvine, M.K. Crystal methamphetamine use and HIV medical outcomes among HIV-infected men who have sex with men accessing support services in New York. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2015, 147, 266–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Jan, R.K.; Lin, J.C.; Miles, S.W.; Kydd, R.R.; Russell, B.R. Striatal volume increases in active methamphetamine-dependent individuals and correlation with cognitive performance. Brain Sci. 2012, 2, 553–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Chang, L.; Andres, M.; Sadino, J.; Jiang, C.S.; Nakama, H.; Miller, E.; Ernst, T. Impact of apolipoprotein E ε4 and HIV on cognition and brain atrophy: Antagonistic pleiotropy and premature brain aging. Neuroimage 2011, 58, 1017–1027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Connolly, C.G.; Bischoff-Grethe, A.; Jordan, S.J.; Woods, S.P.; Ellis, R.J.; Paulus, M.P.; Grant, I.; the Translational Methamphetamine Aids Research Center (TMARC) Group. Altered functional response to risky choice in HIV infection. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e111583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Gowin, J.L.; Stewart, J.L.; May, A.C.; Ball, T.M.; Wittmann, M.; Tapert, S.F.; Paulus, M.P. Altered cingulate and insular cortex activation during risk-taking in methamphetamine dependence: Losses lose impact. Addiction 2014, 109, 237–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Cohen, R.A.; Siegel, S.; Gullett, J.M.; Porges, E.; Woods, A.J.; Huang, H.; Zhu, Y.; Tashima, K.; Ding, M.Z. Neural response to working memory demand predicts neurocognitive deficits in HIV. J. Neurovirol. 2018, 24, 291–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. London, E.D.; Kohno, M.; Morales, A.M.; Ballard, M.E. Chronic methamphetamine abuse and corticostriatal deficits revealed by neuroimaging. Brain Res. 2015, 1628, 174–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Chang, L.; Ernst, T.; Speck, O.; Grob, C.S. Additive effects of HIV and chronic methamphetamine use on brain metabolite abnormalities. Am. J. Psychiatry 2005, 162, 361–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Ances, B.M.; Vaida, F.; Cherner, M.; Yeh, M.J.; Liang, C.L.; Gardner, C.; Grant, I.; Ellis, R.J.; Buxton, R.B.; the HIV Neurobehavioral Research Center (HNRC) Group. HIV and chronic methamphetamine dependence affect cerebral blood flow. J. Neuroimmune Pharmacol. 2011, 6, 409–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Jernigan, T.L.; Gamst, A.C.; Archibald, S.L.; Fennema-Notestine, C.; Mindt, M.R.; Marcotte, T.D.; Heaton, R.K.; Ellis, R.J.; Grant, I. Effects of methamphetamine dependence and HIV infection on cerebral morphology. Am. J. Psychiatry 2005, 162, 1461–1472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. MacDuffie, K.E.; Brown, G.G.; McKenna, B.S.; Liu, T.T.; Meloy, M.J.; Tawa, B.; Archibald, S.; Fennema-Notestine, C.; Atkinson, J.H., Jr.; Ellis, R.J.; et al. Effects of HIV Infection, methamphetamine dependence and age on cortical thickness, area and volume. NeuroImage Clin. 2018, 20, 1044–1052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Archibald, S.L.; Jacobson, M.W.; Fennema-Notestine, C.; Ogasawara, M.; Woods, S.P.; Letendre, S.; Grant, I.; Jernigan, T.L. Functional interactions of HIV-infection and methamphetamine dependence during motor programming. Psychiatry Res. Neuroimaging 2012, 202, 46–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Craig, A.D. Interoception: The sense of the physiological condition of the body. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2003, 13, 500–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. LaMotte, R.H.; Thalhammer, J.G.; Torebjork, H.E.; Robinson, C.J. Peripheral neural mechanisms of cutaneous hyperalgesia following mild injury by heat. J. Neurosci. 1982, 2, 765–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Craig, A.D.; Bushnell, M.C. The thermal grill illusion: Unmasking the burn of cold pain. Science 1994, 265, 252–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Olausson, H.; Lamarre, Y.; Backlund, H.; Morin, C.; Wallin, B.G.; Starck, G.; Ekholm, S.; Strigo, I.; Worsley, K.; Vallbo, A.B.; et al. Unmyelinated tactile afferents signal touch and project to insular cortex. Nat. Neurosci. 2002, 5, 900–904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Vallbo, A.; Olausson, H.; Wessberg, J.; Norrsell, U. A system of unmyelinated afferents for innocuous mechanoreception in the human skin. Brain Res. 1993, 628, 301–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Craig, A.D. How do you feel? Interoception: The sense of the physiological condition of the body. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2002, 3, 655–666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Chikama, M.; McFarland, N.R.; Amaral, D.G.; Haber, S.N. Insular cortical projections to functional regions of the striatum correlate with cortical cytoarchitectonic organization in the primate. J. Neurosci. 1997, 17, 9686–9705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Reynolds, S.M.; Zahm, D.S. Specificity in the projections of prefrontal and insular cortex to ventral striatopallidum and the extended amygdala. J. Neurosci. 2005, 25, 11757–11767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Jasmin, L.; Burkey, A.R.; Granato, A.; Ohara, P.T. Rostral agranular insular cortex and pain areas of the central nervous system: A tract-tracing study in the rat. J. Comp. Neurol. 2004, 468, 425–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Klein, T.A.; Ullsperger, M.; Danielmeier, C. Error awareness and the insula: Links to neurological and psychiatric diseases. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2013, 7, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Craig, A.D. Significance of the insula for the evolution of human awareness of feelings from the body. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2011, 1225, 72–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. May, A.C.; Stewart, J.L.; Migliorini, R.; Tapert, S.F.; Paulus, M.P. Methamphetamine dependent individuals show attenuated brain response to pleasant interoceptive stimuli. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2013, 131, 238–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Paulus, M.P.; Stewart, J.L. Neurobiology, Clinical Presentation, and Treatment of Methamphetamine Use Disorder: A Review. JAMA Psychiatry 2020, 77, 959–966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Walker, S.C.; McGlone, F.P. The social brain: Neurobiological basis of affiliative behaviours and psychological well-being. Neuropeptides 2013, 47, 379–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Kalivas, P.W. The glutamate homeostasis hypothesis of addiction. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2009, 10, 561–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Tang, J.; O’Neill, J.; Alger, J.R.; Shen, Z.; Johnson, M.C.; London, E.D. N-Acetyl and Glutamatergic Neurometabolites in Perisylvian Brain Regions of Methamphetamine Users. Int. J. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2019, 22, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Kumar, A.M.; Ownby, R.L.; Waldrop-Valverde, D.; Fernandez, B.; Kumar, M. Human immunodeficiency virus infection in the CNS and decreased dopamine availability: Relationship with neuropsychological performance. J. Neurovirology 2011, 17, 26–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Vázquez-Santiago, F.J.; Noel, R.J., Jr.; Porter, J.T.; Rivera-Amill, V. Glutamate metabolism and HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders. J. Neurovirology 2014, 20, 315–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Xu, J.; Umlauf, A.; Letendre, S.; Franklin, D.; Bush, W.S.; Atkinson, J.H.; Keltner, J.; Ellis, R.J. Catechol-O-methyltransferase polymorphism Val158Met is associated with distal neuropathic pain in HIV-associated sensory neuropathy. AIDS 2019, 33, 1575–1582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Chatterjea, D.; Martinov, T. Mast cells: Versatile gatekeepers of pain. Mol. Immunol. 2015, 63, 38–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Forsythe, P.; Bienenstock, J. The mast cell-nerve functional unit: A key component of physiologic and pathophysiologic responses. Chem. Immunol. Allergy 2012, 98, 196–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Lowy, D.B.; Makker, P.G.S.; Moalem-Taylor, G. Cutaneous Neuroimmune Interactions in Peripheral Neuropathic Pain States. Front. Immunol. 2021, 12, 660203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Aruldass, A.R.; Kitzbichler, M.G.; Morgan, S.E.; Lim, S.; Lynall, M.E.; Turner, L.; Vertes, P.; Wellcome Trust Consortium for Neuroimmunology of Mood Disorders and Alzheimer’s Disease (NIMA); Alzheimer’s, D.; Cavanagh, J.; et al. Dysconnectivity of a brain functional network was associated with blood inflammatory markers in depression. Brain Behav. Immun. 2021, 98, 299–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Savitz, J.; Harrison, N.A. Interoception and Inflammation in Psychiatric Disorders. Biol. Psychiatry Cogn. Neurosci. Neuroimaging 2018, 3, 514–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Ellis, R.J.; Diaz, M.; Sacktor, N.; Marra, C.; Collier, A.C.; Clifford, D.B.; Calcutt, N.; Fields, J.A.; Heaton, R.K.; Letendre, S.L.; et al. Predictors of worsening neuropathy and neuropathic pain after 12 years in people with HIV. Ann. Clin. Transl. Neurol. 2020, 7, 1166–1173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Karpul, D.; McIntyre, S.; van Schaik, A.; Breen, P.P.; Heckmann, J.M. Vibrotactile sensitivity of patients with HIV-related sensory neuropathy: An exploratory study. Brain Behav. 2019, 9, e01184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. McGlone, F.; Wessberg, J.; Olausson, H. Discriminative and affective touch: Sensing and feeling. Neuron 2014, 82, 737–755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Liljencrantz, J.; Olausson, H. Tactile C fibers and their contributions to pleasant sensations and to tactile allodynia. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 2014, 8, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Robinson-Papp, J.; Gelman, B.B.; Grant, I.; Singer, E.; Gensler, G.; Morgello, S.; the National NeuroAIDS Tissue Consortium. Substance abuse increases the risk of neuropathy in an HIV-infected cohort. Muscle Nerve 2012, 45, 471–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: DSM:VI-TR, 4th ed.; American Psychiatric Association: Washington, DC, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  48. Kessler, R.C.; Üstün, T.B. The World Mental Health (WMH) Survey Initiative Version of the World Health Organization (WHO) Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI). Int. J. Methods Psychiatr. Res. 2004, 13, 93–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Wilkinson, G.S.; Robertson, G.J. Wide Range Achievement Test 4 Professional Manual; Psychological Assessment Resources: Lutz, FL, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  50. Heaton, R.K.; Clifford, D.B.; Franklin, D.R., Jr.; Woods, S.P.; Ake, C.; Vaida, F.; Ellis, R.J.; Letendre, S.L.; Marcotte, T.D.; Atkinson, J.H.; et al. HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders persist in the era of potent antiretroviral therapy: CHARTER Study. Neurology 2010, 75, 2087–2096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Beck, A.; Steer, R.; Brown, G. Manual for the Beck Depression Inventory-II; Psychological Corporation: San Antonio, TX, USA, 1996. [Google Scholar]
  52. Löken, L.S.; Wessberg, J.; Morrison, I.; McGlone, F.; Olausson, H. Coding of pleasant touch by unmyelinated afferents in humans. Nat. Neurosci. 2009, 12, 547–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Migliorini, R.; Stewart, J.L.; May, A.C.; Tapert, S.F.; Paulus, M.P. What do you feel? Adolescent drug and alcohol users show altered brain response to pleasant interoceptive stimuli. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2013, 133, 661–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Stewart, J.L.; May, A.C.; Tapert, S.F.; Paulus, M.P. Hyperactivation to pleasant interoceptive stimuli characterizes the transition to stimulant addiction. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2015, 154, 264–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Gountouna, V.-E.; Job, D.E.; McIntosh, A.M.; Moorhead, T.W.J.; Lymer, G.K.L.; Whalley, H.C.; Hall, J.; Waiter, G.D.; Brennan, D.; McGonigle, D.J.; et al. Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) reproducibility and variance components across visits and scanning sites with a finger tapping task. Neuroimage 2010, 49, 552–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Cox, R.W. AFNI: Software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. Comput. Biomed. Res. 1996, 29, 162–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Jenkinson, M.; Beckmann, C.F.; Behrens, T.E.; Woolrich, M.W.; Smith, S.M. Fsl. Neuroimage 2012, 62, 782–790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  58. Saad, Z.S.; Glen, D.R.; Chen, G.; Beauchamp, M.S.; Desai, R.; Cox, R.W. A new method for improving functional-to-structural MRI alignment using local Pearson correlation. Neuroimage 2009, 44, 839–848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  59. Ségonne, F.; Dale, A.M.; Busa, E.; Glessner, M.; Salat, D.; Kahn, H.K.; Fischl, B. A hybrid approach to the skull stripping problem in MRI. Neuroimage 2004, 22, 1060–1075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Andersson, J.L.R.; Jenkinson, M.; Smith, S. Non-Linear Registration, aka Spatial Normalisation; TR07JA2; FMRIB Centre: Oxford, UK, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  61. Jenkinson, M.; Smith, S. A global optimisation method for robust affine registration of brain images. Med Image Anal. 2001, 5, 143–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Pinheiro, J.C.; Bates, D.M.; DebRoy, S.; Sarkar, D.; Team, R.D.C. Nlme: Linear and Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models; R Package Version 3.1-109. 2013. Available online: https://cran.r-project.org/package=nlme (accessed on 26 April 2019).
  63. Lenth, R. Emmeans: Estimated Marginal Means, aka Least-Squares Means. 2020. [Google Scholar]
  64. Hothorn, T.; Bretz, F.; Westfall, P. Simultaneous inference in general parametric models. Biom. J. 2008, 50, 346–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Desikan, R.S.; Ségonne, F.; Fischl, B.; Quinn, B.T.; Dickerson, B.C.; Blacker, D.; Buckner, R.L.; Dale, A.M.; Maguire, R.P.; Hyman, B.T.; et al. An automated labeling system for subdividing the human cerebral cortex on MRI scans into gyral based regions of interest. Neuroimage 2006, 31, 968–980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Stewart, J.L.; Juavinett, A.L.; May, A.C.; Davenport, P.W.; Paulus, M.P. Do you feel alright? Attenuated neural processing of aversive interoceptive stimuli in current stimulant users. Psychophysiology 2015, 52, 249–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  67. Bischoff-Grethe, A.; Wierenga, C.E.; Berner, L.A.; Simmons, A.N.; Bailer, U.; Paulus, M.P.; Kaye, W.H. Neural hypersensitivity to pleasant touch in women remitted from anorexia nervosa. Transl. Psychiatry 2018, 8, 161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Eklund, A.; Nichols, T.E.; Knutsson, H. Cluster failure: Why fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, 7900–7905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  69. Kato, T.; Yoshihara, Y.; Watanabe, D.; Fukumoto, M.; Wada, K.; Nakakura, T.; Kuriyama, K.; Shirasaka, T.; Murai, T. Neurocognitive impairment and gray matter volume reduction in HIV-infected patients. J. Neurovirol. 2020, 26, 590–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Keltner, J.R.; Connolly, C.G.; Vaida, F.; Jenkinson, M.; Fennema-Notestine, C.; Archibald, S.; Akkari, C.; Schlein, A.; Lee, J.; Wang, D.; et al. HIV Distal Neuropathic Pain Is Associated with Smaller Ventral Posterior Cingulate Cortex. Pain Med. 2017, 18, 428–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Keltner, J.R.; Fennema-Notestine, C.; Vaida, F.; Wang, D.; Franklin, D.R.; Dworkin, R.H.; Sanders, C.; McCutchan, J.A.; Archibald, S.L.; Miller, D.J.; et al. HIV-associated distal neuropathic pain is associated with smaller total cerebral cortical gray matter. J. Neurovirol. 2014, 20, 209–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Keltner, J.R.; Tong, A.; Visser, E.; Jenkinson, M.; Connolly, C.G.; Dasca, A.; Sheringov, A.; Calvo, Z.; Umbao, E.; Mande, R.; et al. Evidence for a novel subcortical mechanism for posterior cingulate cortex atrophy in HIV peripheral neuropathy. J. Neurovirol. 2020, 26, 530–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Bak, Y.; Jun, S.; Choi, J.Y.; Lee, Y.; Lee, S.-K.; Han, S.; Shin, N.-Y. Altered intrinsic local activity and cognitive dysfunction in HIV patients: A resting-state fMRI study. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0207146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Chaganti, J.R.; Heinecke, A.; Gates, T.M.; Moffat, K.J.; Brew, B.J. Functional Connectivity in Virally Suppressed Patients with HIV-Associated Neurocognitive Disorder: A Resting-State Analysis. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2017, 38, 1623–1629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  75. Thomas, J.B.; Brier, M.R.; Snyder, A.Z.; Vaida, F.F.; Ances, B.M. Pathways to neurodegeneration: Effects of HIV and aging on resting-state functional connectivity. Neurology 2013, 80, 1186–1193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Guha, A.; Wang, L.; Tanenbaum, A.; Esmaeili-Firidouni, P.; Wendelken, L.A.; Busovaca, E.; Clifford, K.; Desai, A.; Ances, B.M.; Valcour, V. Intrinsic network connectivity abnormalities in HIV-infected individuals over age 60. J. Neurovirol. 2016, 22, 80–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Ortega, M.; Brier, M.R.; Ances, B.M. Effects of HIV and combination antiretroviral therapy on cortico-striatal functional connectivity. AIDS 2015, 29, 703–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  78. Strigo, I.A.; Keltner, J.; Ellis, R.; Simmons, A.N. Association of Painful Human Immunodeficiency Virus Distal Sensory Polyneuropathy with Aberrant Expectation of Pain Relief: Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Evidence. Brain Commun. 2021, 3, fcab260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Namkung, H.; Kim, S.-H.; Sawa, A. The Insula: An Underestimated Brain Area in Clinical Neuroscience, Psychiatry, and Neurology. Trends Neurosci. 2017, 40, 200–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  80. Bischoff-Grethe, A.; Connolly, C.G.; Jordan, S.J.; Brown, G.G.; Paulus, M.P.; Tapert, S.F.; Heaton, R.K.; Woods, S.P.; Grant, I.; the TMARC Group. Altered reward expectancy in individuals with recent methamphetamine dependence. J. Psychopharmacol. 2017, 31, 17–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  81. Völlm, B.A.; de Araujo, I.E.; Cowen, P.J.; Rolls, E.T.; Kringelbach, M.L.; Smith, K.A.; Jezzard, P.; Heal, R.J.; Matthews, P.M. Methamphetamine activates reward circuitry in drug naive human subjects. Neuropsychopharmacology 2004, 29, 1715–1722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  82. Verdejo-Garcia, A.; Clark, L.; Dunn, B.D. The role of interoception in addiction: A critical review. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2012, 36, 1857–1869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Stewart, J.L.; Khalsa, S.S.; Kuplicki, R.; Puhl, M.; Investigators, T.; Paulus, M.P. Interoceptive attention in opioid and stimulant use disorder. Addict. Biol. 2020, 25, e12831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Nestor, L.J.; Ghahremani, D.G.; Monterosso, J.; London, E.D. Prefrontal hypoactivation during cognitive control in early abstinent methamphetamine-dependent subjects. Psychiatry Res. Neuroimaging 2011, 194, 287–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  85. Stewart, J.L.; Connolly, C.G.; May, A.C.; Tapert, S.F.; Wittmann, M.; Paulus, M.P. Striatum and insula dysfunction during reinforcement learning differentiates abstinent and relapsed methamphetamine-dependent individuals. Addiction 2014, 109, 460–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  86. Taylor, M.J.; Schweinsburg, B.C.; Alhassoon, O.M.; Gongvatana, A.; Brown, G.G.; Young-Casey, C.; Letendre, S.L.; Grant, I. Effects of human immunodeficiency virus and methamphetamine on cerebral metabolites measured with magnetic resonance spectroscopy. J. Neurovirol. 2007, 13, 150–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Nagarajan, R.; Sarma, M.K.; Thomas, M.A.; Chang, L.; Natha, U.; Wright, M.; Hayes, J.; Nielsen-Saines, K.; Michalik, D.E.; Deville, J.; et al. Neuropsychological function and cerebral metabolites in HIV-infected youth. J. Neuroimmune Pharmacol. 2012, 7, 981–990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Illenberger, J.M.; Harrod, S.B.; Mactutus, C.F.; McLaurin, K.A.; Kallianpur, A.; Booze, R.M. HIV Infection and Neurocognitive Disorders in the Context of Chronic Drug Abuse: Evidence for Divergent Findings Dependent upon Prior Drug History. J Neuroimmune Pharmacol. 2020, 15, 715–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Rippeth, J.D.; Heaton, R.K.; Carey, C.L.; Marcotte, T.D.; Moore, D.J.; Gonzalez, R.; Wolfson, T.; Grant, I.; the HNRC Group. Methamphetamine dependence increases risk of neuropsychological impairment in HIV infected persons. J. Int. Neuropsychol. Soc. 2004, 10, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Williams, M.E.; Ipser, J.C.; Stein, D.J.; Joska, J.A.; Naudé, P.J.W. Peripheral immune dysregulation in the ART era of HIV-associated neurocognitive impairments: A systematic review. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2020, 118, 104689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Assis, M.A.; Carranza, P.G.; Ambrosio, E. A “Drug-Dependent” Immune System Can Compromise Protection against Infection: The Relationships between Psychostimulants and HIV. Viruses 2021, 13, 722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Matt, S.M.; Gaskill, P.J. Where Is Dopamine and how do Immune Cells See it?: Dopamine-Mediated Immune Cell Function in Health and Disease. J. Neuroimmune Pharmacol. 2020, 15, 114–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Kass-Iliyya, L.; Leung, M.; Marshall, A.; Trotter, P.; Kobylecki, C.; Walker, S.; Gosal, D.; Jeziorska, M.; Malik, R.A.; McGlone, F.; et al. The perception of affective touch in Parkinson’s disease and its relation to small fibre neuropathy. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2017, 45, 232–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Ernst, T.; Chang, L. Adaptation of brain glutamate plus glutamine during abstinence from chronic methamphetamine use. J. Neuroimmune Pharmacol. 2008, 3, 165–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  95. Volkow, N.D.; Wang, G.-J.; Smith, L.; Fowler, J.S.; Telang, F.; Logan, J.; Tomasi, D. Recovery of dopamine transporters with methamphetamine detoxification is not linked to changes in dopamine release. Neuroimage 2015, 121, 20–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Nance, R.M.; Trejo, M.E.P.; Whitney, B.M.; Delaney, J.A.C.; Altice, F.L.; Beckwith, C.G.; Chander, G.; Chandler, R.; Christopoulous, K.; Cunningham, C.; et al. Impact of Abstinence and of Reducing Illicit Drug Use Without Abstinence on Human Immunodeficiency Virus Viral Load. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2020, 70, 867–874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Iudicello, J.E.; Morgan, E.E.; Gongvatana, A.; Letendre, S.L.; Grant, I.; Woods, S.P.; the Translational Methamphetamine AIDS Research Center (TMARC) Group. Detrimental impact of remote methamphetamine dependence on neurocognitive and everyday functioning in older but not younger HIV+ adults: Evidence for a legacy effect? J. Neurovirology 2014, 20, 85–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Meade, C.S.; Cordero, D.M.; Hobkirk, A.L.; Metra, B.M.; Chen, N.-K.; Huettel, S.A. Compensatory activation in fronto-parietal cortices among HIV-infected persons during a monetary decision-making task. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2016, 37, 2455–2467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  99. Hassanzadeh-Behbahani, S.; Shattuck, K.F.; Bronshteyn, M.; Dawson, M.; Diaz, M.; Kumar, P.; Moore, D.J.; Ellis, R.J.; Jiang, X. Low CD4 nadir linked to widespread cortical thinning in adults living with HIV. NeuroImage: Clin. 2020, 25, 102155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Guha, A.; Brier, M.R.; Ortega, M.; Westerhaus, E.; Nelson, B.; Ances, B.M. Topographies of Cortical and Subcortical Volume Loss in HIV and Aging in the cART Era. J. Acquir. Immune Defic. Syndr. 2016, 73, 374–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  101. Jernigan, T.L.; Archibald, S.L.; Fennema-Notestine, C.; Taylor, M.J.; Theilmann, R.J.; Julaton, M.D.; Notestine, R.J.; Wolfson, T.; Letendre, S.L.; Ellis, R.J.; et al. Clinical factors related to brain structure in HIV: The CHARTER study. J. Neurovirol. 2011, 17, 248–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Ances, B.M.; Ortega, M.; Vaida, F.; Heaps, J.; Paul, R. Independent effects of HIV, aging, and HAART on brain volumetric measures. J. Acquir. Immune. Defic. Syndr. 2012, 59, 469–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  103. O’Connor, E.E.; Zeffiro, T.; Lopez, O.L.; Becker, J.T.; Zeffiro, T. HIV infection and age effects on striatal structure are additive. J. Neurovirol. 2019, 25, 480–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Cohen, R.A.; Harezlak, J.; Schifitto, G.; Hana, G.; Clark, U.; Gongvatana, A.; Paul, R.; Taylor, M.; Thompson, P.; Alger, J.; et al. Effects of nadir CD4 count and duration of human immunodeficiency virus infection on brain volumes in the highly active antiretroviral therapy era. J. Neurovirol. 2010, 16, 25–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  105. Montoya, J.L.; Cattie, J.; Morgan, E.; Woods, S.P.; Cherner, M.; Moore, D.J.; Atkinson, J.H.; Grant, I.; the Translational Methamphetamine Aids Research Center Group. The impact of age, HIV serostatus and seroconversion on methamphetamine use. Am. J. Drug Alcohol Abus. 2016, 42, 168–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Johansen-Berg, H.; Christensen, V.; Woolrich, M.; Matthews, P.M. Attention to touch modulates activity in both primary and secondary somatosensory areas. Neuroreport 2000, 11, 1237–1241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  107. Macaluso, E.; Driver, J. Spatial attention and crossmodal interactions between vision and touch. Neuropsychologia 2001, 39, 1304–1316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Triscoli, C.; Ackerley, R.; Sailer, U. Touch satiety: Differential effects of stroking velocity on liking and wanting touch over repetitions. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e113425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  109. Ellingsen, D.M.; Leknes, S.; Løseth, G.; Wessberg, J.; Olausson, H. The Neurobiology Shaping Affective Touch: Expectation, Motivation, and Meaning in the Multisensory Context. Front. Psychol. 2015, 6, 1986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Viruses 13 02476 g001 550
Figure 1. The soft touch continuous performance task. Participants anticipated or experienced a soft touch via controlled brush strokes on either the forearm (indicated by a yellow background) or palm (indicated by a blue background).
Figure 1. The soft touch continuous performance task. Participants anticipated or experienced a soft touch via controlled brush strokes on either the forearm (indicated by a yellow background) or palm (indicated by a blue background).
Viruses 13 02476 g001
Viruses 13 02476 g002 550
Figure 2. Bar plot showing a significant HIV × Condition interaction in the left anterior insula. Both HIV− and HIV+ participants exhibited a greater BOLD response to pleasant touch relative to anticipation. Error bars represent standard error of the mean. %SC: percent signal change. *** p < 0.001.
Figure 2. Bar plot showing a significant HIV × Condition interaction in the left anterior insula. Both HIV− and HIV+ participants exhibited a greater BOLD response to pleasant touch relative to anticipation. Error bars represent standard error of the mean. %SC: percent signal change. *** p < 0.001.
Viruses 13 02476 g002
Viruses 13 02476 g003 550
Figure 3. Bar plot showing a significant METH × Condition interaction with several clusters. (A) Within the left posterior insula and right anterior insula, both the METH− and METH+ groups demonstrated a greater BOLD response to touch receipt relative to anticipation. Within the right anterior insula, the METH+ group showed a greater BOLD response to anticipation relative to the METH− group; in contrast, the METH− group demonstrated greater BOLD response to touch receipt relative to the METH+ group. (B) Across all three striatal clusters, both METH− and METH+ groups showed greater BOLD response to touch receipt relative to anticipation, and the METH− group had greater BOLD response to touch receipt relative to METH+. %SC: percent signal change. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001.
Figure 3. Bar plot showing a significant METH × Condition interaction with several clusters. (A) Within the left posterior insula and right anterior insula, both the METH− and METH+ groups demonstrated a greater BOLD response to touch receipt relative to anticipation. Within the right anterior insula, the METH+ group showed a greater BOLD response to anticipation relative to the METH− group; in contrast, the METH− group demonstrated greater BOLD response to touch receipt relative to the METH+ group. (B) Across all three striatal clusters, both METH− and METH+ groups showed greater BOLD response to touch receipt relative to anticipation, and the METH− group had greater BOLD response to touch receipt relative to METH+. %SC: percent signal change. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001.
Viruses 13 02476 g003
Viruses 13 02476 g004 550
Figure 4. A significant HIV × METH × Condition interaction was detected in three separate clusters within the insula. For nearly all groups and clusters, participants had greater BOLD responses to touch receipt relative to touch anticipation (p value is denoted with vertical asterisks over anticipation bars). Within both the right anterior insula and left dorsal middle insula, both HIV−/METH− and HIV+/METH+ had significantly lower BOLD response to anticipation relative to HIV−/METH+, but greater BOLD response to touch receipt. Within the left anterior insula, HIV−/METH− had higher BOLD response to pleasant touch relative to the HIV+/METH− and HIV−/METH+ cohorts. %SC: percent signal change. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001.
Figure 4. A significant HIV × METH × Condition interaction was detected in three separate clusters within the insula. For nearly all groups and clusters, participants had greater BOLD responses to touch receipt relative to touch anticipation (p value is denoted with vertical asterisks over anticipation bars). Within both the right anterior insula and left dorsal middle insula, both HIV−/METH− and HIV+/METH+ had significantly lower BOLD response to anticipation relative to HIV−/METH+, but greater BOLD response to touch receipt. Within the left anterior insula, HIV−/METH− had higher BOLD response to pleasant touch relative to the HIV+/METH− and HIV−/METH+ cohorts. %SC: percent signal change. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001.
Viruses 13 02476 g004
Viruses 13 02476 g005 550
Figure 5. Clusters within insula and striatal regions with significant relationships to HIV or METH related clinical variables. (A) HIV+ individuals with lower CD4 nadir had lower BOLD responses to anticipation of touch in both the right anterior insula and left putamen. Figure 5. (B) METH+ participants with longer periods of abstinence had greater BOLD response to pleasant touch in the left anterior and posterior insula. %SC: percent signal change; LMDAZ: z-score of the log of days abstinent; LNCD4Z: z-score of the log of Nadir CD4.
Figure 5. Clusters within insula and striatal regions with significant relationships to HIV or METH related clinical variables. (A) HIV+ individuals with lower CD4 nadir had lower BOLD responses to anticipation of touch in both the right anterior insula and left putamen. Figure 5. (B) METH+ participants with longer periods of abstinence had greater BOLD response to pleasant touch in the left anterior and posterior insula. %SC: percent signal change; LMDAZ: z-score of the log of days abstinent; LNCD4Z: z-score of the log of Nadir CD4.
Viruses 13 02476 g005
Table
Table 1. Demographic and clinical characteristics of participants.
Table 1. Demographic and clinical characteristics of participants.
CharacteristicHIV−/METH−
(N = 28)		HIV+/METH−
(N = 20)		HIV−/METH+
(N = 19)		HIV+/METH+
(N = 16)		p-Value
Age (years)38.8 (11.2)40.1 (11.3)37.2 (8.66)41.5 (10.1)NS
Education (years)14.1 (2.05)13.8 (2.47)12.4 (2.31)13.4 (1.78)0.02
Male/Female ☨24/418/218/116/0NS
Handedness Right/Left ☨27/117/318/116/0NS
Ethnicity (% Caucasian) ☨64505363NS
Wide Range Achievement Test-4 Standard Score53.79 (9.12)49.55 (6.90)49.16 (7.53)53.88 (8.06)0.015
Distal Symmetric Polyneuropathy (n) ☨26270.01
Loss of Sensation (n) ☨03040.004
Paresthesia (n) ☨04150.003
Dysesthesia (n) ☨1114NS
Neuropathic pain (n) ☨1114NS
Beck Depression Inventory II a2.36 (3.23)7.70 (8.57)13.2 (9.28)12.4 (12.6)<0.001
GE Signa/GE MR750 System ☨10/183/1711/86/100.05
Methamphetamine Characteristics
Age of First Use 24.7 (8.36)25.1 (7.80)NS
Total Days Used 1934 (1511)1720 (2269)NS
Days Since Last Use a 182 (160)257 (190)NS
Total Quantity (g) 2733 (3290)1335 (2563)NS
Use Density 1.28 (1.34)0.75 (0.75)NS
Primary Route of Use ☨ SmokingSmokingNS
HIV Characteristics
Duration of Infection (months) b 113.2 (100.6) 139.3 (106.5)NS
Current antiretroviral use ☨ 14 12NS
Nadir CD4 Count 250.0 (170.5) 196.5 (171.2)NS
Current CD4 Count c 447.5 (283.2) 543.0 (259.5)NS
Note: values in parenthesis are standard deviations. GDS: Global Deficit Score; NS: not significant. ☨ Fisher’s Exact Test; a Missing 1 HIV−/METH+, 2 HIV+/METH+; b Missing 1 HIV+/METH−; c Missing 1 HIV+/METH+.
Table
Table 2. Regions of interest with significant BOLD activation for the Location (Palm, Forearm) + HIV × METH × Condition (Anticipation, Receipt) linear mixed effects analysis.
Table 2. Regions of interest with significant BOLD activation for the Location (Palm, Forearm) + HIV × METH × Condition (Anticipation, Receipt) linear mixed effects analysis.
Post Hoc Comparisons
StructureVolume (μL)XYZF(peak)Contrastt Ratiop-ValueES
MAIN EFFECT OF CONDITION
Left Insula Lobe14769−36−124133.42Touch > Condition11.67<0.0010.76
Right Insula Lobe137163616−1470.63Touch > Condition9.71<0.0010.56
Left Striatum15849−28−8−8124.88Touch > Condition10.16<0.0010.71
Right Striatum1188012−62473.95Touch > Condition8.76<0.0010.51
HIV × CONDITION
Left Insula108−4010013.52HIV−: Touch > Anticipation9.25<0.0010.66
HIV+: Touch > Anticipation6.60<0.0010.53
METH × CONDITION
Left Posterior Insula2322−36−12422.57METH−: Touch > Anticipation15.44<0.0010.99
METH+: Touch > Anticipation8.75<0.0010.65
Touch: METH− > METH+3.200.0030.22
Right Anterior Insula13503222−626.53METH−: Touch > Anticipation9.55<0.0010.60
METH+: Touch > Anticipation3.010.0040.22
Anticipation: METH+ > METH−2.260.030.15
Touch: METH− > METH+3.320.0030.23
Left Anterior Insula486−28241218.10METH−: Touch > Anticipation6.76<0.0010.70
METH+: Touch > Anticipation2.490.030.48
Left Dorsal Insula270−3401621.74METH−: Touch > Anticipation12.66<0.0010.57
METH+: Touch > Anticipation7.38<0.0010.34
Left Ventral Anterior Insula243−3016−817.89METH−: Touch > Anticipation10.97<0.0010.74
METH+: Touch > Anticipation5.64<0.0010.55
Left Anterior Insula189−4010014.67METH−: Touch > Anticipation10.72<0.0010.66
METH+: Touch > Anticipation6.91<0.0010.35
Left Dorsal Caudate Nucleus486−1641615.92METH−: Touch > Anticipation12.21<0.0010.92
METH+: Touch > Anticipation5.59<0.0010.64
Touch: METH− > METH+3.360.0020.21
Left Posterior Putamen/Claustrum243−34−14−214.32METH−: Touch > Anticipation13.29<0.0010.69
METH+: Touch > Anticipation8.01<0.0010.48
Touch: METH− > METH+2.820.010.15
Left Posterior Putamen162−28−20614.40METH−: Touch > Anticipation12.18<0.0010.65
METH+: Touch > Anticipation7.34<0.0010.41
Touch: METH− > METH+2.280.030.11
Left Ventral Striatum135−166−1214.25METH−: Touch > Anticipation9.29<0.0010.65
METH+: Touch > Anticipation5.00<0.0010.41
Left Posterior Putamen135−34−6418.44METH−: Touch > Anticipation12.15<0.0010.84
METH+: Touch > Anticipation7.42<0.0010.59
HIV × METH × CONDITION
Right Anterior Insula1893022−215.09Anticipation, HIV−: METH+ > METH−2.670.020.24
Touch, HIV−: METH− > METH+4.88<0.0010.44
HIV−/METH−: Touch > Anticipation5.08<0.0010.41
HIV+/METH−: Touch > Anticipation2.610.020.25
HIV−/METH+: Anticipation > Touch2.850.010.28
HIV+/METH+: Touch > Anticipation3.33<0.0010.35
Anticipation, METH+: HIV− > HIV+2.300.040.24
Touch, METH+: HIV+ > HIV−3.790.0010.39
Left Anterior Insula135−4012013.10Touch, HIV−: METH− > METH+3.280.0030.34
HIV−/METH−: Touch > Anticipation10.21<0.0010.90
HIV+/METH−: Touch > Anticipation3.93<0.0010.41
HIV−/METH+: Touch > Anticipation3.520.0020.38
HIV+/METH+: Touch > Anticipation5.71<0.0010.66
Touch, METH−: HIV− > HIV+3.520.0020.36
Left Dorsal Middle Insula135−36−21617.37Anticipation, HIV−: METH+ > METH−2.860.010.23
Touch, HIV−: METH− > METH+3.710.0010.30
HIV−/METH−: Touch > Anticipation10.08<0.0010.71
HIV+/METH−: Touch > Anticipation7.30<0.0010.61
HIV+/METH+: Touch > Anticipation8.40<0.0010.78
Anticipation, METH+: HIV− > HIV+2.880.010.27
Touch, METH+: HIV+ > HIV−3.650.0010.34
Note: Center of mass coordinates reported in MNI space. Small volume correction was determined with Monte-Carlo simulations (via AFNI’s 3dClustSim) to guard against false positives. ES: standardized effect size.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bischoff-Grethe, A.; Ellis, R.J.; Tapert, S.F.; Paulus, M.P.; Grant, I.; Translational Methamphetamine AIDS Research Center (TMARC). Prior Methamphetamine Use Disorder History Does Not Impair Interoceptive Processing of Soft Touch in HIV Infection. Viruses 2021, 13, 2476. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/v13122476

AMA Style

Bischoff-Grethe A, Ellis RJ, Tapert SF, Paulus MP, Grant I, Translational Methamphetamine AIDS Research Center (TMARC). Prior Methamphetamine Use Disorder History Does Not Impair Interoceptive Processing of Soft Touch in HIV Infection. Viruses. 2021; 13(12):2476. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/v13122476

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bischoff-Grethe, Amanda, Ronald J. Ellis, Susan F. Tapert, Martin P. Paulus, Igor Grant, and Translational Methamphetamine AIDS Research Center (TMARC). 2021. "Prior Methamphetamine Use Disorder History Does Not Impair Interoceptive Processing of Soft Touch in HIV Infection" Viruses 13, no. 12: 2476. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/v13122476

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop