Next Article in Journal
Emergence of High Pathogenicity Avian Influenza Virus H5N1 Clade 2.3.4.4b in Wild Birds and Poultry in Botswana
Next Article in Special Issue
Subjective and Objective Cognitive Impairments in Non-Hospitalized Persons 9 Months after SARS-CoV-2 Infection
Previous Article in Journal
Dynamics and Patterning of 5-Hydroxytryptamine 2 Subtype Receptors in JC Polyomavirus Entry
Previous Article in Special Issue
Elevated Plasma D-Dimer Concentrations in Adults after an Outpatient-Treated COVID-19 Infection
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Comprehensive Report of German Nationwide Inpatient Data on the Post-COVID-19 Syndrome Including Annual Direct Healthcare Costs

1
Department for Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany
2
Department for Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 4 October 2022 / Revised: 18 November 2022 / Accepted: 20 November 2022 / Published: 22 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Post-COVID Syndrome)

Abstract

:
Background: The aim of this study was to provide a comprehensive overview of German nationwide data including (i) the number of hospitalized Post-COVID Syndrome (PCS) cases including in-hospital mortality rates and intensive care unit treatments, (ii) the main common concomitant diagnoses associated with PCS, (iii) the most frequently performed treatment procedures, and (iv) the annual direct healthcare costs. Methods: The incidence was calculated based on annual ICD-10 diagnosis codes “U09.9!, Post-COVID-19 condition”. Data on concomitant diagnoses, treatment procedures, treatment in an intensive care unit (ICU), in-hospital mortality, the proportion of G-DRGs, and cumulative costs were assessed based on the Institute for the Hospital Remuneration System (InEK) data for 2019. Results: A total of 29,808 PCS inpatients could be identified yielding a prevalence of 5.5%. In total, 1330 (4.5%) in-hospital deaths were recorded, and 5140 (17.2%) patients required ICU treatment. The majority of patients (18.6%) were aged 65–74 years. The most common concomitant diagnoses included pneumonia, critical illness polyneuropathy, dyspnea, chronic fatigue syndrome, and pulmonary embolisms. The most frequently performed procedures were computed tomography of the thorax with contrast medium, whole-body plethysmography, and the monitoring of respiration, heart, and circulation. The cost per case of the G-DRG codes that were analyzed ranged from € 620 ± 377 (E64D, Respiratory insufficiency, one day of occupancy) to € 113,801 ± 27,939 (A06B, Ventilation > 1799 h with complex OR procedure). Total cumulative direct healthcare costs of € 136,608,719 were calculated, resulting in mean costs of € 4583 per case. Conclusion: Post-COVID Syndrome is of major public health importance with substantial financial implications. The present article can support stakeholders in health care systems to foresee future needs and adapt their resource management. Consensus diagnostic criteria and rehabilitation guidelines are highly warranted.

1. Introduction

The COVID-19 pandemic has put a tremendous burden on the global healthcare system. While substantial efforts have been made to understand the mechanisms underlying this disease, the long-term sequela remain largely uncertain. Post-COVID syndrome (PCS) was first described in spring 2020 by a patient-led research collaborative surveying prolonged COVID-19 symptoms [1]. According to the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), the condition is defined as a continuation of signs and symptoms consistent with COVID-19 for more than 12 weeks, which could not be explained by alternative diagnoses [2]. As diverse terminology, including “long COVID-19” or “post-acute COVID-19”, has been introduced in the literature, the WHO Classification and Terminologies unit responded with the creation of the International Classification of Diseases 10 (ICD-10) and ICD-11 codes for PCS [3].
A wide range of prevalence rates has been reported, ranging from 10% to 35% in an outpatient setting [4]; however, a working group from Italy showed that up to 87% of patients experienced the persistence of at least one symptom, especially fatigue and dyspnea, 60 days after recovery from COVID-19 [5]. Other studies revealed that neurocognitive long-COVID symptoms can persist more than one year after COVID-19 onset, reducing patients’ quality of life [6]. PCS has further been associated with a diversity of long-term symptoms such as fatigue, breathlessness, chest pain, cognitive impairment, dyspnea, olfactory and gustatory dysfunction, mental disorders, and insomnia, which can also occur after a relatively mild acute infection [4,5,7,8,9,10]. However, it is important to note that there is no consensus on the definition of PCS in terms of symptoms.
Moreover, research agendas addressing topics such as treatment, rehabilitation, and chronic care management are highly necessary as guidance for clinical decision-making remains scarce [11,12]. For instance, the so-called REHabilitation COVID-19 Evidence-based Response (REHCOVER) was launched in 2020 with the aim of the rapid dissemination of knowledge on COVID-19 and rehabilitation in the form of systematic reviews [13]. Notably, in their update on the 31 December 2020, they could only identify n = 2 out of n = 4441 studies reporting on late-onset consequences of COVID-19, and the authors concluded that the lack of high-level evidence studies remains the main limitation [14]. Thus, given that PCS will likely have a substantial public health impact, there is a need to quantify its burden [15,16]. In this stance, epidemiological analyses of large-registry data can be a valuable resource for stakeholders for estimating future demands and developments.
Therefore, the aim of this study was to provide a comprehensive overview of German nationwide data including (i) the number of hospitalized PCS cases, including in-hospital mortality rates and intensive care unit (ICU) treatments, (ii) the main common concomitant diagnoses associated with PCS, (iii) the most frequently performed treatment procedures, and (vi) the annual direct healthcare costs.

2. Materials and Methods

In this cross-sectional study, data consisting of annual ICD-10 diagnosis codes were retrieved from the Institute for the Hospital Remuneration System (InEK GmbH, Siegburg, Germany). This universal, performance-based, and flat-rate remuneration system was introduced for general hospital services in accordance with Section 17 b of the German Hospital Financing Act (KHG). The basis for this is the G-DRG system (German Diagnosis-Related Groups system), whereby each inpatient case of treatment is remunerated by means of a corresponding DRG lump sum payment. The data was accessed via the InEK Data Browser (https://datenbrowser.inek.org/, accessed on 30 September 2022). The analysis was performed for the year 2021. The number of patients diagnosed with COVID-19 (ICD-10: U07.1!, U07.2!, and U10.9) as well as the number of patients with the secondary diagnosis “U09.9!, Post-COVID-19 condition” were extracted. Incidences were calculated based on Germany’s population provided by the Federal Statistical Office of Germany (Destatis). Here, the number of inhabitants in each of the 16 German federal states was considered by year of birth. Furthermore, the total case numbers of in-hospital deaths, and the number of cases treated in an Intensive Care Unit (ICU) were determined. Additionally, the length of hospital stay, the performed procedures, and the G-DRG codes were analyzed. To estimate the cost for the inpatient treatment of Post-COVID syndrome, the G-DRG Report browser was employed. The distribution of cases according to the Patient Clinical Complexity Level (PCCL) was adopted from the InEK Data Browser. The PCCL value was calculated in a complex procedure from the secondary diagnosis values (complication or comorbidity level values − CCL) and indicates the severity of the complication or comorbidity based on results between 0 (no CC) and 6 (most severe CC). Costs according to the distribution of the applied G-DRG codes, that were used in at least 0.05% of cases, were added up proportionally and calculated as the mean value per case.

3. Results

In 2021, 543,789 patients were hospitalized with a coded diagnosis of COVID-19 (Table 1). Out of these, 123,982 patients (60.6% male) received ICU treatment, whereby the majority of patients were aged 65–74 years (23.5%). The mean ICU stay was 18.9 days. In addition, 69,293 in-house deaths were identified (58.4% male, 53.6% older than 80 years). A total of 29,808 patients could be identified with PCS yielding a prevalence of 5.5%. The majority of patients (18.6%) were aged 65–74 years (Figure 1). In the PCS cohort, 1330 (4.5%) in-hospital deaths were recorded, and 5140 (17.2%) patients required ICU treatment (Table 1). Furthermore, 624 (2.09%) patients received level-1 care, 3055 (10.25%) level-2 care, 2405 (8.07%) level-3 care, 1069 (3.59%) level-4 care, and 5450 (1.51%) level-5 care. The mean length of hospital stay was 11.5 days. In about half of the cases, the clinical complexity was low (Figure 2).
In total, 865 different main diagnoses in combination with the PCS were identified. The most common ones are listed in Table 2. Further, 1686 different treatment procedures were recorded. Table 3 provides an overview of the thirthy most frequent ones.
The cost per case of the G-DRG codes that were analysed ranged from € 620 ±377 (E64D, Respiratory insufficiency, one day of occupancy) to € 113,801 ±27,939 (A06B, Ventilation > 1799 h with complex OR procedure). By multiplication of the number of cases with the respective average cost per case according to the used G-DRG code the approximately costs per G-DRG code were calculated. Summed up, in 2019 total costs of € 136,608,719 were produced by the treatment 29,808 inpatients with the PCS. This yields a mean cost of € 4583 per case. G-DRG codes with the highest share of the total cost are shown in Table 4.

4. Discussion

In this cross-sectional study, (i) the number of hospitalized PCS cases including in-hospital mortality rates and intensive care unit (ICU) treatments, (ii) the main common concomitant diagnoses associated with PCS, (iii) the most frequently performed treatment procedures, and (vi) the annual direct healthcare costs were reported for the year 2019. An outstanding characteristic is that the analysis is based on nationwide healthcare insurance data from one of the largest countries of the European Union.
A total of 29,808 PCS inpatients could be identified yielding a prevalence of 5.5%. In the literature, a wide range of prevalence is reported. In China, prevalence rates up to 37.6% for hospitalized patients were estimated [17], while PCS was detected in half of COVID-19 survivors (n = 277) in Spain [18]. In a French cohort of n = 120 hospitalized patients, persistent symptoms were reported more than 100 days after admission including fatigue (55%), dyspnoea (42%), and loss of memory (34%) [19]. Furthermore, our results indicated that PCS is not only likely to occur in elderly multimorbid patients, but also in younger patients. Here, approximately 50% of the cohort had a low Patient Clinical Complexity Level, which is in line with other findings [10,20,21,22]. Moreover, it has also been reported that PCS occurs in patients who did not experience severe symptoms during acute infection or even in those who had an asymptomatic course of the disease [9,23]. For non-hospitalized patients, prevalence rates ranging from 7.5% to 41% were identified in a recent meta-analysis [16]. In addition, the presented data showed heterogeneity among concomitant diagnoses, reflecting the cardiovascular risks and neurological impairments, which have been described previously [9]. However, here one has to consider that the symptoms identified in Table 2 may not be solely attributed to PCS. Notably, research is also hindered by the lack of definition criteria with only the vague consensus that this entity refers to persisting symptoms after COVID-19 diagnosis. However, in the acute and post-acute phase of COVID-19, symptoms can be very diverse, also depending on which of the multiple SARS-CoV-2 variants the patient had [14,24]. To this end, clear diagnostic criteria and studies applying the Delphi technique are highly warranted. Therefore, in clinical practice, a comprehensive medical examination is essential. PCS patients should be monitored closely and managed in an interdisciplinary way [25]. The macroeconomic burden of the COVID-19 pandemic has been tremendous, with estimated mean costs of $2990.76 ± 545.98 per case and total direct medical costs of $163.4 billion over the course of the pandemic solely in the U.S. [26,27]. Based on the presented G-DRG code analysis, the cumulative direct healthcare costs of € 136,608,719 were calculated for PCS, resulting in mean costs of € 4583 per case. While multiple studies have been devoted to the socioeconomic analyses of initial infections, data on the treatment costs of PCS remain scarce and thus, this study is one of the first to present PCS-associated healthcare costs. Additionally, one study estimated an amount of an additional $223.60 per month over a six-month post-COVID diagnosis period [28]. It is reasonable to assume that indirect healthcare costs will substantially contribute to the burden of disease in the foreseeable future as long-term systems will prevent patients from returning to work. Moreover, it is well established that ICU treatments in particular are associated with job absenteeism and subsequent unemployment [29] One survey determined that 44% of PCS patients were out of the labor force and that 51% worked fewer hours [30]. Another study conducted in Germany found a long-term sick leave rate of 5.8% among 30 950 patients diagnosed with COVID-19 [31]. It has further been determined that patients in the UK spend a mean of £18.1 on non-prescription drugs and report a quality-adjusted life day loss of 32.9 after six months with PCS [32].
This study has several limitations. First of all, this is a purely descriptive report. Secondly, only inpatient data were available, and thus, the estimated numbers are limited in their generalizability to the overall population. In addition, the analysis was based on ICD-10 diagnoses, and further individual patient features for an analysis of the risk factors and the severity of the initial COVID-19 infection could not be derived. The correct coding of diagnosis can be assumed since DRG lump sum payment relies on it, which is strictly controlled by the Medical Service of Health Funds. Moreover, it was assumed that PCS was not diagnosed in an acute phase of COVID-19 as defined in the ICD-10.
In conclusion, Post-COVID syndrome is of major public health importance with substantial financial implications. The present article can support stakeholders in health systems to foresee future needs and adapt their resource management accordingly. Consensus diagnostic criteria and rehabilitation guidelines are highly necessary.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, N.W. and T.L.; methodology, N.W. and M.R.; software, S.L.; validation, T.H. and B.L.; formal analysis, N.W.; investigation, N.W.; resources, V.A., S.L. and T.L; writing—original draft preparation, N.W.; writing—review and editing, all authors; All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Ethical review and approval were waived for this study since the data is deidentified.

Informed Consent Statement

Patient consent was waived since the data is deidentified.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We thank the InEK GmbH for their support of this word.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Patient-Led Research Collaborative Report. What Does COVID-19 Recovery Actually Look Like? An Analysis of the Prolonged COVID-19 Symptoms Survey by Patient-Led Research Team. Available online: https://patientresearchcovid19.com/research/report-1/ (accessed on 22 September 2022).
  2. NICE COVID-19 rapid guidelines. PharmacoEcon. Outcomes News 2021, 877, 33. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Soriano, J.B.; Murthy, S.; Marshall, J.C.; Relan, P.; Diaz, J.V. A clinical case definition of post-COVID-19 condition by a Delphi consensus. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2022, 22, e102–e107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Pavli, A.; Theodoridou, M.; Maltezou, H.C. Post-COVID Syndrome: Incidence, Clinical Spectrum, and Challenges for Primary Healthcare Professionals. Arch. Med. Res. 2021, 52, 575–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Carfì, A.; Bernabei, R.; Landi, F. Persistent Symptoms in Patients After Acute COVID-19. JAMA 2020, 324, 603–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Seeßle, J.; Waterboer, T.; Hippchen, T.; Simon, J.; Kirchner, M.; Lim, A.; Müller, B.; Merle, U. Persistent Symptoms in Adult Patients 1 Year After Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): A Prospective Cohort Study. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2022, 74, 1191–1198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Arnold, D.T.; Hamilton, F.W.; Milne, A.; Morley, A.J.; Viner, J.; Attwood, M.; Noel, A.; Gunning, S.; Hatrick, J.; Hamilton, S.; et al. Patient outcomes after hospitalisation with COVID-19 and implications for follow-up: Results from a prospective UK cohort. Thorax 2021, 76, 399–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Halpin, S.J.; McIvor, C.; Whyatt, G.; Adams, A.; Harvey, O.; McLean, L.; Walshaw, C.; Kemp, S.; Corrado, J.; Singh, R.; et al. Postdischarge symptoms and rehabilitation needs in survivors of COVID-19 infection: A cross-sectional evaluation. J. Med. Virol. 2021, 93, 1013–1022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Koc, H.C.; Xiao, J.; Liu, W.; Li, Y.; Chen, G. Long COVID and its Management. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2022, 18, 4768–4780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Havervall, S.; Rosell, A.; Phillipson, M.; Mangsbo, S.M.; Nilsson, P.; Hober, S.; Thålin, C. Symptoms and Functional Impairment Assessed 8 Months after Mild COVID-19 Among Health Care Workers. JAMA 2021, 325, 2015–2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ziegler, S.; Raineri, A.; Nittas, V.; Rangelov, N.; Vollrath, F.; Britt, C.; Puhan, M.A. Long COVID Citizen Scientists: Developing a Needs-Based Research Agenda by Persons Affected by Long COVID. Patient 2022, 15, 565–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Andrenelli, E.; Negrini, F.; Sire, A.D.; Arienti, C.; Patrini, M.; Negrini, S.; Ceravolo, M.G. Systematic rapid living review on rehabilitation needs due to COVID-19: Update to May 31st, 2020. Eur. J. Phys. Rehabil. Med. 2020, 56, 508–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Sire, A.D.; Andrenelli, E.; Negrini, F.; Lazzarini, S.G.; Patrini, M.; Ceravolo, M.G. Rehabilitation and COVID-19: The Cochrane Rehabilitation 2020 rapid living systematic review. Update as of 31 August 2020. Eur. J. Phys. Rehabil. Med. 2020, 56, 839–845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Sire, A.D.; Andrenelli, E.; Negrini, F.; Patrini, M.; Lazzarini, S.G.; Ceravolo, M.G. Rehabilitation and COVID-19: A rapid living systematic review by Cochrane Rehabilitation Field updated as of 31 December 2020 and synthesis of the scientific literature of 2020. Eur. J. Phys. Rehabil. Med. 2021, 57, 181–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Alwan, N.A.; Johnson, L. Defining long COVID: Going back to the start. Med 2021, 2, 501–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Nittas, V.; Gao, M.; West, E.A.; Ballouz, T.; Menges, D.; Wulf Hanson, S.; Puhan, M.A. Long COVID Through a Public Health Lens: An Umbrella Review. Public Health Rev. 2022, 43, 1604501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Xiong, Q.; Xu, M.; Li, J.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, J.; Xu, Y.; Dong, W. Clinical sequelae of COVID-19 survivors in Wuhan, China: A single-centre longitudinal study. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2021, 27, 89–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Moreno-Pérez, O.; Merino, E.; Leon-Ramirez, J.-M.; Andres, M.; Ramos, J.M.; Arenas-Jiménez, J.; Asensio, S.; Sanchez, R.; Ruiz-Torregrosa, P.; Galan, I.; et al. Post-acute COVID-19 syndrome. Incidence and risk factors: A Mediterranean cohort study. J. Infect. 2021, 82, 378–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Garrigues, E.; Janvier, P.; Kherabi, Y.; Le Bot, A.; Hamon, A.; Gouze, H.; Doucet, L.; Berkani, S.; Oliosi, E.; Mallart, E.; et al. Post-discharge persistent symptoms and health-related quality of life after hospitalization for COVID-19. J. Infect. 2020, 81, e4–e6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Logue, J.K.; Franko, N.M.; McCulloch, D.J.; McDonald, D.; Magedson, A.; Wolf, C.R.; Chu, H.Y. Sequelae in Adults at 6 Months after COVID-19 Infection. JAMA Netw. Open 2021, 4, e210830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Davis, H.E.; Assaf, G.S.; McCorkell, L.; Wei, H.; Low, R.J.; Re’em, Y.; Redfield, S.; Austin, J.P.; Akrami, A. Characterizing Long COVID in an International Cohort: 7 Months of Symptoms and Their Impact. EClinicalMedicine 2020, 38, 101019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Sudre, C.H.; Murray, B.; Varsavsky, T.; Graham, M.S.; Penfold, R.S.; Bowyer, R.C.; Pujol, J.C.; Klaser, K.; Antonelli, M.; Canas, L.S.; et al. Attributes and predictors of long COVID. Nat. Med. 2021, 27, 626–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Stavem, K.; Ghanima, W.; Olsen, M.K.; Gilboe, H.M.; Einvik, G. Persistent symptoms 1.5-6 months after COVID-19 in non-hospitalised subjects: A population-based cohort study. Thorax 2021, 76, 405–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Mendiola-Pastrana, I.R.; López-Ortiz, E.; La Río de Loza-Zamora, J.G.; González, J.; Gómez-García, A.; López-Ortiz, G. SARS-CoV-2 Variants and Clinical Outcomes: A Systematic Review. Life 2022, 12, 170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Santhosh, L. Beyond “In the Red”: Building the Business Case for a Post–COVID-19 Clinic. Ann. Am. Thorac. Soc. 2022, 19, 1257–1259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Richards, F.; Kodjamanova, P.; Chen, X.; Li, N.; Atanasov, P.; Bennetts, L.; Patterson, B.J.; Yektashenas, B.; Mesa-Frias, M.; Tronczynski, K.; et al. Economic Burden of COVID-19: A Systematic Review. Clinicoecon. Outcomes Res. 2022, 14, 293–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Bartsch, S.M.; Ferguson, M.C.; McKinnell, J.A.; O’Shea, K.J.; Wedlock, P.T.; Siegmund, S.S.; Lee, B.Y. The Potential Health Care Costs And Resource Use Associated With COVID-19 In The United States. Health Aff. 2020, 39, 927–935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Koumpias, A.M.; Schwartzman, D.; Fleming, O. Long-haul COVID: Healthcare utilization and medical expenditures 6 months post-diagnosis. BMC Health Serv. Res. 2022, 22, 1010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kamdar, B.B.; Suri, R.; Suchyta, M.R.; Digrande, K.F.; Sherwood, K.D.; Colantuoni, E.; Dinglas, V.D.; Needham, D.M.; Hopkins, R.O. Return to work after critical illness: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Thorax 2020, 75, 17–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Cutler, D.M. The Costs of Long COVID. JAMA Health Forum 2022, 3, e221809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Jacob, L.; Koyanagi, A.; Smith, L.; Tanislav, C.; Konrad, M.; van der Beck, S.; Kostev, K. Prevalence of, and factors associated with, long-term COVID-19 sick leave in working-age patients followed in general practices in Germany. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2021, 109, 203–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Sandmann, F.G.; Tessier, E.; Lacy, J.; Kall, M.; van Leeuwen, E.; Charlett, A.; Eggo, R.M.; Dabrera, G.; Edmunds, W.J.; Ramsay, M.; et al. Long-Term Health-Related Quality of Life in Non-Hospitalized Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Cases with Confirmed Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Infection in England: Longitudinal Analysis and Cross-Sectional Comparison With Controls. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2022, 75, e962–e973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Age distribution of Post-COVID syndrome patients.
Figure 1. Age distribution of Post-COVID syndrome patients.
Viruses 14 02600 g001
Figure 2. Distribution of the Patient Clinical Complexity Level in association with the Post-COVID syndrome given in percentages.
Figure 2. Distribution of the Patient Clinical Complexity Level in association with the Post-COVID syndrome given in percentages.
Viruses 14 02600 g002
Table 1. Number of cases diagnosed with COVID-19 and Post-COVID syndrome.
Table 1. Number of cases diagnosed with COVID-19 and Post-COVID syndrome.
DiagnosisTotal NumbersIncidence/100,000 Inhabitants% Male/
Female
% ≤65/>65 Years OldICU TreatmentIn-House Mortality
COVID-19543,789801.351.1/48.943.5/56.5123,082
(22.6%)
69,293
(12.7%)
Post-COVID29,80843.951.8/48.253.1/46.95140
(17.2%)
1330
(4.5%)
Table 2. Thirty main common primary diagnoses in association with Post-COVID syndrome.
Table 2. Thirty main common primary diagnoses in association with Post-COVID syndrome.
ICD-10 CodeDescription Number of CasesPercentage
J12.8 Pneumonia due to other viruses17715.94%
G62.80 Critical-illness-Polyneuropathy16525.54%
R06.0 Dyspnea1614 5.41%
G93.3 Chronic fatigue syndrome703 2.36%
I26.9 Pulmonary embolism without indication of acute cor pulmonale681 2.28%
J96.00 Acute respiratory failure, not elsewhere classified: Type I (hypoxic)679 2.28%
J84.1 Other interstitial lung disease with fibrosis4941.66%
R53 Malaise and fatigue4921.65%
J96.10 Chronic respiratory insufficiency, not elsewhere classified: Type I (hypoxic)393 1.32%
R26.8 Other and unspecified disorders of gait and mobility3511.18%
I50.14 Left-sided heart failure: with symptoms at rest3391.14%
I50.01 Secondary right-sided heart failure3281.10%
J18.9 Pneumonia, unspecified2760.93%
N39.0 Urinary tract infection2750.92%
I50.13 Left-sided heart failure: with discomfort on mild exertion247 0.83%
J98.4 Other changes in the lungs2390.80%
J96.01 Acute respiratory failure, not elsewhere classified: Type II (hypercapnic)236 0.79%
E86 Volume deficiency2290.77%
R07.3 Other chest pain2190.73%
J84.8 Other interstitial lung disease not otherwise specified214 0.72%
J96.11 Chronic respiratory insufficiency, not elsewhere classified: Type II (hypercapnic)204 0.68%
J18.8 Other pneumonia, causative agent unspecified200 0.67%
R51 Headache1980.66%
J18.1 Lobar pneumonia, unspecified1970.66%
R07.4 Chest pain, unspecified1870.63%
F48.0 Neurasthenia1760.59%
I10.01 Benign essential hypertension1720.58%
J80.03 Severe adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).172 0.58%
G47.31 Obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome1670.56%
R42 Immobility1540.52%
Table 3. Thirty main common procedures performed for Post-COVID syndrome patients.
Table 3. Thirty main common procedures performed for Post-COVID syndrome patients.
CPT CodeDescription Number of CasesPercentage
3–222 Computed tomography of the thorax with contrast medium5233 17.56%
1–710 Whole-body plethysmography4990 16.74%
8–930 Monitoring of respiration, heart, and circulation 4968 16.67%
3–990 Computer-aided image data analysis with 3D evaluation4062 13.63%
3–202 Native computed tomography of the thorax3431 11.51%
1–711 Determination of CO diffusion capacity3329 11.17%
3–200 Native computed tomography of the skull3037 10.19%
1–632.0 Diagnostic esophagogastroduodenoscopy2379 7.98%
1–620.00 Diagnostic tracheobronchoscopy2118 7.11%
3–225 Computed tomography of the abdomen with contrast medium2043 6.85%
8–831.0 Placement of catheter in central venous vessels:1800 6.04%
8–800.c0 Whole blood transfusion, red blood cell concentrate, and platelet concentrate: Red blood cell concentrate: 1 TE to less than 6 TE1720 5.77%
8–550.1 Geriatric early rehabilitation complex treatment: at least 14 treatment days and 20 therapy units1554 5.21%
1–620.01 Diagnostic tracheobronchoscopy with bronchoalveolar lavage1518 5.09%
1–207.0 Electroencephalography1413 4.74%
1–715 Guyatt six-minute walk test1269 4.26%
3–800Native magnetic resonance imaging of the skull12614.23%
1–204.2 Examination of the cerebrospinal fluid system: lumbar puncture for cerebrospinal fluid sampling1186 3.98%
1–843 Diagnostic aspiration from the bronchus1123 3.77%
8–706Application of a mask for mechanical ventilation10893.65%
1–206Neurography10753.61%
9–320 Therapy of organic and functional disorders of speech, language, voice, and swallowing9783.28%
3–052 Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE)926 3.11%
8–701Endotracheal intubation899 3.02%
3–820 Magnetic resonance imaging of the skull with contrast medium863 2.90%
Table 4. Main common G-DRG codes.
Table 4. Main common G-DRG codes.
G-DRG CodeDescription Number of CasesPercentage Mean Cost Per Case [Euro]Standard Deviation
[Euro]
Overall Costs [Euro]
E69C Bronchitis and bronchial asthma, one day of occupancy or without extreme severe or severe CC or age < 56 years or respiratory complaints and symptoms or respiratory disorders with cause in the neonatal period, without certain extensive/highly extensive treatment1923 6.45% 11924762,292,216
E79C Infections and inflammations of the respiratory organs without complex diagnosis, without extremely serious CC or one day of occupancy, except in the case of para-/tetraplegia, without certain moderately complex treatments1534 5.15% 1939 842 2,974,426
Z65Z Complaints, symptoms, other abnormalities, and aftercare1242 4.17% 1483 752 1,841,886
E64A Respiratory failure, more than one day of occupancy, with extremely severe CC or pulmonary embolism814 2.73% 2366 1153 1,925,924
E74Z Interstitial lung disease775 2.60% 2070 1027 1,604,250
E42Z Geriatric early rehabilitative complex treatment for diseases and disorders of the respiratory organs725 2.43% 4878 1418 3,536,550
F62C Heart failure and shock without severe CC or without dialysis, without complicated diagnosis, without complicated treatment636 2.13% 2136 965 1,358,496
E75C Other diseases of the respiratory organs without extremely severe CC or respiratory complaints and symptoms with a complex diagnosis523 1.75% 1633 740 854,059
E64C Respiratory failure, more than one day of occupancy, without extremely severe CC, age > 15 years.504 1.69% 1846 964 930,384
B43Z Early rehabilitation for diseases and disorders of the nervous system, more than 27 days488 1.64% 10,131 3359 4,943,928
E63B Sleep apnea syndrome or polysomnography or cardiorespiratory polygraphy, up to 2 days of occupancy, age > 17 years480 1.61% 907 315 435,360
B71D Diseases of cranial nerves and peripheral nerves without complex diagnosis449 1.51% 1693 878 760,157
G67C Esophagitis, gastroenteritis, gastrointestinal hemorrhage, ulcer disease, and various diseases of the digestive organs without specific or other complicating factors443 1.49% 1284 522 568,812
F71B Nonsevere cardiac arrhythmia and conduction disorders439 1.47% 1231 525 540,409
F74Z Thoracic pain and other unspecified diseases of the circulatory system421 1.41% 1051 343 442,471
A13H Ventilation > 95 h with specific OR procedure or complicated constellation.376 1.26% 7839 3112 2,947,464
B81B Other diseases of the nervous system without complex diagnosis345 1.16% 1933 870 666,885
E65C Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease without extremely severe CC337 1.13% 1780 798 599,860
E41Z Early rehabilitation for diseases and disorders of the respiratory organs316 1.06% 8040 4134 2,540,640
B77Z Headache313 1.05% 1467 572 459,171
F75C Other diseases of the circulatory system without extremely severe CC303 1.02% 2087 1102 632,361
F49G Invasive cardiology diagnosis300 1.01% 1804 648 541,200
B42B Early rehabilitation for diseases and disorders of the nervous system for up to 27 days without neurological complex treatment of acute stroke287 0.96% 7913 2311 2,271,031
K62C Various metabolic diseases269 0.90% 1581 773 425,289
E40C Diseases and disorders of the respiratory organs with ventilation > 24 h256 0.86% 5243 2351 1,342,208
B44B Geriatric early rehabilitation complex treatment for diseases and disorders of the nervous system with other neurological complex treatment250 0.84% 4948 1372 1,237,000
L63E Infections of the urinary organs236 0.79% 1472 621 347,392
F67C Hypertension without complicating diagnosis2270.76% 1208 473 274,216
A09F Ventilation > 499 h225 0.75% 27,472 8194 6,181,200
B44C Geriatric early rehabilitation complex treatment for diseases and disorders of the nervous system without complex treatment225 0.75% 4262 972 958,950
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Walter, N.; Rupp, M.; Lang, S.; Leinberger, B.; Alt, V.; Hinterberger, T.; Loew, T. A Comprehensive Report of German Nationwide Inpatient Data on the Post-COVID-19 Syndrome Including Annual Direct Healthcare Costs. Viruses 2022, 14, 2600. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/v14122600

AMA Style

Walter N, Rupp M, Lang S, Leinberger B, Alt V, Hinterberger T, Loew T. A Comprehensive Report of German Nationwide Inpatient Data on the Post-COVID-19 Syndrome Including Annual Direct Healthcare Costs. Viruses. 2022; 14(12):2600. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/v14122600

Chicago/Turabian Style

Walter, Nike, Markus Rupp, Siegmund Lang, Beate Leinberger, Volker Alt, Thilo Hinterberger, and Thomas Loew. 2022. "A Comprehensive Report of German Nationwide Inpatient Data on the Post-COVID-19 Syndrome Including Annual Direct Healthcare Costs" Viruses 14, no. 12: 2600. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/v14122600

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop