Next Article in Journal
Exploring the Potential of Muridae as Sentinels for Human and Zoonotic Viruses
Previous Article in Journal
Viromic and Metagenomic Analyses of Commercial Spirulina Fermentations Reveal Remarkable Microbial Diversity
Previous Article in Special Issue
Investigation of Oral Shedding of Torquetenovirus (TTV) in Moderate-to-Severe COVID-19 Hospitalised Patients
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Communication

Saliva Is a Sensitive and Accessible Sample Both for SARS-CoV-2 Detection and for the Evaluation of Treatment Effectiveness in Follow-Up Studies

by
Eleonora Lalle
1,
Valentina Mazzotta
2,
Giuseppe Sberna
1,*,
Lavinia Fabeni
1,
Anna Rosa Garbuglia
1,
Ilaria Mastrorosa
2,
Alessandra D’Abramo
2,
Emanuele Nicastri
2,
Enrico Girardi
3,
Andrea Antinori
2,
Fabrizio Maggi
1 and
Licia Bordi
1
1
Laboratory of Virology and Biosafety Laboratories, National Institute for Infectious Diseases Lazzaro Spallanzani—IRCCS, 00149 Rome, Italy
2
Clinical and Research Department, National Institute for Infectious Diseases Lazzaro Spallanzani—IRCCS, 00149 Rome, Italy
3
Scientific Direction, National Institute for Infectious Diseases Lazzaro Spallanzani—IRCCS, 00149 Rome, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 23 May 2024 / Revised: 18 June 2024 / Accepted: 26 June 2024 / Published: 27 June 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Saliva in the Diagnosis of Viral Diseases)

Abstract

Despite emerging evidence indicating that molecular SARS-CoV-2 tests performed on saliva have diagnostic sensitivity and specificity comparable to those observed with nasopharyngeal swabs (NPSs), most in vivo follow-up studies on the efficacy of drugs against SARS-CoV-2 have been performed on NPSs, not considering saliva as a possible alternative matrix. For this reason, in this study, we used, in parallel, saliva and NPS samples for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 by real-time RT-PCR in patients receiving Tixagevimab/Cilgavimab, Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir, or Sotrovimab as a treatment against SARS-CoV-2. Our results showed a good correlation between the NPS and saliva samples for each drug; moreover, comparable changes in the cycle threshold (Ct) levels in saliva and NPSs were observed both 7 days and 30 days after treatment, thus confirming that the saliva represents a good matrix for in vivo follow-up studies verifying the effectiveness of treatments against SARS-CoV-2.
Keywords: SARS-CoV-2; molecular assay; saliva; COVID-19 diagnosis; monoclonal antibodies; antiviral therapy; follow-up studies SARS-CoV-2; molecular assay; saliva; COVID-19 diagnosis; monoclonal antibodies; antiviral therapy; follow-up studies

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lalle, E.; Mazzotta, V.; Sberna, G.; Fabeni, L.; Garbuglia, A.R.; Mastrorosa, I.; D’Abramo, A.; Nicastri, E.; Girardi, E.; Antinori, A.; et al. Saliva Is a Sensitive and Accessible Sample Both for SARS-CoV-2 Detection and for the Evaluation of Treatment Effectiveness in Follow-Up Studies. Viruses 2024, 16, 1040. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/v16071040

AMA Style

Lalle E, Mazzotta V, Sberna G, Fabeni L, Garbuglia AR, Mastrorosa I, D’Abramo A, Nicastri E, Girardi E, Antinori A, et al. Saliva Is a Sensitive and Accessible Sample Both for SARS-CoV-2 Detection and for the Evaluation of Treatment Effectiveness in Follow-Up Studies. Viruses. 2024; 16(7):1040. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/v16071040

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lalle, Eleonora, Valentina Mazzotta, Giuseppe Sberna, Lavinia Fabeni, Anna Rosa Garbuglia, Ilaria Mastrorosa, Alessandra D’Abramo, Emanuele Nicastri, Enrico Girardi, Andrea Antinori, and et al. 2024. "Saliva Is a Sensitive and Accessible Sample Both for SARS-CoV-2 Detection and for the Evaluation of Treatment Effectiveness in Follow-Up Studies" Viruses 16, no. 7: 1040. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/v16071040

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop