Next Article in Journal
The Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Antimicrobial Resistance Determinants of Helicobacter pylori Detected in Dyspeptic Patients in North–Central Bangladesh
Previous Article in Journal
Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) in Patients with Tick-Borne Illness: A Scoping Review of 98 Cases
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Infectious Disease Reports
Volume 16
Issue 2
10.3390/idr16020013
idr-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Assessment of Monkeypox (MPOX) Knowledge and Vaccination Intention among Health and Life Sciences Students in Algeria: A Cross-Sectional Study

by
Mohamed Lounis
1,2,*,
Ahmed Hamimes
3 and
Ali Dahmani
4
1
Department of Agro-Veterinary Sciences, Faculty of Natural and Life Sciences, University of Ziane Achour, BP 3117, Road of Moudjbara, Djelfa 17000, Algeria
2
Laboratoire d’Exploration e et Valorisation des Écosystèmes Steppiques, Faculty of Natural and Life Sciences, University of Ziane Achour, BP 3117, Road of Moudjbara, Djelfa 17000, Algeria
3
Laboratory of Biostatistics, Bioinformatics and Mathematical Methodology Applied to Health Sciences (BIOSTIM), Faculty of Medicine, University of Constantine 3, Constantine 25000, Algeria
4
Institute of Veterinary Sciences, University of Blida 1, Blida 09000, Algeria
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Infect. Dis. Rep. 2024, 16(2), 170-180; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/idr16020013
Submission received: 16 December 2023 / Revised: 18 February 2024 / Accepted: 20 February 2024 / Published: 22 February 2024
(This article belongs to the Topic Human Monkeypox Research)
Browse Figure
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Monkeypox (MPOX) is a viral zoonotic disease affecting endemically the Central and Western regions of Africa. The ongoing outbreak in non-endemic countries has made this disease a global concern. While no cases have been reported in Algeria, it is important to raise awareness about the disease to prepare for a potential outbreak, especially in light of the cases reported in neighboring Middle East and North African (MENA) countries. This study aimed to evaluate the knowledge and attitude of Algerian Health and Life Sciences students toward MPOX and its vaccine through an anonymous online survey. A total of 196 students participated in this study. Students of medicine (64.3%), females (85.7%), and those under 20 years of age (55.1%) were the most represented. The results revealed a low level of knowledge represented by a score of only 42.8% for correct answers with multiple gaps in epidemiology, etiology, and clinical manifestations of MPOX. Students of veterinary sciences showed the highest levels of knowledge (OR: 6.71; CI95%: 1.23–36.77), while those aged between 20 and 30 years old (OR: 0.11; CI95%: 0.02–0.79) and those vaccinated against seasonal flu (OR: 0.42; CI95%: 0.21–0.85) were associated with low levels of knowledge. Regarding MPOX vaccination, the study found a moderate level of acceptance (48.5%) among the surveyed students with Natural and Life Sciences students and those having a high vaccine conspiracy belief score (VCBS) showing the lowest level of acceptance. These findings highlight the need for educational programs and intensified public awareness campaigns to improve knowledge about MPOX and emphasize the importance of vaccination in preventing outbreaks and overcoming vaccine reluctance.

1. Introduction

Occurring endemically in the Central and Western region of Africa since the end of the seventies (according to World Health Organization (WHO)), human monkeypox (MPOX) has also emerged in non-endemic countries such as the USA (2003 and 2021), the UK (2018–2019 and 2021), and Singapore (2019). These outbreaks were generally geographically limited and mostly linked with travel to Africa [1,2]. However, in May 2022, MPOX has surprisingly re-emerged in multiple non-endemic countries. The particular facts of these outbreaks are the instantaneous reports of multiple cases in many countries, mainly in Europe and the USA, in addition to the absence of a link with traveling to endemic countries [3]. This situation prompted the WHO to declare the illness a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC) on 23 July 2022 [4].
As of 17 March 2023, approximately 86,601 individuals were affected with 112 deaths in non-endemic regions [5]. It is noteworthy that these numbers reflected a case fatality rate (CFR) lower than those reported in African endemic countries, varying from 3.6 to 10.6% [1], and could be as low as 0.03% [6]. Furthermore, the case hospitalization rate (CHR) was estimated at 14.1% with a variation from 5.8% (during the year 2022) to 49.8% (before the year 2017) [6].
Transmission occurs generally after close contact with affected humans or animals. Cutaneous or mucosal lesions, blood, body fluids, respiratory droplets, and contaminated materials such as bedding are the main sources of contamination [7]. The clinical features of the disease include an incubation period of 6 to 13 days (range: 5 to 21 days), and the development of self-limiting lesions, skin nodules, or a disseminated rash, that generally last for 2 to 4 weeks. In addition, fever, headaches, back discomfort, low energy, muscle soreness, and enlarged lymph nodes are the most common signs reported in the current outbreak of MPOX [7,8]. These signs recall smallpox symptoms with less severity and better outcomes [9]. Consequently, in the absence of specific vaccines against this disease, some new-generation smallpox vaccines (MVA-BN-JYNNEOS, LC16, and ACAM2000) have been advised for high-risk individuals in some countries [2,8].
Although not to the same extent, the health community is nevertheless faced with a new challenge to convince high-risk groups to receive the vaccine, especially after the COVID-19 experience. In fact, multiple factors have been associated with the phenomenon of vaccine reluctance including concerns about their potential side effects, mistrust of medical professionals or the healthcare system, a lack of knowledge, and the impact of disinformation, among others [2,10,11]. These factors have also contributed to increased anxiety in the general population, especially in the first months of MPOX re-emergence [2,12]. In this light, the WHO reported that one of the challenges in preventing the re-emergence of MPOX was a lack of knowledge about this disease, particularly among healthcare providers [13].
Thus, the first step in changing public views and behaviors is to address their knowledge. In fact, adequate knowledge could influence positively attitudes, and attitudes based on substantial knowledge are better at predicting behavior than attitudes based on incomplete or inaccurate information [9,14]. Consequently, raising knowledge levels represents an essential measure in fighting against conspiracy theories and understanding health-seeking behaviors such as adherence to preventive measures [9,14]. To this end, multiple studies were carried out to assess the level of knowledge and adherence to a probable future MPOX vaccine targeting multiple categories including the general public, healthcare staff, students in general, and health studies students in particular [9,10,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19]. These studies shared common findings including a high level of worry, unsatisfactory knowledge and awareness levels, and a medium level of vaccine acceptance. Unfortunately, university students were associated with the lowest levels of knowledge [2]. Knowing their important role in spreading knowledge and awareness among the public, educating them could be a useful strategy in light of the possible emergence of any pandemic [20]. Moreover, the role of students of Health and Life schools as future healthcare providers is of particular interest [9,20].
Thus, the purpose of this work is to assess Algerian Health and Life Science students’ knowledge of MPOX and to determine their attitude toward its probable vaccination, which would provide baseline information about MPOX knowledge and vaccination intention in Algeria.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design

An online-based cross-sectional survey was carried out between 16 December 2022 and 2 March 2023, targeting all Algerian Health and Life Sciences students to gauge their knowledge about MPOX and to describe their attitude toward the MPOX vaccine. Direct contact and social media platforms (including WhatsApp and Facebook) were used to issue invitations to participate in an anonymous online survey by answering a Google Forms self-administered questionnaire (SAQ). In addition, no financial inducements or compensation were given (voluntary participation). With the purpose of minimizing information bias and the Hawthorne effect, the participants’ identities were kept anonymous.
Prior to enrollment, all participants had to provide their e-consent. They were able to leave the questionnaire at any time they wished. The survey was carried out in accordance with the cross-sectional studies STROBE (Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology) standards [21]. The SAQ, which was administered in Arabic and French, was based on earlier studies that looked at knowledge about MPOX and attitude toward its vaccine [19,22,23,24,25,26]. It has 23 multiple-choice items that were divided into four parts. Information on socio-demographic (age, sex, marital status, and living area), educational (specialty, level of education), and vaccination (uptake of flu and COVID-19 vaccines) variables were included in the first part. In the second part, the knowledge level was evaluated using 22 items with “yes/no/I do not know” replies. The attitude toward MPOX vaccines and the willingness to pay were described in the third section using “yes/no” responses. Finally, to assess vaccination beliefs, a 7-item previously validated Vaccine Conspiracy Beliefs Scale (VCBS) using a Likert scale with 7 points was employed in the fourth part [26].
In order to gauge the final level of knowledge, each of the 22 items received a value of one (1) for a correct answer and a value of zero (0) for an incorrect answer (responses with “I do not know” were considered incorrect). Higher scores indicate greater knowledge of MPOX. The 22 items’ scores were totaled up to create an ultimate score that varied from 0 to 23. The mean level (estimated at 9.42) was used to classify the knowledge level as high or low. Respondents with a score of knowledge > 9.42 were deemed to possess a high level of knowledge and vice versa.
The VCBS received a minimum value of 1 for the “strongly disagree” response and a maximum value of 7 for the “strongly agree” response, where higher VCBS represented high acceptance of vaccination conspiracies. The VCBS’s internal consistency was demonstrated through its 0.937 Cronbach’s alpha value [26].

2.2. Statistical Analysis

All statistical analyses were conducted using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 22.0 (SPSS Inc. Chicago, IL, USA, 2011). The score of knowledge was firstly provided as numbers (n), and percentages (%) or mean ± standard deviation (SD). The relationship between the dependent and the independent variables was assessed using Chi-squared (χ2) or Fisher (indicated by an asterisk*) tests. The VCBS was reported as a mean ± SD (estimated at 26.6 ± 11.2).
After that, the hypothesized related factors with MPOX knowledge and attitude regarding MPOX vaccines were evaluated using logistic regression. The statistical analyses were investigated using a threshold of significance (Sig.) of 0.05 and a confidence interval (CI) of ninety-five percent (95%).

3. Results

3.1. Demographic, Educational, and Vaccine-Status Features

In the current study, 202 respondents completed the questionnaire during the investigation’s time period. After removing six incomplete responses, the remaining (196) responses were used for the analysis.
The demographics, education, and vaccine status of the students are displayed in Table 1. Our results showed that the most represented categories were females (85.7%), singles (95.4%), and those living in urban areas (89.3%), while more than half of the respondents (55.1%) were under 20 years old.
Regarding their education, students of Medicine (64.3%) were the most represented followed distantly by Pharmacy (11.7%), and Natural and Life Sciences (11.7%) students. They were mostly in the first year of their university curricula (55.1%).
When asked about their vaccination status, only 21.9% stated that they had received the COVID-19 vaccine, while less than one-third (30.1%) received a seasonal flu vaccine (Table 1).

3.2. MPOX Knowledge

The results of this study showed that 77.6% of the participants had heard about the MPOX pandemic of 2022, while 68.4% reported having a prior knowledge about this disease before its re-emergence in 2022.
Moreover, 54.6% of the respondents thought that this disease is not adequately covered by the media, while 36.7% thought that it is adequately covered. Similarly, 41.8% of respondents stated they were concerned about the spread of this disease, while 39.3% said they were indifferent, and 18.9% said they were not concerned.
Regarding level of knowledge, our findings showed that the average percentage of right answers was 42.8%. This rate reflects a score of knowledge of 9.42 ± 4.79 (from 22 possible points). Additionally, 7 of the 22 items had more than 50% of correct responses. These items are mainly related to the absence of MPOX cases in Algeria (63.3%), its high frequency in Western and Central African countries (53.1%), its viral etiology (66.3%), and its main signs including rash (77.6%), papules (59.2%), and pustules (60.2%) (Table 2).
When asked about their sources of information, the respondents cited the internet and social media platforms, in addition to media, as the main sources used to acquire information about MPOX (Figure 1).

Knowledge-Related Factors

The findings indicated that students over 30 years old (84.6%) showed higher levels of knowledge (Sig. = 0.007). Similar results were observed among students of veterinary sciences (81.3%, Sig. = 0.004) while those of medicine and dental sciences (39.7%, Sig. = 0.013) were characterized by the lowest level of knowledge. In addition, students in the first to the third years of study showed lower levels of knowledge (41.2%) than their counterparts but without a statistical difference (Sig. = 0.061).
Regarding vaccination, our results showed that individuals with previous uptake of a flu vaccine were inversely linked to high levels of knowledge (35%, Sig. = 0.042), while no statistical difference was observed for COVID-19 vaccine uptake (Sig. = 0.260).
Results of the logistic regression showed that students of 20–30 years showed a lower high knowledge OR score (OR: 0.11; CI95%: 0.02–0.79) than those over the age of 30 years. Additionally, while students of veterinary sciences showed the highest OR of high knowledge (OR: 6.71; CI95%: 1.23–36.77), being vaccinated against seasonal flu decreased the odds of high knowledge (OR: 0.42; CI95%: 0.21–0.85) (Table 3).

3.3. Vaccination Intention

Asked about their intention regarding a probable recommended MPOX vaccine in the near future, 48.5% of the surveyed students declared their willingness to be vaccinated. Moreover, 70.5% would be willing to cover the costs of the vaccination if it is not freely available.
Results of the univariate analysis showed that students of Medicine and Dental Science, those of the fourth and the fifth year of study, showed higher rates of willingness than their counterparts. Inversely, students of Natural and Life Sciences and those having a high VCBS showed the lowest levels. The latter factors were the only factors confirmed by logistic regression to be connected to vaccine reluctance (Table 4).

4. Discussion

The present survey aimed to analyze the level of awareness and knowledge of Algerian Health and Life Science students about MPOX and their attitude toward its immunization. As far as we are aware, this is the first study to document MPOX-related knowledge among students in Algeria.
The main conclusions of this study can be summarized as follows. First, more than one-fifth (22.4%) of the questioned students were unaware of the ongoing 2022 MPOX multi-country outbreak. Second, a low level of knowledge with multiple gaps about the epidemiology, the etiology, and the clinical manifestations of MOPX was observed. Third, nearly half (48.5%) of the surveyed students were in favor of vaccination if recommended in the country and 70.5% among them showed their willingness to pay for the vaccine if it was not provided for free.
The first surprising result of this study is the fact that 22.4% of the respondents had not heard of the MPOX pandemic even though the survey was conducted nearly six months after its emergence. This finding could be explained by the absence of any reported cases of MPOX in Algeria. In a previous study conducted earlier among healthcare staff in Algeria, 91.9% were aware of this pandemic [19]. In line with this study, 54.6% of the respondents thought that this disease lacks media coverage and 41.8% expressed their concern about the propagation of the disease. The same observation was reported in different countries (with different levels) [15,17,20,27,28] where people were afraid to be infected by the disease [16] or that the disease would progress to becoming a pandemic [12]. These observations are mainly related to the drastic social, health, and economic consequences engendered by the COVID-19 pandemic [10,12].
Regarding knowledge about this disease, even though multiple scales have been used and multiple categories have been targeted (students, medical students, healthcare workers, the general population) in different countries, the common finding is the unsatisfactory level of knowledge about MPOX with multiple gaps [9,10,17,18,29,30,31,32,33,34,35]. Certain knowledge gaps were also reported among medical students in endemic countries [36].
For the knowledge-linked factors, even age and educational attainment have been reported as determinants in most studies [14], other factors were also reported (i.e., professional standing, information source, and belief in conspiracy theories).
In our study, the effect of age was apparent, in which students aged more than 30 years showed the highest level of knowledge (OR: 0.11; CI95%: 0.02–0.79 for those aged between 20 and 30 years old). In the same way, Sallam et al. [9] and Alshahrani et al. [31] showed that students aged more than 21 years old showed higher levels of knowledge than their younger counterparts. Meanwhile, Lin et al. [20] found that dental clinical students were more knowledgeable about MPOX than preclinical ones.
Surprisingly, veterinary students have shown higher levels of knowledge (OR: 6.71; CI95%: 1.23–36.77) compared to those of the other specialties. These findings could be explained by the fact that most of the students of medicine surveyed were in their first few years of study, whereas most of the veterinary students surveyed were in their fourth or fifth year of study. As a comparison, Kumar et al. [37] in Pakistan found that students of pharmaceutical and medical sciences showed higher levels of knowledge than students of biological sciences or those of other domains.
Another factor, which was incomprehensibly associated with the level of knowledge, was the seasonal flu vaccination status. In fact, students who were vaccinated against seasonal flu showed the lowest levels of knowledge about MPOX (OR: 0.42; CI95%: 0.21–0.85).
Conversely, no link was observed between vaccination status against seasonal flu or COVID-19 and the attitude toward MPOX vaccination among the surveyed students. This is contrary to the results of Winters et al. [38], which showed that COVID-19 vaccine uptake was a strong predictor of MPOX vaccination willingness in the US general population. Similarly, Riccò et al. [17] showed that individuals vaccinated against seasonal influenza are more in favor of the MPOX vaccine. In a study conducted earlier in Algeria, COVID-19 vaccination was a determinant factor for the acceptance of MPOX vaccination [19].
Interestingly, students having a high mean of VCBS showed the lowest level of vaccine acceptance. The VCBS, which was first adopted for HPV vaccine reluctance [26], was reported to be a good scale for vaccination hesitancy, which was subsequently confirmed for the Influenza [39] and COVID-19 vaccines [40].
Finally, it is important to emphasize the medium and the encouraging level (48.5%) of willingness to be vaccinated among the surveyed students, which is higher than the level of 38.7% reported previously among healthcare workers in Algeria [19]. This rate is not far from the global level of acceptance and very close to the level of acceptance in Asian countries [2,11].
Undoubtedly, this study was limited by multiple factors: First, the convenience sampling method carried the risk of selection bias. In addition, the online nature of the survey, especially conducted using social media platforms, may affect certain responses and lead to a bias in answers. (i.e., the media through which information is received). Second, the sample, which was composed of a majority of medical students, increases the selection bias and should be taken into account when attempting to generalize the study’s findings. Third, the sample size could be considered as another limitation, especially in sub-group analysis. Fourth, the self-reported nature of the responses should be considered, acknowledging the potential for social desirability bias. Finally, the cross-sectional nature of this study makes its finding a snapshot of the current situation about knowledge and vaccine intention, which may change over time.

5. Conclusions

The findings of the present study reveal a poor level of knowledge of Algerian Health and Life Sciences students about MPOX with multiple knowledge gaps regarding its epidemiology, etiology, and clinical signs. They also show that despite this poor level of knowledge, a satisfactory medium level of acceptance of MPOX vaccination exists, not far from the global rate of acceptance. This is especially noteworthy given that we know that, to date, no cases of MPOX have been reported in Algeria. Thus, intensifying educational and awareness programs is required to increase the level of knowledge about this disease and show the importance of MPOX vaccination, an approach that could be useful in prevention strategies and fighting against the phenomenon of vaccine hesitancy often mediated by belief in conspiracy theories.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.L.; methodology, M.L.; software, M.L.; validation, M.L.; formal analysis, M.L.; investigation, M.L.; resources, M.L.; data curation, M.L., A.H. and A.D.; writing—original draft preparation, M.L.; writing—review and editing, M.L.; visualization, M.L., A.H. and A.D.; supervision, M.L.; project administration, M.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study protocol was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical approval was obtained from the Scientific Committee of the Faculty of Natural and Life Sciences (the document was signed by the Scientific Committee President and the Dean of the Faculty), Ziane Achour University, Djelfa, on 10 November 2022 (Ref n°261/10/11/2022).

Informed Consent Statement

Consent was granted by all the respondents in the study.

Data Availability Statement

Data can be made available by the authors upon request.

Acknowledgments

The authors would thank all students who participated in this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Bunge, E.M.; Hoet, B.; Chen, L.; Lienert, F.; Weidenthaler, H.; Baer, L.R.; Steffen, R. The Changing Epidemiology of Human Monkeypox—A Potential Threat? A Systematic Review. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2022, 16, e0010141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Lounis, M.; Riad, A. Monkeypox (MPOX)-Related Knowledge and Vaccination Hesitancy in Non-Endemic Countries: Concise Literature Review. Vaccines 2023, 11, 229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. WHO. Disease Outbreak News; Multi-Country Monkeypox Outbreak in Non-Endemic Countries. 2022. Available online: https://www.who.int/emergencies/disease-outbreak-news/item/2022-DON385 (accessed on 18 March 2023).
  4. WHO. WHO Director-General’s Statement at the Press Conference Following IHR Emergency Committee Regarding the Multi-Country Outbreak of Monkeypox. 2022. Available online: https://www.who.int/director-general/speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-statement-on-the-press-conference-following-IHR-emergencycommittee-regarding-the-multi--country-outbreak-of-monkeypox--23-july-2022 (accessed on 20 March 2023).
  5. Mathieux, E.; Dattani, S.; Ritchie, H.; Roser, M. Monkeypox 2022. Available online: https://ourworldindata.org/monkeypox (accessed on 18 March 2023).
  6. DeWitt, M.E.; Polk, C.; Williamson, J.; Shetty, A.K.; Passaretti, C.L.; McNeil, C.J.; Fairman, R.T.; Sampson, M.M.; Dalton, C.; Sanders, J.W. Global Monkeypox Case Hospitalisation Rates: A Rapid Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. EClinicalMedicine 2022, 54, 101710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. WHO. Mpox(Monkeypox) 2022. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/monkeypox (accessed on 19 March 2023).
  8. WHO. Mpox(Monkeypox) 2022. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/questions-and-answers/item/monkeypox (accessed on 19 March 2023).
  9. Sallam, M.; Al-Mahzoum, K.; Dardas, L.A.; Al-Tammemi, A.B.; Al-Majali, L.; Al-Naimat, H.; Jardaneh, L.; AlHadidi, F.; Al-Salahat, K.; Al-Ajlouni, E.; et al. Knowledge of Human Monkeypox and Its Relation to Conspiracy Beliefs among Students in Jordanian Health Schools: Filling the Knowledge Gap on Emerging Zoonotic Viruses. Medicina 2022, 58, 924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sallam, M.; Al-Mahzoum, K.; Al-Tammemi, A.B.; Alkurtas, M.; Mirzaei, F.; Kareem, N.; Al-Naimat, H.; Jardaneh, L.; Al-Majali, L.; AlHadidi, A.; et al. Assessing Healthcare Workers’ Knowledge and Their Confidence in the Diagnosis and Management of Human Monkeypox: A Cross-Sectional Study in a Middle Eastern Country. Healthcare 2022, 10, 1722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ulloque-Badaracco, J.R.; Alarcón-Braga, E.A.; Hernandez-Bustamante, E.A.; Al-kassab-Córdova, A.; Benites-Zapata, V.A.; Bonilla-Aldana, D.K.; Rodriguez-Morales, A.J. Acceptance towards Monkeypox Vaccination: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Pathogens 2022, 11, 1248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Temsah, M.-H.; Aljamaan, F.; Alenezi, S.; Alhasan, K.; Saddik, B.; Al-Barag, A.; Alhaboob, A.; Bahabri, N.; Alshahrani, F.; Alrabiaah, A.; et al. Monkeypox Caused Less Worry than COVID-19 among the General Population during the First Month of the WHO Monkeypox Alert: Experience from Saudi Arabia. Travel. Med. Infect. Dis. 2022, 49, 102426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Youssef, D.; Abboud, E.; Kawtharani, M.; Zheim, Z.; Abou Arrage, N.; Youssef, J. When a Neglected Tropical Zoonotic Disease Emerges in Non-Endemic Countries: Need to Proactively Fill the Unveiled Knowledge Gaps towards Human Monkeypox among the Lebanese Population. J. Pharm. Policy Pract. 2023, 16, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Berdida, D.J.E. Population-based Survey of Human Monkeypox Disease Knowledge in the Philippines: An Online Cross-sectional Study. J. Adv. Nurs. 2023, 79, 2684–2694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Aljamaan, F.; Alenezi, S.; Alhasan, K.; Saddik, B.; Alhaboob, A.; Altawil, E.; Alshahrani, F.; Alrabiaah, A.; Alaraj, A.; Alkriadees, K.; et al. Healthcare Workers’ Worries and Monkeypox Vaccine Advocacy during the First Month of the WHO Monkeypox Alert: Cross-Sectional Survey in Saudi Arabia. Vaccines 2022, 10, 1408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Meo, S.A.; Al-Khlaiwi, T.; Aljofan, Z.F.; Alanazi, A.I.; Meo, A.S. Public Perceptions of the Emerging Human Monkeypox Disease and Vaccination in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study. Vaccines 2022, 10, 1534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Riccò, M.; Ferraro, P.; Camisa, V.; Satta, E.; Zaniboni, A.; Ranzieri, S.; Baldassarre, A.; Zaffina, S.; Marchesi, F. When a Neglected Tropical Disease Goes Global: Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices of Italian Physicians towards Monkeypox, Preliminary Results. TropicalMed 2022, 7, 135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ahmed, S.K.; Abdulqadir, S.O.; Omar, R.M.; Abdullah, A.J.; Rahman, H.A.; Hussein, S.H.; Mohammed Amin, H.I.; Chandran, D.; Sharma, A.K.; Dhama, K.; et al. Knowledge, Attitude and Worry in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq during the Mpox (Monkeypox) Outbreak in 2022: An Online Cross-Sectional Study. Vaccines 2023, 11, 610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Lounis, M.; Bencherit, D.; Abdelhadi, S. Knowledge and Awareness of Algerian Healthcare Workers about Human Monkeypox and Their Attitude toward Its Vaccination: An Online Cross-Sectional Survey. Vacunas 2023, 24, 122–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lin, G.S.; Tan, W.; Chan, D.K.; Ooi, K.; Hashim, H. Monkeypox Awareness, Knowledge, and Attitude among Undergraduate Preclinical and Clinical Students at a Malaysian Dental School: An Emerging Outbreak during the COVID-19 Era. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Med. 2022, 15, 461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. von Elm, E.; Altman, D.G.; Egger, M.; Pocock, S.J.; Gøtzsche, P.C.; Vandenbroucke, J.P. Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies. BMJ 2007, 335, 806–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Harapan, H.; Setiawan, A.M.; Yufika, A.; Anwar, S.; Wahyuni, S.; Asrizal, F.W.; Sufri, M.R.; Putra, R.P.; Wijayanti, N.P.; Salwiyadi, S.; et al. Confidence in Managing Human Monkeypox Cases in Asia: A Cross-Sectional Survey among General Practitioners in Indonesia. Acta Trop. 2020, 206, 105450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Harapan, H.; Setiawan, A.M.; Yufika, A.; Anwar, S.; Wahyuni, S.; Asrizal, F.W.; Sufri, M.R.; Putra, R.P.; Wijayanti, N.P.; Salwiyadi, S.; et al. Knowledge of Human Monkeypox Viral Infection among General Practitioners: A Cross-Sectional Study in Indonesia. Pathog. Glob. Health 2020, 114, 68–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Harapan, H.; Wagner, A.L.; Yufika, A.; Setiawan, A.M.; Anwar, S.; Wahyuni, S.; Asrizal, F.W.; Sufri, M.R.; Putra, R.P.; Wijayanti, N.P.; et al. Acceptance and Willingness to Pay for a Hypothetical Vaccine against Monkeypox Viral Infection among Frontline Physicians: A Cross-Sectional Study in Indonesia. Vaccine 2020, 38, 6800–6806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Harapan, H.; Setiawan, A.M.; Yufika, A.; Anwar, S.; Wahyuni, S.; Asrizal, F.W.; Sufri, M.R.; Putra, R.P.; Wijayanti, N.P.; Salwiyadi, S.; et al. Physicians’ Willingness to Be Vaccinated with a Smallpox Vaccine to Prevent Monkeypox Viral Infection: A Cross-Sectional Study in Indonesia. Clin. Epidemiol. Glob. Health 2020, 8, 1259–1263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Shapiro, G.K.; Holding, A.; Perez, S.; Amsel, R.; Rosberger, Z. Validation of the Vaccine Conspiracy Beliefs Scale. Papillomavirus Res. 2016, 2, 167–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Peptan, C.; Băleanu, V.D.; Mărcău, F.C. Study on the Vaccination of the Population of Romania against Monkeypox in Terms of Medical Security. Vaccines 2022, 10, 1834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Gagneux-Brunon, A.; Dauby, N.; Launay, O.; Botelho-Nevers, E. Attitudes towards Monkeypox Vaccination among Healthcare Workers in France and Belgium: An Element of Complacency? J. Hosp. Infect. 2022, 130, 144–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Alsanafi, M.; Al-Mahzoum, K.; Sallam, M. Monkeypox Knowledge and Confidence in Diagnosis and Management with Evaluation of Emerging Virus Infection Conspiracies among Health Professionals in Kuwait. Pathogens 2022, 11, 994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Jairoun, A.A.; Al-Hemyari, S.S.; Abdulla, N.M.; El-Dahiyat, F.; Shahwan, M.; Hassan, N.; Jairoun, O.; Alyousef, N.G.; Sharif, S.; Jaber, A.A.S. Awareness and Preparedness of Human Monkeypox Outbreak among University Student: Time to Worry or One to Ignore? J. Infect. Public Health 2022, 15, 1065–1071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Alshahrani, N.Z.; Mitra, S.; Alkuwaiti, A.A.; Alhumam, M.N.; Altmimi, S.M.B.; Alamri, M.H.M.; Albalawi, Z.A.S.; Almorgi, M.W.; Alharbi, H.K.D.; Alshahrani, S.M. Medical Students’ Perception Regarding the Re-Emerging Monkeypox Virus: An Institution-Based Cross-Sectional Study from Saudi Arabia. Cureus 2022, 14, e28060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Riad, A.; Drobov, A.; Rozmarinová, J.; Drapáčová, P.; Klugarová, J.; Dušek, L.; Pokorná, A.; Klugar, M. Monkeypox Knowledge and Vaccine Hesitancy of Czech Healthcare Workers: A Health Belief Model (HBM)-Based Study. Vaccines 2022, 10, 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Malaeb, D.; Sallam, M.; Salim, N.A.; Dabbous, M.; Younes, S.; Nasrallah, Y.; Iskandar, K.; Matta, M.; Obeid, S.; Hallit, S.; et al. Knowledge, Attitude and Conspiracy Beliefs of Healthcare Workers in Lebanon towards Monkeypox. Trop. Med. Infect. Dis. 2023, 8, 81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Kaur, A.; Goel, R.; Singh, R.; Bhardwaj, A.; Kumari, R.; Gambhir, R.S. Identifying Monkeypox: Do Dental Professionals Have Adequate Knowledge and Awareness? Rocz. Panstw. Zakl. Hig. 2022, 73, 365–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Sahin, T.K.; Erul, E.; Aksun, M.S.; Sonmezer, M.C.; Unal, S.; Akova, M. Knowledge and Attitudes of Turkish Physicians towards Human Monkeypox Disease and Related Vaccination: A Cross-Sectional Study. Vaccines 2022, 11, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ugwu, S.E.; Abolade, S.A.; Ofeh, A.S.; Awoyinka, T.B.; Okolo, B.O.; Ayeni, E.T.; Kolawole, E.O. Knowledge, Attitude, and Perception of Monkeypox among Medical/Health Students across Media Space in Nigeria. Int. J. Community Med. Public. Health 2022, 9, 4391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kumar, N.; Ahmed, F.; Raza, M.S.; Rajpoot, P.L.; Rehman, W.; Khatri, S.A.; Mohammed, M.; Muhammad, S.; Ahmad, R. Monkeypox Cross-Sectional Survey of Knowledge, Attitudes, Practices, and Willingness to Vaccinate among University Students in Pakistan. Vaccines 2022, 11, 97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Winters, M.; Malik, A.A.; Omer, S.B. Attitudes towards Monkeypox Vaccination and Predictors of Vaccination Intentions among the US General Public. PLoS ONE 2022, 17, e0278622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Sallam, M.; Ghazy, R.M.; Al-Salahat, K.; Al-Mahzoum, K.; AlHadidi, N.M.; Eid, H.; Kareem, N.; Al-Ajlouni, E.; Batarseh, R.; Ababneh, N.A.; et al. The Role of Psychological Factors and Vaccine Conspiracy Beliefs in Influenza Vaccine Hesitancy and Uptake among Jordanian Healthcare Workers during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Vaccines 2022, 10, 1355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Sallam, M.; Dababseh, D.; Eid, H.; Hasan, H.; Taim, D.; Al-Mahzoum, K.; Al-Haidar, A.; Yaseen, A.; Ababneh, N.A.; Assaf, A.; et al. Low COVID-19 Vaccine Acceptance Is Correlated with Conspiracy Beliefs among University Students in Jordan. IJERPH 2021, 18, 2407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Idr 16 00013 g001
Figure 1. Sources of information on MPOX of the surveyed population.
Figure 1. Sources of information on MPOX of the surveyed population.
Idr 16 00013 g001
Table 1. Demographics, education, and vaccine status of the respondents.
Table 1. Demographics, education, and vaccine status of the respondents.
Variable NumberFrequency (%)
AgeUnder 20 years10855.1
20–29 years7538.3
Over 30 years136.6
SexFemales16885.7
Males2814.3
Marital statusMarried94.6
Single18795.4
Living areaRural2110.7
Urban17589.3
SpecialtyMedicine12664.3
Natural and Life Sciences2311.7
Pharmacy2311.7
Veterinary Sciences168.2
Dental Sciences52.6
Paramedical Sciences31.5
Educational levelFirst year10855.1
Second year105.1
Third year136.6
Fourth year84.1
Fifth year2713.8
Sixth year168.2
Seventh year147.1
Influenza vaccineYes 6030.6
No13669.4
COVID-19 vaccineYes4321.9
No15378.1
Table 2. Average correct responses for the different items.
Table 2. Average correct responses for the different items.
ItemCorrect Responses (%)
1. MPOX is prevalent in North African countries48.5
2. MPOX is prevalent in Western and Central Africa53.1
3. There are many MPOX cases in Algeria63.3
4. MPOX is a viral disease infection66.3
5. MPOX is a bacterial disease infection59.7
6. MPOX is easily transmitted from human to human19.9
7. MPOX can be transmitted through a bite of an infected monkey45.9
8. Sexual transmission is the main route of transmission of MPOX29.1
9. Monkeys are the main reservoir of MPOX virus15.8
10. MPOX and smallpox have similar signs and symptoms48.5
11. Flu-like syndrome is one of the early signs or symptoms of MPOX34.7
12. Rashes on the skin are one of the signs or symptoms of MPOX77.6
13. Papules on the skin are one of the signs or symptoms of MPOX59.2
14. Vesicles on the skin are one of the signs or symptoms of MPOX44.9
15. Pustules on the skin are one of the signs or symptoms of MPOX60.2
16. Lymphadenopathy (swollen lymph nodes) is one clinical sign or symptom that could be used to differentiate MPOX and smallpox cases37.8
17. Diarrhea is one of the signs or symptoms of MPOX19.4
18. Antivirals are required in the management of MPOX patients23.5
19. Antibiotics are required in the management of MPOX patients25.0
20. The case fatality rate of MPOX is high43.9
21. Vaccination is available for MPOX in Algeria38.8
22. There is a smallpox vaccine that can be used for MPOX27.6
Average 42.8
Table 3. Knowledge-related factors of the surveyed students.
Table 3. Knowledge-related factors of the surveyed students.
High (%)Low (%)Sig.OR (CI95%)Sig.
AgeUnder 20 years45 (41.7)63 (58.3)0.1860.36 (0.05–2.81)0.332
20–29 years34 (45.3)41 (54.7)0.8970.11 (0.02–0.79)0.028
Over 30 years11 (84.6)2 (15.4)0.007 *..
SexFemales76 (45.2)92 (54.8)0.6401.45 (0.54–3.91)0.459
Males14 (50)14 (50)..
Living areaRural12 (57.1)9 (42.9)0.357 *1.53 (0.57–4.10)0.400
Urban78 (44.6)97 (55.4)..
SpecialtyPharmacy10 (43.5)13 (56.5)0.8031.11 (0.38–3.25)0.855
Veterinary Sciences13 (81.3)3 (18.8)0.004 *6.71 (1.23–36.77)0.028
NLS12 (52.2)11 (47.8)0.5223.45 (0.93–12.84)0.065
Medicines (dental)52 (39.7)79 (60.3)0.013..
Educational level4–5 years21 (60)14 (40)0.0651.52 (0.42–5.56)0.524
6–7 years15 (50)15 (50)0.6262.04 (0.54–7.66)0.293
1–3 years54 (41.2)77 (58.8)0.061..
Influenza vaccineYes21 (35)39 (65)0.0420.42 (0.21–0.85)0.016
No69 (50.7)67 (49.3)..
COVID-19 vaccineYes23 (53.5)20 (46.5)0.2601.78 (0.73–4.30)0.203
No67 (43.8)86 (56.2)..
NLS, Natural and Life Science. Bold character indicates significant results with a statistical difference (Sig. < 0.05) using Chi-squared or Fisher (indicated by an Asterisk (*)) tests.
Table 4. Willingness-to-vaccinate determinants in the surveyed population.
Table 4. Willingness-to-vaccinate determinants in the surveyed population.
Variable Yes (%)No (%)Sig.OR (CI95%)Sig.
AgeUnder 20 years58 (53.7)50 (46.3)0.1042.55 (0.42–15.36)0.306
20–29 years33 (44)42 (56)0.3243.03 (0.66–13.84)0.152
Over 30 years4 (30.8)9 (69.2)0.253 *..
SexFemale81 (48.2)87 (51.8)0.8610.83 (0.37–2.14)0.706
Males14 (50)14 (50)
Living areaRural8 (38.1)13 (61.9)0.3140.77 (0.28–2.10)0.605
Urban87 (49.7)88 (50.3)..
SpecialtyVeterinary Sciences5 (31.3)11 (68.8)0.196 *0.47 (0.10–2.17)0.333
NLS5 (21.7)18 (78.3)0.0060.14 (0.03–0.59)0.008
Paramedical Sciences1 (33.3)2 (66.7)1 *0.56 (0.03–9.38)0.688
Pharmacy9 (39.1)14 (60.9)0.3400.481 (0.16–1.45)0.193
Medicine (dental)75 (57.3)56 (42.7)0.0005..
Educational level4–5 years12 (34.3)23 (65.7)0.0641.273 (0.34–4.83)0.722
6–7 years15 (50)15 (50)0.8551.14 (0.31–4.17)0.842
1–3 years68 (51.9)63 (48.1)0.171..
Influenza vaccineYes34 (56.7)26 (43.3)0.1271.90 (0.95–3.78)0.069
No61 (44.9)75 (55.1).
COVID-19 vaccineYes23 (53.5)20 (46.5)0.4561.49 (0.63–3.56)0.367
No72 (47.1)81 (52.9)..
Knowledge score High39 (43.3)51 (56.7)0.1850.85 (0.45–1.61)0.618
Low56 (52.8)50 (47.2)..
VCBS scale High41 (39.8)62 (60.2)0.0110.476 (0.26–0.89)0.019
Low54 (58.1)39 (41.9)..
NLS, Natural and Life Science. Bold character indicates significant results with a statistical difference (Sig. < 0.05) using Chi-squared or Fisher (indicated by an Asterisk (*)) tests.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lounis, M.; Hamimes, A.; Dahmani, A. Assessment of Monkeypox (MPOX) Knowledge and Vaccination Intention among Health and Life Sciences Students in Algeria: A Cross-Sectional Study. Infect. Dis. Rep. 2024, 16, 170-180. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/idr16020013

AMA Style

Lounis M, Hamimes A, Dahmani A. Assessment of Monkeypox (MPOX) Knowledge and Vaccination Intention among Health and Life Sciences Students in Algeria: A Cross-Sectional Study. Infectious Disease Reports. 2024; 16(2):170-180. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/idr16020013

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lounis, Mohamed, Ahmed Hamimes, and Ali Dahmani. 2024. "Assessment of Monkeypox (MPOX) Knowledge and Vaccination Intention among Health and Life Sciences Students in Algeria: A Cross-Sectional Study" Infectious Disease Reports 16, no. 2: 170-180. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/idr16020013

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop