A Concept Analysis of the Social Responsibility of Nursing Organizations Based on Walker and Avant’s Method
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
Τhe subject of the article is very interesting.
Ιt is essentially a descriptive literature review which, however, has serious methodological problems.
The number of articles studied and included in the text is not stated.
The reader does not understand from the text what this study will aim for.
The bibliography cited is old and as a result does not convey to the reader the newest knowledge.
The analysis of the included articles does not answer the stated purpose of the study.
The bibliography does not follow the rules of journal writing.
Finally, the text is very confusing, which makes the reader very tired.
Author Response
Thank you for valuable comments for my paper.
as what you mentioned for revision, i overall modified parts underlined in red.
i added references in the text is stated, and revised the purpose and results overall clearly.
the biblography modified the rules of journal writing and added the lastest paper.
once again, thanks your comments for making my paper better one.
Author Response File: 
Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 2 Report
Thank you for the opportunity to explore such exciting research.
The authors reflected their research in an article that meets the requirements of highly-reviewed journals. The study's strengths are its relevance and the logical presentation of materials. The methodology is described in sufficient detail, the article's purpose is clearly stated, and the results are also quite logical, filled with visual representations of the study. The arguments and discussion of findings are coherent, balanced and compelling. The authors also emphasized the theoretical and practical significance of the research, so I literally have a couple of suggestions to improve the presentation of the research:
1) there is no gap in the analysis of the literature; still, concerning “corporate social responsibility”, it could be useful Dudek M. Methodology for assessment of inclusive social responsibility of the energy industry enterprises; human capital may this one will be useful Malynovska Y. Enhancing the Activity of Employees of the Communication Department of an Energy Sector Company
2) mention the article’s limitations.
3) This must be indicated if the article affects ethical norms and principles.
4) the only significant drawback, in my opinion, is the smearing of the results throughout the article, I would like to see a clearer formulation of what exactly the author achieved in this article
I hope that the author will do his best to make the necessary corrections to the article for really interesting research to be published.
Author Response
Thank you for valuable comments for my paper.
as what you mentioned for revision, i overall modified parts underlined in red.
i mentioned articles limitations and ethical principles, and revised the purpose and results overall clearly. so there are some different characteristics of nursing organization between corporate and healthcare(nursing) organization caring from individual patients and health environment.
once again, thanks your comments for making my paper better one.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 3 Report
Thank you for giving me the opportunity to read a good paper.
In this paper, the author mentioned that the concept of social responsibility of nursing organizations is unclear, therefore, the concept needs to be analyzed and clarified.
It is clear that it is a good attempt, but this study is missing this part despite the need for conceptual analysis of organizational social responsibility.
I think the author knows that there is social responsibility at the individual and organizational levels. In my opinion, there are things to look at at this point.
Title: Nursing organization must be added to the title.
Abstract: It is understood that the concept of social responsibility of nursing has been analyzed. The terminology to be modified with the term "nursing organization" rather than "nursing". There is also no definition of the concept.
Background : There is a week logic that social responsibility concept analysis in nursing organizations. It is necessary to replace the findings with the latest ones.
Methods :
1. Contrary to the purpose of the study, the keyword for literature review are "social responsibility" and "nursing". Is there a reason why you didn't use the nursing organization?
2. There are five documents that can be found in the reference list in Table 1. In five cases, it deals with social responsibility of nurses and nursing schools. In order to show how the social responsibility of nursing organizations is used in the literature, I think we should consider the literature that has attempted an organizational approach (school, institution, etc.) rather than an individual level.
3. Therefore, the 4.4. process of conceptual analysis also needs to be considered.
4. Steps 4.5 to 4.8 also need to be reviewed to see if the social responsibility case of the nursing organization is correct.
Discussion : I think the logic should be reinforced in the process of the research method and the discussion should proceed according to the results.
Thank you for your efforts.
I recommend you to get an English editing.
Author Response
Thank you for valuable comments for my paper.
as what you mentioned for revision, i overall modified parts underlined in red. Please see the attachment.
once again, thanks your comments for making my paper better one.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Round 2
Reviewer 1 Report
Congratulations.
No comments needed.
Reviewer 3 Report
I think the paper has been revised to make a clearer statement than before.
Thank you for your efforts.
