Next Article in Journal
Optimisation Techniques for Managing the Project Sustainability Objective: Application to a Shell and Tube Heat Exchanger
Next Article in Special Issue
A Methodology for Assessing the Implementation Potential for Retrofitted and Multifunctional Urban Green Infrastructure in Public Areas of the Global South
Previous Article in Journal
Geosites and Georesources to Foster Geotourism in Communities: Case Study of the Santa Elena Peninsula Geopark Project in Ecuador
Previous Article in Special Issue
Vision-Based Decision-Making Methodology for Riparian Forest Restoration and Flood Protection Using Nature-Based Solutions
Review

Analyzing Evidence of Sustainable Urban Water Management Systems: A Review through the Lenses of Sociotechnical Transitions

by 1,2,* and 2,*
1
Department of Civil, Environmental and Mechanical Engineering, University of Trento, 38123 Trento, Italy
2
Division of Urban and Regional Studies, Department of Urban Planning & Environment, Royal Institute of Technology, 114 28 Stockholm, Sweden
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2020, 12(11), 4481; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su12114481
Received: 16 March 2020 / Revised: 19 May 2020 / Accepted: 28 May 2020 / Published: 1 June 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nature-Based Solutions for Water Management from Pilot to Standard)
Sustainability concerns and multiple socio-environmental pressures have necessitated a shift towards Sustainable Urban Water Management (SUWM) systems. Viewing SUWM systems as sociotechnical, this paper departs from eight factors previously identified by transition research: Pressures, Context, Purposes, Actors, Instruments, Processes, Outputs, and Outcomes as a methodological framework for a structured review of 100 articles. The study seeks to analyze empirical cases of planning and implementing SUWM systems worldwide. A wide range of public actors—driven by social and environmental factors rather than by economic pressures—have initiated SUWM projects so as to locally fulfill defined social and environmental purposes. We provide evidence on the emergence of new actors, such as experts, users, and private developers, as well as on the diverse and innovative technical and societal instruments used to promote and implement SUWM systems. We also explore their contexts and institutional capacity to deal with pressures and to mobilize significant financial and human resources, which is in itself vital for the transition to SUWM. Planned or implemented SUWM outputs are divided into green (wet ponds, raingardens, and green roofs) and gray (rain barrels and porous pavements) measures. The outcomes of SUWM projects—in terms of societal and technical learning, and their institutional uptakes—are often implicit or lacking, which seemingly reduces the rate of desirable change. View Full-Text
Keywords: Blue–Green Infrastructure; low-impact development; sustainable urban drainage system; Water-Sensitive Urban Design; Water-Sensitive City; integrated urban water management; Sponge City; rainwater harvesting systems; planning; case study Blue–Green Infrastructure; low-impact development; sustainable urban drainage system; Water-Sensitive Urban Design; Water-Sensitive City; integrated urban water management; Sponge City; rainwater harvesting systems; planning; case study
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

MDPI and ACS Style

Adem Esmail, B.; Suleiman, L. Analyzing Evidence of Sustainable Urban Water Management Systems: A Review through the Lenses of Sociotechnical Transitions. Sustainability 2020, 12, 4481. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su12114481

AMA Style

Adem Esmail B, Suleiman L. Analyzing Evidence of Sustainable Urban Water Management Systems: A Review through the Lenses of Sociotechnical Transitions. Sustainability. 2020; 12(11):4481. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su12114481

Chicago/Turabian Style

Adem Esmail, Blal, and Lina Suleiman. 2020. "Analyzing Evidence of Sustainable Urban Water Management Systems: A Review through the Lenses of Sociotechnical Transitions" Sustainability 12, no. 11: 4481. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su12114481

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop