Next Article in Journal
Pandemic or Environmental Socio-Economic Stressors Which Have Greater Impact on Food Security in the Barishal Division of Bangladesh: Initial Perspectives from Agricultural Officers and Farmers
Next Article in Special Issue
Hybrid Forecasting Methodology for Wind Power-Photovoltaic-Concentrating Solar Power Generation Clustered Renewable Energy Systems
Previous Article in Journal
The New EU Remuneration Policy as Good but Not Desired Corporate Governance Mechanism and the Role of CSR Disclosing
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Analyzing the Effect of Parasitic Capacitance in a Full-Bridge Class-D Current Source Rectifier on a High Step-Up Push–Pull Multiresonant Converter

Sustainability 2021, 13(10), 5477; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su13105477
by Anusak Bilsalam 1,*, Chainarin Ekkaravarodome 2, Viboon Chunkag 3 and Phatiphat Thounthong 4
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Sustainability 2021, 13(10), 5477; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su13105477
Submission received: 15 April 2021 / Revised: 3 May 2021 / Accepted: 6 May 2021 / Published: 13 May 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Sustainable Electrical Engineering)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

This paper presents astudy of the effect parasitic capacitance full bridge class-D current source rectifier (FB-CDCSR) on a high step-up push–pull multi-resonant converter (HSPPMRC).

I consider that overall this paper, is a quite good work: the theory seems correct and the reported results are interesting, but I think that the authors should take into account some issues:

1) From the title is not clear what is the purpose of this paper: presenting the study of the effect parasitic capacitance full bridge class-D current source rectifier (FB-CDCSR) on a high step-up push–pull multi-resonant converter (HSPPMRC) or proposing an innovative design.

2) The Authors should better show how this work could advance the state of the art.

3) Figures from 8 are not correctly numbered/referenced.

4)  A deep linguistic review of the manuscript should be carried out by a native English-speaking person.

 

Author Response

Our response to reviewers’ comments for MDPI sustainability-1204019

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments

The topic covered in this paper is important in terms of improving the operation of power inverters. It is important that all the parameters that influence the operation of the inverters are taken into account in the design of this equipment. Through the results presented in the paper, the authors justify the fact that it is necessary not to neglect in the design of the inverters the parasitic capacities that intervene in their operation. Neglecting these capacities can lead to unacceptable errors in sizing inverters.

 

1.In fig. 3 the signals vgs1, vgs2, vD1, vD2, vD3, vD4, iD1, iD2, iD3, iD4, ip1, ip2  do not intervene in fig. 2. Why?

2.Fig.4 refers to the mode M1 (d) and M2 (c) which are not in the figure.

 

3.In relation 2 and 6 the sign = is missing.

4.In rel. 4, 8, 10, 12 is the left term missing ?

5.Who is the CD in re. 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 13, 14, 16, 17?

6.The loss of active power in the ferromagnetic core of the transformer is neglected. Why?

7.In relation 23 what is cos-1?

8.In relation 30, 103 must be replaced by 10-3.

Author Response

Our response to reviewers’ comments for MDPI sustainability-1204019

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

The manuscript has been improved and the Authors substantially addressed my comments and suggestions.

Back to TopTop