Next Article in Journal
The Impact of Multispecies Probiotics on Calcium and Magnesium Status in Healthy Male Rats
Next Article in Special Issue
Do Older Women of Reproductive Age Have Better Diet Quality than Younger Women of Reproductive Age?
Previous Article in Journal
Consumption of a Low Carbohydrate Diet in Overweight or Obese Pregnant Women Is Associated with Longer Gestation of Pregnancy
Previous Article in Special Issue
Food-Based Dietary Guidelines around the World: A Comparative Analysis to Update AESAN Scientific Committee Dietary Recommendations
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nutrients
Volume 13
Issue 10
10.3390/nu13103512
nutrients-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Factors Related to Diet Quality: A Cross-Sectional Study of 1055 University Students

by
Enrique Ramón-Arbués
1,2,
José-Manuel Granada-López
2,3,4,
Blanca Martínez-Abadía
5,
Emmanuel Echániz-Serrano
2,3,
Isabel Antón-Solanas
3,6,* and
Benjamin Adam Jerue
7
1
Faculty of Health Sciences, Campus Universitario Villanueva de Gállego, Universidad San Jorge, Villanueva de Gállego, 50830 Zaragoza, Spain
2
Research Group Transfercult (H27_20D), University of Zaragoza, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain
3
Department of Physiatrics and Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Zaragoza, C/Domingo Miral S/N, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain
4
Research Group Safety and Care (GIISA021), Institute of Research of Aragón, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain
5
Occupational Health and Prevention Service, Zaragoza City Council, P° de La Mina 9, 50001 Zaragoza, Spain
6
Research Group Nursing Research in Primary Care in Aragón (GENIAPA) (GIIS094), Institute of Research of Aragón, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain
7
Faculty of Communication and Social Sciences, Campus Universitario Villanueva de Gállego, Universidad San Jorge, Villanueva de Gállego, 50830 Zaragoza, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nutrients 2021, 13(10), 3512; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/nu13103512
Submission received: 30 August 2021 / Revised: 29 September 2021 / Accepted: 1 October 2021 / Published: 5 October 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Healthy Eating in Relation to National Dietary Guidelines)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Given that there is only a limited body of evidence available concerning the dietary habits of Spanish university students, the present study assesses the quality of this group’s diet, their adherence to the National Food-Based Dietary Guidelines, and the predictive factors of their diet quality. To do so, a cross-sectional study was performed on a sample of 1055 students. The quality of the participants’ diets was then analysed by using the Spanish Healthy Eating Index, and then their level of compliance was assessed in light of the dietary recommendations put forth by the Spanish Society for Community Nutrition. According to these standards, only 17.4% of the participants had a healthy diet. The level of compliance with the recommendations was poor, highlighting especially the low levels of “fruit” and “vegetables” that they consumed as well as high levels of “cold meats and cuts” and “sweets”. The factors that predicted a worse diet are being male, living alone, low levels of physical activity, smoking, high alcohol intake, leading a sedentary lifestyle, psychological distress, and insomnia (p < 0.005). Furthermore, participants with low or high body weights showed signs of a higher quality diet (p < 0.001). The present findings suggest that a significant proportion of university students ought to change their dietary habits; these also attest to the importance of developing strategies that are directly targeted at university students in order to promote a healthy diet.

1. Introduction

Research has repeatedly shown the important role that diet plays in maintaining one’s short and long-term health as well as its relation to life expectancy [1,2]. Accordingly, increasing diet quality could be independently associated with a reduced risk of death (by all causes) of up to 28% [3,4]. There is also evidence [5,6] that links the consumption of certain foods with the increased or decreased likelihood of suffering from certain diseases. All of these findings on the importance of diet have been taken into account by various organisations that have published dietary guidelines [7]. The level of compliance with these recommendations has in turn served as the basis for constructing indices that seek to assess the diet quality (DQ) of various groups and populations. Not only have these indices proven to be useful tools for assessing alimentary practices (e.g., diet diversity, moderation, etc.), but their use is also recommended for studies on the DQ of the general population as well as more targeted groups [8]. Internationally, these indices have been used to study the DQ of a range of groups [9,10,11,12], including university students [13,14]. Students, in particular, are an important target audience for public health actions, seeing that entering university constitutes a drastic change in lifestyle that can bring about new challenges and meaningfully affect the students’ habits and health. Rivalry between classmates, the pressure to succeed academically, changes in workload and support networks, new types of relationships, and, in some instances, moving away from home are all factors that can trigger new, risky behaviours that may compromise the future health of university students [15,16]. These young adults find themselves in a crucial moment in terms of acquiring and reinforcing many habits that impact health. When it comes to dietary habits, university is the time when previously learned patterns can be cemented, or new patterns can be learned and replace old ones [17,18]. Many variables can exert influence on the ways that university students nourish themselves, including individual factors (e.g., the lack of self-discipline or time constraints), support networks (e.g., the influence of peers or the lack of parental monitoring), the local environment (e.g., accessibility or the appeal and price of certain food products) as well as the macro environment (e.g., advertising) [19,20]. Other sociodemographic variables have also been connected to the DQ of university students, including the following: living alone [21], gender [22], satisfaction with one’s studies and academic performance [23], lack of information [24] as well as anxiety and depression [25].
In Spain, there have been numerous studies on the DQ of the general population [7,26,27,28] and even clinical populations [29,30]. That said, more targeted work on the DQ of young people and university students in particular has been scarcer, and the studies that do exist have generally relied on small samples and somewhat indirect approximations of DQ based on the adherence to the Mediterranean diet. Accordingly, there is an important gap in the research that needs to be filled, especially given that universities can easily communicate with large groups of young adults and hence could become excellent agents for promoting healthier dietary practices. With this in mind, this study’s objectives were twofold: first, to assess Spanish university students’ DQ and adherence to the National Food-Based Dietary Guidelines (NFBDG) [31]; second, to identify possibly linked factors.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Design and Study Population

A descriptive cross-sectional study was carried out among a group of undergraduate students from the San Jorge University in Zaragoza (Aragon, Spain). Information about the research objectives was provided and students were recruited in the classroom during the second semester of the 2020–2021 academic year (specifically, in March and April of 2021). A total of 1309 students out of the 2219 enrolled at the university were asked to participate in the study by anonymously filling out a series of questionnaires. There were 151 students who declined to participate, while the responses of an additional 103 students were discarded due to gaps in the provided information (Figure 1).

2.2. Data Collection

Sociodemographic data (age, gender, place of residence, and marital status), anthropometric measurements (height and weight, which were used to calculate BMI), information about mental health history (signs of depression, anxiety, and stress), and lifestyle (current tobacco and alcohol intake, sleep, level of physical activity, time spent sitting, and diet) were collected. The BMI variable was categorised according to the classification of the World Health Organization (WHO) [32], namely as underweight (<18.5 kg/m2), normal weight (18.5–24.9 kg/m2), overweight (25–29.9 kg/m2), and obese (≥30 kg/m2). However, we combined the participants who were either overweight or obese into one group—overweight/obese (≥25 kg/m2)—in order to increase the sample-size comparability of the groups. The sociodemographic, anthropometric, and smoking data were all self-reported using a questionnaire made specifically for collecting this information.
Data on the mental health of participating students were gathered through the Depression, Anxiety, Stress Scales-21 (DASS-21) [33]. This scale is an abridged version of the DASS-42 and was validated for the study of Spanish university students in 2010 [34]. DASS-21 consists of three sub-scales (depression, anxiety, and stress) with seven Likert-style questions (with choices between 0 and 3) in each section. The total score of each sub-scale is multiplied by two so that results can be compared with those from the DASS-42. Next, the subjects were classified according to the following criteria:
  • Anxiety: Normal (0–7 points), mild (8–9), moderate (10–14), severe (15–19), and extremely severe (>19);
  • Depression: Normal (0–9 points), mild (10–13), moderate (14–20), severe (21–27), and extremely severe (>27);
  • Stress: Normal (0–14 points), mild (15–18), moderate (19–25), severe (26–33), and extremely severe (>33).
Data on alcohol intake were collected through the CAGE questionnaire, which has been validated for studying Spaniards by Rodríguez Martos et al. [35]. This questionnaire consists of four items with two possible responses (Yes or No). Consumption is deemed problematic when two or more questions are answered affirmatively.
Sleep quality was assessed using the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) in its Spanish version [36]. This tool has previously been used to measure this construct in similar populations [37,38]. In its Spanish version, the ISI comprises 7 items measuring three different components of insomnia, namely (1) nature of insomnia, (2) severity of insomnia symptoms, and (3) impact of insomnia on daily function. Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 to 4 points. The global score, ranging from 0 to 28, is obtained by adding the scores from each individual item. The results are classified as follows: (1) no insomnia (0–7 points), (2) sub-threshold insomnia (8–14 points), (3) moderate insomnia (15–21 points), severe insomnia (22–28 points).
Physical activity and sedentary time were assessed using the short version of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ-SF). This research tool, which has been validated for the study of Spanish university students [39], measures the intensity, frequency, and duration of physical activity over the last seven days. IPAQ-SF determines a mean of daily sedentary time and allows researchers to obtain two types of data concerning physical activity: first, it offers a calculation of the metabolic equivalent of tasks (METs), taking the type of activity (walking, moderate physical activity, and vigorous physical activity) and the time spent on the activity into account; secondly, the tool allows researchers to classify individuals into three categories of physical activity (low, moderate, high) [40].
DQ was assessed using the Spanish Healthy Eating Index (SHEI) [26]. This tool comprises 10 items measured on a 5-point Likert scale. Points for each answer (0 = no adherence, 2.5, 5, 7.5, or 10 = full adherence) are given based on the participant’s degree of adherence to the NFBDG recommendations for the frequency of consumption of specific foods [31]. Specifically, the SHEI measures the frequency of consumption of bread and grains, vegetables, fruit, dairy products, meat (including eggs), legumes, cold meats and cuts, sweets, soft drinks with sugar, and diet variety. The diet variety variable is calculated a posteriori by the researcher based on the participant’s report of daily and weekly food consumption (1 point is awarded for each weekly recommendation and 2 points for each daily recommendation that is fully met or adhered to). Supplementary Table S1 details the specific criteria for scoring each of these categories. The final score falls between 0 and 100 points, which is calculated by adding the scores from each category. Based on the results, diet can be classified as follows: healthy (>80), needing change (51–80), and inadequate (<51) [26].

2.3. Data Analysis

The characteristics of the sample were summarised using mean and standard deviation for the continuous variables, and frequency and percentage for the nominal ones. The Kolmogorov–Smirnov test was used to check the normality of DQ (SHEI score). Next, a multiple linear regression analysis was carried out (enter method) to determine which factors were associated with DQ (SHEI score). The covariates included in the multiple linear regression model were age, gender, BMI (WHO categories), life arrangement, marital status, smoking status, alcohol consumption (CAGE categories), physical activity (IPAQ categories), sedentary time, sleep quality (ISI categories), and symptoms of depression, anxiety, and stress (DASS-21 categories).
The model’s goodness-of-fit was assessed through R2. Furthermore, the diagnostic of collinearity of the final regression model showed tolerance levels over 0.6 for all included variables. The statistical analysis of the data was performed with the SPSS statistical package for Windows-Version 21 (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY, USA), accepting a significance level of p < 0.05.

3. Results

The size of the study’s final sample came to 1055 university students, with an average age of 21.74 ± 5.15. The majority of the participants were women (70.5%), living with family (66.4%), and non-smokers (76.6%). Nearly a third reported high alcohol intake and nearly half reported a low level of physical activity. Furthermore, 33.9% of the students reported some degree of stress, 18.5% reported depression, 23.5% anxiety, and 43.1% insomnia. Other information about the sample is presented in Table 1.
The average SHEI score came up to 68.57 ± 12.17 (100 being the maximum). The vast majority of the participants reported an inadequate diet (6.9%) or a diet needing changes (75.6%), while only 17.4% had a healthy diet (Table 1). The scores obtained by the participants ranged between 4.45 ± 3.28, for the consumption of sweets, and 9.27 ± 2.82, for the consumption of dairy products (Table 2).
Most participants showed a low level of compliance with the NFBDG recommendations concerning the frequency with which certain foods are consumed, especially for “bread and grains”, “fruits”, “meat”, “vegetables”; in contrast, participants surpassed recommendations for the categories “cold meats and cuts” and “sweets” (Figure 2). Men and women reported similar dietary patterns; that said, the women more consistently followed the recommendations for the consumption of fruits and vegetables (p < 0.05), whereas the men more rigidly adhered to recommendations concerning meat (p < 0.05).
Through the multiple linear regression analysis, we found that being older, being female, not having a stable partner as well as having a low or high body weight independently correlated with a better DQ (p < 0.05). On the other hand, demonstrating signs of depression, anxiety, stress or insomnia, living alone, smoking, having an unactive lifestyle, being sedentary, and a high alcohol intake were all linked independently with lower SHEI scores (p < 0.05). This model’s predictive power for DQ was determined to be 37.7% (R2 = 0.38) (Table 3).

4. Discussion

Based on the recommendations of the National Food-Based Dietary Guidelines [31], our findings suggest that university students’ diet quality is generally poor. Our participants consumed insufficient amounts of “fruit” and “vegetables” and excessive amounts of “cold meats and cuts” and “sweets”. Factors that predicted a diet of worse quality were being male, living alone, maintaining low levels of physical activity, smoking, consuming alcohol, leading a sedentary lifestyle, experiencing psychological distress, and insomnia. In contrast, participants with low or high body weights showed signs of a higher quality diet.
Only 17.4% of the participants reported having a healthy diet. The present results are similar to those previously obtained by using SHEI to study Spanish university students [22,41,42,43]. They are, however, distinctly lower than the results from studies of the general Spanish population, for which between 28% and 35.8% of the participants reported having a healthy diet [26,27,29]. These results could be explained in two ways that are not mutually exclusive. First, the newly found liberty and independence associated with university life could allow students to let themselves go and overindulge in low-quality foods and alcohol. This does not necessarily mean that these individuals will not improve their DQ in the future after finishing their studies; indeed, they very well could do so. In this vein, previous studies carried out in England, Spain, and Lebanon have shown that some students opt for a poorer diet and gain a significant amount of weight in the first year of university, a phenomenon popularly referred to as “the Freshman 15” [44,45,46]. The second argument is that these trends reflect a more general tendency and could therefore imply that the DQ of Spaniards could decline in the future. The fact that age was positively associated with DQ in our sample lends support to this hypothesis. Indeed, research has shown that there has continually been less adherence to the Mediterranean diet in Spain [47,48], a diet that has been shown to be healthy and traditional in the country. This, however, does not appear to be a trend that is only valid in Spain, since researchers throughout Europe have detected a decrease in DQ over the last decade [49].
Internationally, researchers have found a remarkable range in the percentage of university students who have a healthy diet, ranging between 1.8% and 57% [18,50,51,52,53]. These differences, for the most part, can be explained in terms of the different socioeconomic realities and living arrangements of the various countries studied. For example, whereas 57% of Thai students reported following an inadequate diet [50], only 2.03% of Northern European students followed an unhealthy diet [18].
What deserves special attention is how student habits do not conform to the national alimentary guidelines for the majority of food groups. In fact, over 50% of the participants complied with recommendations in only three of the 10 variables included in the SHEI (dairy products, legumes, and soft drinks with sugar). Likewise, the results show a low level of fruit and vegetable consumption (44.3% and 32.5% of recommended frequency, respectively). Prima facie, these results may come as a surprise since Spain has a reputation for the quality of its agricultural products. However, similar trends have already been observed in Spanish university students [54,55] and the general population [7,56] that support the present findings.
In line with previous studies carried out in Tunisia and Canada [52,57], being a woman is associated with a better DQ. The relationship between gender and diet are conditioned by a suite of physiological, psychological, and sociocultural factors. Thus, women generally believe in the importance of a healthy diet, are more likely to monitor their body weight, and frequently express greater concern over their own eating habits [58,59,60].
The connection between DQ and BMI is controversial. From a biological point of view, it is plausible that a low-quality diet could be associated with deviations (whether higher or lower) from what experts recommend as a healthy body weight. As a corollary, a high-quality diet would be expected to favour healthy body weight. However, various studies have demonstrated how this is not always the case [61,62]. Our analysis found a U-shaped relation between the profiles of BMI and DQ (healthy body weight < low and high weights). These results should be viewed with caution given this study’s qualitative means of assessing DQ. However, it is possible that in a developed country such as Spain, young university students who are over or underweight may be more informed and conscious about what constitutes a healthy and balanced diet; perhaps some are influenced by the enduring canon of beauty in the West (based on being thin), while others seek to have a healthier weight.
The participants that lived alone showed a poorer DQ than those who lived with family members or flat mates. This same phenomenon has been repeatedly found in other studies involving samples of European students [21,63]. There are various reasons that explain why students who live alone were less likely to adopt a healthy diet; these include, but are not limited to, the following: changing lifestyle, the comfort and convenience of fast food, taste, students’ physical and social environment, and awareness of weight [64].
The fact that being in a stable relationship was associated with a poorer DQ in our sample appears to support the prevalent idea that when we enter a serious relationship, we often do not take as good care of ourselves as before. Available research on the issue has shown that people who are overweight or obese (especially women) have more difficulty finding a partner than those who are not overweight [65]. Developing this idea, van Woerden et al. [66] suggest that there is a selection bias related to weight for beginning (but not ending) romantic relationships. In their study, these authors observed that for students that were single at moment A, the increase of each BMI unit reduced their chances of finding a partner at moment B (four months later) by 9%. Taking these results into account, one could infer that an individual seeking to start a new relationship might be more inclined to regulate his/her diet than someone uninterested in finding a new partner.
Among the study population, a clear association was observed between DQ and both unhealthy lifestyle choices (i.e., low levels of physical activity, a highly sedentary lifestyle, high alcohol intake, or smoking) as well as psychological health (i.e., the presence of stress, anxiety, depression, or insomnia). Previous studies have shown the tendency for unhealthy lifestyle choices (including low-quality diet) to cluster among Spanish university students [67,68,69,70]. The same holds for the relation between mental health and DQ [22,23,41]. Unhealthy habits (e.g., high alcohol intake, smoking, or certain dietary behaviours) have often been detected among those suffering from psychological distress and have been identified as passive coping mechanisms based on avoidance and/or escape [71]. However, one should not dismiss a bidirectional relationship between mental health and certain unhealthy lifestyle choices such as poor DQ. In fact, several recent studies have reported a strong correlation between a healthy diet and psychological wellbeing. Therefore, healthy diets such as the Mediterranean, which is rich in fresh fruits and vegetables, could be associated with higher levels of happiness and mental health [72,73,74], whereas certain gaps in the diet could be associated with a deterioration in mental health [71,75]. A similar connection can be observed when it comes to sleep quality; participants suffering from insomnia also reported a worse DQ. These results are consistent with findings in the broader scholarly literature on the topic. Numerous experimental studies have shown how partial sleep deprivation leads to an increased intake of fats [76,77], snacks [78,79], foods rich in rapidly absorbed carbohydrates [80,81], and inconsistent or shifting mealtimes [76]. Similarly, observational studies have provided further evidence of poorer DQ among people who have a lower quality of sleep in Iran and the USA [82,83]. Different explanations have been proffered to illuminate the phenomenon. More waking hours means more time for eating, changes in the level of hormones that regulate appetite (leptin and ghrelin), increased processing of hedonic stimuli in the brain (providing a greater reward from food), and shifting eating schedules [84]. However, it may not only be lack of sleep that affects diet; certain foods and nutrients can themselves influence sleep quality. For example, high-carb diets and foods that contain tryptophan, melatonin, and phytonutrients (e.g., cherries) seem to be linked with higher sleep quality [85].
As far as the authors are aware, this is the first study that analyses DQ and a large number of sociodemographic and behavioural variables among a large sample of Spanish university students. We believe that the obtained results can be generalised to the larger body of Spanish university students, not only due to the large sample size but also because of the standardised procedures used to collect data as well as the plausibility of the associations detected in the data analysis. Accordingly, this would allow us to trace a reliable picture of university students’ DQ as well as its associated factors. Such information is crucial since it can assist in the development and implementation of both diagnostic tools as well as educational activities concerning a healthy diet. That said, the study also has several limitations that need to be underscored. First, the transversal design makes it possible to detect associations, but it does not allow us to determine a cause-and-effect relationship or direction of influence. Second, the type of sampling used, a choice based on convenience and available resources, does impinge on our ability to draw generalisations from these results even though, we should note, the profile of our sample (i.e., predominantly female) does match the broader demographics of university students in Aragon. Third, data was self-reported by the participants, which means that one cannot rule out the possibility of faulty memory or the playing down of certain information such as body weight [86,87]. Fourth, our data was collected when the COVID-19 pandemic and the resulting public health measures were well underway in Spain. This fact provides valuable information about Spanish university students’ diet in the current context, and, in all likelihood, our results reflect the pandemic’s impact on the lives and dietary habits of university students. However, the data does not allow us to determine the precise ways that the current situation has affected students’ diets. Nevertheless, it is worth mentioning that other researchers have observed a decline in DQ since the beginning of the pandemic; lockdown measures have, on the one hand, led to a decline in the consumption of fruits and vegetables [88], and on the other hand, to an increase in the consumption of unhealthy foods (e.g., highly-processed foods, snacks, and frozen foods) [89,90,91]. Furthermore, the SHEI questionnaire only takes into account the frequency with which foods are consumed and not the quantity that is ingested. For this reason, it cannot offer information concerning the intake of nutrients or calories. Despite these limitations, there were three main reasons that we chose this tool: it is a questionnaire specifically adapted to Spanish alimentary habits; it has repeatedly been shown to be well-equipped to assess the DQ of Spaniards [27,92,93]; finally, the original questionnaire from which it was derived has been validated with plasma biomarkers in previous studies [94,95]. Given the limitations listed above, further research on the present issue is needed, including a longitudinal study as well as a quantitative approach to evaluating the diet of Spanish university students.

5. Conclusions and Recommendations

The present findings reveal that a large portion of university students have a poor DQ and do not closely adhere to alimentary recommendations. Therefore, it is necessary to encourage changes in current dietary patterns. Factors such as living arrangement, certain unhealthy habits (high alcohol intake, a sedentary lifestyle, smoking, and the presence of psychological distress and insomnia) predict DQ and can therefore be used to help tailor and direct action. It is indeed essential that educational institutions and health services undertake future action to promote better DQ among university students. We recommend a global approach to the issue that takes into account the factors related to poor DQ. Any such actions ought to take into consideration the following recommendations:
(1)
the early detection of trends of poor DQ among students entering university as part of existing systems that offer students support;
(2)
activities that aim to interrupt and prevent unhealthy dietary habits such as providing gender-specific information about immediate health concerns or organising community-wide public health campaigns that ensure that students have access to needed resources and affordable healthy foods;
(3)
the empowerment of students by encouraging, for example, the acquisition of skills for making dietary choices and increasing resilience so that they can develop their own adaptive strategies to confront dietary problems and avoid unhealthy dietary habits;
(4)
the consideration and handling of any underlying mental health conditions that could be present among university students with poor DQ.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://0-www-mdpi-com.brum.beds.ac.uk/article/10.3390/nu13103512/s1, Table S1: Criteria for scoring the Spanish Healthy Eating Index (SHEI).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.R.-A. and B.A.J.; methodology, E.R.-A., I.A.-S., and B.A.J.; formal analysis, E.R.-A., J.-M.G.-L., and E.E.-S.; investigation, E.R.-A., B.A.J., I.A.-S., J.-M.G.-L., E.E.-S., and B.M.-A.; writing—original draft preparation, E.R.-A.; writing—review and editing, B.A.J., I.A.-S., J.-M.G.-L., E.E.-S., and B.M.-A.; supervision, B.A.J. and J.-M.G.-L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Autonomous Community of Aragón (CEICA) (protocol code C.I. PI09/062X and date of approval 07/08/2017).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available as they contain information that could compromise the privacy of research participants.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Jankovic, N.; Geelen, A.; Streppel, M.T.; de Groot, L.C.; Kiefte-de Jong, J.C.; Orfanos, P.; Bamia, C.; Trichopoulou, A.; Boffetta, P.; Es Bobak, M.; et al. WHO Guidelines for a Healthy Diet and Mortality from Cardiovascular Disease in European and American Elderly: The CHANCES Project. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2015, 102, 745–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Jankovic, N.; Geelen, A.; Streppel, M.T.; de Groot, L.C.P.G.M.; Orfanos, P.; van den Hooven, E.H.; Pikhart, H.; Boffetta, P.; Trichopoulou, A.; Bobak, M.; et al. Adherence to a Healthy Diet According to the World Health Organization Guidelines and All-Cause Mortality in Elderly Adults from Europe and the United States. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2014, 180, 978–988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Liese, A.D.; Krebs-Smith, S.M.; Subar, A.F.; George, S.M.; Harmon, B.E.; Neuhouser, M.L.; Boushey, C.J.; Schap, T.E.; Reedy, J. The Dietary Patterns Methods Project: Synthesis of Findings across Cohorts and Relevance to Dietary Guidance. J. Nutr. 2015, 145, 393–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Neelakantan, N.; Koh, W.-P.; Yuan, J.-M.; van Dam, R.M. Diet-Quality Indexes Are Associated with a Lower Risk of Cardiovascular, Respiratory, and All-Cause Mortality among Chinese Adults. J. Nutr. 2018, 148, 1323–1332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Micha, R.; Peñalvo, J.L.; Cudhea, F.; Imamura, F.; Rehm, C.D.; Mozaffarian, D. Association Between Dietary Factors and Mortality from Heart Disease, Stroke, and Type 2 Diabetes in the United States. JAMA 2017, 317, 912–924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Harrison, S.; Couture, P.; Lamarche, B. Diet Quality, Saturated Fat and Metabolic Syndrome. Nutrients 2020, 12, 3232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Martínez Valero, A.P.; Amo-Saus, E.; Pardo-García, I.; Escribano-Sotos, F. Calidad de la dieta en mayores de 65 años y factores socioeconómicos relacionados. Atención Primaria 2021, 53, 27–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Gil, Á. Indicadores de Evaluación de La Calidad de La Dieta. Nutr. Hosp. 2015, 128–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Asadi, Z.; Ghaffarian Zirak, R.; Yaghooti Khorasani, M.; Saedi, M.; Parizadeh, S.M.; Jafarzadeh-Esfehani, R.; Khorramruz, F.; Jandari, S.; Mohammadi-Bajgiran, M.; Zare-Feyzabadi, R.; et al. Dietary Inflammatory Index Is Associated with Healthy Eating Index, Alternative Healthy Eating Index, and Dietary Patterns among Iranian Adults. J. Clin. Lab. Anal. 2020, 34, e23523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Murakami, K.; Livingstone, M.B.E.; Fujiwara, A.; Sasaki, S. Application of the Healthy Eating Index-2015 and the Nutrient-Rich Food Index 9.3 for Assessing Overall Diet Quality in the Japanese Context: Different Nutritional Concerns from the US. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0228318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Sedaghat, F.; Heidari, Z.; Jalali, S.; Doustmohammadian, A.; Ehteshami, M.; Rashidkhani, B. Healthy Eating Index 2010 and Breast Cancer Risk. Nutr. Cancer 2018, 70, 860–866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Al-Ibrahim, A.A.; Jackson, R.T. Healthy Eating Index versus Alternate Healthy Index in Relation to Diabetes Status and Health Markers in U.S. Adults: NHANES 2007–2010. Nutr. J. 2019, 18, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Tay, M.E.; Foster, E.; Stevenson, L.; Brownlee, I. The Adherence of Singaporean Students in Different Educational Institutions to National Food-Based Dietary Guidelines. Nutrients 2020, 12, 2995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Merhout, F.; Doyle, J. Socioeconomic Status and Diet Quality in College Students. J. Nutr. Educ. Behav. 2019, 51, 1107–1112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. El Ansari, W.; Stock, C. Is the Health and Wellbeing of University Students Associated with Their Academic Performance? Cross Sectional Findings from the United Kingdom. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2010, 7, 509–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Deliens, T.; Clarys, P.; De Bourdeaudhuij, I.; Deforche, B. Determinants of Eating Behaviour in University Students: A Qualitative Study Using Focus Group Discussions. BMC Public Health 2014, 14, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Sogari, G.; Velez-Argumedo, C.; Gómez, M.I.; Mora, C. College Students and Eating Habits: A Study Using an Ecological Model for Healthy Behavior. Nutrients 2018, 10, 1823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Suliga, E.; Cieśla, E.; Michel, S.; Kaducakova, H.; Martin, T.; Śliwiński, G.; Braun, A.; Izova, M.; Lehotska, M.; Kozieł, D.; et al. Diet Quality Compared to the Nutritional Knowledge of Polish, German, and Slovakian University Students—Preliminary Research. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 9062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kabir, A.; Miah, S.; Islam, A. Factors Influencing Eating Behavior and Dietary Intake among Resident Students in a Public University in Bangladesh: A Qualitative Study. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0198801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Vélez-Toral, M.; Rodríguez-Reinado, C.; Ramallo-Espinosa, A.; Andrés-Villas, M. “It’s Important but, on What Level?”: Healthy Cooking Meanings and Barriers to Healthy Eating among University Students. Nutrients 2020, 12, 2309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Bárbara, R.; Ferreira-Pêgo, C. Changes in Eating Habits among Displaced and Non-Displaced University Students. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 5369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ramón-Arbués, E.; Martínez Abadía, B.; Granada López, J.M.; Echániz Serrano, E.; Pellicer García, B.; Juárez Vela, R.; Guerrero Portillo, S.; Saéz Guinoa, M. Eating behavior and relationships with stress, anxiety, depression and insomnia in university students. Nutr. Hosp. 2019, 36, 1339–1345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Whatnall, M.C.; Patterson, A.J.; Siew, Y.Y.; Kay-Lambkin, F.; Hutchesson, M.J. Are Psychological Distress and Resilience Associated with Dietary Intake Among Australian University Students? Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 4099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. El Hajj, J.S.; Julien, S.G. Factors Associated with Adherence to the Mediterranean Diet and Dietary Habits among University Students in Lebanon. J. Nutr. Metab. 2021, 2021, 6688462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Wattick, R.A.; Hagedorn, R.L.; Olfert, M.D. Relationship between Diet and Mental Health in a Young Adult Appalachian College Population. Nutrients 2018, 10, 957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Norte Navarro, A.I.; Ortiz Moncada, R. Spanish diet quality according to the healthy eating index. Nutr. Hosp. 2011, 26, 330–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Hernández Galiot, A.; Goñi Cambrodón, I. Calidad de La Dieta de La Población Española Mayor de 80 Años No Institucionalizada. Nutr. Hosp. 2015, 31, 2571–2577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Valdés, J.; Grau, M.; Subirana, I.; Marrugat, J.; Covas, M.-I.; Schröder, H. Secular Trends in Energy Intake and Diet Quality in a Mediterranean Population. Ann. Nutr. Metab. 2009, 54, 177–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Cebrino, J.; Portero de la Cruz, S. Diet Quality According to Mental Status and Associated Factors during Adulthood in Spain. Nutrients 2021, 13, 1727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Varoucha-Azcarate, A.C. Analysis of the Diet in a Spanish Prison and the Level of Perception in a Sample of Prisoners. Rev. Esp. Sanid. Penit. 2019, 21, 18–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Bartrina, J.A.; Grupo Colaborativo de la Sociedad Española de Nutrición Comunitaria (SENC); Arija Val, A.; Maíz Aldalur, E.; de la Victoria Muñoz, E.; Ortega Anta, R.M.; Pérez-Rodrigo, C.; Quiles Izquierdo, J.; Rodríguez Martín, A.; Román Viñas, B.; et al. Dietary guidelines for the Spanish population (SENC, December 2016): The new graphic icon of healthy nutrition. Nutr. Hosp. 2016, 33, 1–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. World Health Organization. Body Mass Index-BMI. Available online: https://www.euro.who.int/en/health-topics/disease-prevention/nutrition/a-healthy-lifestyle/body-mass-index-bmi (accessed on 11 June 2021).
  33. Lovibond, P.F.; Lovibond, S.H. The Structure of Negative Emotional States: Comparison of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) with the Beck Depression and Anxiety Inventories. Behav. Res. Ther. 1995, 33, 335–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Pedrero, E.F.; Piñeiro, M.; de las, M.P.; Giráldez, S.L.; Fernández, J.M. Propiedades psicométricas de la Depresión Anxiety and Stress Scales-21 (DASS-21) en universitarios españoles. Ansiedad Estrés 2010, 16, 215–226. [Google Scholar]
  35. Rodríguez Martos, A.; Navarro, R.; Vecino, C.; Pérez, R. Validación de Los Cuestionarios KFA (CBA) y CAGE Para El Diagnóstico Del Alcoholismo. Droga-Alcohol 1986, 11, 132–139. [Google Scholar]
  36. Sierra-Guerra, K.L.; Viveros-Contreras, C.; Martínez-Carrillo, G.; Hernández-León, O.; Caballero-Ambriz, G. Calidad de Vida En Pacientes Con Cáncer de Próstata, Operados de Prostatectomía Radical Laparoscópica. Rev. Mex. Urol. 2014, 74, 133–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Dietch, J.R.; Taylor, D.J.; Sethi, K.; Kelly, K.; Bramoweth, A.D.; Roane, B.M. Psychometric Evaluation of the PSQI in U.S. College Students. J. Clin. Sleep Med. 2016, 12, 1121–1129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Veqar, Z.; Hussain, M.E. Validity and Reliability of Insomnia Severity Index and Its Correlation with Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index in Poor Sleepers among Indian University Students. Int. J. Adolesc. Med. Health 2017, 32, 20160090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Rodríguez-Muñoz, S.; Corella, C.; Abarca-Sos, A.; Zaragoza, J. Validation of Three Short Physical Activity Questionnaires with Accelerometers among University Students in Spain. J. Sports Med. Phys. Fit. 2017, 57, 1660–1668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. IPAQ. Scoring, Protocol-International Physical Activity Questionnaire. Available online: https://sites.google.com/site/theipaq/scoring-protocol (accessed on 24 July 2021).
  41. Ramón-Arbués, E.; Gea-Caballero, V.; Granada-López, J.M.; Juárez-Vela, R.; Pellicer-García, B.; Antón-Solanas, I. The Prevalence of Depression, Anxiety and Stress and Their Associated Factors in College Students. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 7001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Amaral Alves, D.; Hernández Regidor, N.; Basabe Baraño, N.; Rocandio Pablo, A.M.; Arroyo Izaga, M. Body satisfaction and diet quality in female university students from the Basque Country. Endocrinol. Nutr. 2012, 59, 239–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Telleria-Aramburu, N.; Bermúdez-Marín, N.; Rocandio, A.M.; Telletxea, S.; Basabe, N.; Rebato, E.; Arroyo-Izaga, M. Nutritional Quality and Carbon Footprint of University Students’ Diets: Results from the EHU12/24 Study. Public Health Nutr. 2021, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Vadeboncoeur, C.; Foster, C.; Townsend, N. Freshman 15 in England: A Longitudinal Evaluation of First Year University Student’s Weight Change. BMC Obes. 2016, 3, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Haidar, S.A.; de Vries, N.K.; Papandreou, D.; Rizk, R.; Karavetian, M. The Freshman Weight Gain Phenomenon: Does It Apply To. Open Access Maced. J. Med. Sci. 2018, 6, 2214–2220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Mihalopoulos, N.L.; Auinger, P.; Klein, J.D. The Freshman 15: Is It Real? J. Am. Coll. Health 2008, 56, 531–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Bach-Faig, A.; Fuentes-Bol, C.; Ramos, D.; Carrasco, J.L.; Roman, B.; Bertomeu, I.F.; Cristià, E.; Geleva, D.; Serra-Majem, L. The Mediterranean Diet in Spain: Adherence Trends during the Past Two Decades Using the Mediterranean Adequacy Index. Public Health Nutr. 2011, 14, 622–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. García Cabrera, S.; Herrera Fernández, N.; Rodríguez Hernández, C.; Nissensohn, M.; Román-Viñas, B.; Serra-Majem, L. KIDMED Test; Prevalence of Low Adherence to the Mediterranean Diet in Children and Young: A Systematic Review. Nutr. Hosp. 2015, 32, 2390–2399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Riccardi, G.; Vitale, M.; Vaccaro, O. Are Europeans Moving towards Dietary Habits More Suitable for Reducing Cardiovascular Disease Risk? Nutr. Metab. Cardiovasc. Dis. 2020, 30, 1857–1860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Calderon, R.; Pupanead, S.; Prachakul, W.; Kim, G. Happiness, Perceived Stress, Psychological Well-Being, and Health Behaviors of Thai University Students: Preliminary Results from a Multinational Study on Well-Being. J. Am. Coll. Health 2021, 69, 176–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Quehl, R.; Haines, J.; Lewis, S.P.; Buchholz, A.C. Food and Mood: Diet Quality Is Inversely Associated with Depressive Symptoms in Female University Students. Can. J. Diet. Pract. Res. 2017, 78, 124–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Delicado-Soria, A.; Serrano-Urrea, R.; Cervera-Burriel, F.; Daouas, T.; García-Meseguer, M.-J. Food Consumption in Tunisian University Students and Its Association with Sociodemographic Characteristics and Lifestyle Behaviours. Public Health Nutr. 2020, 24, 4949–4964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Cervera Burriel, F.; Serrano Urrea, R.; Daouas, T.; Delicado Soria, A.; García Meseguer, M.J. Food habits and nutritional assessment in a tunisian university population. Nutr. Hosp. 2014, 30, 1350–1358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. García-Meseguer, M.J.; Burriel, F.C.; García, C.V.; Serrano-Urrea, R. Adherence to Mediterranean Diet in a Spanish University Population. Appetite 2014, 78, 156–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Ejeda-Manzanera, J.M.; Rodrigo-Vega, M. Hábitos de alimentación y calidad de dieta en estudiantes universitarias de magisterio en relación a su adherencia a la dieta mediterránea. Rev. Española Salud Pública 2021, 95, e1–e14. [Google Scholar]
  56. Salas, R.; del Mar Bibiloni, M.; Zapata, M.E.; Coll, J.L.; Pons, A.; Tur, J.A. Balearic Adults Have Low Intakes of Fruits and Vegetables Compared with the Dietary Guidelines for Adults in Spain. Nutr. Res. 2013, 33, 204–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Beaudry, K.M.; Ludwa, I.A.; Thomas, A.M.; Ward, W.E.; Falk, B.; Josse, A.R. First-Year University Is Associated with Greater Body Weight, Body Composition and Adverse Dietary Changes in Males than Females. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0218554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  58. Leblanc, V.; Bégin, C.; Corneau, L.; Dodin, S.; Lemieux, S. Gender Differences in Dietary Intakes: What Is the Contribution of Motivational Variables? J. Hum. Nutr. Diet. 2015, 28, 37–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Menozzi, D.; Sogari, G.; Mora, C. Explaining Vegetable Consumption among Young Adults: An Application of the Theory of Planned Behaviour. Nutrients 2015, 7, 7633–7650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  60. Grzymisławska, M.; Puch, E.A.; Zawada, A.; Grzymisławski, M. Do Nutritional Behaviors Depend on Biological Sex and Cultural Gender? Adv. Clin. Exp. Med. 2020, 29, 165–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Aljadani, H.M.; Patterson, A.J.; Sibbritt, D.; Collins, C.E. Diet Quality and Six-Year Risk of Overweight and Obesity among Mid-Age Australian Women Who Were Initially in the Healthy Weight Range. Health Promot. J. Austr. 2016, 27, 29–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Aljadani, H.M.A.; Sibbritt, D.; Patterson, A.; Collins, C. The Australian Recommended Food Score Did Not Predict Weight Gain in Middle-Aged Australian Women during Six Years of Follow-Up. Aust. N. Z. J. Public Health 2013, 37, 322–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. El Ansari, W.; Stock, C.; Mikolajczyk, R.T. Relationships between Food Consumption and Living Arrangements among University Students in Four European Countries—A Cross-Sectional Study. Nutr. J. 2012, 11, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Lupi, S.; Bagordo, F.; Stefanati, A.; Grassi, T.; Piccinni, L.; Bergamini, M.; Donno, A.D. Assessment of Lifestyle and Eating Habits among Undergraduate Students in Northern Italy. Ann. Ist. Super. Sanità 2015, 51, 154–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Côté, M.; Bégin, C. Review of the Experience of Weight-Based Stigmatization in Romantic Relationships. Curr. Obes. Rep. 2020, 9, 280–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. van Woerden, I.; Brewis, A.; Hruschka, D.; Dunton, G.; Adams, M.A.; Bruening, M. Young Adults’ BMI and Changes in Romantic Relationship Status during the First Semester of College. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0230806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Moreno-Gómez, C.; Romaguera-Bosch, D.; Tauler-Riera, P.; Bennasar-Veny, M.; Pericas-Beltran, J.; Martinez-Andreu, S.; Aguilo-Pons, A. Clustering of Lifestyle Factors in Spanish University Students: The Relationship between Smoking, Alcohol Consumption, Physical Activity and Diet Quality. Public Health Nutr. 2012, 15, 2131–2139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Romaguera, D.; Tauler, P.; Bennasar, M.; Pericas, J.; Moreno, C.; Martinez, S.; Aguilo, A. Determinants and Patterns of Physical Activity Practice among Spanish University Students. J. Sports Sci. 2011, 29, 989–997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Sánchez-Ojeda, M.A.; De Luna-Bertos, E. Healthy lifestyles of the university population. Nutr. Hosp. 2015, 31, 1910–1919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Bennasar-Veny, M.; Yañez, A.M.; Pericas, J.; Ballester, L.; Fernandez-Dominguez, J.C.; Tauler, P.; Aguilo, A. Cluster Analysis of Health-Related Lifestyles in University Students. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 1776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Adan, R.A.H.; van der Beek, E.M.; Buitelaar, J.K.; Cryan, J.F.; Hebebrand, J.; Higgs, S.; Schellekens, H.; Dickson, S.L. Nutritional Psychiatry: Towards Improving Mental Health by What You Eat. Eur. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2019, 29, 1321–1332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Moreno-Agostino, D.; Caballero, F.F.; Martín-María, N.; Tyrovolas, S.; López-García, P.; Rodríguez-Artalejo, F.; Haro, J.M.; Ayuso-Mateos, J.L.; Miret, M. Mediterranean Diet and Wellbeing: Evidence from a Nationwide Survey. Psychol. Health 2019, 34, 321–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Emerson, S.D.; Carbert, N.S. An Apple a Day: Protective Associations between Nutrition and the Mental Health of Immigrants in Canada. Soc. Psychiatry Psychiatr. Epidemiol. 2019, 54, 567–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Fresán, U.; Bes-Rastrollo, M.; Segovia-Siapco, G.; Sanchez-Villegas, A.; Lahortiga, F.; de la Rosa, P.-A.; Martínez-Gonzalez, M.-A. Does the MIND Diet Decrease Depression Risk? A Comparison with Mediterranean Diet in the SUN Cohort. Eur. J. Nutr. 2019, 58, 1271–1282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Smith, A.D.; Warren, M.J.; Refsum, H. Chapter Six-Vitamin B12. In Advances in Food and Nutrition Research; New Research and Developments of Water-Soluble Vitamins; Eskin, N.A.M., Ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2018; Volume 83, pp. 215–279. [Google Scholar]
  76. Spaeth, A.M.; Dinges, D.F.; Goel, N. Sex and Race Differences in Caloric Intake during Sleep Restriction in Healthy Adults. Am. J. Clin. Nutr 2014, 100, 559–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Fang, Z.; Spaeth, A.M.; Ma, N.; Zhu, S.; Hu, S.; Goel, N.; Detre, J.A.; Dinges, D.F.; Rao, H. Altered Salience Network Connectivity Predicts Macronutrient Intake after Sleep Deprivation. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 8215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  78. Heath, G.; Roach, G.D.; Dorrian, J.; Ferguson, S.A.; Darwent, D.; Sargent, C. The Effect of Sleep Restriction on Snacking Behaviour during a Week of Simulated Shiftwork. Accid. Anal. Prev. 2012, 45, 62–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Mozaffarian, N.; Heshmat, R.; Ataie-Jafari, A.; Motlagh, M.E.; Ziaodini, H.; Shafiee, G.; Taheri, M.; Mansourian, M.; Qorbani, M.; Kelishadi, R. Association of Sleep Duration and Snack Consumption in Children and Adolescents: The CASPIAN-V Study. Food Sci. Nutr. 2020, 8, 1888–1897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Martinez, S.M.; Tschann, J.M.; Butte, N.F.; Gregorich, S.E.; Penilla, C.; Flores, E.; Greenspan, L.C.; Pasch, L.A.; Deardorff, J. Short Sleep Duration Is Associated with Eating More Carbohydrates and Less Dietary Fat in Mexican American Children. Sleep 2017, 40, zsw057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Nedeltcheva, A.V.; Kilkus, J.M.; Imperial, J.; Kasza, K.; Schoeller, D.A.; Penev, P.D. Sleep Curtailment Is Accompanied by Increased Intake of Calories from Snacks. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2009, 89, 126–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Stern, J.H.; Grant, A.S.; Thomson, C.A.; Tinker, L.; Hale, L.; Brennan, K.M.; Woods, N.F.; Chen, Z. Short Sleep Duration Is Associated with Decreased Serum Leptin, Increased Energy Intake and Decreased Diet Quality in Postmenopausal Women. Obesity 2014, 22, E55–E61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Haghighatdoost, F.; Karimi, G.; Esmaillzadeh, A.; Azadbakht, L. Sleep Deprivation Is Associated with Lower Diet Quality Indices and Higher Rate of General and Central Obesity among Young Female Students in Iran. Nutrition 2012, 28, 1146–1150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Dashti, H.S.; Scheer, F.A.; Jacques, P.F.; Lamon-Fava, S.; Ordovás, J.M. Short Sleep Duration and Dietary Intake: Epidemiologic Evidence, Mechanisms, and Health Implications. Adv. Nutr. 2015, 6, 648–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Binks, H.E.; Vincent, G.; Gupta, C.; Irwin, C.; Khalesi, S. Effects of Diet on Sleep: A Narrative Review. Nutrients 2020, 12, 936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  86. King, B.M.; Cespedes, V.M.; Burden, G.K.; Brady, S.K.; Clement, L.R.; Abbott, E.M.; Baughman, K.S.; Joyner, S.E.; Clark, M.M.; Pury, C.L.S. Extreme Under-Reporting of Body Weight by Young Adults with Obesity: Relation to Social Desirability. Obes. Sci. Pract. 2018, 4, 129–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Burke, M.A.; Carman, K.G. You Can Be Too Thin (but Not Too Tall): Social Desirability Bias in Self-Reports of Weight and Height. Econ. Hum. Biol. 2017, 27, 198–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Mattioli, A.V.; Sciomer, S.; Cocchi, C.; Maffei, S.; Gallina, S. Quarantine during COVID-19 Outbreak: Changes in Diet and Physical Activity Increase the Risk of Cardiovascular Disease. Nutr. Metab. Cardiovasc. Dis. 2020, 30, 1409–1417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Izzo, L.; Santonastaso, A.; Cotticelli, G.; Federico, A.; Pacifico, S.; Castaldo, L.; Colao, A.; Ritieni, A. An Italian Survey on Dietary Habits and Changes during the COVID-19 Lockdown. Nutrients 2021, 13, 1197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Ferrante, G.; Camussi, E.; Piccinelli, C.; Senore, C.; Armaroli, P.; Ortale, A.; Garena, F.; Giordano, L. Did Social Isolation during the SARS-CoV-2 Epidemic Have an Impact on the Lifestyles of Citizens? Epidemiol. Prev. 2020, 44, 353–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Sidor, A.; Rzymski, P. Dietary Choices and Habits during COVID-19 Lockdown: Experience from Poland. Nutrients 2020, 12, 1657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Alegria-Lertxundi, I.; Rocandio, A.M.; Telletxea, S.; Rincón, E.; Arroyo-Izaga, M. Relación Entre El Índice de Consumo de Pescado y Carne y La Adecuación y Calidad de La Dieta En Mujeres Jóvenes Universitarias. Nutr. Hosp. 2014, 30, 1135–1143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Rodríguez-Rodríguez, E.; López-Sobaler, A.M.; Ortega, R.M.; Delgado-Losada, M.L.; López-Parra, A.M.; Aparicio, A. Association between Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio with Abdominal Obesity and Healthy Eating Index in a Representative Older Spanish Population. Nutrients 2020, 12, 855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  94. Weinstein, S.J.; Vogt, T.M.; Gerrior, S.A. Healthy Eating Index Scores Are Associated with Blood Nutrient Concentrations in the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 2004, 104, 576–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Fallaize, R.; Livingstone, K.M.; Celis-Morales, C.; Macready, A.L.; San-Cristobal, R.; Navas-Carretero, S.; Marsaux, C.F.M.; O’Donovan, C.B.; Kolossa, S.; Moschonis, G.; et al. Association between Diet-Quality Scores, Adiposity, Total Cholesterol and Markers of Nutritional Status in European Adults: Findings from the Food4Me Study. Nutrients 2018, 10, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Nutrients 13 03512 g001 550
Figure 1. Study flow chart.
Figure 1. Study flow chart.
Nutrients 13 03512 g001
Nutrients 13 03512 g002 550
Figure 2. Percentage of students who adhere to the NFBDG-2016 [31] recommendations for the frequency with which certain foods should be consumed every week.
Figure 2. Percentage of students who adhere to the NFBDG-2016 [31] recommendations for the frequency with which certain foods should be consumed every week.
Nutrients 13 03512 g002
Table
Table 1. Participant characteristics (n = 1055).
Table 1. Participant characteristics (n = 1055).
Variable Mean ± SD/n (%)
Age 21.74 ± 5.15
GenderFemale744 (70.5%)
Male311 (29.5%)
BMI (kg/m2) 22.15 ± 3.48
BMI CategoriesUnderweight (<18.5 kg/m2)160 (15.2%)
Normal weight (18.5–24.9 kg/m2)736 (69.8%)
Overweight/obese (≥25 kg/m2) 159 (15.1%)
Living arrangement Living alone64 (6.1%)
Living with a partner 291 (27.6%)
Living with family 700 (66.4%)
Relationship statusCurrently in a relationship 494 (46.8%)
Currently not in a relationship 561 (53.2%)
Smoking status (current)No 535 (76.6%)
Yes163 (23.4%)
CAGE score 0.48 ± 0.78
CAGE categoriesProblematic alcohol consumption343 (32.5%)
Non-problematic alcohol consumption 712 (67.5%)
SHEI score 68.57 ± 12.17
Diet qualityInadequate (<51 points)73 (6.9%)
Need changes (51–80 points)798 (75.6%)
Healthy (>80 points)184 (17.4%)
Physical activity (METs/week) 1877.03 ± 1966.54
Physical activity categoriesHigh236 (22.4%)
Medium 351 (33.3%)
Low468 (44.4%)
Sedentary time (hours/day) 6.76 ± 2.45
Sedentary time categories<3 h/day133 (12.6%)
3–6 h/day342 (32.4%)
≥6 h/day580 (54.9%)
DASS-E score 12.39 ± 8.08
DASS-E categoriesNo stress697 (66.1%)
Mild stress121 (11.5%)
Moderate stress174 (16.5%)
Severe stress46 (4.4%)
Extremely severe stress17 (1.6%)
DASS-D score 5.45 ± 7.12
DASS-D categoriesNo depression859 (81.4%)
Mild depression80 (7.6%)
Moderate depression48 (4.5%)
Severe depression38 (3.6%)
Extremely severe depression30 (2.8%)
DASS-A score 4.84 ± 5.75
DASS-A categoriesNo anxiety807 (76.5%)
Mild anxiety83 (7.9%)
Moderate anxiety95 (9.0%)
Severe anxiety9 (0.9%)
Extremely severe anxiety61 (5.8%)
ISI score 7.91 ± 4.88
Sleep qualityNo insomnia600 (56.9%)
Sub-threshold insomnia333 (31.6%)
Moderate insomnia114 (10.8%)
Severe insomnia8 (0.8%)
Table
Table 2. SHEI scores of the participants (n = 1055).
Table 2. SHEI scores of the participants (n = 1055).
Food GroupMean ± SDMin.Max.Mode
Bread and grains7.27 ± 3.2501010 (Consumed daily)
Vegetables8.38 ± 2.9101010 (Consumed daily)
Fruits8.23 ± 3.5401010 (Consumed daily)
Dairy products9.27 ± 2.8201010 (Consumed daily)
Meat6.90 ± 2.830107.5 (3 or more times a week but not daily)
Legumes9.17 ± 1.970107.5 (3 or more times a week but not daily)
Cold meats and cuts6.29 ± 3.750105 (Once or twice a week)
Sweets4.45 ± 3.280105 (Once or twice a week)
Soft drinks with sugar8.62 ± 3.360107.5 (Less than once a week)
SHEI score68.57 ± 12.172596.570.5 (Need changes)
Table
Table 3. Factors related to diet quality. Multiple linear regression model *.
Table 3. Factors related to diet quality. Multiple linear regression model *.
Independent VariableB (CI 95%)Std. Errorβp
Age. <20 years (Ref.)
 20–24.93.54 (2.05, 5.04)0.760.140.00
 ≥254.76 (2.68, 6.85)1.060.140.00
Gender. Male (Ref.)
 Female2.47 (0.94, 4.00)0.7810.090.00
BMI categories. Normal weight (Ref.)
 Underweight (<18.5 kg/m2)3.55 (1.63, 5.48)0.980.100.00
 Overweight/obese (≥25 kg/m2)6.42 (4.53, 8.31)0.960.190.00
Living arrangement. Living with family (Ref.)
 Living alone−11.49 (−14.27, −8.71)1.42−0.220.00
 Living with a partner −0.50 (−2.06, 1.07)0.80−0.020.53
Relationship status. Currently in a relationship (Ref.)
 Currently not in a relationship3.63 (2.01, 5.25)0.830.150.00
Smoking status. Not a smoker (Ref.)
 Smoker−2.82 (−4.41, −1.24)0.81−0.100.00
CAGE Categories. Non-problematic alcohol consumption (Ref.)
 Problematic alcohol consumption−1.82 (−3.20, −0.45)0.702−0.0700.01
Physical activity. Medium (Ref.)
 High PA1.74 (−0.05, 3.53)0.910.060.06
 Low PA−2.77 (−4.45, −1.09)0.86−0.110.00
Sedentary time. 3–6 h per day
 <3 h/day−0.29 (−2.48, 1.90)1.11−0.010.80
 ≥6 h/day−2.40 (−3.86, −0.93)0.75−0.100.00
DASS-E categories. No stress (Ref.)
 Mild stress12.10 (9.63, 14.57)1.260.320.00
 Moderate stress−1.08 (−3.08, 0.92)1.02−0.030.29
 Severe stress−0.29 (−3.93, 3.35)1.85−0.000.88
 Extremely severe stress−5.56 (−11.37, 0.24)2.96−0.060.06
DASS-D categories. No depression (Ref.)
 Mild depression2.13 (−1.00, 5.27)1.600.050.18
 Moderate depression−3.23 (−6.71, 0.25)1.77−0.050.07
 Severe depression−18.04 (−22.12, −3.97)2.07−0.280.00
 Extremely severe depression−7.77 (−12.22, −3.33)2.26−0.110.00
DASS-A categories. No anxiety (Ref.)
 Mild anxiety−3.25 (−5.91, −0.60)1.35−0.070.01
 Moderate anxiety−3.32 (−5.93, −0.70)1.33−0.080.01
 Severe anxiety −10.96 (−18.25, −3.66)3.72−0.080.00
 Extremely severe anxiety−1.29 (−5.18, 2.61)1.98−0.020.52
ISI categories. No insomnia (Ref.)
 Sub-threshold insomnia−4.93 (−6.50, −3.37)0.79−0.190.00
 Moderate insomnia−6.62 (−9.11, −4.14)1.27−0.170.00
 Severe insomnia −13.51 (−21.46, −5.56)4.05−0.100.00
Ref. = Group of Reference. * Model’s Goodness of Fit (R2) = 0.38. p value (model) = 0.00 (one-way ANOVA).
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ramón-Arbués, E.; Granada-López, J.-M.; Martínez-Abadía, B.; Echániz-Serrano, E.; Antón-Solanas, I.; Jerue, B.A. Factors Related to Diet Quality: A Cross-Sectional Study of 1055 University Students. Nutrients 2021, 13, 3512. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/nu13103512

AMA Style

Ramón-Arbués E, Granada-López J-M, Martínez-Abadía B, Echániz-Serrano E, Antón-Solanas I, Jerue BA. Factors Related to Diet Quality: A Cross-Sectional Study of 1055 University Students. Nutrients. 2021; 13(10):3512. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/nu13103512

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ramón-Arbués, Enrique, José-Manuel Granada-López, Blanca Martínez-Abadía, Emmanuel Echániz-Serrano, Isabel Antón-Solanas, and Benjamin Adam Jerue. 2021. "Factors Related to Diet Quality: A Cross-Sectional Study of 1055 University Students" Nutrients 13, no. 10: 3512. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/nu13103512

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop