Association of Serum Phosphate with Low Handgrip Strength in Patients with Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease
by
,
Ping-Huang Tsai
1, 
Hsiu-Chien Yang
2,
Chin Lin
3,4,
Chih-Chien Sung
1,
Pauling Chu
1 and
Yu-Juei Hsu
1,5,* 1
Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei 114, Taiwan
2
Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Zuoying Branch of Kaohsiung Armed Forces General Hospital, Kaohsiung 81342, Taiwan
3
School of Public Health, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei 114, Taiwan
4
Department of Research and Development, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei 114, Taiwan
5
Department of Biochemistry, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei 114, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nutrients 2021, 13(10), 3605; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/nu13103605
Submission received: 28 August 2021
/
Revised: 29 September 2021
/
Accepted: 13 October 2021
/
Published: 14 October 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Protein-Energy Wasting, Sarcopenia, Cachexia and Muscle Wasting in Patients Living with Chronic Kidney Disease)
Abstract
:Muscle wasting and hyperphosphatemia are becoming increasingly prevalent in patients who exhibit a progressive decline in kidney function. However, the association between serum phosphate (Pi) level and sarcopenia in advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients remains unclear. We compared the serum Pi levels between advanced CKD patients with (n = 51) and those without sarcopenia indicators (n = 83). Low appendicular skeletal muscle mass index (ASMI), low handgrip strength, and low gait speed were defined per the standards of the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia. Mean serum Pi level was significantly higher in advanced CKD patients with sarcopenia indicators than those without sarcopenia indicators (3.88 ± 0.86 vs. 3.54 ± 0.73 mg/dL; p = 0.016). Univariate analysis indicated that serum Pi was negatively correlated with ASMI, handgrip strength, and gait speed. Multivariable analysis revealed that serum Pi was significantly associated with handgrip strength (standardized β = −0.168; p = 0.022) and this association persisted even after adjustments for potential confounders. The optimal serum Pi cutoff for predicting low handgrip strength was 3.65 mg/dL, with a sensitivity of 82.1% and specificity of 56.6%. In summary, low handgrip strength is common in advanced CKD patients and serum Pi level is negatively associated with handgrip strength.
1. Introduction
Loss of muscle strength and muscle mass are hallmarks of sarcopenia [1]. In addition to its association with aging, sarcopenia is commonly observed in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) [2,3], with its prevalence increasing with CKD progression [4]. Sarcopenia is associated with poor life quality, higher risk of hospitalization, and death in populations with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) [5]. Thus, the early detection and standardized diagnosis of sarcopenia are key to preventing consecutive complications. In previous studies, the diagnosis of sarcopenia was determined solely by reduced skeletal muscle mass [6]. In 2010, the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People (EWGSOP) redefined sarcopenia as a condition characterized by the presence of low muscle mass and either low muscle strength or low physical performance [7]. In 2018, the EWGSOP guidelines were revised to emphasize muscle function, and patients with low muscle strength were defined to have probable sarcopenia [1]. This revision was based on a growing body of evidence on the role of low muscle strength in predicting recurrent falls, poor healthcare outcomes, all-cause mortality, and functional decline in older adults [8,9]. This modification suggested that muscle strength is better than muscle mass in predicting adverse outcomes. Observed among the CKD population is a high prevalence (25.2%) of low handgrip strength [10], which is a predictor of composite renal outcomes defined by predialysis mortality or progression to ESRD [11].
During CKD progression, a patient’s phosphate (Pi) excretion starts to decline in stage 2 CKD and serum Pi retention becomes apparent when CKD progresses from stage 3 to stage 5. Hyperphosphatemia prevalence increases gradually to 40% in patients who have an estimated glomerular filtration (eGFR) <20 mL/min/1.73 m2 [12,13]. Hyperphosphatemia is proven to be associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular morbidity in patients on maintenance hemodialysis (HD) [14] and patients who have predialysis CKD [15]. Recent research has suggested that Pi toxicity can accelerate the mammalian aging process. Klotho is an antiaging protein, and mice with genetic ablation of Klotho exhibit hyperphosphatemia and premature aging phenotypes, such as short life spans, vascular calcification, osteopenia, and skeletal muscle wasting [16]. Conversely, Klotho-knockout mice that were subjected to dietary Pi restriction exhibited reduced serum Pi levels, extended life spans, and alleviated muscle wasting [17], all of which suggest an association between serum Pi levels and muscle wasting. A human study also demonstrated that a higher serum Pi level was associated with reduced vigorous physical activity independent of body mass index (BMI) and eGFR [18]. In contrast to previous rodent [16] and human studies [18,19], Mori et al. reported that, among ESRD patients who received HD treatment, the sarcopenia group exhibited significantly lower serum Pi levels compared with the nonsarcopenia group [20]. However, few studies have explored the association of serum Pi level with muscle wasting and muscle strength in patients who have advanced CKD.
In this study, we aimed to clarify the association between serum Pi and sarcopenia phenotype in patients with advanced CKD. We hypothesized that serum Pi is negatively associated with muscle strength, muscle mass, and physical performance in these patients. To test this hypothesis, we conducted a cross-sectional study involving patients with advanced CKD to explore the association of serum Pi with handgrip strength, gait speed, and appendicular skeletal muscle mass index (ASMI), which was assessed through bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA). We discovered that serum Pi level has an independent negative correlation with handgrip strength in patients with advanced CKD.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Design and Participants
In this cross-sectional study, 134 patients at the Tri-Service General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, were enrolled between August 2017 and June 2018. The objective was to investigate the association of serum Pi with muscle strength and mass among patients with CKD, and they were staged based on their eGFR. Ambulatory male and female patients who had stage 3–5 CKD, were aged ≥20 years, and were receiving conservative treatment were included in the study. Patients who were undergoing chronic dialysis or had a history of chronic dialysis or renal transplantation were excluded. Furthermore, patients with the following conditions were excluded: acute illness, edema, medical implants, joint replacement, cancer, stroke, neuropathy, Parkinson’s disease, heart failure, liver disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, arthritis, amputation, primary muscular disorders, and other systemic causes for muscle wasting (with limited ability to perform the tests necessary for assessing muscle mass and strength).
2.2. Biochemical Profiles
Automated methods (AU 5000 chemistry analyzer; Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) were used to conduct serum biochemical analyses and the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease formula was used to calculate eGFR. The SYSMEX XE-5000 cell counter (SYSMEX, Kobe, Japan) was used to analyze hemoglobin and platelet count.
2.3. Body Composition and BIA
Mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) was measured at the midpoint between the tip of the shoulder and the tip of the elbow. Triceps skinfold (TSF) thickness was measured on the back of the left arm at the midpoint between the acromial process of the scapula and olecranon process of the ulna.
The InBody 720 (Biospace, Seoul, Korea) is a multifrequency impedance plethysmograph body composition analyzer; its results were validated against dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry [21]. The body composition analyzer assessed the resistance of the bilateral arms, bilateral legs, and trunk in broadband frequencies (1, 5, 50, 250, 500, and 1000 kHz) and their reactance in mean frequencies (5, 50, and 250 kHz). Segmental impedance values were then summated to obtain the total body impedance value. Per the manufacturer’s recommendation, the thumb was placed on the thumb electrode and the other four fingers were placed along the palm electrode. Participants stood on the sole electrodes and extended their arms and legs during the procedure to avoid direct contact between body segments. The participant’s body height, age, and sex were entered into the manufacturer’s software, Lookin’ Body Version 3.0 (Biospace, Seoul, Korea), before the bioelectrical impedance measurements were taken. Fat mass (FM), fat-free mass (FFM), and total body skeletal muscle mass (TSM) were calculated. The sum of the total lean body mass of the four limbs was the appendicular skeletal muscle mass (ASM), which was divided by height squared to obtain the ASMI (kg/m2).
2.4. Assessment of Sarcopenia
Handgrip strength was measured using a hydraulic dynamometer (Exacta, North Coast Medical, Arcata, CA, USA). The participants performed voluntary isometric contractions with their dominant hand while seated; their upper arm was aligned vertically and their elbow was flexed to 90°. The values of three successive trials were recorded and the mean was registered. Gait speed was measured in a 5 m walk test; the participants stood with their toes contacting the starting mark, and the time they took from the first step to the first footfall touching or crossing the finish line was recorded. For the walk test, the use of walking aids was prohibited and each participant was tested twice, with the faster time being used for the analyses.
The Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia (AWGS) 2019 criteria [22] defined the following cutoff values for the aforementioned tests: handgrip strength of <28 kg for men and <18 kg for women, gait speed of ≤1.0 m/s, and ASMI (determined through BIA) of <7.0 kg/m2 for men and <5.7 kg/m2 for women. In this study, we defined the sarcopenia phenotype as the presence of decreased grip strength, slow gait speed, or low muscle mass per the AWGS 2019 criteria. Patients who did not meet any of the criteria were assigned to the control group.
2.5. Statistical Analyses
Continuous and categorical variables are expressed as means ± standard deviations and numbers (percentages), respectively. Statistical analyses were carried out using SPSS for Windows version 26.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). A p-value of ≤0.05 was considered statistically significant. To compare the differences between two groups of parametric variables, independent t-tests and chi-squared tests were performed for normally distributed and categorical variables, respectively. Univariable and multivariable linear regression analyses were conducted to examine the association of serum Pi with muscle strength, muscle mass, and gait speed. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted to analyze the predictive ability of serum Pi for sarcopenia indicators and to determine an optimal cutoff point for serum Pi.
3. Results
3.1. Baseline Characteristics
A total of 134 patients with advanced CKD were enrolled. The baseline characteristics of the study population, subgroups segmented by sarcopenia phenotype, and control group are shown in Table 1. The patients’ mean age was 65.34 ± 12.96 years, and 69.4% of them were men. The mean and median serum Pi levels were 3.72 ± 0.81 mg/dL and 3.75 mg/dL, respectively. According to the AWGS 2019 criteria, sarcopenia prevalence in the study group was 6.7%. The analysis of the sarcopenia indicators revealed that 32 patients (23.9%) had low handgrip strength, 54 patients (40.3%) had low gait speed, 18 patients (13.4%) had low ASMI, and 70 patients (52.2%) exhibited at least one indicator that is representative of the sarcopenia phenotype. Compared with the control group, the patients who had CKD and the sarcopenia phenotype had significantly higher mean age and serum Pi, and significantly lower MUAC, hemoglobin, handgrip strength, gait speed, ASMI, and muscle mass surrogates.
3.2. Clinical Characteristics and Sarcopenia Indicators of CKD Patients Stratified by Serum Pi Tertiles
To clarify whether serum Pi level is associated with muscle strength or muscle mass in patients with CKD, we analyzed the characteristics of such patients and stratified the patients into serum Pi tertiles (Table 2). Patients in the lower serum Pi tertile tended to be male; patients in the highest serum Pi tertile had lower hemoglobin and serum total calcium levels but higher BUN, creatinine, and uric acid levels relative to the patients in the lower tertiles. However, the three tertiles did not exhibit any significant differences in serum albumin levels (Table 2).
3.3. Association of Serum Pi Level with Body Composition and Sarcopenia Indicators
Serum Pi level was inversely correlated with FFM (r = −0.252; p = 0.003), TSM (r = −0.261; p = 0.002), ASM (r = −0.248; p = 0.004), and MUAC (r = −0.225; p = 0.009). No significant relationship between serum Pi and FM (r = −0.115; p = 0.185) or TSF (r = 0.142; p = 0.102) was observed (Figure 1). Serum Pi level was inversely correlated with sarcopenia indicators (Figure 2).
To identify the independent association, the standardized β (std. β) coefficients for the association of serum Pi with handgrip strength, gait speed, and ASMI were calculated. A univariate analysis of the association of serum Pi with handgrip strength indicated a significant association with a std. β of −0.372 (p < 0.001; Table 3, Model 1).
Subsequently, we performed multivariable analyses with adjustments for age and sex and obtained a std. β of −0.214 (p = 0.001; Table 3, Model 2). Additional adjustments for eGFR resulted in a std. β of −0.216 (p = 0.001; Table 3, Model 3). Further adjustments for BMI and MUAC did not significantly change the results (std. β = −0.184, p = 0.004; Table 3, Model 4). Finally, additional adjustments for hemoglobin, uric acid, and total calcium in Model 5 (R2 = 0.656) did not significantly change the association of serum Pi with handgrip strength (std. β = −0.168 p = 0.022; Table 3).
A univariate analysis of the association of serum Pi with gait speed indicated a significant association with a std. β of −0.245 (p = 0.004; Table 3, Model 1). Additional adjustments for age and sex did not significantly change the results (std. β = −0.244, p = 0.005; Table 3, Model 2). Further adjustments for eGFR resulted in a std. β of −0.224 (p = 0.010; Table 3, Model 3). Adjustments for BMI and MUAC did not significantly change the results (std. β = −0.197, p = 0.020). However, the association of serum Pi with gait speed was not observed after additional adjustments were made for the potential confounders in Model 5 (std. β = −0.160, p = 0.121).
To investigate the association of serum Pi with ASMI, a crude analysis was performed and a significant association was observed (std. β = −0.184, p = 0.033). However, the association was not observed after adjustments were made for age and sex. Adjustments made for all potential confounders did not reveal any association between serum Pi with ASMI.
3.4. Determination of Optimal Serum Pi Cutoff Point for Low Handgrip Strength
ROC analysis was performed to determine the optimal serum Pi cutoff point for patients with CKD and low handgrip strength (Figure 3a). An area under the curve (AUC) of 0.684 (95% CI: 0.586–0.783, p = 0.003) was obtained for the population, and a serum Pi cutoff of 3.65 mg/dL (82.1% sensitivity and 56.6% specificity) was proposed. Figure 3b presents the additive analysis for hierarchical adjustment and indicates that the AUCs were 0.842, 0.842, and 0.871 in Model 2, 3, and 4, respectively. Model 4, which comprised serum Pi, age, sex, eGFR, BMI, and MUAC, exhibited the highest model discrimination (AUC = 0.871, 95% CI: 0.810–0.932, p < 0.001; Figure 3b). However, the additional laboratory data did not aid the prediction of low handgrip strength.
4. Discussion
Currently, the standards for diagnosing sarcopenia in patients with advanced CKD are not well established, and the reported prevalence of sarcopenia varies from 4% to 49% depending on the cutoff value that is used [23]. To date, only a few studies have reported the prevalence of low handgrip strength in patients with advanced CKD [24,25,26]. In the present study, the prevalence of low handgrip strength was 20.9%. In Europe, the Swedish Renal Exercise trial analysis reported a low handgrip strength prevalence of 26% among patients who had advanced CKD [25], and a cross-sectional study conducted in Italy reported a higher prevalence of 63% in patients aged >65 [26]. In Asia, Lee et al. reported a low handgrip strength prevalence of 25.2% in South Korea [10], and a cross-sectional study in Taiwan indicated a low handgrip strength prevalence of 39.7% [27]. Emerging findings suggest that, compared with muscle mass, handgrip strength is more significantly correlated with clinical outcomes in older adults and ESRD patients [28,29,30,31]. Moreover, EWGSOP2 suggests that handgrip strength decreases faster than muscle mass and that it is a more sensitive screening test for sarcopenia [1]. These findings indicate that low handgrip strength is common in patients with CKD, and the early detection of low handgrip strength and identification of risk factors are key considerations in CKD care.
Older age and male sex are associated with the development of low handgrip strength [32,33]. In this study, the serum Pi level of patients with advanced CKD and the sarcopenia phenotype was significantly higher relative to the control group. Our univariate analysis revealed that serum Pi level was negatively correlated with handgrip strength, gait speed, and ASMI. Furthermore, serum Pi level had a significant negative correlation with handgrip strength after adjustment for possible confounders. For every incremental increase in serum Pi level by 1 mg/dL, handgrip strength was reduced by 1.972 kg on average. These findings indicate that serum Pi level is independently associated with low handgrip strength in patients with advanced CKD. Consistent with our observations, Peri-Okonny et al. assessed the relationship between serum Pi and physical activity in 1603 participants, and they discovered that a higher serum Pi was independently associated with increased sedentary time and less time spent engaging in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity [18]. A study that analyzed data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey also revealed that, among older participants, a high serum Pi (i.e., serum Pi levels in the higher quartiles) was associated with low muscle strength [34].
In this study, we demonstrated that the serum Pi level was significantly higher in advanced CKD patients with sarcopenia phenotype than those without. To further clarify the association among serum Pi level, muscle strength, and muscle mass, we stratified these patients by serum Pi into tertiles and found that patients in the highest serum Pi tertile had lower handgrip strength relative to the patients in the lower tertiles. In line with our observations, growing evidence supports a correlation between higher serum Pi and lower muscle strength. Our present and previous in vitro studies have demonstrated that rodent muscle cells cultured in a high-Pi-containing medium exhibit muscle atrophy characterized by the accumulation of myostatin, accelerated senescence with integrin-linked kinase overexpression, reduced proliferative capacity, activation of autophagy, reductions in mitochondrial membrane potential, and activation of Nrf2 signaling [35,36,37,38]. Furthermore, increased Pi can reduce Ca2+ release from the sarcoplasmic reticulum, which may lead to reduced cross-bridge activity and impaired muscle contraction [39,40]. Similarly to the aforementioned in vitro findings, an animal study revealed that mice subjected to a high-Pi diet developed exercise intolerance, which was determined by conducting a treadmill exercise test and assessing altered fatty acid metabolism in mice skeletal muscles [18]. The pathogenic role of high Pi in muscle wasting was further supported by a human study, which demonstrated that knee extensor fatigability was greater in older adults relative to younger adults and revealed decreased pH and increased Pi levels (which were determined using phosphorus nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy) in the muscles of older adults [41].
Hyperphosphatemia is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in patients on maintenance HD [42]; it is also associated with cardiovascular risk in patients who have CKD but are not on dialysis [43]. In patients who have moderate CKD with a mean eGFR of 50.6 mL/min per 1.73 m2, higher Pi levels are associated with an increased prevalence of vascular calcification that is independent of serum parathyroid hormone (PTH) and calcitriol levels [15,44]. The Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) workgroup suggested that the elevated Pi levels of patients with CKD G3a–G5D ought to be reduced to normal levels [45]. In the present study, the optimal serum Pi cutoff value for predicting low handgrip strength was 3.65 mg/dL (AUC = 0.684, 95% CI: 0.586–0.783). Adjusting the prediction model for age, sex, and eGFR resulted in the AUC increasing from 0.684 to 0.871. Our findings support the position that the serum Pi of patients with advanced CKD should be maintained within a normal range; this position is consistent with KDIGO guidelines.
The present study has limitations. Firstly, we did not conduct a longitudinal survey and, consequently, could not verify any causative relationship between serum Pi and handgrip strength. Secondly, the dietary records of Pi intake, which could be a major confounder, were unavailable. Thirdly, although we excluded patients who had CKD and peripheral edema concurrently, BIA measurements could still be influenced by the hydration status of participants. Fourthly, we did not measure the participants’ serum PTH levels, which are proven to be a muscle-wasting factor. Fifthly, the specificity of serum Pi in predicting low handgrip strength was not so high. Thus, consistent with the recommendations in AWGS 2019 criteria, measuring handgrip strength rather than measuring serum Pi is still the useful screening test for sarcopenia in patients with advanced CKD, especially in those with hyperphosphatemia.
5. Conclusions
In conclusion, the present study demonstrates that a high serum Pi concentration is significantly associated with low handgrip strength in patients with advanced CKD. Moreover, serum Pi may be used to predict low handgrip strength. A large cohort study is warranted to verify the causal relationship between serum Pi and handgrip strength and to investigate the optimal serum Pi concentration range for preventing low handgrip strength in patients who have advanced CKD.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, Y.-J.H.; data curation, P.-H.T. and C.L.; formal analysis, H.-C.Y. and C.L.; funding acquisition, H.-C.Y. and Y.-J.H.; investigation, P.-H.T., C.L., and C.-C.S.; methodology, C.-C.S., P.C., and Y.-J.H.; project administration, H.-C.Y. and Y.-J.H.; resources, H.-C.Y., C.-C.S., P.C., and Y.-J.H.; software, P.-H.T.; supervision, C.-C.S., P.C., and Y.-J.H.; validation, P.-H.T.; visualization, P.-H.T. and C.L.; writing—original draft, P.-H.T.; writing—review and editing, P.C. and Y.-J.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research was funded by the Ministry of Science and Technology, grant numbers MOST 105-2314-B-016-009, 106-2314-B-016-032-MY2, and 108-2314-B-016-017-MY3; the National Health Research Institute, grant number NHRI-EX106-10631SI; the Tri-Service General Hospital, grant numbers TSGH-D109-125 and TSGH-C106-092; the Zuoying Branch of Kaohsiung Armed Forces General Hospital, grant number ZBH 106-02; and the Medical Affairs Bureau, Ministry of National Defense, grant numbers MAB-107-008 and MAB-108-021.
Institutional Review Board Statement
The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the institutional review board of the Tri-Service General Hospital (TSGHIRB 2-106-05-061).
Informed Consent Statement
Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.
Data Availability Statement
Data will be available upon reasonable request to the corresponding author.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- Cruz-Jentoft, A.J.; Bahat, G.; Bauer, J.; Boirie, Y.; Bruyère, O.; Cederholm, T.; Cooper, C.; Landi, F.; Rolland, Y.; Sayer, A.A.; et al. Sarcopenia: Revised european consensus on definition and diagnosis. Age Ageing 2019, 48, 16–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Sharma, D.; Hawkins, M.; Abramowitz, M.K. Association of sarcopenia with egfr and misclassification of obesity in adults with ckd in the united states. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2014, 9, 2079–2088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- De Souza, V.A.; Oliveira, D.; Barbosa, S.R.; Corrêa, J.O.d.A.; Colugnati, F.A.B.; Mansur, H.N.; Fernandes, N.; Bastos, M.G. Sarcopenia in patients with chronic kidney disease not yet on dialysis: Analysis of the prevalence and associated factors. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0176230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Ziolkowski, S.L.; Long, J.; Baker, J.F.; Simard, J.F.; Chertow, G.M.; Leonard, M.B. Sarcopenia, relative sarcopenia and excess adiposity in chronic kidney disease. JCSM Clin. Rep. 2018, 3, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Giglio, J.; Kamimura, M.A.; Lamarca, F.; Rodrigues, J.; Santin, F.; Avesani, C.M. Association of sarcopenia with nutritional parameters, quality of life, hospitalization, and mortality rates of elderly patients on hemodialysis. J. Ren. Nutr. 2018, 28, 197–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rosenberg, I.H. Sarcopenia: Origins and clinical relevance. J. Nutr. 1997, 127, 990s–991s. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Cruz-Jentoft, A.J.; Baeyens, J.P.; Bauer, J.M.; Boirie, Y.; Cederholm, T.; Landi, F.; Martin, F.C.; Michel, J.P.; Rolland, Y.; Schneider, S.M.; et al. Sarcopenia: European consensus on definition and diagnosis: Report of the european working group on sarcopenia in older people. Age Ageing 2010, 39, 412–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Leong, D.P.; Teo, K.K.; Rangarajan, S.; Lopez-Jaramillo, P.; Avezum, A., Jr.; Orlandini, A.; Seron, P.; Ahmed, S.H.; Rosengren, A.; Kelishadi, R.; et al. Prognostic value of grip strength: Findings from the prospective urban rural epidemiology (pure) study. Lancet 2015, 386, 266–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alley, D.E.; Shardell, M.D.; Peters, K.W.; McLean, R.R.; Dam, T.T.; Kenny, A.M.; Fragala, M.S.; Harris, T.B.; Kiel, D.P.; Guralnik, J.M.; et al. Grip strength cutpoints for the identification of clinically relevant weakness. J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 2014, 69, 559–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, Y.L.; Jin, H.; Lim, J.Y.; Lee, S.Y. Relationship between low handgrip strength and chronic kidney disease: Knhanes 2014–2017. J. Ren. Nutr. 2021, 31, 57–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chang, Y.-T.; Wu, H.-L.; Guo, H.-R.; Cheng, Y.-Y.; Tseng, C.-C.; Wang, M.-C.; Lin, C.-Y.; Sung, J.-M. Handgrip strength is an independent predictor of renal outcomes in patients with chronic kidney diseases. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 2011, 26, 3588–3595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Levin, A.; Bakris, G.L.; Molitch, M.; Smulders, M.; Tian, J.; Williams, L.A.; Andress, D.L. Prevalence of abnormal serum vitamin d, pth, calcium, and phosphorus in patients with chronic kidney disease: Results of the study to evaluate early kidney disease. Kidney Int. 2007, 71, 31–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Spiegel, D.M.; Brady, K. Calcium balance in normal individuals and in patients with chronic kidney disease on low- and high-calcium diets. Kidney Int. 2012, 81, 1116–1122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Block, G.A.; Klassen, P.S.; Lazarus, J.M.; Ofsthun, N.; Lowrie, E.G.; Chertow, G.M. Mineral metabolism, mortality, and morbidity in maintenance hemodialysis. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2004, 15, 2208–2218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Adeney, K.L.; Siscovick, D.S.; Ix, J.H.; Seliger, S.L.; Shlipak, M.G.; Jenny, N.S.; Kestenbaum, B.R. Association of serum phosphate with vascular and valvular calcification in moderate ckd. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2009, 20, 381–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ohnishi, M.; Razzaque, M.S. Dietary and genetic evidence for phosphate toxicity accelerating mammalian aging. FASEB J. 2010, 24, 3562–3571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Stubbs, J.R.; Liu, S.; Tang, W.; Zhou, J.; Wang, Y.; Yao, X.; Quarles, L.D. Role of hyperphosphatemia and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin d in vascular calcification and mortality in fibroblastic growth factor 23 null mice. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2007, 18, 2116–2124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Peri-Okonny, P.; Baskin, K.K.; Iwamoto, G.; Mitchell, J.H.; Smith, S.A.; Kim, H.K.; Szweda, L.I.; Bassel-Duby, R.; Fujikawa, T.; Castorena, C.M.; et al. High-phosphate diet induces exercise intolerance and impairs fatty acid metabolism in mice. Circulation 2019, 139, 1422–1434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Petermann-Rocha, F.; Gray, S.R.; Pell, J.P.; Celis-Morales, C.; Ho, F.K. Biomarkers profile of people with sarcopenia: A cross-sectional analysis from uk biobank. J. Am. Med. Dir. Assoc. 2020, 21, 2017.e1–2017.e9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mori, K.; Nishide, K.; Okuno, S.; Shoji, T.; Emoto, M.; Tsuda, A.; Nakatani, S.; Imanishi, Y.; Ishimura, E.; Yamakawa, T.; et al. Impact of diabetes on sarcopenia and mortality in patients undergoing hemodialysis. BMC Nephrol. 2019, 20, 105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ling, C.H.; de Craen, A.J.; Slagboom, P.E.; Gunn, D.A.; Stokkel, M.P.; Westendorp, R.G.; Maier, A.B. Accuracy of direct segmental multi-frequency bioimpedance analysis in the assessment of total body and segmental body composition in middle-aged adult population. Clin. Nutr. 2011, 30, 610–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Chen, L.-K.; Woo, J.; Assantachai, P.; Auyeung, T.-W.; Chou, M.-Y.; Iijima, K.; Jang, H.C.; Kang, L.; Kim, M.; Kim, S.; et al. Asian working group for sarcopenia: 2019 consensus update on sarcopenia diagnosis and treatment. J. Am. Med. Dir. Assoc. 2020, 21, 300–307.e2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sabatino, A.; Cuppari, L.; Stenvinkel, P.; Lindholm, B.; Avesani, C.M. Sarcopenia in chronic kidney disease: What have we learned so far? J. Nephrol. 2020, 34, 1347–1372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ishikawa, S.; Naito, S.; Iimori, S.; Takahashi, D.; Zeniya, M.; Sato, H.; Nomura, N.; Sohara, E.; Okado, T.; Uchida, S.; et al. Loop diuretics are associated with greater risk of sarcopenia in patients with non-dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0192990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Zhou, Y.; Hellberg, M.; Svensson, P.; Höglund, P.; Clyne, N. Sarcopenia and relationships between muscle mass, measured glomerular filtration rate and physical function in patients with chronic kidney disease stages 3–5. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 2018, 33, 342–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Vettoretti, S.; Caldiroli, L.; Armelloni, S.; Ferrari, C.; Cesari, M.; Messa, P. Sarcopenia is associated with malnutrition but not with systemic inflammation in older persons with advanced ckd. Nutrients 2019, 11, 1378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Lin, Y.-L.; Chen, S.-Y.; Lai, Y.-H.; Wang, C.-H.; Kuo, C.-H.; Liou, H.-H.; Hsu, B.-G. Serum creatinine to cystatin c ratio predicts skeletal muscle mass and strength in patients with non-dialysis chronic kidney disease. Clin. Nutr. 2020, 39, 2435–2441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Metter, E.J.; Lynch, N.; Conwit, R.; Lindle, R.; Tobin, J.; Hurley, B. Muscle quality and age: Cross-sectional and longitudinal comparisons. J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 1999, 54, B207–B218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goodpaster, B.H.; Park, S.W.; Harris, T.B.; Kritchevsky, S.B.; Nevitt, M.; Schwartz, A.V.; Simonsick, E.M.; Tylavsky, F.A.; Visser, M.; Newman, A.B. The loss of skeletal muscle strength, mass, and quality in older adults: The health, aging and body composition study. J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 2006, 61, 1059–1064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Moore, A.Z.; Caturegli, G.; Metter, E.J.; Makrogiannis, S.; Resnick, S.M.; Harris, T.B.; Ferrucci, L. Difference in muscle quality over the adult life span and biological correlates in the baltimore longitudinal study of aging. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 2014, 62, 230–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Isoyama, N.; Qureshi, A.R.; Avesani, C.M.; Lindholm, B.; Barany, P.; Heimburger, O.; Cederholm, T.; Stenvinkel, P.; Carrero, J.J. Comparative associations of muscle mass and muscle strength with mortality in dialysis patients. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2014, 9, 1720–1728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Isen, J.; McGue, M.; Iacono, W. Genetic influences on the development of grip strength in adolescence. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 2014, 154, 189–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Sternang, O.; Reynolds, C.A.; Finkel, D.; Ernsth-Bravell, M.; Pedersen, N.L.; Aslan, A.K.D. Factors associated with grip strength decline in older adults. Age Ageing 2015, 44, 269–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Chen, Y.-Y.; Kao, T.-W.; Chou, C.-W.; Wu, C.-J.; Yang, H.-F.; Lai, C.-H.; Wu, L.-W.; Chen, W.-L. Exploring the link between serum phosphate levels and low muscle strength, dynapenia, and sarcopenia. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 3573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhang, Y.-Y.; Yang, M.; Bao, J.-F.; Gu, L.-J.; Yu, H.-L.; Yuan, W.-J. Phosphate stimulates myotube atrophy through autophagy activation: Evidence of hyperphosphatemia contributing to skeletal muscle wasting in chronic kidney disease. BMC Nephrol. 2018, 19, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sosa, P.; Alcalde-Estevez, E.; Plaza, P.; Troyano, N.; Alonso, C.; Martinez-Arias, L.; Aroeira, A.E.d.M.; Rodriguez-Puyol, D.; Olmos, G.; Lopez-Ongil, S.; et al. Hyperphosphatemia promotes senescence of myoblasts by impairing autophagy through ilk overexpression, a possible mechanism involved in sarcopenia. Aging Dis. 2018, 9, 769–784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Sonou, T.; Ohya, M.; Kawakami, K.; Yashiro, M.; Mima, T.; Negi, S.; Shigematsu, T. High phosphate levels promote muscle atrophy via myostatin expression in differentiated l6 myotubes. Res. Sq. 2020. in preprint. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chung, L.-H.; Liu, S.-T.; Huang, S.-M.; Salter, D.M.; Lee, H.-S.; Hsu, Y.-J. High phosphate induces skeletal muscle atrophy and suppresses myogenic differentiation by increasing oxidative stress and activating nrf2 signaling. Aging 2020, 12, 21446–21468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Allen, D.G.; Westerblad, H. Role of phosphate and calcium stores in muscle fatigue. J. Physiol. 2001, 536, 657–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kuo, I.Y.; Ehrlich, B.E. Signaling in muscle contraction. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2015, 7, a006023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hostrup, M.; Bangsbo, J.; Cairns, S.P. Inorganic phosphate, protons and diprotonated phosphate may contribute to the exacerbated muscle fatigue in older adults. J. Physiol. 2019, 597, 4865–4866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rodriguez-Benot, A.; Martin-Malo, A.; Alvarez-Lara, M.A.; Rodriguez, M.; Aljama, P. Mild hyperphosphatemia and mortality in hemodialysis patients. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 2005, 46, 68–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kestenbaum, B.; Sampson, J.N.; Rudser, K.D.; Patterson, D.J.; Seliger, S.L.; Young, B.; Sherrard, D.J.; Andress, D.L. Serum phosphate levels and mortality risk among people with chronic kidney disease. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2005, 16, 520–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Tonelli, M.; Sacks, F.; Pfeffer, M.; Gao, Z.; Curhan, G. Relation between serum phosphate level and cardiovascular event rate in people with coronary disease. Circulation 2005, 112, 2627–2633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes. KDIGO CKD-MBD Update Work Group: KDIGO 2017 Clinical Practice Guideline Update for the Diagnosis, Evaluation, Prevention, and Treatment of Chronic Kidney Disease-Mineral and Bone Disorder (CKD-MBD). Available online: https://kdigo.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/2017-KDIGO-CKD-MBD-GL-Update.pdf (accessed on 20 July 2021).
Figure 1.
Correlation of serum phosphate with (a) FFM, (b) TSM, (c) ASM, (d) MUAC, (e) fat mass, and (f) TSF in patients with stage 3–5 CKD. Abbreviations: ASM, appendicular skeletal muscle mass; FFM, fat-free mass; MUAC, mid-upper arm circumference; TSF, triceps skinfold; TSM, total body skeletal muscle mass.
Figure 1.
Correlation of serum phosphate with (a) FFM, (b) TSM, (c) ASM, (d) MUAC, (e) fat mass, and (f) TSF in patients with stage 3–5 CKD. Abbreviations: ASM, appendicular skeletal muscle mass; FFM, fat-free mass; MUAC, mid-upper arm circumference; TSF, triceps skinfold; TSM, total body skeletal muscle mass.
Figure 2.
Correlation of serum phosphate with (a) handgrip strength (b) gait speed, and (c) ASMI in patients with stage 3–5 CKD. Abbreviations: ASM, appendicular skeletal muscle mass; FFM, fat-free mass; TSM, total body skeletal muscle mass.
Figure 2.
Correlation of serum phosphate with (a) handgrip strength (b) gait speed, and (c) ASMI in patients with stage 3–5 CKD. Abbreviations: ASM, appendicular skeletal muscle mass; FFM, fat-free mass; TSM, total body skeletal muscle mass.
Figure 3.
(a) Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for determining the optimal serum Pi cutoff point to predict low handgrip strength in patients with CKD. (b) ROC curves for multivariate regression models designed to predict low handgrip strength in patients who have CKD. Model 1: Crude analysis. Model 2: Model 1 adjusted for age and sex. Model 3: Model 2 additionally adjusted for eGFR. Model 4: Model 3 additionally adjusted for BMI and MAC. Model 5: Model 4 additionally adjusted for hemoglobin, uric acid, and total calcium.
Figure 3.
(a) Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for determining the optimal serum Pi cutoff point to predict low handgrip strength in patients with CKD. (b) ROC curves for multivariate regression models designed to predict low handgrip strength in patients who have CKD. Model 1: Crude analysis. Model 2: Model 1 adjusted for age and sex. Model 3: Model 2 additionally adjusted for eGFR. Model 4: Model 3 additionally adjusted for BMI and MAC. Model 5: Model 4 additionally adjusted for hemoglobin, uric acid, and total calcium.
Table 1.
Baseline characteristics of patients with stage 3–5 CKD and comparison of patients with sarcopenia phenotype and controls.
Table 1.
Baseline characteristics of patients with stage 3–5 CKD and comparison of patients with sarcopenia phenotype and controls.
| Parameters | Total (n = 134) | Sarcopenia Phenotype (n = 70) | Control (n = 64) | p Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 65.34 ± 12.96 | 68.87± 12.19 | 61.48 ± 12.75 | 0.001 |
| Male sex, n (%) | 93 (69.4) | 40 (57.1) | 53 (82.8) | 0.001 |
| Height (cm) | 162.83 ± 8.93 | 160.54 ± 10.02 | 165.33 ± 6.79 | 0.002 |
| Weight (kg) | 68.13 ± 13.23 | 64.87 ± 14.47 | 71.70 ± 10.74 | 0.003 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 25.60 ± 4.11 | 25.06 ± 4.66 | 26.19 ± 3.33 | 0.114 |
| MUAC (cm) | 28.93 ± 3.46 | 27.74 ± 3.67 | 30.23 ± 2.69 | <0.001 |
| TSF (mm) | 13.68 ± 6.26 | 13.67 ± 5.63 | 13.69 ± 6.93 | 0.988 |
| eGFR | 35.33 ± 16.61 | 34.18 ± 16.29 | 36.59 ± 17.00 | 0.404 |
| Diabetes mellitus, n (%) | 63 (47.0) | 34 (48.6) | 29 (45.3) | 0.706 |
| Hypertension, n (%) | 99 (73.9) | 54 (77.1) | 45 (70.3) | 0.369 |
| Coronary artery disease, n (%) | 31 (23.1) | 17 (24.3) | 14 (21.9) | 0.741 |
| Hyperlipidemia, n (%) | 91 (67.9) | 44 (62.9) | 47 (73.4) | 0.190 |
| Laboratory measurements | ||||
| Hemoglobin (g/dL) | 12.37 ± 2.02 | 11.99 ± 1.93 | 12.79 ± 2.05 | 0.030 |
| Platelet count (×109/L) | 221.31 ± 58.51 | 214.31 ± 64.53 | 227.05 ± 53.25 | 0.365 |
| Total cholesterol (mg/dL) | 166.96 ± 37.73 | 162.72 ± 33.90 | 171.36 ± 41.17 | 0.227 |
| HDL cholesterol (mg/dL) | 46.28 ± 18.92 | 46.00 ± 21.38 | 46.50 ± 17.14 | 0.557 |
| Triglyceride (mg/dL) | 161.98 ± 118.42 | 168.66 ± 139.64 | 155.19 ± 92.71 | 0.524 |
| Blood urea nitrogen (mg/dL) | 36.25 ± 19.90 | 39.67 ± 22.39 | 32.58 ± 16.25 | 0.053 |
| Creatinine (mg/dL) | 2.56 ± 1.83 | 2.79 ± 2.17 | 2.30 ± 1.34 | 0.123 |
| Uric acid (mg/dL) | 6.10 ± 1.71 | 6.28 ± 1.72 | 5.90 ± 1.69 | 0.197 |
| Total calcium (mg/dL) | 9.33 ± 0.54 | 9.33 ± 0.57 | 9.33 ± 0.51 | 0.959 |
| Glucose (mg/dL) | 110.48 ± 31.24 | 116.22 ± 37.17 | 105.22 ± 23.72 | 0.059 |
| Alanine aminotransferase (U/L) | 22.00 ± 13.75 | 22.17 ± 13.69 | 21.85 ± 13.92 | 0.907 |
| Albumin (g/dL) | 4.16 ± 0.41 | 4.11 ± 0.40 | 4.21 ± 0.41 | 0.191 |
| Phosphate (mg/dL) | 3.72 ± 0.81 | 3.88 ± 0.86 | 3.54 ± 0.73 | 0.016 |
| Bioelectrical impedance analysis | ||||
| FM% | 29.01 ± 7.83 | 29.74 ± 8.92 | 28.22 ± 6.40 | 0.260 |
| FM (kg) | 20.32 ± 7.41 | 19.83 ± 8.12 | 20.86 ± 6.56 | 0.424 |
| FFM (kg) | 48.73 ± 9.49 | 45.67 ± 10.42 | 52.07 ± 7.04 | <0.001 |
| TSM (kg) | 26.69 ± 5.67 | 24.75 ± 6.11 | 28.81 ± 4.26 | <0.001 |
| ASM (kg) | 20.36 ± 4.64 | 18.97 ± 5.22 | 21.88 ± 3.33 | <0.001 |
| Sarcopenia indicator | ||||
| Handgrip strength (kg) | 29.33 ± 9.73 | 24.01 ± 7.96 | 35.15 ± 8.04 | <0.001 |
| Gait speed (m/s) | 1.03 ± 0.26 | 0.87 ± 0.20 | 1.21 ± 0.19 | <0.001 |
| ASMI (kg/m2) | 7.59 ± 1.18 | 7.23 ± 1.34 | 7.97 ± 0.84 | <0.001 |
Abbreviations: ASM, appendicular skeletal muscle mass; ASMI, appendicular skeletal muscle mass index; BMI, body mass index; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; FM, fat mass; FFM, fat-free mass; FM%, fat mass percentage; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; MUAC, mid-upper arm circumference; MM, muscle mass; TSF, triceps skinfold; TSM, total body skeletal muscle mass.
Table 2.
Participants stratified by serum phosphate tertiles.
| Parameters | Serum Phosphate Tertiles | p | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower (n = 43) | Middle (n = 47) | Upper (n = 44) | ||
| Age (years) | 66.98 ± 10.76 | 64.36 ± 14.38 | 64.80 ± 13.45 | 0.600 |
| Male sex, n (%) | 39 (90.7) | 32 (68.1) | 22 (50.0) | <0.001 |
| Height (cm) | 166.79 ± 6.82 | 162.28 ± 9.02 | 159.55 ± 9.33 | 0.001 |
| Weight (kg) | 71.05 ± 10.60 | 70.19 ± 12.42 | 63.07 ± 15.07 | 0.007 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 25.46 ± 2.78 | 26.67 ± 4.30 | 24.59 ± 4.74 | 0.051 |
| MUAC (cm) | 29.78 ± 2.22 | 29.19 ± 3.61 | 27.83 ± 4.04 | 0.025 |
| TSF (mm) | 12.14 ± 5.26 | 14.62 ± 6.03 | 14.18 ± 7.18 | 0.139 |
| eGFR | 39.76 ± 14.89 | 34.35 ± 16.85 | 32.05 ± 17.36 | 0.084 |
| Diabetes mellitus, n (%) | 17 (39.5) | 24 (51.1) | 22 (50.0) | 0.489 |
| Hypertension, n (%) | 28 (65.1) | 34 (72.3) | 37 (84.1) | 0.126 |
| Coronary artery disease, n (%) | 9 (20.9) | 8 (17.0) | 14 (31.8) | 0.226 |
| Hyperlipidemia, n (%) | 30 (69.8) | 33 (70.2) | 28 (63.6) | 0.759 |
| Laboratory tests | ||||
| Hemoglobin (g/dL) | 13.63 ± 1.89 | 12.44 ± 1.75 | 11.19 ± 1.72 | <0.001 |
| Platelet count (×109/L) | 214.73 ± 59.90 | 213.35 ± 44.60 | 236.61 ± 69.61 | 0.456 |
| Total cholesterol (mg/dL) | 165.16 ± 35.03 | 174.07 ± 40.99 | 160.97 ± 35.97 | 0.287 |
| HDL Cholesterol (mg/dL) | 43.12 ± 14.42 | 43.10 ± 13.17 | 55.31 ± 28.11 | 0.461 |
| Triglyceride (mg/dL) | 149.80 ± 121.16 | 188.27 ± 126.18 | 146.31 ± 104.59 | 0.189 |
| Blood urea nitrogen (mg/dL) | 22.89 ± 7.14 | 31.15 ± 14.03 | 53.83 ± 20.63 | <0.001 |
| Creatinine (mg/dL) | 1.69 ± 0.74 | 1.92 ± 0.84 | 4.07 ± 2.34 | <0.001 |
| Uric acid (mg/dL) | 5.89 ± 1.60 | 5.79 ± 1.72 | 6.63 ± 1.72 | 0.043 |
| Total calcium (mg/dL) | 9.37 ± 0.52 | 9.46 ± 0.39 | 9.15 ± 0.64 | 0.019 |
| Glucose (mg/dL) | 104.56 ± 18.10 | 118.62 ± 39.42 | 108.14 ± 31.46 | 0.119 |
| Alanine aminotransferase (U/L) | 23.05 ± 13.53 | 23.47 ± 15.49 | 19.00 ± 11.86 | 0.377 |
| Albumin (g/dL) | 4.21 ± 0.33 | 4.22 ± 0.31 | 4.04 ± 0.53 | 0.077 |
| Bioelectrical impedance analysis | ||||
| FM% | 27.88 ± 6.87 | 30.67 ± 8.26 | 28.35 ± 8.11 | 0.190 |
| FM (kg) | 20.22 ± 6.39 | 22.12 ± 7.87 | 18.50 ± 7.54 | 0.065 |
| FFM (kg) | 51.50 ± 7.49 | 49.38 ± 9.47 | 45.33 ± 10.38 | 0.008 |
| TSM (kg) | 28.41 ± 4.49 | 27.09 ± 5.67 | 24.58 ± 6.12 | 0.005 |
| ASM (kg) | 21.66 ± 3.41 | 20.57 ± 4.52 | 18.87 ± 5.41 | 0.017 |
| Sarcopenia indicator | ||||
| Handgrip strength (kg) | 34.13 ± 9.45 | 28.18 ± 8.97 | 25.86 ± 9.09 | <0.001 |
| Gait speed (m/s) | 1.11 ± 0.24 | 1.01 ± 0.28 | 0.98 ± 0.23 | 0.042 |
| ASMI (kg/m2) | 7.74 ± 0.75 | 7.73 ± 1.13 | 7.28 ± 1.51 | 0.120 |
Note: Categorical variables are expressed as percentages; continuous variables are expressed as means ± standard deviations. Abbreviations: ASM, appendicular skeletal muscle mass; ASMI, appendicular skeletal muscle mass index; BMI, body mass index; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; FM, fat mass; FFM, fat-free mass; FM%, fat mass percentage; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; MUAC, mid-upper arm circumference; MM, muscle mass; TSF, triceps skinfold; TSM, total body skeletal muscle mass.
Table 3.
Association of serum phosphate level with muscle strength and mass.
| Std. β | Unstd. β (95% CI) | p Value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Handgrip strength | |||
| Model 1 | −0.372 | −4.446 (−6.357, −2.536) | <0.001 |
| Model 2 | −0.214 | −2.559 (−4.087, −1.031) | 0.001 |
| Model 3 | −0.216 | −2.583 (−4.136, −1.031) | 0.001 |
| Model 4 | −0.184 | −2.197 (−3.698, −0.696) | 0.004 |
| Model 5 | −0.168 | −1.972 (−3.659, −0.285) | 0.022 |
| Gait speed | |||
| Model 1 | −0.245 | −0.078 (−0.131, −0.025) | 0.004 |
| Model 2 | −0.244 | −0.077 (−0.130, −0.024) | 0.005 |
| Model 3 | −0.224 | −0.071 (−0.124, −0.017) | 0.010 |
| Model 4 | −0.197 | −0.062 (−0.115, −0.010) | 0.020 |
| Model 5 | −0.160 | −0.050 (−0.113, 0.013) | 0.121 |
| ASMI | |||
| Model 1 | −0.184 | −0.268 (−0.514, −0.022) | 0.033 |
| Model 2 | 0.008 | 0.011 (−0.211, 0.234) | 0.921 |
| Model 3 | 0.017 | 0.025 (−0.201, 0.250) | 0.829 |
| Model 4 | 0.077 | 0.111 (−0.032, 0.254) | 0.126 |
| Model 5 | 0.001 | 0.002 (−0.158, 0.162) | 0.981 |
Model 1: Crude analysis. Model 2: Model 1 adjusted for age and sex. Model 3: Model 2 additionally adjusted for eGFR. Model 4: Model 3 additionally adjusted for BMI and MUAC. Model 5: Model 4 additionally adjusted for hemoglobin, uric acid, and total calcium.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Tsai, P.-H.; Yang, H.-C.; Lin, C.; Sung, C.-C.; Chu, P.; Hsu, Y.-J. Association of Serum Phosphate with Low Handgrip Strength in Patients with Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease. Nutrients 2021, 13, 3605. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/nu13103605
AMA Style
Tsai P-H, Yang H-C, Lin C, Sung C-C, Chu P, Hsu Y-J. Association of Serum Phosphate with Low Handgrip Strength in Patients with Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease. Nutrients. 2021; 13(10):3605. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/nu13103605
Chicago/Turabian StyleTsai, Ping-Huang, Hsiu-Chien Yang, Chin Lin, Chih-Chien Sung, Pauling Chu, and Yu-Juei Hsu. 2021. "Association of Serum Phosphate with Low Handgrip Strength in Patients with Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease" Nutrients 13, no. 10: 3605. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/nu13103605
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.
