Next Article in Journal
Food Selectivity and Its Implications Associated with Gastrointestinal Disorders in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders
Next Article in Special Issue
Breastfeeding and Allergy Effect Modified by Genetic, Environmental, Dietary, and Immunological Factors
Previous Article in Journal
Assessing the Association between Important Dietary Habits and Osteoporosis: A Genetic Correlation and Two-Sample Mendelian Randomization Study
Previous Article in Special Issue
Early Introduction of Allergenic Foods and the Prevention of Food Allergy
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nutrients
Volume 14
Issue 13
10.3390/nu14132659
nutrients-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Relevance of Early Introduction of Cow’s Milk Proteins for Prevention of Cow’s Milk Allergy

by
Laurien Ulfman
1,
Angela Tsuang
2,
Aline B. Sprikkelman
3,4,
Anne Goh
5 and
R. J. Joost van Neerven
1,6,*
1
FrieslandCampina, 3818 LA Amersfoort, The Netherlands
2
Division of Allergy & Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA
3
Department of Pediatric Pulmonology and Pediatric Allergology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands
4
University Medical Center Groningen, GRIAC Research Institute, University of Groningen, 9713 RB Groningen, The Netherlands
5
Department of Paediatrics, KK Women’s and Children’s Hospital, Singapore 229899, Singapore
6
Cell Biology and Immunology, Wageningen University, 6700 AH Wageningen, The Netherlands
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nutrients 2022, 14(13), 2659; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/nu14132659
Submission received: 12 May 2022 / Revised: 22 June 2022 / Accepted: 24 June 2022 / Published: 27 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Relevance of Nutrition for Pediatric Allergy and Immunity)
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Food allergy incidence has increased worldwide over the last 20 years. For prevention of food allergy, current guidelines do not recommend delaying the introduction of allergenic foods. Several groundbreaking studies, such as the Learning Early About Peanut Allergy study, showed that the relatively early introduction of this allergenic food between 4–6 months of age reduces the risk of peanut allergy. However, less is known about the introduction of cow’s milk, as many children already receive cow’s-milk-based formula much earlier in life. This can be regular cow’s milk formula with intact milk proteins or hydrolyzed formulas. Several recent studies have investigated the effects of early introduction of cow’s-milk-based formulas with intact milk proteins on the development of cow’s milk allergy while breastfeeding. These studies suggest that depending on the time of introduction and the duration of administration of cow’s milk, the risk of cow’s milk allergy can be reduced (early introduction) or increased (very early introduction followed by discontinuation). The aim of this narrative review is to summarize these studies and to discuss the impact of early introduction of intact cow’s milk protein—as well as hydrolyzed milk protein formulas—and the development of tolerance versus allergy towards cow’s milk proteins.

1. Introduction

Food allergy is an immune reaction to the ingestion of food that is either IgE-mediated or non-IgE-mediated. The IgE-mediated allergic reaction is best understood and develops as a type 1 allergic reaction [1]. In food-allergen-sensitized individuals, the allergen induces an immediate response, typically within the first 2 h, leading to clinical symptoms that may involve the following systems: gastrointestinal, skin, respiratory, and cardiovascular [2]. Allergic reactions can occur to over 100 different foods, but egg, milk, and peanut allergens are the most common among children in Western countries, with egg and milk being particularly common under one year of age [3]. In analogy with the increased prevalence of asthma [4], the incidence in food allergies has increased considerably over the last few decades [5,6,7,8]. This is reflected by the atopic march theory that states that allergic diseases start in infancy with atopic dermatitis and food allergy and later progress to the development of allergic asthma and allergic rhinitis [9]. Allergic diseases are strongly associated with Westernized lifestyle and feeding practices, as prevalence in developing countries is also rising [10].
One of the key questions in relation to food allergy is when potentially allergenic foods should be introduced into the diet of infants to induce tolerance. As a result of several intervention trials on early introduction of food allergens, such as peanut and egg, there is increasing scientific consensus that earlier introduction of these foods can be recommended [11].
However, compared to other food allergens, the situation is quite different for the introduction of cow’s milk, as infants may in practice—when not exclusively breastfed—be exposed to cow’s milk proteins in cow’s-milk-based formula (CMF) at any time before 4 months and sometimes already in the first days of their life. Moreover, infants can also be exposed to low amounts of milk and other food proteins through breastmilk [12,13,14,15,16,17,18]. A large proportion of exclusively breastfed infants will not be introduced to dairy until they are weaned from breastfeeding. The most common allergens in cow’s milk are beta-lactoglobulin and caseins (beta, alpha s1 and s2, and kappa). The high prevalence of allergic patients with beta-lactoglobulin-specific IgE is explained by the absence of this protein in human milk. However, other whey proteins (bovine alpha-lactalbumin and bovine serum albumin (BSA)) have also been described as cow’s milk allergens [19].
Recent insights have increased our knowledge about the relationship between the timing and dose of cow’s milk exposure and the development of cow’s milk allergy (CMA). Therefore, the aim of this review is to summarize what is known about the timing of introduction of cow’s milk protein in early life and its influence on the development of tolerance versus allergy. We will discriminate between very early (first days of life) and early (first weeks to months of life) introduction and discuss the role of hydrolysates in the prevention of cow’s milk allergy.

2. Early Introduction of Food Allergens

For many years, dietary guidelines to prevent food allergy recommended a delayed introduction of food allergens into the diet of infants. This has changed in recent years following the publication of several studies that indicated that early introduction of food allergens may actually help to induce tolerance and thus prevent the development of food allergy, specifically for peanut and egg [20,21,22,23]. In addition, several studies have shown that the diversity of the diet in the first year of life is also associated with a lower incidence of food allergies [24]. The first insights for a tolerance-inducing effect when exposed to allergens early in life came from observational studies. It was found that the prevalence of peanut allergy among Jewish children in the UK was much higher compared to Israel, and the main difference was that a much higher percentage of children had ingested peanut protein in their diets by the age of 9 months in Israel compared to the UK [25]. This observation led to the Learning Early About Peanut Allergy (LEAP) study, in which the development of peanut allergy was studied in high-risk infants with eczema with or without egg allergy. The infants were enrolled between 4 to 11 months of age and randomized to avoid or consume peanut at a dose of 6 g of peanut protein/week. This study clearly demonstrated that the risk of peanut allergy at 5 years of age was significantly lower in the group that consumed peanuts (3.4%) compared to the avoidance group (20.3%) (ITT, 95% CI; 3.4 to 20.3; p < 0.001) [20,26]. The subsequent Enquiring About Tolerance (EAT) Study evaluated the effects of early introduction of six foods (peanut, egg, cow’s milk, sesame, whitefish, and wheat) in infants between 3 to 6 months of age alongside continued breastfeeding in comparison to exclusive breastfeeding until 6 months of age. The EAT study reported a significant decrease in the number of children from a general population developing peanut and egg allergy by 3 years of age in the per protocol analysis despite reported difficulties in adherence to the protocol [22]. However, the rates of other food allergies, including milk allergy, were not high enough to show significant effects. Nevertheless, the average relative risk of a positive skin-prick test at the age of 36 months to six food allergens was 79% lower in the early-introduction group compared to the standard food introduction group; These findings reached significance for peanut (p = 0.007), milk (p = 0.02), and sesame (p = 0.04). In addition to the EAT study, there are several randomized controlled trials that have investigated the effects of early egg introduction (STAR [27], HEALTHNUTS [28], STEP [29], HEAP [30], EAT [22], BEAT [31], PETIT [32]). A meta-analysis by Ierodiakonou [21] included five trials (1915 participants) and concluded that there was evidence with moderate certainty that introduction of egg at 4 to 6 months was associated with a lower egg allergy risk (risk ratio [RR], 0.56; 95% CI, 0.36–0.87; I2 = 36%; p = 0.009). Although a recent pilot study suggested that the early introduction of mixtures of many allergenic foods may be safe and efficacious for preventing food allergy [33], the practicality and safety of this approach should be carefully evaluated in future studies with such products. To prevent food allergy, the dosage of allergens should be sufficient and has been reported to be too low in some other commercial preparations [34]. Furthermore, a disadvantage of providing a mixture of multiple allergens is that when an allergic reaction occurs, it requires additional investigations to ascertain which allergen was responsible for the reaction. It is not clear if such a reaction to one of the allergens would also affect responses to other allergens in the mix.
As a result of all these new insights, guidelines have been updated in many different countries. These guidelines have been reviewed in a systematic review by Vale et al [11]. These changes are also illustrated in the policy document of the American Academy of Pediatrics [35,36] that shifted from the statement that “there are insufficient data to document a protective effect of any dietary intervention beyond 4 to 6 months of age for the development of atopic disease” in 2008 [35] to “There is no evidence that delaying the introduction of allergenic foods, including peanuts, eggs, and fish, beyond 4 to 6 months prevents atopic disease. There is now evidence that early introduction of peanuts may prevent peanut allergy” in 2019 [36]. In line with this, Fleischer et al. [37] recently published a consensus document with guidance to prevent food allergy on behalf of the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology (AAAAI), American College of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology (ACAAI), and the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (CSACI). Here, it was stated “to prevent peanut and/or egg allergy, both peanut and egg should be introduced around 6 months of life, but not before 4 months” and “other allergens should be introduced around this time as well. “Also, in other parts of the world, guidelines have been renewed [38] with careful guidance on the early introduction of allergenic food (egg, peanut) in high-risk infants (British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology (BSACI) 2018 [39], European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology Hepatology and Nutrition (ESPGHAN) 2017 [40], National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) 2017 [41]. The most recent European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI) guideline [42] not only provides guidance on egg and peanut introduction but also cow’s milk introduction (as discussed below).

3. Early Introduction of Cow’s Milk and Development of Cow’s Milk Allergy

Multiple studies have shown that introduction of cow’s milk protein in the first hours to days after birth followed by inconsistent incorporation into the diet is associated with increased risk of developing CMA (Table 1). Early studies showed that brief exposure to cows’ milk during the first three days of life in breast fed children was not associated with atopic disease or allergic symptoms up to age 5 [43,44]. However, cow’s milk allergy was not determined in these studies. Indeed, very early introduction of cow’s milk formula supplementation in the first 24 h of life increased the development of CMA in infants who were exclusively breastfed, as shown by a retrospective case–controlled study conducted in Ireland on 55 cow’s-milk-allergic infants born between 2010–2011 [45].
Using logistic regression, the only risk factor for developing CMA was formula supplementation in the first 24 h of life in exclusively breastfed infants (OR 7.01; 95%CI 1.79–27.01, p < 0.001). There was no increased risk of CMA in infants who were exclusively breastfed (without need for formula supplementation) or exclusively formula fed from birth onwards [45]. In another prospective study [46], it was found that infants that had been exclusively breastfed from birth and subsequently developed CMA had been supplemented with cow’s milk formula in the first 3 days of life. In another retrospective observational study in IgE-mediated CMA children, exposure to isolated doses of formula feeding in the hospital followed by exclusive breastfeeding was identified as a risk factor in the development of CMA [47].
Furthermore, a prospective study in more than 6000 infants [48] supported this finding by showing that infants who required supplementary feeding and received CMF while in the maternity hospital in the first 3 days of life had an increased risk for developing CMA (OR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.04–2.30; p = 0.03) as compared to infants who received an extensively hydrolyzed whey formula (OR 0.61;95%CI, 0.38–1.00). Thus, preventing exposure to intact cow’s milk proteins through supplementation with extensively hydrolyzed cow’s milk devoid of allergenic proteins in the first 3 days of life may reduce the risk of developing CMA. Of interest is the observation that the infants that developed CMA in the breastfeeding group supplemented with CMF had a lower intake of formula in the first 8 weeks of life compared to the infants that did not develop CMA in that group [48]. The early exposure to cow’s milk followed by a period of avoidance of the cow’s-milk-based formula once breastfeeding is established likely leads to this increase in CMA. Based on these insights, EAACI recommended to “Avoid supplementing with cow’s milk formula in breastfed infants in the first week of life to prevent cow’s milk allergy in infants and young children” [42].
In contrast, observational studies have found that early introduction (after the first days of life but within the first weeks of life) of cow’s milk and continuation in the diet is associated with a lower chance of developing CMA [49,51,52], see Table 1. Thus, besides timing, the duration and frequency of allergen introduction during breastfeeding is of importance. The case–control study by Onizawa et al. demonstrated that early introduction of formula based on cow’s milk was associated with a decrease in the incidence of cow’s milk allergy of 51 IgE-mediated-cow’s-milk-allergic infants compared to 102 healthy controls [49]. There were significantly increased odds (aOR 23.4, 95%CI 5.39–104.52) of developing CMA when introduction was delayed (starting > 1 month after birth) or ingestion was irregular (less than once daily), further supporting the importance of duration and frequency. Likewise, using data from a large Japanese birth cohort involving over 100,000 mother–child pairs, analysis performed on 80,408 children showed that the regular consumption of cow’s milk based formula within the first 3 months of life was associated with a lower risk of CMA at 6 and 12 months (aRR 0.42, 95%CI 0.30–0.57 and aRR 0.44, 95%CI 0.38–0.51, respectively). [50]. Furthermore, prospective cohort studies from Melbourne, Australia [51] and Israel [52] also found evidence for an association between early introduction of cow’s milk before the third and first month of life and a reduced likelihood of developing CMA. In the Australian study, the early exposure to cow’s milk (before 3 months of life) in a predominantly breastfed group (87%) was associated with a significant risk reduction of cow’s milk allergy (aOR 0.31, 95% CI 0.10–0.91) at 12 months of age. In the Israeli cohort, the greatest risk of developing cow’s milk allergy was apparent in the group that introduced cow’s milk between 3.5 and 6.5 months of age after being exclusively breastfed. They observed that the risk of IgE-mediated CMA was lower in the infants of Arab women than Jewish women, and this difference was attributed to the decreased likelihood for Arab mothers to exclusively breastfeed their infants, instead providing cow’s-milk-based formula while breastfeeding. This finding supports the hypothesis that early and regular exposure to cow’s milk in the context of breastfeeding is important. In line with this, a retrospective study by Sakihara et al. [53] showed that continuous ingestion of cow’s milk reduced the risk of cow’s milk allergy in a population of infants with hen’s egg allergy based on positive oral food challenge. The infants were categorized into 4 groups: exclusively breast-fed, discontinuation of cow’s milk formula before the age of 3 months (temporary formula group), continuous but not daily ingestion of cow’s milk formula up to 3 months of age (non-daily group) and continuous ingestion of cow’s milk formula at least once daily (daily group). The non-daily group and daily group had significantly lower odds to develop CMA (OR 0.43, p = 0.02 and OR 0.11, p < 0.001, respectively) compared to the breastfeeding reference group, whereas the temporary group did not show a significant difference in CMA (OR 0.75, p = NS). However, a systematic review and meta-analysis by Ierodiakonou [21] showed that early introduction of cow’s milk did not significantly reduce the risk for development of CMA compared to late introduction (early n = 762 vs. late n = 788) and was based on two intervention studies [54,55]. A possible effect in the Lowe study [54] could have been missed due to the selection of infants (high risk) and/or the relative low number of infants that were exposed early to milk and/or avoided allergenic foods—including dairy—in the first year of life. In the study by Perkin et al. [55], the aim was to investigate the effect of early introduction of cow’s milk. The standard introduction group in the EAT study was allowed to supplement with CMF between 3 to 6 months of life if less than 300 mL, which already may have been enough to induce tolerance [55].
The best study design thus far to support early introduction and regular consumption of cow’s milk to prevent CMA is provided by the SPADE study (Strategy for prevention of milk allergy by daily ingestion of infant formula in early infancy) [57]. This prospective multicenter, open-label randomized controlled trial conducted in Okinawa, Japan included infants from the general population who were ingesting cow’s milk daily (ingestion group) from 1 to 2 months of age compared to an avoidance group that were supplemented with soy formula. Continuation of breastfeeding up to 3 and 6 months was high (89.5 vs. 89.7% and 72.2 vs. 67.7%, respectively, for ingestion vs. avoidance group). The ingestion group showed a significant reduction in CMA as diagnosed by open oral cow’s milk challenge at 6 months compared to the avoidance group (risk ratio = 0.12; 95% CI = 0.01–0.50; p < 0.001). Furthermore, infants in the avoidance group also showed higher sensitization to cow’s milk manifested as a positive skin prick test. Infants in the intervention group had higher casein-specific IgG4, supporting the hypothesis that tolerance induction is due to skewing of the immune response. The authors [57] concluded that cow’s milk formula should be started early, before the first month of life, and should be continued daily to reduce the risk of cow’s milk allergy while maintaining breastfeeding. The relatively high number of cow’s-milk-allergic-infants in the soy formula group may be the result of avoidance of cow’s milk allergen in the first 2 months of life. This is in line with earlier observations that avoidance may be detrimental [47]. Furthermore, in a subsequent subgroup analysis, Sakihara [57] showed that infants who received cow’s milk supplementation in the first 3 days of life who were subsequently randomized to the avoidance group also showed an increased risk of developing CMA. This is again in line with a difference in risk for CMA between very early introduction of cow’s milk in the first days of life followed by long duration of avoidance compared to early but continuous supplementation of cow’s milk from the first months of life. More observational and intervention studies are needed and are, according to clinicaltrials.gov, underway [58,59].

4. Prevention of Cow’s Milk Allergy: Hydrolysates

As discussed above, the very early introduction of cow’s milk in the first days of life followed by a period of avoidance is associated with increased risk of developing CMA. Therefore, it is important to know which supplements can be provided to support breastfeeding early in life without increasing this risk. Saarinen et al. [48] compared the supplementation of healthy infants during their stay in the maternity hospital with an extensively hydrolyzed whey formula, regular CMF, or pasteurized human milk to an exclusively breastfed group as the control. These infants were followed for 18 to 34 months for the development of CMA. In the group of infants receiving the whey hydrolysate, 1.5% of the infants developed cow’s milk allergy (OR 0.61; 95% CI, 0.38–1.00) compared to 2.4% in the group of infants receiving regular cow’s milk formula. In the infants receiving pasteurized human milk, 1.7% developed CMA (0.70; 95% CI, 0.44–1.12). These trends, however, did not reach statistical significance. In addition to early exposure to cow’s milk, parental history of allergy—defined as asthma, atopic dermatitis, allergic rhinitis, or conjunctivitis as determined by a questionnaire—also increased the risk of developing CMA in line with current knowledge on genetic risk. A randomized clinical trial [60] investigated the risk of sensitization towards cow’s milk and the development of allergic disease by early supplementation (in the first 3 days of life, but without continuous exposure) of breastfed infants with cow’s milk formula (CMF) or an amino-acid-based formula (AAF) in high-risk infants (defined as one immediate family member with atopic disease). Sensitization to cow’s milk (IgE level ≥ 0.35 allergen units [UA]/mL) occurred in 16.8% in the AAF group compared to 32.3% in the CMF group. Prevalence of food allergy at the second birthday was also significantly lower in the AAF group (2.6%) compared to the CMF group (13.2%) (RR 0.2; 95% CI, 0.07–0.57). The differences were not only present for cow’s-milk-induced allergic reactions but also egg- and wheat-related allergic reactions, which were increased in the CMF group. The mechanism for this is not clear. It may also be that those diagnosed with cow’s milk allergy are more likely to delay introduction of other allergenic foods, thereby missing the window of tolerance acquisition. Furthermore, the risk of asthma and recurrent wheeze was reduced in those who avoided early CMF when followed up to their second birthday [61]. The EAACI guidelines therefore suggest hydrolyzed formula as one of the possible temporary supplementary options depending on clinical, cultural, and economic factors [42].
The effectiveness of hydrolysates, either extensive or partial, on the reduction of cow’s milk allergy introduced later in life (beyond 14 days) is less clear. In fact, the conclusion of a recent EAACI guideline by Halken et al. [42] concluded that “There is no recommendation for or against using partially or extensively hydrolyzed formula to prevent CMA in infants. When exclusive breastfeeding is not possible many substitutes are available for families to choose from, including hydrolyzed formulas.” Halken et al. based this recommendation on nine trials [54,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69] that either tested partially or extensively hydrolyzed casein or whey formulas on the occurrence of cow’s milk protein allergy. Cow’s milk allergy was diagnosed by means of clinical examination with either an open oral cow’s milk challenge which was followed by a double-blind challenge when the results were equivocal for the open challenge [65,68,69], single-blind challenge [66], double-blind challenge [62,63,67], clinical examination without an oral food challenge [64], or telephone interview [54]. In line with the EAACI statement, the recommendation from the AAAAI/ACAAI/CSACI Consensus Document [37] was “There is no protective benefit from the use of hydrolyzed formula in the first year of life against food allergy or food sensitization”. Furthermore, an earlier systematic review concluded that the use of hydrolyzed formula to prevent allergic disease in high-risk infants should not be recommended [70]. Many of the studies investigating the effect of hydrolyzed formula on the prevention of CMA have limitations which may have contributed to the lack of robust outcomes, such as (i) small sample size, (ii) design of the study, (iii) diagnostic criteria used, and (iv) characterization of the hydrolysate. With respect to the latter, peptide distribution, source of protein (casein and/or whey), and processing steps are thought to impact efficacy of hydrolysates [71,72,73]. Indeed, the lack of information on the distribution of peptides in a hydrolyzed formula was the main reason why the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) recently concluded that a cause–effect relationship could not be established between the consumption of hydrolyzed infant formula and the risk reduction of atopic dermatitis [74]. Careful documentation and publication of the specifications of the hydrolysates used in clinical intervention studies will therefore be needed to overcome this shortcoming.
Thus, based on current literature, there is a role for hydrolysates in the first days of life in infants whose mothers are planning to subsequently breastfeed exclusively but cannot do so yet in the first days after giving birth. This should help to reduce early sensitization to cow’s milk protein. The role of continuous consumption of hydrolysates versus early cow’s milk formula consumption in the prevention of CMA is not so clear.

5. Limitations

A limitation of this narrative review is that it did not discuss other risk factors that may also play a role in development of CMA. These factors include, but are not limited to, preterm birth, the mode of delivery, and microbiota composition. Another limitation is that the review does not discuss non-IgE manifestations of CMA, and neither did it discuss the effect of combined preventive strategies.

6. Conclusions

The studies on early introduction of cow’s milk proteins into the infant diet via infant formulas have taught us that if mothers plan to exclusively breastfeed the infant, no cow’s milk formula should be given in the first weeks of life while breastfeeding is being established. If (donor) breast milk is not or insufficiently available in this very early period, extensively hydrolyzed milk formula or amino acid formula may be considered as an alternative [42].
Breastfeeding from birth with early introduction of cow’s milk supplementation within the first month of life and continued daily consumption of small amounts without hampering breastfeeding may reduce the risk of developing cow’s milk allergy. Additionally, the introduction of cow’s milk should not be followed by prolonged periods of avoidance, as this seems to increase the risk of developing cow’s milk allergy. Finally, even though many studies have been performed to date, there is currently no strong evidence that supports the use of hydrolyzed formula after 2 weeks of life for the prevention of CMA, indicating the need for additional studies with specific attention to the number of infants in the study, better characterization of the hydrolysates and their properties, and robust study design.

Author Contributions

All authors contributed to the design and writing of this review. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

A.T., A.B.S. and A.G. declare no conflict of interest. L.U. and R.J.J.v.N. are employed by FrieslandCampina.

Abbreviations

AAFAmino-acid-based formula
AAAAIAmerican Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology
ACAAIAmerican College of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology
BSACIBritish Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology
CSACICanadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
CMACow’s milk allergy
CMFCow’s-milk-based formula
EAACIEuropean Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
EFSAEuropean Food Safety Authority
ESPGHANEuropean Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology Hepatology and Nutrition
LEAPLearning Early About Peanut
NIAIDNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases

References

  1. Justiz Vaillant, A.A.; Vashisht, R.; Zito, P.M. Immediate Hypersensitivity Reactions. Statpearls. 2022. Available online: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30020687/ (accessed on 12 April 2022).
  2. Sampson, H.A.; Muñoz-Furlong, A.; Campbell, R.L.; Adkinson, N.F.J.; Bock, S.A.; Branum, A.; Brown, S.G.A.; Camargo, C.A.; Cydulka, R.; Galli, S.J.; et al. Second symposium on the definition and management of anaphylaxis: Summary report—Second National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease/Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Network symposium. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2006, 117, 391–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Nwaru, B.I.; Hickstein, L.; Panesar, S.S.; Muraro, A.; Werfel, T.; Cardona, V.; Dubois, A.E.J.; Halken, S.; Hoffmann-Sommergruber, K.; Poulsen, L.K.; et al. The epidemiology of food allergy in Europe: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Allergy 2014, 69, 62–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Eder, W.; Ege, M.J.; von Mutius, E. The asthma epidemic. N. Engl. J. Med. 2006, 355, 2226–2235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Mullins, R.J.; Dear, K.B.G.; Tang, M.L.K. Characteristics of childhood peanut allergy in the Australian Capital Territory, 1995 to 2007. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2009, 123, 689–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. McGowan, E.C.; Peng, R.D.; Salo, P.M.; Zeldin, D.C.; Keet, C.A. Changes in Food-Specific IgE Over Time in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. Pract. 2016, 4, 713–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Prescott, S.L. Early-life environmental determinants of allergic diseases and the wider pandemic of inflammatory noncommunicable diseases. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2013, 131, 23–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Motosue, M.S.; Bellolio, M.F.; Van Houten, H.K.; Shah, N.D.; Campbell, R.L. National trends in emergency department visits and hospitalizations for food-induced anaphylaxis in US children. Pediatr. Allergy Immunol. Off. Publ. Eur. Soc. Pediatr. Allergy Immunol. 2018, 29, 538–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Tsuge, M.; Ikeda, M.; Matsumoto, N.; Yorifuji, T.; Tsukahara, H. Current Insights into Atopic March. Child 2021, 8, 1067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Leung, A.S.Y.; Wong, G.W.K.; Tang, M.L.K. Food allergy in the developing world. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2018, 141, 76–78.e1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Vale, S.L.; Lobb, M.; Netting, M.J.; Murray, K.; Clifford, R.; Campbell, D.E.; Salter, S.M. A systematic review of infant feeding food allergy prevention guidelines—Can we AGREE? World Allergy Organ. J. 2021, 14, 100550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Metcalfe, J.R.; Marsh, J.A.; D’Vaz, N.; Geddes, D.T.; Lai, C.T.; Prescott, S.L.; Palmer, D.J. Effects of maternal dietary egg intake during early lactation on human milk ovalbumin concentration: A randomized controlled trial. Clin. Exp. Allergy J. Br. Soc. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2016, 46, 1605–1613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Palmer, D.J.; Gold, M.S.; Makrides, M. Effect of cooked and raw egg consumption on ovalbumin content of human milk: A randomized, double-blind, cross-over trial. Clin. Exp. Allergy. J. Br. Soc. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2005, 35, 173–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Sorva, R.; Mäkinen-Kiljunen, S.; Juntunen-Backman, K. Beta-lactoglobulin secretion in human milk varies widely after cow’s milk ingestion in mothers of infants with cow’s milk allergy. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 1994, 93, 787–792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Chirdo, F.G.; Rumbo, M.; Añón, M.C.; Fossati, C.A. Presence of high levels of non-degraded gliadin in breast milk from healthy mothers. Scand. J. Gastroenterol. 1998, 33, 1186–1192. [Google Scholar]
  16. Schocker, F.; Scharf, A.; Kull, S.; Jappe, U. Detection of the Peanut Allergens Ara h 2 and Ara h 6 in Human Breast Milk: Development of 2 Sensitive and Specific Sandwich ELISA Assays. Int. Arch. Allergy Immunol. 2017, 174, 17–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Vadas, P.; Wai, Y.; Burks, W.; Perelman, B. Detection of peanut allergens in breast milk of lactating women. JAMA 2001, 285, 1746–1748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Schocker, F.; Baumert, J.; Kull, S.; Petersen, A.; Becker, W.-M.; Jappe, U. Prospective investigation on the transfer of Ara h 2, the most potent peanut allergen, in human breast milk. Pediatr. Allergy Immunol. Off. Publ. Eur. Soc. Pediatr. Allergy Immunol. 2016, 27, 348–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Savilahti, E.; Kuitunen, M. Allergenicity of cow milk proteins. J. Pediatr. 1992, 121, S12–S20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Du Toit, G.; Roberts, G.; Sayre, P.H.H.; Bahnson, H.T.; Radulovic, S.; Santos, A.F.; Brough, H.A.; Phippard, D.; Basting, M.; Feeney, M.; et al. Randomized Trial of Peanut Consumption in Infants at Risk for Peanut Allergy. N. Engl. J. Med. 2015, 372, 803–813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Ierodiakonou, D.; Garcia-Larsen, V.; Logan, A.; Groome, A.; Cunha, S.; Chivinge, J.; Zoe, R.; Natalie, G.; Katharine, J.; Tim, R.; et al. Timing of Allergenic Food Introduction to the Infant Diet and Risk of Allergic or Autoimmune Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA 2016, 316, 1181–1192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Perkin, M.R.; Logan, K.; Marrs, T.; Radulovic, S.; Craven, J.; Flohr, C.; Lack, G.; Young, L.; Offord, V.; DeSousa, M.; et al. Enquiring About Tolerance (EAT) study: Feasibility of an early allergenic food introduction regimen. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2016, 137, 1477–1486.e8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Koplin, J.J.; Allen, K.J. Optimal timing for solids introduction—Why are the guidelines always changing? Clin. Exp. Allergy J. Br. Soc. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2013, 43, 826–834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Roduit, C.; Frei, R.; Depner, M.; Schaub, B.; Loss, G.; Genuneit, J.; Pfefferle, P.; Hyvärinen, A.; Karvonen, A.M.; Riedler, J.; et al. Increased food diversity in the first year of life is inversely associated with allergic diseases. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2014, 133, 1056–1064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Du Toit, G.; Katz, Y.; Sasieni, P.; Mesher, D.; Maleki, S.J.; Fisher, H.R.; Fox, A.T.; Turcanu, V.; Amir, T.; Zadik-Mnuhin, G.; et al. Early consumption of peanuts in infancy is associated with a low prevalence of peanut allergy. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2008, 122, 984–991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Toit, G.; Tsakok, T.; Lack, S.; Lack, G. Prevention of food allergy. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2016, 137, 998–1010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Palmer, D.J.; Metcalfe, J.; Makrides, M.; Gold, M.S.; Quinn, P.; West, C.E.; Loh, R.; Prescott, S.L. Early regular egg exposure in infants with eczema: A randomized controlled trial. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2013, 132, 387–392.e1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Koplin, J.; Osborne, N.; Wake, M.; Martin, P.E.; Gurrin, L.; Robinson, M.N.; Tey, D.; Slaa, M.; Thiele, L.; Miles, L. Can early introduction of egg prevent egg allergy in infants? A population-based study. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2010, 126, 807–813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Palmer, D.J.; Sullivan, T.R.; Gold, M.S.; Prescott, S.L.; Makrides, M. Randomized controlled trial of early regular egg intake to prevent egg allergy. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2017, 139, 1600–1607.e2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Bellach, J.; Schwarz, V.; Ahrens, B.; Trendelenburg, V.; Aksünger, Ö.; Kalb, B.; Niggemann, B.; Keil, T.; Beyer, K. Randomized placebo-controlled trial of hen’s egg consumption for primary prevention in infants. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2017, 139, 1591–1599.e2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Tan, J.W.L.; Valerio, C.; Barnes, E.H.; Turner, P.J.; Van Asperen, P.A.; Kakakios, A.M.; Campbell, D.E.; Beating Egg Allergy Trial BEAT Study Group. A randomized trial of egg introduction from 4 months of age in infants at risk for egg allergy. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2017, 139, 1621–1628.e8. [Google Scholar]
  32. Natsume, O.; Kabashima, S.; Nakazato, J.; Yamamoto-Hanada, K.; Narita, M.; Kondo, M.; Saito, M.; Kishino, A.; Takimoto, T.; Inoue, E.; et al. Two-step egg introduction for prevention of egg allergy in high-risk infants with eczema (PETIT): A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2017, 389, 276–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Quake, A.Z.; Liu, T.A.; D’Souza, R.; Jackson, K.G.; Woch, M.; Tetteh, A.; Sampath, V.; Nadeau, K.C.; Sindher, S.; Chinthrajah, R.S.; et al. Early Introduction of Multi-Allergen Mixture for Prevention of Food Allergy: Pilot Study. Nutrients 2022, 14, 737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Cox, A.L.; Shah, A.; Groetch, M.; Sicherer, S.H. Allergic reactions in infants using commercial early allergen introduction products. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. Pract. 2021, 9, 3517–3520.e1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Greer, F.R.; Sicherer, S.H.; Burks, A.W. Effects of early nutritional interventions on the development of atopic disease in infants and children: The role of maternal dietary restriction, breastfeeding, timing of introduction of complementary foods, and hydrolyzed formulas. Pediatrics 2008, 121, 183–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Greer, F.R.; Sicherer, S.H.; Burks, A.W. The Effects of Early Nutritional Interventions on the Development of Atopic Disease in Infants and Children: The Role of Maternal Dietary Restriction, Breastfeeding, Hydrolyzed Formulas, and Timing of Introduction of Allergenic Complementary Foods. Pediatrics 2019, 143, e20190281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Fleischer, D.M.; Chan, E.S.; Venter, C.; Spergel, J.M.; Abrams, E.M.; Stukus, D.; Groetch, M.; Shaker, M.; Greenhawt, M. A Consensus Approach to the Primary Prevention of Food Allergy Through Nutrition: Guidance from the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology; American College of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology; and the Canadian Society for Allergy and Clinical. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. Pract. 2021, 9, 22–43.e4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Chan, A.W.; Chan, J.K.; Lee, T.; Leung, T.; Tam, A.Y. Guidelines for Allergy Prevention in Hong Kong on Behalf of the Hong Kong Institute of Allergy. September 2015. Available online: https://www.allergy.org.hk/publications/Guidelines%20for%20Allergy%20Prevention%20in%20Hong%20Kong%20(Published%20version%20on%20HKMJ).pdf (accessed on 12 April 2022).
  39. Turner, P.J.; Feeney, M.; Meyer, R.; Perkin, M.R.; Fox, A.T. Implementing primary prevention of food allergy in infants: New BSACI guidance published. Vol. 48, Clinical and experimental allergy. J. Br. Soc. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2018, 48, 912–915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Fewtrell, M.; Bronsky, J.; Campoy, C.; Domellöf, M.; Embleton, N.; Fidler Mis, N.; Hojsak, I.; Hulst, J.M.; Indrio, F.; Lapillonne, A.; et al. Complementary Feeding: A Position Paper by the European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition (ESPGHAN) Committee on Nutrition. J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr. 2017, 64, 119–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Togias, A.; Cooper, S.F.; Acebal, M.L.; Assa’ad, A.; Baker, J.R.J.; Beck, L.A.; Block, J.; Byrd-Bredbenner, C.; Chan, E.S.; Eichenfield, L.F.; et al. Addendum guidelines for the prevention of peanut allergy in the United States: Report of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases-sponsored expert panel. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2017, 139, 29–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Halken, S.; Muraro, A.; de Silva, D.; Khaleva, E.; Angier, E.; Arasi, S.; Arshad, H.; Bahnson, H.T.; Beyer, K.; Boyle, R.; et al. EAACI guideline: Preventing the development of food allergy in infants and young children (2020 update). Pediatr. Allergy Immunol. 2021, 32, 843–858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. de Jong, M.H.; Scharp-Van Der Linden, V.T.; Aalberse, R.C.; Oosting, J.; Tijssen, J.G.; de Groot, C.J. Randomised con-trolled trial of brief neonatal exposure to cows’ milk on the development of atopy. Arch. Dis. Child. 1998, 79, 126–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. de Jong, M.H.; Scharp-Van Der Linden, V.T.M.; Aalberse, R.; Heymans, H.S.A.; Brunekreef, B. The effect of brief neo-natal exposure to cows’ milk on atopic symptoms up to age 5. Arch. Dis. Child. 2002, 86, 365–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Kelly, E.; DunnGalvin, G.; Murphy, B.P.; Hourihane, J.O.; Hourihane, J.O. Formula supplementation remains a risk for cow’s milk allergy in breast-fed infants. Pediatr. Allergy Immunol. 2019, 30, 810–816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Høst, A.; Husby, S.; Osterballe, O. A prospective study of cow’s milk allergy in exclusively breast-fed infants. Incidence, pathogenetic role of early inadvertent exposure to cow’s milk formula, and characterization of bovine milk protein in human milk. Acta Paediatr. Scand. 1988, 77, 663–670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Gil, F.; Amezqueta, A.; Martinez, D.; Aznal, E.; Etayo, V.; Durá, T.; Sánchez-Valverde, F. Association between Caesarean Delivery and Isolated Doses of Formula Feeding in Cow Milk Allergy. Int. Arch. Allergy Immunol. 2017, 173, 147–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Saarinen, K.M.; Juntunen-Backman, K.; Järvenpää, A.L.; Kuitunen, P.; Lope, L.; Renlund, M.; Siivola, M.; Savilahti, E. Supplementary feeding in maternity hospitals and the risk of cow’s milk allergy: A prospective study of 6209 infants. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 1999, 104, 457–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Sakihara, T.; Otsuji, K.; Arakaki, Y.; Hamada, K.; Sugiura, S.; Ito, K. Early Discontinuation of Cow’s Milk Protein Ingestion Is Associated with the Development of Cow’s Milk Allergy. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. Pract. 2022, 10, 172–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Tezuka, J.; Sanefuji, M.; Ninomiya, T.; Kawahara, T.; Matsuzaki, H.; Sonoda, Y.; Ogawa, M.; Shimono, M.; Suga, R.; Honjo, S.; et al. Possible association between early formula and reduced risk of cow’s milk allergy: The Japan Environment and Children’s Study. Clin. Exp. Allergy J. Br. Soc. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2021, 51, 99–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Peters, R.L.; Koplin, J.J.; Dharmage, S.C.; Tang, M.L.K.; McWilliam, V.L.; Gurrin, L.C.; Neeland, M.R.; Lowe, A.J.; Ponsonby, A.L.; Allen, K.J. Early Exposure to Cow’s Milk Protein Is Associated with a Reduced Risk of Cow’s Milk Allergic Outcomes. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. Pract. 2019, 7, 462–470.e1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Katz, Y.; Rajuan, N.; Goldberg, M.R.; Eisenberg, E.; Heyman, E.; Cohen, A.; Leshno, M. Early exposure to cow’s milk protein is protective against IgE-mediated cow’s milk protein allergy. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2010, 126, 77–82.e1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Sakihara, T.; Sugiura, S.; Ito, K. The ingestion of cow’s milk formula in the first 3 months of life prevents the development of cow’s milk allergy. Asia Pac. Allergy 2016, 6, 207–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Lowe, A.J.; Hosking, C.S.; Bennett, C.M.; Allen, K.J.; Axelrad, C.; Carlin, J.B.; Abramson, M.J.; Dharmage, S.C.; Hill, D.J. Effect of a partially hydrolyzed whey infant formula at weaning on risk of allergic disease in high-risk children: A randomized controlled trial. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2011, 128, 360–365.e4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Perkin, M.R.; Logan, K.; Tseng, A.; Raji, B.; Ayis, S.; Peacock, J.; Brough, H.; Marrs, T.; Radulovic, S.; Craven, J.; et al. Randomized Trial of Introduction of Allergenic Foods in Breast-Fed Infants. N. Engl. J. Med. 2016, 374, 1733–1743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Sakihara, T.; Otsuji, K.; Arakaki, Y.; Hamada, K.; Sugiura, S.; Ito, K. Randomized trial of early infant formula introduction to prevent cow’s milk allergy. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2021, 147, 224–232.e8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Onizawa, Y.; Noguchi, E.; Okada, M.; Sumazaki, R.; Hayashi, D. The Association of the Delayed Introduction of Cow’s Milk with IgE-Mediated Cow’s Milk Allergies. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. Pract. 2016, 4, 481–488.e2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Preventing Atopic Dermatitis and ALLergies in Children (PreventADALL). ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02449850. Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02449850 (accessed on 12 April 2022).
  59. The Influence of Early and Continuous Exposure of Infants to Cow’s Milk Formula on the Prevention of Milk Allergy. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02785679. Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02785679 (accessed on 12 April 2022).
  60. Urashima, M.; Mezawa, H.; Okuyama, M.; Urashima, T.; Hirano, D.; Gocho, N.; Tachimoto, H. Primary Prevention of Cow’s Milk Sensitization and Food Allergy by Avoiding Supplementation with Cow’s Milk Formula at Birth: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Pediatr. 2019, 173, 1137–1145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Tachimoto, H.; Imanari, E.; Mezawa, H.; Okuyama, M.; Urashima, T.; Hirano, D.; Gocho, N.; Urashima, M. Effect of Avoiding Cow’s Milk Formula at Birth on Prevention of Asthma or Recurrent Wheeze Among Young Children: Extended Follow-up From the ABC Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw. Open 2020, 3, e2018534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Vandenplas, Y. Atopy at 3 years in high-risk infants fed whey hydrolysate or conventional formula. Lancet 1992, 339, 1118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Zeiger, R.S.; Heller, S.; Mellon, M.H.; Forsythe, A.B.; O’Connor, R.D.; Hamburger, R.N.; Schatz, M. Effect of combined maternal and infant food-allergen avoidance on development of atopy in early infancy: A randomized study. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 1989, 84, 72–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Mallet, E.; Henocq, A. Long-term prevention of allergic diseases by using protein hydrolysate formula in at-risk infants. J. Pediatr. 1992, 121, S95–S100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Halken, S.; Høst, A.; Hansen, L.G.; Osterballe, O. Preventive effect of feeding high-risk infants a casein hydrolysate formula or an ultrafiltrated whey hydrolysate formula. A prospective, randomized, comparative clinical study. Pediatr. Allergy Immunol. Off. Publ. Eur. Soc. Pediatr. Allergy Immunol. 1993, 4, 173–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Odelram, H.; Vanto, T.; Jacobsen, L.; Kjellman, N.I. Whey hydrolysate compared with cow’s milk-based formula for weaning at about 6 months of age in high allergy-risk infants: Effects on atopic disease and sensitization. Allergy 1996, 51, 192–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Oldaeus, G.; Anjou, K.; Björkstén, B.; Moran, J.R.; Kjellman, N.I. Extensively and partially hydrolysed infant formulas for allergy prophylaxis. Arch. Dis. Child. 1997, 77, 4–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Halken, S.; Hansen, K.S.; Jacobsen, H.P.; Estmann, A.; Faelling, A.E.; Hansen, L.G.; Kier, S.R.; Lassen, K.; Lintrup, M.; Mortensen, S.; et al. Comparison of a partially hydrolyzed infant formula with two extensively hydrolyzed formulas for allergy prevention: A prospective, randomized study. Pediatr. Allergy Immunol. 2000, 11, 149–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. von Berg, A.; Koletzko, S.; Grübl, A.; Filipiak-Pittroff, B.; Wichmann, H.-E.; Bauer, C.P.; Reinhardt, D.; Berdel, D. The effect of hydrolyzed cow’s milk formula for allergy prevention in the first year of life: The German Infant Nutritional Intervention Study, a randomized double-blind trial. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2003, 111, 533–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Boyle, R.J.; Ierodiakonou, D.; Khan, T.; Chivinge, J.; Robinson, Z.; Geoghegan, N.; Jarrold, K.; Afxentiou, T.; Reeves, T.; Cunha, S.; et al. Hydrolysed formula and risk of allergic or autoimmune disease: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Br. Med. J. 2016, 352, i974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Nutten, S.; Maynard, F.; Järvi, A.; Rytz, A.; Simons, P.J.; Heine, R.G.; Kuslys, M. Peptide size profile and residual immunogenic milk protein or peptide content in extensively hydrolyzed infant formulas. Allergy Eur. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2020, 75, 1446–1449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Knol, E.F.; de Jong, N.W.; Ulfman, L.H.; Tiemessen, M.M. Management of cow’s milk allergy from an immunological perspective: What are the options? Nutrients 2019, 11, 81–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Lambers, T.T.; Gloerich, J.; van Hoffen, E.; Alkema, W.; Hondmann, D.H.; van Tol, E.A. Clustering analyses in peptidomics revealed that peptide profiles of infant formulae are descriptive. Food Sci. Nutr. 2015, 3, 81–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. EFSA Panel on Nutrition NF and FA (NDA); Castenmiller, J.; Hirsch-Ernst, K.-I.; Kearney, J.; Knutsen, H.K.; Maciuk, A.; Mangelsdorf, I.; McArdle, H.J.; Naska, A.; Pelaez, C.; et al. Efficacy of an infant formula manufactured from a specific protein hydrolysate derived from whey protein isolate and concentrate produced by Société des Produits Nestlé, S.A. in reducing the risk of developing atopic dermatitis. EFSA J. 2021, 19, e06603. [Google Scholar]
Table
Table 1. Studies on very early introduction of cow’s milk in first days of life [45,46,47,48,49] and early introduction of cow’s milk [50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57].
Table 1. Studies on very early introduction of cow’s milk in first days of life [45,46,47,48,49] and early introduction of cow’s milk [50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57].
StudyDesignPopulationInfants/
Children		Age Onset Introduction CMCM FormulaBreastfeedingCMA DiagnosisOutcome
Kelly et al. [45]
2019		Retro- and prospectiveInfants at risk55 infantsWithin 24 h after birthRegular CMFBF only vs. BF + CMFAllergy-focused clinical history, SPT, SpIgE measurement, and open food challenge, if necessaryIncreased risk when CMF supplementation in first 24 h (OR 7.01; 95CI 1.79 27.01, p < 0.001)
Host et al. [46] 1988ProspectiveGeneral population1749 infantsWithin first 3 days after birthRegular CMF BF population +/− early introduction of CMF in nurseryIgE and non-IgE, elimination/challenge test39/1539 infants that received supplementation with CMF in the first 3 days had confirmed CMA while none of 210 exclusively BF neonates developed CMA (0/210), p < 0.05
Gil et al [47] 2017RetrospectiveCMA + infants211 infants/groupDiverseRegular CMFStudy focused on duration of IgEIgE + CMA cases by clinical examination, provocation tests, serologyIncreased risk when CMF supplementation in hospital, BF duration < 1 mo and 4–6 mo associated with higher risk of CMA while no increased risk of BF duration of 1–3 mo
Saarinen [48] 1999ProspectiveGeneral population6209 infantsWithin first 20 h of life, and average feeding time of 2 days after birthPasteurized breastmilk Regular CMF Ext.Hydrolyzed whey formulaBF population (exclusively or supplemented with CMF, Hydrolyzed or pasteurized breastmilk)Interview, elimination/challenge test, SPTFeeding of CM at maternity hospitals increases the risk of CMA when compared with feeding of other supplements, but exclusive breast-feeding does not eliminate the risk
Sakihara [49] 2022 Data from SPADE study. Randomized controlled trial Participants who ingested CMF in the first 3 days of life 431 children 4 groups of breastfed infants who discontinued CMF ingestion
before age 1 month (“DISC < 1-month group”), during age 1 to 2 months (“DISC 1-2-month group”), during age 3 to 5 months (“DISC 3-5-month group”) not until age 6 months ("continuous group")		 Mixed feeding groups (breastfeeding and cow’s milk formula (CMF) who discontinued CMF at different ages) Breastfeeding + CMF in first 3 days of life +/− continuous CMF supplementation Oral food challenge was performed to assess CMA development CMA incidence was significantly higher in the DISC < 1 month group (n = 7 of 17, 41.2%; RR, 65.7; 95% CI, 14.7–292.5; p < 0.001), DISC 1–2-month group (n = 3 of 26, 11.5%; RR, 18.4; 95% CI, 3.2–105.3; p = 0.003), and DISC 3–5-month group (n = 7 of 69, 10.1%; RR, 16.2; 95% CI, 3.4–76.2; p < 0.001) than in the continuous group (n = 2 of 319, 0.6%)
Tezuka [50] 2020ProspectiveGeneral population>80,000 childrenCMF consumption was categorized in < 3 mo, 3–6 mo or 6–12 mo at introductionRegular CMFBF and mixed fed.CMA was defined as an allergic reaction to a CM product in an individual not consuming CM products at the time of evaluation, combined with physician-diagnosed food allergyIntroducing regular consumption of formula within the first 3 months of age was associated with lower risk of CMA at 12 months. Regular consumption at 3–6 months was strongly associated with a reduction in 12-month CMA (adjusted relative risks [95% confidence intervals]: 0.22 [0.12–0.35]), whereas no association was observed at 0–3 months (1.07 [0.90–1.27]
Peters [51] 2018Longitudinal General population5276Exposed to CMF 0–3 months or notRegular CMFExcl BF, mixed feeding, excl FFParental report of a reaction to cow’s milk consistent with IgE-mediated symptoms and a positive cow’s milk skin prick testEarly exposure to cow’s milk protein was associated with a reduced risk of cow’s milk sensitization (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.44, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.23–0.83), parent-reported reactions to cow’s milk (aOR 0.44, 95% CI 0.29–0.67), and cow’s milk allergy (aOR 0.31, 95% CI 0.10–0.91) at age 12 months
Katz [52] 2010ProspectiveGeneral population13019Age at CMF exposure
0–14 days
15–104 days
105–194 days
195–374 days		Regular CMFExcl BF, mixed feeding, excl FF feedingInterview followed by SPT and open food challengeThe mean age of cow’s milk protein (CMP) introduction was significantly different (p < 0.001) between the healthy infants (61.6 ± 92.5 days) and those with IgE-mediated CMA (116.1 ± 64.9 days). Only 0.05% of the infants who were started on regular CMP formula within the first 14 days versus 1.75% who were started on formula between the ages of 105 and 194 days had IgE-mediated CMA (p < 0.001). The odds ratio was 19.3 (95% CI, 6.0–62.1) for development of IgE-mediated CMA among infants with exposure to CMP at the age of 15 days or more (p < 0.001)
Sakihara [53] 2016ProspectiveHen’s-egg-allergic patients397,
<6 years of age		Excl BF group , discont ingestion of CMF before 3 mo of age (temp group; continuous ingestion of CMF, but not daily, up to 3 months of age (nondaily group); continuous ingestion of CMF at least once daily (daily group)Regular CMFExcl BF and mixed feeding groups(1) a positive OFC result or any convincing episode of immediate reaction within 2 h after the ingestion of a cow’s milk product and [2] positive cow’s milk-specific IgE (CM-sIgE, > 0.34 KUA/L)The incidence of developing CMA between the breast-fed group and temporary group did not show any statistical difference. Nondaily group and daily group had significantly lower incidence of developing CMA in comparison to the breast-fed group (nondaily group odds ratio 0.43; p = 0.02, daily group odds ratio 0.11; p < 0.001).
Lowe [54] 2011 Single-blind (participant) randomized controlled trial Children with a family history of allergic disease620, 0–2 y old children. Follow up at 6–7 years randomized to receive the allocated formula at cessation of breast-feeding cow’s milk formula, a pHWF, or a soy formula
(after cessation of breastfeeding)		 breast-feeding until cessation, followed by formula (cow’s milk formula, a pHWF, or a soy formula) Skin prick tests to 6 common allergens (milk, egg, peanut, dust mite, rye grass, and cat dander) were performed at 6, 12, and 24 months. The primary outcome was any allergic manifestation (cumulative incidence)
up to 2 years of age. There was no evidence that infants allocated to the pHWF (odds ratio, 1.21; 95% CI, 0.81–1.80) or the soy formula (odds ratio, 1.26; 95% CI, 0.84–1.88) were at a lower risk of allergic manifestations in infancy compared with conventional formula. There was also no evidence of reduced risk of skin prick test reactivity or childhood allergic disease.
Perkin [55] 2016 Randomized controlled study Exclusively breast-fed infants who were 3 months of age 1303 exclusively breast-fed infants randomized to
(a)
early introduction group of six allergenic foods
(b)
standard introduction group
 As of 3 months of age for early introduction and as of 6 months for standard introduction group peanut, cooked egg, cow’s milk, sesame, whitefish, and wheat In the standard-introduction group, there was no consumption of peanut, egg, sesame, fish, or wheat before 5 months of age and consumption of less than 300 mL per day of formula milk between 3 and 6 months of age Double blind placebo controlled food challenges, skin prick testing The primary outcome was challenge-proven food allergy to one or more of the six early-introduction foods between 1 year and 3 years of age. In the intention-to-treat analysis, no significant differences were found. In the per-protocol analysis, the prevalence of any food allergy was significantly lower in the early-introduction group than in the standard introduction group (2.4% vs. 7.3%, p = 0.01), as was the prevalence of peanut allergy (0% vs. 2.5%, p = 0.003) and egg allergy (1.4% vs. 5.5%, p = 0.009); there were no significant effects with respect to milk, sesame, fish, or wheat. The early introduction of all six foods was not easily achieved but was safe
Sakihara [56] 2021 Randomized controlled trial (SPADE study) Breastfed infants who
(a) ingested at least 10 mL of CMF daily
(b) avoided CMF but were given soy formula if needed		 491 participants (242 in the ingestion group and 249 in the avoidance group) Start CMF between 1 and 2 months of age ingest at least 10 mL of CMF daily (ingestion group) Breastfeeding +/− CMF or soy formula Oral food challenge was performed to assess CMA development, skin prick test, serum titers specific IgE and IgG4 Primary outcome was CMA by oral food challenge. Secondary outcomes were proportion of infants with positive SPT and seruvm titers of specific IgE and IgG4.
There were 2 CMA cases (0.8%) among the 242 members of the ingestion group and 17 CMA cases (6.8%) among the 249 participants in the avoidance group (risk ratio = 0.12; 95% CI = 0.01–0.50; p < 0.001). The risk difference was 6.0% (95% CI = 2.7–9.3). Approximately 70% of the participants in both groups were still being breast-fed at 6 months of age.Of the 227 ingestion group participants, 11 (4.8%) had a positive SPT response to cow’s milk at 6 months of age, as did 38 (16.2%) of the 235 avoidance group participants (RR 0.26; 95% CI 0.12–0.55; p < 0.001).
The median titer of casein-specific IgG4 was 2.61 mgA/L (range, 0.45–10.46 mgA/L) in the ingestion group and 0.12 mgA/L (range, 0.08–0.33 mgA/L) in the avoidance group (P 0.02). Specific IgE titers did not significantly differ between the groups.
Onizawa [57] 2016RetrospectivelyCMA-allergic patients and non-allergic controls51 IgE-CMA, 102 controls, 32 unmatched patients IgE egg. Over 1 year of ageSupplemented with CMF maternity clinic, excl BF, early regular CMF, delayed CMF, no early regular continuous CMF Regular CMFBF and mixed feeding populationImmediate allergic reactions, CM specific IgE (≥0.7 kUA/L), doctors diagnose of allergyIn a multivariable logistic regression analysis, the adjusted odds ratio of delayed (started more than 1 month after birth) or no regular cow’s milk formula (less than once daily) was 23.74 (95% CI, 5.39–104.52) comparing the CMA group with the Control group
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ulfman, L.; Tsuang, A.; Sprikkelman, A.B.; Goh, A.; van Neerven, R.J.J. Relevance of Early Introduction of Cow’s Milk Proteins for Prevention of Cow’s Milk Allergy. Nutrients 2022, 14, 2659. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/nu14132659

AMA Style

Ulfman L, Tsuang A, Sprikkelman AB, Goh A, van Neerven RJJ. Relevance of Early Introduction of Cow’s Milk Proteins for Prevention of Cow’s Milk Allergy. Nutrients. 2022; 14(13):2659. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/nu14132659

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ulfman, Laurien, Angela Tsuang, Aline B. Sprikkelman, Anne Goh, and R. J. Joost van Neerven. 2022. "Relevance of Early Introduction of Cow’s Milk Proteins for Prevention of Cow’s Milk Allergy" Nutrients 14, no. 13: 2659. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/nu14132659

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop