Next Article in Journal
Depletion of Zinc Causes Osteoblast Apoptosis with Elevation of Leptin Secretion and Phosphorylation of JAK2/STAT3
Previous Article in Journal
Dietary Patterns and Non-Communicable Disease Biomarkers: A Network Meta-Analysis and Nutritional Geometry Approach
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nutrients
Volume 15
Issue 1
10.3390/nu15010073
nutrients-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Sex- and Age-Dependent Changes in the Adiponectin/Leptin Ratio in Experimental Diet-Induced Obesity in Mice

by
Sara Becerril
1,2,3,*,
Amaia Rodríguez
1,2,3,
Victoria Catalán
1,2,3,
Beatriz Ramírez
1,2,3,
Amaia Mentxaka
1,2,3,
Gabriela Neira
1,2,
Javier Gómez-Ambrosi
1,2,3 and
Gema Frühbeck
1,2,3,4,*
1
Metabolic Research Laboratory, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, 31008 Pamplona, Spain
2
CIBER Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición (CIBEROBN), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, 28029 Madrid, Spain
3
Obesity and Adipobiology Group, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra (IdiSNA), 31008 Pamplona, Spain
4
Department of Endocrinology & Nutrition, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, 31008 Pamplona, Spain
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nutrients 2023, 15(1), 73; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/nu15010073
Submission received: 11 November 2022 / Revised: 20 December 2022 / Accepted: 21 December 2022 / Published: 23 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Nutrition and Metabolism)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Biological sex and aging impact obesity development and type 2 diabetes, changing the secretion of leptin and adiponectin. The balance between these factors has been propounded as a reliable biomarker of adipose tissue dysfunction. Our proposal was to study sexual differences and aging on the adiponectin/leptin (Adpn/Lep) ratio in order to acquire a broader view of the impact of consuming an high-fat diet (HFD) on energy metabolism according to sex and age. Male and female C57BL/6J mice were fed a normal chow diet or an HFD for 12 or 32 weeks (n = 7–10 per group) and evolution of body weight, food intake and metabolic profile were registered. The HFD triggered an increase in body weight (p < 0.001), body weight gain (p < 0.01) and adiposity index (p < 0.01) in both sexes at 32 weeks of age, but female mice fed the HFD exhibited these changes to a significantly lower extent than males. Aged female mice showed an increase (p < 0.01) in the Adpn/Lep ratio, which was negatively correlated with body weight gain, changes in different fat depots and insulin resistance. Females were more metabolically protected from obesity development and its related comorbidities than males regardless of age, making the Adpn/Lep ratio a relevant factor for body composition and glucose metabolism.

1. Introduction

Type 2 diabetes (T2D) prevalence is growing worldwide concomitantly with obesity, emerging as a global international public health issue [1,2,3]. Obesity is a complex, multifactorial and preventable disease; the most relevant factors that influence energy homeostasis are increased food intake, decreased energy expenditure, fat accumulation and nutrient absorption [4]. Dietary fat induces obesity and its related comorbidities in both humans and mice [5]. The distribution of adipose tissue (AT) differs substantially depending on biological sex, thereby exerting an influence on the development and pathogenesis of these metabolic diseases. Epidemiological studies have reported relevant sex differences in insulin resistance incidence, and T2D has a much higher prevalence in men than in women [6,7].
The C57BL/6 J inbred strain of laboratory mouse is considered a particularly good animal model for mimicking human metabolic disorders since these rodents develop obesity, hyperinsulinemia, hyperglycemia and hypertension when allowed ad libitum access to an high-fat diet (HFD) [8]. Male mice resemble humans in that they are more susceptible to diet-induced obesity (DIO) and exhibit lower insulin sensitivity than female mice, whereas females are more likely to be protected from the development of these pathologies [9,10,11]. However, the underlying mechanisms that drive this sexual dimorphism in metabolism have not yet been elucidated.
Obesity is also associated with a state of chronic low-grade inflammation with immune cell infiltration in AT. Immunophenotype alterations derived from aging constitute an important contributory factor to the pathogenesis of the metabolic disorders of obesity, most notably insulin resistance, steatosis, and generalized dyslipidemia. Healthy or young AT exhibits an adequate metabolic response, with the infiltrated immune cells being responsible for maintaining homeostasis through the secretion of anti-inflammatory cytokines. The proinflammatory immune cells present in obese or aged AT promote its dysfunction, contributing to the development of insulin resistance [12].
Both biological sex and aging change the secretion of hormones and cytokines related to energy metabolism, including leptin, adiponectin or insulin, contributing to the development of obesity-related diseases. In this sense, adiponectin and leptin have a shared origin, as they are mainly secreted by adipocytes in white AT (WAT), but their activities are quite different. Adiponectin possesses insulin-sensitizing, anti-inflammatory and antiatherogenic properties and its plasma levels are negatively associated with percent body fat and insulin. Leptin is principally responsible for the regulation of feeding behavior and energy balance as it is involved in physiological functions that include hematopoiesis, angiogenesis and reproduction, among others; it is produced in proportion to body fat stores [13,14,15]. The balance between these AT- derived factors, the adiponectin/leptin (Adpn/Lep) ratio, has been proposed as a reliable biomarker of the AT dysfunction and inflammation, corresponding more closely with insulin resistance than adiponectin and leptin separately and decreasing with the augmented number of metabolic risk factors [16,17]. Both sex and age differences impact biological processes, but it is not yet known the extent to which the aging-related increase in AT and the simultaneous effect of sex in a model of DIO promotes metabolic homeostasis alterations. In this sense, although the association between aging and increased prevalence of T2D has long been recognized [18,19], the potential contribution of sex-dependent mechanisms to aging-associated insulin resistance remains unexplored. We hypothesized that females are more likely to be protected from developing obesity and its related comorbidities with aging than males, with the Adpn/Lep ratio constituting a significant factor as well as a relevant marker of metabolism. To that end, we analyzed the effect of aging and sexual differences on the Adpn/Lep ratio in order to gain a broader view of AT function according to sex and age. We have compared cohorts of male and female C57BL/6J mice under standard chow diet and HFD conditions for 12 or 32 weeks to observe the effect of both variables together with the impact of an HFD on energy homeostasis.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Experimental Animals

Male and female C57BL/6J mice pups were weaned between 21 and 23 days of age, housed (2–3 animals per cage) and maintained at room temperature (22 ± 2 °C), with a relative humidity (50 ± 10%), artificial light–dark cycle (lights on from 8:00 am) and under pathogen-free conditions. The mature adult mice ranged in age from 3 to 6 months (12 to 24 weeks), so they were not yet affected by senescence. After six months, mice are considered middle aged and some age-related changes may be present [20]. For this purpose, a cohort of male and female mice aged 12 weeks (“mature”) and 32 weeks (“aged”) were selected. Animals had free access to tap water and were fed ad libitum either a normal diet (ND) (2014S Teklad Global 14% Protein Rodent Maintenance Diet, Harlan, Barcelona, Spain) or an HFD (D12451 Research Diets, Inc., New Brunswick, NJ, USA, 45% kcal fat) (n = 7–10 per group). Evolution of body weight (BW) and food intake were registered twice weekly during the experimental period (12 and 32 weeks). Calculations were made based on the average food intake of each cage, standardized to the individual body weights. The food efficiency ratio (FER) was calculated as a ratio of BW (grams) gained per week divided by total energy (kilocalories) consumed over this period. Rectal thermoprobe was used to measure body core temperature in mice (YSI 4600 Series Precision Thermometers, YSI Temperature, Dayton, OH, USA).

2.2. Blood and Tissue Collection

12- and 32-week-old mice were sacrificed by CO2 euthanasia in a fasting condition. Heart puncture was used for blood collection, and sera were obtained by cold centrifugation (4 °C) at 700× g for 15 min and stored at −20 °C. Gonadal, subcutaneous, perirenal and brown fat depots were carefully excised. Tissue and plasma samples were immediately stored at −80 °C for subsequent assays. Total body fat was measured as the sum of gonadal, perirenal and subcutaneous fat pad weights. The adiposity index was determined as (total body fat/final BW) × 100 (Supplementary Figure S1). All experimental procedures conformed to the European Guidelines for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (directive 2010/63/EU). The study was approved by the Ethical Committee for Animal Experimentation of the University of Navarra (042/03, 041/08).

2.3. Blood Measurements

Serum concentrations of free fatty acids (FFA) (Wako Chemicals, GmbH, Neuss, Germany) were determined by enzymatic methods using commercially available kits [21]. Insulin, adiponectin and leptin were determined by ELISA (Crystal Chem, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) as formerly indicated [14,22]. Intra- and inter-assay coefficients of variation for measurements were 4.5% and 5.4%, 3.5% and 6.3%, and 5.6% and 7.2%, respectively. To estimate insulin resistance, the Homeostatic Model Assessment (HOMA) index was calculated as fasting insulin concentration (μU/mL) × fasting glucose concentration (mmol/L)/22.5. The quantitative insulin sensitivity check index (QUICKI), an indirect measure of insulin sensitivity, was determined as follows: 1/(log(fasting insulin μU/mL) + log(fasting glucose mg/dL)). The adipose tissue insulin resistance index (Adipo-IR), a surrogate measure of adipocyte dysfunction, was calculated as fasting FFA (mmol/L) × fasting insulin (pmol/L).

2.4. Oral Glucose Tolerance Tests

Blood glucose was measured in conscious male and female mice before (baseline) and 15, 30, 60 and 120 min after the administration of a D-glucose solution (2 g/kg of BW) by oral gavage after 12 h of fasting. Glucose was measured by glucometer (Ascensia Elite, Bayer, Barcelona, Spain) from whole blood samples collected by puncturing the tail vein. The area under the curve (AUC) was calculated from the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) curve by the trapezoidal method.

2.5. Intraperitoneal Insulin Tolerance Test

Male mice were fasted for 5 h before intraperitoneal injection with insulin (0.5 units/kg). Glucose concentrations were determined by glucometer (Ascensia Elite) before and 15, 30, 60 and 120 min after the insulin administration from whole blood samples collected by puncturing the tail vein. The area under the curve (AUC) was calculated from the intraperitoneal insulin tolerance test (IPITT) curve by the trapezoidal method.

2.6. Statistical Analysis

Data are mean ± Standard Error of the Mean (SEM) of 7–10 animals per group. Normality was assessed by the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. For each group, the control is the mice of the same sex, fed a ND. Differences between groups were tested by two-way ANOVA and, in case of interaction between factors (sex and diet), one-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s post hoc tests were applied. Pearson’s correlation coefficient (r) was used to analyze the association between variables. Statistics were calculated using the SPSS/Windows version 15.0 software (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) and the figures were created using GraphPad Prism version 8.3 (GraphPad Software, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). A p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Effect of Sexual Differences and Diet on Energy Homeostasis

In order to determine if the time course of DIO is sex divergent, BW and food intake of both males and females was measured over 32 weeks. Following 12 weeks of HFD, the BW and total BW gain (%TWG) of female mice was significantly lower (p < 0.001) than that of male mice (Table 1), although there were no differences in %TWG compared to ND (Figure 1a,b). After 32 weeks of HFD intake, BW was increased by 19 g in males and 13 g in females, corresponding to a TWG of 115% in males and a 71% in female mice. HFD-fed female mice exhibited these changes to a significantly lower extent (p < 0.001) than males (Figure 1c) in spite of showing increased relative food intake (p < 0.001), expressed as kcal/100 g of BW (Table 1). Interestingly, 12- and 32-week-old HFD female mice showed decreased (p < 0.01 and p < 0.05, respectively) rectal temperature as compared to male mice. However, FER of female mice, a measure of the animal’s efficiency to convert feed into body mass, was significantly reduced (p < 0.001) as compared with that of male mice at both 12 and 32-weeks of age.
Both 12- and 32-week-old male mice fed an HFD showed significantly increased gonadal, subcutaneous, perirenal and total fat pads (p < 0.001 all) compared to their respective ND controls. Moreover, HFD increased fat mass to a greater extent in 12- and 32-week-old males than females (Table 1). In this sense, the lower TWG observed in HFD female mice was related to a significant reduction in gonadal, subcutaneous and total fat depots compared to male mice (p < 0.001 all). No differences in brown adipose tissue (BAT) were observed among young groups, whereas a significant effect of sex was observed at 32 weeks of age (p < 0.001) (Table 1).
As expected, 32-week-old male mice fed an HFD showed significantly augmented leptin levels compared to males fed a ND (p < 0.001) and HFD-fed females (p < 0.001). A positive correlation with the adiposity index was also detected (r = 0.708; p < 0.001). The 12-week-old ND female mice exhibited increased Adpn levels (p < 0.05) as compared to males, but these differences disappeared with age.

3.2. Sex and Age-Dependent Differences in Glucose Metabolism

In fasting conditions, 12-week-old male and female mice exhibited no changes in glycemia by diet, with the basal glucose levels in females significantly lower (p < 0.05) than in males (Table 2). At 32 weeks of age, however, HFD increased basal glucose levels in both sexes (p < 0.001), with females exhibiting significantly lower glucose levels (p < 0.01) than males (Table 2).
Glucose control, examined by OGTT, was also affected in a sexually dimorphic manner. Male mice on HFD showed worsened glycemia at the end of the OGTT compared to ND-male and the HFD-female mice at both ages (Figure 2a,b). Glycemia 60 and 120 min after the glucose load was significantly higher in 12-week-old males fed an HFD than ND-fed ones (p < 0.01), whereas these differences were not observed in female mice in the same conditions. Furthermore, male mice displayed significantly higher glycemia than female counterparts 120 min after the glucose load (p < 0.01) (Figure 2a). These sex differences were also observed in 32-week-old males fed an HFD compared to females from 30 min to the end of the experiment (all p < 0.001) (Figure 2b).
Data reveal a statistically significant interaction between sex and diet for the AUC at both ages (p < 0.01). In this sense, sex did not affect the AUC after the OGTT in mice fed a ND (Figure 2b,c). The glucose AUC was significantly higher in HFD male compared to ND male mice at both ages (p < 0.001 for both), whereas HFD female mice showed significantly lower AUC than males (p < 0.001) (Figure 2c,d), highlighting an impaired glucose tolerance in males. Furthermore, 12-week-old HFD male mice exhibited decreased insulin sensitivity as evidenced by the increased concentrations of insulin (p < 0.01), HOMA and adipo-IR indexes (p < 0.05) (Table 2). These differences, together with a significant decrease (p < 0.001) in the QUICKI index were also observed at 32 weeks of age (Table 2).

3.3. Sex-Specific Effect of HFD on Adiponectin/Leptin Ratio

The Adpn/Lep ratio, a functional biomarker of dysfunctional AT, significantly decreased (p < 0.05) with the HFD at 12 weeks of age in both sexes. As expected, 32-week-old female mice exhibited a significantly increased (p < 0.05) Adpn/Lep ratio compared to males (Figure 3a,b).
Focusing on male mice, a negative correlation of the Adpn/Lep ratio with BW (r = −0.59, p = 0.005) as well as with different fat depots, including GWAT (r = −0.65, p = 0.002), SCWAT (r = −0.54, p = 0.011) and total WAT (r = −0.59, p = 0.006) (Figure 4) was found. No correlation with basal glucose was observed.
Regarding female mice, a negative correlation between the Adpn/Lep ratio and BW (r = −0.71, p < 0.001), GWAT (r = −0.67 p < 0.001), SCWAT (r = −0.75, p < 0.001) and total WAT (r = −0.74, p < 0.001) was also observed. To further reinforce the accuracy of the Adpn/Lep ratio as an important marker of metabolic improvement, the correlation between the Adpn/Lep ratio and basal glucose was also analyzed, and a negative correlation between them was identified (r = −0.44, p = 0.048) (Figure 5).

4. Discussion

Despite the well-known differences in metabolic physiological systems, diseases and treatment outcomes among sex, the models used in the study of obesity are limited by the underrepresentation of females [23,24,25], as the presence of both sexes in animal as well as in cell-based studies has been recently considered [26]. In this context, it is necessary to examine the sex-specific characteristics of glucose metabolism as they are clearly involved in regulatory mechanisms in clinical pathologies including metabolic syndrome, obesity and T2D [27,28]. Obesity superimposed on aging drastically alters the inflammatory status, promoting the development of metabolic diseases, such as T2D, metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular disease [29]. However, to our knowledge, few publications delve into the simultaneous metabolic effect of sex and age on the response to an HFD. Since the strength of the reliability of the Adpn/Lep ratio as a biomarker of AT dysfunction has been previously described [30], the current study was focused on the age and sex-dependent effects of DIO on changes in the Adpn/Lep ratio, as well as in body composition and glucose metabolism.
Globally, many of the main findings that were related to the effect of HFD were in accordance with those previously published [31,32,33]. HFD and aging have a wide-ranging impact on metabolic variables, with a greater effect on male mice than female. Young HFD female mice showed a decreased body fat mass compared with females fed a ND despite their hyperphagia, which was probably due to their decreased FER. On the contrary, HFD induces an increased adiposity index in male mice compared with female ones, being male mice more prone to metabolic disorders associated with the HFD, even in the absence of overeating and their increased energy expenditure. The observed lower weight gain in females when presented with the metabolic challenge is in line with previous studies and was probably due to estrogens, which protect against increased obesity through their induced anorectic effects [34], as well as to lipolytic differences [35,36,37].
Sex- and age-dependent changes in plasma concentrations of adipokines and hormones related to glucose metabolism were also detected. The 12-week-old HFD female mice exhibited increased insulin sensitivity compared with males, as suggested by the decreased concentrations of plasma glucose and insulin as well as HOMA and adiposity indexes according to previous studies in both humans [38] and rodents [39]. Plasma adiponectin levels, widely described as an insulin sensitizing factor [40], were also increased in female mice. In this regard, aged HFD female rats showed improved glucose tolerance, suggesting a healthier serum profile of insulin sensitivity, which could be related with the increase in the AT insulin resistance index as well as in the Adpn/Lep ratio. We also observed that this biomarker correlated with body composition and insulin resistance better than adiponectin or leptin alone. However, these correlations were not observed in young females.
The combination of age and HFD significantly worsened the glucose tolerance of male mice, with aged male mice who were fed an HFD exhibiting hyperglycemia and glucose intolerance, thereby confirming their deleterious effects. The significant increase in serum adiponectin levels shown in aged male mice is interesting, contrasting with their impaired insulin sensitivity. Controversy related to the effect of an HFD on serum adiponectin levels exists [41,42], and a paradoxical increased incidence of death with higher adiponectin levels has been also reported [43]. The increased serum adiponectin levels observed in aged HFD male mice could be a compensatory mechanism to prevent insulin resistance, which was not sufficient to avoid the deterioration of systemic insulin sensitivity. The notion that females have improved insulin sensitivity is reinforced by the absence of differences as their age influences their glucose metabolism parameters. Sexual dimorphism with regard to insulin sensitivity has been well documented, and both clinical and animal studies exhibit a strong correlation between estrogen depletion, insulin resistance and dysregulation of metabolic homeostasis [44,45,46]. In this regard, estrogen may confer a protective role in the maintenance of insulin sensitivity in females [47] since this sex hormone is known to be a relevant modulator of glucose homeostasis, insulin signaling, energy balance and body composition [48]. In contrast to the preferential effect of estrogen on females, testosterone plays a key role in body composition, as well as in glucose and lipid metabolism, exerting an inhibitory effect on insulin sensitivity in males [49,50,51]. In line with these results, the differences in TWG observed between young males and females may also be associated with the effect of sex hormones, since testosterone favors muscle mass accretion [52], and differences disappear with age where testosterone concentrations are lower. A limitation of the present study is that adipocytes from rodent WAT were not isolated and cultured in order to study the hormone production related to energy homeostasis, and further investigations analyzing both the hormones and the mechanisms related to the improvement of the adipose tissue function in female mice are warranted.
In summary, body composition and glucose metabolism are distinctly regulated in females and males and, together with age, influence the predisposition to the development of obesity and its associated comorbidities. In this sense, females are more metabolically protected against obesity and its associated metabolic disorders than males regardless of age, indicating that the Adpn/Lep ratio is a relevant biomarker of body composition and glucose metabolism (Figure 6). This study provides evidence that long-term HFD induces metabolic alterations during aging in a sex-dependent manner, meaning that sex is a critical factor to be considered in dietary strategies used to mitigate T2D development. Changes in body composition related to sex, age and diet of wild type animals might provide a reference standard to evaluate the effects of dietary factors, genetic manipulation or pharmacological treatments, constituting critical parameters for the potential application against metabolic diseases in humans.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://0-www-mdpi-com.brum.beds.ac.uk/article/10.3390/nu15010073/s1. Figure S1: Experimental design.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.B. and G.F.; data curation, A.R., J.G.-A., V.C., B.R., A.M., G.N., G.F. and S.B.; formal analysis, A.R., J.G.-A., V.C., G.F. and S.B.; writing—original draft preparation, S.B.; writing—review and editing, V.C., A.R., A.M., J.G.-A. and G.F.; supervision, S.B. and G.F.; project administration, G.F.; funding acquisition, V.C., J.G.-A. and G.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by grants from the Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Fondo de Investigación Sanitaria-FEDER (FIS PI19/00785, PI19/00990, PI20/00080, PI20/00927) and from the CIBER de Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición (CIBEROBN), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Spain.

Institutional Review Board Statement

All experimental protocols were approved by the Ethical Committee for Animal Experimentation of the University of Navarra (1 January 2004, 042/03; 1 January 2009, 041/08) and conformed to the European Guidelines for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (directive 2010/63/EU).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available upon reasonable request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy restrictions.

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge the collaboration of all the staff of the breeding house of the University of Navarra, in particular, to Elena Ciordia, Alberto Espinal and Eneko Etxetxikia.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. NCD Risk Factor Collaboration (NCD-RisC). Worldwide trends in body-mass index, underweight, overweight, and obesity from 1975 to 2016: A pooled analysis of 2416 population-based measurement studies in 1289 million children, adolescents, and adults. Lancet 2017, 390, 2627–2642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Frühbeck, G.; Busetto, L.; Dicker, D.; Yumuk, V.; Goossens, G.H.; Hebebrand, J.; Halford, J.G.; Farpour-Lambert, N.J.; Blaak, E.E.; Woodward, E.; et al. The ABCD of Obesity: An EASO Position Statement on a Diagnostic Term with Clinical and Scientific Implications. Obes. Facts 2019, 12, 131–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Yárnoz-Esquiroz, P.; Olazarán, L.; Aguas-Ayesa, M.; Perdomo, C.M.; García-Goñi, M.; Silva, C.; Fernández-Formoso, J.A.; Escalada, J.; Montecucco, F.; Portincasa, P.; et al. ‘Obesities’: Position statement on a complex disease entity with multifaceted drivers. Eur. J. Clin. Investig. 2022, 52, e13811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Catalán, V.; Avilés-Olmos, I.; Rodríguez, A.; Becerril, S.; Fernández-Formoso, J.A.; Kiortsis, D.; Portincasa, P.; Gómez-Ambrosi, J.; Frühbeck, G. Time to Consider the “Exposome Hypothesis” in the Development of the Obesity Pandemic. Nutrients 2022, 14, 1597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Bourgeois, F.; Alexiu, A.; Lemonnter, D. Dietary-induced obesity: Effect of dietary fats on adipose tissue cellularity in mice. Br. J. Nutr. 1983, 49, 17–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Nordström, A.; Hadrévi, J.; Olsson, T.; Franks, P.W.; Nordström, P. Higher Prevalence of Type 2 Diabetes in Men than in Women Is Associated with Differences in Visceral Fat Mass. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2016, 101, 3740–3746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Yang, W.; Lu, J.; Weng, J.; Jia, W.; Ji, L.; Xiao, J.; Shan, Z.; Liu, J.; Tian, H.; Ji, Q.; et al. Prevalence of diabetes among men and women in China. N. Engl. J. Med. 2010, 362, 1090–1101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Rebuffé-Scrive, M.; Surwit, R.; Feinglos, M.; Kuhn, C.; Rodin, J. Regional fat distribution and metabolism in a new mouse model (C57BL/6J) of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Metabolism 1993, 42, 1405–1409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lovejoy, J.C.; Sainsbury, A.; Stock Conference Working Group. Sex differences in obesity and the regulation of energy homeostasis. Obes. Rev. 2009, 10, 154–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Oraha, J.; Enriquez, R.F.; Herzog, H.; Lee, N.J. Sex-specific changes in metabolism during the transition from chow to high-fat diet feeding are abolished in response to dieting in C57BL/6J mice. Int. J. Obes. 2022, 46, 1749–1758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Pettersson, U.S.; Waldén, T.B.; Carlsson, P.-O.; Jansson, L.; Phillipson, M. Female mice are protected against high-fat diet induced metabolic syndrome and increase the regulatory T cell population in adipose tissue. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e46057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Mancuso, P.; Bouchard, B. The Impact of Aging on Adipose Function and Adipokine Synthesis. Front. Endocrinol. 2019, 10, 137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Zhang, Y.; Proenca, R.; Maffei, M.; Barone, M.; Leopold, L.; Friedman, J.M. Positional cloning of the mouse obese gene and its human homologue. Nature 1994, 372, 425–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Muruzabal, F.J.; Frühbeck, G.; Gomez-Ambrosi, J.; Archanco, M.; Burrell, M.A. Immunocytochemical detection of leptin in non-mammalian vertebrate stomach. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 2002, 128, 149–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Stern, J.H.; Rutkowski, J.M.; Scherer, P.E. Adiponectin, leptin, and fatty acids in the maintenance of metabolic homeostasis through adipose tissue crosstalk. Cell Metab. 2016, 23, 770–784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Frühbeck, G.; Catalán, V.; Rodríguez, A.; Ramírez, B.; Becerril, S.; Salvador, J.; Portincasa, P.; Colina, I.; Gómez-Ambrosi, J. Involvement of the leptin-adiponectin axis in inflammation and oxidative stress in themetabolic syndrome. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 6619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Unamuno, X.; Izaguirre, M.; Gómez-Ambrosi, J.; Rodríguez, A.; Ramírez, B.; Becerril, S.; Valentí, V.; Moncada, R.; Silva, C.; Salvador, J.; et al. Increase of the Adiponectin/Leptin Ratio in Patients with Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes after Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass. Nutrients 2019, 11, 2069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Bailey, C.J.; Flatt, P. Hormonal control of glucose homeostasis during development and ageing in mice. Metabolism 1982, 31, 238–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Barzilai, N.; Huffman, D.M.; Muzumdar, R.H.; Bartke, A. The Critical Role of Metabolic Pathways in Aging. Diabetes 2012, 61, 1315–1322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Dutta, S.; Sengupta, P. Men and mice: Relating their ages. Life Sci. 2016, 152, 244–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Rodríguez, A.; Gomez-Ambrosi, J.; Catalan, V.; Rotellar, F.; Valentí, V.; Silva, C.; Mugueta, M.D.C.; Pulido, M.R.; Vázquez, R.; Salvador, J.; et al. The ghrelin O-acyltransferase-ghrelin system reduces TNF-α-induced apoptosis and autophagy in human visceral adipocytes. Diabetologia 2012, 55, 3038–3050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Catalan, V.; Gómez-Ambrosi, J.; Rodríguez, A.; Ramírez, B.; Rotellar, F.; Valentí, V.; Silva, C.; Gil, M.J.; Fernández-Real, J.M.; Salvador, J.; et al. Increased levels of calprotectin in obesity are related to macrophage content: Impact on inflammation and effect of weight loss. Mol. Med. 2011, 17, 1157–1167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Mauvais-Jarvis, F.; Arnold, A.P.; Reue, K. A Guide for the Design of Pre-clinical Studies on Sex Differences in Metabolism. Cell Metab. 2017, 25, 1216–1230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Beery, A.K.; Zucker, I. Sex bias in neuroscience and biomedical research. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2011, 35, 565–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Sara, B.; Amaia, R.; Victoria, C.; Beatriz, R.; Amaia, M.; Gabriela, N.; Javier, G.-A.; Gema, F. Putting gender on the agenda. Nature 2010, 465, 665. Available online: https://0-www-nature-com.brum.beds.ac.uk/articles/465665a (accessed on 19 December 2022).
  26. Clayton, J.A.; Collins, F.S. Policy: NIH to balance sex in cell and animal studies. Nature 2014, 509, 282–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Palmer, B.F.; Clegg, D.J. The sexual dimorphism of obesity. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2015, 402, 113–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Goo, B.; Ahmadieh, S.; Zarzour, A.; Yiew, N.K.H.; Kim, D.; Shi, H.; Greenway, J.; Cave, S.; Nguyen, J.; Aribindi, S.; et al. Sex-Dependent Role of Adipose Tissue HDAC9 in Diet-Induced Obesity and Metabolic Dysfunction. Cells 2022, 11, 2698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Reyes-Farias, M.; Fos-Domenech, J.; Serra, D.; Herrero, L.; Sánchez-Infantes, D. White adipose tissue dysfunction in obesity and aging. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2021, 192, 114723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Frühbeck, G.; Catalán, V.; Rodríguez, A.; Ramírez, B.; Becerril, S.; Salvador, J.; Colina, I.; Gómez-Ambrosi, J. Adiponectin-leptin Ratio is a Functional Biomarker of Adipose Tissue Inflammation. Nutrients 2019, 11, 454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. West, D.B.; Boozer, C.N.; Moody, D.L.; Atkinson, R.L. Dietary obesity in nine inbred mouse strains. Am. J. Physiol. 1992, 262, R1025–R1032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Iena, F.M.; Jul, J.B.; Vegger, J.B.; Lodberg, A.; Thomsen, J.S.; Brüel, A.; Lebeck, J. Sex-Specific Effect of High-Fat Diet on Glycerol Metabolism in Murine Adipose Tissue and Liver. Front. Endocrinol. 2020, 11, 577650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Berglund, E.D.; Li, C.Y.; Poffenberger, G.; Ayala, J.E.; Fueger, P.T.; Willis, S.E.; Jewell, M.M.; Powers, A.C.; Wasserman, D.H. Glucose metabolism in vivo in four commonly used inbred mouse strains. Diabetes 2008, 57, 1790–1799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Stubbins, R.E.; Holcomb, V.B.; Hong, J.; Núñez, N.P. Estrogen modulates abdominal adiposity and protects female mice from obesity and impaired glucose tolerance. Eur. J. Nutr. 2011, 51, 861–870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Frühbeck, G.; Gomez-Ambrosi, J.; Salvador, J. Leptin-induced lipolysis opposes the tonic inhibition of endogenous adenosine in white adipocytes. FASEB J. 2001, 15, 333–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Frühbeck, G. Obesity: Aquaporin enters the picture. Nature 2005, 438, 436–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Poulain-Godefroy, O.; Lecoeur, C.; Pattou, F.; Frühbeck, G.; Froguel, P. Inflammation is associated with a decrease of lipogenic factors in omental fat in women. Am. J. Physiol.-Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 2008, 295, R1–R7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Xu, A.; Chan, K.W.; Hoo, R.L.; Wang, Y.; Tan, K.C.; Zhang, J.; Chen, B.; Lam, M.C.; Tse, C.; Cooper, G.J.; et al. Testosterone selectively reduces the high molecular weight form of adiponectin by inhibiting its secretion from adipocytes. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280, 18073–18080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Gómez-Pérez, Y.; Amengual-Cladera, E.; Català-Niell, A.; Thomàs-Moyà, E.; Gianotti, M.; Proenza, A.M.; Lladó, I. Gender dimorphism in high-fat-diet-induced insulin resistance in skeletal muscle of aged rats. Cell. Physiol. Biochem. 2008, 22, 539–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Kadowaki, T.; Yamauchi, T.; Kubota, N.; Hara, K.; Ueki, K.; Tobe, K. Adiponectin and adiponectin receptors in insulin resistance, diabetes, and the metabolic syndrome. J. Clin. Investig. 2006, 116, 1784–1792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Bullen, J.W., Jr.; Bluher, S.; Kelesidis, T.; Mantzoros, C.S. Regulation of adiponectin and its receptors in response to development of diet-induced obesity in mice. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 2007, 292, E1079–E1086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Marecki, J.C.; Ronis, M.J.; Shankar, K.; Badger, T.M. Hyperinsulinemia and ectopic fat deposition can develop in the face of hyperadiponectinemia in young obese rats. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2011, 22, 142–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Jang, A.Y.; Scherer, P.E.; Kim, J.Y.; Lim, S.; Koh, K.K. Adiponectin and cardiometabolic trait and mortality: Where do we go? Cardiovasc. Res. 2022, 118, 2074–2084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Salpeter, S.R.; Walsh, J.M.; Ormiston, T.M.; Greyber, E.; Buckley, N.S.; Salpeter, E.E. Meta-analysis: Effect of hormone-replacement therapy on components of the metabolic syndrome in postmenopausal women. Diabetes Obes. Metab. 2006, 8, 538–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Misso, M.L.; Murata, Y.; Boon, W.C.; Jones, M.E.; Britt, K.L.; Simpson, E.R. Cellular and molecular characterization of the adipose phenotype of the aromatase-deficient mouse. Endocrinology 2003, 144, 1474–1480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Mauvais-Jarvis, F. Estrogen and androgen receptors: Regulators of fuel homeostasis and emerging targets for diabetes and obesity. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 2011, 22, 24–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Díaz, A.; López-Grueso, R.; Gambini, J.; Monleón, D.; Mas-Bargues, C.; Abdelaziz, K.M.; Vina, J.; Borrás, C. Sex Differences in Age-Associated Type 2 Diabetes in Rats-Role of Estrogens and Oxidative Stress. Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2019, 2019, 6734836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Barros, R.P.; Gustafsson, J.A. Estrogen receptors and the metabolic network. Cell Metab. 2011, 14, 289–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Pitteloud, N.; Mootha, V.K.; Dwyer, A.A.; Hardin, M.; Lee, H.; Eriksson, K.F.; Tripathy, D.; Yialamas, M.; Groop, L.; Elahi, D.; et al. Relationship between testosterone levels, insulin sensitivity, and mitochondrial function in men. Diabetes Care 2005, 28, 1636–1642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Sato, K.; Iemitsu, M.; Aizawa, K.; Ajisaka, R. Testosterone and DHEA activate the glucose metabolism-related signaling pathway in skeletal muscle. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 2008, 294, E961–E968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Pal, M.; Khan, J.; Kumar, R.; Surolia, A.; Gupta, S. Testosterone supplementation improves insulin responsiveness in HFD fed male T2DM mice and potentiates insulin signaling in the skeletal muscle and C2C12 myocyte cell line. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0224162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Davidyan, A.; Pathak, S.; Baar, K.; Bodine, S.C. Maintenance of muscle mass in adult male mice is independent of testosterone. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0240278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Nutrients 15 00073 g001 550
Figure 1. Growth curves of 4–32 week-old-male and female mice fed a normal (ND) or an high- fat diet (HFD) (a). Bar graphs show the % total weight gain (TWG) of (b) 12- and (c) 32- week-old mice (n = 10–20). Data are the mean ± SEM. Statistical differences were analyzed by two-way ANOVA. * interaction between both factors (sex and diet); *** p < 0.001 effect of sex; + p < 0.05 effect of diet. p values lower than 0.05 are highlighted with bold text.
Figure 1. Growth curves of 4–32 week-old-male and female mice fed a normal (ND) or an high- fat diet (HFD) (a). Bar graphs show the % total weight gain (TWG) of (b) 12- and (c) 32- week-old mice (n = 10–20). Data are the mean ± SEM. Statistical differences were analyzed by two-way ANOVA. * interaction between both factors (sex and diet); *** p < 0.001 effect of sex; + p < 0.05 effect of diet. p values lower than 0.05 are highlighted with bold text.
Nutrients 15 00073 g001
Nutrients 15 00073 g002 550
Figure 2. Oral glucose tolerance test of (a) 12- and (b) 32-week-old mice and area under the curve of (c) 12- and (d) 32-week-old experimental animals. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM of 6–12 animals per group. Statistical differences were analyzed by two-way ANOVA or one-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post hoc test if an interaction was detected. * interaction between both factors (sex and diet); ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001 vs. male mice fed a ND; $ p < 0.05; $$ p < 0.01; $$$ p < 0.001 vs. female mice fed the same diet. AUC, area under the curve, HFD, high-fat diet; ND, normal diet; OGTT, oral glucose tolerance test. p values lower than 0.05 are highlighted with bold text.
Figure 2. Oral glucose tolerance test of (a) 12- and (b) 32-week-old mice and area under the curve of (c) 12- and (d) 32-week-old experimental animals. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM of 6–12 animals per group. Statistical differences were analyzed by two-way ANOVA or one-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post hoc test if an interaction was detected. * interaction between both factors (sex and diet); ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001 vs. male mice fed a ND; $ p < 0.05; $$ p < 0.01; $$$ p < 0.001 vs. female mice fed the same diet. AUC, area under the curve, HFD, high-fat diet; ND, normal diet; OGTT, oral glucose tolerance test. p values lower than 0.05 are highlighted with bold text.
Nutrients 15 00073 g002
Nutrients 15 00073 g003 550
Figure 3. Adiponectin/leptin (Adpn/Lep) ratio of (a) 12- and (b) 32-week-old mice. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM of 6–8 animals per group. Statistical differences were analyzed by two-way ANOVA. * interaction between both factors (sex and diet); Adpn, adiponectin; HFD, high-fat diet; Lep, leptin; ND, normal diet; p values lower than 0.05 are highlighted with bold text.
Figure 3. Adiponectin/leptin (Adpn/Lep) ratio of (a) 12- and (b) 32-week-old mice. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM of 6–8 animals per group. Statistical differences were analyzed by two-way ANOVA. * interaction between both factors (sex and diet); Adpn, adiponectin; HFD, high-fat diet; Lep, leptin; ND, normal diet; p values lower than 0.05 are highlighted with bold text.
Nutrients 15 00073 g003
Nutrients 15 00073 g004 550
Figure 4. Univariate analysis of the correlations between the adiponectin/leptin (Adpn/Lep) ratio with (a) body weight (BW), (b) gonadal (GWAT), (c) subcutaneous (SCWAT) and (d) whole-body fat content of male animal. Adpn/Lep ratio, adiponectin/leptin ratio; BW, body weight; r, Pearson correlation coefficient; p, significance value. p values lower than 0.05 are highlighted with bold text.
Figure 4. Univariate analysis of the correlations between the adiponectin/leptin (Adpn/Lep) ratio with (a) body weight (BW), (b) gonadal (GWAT), (c) subcutaneous (SCWAT) and (d) whole-body fat content of male animal. Adpn/Lep ratio, adiponectin/leptin ratio; BW, body weight; r, Pearson correlation coefficient; p, significance value. p values lower than 0.05 are highlighted with bold text.
Nutrients 15 00073 g004
Nutrients 15 00073 g005 550
Figure 5. Univariate analysis of the correlations between the adiponectin/leptin (Adpn/Lep) ratio with (a) body weight (BW), (b) gonadal (GWAT), (c) subcutaneous (SCWAT) and (d) whole-body fat content of female animal, together with the basal glucose (e). Adpn/Lep ratio, adiponectin/leptin ratio; BW, body weight; r, Pearson correlation coefficient; p, significance value. p values lower than 0.05 are highlighted with bold text.
Figure 5. Univariate analysis of the correlations between the adiponectin/leptin (Adpn/Lep) ratio with (a) body weight (BW), (b) gonadal (GWAT), (c) subcutaneous (SCWAT) and (d) whole-body fat content of female animal, together with the basal glucose (e). Adpn/Lep ratio, adiponectin/leptin ratio; BW, body weight; r, Pearson correlation coefficient; p, significance value. p values lower than 0.05 are highlighted with bold text.
Nutrients 15 00073 g005
Nutrients 15 00073 g006 550
Figure 6. Impact of aging and sex in Adpn/Lep ratio on HFD-induced metabolic effects. Adpn, adiponectin; Adpn/Lep ratio, adiponectin/leptin ratio; TWG, total weight gain; WAT, white adipose tissue.
Figure 6. Impact of aging and sex in Adpn/Lep ratio on HFD-induced metabolic effects. Adpn, adiponectin; Adpn/Lep ratio, adiponectin/leptin ratio; TWG, total weight gain; WAT, white adipose tissue.
Nutrients 15 00073 g006
Table
Table 1. Effect of sex and diet on the body weight, food intake, body composition and homeostasis in 12- and 32-week-old mice.
Table 1. Effect of sex and diet on the body weight, food intake, body composition and homeostasis in 12- and 32-week-old mice.
12 WEEKS
MalesFemalesANOVA 12 weeks
NDHFDNDHFDSexDietSex*Diet
BW(g)26.1 ± 0.326.4 ± 0.621.6 ± 0.321.5 ± 0.2<0.0010.8340.618
Relative FI (kcal/100 g BW)42.8 ± 2.449.3 ± 1.454.5 ± 1.556.6 ± 1.3<0.0010.0230.246
Rectal temp (°C)36.7 ± 0.137.5 ± 0.2 b36.7 ± 0.136.8 ± 0.1 e0.0100.0010.010
FER0.15 ± 0.010.17 ± 0.010.09 ± 0.010.14 ± 0.01<0.001<0.0010.091
BAT (g/100 g BW)0.31 ± 0.050.32 ± 0.020.30 ± 0.010.30 ± 0.010.3090.6910.587
GWAT (g/100 g BW)0.65 ± 0.031.04 ± 0.09 c0.40 ± 0.03 e0.30 ± 0.03 f<0.0010.010<0.001
SCWAT (g/100 g BW)0.56 ± 0.070.88 ± 0.09 c0.49 ± 0.060.45 ± 0.02 f0.0010.0230.004
PRWAT (g/100 g BW)0.15 ± 0.020.33 ± 0.05 c0.13 ± 0.010.12 ± 0.02 f<0.0010.0030.002
Adiposity index (g/100 g BW)1.35 ± 0.112.25 ± 0.23 c1.02 ± 0.110.87 ± 0.07 f<0.0010.013<0.001
Leptin (ng/mL)0.60 ± 0.480.91 ± 0.290.24 ± 0.060.28 ± 0.050.1320.5650.680
Adpn (μg/mL)23.1 ± 3.422.4 ± 1.434.5 ± 4.422.8 ± 1.90.0490.0420.065
32 WEEKS
MalesFemalesANOVA 32 weeks
NDHFDNDHFDSexDietSex*Diet
BW(g)32.9 ± 1.236.9 ± 1.525.3 ± 0.327.2 ± 1.0<0.0010.0160.547
Relative FI (kcal/100 g BW)33.3 ± 1.534.9 ± 1.453.60 ± 1.4947.06 ± 2.03<0.0010.0460.104
Rectal temp (°C)36.6 ± 0.137.5 ± 0.2 b37.1 ± 0.1 d36.8 ± 0.1 d0.3490.046<0.001
FER0.05 ± 0.000.08 ± 0.010.01 ± 0.000.04 ± 0.01<0.0010.0110.933
BAT (g/100 g BW)0.44 ± 0.030.48 ± 0.040.34 ± 0.020.36 ± 0.02<0.0010.3250.795
GWAT (g/100 g BW)1.57 ± 0.152.31 ± 0.19 c0.68 ± 0.06 f0.81 ± 0.09 f<0.0010.0040.038
SCWAT (g/100 g BW)1.26 ± 0.131.94 ± 0.170.85 ± 0.061.02 ± 0.15<0.0010.0040.070
PRWAT (g/100 g BW)0.50 ± 0.060.73 ± 0.050.27 ± 0.020.50 ± 0.14<0.0010.0070.772
Adiposity index (g/100 g BW)3.37 ± 0.344.85 ± 0.401.80 ± 0.132.33 ± 0.34<0.0010.0040.155
Leptin (ng/mL)1.16 ± 0.146.49 ± 1.03 c1.27 ± 0.331.42 ± 0.67 f0.0040.0020.003
Adpn (μg/mL)36.8 ± 1.939.9 ± 2.634.9 ± 4.336.8 ± 7.10.1640.7880.820
BW, body weight; BAT, brown adipose tissue; GWAT, gonadal white adipose tissue; HFD, high-fat diet; FER, food efficiency ratio; FI, food intake, ND, normal diet; PRWAT, perirenal white adipose tissue; SCWAT, subcutaneous white adipose tissue. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM of 6–8 animals per group. Statistical differences were analyzed by two-way ANOVA or one-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post hoc test if an interaction was detected. b p < 0.01; c p < 0.001 vs. same sex fed a ND; d, p < 0.05; e p < 0.01; f p < 0.001 vs. male mice fed the same diet. * interaction between both factors (Sex and Diet). Bold lettering indicates statistically significant values.
Table
Table 2. Effect of sex and diet on glucose metabolism in 12-and 32-week-old mice.
Table 2. Effect of sex and diet on glucose metabolism in 12-and 32-week-old mice.
12 WEEKS
MalesFemalesANOVA 12 weeks
NDHFDNDHFDSexDietSex*Diet
Glucose (mg/dL)75.2 ± 3.481.8 ± 4.770.3 ± 3.472.4 ± 1.60.0440.2120.514
Insulin (ng/mL)0.39 ± 0.040.60 ± 0.05 b0.45 ± 0.050.39 ± 0.02 e0.1040.1060.004
HOMA-IR0.09 ± 0.010.14 ± 0.02 a0.09 ± 0.010.08 ± 0.01 d0.0380.1400.019
QUICKI0.67 ± 0.030.58 ± 0.020.64 ± 0.010.66 ± 0.010.2820.2020.034
FFA (mmol/L)0.70 ± 0.060.78 ± 0.050.83 ± 0.140.85 ± 0.140.1880.4830.704
Adipo-IR0.08 ± 0.010.13 ± 0.01 a0.11 ± 0.040.09 ± 0.01 c0.7480.5890.039
32 WEEKS
MalesFemalesANOVA 32 weeks
NDHFDNDHFDSexDietSex*Diet
Glucose (mg/dL)73.0 ± 3.686.7 ± 4.465.6 ± 3.976.4 ± 2.10.007<0.0010.270
Insulin (ng/mL)0.97 ± 0.130.86 ± 0.130.50 ± 0.030.48 ± 0.020.0030.6120.719
HOMA-IR0.20 ± 0.040.23 ± 0.050.09 ± 0.010.11 ± 0.010.0140.6270.843
QUICKI0.54 ± 0.020.53 ± 0.020.64 ± 0.020.61 ± 0.01<0.0010.6850.358
FFA (mmol/L)0.72 ± 0.060.75 ± 0.060.91 ± 0.100.84 ± 0.070.0540.8070.521
Adipo-IR0.20 ± 0.030.21 ± 0.050.12 ± 0.020.12 ± 0.010.0420.8640.938
Adipo-IR, adipocyte insulin resistance index; Adpn, adiponectin; HFD, high-fat diet; HOMA, homeostasis model assessment; ND, normal diet; QUICKI, quantitative insulin sensitivity check index. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM of 6–12 animals per group. Statistical differences were analyzed by two-way ANOVA or one-way ANOVA. a p < 0.05; b p < 0.01; c p < 0.001 vs. same sex fed a ND; d, p < 0.05; e p < 0.01 vs. male mice fed the same diet. * interaction between both factors (Sex and Diet). Bold lettering indicates statistically significant values.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Becerril, S.; Rodríguez, A.; Catalán, V.; Ramírez, B.; Mentxaka, A.; Neira, G.; Gómez-Ambrosi, J.; Frühbeck, G. Sex- and Age-Dependent Changes in the Adiponectin/Leptin Ratio in Experimental Diet-Induced Obesity in Mice. Nutrients 2023, 15, 73. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/nu15010073

AMA Style

Becerril S, Rodríguez A, Catalán V, Ramírez B, Mentxaka A, Neira G, Gómez-Ambrosi J, Frühbeck G. Sex- and Age-Dependent Changes in the Adiponectin/Leptin Ratio in Experimental Diet-Induced Obesity in Mice. Nutrients. 2023; 15(1):73. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/nu15010073

Chicago/Turabian Style

Becerril, Sara, Amaia Rodríguez, Victoria Catalán, Beatriz Ramírez, Amaia Mentxaka, Gabriela Neira, Javier Gómez-Ambrosi, and Gema Frühbeck. 2023. "Sex- and Age-Dependent Changes in the Adiponectin/Leptin Ratio in Experimental Diet-Induced Obesity in Mice" Nutrients 15, no. 1: 73. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/nu15010073

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop