Next Article in Journal
Inflammatory Reaction Induced by Two Metalloproteinases Isolated from Bothrops atrox Venom and by Fragments Generated from the Hydrolysis of Basement Membrane Components
Previous Article in Journal
Stability of Mycotoxins in Individual Stock and Multi-Analyte Standard Solutions
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Toxins
Volume 12
Issue 2
10.3390/toxins12020095
toxins-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Impacts of Asparagus Extract Fractions on Growth and Fumonisins Biosynthesis in Fusarium Proliferatum

by
Natalia Witaszak
1,†,
Justyna Lalak-Kańczugowska
1,*,†,
Agnieszka Waśkiewicz
2 and
Łukasz Stępień
1
1
Department of Pathogen Genetics and Plant Resistance, Institute of Plant Genetics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Strzeszyńska 34, 60-479 Poznań, Poland
2
Department of Chemistry, Poznan University of Life Sciences, Wojska Polskiego 75, 60-637 Poznań, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Toxins 2020, 12(2), 95; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/toxins12020095
Submission received: 29 November 2019 / Revised: 19 January 2020 / Accepted: 28 January 2020 / Published: 30 January 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Mycotoxins)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Asparagus is a genus consisting of over two hundred species of perennial plants. Fusarium proliferatum is a major asparagus pathogen and it biosynthesizes a variety of mycotoxins, of which fumonisins B are prevalent. Our previous studies on F. proliferatum strains indicated that asparagus extract affects the expression of FUM1 gene, encoding polyketide synthase, a key enzyme of the FUM gene cluster governing the biosynthesis of fumonisins. An asparagus-derived F. proliferatum strain increased fumonisin B1 production after extract fractions’ addition, reaching the maximum 2 or 24 h after treatment. The cultures yielded between 40 and 520 mg of dry weight of mycelia after 14 days of cultivation. The differences in fungal biomass amounts between the whole extract and its fractions may result from synergistic effect of all bioactive compounds present in asparagus extract. Among extract fractions, the methanolic fraction had the highest effect on the dry weight of the mycelium reaching about a 13-fold increase compared to the control. Furthermore, we measured the relative expression of the FUM1 gene. Due to the possible antifungal activity of tested extract fractions, future research will be focused on the identification of the Asparagus officinalis L. compounds responsible for this activity.
Keywords:
asparagus; Fusarium proliferatum; fumonisins; plant-pathogen interaction; qPCR; UPLC/TQD
Key Contribution: Asparagus extract fractions had differential effects on growth and fumonisin synthesis by Fusarium proliferatum strain. This effect putatively depended on composition alterations resulting from the polarity of the solvent used. Similarly; FUM1 expression levels differed significantly in strain cultures supplemented with extract fractions.

1. Introduction

Asparagus (Asparagus sp.) is a genus of perennial plants, consisting of over two hundred species (according to World Checklist of Selected Plant Families). This savory vegetable is a plant of high nutritional and pharmaceutical values but is also often used as an ornamental plant. Asparagus is a rich source of vitamins and minerals as well as antioxidants and saponins, which occur mainly in peels [1,2]. Thanks to saponins, asparagus has antifungal, antitumor, antidiabetic and hypolipidemic properties [3,4,5,6,7,8,9]. In traditional medicine, asparagus has been applied as a diuretic and laxative agent [2].
Asparagus occurs in the areas of Europe, Africa, Asia and Americas. Multiple applications make it an economically important crop plant and, thus, extensive knowledge about asparagus pathogens and diseases is necessary to effectively prevent the yield loss. Asparagus rust, purple spot as well as Fusarium crown and root rot are the most important diseases caused by Puccinia asparagi, Pleospora herbarium as well as Fusarium proliferatum and Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. asparagi, respectively [10,11].
Fusarium is a group of the most common plant pathogens occurring all over the world and damaging crop yield. Fusarium proliferatum is a very important representative among Fusarium genus and the species has the ability to infect a wide range of host-plants, including asparagus, maize, garlic, wheat, pea, pineapple, banana and many more [12]. It is mainly transferred and spread by seeds and crop residues. F. proliferatum biosynthesizes multiple mycotoxins, such as: beauvericin, moniliformin, fusaric acid and highly toxic fumonisins from group B. Moreover, this pathogen can survive in many ecological niches, but the optimal environment is a warm and humid climate as well as loam soils with pH of about 5 [13]. Such characteristics may indicate a high plasticity and excellent adaptability of F. proliferatum to environmental challenges.
Infection caused by F. proliferatum is manifested by yellowing, stunting and wilting of the organs of infected plants and is correlated with asparagus decline [13,14]. Management of Fusarium infections is very difficult because no effective fungicides against Fusarium are available and multi-stage actions including plant and soil protection as well as inoculum reduction are necessary [11,13]. Moreover, accumulation of Fusarium secondary metabolites in plants’ tissue and their possible harmful effects on human and animal health is an additional issue in effective plant protection [12].
Fumonisin B1 is among the most dangerous secondary metabolites biosynthesized by F. proliferatum strains in apical cells of hyphae [15]. FB1 synthesis is governed by the FUM gene cluster, which is localized on F. proliferatum chromosome 1. This mycotoxin is harmful to other microorganisms as well as plants, animals and human. The FB1 mechanism of action bases on the disruption of the sphingolipid biosynthesis, particularly sphingosine and sphinganine. These compounds are the precursors of sphingolipids—the basic phospholipids of cell membranes [16]. Chemical structure of FB1 is similar to sphingosine, thus, both molecules compete for the active site of the ceramide synthase. The enzyme is responsible for the acylation of sphingosine and sphinganine, which results in the formation of ceramides. Lack of activity of this enzyme causes the inhibition of sphingolipid biosynthesis, which is the reason for their deficiency in cell membranes [17,18]. Disruption of sphingolipid metabolism and associated fat peroxidation results in the increase of reactive oxygen species (ROS), damaging DNA and proteins [19,20]. In turn, ROS play an important role as signal transducers in many molecular processes, such as hypersensitivity response in plants. These processes are a part of plant immunity response called FB1-induced cell death, which is similar to hypersensitivity response (HR), a type of programmed cell death that protects the plant from further infection [21].
Relatively much is known about changes caused in the plant during Fusarium infection. First, a hypersensitivity response occurs, causing cell death of the infected area. Some reports indicate that fumonisin B1 is a virulence factor causing FB1-induced cell death, mediated by reactive oxygen species (ROS) activation, phytoalexins accumulation and pathogenesis genes overexpression [21,22]. Along with the pathogen’s attack, a systemic acquired resistance (SAR) is activated. In asparagus plants, F. proliferatum affects salicylic acid production, which is the main signaling molecule connected with systemic response [23]. The mechanism of this process is not fully known but may be similar to the other Fusarium representative—F. graminearum—which contains salicylic acid degrading enzymes [24,25].
Plant-pathogen interaction is a complex network of connections, actions and reactions. To fully understand its rules, it is necessary to examine in detail the changes observed for both organisms during the infection process. So far, researchers were focused on the impact of the pathogen on plant gene expression and metabolism. On the contrary, the effect of plant metabolites with antifungal activity like camalexin, pisatin and resveratrol were less studied and fungal genes and biochemical pathways associated with the response against plant effectors are still not well-researched and understood [26,27,28]. In the case of Fusarium, reports on mechanisms occurring in the plant’s organism are available, but limited information has been gathered about molecular mechanisms of the reaction of Fusarium under biotic stress conditions. Therefore, it is necessary to continuously improve the knowledge about them, particularly for economically important crops.
Our previous studies on F. proliferatum strains indicated that asparagus extract affects the expression of FUM1 gene, encoding a key enzyme of the FUM gene cluster governing the biosynthesis of fumonisins. Simultaneously, changes in biosynthesis of fumonisins were observed [29,30].
Furthermore, proteomic analyses brought us the knowledge about some of the proteins induced in strains treated with asparagus extract [31]. Obtained information is not sufficient to reveal the molecular mechanisms of Fusarium reaction under biotic stress conditions, therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the effect of bioactive compounds obtained by fractionation of asparagus extract on fumonisins production, FUM1 expression and dry biomass changes in the Fusarium proliferatum strain. Different solvents were tested (methanol, ethanol, methanol:water 1:1 and water) for extraction of the bioactive compounds from asparagus extract. In addition, to investigate the effectiveness of extracting the free and bound bioactive compounds, the alkaline and acidic hydrolysis extraction were used for the substances bound to the cell walls.

2. Results

2.1. Fumonisins

Fumonisins were detected both in controls as well as in the samples after extract and extract fractions treatment. Total fumonisin content reflects similar trend to that represented by individual FB1, FB2 and FB3 (Table 1). The FBs concentrations were higher in the first three time points and much lower at the end of the experiment. In the first and second (2 h) time point, total fumonisins content was higher for all asparagus extract fractions compared to the control with methanol. High FBs content was maintained only in F. proliferatum cultures treated with I and II extract fractions after 24 h since the beginning of the treatment .
The average of maximum values measured in tested samples were 15.30, 1.53 and 4.24 ng/μL, whereas the average minimums were 0.04, 0.01 and 0.03 ng/μL for FB1, FB2 and FB3, respectively. Changes in fumonisin B1, B2 and B3 production occurring over the time of the experiment are shown in Figure 1. In almost all experimental variants, FBs showed similar distribution-fumonisin B1 level increased reaching the maximum in the 2nd or 24th hour after the treatment, then slightly decreased until the second day to reach the level just above the limit of detection. The cultures with fraction V or VI applied as a stressor, but in the case of fraction VI, this tendency was less visible. Fraction V maintained FB1 biosynthesis throughout the experiment but the production declined in the third day after the treatment. Generally, other analogues of fumonisins were produced at lower levels or were not detected, which particularly applies to FB3 for which no uniform trend was observed, except for fraction I. The only visible change was slight induction of fumonisin FB2 biosynthesis 24 h after the addition of fractions II and VI. Most of the asparagus extract fractions caused lower induction of fumonisins biosynthesis compared to asparagus extract. The differences in the activity of individual fractions may result from the difference in solvent polarities used, which also play a key role in increasing the solubility of bioactive compounds [32]. ANOVA showed an influence of asparagus extract as insignificant (p > 0.05).
Many bioactive compounds can be found in different plants, including phenolics, carotenoids, anthocyanins, vitamins and tocopherols. Asparagus is a rich source of bioactive compounds, containing phenolic compounds, flavonoids, alkaloids, tannins, sterols, amino acids, vitamins, saponins and fructans [33,34]. Most of the above-described groups of complex compounds were identified in obtained fractions but their intensities depended on polarity of the solvent used (data not shown). Adding a hydrolysis step to the fractionation process resulted in an increased number of free moieties compared to the fractions without a hydrolysis step. Since the obtained fractions were re-suspended in methanol, it was decided to apply two controls—first with the addition of water and second with methanol. The fumonisins level was about three times lower in the control with methanol compared to the water control, and differed significantly (p < 0.05). The distribution of FBs in time was similar, and for this reason, all results were referred to the control with methanol. Two hours after the beginning of the treatment, a higher level of FB1 was observed in the cases of fractions II, IV and VI, but only results for the fractions II and VI were statistically significant (p < 0.05) (Figure 1). Fraction II caused the highest induction of FB1, which reached the mean concentration of 12.20 ng/μL. In turn, after 24 h, higher values were observed only after fraction III application and the difference was also statistically significant (p < 0.05) from the control with methanol.

2.2. Analysis of FUM1 Gene Expression

Despite the low concentrations of fumonisins in the liquid medium at the last day of cultivation, we assumed that the expression of the key enzyme from fumonisin biosynthetic pathway-FUM1, encoding polyketide synthase could be altered during the culture. Knowing that the expression still occurs would improve the understanding of fumonisin accumulation, as well as clarify the influence of the whole extract and extract fractions on fumonisin biosynthesis. Relative normalized gene expression analysis was performed and is shown in Figure 2. The normalized FUM1 gene expression of the KF 3360 F. proliferatum strain at 14th day of cultivation in response to whole water asparagus extract and different extract fractions was measured. The levels of the FUM1 transcript varied relating to extract fractions used. The fraction V induced the highest expression level and the fraction IV was the second most effective inducer compared to the control (with methanol). The results revealed that fraction II inhibited the expression of the FUM1 gene, which suggested that some extract compounds might have a certain effect on secondary metabolism gene expression. Surprisingly, the expression of the FUM1 gene after whole asparagus extract supplementation did not change significantly (p > 0.05). ANOVA showed that fractions II, IV and V had statistically significant effects on the FUM1 gene expression (p < 0.05).

2.3. Effect of Extract Fraction on Fungal Biomass

An asparagus-derived strain yielded between 40 and 520 mg of dry weight of mycelia at the end of cultivation (Figure 3). Fungal biomass amounts showed changes under experimental conditions. In all samples, increase in dry weight of mycelia was observed in comparison to the control. Among all extract fractions, fraction VI had the highest significant effect (p < 0.05) on dry weight of the mycelium after 14 days of cultivation, about 13-fold increase compared to the water control. Supplementation with methanol had a slight effect on biomass amount. Noteworthy, the asparagus extract induced about a 10-fold increase of fungal biomass compared to the control, however, the difference observed was not statistically significant (p > 0.05).

3. Discussion

Changes caused by Fusarium-produced fumonisin B1 in plants are generally well-known, comparing to the limited knowledge about the changes occurring in pathogen during this interaction. It is clear that fumonisin B1 plays a crucial role in activation of plant immunity; therefore, the mycotoxin was selected as an indicator of the intensity of plant-pathogen interaction in the present study. The interaction between a pathogen and a host is a continuous battle in which each action is followed by a reaction. It has been proven that FB1 causes an FB1-induced response in plants. In our studies, the increasing trend in the production of this mycotoxin in the first phase of infection might be a sign of FB1-induced response or HR, which are the early stage responses. However, research conducted by Waśkiewicz et al. [23] in asparagus showed that FB1 causes the increase in salicylic acid concentration, and, thereby, also a systemic acquired resistance (SAR) is induced, which might indicate that FB1 production does not lose its relevance during the course of the infection. Another explanation may be the plant’s secretion of a specific compound (or compounds) against the pathogen at the first contact, which might be equivalent to fungal FB1. Some compounds with antifungal activities were previously reported, including phytoalexins, for instance, pisatin from Pisum sativum L. against Fusarium solani, resveratrol from grapes against yeast or camalexin from Arabidopsis thaliana against Alternaria brassiciola [26,27,28].
Few studies were conducted analyzing the effect of plant extracts against Fusarium species and fumonisin biosynthesis. Research conducted by Suárez-Jiménez et al. [35] showed that methanolic extracts of Larrea tridentata, Baccharis glutinosa and Ambrosia confertiflora induced FB1 biosynthesis in Fusarium verticillioides, which is a close relative of F. proliferatum and also belongs to the Liseola section. Similar research was conducted by Thippeswamy et al. [36]. This research group tested aqueous extracts from 48 medicinal plants against F. proliferatum as well as the inhibition of fumonisin B1 production. Asparagus racemosus was among the plant species examined and it had no inhibitory properties on FB1 biosynthesis [36]. Some studies on the application of plant extracts against other Fusarium species, like F. oxysporum, F. graminearum or F. sporotrichioides, were also performed [37,38,39]. In our previous study, 16 isolates of F. proliferatum obtained from different host-plants have been exposed to the extracts obtained from maize, garlic, pea, pineapple and asparagus [30]. In most cases, application of the extract caused an increase in fumonisin B1 production and the distribution of its biosynthesis was comparable to the trend presented in the present study. The addition of the extract or extract fraction immediately caused a sudden increase in the amount of FB1. In conclusion, the results obtained by various research groups might suggest that the plants’ compound or group of compounds produced against Fusarium are not species-specific.
Fractionation of plant extracts is a complex way to select an antifungal agent. Correctly selected parameters of the extraction process allow to obtain from these extracts the maximum number of compounds with the highest biological activity [40]. One of the most important factors affecting the efficiency of bioactive compounds extraction from the plant samples is the extraction solvent. Due to the variety of bioactive compounds present in plant samples and their solubility depending on the polarity of the solvent, selection of an optimal solvent for a particular plant is quite difficult [41]. Many solvents of different polarities including methanol, ethanol, acetone, diethyl ether, water or their mixtures, should be used for extracting bioactive compounds from plants, applying the rule-a solvent will properly dissolve the solute of similar polarity [42]. Da Cruz-Silva et al. [43] conducted research on Randia nitida extracts and their fractions concerning their influence on Colletotrichum truncatum, Rhizoctonia solani and Sclerotinia sclerotiorum growth. The leaves extract was subjected to fractionation using methanol, n-hexane, dichloromethane and ethyl acetate, proving that each of them differed in terms of content of compound groups as well as their quantities. For example, methanolic fraction contained phenolic compounds, tannins, flavonoids, coumarins, triterpenes, steroids and alkaloids, while n-hexane fraction contained only triterpenes and steroids. Methanolic and ethyl acetate fractions contained the same groups of compounds, but in ethyl acetate fraction, lower amounts of tannins, triterpenes and steroids were detected [43]. Sales et al. [44] applied the extracts, along with acetate, butanol, dichloromethane, n-hexane and ethanolic fractions of extracts of 60 plants against two pineapple pathogens: Fusarium guttiforme and Chalara paradoxa. Extract and/or fractions obtained from 16 species were effectively inhibiting F. guttiforme [44]. In turn, Pizollito et al. [45] conducted the experiment with the use of fractions obtained from peanut skins. In this research, ethanolic extract (70:30, v:v) was fractionated with n-hexane, ethyl acetate and water, which resulted in the formation of three fractions: yellow, purple and brown, respectively. Yellow fraction showed the highest activity against F. verticillioides and fumonisin B1 accumulation [45]. Based on that, we might conclude that the fractions obtained in our experiments represent a wide cross-section of chemical compounds. The highest induction of FB1 biosynthesis was observed during the treatment of F. proliferatum culture with extract fraction I, which is an aqueous fraction, and fraction II-diethyl ether fraction with 2 M NaOH. Interestingly, the distribution of fumonisins in time was different in samples treated with fraction V (ethanolic fraction). On the contrary to other fractions, the content of fumonisins during the whole experiment did not reach the zero level, which suggests that the V fraction might contain compounds that stimulate continuous biosynthesis of this mycotoxin.
To further analyze the relationship between the levels of fumonisins produced and the composition of the extract fractions used, we measured the relative expression of the FUM1 gene. Earlier studies have shown a linear relationship between the FUM1 transcript and fumonisin production in vitro [46,47,48,49,50]. Although, in the present study, it was difficult to find similar correlation between FUM1 transcript and fumonisin level at the 8th day of culture after fraction treatment. Our previous study has shown that the FUM1 transcript levels were highly increased after exposure of the fungus to asparagus extracts, although previous findings suggested that in vitro expression of FUM genes in F. proliferatum is relatively stable and not depending on the culture conditions [30,47].
F. proliferatum supplemented with extract fraction V produced the highest amounts of fumonisins at the 9th day, showing the highest FUM1 expression due to higher concentration of stimulating bioactive compounds. However, in the case of culture enriched with extract fraction IV, fumonisins were not detected at the 9th day, while the FUM1 expression was still present. Medina et al. [51] and Battilanis et al. [52] suggested that the presence of a particular mycotoxin biosynthetic gene is not the only condition that has to be fulfilled by the pathogen to produce fumonisin. Moreover, previous studies described that the analysis of expression of the genes involved in fumonisin biosynthesis does not fully explain the regulation of their biosynthesis, however, it allows to better understand the changes in the pathogen’s physiology [30,46,53,54]. Notably, FUM1 was down-regulated during increased FB1 production in the culture supplemented with extract fraction II. The mechanisms responsible for that might be independent of the activity of the FUM gene cluster. On the other hand, low fumonisin level in the medium supplemented with extract fractions I and III may result from the low activity of other genes from the FB biosynthetic cluster, which are responsible for processing of the pre-fumonisin compound [30,55,56]. It was suggested that the fungus protects the interior and exterior of its organism from harmful influence of mycotoxins by storing them inside the vacuoles and releasing it in the presence of stress factors [30]. Additionally, fumonisins can be transformed into different types, such as FAs, FCs or FPs by still unidentified enzymatic mechanisms [30,57].
Recently, some environmental and abiotic factors were reported to enhance the mycelia growth of F. proliferatum, including light, pH and nutrient level, as well as host plant extracts [29,30,53,54,55,56,57,58]. Our results indicate that extract fractions acted differently and generally increased fungal biomass of F. proliferatum after 14 days of culture, and extract fraction VI induced the highest amounts of FBs compared to the control. These results suggest the role played by the substrate in fungal growth rate-the fraction VI is richer in nutrients than fractions I–V. A possible explanation of why the biomass was more affected by the fraction VI might be due to the sudden delivery of the rich and easily accessible carbon source [29]. On the other hand, the slight decrease in fungal biomass in the case of the extract fraction II may result from the presence of bioactive compounds with antifungal properties such as flavonoids [59]. It is remarkable that the highest total amount of fumonisins in culture supplemented with extract fraction II was observed simultaneously with low dry weight of F. proliferatum. This finding suggests that the stressful environment created by the fraction II, as well as physiological response to overcome these conditions, might induce the fumonisin production.
It is important to emphasize that previous studies on the F. proliferatum pathogen treated with the host plant extract corresponded to this study’s results. It has been demonstrated that asparagus extract induced fungal biomass production (about two-fold increase) [29]. A similar reaction was observed for pineapple or maize extracts [30]. In our study, fungal biomass treated with whole asparagus extract was found to be higher than the control group, still not being statistically significant. Moreover, the differences in fungal biomass amounts between the whole extract and its fractions might have resulted from synergistic action of all bioactive compounds present in the asparagus extract.

4. Conclusions

Asparagus is a valuable crop with many beneficial features. It is often attacked by fungal pathogens and Fusarium proliferatum is one of the most dangerous ones. The species produces fumonisins and it has been found that supplementing the culture with the host plant extract changes the metabolism of the pathogen and its mycotoxigenic potential. Here, we have proven that fractions of the asparagus extract obtained using different solvents differed in the effect observed. Ethanolic and methanolic fractions induced the highest fumonisin biosynthesis. In addition, FUM1 gene expression changed when the extract fractions were applied to the culture. Further research is needed to separate and identify chemical compounds responsible for the changes in fumonisin and biomass production.

5. Materials and Methods

5.1. Fungal Strain and Culture Conditions

An asparagus-derived KF 3360 Fusarium proliferatum strain from the KF pathogenic fungi collection at the Institute of Plant Genetics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Poznań, Poland, was used for this study. Based on the phenotypic variation and genetic divergence, selection of the strains was performed during earlier studies [29,60]. The KF 3360 strain, originally isolated from white asparagus spear (Asparagus officinalis L.) was cultured on potato dextrose agar (PDA, Oxoid) medium at 25 °C for 7 days for inoculum preparation.
The fungus was cultured in vitro in 100 mL flasks containing 40–49 mL of a fumonisin-inducing liquid medium (25 °C without shaking at 12 h photoperiod) [29,46]. The medium contained: malt extract 0.5 g/L, yeast extract 1 g/L mycological peptone 1 g/L, KH2PO4 1 g/L, MgSO4 × 7 H2O 0.3 g/L, KCl 0.3 g/L, ZnSO4 × 7 H2O 0.05 g/L, CuSO4 × 5 H2O 0.01 g/L and D-fructose 20 g/L. About 4 cm2 of mycelium harvested of the 7-day-old PDA plate cultures were used for the inoculation. At the 5th day of cultivation, the culture was supplemented with 10 mL of asparagus extract or 1 mL of I, II, III, IV, V, and VI fraction obtained according to the procedure described in Section 5.3. (Figure 4). A negative control was conducted to exclude the influence of methanol on fumonisins production and FUM1 gene expression. The second negative control was the culture supplemented with water. Media of each culture were collected 2 h after the extract/fractions were added, and on 6th, 8th, 10th, 12th and 14th day of incubation, and subjected to the fumonisins quantification. Mycelia for dry weight measurement and FUM1 gene expression analysis were harvested after 14 days of culturing, and immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen, and then freeze-dried. The concentrations of asparagus extracts, the time of application as well as culture conditions were optimized during earlier studies [30].

5.2. Extract Preparation

Extract of white asparagus spears was obtained according to Stępień et al. 2015 [29]. Fresh white asparagus spears without any symptoms of disease were frozen overnight at −80 °C, after that, completely defrosted asparagus spears were homogenized in a blender. Obtained pulp was centrifuged at 6000× g for 15 minutes. Extract was filtered through 0.20 μm membrane (Chromafil PET20/15 MS, Macherey-Nagel, Germany) and stored at –20 °C.

5.3. Fraction Preparation

Solvents used for the extraction of bioactive compounds from plants were chosen based on the different polarities. We tested six different solvents or solvent mixtures: water (I); methanol: water, 1:1, v:v (IV); ethanol (96%) (V); methanol (VI) in a 1:2 ratio (asparagus homogenate: solvent). Extraction was carried out in a water bath (60 °C, 4 h), shaken (24 h) and centrifuged. Then the supernatants were collected. For variants II and III, hydrolysis was performed in alkaline (2 M NaOH) and acidic (6 M HCl) medium, respectively. After 24 h of shaking, extraction was carried out 3 times with diethyl ether for both variants, and then, after combining the fractions, the solvent was evaporated to dryness. The dry residue was dissolved in a mixture of MeOH:H2O (1:1, v:v). Obtained supernatants were filtered through a 0.20 µm syringe filters (Chromafil PET20/15 MS, Macherey-Nagel, Germany) before use in microbiological tests.

5.4. Fumonisins Quantification

High purity mycotoxin standards (FB1-3, 50 µg/mL in acetonitrile: water, 1:1), LC/MS-grade organic solvents and other reagents were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Steinheim, Germany). The distilled water used for the studies was purified using a Milli-Q system (Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA). The analytical system consisted of the Aquity UPLC chromatograph (Waters, Manchester, MA, USA), coupled with an electrospray ionization triple quadrupole mass spectrometer (TQD) (Waters, Manchester, MA, USA). A Waters ACQUITY UPLC HSS T3 (100 × 2.1 mm/ID, with a particle size of 1.8 µm) (Waters, Manchester, MA, USA) was used for chromatographic separation, with a flow rate of 0.35 mL/min at room temperature. Mobile phase was composed of methanol (A) and water (B). Both phases contained 0.1% formic acid, phase B additionally contained 2 mM ammonium formate. The following gradient was used: from 1% to 95% A in 10 min, then 95% A for 2 min, and return to initial conditions in 2 min. The injection volume was 3 µL. Mass spectrometer was operated in the positive electrospray ionization mode (ESI). Ion source/desolvation temperature was 150/350 °C, respectively. Nebulizing gas (nitrogen) flow rate was 750 L/min, cone flow rate was 20 L/min. The collision-induced decomposition was performed using argon as the collision gas, with a collision energy of 14–22 eV. The compounds were quantitatively analyzed using multiple reaction monitoring. The analytes were identified by comparing the retention times and m/z values obtained by MS and MS2 with the mass spectra (722.4/352.4, 706.4/336.4 and 706.4/170.4 for FB1, FB2 and FB3, respectively) of the corresponding standards tested under the same conditions. Limit of detection for fumonisins was 0.1 ng/µL. All samples were analyzed in triplicate. For data processing, EmpowerTM 1 software was used (Waters, Manchester, UK).

5.5. Expression Analysis of FUM1 by RT-qPCR

To analyze the expression of FUM1 in F. proliferatum after extract fraction treatment, total RNA was extracted and purified from 30 mg of lyophilized mycelium sampled at the 14th day of culturing using the Universal RNA Purification Kit (EURx, Gdansk, Poland), followed by treatment with RNase-free DNase set (Qiagene, Hilden, USA). The total RNA concentration was quantified using a NanoDrop ND-1000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and the integrity of RNA was evaluated on a 1% agarose gel (100 V/20 min). Then, 1 µg of total RNA was reverse-transcribed using a High Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). Reactions were incubated at 25 °C for 10 min, followed by 37 °C for 120 min and 85 °C for 5 min using BioRad C1000 thermal cyclers. The resulting cDNA was used as template for RT-qPCR (SsoAdvanced Universal SYBR Green Supermix, Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA), with β-tubulin as endogenous control to normalize differences in mRNA quantity due to differing amounts of total RNA. Three biological and two technical replicates of each sample, along with a negative control, were included in each assay. Primers used for β-tubulin and FUM1 gene expression analysis were as follows: PQTUB-F2 ACATCCAGACAGCCCTTTGTG; PQTUB-R2 AGTTTCCGATGAAGGTCGAAGA [47] and F1_PRO_F CAACCGGAGAGAGCATTTGT; F1_PRO_R TCTTGGACAGAGGGGAGAAA [30]. Target sequences were amplified in a 5-μL reaction containing 2.5 µL of SsoAdvanced universal SYBR Green supermix, 500 nM of each primer for FUM1 and 250 nM of each primer for β-tubulin and 2 µL of cDNA template (dilution 1:10). The PCR cycling conditions were: initial denaturation at 95 °C for 30 s, followed by 40 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 10 s and annealing at 60 °C for 30 s. The melting curve analysis from 65–95 °C with 0.5 °C increment (5 s per step), confirmed primer pairs specificity.

5.6. Statistical Analysis

One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by the Tukey test (HSD) (5% level of significance) was used to evaluate differences of FB1, FB2 and FB3 production between asparagus extract fractions during the period of incubation. The results were analyzed using the STATISTICA 13.1. Mean values (n = 3) and error standard of individual characteristics were calculated.
Target gene expression (FUM1) was determined using the 2−ΔΔCt method [61]. All data were analyzed using CFX Maestro 1.1 software (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). The differences of FUM1 gene expression between samples treated with fractions were evaluated using the one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) (5% level of significance). The expression was transformed to ln(x) to reduce the variability among the data. Baseline correction and threshold setting were performed using the automatic calculation in the CFX Maestro 1.1 software (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA).

Author Contributions

N.W., J.L-K. and Ł.S. conceived and designed the experiments; A.W. performed fumonisins quantification, N.W. and J.L-K. performed the fungal experiments and expression analysis; N.W and J.L-K. analyzed the data and performed statistical analyses, N.W., J.L-K., A.W. and Ł.S. wrote the paper; N.W, J.L-K. and Ł.S. reviewed and edited the paper All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The research was supported by the National Science Centre project NCN 2015/17/B/NZ9/03577.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Fuentes Alventosa, J.M.; Moreno Rojas, J.M. Bioactive compounds in Asparagus and impact on storage and processing. In Processing and impact on active components in food; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2015; pp. 103–110. [Google Scholar]
  2. Negi, J.S.; Singh, P.; Joshi, G.P.; Rawat, M.S.; Bisht, V.K. Chemical consituents of Asparagus. Pharmacogn. Rev. 2010, 4, 215–220. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Hafizur, R.M.; Kabir, N.; Chishti, S. Asparagus officinalis extract controls blood glucose by improving insulin secretion and β-cell function in streptozotocin-induced type 2 diabetic rats. Br. J. Nutr. 2012, 108, 1586–1595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Shao, Y.; Chin, C.-K.; Ho, C.-T.; Ma, W.; Garrison, S.A.; Huang, M.-T. Anti-tumor activity of the crude saponins obtained from Asparagus. Cancer Lett. 1996, 104, 31–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Wang, J.; Liu, Y.; Zhao, J.; Zhang, W.; Pang, X. Saponins extracted from by-product of Asparagus officinalis L. suppress tumour cell migration and invasion through targeting Rho GTPase signalling pathway. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2013, 93, 1492–1498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Shimoyamada, M.; Suzuki, M.; Maruyama, M.; Watanabe, K. An Antifungal Saponin from White Asparagus (Asparagus officinalis L) Bottoms. J. Sci. Food Agric. 1996, 72, 430–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Shimoyamada, M.; Suzuki, M.; Sonta, H.; Maruyama, M.; Okubo, K. Antifungal Activity of the Saponin Fraction Obtained from Asparagus officinalis L. and Its Active Principle. Agric. Boil. Chem. 1990, 54, 2553–2557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Zhu, X.; Zhang, W.; Zhao, J.; Wang, J.; Qu, W. Hypolipidaemic and hepatoprotective effects of ethanolic and aqueous extracts from Asparagus officinalis L. by-products in mice fed a high-fat diet. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2010, 90, 1129–1135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zhu, X.; Zhang, W.; Pang, X.; Wang, J.; Zhao, J.; Qu, W. Hypolipidemic Effect of n-Butanol Extract from Asparagus officinalis L. in Mice fed a High-fat Diet. Phytotherapy Res. 2011, 25, 1119–1124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Elmer, W.H. The Economically Important Diseases of Asparagus in the United States. Plant Heal. Prog. 2001, 2, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Pontaroli, A.C.; Camadro, E.L. Increasing resistance to Fusarium crown and root rot in asparagus by gametophyte selection. Euphytica 2001, 122, 343–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Stępień, Ł.; Waśkiewicz, A.; Urbaniak, M. Wildly growing asparagus (Asparagus officinalis L.) hosts pathogenic Fusarium species and accumulates their mycotoxins. Microb. Ecol. 2016, 71, 927–937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Vujanovic, V.; Hamel, C.; Yergeau, E.; St-Arnaud, M. Biodiversity and Biogeography of Fusarium Species from Northeastern North American Asparagus Fields Based on Microbiological and Molecular Approaches. Microb. Ecol. 2006, 51, 242–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Elmer, W.H. Management of Fusarium crown and root rot of asparagus. Crop. Prot. 2015, 73, 2–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Lumsangkul, C.; Chiang, H.-I.; Lo, N.-W.; Fan, Y.-K.; Ju, J.-C. Developmental Toxicity of Mycotoxin Fumonisin B1 in Animal Embryogenesis: An Overview. Toxins 2019, 11, 114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Berkey, R.; Bendigeri, D.; Xiao, S. Sphingolipids and Plant Defense/Disease: The “Death” Connection and Beyond. Front. Plant Sci. 2012, 3, 68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Merrill Jr., A. H. Sphingolipid and glycosphingolipid metabolic pathways in the era of sphingolipidomics. Chem. Rev. 2011, 111, 6387–6422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Merrill, A.H.; Sullards, M.C.; Wang, E.; Voss, K.A.; Riley, R.T. Sphingolipid metabolism: Roles in signal transduction and disruption by fumonisins. Environ. Heal. Perspect. 2001, 109, 283–289. [Google Scholar]
  19. Zoeller, M.; Stingl, N.; Krischke, M.; Fekete, A.; Waller, F.; Berger, S.; Mueller, M.J. Lipid Profiling of the Arabidopsis Hypersensitive Response Reveals Specific Lipid Peroxidation and Fragmentation Processes: Biogenesis of Pimelic and Azelaic Acid1[C][W]. Plant Physiol. 2012, 160, 365–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Salehi, F.; Behboudi, H.; Kavoosi, G.; Ardestani, S.K. Oxidative DNA damage induced by ROS-modulating agents with the ability to target DNA: A comparison of the biological characteristics of citrus pectin and apple pectin. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 13902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Xing, F.; Li, Z.; Sun, A.; Xing, D. Reactive oxygen species promote chloroplast dysfunction and salicylic acid accumulation in fumonisin B1-induced cell death. FEBS Lett. 2013, 587, 2164–2172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Stone, J.M.; Heard, J.E.; Asai, T.; Ausubel, F.M. Simulation of Fungal-Mediated Cell Death by Fumonisin B1 and Selection of Fumonisin B1–Resistant (fbr) Arabidopsis Mutants. Plant Cell 2000, 12, 1811–1822. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Waśkiewicz, A.; Irzykowska, L.; Drzewiecka, K.; Bocianowski, J.; Dobosz, B.; Weber, Z.; Karolewski, Z.; Krzyminiewski, R.; Goliński, P. Plant-pathogen interactions during infection process of asparagus with Fusarium spp. Open Life Sci. 2013, 8, 1065–1076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Rocheleau, H.; Al-Harthi, R.; Ouellet, T. Degradation of salicylic acid by Fusarium graminearum. Fungal Boil. 2019, 123, 77–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Hao, G.; Naumann, T.A.; Vaughan, M.M.; McCormick, S.; Usgaard, T.; Kelly, A.; Ward, T.J. Characterization of a Fusarium graminearum Salicylate Hydroxylase. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 9, 3129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Pueppke, S.G.; VanEtten, H.D. Accumulation of pisatin and three additional antifungal pterocarpans in Fusarium solani-infected tissues of Pisum sativum. Physiol. Plant Pathol. 1976, 8, 51–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Pedras, M.S.C.; Minic, Z.; Abdoli, A. The phytoalexin camalexin induces fundamental changes in the proteome of Alternaria brassicicola different from those caused by brassinin. Fungal Boil. 2014, 118, 83–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Houillé, B.; Papon, N.; Boudesocque, L.; Bourdeaud, E.; Besseau, S.; Courdavault, V.; Enguehard-Gueiffier, C.; Delanoue, G.; Guérin, L.; Bouchara, J.-P.; et al. Antifungal Activity of Resveratrol Derivatives against Candida Species. J. Nat. Prod. 2014, 77, 1658–1662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Stępień, Ł.; Waśkiewicz, A.; Wilman, K. Host extract modulates metabolism and fumonisin biosynthesis by the plant-pathogenic fungus Fusarium proliferatum. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2015, 193, 74–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Górna, K.; Pawłowicz, I.; Waśkiewicz, A.; Stepien, L. Fusarium proliferatum strains change fumonisin biosynthesis and accumulation when exposed to host plant extracts. Fungal Boil. 2016, 120, 884–893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Górna, K.; Perlikowski, D.; Kosmala, A.; Stępień, Ł. Host extracts induce changes in the proteome of plant pathogen Fusarium proliferatum. Fungal Boil. 2017, 121, 676–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Naima, R.; Oumam, M.; Hannache, H.; Sesbou, A.; Charrier, B.; Pizzi, A.; El Bouhtoury, F.C. Comparison of the impact of different extraction methods on polyphenols yields and tannins extracted from Moroccan Acacia mollissima barks. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2015, 70, 245–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Fuentes-Alventosa, J.; Jaramillo-Carmona, S.; Rodríguez-Gutiérrez, G.; Guillén-Bejarano, R.; Jiménez-Araujo, A.; Fernández-Bolaños, J.; Rodríguez-Arcos, R. Preparation of bioactive extracts from asparagus by-product. Food Bioprod. Process. 2013, 91, 74–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Lee, J.W.; Lee, J.H.; Yu, I.H.; Gorinstein, S.; Bae, J.H.; Ku, Y.G. Bioactive Compounds, Antioxidant and Binding Activities and Spear Yield of Asparagus officinalis L. Plant Foods Hum. Nutr. 2014, 69, 175–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Suárez-Jiménez, G.M.; Cortez-Rocha, M.O.; Rosas-Burgos, E.C.; Burgos-Hernández, A.; Plascencia-Jatomea, M.; Cinco-Moroyoqui, F.J. Antifungal activity of plant methanolic extracts against Fusarium verticillioides (Sacc.) Nirenb. and Fumonisin B1 Production. Rev Mex Fitopatol 2007, 25, 134–142. [Google Scholar]
  36. Thippeswamy, S.; Umesh, A.R. Effect of plant extracts on inhibition of Fusarium verticillioides growth and its toxin fumonisin B1 production. J Agri Sci Tech 2013, 9, 889–900. [Google Scholar]
  37. Salhi, N.; Saghir, S.A.M.; Terzi, V.; Brahmi, I.; Ghedairi, N.; Bissati, S. Antifungal Activity of Aqueous Extracts of Some Dominant Algerian Medicinal Plants. BioMed. Res. Int. 2017, 2017, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Riaz, T.; Khan, S.; Javaid, A. Antifungal activity of plant extracts against Fusarium oxysporum- the cause of corn-rot disease of Gladiolus. Mycopath 2008, 6, 13–15. [Google Scholar]
  39. Rongai, D.; Pulcini, P.; Pesce, B.; Milano, F. Antifungal activity of some botanical extracts on Fusarium oxysporum. Open Life Sci. 2015, 10, 409–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Truong, D.-H.; Nguyen, D.H.; Ta, N.T.A.; Bui, A.V.; Do, T.H.; Nguyen, H.C. Evaluation of the Use of Different Solvents for Phytochemical Constituents, Antioxidants, and In Vitro Anti-Inflammatory Activities of Severinia buxifolia. J. Food Qual. 2019, 2019, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Mahdi-Pour, B.; Jothy, S.L.; Latha, L.Y.; Chen, Y.; Sasidharan, S. Antioxidant activity of methanol extracts of different parts of Lantana camara. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Biomed. 2012, 12, 960–965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Wong, P.; Kitts, D. Studies on the dual antioxidant and antibacterial properties of parsley (Petroselinum crispum) and cilantro (Coriandrum sativum) extracts. Food Chem. 2006, 97, 505–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Da Cruz-Silva, S.C.B.; Santos, K.S.; Matias, R.; Bono, J.A.M.; Ludwig, J. ANTIFUNGAL POTENTIAL OF EXTRACTS AND FRACTIONS OF Randia nitida LEAVES ON SOYBEAN PATHOGENS AND THEIR PHYTOCHEMISTRY. Rev. Caatinga 2016, 29, 594–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Sales, M.D.C.; Costa, H.B.; Fernandes, P.M.B.; Ventura, J.A.; Meira, D.D. Antifungal activity of plant extracts with potential to control plant pathogens in pineapple. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Biomed. 2016, 6, 26–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Pizzolitto, R.P.; Dambolena, J.S.; Zunino, M.P.; Larrauri, M.; Grosso, N.R.; Nepote, V.; Dalcero, A.M.; Zygadlo, J.A. Activity of natural compounds from peanut skins on Fusarium verticillioides growth and fumonisin B1 production. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2013, 47, 286–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. López-Errasquín, E.; Vázquez, C.; Jiménez, M.; González-Jaén, M.T.; Escamilla, M.J. Real-Time RT-PCR assay to quantify the expression of fum1 and fum19 genes from the Fumonisin-producing Fusarium verticillioides. J. Microbiol. Methods 2007, 68, 312–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Jurado, M.; Marín, P.; Callejas, C.; Moretti, A.; Vázquez, C.; González-Jaén, M.T. Genetic variability and Fumonisin production by Fusarium proliferatum. Food Microbiol. 2010, 27, 50–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Jurado, M.; Marín, P.; Magan, N.; González-Jaén, M.T. Relationship between Solute and Matric Potential Stress, Temperature, Growth, and FUM1 Gene Expression in Two Fusarium verticillioides Strains from Spain. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2008, 74, 2032–2036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Rocha, L.D.O.; Reis, G.M.; Da Silva, V.N.; Braghini, R.; Teixeira, M.M.G.; Corrêa, B. Molecular characterization and fumonisin production by Fusarium verticillioides isolated from corn grains of different geographic origins in Brazil. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2011, 145, 9–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Rocha, L.O.; Barroso, V.M.; Andrade, L.J.; Pereira, G.H.A.; Ferreira-Castro, F.L.; Duarte, A.P.; Michelotto, M.D.; Corrêa, B. FUM Gene Expression Profile and Fumonisin Production by Fusarium verticillioides Inoculated in Bt and Non-Bt Maize. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 6, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Medina, A.; Schmidt-Heydt, M.; Cárdenas-Chávez, D.L.; Parra, R.; Geisen, R.; Magan, N. Integrating toxin gene expression, growth and fumonisin B1 and B2 production by a strain of Fusarium verticillioides under different environmental factors. J. R. Soc. Interface 2013, 10, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Battilani, P.; Formenti, S.; Ramponi, C.; Rossi, V. Dynamic of water activity in maize hybrids is crucial for fumonisin contamination in kernels. J. Cereal Sci. 2011, 54, 467–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Fanelli, F.; Schmidt-Heydt, M.; Haidukowski, M.; Geisen, R.; Logrieco, A.F.; Mulè, G.; Haidukowski, E.M. Influence of light on growth, fumonisin biosynthesis and FUM1 gene expression by Fusarium proliferatum. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2012, 153, 148–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Lazzaro, I.; Susca, A.; Mulè, G.; Ritieni, A.; Ferracane, R.; Marocco, A.; Battilani, P. Effects of temperature and water activity on FUM2 and FUM21 gene expression and fumonisin B production in Fusarium verticillioides. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2012, 134, 685–695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Proctor, R.H.; Brown, D.W.; Plattner, R.D.; Desjardins, A.E. Co-expression of 15 contiguous genes delineates a fumonisin biosynthetic gene cluster in Gibberella moniliformis. Fungal Genet. Boil. 2003, 38, 237–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Brown, D.W.; Cheung, F.; Proctor, R.H.; Butchko, R.A.; Zheng, L.; Lee, Y.; Utterback, T.; Smith, S.; Feldblyum, T.; Glenn, A.E.; et al. Comparative analysis of 87,000 expressed sequence tags from the fumonisin-producing fungus Fusarium verticillioides. Fungal Genet. Boil. 2005, 42, 848–861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Tamura, M.; Mochizuki, N.; Nagatomi, Y.; Toriba, A.; Hayakawa, K. Characterization of Fumonisin A-Series by High-Resolution Liquid Chromatography-Orbitrap Mass Spectrometry. Toxins 2014, 6, 2580–2593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  58. Kohut, G.; Ádám, A.L.; Fazekas, B.; Hornok, L. N-starvation stress induced FUM gene expression and fumonisin production is mediated via the HOG-type MAPK pathway in Fusarium proliferatum. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2009, 130, 65–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Rosado-Álvarez, C.; Molinero-Ruiz, L.; Arcos, R.R.; Basallote-Ureba, M. Antifungal activity of asparagus extracts against phytopathogenic Fusarium oxysporum. Sci. Hortic. 2014, 171, 51–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Stępień, Ł.; Koczyk, G.; Waśkiewicz, A. Genetic and phenotypic variation of Fusarium proliferatum isolates from different host species. J Appl Genet 2011, 52, 487–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Livak, K.J.; Schmittgen, T.D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods 2001, 25, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Toxins 12 00095 g001 550
Figure 1. Changes of fumonisin B1, B2 and B3 concentrations in liquid medium during F. proliferatum cultures (* p < 0.05). (A)- H2O control, (B)- MeOH control, (C)- asparagus extract, (D–I)- asparagus extract fractions.
Figure 1. Changes of fumonisin B1, B2 and B3 concentrations in liquid medium during F. proliferatum cultures (* p < 0.05). (A)- H2O control, (B)- MeOH control, (C)- asparagus extract, (D–I)- asparagus extract fractions.
Toxins 12 00095 g001
Toxins 12 00095 g002 550
Figure 2. Normalized expression of the FUM1 in F. proliferatum strain culture supplemented with asparagus extract fractions after 9th day of treatment (*p < 0.05).
Figure 2. Normalized expression of the FUM1 in F. proliferatum strain culture supplemented with asparagus extract fractions after 9th day of treatment (*p < 0.05).
Toxins 12 00095 g002
Toxins 12 00095 g003 550
Figure 3. Changes of F. proliferatum dry biomass after treatment with crude extract (A), six asparagus extract fractions (I–IV), water and methanol controls (Ctr and Ctr MeOH) (*p < 0.05).
Figure 3. Changes of F. proliferatum dry biomass after treatment with crude extract (A), six asparagus extract fractions (I–IV), water and methanol controls (Ctr and Ctr MeOH) (*p < 0.05).
Toxins 12 00095 g003
Toxins 12 00095 g004 550
Figure 4. Scheme of the experimental design.
Figure 4. Scheme of the experimental design.
Toxins 12 00095 g004
Table
Table 1. Average values (ng/μL) and standard error of total fumonisins content in F. proliferatum cultures treated with asparagus extract fractions (*p < 0.05).
Table 1. Average values (ng/μL) and standard error of total fumonisins content in F. proliferatum cultures treated with asparagus extract fractions (*p < 0.05).
02h24h3d5d7d9d
Ctrl + H2O1.97 ± 0.5213.88 ± 4.384.88 ± 0.070.34 ± 0.070.33 ± 0.060.19 ± 0.040.13 ± 0.04
Ctrl + MeOH0.29 ± 0.074.26 ± 1.196.48 ± 1.940.71 ± 0.180.37 ± 0.080.12 ± 0.020.08 ± 0.01
Extract15.30 ± 6.296.67 ± 1.257.86 ± 2.091.08 ± 0.271.31 ± 0.24 0.85 ± 0.171.35 ± 0.26
Fraction I3.54 ± 1.086.23 ± 1.3311.56 ± 1.712.88 ± 0.721.48 ± 0.220.85 ± 0.160.26 ± 0.02
Fraction II4.18 ± 1.3214.34 ± 3.718.70 ± 1.551.67 ± 0.461.02 ± 0.050.31 ± 0.220.23 ± 0.04
Fraction III0.88 ± 0.213.07 ± 0.446.07 ± 1.571.03 ± 0.300.72 ± 0.120.81 ± 0.220.49 ± 0.11
Fraction IV1.98 ± 0.604.24 ± 1.023.37 ± 0.89n.d.n.d.0.06 ± 0.02n.d.
Fraction V1.01 ± 0.285.16 ± 1.334.91 ± 1.426.38 ± 1.882.58 ± 0.001.69 ± 0.352.30 ± 0.61
Fraction VI0.20 ± 0.035.26 ± 2.322.64 ± 0.680.82 ± 0.121.01 ± 0.241.19 ± 0.380.09 ± 0.02
n.d.—not detected.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Witaszak, N.; Lalak-Kańczugowska, J.; Waśkiewicz, A.; Stępień, Ł. The Impacts of Asparagus Extract Fractions on Growth and Fumonisins Biosynthesis in Fusarium Proliferatum. Toxins 2020, 12, 95. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/toxins12020095

AMA Style

Witaszak N, Lalak-Kańczugowska J, Waśkiewicz A, Stępień Ł. The Impacts of Asparagus Extract Fractions on Growth and Fumonisins Biosynthesis in Fusarium Proliferatum. Toxins. 2020; 12(2):95. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/toxins12020095

Chicago/Turabian Style

Witaszak, Natalia, Justyna Lalak-Kańczugowska, Agnieszka Waśkiewicz, and Łukasz Stępień. 2020. "The Impacts of Asparagus Extract Fractions on Growth and Fumonisins Biosynthesis in Fusarium Proliferatum" Toxins 12, no. 2: 95. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/toxins12020095

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop