Next Article in Journal
Contribution of Anoctamins to Cell Survival and Cell Death
Next Article in Special Issue
Comparative Effectiveness of Gemcitabine plus Nab-Paclitaxel and FOLFIRINOX in the First-Line Setting of Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
Phenotypic Characterization of Circulating Lung Cancer Cells for Clinically Actionable Targets
Previous Article in Special Issue
CAFs and TGF-β Signaling Activation by Mast Cells Contribute to Resistance to Gemcitabine/Nabpaclitaxel in Pancreatic Cancer
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Cancers
Volume 11
Issue 3
10.3390/cancers11030381
cancers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Angiogenesis in Pancreatic Cancer: Pre-Clinical and Clinical Studies

by
Tiziana Annese
,
Roberto Tamma
,
Simona Ruggieri
and
Domenico Ribatti
*
Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Neurosciences and Sensory Organs, Section of Human Anatomy and Histology, University of Bari Medical School Bari, 70124 Bari, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cancers 2019, 11(3), 381; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/cancers11030381
Submission received: 11 February 2019 / Revised: 11 March 2019 / Accepted: 14 March 2019 / Published: 18 March 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Pancreatic Cancer Research)
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Angiogenesis is a crucial event in tumor development and progression, occurring by different mechanisms and it is driven by pro- and anti-angiogenic molecules. Pancreatic cancer vascularization is characterized by a high microvascular density, impaired microvessel integrity and poor perfused vessels with heterogeneous distribution. In this review article, after a brief introduction on pancreatic cancer classification and on angiogenesis mechanisms involved in its progression, the pre-clinical and clinical trials conducted in pancreatic cancer treatment using anti-angiogenic inhibitors will be described. Finally, we will discuss the anti-angiogenic therapy paradox between the advantage to abolish vessel supply to block tumor growth and the disadvantage due to reduction of drug delivery at the same time. The purpose is to identify new anti-angiogenic molecules that may enhance treatment regimen.

1. Introduction

Pancreatic cancer is the seventh leading cause of cancer death in the world in 2018, with an incidence of 2.5% and a mortality of 4.5% [1]. It has a higher incidence in high/very high developed countries compare to low/medium developed countries [1]. Pancreatic cancer is asymptomatic until the disease reaches an advanced stage and this is one of the causes of the low survival rate. Indeed, there is no a screening program to improve prognosis through early diagnosis. Individuals with a family history of pancreatic cancer, as well as cigarette smokers, and suffering from chronic pancreatitis and diabetes mellitus have an increased risk of developing pancreatic cancer (see Table 1 for an overview of risk factors) [2,3,4,5].
World Human Organization classified pancreatic cancer in epithelial tumors, exocrine and neuroendocrine ones, mature teratoma, mesenchymal tumors, lymphomas and secondary tumors based on histologic features [6]. Usually, two big types are identified, such as cancers of exocrine gland and the cancers of endocrine one.
The major part (>95%) are cancers of exocrine gland and these are mostly (>85%) pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas, that via lymph vascular system metastasize to organs, such as liver [7,8]. Curative treatment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas is surgery, but only 10–15% of the patients present a resectable cancer mass and are candidate to subsequent adjuvant therapy to avoid local and systemic recurrence [9]. Indeed, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is resistant to chemotherapy. Gemcitabine- or 5-Fluorouracil-based chemo-radiation were employed in either early stage or advanced pancreatic cancer with moderate survival benefits [10,11]. The most recent therapeutic protocols provide for the use of combined chemotherapeutic agents in association with agents targeting specific molecular pathways (i.e., fibroblast growth factor (FGF), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), farnesyl-transferase inhibition) or the cellular or acellular components of fibrotic tumor stroma [12].
Cancers of the endocrine gland, also called pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors are less common (1–2% of all pancreatic cancer in Europe) and are most often benign [13]. Based on secretion of endocrine hormones, including gastrin, insulin, glucagon, or vasoactive-intestinal peptide, some types of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors are functional and other are non-functional showing a wide heterogeneity with highly variable prognosis. For pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors the first line of attack is the surgical resection if the tumor is identified early and in a localized stage [14]. Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors metastasize, especially in the liver [15,16,17]. In addition to surgery, control hormone-dependent symptom is mandatory [18]. Therefore, given the high heterogeneity of pancreatic cancer, an accurate characterization of different types by origin, degree and metastasis presence/absence and their localization, are crucial in order to adopt the most appropriate therapy.

2. Angiogenesis in Pancreatic Cancer

Angiogenesis is involved in tumor development and progression and plays a key role in development of metastasis [19]. It occurs by different mechanisms and it is driven by many pro- and anti-angiogenic molecules [20].
Li et al. exhaustively explained the different pathways of angiogenic and non-angiogenic types of vascularization in pancreatic cancer pointing out the possible mechanisms for the poor efficacy of anti-angiogenic therapies [21]. Among these, vessel co-option, vasculogenic mimicry and vasculogenesis are noteworthy, because they seem to play a key role in the ineffectiveness of classical anti-angiogenic therapies in pancreatic tumors, as they represent alternative and compensatory mechanisms of tumor growth and progression. Franco et al., by the use of a genetically engineered mouse model of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, demonstrated the utility of α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA), expressed by pericytes surrounding tumor co-opted vessels, as surrogate marker for response or evasive resistance to anti-angiogenic therapy [22]. Yang et al., by hypoxia inducible factor 2 alpha (HIF-2α) immunohistochemistry on pancreatic cancer patients and by HIF-2α-induced vasculogenic mimicry in vitro and in vivo experiments, demonstrated that HIF-2α overexpression and vasculogenic mimicry are correlated with poor tumor differentiation, late clinical stage, lymph node metastasis, and poor prognosis [23]. Others authors demonstrated that endothelial progenitor cells contribute to pancreatic cancer vasculogenesis homing to tumor area under the stimulation of different pro-angiogenic factors released by pancreatic cancer cells [24,25,26,27,28].
Furthermore, pancreatic cancer is characterized by a high microvascular density, impaired microvessel integrity and poor perfused vessels with heterogeneous distribution in different subtypes of pancreatic cancer, even within a specific type [29,30]. High microvascular density together with low microvessel integrity are associated with early recurrence, metastasis and short survival after tumor resection [31]. These altered characteristics of the pancreatic cancer vasculature may be targets of therapies with the purpose to induce normalization of tumor blood vessels, resulting in improved tumor perfusion, reduced hypoxia, and improved drug delivery and therapeutic outcomes [32,33,34]. Yapp et al., comparing the efficacy of metronomic chemotherapy versus conventional chemotherapy regimen, showed that metronomic treatment affects both tumor vasculature and tumor pancreatic cells [35]. Indeed, vessel density increased, tumor perfusion was transiently improved, and hypoxia decreased [35].
Pancreatic cancer angiogenesis is activated by genetic and epigenetic alterations and by cells and stromal components of tumor microenvironment. Those diverse tumor inducers determine a limited sets of nuclear transcription factors, including Sp1, Stat3 and NF-κB [36], conferring a high survival and growth advantage to cancer cells through alteration of the expression and functions of downstream effector factors, such as VEGF and interleukin 8 (IL-8). Therefore, transcription factors should be considered for the development of new antitumor and anti-angiogenic therapeutic approaches.
Among the cells of the tumor microenvironment, pancreatic stellate cells, the major tumor stroma pro-fibrogenetic cells, together with pancreatic cancer cells, support the pro-angiogenic hypoxia microenvironment increasing the expression of endostatin, that in turn induce the expression of several pro-angiogenic molecules [37,38,39].
Moreover, mast cells, tumor associated macrophages and neutrophils were found to play a critical role in the regulation of pancreatic cancer microenvironment. In pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma infiltrated mast cell counts and serum mast cells tryptase levels are positively correlated with tumor microvascular density indicating a worse prognosis [40,41]. Tumor associated macrophages, prevalent M2 likes, facilitate pancreatic cancer cells progression and migration in a VEGF-dependent manner [42]. M2 also have a central role in stimulating angiogenesis mediated by the expression on their membrane of folate receptor β-expressing, by their recruitment via HIF-1α–CCL2 pathway and by the pancreatic stellate cells activation [43,44].
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is a hypovascular tumor in a hypoxic microenvironment, and the major pathological feature is the high levels of fibrosis, termed desmoplasia, that generate an excessive interstitial fluid pressures at primary tumor sites and at metastatic ones [45]. Desmoplasia results in vasculature collapse that promotes cancer development and inhibits drug penetration and uptake inducing cancer resistance to targeting-therapy [46,47]. However, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma cells have high glucose uptake due to the presence of basal microvilli on the microvessels that represent a novel and unique pathological feature [48]. Despite the hypovascularization, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas are characterized by their strong capacity to proliferate and ability to metastasize.
By contrast, pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors are hypervascular tumors due to overexpression of angiogenic molecules such as VEGF and its related receptor (VEGFR), especially in liver metastasis [49,50,51]. In addition, it has been demonstrated that the serum levels of angiogenic cytokines, such as VEGF and IL-8, are associated with tumor progression in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor patients, and they might use as biomarkers for prognosis and therapy [52].
For these reasons it is expected that anti-angiogenic therapy will be effective in both pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors with the aim to block blood vessels growth to stop cancer cells growth (see Table 2 for an overview of anti-angiogenic drugs in pancreatic cancer) [19].

3. Anti-Angiogenic Inhibitors in Pre-Clinical Studies

At present, surgery is the gold standard treatment in localized pancreatic cancer, but when is not enough different drugs are used to decrease tumor proliferation and progression, and to treat tumor symptoms. In this section we discuss the pre-clinical studies of last 5 years concerning the most innovative anti-angiogenic approaches to pancreatic cancer (for the state of the art of previous years see [81,82]) focused on targeting therapy against specific angiogenic pathways, cellular and acellular components of tumor microenvironment, and specific cell surface markers.
Several Authors examined the effects of anti-angiogenic molecules on many model of human pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors such as cells cultures, orthotopic or subcutaneous nude mouse and the newest genetically engineered mouse models for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma [83,84,85,86,87,88,89] and RIP-Tag2 mouse model for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors [90,91].
Sunitinib is multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor that targets both angiogenic pathways (VEGFR1-3, PDGFR) and pro-oncogenic pathways (c-kit, RET, stem-cell factor receptor and FMS-like tyrosine kinase-3) [92]. Sunitinib was explored in several pre-clinical and clinical studies for both pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Wegner et al., in two pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma xenograft models treated and untreated with sunitinib following changes by dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging, provides sevidence that anti-angiogenic treatment with sunitinib induce changes in the tumor microenvironment, and furthermore, demonstrated that Ktrans (vasculature functional parameter that combined effects of plasma blood flow, permeability and capillary surface area per unit mass) may be an adequate measure of tumor vascular density and hypoxia in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma [60,61]. For patients no-responding to gemcitabine-based treatments, sunitinib has been highlighted as a promising drug [62].
Other studies have been focused on molecules that explicate their anti-angiogenic activities against HIF-1α pathway, the major transcription factor expressed under hypoxia. Xu et al. hunting among 32 benzofuran derivatives that suppressed p53-independent tumor cells through inhibition of HIF-1 pathway, in an in vivo study on pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma cell lines, showed that compound 90 suppressed tumor growth and exerted an anti-angiogenic activity [74].
As previously mentioned, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma growth, chemoresistance and metastasis are sustained by vasculogenic mimicry, an alternative type of blood supply independent of endothelial vessels and formed by highly invasive and genetically dysregulated cancer cells. Wei et al. demonstrated that verteporfin, a photosensitizer clinically used for photodynamic therapy to treat neovascularization, targeting the Hippo pathway, suppress the proliferation of human tumor cells, and tumor growth on the pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma xenograft model [79]. Verteporfin arrests cells at the G1 phase, and induces apoptosis by activating the intrinsic apoptotic signalling pathway in dose- and time-dependent manner via reducing the expression of cyclin D1 and cyclinE1 [79]. Moreover, verteporfin inhibits tumor angiogenesis downregulating angiopoietin-2 (Ang-2) through inhibition of YAP activity, and suppress vasculogenic mimicry downregulating MMP2, VE-cadherin and α-SMA expression [79]. Tangutoori et al. enhanced the use of photosensitizing compounds combining them with biological therapeutic ones in the treatment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma to induce tumor reduction [80]. In in vitro and in an in vivo subcutaneous mouse model of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, they carried out a nanoscale intracellular drug delivery systems capable of multidrug delivery (verteporfin plus anti-VEGF monoclonal antibody bevacizumab) in a nano-photoactivatable liposome to enhance the efficacy photodynamic therapy combined with suppression of VEGF-mediated signalling pathways [80].
The transcription factor NF-κB is constitutively activated in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and further activated by gemcitabine [93]. In athymic mice tumor growth model injected subcutaneously with IκBα-super-repressor or vector-expressing human pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma cells, Waters et al. demonstrated that stable IκBα-super-repressor expression in vivo potentiated the antitumor effects of gemcitabine, resulting in decreased tumor growth in association with decreased cell proliferation [93].
VEGF, platelet derived growth factor (PDGF), FGF and their receptors are highly expressed in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and their expression correlate with poor prognosis because they are involved in the development of resistance to anti-VEGF therapy and in the induction of metastasis [94,95]. Single-target anti-angiogenic agents have been studied for combined therapy in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with limited success [96]. In 2015, Awasthi et al. investigated the antitumor activity of nintedanib, a triple angiokinase inhibitor that targets VEGFR1/2/3, FGFR1/2/3 and PDGFRα/β signalling, alone or in combination with Gemcitabine in two murine pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma xenograft models [56]. They demonstrated a strong antitumor activity of nintedanib as a single agent and combined with the cytotoxic agent Gemcitabine [56]. In detail, nintedanib inhibits pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma related cell proliferation and migration, blocks or downregulates signalling proteins such as PI3K/MAPK, induces apoptosis in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma associated stromal cells and in intratumoral ones, inhibits local tumor growth, enhances gemcitabine antitumor response, and reduces microvascular density [56].
The anti-angiogenic drug nintedanib has been proposed as a new treatment modality also for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors patients. Bill et al. in nintedanib treated RIP-Tag2 mice, demonstrated a strong suppression of angiogenesis, accompanied by a reduced tumor burden, which translated into a significant prolongation of survival, without any impact on tumor lymphangiogenesis [57].
Pancreatic stellate cells are the principal cells responsible of desmoplasia in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, display phagocytic activity and express toll-like receptors 2–5, which suggests a macrophage-like role in the pancreas for these cells [97,98,99]. Gonzalez-Villasana et al. demonstrated that nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates in combination with Nab-paclitaxel, which is known to enhance drug delivery in tumors, inhibited pancreatic stellate cells proliferation, their activation, the release of macrophage chemoattractant protein-1 and of type I collagen expression, and reduced angiogenesis [69].
A greater responses and improved antitumor results targeting tumor angiogenesis have been obtained using, nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates-paclitaxel in combination with Bevacizumab and Sunitinib [100].
Herrera et al. found the dual endothelin1/VEGF signal peptide receptor expressed by pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma microvessels, cancer cells and cancer stem-like cells [70]. Moreover, dual endothelin1/VEGF signal peptide receptor-inhibition decreased angiogenesis, invasiveness, cancer stem-like cells-survival [70].
MicroRNAs regulate tumor cell proliferation, angiogenesis, and metastasis, and therefore they constitute highly promising targets for antitumor therapies [101]. Passadouro et al., using tumor cell line as an in vitro model of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, demonstrated that the combination of microRNA silencing miR-21 with low amounts of sunitinib resulted in a strong and synergistic antitumor effect [61]. In fact, cell viability decrease of approximately 45%, which was much higher than that observed with any of the two strategies by themselves [61].
Sustained angiogenesis and immunosuppression are hallmarks of cancer and these processes share some regulators in physiological and cancer processes [102,103]. Ongoing clinical immunotherapeutic trials are based on the direct stimulation of the immune system [104,105]. Direct stimulation of the immune system with immune check-point inhibitors, such as antibody against programmed death protein 1/programmed death ligand, target also pro-angiogenic cytokines in addition to the tumor itself, making anti-angiogenic immunotherapy more resistant to immune-escape mechanisms.
In this context, Allen et al. demonstrated that treatment with anti-VEGFR2 and anti–programmed cell death ligand 1 antibodies induced high endothelial venules in RIP1-Tag2 transgenic mouse model of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors that in turn promoted lymphocyte infiltration and activity through activation of lymphotoxin β receptor signalling [72]. Anti–programmed cell death ligand 1 therapy could make tumor susceptible to anti-angiogenic therapy and prolong its efficacy, and conversely, anti-angiogenic therapy could improve anti-programmed cell death ligand 1 treatment specifically when it generates intratumoral high endothelial venules that facilitate enhanced cytotoxic T cells infiltration, activity, and cancer cells destruction [72].
Several studies demonstrated the efficacy of anti-VEGF-A therapies in animal models of pancreatic cancer [81,82]. There are several modalities of disrupting the VEGF-A signalling including blocking VEGF-A secretion from tumors cells, neutralizing the VEGF-A ligand, blocking VEGF-A binding to VEGFRs, and blocking downstream signalling of the VEGFR. Keklikoglou et al., by genetic deletion of periostin (a matricellular protein expressed by stromal cells) in RIP1-Tag2 mice blunted tumor, demonstrated that revascularization and progression of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors under extended VEGFA blockade are dependent on it [106]. Moreover, they showed that periostin deficiency also impeded the upregulation of FGF2, an adaptive mechanism previously implicated in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors evasion from anti-angiogenic therapy [106].
The infiltration of tumor associated macrophages in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors might correlate with tumor progression and metastasis formation. Krug et al. investigated the effect of targeted tumor associated macrophage therapy in vitro and in vivo using liposomal clodronate [67]. By immunohistochemistry and tissue-micro-array, they assessed that clodronate arrests tumor progression and reduce tumor angiogenesis in the RIP1-Tag2 mice [67]. However, combined therapy with liposomal Clodronate and the anti-angiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitor sunitinib did not show any synergistic effects [67].
Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors are well vascularized and express somatostatin receptors and the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor. Wicki et al., using the RIP1-Tag2 mice, demonstrated the potential benefit of co-administration of anti-angiogenic treatment with oral vatalanib (an inhibitor of VEGFR) or imatinib (a c-kit/PDGFR inhibitor) and radiotherapy with the a radiopeptide that selectively binds to glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor expressed on pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor cells [78]. Figure 1 summarizes the clinical studies of the past 5 years discussed in this section.

4. Anti-Angiogenic Inhibitors in Clinical Studies

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency have approved a number of angiogenesis inhibitors to treat cancer and several clinical studies, in search of biomarkers that allow to better characterize the different types of pancreatic cancer in order to improve patient’s management. In this section we discuss the most relevant clinical studies of last 5 years concerning the anti-angiogenic therapies for pancreatic cancers.
Hypoxia is one of the most potent inducers of an angiogenic response as a primary regulator of the angiogenic switch [107]. Tumor hypoxia activates anaerobic metabolism, angiogenesis, erythropoiesis and cell survival [108]. Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), a key enzyme in the conversion of pyruvate to lactate during anaerobic metabolism, has been correlated with mechanisms underlying tumor hypoxia and angiogenesis [68,109,110]. Faloppi et al., in a randomised phase II trial for patients with locally advanced, unresectable or metastatic pancreatic cancer, treated with sorafenib, an anti-angiogenetic multitarget tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in combination with gemcitabine vs. gemcitabine alone demonstrated that LDH is a prognostic and predictive parameter to select candidate to receive sorafenib [58]. In patients with a lower LDH serum level under the inferior normal rate, this parameter was correlated to a better prognosis in terms of median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) [58]. Moreover, the patients with low LDH serum level treated with sorafenib plus gemcitabine showed an advantage in PFS and OS compared to patients treated with gemcitabine alone [58].
In pancreatic cancer, gemcitabine is one of the standard chemotherapy drugs used alone or in combination with other chemotherapy drugs to make treatment more effective. OS has been significantly prolonged with combined therapies but, considering the several side effects (skin rash, febrile neutropenia, and peripheral neuropathy/myelosuppression) of these therapies, new therapeutic protocols are always in progress. Yamaue et al., based on the promising results of their phase I trial, conducted a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind phase II/III clinical trial to testing the combined therapy gemcitabine plus elpamotide to treat adenocarcinoma or adeno-squamous pancreatic cancer [73]. Elpamotide is an epitope peptide derived from the amino acid sequence of VEGFR2, previously, characterized as agent for anti-angiogenic immunotherapy against cancer in clinical settings [111]. Elpamotide induces cytotoxic T lymphocytes with potent cytotoxicity that are capable of killing VEGFR2-expressing human endothelial cells and in turn could reduce angiogenesis [111]. In the clinical trial, OS was 8.36 months for the active group and 8.54 months for the placebo group, but despite the lack of benefit in OS, subgroup analysis suggested that the patients who experienced severe injection site reaction, such as ulceration and erosion, might have better survival [73].
The efficacy of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors in combination with gemcitabine chemotherapy has been also evaluated [112]. Joka et al. pointed out an open-label, multicenter phase I study designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose and dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of escalating doses of everolimus (a selective inhibitor of mTOR downstream signalling) plus gemcitabine in patients with advanced or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma [75]. They found the maximum tolerated dose of a low-dose Gemcitabine treatment in combination with everolimus and no new safety concerns.
Another way to fight pancreatic cancer is combined chemo- and radiation therapy with targeted anti-angiogenic drugs, such as bevacizumab and sorafenib [54,55,113,114]. Chiorean et al. in a phase I study evaluated the safety and efficacy effects of sorafenib with gemcitabine-based chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma, through pharmacodynamics analysis of tumor perfusion and vascularity and analysis of VEGFA and VEGFR2 single nucleotide gene polymorphisms [59].
Despite the promising results of the pre-clinical studies suggesting VEGF as a therapeutic target in pancreatic cancer, phase III trials of gemcitabine plus anti-angiogenic therapy with bevacizumab or axitinib (a VEGFR inhibitor) failed to reach their primary endpoint of OS [53,63,83,115]. Therefore, to date we are still looking for biomarkers that allow to identify subsets of patients who may benefit from these targeted anti-angiogenic therapies. Pant et al. evaluated the utility of bevacizumab-related hypertension as a biomarker for bevacizumab efficacy in pancreatic adenocarcinoma [116]. They evaluated the clinical outcomes according to bevacizumab-related hypertension using pooled data from 4 prospective studies of gemcitabine plus bevacizumab therapy. Their data demonstrated that pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients with any grade derive benefit from bevacizumab, allowing to consider bevacizumab-related hypertension as potential pharmacodynamic biomarker for the enrolment of patients to treat with this therapy. Patients had a significantly improved median OS (13.1 vs. 8.1 months), median time to tumor progression (7.6 vs. 5.5 months), objective response rate (ORR) (47% vs. 16%), and disease control rate (85% vs. 59%) [116].
Endostatin, a COOH-terminal fragment of collagen XVIII, is an inhibitor of endothelial proliferation and causes regression of large tumor to microscopic size inhibiting angiogenesis [117,118]. For these therapeutic potentials, it has been developed a recombinant human endostatin, namely endostar [119]. In non-small cell lung cancer patients, it was showed that endostar plus paclitaxel-carboplatin improved objective response rate (ORR) and exhibited a good safety profile [120]. Cheng et al. in a single-center phase II trial, assessed the effect of endostar and temozolomide or dacarbazine plus 5-fluoruracile in 14 patients with locally advanced or metastatic well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors checking the radiographic response rate [71]. They observed an objective radiographic response rate of 46% among patients treated with endostar combined with chemotherapy, suggesting that the study regimen could effectively reduce the tumor burden (ORR was 33% and PFS was 12 months).
The multitargeted kinase inhibitor sunitinib has been approved for the treatment of well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors because it showed a prolonged PFS and a trend in benefit in OS [121]. Pellat et al. in a prospective phase II trial evaluated the potential predictive biomarkers of sunitinib activity in patients affected by grade 3 gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors [64]. Following PDGFRβ, carbonic anhydrase 9, Ki-67, VEGFR2 and p-AKT as potential biomarkers by immunohistochemistry, they found that sunitinib displayed a greater activity in grade 3 gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors with low Ki-67 and a lower one when p-AKT expression was high [64].
Among multitargeted kinase inhibitors, pazopanib was approved in monotherapy for a phase II study in metastatic gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors showing an ORR of 18.9%, a disease control rate of 75.7% and a median PFS of 9.1 month [122]. Grande et al. in a multicenter, open-label, phase II study (PAZONET study) assessed the activity of Pazopanib in previously treated advanced neuroendocrine tumors, including patients who received mTOR inhibitors and other multitargeted agents [65]. They showed a Pazopanib clinical activity in patients with advanced PNETs regardless of previous treatments. In fact, two thirds of the patients had a clinical benefit rate at 6 months with a median PFS of 9.5 months [65]. Additionally, they correlated the activity of pazopanib to circulating tumor cells and soluble-s VEFGR2-3 gene polymorphisms that may constitute potential biomarkers to predict response of individual patients to pazopanib [65].
Bevacizumab, used as a tumor-starving therapy, has also been studied in patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Yao et al. in a randomized phase III study of octreotide (a synthetic somatostatin analogues) in combination with bevacizumab or pegylated interferon alpha-2b (IFNα-2b) showed an ORR of 12% with octreotide/bevacizumab compared to 4% with octreotide/IFNα-2b, and a median PFS of 16.6 months in the first group and 15.4 months in the second one [77]. Although no improvement in PFS was observed, bevacizumab was associated with a higher ORR, a longer time to treatment failure, and a lower rate of fatigue than IFN [77].
Bevacizumab efficacy and safety was also evaluated in combination with pertuzumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody that binds to the extracellular domain II of the HER2- receptor, blocking its ability to dimerize with other HER receptors (EGFR (HER1), HER3 and HER4). Therefore, pertuzumab inhibits the MAPK and PI3K pathways with a mechanism of action distinct from other tyrosine kinase inhibitors [123]. Bendall et al. in a phase II study of the combination of bevacizumab, pertuzumab, and octreotide long-acting release for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors patients, showed some signs of clinical efficacy and good tolerability [66]. The median PFS was 6.5 months and OS was 26.4 months with a 16% ORR [66].
Somatostatin analogues have emerged as a successful tool for the management of neuroendocrine diseases. Somatostatin analogues inhibit hormonal secretion by binding to their receptor and thus provide relief of symptoms in patients with functional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors [125,126,127]. Sampedro-Núñez in human primary and metastatic gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors studied the presence and potential functional roles of truncated variants of somatostatin receptors, and their relationships with the angiogenic system Ang/Tie-2 and VEGF by Real Time-PCR, immunofluorescence and immunohistochemistry [124]. Indeed, the functional role of truncated variants of somatostatin receptor was analyzed in gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors cell lines [124]. They demonstrated that truncated variants of somatostatin receptor are overexpressed in gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors and is associated to enhanced aggressiveness, suggesting its potential value as biomarker and target in gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors [124]. Clinical studies in the past 5 years discussed in this section are summarized in Table 3.

5. Concluding Remarks

It is clear from the recent literature that, despite the increasing number of new anti-angiogenic therapies, there are few data regarding new targeted agents compared to others and studies focusing on the optimal sequencing strategy or a combined approach to have the best long-term outcome. Instead, the look for biomarkers for personalized therapy and new therapeutic approaches against the cellular and acellular components of the microenvironment is evident. The proper patient selection through predictive and prognostic biomarkers may maximize the efficacy of anti-angiogenic therapy in cancer [59].
The aim of anti-angiogenic therapy is to reduce tumor blood vessel increase in order to inhibit tumor growth, reducing oxygen and nutrients supplying. However, long term anti-angiogenic therapy sometimes leads to tumor hypoxia that in turn triggers VEGF production, genetic instability in tumor endothelial cells and vascular permeability [128,129].
Moreover, the anti-angiogenic therapy negatively affects the drug delivery. Drugs transport to cancer cells is inefficient due to structurally and functionally abnormal blood vessels morphology [130]. Tumor blood vessels are fenestrated with a thin wall due to the lack of pericytes changing the permeability within the same tumor and between different tumors [130,131]. Anti-angiogenic therapies are ineffective because tumor vascularisation may occur via alternative mechanisms, which include vessel co-option, vasculogenic mimicry and vasculogenesis [21]. This partially explain the necessity of combined inhibition of angiogenesis and alternative mechanisms in treatment of pancreatic cancer [79,80].
Probably, tumor blood vessels should not inhibit tumor starvation and shrinkage, but they should normalize to enhance effective drug concentration. Nagathihalli et al. targeting inhibition of STAT3 combined with gemcitabine in tumor cell lines, enhanced drug delivery, therapeutic response, and favoring blood vessel normalization [132,133].
The new therapies should have to experiment the timing of chemotherapy. Chemotherapy before surgery may help to shrink the tumor and to destroy undetectable micrometastases reducing the risk of relapse after surgery. Another possibility may be chemotherapy before and after surgery.
Further studies are needed to have an accurate identification and characterization of the key regulators of angiogenesis to develop new therapies to simultaneously target different molecular signalling pathways. Moreover, it will be necessary to focus on choosing the right drug based on the stage of the tumor, on the most effective combination therapies and on the study of the mechanisms of resistance. The future will be focused on the realization of a personalized anti-angiogenic therapy.

Author Contributions

T.A. wrote the manuscript with support from R.T. and S.R.; D.R. supervised the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by Fellowship FIRC-AIRC one-year fellowship “Laura Bassi” id. 20879 to T.A.

Conflicts of Interest

All authors declare the absence of conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bray, F.; Ferlay, J.; Soerjomataram, I.; Siegel, R.L.; Torre, L.A.; Jemal, A. Global cancer statistics 2018: Globocan estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2018, 68, 394–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Bosetti, C.; Rosato, V.; Li, D.; Silverman, D.; Petersen, G.M.; Bracci, P.M.; Neale, R.E.; Muscat, J.; Anderson, K.; Gallinger, S.; et al. Diabetes, antidiabetic medications, and pancreatic cancer risk: An analysis from the international pancreatic cancer case-control consortium. Ann. Oncol. 2014, 25, 2065–2072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Raimondi, S.; Lowenfels, A.B.; Morselli-Labate, A.M.; Maisonneuve, P.; Pezzilli, R. Pancreatic cancer in chronic pancreatitis; aetiology, incidence, and early detection. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Gastroenterol. 2010, 24, 349–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Schulte, A.; Pandeya, N.; Fawcett, J.; Fritschi, L.; Klein, K.; Risch, H.A.; Webb, P.M.; Whiteman, D.C.; Neale, R.E. Association between family cancer history and risk of pancreatic cancer. Cancer Epidemiol. 2016, 45, 145–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Yuan, C.; Morales-Oyarvide, V.; Babic, A.; Clish, C.B.; Kraft, P.; Bao, Y.; Qian, Z.R.; Rubinson, D.A.; Ng, K.; Giovannucci, E.L.; et al. Cigarette smoking and pancreatic cancer survival. J. Clin. Oncol. 2017, 35, 1822–1828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Chen, W. WHO Classification of Tumors. Available online: http://www.pathologyoutlines.com/topic/pancreaswho.html (accessed on 21 January 2019).
  7. Tirado, C.A.; Shabsovich, D.S.; Ji, J.; Dawson, D. Pancreatic tumors: An overview. Atlas Genet. Cytogenet. Oncol. Haematol. 2014, 18, 125–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kamisawa, T.; Wood, L.D.; Itoi, T.; Takaori, K. Pancreatic cancer. Lancet 2016, 388, 73–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ferrone, C.R.; Brennan, M.F.; Gonen, M.; Coit, D.G.; Fong, Y.; Chung, S.; Tang, L.; Klimstra, D.; Allen, P.J. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma: The actual 5-year survivors. J. Gastrointest. Surg. 2008, 12, 701–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. O’Reilly, E.M. Adjuvant therapy for pancreas adenocarcinoma: Where are we going? Expert Rev. Anticancer Ther. 2011, 11, 173–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Regine, W.F.; Winter, K.A.; Abrams, R.A.; Safran, H.; Hoffman, J.P.; Konski, A.; Benson, A.B.; Macdonald, J.S.; Kudrimoti, M.R.; Fromm, M.L.; et al. Fluorouracil vs. gemcitabine chemotherapy before and after fluorouracil-based chemoradiation following resection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2008, 299, 1019–1026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Paulson, A.S.; Tran Cao, H.S.; Tempero, M.A.; Lowy, A.M. Therapeutic advances in pancreatic cancer. Gastroenterology 2013, 144, 1316–1326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Singh, S.; Asa, S.L.; Dey, C.; Kennecke, H.; Laidley, D.; Law, C.; Asmis, T.; Chan, D.; Ezzat, S.; Goodwin, R.; et al. Diagnosis and management of gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors: An evidence-based canadian consensus. Cancer Treat. Rev. 2016, 47, 32–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Fendrich, V.; Waldmann, J.; Bartsch, D.K.; Langer, P. Surgical management of pancreatic endocrine tumors. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 2009, 6, 419–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Kim, M.J.; Choi, D.W.; Choi, S.H.; Heo, J.S.; Park, H.J.; Choi, K.K.; Jang, K.T.; Sung, J.Y. Surgical strategies for non-functioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours. Br. J. Surg. 2012, 99, 1562–1568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kulke, M.H.; Bendell, J.; Kvols, L.; Picus, J.; Pommier, R.; Yao, J. Evolving diagnostic and treatment strategies for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. J. Hematol. Oncol. 2011, 4, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Tomassetti, P.; Campana, D.; Piscitelli, L.; Casadei, R.; Santini, D.; Nori, F.; Morselli-Labate, A.M.; Pezzilli, R.; Corinaldesi, R. Endocrine pancreatic tumors: Factors correlated with survival. Ann. Oncol. 2005, 16, 1806–1810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Kondo, N.I.; Ikeda, Y. Practical management and treatment of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Gland Surg. 2014, 3, 276–283. [Google Scholar]
  19. Folkman, J. Tumor angiogenesis: Therapeutic implications. N. Engl. J. Med. 1971, 285, 1182–1186. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  20. Annese, T.; Tamma, R.; Ruggieri, S.; Ribatti, D. Erythropoietin in tumor angiogenesis. Exp. Cell Res. 2019, 374, 266–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Li, S.; Xu, H.X.; Wu, C.T.; Wang, W.Q.; Jin, W.; Gao, H.L.; Li, H.; Zhang, S.R.; Xu, J.Z.; Qi, Z.H.; et al. Angiogenesis in pancreatic cancer: Current research status and clinical implications. Angiogenesis 2019, 22, 15–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Franco, M.; Paez-Ribes, M.; Cortez, E.; Casanovas, O.; Pietras, K. Use of a mouse model of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors to find pericyte biomarkers of resistance to anti-angiogenic therapy. Horm. Metab. Res. Horm. Stoffwechs. Horm. Metab. 2011, 43, 884–889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Yang, J.; Zhu, D.M.; Zhou, X.G.; Yin, N.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, Z.X.; Li, D.C.; Zhou, J. Hif-2alpha promotes the formation of vasculogenic mimicry in pancreatic cancer by regulating the binding of twist1 to the ve-cadherin promoter. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 47801–47815. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  24. Li, A.; Cheng, X.J.; Moro, A.; Singh, R.K.; Hines, O.J.; Eibl, G. Cxcr2-dependent endothelial progenitor cell mobilization in pancreatic cancer growth. Transl. Oncol. 2011, 4, 20–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Maity, G.; Mehta, S.; Haque, I.; Dhar, K.; Sarkar, S.; Banerjee, S.K.; Banerjee, S. Pancreatic tumor cell secreted ccn1/cyr61 promotes endothelial cell migration and aberrant neovascularization. Sci. Rep. 2014, 4, 4995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Nakamura, K.; Sasajima, J.; Mizukami, Y.; Sugiyama, Y.; Yamazaki, M.; Fujii, R.; Kawamoto, T.; Koizumi, K.; Sato, K.; Fujiya, M.; et al. Hedgehog promotes neovascularization in pancreatic cancers by regulating ang-1 and igf-1 expression in bone-marrow derived pro-angiogenic cells. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e8824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Vizio, B.; Biasi, F.; Scirelli, T.; Novarino, A.; Prati, A.; Ciuffreda, L.; Montrucchio, G.; Poli, G.; Bellone, G. Pancreatic-carcinoma-cell-derived pro-angiogenic factors can induce endothelial-cell differentiation of a subset of circulating cd34+ progenitors. J. Transl. Med. 2013, 11, 314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Vizio, B.; Novarino, A.; Giacobino, A.; Cristiano, C.; Prati, A.; Brondino, G.; Ciuffreda, L.; Bellone, G. Pilot study to relate clinical outcome in pancreatic carcinoma and angiogenic plasma factors/circulating mature/progenitor endothelial cells: Preliminary results. Cancer Sci. 2010, 101, 2448–2454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Barau, A.; Ruiz-Sauri, A.; Valencia, G.; Gomez-Mateo Mdel, C.; Sabater, L.; Ferrandez, A.; Llombart-Bosch, A. High microvessel density in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is associated with high grade. Virchows Arch. Int. J. Pathol. 2013, 462, 541–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Van der Zee, J.A.; van Eijck, C.H.; Hop, W.C.; van Dekken, H.; Dicheva, B.M.; Seynhaeve, A.L.; Koning, G.A.; Eggermont, A.M.; ten Hagen, T.L. Angiogenesis: A prognostic determinant in pancreatic cancer? Eur. J. Cancer 2011, 47, 2576–2584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wang, W.Q.; Liu, L.; Xu, H.X.; Luo, G.P.; Chen, T.; Wu, C.T.; Xu, Y.F.; Xu, J.; Liu, C.; Zhang, B.; et al. Intratumoral alpha-sma enhances the prognostic potency of cd34 associated with maintenance of microvessel integrity in hepatocellular carcinoma and pancreatic cancer. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e71189. [Google Scholar]
  32. Huang, Y.; Yuan, J.; Righi, E.; Kamoun, W.S.; Ancukiewicz, M.; Nezivar, J.; Santosuosso, M.; Martin, J.D.; Martin, M.R.; Vianello, F.; et al. Vascular normalizing doses of antiangiogenic treatment reprogram the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment and enhance immunotherapy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 17561–17566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Jain, R.K. Normalization of tumor vasculature: An emerging concept in antiangiogenic therapy. Science 2005, 307, 58–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Mpekris, F.; Baish, J.W.; Stylianopoulos, T.; Jain, R.K. Role of vascular normalization in benefit from metronomic chemotherapy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, 1994–1999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Yapp, D.T.; Wong, M.Q.; Kyle, A.H.; Valdez, S.M.; Tso, J.; Yung, A.; Kozlowski, P.; Owen, D.A.; Buczkowski, A.K.; Chung, S.W.; et al. The differential effects of metronomic gemcitabine and antiangiogenic treatment in patient-derived xenografts of pancreatic cancer: Treatment effects on metabolism, vascular function, cell proliferation, and tumor growth. Angiogenesis 2016, 19, 229–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Xie, K.; Wei, D.; Huang, S. Transcriptional anti-angiogenesis therapy of human pancreatic cancer. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2006, 17, 147–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Di Maggio, F.; Arumugam, P.; Delvecchio, F.R.; Batista, S.; Lechertier, T.; Hodivala-Dilke, K.; Kocher, H.M. Pancreatic stellate cells regulate blood vessel density in the stroma of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Pancreatol. Off. J. Int. Assoc. Pancreatol. 2016, 16, 995–1004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Haqq, J.; Howells, L.M.; Garcea, G.; Metcalfe, M.S.; Steward, W.P.; Dennison, A.R. Pancreatic stellate cells and pancreas cancer: Current perspectives and future strategies. Eur. J. Cancer 2014, 50, 2570–2582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Masamune, A.; Kikuta, K.; Watanabe, T.; Satoh, K.; Hirota, M.; Shimosegawa, T. Hypoxia stimulates pancreatic stellate cells to induce fibrosis and angiogenesis in pancreatic cancer. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 2008, 295, G709–G717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Abrakov, L.V.; Astakhova, L.S.; Vatnitskaia, T.V.; Nemchin, E.; Fainshtein, I.I. State of neurosurgical information in soviet and foreign journals. Vopr. Neirokhirurgii 1976, 3, 52–58. [Google Scholar]
  41. Esposito, I.; Menicagli, M.; Funel, N.; Bergmann, F.; Boggi, U.; Mosca, F.; Bevilacqua, G.; Campani, D. Inflammatory cells contribute to the generation of an angiogenic phenotype in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. J. Clin. Pathol. 2004, 57, 630–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Penny, H.L.; Sieow, J.L.; Adriani, G.; Yeap, W.H.; See Chi Ee, P.; San Luis, B.; Lee, B.; Lee, T.; Mak, S.Y.; Ho, Y.S.; et al. Warburg metabolism in tumor-conditioned macrophages promotes metastasis in human pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Oncoimmunology 2016, 5, e1191731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Kurahara, H.; Takao, S.; Kuwahata, T.; Nagai, T.; Ding, Q.; Maeda, K.; Shinchi, H.; Mataki, Y.; Maemura, K.; Matsuyama, T.; et al. Clinical significance of folate receptor beta-expressing tumor-associated macrophages in pancreatic cancer. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2012, 19, 2264–2271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Li, N.; Li, Y.; Li, Z.; Huang, C.; Yang, Y.; Lang, M.; Cao, J.; Jiang, W.; Xu, Y.; Dong, J.; et al. Hypoxia inducible factor 1 (hif-1) recruits macrophage to activate pancreatic stellate cells in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Whatcott, C.J.; Diep, C.H.; Jiang, P.; Watanabe, A.; LoBello, J.; Sima, C.; Hostetter, G.; Shepard, H.M.; Von Hoff, D.D.; Han, H. Desmoplasia in primary tumors and metastatic lesions of pancreatic cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 2015, 21, 3561–3568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Minchinton, A.I.; Tannock, I.F. Drug penetration in solid tumours. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2006, 6, 583–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Netti, P.A.; Berk, D.A.; Swartz, M.A.; Grodzinsky, A.J.; Jain, R.K. Role of extracellular matrix assembly in interstitial transport in solid tumors. Cancer Res. 2000, 60, 2497–2503. [Google Scholar]
  48. Hexige, S.; Ardito-Abraham, C.M.; Wu, Y.; Wei, Y.; Fang, Y.; Han, X.; Li, J.; Zhou, P.; Yi, Q.; Maitra, A.; et al. Identification of novel vascular projections with cellular trafficking abilities on the microvasculature of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. J. Pathol. 2015, 236, 142–154. [Google Scholar]
  49. Casanovas, O.; Hicklin, D.J.; Bergers, G.; Hanahan, D. Drug resistance by evasion of antiangiogenic targeting of vegf signaling in late-stage pancreatic islet tumors. Cancer Cell 2005, 8, 299–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Terris, B.; Scoazec, J.Y.; Rubbia, L.; Bregeaud, L.; Pepper, M.S.; Ruszniewski, P.; Belghiti, J.; Flejou, J.; Degott, C. Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor in digestive neuroendocrine tumours. Histopathology 1998, 32, 133–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Takahashi, Y.; Akishima-Fukasawa, Y.; Kobayashi, N.; Sano, T.; Kosuge, T.; Nimura, Y.; Kanai, Y.; Hiraoka, N. Prognostic value of tumor architecture, tumor-associated vascular characteristics, and expression of angiogenic molecules in pancreatic endocrine tumors. Clin. Cancer Res. 2007, 13, 187–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Pavel, M.E.; Hassler, G.; Baum, U.; Hahn, E.G.; Lohmann, T.; Schuppan, D. Circulating levels of angiogenic cytokines can predict tumour progression and prognosis in neuroendocrine carcinomas. Clin. Endocrinol. 2005, 62, 434–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Kindler, H.L.; Ioka, T.; Richel, D.J.; Bennouna, J.; Letourneau, R.; Okusaka, T.; Funakoshi, A.; Furuse, J.; Park, Y.S.; Ohkawa, S.; et al. Axitinib plus gemcitabine versus placebo plus gemcitabine in patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma: A double-blind randomised phase 3 study. Lancet. Oncol. 2011, 12, 256–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Crane, C.H.; Winter, K.; Regine, W.F.; Safran, H.; Rich, T.A.; Curran, W.; Wolff, R.A.; Willett, C.G. Phase ii study of bevacizumab with concurrent capecitabine and radiation followed by maintenance gemcitabine and bevacizumab for locally advanced pancreatic cancer: Radiation therapy oncology group rtog 0411. J. Clin. Oncol. 2009, 27, 4096–4102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Koukourakis, M.I.; Giatromanolaki, A.; Sheldon, H.; Buffa, F.M.; Kouklakis, G.; Ragoussis, I.; Sivridis, E.; Harris, A.L.; The Tumour and Angiogenesis Research Group. Phase i/ii trial of bevacizumab and radiotherapy for locally advanced inoperable colorectal cancer: Vasculature-independent radiosensitizing effect of bevacizumab. Clin. Cancer Res. 2009, 15, 7069–7076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Awasthi, N.; Hinz, S.; Brekken, R.A.; Schwarz, M.A.; Schwarz, R.E. Nintedanib, a triple angiokinase inhibitor, enhances cytotoxic therapy response in pancreatic cancer. Cancer Lett. 2015, 358, 59–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Bill, R.; Fagiani, E.; Zumsteg, A.; Antoniadis, H.; Johansson, D.; Haefliger, S.; Albrecht, I.; Hilberg, F.; Christofori, G. Nintedanib is a highly effective therapeutic for neuroendocrine carcinoma of the pancreas (pnet) in the rip1tag2 transgenic mouse model. Clin. Cancer Res. 2015, 21, 4856–4867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Faloppi, L.; Bianconi, M.; Giampieri, R.; Sobrero, A.; Labianca, R.; Ferrari, D.; Barni, S.; Aitini, E.; Zaniboni, A.; Boni, C.; et al. The value of lactate dehydrogenase serum levels as a prognostic and predictive factor for advanced pancreatic cancer patients receiving sorafenib. Oncotarget 2015, 6, 35087–35094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Chiorean, E.G.; Schneider, B.P.; Akisik, F.M.; Perkins, S.M.; Anderson, S.; Johnson, C.S.; DeWitt, J.; Helft, P.; Clark, R.; Johnston, E.L.; et al. Phase 1 pharmacogenetic and pharmacodynamic study of sorafenib with concurrent radiation therapy and gemcitabine in locally advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2014, 89, 284–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Wegner, C.S.; Hauge, A.; Simonsen, T.G.; Gaustad, J.V.; Andersen, L.M.K.; Rofstad, E.K. Dce-mri of sunitinib-induced changes in tumor microvasculature and hypoxia: A study of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma xenografts. Neoplasia 2018, 20, 734–744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Passadouro, M.; Pedroso de Lima, M.C.; Faneca, H. Microrna modulation combined with sunitinib as a novel therapeutic strategy for pancreatic cancer. Int. J. Nanomed. 2014, 9, 3203–3217. [Google Scholar]
  62. O’Reilly, E.M.; Niedzwiecki, D.; Hall, M.; Hollis, D.; Bekaii-Saab, T.; Pluard, T.; Douglas, K.; Abou-Alfa, G.K.; Kindler, H.L.; Schilsky, R.L.; et al. A cancer and leukemia group b phase ii study of sunitinib malate in patients with previously treated metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (calgb 80603). Oncologist 2010, 15, 1310–1319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Baker, C.H.; Solorzano, C.C.; Fidler, I.J. Blockade of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor and epidermal growth factor receptor signaling for therapy of metastatic human pancreatic cancer. Cancer Res. 2002, 62, 1996–2003. [Google Scholar]
  64. Pellat, A.; Dreyer, C.; Couffignal, C.; Walter, T.; Lombard-Bohas, C.; Niccoli, P.; Seitz, J.F.; Hentic, O.; Andre, T.; Coriat, R.; et al. Clinical and biomarker evaluations of sunitinib in patients with grade 3 digestive neuroendocrine neoplasms. Neuroendocrinology 2018, 107, 24–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Grande, E.; Capdevila, J.; Castellano, D.; Teule, A.; Duran, I.; Fuster, J.; Sevilla, I.; Escudero, P.; Sastre, J.; Garcia-Donas, J.; et al. Pazopanib in pretreated advanced neuroendocrine tumors: A phase ii, open-label trial of the spanish task force group for neuroendocrine tumors (getne). Ann. Oncol. 2015, 26, 1987–1993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Bendell, J.C.; Zakari, A.; Lang, E.; Waterhouse, D.; Flora, D.; Alguire, K.; McCleod, M.; Peacock, N.; Ruehlman, P.; Lane, C.M.; et al. A phase ii study of the combination of bevacizumab, pertuzumab, and octreotide lar for patients with advanced neuroendocrine cancers. Cancer Investig. 2016, 34, 213–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Krug, S.; Abbassi, R.; Griesmann, H.; Sipos, B.; Wiese, D.; Rexin, P.; Blank, A.; Perren, A.; Haybaeck, J.; Huttelmaier, S.; et al. Therapeutic targeting of tumor-associated macrophages in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Int. J. Cancer 2018, 143, 1806–1816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Markert, C.L. Lactate dehydrogenase isozymes: Dissociation and recombination of subunits. Science 1963, 140, 1329–1330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Gonzalez-Villasana, V.; Rodriguez-Aguayo, C.; Arumugam, T.; Cruz-Monserrate, Z.; Fuentes-Mattei, E.; Deng, D.; Hwang, R.F.; Wang, H.; Ivan, C.; Garza, R.J.; et al. Bisphosphonates inhibit stellate cell activity and enhance antitumor effects of nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2014, 13, 2583–2594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Herrera, V.L.; Decano, J.L.; Tan, G.A.; Moran, A.M.; Pasion, K.A.; Matsubara, Y.; Ruiz-Opazo, N. Despr roles in tumor vasculo-angiogenesis, invasiveness, csc-survival and anoikis resistance: A ‘common receptor coordinator’ paradigm. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e85821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Cheng, Y.J.; Meng, C.T.; Ying, H.Y.; Zhou, J.F.; Yan, X.Y.; Gao, X.; Zhou, N.; Bai, C.M. Effect of endostar combined with chemotherapy in advanced well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Medicine 2018, 97, e12750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Allen, E.; Jabouille, A.; Rivera, L.B.; Lodewijckx, I.; Missiaen, R.; Steri, V.; Feyen, K.; Tawney, J.; Hanahan, D.; Michael, I.P.; et al. Combined antiangiogenic and anti-pd-l1 therapy stimulates tumor immunity through hev formation. Sci. Transl. Med. 2017, 9, eaak9679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Yamaue, H.; Tsunoda, T.; Tani, M.; Miyazawa, M.; Yamao, K.; Mizuno, N.; Okusaka, T.; Ueno, H.; Boku, N.; Fukutomi, A.; et al. Randomized phase ii/iii clinical trial of elpamotide for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: Pegasus-pc study. Cancer Sci. 2015, 106, 883–890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Xu, X.L.; Yang, Y.R.; Mo, X.F.; Wei, J.L.; Zhang, X.J.; You, Q.D. Design, synthesis, and evaluation of benzofuran derivatives as novel anti-pancreatic carcinoma agents via interfering the hypoxia environment by targeting hif-1alpha pathway. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2017, 137, 45–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Joka, M.; Boeck, S.; Zech, C.J.; Seufferlein, T.; Wichert, G.; Licht, T.; Krause, A.; Jauch, K.W.; Heinemann, V.; Bruns, C.J. Combination of antiangiogenic therapy using the mtor-inhibitor everolimus and low-dose chemotherapy for locally advanced and/or metastatic pancreatic cancer: A dose-finding study. Anti Cancer Drugs 2014, 25, 1095–1101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Waters, J.A.; Matos, J.; Yip-Schneider, M.; Aguilar-Saavedra, J.R.; Crean, C.D.; Beane, J.D.; Dumas, R.P.; Suvannasankha, A.; Schmidt, C.M. Targeted nuclear factor-kappab suppression enhances gemcitabine response in human pancreatic tumor cell line murine xenografts. Surgery 2015, 158, 881–888, discussion 888–889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Yao, J.C.; Guthrie, K.A.; Moran, C.; Strosberg, J.R.; Kulke, M.H.; Chan, J.A.; LoConte, N.; McWilliams, R.R.; Wolin, E.M.; Mattar, B.; et al. Phase iii prospective randomized comparison trial of depot octreotide plus interferon alfa-2b versus depot octreotide plus bevacizumab in patients with advanced carcinoid tumors: Swog s0518. J. Clin. Oncol. 2017, 35, 1695–1703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Wicki, A.; Wild, D.; Pretre, V.; Mansi, R.; Orleth, A.; Reubi, J.C.; Rochlitz, C.; Mamot, C.; Macke, H.R.; Christofori, G. Synergism of peptide receptor-targeted auger electron radiation therapy with anti-angiogenic compounds in a mouse model of neuroendocrine tumors. Ejnmmi Res. 2014, 4, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Wei, H.; Wang, F.; Wang, Y.; Li, T.; Xiu, P.; Zhong, J.; Sun, X.; Li, J. Verteporfin suppresses cell survival, angiogenesis and vasculogenic mimicry of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma via disrupting the yap-tead complex. Cancer Sci. 2017, 108, 478–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Tangutoori, S.; Spring, B.Q.; Mai, Z.; Palanisami, A.; Mensah, L.B.; Hasan, T. Simultaneous delivery of cytotoxic and biologic therapeutics using nanophotoactivatable liposomes enhances treatment efficacy in a mouse model of pancreatic cancer. Nanomed. Nanotechnol. Biol. Med. 2016, 12, 223–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Capozzi, M.; Von Arx, C.; De Divitiis, C.; Ottaiano, A.; Tatangelo, F.; Romano, G.M.; Tafuto, S. Antiangiogenic therapy in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Anticancer Res. 2016, 36, 5025–5030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Longo, V.; Brunetti, O.; Gnoni, A.; Cascinu, S.; Gasparini, G.; Lorusso, V.; Ribatti, D.; Silvestris, N. Angiogenesis in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: A controversial issue. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 58649–58658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Bruns, C.J.; Shrader, M.; Harbison, M.T.; Portera, C.; Solorzano, C.C.; Jauch, K.W.; Hicklin, D.J.; Radinsky, R.; Ellis, L.M. Effect of the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 antibody dc101 plus gemcitabine on growth, metastasis and angiogenesis of human pancreatic cancer growing orthotopically in nude mice. Int. J. Cancer 2002, 102, 101–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Duan, J.X.; Jiao, H.; Kaizerman, J.; Stanton, T.; Evans, J.W.; Lan, L.; Lorente, G.; Banica, M.; Jung, D.; Wang, J.; et al. Potent and highly selective hypoxia-activated achiral phosphoramidate mustards as anticancer drugs. J. Med. Chem. 2008, 51, 2412–2420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Jacobetz, M.A.; Chan, D.S.; Neesse, A.; Bapiro, T.E.; Cook, N.; Frese, K.K.; Feig, C.; Nakagawa, T.; Caldwell, M.E.; Zecchini, H.I.; et al. Hyaluronan impairs vascular function and drug delivery in a mouse model of pancreatic cancer. Gut 2013, 62, 112–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Melisi, D.; Ishiyama, S.; Sclabas, G.M.; Fleming, J.B.; Xia, Q.; Tortora, G.; Abbruzzese, J.L.; Chiao, P.J. Ly2109761, a novel transforming growth factor beta receptor type i and type ii dual inhibitor, as a therapeutic approach to suppressing pancreatic cancer metastasis. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2008, 7, 829–840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Shimamura, T.; Royal, R.E.; Kioi, M.; Nakajima, A.; Husain, S.R.; Puri, R.K. Interleukin-4 cytotoxin therapy synergizes with gemcitabine in a mouse model of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Cancer Res. 2007, 67, 9903–9912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Olive, K.P.; Jacobetz, M.A.; Davidson, C.J.; Gopinathan, A.; McIntyre, D.; Honess, D.; Madhu, B.; Goldgraben, M.A.; Caldwell, M.E.; Allard, D.; et al. Inhibition of hedgehog signaling enhances delivery of chemotherapy in a mouse model of pancreatic cancer. Science 2009, 324, 1457–1461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Provenzano, P.P.; Cuevas, C.; Chang, A.E.; Goel, V.K.; Von Hoff, D.D.; Hingorani, S.R. Enzymatic targeting of the stroma ablates physical barriers to treatment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Cancer Cell 2012, 21, 418–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Atwood, W.J.; Shah, K.V. Polyomaviruses Encyclopedia of Life Sciences; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Hanahan, D. Heritable formation of pancreatic beta-cell tumours in transgenic mice expressing recombinant insulin/simian virus 40 oncogenes. Nature 1985, 315, 115–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Christensen, J.G. A preclinical review of sunitinib, a multitargeted receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor with anti-angiogenic and antitumour activities. Ann. Oncol. 2007, 18 (Suppl. 10), x3–x10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Prabhu, L.; Mundade, R.; Korc, M.; Loehrer, P.J.; Lu, T. Critical role of nf-kappab in pancreatic cancer. Oncotarget 2014, 5, 10969–10975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Fujimoto, K.; Hosotani, R.; Wada, M.; Lee, J.U.; Koshiba, T.; Miyamoto, Y.; Tsuji, S.; Nakajima, S.; Doi, R.; Imamura, M. Expression of two angiogenic factors, vascular endothelial growth factor and platelet-derived endothelial cell growth factor in human pancreatic cancer, and its relationship to angiogenesis. Eur. J. Cancer 1998, 34, 1439–1447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Wagner, M.; Lopez, M.E.; Cahn, M.; Korc, M. Suppression of fibroblast growth factor receptor signaling inhibits pancreatic cancer growth in vitro and in vivo. Gastroenterology 1998, 114, 798–807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Assifi, M.M.; Hines, O.J. Anti-angiogenic agents in pancreatic cancer: A review. Anti Cancer Agents Med. Chem. 2011, 11, 464–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Masamune, A.; Kikuta, K.; Watanabe, T.; Satoh, K.; Satoh, A.; Shimosegawa, T. Pancreatic stellate cells express toll-like receptors. J. Gastroenterol. 2008, 43, 352–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Masamune, A.; Shimosegawa, T. Signal transduction in pancreatic stellate cells. J. Gastroenterol. 2009, 44, 249–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Shimizu, K.; Kobayashi, M.; Tahara, J.; Shiratori, K. Cytokines and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma ligand regulate phagocytosis by pancreatic stellate cells. Gastroenterology 2005, 128, 2105–2118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Awasthi, N.; Zhang, C.; Schwarz, A.M.; Hinz, S.; Schwarz, M.A.; Schwarz, R.E. Enhancement of nab-paclitaxel antitumor activity through addition of multitargeting antiangiogenic agents in experimental pancreatic cancer. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2014, 13, 1032–1043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Mardin, W.A.; Mees, S.T. Micrornas: Novel diagnostic and therapeutic tools for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma? Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2009, 16, 3183–3189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Hanahan, D.; Weinberg, R.A. Hallmarks of cancer: The next generation. Cell 2011, 144, 646–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Motz, G.T.; Coukos, G. The parallel lives of angiogenesis and immunosuppression: Cancer and other tales. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2011, 11, 702–711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Mahoney, K.M.; Rennert, P.D.; Freeman, G.J. Combination cancer immunotherapy and new immunomodulatory targets. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2015, 14, 561–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Sharma, P.; Allison, J.P. Immune checkpoint targeting in cancer therapy: Toward combination strategies with curative potential. Cell 2015, 161, 205–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Keklikoglou, I.; Kadioglu, E.; Bissinger, S.; Langlois, B.; Bellotti, A.; Orend, G.; Ries, C.H.; De Palma, M. Periostin limits tumor response to vegfa inhibition. Cell Rep. 2018, 22, 2530–2540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Giordano, F.J.; Johnson, R.S. Angiogenesis: The role of the microenvironment in flipping the switch. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 2001, 11, 35–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Semenza, G.L. Hif-1: Mediator of physiological and pathophysiological responses to hypoxia. J. Appl. Physiol. 2000, 88, 1474–1480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Hecht, J.R.; Trarbach, T.; Hainsworth, J.D.; Major, P.; Jager, E.; Wolff, R.A.; Lloyd-Salvant, K.; Bodoky, G.; Pendergrass, K.; Berg, W.; et al. Randomized, placebo-controlled, phase iii study of first-line oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy plus ptk787/zk 222584, an oral vascular endothelial growth factor receptor inhibitor, in patients with metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma. J. Clin. Oncol. 2011, 29, 1997–2003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Van Cutsem, E.; Bajetta, E.; Valle, J.; Kohne, C.H.; Hecht, J.R.; Moore, M.; Germond, C.; Berg, W.; Chen, B.L.; Jalava, T.; et al. Randomized, placebo-controlled, phase iii study of oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin with or without ptk787/zk 222584 in patients with previously treated metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma. J. Clin. Oncol. 2011, 29, 2004–2010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Wada, S.; Tsunoda, T.; Baba, T.; Primus, F.J.; Kuwano, H.; Shibuya, M.; Tahara, H. Rationale for antiangiogenic cancer therapy with vaccination using epitope peptides derived from human vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2. Cancer Res. 2005, 65, 4939–4946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Soliman, G.A. The mammalian target of rapamycin signaling network and gene regulation. Curr. Opin. Lipidol. 2005, 16, 317–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Plastaras, J.P.; Kim, S.H.; Liu, Y.Y.; Dicker, D.T.; Dorsey, J.F.; McDonough, J.; Cerniglia, G.; Rajendran, R.R.; Gupta, A.; Rustgi, A.K.; et al. Cell cycle dependent and schedule-dependent antitumor effects of sorafenib combined with radiation. Cancer Res. 2007, 67, 9443–9454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Suen, A.W.; Galoforo, S.; Marples, B.; McGonagle, M.; Downing, L.; Martinez, A.A.; Robertson, J.M.; Wilson, G.D. Sorafenib and radiation: A promising combination in colorectal cancer. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2010, 78, 213–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Kindler, H.L.; Niedzwiecki, D.; Hollis, D.; Sutherland, S.; Schrag, D.; Hurwitz, H.; Innocenti, F.; Mulcahy, M.F.; O’Reilly, E.; Wozniak, T.F.; et al. Gemcitabine plus bevacizumab compared with gemcitabine plus placebo in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: Phase iii trial of the cancer and leukemia group b (calgb 80303). J. Clin. Oncol. 2010, 28, 3617–3622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Pant, S.; Martin, L.K.; Geyer, S.; Wei, L.; Van Loon, K.; Sommovilla, N.; Zalupski, M.; Iyer, R.; Fogelman, D.; Ko, A.H.; et al. Treatment-related hypertension as a pharmacodynamic biomarker for the efficacy of bevacizumab in advanced pancreas cancer: A pooled analysis of 4 prospective trials of gemcitabine-based therapy with bevacizumab. Am. J. Clin. Oncol. 2016, 39, 614–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. O’Reilly, M.S.; Boehm, T.; Shing, Y.; Fukai, N.; Vasios, G.; Lane, W.S.; Flynn, E.; Birkhead, J.R.; Olsen, B.R.; Folkman, J. Endostatin: An endogenous inhibitor of angiogenesis and tumor growth. Cell 1997, 88, 277–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Sasaki, T.; Fukai, N.; Mann, K.; Gohring, W.; Olsen, B.R.; Timpl, R. Structure, function and tissue forms of the c-terminal globular domain of collagen xviii containing the angiogenesis inhibitor endostatin. EMBO J. 1998, 17, 4249–4256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Song, H.F.; Liu, X.W.; Zhang, H.N.; Zhu, B.Z.; Yuan, S.J.; Liu, S.Y.; Tang, Z.M. Pharmacokinetics of his-tag recombinant human endostatin in rhesus monkeys. Acta Pharmacol. Sin. 2005, 26, 124–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Han, B.H.; Xiu, Q.Y.; Wang, H.M.; Shen, J.; Gu, A.Q.; Luo, Y.; Bai, C.X.; Guo, S.L.; Liu, W.C.; Zhuang, Z.X.; et al. A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled safety study to evaluate the clinical effects and quality of life of paclitaxel-carboplatin (PC) alone or combined with endostar for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi Chin. J. Oncol. 2011, 33, 854–859. [Google Scholar]
  121. Blumenthal, G.M.; Cortazar, P.; Zhang, J.J.; Tang, S.; Sridhara, R.; Murgo, A.; Justice, R.; Pazdur, R. Fda approval summary: Sunitinib for the treatment of progressive well-differentiated locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Oncologist 2012, 17, 1108–1113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Ahn, H.K.; Choi, J.Y.; Kim, K.M.; Kim, H.; Choi, S.H.; Park, S.H.; Park, J.O.; Lim, H.Y.; Kang, W.K.; Lee, J.; et al. Phase ii study of pazopanib monotherapy in metastatic gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours. Br. J. Cancer 2013, 109, 1414–1419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Jhaveri, K.; Esteva, F.J. Pertuzumab in the treatment of her2+ breast cancer. J. Natl. Compr. Cancer Netw. Jnccn 2014, 12, 591–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Sampedro-Nunez, M.; Luque, R.M.; Ramos-Levi, A.M.; Gahete, M.D.; Serrano-Somavilla, A.; Villa-Osaba, A.; Adrados, M.; Ibanez-Costa, A.; Martin-Perez, E.; Culler, M.D.; et al. Presence of sst5tmd4, a truncated splice variant of the somatostatin receptor subtype 5, is associated to features of increased aggressiveness in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 6593–6608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Lamberts, S.W.; van der Lely, A.J.; de Herder, W.W.; Hofland, L.J. Octreotide. N. Engl. J. Med. 1996, 334, 246–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Caplin, M.E.; Pavel, M.; Cwikla, J.B.; Phan, A.T.; Raderer, M.; Sedlackova, E.; Cadiot, G.; Wolin, E.M.; Capdevila, J.; Wall, L.; et al. Lanreotide in metastatic enteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. N. Engl. J. Med. 2014, 371, 224–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Rinke, A.; Muller, H.H.; Schade-Brittinger, C.; Klose, K.J.; Barth, P.; Wied, M.; Mayer, C.; Aminossadati, B.; Pape, U.F.; Blaker, M.; et al. Placebo-controlled, double-blind, prospective, randomized study on the effect of octreotide lar in the control of tumor growth in patients with metastatic neuroendocrine midgut tumors: A report from the promid study group. J. Clin. Oncol. 2009, 27, 4656–4663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Taylor, S.M.; Nevis, K.R.; Park, H.L.; Rogers, G.C.; Rogers, S.L.; Cook, J.G.; Bautch, V.L. Angiogenic factor signaling regulates centrosome duplication in endothelial cells of developing blood vessels. Blood 2010, 116, 3108–3117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Winkler, F.; Kozin, S.V.; Tong, R.T.; Chae, S.S.; Booth, M.F.; Garkavtsev, I.; Xu, L.; Hicklin, D.J.; Fukumura, D.; di Tomaso, E.; et al. Kinetics of vascular normalization by vegfr2 blockade governs brain tumor response to radiation: Role of oxygenation, angiopoietin-1, and matrix metalloproteinases. Cancer Cell 2004, 6, 553–563. [Google Scholar]
  130. Maes, H.; Olmeda, D.; Soengas, M.S.; Agostinis, P. Vesicular trafficking mechanisms in endothelial cells as modulators of the tumor vasculature and targets of antiangiogenic therapies. FEBS J. 2016, 283, 25–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Van Dusseldorp, M. Health aspects of sweets and other snack foods. Ned. Tijdschr. Voor Tandheelkd. 1990, 97, 23–26. [Google Scholar]
  132. Nagathihalli, N.S.; Castellanos, J.A.; Shi, C.; Beesetty, Y.; Reyzer, M.L.; Caprioli, R.; Chen, X.; Walsh, A.J.; Skala, M.C.; Moses, H.L.; et al. Signal transducer and activator of transcription 3, mediated remodeling of the tumor microenvironment results in enhanced tumor drug delivery in a mouse model of pancreatic cancer. Gastroenterology 2015, 149, 1932–1943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Greenberg, J.I.; Shields, D.J.; Barillas, S.G.; Acevedo, L.M.; Murphy, E.; Huang, J.; Scheppke, L.; Stockmann, C.; Johnson, R.S.; Angle, N.; et al. A role for VEGF as a negative regulator of pericyte function and vessel maturation. Nature 2008, 456, 809–813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Cancers 11 00381 g001 550
Figure 1. Anti-angiogenic approaches in pancreatic cancer pre-clinical studies of last 5 years discussed in the text.
Figure 1. Anti-angiogenic approaches in pancreatic cancer pre-clinical studies of last 5 years discussed in the text.
Cancers 11 00381 g001
Table
Table 1. Pancreatic cancer risk factors.
Table 1. Pancreatic cancer risk factors.
Tobacco, Cigar and Pipe Use20–30% of pancreatic cancers are caused by smoking.
Overweight and obesity
DietHigher in red and processed meats and lower in fruits and vegetables.
Lack of physical activity
Workplace exposure to chemicalsChemicals used in the dry cleaning and metal working industries.
AgeRisk goes up as people age.
GenderMen.
RaceAfrican Americans more likely to develop than white.
Blood groupPeople with blood groups A, AB and B have a higher risk.
Family history
Inherited genetic syndromesHereditary pancreatitis, Peutz-Jeghers syndrome, Familial malignant melanoma and pancreatic cancer, Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome, Lynch syndrome, Li-Fraumeni syndrome, Familial adenomatous polyposis.
Type 2 Diabetes
Chronic pancreatitis
Cirrhosis of the liver
Gastric ulcerHelicobacter pylori related.
Data from American Cancer Society (Last Revised: May 2016), Pancreatic Cancer UK (Last Revised: January 2018), and Cancer. Net Editorial Board (Last Revised: May 2018).
Table
Table 2. Drugs targeting directly or indirectly angiogenesis in pancreatic cancer.
Table 2. Drugs targeting directly or indirectly angiogenesis in pancreatic cancer.
Drugs Targeting Growth Factor- and Growth Factor Receptor InhibitorsDrug Target/Mechanism of ActionPre-Clinical/Clinical StudiesEvaluated in PDAC/PNETs
Axitinib [53]Selective inhibitor of VEGFR 1–3ClinicalPDAC
Bevacizumab [54,55]Humanized anti-VEGF monoclonal antibodyClinicalPDAC
Nintedanib [56,57]Triple angiokinase inhibitor that targets VEGFR 1–3. FGFR 1–3 and PDGFRα/βPre-clinicalPDAC and PNETs
Sorafenib [58,59]Small molecule inhibitor of Raf kinase, PDGF, VEGFR 2–3 and c-kitClinicalPDAC
Sunitinib [60,61,62,63,64]Multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor that targets VEGFR1-3, PDGFR, c-kit, RET, stem-cell factor receptor and FMS-like tyrosine kinase-3Pre-clinical and ClinicalPDAC and PNETs
Pazopanib [65]Multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor that targets VEGFR, PDGFR and c-kitClinicalPNETs
Pertuzumab [66]Humanized anti-HER2-receptorClinicalPNETs
Drugs targeting the tumor stroma
Liposomal Clodronate [67,68]Arrest tumor progression and angiogenesisPre-clinicalPNETs
Nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates (NBPs) [69]Inhibit PSCs proliferation and activation, the release of MCP-1, type I collagen expressionPre-clinicalPDAC
Drugs targeting cancer stem cells
DEspR [70]DEspR-inhibition decrease angiogenesis, invasiveness, CSCs-survival and anoikis resistancePre-clinicalPDAC
Endostar [71]Inhibit endothelial proliferationClinicalPNETs
Drugs targeting immune-cells
Anti-PD-L1 [72]Promote lymphocyte infiltration and activity through activation of LTβR signallingPre-clinicalPNETs
Elpamotide [73]Induce CTLs to kill VEGFR2-expressing endothelial cellsClinicalPDAC
Drugs targeting other molecules or pathways
Benzofuran 90 [74]Suppress p53-indipendent tumor cells through inhibition of HIF-1 pathway.
Inhibits tumor angiogenesis downregulating Ang-2 through inhibition of YAP activity, and suppress VM downregulating MMP2, VE-cadherin and α-SMA expression		Pre-clinicalPDAC
Everolimus [75]Selective inhibitor of mTOR downstream signallingClinicalPDAC
IkBα-SR [76]Inhibit NF-κB pathwayPre-clinicalPDAC
miR21 [61]Decrease cell viabilityPre-clinicalPDAC
Octreotide [77]Synthetic somatostatin analogues that inhibit hormonal secretionClinicalPNETs
Radiopeptide anti-GLP-1R [78]Target beta-cells with radiopepetidePre-clinicalPNETs
Verteporfin [79,80]Arrest cell-cycle and induce apoptosis targeting Hippo pathwayPre-clinicalPDAC
Table
Table 3. Main clinical studies ongoing in pancreatic cancer of last 5 years discussed in the text.
Table 3. Main clinical studies ongoing in pancreatic cancer of last 5 years discussed in the text.
Drug’s NameSample SizeCombined RegimensResponse RateObjective Response RateOverall Survival (Months)Progression Free Survival (Months)Median Survival TimeDidease Control RateTime to Progression
Sorafenib [58]71Gemcitabine plus or not Sorafenib in patients with LDH values under or above the cut-off 10.7 vs. 5.95.2 vs. 2.7
Elpamotide [73]153Gemcitabine plus or not Elpamotide No significative3.71 vs. 3.758.36 vs. 8.5459.6% vs. 60.4%
Everolimus [75]27Everolimus in combination with escalating low-dose gemcitabine13%
Sorafenib [59]25Gemcitabine-based chemoradion therapy plus or not Sorafenib 12.6 in evaluable patients;
11.5 in intent to treat patients; 21.6 in patients with VEGF-A -2578 AA, -1498 CC genotypes; 14.7 in patients with VEGF-A -1154 AA genotype		10.6 in evaluable patients;
9.9 in intent to treat patients		 10.7 in evaluable and in intent to treat patients
Bevacizumab [116]163Gemcitabine plus Bevacizumab in patient with related hypertension (B-HTN) or not 47% vs. 16%13.1 vs. 8.1 85% vs. 59%
Endostar [71]14Endostar and Temozolomide or Dacarbazine plus 5-fluorouracil46%33% vs. 50% in no therapy vs. prior therapyNot reached12
Sunitinib [64]26Sunitinib after different chemotherapy protocols58% 6.01.4
Pazopanib [65]44Pazopanib 24.19.5
Octreotide [77]427Octreotide vs. Octreotide plus Bevacizumab or interferon alfa-2b 12% in Bevacizumab arm; 4% in interferon alfa-2b armNo significative16.6 in Bevacizumab arm; 15.4 in interferon alfa-2b arm
Pertuzumab [66]43Bevacizumab, Pertuzumab and Octreotide 16%26.46.5
sst5TMD4 [124]42Study designed to focus on functional roles of somatostatin receptors

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Annese, T.; Tamma, R.; Ruggieri, S.; Ribatti, D. Angiogenesis in Pancreatic Cancer: Pre-Clinical and Clinical Studies. Cancers 2019, 11, 381. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/cancers11030381

AMA Style

Annese T, Tamma R, Ruggieri S, Ribatti D. Angiogenesis in Pancreatic Cancer: Pre-Clinical and Clinical Studies. Cancers. 2019; 11(3):381. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/cancers11030381

Chicago/Turabian Style

Annese, Tiziana, Roberto Tamma, Simona Ruggieri, and Domenico Ribatti. 2019. "Angiogenesis in Pancreatic Cancer: Pre-Clinical and Clinical Studies" Cancers 11, no. 3: 381. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/cancers11030381

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop