Next Article in Journal
Trapping Capability of Small Vacancy Clusters in the α-Zr Doped with Alloying Elements: A First-Principles Study
Previous Article in Journal
Nanomechanical Characterization of Enzyme Induced Carbonate Precipitates
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effects of ESMT on Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Al-8Zn-2Mg-1.5Cu-0.15Sc-0.15Zr Cast Alloy in Squeeze Casting Process

1
National Engineering Research Center for Non-Ferrous Metal Composites, GRINM Group, Beijing 101407, China
2
School of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100088, China
3
Grinm Metal Composites Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing 101407, China
4
General Research Institute for Nonferrous Metals, Beijing 100088, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 24 June 2022 / Revised: 10 July 2022 / Accepted: 12 July 2022 / Published: 18 July 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Hybrid and Composite Crystalline Materials)

Abstract

:
Al-8Zn-2Mg-1.5Cu-0.15Sc-0.15Zr alloy with high-strength performance as well as good castability has been developed. In this study, effects of electromagnetic stirring melt treatment (ESMT) on microstructure and mechanical properties of the alloy in the squeeze casting process were investigated. The results show that solidification structure and mechanical properties are significantly improved by ESMT; compared with the conventional squeeze casting, the average grain size decreases from 112 μm without ESMT to 53 μm with ESMT. Meanwhile coarse primary Al3(Sc, Zr) particles unavoidably occurred in cases without ESMT disappear, and segregation degree of the main elements of Zn, Mg, Cu are greatly alleviated; the tensile strength increases from 590 MPa to 610 MPa, and the elongation increases from 9% to 11%. The structure refinement and homogenization should owe to uniform temperature and composition distribution by ESMT under squeeze casting with rapid solidification.

1. Introduction

Lightweight, ultra-high-strength aluminum alloys in aerospace, rail transit, national defense, and military industries are increasingly demanded [1,2]. The castability of the cast aluminum alloys, such as Al-Zn, Al-Mg, Al-Si and Al-Cu, are fairly good, but their strength are not particularly good, which cannot satisfy the needs of high toughness. Characterized with excellent comprehensive mechanical properties processed by subsequent deformation and heat treatment, commercial Al-Zn-Mg-Cu series aluminum alloys are widely applied to substitute for low-carbon steel and cast-iron materials. However, in the alloys featured with high-alloying and large solidification temperature range, there are also problems such as coarse grains, serious segregation tendency, severe shrinkage, and high hot-tearing sensitivity by the conventional casting processes [3,4,5]. Much attention is being focused on squeeze casting process for this kind of alloy, because its rapid solidification under high pressure can eliminate shrinkage porosity defects in the casting process, and the casting structure becomes denser [1,6].
To achieve near-finish casting of high-strength aluminum alloy, much research has been carried out on the forming process and composition design in recent years [7,8,9]. On one hand, casting defects in the small-sized squeeze castings can be reduced to some degree for some wrought Al-Zn-Mg-Cu alloys, but there are still unavoidable defects such as shrinkage porosity, and coarse structure in the large-sized squeeze castings, which seriously affect casting performance and mechanical properties [10,11]. In response to this problem, an advanced electromagnetic stirring melt treatment (ESMT) method was developed [12,13], and uniform, fine solidification structure of wrought 7XXX series alloys was obtained by applying electromagnetic stirring in the solidification process [14,15,16]. On the other hand, an ultra-high-strength cast aluminum alloy for squeeze casting, designed by main element composition optimization and Sc and Zr micro-alloying, exhibited good casting properties while maintaining mechanical properties with high strength and high toughness [17]. However, little work has been done to examine the effect of the ESMT on the microstructure and mechanical properties of the cast alloy.
The aim of this work is to study the solidification characterization of the new Al-8Zn-2Mg-1.5Cu-0.15Sc-0.15Zr cast alloy, where effects of ESMT on microstructure, composition, and mechanical properties of squeeze castings are explored, and also corresponding mechanisms of structure refinement and homogenization are discussed.

2. Materials and Methods

The industrial high-purity aluminum (99.99%), pure zinc (99.92%), pure magnesium (99.95%), Al-50Cu, Al-5Zr, and Al-2Sc master alloys were adopted to prepare the experimental alloy, and its practical chemical composition is shown in Table 1. The liquidus temperature is calculated to 632 °C by the JMatPro software. Figure 1 shows the schematic view of the ESMT apparatus. The test alloy was first heated to 760 °C, and then the alloy melt was poured into a stainless-steel crucible with a size of φ70 mm × H180 mm and a preheating temperature of 350 °C. In the case with ESMT, as the melt temperature is reduced to 660 °C, the melt was poured into a cylindrical die with a size of φ60 mm × H90 mm and a preheating temperature of 150 °C to squeeze castings, and the melt processing parameters and forming pressures of the die forming machine are shown in Table 2. In the case without ESMT, the melt was naturally cooled to about 660 °C. The detailed information about experimental process procedures is provided in literature [12]. To obtain the temperature change of the alloy melt in the experiments under two conditions, the temperature curve with time at different positions in the melt were measured, and the testing positions of the thermocouples are shown in Figure 1, named 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6.
Metallographic samples with a size of 25 mm × 10 mm × 6 mm were cut along the radial direction of the squeeze castings. The specimens were grounded, polished, and then anodized in a diluted solution of 2.5%HBF4 acid. The coating voltage is 30 V, the coating current is controlled below 1 mA, and the coating time is 60 s. The microstructures were observed by ZEISS optical microscope and the grain size was evaluated using the linear intercept method described in ASTM standard E112-96. The solid solution level of elemental line scan analysis and secondary phases were observed on a JSM-7900F scanning electron microscope. Element distribution in squeeze castings was measured by direct reading spectrometer, by measuring three points at each location and calculating the average. The tensile testing samples was subjected to T6 heat treatment [17] for the mechanical properties measurement according to GB/T228.11-2010, by taking three samples along the axis of each casting for measuring at least 3 times to ensure the stability of the experimental results. Tensile properties were performed on a CSS-44100 electronic universal testing machine with a 2 mm/min loading speed. The tensile specimens are illustrated in Figure 2.

3. Results

3.1. Microstructure Characterization

Figure 3 shows the optical microstructures of squeeze castings of the test alloy under two conditions: (a) without ESMT; (b) with ESMT. It can be seen from Figure 3a that the alloy melt without ESMT consists of coarse dendritic grains with irregular morphology, and the average grain size is 112 μm by the cross-section method. In the case with ESMT shown in Figure 3b, the microstructure is significantly refined, and the grains are mainly made of equiaxed spherical crystal structures with an average grain size of 53 μm. It is clear that the grain size and microscopic morphology are improved greatly when the ESMT is applied to the test alloy melt during squeeze casting process.
Figure 4 shows the scanning images of the alloy microstructure of the squeeze castings under different conditions. It can be seen that there are rectangular and triangular bulk primary second phases inside the grains without ESMT, and the size of the primary second phase is about 10 μm, as shown in the black circle in Figure 4a, which is Al3(Sc, Zr) primary phase by EDS analysis, as shown in Figure 5. After ESMT, the coarse primary Al3(Sc, Zr) phases inside the grains decrease or even nearly disappear, as shown in Figure 4b.

3.2. Composition Analysis

Figure 6 shows the concentration distribution of Zn, Mg, and Cu elements in different positions of the castings formed by squeeze casting under different treatment conditions. It is noted that, the concentration distribution of alloying elements has a decreasing trend from the center to the edge in the castings without ESMT, and the difference in the distribution of element concentration is very large. After the ESMT, the difference in the distribution of element concentrations in the castings decreases obviously. It is clear that the ESMT can reduce the macro-segregation degree of the alloying element concentration.
Figure 7 shows the line-scan element distribution among grains at different positions of squeeze castings under different processing conditions. In the case without ESMT, shown in Figure 7a,b, the degree of element segregation at the edge is more serious than at the center, and the segregation position of Zn, Mg, and Cu elements exist at the grain boundary in the microstructure. In the case with ESMT, shown in Figure 7c,d, the degree of element segregation between the edge and the center decreases, especially at the grain boundary in the microstructure. It is obvious that the ESMT can improve the composition homogenization of the castings, as well as at the grain boundary.

3.3. Mechanical Properties

Figure 8 shows the mechanical properties of squeeze castings under different conditions. It can be seen from the figure that the mechanical properties of the alloy are improved by ESMT. The tensile strength increases from 590 MPa without ESMT to 610 MPa with ESMT, and the elongation increases from 9% without ESMT to 11% with ESMT. Furthermore, the mechanical property error reduces greatly with ESMT, and the performance of the alloy is more stable.
Figure 9 shows the fracture surfaces of squeeze castings under different conditions: (a) without ESMT; (b) with ESMT. It can be seen from Figure 9a that the tensile fracture is mostly composed of shear planes and a few small dimples, indicating the main fracture mode of intergranular shear fracture. Figure 9b shows the tensile fracture morphology when the alloy is treated with ESMT. The fracture morphology of the alloy is basically the same as the alloy without ESMT, but the number of dimples increased, especially the intergranular dimples which increased substantially. In addition, there will be more transgranular dimples on the fracture surface.

4. Discussion

Al-8Zn-2Mg-1.5Cu-0.15Sc-0.15Zr cast alloy, designed by main element composition optimization and Sc and Zr microalloying, exhibited good casting properties while maintaining mechanical properties with high strength and high toughness [17]. However, the alloy is featured with high-alloying, grain refinement, and homogenization which have a great effect on mechanical properties of the castings.
For the untreated melt, since there is only natural convection in the melt, the cooling of the melt mainly relies on the heat conduction with the crucible wall for heat dissipation. The stainless-steel crucible wall dissipates heat faster, so the melt temperature near the crucible wall is relatively low. The melt away from the crucible wall has a slow heat conduction speed, leading to a large temperature gradient and uneven temperature distribution as shown in Figure 10a. When ESMT is applied, forced convection is caused by the electromagnetic force driving the melt flow, and the temperature distribution is more uniform as shown in Figure 10b. During the solidification process of the melt without ESMT, the temperature field and composition field of the melt is not uniformly distributed, and the Sc-Zr atomic clusters have a high aggregation ability, which leads to the aggregation and segregation of Sc and Zr elements, and the Al3(Sc, Zr) phase in the melt first nucleates and grows due to the higher liquidus temperature as shown in Figure 11a, and subsequently coarse Al3(Sc, Zr) particles cannot be used as a nucleation base to refine the microstructure of the alloy, which will eventually lead to the coarse and uneven grains in the castings.
When applying ESMT to the melt, the temperature field and composition field of the melt is uniformly distributed, and Sc and Zr elements are more evenly distributed in the melt, and the trend of aggregation and segregation of Sc and Zr elements is alleviated, and lots of Al3(Sc, Zr) phases in the melt simultaneously nucleate as the melt temperature drops to the liquidus, as shown in Figure 11b; consequently, a large number of fine and dispersed primary Al3(Sc, Zr) crystal nuclei have not enough time and space to grow, and the tiny Al3(Sc, Zr) particles can be used as effective nucleation bases to refine the microstructure of the alloy, which will eventually lead to the fine and even grains in the castings.
At the same time, the solute concentration in the liquid phase can be homogenized by strong shearing action of ESMT, and the uneven distribution of solute elements in the case without ESMT can be improved as well. According to the Hall-Petch formula, the mechanical properties of the alloy increase with the decrease of the grain size, so the mechanical properties of the alloy castings by ESMT are improved. It is emphasized in this study that fine microstructure and homogenous composition distribution will contribute to elongation enhancement.

5. Conclusions

In this study, effects of ESMT on microstructure and mechanical properties of Al-8Zn-2Mg-1.5Cu-0.15Sc-0.15Zr cast alloy in the squeeze casting process were investigated. The following conclusions can be made:
(1)
Solidification structure and mechanical properties are significantly improved by ESMT; compared with the conventional squeeze casting, the average grain size decreases from 112 μm without ESMT to 53 μm with ESMT, and segregation degree of the main elements of Zn, Mg, Cu are greatly alleviated.
(2)
Rectangular and triangular bulk primary second phases with a size of about 10 μm inside the grains unavoidably occurred in cases without ESMT decrease or even nearly disappear by ESMT.
(3)
The tensile strength increases from 590 MPa without ESMT to 610 MPa with ESMT, and the elongation increases from 9% without ESMT to 11% with ESMT. The improvement of the mechanical properties should owe to structure refinement and composition homogenization by ESMT under squeeze casting with rapid solidification.

Author Contributions

Z.Z., Z.G., and Y.B. devised the project. Z.Z. supervised the work and reviewed the manuscript. Y.X., and P.Z. carried out experiments, simulations, and wrote the manuscript. W.M. put forward the conceptualization and methodology. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Date is contained within the article.

Acknowledgments

The work support by GRINM Metal Composites Technology Co., Ltd. (Enterprise Technology Re-search Project) and research platform support by National Engineering and Technology Research Center for Non-ferrous Metal Matrix Composites, GRINM Group Co., Ltd. is greatly acknowledged.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Xing, S. Advance in the Rheological processing for clean and perfect castings. Spec. Cast. Nonferrous Alloy. 2008, 1, 22–25. [Google Scholar]
  2. Williams, J.C.; Starke, E.A., Jr. Progress in structural materials for aerospace systems. Acta Mater. 2003, 51, 5775–5799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Kwak, H.S.; Kuwahara, K.; Hyun, J.M. Resonant enhancement of natural convection heat transfer in a square enclosure. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 1998, 41, 2837–2846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Deng, Y.; Yin, Z.; Huang, J. Hot deformation behavior and microstructural evolution of homogenized 7050 aluminum alloy during compression at elevated temperature. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2011, 528, 1780–1786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Liu, Z.; Fecht, H.; Xu, Y.; Yin, J.; Tsuchiya, K.; Umemoto, M. Electron-microscopy investigation on nanocrystal formation in pure Fe and carbon steel during ball milling. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2003, 362, 322–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Qi, P. Squeezing casting for wrought aluminum alloy. Spec. Cast. Nonferrous Alloy. 2008, 28, 769–772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zhang, W.; Lin, B.; Fan, J.; Zhang, D.; Li, Y. Microstructures and mechanical properties of heat-treated Al–5.0Cu–0.5Fe squeeze cast alloys with different Mn/Fe ratio. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2013, 588, 366–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Xiong, Y.; Li, N.; Jiang, H.; Li, Z.; Xu, Z.; Liu, L. Microstructural Evolutions of AA7055 Aluminum Alloy under Dynamic and Quasi-static Compressions. Acta Met. Sin. Engl. Lett. 2014, 27, 272–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wang, Z.G.; Xu, J.; Zhang, Z.F.; Li, B.; Li, D.Q. The Study on Microstructures and Properties of the Direct Squeeze Casting Al-Zn-Mg-Cu-Zr-Sc Alloy. Adv. Mater. Res. 2013, 652–654, 2455–2459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Stangeland, A.; Mo, A.; Eskin, D. Thermal strain in the mushy zone for aluminum alloys. Met. Mater. Trans. A Phys. Metall. Mater. Sci. 2006, 37, 2219–2229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Tang, Z.; Vollertsen, F. Influence of grain refinement on hot cracking in laser welding of aluminum. Weld. World 2014, 58, 355–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zheng, H.; Zhang, Z.; Bai, Y.; Xu, Y. Research on Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Rheological Die Forging Parts of Al-6.54Zn-2.40Cu-2.35Mg-0.10Zr(-Sc) Alloy. Materials 2020, 13, 5591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Xu, J.; Gao, Z.H.; Zhang, Z.F.; Tang, M.G.; Yu, W.D. Application Research on Annular Electromagnetic Stirring Casting Process of Al-Zn-Mg-Cu Alloy. Solid State Phenom. 2013, 192–193, 466–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Guan, T.; Zhang, Z.; Bai, Y.; Li, B.; Wang, P. Enhanced Refinement of Al-Zn-Mg-Cu-Zr Alloy via Internal Cooling with An-nular Electromagnetic Stirring above the Liquidus Temperature. Materials 2019, 12, 2337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Guan, T.; Zhang, Z.; Bai, Y.; He, M.; Zheng, H.; Zhao, H.; Li, X.; Wang, P. The Influence of Inter-Cooling and Electromagnetic Stirring above Liquidus on the Formation of Primary Al3Zr and Grain Refinement in an Al-0.2%Zr Alloy. Materials 2018, 12, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. He, M.; Zhang, Z.; Mao, W.; Li, B.; Bai, Y.; Xu, J. Numerical and Experimental Study on Melt Treatment for Large-Volume 7075 Alloy by a Modified Annular Electromagnetic Stirring. Materials 2019, 12, 820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Xu, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Gao, Z.; Bai, Y.; Zhao, P.; Mao, W. Effect of main elements (Zn, Mg and Cu) on the microstructure, castability and mechanical properties of 7xxx series aluminum alloys with Zr and Sc. Mater. Charact. 2021, 182, 111559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of ESMT.
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of ESMT.
Crystals 12 00996 g001
Figure 2. Sample geometry of a tensile specimen (unit: mm).
Figure 2. Sample geometry of a tensile specimen (unit: mm).
Crystals 12 00996 g002
Figure 3. Optical microstructures of squeeze castings of the test alloy under two conditions: (a) Without ESMT; (b) With ESMT.
Figure 3. Optical microstructures of squeeze castings of the test alloy under two conditions: (a) Without ESMT; (b) With ESMT.
Crystals 12 00996 g003
Figure 4. SEM microstructures of squeeze castings of the test alloy under two conditions: (a) Without ESMT; (b) With ESMT.
Figure 4. SEM microstructures of squeeze castings of the test alloy under two conditions: (a) Without ESMT; (b) With ESMT.
Crystals 12 00996 g004
Figure 5. Coarse bulk primary Al3(Sc, Zr) phase (a), and EDS analysis result (b) in SEM microstructures of squeeze castings without ESMT.
Figure 5. Coarse bulk primary Al3(Sc, Zr) phase (a), and EDS analysis result (b) in SEM microstructures of squeeze castings without ESMT.
Crystals 12 00996 g005
Figure 6. Concentration distribution of Zn, Mg, and Cu elements in different positions of the squeeze castings under different treatment conditions: (a) Zn; (b) Mg; (c) Cu.
Figure 6. Concentration distribution of Zn, Mg, and Cu elements in different positions of the squeeze castings under different treatment conditions: (a) Zn; (b) Mg; (c) Cu.
Crystals 12 00996 g006
Figure 7. Line scanning element distribution among grains at different positions of squeeze castings under different conditions: (a,e) Without ESMT, edge; (b,f) Without ESMT, center; (c,g) With ESMT, edge; (d,h) With ESMT, center.
Figure 7. Line scanning element distribution among grains at different positions of squeeze castings under different conditions: (a,e) Without ESMT, edge; (b,f) Without ESMT, center; (c,g) With ESMT, edge; (d,h) With ESMT, center.
Crystals 12 00996 g007
Figure 8. Mechanical properties of squeeze castings under different conditions.
Figure 8. Mechanical properties of squeeze castings under different conditions.
Crystals 12 00996 g008
Figure 9. The tensile fracture morphology of squeeze castings under different conditions: (a) Without ESMT; (b) With ESMT.
Figure 9. The tensile fracture morphology of squeeze castings under different conditions: (a) Without ESMT; (b) With ESMT.
Crystals 12 00996 g009
Figure 10. Cooling curves of temperature with time under different conditions: (a) Without ESMT; (b) With ESMT.
Figure 10. Cooling curves of temperature with time under different conditions: (a) Without ESMT; (b) With ESMT.
Crystals 12 00996 g010
Figure 11. Schematic diagram of Al3(Sc, Zr) nucleation: (a) Without ESMT; (b) With ESMT; Crystals 12 00996 i001 Al atom group, Crystals 12 00996 i002 Sc atom group, Crystals 12 00996 i003 Zr atom group.
Figure 11. Schematic diagram of Al3(Sc, Zr) nucleation: (a) Without ESMT; (b) With ESMT; Crystals 12 00996 i001 Al atom group, Crystals 12 00996 i002 Sc atom group, Crystals 12 00996 i003 Zr atom group.
Crystals 12 00996 g011
Table 1. Practical chemical composition of the test alloy (wt. %).
Table 1. Practical chemical composition of the test alloy (wt. %).
ZnMgCuZrScFeSiOthersAl
7.941.941.480.140.140.020.02≤0.01Bal.
Table 2. Melt treatment parameters under different conditions.
Table 2. Melt treatment parameters under different conditions.
ConditionsPouring Temperature/°CStirring Frequency/HzStirring Current/AEnd Temperature/°CRatio PRESSURE/MPa
No ESMT76000632100
ESMT760510632100
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Xu, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Zhao, P.; Gao, Z.; Bai, Y.; Mao, W. Effects of ESMT on Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Al-8Zn-2Mg-1.5Cu-0.15Sc-0.15Zr Cast Alloy in Squeeze Casting Process. Crystals 2022, 12, 996. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/cryst12070996

AMA Style

Xu Y, Zhang Z, Zhao P, Gao Z, Bai Y, Mao W. Effects of ESMT on Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Al-8Zn-2Mg-1.5Cu-0.15Sc-0.15Zr Cast Alloy in Squeeze Casting Process. Crystals. 2022; 12(7):996. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/cryst12070996

Chicago/Turabian Style

Xu, Yongtao, Zhifeng Zhang, Purui Zhao, Zhihua Gao, Yuelong Bai, and Weimin Mao. 2022. "Effects of ESMT on Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Al-8Zn-2Mg-1.5Cu-0.15Sc-0.15Zr Cast Alloy in Squeeze Casting Process" Crystals 12, no. 7: 996. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/cryst12070996

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop