Next Article in Journal
Defect Dynamics in Anomalous Latching of a Grating Aligned Bistable Nematic Liquid Crystal Device
Next Article in Special Issue
Pre-Recycling Material Analysis of NMC Lithium-Ion Battery Cells from Electric Vehicles
Previous Article in Journal
Theoretical Study on the Electrochemical Water Splitting of Two-Dimensional Metal–Organic Frameworks TM3C12O12 (TM = Mn, Fe, Co, Ni)
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Comparative Study on the K-ion Storage Behavior of Commercial Carbons
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Non-Flammable Dual-Salt Deep Eutectic Electrolyte for High-Voltage Lithium Metal Battery

1
Research Centre of Printed Flexible Electronics, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology (Shenzhen), Shenzhen 518055, China
2
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen 518055, China
3
State Key Laboratory of Advanced Welding and Joining, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology (Shenzhen), Shenzhen 518055, China
4
School of Science, Harbin Institute of Technology (Shenzhen), Shenzhen 518055, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Submission received: 23 August 2022 / Revised: 10 September 2022 / Accepted: 11 September 2022 / Published: 13 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Technologies in Lithium-Ion Batteries)

Abstract

:
The application of high voltage cathode electrode materials is an effective way to increase the energy density of batteries. However, the development and design of a stable electrolyte at high voltages needs to be further addressed. Herein, we developed a non-flammable dual-salt deep eutectic solvent (DES) as a safe electrolyte containing LiTFSI, LiDFOB, and succinonitrile in different molar ratios. This non-flammable DES provides high ionic conductivity (4.23 mS cm−1) at 25 °C, high Li+ transference number (0.75), and wide electrochemical stability (>5.5 V). When using the designed DES electrolytes in high voltage LiCoO2||Li cells, superior electrochemical performance was achieved at cut-off voltages of 3.0–4.45 V and 3.0–4.6 V, even at a high current density of 2 C. This work offers an in-depth understanding of the critical role of dual-salts in DES and provides an approach to designing safe electrolytes for high voltage LiCoO2||Li cells.

1. Introduction

With the rapid development of information technology, electronic products have become more concerned with the issues of lightness and long lifespan. The higher demands are being made on the volume energy density of batteries. LiCoO2 (LCO), the first commercially available cathode material, continues to occupy an important position in portable electronics and consumer electronics, despite the fact that the price of cobalt has been rising, because LCO has the advantages of high theoretical capacity (275 mAh g−1), high operating voltage, high bulk energy density, and excellent electronic conductivity [1,2]. However, the LCO has a discharge capacity of only 140 mAh g−1 when the charge cut-off voltage is at 4.2 V in practical applications. When the charging cut-off voltage is increased, the discharge capacity also rises, rising to 180 mAh g−1 at the 4.5 V charging cut-off voltage and even to 220 mAh g−1 at the 4.6 V cut-off voltage [3,4]. However, conventional electrolytes such as carbonates and ethers cannot withstand high voltages above 4.5 V and will decompose, failing to allow stable cycling of the battery. In addition, increasing the charge cut-off voltage will deteriorate the cathode/electrolyte interface and cause irreversible phase transitions, resulting in rapid capacity decay [5,6,7,8].
Researchers have devoted considerable effort to stabilizing the cathode structure and cathode/electrolyte interface at high voltages, including element doping [9,10,11,12,13], surface coating [14,15,16], binder improvement [5,17], separator modification [18,19,20], and electrolyte optimization [21,22,23,24]. Among these strategies, elemental doping obviously adjusts the basic physical properties of the electrode material. However, some inactive elements are also introduced, lowering the energy density of the cathode. Although the coating method is an effective way to improve the electrochemical performance of high-voltage LCO, the coating layer can also lead to high interfacial resistance. Based on cost and procedure considerations, electrolyte modification is a convenient and promising method. Traditional organic carbonate electrolytes, although preferred for commercial lithium-ion batteries, are not suitable for lithium metal batteries. This is because carbonate electrolytes cannot form a stable electrode/electrolyte interface, resulting in a continuous reaction between electrolyte and lithium metal, leading to low Coulombic efficiency and rapid capacity decay. Although ether electrolytes have good compatibility with lithium metal, the low oxidation decomposition potential (<4 V vs. Li+/Li) limits their applications in high-voltage cathodes. More importantly, both carbonate and ether electrolytes have low flash points and are highly flammable, leading to safety hazards in the event of thermal runaway of the battery. The strategies for electrolyte modification in high voltage include additives [22], fluorinated solvents [25], localized high concentration electrolytes [26], deep eutectic solvents [27], and solid-state electrolytes [28] have been investigated. Among these, deep eutectic solvents have attracted a lot of attention because of their advantages, such as non-flammability, low cost, and ease of preparation. Fu’s group reported a new deep eutectic electrolyte consisting of 2,2′-dipyridyl disulfide and LiTFSI with a relatively low ionic conductivity of 1.5 × 10−4 S cm−1 at 50 °C [29]. Therefore, the issues of low ionic conductivity and high viscosity still need to be addressed. Moreover, there are few reports regarding the use of deep eutectic electrolytes in high voltage LCO cathodes, and the optimization of electrolytes compatible with high voltage cathodes is still required.
According to some previous studies, LiDFOB as an additive can facilitate the formation of a stable cathode electrolyte interface (CEI) due to its high HOMO, which can be preferentially oxidized and involved in the formation of CEI film [30,31]. Furthermore, LiDFOB can be preferentially reduced to form stable SEI films, which effectively inhibits the side-reaction between SN and lithium metal [27,32]. In this work, we reported a non-flammable dual salt deep eutectic solvent electrolyte (DES) containing LiTFSI, LiDFOB, and SN in different molar ratios. This well-designed electrolyte possesses high thermal stability, high ionic conductivity (4.23 mS cm−1, 25 °C), a wide electrochemical window (>5.5 V), and a high Li+ transport number (0.75). We also investigated the effect of different LiTFSI and LiDFOB molar ratios on the electrochemical performance of high voltage LCO cathodes. By benefitting from the favorable characteristics of the dual salt DES electrolyte, the LCO||Li cells demonstrated superior cycling performance. The capacity is 111.5 mAh g−1 with a cut-off voltage of 4.45 V after 600 cycles at 0.5 C and 91.1 mAh g−1 with a cut-off voltage of 4.6 V after 500 cycles at 1 C.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Material

Lithium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide (LiTFSI) and lithium difluoro(oxalato)borate (LiDFOB) and succinonitrile (SN) were all obtained from Aladdin Reagent Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). LiCoO2 powder was purchased from Guangdong Canrd New Energy Technology Co., Ltd. (Zhaoqing, China).

2.2. Preparation of Electrolytes

The dual salt deep eutectic solvent (DES) was prepared by mixing LiTFSI, LiDFOB, and SN at 50 °C until the solution became clarified. The molar ratios of LiTFSI, LiDFOB, and SN are 0.7:0.3:10, 0.8:0.2:10, and 0.9:0.1:10, respectively, and are defined as DES-1, DES-2, and DES-3, respectively. All DES electrolytes were prepared in an argon-filled glove box.

2.3. Characterization

The viscosity of electrolytes was tested at 25 °C using an A&D SV-1A vibrational viscometer. The ionic conductivity of the DES electrolytes was carried out on a Leici 308F conductivity meter at 25 °C. Thermogravimetric analyses were recorded from 30 °C to 600 °C in a nitrogen atmosphere with a heating rate of 10 °C/min.

2.4. Electrochemical Measurements

The LiCoO2 cathode was prepared by dispersing LCO material, Super P, and polyvinylidene fluoride in a mass ratio of 8:1:1 through an FA25 superfine homogenizer with N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone as solvent. The coated electrodes were dried in a vacuum at 80 °C for 12 h. The mass loading of active material was controlled at 2.0~2.5 mg cm−2. Lithium metal (450 µm) was used as the anode, and Glass fiber (Whatman GF/A) was used as the separator. A total of 80 µL of deep eutectic electrolyte was used for cell testing. The carbonate electrolyte (1 M LiPF6 EC-DEC) was used as a comparison. All the cells were assembled in the Ar-filled glove box (Vigor, H2O/O2 < 0.2 ppm) and tested at 25 °C. Linear scanning voltammetry was measured by Li||SS cells from 1 V to 6 V with a sweep rate of 1 mV s−1. The cyclic voltammetry (CV) was carried out by LCO||Li cells from 3.0–4.6 V with a scan rate of 0.1 mV s−1. The rate performance and cycling performance of LCO||Li cells were tested on the NEWARE BTS-51 battery test system. The EIS test was performed on a CHI 760E electrochemical workstation from 10 MHz to 0.1 Hz. The Li+ transference number of deep eutectic electrolytes was performed by Li||Li cells and calculated by the following equation:
t L i + = I s R b ( s ) [ Δ V I 0 R c t ( 0 ) ] I 0 R b ( 0 ) [ Δ V I s R c t ( s ) ]
where Δ V is the applied potential of 5 mV, Rb(0) and Rb(s) stand for the initial and final.
Resistance of deep eutectic electrolytes, respectively. The Rct(0) and Rct(s) are the initial and after polarization interfacial resistance of the cell, respectively. I0 and Is are the initial and the steady-state currents after polarization, respectively.

3. Results and Discussion

In this work, we prepared three dual-salt DES electrolytes containing LiTFSI, LiDFOB, and SN in different molar ratios (Figure 1). The composition of the different DES electrolytes is shown in Table 1. The physicochemical properties of different DES electrolytes are shown in Figure 2. The ionic conductivity increased with decreasing LiDFOB content. The ionic conductivity is 3.91, 4.23, and 4.35 mS cm−1 for DES-1, DES-2, and DES-3, respectively, which is higher than some reported DES electrolytes [29,33,34]. As illustrated in Figure 2b, the viscosity of three DES electrolytes is not significantly different, which range between 23 and 27 mPa s. SN containing C≡N bond has a stronger coordination ability with Li+, which weakens the intermolecular forces of Li+ and TFSI and DFOB thus lowering the melting point and forming a eutectic liquid. Furthermore, the high polarity of SN facilitates the dissociation of lithium salts. These results contribute to the lower viscosity of dual-salt deep eutectic electrolytes. The high conductivity and low viscosity of DES electrolytes can be attributed to the good ability of SN to dissociate lithium salts.
The electrochemical window is a key factor in evaluating the properties of an electrolyte. An electrolyte with high electrochemical stability at high voltages matched with high voltage electrode materials can effectively improve the energy density of the battery. Figure 2c presents the LSV curves for three DES electrolytes. The oxidation resistance of all electrolytes exceeds 5.5 V (vs. Li/Li+), which allows matching with high voltage cathodes, such as high voltage LCO electrodes, even at operating voltages up to 4.6 V.
The ion transference number of an electrolyte is as important as its ionic conductivity. We further measured the Li+ transference numbers for three DES electrolytes by using Li||Li symmetric cells. As depicted in Figure 3a–c, DES-2 exhibits the highest Li+ transference number of 0.75, which is higher than DES-1 of 0.59 and DES-3 of 0.54. In contrast, the Li+ transference number of carbonate-based electrolytes is only 0.2~0.4 [35,36,37,38]. The high lithium-ion transference number reduces polarization during charging and discharging, enabling the cell to cycle stably at higher current densities.
The high thermal stability and non-flammability of the electrolyte can reduce the risk of battery in case of thermal runaway or short circuit. To further verify the potential of DES as a safe electrolyte, flammability tests were carried out on conventional electrolytes and three DES electrolytes. As shown in Figure 3d–g, the conventional electrolyte is easily ignited and poses a significant safety hazard in practical applications (Figure 3d). In contrast, all DES electrolytes cannot be combusted, which is attributed to the inherent non-flammability of SN. This result demonstrates the remarkable safety of DES electrolytes.
The above experimental results demonstrate the advantages of the DES electrolyte with its non-flammability, high ionic conductivity, high Li+ transference number, and oxidation potential of up to 5.5 V. To take advantage of the DES electrolyte, we assembled cells with a high voltage LCO cathode and lithium metal as the anode to evaluate its electrochemical performance at high voltages. The cyclic voltammetry (CV) was performed to understand the electrochemical characteristics of high voltage LCO||Li cells with DES electrolytes. As depicted in Figure 4a–c, the three DES electrolytes exhibit similar oxidation and reduction peaks in the first three cycles. The good reversible redox peaks demonstrate that the phase transition of LCO at high voltage (3.0–4.6 V) is highly reversible in the DES electrolyte. Furthermore, EIS measurements indicate that all three DES electrolytes possess a low interfacial resistance (Figure 4d).
Figure 5a,b demonstrates the rate performance of three DES electrolytes; the DES-1 delivers a reversible capacity of 170.9, 168.6, 162.8, 157.9, and 152.2 mAh g−1 at 0.1 C, 0.2 C, 0.5 C, 1 C, and 2 C, respectively, and the capacity recovers to 170.3 mAh g−1 after returning to 0.1 C. DES-2 exhibits better rate performance than DES-1, with a relatively high capacity of 188.3, 181.1, 171.9, 165.8, and 159.2 mAh g−1, at 0.1 C, 0.2 C, 0.5 C, 1 C, and 2 C, respectively, and the high capacity recovers to 187.8 mAh g−1 after returning to 0.1 C. In addition, the DES-3 delivers a reversible capacity of 178.8, 175.4, 169.8, 164.8, and 158.3 mAh g−1 at 0.1 C, 0.2 C, 0.5 C, 1 C, and 2 C, respectively, and the capacity recovers to 177.7 mAh g−1 after returning to 0.1 C. By contrast, carbonate-based electrolyte only delivers a reversible capacity of 174.8, 170.4, 166.5, 161.1, and 153.6 mAh g−1 at 0.1 C, 0.2 C, 0.5 C, 1 C, and 2 C, respectively. The better rate performance of DES-2 is mainly attributed to the higher Li+ transference number, which facilitates the rapid Li+ migration and reduces cell polarization.
The long cycling performance of DES electrolytes was further evaluated in LCO||Li cells under 3.0–4.45 V and 3.0–4.6 V. As shown in Figure 5c, the cell with DES-2 delivers a high capacity of 111.5 mAh g−1 after 600 cycles at 0.5 C under 3.0–4.45 V, which is higher than DES-1 of 97.9 mAh g−1 and DES-3 of 77.5 mAh g−1. In contrast, carbonate-based electrolytes exhibit a relatively low initial capacity of 153.9 mAh g−1 and suffer from rapid capacity decay. Figure 5f–h shows the voltage–capacity curve of three DES electrolytes with different cycles under 3.0–4.45 V. The results demonstrate that the initial Coulombic efficiencies of DES-1, DES-2, and DES-3 are 87.9%, 91.2%, and 63.1%, respectively. Moreover, DES-2 exhibits a lower polarization during cycling. Moreover, the cells display outstanding cycling stability, with the reversible capacity of 112.1, 110.3, and 105.0 mAh g−1 for DES-1, DES-2, and DES-3 after 700 cycles at 2 C, respectively (Figure 5d), which is much higher than carbonate-based of 54.8 mAh g−1. Notably, DES-2 exhibited the highest average Coulomb efficiency of 99.6%, higher than DES-1 at 97.6% and DES-3 at 99.4%. To further demonstrate the good oxidation resistance of DES, LCO||Li cells were cycled at 3.0–4.6 V. The DES-3 delivers the highest initial discharge capacity of 208.9 mAh g−1 at 1 C. In addition, all DES electrolytes can be stably cycled for 500 cycles at 1 C and under the voltage of 3.0–4.6 V (Figure 5e,i–k). The carbonate-based only delivers a reversible capacity of 89.7 mAh g−1 after 200 cycles at 3.0–4.6 V and 1 C. Consequently, the dual-salt DES electrolyte exhibits excellent cycling performance in high voltage LCO||Li cells (Table 2).

4. Conclusions

In summary, a non-flammable dual-salt DES has been designed as a safe electrolyte for high voltage LCO||Li cells owing to the inherent non-flammability of SN. Comparative and comprehensive studies were carried out on the ion conductivity, viscosity, electrochemical window, Li+ transference number, rate performance, cycling performance, and Coulombic efficiency for different molar ratios of DES. As a result, DES-2 possesses a better rate performance and stable cycling performance with high Coulombic efficiency owing to its high ion conductivity and higher Li+ transference number. In detail, the LCO||Li cell with DES-2 delivers a high reversible capacity of 110.3 mAh g−1 with high Coulombic efficiency of 99.6% at 2 C under 3.0–4.45 V. This work broadens the application of deep eutectic solvent as a safe electrolyte in high safety and high voltage lithium metal batteries.

Author Contributions

W.W. and Q.L. contributed equally to this work. Conceptualization, W.W.; methodology, W.W. and Q.L.; validation, W.W. and Q.L.; formal analysis, W.W. and Q.L.; investigation, W.W. and Q.L.; resources, D.L. and J.L.; data curation, W.W. and M.C.; writing—original draft preparation, W.W. and Q.L.; writing—review and editing, D.L. and J.L.; visualization, W.W. and Q.L.; supervision, M.L. and J.Z.; project administration, M.L. and J.Z.; funding acquisition, J.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21703218 and U21A20307), Shenzhen Science and Technology Program (JCYJ20180507183907224 and KQTD20170809110344233), and Guangdong Province COVID-19 Pandemaic Control Research Fund (2020KZDZX1220).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Lyu, Y.; Wu, X.; Wang, K.; Feng, Z.; Cheng, T.; Liu, Y.; Wang, M.; Chen, R.; Xu, L.; Zhou, J.; et al. An Overview on the Advances of LiCoO2 Cathodes for Lithium-Ion Batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 2020, 11, 2000982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Wang, L.; Chen, B.; Ma, J.; Cui, G.; Chen, L. Reviving Lithium Cobalt Oxide-Based Lithium Secondary Batteries-toward a Higher Energy Density. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2018, 47, 6505–6602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Radin, M.D.; Hy, S.; Sina, M.; Fang, C.; Liu, H.; Vinckeviciute, J.; Zhang, M.; Whittingham, M.S.; Meng, Y.S.; Van der Ven, A. Narrowing the Gap between Theoretical and Practical Capacities in Li-Ion Layered Oxide Cathode Materials. Adv. Energy Mater. 2017, 7, 1602888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Nisa, S.S.; Rahmawati, M.; Yudha, C.S.; Nilasary, H.; Nursukatmo, H.; Oktaviano, H.S.; Muzayanha, S.U.; Purwanto, A. A Fast Approach to Obtain Layered Transition-Metal Cathode Material for Rechargeable Batteries. Batteries 2022, 8, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Huang, H.; Li, Z.; Gu, S.; Bian, J.; Li, Y.; Chen, J.; Liao, K.; Gan, Q.; Wang, Y.; Wu, S.; et al. Dextran Sulfate Lithium as Versatile Binder to Stabilize High-Voltage LiCoO2 to 4.6 V. Adv. Energy Mater. 2021, 11, 2101864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wang, L.; Ma, J.; Wang, C.; Yu, X.; Liu, R.; Jiang, F.; Sun, X.; Du, A.; Zhou, X.; Cui, G. A Novel Bifunctional Self-Stabilized Strategy Enabling 4.6 V LiCoO2 with Excellent Long-Term Cyclability and High-Rate Capability. Adv. Sci. 2019, 6, 1900355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Yang, X.; Lin, M.; Zheng, G.; Wu, J.; Wang, X.; Ren, F.; Zhang, W.; Liao, Y.; Zhao, W.; Zhang, Z.; et al. Enabling Stable High-Voltage LiCoO2 Operation by Using Synergetic Interfacial Modification Strategy. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2020, 30, 2004664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Tuccillo, M.; Palumbo, O.; Pavone, M.; Muñoz-García, A.B.; Paolone, A.; Brutti, S. Analysis of the Phase Stability of LiMO2 Layered Oxides (M = Co, Mn, Ni). Crystals 2020, 10, 526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Reddy, M.V.; Jie, T.W.; Jafta, C.J.; Ozoemena, K.I.; Mathe, M.K.; Nair, A.S.; Peng, S.S.; Idris, M.S.; Balakrishna, G.; Ezema, F.I.; et al. Studies on Bare and Mg-doped LiCoO2 as a cathode material for Lithium ion Batteries. Electrochim. Acta 2014, 128, 192–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kim, S.; Choi, S.; Lee, K.; Yang, G.J.; Lee, S.S.; Kim, Y. Self-Assembly of Core–Shell Structures Driven by Low Doping Limit of Ti in LiCoO2: First-Principles Thermodynamic and Experimental Investigation. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2017, 19, 4104–4113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Yang, Z.; Yang, W.; Tang, Z. Pillared Layered Li1−2xCaxCoO2 Cathode Materials Obtained by Cationic Exchange under Hydrothermal Conditions. J. Power Sources 2008, 184, 557–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Caballero, A.; Hernan, L.; Morales, J.; Castellon, E.R.; Santos, J. Enhancing the Electrochemical Properties of Lt-LICoO2 in Lithium Cells by Doping with Mn. J. Power Sources 2004, 128, 286–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zhang, J.-N.; Li, Q.; Ouyang, C.; Yu, X.; Ge, M.; Huang, X.; Hu, E.; Ma, C.; Li, S.; Xiao, R. Trace Doping of Multiple Elements Enables Stable Battery Cycling of LiCoO2 at 4.6 V. Nat. Energy 2019, 4, 594–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Liu, L.; Chen, L.; Huang, X.; Yang, X.-Q.; Yoon, W.-S.; Lee, H.; McBreen, J. Electrochemical and in Situ Synchrotron Xrd Studies on Al2O3-Coated LiCoO2 Cathode Material. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2004, 151, A1344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Tebbe, J.L.; Holder, A.M.; Musgrave, C.B. Mechanisms of LiCoO2 Cathode Degradation by Reaction with Hf and Protection by Thin Oxide Coatings. ACS Appl. Mater. Inter. 2015, 7, 24265–24278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Aboulaich, A.; Ouzaouit, K.; Faqir, H.; Kaddami, A.; Benzakour, I.; Akalay, I. Improving Thermal and Electrochemical Performances of LiCoO2 Cathode at High Cut-Off Charge Potentials by Mf3 (M = Ce, Al) Coating. Mater. Res. Bull. 2016, 73, 362–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Yabuuchi, N.; Kinoshita, Y.; Misaki, K.; Matsuyama, T.; Komaba, S. Electrochemical Properties of LiCoO2 Electrodes with Latex Binders on High-Voltage Exposure. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2015, 162, A538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Jeong, H.-S.; Kim, D.-W.; Jeong, Y.U.; Lee, S.-Y. Effect of Phase Inversion on Microporous Structure Development of Al2O3/Poly (Vinylidene Fluoride-Hexafluoropropylene)-Based Ceramic Composite Separators for Lithium-Ion Batteries. J. Power Sources 2010, 195, 6116–6121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Jung, Y.S.; Cavanagh, A.S.; Gedvilas, L.; Widjonarko, N.E.; Scott, I.D.; Lee, S.H.; Kim, G.H.; George, S.M.; Dillon, A.C. Improved Functionality of Lithium-Ion Batteries Enabled by Atomic Layer Deposition on the Porous Microstructure of Polymer Separators and Coating Electrodes. Adv. Energy Mater. 2012, 2, 1022–1027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Park, J.-H.; Cho, J.-H.; Park, W.; Ryoo, D.; Yoon, S.-J.; Kim, J.H.; Jeong, Y.U.; Lee, S.-Y. Close-Packed SiO2/Poly (Methyl Methacrylate) Binary Nanoparticles-Coated Polyethylene Separators for Lithium-Ion Batteries. J. Power Sources 2010, 195, 8306–8310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Yong, T.; Zhang, L.; Wang, J.; Mai, Y.; Yan, X.; Zhao, X. Novel Choline-Based Ionic Liquids as Safe Electrolytes for High-Voltage Lithium-Ion Batteries. J. Power Sources 2016, 328, 397–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Fu, A.; Lin, J.; Zhang, Z.; Xu, C.; Zou, Y.; Liu, C.; Yan, P.; Wu, D.-Y.; Yang, Y.; Zheng, J. Synergistical Stabilization of Li Metal Anodes and LiCoO2 Cathodes in High-Voltage Li//LiCoO2 Batteries by Potassium Selenocyanate (Ksecn) Additive. ACS Energy Lett. 2022, 7, 1364–1373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Wang, X.; Zheng, X.; Liao, Y.; Huang, Q.; Xing, L.; Xu, M.; Li, W. Maintaining Structural Integrity of 4.5 V Lithium Cobalt Oxide Cathode with Fumaronitrile as a Novel Electrolyte Additive. J. Power Sources 2017, 338, 108–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Kong, X.; Zhou, R.; Wang, J.; Zhao, J. An Effective Electrolyte Strategy to Improve the High-Voltage Performance of LiCoO2 Cathode Materials. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2019, 2, 4683–4691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Lin, S.; Zhao, J. Functional Electrolyte of Fluorinated Ether and Ester for Stabilizing Both 4.5 V LiCoO2 Cathode and Lithium Metal Anode. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 8316–8323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Lee, S.; Park, K.; Koo, B.; Park, C.; Jang, M.; Lee, H.; Lee, H. Safe, Stable Cycling of Lithium Metal Batteries with Low-Viscosity, Fire-Retardant Locally Concentrated Ionic Liquid Electrolytes. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2020, 30, 2003132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Fu, C.; Ma, Y.; Lou, S.; Cui, C.; Xiang, L.; Zhao, W.; Zuo, P.; Wang, J.; Gao, Y.; Yin, G. A Dual-Salt Coupled Fluoroethylene Carbonate Succinonitrile-Based Electrolyte Enables Li-Metal Batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 2020, 8, 2066–2073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wang, C.; Wang, T.; Wang, L.; Hu, Z.; Cui, Z.; Li, J.; Dong, S.; Zhou, X.; Cui, G. Differentiated Lithium Salt Design for Multilayered PEO Electrolyte Enables a High-Voltage Solid-State Lithium Metal Battery. Adv. Sci. 2019, 6, 1901036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Song, J.; Si, Y.; Guo, W.; Wang, D.; Fu, Y. Organosulfide-Based Deep Eutectic Electrolyte for Lithium Batteries. Angew. Chem. Inter. Ed. 2021, 133, 9969–9973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Yu, L.; Chen, S.; Lee, H.; Zhang, L.; Engelhard, M.H.; Li, Q.; Jiao, S.; Liu, J.; Xu, W.; Zhang, J.-G. A Localized High-Concentration Electrolyte with Optimized Solvents and Lithium Difluoro(Oxalate)Borate Additive for Stable Lithium Metal Batteries. ACS Energy Lett. 2018, 3, 2059–2067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Yu, L.; Guo, S.; Lu, Y.; Li, Y.; Lan, X.; Wu, D.; Li, R.; Wu, S.; Hu, X. Highly Tough, Li-Metal Compatible Organic-Inorganic Double-Network Solvate Ionogel. Adv. Energy Mater. 2019, 9, 1900257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Hu, Z.; Xian, F.; Guo, Z.; Lu, C.; Du, X.; Cheng, X.; Zhang, S.; Dong, S.; Cui, G.; Chen, L. Nonflammable Nitrile Deep Eutectic Electrolyte Enables High-Voltage Lithium Metal Batteries. Chem. Mater. 2020, 32, 3405–3413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Jaumaux, P.; Liu, Q.; Zhou, D.; Xu, X.; Wang, T.; Wang, Y.; Wang, G. Deep Eutectic Solvent-Based Self-Healing Polymer Electrolyte for Safe and Long-Life Lithium-Metal Batteries. Angew. Chem. Inter. Ed. 2020, 59, 9134–9142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Wu, W.; Bo, Y.; Li, D.; Liang, Y.; Zhang, J.; Cao, M.; Guo, R.; Zhu, Z.; Ci, L.; Li, M.; et al. Safe and Stable Lithium Metal Batteries Enabled by an Amide-Based Electrolyte. Nano-Micro Lett. 2022, 14, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Zhao, J.; Wang, L.; He, X.; Wan, C.; Jiang, C. Determination of Lithium-Ion Transference Numbers in LiPF6–Pc Solutions Based on Electrochemical Polarization and Nmr Measurements. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2008, 155, A292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Valøen, L.O.; Reimers, J.N. Transport Properties of Lipf6-Based Li-Ion Battery Electrolytes. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2005, 152, A882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Du, Z.; Wood, D.L.; Belharouak, I. Enabling Fast Charging of High Energy Density Li-Ion Cells with High Lithium Ion Transport Electrolytes. Electrochem. Commun. 2019, 103, 109–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Pu, W.; He, X.; Lu, J.; Jiang, C.; Wan, C. Molar Conductivity Calculation of Li-Ion Battery Electrolyte Based on Mode Coupling Theory. J. Chem. Phys. 2005, 123, 231105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Yu, X.; Wang, L.; Ma, J.; Sun, X.; Zhou, X.; Cui, G. Selectively Wetted Rigid-Flexible Coupling Polymer Electrolyte Enabling Superior Stability and Compatibility of High-Voltage Lithium Metal Batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 2020, 10, 1903939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Dong, T.; Zhang, J.; Xu, G.; Chai, J.; Du, H.; Wang, L.; Wen, H.; Zang, X.; Du, A.; Jia, Q.; et al. A Multifunctional Polymer Electrolyte Enables Ultra-Long Cycle-Life in a High-Voltage Lithium Metal Battery. Energy Environ. Sci. 2018, 11, 1197–1203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ruan, D.; Chen, M.; Wen, X.; Li, S.; Zhou, X.; Che, Y.; Chen, J.; Xiang, W.; Li, S.; Wang, H.; et al. In Situ Constructing a Stable Interface Film on High-Voltage LiCoO2 Cathode Via a Novel Electrolyte Additive. Nano Energy 2021, 90, 106535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The preparation process of the DES electrolyte.
Figure 1. The preparation process of the DES electrolyte.
Crystals 12 01290 g001
Figure 2. (a) The conductivity and (b) viscosity of three DES electrolytes at 25 °C. (c) LSV plots of three DES electrolytes.
Figure 2. (a) The conductivity and (b) viscosity of three DES electrolytes at 25 °C. (c) LSV plots of three DES electrolytes.
Crystals 12 01290 g002
Figure 3. Current-time curve of Li||Li symmetrical cells with (a) DES-1, (b) DES-2, and (c) DES-3. The flame tests of (d) 1 M LiPF6 EC/DEC, (e) DES-1, (f) DES-2, and (g) DES-3 with a torch turned on (up) and off (down).
Figure 3. Current-time curve of Li||Li symmetrical cells with (a) DES-1, (b) DES-2, and (c) DES-3. The flame tests of (d) 1 M LiPF6 EC/DEC, (e) DES-1, (f) DES-2, and (g) DES-3 with a torch turned on (up) and off (down).
Crystals 12 01290 g003
Figure 4. The cyclic voltammetry (CV) of LCO||Li cells from 3.0–4.6 V with (a) DES-1, (b) DES-2, and (c) DES-3. (d) The electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) of LCO||Li cells with three DES electrolytes before cycle.
Figure 4. The cyclic voltammetry (CV) of LCO||Li cells from 3.0–4.6 V with (a) DES-1, (b) DES-2, and (c) DES-3. (d) The electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) of LCO||Li cells with three DES electrolytes before cycle.
Crystals 12 01290 g004
Figure 5. (a) The rate performance of three DES electrolytes and carbonate-based electrolytes at 25 °C. (b) The charge–discharge curves of DES-2 with different current densities. The cycling performance of LCO||Li cells with different electrolytes at 25 °C and (c) 0.5 C and (d) 2 C and under the voltage of 3.0–4.45 V. (e) The cycling performance of LCO||Li cells with different electrolytes at 25 °C and 1 C and 3.0–4.6 V. The charge–discharge curves with (f) DES-1, (g) DES-2, and (h) DES-3 for different cycles at 0.5 C and under the voltage of 3.0–4.45 V. The charge–discharge curves with (i) DES-1, (j) DES-2, and (k) DES-3 for different cycles at 1 C and under the voltage of 3.0–4.6 V.
Figure 5. (a) The rate performance of three DES electrolytes and carbonate-based electrolytes at 25 °C. (b) The charge–discharge curves of DES-2 with different current densities. The cycling performance of LCO||Li cells with different electrolytes at 25 °C and (c) 0.5 C and (d) 2 C and under the voltage of 3.0–4.45 V. (e) The cycling performance of LCO||Li cells with different electrolytes at 25 °C and 1 C and 3.0–4.6 V. The charge–discharge curves with (f) DES-1, (g) DES-2, and (h) DES-3 for different cycles at 0.5 C and under the voltage of 3.0–4.45 V. The charge–discharge curves with (i) DES-1, (j) DES-2, and (k) DES-3 for different cycles at 1 C and under the voltage of 3.0–4.6 V.
Crystals 12 01290 g005
Table 1. The composition of different DES electrolytes.
Table 1. The composition of different DES electrolytes.
NameLiTFSI (Molar)LiDFOB (Molar)SN (Molar)
DES-10.70.310
DES-20.80.210
DES-30.90.110
Table 2. A comparison with some previous reports on cycling performance.
Table 2. A comparison with some previous reports on cycling performance.
StrategyVoltageRateCyclingRetentionRef.
PVDF/PVAC-Based CPE3.0–4.50.5 C20085%[39]
Sulfonamide-based electrolyte3.0–4.550.3 C20089%[40]
0.2% ATCN3.0–4.51 C20091%[41]
LiTFSI-P13FSI-TTE3.0–4.30.5 C35080%[26]
SN-DLi-FEC3.0–4.40.5 C20085%[27]
10% MSM + DMC/FEC/HFE2.75–4.45200 mA/g30087.1%[25]
Dual-salt Deep Eutectic Electrolyte3.0–4.450.5 C20094%This work
3.0–4.452 C50072%
3.0–4.61 C20070%
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wu, W.; Li, Q.; Cao, M.; Li, D.; Lu, J.; Li, M.; Zhang, J. Non-Flammable Dual-Salt Deep Eutectic Electrolyte for High-Voltage Lithium Metal Battery. Crystals 2022, 12, 1290. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/cryst12091290

AMA Style

Wu W, Li Q, Cao M, Li D, Lu J, Li M, Zhang J. Non-Flammable Dual-Salt Deep Eutectic Electrolyte for High-Voltage Lithium Metal Battery. Crystals. 2022; 12(9):1290. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/cryst12091290

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wu, Wanbao, Qing Li, Miaomiao Cao, Deping Li, Jingyu Lu, Mingyu Li, and Jiaheng Zhang. 2022. "Non-Flammable Dual-Salt Deep Eutectic Electrolyte for High-Voltage Lithium Metal Battery" Crystals 12, no. 9: 1290. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/cryst12091290

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop