Next Article in Journal
Influence of Internal Innovative Architecture on the Mechanical Properties of 3D Polymer Printed Parts
Next Article in Special Issue
Electrically Conductive Nanocomposites Composed of Styrene–Acrylonitrile Copolymer and rGO via Free-Radical Polymerization
Previous Article in Journal
Production of Sustainable and Biodegradable Polymers from Agricultural Waste
Previous Article in Special Issue
Preparation and Application of Organic-Inorganic Nanocomposite Materials in Stretched Organic Thin Film Transistors
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Ophthalmic Performance of Hydrogel Contact Lenses Loaded with Silicone Nanoparticles

by
Nguyen-Phuong-Dung Tran
and
Ming-Chien Yang
*
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taipei 10607, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 13 April 2020 / Revised: 6 May 2020 / Accepted: 11 May 2020 / Published: 14 May 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Polymer Nanocomposites)

Abstract

:
In this study, silicone nanoparticles (SiNPs) were prepared from polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) and tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS) via the sol-gel process. The resultant SiNPs were characterized by dynamic light scattering (DLS), transmission electron microscope (TEM), and scanning electron microscope (SEM). These SiNPs were then blended with 2-hydroxyethylmethacrylate (HEMA) and 1-vinyl-2-pyrrolidinone (NVP) before polymerizing into hydrogel contact lenses. All hydrogels were subject to characterization, including equilibrium water content (EWC), contact angle, and oxygen permeability (Dk). The average diameter of SiNPs was 330 nm. The results indicated that, with the increase of SiNPs content, the oxygen permeability increased, while the EWC was affected insignificantly. The maximum oxygen permeability attained was 71 barrer for HEMA-NVP lens containing 1.2 wt% of SiNPs with an EWC of 73%. These results demonstrate that by loading a small amount of SiNPs, the Dk of conventional hydrogel lenses can be improved greatly. This approach would be a new method to produce oxygen-permeable contact lenses.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Contact lenses are employed for correcting eye vision. The global market for contact lenses is about US$8.1 billion in 2018. Two major classes of soft contact lenses are silicone hydrogel and conventional hydrogel lenses. The market shares for the former is 69% while the latter takes 19% in 2018 [1]. Conventional hydrogel contact lenses are synthesized from hydrophilic monomers such as 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA), offering the wearer comfort due to their hydrophilicity. However, this class of contact lenses exhibits low oxygen permeability that may cause red-eye syndrome for long-term wearing [2,3]. To cope with this problem, silicon-containing polymers such as 3-(methacryloyloxy) propyltris(trimethylsiloxy) silane (TRIS) or polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) are incorporated into the hydrogel to increase the oxygen permeability, leading to the inception of silicone hydrogel lenses [4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11].
Polydimethylsiloxane exhibits a hydrophobic nature and is low cost, simple to fabricate, and shows good biocompatibility, flexibility, thermal and oxidative stability, high optical transparency, and especially high oxygen permeability [12,13,14,15,16,17,18]. The main drawback of PDMS is the restriction of water absorptivity, surface wettability, and higher lipid deposition because of its inherent hydrophobicity [19,20,21]. These limitations can be improved through the combination with hydrophilic materials. The incorporation of hydrophobic and hydrophilic monomers usually takes two oppositional tendencies. The first trend is to increase equilibrium water content. However, this will decrease the oxygen permeability because of hydrophilic monomers. On the other hand, a higher PDMS content will enhance oxygen permeability but reduce the water uptake ability [11,22,23]. In silicone hydrogel contact lenses, water is a main factor to restrict the oxygen permeability [24,25,26]. However, the second trend may improve both wettability and oxygen transmissibility when hydrophobic and hydrophilic monomers are cooperated at a proper ratio.
In this work, a novel approach is adopted to improve the oxygen permeability of HEMA-based hydrogels. Instead of incorporating PDMS into the polymer chain, poly(dimethylsiloxane) dialkanol (PDMS diol) was reacted with tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS) through hydrolysis and condensation to form silicone nanoparticles (SiNPs) via the sol-gel process [27,28,29]. Thereafter, SiNPs were loaded into hydrogel synthesized from HEMA and 1-vinyl-2-pyrrolidinone (NVP). All the resultant hydrogels were subject to characterization, including Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), Raman, scanning electron microscope (SEM), transmission electron microscope (TEM), dynamic light scattering (DLS), equilibrium water content (EWC), oxygen permeability (Dk), optical transparency, mechanical strength, and contact angle measurements. We think this novel approach of loading silicone nanoparticles would improve the oxygen permeability without reducing the hydrophilicity and wettability of HEMA hydrogels.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Poly(dimethylsiloxane) dialkanol (PDMS-diol, KF-6001) was purchased from Shin-Etsu Chemical Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan. 1-Vinyl-2-pyrrolidinone (NVP), tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS), and 2-hydroxy-2-methylbenzene acetone (D-1173) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, Mo USA). Further, 2-hydroxyethylmethacrylate (HEMA) and ethylene glycol dimethacrylate (EGDMA) were obtained from Acros Organics (NJ, USA). Phosphate buffered saline solution (PBS, 0.1 M, pH 7.4) was prepared in our laboratory.

2.2. Preparation of Silicone Nanoparticles

Silicone nanoparticles (SiNPs) were synthesized by cross-linking PDMS-diol with TEOS through the sol-gel process shown in Figure 1. The reaction was conducted in a solution containing 0.1 mL of HCl (37%), 4 mL of water, and 2 mL of ethanol (95%). Subsequently, 1 mL of TEOS was added into the solution and then stirred for 1 h at room temperature, followed by adding 4 mL of PDMS-diol dropwise into the reacting solution. The reaction was stirred for 24 h at room temperature in the dark after completion of the addition. After condensing in a vacuum oven at 80 °C for 24 h, SiNPs were harvested and purified with ethanol before sonication and centrifugation. Finally, SiNPs were stored after drying in an oven at 80 °C for 12 h.
Figure 1 shows the synthetic reactions for silicone nanoparticles (SiNPs) from PDMS and TEOS. Firstly, the ethoxy groups of TEOS were hydrolyzed into the hydroxyl groups. In the subsequent condensation, silica and silicone were formed by removing hydroxyl groups of Si-OH [27,29,30].

2.3. Preparation of SiNPs-Loaded Hydrogel Composites

The hydrogels were polymerized from NVP and HEMA in the presence of SiNPs, cross-linking agent EGDMA and photo initiator D-1173 as shown in Table 1 and Figure 2. For all formulations, the mixture contained 0.5 wt% of EGDMA and D-1173. Then, the mixture was stirred in the dark at room temperature for 5 h. Afterward, the mixture was transferred to polypropylene molds and cured under UV light (365 nm) for 40 min. After demolding, lenses were soaked in 50% ethanol for 20 h at 50 °C to remove un-reacted monomers and photo initiator. Then, the lenses were immersed in distilled water for 4 h at 50 °C to wash out ethanol. Finally, the lenses were preserved in PBS (pH 7.4) at room temperature.

2.4. Elemental Analysis and Size of Particles

The elemental composition of dry particles was determined using a field emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM/EDS, JSM-6500F, JEOL, Tokyo, Japan). The particle size was analyzed using dynamic light scattering (DLS-DKSH, Malvern Instruments Ltd., Malvern, UK), and transmission electron microscopy (TEM, JEM-2000FXII, JEOL, Japan).

2.5. Equilibrium Water Content

The equilibrium water content (EWC) of the hydrogel was calculated as follows:
EWC   ( % ) = W 2 W 1 W 2 × 100
where W1 and W2 are the weights of the dry lens and the rehydrated lens in distilled water for one day at room temperature, respectively.

2.6. Optical Transparency

After swelling in PBS solution, the lens was adhered on the surface of cuvette containing 2 mL distilled water. The optical transparency was determined in a wavelength range of 400–700 nm using a UV-Vis spectrophotometer (Cary 300, Agilient Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA).

2.7. Surface Characterization

The contact angle of the contact lens was measured using a contact angle goniometer (DSA 100, Krüss GmbH, Hamburg, Germany) at room temperature. The contact angle was an average of three repetitions.

2.8. Chemical structure

The structure of SiNPs and contact lenses were examined using Raman Spectroscopy and FTIR. The FTIR of SiNPs (Nicolet 170 SX, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Madison, WI, USA) were performed in the wavenumber range of 600–4000 cm−1. SiNPs were pelletized with potassium bromide (KBr) before being scanned over 32 times by an infrared ray. The lenses were detected over 32 scans based on FTIR-ATR. The Raman spectroscopy (iHR550, Horiba Scientific, Kyoto, Japan) was determined in the wavenumber range of 400–4000 cm−1.

2.9. Mechanical Properties

The mechanical properties of hydrogel specimens were determined by modulus and tensile strength. Samples were cut as dog bone shape after hydrated in DI water. Modulus and tensile strength of specimens were measured based on a tensile tester (MTS 810, Material Test System, Eden Prairie, MN, USA) via ASTM D1708 standard at a crosshead speed of 50 mm/min.

2.10. Oxygen Permeability

The oxygen permeability (Dk, barrer) of the lens was determined according to ISO18369-4:2006 which is based on polarographic method using an oxygen permeometer (201 T O2 permeometer, Createch, Chesterfield Twp, MI, USA). Polarography measures the oxygen permeation through a sample by measuring the current produced in a cell by reducing oxygen at a noble metal electrode. Before testing, guard ring polarographic cell (8.6 mm radius, CreaTech/Rehder Development Co., Chesterfield Twp, MI, USA), buffer solutions and the lenses were placed in a temperature and humidity-controlled box at 37 °C and 98% relative humidity till the temperature equilibrium. After fully hydrated, the lenses were stacked to measure the electronic current at a various number of lenses to correct the boundary effect. The linear plot of t/Dk versus thickness was drawn and determined Dk/t from the slope [31,32,33].

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Size and Elemental Composition of Particles

The size of SiNPs was determined based on DLS measurement as shown in Figure 3. The average diameter of SiNPs was 330 ± 100 nm. The TEM image in Figure 4 shows similar SiNPs sizes.
The hydrolysis and condensation reaction of TEOS would produce silica particles based on the sol-gel process [27,28,29,34]. In this work, the condensation of TEOS occurred in the presence of PDMS-diol to result in silicone nanoparticles. The EDX results in Figure 5 showed that the elemental composition of SiNPs was consisted of 28.6% Si, 40.8% O, and 30.6% C. Considering that the atomic ratio of Si:O in PDMS is 1:1 while that in SiO2 is 1:2, the mole fractions of PDMS and SiO2 in SiNP can be estimated by solving the following equations
{ x + y = 0.286 for   Si x + 2 y = 0.408 for   O y = 0.122 ,   x = 0.164
Thus, the mole fraction of silicone is x x + y = 0.164 0.286 = 57.4% and that of silica is y x + y = 42.6%. In addition, the presence of carbon in SiNPs indicated that PDMS did incorporated into SiNPs.
Raman and FTIR were employed to examine the chemical structure of SiNPs synthesized from PDMS and TEOS. Figure 6 shows that the Raman spectrum of SiNPs exhibited strong PDMSs peaks appearing at 2909–2968 cm−1, 1409–1459 cm−1 (C-H groups), and 706–782 cm−1 (Si-C groups). These results were also found in the literature [35,36,37]. Furthermore, the peak at 483 cm−1 were attributed to Si-O-Si [38]. These characteristic peaks indicated that the reaction of PDMS and TEOS through the sol-gel process was successful. Comparing the spectra of TEOS, PDMS, and SiNPs in Figure 7, the peaks of Si-O-Si (1074 cm−1, 808 cm−1, 796 cm−1, 786 cm−1, 495 cm−1, 480 cm−1, 460 cm−1) and SiOH (958 cm−1) were observed. The stretching vibrations of C-H occurred at 2792 cm−1 of TEOS, 2956 cm−1 of PDMS, and 2966 cm−1 of SiNPs while the peaks of Si-C (1251 cm−1 and 1263 cm−1) were respectively observed in the spectra of PDMS and SiNPs [24].

3.2. Optical Transparency

Figure 8 shows the photos of hydrated soft lenses including poly(HEMA-co-NVP) and poly(HEMA-co-NVP)-SiNPs. These lenses appeared transparent.
Figure 9 shows that the light transmittance (T%) of the contact lens decreased with the increase of SiNPs content. The reduction in transparency can be attributed to the size distribution of SiNPs (see Figure 4) that caused light scattering. At a content of 1.2 wt%, the transmittance dropped to 90%. The light transmittance of a contact lens is preferred to be above 90% [39]. A higher SiNPs content would further decrease the transparency of the contact lens below 90%. Thus, in this study, the maximum content of SiNPs was limited to 1.2 wt%.

3.3. Equilibrium Water Content

Equilibrium water content (EWC) is an important index conferring comfortable wearing for patients because of the softness and wettability as well as the limitation of dry corneal eye [40,41]. In this present work, three series of soft lenses were prepared with different EWC values. The basic ingredient of these hydrogels was HEMA, which is a well-known monomer for contact lens. The other ingredient, NVP, is to increase the hydrophilicity of the hydrogel. All these formulations were crosslinked with 0.5 wt% of EGDMA.
Figure 10 shows that the presence of SiNPs in hydrogel network did not significantly affect the EWC of soft lenses. The values of EWC for the HS-, HN2-, and HN5- series varied around 34%, 42%, and 73%, respectively, regardless of the content of SiNPs. This is because that the content of SiNPs was low, and that these nanoparticles interacted little with the matrix of HEMA and NVP. In other words, a small number of nanoparticles were simply dispersed in the hydrogel matrix. On the contrary, for commercialized silicone soft lenses, hydrophobic ingredients such as TRIS, SiMA, and PDMS were incorporated into the main chains of the hydrogel and caused the reduction in EWC of contact lenses [19,22,42,43].

3.4. Contact Angle

Figure 11 shows that the contact angle of the soft lenses increased slightly with the content of SiNPs. This may be attributed to the inherent hydrophobic PDMS in SiNPs embedded in hydrogel matrix [24,44,45]. However, the difference was less than 5°, and all the contact angles were below 70°. Thus, the addition of SiNPs did little to change the wettability of these lenses. The slight increase may be attributed to a small quantity of hydrophobic PDMS (from SiNPs) exposed on the surface [23].

3.5. IR Spectra of Contact Lenses

Figure 12 shows that the FTIR spectra of HS-series lenses differed little as the contents of SiNPs increased from 0 wt% to 1.2 wt%. This phenomenon was observed for HN2S- and HN5S- series as well (not shown). In the spectra of HS-series lenses, peaks of OH groups appeared at 3350 cm−1 while peaks of Si-O-Si groups were detected at 1074 cm−1. Further, in the spectrum of HS-series, the presence of Si-C and C=O were respectively observed at the peaks of 1253 cm−1 and 1706 cm−1 [24]. In the spectra of HN2S- and HN5S- series, the peaks of OH (3338, 3338 cm−1) and Si-O-Si (1072, 1080 cm−1), Si-C (1257 cm−1, 1257 cm−1) and C=O (1643 cm−1, 1631 cm−1) were also detected.

3.6. Mechanical Properties

Figure 13 presents the modulus and tensile strength of all HS, HN2S, and HN5S series. The moduli of all HN5S samples were not significantly affected by the SiNPs content increasing from 0 wt% to 1.2 wt%. Particularly, the moduli of all HN5S lenses were approximately 0.48 MPa for all SiNPs contents. This tendency was also found for HS and HN2S series samples. The moduli of HS and HN2S samples were approximately 0.65 MPa and 0.56 MPa, respectively. In this research, the moduli of all HN5S, HN2S, and HS series were around 0.48–0.65 MPa, which were similar to commercial lenses such as Acuvue Oasys, Acuvue Advance, and Biomedics 38 [43,46]. Hence, these SiNPs-contained contact lenses exhibited mechanical properties comparable to those commercial contact lenses.

3.7. Oxygen Permeability

Figure 14 shows that Dk is linearly depending on the SiNPs content. Furthermore, the slop increased with the hydrophilicity. Although the Dk increases with the EWC for conventional non-silicone hydrogels, the loading of SiNPs did accelerate the permeation of oxygen in these composite hydrogels. For the HS series, the Dk increased from 9 to 29 barrer as the content of SiNPs increased to 1.2 wt%. For a more hydrophilic series, Dk of HN5 soft lenses increased rapidly from 39 to 71 barrer when the content of SiNPs increased from 0 to 1.2 wt%. Additionally, all formulations containing a higher concentration of NVP monomers exhibited higher oxygen transmissibility than others. As a result, the oxygen permeation of three formulation series including p(HEMA-co-NVP) and pure HEMA polymers was affected by the SiNPs content.
It is well-known that hydrophobic PDMS can improve oxygen transmissibility of soft lenses based on its siloxane groups (-Si(CH3)2-O-), especially silicon-oxygen bond [7,9,47]. However, the main weakness of the hydrophobic component is to impair the water absorbability of the lens, [16,24,48] thus EWC and Dk usually follow an inverse correlation. Accordingly, water is usually the limiting factor of oxygen transport for silicone hydrogel lenses [26,49]. On the contrary, for the SiNPs-loaded hydrogel, the addition of SiNPs did not affect the water uptake ability while increasing the oxygen permeability of lenses, as shown in Table 1. This phenomenon broke the reverse relationship of EWC and Dk in comparison to other non SiNPs lenses.
For hydrogels loaded with SiNPs, the content of these nanoparticles was less than 1.2 wt% of the matrix. Although SiNPs were hydrophobic, the effect on the water absorbability was low due to this small content. Furthermore, hydrophilic matrix of the hydrogel interacted little with these hydrophobic nanoparticles. Thus, the mobility of these nanoparticles would be higher than in the case of silicone hydrogels where PDMS chains were integrated into the matrix. Apparently, higher mobility would facilitate the permeation of oxygen through the lens. Although in this study the highest Dk was 70 barrer, we believe that higher Dk could be attained for higher SiNPs content once the particle size was reduced through improving the synthesizing process of SiNPs, thereby breaking through the transparency limitation.

4. Conclusions

As demonstrated in this study, silicone nanoparticles (SiNPs) were synthesized from TEOS and PDMS-diol. The existence of PDMS and TEOS in SiNPs was verified through Raman and FTIR spectroscopy. The resultant nanoparticles exhibited a diameter of 330 ± 100 nm and composed of 57% of silicone and 43% of silica. These nanoparticles were further entrapped in hydrogels polymerized from HEMA and NVP. The resultant SiNPs-loaded hydrogel lenses exhibited an unusual correlation between the oxygen permeability (Dk) and the equilibrium water content (EWC): the Dk increased with the content of silicone nanoparticles while the EWC changed insignificantly. Moreover, based on the result of the contact angle and Young’s modulus, the loading of SiNPs slightly influenced the wetting surface and mechanical properties. The transparency was reduced to 91% when the content of SiNPs was 1.2 wt%, probably due to the light scattering from the nanoparticles. Further effort to reduce the particle size is underway in our lab. With this work, we demonstrate a novel approach to improve the oxygen permeability without impairing the hydrophilicity of soft contact lenses. These results would be beneficial to the development of soft contact lenses.

Author Contributions

N.-P.-D.T. prepared experiments, as well as wrote the original draft. M.-C.Y. supervised the research project and finalized the manuscripts. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan through Grant No. MOST 106-2622-E-011-004-CC2.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Nichols, J.J.; Fisher, D. Overview of general market trends. Contact Lens Spectrum 2019, 34, 18–23. [Google Scholar]
  2. Calossi, A.; Fossetti, A.; Lupelli, L.; Rossetti, A. The effects of short-term contact lens-induced hypoxia tried on ourselves. Cont. Lens Anterior Eye 2015, 38, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Duench, S.; Sorbara, L.; Keir, N.; Simpson, T.; Jones, L. Impact of silicone hydrogel lenses and solutions on corneal epithelial permeability. Optom. Vis. Sci. 2013, 90, 546–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Awasthi, A.; Meng, F.; Künzler, J.; Linhardt, J.; Papagelis, P.; Oltean, G.; Myers, S. Ethylenically unsaturated polycarbosiloxanes for novel silicone hydrogels: Synthesis, end-group analysis, contact lens formulations, and structure–property correlations. Polym. Adv. Technol. 2013, 24, 557–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Chekina, N.; Pavlyuchenko, V.; Danilichev, V.; Ushakov, N.; Novikov, S.; Ivanchev, S. A new polymeric silicone hydrogel for medical applications: Synthesis and properties. Polym. Adv. Technol. 2006, 17, 872–877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wu, J.; He, C.; He, H.; Cheng, C.; Zhu, J.; Xiao, Z.; Zhang, H.; Li, X.; Zheng, J.; Xiao, J. Importance of zwitterionic incorporation into polymethacrylate-based hydrogels for simultaneously improving optical transparency, oxygen permeability, and antifouling properties. J. Mater. Chem. B 2017, 5, 4595–4606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Saini, A.; Rapuano, C.J.; Laibson, P.R.; Cohen, E.J.; Hammersmith, K.M. Episodes of microbial keratitis with therapeutic silicone hydrogel bandage soft contact lenses. Eye Contact Lens 2013, 39, 324–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Seitz, M.E.; Wiseman, M.E.; Hilker, I.; Loos, J.; Tian, M.; Li, J.; Goswami, M.; Litvinov, V.M.; Curtin, S.; Bulters, M. Influence of silicone distribution and mobility on the oxygen permeability of model silicone hydrogels. Polymer 2017, 118, 150–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Szczotka-Flynn, L.; Jiang, Y.; Raghupathy, S.; Bielefeld, R.A.; Garvey, M.T.; Jacobs, M.R.; Kern, J.; Debanne, S.M. Corneal inflammatory events with daily silicone hydrogel lens wear. Optom. Vis. Sci. 2014, 91, 3–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Tran, N.P.D.; Yang, M.C. Synthesis and Characterization of Silicone Contact Lenses Based on TRIS-DMA-NVP-HEMA Hydrogels. Polymers 2019, 11, 944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Wang, J.J.; Li, X.S. Improved oxygen permeability and mechanical strength of silicone hydrogels with interpenetrating network structure. Chin. J. Polym. Sci. 2010, 28, 849–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Chen, D.; Chen, F.; Hu, X.; Zhang, H.; Yin, X.; Zhou, Y. Thermal stability, mechanical and optical properties of novel addition cured PDMS composites with nano-silica sol and MQ silicone resin. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2015, 117, 307–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Mi, H.Y.; Jing, X.; Huang, H.X.; Turng, L.S. Novel polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) composites reinforced with three-dimensional continuous silica fibers. Mater. Lett. 2018, 210, 173–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Abbasi, F.; Mirzadeh, H.; Katbab, A.A. Modification of polysiloxane polymers for biomedical applications: A review. Polym. Int. 2001, 50, 1279–1287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Rudy, A.; Kuliasha, C.; Uruena, J.; Rex, J.; Schulze, K.D.; Stewart, D.; Angelini, T.; Sawyer, W.; Perry, S.S. Lubricous hydrogel surface coatings on polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS). Tribol. Lett. 2017, 65, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ghoreishi, S.; Abbasi, F.; Jalili, K. Hydrophilicity improvement of silicone rubber by interpenetrating polymer network formation in the proximal layer of polymer surface. J. Polym. Res. 2016, 23, 115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Abbasi, F.; Mirzadeh, H.; Simjoo, M. Hydrophilic interpenetrating polymer networks of poly (dimethyl siloxane)(PDMS) as biomaterial for cochlear implants. J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed. 2006, 17, 341–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Lin, C.H.; Lin, W.C.; Yang, M.C. Fabrication and characterization of ophthalmically compatible hydrogels composed of poly (dimethyl siloxane-urethane)/Pluronic F127. Colloids Surf. B 2009, 71, 36–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Chen, J.S.; Liu, T.Y.; Tsou, H.M.; Ting, Y.S.; Tseng, Y.Q.; Wang, C.H. Biopolymer brushes grown on PDMS contact lenses by in situ atmospheric plasma-induced polymerization. J. Polym. Res. 2017, 24, 69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Jones, L.; Senchyna, M.; Glasier, M.A.; Schickler, J.; Forbes, I.; Louie, D.; May, C. Lysozyme and lipid deposition on silicone hydrogel contact lens materials. Eye Contact Lens 2003, 29, 75–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lin, C.H.; Cho, H.L.; Yeh, Y.H.; Yang, M.C. Improvement of the surface wettability of silicone hydrogel contact lenses via layer-by-layer self-assembly technique. Colloids Surf. B 2015, 136, 735–743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Van Beek, M.; Weeks, A.; Jones, L.; Sheardown, H. Immobilized hyaluronic acid containing model silicone hydrogels reduce protein adsorption. J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed. 2008, 19, 1425–1436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Zhao, Z.B.; An, S.S.; Xie, H.J.; Han, X.L.; Wang, F.H.; Jiang, Y. The relationship between the hydrophilicity and surface chemical composition microphase separation structure of multicomponent silicone hydrogels. J. Phys. Chem. B 2015, 119, 9780–9786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Lin, C.H.; Yeh, Y.H.; Lin, W.C.; Yang, M.C. Novel silicone hydrogel based on PDMS and PEGMA for contact lens application. Colloids Surf. B 2014, 123, 986–994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Pozuelo, J.; Compañ, V.; González-Méijome, J.M.; González, M.; Mollá, S. Oxygen and ionic transport in hydrogel and silicone-hydrogel contact lens materials: An experimental and theoretical study. J. Membr. Sci. 2014, 452, 62–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Zhao, Z.; Xie, H.; An, S.; Jiang, Y. The relationship between oxygen permeability and phase separation morphology of the multicomponent silicone hydrogels. J. Phys. Chem. B 2014, 118, 14640–14647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kim, G.D.; Lee, D.A.; Moon, J.W.; Kim, J.D.; Park, J.A. Synthesis and applications of TEOS/PDMS hybrid material by the sol–gel process. Appl. Organomet. Chem. 1999, 13, 361–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kohjiya, S.; Ochiai, K.; Yamashita, S. Preparation of inorganic/organic hybrid gels by the sol-gel process. J. Non Cryst. Solids 1990, 119, 132–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Huang, H.H.; Orler, B.; Wilkes, G.L. Structure-property behavior of new hybrid materials incorporating oligomeric species into sol-gel glasses. 3. Effect of acid content, tetraethoxysilane content, and molecular weight of poly (dimethylsiloxane). Macromolecules 1987, 20, 1322–1330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Loccufier, E.; Geltmeyer, J.; Daelemans, L.; D’hooge, D.R.; De Buysser, K.; De Clerck, K. Silica nanofibrous membranes for the separation of heterogeneous azeotropes. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2018, 28, 1804138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Compan, V.; Andrio, A.; Lopez-Alemany, A.; Riande, E.; Refojo, M. Oxygen permeability of hydrogel contact lenses with organosilicon moieties. Biomaterials 2002, 23, 2767–2772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Compan, V.; Guzman, J.; Riande, E. A potentiostatic study of oxygen transmissibility and permeability through hydrogel membranes. Biomaterials 1998, 19, 2139–2145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Compan, V.; Villar, M.; Valles, E.; Riande, E. Permeability and diffusional studies on silicone polymer networks with controlled dangling chains. Polymer 1996, 37, 101–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. De, G.; Karmakar, B.; Ganguli, D. Hydrolysis–condensation reactions of TEOS in the presence of acetic acid leading to the generation of glass-like silica microspheres in solution at room temperature. J. Mater. Chem. 2000, 10, 2289–2293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Chrimes, A.F.; Khoshmanesh, K.; Stoddart, P.R.; Mitchell, A.; Kalantar-zadeh, K. Microfluidics and Raman microscopy: Current applications and future challenges. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 5880–5906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. González-Vázquez, M.; Hautefeuille, M. Controlled Solvent-Free formation of embedded PDMS-derived carbon nanodomains with tunable fluorescence using selective laser ablation with a Low-Power CD laser. Micromachines 2017, 8, 307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Warner, J.; Polkinghorne, J.; Gonerka, J.; Meyer, S.; Luo, B.; Frethem, C.; Haugstad, G. Strain-induced crack formations in PDMS/DXA drug collars. Acta. Biomater. 2013, 9, 7335–7342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Wang, D.; Yang, P.; Hou, P.; Zhang, L.; Zhou, Z.; Cheng, X. Effect of SiO2 oligomers on water absorption of cementitious materials. Cem. Concr. Res. 2016, 87, 22–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Korogiannaki, M.; Guidi, G.; Jones, L.; Sheardown, H. Timolol maleate release from hyaluronic acid-containing model silicone hydrogel contact lens materials. J. Biomater. Appl. 2015, 30, 361–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Jacob, J.T. Biocompatibility in the development of silicone-hydrogel lenses. Eye Contact Lens 2013, 39, 13–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Maldonado-Codina, C.; Efron, N. Hydrogel lenses-material and manufacture: A review. Optom. Pract. 2003, 4, 101–115. [Google Scholar]
  42. Abbasi, F.; Mirzadeh, H. Properties of poly (dimethylsiloxane)/hydrogel multicomponent systems. J. Polym. Sci. B Polym. Phys. 2003, 41, 2145–2156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Wang, J.; Li, X. Preparation and characterization of interpenetrating polymer network silicone hydrogels with high oxygen permeability. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2010, 116, 2749–2757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Maldonado-Codina, C.; Morgan, P.B.; Efron, N.; Canry, J.-C. Characterization of the surface of conventional hydrogel and silicone hydrogel contact lenses by time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry. Optom. Vis. Sci. 2004, 81, 455–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. French, K. Contact lens material properties part 1: Wettability. Optician 2005, 230, 20–28. [Google Scholar]
  46. Green-Church, K.B.; Nichols, K.K.; Kleinholz, N.M.; Zhang, L.; Nichols, J.J. Investigation of the human tear film proteome using multiple proteomic approaches. Mol. Vis. 2008, 14, 456. [Google Scholar]
  47. Tran, N.P.D.; Yang, M.C. Synthesis and characterization of soft contact lens based on the combination of silicone nanoparticles with hydrophobic and hydrophilic monomers. J. Polym. Res. 2019, 26, 143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Song, M.; Shin, Y.H.; Kwon, Y. Synthesis and properties of siloxane-containing hybrid hydrogels: Optical transmittance, oxygen permeability and equilibrium water content. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2010, 10, 6934–6938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Gavara, R.; Compañ, V. Oxygen, water, and sodium chloride transport in soft contact lenses materials. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B 2017, 105, 2218–2231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Preparation of silicone nanoparticles from TEOS and PDMS-diol.
Figure 1. Preparation of silicone nanoparticles from TEOS and PDMS-diol.
Polymers 12 01128 g001
Figure 2. Preparation of SiNPs-loaded hydrogel lenses.
Figure 2. Preparation of SiNPs-loaded hydrogel lenses.
Polymers 12 01128 g002
Figure 3. Size distribution of silicone nanoparticles obtained from DLS.
Figure 3. Size distribution of silicone nanoparticles obtained from DLS.
Polymers 12 01128 g003
Figure 4. TEM image of SiNPs.
Figure 4. TEM image of SiNPs.
Polymers 12 01128 g004
Figure 5. Micrograph of SiNPs from SEM-EDS.
Figure 5. Micrograph of SiNPs from SEM-EDS.
Polymers 12 01128 g005
Figure 6. Raman spectrum of SiNPs.
Figure 6. Raman spectrum of SiNPs.
Polymers 12 01128 g006
Figure 7. FTIR spectra of TEOS, PDMS, and SiNPs.
Figure 7. FTIR spectra of TEOS, PDMS, and SiNPs.
Polymers 12 01128 g007
Figure 8. Photos of hydrated contact lenses.
Figure 8. Photos of hydrated contact lenses.
Polymers 12 01128 g008
Figure 9. Light transmittance of SiNPs samples.
Figure 9. Light transmittance of SiNPs samples.
Polymers 12 01128 g009
Figure 10. EWC of SiNPs samples.
Figure 10. EWC of SiNPs samples.
Polymers 12 01128 g010
Figure 11. Contact angle of SiNPs samples.
Figure 11. Contact angle of SiNPs samples.
Polymers 12 01128 g011
Figure 12. The FTIR spectra of HS- series SiNPs-containing contact lenses.
Figure 12. The FTIR spectra of HS- series SiNPs-containing contact lenses.
Polymers 12 01128 g012
Figure 13. The modulus and strength of SiNPs samples.
Figure 13. The modulus and strength of SiNPs samples.
Polymers 12 01128 g013
Figure 14. The effect of SiNPs content on Dk.
Figure 14. The effect of SiNPs content on Dk.
Polymers 12 01128 g014
Table 1. Formulation of soft lenses including HEMA, NVP, and silicone nanoparticles (SiNPs).
Table 1. Formulation of soft lenses including HEMA, NVP, and silicone nanoparticles (SiNPs).
SampleGel Composition (mg)
HEMANVPSiNPs
HS010000
HS0410000.4
HS0810000.8
HS1210001.2
HN2S080200
HN2S0480200.4
HN2S0880200.8
HN2S1280201.2
HN5S050500
HN5S0450500.4
HN5S0850500.8
HN5S1250501.2

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tran, N.-P.-D.; Yang, M.-C. The Ophthalmic Performance of Hydrogel Contact Lenses Loaded with Silicone Nanoparticles. Polymers 2020, 12, 1128. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/polym12051128

AMA Style

Tran N-P-D, Yang M-C. The Ophthalmic Performance of Hydrogel Contact Lenses Loaded with Silicone Nanoparticles. Polymers. 2020; 12(5):1128. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/polym12051128

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tran, Nguyen-Phuong-Dung, and Ming-Chien Yang. 2020. "The Ophthalmic Performance of Hydrogel Contact Lenses Loaded with Silicone Nanoparticles" Polymers 12, no. 5: 1128. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/polym12051128

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop