Insights on Cellulose Research in the Last Two Decades in Romania
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Chemical Composition Study of Some Tree Species, Structure and Characterization of Amorphous Cellulose
3. Bacterial Cellulose, Production and Characterization
4. Chemical Functionalization of Cellulose
4.1. Phosphorous Containing Cellulose Derivatives
4.2. Oxidation Reaction for the Cellulose Derivatives Preparation
5. Preparation and Characterization of Hybrid Materials Based on Cellulose
5.1. Composite Materials Containing Various Cellulose Types
5.2. Hydrogels Containing Cellulosic Components
6. Applications of the Cellulose-Based Materials
6.1. Dyes and Metallic Ions Removal from Aqueous Solutions
6.2. Applications of TEMPO-Oxidized Cellulose
6.2.1. UV Shielding Materials
6.2.2. Contrasting Agent for Noninvasive Cellular Imaging and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
6.2.3. Proton Conductive Composites Based on Carboxyl Cellulose
7. Conclusions and Future Outlooks
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Măluțan, T.; Popa, V.I.; Cașcaval, D. 100 Years of Chemical Engineering Education in Iași, 1912–2012; Editura Politehnium: Iasi, Romania, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Simionescu, C.; Grigoraș, M.; Cernătescu-Asandei, A. The Chemistry of Wood from Romania; Academy Publishing House: Bucharest, Romania, 1964. [Google Scholar]
- Simionescu, C.; Grigoraș, M.; Cernătescu-Asandei, A.; Rozmarin, G.H. Wood Chemistry in Romania: Poplar and Willow; Academy Publishing House: Bucharest, Romania, 1973. [Google Scholar]
- Simionescu, C.; Rozmarin, G.H. Reed Chemistry; Technical Publishing House: Bucharest, Romania, 1966. [Google Scholar]
- Simionescu, C.; Rusan, V.; Popa, V.I. Chemistry of Seaweed; Academy Publishing House: Bucharest, Romania, 1974. [Google Scholar]
- Bodîrlǎu, R.; Spiridon, I.; Teacǎ, C.-A. Chemical investigation of wood tree species in temperate forest in east-northern Romania. BioResources 2007, 2, 41–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ciolacu, D.; Ciolacu, F.; Popa, V.I. Amorphous cellulose—Structure and characterization. Cellul. Chem. Technol. 2011, 45, 13–21. [Google Scholar]
- Ul-Islam, M.; Khan, S.; Ullah, M.W.; Park, J.K. Comparative study of plant and bacterial cellulose pellicles regenerated from dissolved states. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 137, 247–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wanga, J.; Tavakoli, J.; Tang, Y. Bacterial cellulose production, properties and applications with different culture methods—A review. Carbohydr. Polym. 2019, 219, 63–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Feng, X.-C.; Niamat, U.; Wang, X.-J.; Sun, X.-C.; Li, C.-Y.; Bai, Y.; Chen, L.; Li, Z. Characterization of bacterial cellulose by gluconacetobacter hansenii CGMCC 3917. J. Food Sci. 2015, 80, E2217–E2227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lynd, L.-R.; Weimer, P.-J.; van Zyl, W.-H.; Pretorius, I.-S. Microbial cellulose utilization: Fundamentals and biotechnology. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2002, 66, 506–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Rebelo, A.-R.; Archer, A.-J.; Chen, X.-L.; Liu, C.-Q.; Yang, G.; Liu, Y. Dehydration of bacterial cellulose and the water content effects on its viscoelastic and electrochemical properties. Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 2018, 19, 203–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Monika, S.-C.; Justyna, C.; Artur, Z. Sensing the structural differences in cellulose from apple and bacterial cell wall materials by Raman and FT-IR spectroscopy. Sensors 2011, 11, 5543–5560. [Google Scholar]
- Park, S.; Baker, J.-O.; Himmel, M.-E.; Parilla, P.-A.; Johnson, D.-K. Cellulose crystallinity index: Measurement techniques and their impact on interpreting cellulose performance. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2010, 3, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bishop, C. Vacuum Deposition onto Webs, Films, and Foils. Engineering (General), 3rd ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2007; pp. 165–190. [Google Scholar]
- Klemm, D.; Heublein, B.; Fink, H.-P.; Andreas, B. Cellulose: Fascinating biopolymer and sustainable raw material. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 3358–3393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tahara, N.; Tabuchi, M.; Watanabe, K.; Yano, H.; Morinaga, Y.; Yoshinaga, F. Degree of polymerization of cellulose from acetobacter xylinum BPR2001 decreased by cellulase produced by the strain. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 1997, 61, 1862–1865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Elham, E.-A.; Amir, K.-A. Influence of fer entation condition and alkali treatment on the porosity and thickness of bacterial cellulose membranes. TOJSAT 2013, 3, 194–203. [Google Scholar]
- Ul-Islam, M.; Taous, K.; Joong, K.-P. Water holding and release properties of bacterial cellulose obtained by in situ and ex situ modification. Carbohydr. Polym. 2012, 88, 596–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dima, S.-O.; Panaitescu, D.-M.; Orban, C.; Ghiurea, M.; Doncea, S.-M.; Fierascu, R.C.; Nistor, C.L.; Alexandrescu, E.; Nicolae, C.-A.; Trica, B.; et al. Bacterial Nanocellulose from Side-Streams of Kombucha Beverages Production: Preparation and Physical-Chemical Properties. Polymers 2017, 9, 374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Frone, A.N.; Chiulan, I.; Panaitescu, D.M.; Nicolae, C.A.; Ghiurea, M.; Galan, A.-M. Isolation of cellulose nanocrystals from plum seed shells, structural and morphological characterization. Mater. Lett. 2017, 194, 160–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ullah, W.M.; Ul-Islam, M.; Khan, S.; Kim, Y.; Park, J.K. Innovative production of bio-cellulose using a cell-free system derived from a single cell line. Carbohydr. Polym. 2015, 132, 286–294. [Google Scholar]
- Kim, Y.; Ullah, W.M.; Ul-Islam, M.; Khan, S.; Jang, J.H.; Park, J.K. Self-assembly of bio-cellulose nanofibrils through intermediate phase in a cell-free enzyme system. Biochem. Eng. J. 2009, 142, 135–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Klemm, D.; Philipp, B.; Heinze, T.; Heinze, U.; Wagenknecht, W. Comprehensive Cellulose Chemistry; Wiley Verlag: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 1998; Volume 2, pp. 133–140. [Google Scholar]
- Suflet, D.M.; Chitanu, G.C.; Popa, V.I. Phosphorylation of polysaccharides: New results on synthesis and characterisation of phosphorylated cellulose. React. Funct. Polym. 2006, 66, 1240–1249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Coseri, S.; Nistor, G.; Fras, L.; Strnad, S.; Harabagiu, V.; Simionescu, B.C. Mild and Selective Oxidation of Cellulose Fibers in the Presence of N-Hydroxyphthalimide. Biomacromolecules 2009, 10, 2294–2299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Biliuta, G.; Fras, L.; Strnad, S.; Harabagiu, V.; Coseri, S. Oxidation of Cellulose Fibers Mediated by Nonpersistent Nitroxyl Radicals. J. Polym. Sci. Pol. Chem. 2010, 48, 4790–4799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Coseri, S.; Biliuta, G. Bromide-free oxidizing system for carboxylic moiety formation in cellulose chain. Carbohydr. Polym. 2012, 90, 1415–1419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Biliuta, G.; Fras, L.; Harabagiu, V.; Coseri, S. Mild oxidation of cellulose fibers using dioxygen as ultimate oxidizing agent. Dig. J. Nanomater. Biostruct. 2011, 6, 293–299. [Google Scholar]
- Biliuta, G.; Fras, L.; Drobota, M.; Persin, Z.; Kreze, T.; Stana-Kleinschek, K.; Ribitsch, V.; Harabagiu, V.; Coseri, S. Comparison study of TEMPO and phthalimide-N-oxyl (PINO) radicals on oxidation efficiency toward cellulose. Carbohydr. Polym. 2013, 91, 502–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Coseri, S.; Biliuta, G.; Simionescu, B.C.; Stana-Kleinschek, K.; Ribitsch, V.; Harabagiu, V. Oxidized cellulose—Survey of the most recent achievements. Carbohydr. Polym. 2013, 93, 207–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Coseri, S. Cellulose: To depolymerize… or not to? Biotechnol. Adv. 2017, 35, 251–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Coseri, S.; Biliuta, G.; Simionescu, B.C. Selective oxidation of cellulose, mediated by N-hydroxyphthalimide, under metal-free environment. Polym. Chem. 2018, 9, 961–967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Biliuta, G.; Coseri, S. Cellulose: A ubiquitous platform for ecofriendly metal nanoparticles preparation. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2019, 383, 155–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Coseri, S.; Biliuta, G.; Fras-Zemljic, L.; Stevanic Srndovic, J.; Larsson, T.; Strnad, S.; Kreze, T.; Naderi, A.; Lindstrom, T. One-shot carboxylation of microcrystalline cellulose in the presence of nitroxyl radicals and sodium periodate. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 85889–85897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baron, R.I.; Coseri, S. Preparation of water-soluble cellulose derivatives using TEMPO radical-mediated oxidation at extended reaction time. React, Funct. Polym. 2020, 157, 104768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Panaitescu, D.M.; Donescu, D.; Bercu, C.; Vuluga, D.M.; Iorga, M.; Ghiurea, M. Polymer Composites with Cellulose Microfibrils. Polym. Eng. Sci. 2007, 47, 1228–1234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Frone, A.N.; Berlioz, S.; Chailan, J.-F.; Panaitescu, D.M.; Donescu, D. Cellulose fiber-reinforced polylactic acid. Polym. Compos. 2011, 32, 976–985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Frone, A.N.; Berlioz, S.; Chailan, J.-F.; Panaitescu, D.M. Morphology and thermal properties of PLA–cellulose nanofibers composites. Carbohydr. Polym. 2013, 91, 377–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Frone, A.N.; Panaitescu, D.M.; Chiulan, I.; Nicolae, C.A.; Vuluga, Z.; Vitelaru, C.; Damian, C.M. The effect of cellulose nanofibers on the crystallinity and nanostructure of poly(lactic acid) composites. J. Mater. Sci. 2016, 51, 9771–9791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Parparita, E.; Nistor, M.T.; Popescu, M.-C.; Vasile, C. TG/FT-IR/MS study on thermal decomposition of polypropylene/biomass composites. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2014, 109, 13–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dinca, V.; Mocanu, A.; Isopencu, G.; Busuioc, C.; Brajnicov, S.; Vlad, A.; Icriverzi, M.; Roseanu, A.; Dinescu, M.; Stroescu, M.; et al. Biocompatible pure ZnO nanoparticles-3D bacterial cellulose biointerfaces with antibacterial properties. Arab. J. Chem. 2020, 13, 3521–3533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Busuioc, C.; Ghitulica, C.D.; Stoica, A.; Stroescu, M.; Voicu, G.; Ionita, V.; Averous, L.; Jinga, S.I. Calcium phosphates grown on bacterial cellulose template. Ceram. Int. 2018, 44, 9433–9441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Busuioc, C.; Stroescu, M.; Stoica-Guzun, A.; Voicu, G.; Jinga, S.-I. Fabrication of 3D calcium phosphates based scaffolds using bacterial cellulose as template. Ceram. Int. 2016, 42, 15449–15458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chirani, N.; Yahia, L.; Gritsch, L.; Motta, F.L.; Chirani, S.; Faré, S. History and Applications of Hydrogels. J. Biomed. Sci. 2015, 4, 13–36. [Google Scholar]
- Ciolacu, D.; Rudaz, C.; Vasilescu, M.; Budtova, T. Physically and chemically cross-linked cellulose cryogels: Structure,properties and application for controlled release. Carbohydr. Polym. 2016, 151, 392–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ciolacu, D.; Doroftei, F.; Cazacu, G.; Cazacu, M. Morphological and surface aspects of cellulose-lignin hydrogels. Cellul. Chem. Technol. 2013, 47, 377–386. [Google Scholar]
- Ciolacu, D.; Oprea, A.M.; Anghel, N.; Cazacu, G.; Cazacu, M. New cellulose–lignin hydrogels and their application in controlled release of polyphenols. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2012, 32, 452–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hixon, K.R.; Lu, T.; Sell, S.A. A comprehensive review of cryogels and their roles in tissue engineering applications. Acta Biomater. 2017, 62, 29–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Păduraru, O.M.; Ciolacu, D.; Darie, R.N.; Vasile, C. Synthesis and characterization of polyvinyl alcohol/cellulose cryogels and their testing as carriers for a bioactive component. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2012, 32, 2508–2515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baron, R.I.; Bercea, M.; Avadanei, M.; Lisa, G.; Biliuta, G.; Coseri, S. Green route to produce self-healable hydrogels based on tricarboxy cellulose and poly (vinyl alcohol). Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 123, 744–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baron, R.I.; Culica, M.E.; Biliuta, G.; Bercea, M.; Gherman, S.; Zavastin, D.; Ochiuz, L.; Avadanei, M.; Coseri, S. Physical Hydrogels of Oxidized Polysaccharides and Poly(Vinyl Alcohol) for Wound Dressing Applications. Materials 2019, 12, 1569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Suteu, D.; Coseri, S.; Zaharia, C.; Biliuta, G.; Nebunu, I. Modified cellulose fibers as adsorbent for dye removal from aqueous environment. Desalin. Water Treat. 2017, 90, 341–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Biliuta, G.; Suteu, D.; Malutan, T.; Chirculescu, A.-I.; Nica, I.; Coseri, S. Valorization of TEMPO-oxidized cellulosic fractions for efficient dye removal from wastewaters. Cellul. Chem. Technol. 2018, 52, 609–618. [Google Scholar]
- Stoica-Guzun, A.; Stroescu, M.; Jinga, S.I.; Mihalache, N.; Botez, A.; Matei, C.; Berger, D.; Damian, C.M.; Ionita, V. Box-Behnken experimental design for chromium(VI) ions removal bybacterial cellulose-magnetite composites. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2016, 91, 1062–1072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Culica, M.E.; Biliuta, G.; Rotaru, R.; Lisa, G.; Baron, R.I.; Coseri, S. New Electromagnetic Shielding Materials Based on Viscose-Carbon Nanotubes Composites. Polym. Eng. Sci. 2019, 59, 1499–1506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Culica, M.E.; Chibac-Scutaru, A.L.; Melinte, V.; Coseri, S. Cellulose Acetate Incorporating Organically Functionalized CeO2 NPs: Efficient Materials for UV Filtering Applications. Materials 2020, 13, 2955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Biliuta, G.; Sacarescu, L.; Socoliuc, V.; Iacob, M.; Gheorghe, L.; Negru, D.; Coseri, S. Carboxylated Polysaccharides Decorated with Ultrasmall Magnetic Nanoparticles with Antibacterial and MRI Properties. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 2017, 218, 1700062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Biliuta, G.; Coseri, S. Magnetic cellulosic materials based on TEMPO-oxidized viscose fibers. Cellulose 2016, 23, 3407–3415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Culica, M.E.; Avadanei, M.; Baron, R.I.; Chibac-Scutaru, A.L.; Asandulesa, M.; Biliuta, G.; Lisa, G.; Coseri, S. The source of conductivity and proton dynamics studyin TEMPO-oxidized cellulose doped with various heterocyclic molecules. Cellulose 2020, 27, 8585–8604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Property | PC | BC | Reference |
---|---|---|---|
Tensile strength (MPa) | 25–200 | 20–300 | [10] |
Young’s modulus (MPa) | 25–200 | Sheet: 20,000 Single fibre:130,000 | [11] |
Water holding capacity (%) | 25–35 | >95 | [12] |
Size of fibers (nm) | micrometer scale | 20–100 | [13] |
Crystallinity (%) | 40–85 | 74–96 | [14] |
Relative hydrophilicity (%) | 20–30 | 40–50 | [15] |
Purity (%) | <80 | >99 | [16] |
Degree of polymerization | 300–10,000 | 14,000–16,000 | [17] |
Porosity (%) | <75 | >85 | [18] |
Total surface area (m2/g) | <10 | >150 | [19] |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Coseri, S. Insights on Cellulose Research in the Last Two Decades in Romania. Polymers 2021, 13, 689. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/polym13050689
Coseri S. Insights on Cellulose Research in the Last Two Decades in Romania. Polymers. 2021; 13(5):689. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/polym13050689
Chicago/Turabian StyleCoseri, Sergiu. 2021. "Insights on Cellulose Research in the Last Two Decades in Romania" Polymers 13, no. 5: 689. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/polym13050689