Next Article in Journal
Carbon Nanofiber Double Active Layer and Co-Incorporation as New Anode Modification Strategies for Power-Enhanced Microbial Fuel Cells
Next Article in Special Issue
How Do Phosphorus Compounds with Different Valence States Affect the Flame Retardancy of PET?
Previous Article in Journal
Insights into Fluctuations of Structure of Proteins: Significance of Intermediary States in Regulating Biological Functions
Previous Article in Special Issue
Green Flame-Retardant Composites Based on PP/TiO2/Lignin Obtained by Melt-Mixing Extrusion
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Fabrication of Polypyrrole-Decorated Tungsten Tailing Particles for Reinforcing Flame Retardancy and Ageing Resistance of Intumescent Fire-Resistant Coatings

Institute of Disaster Prevention Science and Safety Technology, School of Civil Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410075, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 28 February 2022 / Revised: 1 April 2022 / Accepted: 5 April 2022 / Published: 11 April 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Flame Retardant Polymer Materials)

Abstract

:
Polypyrrole-decorated tungsten tailing particles (PPY-TTF) were prepared via the in situ polymerization of pyrrole in the presence of tungsten tailing particles (TTF), and then carefully characterized by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and thermogravimetric analysis (TG) analyses. The effect of PPY-TTF on the flame retardancy, smoke suppression property and ageing resistance of intumescent fire-resistant coatings was investigated by a fire protection test, smoke density test and cone calorimeter test. The results show that PPY-TTF exerts excellent cooperative effect on enhancing the flame retardancy and smoke suppression properties of the intumescent fire-retardant coatings, which is ascribed to the formation of more cross-linking structures in the condense phase that enhance the compactness and thermal stability of intumescent char. The cooperative effect of PPY-TTF in the coatings depends on its content, and the coating containing 3 wt% PPY-TTF exhibits the best cooperative effect among the samples, showing a 10.7% reduction in mass loss and 35.4% reduction in flame-spread rating compared to that with 3% TTF. The accelerated ageing test shows that the presence of PPY-TTF greatly slows down the blistering and powdering phenomenon of the coatings, thus endowing the coating with the super durability of fire resistance and smoke suppression property. This work provides a new strategy for the resource utilization of tungsten tailing in the field of flame-retardant materials.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Intumescent fire-retardant coatings are widely used in high-rise buildings, steel structures, ancient buildings, railway stations, airport terminals and other buildings for the advantages of good finish, small coating thickness, being lightweight, and excellent fire protection performance of the components [1,2,3,4], which are considered to be one of the most effective and economical materials to reduce fire hazards on buildings [5,6]. Intumescent fire-retardant coatings generally compose of an intumescent fire-retardant system, binders, synergists, adjuvants and additives, which interact to forge an expanding char layer during combustion that effectively delays the spread of flame and preventing the formation of fire, thus guaranteeing the structural integrity of buildings and minimizing the fire risk [7,8]. Although a large number of studies have concentrated on the enhancement of fire resistance, smoke suppression and reduction in the thickness of intumescent fire-retardant coatings [4,9,10,11], which neglected the ageing degradation of intumescent fire-retardant coatings under the impacts of environmental factors such as certain humidity, UV radiation, temperature and oxygen.
The use of multifunctional additive is an important strategy to enhance the flame-retardant and smoke suppression efficiencies of intumescent fire-retardant materials. Numerous efforts have investigated the effects of additive on fire resistance, smoke suppression and ageing resistance of materials, such as SiO2, bio-fillers, kaolinite, graphene, carbon nanotubes and carbon black [3,6,7,12]. TTF enriches in SiO2, Al2O3, CaO, Fe2O3 and other components, which has high chemical stability and small size of particles. However, TTF is easily agglomerated and migrated on the surface of coatings in actual application. To overcome these limitations, many studies have been concentrated on the fabrication of hybrid materials, such as organic space-stabilized polypyrrole latexes and composites with metal oxide or silica particles [13]. Polypyrrole (PPY) has attracted extensive research in supercapacitors, DNA extraction, microwave absorption and contaminant removal, owing to its superior conductivity, easier synthesis, excellent biocompatibility, high thermal stability and non-toxicity [14,15,16,17,18]. The preparation and characterization of silica–polypyrrole nanocomposite colloids using silica particles have been reported by Armes et al. [19]. Among them, silica/PPY nanocomposites have a low cost, high surface area and easier dispersion, which can improve the wear resistance, UV resistance, barrier property, mechanical performance and thermal stability of organic coatings [20]. Copolymerization can be an opportunity to amend the physical properties and avoid the drawbacks of individual polymers, and several copolymer composites may demonstrate better behavior in many applications [21]. Microencapsulation is an important method of enhancing the compatibility of fillers, and the resulting polypyrrole-decorated tungsten tailing particles (PPY-TTF) are expected to have better dispersion in intumescent fire-retardant coatings via the in situ polymerization of pyrrole, thus obtaining better fire resistance and anti-ageing properties.
Herein, a preparation method for PPY-TTF was proposed via the in situ polymerization of pyrrole in the presence of TTF particles. Five intumescent fire-retardant coatings were prepared with an intumescent fire-retardant system, waterborne epoxy resin and PPY-TTF. The effect of PPY-TTF on the combustion performance of intumescent fire-retardant coatings was analyzed by various analytical methods, and the flame-retardant and smoke suppression mechanisms of PPY-TTF were also proposed.

2. Experimental Section

2.1. Materials

TTF was obtained from Hunan Anhua Xiangan Tungsten Co., Ltd., Hunan, China. Waterborne epoxy hardener (ERC 2610, amine value:180 ± 40 mg KOH/g) and waterborne epoxy resin (ERE 2581, solid content: 52 ± 1%) were supplied from Ruicheng Selected New Materials Technology Co., Ltd., Guangdong, China. Pyrrole (C4H5N, purity: 99%) and FeCl3·6H2O (purity: 99.0%) were offered by Shanghai Aladdin Biochemical Technology Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China. The pentaerythritol (PER, purity: 99.5%), ammonium polyphosphate (APP, water solubility ≤ 0.04%, purity: 99.5%) and melamine (MEL, purity ≥ 99.5%) were available from Hangzhou JLS Flame Retardant Chemical Co., Ltd., Hangzhou, China. The acrylate copolymer carboxylate used as a dispersant was supplied by Qingdao Xingguo Coatings Co., Ltd., Qingdao, China. The non-silicon defoamer was supplied by Qingdao Xingguo Coatings Co., Ltd., Qingdao, China.

2.2. Preparation of Polypyrrole-Decorated Tungsten Tailing Filler

Firstly, 30 g TTF was added to 400 mL mixture of anhydrous ethanol and water (2:8) and ultrasonicated for 0.5 h. One milliliter pyrrole was dropped into the solution and dispersed ultrasonically for 10 min. Owing to the charge interaction between the pyrrole and TTF, the pyrrole monomers in solution migrated to the surface of TTF particles. Then, 7.99 g FeCl3·6H2O was mixed with 100 mL water, stirred to dissolve and sonicated to disperse. The FeCl3·6H2O solution was slowly dropped into the above solution and the reaction occurred at low temperature, with stirring for 24 h to polymerize the pyrrole monomers on the surface of TTF particles. The PPY-TTF was obtained by extracting and drying at 60 °C for 6 h. The synthetic route of PPY-TTF is shown in Figure 1.

2.3. Preparation of the Intumescent Fire-Retardant Coatings

The intumescent flame retardant (IFR) was obtained by mixing APP, PER and MEL with a mass ratio of 3:1.5:1, which was combined with PPY-TTF and deionized water according to the formula in Table 1 and then stirred at 1000 r/min for 20 min. Then, waterborne epoxy resin, defoamer and dispersant were put into the slurry stirring at 500 r/min for 20 min. Finally, the waterborne epoxy hardener was added and stirred at 500 r/min for 20 min to obtain the intumescent fire-retardant coatings. The intumescent fire-retardant coatings with different amounts of PPY-TTF are named IFRC0-IFRC5, and the specific test formulations are shown in Table 1.

2.4. Characterization

2.4.1. Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy

Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) spectra were characterized by an iCAN9 FTIR spectrometer using KBr pellets (Tianjin Energy Spectrum Technology Co., Ltd., Tianjing, China).

2.4.2. Scanning Electron Microscopy

The MIRA 3 LMU scanning electron microscopy (Tescan, Brno, Czech Republic) was used to characterize the micromorphology of the samples at a voltage of 20.0 kV.

2.4.3. X-ray Diffraction

X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern was characterized by an Advance D8 XRD diffractometer at a range of 3 to 70°, a Cu-Ka radiation and a rate of 5°/min (Bruker, Fällanden, Switzerland).

2.4.4. X-ray Fluorescence Spectrometer

X-ray fluorescence spectrometer (XRF) analysis was performed with a ZSX Primus II X-ray Fluorescence Spectrometer (Rigaku, Japan).

2.4.5. Smoke Density Test

Smoke density test was performed on a PX-07-008 smoke density tester for building materials (Phoenix Quality Inspection Instruments Co., Ltd., Suzhou, China).

2.4.6. Fire Protection Tests

Fire protection properties of the samples were assessed by the big panel method, cabinet method, tunnel method tests according to GB12441-2018 standard procedure. The big panel method test was conducted on a MT-X multiplex temperature recorder (Shenzhen Shenhwa Technology Co., Ltd., Shenzhen, China) to obtain the backside-temperature curves of coating samples.
Cabinet method test was carried out on an XSF-1 apparatus, the weight loss (the difference in the sample mass before and after the test), char index and intumescent factor (the ratio of the thickness of the coatings after and before test) of the samples were determined. The char index was calculated by Formula (1):
C h a r   i n d e x = i = 1 n ( a i b i h i ) n
where ai is defined as the char length (cm), bi is defined as the char width (cm), hi is defined as the char depth (cm) and n is the number of samples.
Tunnel method test was conducted on a SDF-2-type 2-foot flame tunnel instrument (Jiangning Analysis Instrument Company, Nanjing, China). The flame spread over the coating surface of the samples was evaluated when ignited under controlled conditions in a small tunnel, and the flame-spread rating of the samples was calculated by Formula (2):
F R S = L s L a L r L a
where Ls is the mean of five flame advance readings of samples (mm), La is the mean of five flame advance readings of asbestos board (mm) and Lr is the mean of five flame advance readings of oak board (mm).

2.4.7. Adhesion Classification Test

The adhesion classification test was carried out on a QFH-HD600 adhesion tester to test the coating adhesion (Changzhou Edex Instruments Co., Ltd., Changzhou, China) on the basis of ASTM D 3359-09.

2.4.8. Pencil Hardness Test

The pencil hardness test was performed on a QHQ-A portable pencil scratch tester in accordance with ISO 15184-2012. The lead of a pencil was vertically erected and polished on sandpaper for a flat and round cross-sectioned end. The pencil hardness of the coating was tested progressively by placing a polished pencil on the coating at an angle of 45° under a load of 750 g.

2.4.9. Cone Calorimeter Test

The cone calorimeter test was used to characterize the heat release rate (HRR) and total heat release (THR) curves of coatings with an external heat flux of 50 kW/m2.

2.4.10. Thermogravimetric Analysis

TG analysis was carried out on a TGA/SOTA 851 thermogravimetric instrument (Mettretoli Instruments Co., Ltd., Zurich, Switzerland) from 30 °C to 800 °C at a heating rate of 10 °C/min under a nitrogen atmosphere. The theoretical char residue (Wtheo) of IFRC0-IFRC5 samples was calculated using Formula (3):
W theo ( t ) = i = 1 n χ i W i ( t )
where W i ( t ) is the amount of residual char for i at t °C; χ i is the percentage of i, %.

2.4.11. Accelerated Ageing Test

The accelerated ageing test was performed on an UV-accelerated ageing tester (Shi Haoran Machinery Equipment Factory, Dongguan, China) according to ASTM G154-2006. One ageing cycle included 12 h, during which, the condensation time was 4 h at 50 ± 3 °C, and the UV exposure was 8 h at 60 ± 3 °C with an irradiation of 0.76 W/(m2·nm). The samples were exposed to accelerated ageing tests for 2, 6 and 11 cycles, accompanying with the change of sample position every 12 h.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Morphology and Composition of TTF and PPY-TTF

The XRD patterns of TTF are presented in Figure 2. From Figure 2, the XRD patterns of TTF samples are generally consistent with the standard patterns of quartz (SiO2) (PDF85-0794). The major diffraction peaks located at 21.0°, 26.8°, 36.7°, 39.6°, 40.5°, 42.7°, 46.0°, 50.3°, 55.1°, 55.5°, 60.1°, 64.2°, 67.9° and 68.3° are attributed to (100), (011), (110), (102), (111), (200), (201), (112), (022), (013), (121), (113), (122) and (203) phases of SiO2, indicating that the main component of TTF is SiO2. XRF is used for analyzing the elemental composition of TTF, and the results are illustrated in Table 2. From Table 2, it is clearly seen that the main component of TTF is SiO2, which is in agreement with the XRD result.
Figure 3 exhibits the SEM images and EDS maps of TTF and PPY-TTF. From Figure 3a, it can be seen that the TTF sample shows irregular blocky structures with a size range of 10 and 50 μm. Compared to TTF, the size of PPY-TTF is obviously reduced, showing a smaller agglomeration phenomenon. From EDS maps, C and N elements from polypyrrole are homogeneously distributed on the surface of TTF, indicating that PPY-TTF was prepared successfully.
Figure 4 shows the FTIR spectra of TTF and PPY-TTF. In the spectrum of TTF, the characteristic peaks at 1005, 777 and 459 cm−1 are attributed to the symmetric and antisymmetric stretching vibration peaks of Si–O–Si [22,23]. As for PPY-TTF, the new peaks of the C–H stretching vibration (2928, 2859 cm−1), C=C stretching vibration (1631 cm−1) and C–N and N–H stretching vibration (1551 cm−1) are observed [23,24,25], further confirming polypyrrole was successfully decorated on the surface of TTF particles.
Figure 5 shows the TG and differential thermo-gravimetric (DTG) curves of TTF and PPY-TTF. From the TG and DTG curves of TTF, it can be seen that the pyrolysis process of TTF is mainly from 420 °C to 800 °C concomitant with a strong DTG peak and a residual weight of 96.0% at 800 °C. Meanwhile, the pyrolysis process of PPY-TTF is mainly divided into four stages. The first stage corresponds to the temperature interval of 26–200 °C, which is due to physics-absorbing water molecules, oligomer molecules and volatile impurities. The second stage at 200–430 °C is attributed to the degradation of low molecular-weight polymer chains. The third stage at 430–560 °C is the decomposition stage of polypyrrole. The fourth stage at 560–800 °C is the decomposition stage of TTF and polypyrrole, remaining an 81.8% residue at 800 °C.

3.2. Fire Protection Tests

The results of the tunnel method and cabinet method tests are given in Table 3. The mass loss, charring index, flame-spread rating and intumescent factor of IFRC0 samples are 3.7 g, 34.9 cm3, 20.5 and 25.0, respectively, while the addition of PPY-TTF can significantly enhance the fire resistance of the intumescent fire-retardant coatings. In particular, IFRC3 presents the best heat-insulation performance, with a 32.9% reduction in weight loss, 46.7% reduction in charring index, 74.3% reduction in flame-spread rating and 80.0% increase in intumescent factor compared with IFRC0. The results indicate that the appropriate amount of PPY-TTF obtained via the in situ polymerization of pyrrole can effectively strengthens the fire protection of coatings. In addition, an excessive amount of PPY-TTF may suppress the expansion and carbonization of the coatings, thus diminishing its cooperative fire resistance in intumescent fire-retardant coatings.
Figure 6 shows the backside temperature curves of the substrates coated with IFRC0-IFRC4 coatings. As demonstrated in Figure 6, the backside temperature of the IFRC0 sample without PPY-TTF rises rapidly, with a fire resistance time of 800 s, corresponding to a poor heat-insulation performance. The backside temperature of IFRC1-IFRC4 samples containing PPY-TTF has a slower rise and becomes stable at about 500 s. The equilibrium backside temperatures of the samples at 900 s are 180.0, 167.7, 142.3 and 156.2 °C, respectively, indicating that the presence of PPY-TTF enhances the fire protection of the coatings. Among them, the IFRC3 sample presents the best fire-retardant effect, which is consistent with the results in Table 3.
Figure 7 exhibits digital photographs of the char layers after the smoke density test, where the IFRC0 char presents the smallest expansion height and the poorest surface structure, thus showing the worst fire-retardant properties. After the addition of PPY-TTF, the char layer heights of IFRC1–IFRC4 are 8.5 mm, 11.5 mm, 14.5 mm and 12.5 mm, respectively, revealing that the presence of PPY-TTF enhances the carbonization and expansion process of the coatings. In particular, the IFRC3 sample exhibits the highest intumescent factor and the densest char. From the SEM images of Figure 8, it can be found that the introduction of PPY-TTF facilitates the formation of a denser and more continuous char layer structure without obvious holes or other defects that effectively blocks the transfer of combustible materials and heat. From the EDS maps of Figure 8, the higher content of P and Si elements in IFRC3 are observed, which indicate that the presence of PPY-TTF is favorable to the formation of more phosphorus-rich and silicon-rich cross-linking structures that enhance the heat-insulation performance of the char layer. Moreover, the char layer of IFRC3 has a higher C/O mass ratio compared to that of IFRC0, resulting in a good oxidation resistance and fire resistance [7].

3.3. Cone Calorimeter Test

The THR and HRR curves of the IFRC0–IFRC4 samples are presented in Figure 9 and Figure 10, respectively. As depicted in the figures, the samples illustrate two peaks due to the decomposition of the char layer and the plywood. The first peak heat release rate (PHRR1) of IFRC0 is 108.5 kW/m2 appeared at 21 s. With the addition of PPY-TTF, both THR and PHRR values of IFRC1–IFRC4 coatings are significantly reduced. Compared with IFRC0, the THR and PHRR1 values are reduced by 5.9% and 12.1% for IFRC1, 13.5% and 18.5% for IFRC2, 21.6% and 31.2% for IFRC3 and 10.9% and 27.2% for IFRC4, suggesting that the presence of PPY-TTF can effectively improve flame retardancy of the coating. Moreover, the coatings containing PPY-TTF show lower second peak heat release rate (PHRR2) compared to the coating without PPY-TTF, indicating better flame inhibition effect on wood substrates. In conclusion, the coatings containing PPY-TTF can significantly reduce the THR and HRR of coating samples, among which, the IFRC3 has the best performance. This phenomenon is mainly attributed to the fact that PPY-TTF can effectively promote the char formation of the coating and strengthen the structure of the char layer, thus effectively delaying the transfer of heat and mass between the flame and the substrates. However, the cooperative effect of PPY-TTF in the coatings depends on the amount of PPY-TTF. When the amount of PPY-TTF exceeds 3 wt%, the cooperative fire-retardant effect will be weakened, which is ascribed to an excessive content of PPY-TTF may solidify the molten char layer that inhibits the char formation process [20].

3.4. Smoke Density Test

Figure 11 presents the light absorption curves and smoke density rating (SDR) values of the wood substrates coated with intumescent fire-resistant coatings. The maximum light absorption values of IFRC0–IFRC4 are 59.0%, 56.2%, 52.2%, 40.6% and 47.7%, and the smoke density rating values are 33.3%, 31.3%, 24.4%, 22.5% and 23.6%, respectively. The addition of PPY-TTF can effectively reduce the smoke density rating values and light absorption rate of coatings, among which the IFRC3 sample shows the optimal smoke suppression performance. The super smoke suppression effect of PPY-TTF in the coating is ascribed to the formation of a dense and compact char against the release of pyrolysis products during combustion.

3.5. Thermal Stability Analysis

The TG and DTG curves of coatings under a nitrogen atmosphere are depicted in Figure 12. As seen in Figure 12, the decomposition process of the coating is mainly divided into four stages in the temperature range of 100–300 °C, 300–430 °C, 430–580 °C and 580–800 °C, respectively. The first stage is mainly the stage of dehydration, volatilization for small molecules and low temperature decomposition of IFR with lower mass loss. As the temperature continues to rise, the second stage appears a strong DTG peak accompanied with a higher mass loss, which is mainly caused by the decomposition of the cured epoxy resin and APP, PER and MEL. In this stage, APP decomposes to generate polyphosphoric acid and phosphoric acid derivatives that promote the esterification of PER into char, while polyphosphoric acid dehydrates to form a cross-linking structure. The NH3 and H2O released from MEL and APP in this process can promote the expansion of the char layer. In the third stage, the formed cross-linking structures and polypyrrole are degraded at a large scale. The fourth stage is ascribed to the decomposition of unstable char layer at a high temperature, accompanying with a mass loss of about 1.5%.
Table 4 illustrates the relevant thermal decomposition parameters.As seen in Table 4, T0 and Tm values of IFRC0 sample occur at 223.1 °C and 362.9 °C, respectively, and the residual weight at 800 °C is 26.7%. With the addition of PPY-TTF, the coatings show lower T0, Tm and mass loss, suggesting a reduction in the release of pyrolysis products and an increase in the amount of residual char. Generally, the higher the ΔW value of the sample, the stronger the interaction between the components. After adding PPY-TTF, the Wexp of the specimens is significantly higher than their Wtheo. Among them, IFRC3 shows the maximum ΔW value of 15.9% corresponding to the best char-forming efficiency. The results indicate that PPY-TTF can effectively improve the structure of the char layer and encourage the cross-linking reaction of degradation products to strengthen the thermal stability and char-forming ability of coatings, thus exhibiting a super cooperative effect.

3.6. Accelerated Ageing Test

Figure 13 presents the morphologies of the IFRC0 and IFRC3 samples before and after the ageing treatment. With the increased ageing time, the obvious blistering, powdering and yellowing phenomena appear on the surface of the IFRC0 coating. The powdering phenomenon is caused by the precipitation and decomposition of IFR under the influence of UV irradiation and hydrothermal conditions, whereas the blistering phenomenon mainly results from the reduction of the adhesion of the coatings. Figure 14 exhibits the adhesion classification and pencil hardness of IFRC0 and IFRC3 coatings after the accelerated ageing treatment. As shown in Figure 14, the adhesion classification and pencil hardness of the coatings gradually weaken with the increase of ageing cycles. However, the IFRC3 coating has a better performance than that of IFRC0 under the same ageing treatment. This may be explained by the reason that the introduction of PPY-TTF can effectively strengthen the hardness, adhesion and shielding effect of the coating and weaken the ageing degradation of the coatings, thus exhibiting less bubbles and the precipitation of flame retardants, as seen in Figure 13. Therefore, the addition of PPY-TTF can effectively enhance the durability of the coating and slow down the blistering, powdering and yellowing of the coatings.
The smoke emission characteristics of IFRC0 and IFRC3 coatings before and after ageing treatment are presented in Figure 15. As depicted in Figure 15, the maximum light absorption rating and SDR values of IFRC0 and IFRC3 samples gradually increase with the growth of the ageing cycle, reflecting the increase of smoke production. Compared with IFRC0, the IFRC3 sample still expresses a better cooperative smoke-suppression effect after the same accelerated ageing treatment, which is ascribed to the enhanced integrity of the coatings after introduction of PPY-TTF under ageing treatment. It can be concluded that the presence of PPY-TTF can strengthen the durability of smoke-suppression effect of intumescent fire-retardant coatings.
The fire resistance of IFRC0 and IFRC3 samples after the ageing treatment are given in Figure 16. As shown in Figure 16, IFRC0 and IFRC3 have a reduction in fire-retardant time with the increase of ageing time, indicating that the degradation of fire protection performance. Compared with IFRC0, the ageing process has a less negative effect on the fire resistance of IFRC3 coating. The reason is that the addition of PPY-TTF is beneficial to weaken the migration of flame retardants and morphology deterioration of the coatings, thus imparting the coatings with a long-term durability of fire resistance.
Intumescent fire-retardant coatings are susceptible to photo-oxidation and thermal oxidation in daily use, and the evolution processes of coatings under ageing conditions are monitored by FTIR analysis. Figure 17 presents the FTIR spectra of IFRC0 and IFRC3 coatings, and Table 5 gives the functional groups of IFRC0 and IFRC3 samples after different ageing cycles. As observed in Figure 17 and Table 5, the absorption peaks of –NH2 (3470, 3419, 1439 cm−1), C=N (1654 cm−1), N–H (1552, 3134 cm−1), P=O (1249 cm−1) and C–O (1016 cm−1) groups are obviously strengthened with the increase in the ageing cycle [24,26,27,28,29,30,31,32], indicating that flame retardant migrates to the surface of the coating under the influence of ageing factors such as irradiation, oxygen, humidity and temperature. However, after eleven ageing cycles, the intensity of the absorption peaks for –NH2, C=N, N–H, P=O, and C–O functional groups decrease remarkably and the –NH2 and N–H groups disappear, showing that the migration, hydrolization and oxidation of APP, PER and MEL under ageing conditions. Compared with IFRC0, the IFRC3 coating has stronger absorption vibration peaks for the main functional groups under the same ageing treatment, corresponding to a weaker ageing degradation. This result shows that PPY-TTF can strengthen the structural stability of the coatings and reduce the migration, hydrolization and oxidation of the coatings during ageing conditions, thus endowing the coatings with a better ageing resistance.

3.7. Flame Retardant and Smoke-Suppression Mechanisms

To further study the effect of PPY-TTF on the flame retardancy and smoke suppression properties of intumescent fire-retardant coatings, the combustion processes of the cured epoxy resin, IFRC0 and IFRC3 samples are analyzed using a cone calorimeter, and the results are presented in Figure 18. As shown in Figure 18, a molten layer is formed at about 60 s on the surface of the coating at a radiation flux of 50 kW/m2. As the temperature increases, the components of the coatings interact to form an intumescent char layer, which suppresses the further decomposition of the coatings. With the increase in burning time, the formed char layers start to decompose and weaken the barrier effect on the inner coating. The cured epoxy resin starts to burn at 125 s, while the addition of IFR delays the ignition time of the coating to 372 s. More importantly, the IFRC3 char maintains its structural integrity at 900 s, which means that the incorporation of PPY-TTF can effectively strengthen the fire resistance of the coatings and provide better protection for the substrate.
The FTIR spectra and digital photos of IFRC0 and IFRC3 after different treating temperatures are depicted in Figure 19 and Table 6. When the temperature reaches 300 °C, the –NH2 (3469, 3419 cm−1), N–H (1552 cm−1), PO32− (1129 cm−1), C–O (1015 cm−1) and P–O–P (669, 873 cm−1) groups disappear and the P–O–C group appears at 1043 cm−1 [23,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34], indicating the decomposition of APP, PER, MEL and epoxy resin at a low temperature. Besides, the decomposition temperature of the N–H group in the IFRC3 coating is 100 °C lower than that of the IFRC0 sample due to the earlier char formation of the coating. As the temperature continues to increase, the pictures reveal that the components of the intumescent fire-retardant coatings interact to form an intumescent char layer, and the main functional group peaks of the coatings in the corresponding FTIR spectra basically disappear. When the temperature reaches 800 °C, the char residue of the IFRC3 sample appears stronger stretching vibration peaks of P=O (1324 cm−1), C–O–C (1139 cm−1), P–O–C (921 cm−1) and aromatic C–H (739 cm−1) groups than those of IFRC0, indicating that the presence of PPY-TTF causes the char residue to form more phosphorus-rich cross-linking structures and aromatic structures, thus improving the heat insulation and thermal stability of the char layer [35,36,37,38]. This result is consistent with the higher residual weight of IFRC3 sample in TG analysis.
During the combustion process, APP is heated and decomposed to release metaphosphate, phosphate, inorganic acid and non-combustible gas, among which inorganic acid can encourage the esterification of PER into char to form a molten layer. At this stage, the introduction of PPY-TTF promotes the production of more cross-linking structures in the condensed phase. At the same time, MEL will decompose and cyclize into triazine compounds, while a large amount of non-combustible gas is released to induce the expansion of the char layer, diluting the fuel gas and weakening the burning intensity. The PPY-TTF will promote the formation of a smoother and denser protective char layer that delays the transfer of heat and mass between the fire and char layer, thus effectively suppressing the further decomposition of the coating. With the rise in temperature, the PPY-TTF contributes to the cross-linking reaction of degradation products that generate more cross-linking and aromatic structures in the condensed phase, which enhance the thermal stability and char-forming properties of coatings. However, the positive effect of PPY-TTF in the coatings is depended on its content. An excessive content of PPY-TTF may inhibit the char formation and decrease the expansion rating of the char layer, thus causing a reduction in the cooperative effect on the fire resistance and smoke suppression performance of intumescent fire-retardant coatings.

4. Conclusions

In this work, a preparation method for PPY-TTF was proposed via the in situ polymerization of pyrrole on the surface of tungsten tailing fillers, and the structures and properties of synthesized particles were characterized in detail by combining SEM-EDS, XRD, FTIR, XRF and TG analyses. Then, the PPY-TTF was applied to intumescent fire-retardant coatings as an adjuvant, and the effect of PPY-TTF on the fire resistance and anti-ageing properties of intumescent fire-retardant coatings was investigated by different analytical methods. The results reveal that the presence of PPY-TTF enhances the fire resistance, thermal stability, char formation and smoke suppression properties of intumescent fire-retardant coatings, exhibiting super cooperative flame-retardant and smoke suppression effects. The cooperative effect of PPY-TTF in intumescent coatings is ascribed to the formation of more cross-linking and aromatic structures in the condensed phase that enhance the barrier effect of char, as supported by digital photos and SEM images. However, an excessive content of PPY-TTF will weaken the char-forming ability of the coatings, thus diminishing the excellent cooperative efficiency. In particular, the IFRC3 sample containing 3 wt% PPY-TTF presents the best fire resistance among all samples, and has a 74.3% reduction in flame-spread rating, 30.7% reduction in total heat release, 32.9% reduction in mass loss and 32.4% reduction in smoke density rating value compared with IFRC0. The TG analysis suggests that PPY-TTF can strengthen the char-forming ability of intumescent fire-retardant coatings, and the residual weights of IFRC0, IFRC1, IFRC3, IFRC4 and IFRC5 at 800 °C are 26.7%, 31.6%, 34.9%, 33.5% and 30.6%, respectively. The accelerated ageing test demonstrates that an appropriate amount of PPY-TTF can improve the shielding effect and structural stability of the coatings that effectively slow down the blistering and powdering phenomenon of the coatings, thus achieving a long-term durability of the fire resistance and smoke suppression properties of the coatings. In summary, PPY-TTF provides a new strategy to utilize tungsten tailing in the fields of flame-retardant materials.

Author Contributions

F.W., conception, formal analysis, writing—review and editing; H.L., methodology, investigation, resources, validation, data curation, writing—original draft preparation; L.Y., validation, methodology, writing—review and editing, project administration, supervision; All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study received funding from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 51906261, 51974362), the Key Research and Development Program of Hunan Province (No. 2021SK2054) and the Graduate Research and Innovation Project of Central South University (2020zzts636).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available upon request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Schaumann, P.; Tabeling, F.; Weisheim, W. Application of intumescent coatings in steel construction. Bautechnik 2017, 94, 368–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Puri, R.; Khanna, A. Intumescent coatings: A review on recent progress. J. Coat. Technol. Res. 2017, 14, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Xu, Z.; Xie, X.; Yan, L.; Zhou, H. Influence of carbon nanoparticle geometry on the fire resistance and anti-aging properties of intumescent fire-retardant coatings. Fire Mater. 2021, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Yan, L.; Xu, Z.; Wang, X. Synergistic effects of organically modified montmorillonite on the flame-retardant and smoke suppression properties of transparent intumescent fire-retardant coatings. Prog. Org. Coat. 2018, 122, 107–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Xu, Z.; Chu, Z.; Yan, L.; Chen, H.; Jia, H.; Tang, W. Effect of chicken eggshell on the flame-retardant and smoke suppression properties of an epoxy-based traditional APP-PER-MEL system. Polym. Compos. 2019, 40, 2712–2723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wang, F.; Liu, H.; Yan, L.; Feng, Y. Comparative Study of Fire Resistance and Anti-Ageing Properties of Intumescent Fire-Retardant Coatings Reinforced with Conch Shell Bio-Filler. Polymers 2021, 13, 2620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Xu, Z.; Xie, X.; Yan, L.; Feng, Y. Fabrication of organophosphate-grafted kaolinite and its effect on the fire-resistant and anti-ageing properties of amino transparent fire-retardant coatings. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2021, 188, 109589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Nguyen, T.; Dao, P.; Duong, K.; Duong, Q.; Vu, Q.; Nguyen, A.; Mac, V.; Le, T. Effect of R-TiO2 and ZnO nanoparticles on the UV-shielding efficiency of water-borne acrylic coating. Prog. Org. Coat. 2017, 110, 114–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Li, Y.; Feng, Y.; Xu, Z.; Yan, L.; Xie, X.; Wang, Z. Synergistic effect of clam shell bio-filler on the fire-resistance and char formation of intumescent fire-retardant coatings. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2020, 9, 14718–14728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Xu, Z.; Zhou, H.; Yan, L.; Jia, H. Comparative study of the fire protection performance and thermal stability of intumescent fire-retardant coatings filled with three types of clay nano-fillers. Fire Mater. 2019, 44, 112–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Yan, L.; Xu, Z.; Liu, D. Synthesis and application of novel magnesium phosphate ester flame retardants for transparent intumescent fire-retardant coatings applied on wood substrates. Prog. Org. Coat. 2019, 129, 327–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Habashy, M.; Abd-Elhady, A.; Elsad, R.; Izzularab, M. Performance of PVC/SiO2 nanocomposites under thermal ageing. Appl. Nanosci. 2021, 11, 2143–2151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Dai, T.; Yang, X.; Yun, L. Conductive composites of polypyrrole and sulfonic-functionalized silica spheres. Mater. Lett. 2007, 61, 3142–3145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Mrah, L.; Meghabar, R. Influence of clay modification process in polypyrrole-layered silicate nanocomposite. SN Appl. Sci. 2020, 2, 155–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Gan, J.; Lim, Y.; Huang, N.; Hong, N. Effect of pH on morphology and supercapacitive properties of manganese oxide/polypyrrole nanocomposite. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2015, 357, 479–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Gai, L.; Han, X.; Hou, Y.; Chen, J.; Jiang, H. Surfactant-free synthesis of Fe304@ PANI and Fe3O4@ PPy microspheres as adsorbents for isolation of PCR-ready DNA. Dalton Trans. 2013, 42, 1820–1826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Yang, R.; Reddy, P.; Chang, C.; Chen, P. Synthesis and characterization of Fe3O4/polypyrrole/carbon nanotube composites with tunable microwave absorption properties: Role of carbon nanotube and polypyrrole content. Chem. Eng. J. 2016, 285, 497–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wang, H.; Yuan, X.; Wu, Y.; Chen, X.; Leng, L.; Wang, H.; Li, H.; Zeng, G. Facile synthesis of polypyrrole decorated reduced graphene oxide-Fe3O4 magnetic-composites and its application for the Cr(VI) removal. Chem. Eng. J. 2015, 262, 597–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Maeda, S.; Gill, M.; Armes, S.; Fletcher, I. Surface Characterization of Conducting Polymer-Silica Nanocomposites by X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy. Langmuir. 1995, 11, 1899–1904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Yan, L.; Xu, Z.; Wang, X. Influence of nano-silica on the flame retardancy and smoke suppression properties of transparent intumescent fire-retardant coatings. Prog. Org. Coat. 2017, 112, 319–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Khadija, E.; Shimaa, A.; Aishah, A. Synthesis and Characterization of Nano-Conducting Copolymer Composites: Efficient Sorbents for Organic Pollutants. Molecules. 2017, 22, 772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Shi, Y.; Wang, G. The novel silicon-containing epoxy/PEPA phosphate flame retardant for transparent intumescent fire resistant coating. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2016, 385, 456–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Yang, F.; Yang, W.; Zhu, L.; Chen, Y.; Ye, Z. Preparation and investigation of waterborne fluorinated polyacrylate/silica nanocomposite coatings. Prog. Org. Coat. 2016, 95, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Gómez-Fernández, S.; Ugarte, L.; Peña-Rodriguez, C.; Corcuera, M.; Eceiza, A. The effect of phosphorus containing polyol and layered double hydroxides on the properties of a castor oil based flexible polyurethane foam. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2016, 132, 41–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Chang, C.; Wu, Y.; Cheng, L. Preparation of HMDS-modified silica/polyacrylate hydrophobic hard coatings on PMMA substrates. J. Coat. Technol. Res. 2016, 13, 999–1007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wang, J.; Wang, G. Influences of montmorillonite on fire protection, water and corrosion resistance of waterborne intumescent fire retardant coating for steel structure. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2014, 239, 177–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Wang, J.; Zhao, M. Study on the effects of aging by accelerated weathering on the intumescent fire retardant coating for steel elements. Eng. Fail. Anal. 2020, 118, 104920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Shi, Y.; Wang, G. The novel epoxy/PEPA phosphate flame retardants: Synthesis, characterization and application in transparent intumescent fire resistant coatings. Prog. Org. Coat. 2016, 97, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zhu, F.; Xin, Q.; Feng, Q.; Liu, R.; Li, K. Influence of nano-silica on flame resistance behavior of intumescent flame retardant cellulosic textiles: Remarkable synergistic effect? Surf. Coat. Technol. 2016, 294, 90–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Das, S.; Pandey, P.; Mohanty, S.; Nayak, S. Effect of nanosilica on the physicochemical, morphological and curing characteristics of transesterified castor oil based polyurethane coatings—ScienceDirect. Prog. Org. Coat. 2016, 97, 233–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Makhlouf, G.; Hassan, M.; Nour, M.; Abdel-Monem, Y.; Abdelkhalik, A. Evaluation of fire performance of linear low-density polyethylene containing novel intumescent flame retardant. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2017, 130, 1031–1041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ullah, S.; Ahmad, F. Effects of zirconium silicate reinforcement on expandable graphite based intumescent fire retardant coating. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2014, 103, 49–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Deng, C.; Du, S.; Zhao, J.; Shen, Z.; Deng, C.; Wang, Y. An intumescent flame retardant polypropylene system with simultaneously improved flame retardancy and water resistance. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2014, 108, 97–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zheng, Z.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, L.; Wang, H. Synergistic effect of expandable graphite and intumescent flame retardants on the flame retardancy and thermal stability of polypropylene. J. Mater. Sci. 2016, 51, 5857–5871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Hu, Q.; Peng, P.; Peng, S.; Liu, J.; Liu, X.; Zou, L.; Chen, J. Flame-retardant epoxy resin based on aluminum monomethylphosphinate. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2017, 128, 201–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Nikolic, M.; Nguyen, H.; Daugaard, A.; Löf, D.; Mortensen, K.; Barsberg, S.; Sanadi, A. Influence of surface modified nano silica on alkyd binder before and after accelerated weathering. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2016, 126, 134–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Hu, X.; Wang, G.; Huang, Y. Study on the preparation and properties of novel transparent fire-resistive coatings. J. Coat. Technol. Res. 2013, 10, 717–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Wang, G.; Huang, Y.; Hu, X. Synthesis of a novel phosphorus-containing polymer and its application in amino intumescent fire resistant coating. Prog. Org. Coat. 2013, 76, 188–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Synthetic route of PPY-TTF.
Figure 1. Synthetic route of PPY-TTF.
Polymers 14 01540 g001
Figure 2. XRD patterns of TTF.
Figure 2. XRD patterns of TTF.
Polymers 14 01540 g002
Figure 3. SEM and EDS; (a) SEM of TTF; (b) SEM of PPY-TTF; (c) carbon; (d) nitrogen; (e) silicon; (f) ferrum.
Figure 3. SEM and EDS; (a) SEM of TTF; (b) SEM of PPY-TTF; (c) carbon; (d) nitrogen; (e) silicon; (f) ferrum.
Polymers 14 01540 g003
Figure 4. FTIR spectra of TTF and PPY-TTF.
Figure 4. FTIR spectra of TTF and PPY-TTF.
Polymers 14 01540 g004
Figure 5. TG and DTG curves of TTF and PPY-TTF.
Figure 5. TG and DTG curves of TTF and PPY-TTF.
Polymers 14 01540 g005
Figure 6. The backside-temperature curves of the substrates coated with IFRC0–IFRC4 coatings.
Figure 6. The backside-temperature curves of the substrates coated with IFRC0–IFRC4 coatings.
Polymers 14 01540 g006
Figure 7. Digital photographs of the obtained char layers from IFRC0–IFRC4.
Figure 7. Digital photographs of the obtained char layers from IFRC0–IFRC4.
Polymers 14 01540 g007
Figure 8. SEM-EDS maps of IFRC0 and IFRC3.
Figure 8. SEM-EDS maps of IFRC0 and IFRC3.
Polymers 14 01540 g008
Figure 9. HRR curves of IFRC0–IFRC4 samples.
Figure 9. HRR curves of IFRC0–IFRC4 samples.
Polymers 14 01540 g009
Figure 10. THR curves of IFRC0–IFRC4 samples.
Figure 10. THR curves of IFRC0–IFRC4 samples.
Polymers 14 01540 g010
Figure 11. Light absorption curves and SDR values of IFRC0–IFRC4 samples.
Figure 11. Light absorption curves and SDR values of IFRC0–IFRC4 samples.
Polymers 14 01540 g011
Figure 12. TG and DTG curves of intumescent fire-retardant coatings.
Figure 12. TG and DTG curves of intumescent fire-retardant coatings.
Polymers 14 01540 g012
Figure 13. Digital photos of IFRC0 and IFRC3 after different ageing cycles.
Figure 13. Digital photos of IFRC0 and IFRC3 after different ageing cycles.
Polymers 14 01540 g013
Figure 14. Adhesion classification (a) and pencil hardness (b) of IFRC0 and IFRC3 after different ageing cycles.
Figure 14. Adhesion classification (a) and pencil hardness (b) of IFRC0 and IFRC3 after different ageing cycles.
Polymers 14 01540 g014
Figure 15. Smoke density testing results after different ageing cycles; (a) light absorption of IFRC0; (b) light absorption of IFRC3; (c) SDR of IFRC0 and IFRC3.
Figure 15. Smoke density testing results after different ageing cycles; (a) light absorption of IFRC0; (b) light absorption of IFRC3; (c) SDR of IFRC0 and IFRC3.
Polymers 14 01540 g015
Figure 16. Fire-resistant time (a) and char layer thickness (b) of IFRC0 and IFRC3 after accelerated ageing test.
Figure 16. Fire-resistant time (a) and char layer thickness (b) of IFRC0 and IFRC3 after accelerated ageing test.
Polymers 14 01540 g016
Figure 17. FTIR spectra of IFRC0 (a) and IFRC3 (b) after different ageing cycles.
Figure 17. FTIR spectra of IFRC0 (a) and IFRC3 (b) after different ageing cycles.
Polymers 14 01540 g017
Figure 18. Digital photographs of the cured epoxy resin, IFRC0 and IFRC3 at expansion test.
Figure 18. Digital photographs of the cured epoxy resin, IFRC0 and IFRC3 at expansion test.
Polymers 14 01540 g018
Figure 19. FTIR spectrum and digital pictures of IFRC0 (a) and IFRC3 (b) after different treating temperatures.
Figure 19. FTIR spectrum and digital pictures of IFRC0 (a) and IFRC3 (b) after different treating temperatures.
Polymers 14 01540 g019
Table 1. Compositions of the intumescent fire-retardant coatings %.
Table 1. Compositions of the intumescent fire-retardant coatings %.
SamplesIFRTTFPPY-TTFWaterborne Epoxy ResinDefoamerDispersantWaterborne Epoxy Hardener
IFRC05500400.50.54
IFRC15401400.50.54
IFRC25302400.50.54
IFRC35203400.50.54
IFRC45005400.50.54
IFRC55230400.50.54
Table 2. XRF test of TTF.
Table 2. XRF test of TTF.
ComponentsSiO2Al2O3CaOMnOFe2O3MgONa2OK2OWO3SO3
Content/%60.210.411.82.46.71.60.81.80.42.8
Table 3. Fire protection performance of intumescent fire-retardant coatings.
Table 3. Fire protection performance of intumescent fire-retardant coatings.
SamplesIFRC0IFRC1IFRC2IFRC3IFRC4IFRC5
Mass loss/g3.7 ± 0.13.4 ± 0.13.0 ± 0.12.5 ± 0.12.8 ± 0.12.8 ± 0.1
Charring index/cm334.9 ± 0.629.9 ± 0.823.8 ± 2.418.6 ± 0.819.6 ± 0.418.1 ± 0.4
Flame-spread rating20.5 ± 1.715.8 ± 2.98.2 ± 0.85.3 ± 2.98.2 ± 0.88.2 ± 0.3
Intumescent factor25.0 ± 4.131.7 ± 2.437.5 ± 2.445.0 ± 4.142.5 ± 4.141.7 ± 2.4
Table 4. The relevant thermal decomposition parameters of intumescent fire-retardant coatings.
Table 4. The relevant thermal decomposition parameters of intumescent fire-retardant coatings.
SamplesT0/
°C
Tm/
°C
PMLR/
(%/min)
Wexp
(800 °C)/%
Wtheo
(800 °C)/%
ΔW
(800 °C)/%
IFRC0223.1362.96.526.716.89.5
IFRC1222.2359.16.731.617.414.2
IFRC3214.3354.76.834.919.015.9
IFRC4215.8358.16.933.520.612.9
IFRC5219.3362.06.830.619.411.2
Notes: T0, the temperature of initial decomposition with the mass loss of 5%; PMLR, peak mass loss rate; Tm, the temperature of PMLR; Wexp, the experimental char residue; ΔW = WexpWtheo; Wexp of the cured epoxy resin, IFR, TTF, PPY-TTF at 800 °C were 6.7%, 25.2%, 96.0%, 81.8%, respectively.
Table 5. FTIR assignments for functional groups of IFRC0 and IFRC3 after different ageing cycles.
Table 5. FTIR assignments for functional groups of IFRC0 and IFRC3 after different ageing cycles.
FTIR Band (cm−1)Functional GroupsObservations
IntensityChanges
1439, 3419, 3470–NH2 stretchingStrongDisappeared
1645C=N stretchingWeakSlightly decreased
1552, 3134N–H stretchingStrongDisappeared
1249P=O stretchingWeakSlightly decreased
1016C–O stretchingStrongSignificantly decreased
Table 6. FTIR assignments for the functional groups of the IFRC0 and IFRC3 after different treatment temperatures.
Table 6. FTIR assignments for the functional groups of the IFRC0 and IFRC3 after different treatment temperatures.
FTIR Band (cm−1)Functional GroupsObservations
IntensityChanges
3469, 3419–NH2 stretchingStrongDisappeared
2956, 2885–CH2 stretchingStrongDisappeared
1552N–H stretchingStrongDisappeared
1324P=O stretchingStrongNew, increased
1139C–O–C stretchingStrongNew, increased
1129PO32− stretchingStrongDisappeared
1043, 921P–O–C stretchingStrongNew, increased
1015C–O stretchingStrongDisappeared
739C–H deformation for benzene ringStrongNew, increased
669, 873P–O–P stretchingStrongDisappeared
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, F.; Liu, H.; Yan, L. Fabrication of Polypyrrole-Decorated Tungsten Tailing Particles for Reinforcing Flame Retardancy and Ageing Resistance of Intumescent Fire-Resistant Coatings. Polymers 2022, 14, 1540. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/polym14081540

AMA Style

Wang F, Liu H, Yan L. Fabrication of Polypyrrole-Decorated Tungsten Tailing Particles for Reinforcing Flame Retardancy and Ageing Resistance of Intumescent Fire-Resistant Coatings. Polymers. 2022; 14(8):1540. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/polym14081540

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Feiyue, Hui Liu, and Long Yan. 2022. "Fabrication of Polypyrrole-Decorated Tungsten Tailing Particles for Reinforcing Flame Retardancy and Ageing Resistance of Intumescent Fire-Resistant Coatings" Polymers 14, no. 8: 1540. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/polym14081540

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop