Next Article in Journal
Electrical Breakdown Mechanism of ENB-EPDM Cable Insulation Based on Density Functional Theory
Next Article in Special Issue
Advances and Applications of Block Copolymers
Previous Article in Journal
Physicochemical Characterization and Antioxidant Properties of Chitosan and Sodium Alginate Based Films Incorporated with Ficus Extract
Previous Article in Special Issue
Thermal and Bulk Properties of Triblock Terpolymers and Modified Derivatives towards Novel Polymer Brushes
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Polymers
Volume 15
Issue 5
10.3390/polym15051216
polymers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Nanostructuring Biobased Epoxy Resin with PEO-PPO-PEO Block Copolymer

by
Irati Barandiaran
1,2,
Joseba Gomez-Hermoso-de-Mendoza
1,
Junkal Gutierrez
1,
Agnieszka Tercjak
1 and
Galder Kortaberria
1,*
1
Group ‘Materials + Technologies’ (GMT), Chemical and Environmental Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering of Gipuzkoa, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), Plaza Europa 1, 20018 Donostia-San Sebastian, Spain
2
Chemical and Environmental Engineering Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), Paseo de la Universidad, 7, 01006 Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2023, 15(5), 1216; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/polym15051216
Submission received: 1 February 2023 / Revised: 23 February 2023 / Accepted: 24 February 2023 / Published: 28 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances and Applications of Block Copolymers)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
A biobased diglycidyl ether of vanillin (DGEVA) epoxy resin was nanostructured by poly(ethylene oxide-b-propylene oxide-b-ethylene oxide) (PEO-PPO-PEO) triblock copolymer. Due to the miscibility/immiscibility properties of the triblock copolymer in DGEVA resin, different morphologies were obtained depending on the triblock copolymer amount. A hexagonally packed cylinder morphology was kept until reaching 30 wt% of PEO-PPO-PEO content, while a more complex three-phase morphology was obtained for 50 wt%, in which large worm-like PPO domains appear surrounded by two different phases, one of them rich in PEO and another phase rich in cured DGEVA. UV-vis measurements show that the transmittance is reduced with the increase in triblock copolymer content, especially at 50 wt%, probably due to the presence of PEO crystals detected by calorimetry.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

During recent years, bio-based polymers have attracted attention due to the overuse of fossil fuels as well as the increase in greenhouse gas emissions, which causes important environmental issues [1,2]. Those polymers can be obtained from renewable materials, such as lignin [3] or vegetable oils [4,5], among others. Between these different types of polymeric materials, epoxy-based thermosets are the most popular, due to their broad spectrum of properties through the selection of epoxy prepolymers and curing agents, and therefore their use in various applications, such as coatings, adhesives, and composites, among others [6,7,8]. Over 90% of these epoxide materials are based on bis(4-hydroxyphenylene)-2,2-propane, known as bisphenol A, to which the aromatic ring confers good thermal resistance. Commercialized for more than 50 years, these bisphenol A based thermosets (DGEBA) have been employed in many common products, such as containers, and human health applications, such as filling materials or sealants in dentistry. However, bisphenol A can also mimic the body’s own hormones, and it could lead to severe negative health effects [9,10], besides cited environmental issues. Recently, poly-functional glycidyl ether derivatives based on both biobased and barely toxic extracts, such as vanillin [11,12,13,14,15] and phloroglucinol [16,17,18], which are extracted from lignins and tannins [1,19], and used as food flavoring or active ingredient in medicine, have been studied as new feedstock for thermosets. Between different biobased resins investigated by other authors, diglycidyl ether of vanillin (DGEVA) have shown good thermomechanical properties [20,21].
On the other hand, the self-assembly of block copolymers (BCP) into different nanoscale structures makes them interesting polymeric macromolecules from both academic and industrial points of view. This class of macromolecules consists of two or more covalently linked polymers, which are thermodynamically incompatible, giving rise to a variety of the microstructures. As it is well known, BCPs can self-assemble to form nanoscale structures with domain spacing that depends strongly on molecular weight, segment size and interaction between the blocks among others. Consequently, microphase separation of BCPs is determined by the degree of polymerization, N, the volume fraction of each block, f, and the Flory–Huggins interaction parameter, χ, which depends on temperature. A typical size of the microphase separated BCP domains is in the range of 10–200 nm.
BCPs can microphase separated in stable structures, such as lamellar, hexagonal-packed cylinder, body-centered cubic, close-packed spherical, or bicontinuous cubic gyroid structures. The ability to control both the length scale and the spatial organization of BCP morphologies makes these polymeric materials attractive candidates for use as templates for the fabrication of novel multifunctional materials with application in many fields of nanotechnology and advanced materials.
BCPs can also act as a nanostructuring agent for different homopolymers and thermosetting systems. As the main drawback of epoxy thermosetting polymers, for their applications as adhesives, surface coatings or composite matrices, is their low fracture toughness. One of the successful pathways to achieve high improvements on the toughness of these systems is incorporation of BCPs [22,23,24,25,26]. Use of the BCPs not only improves the toughness of thermosetting polymers but also leads to nanostructured thermosets, which can act as templates for dispersion and selective localization of low molecular weight organic molecules, such as azobenzene or liquid crystals, or inorganic nanoobjects, such as nanoparticles, carbon nanotubes, nanofibers and others.
Nanostructured thermosetting materials can be formed followed two different mechanisms. In the first one, the epoxy precursor acts as a selective solvent and, consequently, the microphase separation takes place before the curing reaction, and the epoxy network formation process only fixed the final morphology. In the second pathway, the microphase separation of the immiscible block takes place by reaction-induced phase separation (RIPS). Thus, the mixture of BCP and epoxy precursors is miscible before curing and the phase separation takes place during network formation.
Many authors, among which our research group can be mentioned, obtained nanostructured thermosetting systems by employing amphiphilic BCPs. Different amphiphilic BCPs used as nanostructuring agents by different authors can be found in Table 1.
As it can be seen in Table 1, poly(ethylene glycol)-poly(propylene glycol)-poly(ethyleneglycol) (PEO-PPO-PEO), has been widely employed for nanostructuring epoxy matrices, mainly DGEBA resin [30,31,32,33,34,35]. The popularity of PEO-PPO-PEO is due to its commercial availability, including different ratios of each block as well as the simplicity of the experimental procedure and the absence of any chemical synthesis or reaction with the epoxy system [32]. For PEO-PPO-PEO/epoxy blends, the formation of the self-assembled nanostructure depends on the curing conditions, curing agent and the inner characteristics of the BCP [53]. Regarding the effect of BCP composition, Guo et al. [30] obtained different nanostructured features based on the DGEBA/MDA system and PPO-PEO-PPO copolymers with different block ratios. For the BCP with 30 wt% of PEO block, it did not find macroscopic phase separation up to a content of 50 wt%, exhibiting nanostructures based on spherical PPO domains with an average size of about 10 nm. For blends with the BCP with 80 wt% PEO, blends were not macroscopically phase-separated over the entire composition range because of the much higher PEO content, showing composition-dependent nanostructures on the order of 10−100 nm. Sun et al. [31] studied the same systems by solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), finding that the domain size and long period depended strongly on the PEO fraction. They demonstrated that PEO blocks were only partially miscible with the cured network. Upon curing, the cross-linked rigid epoxy resin formed a separated microphase, while some PEO were locally expelled out of the cured network, forming another microphase with PPO. Similar systems but employing diamino diphenyl methane (DDM) as a hardener have also been deeply analyzed by our group [32,33,34,35]. Firstly, the miscibility and morphological features were studied, together with cure kinetics, by changing cure temperatures and copolymer amount [32]. Depending on the curing condition, phase separation took place at micro or nanoscale due to competition among kinetic and thermodynamic factors. Two distinct phases were present for every blend studied except for the system with 10 wt% PEO–PPO–PEO and cured at a low temperature. A thermodynamic model describing a thermoset/block copolymer considered as only one entity system was proposed. In a second stage, the effect of copolymer composition (block ratios) and curing conditions was analyzed [33]. A delay of cure rate was found, which increased as copolymer content and PEO molar ratio in the block copolymer increased. Infrared spectroscopy showed that PEO block was mainly responsible for physical interactions between the hydroxyl groups of growing epoxy thermoset and ether bonds of block copolymer that led to the delay in cure kinetics. Regarding structural characterization [34], taking into account DGEBA/DDM systems modifided with PEO or PPO homopolymers for comparison, it was found that, depending on the molar ratio among blocks, micro or macrophase separated morphologies were obtained. For high molar ratio among blocks, microphase-separated structures were obtained for all block copolymer contents and cure temperatures, with the self-assembly of PPO into nanoscopic entities. For low molar ratio among blocks, however, the physical interactions among the PEO block and the epoxy matrix were not favourable enough, due to the lower content of this block. Indeed, the micelles formed initially coalesced, leading to macroscopic phase separation, where different morphologies were obtained depending on copolymer content and cure temperature. Finally, the mechanical properties–morphology relationships were also analyzed [35]. Macrophase-separated systems modified with low PEO/PPO block ratio showed a similar behaviour to that for rubber-modified systems. Increasing the content of a modifier decreases both flexural modulus and strength, while fracture toughness increases. Microphase-separated systems, on the other hand, did not present significant changes in both flexural modulus and strength for low contents, but the critical stress intensity factor increased due to partial miscibility of the PEO block with the epoxy matrix.
Parameswaranpillai et al. [54] nanostructured a DGEBA/DDM system with PEO-PPO-PEO, finding that the phase separation occurred via self-assembly of PPO blocks, followed by the reaction-induced phase separation of PEO blocks, and confirming that phase separated PEO blocks formed the crystalline phase in the amorphous crosslinked epoxy matrix.
In the present work, as a preliminary study for analyzing the nanostructuring of bio-based epoxy thermosetting formulation, DGEVA epoxy resin has been modified using different amounts of PEO-PPO-PEO triblock copolymer ranging from 10 to 50 wt%. Thermal properties are analyzed in terms of differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), while optical properties are characterized by UV-vis spectroscopy and corroborated by photographs. Finally, the effect of copolymer amount on the morphology of the nanostructured thermosetting system is analyzed by atomic force microscopy (AFM). The possibility of nanostructuring and the control of generated nanostructures will be further employed in future works for the preparation of ternary systems based on biobased epoxy thermosetts by placing nanofillers at the nanodomains.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials and Sample Preparation

The biobased epoxy used in this research work was diglycidyl ether of vanillin (DGEVA) supplied by Specific Polymers, Castries, France. The curing agent was 4,4′-diaminodiphenylmethane (DDM), purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, Darmstadt, Germany. The block copolymer used was poly(ethylene oxide-b-propylene oxide-b-ethylene oxide) (PEO-PPO-PEO) triblock copolymer (Pluronic F-127) supplied by Sigma Aldrich, Darmstadt, Germany. Chemical structures of employed materials are shown in Table 2. An amine:epoxy ratio of 1:1 was used for the DGEVA/DDM system, while PEO-PPO-PEO block copolymer content was varied from 10 to 50 wt% to design different BCP-DGEVA/DDM systems.
Sample preparation was carried out in the following way. First, DGEVA resin and PEO–PPO–PEO triblock copolymer were blended at 80 °C under mechanic stirring. Then, a corresponding amount of DDM was added with continuous stirring, in an oil bath at 80 °C, until a homogeneous mixture was achieved. Finally, the mixture was poured to the mold, and samples were degassed in a vacuum oven and cured at 120 °C for 6 h and post-cured under vacuum at 190 °C for 2 h. In both cases, a mechanical vacuum pump device was employed.

2.2. Techniques

Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) measurements of the individual components, as well as BCP-DGEVA/DDM systems, were performed using a DSC3+ from Mettler Toledo equipment (Columbus, OH, USA). Thermal behavior of individual components and the DGVA/DDM system was evaluated by dynamic scans performed from −80 °C to 250 °C at 10 °C/min scan rate. The miscibility of PEO–PPO–PEO triblock copolymer with the uncured DGEVA/DDM system was investigated by dynamic scans performed from −80 °C to 50 °C at 10 °C/min scan rate. The curing processes of all BCP-DGEVA/DDM systems were analyzed by isothermal scan performed at 80, 100 and 120 °C (followed by a dynamic scan from 25 °C to 200 °C at 10 °C/min). Finally, thermal behavior of BCP-DGEVA/DDM systems was analyzed by dynamic scans performed from −80 °C to 250 °C at 10 °C/min scan rate. All experiments were performed under nitrogen atmosphere, with a flow of 10 mL/min.
Thermogravimetric tests were performed on a TGA 500 from TA Instruments Inc. (New Castle, DE, USA). Samples were heated from 25 to 800 °C at a heating rate of 10 °C/min under nitrogen atmosphere.
Fourier-transformed infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) spectra were recorded with a Nicolet Nexus spectrometer from Thermo Fisher Scientific SL (Bilbao, Spain) with a Golden Gate ATR sampling accessory. Background was recorded before every sample and the spectra were obtained in the range of 4000–650 cm−1, performing 32 scans with a resolution of 4 cm−1.
The morphologies of the cured BCP-DGEVA/DDM systems were studied by atomic force microscopy (AFM) under ambient conditions, using a scanning probe microscope Multimode 8 from Bruker (Billerica, MI, USA). Tapping mode (TM) was employed in air using an integrated tip/cantilever (125 mm in length with a 300 kHz resonant frequency). Measurements were performed with 512 scan lines and target amplitude around 0.9 V. Different regions of the cured BCP-DGEVA/DDM systems were scanned to ensure that the morphology of the investigated materials was a representative one. Samples were cut using an ultramicrotome Leica Ultracut R with a diamond blade.
UV-vis transmittance spectra of the cured BCP-DGEVA/DDM systems were performed with a Shimadzu UV-3600 (Kioto, Japan) spectrophotometer in the range between 200 and 800 nm.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Differential Scaning Calorimetry Analysis

DSC dynamic measurements were carried out in order to investigate the miscibility between PEO-PPO-PEO triblock copolymer and DGEVA/DDM.
Figure 1A shows thermograms of blend components (PEO-PPO-PEO and DGEVA/DDM). Moreover, uncured BCP-DGEVA/DDM blends with different BCP amounts were also included in Figure 1B. PEO-PPO-PEO thermogram shows a Tg at around −68.5 °C [32] and a melting peak centered at 58.0 °C, related to the melting of crystalline PEO block. DGEVA resin presents a Tg at −41.7 °C that increased up to −32.5 °C when curing agent was added. This behavior can be related to the partial miscibility between the DGEVA resin and the amine before curing. In addition, the DGEVA/DDM thermogram shows an exothermic peak centered around 140 °C, indicating the curing reaction of the blend. If the dynamic thermograms for BCP-DGEVA/DDM systems are compared, the Tg of the DGEVA resin phase decreases from −36.5 °C to −44.0 °C with increasing BCP content, owing to the miscibility of PEO-PPO-PEO and DGEVA [32,37]. Moreover, at the thermogram of the 50BCP-DGEVA/DDM system, the melting of the crystalline phase of the PEO block is detected and, in contrast to that of neat BCP, the melting happens in two steps, indicating the presence of different types of crystals. This phenomenon will be further discussed in the morphology section shown below.
The curing behavior of all BCP-DGEVA/DDM blends was analyzed by isothermal thermograms at 80, 100 and 120 °C (Figure 2).
As can be observed, the reaction rate increased with the increasing of curing temperature, while BCP addition delayed the exothermic peak of the isothermal thermograms at all temperatures, due to the dilution effect of PEO-PPO-PEO [32,46]. For systems with highest amount of BCP, the exothermic peak almost disappeared at 80 and 100 °C, as the full conversion was not reached in the analyzed time scale at 80 and 100 °C. For these BCP-DGEVA/DDM systems, the curing process would be completed at the post-curing stage. At 120 °C the curing reaction was completed for all investigated BCP-DGEVA/DDM systems, and all composites were cured at 120 °C.
All BCP-DGEVA/DDM systems cured at 120 °C were studied by dynamic DSC analysis (Figure 3). The neat DGEVA/DDM epoxy system showed a Tg at 115.1 °C. With PEO-PPO-PEO triblock copolymer addition, the Tg of the epoxy matrix decreased from 109.5 °C (10BCP-DGEVA/DDM system) to 91.6 °C (50BCP-DGEVA/DDM system), confirming of the epoxy matrix the miscibility between DGEVA epoxy resin and PEO block of PEO-PPO-PEO [26]. However, the sample with 30 wt% of BCP presented a lower Tg value of for epoxy matrix than the sample with 50 wt% of BCP. Moreover, the 50BCP-DGEVA/DDM system presented an additional Tg at −50.2 °C, which could be attributed to the Tg of PEO block of PEO-PPO-PEO. Dynamic thermograms of BCP-DGEVA/DDM systems with BCP content from 10 to 50 wt% also presented endothermic peaks, related to the melting of PEO block of the BCP, which is represented by two peaks that tend to become closer as the BCP content is increased, indicating different types of crystals.
As has been pointed out by other authors [26,33], the Tg of a blend depends on the weight fraction of the components. For this reason, it could be expected that the higher the BCP content in the mixture, the lower the Tg of the system will be. However, in this case, although the BCP amount is higher for the 50BCP-DGEVA/DDM system than for the 30BCP-DGEVA/DDM one, the value of the Tg increases. This could indicate that part of the PEO block phase separates from the DGEVA/DDM matrix, as found in previous works of our group [26]. These melting peaks increased significantly in the case of the 50BCP-DGEVA/DDM system. The increase in melting peaks, together with the presence of the Tg of PEO block of BCP and the higher Tg of epoxy matrix when compared with that for the 30BCP-DGEVA/DDM system, could indicate that the phase separated BCP content could be remarkably higher in this case than for the rest of the systems.

3.2. Thermogravimetric Analysis

Thermogravimetric analysis of PEO-PPO-PEO triblock copolymer and developed BCP-DGEVA/DDM systems was also carried out (Figure 4). If the thermal degradation curves of PEO-PPO-PEO and neat DGEVA/DDM are compared, for both samples the main degradation step occurs between 350 and 425 °C. As a result, for BCP-DGEVA/DDM systems the main degradation occurs in the same temperature range, showing that BCP addition does not affect the thermal stability of the system. On the other side, formed char amount (32 wt% for neat epoxy system) proportionally decreases with BCP content from 29 wt% for the 10BCP-DGEVA/DDM system to 14 wt% for the 50BCP-DGEVA/DDM one.

3.3. Fourier-Transform Infrared Spectroscopy Analysis

Figure 5A shows FTIR spectra of DGEVA resin and the DGEVA/DDM system. If these two spectra are compared, in the case of DGEVA/DDM system, a broad band centered at 3370 cm−1 is detected, attributed to the alcohol groups formed after the reaction of the epoxy groups of DGEVA and the amine groups of DDM [33]. In addition, the peak related to the epoxide group (910 cm−1) disappears at the cured spectrum, proving the curing of the epoxy resin [33,55].
Regarding the effect of PEO-PPO-PEO triblock copolymer addition, Figure 5B shows that by increasing BCP content, the intensity of the band related to alcohol groups (broad band centered at 3370 cm−1, in DGEVA/DDM) decreases and shifts towards higher wavenumbers (3387 and 3428 cm−1 for 15BCP-DGEVA/DDM and 50BCP-DGEVA/DDM, respectively). This could be due to the hydrogen bonding interaction between the OH groups formed in the cured resin and the PEO block of the triblock copolymer [33]. Moreover, in the spectra of systems with higher BCP content (30 and 50 wt%) the bands related to the PEO-PPO-PEO block copolymer present higher intensity.

3.4. Atomic Force Microscopy

The morphologies of the BCP-DGEVA/DDM systems cured at 120 °C were investigated by AFM. As can be observed in Figure 6, all investigated systems show microphase separation at nanoscale. In the case of the samples with BCP content up to 30 wt%, it is remarkable the formation of small nanostructures. For the system with 10 wt% of block copolymer (Figure 6A), a hexagonally packed cylinder morphology is formed, in which the dark spherical domains with diameters ranging from 10 to 15 nm correspond to the PPO block rich phase, while the continuous light phase corresponds to the PEO-epoxy rich one [31]. As other authors have reported for DGEBA epoxy systems [26,37,46], it seems that as a result of the interactions between the PEO block and epoxy resin, the PEO block is miscible with DGEBA epoxy resin, while PPO remains immiscible. In the case of the system based on DGEVA resin, a similar behavior is observed. As shown in Figure 6B, an increase of 5 wt% in PEO-PPO-PEO triblock copolymer content seems not to affect the morphology observed, as the 15BCP-DGEVA/DDM system presents the same morphology than the 10BCP-DGEVA/DDM one. Moreover, for the 30BCP-DGEVA/DDM system, no significant morphological changes are detected, observing a similar hexagonally packed cylinder morphology (marked at the images) than for 10BCP-DGEVA/DDM and 15BCP-DGEVA/DDM systems. On the contrary, when PEO-PPO-PEO concentration rises up to 50 wt%, the morphology changes drastically. In this case, large worm-like domains (PPO block) are observed, surrounded by two different phases, one of them rich in PEO (lower hardness) and the last phase rich in cured DGEVA [56]. This fact could be in agreement with the dynamic DSC results for the 50BCP-DGEVA/DDM system shown in Figure 3, in which an additional Tg attributed to the PEO block of PEO-PPO-PEO was detected.

3.5. UV-Vis Spectroscopy

UV-vis transmittance results of the BCP-DGEVA/DDM systems with different PEO-PPO-PEO contents are shown in Figure 7. The transmittance of the DGEVA/DDM system decreases with the addition of triblock copolymer. The DGEVA/DDM system presents a transmittance value of 77% at 650 nm, while values of 75, 74 and 73% are measured for systems with 10, 15 and 30% of BCP, respectively. When the triblock copolymer content increases to 50 wt%, the transmittance value at 650 nm is reduced to 19%. The presence of PEO crystals observed by DSC for this system (increase in the melting temperature for PEO block) could explain the drastic reduction in the transmittance.
The digital images of samples shown in Figure 8 corroborate the results obtained by UV-vis transmittance. The systems with PEO-PPO-PEO concentrations up to 30 wt% allow light transmittance, while the 50BCP-DGEVA/DDM system presents much lower transmittance and the image behind cannot be clearly seen.

4. Conclusions

The following conclusions can be extracted from this preliminary work on the nanostructuring of bio-based epoxy matrix by PEO-PPO-PEO block copolymer.
This research work demonstrates that the biobased DGEVA epoxy resin is an adequate resin to be nanostructured with PEO-PPO-PEO triblock copolymer. The curing temperature was set at 120 °C, as at lower temperatures systems with higher BCP content did not reach full conversion, as BCP addition delayed the cure reaction by dilution effect. The investigated systems showed, up to 30 wt% of triblock copolymer, a hexagonally packed cylinder morphology, with spherical domains ranging from 10 to 15 nm. In the 50BCP-DGEVA/DDM system, a change in the morphology was detected, forming a more complex morphology with phase separation of PEO-PPO-PEO triblock copolymer. These results are in agreement with presented DSC thermograms, in which an additional Tg related to PEO crystals was detected, and also with the transmittance data obtained by UV-vis, as the most significant decrease in transmittance was not detected up to a BCP content of 50 wt%, probably due to the presence of PEO crystals.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, I.B. and G.K.; methodology, J.G.; software, J.G.; validation, I.B., J.G.-H.-d.-M. and A.T.; formal analysis, G.K.; investigation, A.T; resources, G.K.; data curation, I.B.; writing—original draft preparation, G.K. and A.T.; writing—review and editing, A.T.; visualization, J.G.; supervision, G.K.; project administration, A.T.; funding acquisition, G.K. and A.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovacion y Universidades, grant number PID2021-126417NB-I00 and by the Gobierno Vasco/Eusko Jaurlaritza, grant number IT1690-22.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

J.G.H. thanks Basque Government for PhD Fellowship (PRE_2021_2_0044); Macrobehavior-Mesostructure-Nanotechnology SGIker unit of UPV/EHU is also acknowledged.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Benyahya, S.; Aouf, C.; Caillol, S.; Boutevin, B.; Pascault, J.P.; Fulcrand, H. Functionalized green tea tannins as phenol-ic prepolymers for bio-based epoxy resins. Ind. Crops Prod. 2014, 53, 296–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ma, S.; Liu, X.; Jiang, Y.; Zhang, C.; Zhu, J. Bio-based epoxy resin from itaconic acid and its thermosets cured with an-hydride and comonomers. Green Chem. 2013, 15, 245–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ferdosian, F.; Yuan, Z.; Anderson, M.; Xu, C. Synthesis of lignin-based epoxy resins: Optimization of reaction parame-ters using response surface methodology. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 31745–31753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Tanm, S.G.; Chow, W.S. Thermal properties of anhydride-cured bio-based epoxy blends. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2010, 101, 1051–1058. [Google Scholar]
  5. Zhu, J.; Chandrashekhara, K.; Flanigan, V.; Kapila, J. Curing and mechanical characterization of a soy-based epoxy resin system. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2004, 91, 3513–3518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Raquez, J.M.; Deleglise, M.; Lacrampe, M.F.; Krawczak, P. Thermosetting (bio)materials derived from renewable re-sources: A critical review. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2010, 35, 487–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Shi, X.H.; Chen, L.; Liu, B.W.; Long, J.W.; Xu, X.J.; Wang, Y.Z. Carbon fibers decorated by polyelectrolyte complexes toward their epoxy resin composites with high fire safety. Chin. J. Polym. Sci. 2018, 36, 1375–1384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Jin, F.L.; Li, X.; Park, S.J. Synthesis and application of epoxy resins: A review. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2015, 29, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. vom Saal, F.S.; Hughes, C. An extensive new literature concerning low-dose effects of bisphenol A shows the need for a new risk assessment. Environ. Health Perspect. 2005, 113, 926–933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. vom Saal, F.S.; Myers, J.P. Bisphenol A and risk of metabolic disorders. JAMA 2008, 300, 1353–1355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Fache, M.; Darroman, E.; Besse, V.; Auvergne, R.; Caillol, S.; Boutevin, B. Vanillin, a promising biobased build-ing-block for monomer synthesis. Green Chem. 2014, 16, 1987–1998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Fache, M.; Monteremal, C.; Boutevin, B.; Caillol, S. Amine hardeners and epoxy crosslinker from aromatic renewable resources. Eur. Polym. J. 2015, 73, 344–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Fache, M.; Boutevin, B.; Caillol, S. Vanillin, a key-intermediate of biobased polymers. Eur. Polym. J. 2015, 68, 488–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Fache, M.; Auvergne, R.; Boutevin, B.; Caillol, S. New vanillin-derived diepoxy monomers for the synthesis of bi-obased thermosets. Eur. Polym. J. 2015, 67, 527–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Fache, M.; Boutevin, B.; Caillol, S. Epoxy thermosets from model mixtures of the lignin-to-vanillin process. Green Chem. 2016, 18, 712–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Menard, R.; Negrell, C.; Fache, M.; Ferry, L.; Sonnier, R.; David, G. From a bio-based phosphorus-containing epoxy monomer to fully bio-based flame-retardant thermosets. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 70856–70867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Menard, R.; Negrell, C.; Ferry, L.; Sonnier, R.; David, G. Synthesis of biobased phosphorus-containing flame retardants for epoxy thermosets comparison of additive and reactive approaches. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2016, 120, 300–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Fanny, J.; Hélène, N.; Bernard, B.; Sylvain, C. Synthesis of novel vinyl ester from biobased phloroglucinol. Green Mater. 2016, 4, 63–71. [Google Scholar]
  19. Aouf, C.; Nouailhas, H.; Fache, M.; Caillol, S.; Boutevin, B.; Fulcrand, B.H. Multifunctionalization of gallic acid. Synthesis of a novel bio-based epoxy resin. Eur. Polym. J. 2013, 49, 1185–1195. [Google Scholar]
  20. Nikafshar, S.; Zabihi, O.; Hamidi, S.; Moradi, Y.; Barzegar, S.; Ahmadi, M.; Naebe, M. A renewable bio-based epoxy resin with improved mechanical performance that can compete with DGEBA. RSC Adv. 2017, 7, 8694–8701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Mauck, J.R.; Yadav, S.K.; Sadler, J.M.; La Scala, J.J.; Palmese, G.R.; Schmalbach, K.M.; Stanzione, J.F. Preparation and characterization of highly bio-based epoxy amine thermosets derived from lignocellulosics. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 2017, 218, 1700013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Dean, J.M.; Grubbs, R.B.; Saad, W.; Cook, R.F.; Bates, F.S. Mechanical properties of block copolymer vesicle and micelle modified epoxies. J. Polym. Sci. Part B Polym. Phys. 2003, 41, 2444–2456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Rebizant, V.; Venet, A.-S.; Tournilhac, F.; Girard-Reydet, E.; Navarro, C.; Pascault, J.-P.; Leibler, L. Chemistry and mechanical properties of epoxy-based thermosets reinforced by reactive and nonreactive SBMX block copolymers. Macromolecules 2004, 34, 8017–8027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Thio, Y.S.; Wu, J.; Bates, F.S. Epoxy toughening using low molecular weight poly(hexylene oxide)-poly(ethylene oxide) diblock copolymers. Macromolecules 2006, 39, 7187–7189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Liu, J.D.; Thompson, Z.J.; Sue, H.-J.; Bates, F.S.; Hillmyer, M.A.; Dettloff, M.; Jacob, G.; Verghese, N.; Pham, H. Toughening of epoxies with block copolymer micelles of wormlike morphology. Macromolecules 2010, 43, 7238–7243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Cano, L.; Builes, D.H.; Tercjak, A. Morphological and mechanical study of nanostructured epoxy systems modified with amphiphilic poly(ethylene oxide-b-propylene oxide-b-ethylene oxide)triblock copolymer. Polymer 2014, 55, 738–745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Hillmyer, M.A.; Lipic, P.M.; Hajduk, D.A.; Almdal, K.; Bates, F.S. Self-assembly and polymerization of epoxy resin-amphiphilic block copolymer nanocomposites. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 2749–2750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Lipic, P.M.; Bates, F.S.; Hillmyer, M.A. Nanostructured thermosets from self-assembled amphiphilic block copolymer/epoxy resin mixtures. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 8963–8970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Mijovic, J.; Shen, M.; Sy, J.W.; Mondragon, I. Dynamics and morphology in nanostructured thermoset network/block copolymer blends during network formation. Macromolecules 2000, 33, 5235–5244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Guo, Q.; Thomann, R.; Gronski, W.; Thurn-Albrecht, T. Phase behavior, crystallization, and hierarchical nanostructures in self-organized thermoset blends of epoxy resin and amphiphilic poly(ethylene oxide)-block-poly(propylene oxide)-block-poly(ethylene oxide) triblock copolymers. Macromolecules 2002, 35, 3133–3144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Sun, P.; Dang, Q.; Li, B.; Chen, T.; Wang, Y.; Lin, H.; Jin, Q.; Ding, D. Mobility, miscibility, and microdomain structure in nanostructured thermoset blends of epoxy resin and amphiphilic poly(ethylene oxide)-block-poly(propylene oxide)-block-poly(ethylene oxide) triblock copolymers characterized by solid-state NMR. Macromolecules 2005, 38, 5654–5667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Larrañaga, M.; Gabilondo, N.; Kortaberria, G.; Serrano, E.; Remiro, P.; Riccardi, C.C.; Mondragon, I. Micro- or nanoseparated phases in thermoset blends of an epoxy resin and PEO–PPO–PEO triblock copolymer. Polymer 2005, 46, 7082–7093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Larrañaga, M.; Martin, M.D.; Gabilondo, N.; Kortaberria, G.; Eceiza, A.; Riccardi, C.C.; Mondragon, I. Toward microphase separation in epoxy systems containing PEO–PPO–PEO block copolymers by controlling cure conditions and molar ratios between blocks. Part 1. Cure kinetics. Colloid Polym. Sci. 2006, 284, 1403–1410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Larrañaga, M.; Arruti, P.; Serrano, E.; de la Caba, K.; Remiro, P.; Riccardi, C.C.; Mondragon, I. Towards microphase separation in epoxy systems containing PEO/PPO/PEO block copolymers by controlling cure conditions and molar ratios between blocks. Part 2. Structural characterization. Colloid Polym. Sci. 2006, 284, 1419–1430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Larrañaga, M.; Serrano, E.; Martin, M.D.; Tercjak, A.; Kortaberria, G.; de la Caba, K.; Riccardi, C.C.; Mondragon, I. Mechanical properties-morphology relationships in nano-/microstructured epoxy matrices modified with PEO-PPO-PEO block copolymers. Polym. Int. 2007, 56, 1392–1403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Guo, Q.; Thomann, R.; Gronski, W.; Staneva, R.; Ivanova, R.; Stühn, B. Nanostructures, semicrytalline morphology, and nanoscale confinement effect on the crystallization kinetics in self-organized block copolymer/thermoset blends. Macromolecules 2003, 36, 3635–3645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Tercjak, A.; Larrañaga, M.; Martin, M.D.; Mondragon, I. Thermally reversible nanostructured thermosetting blends modified with poly(ethylene-b-ethylene oxide) diblock copolymer. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2006, 86, 663–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Guo, Q.; Chen, F.; Wang, K.; Chen, L. Nanostructured thermoset epoxy resin templated by an amphiphilic poly(ethylene oxide)-block-poly(dimethylsiloxane) diblock copolymer. J. Polym. Sci. Part B Polym. Phys. 2006, 44, 3042–3052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Meng, F.; Zheng, S.; Liu, T. Epoxy resin containing poly(ethylene oxide)-block-poly(ε-caprolactone) diblock copolymer: Effect of curing agents on nanostructures. Polymer 2006, 47, 7590–7600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Meng, F.; Zheng, S.; Li, H.; Liang, Q.; Liu, T. Formation of ordered nanostructures in epoxy thermosets: A mechanism of reaction-induced microphase separation. Macromolecules 2006, 39, 5072–5080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Tercjak, A.; Serrano, E.; Garcia, I.; Mondragon, I. Thermoresponsive meso/nanostructured thermosetting materials based on PS-b-PEO block copolymer-dispersed liquid crystal: Curing behavior and morphological variation. Acta Mater. 2008, 56, 5112–5122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Tercjak, A.; Mondragon, I. Relationships between the morphology and thermoresponsive behavior in micro/nanostructured thermosetting matrixes containing a 4′-(hexyloxy)-4-biphenylcarbonitrile liquid crystal. Langmuir 2008, 24, 11216–11224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Tercjak, A.; Gutierrez, J.; Peponi, L.; Rueda, L.; Mondragon, I. Arrangement of conductive TiO2 nanoparticles in hybrid inorganic/organic thermosetting materials using liquid crystal. Macromolecules 2009, 42, 3386–3390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Tercjak, A.; Gutierrez, J.; Mondragon, I. Conductive properties of inorganic/organic nanostructured systems based on block copolymers. Mater. Sci. Forum 2012, 714, 153–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Gutierrez, J.; Tercjak, A.; Mondragon, I. Transparent nanostructured thermoset composites containing well-dispersed TiO2 nanoparticles. J. Phys. Chem. C 2010, 114, 22424–22430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Gutierrez, J.; Mondragon, I.; Tercjak, A. Morphological and optical behavior of thermoset matrix composites varying both polystyrene-block-poly(ethylene oxide) and TiO2 nanoparticle content. Polymer 2011, 52, 5699–5707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Francis, R.; Baby, D.K. Toughening of epoxy thermoset with polystyrene-block-polyglycolic acid star copolymer: Nanostructure—Mechanical property correlation. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2014, 53, 17945–17951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Meng, F.; Zheng, S.; Zhang, W.; Li, H.; Liang, Q. Nanostructured thermosetting blends of epoxy resin and amphiphilic poly(ε-caprolactone)-block-polybutadiene-block-poly(ε-caprolactone) triblock copolymer. Macromolecules 2006, 39, 711–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Xu, Z.; Zheng, S. Reaction-induced microphase separation in epoxy thermosets containing poly(ε-caprolactone)-block-poly(n-butyl acrylate) diblock copolymer. Macromolecules 2007, 40, 2548–2558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Ocando, C.; Serrano, E.; Tercjak, A.; Peña, C.; Kortaberria, G.; Calberg, C.; Grignard, B.; Jerome, R.; Carrasco, P.M.; Mecerreyes, D.; et al. Structure and properties of a semifluorinated diblock copolymer modified epoxy blend. Macromolecules 2007, 40, 4068–4074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Fan, W.; Wang, L.; Zheng, S. Nanostructures in thermosetting blends of epoxy resin with polydimethylsiloxane-block-poly(ε-caprolactone)-block-polystyrene ABC triblock copolymer. Macromolecules 2009, 42, 327–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Zhu, L.; Zhang, C.; Han, J.; Zheng, S.; Li, X. Formation of nanophases in epoxy thermosets containing an organic–inorganic macrocyclic molecular brush with poly(ε-caprolactone)-block-polystyrene side chains. Soft Matter 2012, 8, 7062–7072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Ji, S.; Wan, L.; Liu, C.C.; Nealey, P.F. Directed self-assembly of block copolymers on chemical patterns: A platform for nanofabrication. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2016, 54-55, 76–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Parameswaranpillai, J.; Sidhardhan, S.K.; Harikrishnan, P.; Pionteck, J.; Siengchin, S.; Unni, A.B.; Magueresse, A.; Grohens, Y.; Hameed, N.; Jose, S. Morphology, thermo-echanical properties and surface hydrofobicity of nanostructured epoxy thermosets modified with PEO-PPO-PEO triblock copolymer. Polym. Test. 2017, 59, 168–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Cherdoud-Chihani, A.; Mouzali, M.; Abadie, M.J.M. Study of crosslinking acid copolymer/DGEBA systems by FTIR. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2003, 87, 2033–2051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Builes, D.H.; Hernandez, H.; Mondragon, I.; Tercjak, A. Relationship between the morphology of nanostructured unsaturated polyesters modified with PEO-b-PPO-b-PEO triblock copolymer and their optical and mechanical properties. J. Phys. Chem. C 2013, 117, 3563–3571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Polymers 15 01216 g001 550
Figure 1. Dynamic DSC thermograms of (A) the neat components (DGEVA resin and PEO-PPO-PEO triblock copolymer) and uncured DGEVA/DDM blend, and (B) uncured BCP-DGEVA/DDM blends with different BCP contents from 10 to 50 wt%. Note: thermograms have been shifted along the Y-axes for a better visualization.
Figure 1. Dynamic DSC thermograms of (A) the neat components (DGEVA resin and PEO-PPO-PEO triblock copolymer) and uncured DGEVA/DDM blend, and (B) uncured BCP-DGEVA/DDM blends with different BCP contents from 10 to 50 wt%. Note: thermograms have been shifted along the Y-axes for a better visualization.
Polymers 15 01216 g001
Polymers 15 01216 g002 550
Figure 2. Isothermal DSC thermograms of investigated BCP-DGEVA/DDM systems with BCP content from 0 to 50 wt% at (A) 80, (B) 100, and (C) 120 °C. Note: thermograms have been shifted along the Y-axes for a better visualization.
Figure 2. Isothermal DSC thermograms of investigated BCP-DGEVA/DDM systems with BCP content from 0 to 50 wt% at (A) 80, (B) 100, and (C) 120 °C. Note: thermograms have been shifted along the Y-axes for a better visualization.
Polymers 15 01216 g002
Polymers 15 01216 g003 550
Figure 3. Dynamic DSC thermograms of investigated BCP-DGEVA/DDM systems with BCP content from 0 to 50 wt% cured at 120 °C. Note: thermograms have been shifted along the Y-axes for a better visualization.
Figure 3. Dynamic DSC thermograms of investigated BCP-DGEVA/DDM systems with BCP content from 0 to 50 wt% cured at 120 °C. Note: thermograms have been shifted along the Y-axes for a better visualization.
Polymers 15 01216 g003
Polymers 15 01216 g004 550
Figure 4. TGA curves of PEO-PPO-PEO block copolymer and BCP-DGEVA/DDM systems with BCP content from 0 to 50 wt% cured at 120 °C.
Figure 4. TGA curves of PEO-PPO-PEO block copolymer and BCP-DGEVA/DDM systems with BCP content from 0 to 50 wt% cured at 120 °C.
Polymers 15 01216 g004
Polymers 15 01216 g005 550
Figure 5. FTIR spectra of (A) neat DGEVA resin and DGEVA/DDM system, and (B) investigated BCP-DGEVA/DDM systems with BCP content from 0 to 50 wt% cured at 120 °C. Note: spectra have been shifted along the Y-axes for a better visualization.
Figure 5. FTIR spectra of (A) neat DGEVA resin and DGEVA/DDM system, and (B) investigated BCP-DGEVA/DDM systems with BCP content from 0 to 50 wt% cured at 120 °C. Note: spectra have been shifted along the Y-axes for a better visualization.
Polymers 15 01216 g005
Polymers 15 01216 g006 550
Figure 6. AFM phase images of BCP-DGEVA/DDMP systems cured at 120 °C with (A) 10 wt%, (B) 15 wt%, (C) 30 wt%, and (D) 50 wt% of PEO-PPO-PEO.
Figure 6. AFM phase images of BCP-DGEVA/DDMP systems cured at 120 °C with (A) 10 wt%, (B) 15 wt%, (C) 30 wt%, and (D) 50 wt% of PEO-PPO-PEO.
Polymers 15 01216 g006
Polymers 15 01216 g007 550
Figure 7. UV-vis transmittance results of BCP-DGEVA/DDM systems with BCP content from 0 to 50 wt% cured at 120 °C.
Figure 7. UV-vis transmittance results of BCP-DGEVA/DDM systems with BCP content from 0 to 50 wt% cured at 120 °C.
Polymers 15 01216 g007
Polymers 15 01216 g008 550
Figure 8. Photographs of all BCP-DGEVA/DDM samples cured at 120 °C.
Figure 8. Photographs of all BCP-DGEVA/DDM samples cured at 120 °C.
Polymers 15 01216 g008
Table
Table 1. Relation of different amphiphilic block copolymers and thermosetting precursors used by different authors.
Table 1. Relation of different amphiphilic block copolymers and thermosetting precursors used by different authors.
BCPsAbbreviationThermosetting PrecursorReferences
poly(hexylene oxide)-b-poly(ethylene oxide)PHO-b-PEODGEBA + PN[24]
poly(ethylene oxide)-b-poly(ethyl ethylene)PEO-b-PEEDGEBA + PA[27]
poly(ethylene oxide)-b-poly(ethylene-alt-propylene)PEO-b-PEPDGEBA + MDA[28]
poly(ethylene oxide)-b-poly(propylene oxide)PEO-b-PPODGEBA + MDA[29]
poly(ethylene oxide)-b-poly(propylene oxide)-b- poly(ethylene oxide)PEO-b-PPO-b-PEODGEBA + MDA
DGEBA + DDM		[30,31]
[32,33,34,35]
polyethylene-b-poly(ethylene oxide)PE-b-PEODGEBA + MDA
DGEBA + MCDEA		[36]
[37]
poly(ethylene oxide)-b-poly(dimethylsiloxane)PEO-b-PDMSDGEBA + MDA[38]
poly(ethylene oxide)-b-poly(ε-caprolactone)PEO-b-PCLDGEBA + MOCA[39]
poly(ethylene oxide)-b-polystyrenePEO-b-PSDGEBA + MDA
DGEBA + MXDA
DGEBA + MCDEA
DGEBA + DDM		[40]
[41,42,43,44]
[45,46]
[47]
poly(ε-caprolactone)-b-polybutadiene-b-poly(ε-caprolactone)PCL-b-PB-b-PCLDGEBA + MOCA[48]
poly(ε-caprolactone)-b-poly(n-butyl acrylate)PCL-b-PBADGEBA + MOCA[49]
poly(heptadecafluorodecyl acrylate)-b-poly(caprolactone)PaF-b-PCLDGEBA + MCDEA[50]
polydimethylsiloxane-b-poly(ε-caprolactone)-b-polystyrenePDMS-b-PCL-b-PSDGEBA + MOCA[51]
poly(ε-caprolactone)-b-polystyrenePCL-b-PSDGEBA + MOCA[52]
Table
Table 2. Chemical structures of employed materials.
Table 2. Chemical structures of employed materials.
MaterialChemical Structure
DGEVAPolymers 15 01216 i001
DDMPolymers 15 01216 i002
PEO-PPO-PEOPolymers 15 01216 i003
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Barandiaran, I.; Gomez-Hermoso-de-Mendoza, J.; Gutierrez, J.; Tercjak, A.; Kortaberria, G. Nanostructuring Biobased Epoxy Resin with PEO-PPO-PEO Block Copolymer. Polymers 2023, 15, 1216. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/polym15051216

AMA Style

Barandiaran I, Gomez-Hermoso-de-Mendoza J, Gutierrez J, Tercjak A, Kortaberria G. Nanostructuring Biobased Epoxy Resin with PEO-PPO-PEO Block Copolymer. Polymers. 2023; 15(5):1216. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/polym15051216

Chicago/Turabian Style

Barandiaran, Irati, Joseba Gomez-Hermoso-de-Mendoza, Junkal Gutierrez, Agnieszka Tercjak, and Galder Kortaberria. 2023. "Nanostructuring Biobased Epoxy Resin with PEO-PPO-PEO Block Copolymer" Polymers 15, no. 5: 1216. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/polym15051216

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop