Next Article in Journal
Mitigation of CaCO3 Influence on Ipomoea batatas Plants Using Bacillus megaterium DSM 2894
Next Article in Special Issue
The Effects of Proline on the Yield and Essential Oil Content of Turnip-Rooted Parsley (Petroselinum crispum ssp. tuberosum)
Previous Article in Journal
Exogenous Si Mitigates the Effects of Cinnamic-Acid-Induced Stress by Regulating Carbon Metabolism and Photosynthetic Pigments in Cucumber Seedlings
Previous Article in Special Issue
Essential Oil of Citrus aurantium L. Leaves: Composition, Antioxidant Activity, Elastase and Collagenase Inhibition
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Biological and Chemical Diversity of Angelica archangelica L.—Case Study of Essential Oil and Its Biological Activity

1
Institute of Field and Vegetable Crops Novi Sad, Maksima Gorkog, 30, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia
2
Faculty of Science, University of Novi Sad, Trg Dositeja Obradovića, 3, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia
3
Institute of General and Physical Chemistry, University of Belgrade, Studentski trg, 12, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia
4
Faculty of Technology Novi Sad, University of Novi Sad, Bulevar cara Lazara, 1, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia
5
Department of Thermal Engineering and Energy, “Vinča” Institute of Nuclear Sciences—National Institute of the Republic of Serbia, University of Belgrade, P.O. Box 522, 11001 Belgrade, Serbia
6
Faculty of Medicine, University of Novi Sad, Hajduk Veljkova, 3, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia
7
SAGEA Group, Via San Sudario, 15, 12050 Castagnito d’ Alba, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 1 June 2022 / Revised: 23 June 2022 / Accepted: 27 June 2022 / Published: 29 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Chemical Diversity, Yield and Quality of Aromatic Plant)

Abstract

:
Garden angelica (Angelica archangelica L.), native to the northern temperate region, is widespread in Europe and Asia. Since the middle ages, it has been used for healing and as a vegetable in traditional dishes. In the modern era, it has been proven that A. archangelica has a complex chemical composition. The main derivatives that contribute to the plant’s biological activities are essential oil and coumarins. In this review, the focus is on the cross-analysis of the taxonomy of A. archangelica, and its distribution in different regions, with the presentation of the richness of its biochemical composition, which overall contributes to the widespread use of the roots of this plant in folk medicine. It belongs to the plants that were introduced to the wider area of Central, Eastern, and Southern Europe; as a medicinal plant, it represents a significant part of the medical flora of many areas. Cluster analysis of pooled data indicates a clear differentiation of chemotypes.

1. Introduction

Angelica archangelica L. (syn. A. officinalis Hoff.), garden angelica, or The Root of the Holy Ghost, is a well-known medicinal plant with doubtful native range, but best known as Norwegian angelica. Distribution is limited to the northern temperate region of Europe, from Northern Fennoscandia to Eastern Siberia, and the natural habitat of this plant extends up to the Himalayas, while it is cultivated in most other regions [1,2,3]. It mostly grows in moist places in the mountains and in mountain valleys. It can be found in the lowlands of the far north [4]. It was highly valued in the Middle Ages and traded to Continental Europe by the Vikings as food (for flavoring liqueurs and aquavits, omelets, trout, to be made into jam, and as a preservative for reindeer milk) and a medicinal plant (as a calming remedy for treating hysteria, seizures, hypertension, rheumatism, and biliary diseases, as well as plague) [2,5,6]. It is known that this plant was associated with the magic of protection against evil spirits and witchcraft, as well as for healing [7,8,9]. Furthermore, the whole plant can be used as a vegetable (roots, young shoots, leaves, and seeds) if harvested appropriately [10].
In Europe, apart from Nordic countries (Finland, Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Greenland, the Faroe Islands, and Iceland), A. archangelica is cultivated in Poland, Germany, the Netherlands, Belgium, France, Austria, Hungary, and Romania, while it is often grown in Asia in Central Russia, as well as in India and Thailand [11,12,13,14,15,16]. In Serbia, A. archangelica is a rare plant in natural and semi-natural habitats [17]; however, due to good prices and the constant demand for essential oil, there is considerable interest in cultivating this essential-oil-bearing crop [18,19].
This study is aimed at systematically describing A. archangelica’s biology, phytochemistry, and chemotaxonomy according to the essential oil composition as well as the biological activities associated with the essential oil. It is based on the more than 70 literature references collected from available scientific databases, books, and other resources. Therefore, this review article could present a valuable update on current knowledge about A. archangelica and to improve the cultivation processes, concerning species diversity. Further, this study could give an explanation of the chemical diversity of the root/seed essential oil between subspecies and distribution areas of A. archangelica.

2. Biological Characteristics

Angelica archangelica L. 1753 is a bi-annual or perennial plant from the Apiaceae family. In the first year of growing, it produces a rosette of large (30–70 cm in length), compound leaves with a hollow, tubular leaf stalk. During the first year, it accumulates nutrients in long, spindle-shaped, thick roots with a yellowish–grey epidermis. If the fresh root is bruised, it oozes honey-colored juice. In the second year, it forms erect flower stalks, up to 2 m tall, with ridges and grooves, hollow and tinged with purple, not glaucous. Basal leaves are huge, two-pinnate, and glabrous. Cauline leaves are two-pinate with petioles strongly sheathed at the base, while upper leaves are reduced to inflated sheaths, which enclose the development of inflorescences, of the umbel type. Umbels are spherical (10–15 cm or more in diameter), with greenish–white flowers. It is a self-pollinated plant. Fruit is a schizocarp consisting of two mericarps, oblong, slightly dorso-ventrally flattened, glabrous, with prominent and acute dorsal ridges and developed marginal wings. The monocarpic plant wilts and dies after seed maturation. If the flowering stem is gathered before flowering and seed maturation, the plant’s lifetime is prolonged (perennial). When damaged, the whole plant emits a strong aromatic scent, which could be described as terpenic, fresh, celeriac, and sweet [2,3,4,8,20,21,22].
The native range of the species covers the northern temperate region of Europe and Asia, from Northern Fennoscandia to Eastern Siberia, and the natural habitat of this plant extends up to the Himalayas. In the native range, the species are distributed along riverbanks and coastal zones, moving towards higher altitudes, where it also prefers moist or wet habitats [1,23,24,25,26].
Genus Angelica comprises 15 species with distribution in Europe and the Mediterranean, while in Serbia, five are present [17,27]. Among them, Angelica archangelica stands out as well known in folk medicine as angel root, primarily due to its traditional medicinal use. Within the species A. archangelica, more infraspecific taxa have been identified over time [28]. According to modern taxonomic treatment, three subspecies are accepted within the species A. archangelica subsp. archangelica, A. archangelica subsp. litoralis (Fr.) Thell, earlier known as A. litoralis Fr., and A. archangelica subsp. decurrens (Ledeb.) B. Fedtsch., formerly accepted as a species [29]. The populations from the Himalayas are recognized as taxon A. archangelica subsp. himalaica (C.B.Clarke) G.Singh & G.M.Oza [30]. Although numerous authors have lately classified populations from the Himalayas as A. angelica subsp. archangelica var. himalaica [29], differences in fruit size and the chemical composition of the root essential oil, followed by the geographical isolation of the population, indicate that it should be treated as a subspecies A. archangelica subsp. himalaica (C.B.Clarke) G.Singh & G.M.Oza, or eventually species, A. himalaica Clarke, due to geographical and ecological isolation. Further investigations need to be conducted to resolve this taxonomical and nomenclature problem. In addition, it is noted that a correlation exists between habitat preferences and fruit morphology, i.e., the smallest fruits are characteristic for subsp. litoralis (distributed at the seashore), followed by subsp. archangelica (distributed in continental and mountain regions), while the largest are in the populations from the Himalayas [22,30].
Contrary to some authors, who describe some characteristics as useful for Angelica species identification, followed by studies in which even subspecies can be clearly distinguished, [22,31,32], there are also scientists who claim that the genus Angelica has highly variable morphological traits, which leads to difficulty in recognition of both species and infraspecific taxa [21,33,34]. By comparing the native range of the above infraspecies taxa, geographical separation in four areas is noticeable. On the other hand, considering that Central Europe (excluding Poland, which belongs to the native range of species), moving further south and southeast, is treated as an arched area for Angelica archangelica, overlapping distribution areas of European subspecies in this region support the given taxonomic approach [27,35,36,37].
Nowadays, it is valued primarily as a cultivated species, often used as a medicinal herb. In Southern and Southeastern Europe, both subsp. archangelica and subsp. litoralis are recorded as cultivated and as naturalized along river banks or in moist forests [17,21,31,35,36]. Since representatives out of cultivation are rare, it is not considered an invasive species, but rather a casual alien without or with a negligible impact on nature. This trait is important considering the need to grow this plant for pharmaceutical and medicinal use.

3. Chemical Composition and Biological Activities

A. archangelica has a complex chemical composition [38]. Apart from essential oil and coumarins, which contribute to the plant’s biological activities [39], it contains glycosides, carbohydrates, phytosterols, saponins, phenols, fixed oil, and fats [40], which influence its nutraceutical potential [10].
Furanocoumarins (such as archangelicin, bergapten, xanthotoxin, imperatorin, osthole, and others) [41,42] are constituents responsible for the antibacterial, [43] antiviral, [44] anti-inflammatory, [45] antitumor [46,47], hepatoprotective, [48] antidepressant [42], and other activities, as well as for phototoxicity [49]. For these reasons, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) commission pointed out risks associated with furanocoumarins in preparations of A. archangelica [50]. However, this chemical class of compounds is not addressed in this paper; rather, only volatile compounds in the essential oil are presented.

4. Statistical Analysis

All available data dealing with the chemical composition of both root and seed (fruit) essential oils were used for the construction of tables, which systematically show ten main compounds (in average), in descending order.
Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was introduced to investigate the chemical compositions of different A. archangelica L. root and seed (fruit) essential oil volatile compounds. The perspective trend for a more profound comprehension of the essential oil feature profile could be assessed by embracing the grouped samples’ PCA plot. Correlation analysis was applied to examine the similarity in the active compound content of the different samples. A statistical study of the data was accomplished using the Statistica 10 software. Correlation analysis and an unrooted cluster tree were performed using the R software 4.0.3 (64-bit version) to investigate the likeness among various samples visually.

5. Root Essential Oil

The plant is generally cultivated for its root (Angelicae radix), an official drug according to the European Pharmacopoeia [51]. The essential oil (Angelicae radix aetheroleum) is a yellow liquid with a fresh, herbaceous, and gently pungent aroma, with earthy and woody notes. The minimum essential oil content in dried drugs needs to be 2.0 mL/kg. However, the essential oil is usually obtained from fresh roots by steam distillation, and ranges between 0.1 and 1.0% [17]. Drying raw material before distillation is to be avoided because of volatile compound loss, which may alter the top fragrance notes of the oil [11]. Apart from steam distillation and hydrodistillation [9,52,53,54,55,56,57,58], other advanced techniques can be used for essential oil isolation, such as supercritical fluid extraction and solvent extraction [5,11,59,60].
The chemical compositions of different A. archangelica root volatile compounds of different accessions according to the literature are given in Table 1, while the unrooted tree (Figure 1) was created using these data, in order to apply the neighbor-joining method to identify various groups (chemotypes). Obtained results strongly support the separation of the A. archangelica subsp. himalaica taxon. Furthermore, Eurasian samples indicate the coincidence of isolated chemotypes in relation to non-widespread subspecies. While expected, in a certain part of Europe, there are more chemotypes, where the distributions of the subspecies partially overlap, or the species was introduced for cultivation.
The compositions of volatile compounds varied greatly due to the weather, soil, [62,63] locality, [64], and altitude [9]. Such great variations in the essential composition of the oil may be attributed to the existence of chemotypes and the adaptation of the species to a particular habitat [9]. Large intra-population variation occurs due to hybridization [13,65]. Apart from this, the composition of volatile compounds depends on the development stage [66], storage period [67], extraction method, and conditions [20], while different harvest dates (summer and spring) caused slight changes only in the root essential oil composition [54].
A. archangelica root essential oil is used extensively in the alcoholic beverage industry for flavoring liquors and vines, such as vermouths, Benedictine, Becherovka, Boonekamp, and Chartreuse [38,68]. In addition, in the perfume industry, A. archangelica is a high-grade ingredient, as it imparts a musky note and is used as a fixative [9].

Correlation between Different A. archangelica Root Volatile Compounds of Accession According to Literature

The correlation analysis was performed to investigate the similarities in the active compound content of the different A. archangelica root samples (1–20), and the results are visually displayed in Figure 1. The darker blue color of the circles, which shows the two samples’ relation, presents a stronger correlation between these samples, i.e., the more pronounced similarity in the active compound content. On the other hand, the lighter tone suggests a certain dissimilarity between samples. Therefore, if the color tone is lighter, the correlation is lower.
The content of α-pinene is negatively correlated with dillapiole content (r = −0.504), and positively correlated with the content of sabinene and myrcene (r = −0.573 and r = −0.529, respectively), statistically significant at the p ≤ 0.05 level. The content of dillapiole is negatively correlated with δ-3-carene and myrcene content (r = −0.502 and r = −0.618, respectively), statistically significant at the p ≤ 0.05 level. The content of δ-3-carene is positively correlated with myrcene content (r = 0.759), statistically significant at the p ≤ 0.01 level, and positively correlated with limonene and p-cymene content (r = 0.520 and r = 0.520, respectively), at the p ≤ 0.05 level. The content of β-phellandrene is positively correlated with α-phellandrene content (r = 0.774, p ≤ 0.01), and positively correlated with p-cymene content (r = 0.506, p ≤ 0.05 level). The content of limonene is positively correlated with myrcene content (r = 0.640, p ≤ 0.05). The content of α-phellandrene is positively correlated with p-cymene content (r = 0.552, p ≤ 0.05 level). The content of myrcene is positively correlated with p-cymene content (r = 0.665, p ≤ 0.05 level) and negatively correlated with nothoapiole content (r = −0.469, p ≤ 0.05 level).
The PCA analysis was performed to test the correlations between A. archangelica root volatile compounds, and the results are presented in Figure 2. The points shown in the PCA graphics, which are geometrically close to each other, indicate the similarity of patterns representing these points. The vector’s orientation describing the variable in factor space indicates an increasing trend in these variables, and the length of the vector is proportional to the square of the correlation values between the fitting value for the variable and the variable itself. The angles between corresponding variables indicate the degree of their correlation (small angles corresponding to high correlations). The first PC explained 41.88% and the second 21.23% of the total variance between the experimental data. The parting within samples could be seen from the PCA figure, where the samples from A. archangelica root volatile compounds were presented.
The unrooted cluster tree (Figure 3) constructed according to A. archangelica root volatile compounds (listed in Table 1) shows the presence of four chemotypes. However, α-pinene is noted in all samples except in No. 16, 17, and 18, originating from India, with dillapiole and nothapiole as the main compounds (dillapiole+nothapiole chemotype {1}). The most prevalent is a combination of α-pinene and δ-3-carene in the root essential oil (α-pinene+δ-3-carene chemotype {2}), which could be divided into three subgroups: solely α-pinene and δ-3-careneis present in samples No. 8 (from France), No. 14 (from China), and No. 19 (from Serbia). The second subgroup is α-pinene and δ-3-carene in combination with limonene (α-pinene+δ-3-carene+limonene), which is noted in samples No. 7 (from France), No. 9 (from Romania), No. 11 (from Lithuania), and No. 15 (from Italy), while in the third group α-pinene and δ-3-carene occur in combination with α-phellandrene and β-phellandrene (α-pinene+δ-3-carene+α-phellandrene+β-phellandrene chemotype), which is noted in samples No. 10 (from Canada), No. 12 and 13 (from Lithuania), and No. 20 (from Finland). A chemotype with the domination of α-pinene and β-phellandrene (α-pinene+β-phellandrene chemotype {3}) is noted in samples No. 1, 2, 3, and 4, originating from Finland, while a chemotype with α-pinene and sabinene (α-pinene+sabinene chemotype {4}) is noted in samples No. 5 and 6, originating from Lapland.
The composition of volatile compounds varied greatly due to the weather, soil, locality, and altitude [9,62,63,64]. Such great variations in the essential composition of the oil may be attributed to the existence of chemotypes and the adaptation of the species to a particular habitat [9]. Large intra-population variation occurs due to hybridization [13,65]. Apart from this, the composition of volatile compounds depends on the development stage [66], storage period [67], and extraction method and conditions [20], while different harvest dates (summer and spring) cause slight changes only in the root essential oil composition [54].

6. Seed Essential Oil

The seed essential oil is a light yellow liquid with a fresh, sweet, and peppery odor [54]. Chemical compositions of different A. archangelica seed (fruit) essential oils of different accessions according to the literature are shown in Table 2. As can be seen, the dominant compound in seed essential oil in almost all samples is β-phellandrene, with 57.0% on average; however, its content ranges between 33.6 and 84.7%. In one sample from Iceland, the dominant compound was α-pinene, with 41.4%, followed by bicyclogermacrene (11.9%) [69].

Correlation between Different A. archangelica Seed (Fruit) Volatile Compounds of Accession According to Literature

The correlation analysis was performed to investigate the similarities in the active compound content of the different A. archangelica seed (fruit) essential oils (1–15), and the results are visually displayed in Figure 4.
The content of β-phellandrene is negatively correlated with α-pinene (r = −0.853), statistically significant at the p ≤ 0.01 level, and negatively correlated with bicyclogermacrene, β-pinene, and α-zingiberene content (r = −0.783; r = −0.693, and r = −0.704, respectively), statistically significant at the p ≤ 0.05 level. The content of α-pinene is positively correlated with bicyclogermacrene and α-zingiberene (r = 0.892 and r = 0.649, respectively), statistically significant at the p ≤ 0.01 level. The content of sabinene is positively correlated with myrcene (r = −0.759), statistically significant at the p ≤ 0.01 level, and positively correlated with α-phellandrene (r = −0.592), statistically significant at the p ≤ 0.05 level. The content of α-phellandrene is negatively correlated with bicyclogermacrene (r = −0.759, p ≤ 0.05) and positively correlated with α-humulene content (r = −0.633, p ≤ 0.05). The content of bicyclogermacrene is positively correlated with α-zingiberene (r = 0.770, p ≤ 0.01).
The content of limonene is negatively correlated with α-humulene (r = −0.554, p ≤ 0.05). The content of β-pinene is positively correlated with α-humulene (r = 0.726, p ≤ 0.01).
The first PC explained 42.61% and the second 27.68% of the total variance between the experimental data. The parting within samples could be seen in the PCA figure (Figure 5), where the samples from A. archangelica seed volatile compounds were presented.
Cluster analysis based on these data was used for drawing an unrooted tree (Figure 6). Moreover, vice versa in relation to the morphological characteristics of the fruit, which are extremely conservative among species and subspecies according to the individual (discussed earlier), essential oils cannot easily be analyzed for their chemotypes as in the previous group. However, these conclusions should not be completely rejected, as, potentially, these results may be important in identifying the origins of the plants.
The unrooted tree of A. archangelica seed (fruit) essential oil (samples were numbered according to Table 2) indicated the presence of three chemotypes; the first with β-Phellandrene, second with α-Pinenen and the third with β-Phellandrene and α-Pinenen as main volatile compound. The main volatile compound in A. archangelica seeds is β-phellandrene (total 11 accessions), and this chemotype could be divided into four subgroups. The extremely high content of β-phellandrene (with variation between 82.1 and 84.7%) is noted in accessions No. 1 from Lapland and No. 15 from Hungary. The very high content of β-phellandrene (variation between 74.0 and 76.0%) is noted in accessions No. 3 (Lapland), No. 6 (France), and No. 7 (Canada). The high content of β-phellandrene (variation between 63.4 and 65.8%) is noted in accessions No. 4 and 5 (France), as well as in No. 10 (Lithuania). An accession rich in β-phellandrene (with variation between 55.2 and 66.4%) is noted in No. 2 (Lapland), No. 13 (Iceland), and No. 14 (Czech). A combination of β-phellandrene (33.6–43.8%) and α-pinene (9.1–28.9%) is noted in accessions No. 8 and 9 (from Lithuania) and No. 12 (from Iceland). Accessions with dominant α-pinene (41.4%) from Iceland.

7. Biological Activities Associated with Essential Oil

A number of Angelica species have been used in traditional medicine and ethnoveterinary care to treat many ailments [73,74,75,76]. Traditionally, A. archangelica has been used as a cure for nervous headaches, fever, skin rashes, wounds, rheumatism, toothaches, digestive problems, bronchitis, excess mucus, the flu, chronic fatigue, and menstrual and obstetric complaints [73]. In addition, volatile compounds from angelica essential oils give a specific fragrance and biological properties to every plant part [74].
Scientific results show that the A. archangelica root essential oil expressed good antimicrobial activity against Aspergillus niger, Candida albicans, Cladosporium cladosporioides, Clostridium difficile, C. perfringens, Enterococcus faecalis, Escherichia coli, Eubacterium limosum, Penicillium venetum, Peptostreptoccocus anaerobius, and Staphylococcus aureus [58,60,74], as well as against Alternaria solani, Botrytis cinerea, and Fusarium sp. [57]. According to these results, A. archangelica root essential oil can be used as a natural preservative and as a natural antibiotic for treating infectious diseases caused by these pathogens, as well as serving as a control agent for plant pathogenic fungi in natural formulations [57,58,74].
A. archangelica fruit essential oil expresses cytotoxic activity towards human pancreatic cancer lines (PANC-1) and Crl mouse breast cancer cells [47], while the root essential oil at high doses (from 219.9 μg/mL) induced significant apoptosis and necrosis in human histocystic lymphoma cells (U937) [61]. In addition, A. archangelica root essential oil at low doses, which are nontoxic, showed anti-inflammatory effects. These results provide an important basis for developing adjuvant formulations for pharmacological therapies and new food products or dietary supplements for antagonistic inflammation [61]. However, the Committee for Veterinary Medicinal Products has limited the usage of A. archangelica root essential oil in products used as nose sprays to facilitate breathing in newborn animals [73].

8. Conclusions

Angelica archangelica L. is often grown throughout Asia and Europe, but only in one region is it a natural species. A systematic approach to the species is still often the goal of many papers, and new research on chemical diversity is equally present.
Our research has shown that within a species, four subspecies can be clearly defined: A. archangelica subsp. archangelica, A. archangelica subsp. litoralis (Fr.) Thell, A. archangelica subsp. decurrens (Ledeb.) B. Fedtsch., and A. archangelica subsp. himalaica (C.B.Clarke) G.Singh & G.M.Oza. This conclusion is supported by the distribution area, morphological traits, and differentiated chemotypes that resulted from the analysis of the volatiles of the essential oils. The results of the unrooted cluster tree constructed according to A. archangelica root volatile compounds showed the presence of four chemotypes. However, α-pinene is noted in all samples except in No. 16, 17, and 18, originating from India, with dillapiole and nothapiole as the main compounds. On the other hand, the unrooted tree of A. archangelica seed (fruit) essential oil indicated the presence of three chemotypes. The main volatile compound in A. archangelica seeds is β-phellandrene, and this chemotype could be divided into four subgroups. The unrooted cluster tree of A. archangelica root volatile compounds clearly shows that samples from India, probably subsp. himalaica, were significantly different from others (with dillapiole and nothapiole), while other samples, both for roots and seeds, are very similar, with α-pinene in root oil and β-phellandrene and α-pinene in seed oil. This indicates the origination of Angelica archangelica from the northern temperate regions of Europe, and the existence of two subspecies: subsp. archangelica and subsp. litoralis. According to this theory, subsp. himalaica could be an ecologically distinct species.
All these results have been cross-analyzed and are particularly important for planning and defining the process of cultivation and use of this species in both traditional and official medicine.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.A. and L.P.; methodology, M.R. and J.L.; software, L.P. and B.L.; validation, M.R. and J.L.; formal analysis, M.A. and M.R.; investigation, M.A. and M.R.; resources, M.A.; data curation, L.P. and B.L.; writing—original draft preparation, M.A. and M.R.; writing—review and editing, L.P. and B.L.; visualization, A.M. and M.P.; supervision, A.M. and M.P.; project administration, M.A.; funding acquisition, M.A., L.P., B.L. and M.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia, Grant Numbers 51-03-68/2022-14/200032, 451-03-68/2022-14/200125, 451-03-68/2022-14/200134, and 451-03-68/2022-14/200051.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Vashistha, R.; Nautiyal, B.P.; Nautiyal, M.C. Conservation status and morphological variations between populations of Angelica glauca Edgew. and Angelica archangelica Linn. in Garhwal Himalaya. Curr. Sci. 2006, 91, 1537–1542. [Google Scholar]
  2. Rautio, A.M.; Linkowski, W.A.; Ostlund, L. They followed the power of the plant’: Historical Sami harvest and traditional ecological knowledge (TEK) of Angelica archangelica in northern Fennoscandia. J. Ethnobiol. 2016, 36, 617–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Teixidor-Toneu, I.; Kjesrud, K.; Kool, A. Sweetness beyond desserts: The cultural, symbolic, and botanical history of angelica (Angelica archangelica) in the Nordic Region. J. Ethnobiol. 2020, 40, 289–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Fossa, O. Angelica: From Norwegian mountains to the English trifle. In Wild Food—Proceedings of the Oxford Symposium on Food and Cookery; Hosking, R., Ed.; Prospect Book: London, UK, 2004; pp. 131–142. [Google Scholar]
  5. Holm, Y.; Vuorela, P.; Hiltunen, R. Enantiomeric composition of monoterpene hydrocarbons in n-hexane extracts of Angelica archangelica L. roots and seeds. Flavour Fragr. J. 1997, 12, 397–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Yankova-Tsvetkova, E.; Semerdjieva, I. On the reproductive biology of Angelica archangelica L. (Apiaceae). Int. J. Adv. Res. Biol. Sci. 2015, 2, 270–277. [Google Scholar]
  7. Mathias, M.E. Magic, myth and medicine. Econ. Bot. 1994, 48, 3–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bhat, Z.A.; Kumar, D.; Shah, M.Y. Angelica archangelica Linn. is an angel on earth for the treatment of diseases. Int. J. Nutr. Pharmacol. Neurol. Dis. 2011, 1, 36–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Chauhan, R.S.; Nautiyal, M.C.; Cecotti, R.; Mella, M. Variation in the essential oil composition of Angelica archangelica from three different altitudes in Western Himalaya, India. Ind. Crops Prod. 2016, 94, 401–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Aćimović, M. Nutraceutical potential of Apiaceae. In Bioactive Molecules in Food, Reference Series in Phytochemistry; Mérillon, J.M., Ramawat, K.G., Eds.; Springer International Publishing AG: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2019; pp. 1311–1341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Doneanu, C.; Anitescu, G. Supercritical carbon dioxide extraction of Angelica archangelica L. root oil. J. Supercrit. Fluids. 1998, 12, 59–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Eeva, M.; Ojala, T.; Tammela, P.; Galambosi, B.; Vuorela, H.; Hiltunen, R.; Fagerstedt, K.; Vuorela, P. Propagation of Angelica archangelica plants in an air-sparged bioreactor from a novel embryogenetic cell line, and their production of coumarins. Biol. Plant. 2003, 46, 343–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Goransson, M.; Solberg, S.; Brantestam, A.K. Genetic diversity in angelica (Angelica archangelica L.) populations assessed by ISSR molecular markers. Fræðaþing Landbúnaðarins 2011, 8, 264–269. [Google Scholar]
  14. Popescu, G.C.; Motounu, M.; Alexiu, V. Some ecophysiological and edaphic parameters of Angelica archangelica, a threatened high altitude aromatic herb from Romanian Carpathian Mountains. Acta Hort. 2012, 955, 303–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Maurya, A.; Verma, S.C.; Gupta, V.; Shankar, M.B. Angelica archangelica L.—A phytochemical and pharmacological review. Asian J. Res. Chem. 2017, 10, 852–856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Spałek, K.; Spielvogel, I.; Proćków, M.; Proćków, J. Historical ethnopharmacology of the herbalists from Krummhübel in the Sudety Mountains (seventeenth to nineteenth century), Silesia. J. Ethnobiol. Ethnomedicine 2019, 15, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Nikolić, V. Rod Angelica L. In Flora of SR Serbia; Josifović, M., Ed.; Serbian Academy of Art and Science: Belgrade, Serbia, 1973; Volume 5, pp. 272–273. [Google Scholar]
  18. Vukomanović, L.M.; Stepanović, B. Production and economical aspects of Angelica arcangelica L. in central regions of Serbia. Ekon. Poljopr. 1996, 43, 339–346. [Google Scholar]
  19. Lazarević, J.; Dragumilo, A.; Marković, T.; Savić, A.; Božić, D. Weed control in angelica (Angelica archangelica L.). Acta Herbol. 2020, 29, 129–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kerrola, K.M.; Kallio, H.P. Extraction of volatile compounds of angelica (Angelica archangelica L.) root by liquid carbon dioxide. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1994, 42, 2235–2245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Dihoru, G.; Pauca-Comanescu, M.R.I. Analysis of the characters on some Angelica taxa. Rom. J. Biol.—Plant. Biol. 2011, 56, 80–89. [Google Scholar]
  22. Daskin, R.; Kaynak, G. Angelica archangelica (Apiaceae), a new species to Turkey: A contribution to its taxonomy and distribution. Phytol. Balc. 2012, 18, 5–9. [Google Scholar]
  23. Thelung, A. Ubelliferae. In Illustrierte Flora von Mitteleuropa; Hegi, J.F.G., Ed.; Lehmann Verlag: Munchen, Germany, 1926; Volume 5-II, pp. 1338–1341. [Google Scholar]
  24. Meusel, H.; Jager, E.J.; Braumtigam, S.; Knapp, H.D.; Rauschert, S.; Weinert, E. Vergleichende Chorologoie der Zentraleuropaischen Flora; Martin-Luter Universitat Halle-Wittenberg: Jena, Germany, 1992; Volume 2, pp. 20–321. [Google Scholar]
  25. Ojala, A. Variation of Angelica archangelica subsp. archangelica (Apiaceae) in northern Fennoscandia: 4. Pattern of geographic variation. Ann. Bot. Fenn. 1986, 23, 23–31. [Google Scholar]
  26. Frobert, L. Angelica archangelica L. In Flora Nordica; Jonsell, B., Karlsson, T., Eds.; Swedish Royal Academy of Sciences: Stockholm, Sweden, 2010; Volume 6, pp. 181–185. [Google Scholar]
  27. Hand, R. Apiaceae. In Euro + Med Plantbase—The Information Resource for Euro-Mediterranean Plant Diversity; Published on the Internet; Available online: hppt://ww2.bgbm.org/EuroPlusMed/ (accessed on 9 February 2022).
  28. Weinert, E. Die Taxonomische Stellung und das Areal von Angelica archangelica L. und A. lucida L. Feddes Repert. 1973, 84, 303–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. The Plant List. Version 1.1. Published on the Internet. 2013. Available online: http://www.theplantlist.org/ (accessed on 9 February 2022).
  30. Singh, G.; Oza, G.M. Nomenclatural note on the Indian Archangelica. Bull. Bot. Surv. India. 1974, 16, 167–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Stroh, P.; Scott, W. Angelica archangelica subsp. litoralis (Apiaceae)—A new native taxon for Britain. New J. Bot. 2017, 7, 57–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Forycka, A.; Buchwald, W. Variability of composition of essential oil and coumarin compounds of Angelica archangelica L. Herba Pol. 2019, 65, 62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ojala, A. Variation of Angelica archangelica subsp. archangelica (Apiaceae) in northern Fennoscania: 1. Variation in fruit morphology. Ann. Bot. Fenn. 1984, 21, 103–115. [Google Scholar]
  34. Liao, C.; Downie, S.R.; Li, Q.; Yu, Y.; He, X.; Zhou, B. New insights into the phylogeny of Angelica and its allies (Apiaceae) with emphasis on East Asian species, inferred from nrDNA, cpDNA, and morphological evidence. Syst. Bot. 2013, 38, 266–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Yankova, E.; Cherneva, Z. Notes on the species distribution of genus Angelica in Bulgaria. Phytol. Balc. 2007, 13, 189–192. [Google Scholar]
  36. Nikolić, T. (Ed.) Flora Croatica Baza Podataka, Prirodoslovno-Matematički Fakultet, Sveučilište u Zagrebu. Available online: http://hirc.botanic.hr/fcd (accessed on 9 February 2022).
  37. Pladias—Database of the Czech Flora and Vegetation. Available online: www.pladias.cz (accessed on 9 February 2022).
  38. Joshi, R.K. Angelica (Angelica glauca and A. archangelica) oils. In Essential Oil in Food Preservation, Flavour and Safety; Preedy, V.R., Ed.; Academic Press: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2016; pp. 203–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Kaur, A.; Bhatti, R. Understanding the phytochemistry and molecular insights to the pharmacology of Angelica archangelica L. (Garden angelica) and its bioactive components. Phytother. Res. 2021, 35, 5961–5979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Kumar, D.; Bhat, Z.A.; Kumar, V.; Chashoo, I.A.; Khan, N.A.; Shah, M.Y. Pharmacognostical and phytochemical evaluation of Angelica archangelica Linn. Int. J. Drug Dev. Res. 2011, 3, 173–188. [Google Scholar]
  41. Muller, M.; Byres, M.; Jaspars, M.; Kumarasamy, Y.; Diddleton, M.; Nahar, L.; Shoeb, M.; Sarker, S. 2D NMR spectroscopic analyses of archangelicin from the seeds of Angelica archangelica. Acta Pharm. 2004, 54, 277–285. [Google Scholar]
  42. Kaur, A.; Garg, S.; Shiekh, B.A.; Singh, N.; Singh, P.; Bhatti, R. In silico studies and in vivo MAOA inhibitory activity of coumarins isolated from Angelica archangelica extract: An approach toward antidepressant activity. ACS Omega 2020, 5, 15069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Mišić, D.; Ašanin, R.; Jasna, I.; Žižović, I. Investigation of antibacterial activity of supercritical extract of plants, as well as of extract obrained by other technological processes on some bacteria isolated from animals. Acta Vet. 2009, 59, 557–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Rajtar, B.; Skalicka-Woźniak, K.; Świątek, Ł.; Stec, A.; Boguszewska, A.; Polz-Dacewicz, M. Antiviral effect of compounds derived from Angelica archangelica L. on Herpes simplex virus-1 and Coxsackievirus B3 infections. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2017, 109, 1026–1031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Kaur, A.; Singh, N.; Bhatti, M.S.; Bhatti, R. Optimization of extraction conditions of Angelica archangelica extract and activity evaluation in experimental fibromyalgia. J. Food Sci. 2020, 85, 3700–3710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Sigurdsson, S.; Ogmundsdottir, H.M.; Gudbjarnason, S. Antiproliferative effect of Angelica archangelica fruits. Z. Naturforsch 2004, 59, 523–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Sigurdsson, S.; Ogmundsdottir, H.M.; Hallgrimsson, J.; Gudbjarnason, S. Antitumor activity of Angelica archangelica leaf extract. In Vivo 2005, 19, 191–194. [Google Scholar]
  48. Yeh, M.L.; Liu, C.F.; Huang, C.L.; Huang, T.C. Hepatoprotective effect of Angelica archangelica in chronically ethanol-treated mice. Pharmacology 2003, 68, 70–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Knapp, C.F.; Elston, D.M. Botanical briefs: Garden angelica (Angelica archangelica). Cutis 2009, 84, 189–190. [Google Scholar]
  50. EMEA/HMPC/317913/06. Reflection Paper on the risks associated with furocoumarins contained in preparations of Angelica archangelica L. In European Pharmacopoeia, 10th ed.; European Directorate for the Quality of Medicine & Health Care of the Council of Europe (EDQM): Strasbourg, France, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  51. Bernard, C.; Clair, G. Essential oils of three Angelica L. species growing in France. Part I: Root oils. J. Essent. Oil Res. 1997, 9, 289–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Chalchat, J.C.; Garry, R.P. Essential oil of angelica roots (Angelica archangelica L.): Optimization of distillation, location in plant and chemical composition. J. Essent. Oil Res. 1997, 9, 311–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Lopes, D.; Strobl, H.; Kolodziejczyk, P. 14-Methylpentadecano-15-lactone (Muscolide): A new macrocyclic lactone from the oil of Angelica archangelica L. Chem. Biodivers. 2004, 1, 1880–1887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Nivinskiene, O.; Butkiene, R.; Mockute, D. The chemical composition of the essential oil of Angelica archangelica L. roots growing wild in Lithuania. J. Essent. Oil Res. 2005, 17, 373–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Wedge, D.E.; Klun, J.A.; Tabanaca, N.; Demirci, B.; Ozek, T.; Baser, K.H.C.; Liu, Z.; Zhang, S.; Cantrell, C.L.; Zhang, J. Bioactivity-guided fractionation and GC/MS fingerprinting of Angelica sinensis and Angelica archangelica root components for antifungal and mosquito deterrent activity. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009, 57, 464–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Fraternale, D.; Flamini, G.; Ricci, D. Essential oil composition of Angelica archangelica L. (Apiaceae) roots and its antifungal activity against plant pathogenic fungi. Plant Biosyst. 2016, 150, 558–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Aćimović, M.; Pavlović, S.; Varga, A.; Filipović, V.; Cvetković, M.; Stanković, J.; Čabarkapa, I. Chemical composition and antibacterial activity of Angelica archangelica root essential oil. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2017, 12, 205–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Kerrola, K.; Galambosi, B.; Kallio, H. Characterization of volatile composition and odor of angelica (Angelica archangelica subsp. archangelica L.) root extracts. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1994, 42, 1979–1988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Korpinen, R.I.; Valimaa, A.L.; Liimatainen, J.; Kunnas, S. Essential oils and supercritical CO2 extracts of Arctic angelica (Angelica archangelica L.), marsh labrador tea (Rhododendron tomentosum) and common tansy (Tanacetum vulgare)—chemical composition and antimicrobial activities. Molecules 2021, 26, 7121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Fraternale, D.; Teodori, L.; Rudov, A.; Prattichizzo, F.; Olivieri, F.; Guidarelli, A.; Albertini, M.C. The in vitro activity of Angelica archangelica L. essential oil on inflammation. J. Med. Food. 2018, 21, 1238–1243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Chatterjee, A.; Gupta, S.S. The constitution of archangelin, a new coumarin isolated from the root of Angelica archangelica Linn. (Umbelliferae). Tetrahedron Lett. 1964, 29, 1961–1965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Vashistha, R.K.; Nautiyal, B.P.; Nautiyal, M.C. Cultivation of Angelica archangelica Linn.: Evaluation for economic viability at two different climatic conditions. Int. J. Biol. Chem. Sci. 2008, 2, 563–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Nivinskiene, O.; Butkiene, R.; Mockute, D. Chemical composition of seed (fruit) essential oils of Angelica archangelica L. growing wild in Lithuania. Chemija 2005, 16, 51–54. [Google Scholar]
  64. Pop, M.R. The grouping of some Angelica archangelica L. families with help of dendrogram obtained by rapid technique. Analele Universitatii din Oradea. Fasc. Biol. 2008, 15, 86–87. [Google Scholar]
  65. Pasqua, G.; Monacelli, B.; Silvestrini, A. Accumulation of essential oils in relation to root differentiation in Angelica archangelica L. Eur. J. Histochem. 2003, 47, 87–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  66. Wszelaki, N.; Paradowska, K.; Jamroz, M.; Granica, S.; Kiss, A. Bioactivity-guided fraction for the butyrylcholinesterase inhibitory activity of furanocumarines from Angelica archangelica L. roots and fruits. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2011, 25, 9186–9193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Sigurdsson, S.; Ogmundsdottir, H.M.; Gudbjarnason, S. The cytotoxic effect of two chemotypes of essential oils from the fruits of Angelica archangelica L. Anticancer Res. 2005, 25, 1877–1880. [Google Scholar]
  68. Bernard, C. Essential oils of three Angelica L. species growing in France. Part II: Fruit oils. J. Essent. Oil Res. 2001, 13, 260–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Pavela, R.; Vrchotova, N. Insecticidal effect of furanocumarins from fruits of Angelica archangelica L. against larvae Spodoptera litoralis boisd. Ind. Crops Prod. 2013, 43, 33–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Aćimović, M.; Cvetković, M.; Stanković, J.; Filipović, V.; Nikolić, L.; Dojčinović, N. Analysis of volatile compounds from angelica seeds obtained by headspace method. Arab. J. Med. Aromat. Plants 2017, 3, 10–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. EMEA/MRL/412/98. Angelicae Radix Aetheroleum—Summary Report. In The European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products Veterinary Medicines Evaluation Unit; European Medicines Agency (EMEA): Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  72. Fraternale, D.; Flamini, G.; Ricci, D. Essential oil composition and antimicrobial activity of Angelica archangelica L. (Apiaceae) roots. J. Med. Food. 2014, 17, 1043–1047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Sarker, S.D.; Nahar, L. Natural Medicine: The Genus Angelica. Curr. Med. Chem. 2004, 11, 1479–1500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Sowndhararajan, K.; Deepa, P.; Kim, M.; Park, S.J.; Kim, S. A Review of the Composition of the Essential Oils and Biological Activities of Angelica Species. Sci. Pharm. 2017, 85, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  75. Tian, M.; Li, K.; Liu, R.; Du, J.; Zou, D.; Ma, Y. Angelica polysaccharide attenuates LPSinduced inflammation response of primary dairy cow claw dermal cells via NF-κB and MAPK signaling pathways. BMC Vet. Res. 2021, 17, 248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Khan, R.S.M.; Akhter, T.; Hussain, M. Ethno-veterinary practice for the treatment of animal diseases in Neelum Valley, Kashmir Himalaya, Pakistan. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0250114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Correlations between different A. archangelica root volatile compounds.
Figure 1. Correlations between different A. archangelica root volatile compounds.
Agronomy 12 01570 g001
Figure 2. The PCA biplot diagram describing the relations between A. archangelica root volatile compounds.
Figure 2. The PCA biplot diagram describing the relations between A. archangelica root volatile compounds.
Agronomy 12 01570 g002
Figure 3. Unrooted cluster tree of A. archangelica root essential oil (samples are numbered according to Table 1).
Figure 3. Unrooted cluster tree of A. archangelica root essential oil (samples are numbered according to Table 1).
Agronomy 12 01570 g003
Figure 4. Correlations between different A. archangelica seed volatile compounds.
Figure 4. Correlations between different A. archangelica seed volatile compounds.
Agronomy 12 01570 g004
Figure 5. The PCA biplot diagram describing the relations between A. archangelica seed (fruit) volatile compounds.
Figure 5. The PCA biplot diagram describing the relations between A. archangelica seed (fruit) volatile compounds.
Agronomy 12 01570 g005
Figure 6. Unrooted cluster tree of A. archangelica seed (fruit) essential oil (samples are numbered according to Table 2).
Figure 6. Unrooted cluster tree of A. archangelica seed (fruit) essential oil (samples are numbered according to Table 2).
Agronomy 12 01570 g006
Table 1. Chemical compositions of different A. archangelica root volatile compounds of accession according to the literature.
Table 1. Chemical compositions of different A. archangelica root volatile compounds of accession according to the literature.
NoRegionRef.12345678910
α-PineneDillapioleδ-3-Careneβ-PhellandreneSabineneLimoneneα-PhellandreneNothoapiolep-CymeneMyrcene
1Finland[54]4.80.02.74.05.91.90.40.00.61.3
2Finland[54]9.90.06.72.114.84.61.00.01.23.1
3Finland[54]9.10.00.212.33.91.50.40.00.70.5
4Finland[54]2.20.03.515.43.33.40.20.01.02.4
5Lapland[5]21.40.021.60.022.210.80.00.04.22.7
6Lapland[5]47.60.00.00.029.16.70.00.01.71.4
7France[52]9.80.013.02.00.07.30.00.02.32.9
8France[53]32.20.016.21.30.56.62.00.06.45.3
9Romania[11]16.70.08.78.90.613.111.30.05.63.9
10Canada[54]15.70.05.726.60.75.919.10.05.02.8
11Lithuania[55]17.50.016.31.46.58.52.50.03.32.9
12Lithuania[55]20.20.013.914.73.20.08.60.02.01.9
13Lithuania[55]13.70.011.416.21.70.07.40.08.43.0
14China[56]24.50.013.810.16.38.41.70.08.84.8
15Italy[61]21.30.016.50.05.116.48.70.02.25.5
16India[9]0.035.90.00.00.00.00.062.80.00.0
17India[9]0.066.10.00.00.00.00.021.90.00.0
18India[9]0.391.60.00.00.01.10.00.10.50.0
19Serbia[58]29.70.014.213.26.10.05.70.03.84.1
20Finland[60]11.10.07.426.88.74.620.80.08.43.2
AVERAGE 15.49.78.67.75.95.04.54.23.32.6
Table 2. Chemical composition of different A. archangelica seed (fruit) essential oil accessions according to the literature.
Table 2. Chemical composition of different A. archangelica seed (fruit) essential oil accessions according to the literature.
12345678910
NoRegionRef.β-Phellandreneα-PineneSabineneα-PhellandreneMyrceneBicyclogermacreneLimoneneβ-Pineneα-Humuleneα-Zingiberene
1Lapland[5]82.18.30.53.83.40.02.00.00.00.0
2Lapland[5]66.49.411.33.17.30.01.70.00.00.0
3Lapland[5]74.010.35.44.34.00.02.10.00.00.0
4France[70]65.86.60.00.02.41.52.60.60.00.0
5France[70]64.92.30.21.93.20.71.80.30.80.0
6France[70]76.04.20.53.40.00.00.60.00.00.0
7Canada[54]74.76.60.43.72.90.02.70.60.60.0
8Lithuania[64]43.89.12.52.72.50.00.02.41.51.3
9Lithuania[64]33.612.84.67.42.00.00.03.73.40.0
10Lithuania[64]63.44.23.32.62.00.00.00.71.01.9
11Iceland[69]0.041.42.10.00.010.10.51.70.03.6
12Iceland[69]37.828.90.31.70.03.01.21.20.00.4
13Iceland[69]55.214.42.43.42.13.01.70.70.00.6
14Czech[71]60.08.415.07.76.00.00.00.01.40.0
15Hungary[72]84.72.50.43.42.10.00.00.40.60.4
AVERAGE57.011.93.53.32.71.31.20.80.60.6
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Aćimović, M.; Rat, M.; Pezo, L.; Lončar, B.; Pezo, M.; Miljković, A.; Lazarević, J. Biological and Chemical Diversity of Angelica archangelica L.—Case Study of Essential Oil and Its Biological Activity. Agronomy 2022, 12, 1570. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/agronomy12071570

AMA Style

Aćimović M, Rat M, Pezo L, Lončar B, Pezo M, Miljković A, Lazarević J. Biological and Chemical Diversity of Angelica archangelica L.—Case Study of Essential Oil and Its Biological Activity. Agronomy. 2022; 12(7):1570. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/agronomy12071570

Chicago/Turabian Style

Aćimović, Milica, Milica Rat, Lato Pezo, Biljana Lončar, Milada Pezo, Ana Miljković, and Jovan Lazarević. 2022. "Biological and Chemical Diversity of Angelica archangelica L.—Case Study of Essential Oil and Its Biological Activity" Agronomy 12, no. 7: 1570. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/agronomy12071570

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop