Next Article in Journal
Progesterone Induced Blocking Factor Reduces Hypertension and Placental Mitochondrial Dysfunction in Response to sFlt-1 during Pregnancy
Next Article in Special Issue
SETDB1 Regulates Porcine Spermatogonial Adhesion and Proliferation through Modulating MMP3/10 Transcription
Previous Article in Journal
Macrophage-Derived Immunoglobulin M Inhibits Inflammatory Responses via Modulating Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress
Previous Article in Special Issue
Loss of Ubiquitin Carboxy-Terminal Hydrolase L1 Impairs Long-Term Differentiation Competence and Metabolic Regulation in Murine Spermatogonial Stem Cells
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Neonatal Porcine Germ Cells Dedifferentiate and Display Osteogenic and Pluripotency Properties

by
Mohammad Amin Fayaz
,
Gustavo dos Santos Rosa
and
Ali Honaramooz
*
Department of Veterinary Biomedical Sciences, Western College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5B4, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Present address: Department of Veterinary Surgery and Animal Reproduction, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, São Paulo State University (Unesp), Botucatu 18618-681, Brazil.
Submission received: 28 July 2021 / Revised: 13 October 2021 / Accepted: 15 October 2021 / Published: 20 October 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Male Germline Stem Cells)

Abstract

:
Gonocytes are progenitors of spermatogonial stem cells in the neonatal testis. We have previously shown that upon culturing, neonatal porcine gonocytes and their colonies express germ cell and pluripotency markers. The objectives of present study were to investigate in vitro trans-differentiation potential of porcine gonocytes and their colonies into cells from three germinal layers, and to assess pluripotency of cultured gonocytes/colonies in vivo. For osteogenic and tri-lineage differentiation, cells were incubated in regular culture media for 14 and 28 days, respectively. Cells were cultured for an additional 14 days for osteogenic differentiation or 7 days for differentiation into derivates of the three germinal layers. Osteogenic differentiation of cells and colonies was verified by Alizarin Red S staining and tri-lineage differentiation was confirmed using immunofluorescence and gene expression analyses. Furthermore, upon implantation into recipient mice, the cultured cells/colonies developed teratomas expressing markers of all three germinal layers. Successful osteogenic differentiation from porcine germ cells has important implications for bone regeneration and matrix formation studies. Hence, gonocytes emerge as a promising source of adult pluripotent stem cells due to the ability to differentiate into all germinal layers without typical biosafety risks associated with viral vectors or ethical implications.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Gonocytes are a transitory population of male germline stem cells (MGSCs) in the neonatal testis; they develop from fetal primordial germ cells (PGCs) and postnatally transition into spermatogonial stem cells (SSCs). In mice, gonocytes proliferate within the testicular niche by embryonic day (ED) ~12.5, gradually become mitotically inactive by ED ~15.5, and then maintain their quiescent state for the remainder of the prenatal period [1,2]. The transition of gonocytes into SSCs occurs at ~6 days after birth in rodents or ~2 months in humans [3]. SSCs, considered adult stem cells, are fundamental for spermatogenesis due to their dual potential for self-renewal and differentiation ability for subsequent mitosis and meiosis [4,5]. Compared to both PGCs and SSCs, gonocytes in the neonatal testis are a preferred source of MGSCs, since they offer a relatively large population, ease of accessibility, identifiable morphology, and more specific molecular markers for their identification and isolation [6].
When still situated in the testis niche, MGSCs are programmed to unipotently differentiate into more specialized germ cells [7,8]. However, compiling evidence demonstrates the dedifferentiation potential of MGSCs, as well as their ability to derive multipotent or even pluripotent stem cells in an ex situ environment [9,10,11,12,13,14]. These cells can spontaneously transform into a population of cells that express embryonic stem (ES) cell markers, otherwise if genetic manipulations were needed, they would have imposed safety concerns regarding their use and expansion [9,15,16,17]. The ability to dedifferentiate into a pluripotent state allows these ES-like cells to convert into other cell types from derivatives of three germinal layers [9,10,11,13].
Although several studies have demonstrated the potential of MGSCs as a source of pluripotent stem cells, the extent of their full potential is yet to be known and the complicated derivation process remains a major limitation in their application. Further, the conversion of MGSCs into a dedifferentiated state in the presence of exogenous factors, such as multiple growth factors and embryonic fibroblasts used as the supportive feeder layer, may pose unwanted genetic and epigenetic changes to the dedifferentiated cells; this, too, may limit their applications. Additionally, passaging of MGSCs for their expansion or induction of reprogramming can disrupt their normal cell cycle, growth, and overall physiological response to their microenvironment [9]. Therefore, the use of minimal exogenous factors and manipulations for induction of pluripotency in prospective studies is desirable for reducing concerns of immunogenicity, tumorigenicity, and/or viral contamination, and provides a more practical approach for in vitro development [8,13].
Pluripotent stem cells have also been produced by introducing specific sets of pluripotency-associated genes or ‘reprogramming factors’ to the somatic cells. The resultant cells, known as induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells, were developed via retroviral delivery of various transcription factors (e.g., Oct3/4, Sox2, c-Myc, and Klf4) to adult dermal fibroblasts [18,19,20], hepatocytes, gastric epithelial cells, and even neural stem cells [21,22]. However, the practicality of utilizing different stem cells in clinical settings remains limited due to the ethical and safety concerns over their source [23]. In addition, current protocols for inducing differentiation into specific cell lineages are inefficient, time-consuming, technically complex, and are not cost effective given the requirement for multiple induction materials [24,25]. Increased tumorigenicity of iPS cells due to introduced transcription factors, genetic instability, and biosafety risks associated with the use of viral vectors in their development further limits their applications as therapeutic agents [13]. As a result, it is imperative to seek alternative stem cell sources that lack the biosafety risks associated with viral transduction or tumor formation, and the ethical concerns associated with the manipulation of embryos to harvest stem cells.
Our laboratory has recently shown that porcine gonocytes, cocultured with testis somatic cells as a feeder layer, rapidly expand in our developed culture conditions composed of basic media and fetal bovine serum (FBS), with or without basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF). More importantly, we demonstrated that porcine gonocytes are capable of spontaneous dedifferentiation into more primitive stages that express ES cell markers such as SSEA-1, POU5F1, NANOG, and E-cadherin [17]. This is especially important since in vitro dedifferentiation and trans-differentiation of germ cells in previous reports required coculturing with somatic cells from other species and/or supplementation of the media with multiple exogenous factors [7,13,23]. In the present study, we used our recently developed culture conditions to obtain a population of ES-like cells that express pluripotency markers from porcine gonocytes, and then further evaluated their teratoma formation potential using an in vivo implantation assay. We also investigated the induction of their differentiation into derivatives of all three germinal layers by using a simple protocol without the addition of multiple exogenous factors. In doing so, the present study provides a much faster and safer approach for the acquisition of differentiated germinal cells than that reported in previous studies, without complicated manipulation procedures and a reduced overall differentiation cost.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. General Experimental Design

Figure 1 shows the schematic representation of the experimental design. The present study was comprised of four sets of experiments used to investigate the differentiation potential and in vivo teratoma formation of cultured neonatal porcine gonocytes. In Experiment I, cultured gonocytes were directed to differentiate into an osteogenic pathway, where differentiation was confirmed using Alizarin Red S staining. In Experiment II and III, the cultured cells were directed to differentiate into derivatives of the three germinal layers (e.g., ectoderm, mesoderm, and endoderm) followed by confirmation using immunocytochemistry and expression analysis for lineage-specific markers. In Experiment IV, the in vivo teratoma formation of cultured cells was tested using an implantation assay as a follow up to our previous report of their expression of several pluripotency markers [17].

2.2. Castration of Donors, Testis Cell Isolation, and Culture in Regular Media

Procedures for the castration of neonatal piglets (~1-wk old; n = 15 for Experiment I, n = 60 for Experiment II and III, and n = 15 for Experiment IV), testis cell isolation, and cell culture were conducted as previously described [14,26,27]. Cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s media (DMEM; catalogue No. 12-604F; Corning, New York, NY, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; catalogue No. A15-701; PAA Laboratories, Etobicoke, ON, Canada) for 14 days in Experiment I, 28 days for Experiment IV, and in DMEM + 15% FBS + 10 ng/mL basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF; catalogue No. 233-FB-025; R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA) for 28 days in Experiment II. However, in Experiment II, following immunocytochemistry, the cells and colonies did not stain positive for the selected differentiation markers. Also, cells showed a reduced confluency following visual examination on day 4 of differentiation in Experiment II. As such, we designed Experiment III where cultures were exposed to the various differentiation media for a longer period and without frequently changing the media to prevent potential interference with cell organization and interactions. In Experiment III, similar seeding density, regular media composition, and incubation conditions were used as in Experiment II.

2.3. In Vitro Osteogenic Trans-Differentiation of Porcine Germ Cells

The osteogenic differentiation media was prepared according to the manufacturer’s instructions (catalogue No. A1007201; StemPro Osteogenesis Differentiation Kit, Gibco, Grand Island, NY, USA). Briefly, differentiation supplement was mixed with base media at a 1:9 ratio. On day 14 of culture, regular media was removed, and each well was rinsed with Dulbecco’s phosphate-buffered saline (DPBS; catalogue No. 20-031-CV; Mediatech, Manassas, VA, USA) and cells were exposed to the prepared osteogenesis differentiation media for 14 days. This differentiation media was replenished every 3 days and cultures were visually examined using phase-contrast microscopy.

2.4. In Vitro Tri-Lineage Differentiation of Porcine Germ Cells

For trans-differentiation of gonocytes and colonies into derivatives of the three germinal layers, tri-lineage differentiation kits were used according to the manufacturer’s instructions with modifications. On day 28 of Experiment II, regular media in different wells was switched with each tri-lineage differentiation media that was developed for differentiation of human pluripotent stem cells (catalogue No. SC031B ectoderm kit; catalogue No. SC030B mesoderm kit; and catalogue No. SC019B endoderm kit; all from R&D Systems). To prepare the endoderm differentiation media-I, bFGF, Activin A, and Wnt-a were diluted 1000-fold in pre-warmed differentiation base media. To prepare the endoderm differentiation media-II, only bFGF and Activin A were diluted 1000-folds in pre-warmed differentiation base media. Each tri-lineage differentiation media was tested in a 6-well plate containing three replicates. For ectoderm and mesoderm differentiation, regular media was switched with 2.5 mL of the differentiation media and cells were incubated for 24 h at 37 °C and 5% CO2. The media was replenished with fresh differentiation media every 24 h on days 2 and 3. For endoderm differentiation, regular media was switched with differentiation media-I and plates were maintained in similar conditions as described above. Media-I was then replaced with media-II after 16 h of incubation. Media-II was replenished every 12 h on days 2 and 3. Alternatively, in Experiment III, cultures were incubated with 2.5 mL of the ectoderm or mesoderm differentiation media for 7 days, but without regularly replenishing the media. For endoderm differentiation, regular media was replaced with differentiation media-I, media-I was switched with media-II after 16 h of incubation, and the cultures were maintained for an additional 7 days without replenishing the media. In each differentiation group, cultures were examined daily under a phase-contrast microscope.

2.5. Imaging and Morphometrical Assessment

Viability of freshly isolated and cultured cells was evaluated using the trypan blue exclusion technique [14,26,27]. For quantification and measurements in Experiment I, photomicrographs were captured from culture plates in treatment and control groups before and after staining with Alizarin Red S. In Experiment II and III, photomicrographs were obtained before adding the differentiation media (day 0), as well as on days 3, 5, and 7 after incubation with differentiation media. Imaging, morphometrical assessment, and quantification protocols were carried out as described in our previous work [17].

2.6. Staining and Immunocytochemistry for Evaluation of Dedifferentiation and Trans-Differentiation

2.6.1. Alizarin Red S Staining

Calcium deposition is a known indicator of successful differentiation of stem cells into osteoblasts, and of in vitro bone matrix formation [28]. Therefore, on day 14 of differentiation in Experiment I, Alizarin Red S staining solution was used to identify calcium deposition as described previously [29]. Briefly, the media was aspirated, wells were rinsed with DPBS, and cells/colonies were fixed using 10% formaldehyde solution (catalogue No. HT501128; Sigma-Aldrich) for 30 min. Wells were rinsed and incubated with the staining solution at room temperature for 20 min. Wells were rinsed again with distilled water and visualized under an inverted light microscope.

2.6.2. Immunofluorescence Assay

In Experiment II and III, cells and colonies were grown on poly-L-lysine-coated coverslips. The preparation of coverslips followed our previously described protocols [26]. We have previously shown that culture of neonatal porcine MGSCs in regular media leads to their dedifferentiation and expression of multiple ES cell markers [14,17]. As such, here we also evaluated the expression of POU5F1 as a representative ES marker to confirm MGSC dedifferentiation prior to their trans-differentiation [30,31,32]. The expression of this marker was examined immediately after cell isolation and on day 28 of culture in regular media. On day 4 of Experiment II and day 7 of differentiation in Experiment III, the coverslips were removed from culture wells and stained against gonocyte- and germinal layer markers, as summarized in Table 1. The procedure used for immunofluorescence assay has been previously described by our laboratory [14,26]. To double-label the cells and colonies with a gonocyte-specific marker, FITC-labeled Dolichos biflorus agglutinin (DBA-FITC; catalogue No. FL1031; Vector Labs, Burlington, ON, Canada) was used [33].

2.7. Gene Expression Analyses for Confirmation of Dedifferentiation and Trans-Differentiation

In Experiment III, the expression of the pluripotency marker (POU5F1) and 6 germinal layer markers were examined using reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). To confirm dedifferentiation of cultured MGSCs, expression of POU5F1 was examined using samples of freshly-isolated testis cells and cultured cells in regular media on days 7, 14, 21, and 28. Following 7 days of culture in differentiation media, RT-PCR analysis for differentiation markers was carried out on cells and colonies from each differentiation group. The procedure for gene expression analyses was as described in our previous work [17]. Selected target genes were as follows: POU5F1, OTX2, GFAP, TBXT (T-box transcription factor T; gene for Brachyury), ACTA2 (Actin alpha 2; gene for ASM), SOX17, and AFP. The annealing temperatures, names, and primer sequences for each gene are listed in Table 2.

2.8. Subcutaneous Implantation of Cultured Cells and Colonies

Cultured cells were examined for pluripotency based on their teratogenic potential following subcutaneous injection into male hairless immunodeficient mice (n = 2; SHO, Crl: SHO-PrkdcscidHrhr, strain code 474; Charles River, Montreal, Canada). On the day of implantation all media (DMEM + 10% FBS) was removed, the wells were rinsed with sterile DPBS, and cells/colonies were detached using trypsin-EDTA solution as previously described [26]. To stop the trypsin reaction, FBS was added to each well, then contents were pooled and centrifuged at 500× g at 16 °C for 5 min. The supernatant was discarded, and the pellet washed with DPBS and centrifuged again using the same settings. Preparation and anesthesia of recipient mice were as described previously [34,35,36]. For implantation procedure, 0.1 mL of the cell aggregates (equals to the content of ~3 wells) were injected subcutaneously into each of 8 sites per mouse (4 sites on the left and 4 sites on the right side of the dorsal midline) as described previously [34,35,36]. Each mouse was kept in an individual plexiglass micro-isolator cage under sterile conditions and maintained in standard temperature (22 ± 2 °C) and controlled lighting photoperiod (12 h light/dark cycles). The mice were kept for 4 wk, evaluated daily for abnormal signs, and provided with sterile water and chow ad libitum.

2.9. Retrieval of the Subcutaneous Implants and (Immuno)histochemistry

Recipient mice were sacrificed after 4 wk. The implants were retrieved, rinsed with DPBS, fixed in Bouin’s solution, processed, embedded in paraffin, and sectioned at 5 µm. Among the largest sections, randomly selected samples were used for routine histology (hematoxylin and eosin; H&E staining) and immunohistochemistry against lineage-specific antibodies (i.e., GFAP, ASM, and AFP). The procedure for immunohistochemistry was performed as described previously [35].

2.10. Statistical Analyses

All the data are presented as the mean ± standard error of mean (SEM) from at least three independent replicates and p < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant. The statistical methods used for the analyses include t-test and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), and Tukey’s HSD was used as the post hoc test, unless stated otherwise. All data analyses were performed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (IBM SPSS Statistics for Macintosh, Version 26.00; IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA).

3. Results

3.1. Viability and Morphometric Assessments

The viability of the freshly isolated testis cells and cultured cells sampled on day 28 in the osteogenic differentiation group, (Experiment I) and day 35 in the tri-lineage differentiation groups (Experiment III), was ~90%. In Experiments I-III and during the culture period in regular media, morphological features of the cells and colonies were similar to those reported in our previous study, including formation of a wave-shape monolayer after 7 days, development of circular arrangements, and 3D embryoid body-like colonies (EBLCs) after ~14 days [17] (Figure 2A–D).
In Experiment I, EBLCs in the control group appeared light in color, while those developed in the differentiation induction media had a more compact appearance with a darker center. The margins of EBLCs developed in differentiation induction media were relatively translucent compared to their opaquer central areas (Figure 2E–J). The number of EBLCs did not differ between these groups (p = 0.56), although the average EBLC diameter was ~26% greater in the differentiation induction media compared to control groups (p < 0.001; Figure 2K). The average EBLC diameter in the differentiation and regular cultures were 197.16 ± 16.66 µm and 156.10 ± 10 µm, respectively.
In Experiment II, cell confluency was reduced following incubation with tri-lineage differentiation media in all treatment groups. Hence, Experiment II was removed from further analyses. Following this, Experiment III was designed and conducted, wherein a modified media changing regimen was used to reduce cell loss and interference with cell organization and arrangement.
In Experiment III, after 7 days of culture, the overall morphology of cells and colonies cultured in differentiation media did not differ from those developed in the regular media. However, after 7 days of incubation in differentiation media, EBLCs appeared more translucent and lighter colored compared to day 0 of differentiation (Figure 3). Further, EBLCs developed in differentiation media appeared to have two different, albeit indistinct, areas: a narrow marginal region close to their edges and a more central area. Notably, while the number of gonocytes or EBLCs in differentiation media were not different from that of control groups (0.59 < p < 0.93), the average diameter of EBLCs was smaller than that of the control group and was reduced from day 0 to day 7 of differentiation in all tri-lineage differentiation media (0.001 < p 0.002; Figure 3).

3.2. Alizarin Red S Staining and Immunofluorescence Assay

3.2.1. Osteogenic Differentiation

All colonies developed in the differentiation group produced hydroxyapatite deposits, while none of the colonies in control group were positive for Alizarin Red S staining. No differences in the extent of differentiation were observed between colonies in the differentiation group. In the control group, gonocytes appeared translucent without color staining and colonies showed a homogenous distribution of dark color. Conversely, all colonies in the differentiation group showed light red staining in the narrow marginal areas and dark red staining in more central areas, indicative of hydroxyapatite deposition (Figure 2E–J). Gonocytes and somatic cells in the differentiation group appeared in light red color following the staining process. The overall distribution pattern of gonocytes, EBLCs, and somatic cells was similar to those observed in the control group.

3.2.2. Pluripotency of Germ Cells and their Differentiation into Derivatives of Three Germinal Layers

Freshly-isolated testis cells were negative for POU5F1; however, both gonocytes and EBLCs in regular media appeared positive for POU5F1 on day 28 of culture. Co-localization of DBA and POU5F1 was observed in all germ cells. DBA+/POU5F1+ cells comprised 42 ± 4% of total number of cells in the regular media. Also, gonocytes and EBLCs in regular media were positive for Brachyury but negative for all other lineage-specific markers. In both regular and differentiation media, germ cells appeared positive for DBA. In differentiation groups, some cells and colonies showed strong expression of DBA but weak expression of designated lineage-specific markers. Conversely, a fraction of cells appeared strongly positive for the designated differentiation marker but showed weak expression of DBA. A similar expression pattern for each lineage-specific marker was observed in the corresponding differentiation media (Figure 4A and Figure 5).

3.3. Gene Expression Analyses

Freshly-isolated testis cells were negative for expression of POU5F1. However, in Experiment III, cultured cells in regular media displayed POU5F1 expression on day 7 to day 28 (Figure 4B). RT-PCR for cultured cells in ectoderm, mesoderm, and endoderm differentiation media were positive for OTX2/GFAP, TBXT/ACTA2, and SOX17/AFP, respectively. Samples of freshly isolated testis cells were also positive for SOX17, TBXT, ACTA2, OTX2, and GFAP. Cells cultured in regular media (DMEM + 15% FBS + 10 ng/mL bFGF) were positive for TBXT and ACTA2. Also, ACTA2 expression was evident in samples of endoderm and ectoderm differentiation cultures (Figure 6).

3.4. Characterization of Dedifferentiated Cell Implants

3.4.1. H&E Staining

Histological examination of the injected cells/colonies (n = 16 injected aggregates) revealed gradual formation of cellular structures, which morphologically did not belong to the normal adjacent peripheral tissues. These structures were located at the expected implantation sites, including immediately ventral to the dermis and dorsal to the hypodermis. The morphologies, dimensions and extension of these tumor-like growth formations varied between injection sites and animals. These formations appeared as multicellular dense structures, were present in all implantation sites, and were encapsulated within a dense connective tissue. In sparse areas within the formations, the distribution of cells formed circular and oval patterns. In certain other areas, the formations contained distinguishable groups of cells that resembled melanocyte nests. Furthermore, increased numbers of melanocytes with melanin deposition were detected in cross-sections of all implants, representing the formation of melanomas. In addition, the formations contained bundles resembling those of peripheral nerves (Figure 7A–D).

3.4.2. Immunohistochemistry

To confirm the differentiation of implanted cells and colonies we used antibodies associated with each germinal layer. Expression of each maker was observed in all samples but were localized to specific areas of the formations. Cells in adjacent foci to the adipose tissue appeared positive for anti-pig-AFP, which was expressed in both the nucleus and cytoplasm. Cells within and surrounding the aforementioned circular/oval patterns expressed ASM. Also, GFAP was expressed in small foci, and within the bundles resembling peripheral nerves. GFAP expression also appeared to be both nuclear and cytoplasmic (Figure 7E–H).

4. Discussion

In previous works as well as in the present study, our laboratory has shown that gonocytes from neonatal porcine testis can spontaneously dedifferentiate and express pluripotency-associated markers when cultured under basic conditions [14,17]. Given the potential of these cells in conversion into a pluripotent state, here we first developed a population of dedifferentiated gonocytes using our previously established culture conditions, evaluated their potential to generate derivatives of three germinal layers in vitro, and assessed their pluripotency and plasticity using an in vivo implantation assay. As such, the present study is the first to show that, upon providing the appropriate media and supplements, dedifferentiated porcine gonocytes and their colonies can undergo osteogenic differentiation in vitro and can convert into cells of the three germinal layers (i.e., ectoderm, mesoderm, or endoderm). Additionally, we showed that implantation of cultured gonocytes and their colonies into the subcutaneous tissue of recipient mice can lead to development of tumor-like growth formations. These formations contain areas which morphologically resembled ectoderm, mesoderm, or endoderm-derived tissues and express markers that are present in all three germinal layers. This observation further confirms the unique potential of gonocytes to spontaneously transform into a pluripotent state under simple in vitro conditions. The dedifferentiation and trans-differentiation potential of germ cells is a remarkable finding that sheds light on their unique conversion potential and can open new avenues of research into their applications in stem cell therapy and regenerative medicine.
In Experiment I of the present study, we successfully induced osteogenic differentiation in gonocyte colonies. Osteoblasts have mesodermal origin and are specialized mesenchymal cells that synthesize bone matrix [37,38]. Here, we used simple culture conditions to develop pluripotent germline stem cells in a short-term culture (~2 wk) and transformed them into osteogenic cell derivatives with bone matrix deposition potential. Following differentiation, morphological features of EBLCs stained with Alizarin Red S resembled those of in vitro developed osteoblast colonies which typically possess darker color in the central areas and lighter color in the marginal areas [39,40]. This morphological pattern of EBLCs features a dome shape appearance and greater calcium deposition in the central areas compared to the narrow marginal areas. Previously, embryonic chicken SSCs were shown to undergo directional differentiation into osteoblasts by cultivation for multiple passages on a feeder layer and in media composed of multiple growth factors and/or other supplements [41]. Although successful, trans-differentiation rate of chicken SSCs was 75–80%. In contrast, we showed that all EBLCs developed from porcine testis cells transformed into calcium phosphate deposition sites and appeared positive for Alizarin Red S staining; all in a relatively short period of time and without supplementation of multiple exogenous factors. In another study, bovine germ cells were co-cultured with Sertoli cells for 21 days in a differentiation induction media to become trans-differentiated into osteoblasts followed by confirmation of differentiation using Alizarin Red S staining [42]. Although multiple studies have already shown mesenchymal and ES cell potential to convert into osteogenic cell lineages [43,44], successful generation of osteogenic progenitors from porcine germ cells acts as an even stronger indication of similar potential in human germ cells, given the anatomical and physiological similarities between pigs and humans. As such, our findings introduce a new avenue for application of these cells in bone regeneration and matrix formation. Of notable importance, using MGSCs for the purpose of bone regeneration in an autologous manner does not carry the same ethical concerns associated with the use of ES cells, nor the biosafety risks associated with the use of iPS cells.
In addition to the osteogenic differentiation, we also examined the conversion potential of cultured gonocytes into cell derivatives of all three germinal layers. As mentioned above, Experiment II was not continued due to limited cell growth and negative expression of lineage-specific markers following brief exposure to the differentiation media. Limited cell growth in Experiment II can be attributed to an underdeveloped somatic cell monolayer, which is essential for survival of non-adherent gonocytes [14,26]. We suggest that perhaps the frequent replenishment of the differentiation media in Experiment II led to physical detachment of the monolayer and/or removed essential components that were naturally produced by cultured cells. However, in the immunofluorescence results of Experiment III we showed decreased intensity of DBA expression and increased intensity of lineage-specific markers, including AFP/SOX17 in endoderm differentiation group, ASM in mesoderm differentiation group, and GFAP/OTX2 in ectoderm differentiation group, all indicative of gradual conversion of gonocytes into other cell lineages.
The expression of transcription factors examined in the present study are critical for normal formation and development of germinal layers during embryonic development [45,46,47,48,49,50,51]. In the present work, we used differentiation kits designed for in vitro differentiation of human ES cells into three germinal layers. For each germinal layer, the manufacturer has provided one of the main and validated biomarkers for confirmation of differentiation into endoderm, mesoderm, or ectoderm. To increase the reliability of our observations and further confirm successful trans-differentiation, we evaluated the expression of a secondary set of markers that have been previously used and validated for each germinal layer [10,52,53,54,55,56,57,58]. Here, positive expression of SOX17 in freshly isolated testis cells is in agreement with previous studies on isolated human PGCs and gonocytes [59,60]. Conversely, negative expression of SOX17 in cultures of regular media may be indicative of germ cell transformation into more primitive developmental stages. SOX17 is a key transcription factor in the development of endoderm as its mutation leads to defective intercellular transport in endoderm [60,61]. Additionally, we used AFP as a secondary endoderm marker. Expression of AFP is typically upregulated in nonseminomatous germ cell tumors [62] and expectedly was not expressed in our fresh testis cell samples. Here, mesoderm and ectoderm cultures were also negative for AFP, perhaps due to the lack of chemical components required for directing cell differentiation towards definitive endodermal lineages. Components of endoderm differentiation media such as bFGF, Wnt-a, and Activin A play important roles in enhancement of definitive endoderm-associated gene expression and cell viability in a dose dependent manner [63,64,65,66]. The same interplay can be speculated between these components in our culture system, leading to expression of endodermal gene transcripts.
Here, we also showed mesoderm differentiation cultures became Brachyury+ while endoderm and ectoderm differentiation cultures appeared Brachyury. Brachyury is a factor required for posterior mesoderm formation [67]. In agreement with our observations, a previous study on mouse germ cells showed fresh testis lysates and germ cell enriched cultures were positive for Brachyury, which the authors concluded was essential for mouse germ cell self-renewal [68]. Interestingly, multipotent germline stem cells developed from murine testis cells were also positive for Brachyury [69]. This further supports our finding regarding Brachyury+ cultures in regular media, which were previously demonstrated to express pluripotency-associated markers [14,17]. Additionally, ASM as a secondary marker for mesoderm differentiation was positive in all samples. This could have occurred due to contaminating peritubular myoid cells and/or blood endothelial cells; however, in immunocytochemistry, ASM expression was localized to the cells surrounding the EBLCs, which also weakly expressed DBA. This may point at gradual transformation of DBA+ cells to cells with mesodermal origin. Identification and positive expression of ASM has been also reported in previous studies on primate testis cell culture [70,71]. ASM is one of the actin isoforms responsible for mechanical tension of the cells [72].
Here, similar to SOX17, the expression of OTX2 and GFAP was downregulated in germ cells during culture in regular media. OTX2 is required for neuroectoderm differentiation [23,73,74,75] and is inherently expressed in porcine brain and reproductive tissues [76,77]. Additionally, Leydig cells possess neuroendocrine features and are immunopositive for neuroectodermal and astrocyte markers such as GFAP [78,79]. Thus, positive GFAP expression by freshly isolated cells can be explained by the presence of Leydig cells, which once isolated and cultured in regular media, perhaps downregulated its expression.
In Experiments I and III, migrating gonocytes formed clusters and colonies which transformed into EBLCs. Although smaller in size, the morphology of the EBLCs in Experiment III was comparable to those of Experiment I. The presence of two indistinct peripheral and central areas in EBLCs can be explained by their dome-shape appearance, which normally have thinner marginal areas and thicker central areas. This can lead to a more translucent edge and opaque center in EBLCs.
We have previously shown that MGSCs in regular media dedifferentiate and express a number of ES cell markers [14]. Similarly, to confirm dedifferentiation of cultured MGSCs in regular media into primitive developmental stages, we examined their expression of POU5F1 as one of the important and widely used ES markers [30,31,32]. As demonstrated previously, unlike freshly-isolated testis cells which are negative for this marker, cultured cells are positive POU5F1 expression [14,17]. Here we showed that all MGSCs in culture conditions appeared both DBA- and POU5F1- positive. This further confirms that MGSCs are able to spontaneously revert to a dedifferentiated state and express markers that are mutually present in ES cells. As such, in the present study we also used an implantation assay to evaluate their tumorigenic potential and examined the expression of selected germinal layer biomarkers (i.e., AFP, ASM, and GFAP) in retrieved samples. In all injection sites, multicellular tumor-like formations contained foci with positive cells for AFP, ASM, or GFAP. AFP is a known marker for nonseminomatous germ cell tumors [80], and its expression may point at development of endodermal component within our observed formations [81,82,83]. ASM expression was similarly observed in sparse locations of our retrieved samples. ASM expression is associated with mesodermal differentiation in tumors derived from pluripotent stem cells [84,85]. Here, we also observed GFAP expression in focal areas within the formations. The morphology and pattern of diffuse GFAP-positive areas partly resembled those observed in previously reported glial cell neoplastic tissues containing polygonal and spindle shape cells with indistinct cellular borders [86]. Additionally, nerve bundle-like structures within these formations appeared positive for GFAP, which may suggest the presence of a neuroectodermal component. Increased GFAP expression has been attributed to neuroectodermal component in teratomas [87,88]. Importantly, excessive accumulation of melanin and development of melanocyte nests further confirms the presence of ectodermal tissue in the developed tumor-like formations. Thus, the overall morphological and immunohistochemical attributes of the implanted cells and EBLCs point at their potential contribution to formation of tumor-like structures which contain endodermal, mesodermal, and ectodermal components. The tumorigenic potential is one of the staple characteristics of ES- or iPS cells derived from somatic cells [85]. Additionally, by definition, pluripotent stem cells can give rise to cells of all three germinal layers, whereas multipotent stem cells can differentiate to particular tissue types/cell lineages but not all [89]. Given that, similar to ES- and iPS cells, our developed germline-derived stem cells have the ability to differentiate into cells of all three germinal layers, generate teratomas, and express pluripotency markers, they can be classified as pluripotent stem cells. As such, gonocytes in our primary culture conditions spontaneously underwent reprogramming into a pluripotent state in a relatively shorter time (~4 wk post-implantation) as confirmed by the implantation assay. In addition, we successfully converted these cells into cell derivatives from all three germinal layers, which has not been achieved previously. Harvesting germ cells from primary culture is important since multiple passages and removal of the cells from their microenvironment causes unwanted changes to their physiological and biochemical properties [90]. Such changes can generate confounding factors for their downstream applications and pose negative effects on their proliferation and differentiation potential at genetic or epigenetic levels [90].
Therefore, our results substantiate the conclusion that neonatal germline stem cells present dedifferentiation and trans-differentiation capabilities. As such, the present work sets the stage for future studies using human germ cells for potential use in regenerative medicine with important advantages over the use of ES or iPS cells for similar applications. For instance, we propose that considerations be given to the use of testicular biopsies both as a source for sperm and stem cell production. Using an individual’s endogenous germ cells for development of pluripotent stem cells holds great promise for downstream applications in stem cell therapy of the same individual. Such an autologous application of germline-derived pluripotent stem cells is expected to be far less problematic from the ethical and biosafety aspects. This is especially the case when considering that the testicular biopsies collected prior to the start of cancer treatment from preadolescent patients are routinely cryopreserved and hence can serve dual purposes; not only can they be considered as the source of germline stem cells for potential restoration of fertility, they may also be viewed as a potential source for derivation of pluripotent stem cells for other tissue regeneration applications. Importantly, autologous application of germline-derived stem cells also eliminates or limits issues related to immunorejection and the various biosafety and ethical issues related to the genetic manipulation or acquisition of stem cells from allogeneic, xenogeneic, iPS, or ES sources to derive stem cells for cell-based therapy to replace cells and tissues perished during the course of cytoablative cancer treatments. However, as with any other potential source for stem cell therapy, due diligence should be applied to ensure safety of the germline-derived stem cells, especially as related to the potential presence of tumor cells.

5. Conclusions

Neonatal porcine gonocytes represent a promising source of adult stem cells. In our culture conditions, these stem cells undergo dedifferentiation into more primitive developmental stages. When implanted into recipient mice, the cultured gonocytes and their colonies develop formations with morphological and biomolecular characteristics of all three germinal layers, which further confirms their plasticity. Furthermore, cultured gonocytes and their colonies effectively convert into derivatives of ectodermal, mesodermal, and endodermal germinal layers in trans-differentiation media. In vitro dedifferentiation and subsequent conversion of neonatal gonocytes into osteogenic cells and derivatives of three germinal layers are important observations since this in vitro system can provide an easily accessible and abundant source of adult stem cells for numerous downstream applications in regenerative medicine. More importantly, unique conversion potential of neonatal gonocytes into other cell types makes them a potentially attractive autologous pluripotent cell source since their use eliminates ethical implications and the biosafety risks associated with viral vectors to induce pluripotency, and they can be easily produced in vitro without addition of multiple extrinsic factors. The capacity of neonatal germ cells to differentiate into cells of all embryonic germinal layers highlights their importance and warrants further research including on their putative differentiation triggers. Such studies may put these cells in a privileged position to treat tissues of high interest in regenerative medicine, especially those that present low regeneration rates such as neural tissue, tendon, or cartilage when compared to other better studied multipotent stem cells. More specifically, the testicular biopsies obtained from preadolescent boys can potentially serve as a dual source of germ cells for fertility restoration and germ cell-derived pluripotent stem cells for development of somatic cells and tissues. As such, MGSCs offer an autologous alternative stem cell source to the available adult stem cells such as cord blood stem cells with similar potentials. It goes without saying that any in vivo application of these cells should be preceded with extensive assessments of any potential risk for tumor development or other biosafety risks.

Author Contributions

M.A.F. contributed to the design of the experiments, performed the study, and wrote the first draft of the manuscript. G.d.S.R. assisted in the initial experiments and revised the manuscript. A.H. contributed to the experimental design, revised the manuscript, and supervised the project. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by grants to A.H. from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada (# 404908). M.A.F. was financially supported by scholarships from the University of Saskatchewan’s College of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies, and Western College of Veterinary Medicine, as well as the Government of Saskatchewan. G.d.S.R. was a recipient of a visiting student award from the Emerging Leaders in the Americas Program (ELAP) to do research at A.H.’s lab.

Institutional Review Board Statement

All experiments involving animals were reviewed and approved by the University of Saskatchewan’s Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (# 20080042).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The visual and numeric data included in this article to further support the conclusion are available upon request.

Acknowledgments

The authors are thankful to Carlos Carvalho of the University of Saskatchewan’s Department of Biology, Ahmad Al-Dissi of the Department of Pathology, and Daniel MacPhee, Jaswant Singh, and Suraj Unniappan of the Department of Veterinary Biomedical Sciences for their comments and thoughtful feedback throughout the development of the present work. We also thank Tatjana Ometlic and her animal care staff at the Prairie Swine Centre. We also express our gratitude to Champika Ferando of the Department of Veterinary Microbiology for her generous help and invaluable assistance with gene expression analyses. We are grateful to Savannah Goldstein for proofreading the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. De Rooji, D.G. Stem cells in the testis. Int. J. Exp. Pathol. 1998, 79, 67–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Phillips, B.T.; Gassei, K.; Orwig, K.E. Spermatogonial stem cell regulation and spermatogenesis. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2010, 365, 1663–1678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Wu, X.; Schmidt, J.A.; Avarbock, M.R.; Tobias, J.W.; Carlson, C.A.; Kolon, T.F.; Ginsberg, J.P.; Brinster, R.L. Prepubertal human spermatogonia and mouse gonocytes share conserved gene expression of germline stem cell regulatory molecules. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 21672–21677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Roosen-Runge, E.C.; Giesel, L.O., Jr. Quantitative studies on spermatogenesis in the albino rat. Am. J. Anat. 1950, 87, 1–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Ibtisham, F.; Awang-Junaidi, A.H.; Honaramooz, A. The study and manipulation of spermatogonial stem cells using animal models. Cell Tissue Res. 2020, 380, 393–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Lehmann, R. Germline stem cells: Origin and destiny. Cell Stem Cell 2012, 10, 729–739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Azizi, H.; Asgari, B.; Skutella, T. Pluripotency potential of embryonic stem cell-like cells derived from mouse testis. Cell J. 2019, 21, 281–289. [Google Scholar]
  8. Golestaneh, N.; Kokkinaki, M.; Pant, D.; Jiang, J.; DeStefano, D.; Fernandez-Bueno, C.; Rone, J.D.; Haddad, B.R.; Gallicano, G.I.; Dym, M. Pluripotent stem cells derived from adult human testes. Stem Cells Dev. 2009, 18, 1115–1125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Kanatsu-Shinohara, M.; Inoue, K.; Lee, J.; Yoshimoto, M.; Ogonuki, N.; Miki, H.; Baba, S.; Kato, T.; Kazuki, Y.; Toyokuni, S.; et al. Generation of pluripotent stem cells from neonatal mouse testis. Cell 2004, 119, 1001–1012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Guan, K.; Nayernia, K.; Maier, L.S.; Wagner, S.; Dressel, R.; Jae, H.L.; Nolte, J.; Wolf, F.; Li, M.; Engel, W.; et al. Pluripotency of spermatogonial stem cells from adult mouse testis. Nature 2006, 440, 1199–1203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Seandel, M.; James, D.; Shmelkov, S.V.; Falciatori, I.; Kim, J.; Chavala, S.; Scherr, D.S.; Zhang, F.; Torres, R.; Gale, N.W.; et al. Generation of functional multipotent adult stem cells from GPR125 + germline progenitors. Nature 2007, 449, 346–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Kossack, N.; Meneses, J.; Shefi, S.; Nguyen, H.N.; Chavez, S.; Nicholas, C.; Gromoll, J.; Turek, P.J.; Reijo-Pera, R.A. Isolation and characterization of pluripotent human spermatogonial stem cell-derived cells. Stem Cells 2009, 27, 138–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Chen, Z.; Hong, F.; Wang, Z.; Hao, D.; Yang, H. Spermatogonial stem cells are a promising and pluripotent cell source for regenerative medicine. Am. J. Transl. Res. 2020, 12, 7048–7059. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  14. Awang-Junaidi, A.H.; Fayaz, M.A.; Kawamura, E.; Sobchishin, L.; MacPhee, D.; Honaramooz, A. Live-cell imaging and ultrastructural analysis reveal remarkable features of cultured porcine gonocytes. Cell Tissue Res. 2020, 381, 361–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ko, K.; Tapia, N.; Wu, G.; Kim, J.B.; Bravo, M.J.A.; Sasse, P.; Glaser, T.; Ruau, D.; Han, D.W.; Greber, B.; et al. Induction of Pluripotency in Adult Unipotent Germline Stem Cells. Cell Stem Cell 2009, 5, 87–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Holstein, A.F.; Maekawa, M.; Nagano, T.; Davidoff, M.S. Myofibroblasts in the lamina propria of human seminiferous tubules are dynamic structures of heterogeneous phenotype. Arch. Histol. Cytol. 1996, 59, 109–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Fayaz, M.A.; Honaramooz, A. Effects of different culture conditions on proliferation, colony-formation, and pluripotency state of porcine male germ cells. Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 2021, in press. [Google Scholar]
  18. Takahashi, K.; Yamanaka, S. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell 2006, 126, 663–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Wernig, M.; Meissner, A.; Foreman, R.; Brambrink, T.; Ku, M.; Hochedlinger, K.; Bernstein, B.E.; Jaenisch, R. In Vitro reprogramming of fibroblasts into a pluripotent ES-cell-like state. Nature 2007, 448, 318–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Takahashi, K.; Tanabe, K.; Ohnuki, M.; Narita, M.; Ichisaka, T.; Tomoda, K.; Yamanaka, S. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from adult human fibroblasts by defined factors. Cell 2007, 131, 861–872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  21. Aoi, T.; Yae, K.; Nakagawa, M.; Ichisaka, T.; Okita, K.; Takahashi, K.; Chiba, T.; Yamanaka, S. Generation of pluripotent stem cells from adult mouse liver and stomach cells. Science 2008, 321, 699–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Kim, J.B.; Zaehres, H.; Wu, G.; Gentile, L.; Ko, K.; Sebastiano, V.; Araúzo-Bravo, M.J.; Ruau, D.; Han, D.W.; Zenke, M. Pluripotent stem cells induced from adult neural stem cells by reprogramming with two factors. Nature 2008, 454, 646–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Yang, H.; Hao, D.; Liu, C.; Huang, D.; Chen, B.; Fan, H.; Liu, C.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, Q.; An, J. Generation of functional dopaminergic neurons from human spermatogonial stem cells to rescue parkinsonian phenotypes. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2019, 10, 195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Ben-Porath, I.; Thomson, M.W.; Carey, V.J.; Ge, R.; Bell, G.W.; Regev, A.; Weinberg, R.A. An embryonic stem cell–like gene expression signature in poorly differentiated aggressive human tumors. Nat. Genet. 2008, 40, 499–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Volarevic, V.; Markovic, B.S.; Gazdic, M.; Volarevic, A.; Jovicic, N.; Arsenijevic, N.; Armstrong, L.; Djonov, V.; Lako, M.; Stojkovic, M. Ethical and safety issues of stem cell-based therapy. Int. J. Med. Sci. 2018, 15, 36–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Awang-Junaidi, A.H.; Honaramooz, A. Optimization of culture conditions for short-term maintenance, proliferation, and colony formation of porcine gonocytes. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 2018, 9, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Yang, Y.; Yarahmadi, M.; Honaramooz, A. Development of novel strategies for the isolation of piglet testis cells with a high proportion of gonocytes. Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 2010, 22, 1057–1065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Virtanen, P.; Isotupa, K. Staining properties of alizarin red S for growing bone in vitro. Cells Tissues Organs 1980, 108, 202–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Silva, M.J.; Brodt, M.D.; Ko, M.; Abu-Amer, Y. Impaired marrow osteogenesis is associated with reduced endocortical bone formation but does not impair periosteal bone formation in long bones of SAMP6 mice. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2005, 20, 419–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zeineddine, D.; Abou Hammoud, A.; Mortada, M.; Boeuf, H. The Oct4 protein: More than a magic stemness marker. Am. J. Stem Cells 2014, 3, 74–82. [Google Scholar]
  31. Pan, G.J.; Chang, Z.Y.; Schöler, H.R.; Duanqing, P.E.I. Stem cell pluripotency and transcription factor Oct4. Cell Res. 2002, 12, 321–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Nichols, J.; Zevnik, B.; Anastassiadis, K.; Niwa, H.; Klewe-Nebenius, D.; Chambers, I.; Schöler, H.; Smith, A. Formation of pluripotent stem cells in the mammalian embryo depends on the POU transcription factor Oct4. Cell 1998, 95, 379–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Goel, S.; Sugimoto, M.; Minami, N.; Yamada, M.; Kume, S.; Imai, H. Identification, isolation, and in vitro culture of porcine gonocytes. Biol. Reprod. 2007, 77, 127–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Fayaz, M.A.; Awang-Junaidi, A.H.; Singh, J.; Honaramooz, A. Validation of ultrasound biomicroscopy for the assessment of xenogeneic testis tissue grafts and cell implants in recipient mice. Andrology 2020, 8, 1332–1346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Fayaz, M.A.; Awang-Junaidi, A.H.; Singh, J.; Honaramooz, A. Long-term monitoring of donor xenogeneic testis tissue grafts and cell implants in recipient mice using ultrasound biomicroscopy. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 2020, 46, 3088–3103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Awang-Junaidi, A.H.; Singh, J.; Honaramooz, A. Regeneration of testis tissue after ectopic implantation of porcine testis cell aggregates in mice: Improved consistency of outcomes and in situ monitoring. Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 2020, 32, 594–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Franz-Odendaal, T.A.; Hall, B.K.; Witten, P.E. Buried alive: How osteoblasts become osteocytes. Dev. Dyn. an Off. Publ. Am. Assoc. Anat. 2006, 235, 176–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Mackie, E.J. Osteoblasts: Novel roles in orchestration of skeletal architecture. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2003, 35, 1301–1305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Orriss, I.R.; Taylor, S.E.B.; Arnett, T.R. Rat osteoblast cultures. Bone Res. Protoc. 2012, 816, 31–41. [Google Scholar]
  40. Yin, X.; Chen, Z.; Liu, Z.; Dang, G. Icariine stimulates proliferation and differentiation of human osteoblasts by increasing production of bone morphogenetic protein 2. Chin. Med. J. 2007, 120, 204–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Li, B.; Wang, X.-Y.; Tian, Z.; Xiao, X.-J.; Xu, Q.; Wei, C.-X.; Sun, H.-C.; Chen, G.-H. Directional differentiation of chicken spermatogonial stem cells in vitro. Cytotherapy 2010, 12, 326–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Qasemi-Panahi, B.; Tajik, P.; Movahedin, M.; Moghaddam, G.; Barzgar, Y.; Heidari-Vala, H. Differentiation of bovine spermatogonial stem cells into osteoblasts. Avicenna J. Med. Biotechnol. 2011, 3, 149–153. [Google Scholar]
  43. Parikka, V.; Väänänen, A.; Risteli, J.; Salo, T.; Sorsa, T.; Väänänen, H.K.; Lehenkari, P. Human mesenchymal stem cell derived osteoblasts degrade organic bone matrix in vitro by matrix metalloproteinases. Matrix Biol. 2005, 24, 438–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Hanna, H.; Mir, L.M.; Andre, F.M. In Vitro osteoblastic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells generates cell layers with distinct properties. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2018, 9, 203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. De Jong, J.; Stoop, H.; Gillis, A.J.M.; Van Gurp, R.; van de Geijn, G.; de Boer, M.; Hersmus, R.; Saunders, P.T.K.; Anderson, R.A.; Oosterhuis, J.W. Differential expression of SOX17 and SOX2 in germ cells and stem cells has biological and clinical implications. J. Pathol. J. Pathol. Soc. Great Br. Irel. 2008, 215, 21–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Abe, K.; Niwa, H.; Iwase, K.; Takiguchi, M.; Mori, M.; Abé, S.-I.; Abe, K.; Yamamura, K.-I. Endoderm-specific gene expression in embryonic stem cells differentiated to embryoid bodies. Exp. Cell Res. 1996, 229, 27–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Bernardo, A.S.; Faial, T.; Gardner, L.; Niakan, K.K.; Ortmann, D.; Senner, C.E.; Callery, E.M.; Trotter, M.W.; Hemberger, M.; Smith, J.C. BRACHYURY and CDX2 mediate BMP-induced differentiation of human and mouse pluripotent stem cells into embryonic and extraembryonic lineages. Cell Stem Cell 2011, 9, 144–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Babai, F.; Musevi-Aghdam, J.; Schurch, W.; Royal, A.; Gabbiani, G. Coexpression of α-sarcomeric actin, α-smooth muscle actin and desmin during myogenesis in rat and mouse embryos I. Skeletal muscle. Differentiation 1990, 44, 132–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Eng, L.F. Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP): The major protein of glial intermediate filaments in differentiated astrocytes. J. Neuroimmunol. 1985, 8, 203–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Ang, S.-L.; Conlon, R.A.; Jin, O.; Rossant, J. Positive and negative signals from mesoderm regulate the expression of mouse Otx2 in ectoderm explants. Development 1994, 120, 2979–2989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Mortensen, A.H.; Schade, V.; Lamonerie, T.; Camper, S.A. Deletion of OTX2 in neural ectoderm delays anterior pituitary development. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2015, 24, 939–953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Liu, K.; Mao, J.; Song, L.; Fan, A.; Zhang, S.; Wang, J.; Fan, N.; Liu, N.; Ye, X.; Fu, H. DNA repair and replication links to pluripotency and differentiation capacity of pig iPS cells. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0173047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Li, Y.; Wu, S.; Yu, Y.; Zhang, H.; Wei, R.; Lv, J.; Cai, M.; Yang, X.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, Z. Derivation of porcine extraembryonic endoderm-like cells from blastocysts. Cell Prolif. 2020, 53, e12782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Kim, D.; Kim, C.-H.; Moon, J.-I.; Chung, Y.-G.; Chang, M.-Y.; Han, B.-S.; Ko, S.; Yang, E.; Cha, K.Y.; Lanza, R. Generation of human induced pluripotent stem cells by direct delivery of reprogramming proteins. Cell Stem Cell 2009, 4, 472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Mauritz, C.; Schwanke, K.; Reppel, M.; Neef, S.; Katsirntaki, K.; Maier, L.S.; Nguemo, F.; Menke, S.; Haustein, M.; Hescheler, J. Generation of functional murine cardiac myocytes from induced pluripotent stem cells. Circulation 2008, 118, 507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Hentze, H.; Soong, P.L.; Wang, S.T.; Phillips, B.W.; Putti, T.C.; Dunn, N.R. Teratoma formation by human embryonic stem cells: Evaluation of essential parameters for future safety studies. Stem Cell Res. 2009, 2, 198–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Acampora, D.; Di Giovannantonio, L.G.; Simeone, A. Otx2 is an intrinsic determinant of the embryonic stem cell state and is required for transition to a stable epiblast stem cell condition. Development 2013, 140, 43–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Kurokawa, D.; Ohmura, T.; Sakurai, Y.; Inoue, K.; Suda, Y.; Aizawa, S. Otx2 expression in anterior neuroectoderm and forebrain/midbrain is directed by more than six enhancers. Dev. Biol. 2014, 387, 203–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Irie, N.; Weinberger, L.; Tang, W.W.C.; Kobayashi, T.; Viukov, S.; Manor, Y.S.; Dietmann, S.; Hanna, J.H.; Surani, M.A. SOX17 is a critical specifier of human primordial germ cell fate. Cell 2015, 160, 253–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Fang, F.; Li, Z.; Zhao, Q.; Xiong, C.; Ni, K. Analysis of multi-lineage gene expression dynamics during primordial germ cell induction from human induced pluripotent stem cells. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2020, 11, 100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Viotti, M.; Niu, L.; Shi, S.-H.; Hadjantonakis, A.-K. Role of the gut endoderm in relaying left-right patterning in mice. PLoS Biol. 2012, 10, e1001276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Bostwick, D.G. Chapter 13—Immunohistology of the Prostate, Bladder, Testis and Kidney, 2nd ed.; Dabbs, D.J., Ed.; Churchill Livingstone: London, UK, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  63. Diekmann, U.; Wolling, H.; Dettmer, R.; Niwolik, I.; Naujok, O.; Buettner, F.F.R. Chemically defined and xenogeneic-free differentiation of human pluripotent stem cells into definitive endoderm in 3D culture. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Qu, S.; Yan, L.; Fang, B.; Ye, S.; Li, P.; Ge, S.; Wu, J.; Qu, D.; Song, H. Generation of enhanced definitive endoderm from human embryonic stem cells under an albumin/insulin-free and chemically defined condition. Life Sci. 2017, 175, 37–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Xu, X.; Browning, V.L.; Odorico, J.S. Activin, BMP and FGF pathways cooperate to promote endoderm and pancreatic lineage cell differentiation from human embryonic stem cells. Mech. Dev. 2011, 128, 412–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  66. Yao, S.; Chen, S.; Clark, J.; Hao, E.; Beattie, G.M.; Hayek, A.; Ding, S. Long-term self-renewal and directed differentiation of human embryonic stem cells in chemically defined conditions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 6907–6912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  67. Barresi, V.; Ieni, A.; Branca, G.; Tuccari, G. Brachyury: A diagnostic marker for the differential diagnosis of chordoma and hemangioblastoma versus neoplastic histological mimickers. Dis. Markers 2014, 2014, 514753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  68. Wu, X.; Goodyear, S.M.; Tobias, J.W.; Avarbock, M.R.; Brinster, R.L. Spermatogonial stem cell self-renewal requires ETV5-mediated downstream activation of Brachyury in mice. Biol. Reprod. 2011, 85, 1114–1123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Baba, S.; Heike, T.; Umeda, K.; Iwasa, T.; Kaichi, S.; Hiraumi, Y.; Doi, H.; Yoshimoto, M.; Kanatsu-Shinohara, M.; Shinohara, T. Generation of cardiac and endothelial cells from neonatal mouse testis-derived multipotent germline stem cells. Stem Cells 2007, 25, 1375–1383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Sharma, S.; Schlatt, S.; Van Pelt, A.; Neuhaus, N. Characterization and population dynamics of germ cells in adult macaque testicular cultures. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0218194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Langenstroth, D.; Kossack, N.; Westernströer, B.; Wistuba, J.; Behr, R.; Gromoll, J.; Schlatt, S. Separation of somatic and germ cells is required to establish primate spermatogonial cultures. Hum. Reprod. 2014, 29, 2018–2031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  72. Wang, J.; Zohar, R.; McCulloch, C.A. Multiple roles of α-smooth muscle actin in mechanotransduction. Exp. Cell Res. 2006, 312, 205–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Boyl, P.P.; Signore, M.; Acampora, D.; Martinez-Barbera, J.P.; Ilengo, C.; Annino, A.; Corte, G.; Simeone, A. Forebrain and midbrain development requires epiblast-restricted Otx2 translational control mediated by its 3′ UTR. Development 2001, 128, 2989–3000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Beby, F.; Lamonerie, T. The homeobox gene Otx2 in development and disease. Exp. Eye Res. 2013, 111, 9–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Li, J.Y.H.; Joyner, A.L. Otx2 and Gbx2 are required for refinement and not induction of mid-hindbrain gene expression. Development 2001, 128, 4979–4991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Wang, N.; Wang, Y.; Xie, Y.; Wang, H. OTX2 impedes self–renewal of porcine iPS cells through downregulation of NANOG expression. Cell death Discov. 2016, 2, 16090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  77. Dawson, E.P.; Lanza, D.G.; Webster, N.J.; Benton, S.M.; Suetake, I.; Heaney, J.D. Delayed male germ cell sex-specification permits transition into embryonal carcinoma cells with features of primed pluripotency. Development 2018, 145, dev156612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Davidoff, M.S.; Middendorff, R.; Köfüncü, E.; Müller, D.; Ježek, D.; Holstein, A.-F. Leydig cells of the human testis possess astrocyte and oligodendrocyte marker molecules. Acta Histochem. 2002, 104, 39–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Apte, M.V.; Haber, P.S.; Applegate, T.L.; Norton, I.D.; McCaughan, G.W.; Korsten, M.A.; Pirola, R.C.; Wilson, J.S. Periacinar stellate shaped cells in rat pancreas: Identification, isolation, and culture. Gut 1998, 43, 128–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Milose, J.C.; Filson, C.P.; Weizer, A.Z.; Hafez, K.S.; Montgomery, J.S. Role of biochemical markers in testicular cancer: Diagnosis, staging, and surveillance. Open Access J. Urol. 2012, 4, 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  81. Jacobsen, G.K. Alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) and human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) in testicular germ cell tumours: A comparison of histologic and serologic occurrence of tumour markers. Acta Pathol. Microbiol. Scand. Ser. A Pathol. 1983, 91, 183–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Lempiäinen, A.; Sankila, A.; Hotakainen, K.; Haglund, C.; Blomqvist, C.; Stenman, U.-H. Expression of human chorionic gonadotropin in testicular germ cell tumors. Urol. Oncol. Semin. Orig. Investig. 2014, 32, 727–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Mosbech, C.H.; Svingen, T.; Nielsen, J.E.; Toft, B.G.; Rechnitzer, C.; Petersen, B.L.; Rajpert-De Meyts, E.; Hoei-Hansen, C.E. Expression pattern of clinically relevant markers in paediatric germ cell-and sex-cord stromal tumours is similar to adult testicular tumours. Virchows Arch. 2014, 465, 567–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Wagner, T.; Scandura, G.; Roe, A.; Beltran, L.; Shamash, J.; Alfrangis, C.; Daugaard, G.; Grantham, M.; Berney, D. Prospective molecular and morphological assessment of testicular prepubertal-type teratomas in postpubertal men. Mod. Pathol. 2020, 33, 713–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Wakao, S.; Kitada, M.; Kuroda, Y.; Ogura, F.; Murakami, T.; Niwa, A.; Dezawa, M. Morphologic and gene expression criteria for identifying human induced pluripotent stem cells. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e48677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  86. Akiyama, Y.; Komiyama, M.; Miyata, H.; Yagoto, M.; Ashizawa, T.; Iizuka, A.; Oshita, C.; Kume, A.; Nogami, M.; Ito, I. Novel cancer-testis antigen expression on glioma cell lines derived from high-grade glioma patients. Oncol. Rep. 2014, 31, 1683–1690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Gu, S.; Wu, Y.-M.; Hong, L.; Zhang, Z.-D.; Yin, M.-Z. Glial fibrillary acidic protein expression is an indicator of teratoma maturation in children. World J. Pediatr. 2011, 7, 262–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Sundström, J.; Pelliniemi, L.J.; Kuopio, T.; Veräjänkorva, E.; Fröjdman, K.; Harley, V.; Salminen, E.; Pöllänen, P. Characterization of the model for experimental testicular teratoma in 129/SvJ-mice. Br. J. Cancer 1999, 80, 149–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Singh, V.K.; Saini, A.; Kalsan, M.; Kumar, N.; Chandra, R. Describing the stem cell potency: The various methods of functional assessment and in silico diagnostics. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2016, 4, 134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Goel, S.; Fujihara, M.; Tsuchiya, K.; Takagi, Y.; Minami, N.; Yamada, M.; Imai, H. Multipotential ability of primitive germ cells from neonatal pig testis cultured in vitro. Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 2009, 21, 696–708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the experimental design. In Experiment I, differentiation of neonatal porcine gonocytes to osteogenic pathway was investigated. Gonocytes were isolated from neonatal piglets and cultured in regular media for 2 wk to induce dedifferentiation. Media was then changed to osteogenic differentiation media to direct their differentiation into osteogenic cells. Cells and colonies were stained with Alizarin Red S for confirmation of osteogenic differentiation. In Experiment II and III, to induce tri-lineage differentiation, porcine gonocytes were cultured in regular media for 4 wk to induce dedifferentiation. Cells and colonies were then cultured in ectoderm, mesoderm, or endoderm differentiation media to direct their differentiation into the respective cell derivates. Tri-lineage differentiation was confirmed by immunocytochemistry and RT-PCR analyses against markers associated with formation of ectoderm, mesoderm, and endoderm. The pluripotency and tumorigenicity of cultured gonocytes and their colonies were also investigated using an implantation assay (Experiment IV). Isolated testis cells were cultured for 4 wk in DMEM + 10% FBS, dislodged from culture wells, and injected into the subcutaneous tissue of immunodeficient recipient mice. After 4 wk, recipient mice were sacrificed, and implants were retrieved for histomorphometric analyses.
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the experimental design. In Experiment I, differentiation of neonatal porcine gonocytes to osteogenic pathway was investigated. Gonocytes were isolated from neonatal piglets and cultured in regular media for 2 wk to induce dedifferentiation. Media was then changed to osteogenic differentiation media to direct their differentiation into osteogenic cells. Cells and colonies were stained with Alizarin Red S for confirmation of osteogenic differentiation. In Experiment II and III, to induce tri-lineage differentiation, porcine gonocytes were cultured in regular media for 4 wk to induce dedifferentiation. Cells and colonies were then cultured in ectoderm, mesoderm, or endoderm differentiation media to direct their differentiation into the respective cell derivates. Tri-lineage differentiation was confirmed by immunocytochemistry and RT-PCR analyses against markers associated with formation of ectoderm, mesoderm, and endoderm. The pluripotency and tumorigenicity of cultured gonocytes and their colonies were also investigated using an implantation assay (Experiment IV). Isolated testis cells were cultured for 4 wk in DMEM + 10% FBS, dislodged from culture wells, and injected into the subcutaneous tissue of immunodeficient recipient mice. After 4 wk, recipient mice were sacrificed, and implants were retrieved for histomorphometric analyses.
Cells 10 02816 g001
Figure 2. Representative photomicrographs of culture wells in regular media and osteogenic differentiation media, as well as the average diameter of EBLCs in different groups. When cultured in regular media, by day 7, somatic cells of the testis formed a complete monolayer attached to the culture well (black arrowhead). Gonocytes were located on top of the spindle-shaped somatic cells (white arrowhead) (A). By day 14, somatic cells formed circular arrangements (black broken line) (B). In circular arrangements, gonocytes were surrounded by cytoplasmic projections of somatic cells. Gonocytes gradually increased in number by undergoing proliferation. Also, by day 14, convergence of surrounding gonocytes in circular arrangements led to formation of large multinucleated embryoid body-like colonies (EBLCs). By day 28, gonocytes increased in number and EBLCs became larger (black asterisk) (C,D). EBLCs in osteogenic differentiation group (E,F,H,I,L,M) possessed a more compact appearance compared to those developed in control groups (G,J,N,O). Also, EBLCs in osteogenic differentiation groups developed darker central areas and narrower translucent marginal areas. This may be related to their dome-shaped structure leading to a thicker central area compared to thinner marginal areas. EBLCs appeared positive for Alizarin Red S staining, indicative of their transformation into calcium deposition sites (H,I,L,M), while control groups appeared negative for this staining (J,N,O). Although the number of EBLCs did not differ between osteogenic differentiation and control groups, their average diameter was greater in differentiation group (p < 0.001) (K) (Scale bar = 100 µm).
Figure 2. Representative photomicrographs of culture wells in regular media and osteogenic differentiation media, as well as the average diameter of EBLCs in different groups. When cultured in regular media, by day 7, somatic cells of the testis formed a complete monolayer attached to the culture well (black arrowhead). Gonocytes were located on top of the spindle-shaped somatic cells (white arrowhead) (A). By day 14, somatic cells formed circular arrangements (black broken line) (B). In circular arrangements, gonocytes were surrounded by cytoplasmic projections of somatic cells. Gonocytes gradually increased in number by undergoing proliferation. Also, by day 14, convergence of surrounding gonocytes in circular arrangements led to formation of large multinucleated embryoid body-like colonies (EBLCs). By day 28, gonocytes increased in number and EBLCs became larger (black asterisk) (C,D). EBLCs in osteogenic differentiation group (E,F,H,I,L,M) possessed a more compact appearance compared to those developed in control groups (G,J,N,O). Also, EBLCs in osteogenic differentiation groups developed darker central areas and narrower translucent marginal areas. This may be related to their dome-shaped structure leading to a thicker central area compared to thinner marginal areas. EBLCs appeared positive for Alizarin Red S staining, indicative of their transformation into calcium deposition sites (H,I,L,M), while control groups appeared negative for this staining (J,N,O). Although the number of EBLCs did not differ between osteogenic differentiation and control groups, their average diameter was greater in differentiation group (p < 0.001) (K) (Scale bar = 100 µm).
Cells 10 02816 g002
Figure 3. Representative photomicrographs obtained from culture wells before (day 0) and 7 days after incubation with the tri-lineage differentiation media. The overall morphological features of gonocytes (black arrows), embryoid body-like colonies (EBLCs) (dotted circles), and somatic cell monolayer (white arrowheads) did not differ between control groups provided with regular media (DMEM + 15% FBS + 10 ng/mL bFGF) and treatment groups incubated with ectoderm, mesoderm, or endoderm differentiation media. However, the diameter of EBLCs decreased in the three-differentiation media compared with those in the control group (0.001 < p 0.002). Also, the EBLCs in differentiation media possessed a narrow marginal area close to the periphery (black arrowheads) and more central areas (*). Insets show higher magnification. (Scale bar = 150 µm). “A” and “B” denote significant differences and p < 0.05 was considered as the significance level.
Figure 3. Representative photomicrographs obtained from culture wells before (day 0) and 7 days after incubation with the tri-lineage differentiation media. The overall morphological features of gonocytes (black arrows), embryoid body-like colonies (EBLCs) (dotted circles), and somatic cell monolayer (white arrowheads) did not differ between control groups provided with regular media (DMEM + 15% FBS + 10 ng/mL bFGF) and treatment groups incubated with ectoderm, mesoderm, or endoderm differentiation media. However, the diameter of EBLCs decreased in the three-differentiation media compared with those in the control group (0.001 < p 0.002). Also, the EBLCs in differentiation media possessed a narrow marginal area close to the periphery (black arrowheads) and more central areas (*). Insets show higher magnification. (Scale bar = 150 µm). “A” and “B” denote significant differences and p < 0.05 was considered as the significance level.
Cells 10 02816 g003
Figure 4. Evaluation of POU5F1 expression as a pluripotency marker and DBA as a gonocyte-specific marker by freshly-isolated and cultured porcine testis cells in regular media. Following isolation of testis cells, gonocytes were positive for DBA (green arrows) but negative for POU5F1. When cultured in regular media, gonocytes (blue arrows) and EBLCs (yellow arrows) were positive for both POU5F1 and DBA (A). Testis cells were also negative for POU5F1 immediately after isolation in RT-PCR analyses, while they were positive in samples of cultured cells on days 7, 14, 21, and 28 (B). These findings are indicative of spontaneous reversion of MGSCs into more primitive developmental stages. N, no template control; M, 50 bp DNA ladder; F, freshly-isolated testis cell sample; Lines 1–4, cultured cells and colonies in regular media on days 7, 14, 21, or 28, respectively. Insets display higher magnifications (Scale bar = 50 µm).
Figure 4. Evaluation of POU5F1 expression as a pluripotency marker and DBA as a gonocyte-specific marker by freshly-isolated and cultured porcine testis cells in regular media. Following isolation of testis cells, gonocytes were positive for DBA (green arrows) but negative for POU5F1. When cultured in regular media, gonocytes (blue arrows) and EBLCs (yellow arrows) were positive for both POU5F1 and DBA (A). Testis cells were also negative for POU5F1 immediately after isolation in RT-PCR analyses, while they were positive in samples of cultured cells on days 7, 14, 21, and 28 (B). These findings are indicative of spontaneous reversion of MGSCs into more primitive developmental stages. N, no template control; M, 50 bp DNA ladder; F, freshly-isolated testis cell sample; Lines 1–4, cultured cells and colonies in regular media on days 7, 14, 21, or 28, respectively. Insets display higher magnifications (Scale bar = 50 µm).
Cells 10 02816 g004
Figure 5. Expression of a gonocyte-specific marker (DBA) and markers of endoderm (SOX17 and AFP), mesoderm (Brachyury and ASM), and ectoderm (OTX2 and GFAP) by cultured gonocytes and their colonies in regular and differentiation media. Overall, gonocytes and embryoid body-like colonies (EBLCs) were positive for DBA. Many gonocytes showed strong expression of DBA (green arrows) but weak expression of lineage-specific markers. Other gonocytes showed strong expression of the lineage-specific markers (orange arrows) when cultured in corresponding media. EBLCs appeared positive for all three lineage differentiation markers. When cultured in regular media, gonocytes, and EBLCs were positive for DBA and Brachyury, but were negative for OTX2, SOX17, AFP, ASM, and GFAP. This may indicate that gonocytes in differentiation media are gradually converting into a new population of cells with similar biomolecular properties as cells of three germinal layer derivatives. Insets show higher magnification (Scale bar = 100 µm).
Figure 5. Expression of a gonocyte-specific marker (DBA) and markers of endoderm (SOX17 and AFP), mesoderm (Brachyury and ASM), and ectoderm (OTX2 and GFAP) by cultured gonocytes and their colonies in regular and differentiation media. Overall, gonocytes and embryoid body-like colonies (EBLCs) were positive for DBA. Many gonocytes showed strong expression of DBA (green arrows) but weak expression of lineage-specific markers. Other gonocytes showed strong expression of the lineage-specific markers (orange arrows) when cultured in corresponding media. EBLCs appeared positive for all three lineage differentiation markers. When cultured in regular media, gonocytes, and EBLCs were positive for DBA and Brachyury, but were negative for OTX2, SOX17, AFP, ASM, and GFAP. This may indicate that gonocytes in differentiation media are gradually converting into a new population of cells with similar biomolecular properties as cells of three germinal layer derivatives. Insets show higher magnification (Scale bar = 100 µm).
Cells 10 02816 g005
Figure 6. Gene expression analyses of germinal layer-specific markers using RT-PCR. Expression of germinal layer markers was positive in respective differentiation media. Also, freshly isolated testis cell samples were positive for the expression of SOX17, TBXT, ACTA2, OTX2, and GFAP. Cultured testis cells in regular media (DMEM + 15% FBS) were positive for mesoderm markers (TBXT and ASM). ACTA2 expression was also positive in cultures of endoderm and ectoderm differentiation media in addition to cultures treated with mesoderm differentiation media. Mo, 50 bp DNA ladder; F, freshly isolated testis cell sample; R, cultured cells and colonies in regular media; En, cultured cells and colonies in endoderm differentiation media; Me, cultured cells and colonies in mesoderm differentiation media; Ec, cultured cells and colonies in ectoderm differentiation media; C, positive control (liver sample for SOX17 and AFP; muscle sample for TBXT and ACTA2; brain sample for OTX2 and GFAP); L, liver sample; M, muscle sample; B, brain sample.
Figure 6. Gene expression analyses of germinal layer-specific markers using RT-PCR. Expression of germinal layer markers was positive in respective differentiation media. Also, freshly isolated testis cell samples were positive for the expression of SOX17, TBXT, ACTA2, OTX2, and GFAP. Cultured testis cells in regular media (DMEM + 15% FBS) were positive for mesoderm markers (TBXT and ASM). ACTA2 expression was also positive in cultures of endoderm and ectoderm differentiation media in addition to cultures treated with mesoderm differentiation media. Mo, 50 bp DNA ladder; F, freshly isolated testis cell sample; R, cultured cells and colonies in regular media; En, cultured cells and colonies in endoderm differentiation media; Me, cultured cells and colonies in mesoderm differentiation media; Ec, cultured cells and colonies in ectoderm differentiation media; C, positive control (liver sample for SOX17 and AFP; muscle sample for TBXT and ACTA2; brain sample for OTX2 and GFAP); L, liver sample; M, muscle sample; B, brain sample.
Cells 10 02816 g006
Figure 7. Representative photomicrographs captured from (immuno)histological sections of dedifferentiated cell implants. Implants were stained using H&E (AD) or labelled with lineage-specific antibodies including AFP (E), ASM (F), or GFAP (G,H). The implants were surrounded by a dense fibrous capsule (green arrowhead) (A,B). Implants developed into tumor-like growth formations containing circular and/or oval patterns as well as large numbers of melanocytes with remarkable accumulation of melanin pigments (orange arrows) (AC). The distribution pattern of the cells resembled nests of melanocytes (red broken lines) (B,C). Within these formations were also located the bundles resembling those of peripheral nerves (asterisk) (D). AFP as endoderm marker was expressed in foci of implanted cells/EBLCs (E). Focal AFP expression can be attributed to endodermal elements in tumor-like formations. Also, limited expression of ASM was observed by the cells inside and surrounding the circular patterns (F), which can be deemed as the presence of differentiated myofibroblasts. Small foci within the formations and nerve bundle-like structures both appeared positive for GFAP as neuroectodermal marker (G,H), which can point at development of ectodermal component within the formations. Squares display higher magnification (Scale bar = 50 µm).
Figure 7. Representative photomicrographs captured from (immuno)histological sections of dedifferentiated cell implants. Implants were stained using H&E (AD) or labelled with lineage-specific antibodies including AFP (E), ASM (F), or GFAP (G,H). The implants were surrounded by a dense fibrous capsule (green arrowhead) (A,B). Implants developed into tumor-like growth formations containing circular and/or oval patterns as well as large numbers of melanocytes with remarkable accumulation of melanin pigments (orange arrows) (AC). The distribution pattern of the cells resembled nests of melanocytes (red broken lines) (B,C). Within these formations were also located the bundles resembling those of peripheral nerves (asterisk) (D). AFP as endoderm marker was expressed in foci of implanted cells/EBLCs (E). Focal AFP expression can be attributed to endodermal elements in tumor-like formations. Also, limited expression of ASM was observed by the cells inside and surrounding the circular patterns (F), which can be deemed as the presence of differentiated myofibroblasts. Small foci within the formations and nerve bundle-like structures both appeared positive for GFAP as neuroectodermal marker (G,H), which can point at development of ectodermal component within the formations. Squares display higher magnification (Scale bar = 50 µm).
Cells 10 02816 g007
Table 1. Antibodies used for immunofluorescence and immunocytochemistry.
Table 1. Antibodies used for immunofluorescence and immunocytochemistry.
AntibodySupplierCatalogue No.Dilution
Rabbit anti-POU5F1AbcamAB189761:200
Goat anti-OTX2R&D SystemsSC031B1:200
Mouse anti-GFAPNovus BiologicalNBP1-05197SS1:200
Goat anti-BrachyuryR&D SystemsSC030B1:200
Mouse anti-ASMNovus BiologicalNBP1-330061:200
Goat anti-SOX17R&D SystemsSC019B1:200
Rabbit anti-AFPNovus BiologicalNBP1-762751:200
Alexa Fluor 594 goat anti-rabbitAbcamAB1500881:200
Alexa Fluor 594 goat anti-mouseAbcam1501161:200
Alexa Fluor 594 rabbit anti-goatAbcam1501481:200
Table 2. RT-PCR primer sequences for gene expression analyses.
Table 2. RT-PCR primer sequences for gene expression analyses.
Target NameDirectionPrimer Sequence (5′-3′)Annealing Temperature (°C)Product Size (BP)
POU5F1ForwardAGAGAAAGCGGACAAGTA51.7299
ReverseATCCTCTCGTTGCGAATA
OTX2ForwardTTTATCTGGTCTCTCTCCCTCTC61129
ReverseGTTAGTGGTGGAAAGTGGTAGG
GFAPForwardCAGAGCAGGACCGAGTTTATG61117
ReverseCATAAAGAGAAGAGGGAAGGACAG
TBXTForwardGGGATTTGCTTCTGGGTCTAA63.7124
ReverseGTTGAGAAGTCACTGGACAGAG
ACTA2ForwardCTGGGTCTGAGTCTTAGCTTTC63.7114
ReverseGATAGGATGGCTGTGTGGATT
SOX17ForwardCATCTCAAGTGACCCTAGTCTTTAC61136
ReverseGTTGAATCTTGAGGTCTGCCT
AFPForwardGCTCCATCTCCTTGCTTTCT66.1100
ReverseAAGAGATGCCCATAAACCCTG
GAPDHForwardTCGGAGTGAACGGATTTG62219
ReverseCCTGGAAGATGGTGATGG
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Fayaz, M.A.; Rosa, G.d.S.; Honaramooz, A. Neonatal Porcine Germ Cells Dedifferentiate and Display Osteogenic and Pluripotency Properties. Cells 2021, 10, 2816. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/cells10112816

AMA Style

Fayaz MA, Rosa GdS, Honaramooz A. Neonatal Porcine Germ Cells Dedifferentiate and Display Osteogenic and Pluripotency Properties. Cells. 2021; 10(11):2816. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/cells10112816

Chicago/Turabian Style

Fayaz, Mohammad Amin, Gustavo dos Santos Rosa, and Ali Honaramooz. 2021. "Neonatal Porcine Germ Cells Dedifferentiate and Display Osteogenic and Pluripotency Properties" Cells 10, no. 11: 2816. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/cells10112816

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop