Next Article in Journal
The Plasticity of Genome Architecture
Previous Article in Journal
The Many Faces of DFNB9: Relating OTOF Variants to Hearing Impairment
Previous Article in Special Issue
Knockout of Pi21 by CRISPR/Cas9 and iTRAQ-Based Proteomic Analysis of Mutants Revealed New Insights into M. oryzae Resistance in Elite Rice Line
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Evolutionary Understanding of Metacaspase Genes in Cultivated and Wild Oryza Species and Its Role in Disease Resistance Mechanism in Rice

1
National Agri-Food Biotechnology Institute (NABI), Mohali, Punjab 140306, India
2
Department of Biotechnology, Panjab University, Chandigarh 160014, India
3
Department of Crop Science, Indian Council of Agriculture Research (ICAR), Krishi Bhavan, New Delhi 110001, India
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 13 September 2020 / Revised: 18 November 2020 / Accepted: 24 November 2020 / Published: 26 November 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Genetics and Epigenetics of Biotic Stress Response in Plants)

Abstract

:
Metacaspases (MCs), a class of cysteine-dependent proteases found in plants, fungi, and protozoa, are predominately involved in programmed cell death processes. In this study, we identified metacaspase genes in cultivated and wild rice species. Characterization of metacaspase genes identified both in cultivated subspecies of Oryza sativa, japonica, and indica and in nine wild rice species was performed. Extensive computational analysis was conducted to understand gene structures, phylogenetic relationships, cis-regulatory elements, expression patterns, and haplotypic variations. Further, the haplotyping study of metacaspase genes was conducted using the whole-genome resequencing data publicly available for 4726 diverse genotype and in-house resequencing data generated for north-east Indian rice lines. Sequence variations observed among wild and cultivated rice species for metacaspase genes were used to understand the duplication and neofunctionalization events. The expression profiles of metacaspase genes were analyzed using RNA-seq transcriptome profiling in rice during different developmental stages and stress conditions. Real-time quantitative PCR analysis of candidate metacaspase genes in rice cultivars Pusa Basmati-1 in response to Magnaporthe oryzae infection indicated a significant role in the disease resistance mechanism. The information provided here will help to understand the evolution of metacaspases and their role under stress conditions in rice.

1. Introduction

Plants are able to engage in programmed cell death, which can be defined as a schematic mode of action that mediates cell death both under stress and at developmental phases of life [1,2]. The phenomenon of programmed cell death is thoroughly characterized in higher animals where caspases are found to have the key role [3,4]. In contrast, very little is known about the programmed cell death in plants and fungi, which lack caspases [5]. Instead of caspases, metacaspases and paracaspases, which are structurally related to caspases, are present in plants and fungi [6]. The metacaspases and paracaspases belong to the C14 family of proteases. Interestingly, metacaspases can be found in all eukaryotic lineages except for a strict absence in animals [7]. Numerous studies have been performed to characterize the metacaspases to understand structural and functional features defining their precise role [8,9,10,11].
Structurally, metacaspases contain two domains, p20 and p10. The metacaspases’ catalytic activity is due to the presence of conserved cysteine and histidine residues in the p20 domain [12]. Along with p20 and p10 domains, additional domains are present in the structure of metacaspases. On the basis of these additional domains, metacaspases are classified into Type I and Type II groups [8,13]. Similar to caspases in animals, a proline-rich prodomain is present in the N-terminal region of Type I metacaspases, which is known to be responsible for inflammation and initiation of programmed cell death. Another prodomain known as LSD-1 (Lysine-specific histone demethylase-1), LOL zinc fingers are present in the structure of some type I metacaspases. Rice metacaspase 1 OsMC1 and OsMC3 interact strongly with this domain in regulating programmed cell death [14]. Both of these prodomains are absent in Type II metacaspases. Additionally, metacaspase type II has an elongated linker region present between the p10 and p20 domains, which is absent in Type I metacaspases.
Genome-wide studies have been performed to understand the evolution of metacaspase gene families in plant species having whole-genome sequence resources. In the model plant Arabidopsis, nine metacaspase genes were identified, among which three (AtMC1 to AtMC3) belong to Type I and six (AtMC4 to AtMC9) belong to Type II [15]. The effect of type II metacaspase AtMCP2d (different nomenclature) in response to the fumonisin mycotoxin B1 in the Arabidopsis plant system has been studied [16]. The over-expression of AtMCP2d showed accelerated cell death in response to pathogen attack, whereas the mcp2d-1 mutant showed reduced sensitivity and low induction of oxidative stress [16]. Similar to AtMC9, overexpression of metacaspase gene Camc9 was reported to enhance pathogen-induced programmed cell death in Capsicum annuum [17]. The role of metacaspases in boron-induced programmed cell death was studied in barley. The expression of MC4 in barley was reported to be significantly increased, whereas the expression of MC5 was antagonistic to MC4 and was downregulated in barley [18]. Similarly, the role of Type II metacaspase gene TaMCA4 in wheat was studied for hypersensitive plant death in response to Puccinia striiformis. The expression level of TaMCA4 in wheat leaves was highly upregulated in response to P. striiformis infection [19]. In response to the fungal pathogen, Botrytis cinerea, the expression of Type II metacaspase LeMCA1 in tomato was reported to be rapidly increased [20]. Numerous studies conducted over a period of time established the role of metacaspase genes in plant defense when exposed to biotic or abiotic stresses.
The current study is conducted to analyze the role of metacaspases in wild and cultivated Oryza species. Due to their adaptation in different conditions over time, the wild rice species possess an immense potential to solve many grueling problems concerning yield, disease resistance, drought, and salt tolerance and, hence, are considered an important aspect of studying the molecular evolution of resistance- and yield-related genes [21,22,23]. Introgression of the Xa21 resistance to bacterial blight from Oryza longistaminata is a brilliant illustration of the advantage of exploiting wild genomes [24]. In around 15 million years, 27 Oryza species have evolved into 11 types of genomes, and among those, six of them are diploid with a total chromosomal count of 12 (AA, BB, CC, EE, FF, GG), whereas the other five are allotetraploid (2n = 4x = 48) (BBCC, CCDD, HHJJ, HHKK, KKLL) [25,26]. The gene pool of the cultivated rice species Oryza sativa japonica is the AA type, and hence to study the metacaspase genes in other Oryza clades, ten rice species were characterized. In this study, we analyzed the variation in structural, biochemical, and functional divergence of metacaspases in cultivated and wild rice species.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Identification and Nomenclature of Rice Metacaspase Genes Sequences

The protein sequences of O. sativa subspecies japonica and indica, and nine other wild Oryza species were retrieved from EnsemblPlant [27]. The wild species having AA genome similar to O. sativa include, O. nivara, O. barthii, O. glumaepatula, O. glaberrima, O. longistaminata, and O. rufipogon, whereas two species, O. punctata and O. meridionalis, have BB genome, and only one species O. brachyantha has FF genome. The O. nivara as a separate species is not yet established, but considering the whole genome resequencing of reference genome, here we considered it as a species. The retrieved protein data were used to create a local database in BioEdit [28]. Subsequently, BLASTp search was performed using nine metacaspase genes (AthMC1–AthMC9) reported in Arabidopsis [29]. To identify significant matches, BLASTp was performed with default parameters with an e-value lesser than 0.00001, and the bit score was set to be greater than 100. All the insignificant hits were excluded. The selected sequences were confirmed by screening for the peptidase domain (Peptidase C_14, pfam00656) by subjecting the sequences to Conserved Domains Database (CDD) [30].
The nomenclature of the selected genes was performed on the basis of initials of the rice species. The first letter “O” signifies Oryza, second and third letters stand for the species name, for example OJa, OIn, ORu, ONi, OBa, OBr, OGl, OGb, OPu, OMe, and OLo stands for O. sativa subsp. japonica, O. sativa subsp. indica, O. rufipogon, O. nivara, O. barthii, O. brachyantha, O. glumaepatula, O. glaberrima, O. punctata, O. meridionalis, and O. longistaminata, respectively. MC denotes the metacaspase family, which is followed by a numeral.

2.2. Gene Structure, Motif Analysis, and Phylogenetic Tree Construction

The Gff3 (General feature format) files were used to retrieve the information regarding the exons and introns in the metacaspase genes. The gene structure was visualized by Gene Structure Display Server 2 [31]. Similarly, the MEME Suite was used to identify the conserved motifs in the metacaspases protein sequences [32]. Multiple sequence alignment was performed by ClustalW provided in the MEGA (version 10.0) software tool. The phylogenetic tree was constructed for protein sequences of 92 Oryza metacaspase genes by the Neighbor-Joining Tree Method with JTT + G + I model with bootstrap value 1000 replicates in Mega X software [33].

2.3. Chromosomal Localization, Gene Synteny, and Cis-Regulatory Element Analysis

On the basis of genomic annotations retrieved from EnsemblPlants, the chromosomal locations of metacaspases were visualized by Mapchart2.2 [34] and Circos tool [35]. Along with the chromosomal localization, the relationship between the genes was visualized using the Circos tool. The 2 kb upstream genomic region was retrieved for all the 92 metacaspase genes and subsequently analyzed by PlantCARE and PLACE databases to identify the transcription factor binding elements [36].

2.4. Localization and Tertiary (3D) Protein Structure Analyses

Various in silico tools, including CELLO [37], TMHMM 2.0 [38], and ProtParam [39] were used to study the localization of metacaspase proteins. A gene annotation study was conducted to annotate the roles of metacaspase proteins. The protein tertiary structure for the metacaspases was developed using I-TASSER (Iterative Threading ASSEmbly Refinement) server [40].

2.5. Haplotypic Evaluation

Haplotypic evaluation of the metacaspase genes was performed based on the sequence variations, including single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and InDels. Whole-genome resequencing information available for 4500 diverse rice genotypes provided at RiceVarMap2.0 was used for the haplotyping of the metacaspase genes [41]. A haplotyping network was developed to understand the evolution of different haplotypes in respective rice groups such as O. sativa subsp. indica and japonica, and tropical.

2.6. Transcriptomic Evaluation and Co-Expression Analysis of Metacaspase Genes

Transcriptomic data (RNA-Seq) were retrieved from the Sequence Read Archive (SRA) at the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) to study the expression pattern of metacaspase genes. The data related to developmental, abiotic, and biotic stress conditions such as Magnaporthe oryzae infection, cold, drought, and salt stress conditions in susceptible and resistant cultivars were downloaded in the fastq format. CLC Genomic Workbench 12 (http://resources.qiagenbioinformatics.com/) was used to obtain the expression values in terms of reads per kilobase of transcripts, per million mapped reads (RPKM). The raw reads were processed and then mapped to the respective genomes with default parameters. The RPKM values were then used to develop the co-expression network by CoExpNetViz. The co-expression network was visualized using Cytoscape 3.7.1. Highly co-expressed genes were highlighted with a larger label size. Furthermore, log2-transformed RPKM expression values were used to generate a heatmap to show the expression pattern in different conditions by performing hierarchical clustering analysis using the Euclidean distance metric and average linkage clustering linkage method implemented in Multiple Experiment Viewer (MeV) v 4.9.0 software.

2.7. Plant Materials and Fungal Infection

To study the response of metacaspase genes family in compatible and incompatible interactions, a resistant rice genotype Tetep and a susceptible genotype Pusa Basmati-1 were subjected to infection with Magnaporthe oryzae race Pani NB. The plants were grown in a greenhouse under controlled environment conditions (16 h light/8 h dark at 25 °C) for three to four weeks. The M. oryzae infection assay was performed as earlier described by Valent et al. [42], with some modifications. At the 3–4 leaf stage, each plant was inoculated with 20–25 mL of blast spore suspension (105 spores/mL). To ensure uniform application of inoculum, an atomizer sprayer was used. The plants were maintained in complete darkness and 100% relative humidity for the initial 24 h. Later, the photoperiod was adjusted to the 16 h/8 h dark, keeping the relative humidity at 70–80%. Sampling was performed at five time-points, 0, 12, 24, 36, and 48 h post-infection in three biological and technical replicates each.

2.8. RNA Extraction and Expression Analysis

Total RNA isolation was performed by using SpectrumTM Plant Total RNA Isolation Kit (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) following the manufacturer’s protocol. The quality and the quantity of the total isolated RNA was checked on agarose gel electrophoresis and Nanodrop Lite UV–Visible spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Total RNA was used to synthesize cDNA using iScriptTM cDNA Synthesis kit (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) following the manufacturer protocol. The primers for the real-time quantitative qRT-PCR were designed by QuantPrime online tool (https://quantprime.mpimp-golm.mpg.de/). The qRT-PCR was performed in 10 µL PCR mixture (5 µL SYBRGreen, 0.3 µL forward and reverse primer each, 1 µL cDNA (5 ng/µL), 3.4 µL ddH2O). The house-keeping gene Ubiquitin was used as a reference to normalize the expression values of target genes. The relative expression calculations were performed using the 2−ΔΔCt formula [43] for three biological and technical replicates each.

3. Results

3.1. Metacaspases in Wild and Cultivated Rice Genomes

A homology-based search performed in ten Oryza species initially identified 93 metacaspase genes. Furthermore, the peptidase domain (PF00656) was identified in all genes (Supplementary File S1). One of the candidate genes (OBART11G02150.1) was omitted from the analysis despite the presence of the peptidase domain, due to the presence of a redundant sequence. The number of metacaspase genes was roughly similar in all ten wild and cultivated Oryza species under study (Figure 1). Eight metacaspase genes were found in O. brachyantha, O. sativa subsp. indica, O. glumaepatula, O. barthii, O. meridionalis, O. nivara, and O. punctata genomes and nine in O. longistaminata, O. sativa subsp. japonica, O. glaberrima and O. rufipogon genomes. A single peptidase domain was found to be present in almost all metacaspase genes with the exception of ONiMC2, OPuMC1, and OPuMC2 where two peptidase domains were observed (Supplementary File S1). The metacaspase genes were divided into two types, Type I and Type II on the basis of the length of the linker region between p10 and p20 subunits and the presence of additional domains. An additional 24–26 amino acids long zinc finger domain (zf-domain) is present in some Type I metacaspase genes. Contrary to it, a 45–46 amino acid long zf-domain was found in O. rufipogon. A maximum of two genes with zf-domains were found in O. sativa subsp. japonica, O. glaberrima, and O. rufipogon, whereas no single zf-domain was found in the metacaspase genes from O. brachyantha, O. glumaepatula, and O. longistaminata. Only one zf-domain was present in O. barthii, O. meridionalis, O. nivara, O. punctata, and O. sativa subsp. indica.

3.2. Predicted Structural and Functional Attributes of Metacaspase Genes

The proteins in this family were found to be highly variable (Supplementary File S2, Table 1). Mostly the metacaspase protein length falls in the range of approximately 200–400 amino acids. The smallest metacaspase protein was found to be 120 amino acids long (OLoMC1); whereas, the largest protein found was 1086 amino acid long (ONiMC8). The average size and molecular weight of all 92 metacaspase genes under study were 404 amino acids and 40 kDa. The pI ranges between 5.24 and 11.59, which indicates both the acidic and basic nature of the protein. Mostly, all the metacaspase proteins are acidic or slightly acidic in nature, but a few among them possess basic characteristics. Similar to the molecular weight, the gravy score fluctuates between −0.713 and −0.008. The studies regarding the subcellular localization of metacaspase proteins in the cell suggested that localization of metacaspase proteins in the cell is also highly variable. Few metacaspase proteins showed the presence of signals for the plasma membrane, whereas a single protein contains the signal sequence for mitochondrial localization (OBrMC1). Gene annotation studies revealed the role of metacaspase proteins majorly in biological processes and molecular functions (Supplementary Figure S1). The three-dimensional structure studied by the iTASSER server revealed the similar architecture of metacaspase proteins with a high level of structural conservations (Supplementary File S3).

3.3. Gene Architecture, Conserved Motifs, and Phylogenetic Distribution of Metacaspase Genes

The evolutionary relationship among the metacaspases identified in the ten Oryza species was studied by phylogenetic tree construction. Metacaspase proteins on the basis of their domains were categorized into Type I and Type II groups, which were also grouped into two separate clades in the phylogenetic tree (Figure 2). Out of the entire 92 metacaspases in rice species and 9 in Arabidopsis metacaspases under study, 54 and 47 proteins belonged to Type I and Type II, respectively (Figure 2).
A thorough study was conducted to analyze the gene structure and conserved domains present in the metacaspase proteins in the Oryza species. An exon–intron organization for all the metacaspase genes in wild and cultivated rice species was constructed to understand the variations in the coding and non-coding metacaspases sequences (Figure 3). The number of introns in the metacaspase genes is highly variable, spanning from as low as one to as high as thirty introns. Exceptionally, ORuMC9, OJaMC9, OInMC8, OGbMC9, OJaMC6 genes were found to be intron-less, whereas OPuMC8, ONiMC8, OMeMC8, OLoMC9 genes had more than 25 introns. The genes coding for longer metacaspases possessed a higher number of introns. Interestingly, the protein length of all genes with no intron was 341 amino acids with the exception of OJaMC6 (305 amino acids). A total of twenty conserved motifs were identified in metacaspase proteins using the MEME software tool (Figure 4). Subsequently, a CDD search was performed to annotate the identified motifs. Interestingly, the domain architecture in Type II metacaspases was very much similar to that in the Type I metacaspases group.

3.4. Chromosomal Distribution, Gene Duplication, and Syntenic Relationship of Metacaspase Genes in Wild and Cultivated Oryza Species

Metacaspase genes were very asymmetrically distributed on eight different chromosomes (Chr.) in Oryza species (Figure 5). No metacaspase genes were found to be located on Chr. 2, Chr. 4, Chr. 6, and Chr. 7 in all ten Oryza species. Interestingly, 42% of total metacaspase genes, i.e., 39 out of 92, were found to be located on Chr. 3. Gene duplication events were analyzed to understand the duplication event that possibly happened during the evolution of metacaspase genes. The results suggested that metacaspase genes evolved through the segmental and proximal duplication events over tandem and dispersal duplications (Supplementary Table S1). Exceptionally, O. meridionalis showed dispersal duplication in all of its genes. The syntenic relation was also studied in order to gain a better understanding of the relationship between the metacaspase genes. As expected, a high level of synteny between metacaspase genes from different Oryza species was observed (Supplementary Figure S2).

3.5. Cis-Acting Promoter Analysis

Promoter analysis was carried out in metacaspase genes identified in Oryza species to gain a better understanding of the gene regulation across the species (Supplementary File S4). Many stress, development, and light-responsive cis-regulatory elements were found in 2 kb upstream regions of the metacaspase genes along with the most commonly occurring cis-regulatory elements which include CAAT, CTCC, TATA, and TATATA box (Figure 6). Light responsive G-box was present majorly in all the metacaspase genes of Oryza species; in contrast, Sp1 (GGGCGG), which is also related to light responsiveness, was found in some metacaspase genes. Identified cis-elements known to be participating in abiotic and biotic stresses include WRKY-related (S000447, S000390, and S000457), MYB-related (S000176), and MYC-related (S000407) [44,45]. Abscisic responsive elements known as ABRELATED1 (S000414), ABRERATICAL (S000408), and ABREOSRAB21 (S000012) and a GCC box (S000430) were also found to be located in the upstream regions of the metacaspase genes. Along with this an auxin-responsive element, NtBBF1 (S000273), which was found in a few metacaspase genes [46] (Supplementary File S4). The most frequently occurring stress-related cis-elements in all the Oryza species were Myc-related MYCCONSENSUSAT and WRKY71OS, whereas in O. glumaepatula they were MYCCONSENSUSAT and WBOXNTERF3. Auxin-related cis-element, NtBBF1 (S000273), was found in two or three members of each Oryza species except for O. brachyantha where the NtBBF1 promoter element was present in six metacaspase genes.

3.6. Haplotyping for Genes in Rice

Haplotyping of Oryza metacaspase genes was performed using whole-genome sequencing information data obtained from RiceVarMap2.0 (Supplementary Files S5 and S6). Consequently, haplotype networks were developed to depict the distribution of haplotypes across Oryza subgroups. As shown in Table 2, gene Os03t0389100-01 depicted the maximum number of non-synonymous mutations, whereas the minimum number of non-synonymous mutations was observed in Os10t0565100-00. Similarly, haplotypes based on the number of SNPs were found to be maximum in number for Os03t0389100-01 and minimum for Os05t0496400-00. The effects of amino acid variations detected in the metacaspase genes were further studied using the PROVEAN tool (Supplementary File S7). PROVEAN results revealed no deleterious mutations present in Os01t0799900, Os03t0389501, Os03t0389000, and Os11t0134700, whereas maximum deleterious mutations were present in Os03t389100.

3.7. Expression Analysis of Metacaspase Genes during Different Developmental and Stress Conditions

For a complete expression atlas of metacaspase genes, the RNA-seq data were retrieved from PRJNA134239, which comprises 43 independent RNA-seq libraries for O. japonica (cv. Nipponbare) tissues. The expression pattern of metacaspase genes was studied for abiotic, biotic, and developmental stages using data from different studies. No expression was observed for OJaMC3 across different RNA-seq libraries, therefore hierarchical clustering of eight genes across abiotic stress in O. sativa was performed. Expression analysis revealed categorization of these genes into two groups, wherein four genes showed moderate-to-low gene expression under drought, salt, and cold conditions (Figure 7a, Supplementary File S8). The OJaMC5 gene has higher expression in leaves under drought and salt stress compared to that in control conditions. Similarly, OJaMC8 and OJaMC7 has higher expression in leaves under control condition compared to that in cold stress (Figure 7a). Gene expression clustering across different developmental stages and tissues of O. sativa revealed a similar clustering into two groups (Figure 7b). However, among eight genes, five clustered under a single group and the rest into the second group. Based on expression patterns, the group with five genes showed low-to-moderate gene expression, whereas the remaining group showed moderate-to-high gene expression for several developmental stages. The OJaMC5 gene showed higher expression in 60 days old leaves, stem, and mature stigma and ovary (Figure 7b).
The comparative expression analysis of metacaspase genes in Oryza species was studied using the RNA-seq data retrieved from the bioproject PRJNA393480. The study was conducted on root tissue for Oryza species O. rufipogon (Dongxiang) and O. sativa japonica (Dongdao-4) when exposed to M. oryzae (Guy 11) under controlled environmental conditions in triplicates. The expression pattern of all nine metacaspase genes was studied in all control and test samples. The ORuMC7 gene was found to have high expression in both O. sativa subsp. japonica and rufipogon samples as compared to control, but the RNA-seq expression of ORuMC7 was much higher in wild species as compared to that in cultivated ones (Figure 7c).
The expression profiling of metacaspase genes against blast disease in the O. sativa indica resistant and susceptible varieties, Tetep and Pusa Basmati-1, respectively, were carried out in controlled lab conditions. The expression of all eight OInMC(1-8) genes was studied by qRT-PCR (Figure 8). The relative expression values of all of the OInMC genes were found to be increasing at different time intervals. A high relative log2 fold change value was obtained for OInMC1 and OInMC3 genes 12 and 36 h post-infection (hpi), respectively.

4. Discussion

The metacaspase genes have been studied in several plant species to understand their role in stress and developmental phases of the growth cycle [29,47]. The number of metacaspases in plant species varies considerably, for instance, 6 in grapes, 8 in rice and tomato, 9 in Arabidopsis, and 30 in cotton species [18]. Such wide range of occurrence may be due to the high level of variation in duplicated genome and ploidy level in plants. The genome-wide study of metacaspases in the Oryza clade will help to better understand its functional role and evolution in rice. The in-depth understanding of metacaspases in wild relatives will also provide an opportunity to introduce desirable alleles from wild genetic resources. Here, identification, characterization, and distribution of metacaspase genes in ten Oryza species were performed, which uniformly identified 8 or 9 homologs in each species despite having differences in the origin of the genomes (AA, BB, or FF) (Figure 1, Table 1). Recently, genome-wide identification of metacaspase genes performed in four Gossypium species identified a varying number of homologs: 16 in G. raimondii, 17 in G. arboreum, 26 in G. hirsutum, and the highest, 30, in G. barbadense [48]. Such a wide variation among Gossypium species as compared to the Oryza species is mostly due to the higher ploidy level and proportion of the duplicated genome.
The metacaspase genes were classified into Type I and Type II metacaspases on the basis of the linker region between p10 and p20 domains (Figure 2, Supplementary File S1). An additional domain, zinc finger (zf) domain, is present in the structure of some of the Type I metacaspase genes. However, the zf domains were completely absent in the Type I metacaspase genes of O. brachyantha, O. glaberrima, and O. longistaminata. In contrast, a single zf domain was found in Type I metacaspase genes of O. barthii, O. meridionalis, O. nivara, O. punctata, and O. sativa indica. Two genes with zf domains were present in O. sativa japonica, O. glaberrima, and O. rufipogon. It is very surprising to see present/absent variation for the zf-domain among O. sativa subsp. indica and japonica since both subspecies belong to O. sativa. The zf domains are thought to be involved in protein–protein interactions. A study performed in yeast has shown active involvement of zf domains in the interaction of AtMC1 with LSD-1 in the case of the Oryza genus [49]. Therefore, the present/absent variation for the zf domains amongst species will help to study the significance of this domain.
Information about the exon–intron organization of metacaspase genes helps to predict the origin, expression activity, as well as possibilities of alternate splicing [50]. The number of introns was higher in Type I metacaspase genes as compared to that in Type II MC (Figure 3). The number of introns was comparatively very high in O. longistaminata, O. punctata, O. nivara, O. meridionalis wild species, whereas three or four introns and intron-less metacaspase genes are common in O. sativa (japonica and indica), O. rufipogon, O. barthii, and O. brachyantha. The exon–intron organization study was consistent with the earlier reported studies about the number of introns higher in Type I than in Type II metacaspases [13,51]. Gene duplication plays an important role in the loss of introns. In general, recently evolved genes tend to have fewer introns. However, this is very controversial to say whether intron loss is dominant in higher plant or intron gain [50]. Nevertheless studies in rice clearly indicated that the newly evolved genes tend to have fewer introns and have more chances to lose their expression during the evolution [50]. Similarly, the organization of conserved motif also helps to understand the functional domains as well as the evolutionary relationship of the metacaspase gene family members. Here, a total of 20 conserved motifs identified with the MEME tool (Figure 4), including the signature p10 and p20 domains, and the overall organization looked highly conserved in the two types of metacaspases.
In the present study, whole-genome resequencing data from 4726 diverse genotypes were accessed to get the sequence variation in metacaspase genes. The sequence analysis helped to locate all the SNPs and InDels and subsequently predicted their effect on protein functionality (Table 2). The deleterious mutations identified in the present study will be helpful in understanding the role of metacaspases. Earlier, such deleterious and neutral variation predicted with the PROVEAN tool was successfully validated using a site-directed mutagenesis experiment performed with SlNIP2-1, PtNIP2-1, and OsNIP2-1, respectively, from tomato, poplar, and rice [52]. Such predicted deleterious variation in the metacaspase genes need to be experimentally validated. The publicly available whole-genome resequencing data provide an opportunity to understand the functional role of metacaspase genes. The sequencing data were also used to define the haplotypes, which will be helpful to develop haplotype-specific markers and also to understand the haplotypic evolution (Supplementary File S5). The haplotypes representing allelic variation existing in the rice germplasm allow us to study the effect of each allele. The variations located in conserved domains can also help to elucidate the molecular mechanism involved in metacaspase activity.
Studying gene expression is essential to understand the tissue-specific or stress-specific function of metacaspase gene family members. Numerous studies have shown stress-induced expression of several metacaspase genes in different plants [47,48,53]. In the present study, available RNAseq transcriptome profiling was used to identify tissue- and stage-specific, stress-specific as well as differential expression among different Oryza species of metacaspases genes (Figure 7). The RNA-seq transcriptome data of control and different stress conditions clearly showed that the some metacaspase genes highly expressed in control also had high expression throughout all the stress conditions. Such abundant expression of some metacaspase genes is surprising. In this regard, a recent study where the crystal structure of Arabidopsis metacaspase 4 (AtMC4) was evaluated seems helpful to explain why some metacaspases have ubiquitous expression [54]. The structural analysis of AtMC4 revealed activation of the metacaspases only in the presence of Ca2+ [54]. Such a Ca2+-dependency explains several phenomena that were elusive before. The study suggests that the highly expressed metacaspase genes are non-functional until an adequate supply of Ca2+ occurs. This helps the plant to respond quickly to stress conditions. For instance, Ca2+ stored in different cellular compartments get fluxed in the cytoplasm with stress signals, and then Ca2+-dependent activation of metacaspase takes place. The constitutive high expression of some of the metacaspases will be surely helpful in Ca2+-dependent stress response mechanism. Such a phenomenon may be dominantly observed with metacaspase, but many of the metacaspases family members may have a very specific mode of action. To understand such a tissue- and condition-specific role of metacaspases, more extensive studies using integrated omics approaches are needed.
In addition to extensive RNAseq transcriptome analysis, qRT-PCR analysis of metacaspase genes under M. oryzae infection was performed in the present study (Figure 8). The metacaspase genes were found to be differentially expressed after M. oryzae infection, but the response time for each of the genes was unique. For instance, OInMC1 showed upregulation at 12 hpi, OInMC8 at 24 hpi, whereas OInMC4 showed upregulation at 48 hpi. This suggests the possible role of all the metacaspase genes in M. oryzae resistance mechanism, but they may have a different role in different cellular compartments or at different steps of the stress–response cascade. Similar results have been reported in rubber tree (Hevea brasiliensis) where most of the metacaspase genes showed differential expression patterns under various stresses [55]. For instance, eight out of nine metacaspase genes were found to be differentially expressed under drought conditions in rubber trees [55].

5. Conclusions

The role of metacaspase genes under stress and developmental processes in plants has been demonstrated in several studies. However, precise molecular mechanisms involving metacaspase genes are not yet well understood. In the present study, 92 metacaspase genes were identified in nine Oryza species and two subspecies of cultivated species O. sativa. Extensive gene characterization performed in this study will help to explain the functional role of metacaspases. The phylogenetic analysis performed here helped to define the distribution of Type 1 and Type 2 metacaspases in the Oryza clade. The distribution of Type 1 and Type 2 across the Oryza species is uniform despite having different genomes (AA, BB, or FF). The sequence variations identified in the metacaspase genes will be helpful for the understanding of structural features of the protein, role of conserved domains, allelic effects, and overall functionality of metacaspase genes. The defined haplotypes for metacaspase genes will be helpful to develop markers for breeding applications as well as for genetic studies. In addition, the present study has provided information about the metacaspase gene expression under biotic and abiotic stress conditions, in different tissues and developmental conditions. Metacaspase gene expression was also evaluated with a real-time qPCR assay, which suggested its role in different stages of disease development. The stepwise upregulation and downregulation of different metacaspases indicate the possibility of a metacaspase-regulated cascade of systematic stress response. The detailed information of evolution, distribution, expression, and allelic variation provided here will be helpful to better understand the metacaspases in rice and for the exploration of knowledge in crop improvement programs.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary materials can be found at https://0-www-mdpi-com.brum.beds.ac.uk/2073-4425/11/12/1412/s1. Supplementary Table S1. Details of gene duplication types predicted for the 92 metacaspase genes identified in Oryza species. Supplementary Figure S1. Functional annotation-based distribution of 92 metacaspase genes identified in Oryza species. Supplementary Figure S2. Syntenic relationship between metacaspase genes. The circle represents the Oryza chromosomes with metacaspase genes, and the inner network shows their relationship. Supplementary File S1. Details of conserved domains and motifs identified in rice metacaspase genes. Supplementary File S2. Details of metacaspase genes identified in eight Oryza species along with two subspecies indica and japonica of cultivated rice (Oryza sativa). Supplementary File S3. Protein tertiary structure of metacaspases proteins identified in Oryza species. The structures were constructed by iTASSER server. Supplementary File S4. Details of transcription factor binding domains identified in the 2 kb upstream region of the 92 metacaspase genes in Oryza species. Supplementary File S5. Details of haplotypes identified in the metacaspase genes in rice. The haplotypes were identified using whole-genome resequencing data from 4726 genotypes available at Rice Variation Map v2.0 (RiceVar Map 2.0). Supplementary File S6. Distribution and network of haplotypes identified for the metacaspase genes in rice genome. The haplotypes were identified using whole-genome resequencing data from 4726 genotypes available at Rice Variation Map v2.0 (RiceVar Map 2.0). Supplementary File S7. Predictions of SNPs having higher functional impacts using the PROVEAN tool (http://provean.jcvi.org/index.php). Supplementary File S8. Gene expression of OsJaMCs genes under different stress conditions constructed by Bio-Analytic Resource for Plant Biology (http://bar.utoronto.ca).

Author Contributions

Data curation, R.B. and N.R.; Formal analysis, R.B., N.R., H.S.; Funding acquisition, H.S., R.D. and T.R.S.; Methodology, R.B., N.R., P.D. and R.M.; Software, N.R. and A.S.; Supervision, H.S., R.D. and T.R.S.; Validation, R.B. and P.D.; Visualization, R.B., A.S., R.M. and R.D.; Writing—original draft, R.B.; Writing—review & editing, N.R., H.S., R.D. and T.R.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Department of Biotechnology (DBT) and Science and Engineering Research Board (SERB), Department of Science and Technology, Government of India.

Acknowledgments

The authors are thankful to the Department of Biotechnology, Government of India, for the Ramalingaswami Fellowship Award to H.S. and R.D.; Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) for granting junior research fellowship to R.B.; and the Department of Science and Technology for JC Bose Fellowship to T.R.S.; authors are also thankful to Ganesh Prakashan, Division of Plant Pathology, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India for sharing Magnaporthe oryzae isolate and valuable inputs.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Pennell, R.I.; Lamb, C. Programmed cell death in plants. Plant Cell 1997, 9, 1157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Danon, A.; Delorme, V.; Mailhac, N.; Gallois, P. Plant programmed cell death: A common way to die. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2000, 38, 647–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Thornberry, N.A.; Lazebnik, Y. Caspases: Enemies within. Science 1998, 281, 1312–1316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Sanmartín, M.; Jaroszewski, L.; Raikhel, N.V.; Rojo, E. Caspases. Regulating death since the origin of life. Plant Physiol. 2005, 137, 841–847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Bonneau, L.; Ge, Y.; Drury, G.E.; Gallois, P. What happened to plant caspases? J. Exp. Bot. 2008, 59, 491–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Uren, A.G.; O’Rourke, K.; Aravind, L.A.; Pisabarro, M.T.; Seshagiri, S.; Koonin, E.V.; Dixit, V.M. Identification of paracaspases and metacaspases: Two ancient families of caspase-like proteins, one of which plays a key role in MALT lymphoma. Mol. Cell 2000, 6, 961–967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Minina, E.; Coll, N.; Tuominen, H.; Bozhkov, P. Metacaspases versus caspases in development and cell fate regulation. Cell Death Differ. 2017, 24, 1314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Vercammen, D.; Declercq, W.; Vandenabeele, P.; Van Breusegem, F. Are metacaspases caspases? J. Cell Biol. 2007, 179, 375–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Bozhkov, P.V.; Smertenko, A.P.; Zhivotovsky, B. Aspasing out metacaspases and caspases: Proteases of many trades. Sci. Signal. 2010, 3, pe48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Carmona-Gutierrez, D.; Fröhlich, K.; Kroemer, G.; Madeo, F. Metacaspases Are Caspases. Doubt No More; Nature Publishing Group: Berlin, Germany, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  11. Enoksson, M.; Salvesen, G. Metacaspases Are Not Caspases—Always Doubt. Cell Death Differ. 2010, 8, 1221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Tsiatsiani, L.; Van Breusegem, F.; Gallois, P.; Zavialov, A.; Lam, E.; Bozhkov, P. Metacaspases. Cell Death Differ. 2011, 18, 1279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Fagundes, D.; Bohn, B.; Cabreira, C.; Leipelt, F.; Dias, N.; Bodanese-Zanettini, M.H.; Cagliari, A. Caspases in plants: Metacaspase gene family in plant stress responses. Funct. Integr. Genom. 2015, 15, 639–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Huang, L.; Zhang, H.; Hong, Y.; Liu, S.; Li, D.; Song, F. Stress-responsive expression, subcellular localization and protein–protein interactions of the rice metacaspase family. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16, 16216–16241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Kwon, S.I.; Hwang, D.J. Expression analysis of the metacaspase gene family in Arabidopsis. J. Plant Biol. 2013, 56, 391–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Watanabe, N.; Lam, E. Arabidopsis metacaspase 2d is a positive mediator of cell death induced during biotic and abiotic stresses. Plant J. 2011, 66, 969–982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kim, S.M.; Bae, C.; Oh, S.K.; Choi, D. A pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) metacaspase 9 (Camc9) plays a role in pathogen-induced cell death in plants. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2013, 14, 557–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Bostancioglu, S.M.; Tombuloglu, G.; Tombuloglu, H. Genome-wide identification of barley MCs (metacaspases) and their possible roles in boron-induced programmed cell death. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2018, 45, 211–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wang, X.; Wang, X.; Feng, H.; Tang, C.; Bai, P.; Wei, G.; Huang, L.; Kang, Z. TaMCA4, a novel wheat metacaspase gene functions in programmed cell death induced by the fungal pathogen Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2012, 25, 755–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Hoeberichts, F.A.; Ten Have, A.; Woltering, E.J. A tomato metacaspase gene is upregulated during programmed cell death in Botrytis cinerea-infected leaves. Planta 2003, 217, 517–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Atwell, B.J.; Wang, H.; Scafaro, A.P. Could abiotic stress tolerance in wild relatives of rice be used to improve Oryza sativa? Plant Sci. 2014, 215, 48–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Garg, R.; Verma, M.; Agrawal, S.; Shankar, R.; Majee, M.; Jain, M. Deep transcriptome sequencing of wild halophyte rice, Porteresia coarctata, provides novel insights into the salinity and submergence tolerance factors. DNA Res. 2014, 21, 69–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Giuliani, R.; Koteyeva, N.; Voznesenskaya, E.; Evans, M.A.; Cousins, A.B.; Edwards, G.E. Coordination of leaf photosynthesis, transpiration, and structural traits in rice and wild relatives (genus Oryza). Plant Physiol. 2013, 162, 1632–1651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Song, W.-Y.; Wang, G.-L.; Chen, L.-L.; Kim, H.-S.; Pi, L.-Y.; Holsten, T.; Gardner, J.; Wang, B.; Zhai, W.-X.; Zhu, L.-H. A receptor kinase-like protein encoded by the rice disease resistance gene, Xa21. Science 1995, 270, 1804–1806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Chang, T.-T. The origin, evolution, cultivation, dissemination, and diversification of Asian and African rices. Euphytica 1976, 25, 425–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Jena, K.K. The species of the genus Oryza and transfer of useful genes from wild species into cultivated rice, O. sativa. Breed. Sci. 2010, 60, 518–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Ensembl Plants. Oryza sativa Japonica Group (IRGSP-1.0). Available online: https://plants.ensembl.org/Oryza_sativa/Info/Index (accessed on 1 January 2020).
  28. Hall, T.A. BioEdit: A user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp. Ser. 1999, 41, 95–98. [Google Scholar]
  29. Vercammen, D.; Van De Cotte, B.; De Jaeger, G.; Eeckhout, D.; Casteels, P.; Vandepoele, K.; Vandenberghe, I.; Van Beeumen, J.; Inzé, D.; Van Breusegem, F. Type II metacaspases Atmc4 and Atmc9 of Arabidopsis thaliana cleave substrates after arginine and lysine. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 45329–45336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Marchler-Bauer, A.; Bo, Y.; Han, L.; He, J.; Lanczycki, C.J.; Lu, S.; Chitsaz, F.; Derbyshire, M.K.; Geer, R.C.; Gonzales, N.R. CDD/SPARCLE: Functional classification of proteins via subfamily domain architectures. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017, 45, D200–D203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Hu, B.; Jin, J.; Guo, A.-Y.; Zhang, H.; Luo, J.; Gao, G. GSDS 2.0: An upgraded gene feature visualization server. Bioinformatics 2015, 31, 1296–1297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Bailey, T.L.; Boden, M.; Buske, F.A.; Frith, M.; Grant, C.E.; Clementi, L.; Ren, J.; Li, W.W.; Noble, W.S. MEME SUITE: Tools for motif discovery and searching. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 37, W202–W208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kumar, S.; Stecher, G.; Li, M.; Knyaz, C.; Tamura, K. MEGA X: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2018, 35, 1547–1549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Voorrips, R. MapChart: Software for the graphical presentation of linkage maps and QTLs. J. Hered. 2002, 93, 77–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Krzywinski, M.; Schein, J.; Birol, I.; Connors, J.; Gascoyne, R.; Horsman, D.; Jones, S.J.; Marra, M.A. Circos: An information aesthetic for comparative genomics. Genome Res. 2009, 19, 1639–1645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Higo, K.; Ugawa, Y.; Iwamoto, M.; Korenaga, T. Plant cis-acting regulatory DNA elements (PLACE) database: 1999. Nucleic Acids Res. 1999, 27, 297–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Yu, C.S.; Chen, Y.C.; Lu, C.H.; Hwang, J.K. Prediction of protein subcellular localization. Proteins Struct. Funct. Bioinform. 2006, 64, 643–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Krogh, A.; Larsson, B.; Von Heijne, G.; Sonnhammer, E.L. Predicting transmembrane protein topology with a hidden Markov model: Application to complete genomes. J. Mol. Biol. 2001, 305, 567–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Gasteiger, E.; Hoogland, C.; Gattiker, A.; Wilkins, M.R.; Appel, R.D.; Bairoch, A. Protein identification and analysis tools on the ExPASy server. In The Proteomics Protocols Handbook; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2005; pp. 571–607. [Google Scholar]
  40. Yang, J.; Yan, R.; Roy, A.; Xu, D.; Poisson, J.; Zhang, Y. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nat. Methods 2015, 12, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Zhao, H.; Yao, W.; Ouyang, Y.; Yang, W.; Wang, G.; Lian, X.; Xing, Y.; Chen, L.; Xie, W. RiceVarMap: A comprehensive database of rice genomic variations. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015, 43, D1018–D1022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Valent, B.; Farrall, L.; Chumley, F.G. Magnaporthe grisea genes for pathogenicity and virulence identified through a series of backcrosses. Genetics 1991, 127, 87–101. [Google Scholar]
  43. Pfaffl, M.W. A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT–PCR. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001, 29, e45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Abe, H.; Urao, T.; Ito, T.; Seki, M.; Shinozaki, K.; Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K. Arabidopsis AtMYC2 (bHLH) and AtMYB2 (MYB) function as transcriptional activators in abscisic acid signaling. Plant Cell 2003, 15, 63–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Eulgem, T.; Rushton, P.J.; Robatzek, S.; Somssich, I.E. The WRKY superfamily of plant transcription factors. Trends Plant Sci. 2000, 5, 199–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Baumann, K.; De Paolis, A.; Costantino, P.; Gualberti, G. The DNA binding site of the Dof protein NtBBF1 is essential for tissue-specific and auxin-regulated expression of the rolB oncogene in plants. Plant Cell 1999, 11, 323–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Dubey, N.; Trivedi, M.; Varsani, S.; Vyas, V.; Farsodia, M.; Singh, S.K. Genome-wide characterization, molecular evolution and expression profiling of the metacaspases in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). Heliyon 2019, 5, e01162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Fan, S.; Liu, A.; Zhang, Z.; Zou, X.; Jiang, X.; Huang, J.; Fan, L.; Zhang, Z.; Deng, X.; Ge, Q. Genome-Wide Identification and Expression Analysis of the Metacaspase Gene Family in Gossypium Species. Genes 2019, 10, 527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  49. Coll, N.S.; Vercammen, D.; Smidler, A.; Clover, C.; Van Breusegem, F.; Dangl, J.L.; Epple, P. Arabidopsis type I metacaspases control cell death. Science 2010, 330, 1393–1397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Deshmukh, R.K.; Sonah, H.; Singh, N.K. Intron gain, a dominant evolutionary process supporting high levels of gene expression in rice. J. Plant Biochem. Biotechnol. 2016, 25, 142–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Zhang, C.; Gong, P.; Wei, R.; Li, S.; Zhang, X.; Yu, Y.; Wang, Y. The metacaspase gene family of Vitis vinifera L.: Characterization and differential expression during ovule abortion in stenospermocarpic seedless grapes. Gene 2013, 528, 267–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Deshmukh, R.K.; Vivancos, J.; Ramakrishnan, G.; Guérin, V.; Carpentier, G.; Sonah, H.; Labbé, C.; Isenring, P.; Belzile, F.J.; Bélanger, R.R. A precise spacing between the NPA domains of aquaporins is essential for silicon permeability in plants. Plant J. 2015, 83, 489–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Cao, Y.; Meng, D.; Chen, T.; Chen, Y.; Zeng, W.; Zhang, L.; Wang, Q.; Hen, W.; Abdullah, M.; Jin, Q. Metacaspase gene family in Rosaceae genomes: Comparative genomic analysis and their expression during pear pollen tube and fruit development. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0211635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Zhu, P.; Yu, X.-H.; Wang, C.; Zhang, Q.; Liu, W.; McSweeney, S.; Shanklin, J.; Lam, E.; Liu, Q. Structural basis for Ca2+-dependent activation of a plant metacaspase. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Liu, H.; Deng, Z.; Chen, J.; Wang, S.; Hao, L.; Li, D. Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of the metacaspase gene family in Hevea brasiliensis. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2016, 105, 90–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Distribution of the number of metacaspase genes in wild and cultivated Oryza species. Blue bars represent Type I metacaspase genes, and red bars represent Type II metacaspase genes.
Figure 1. Distribution of the number of metacaspase genes in wild and cultivated Oryza species. Blue bars represent Type I metacaspase genes, and red bars represent Type II metacaspase genes.
Genes 11 01412 g001
Figure 2. Neighbor-Joining phylogenetic tree of metacaspase genes from wild and cultivated Oryza species. The phylogenetic tree comprising 92 Oryza and 9 Arabidopsis metacaspase genes was generated using Mega X software. Red square tiles represent Type II metacaspase genes whereas green square tiles indicate Type I metacaspases. Gene nomenclature used OJa for japonica, OIn for indica, ORu for rufipogon, ONi for nivara, barthii is named as OBa, brachyantha as OBr, glumaepatula as OGl, glaberrima as OGb, OPu stands for punctata, OMe stands for meridionalis, and OLo is for longistaminata, and MC denotes the metacaspase family, which is followed by a numeral representing the specific gene.
Figure 2. Neighbor-Joining phylogenetic tree of metacaspase genes from wild and cultivated Oryza species. The phylogenetic tree comprising 92 Oryza and 9 Arabidopsis metacaspase genes was generated using Mega X software. Red square tiles represent Type II metacaspase genes whereas green square tiles indicate Type I metacaspases. Gene nomenclature used OJa for japonica, OIn for indica, ORu for rufipogon, ONi for nivara, barthii is named as OBa, brachyantha as OBr, glumaepatula as OGl, glaberrima as OGb, OPu stands for punctata, OMe stands for meridionalis, and OLo is for longistaminata, and MC denotes the metacaspase family, which is followed by a numeral representing the specific gene.
Genes 11 01412 g002
Figure 3. Exon–intron architecture of metacaspases identified in ten Oryza species. Exons, introns, and untranslated region are indicated by green, grey, and red, respectively. The coding DNA sequence (CDS) and genomic sequences of metacaspase from all ten Oryza species were used to develop pictorial presentation using the GSDS 2.0 online tool. Gene nomenclature used OJa for japonica, OIn for indica, ORu for rufipogon, ONi for nivara, barthii is named as OBa, brachyantha as OBr, glumaepatula as OGl, glaberrima as OGb, OPu stands for punctata, OMe stands for meridionalis, and OLo is for longistaminata, and MC denotes the metacaspase family, which is followed by a numeral representing the specific gene.
Figure 3. Exon–intron architecture of metacaspases identified in ten Oryza species. Exons, introns, and untranslated region are indicated by green, grey, and red, respectively. The coding DNA sequence (CDS) and genomic sequences of metacaspase from all ten Oryza species were used to develop pictorial presentation using the GSDS 2.0 online tool. Gene nomenclature used OJa for japonica, OIn for indica, ORu for rufipogon, ONi for nivara, barthii is named as OBa, brachyantha as OBr, glumaepatula as OGl, glaberrima as OGb, OPu stands for punctata, OMe stands for meridionalis, and OLo is for longistaminata, and MC denotes the metacaspase family, which is followed by a numeral representing the specific gene.
Genes 11 01412 g003
Figure 4. Conserved motifs identified in metacaspase protein from ten Oryza species. The motifs were identified by MEME online tool (http://meme-suite.org/) using default parameters. Gene nomenclature used OJa for O. sativa subsp. japonica, OIn for O. sativa subsp. indica, ORu for rufipogon, ONi for nivara, barthii is named as OBa, brachyantha as OBr, glumaepatula as OGl, glaberrima as OGb, OPu stands for punctata, OMe stands for meridionalis, and OLo is for longistaminata, and MC denotes the metacaspase family, which is followed by a numeral representing the specific gene.
Figure 4. Conserved motifs identified in metacaspase protein from ten Oryza species. The motifs were identified by MEME online tool (http://meme-suite.org/) using default parameters. Gene nomenclature used OJa for O. sativa subsp. japonica, OIn for O. sativa subsp. indica, ORu for rufipogon, ONi for nivara, barthii is named as OBa, brachyantha as OBr, glumaepatula as OGl, glaberrima as OGb, OPu stands for punctata, OMe stands for meridionalis, and OLo is for longistaminata, and MC denotes the metacaspase family, which is followed by a numeral representing the specific gene.
Genes 11 01412 g004
Figure 5. Distribution of metacaspase genes in ten Oryza species genomes. Green represents Type I metacaspase genes, and red represents Type II metacaspase genes. The outer circle represents the chromosomes of ten Oryza species carrying the metacaspase genes. The inner circle denotes the chromosomal location of all 92 metacaspase genes.
Figure 5. Distribution of metacaspase genes in ten Oryza species genomes. Green represents Type I metacaspase genes, and red represents Type II metacaspase genes. The outer circle represents the chromosomes of ten Oryza species carrying the metacaspase genes. The inner circle denotes the chromosomal location of all 92 metacaspase genes.
Genes 11 01412 g005
Figure 6. Frequency of transcription factor binding motifs identified in the 2 kb upstream region of the metacaspase genes in ten Oryza species. The variation in size represents the abundance of the respective sequences.
Figure 6. Frequency of transcription factor binding motifs identified in the 2 kb upstream region of the metacaspase genes in ten Oryza species. The variation in size represents the abundance of the respective sequences.
Genes 11 01412 g006
Figure 7. Heatmaps of metacaspase gene expression generated from RNA-Seq datasets under different abiotic stress conditions, different developmental stages and tissues, and biotic stress in rice. (a) Expression of metacaspase genes in O. sativa subsp. japonica under various abiotic stress, (b) gene expression analysis for O. sativa subsp. japonica across different developmental stages in tissues such as callus, germinating seed, panicle, leaves, roots, stem, pollen, stigma, and ovary. (c) Hierarchical clustering analysis for O. sativa subsp. japonica and O. rufipogon gene expression data under mock and infection cases.
Figure 7. Heatmaps of metacaspase gene expression generated from RNA-Seq datasets under different abiotic stress conditions, different developmental stages and tissues, and biotic stress in rice. (a) Expression of metacaspase genes in O. sativa subsp. japonica under various abiotic stress, (b) gene expression analysis for O. sativa subsp. japonica across different developmental stages in tissues such as callus, germinating seed, panicle, leaves, roots, stem, pollen, stigma, and ovary. (c) Hierarchical clustering analysis for O. sativa subsp. japonica and O. rufipogon gene expression data under mock and infection cases.
Genes 11 01412 g007
Figure 8. Relative log 2-fold change of the eight (OInMC1-8) genes with response to biotic stress posed by Magnaporthe oryzae at different time intervals after inoculation on rice cultivar Pusa Basmati 1. The house-keeping gene Ubiquitin was used as a reference to normalize the expression values of target genes. The relative expression calculations were performed using the 2−ΔΔCt formula [43] for three biological and technical replicates each.
Figure 8. Relative log 2-fold change of the eight (OInMC1-8) genes with response to biotic stress posed by Magnaporthe oryzae at different time intervals after inoculation on rice cultivar Pusa Basmati 1. The house-keeping gene Ubiquitin was used as a reference to normalize the expression values of target genes. The relative expression calculations were performed using the 2−ΔΔCt formula [43] for three biological and technical replicates each.
Genes 11 01412 g008
Table 1. Details of 92 metacaspase genes identified in eight Oryza wild species and two subspecies indica and japonica of cultivated rice (Oryza sativa).
Table 1. Details of 92 metacaspase genes identified in eight Oryza wild species and two subspecies indica and japonica of cultivated rice (Oryza sativa).
Sr. No.Selected GenesMC TypeGene Length (aa)MW (Kd)pIProtein Localization
1OBART01G33990.1IIOBaMC741745.85.52Nuclear
2OBART03G19910.1IOBaMC136839.67.85Nuclear and Extracellular
3OBART03G19930.1IOBaMC237240.05.73Chloroplast
4OBART03G19940.1IOBaMC528030.96.12Nuclear
5OBART03G19960.1IOBaMC325527.54.95Extracellular and Plasma membrane
6OBART05G21540.1IIOBaMC640944.56.53Nuclear
7OBART05G21550.1IIOBaMC842046.06.04Nuclear
8OBART10G18850.1IOBaMC433436.16.16Extracellular
9OB01G42780.1IIOBrMC541745.85.46Nuclear
10OB03G29120.1IOBrMC124727.07.6Nuclear and Mitochondrial
11OB03G29130.1IOBrMC234436.75.62Chloroplast and Nuclear
12OB03G29140.1IOBrMC329432.05.44Extracellular and Plasma membrane
13OB05G29040.1IIOBrMC744047.98.86Nuclear
14OB05G29050.1IIOBrMC641945.86.48Nuclear
15OB10G25980.1IOBrMC426228.45.15Extracellular
16OB12G12140.1IIOBrMC840942.24.79Cytoplasmic
17ORGLA01G0279200.1IIOGbMC741745.85.52Nuclear
18ORGLA03G0186200.1IOGbMC136839.67.85Extracellular, Nuclear
19ORGLA03G0186300.1IOGbMC239742.711.24Nuclear
20ORGLA03G0186400.1IOGbMC530233.56.46Nuclear
21ORGLA03G0186500.1IOGbMC336939.17.91Chloroplast and Plasma Membrane
22ORGLA05G0187100.1IIOGbMC640944.56.53Nuclear
23ORGLA05G0187200.1IIOGbMC842046.06.04Nuclear
24ORGLA10G0139900.1IOGbMC435538.55.8Extracellular
25ORGLA11G0018800.1IIOGbMC934135.65.09Cytoplasmic
26OGLUM01G38250.1IIOGlMC741745.85.37Nuclear
27OGLUM03G20520.1IOGlMC136839.77.85Nuclear
28OGLUM03G20560.1IOGlMC239241.47.91Chloroplast
29OGLUM03G20570.1IOGlMC517619.74.98Cytoplasmic
30OGLUM03G20600.1IOGlMC344348.08.67Chloroplast
31OGLUM05G22740.1IIOGlMC640944.56.35Nuclear
32OGLUM05G22750.1IIOGlMC841645.56.03Nuclear
33OGLUM10G18910.1IOGlMC458263.17.91Extracellular
34AMDW01032852.1_FGP001IOLoMC112012.64.35Cytoplasmic, Nuclear
35KN538687.1_FGP194IIOLoMC882387.35.32Chloroplast
36KN538687.1_FGP207IIOLoMC642046.06.04Nuclear
37KN538892.1_FGP005IOLoMC423526.05.46Nuclear
38KN538892.1_FGP007IOLoMC227229.85.16Nuclear
39KN539149.1_FGP003IOLoMC349654.46.81Extracellular and Nuclear
40KN539612.1_FGP001IIOLoMC945249.26.63Plasma Membrane
41KN540137.1_FGP001IOLoMC515716.74.77Plasma Membrane, Chloroplast
42KN540619.1_FGP006IIOLoMC741745.75.44Nuclear
43OMERI03G17880.1IOMeMC137039.78.16Nuclear
44OMERI03G17890.1IOMeMC239141.37.91Chloroplast
45OMERI03G17900.1IOMeMC530333.45.83Nuclear
46OMERI03G17920.1IOMeMC339542.08.87Plasma Membrane and Chloroplast
47OMERI05G19430.1IIOMeMC642045.95.94Nuclear
48OMERI08G00110.2IOMeMC445049.08.59Extracellular and Nuclear
49OMERI09G06400.1IIOMeMC751856.86.81Nuclear
50OMERI11G02500.2IIOMeMC883390.98.27Plasma Membrane
51ONIVA01G38790.1IIONiMC641745.85.44Nuclear
52ONIVA03G21600.1IONiMC136839.67.85Nuclear and Extracellular
53ONIVA03G21620.1IONiMC267973.06.77Chloroplast and Nuclear
54ONIVA03G21660.1IONiMC336038.37.5Plasma Membrane
55ONIVA05G22210.1IIONiMC540944.56.57Nuclear
56ONIVA05G22220.1IIONiMC742046.06.04Nuclear
57ONIVA10G21340.1IONiMC481487.89.05Extracellular and Nuclear
58ONIVA11G02360.1IIONiMC81086117.66.95Plasma Membrane
59OPUNC01G33030.1IIOPuMC541745.95.37Nuclear
60OPUNC03G18760.1IOPuMC166071.96.78Plasma Membrane and Nuclear
61OPUNC03G18780.1IOPuMC255560.66.1Cytoplasmic and Nuclear
62OPUNC03G18790.1IOPuMC329432.05.61Plasma membrane and Chloroplast
63OPUNC05G19180.1IIOPuMC641644.35.46Nuclear
64OPUNC05G19190.1IIOPuMC741946.06.14Nuclear
65OPUNC10G17260.1IOPuMC4968105.69.13Extracellular, Plasma membrane, and Nuclear
66OPUNC12G01940.1IIOPuMC81019109.96.54Plasma Membrane
67ORUFI01G37300.1IIORuMC741745.85.54Nuclear
68ORUFI03G20550.1IORuMC136839.67.85Extracellular
69ORUFI03G20570.1IORuMC240042.17.01Chloroplast
70ORUFI03G20590.1IORuMC526829.55.75Nuclear
71ORUFI03G20620.1IORuMC332333.76.24Plasma Membrane
72ORUFI05G22800.1IIORuMC640944.56.35Nuclear
73ORUFI05G22810.1IIORuMC842046.06.04Nuclear
74ORUFI10G20040.1IORuMC436338.86.21Extracellular
75ORUFI11G02080.1IIORuMC934135.75.32Cytoplasmic
76BGIOSGA004618-PAIIOInMC641745.75.36Nuclear
77BGIOSGA010607-PAIOInMC136939.07.5Plasma Membrane
78BGIOSGA010608-PAIOInMC430133.66.46Nuclear
79BGIOSGA010610-PAIOInMC240042.17.91Chloroplast
80BGIOSGA010611-PAIOInMC336839.67.85Nuclear & Extracellular
81BGIOSGA017791-PAIIOInMC742046.06.04Nuclear
82BGIOSGA017792-PAIIOInMC540944.56.35Nuclear
83BGIOSGA034558-PAIIOInMC834135.65.24Cytoplasmic
84Os01t0799900-01IIOJaMC741745.85.51Nuclear
85Os03t0388900-01IOJaMC136839.67.85Extracellular and Nuclear
86Os03t0389000-00IOJaMC442445.211.59Nuclear
87Os03t0389100-01IOJaMC530233.56.46Nuclear
88Os03t0389501-00IOJaMC220821.96.94Chloroplast
89Os05t0496400-00IIOJaMC630533.28.46Nuclear
90Os05t0496500-01IIOJaMC842046.06.04Nuclear
91Os10t0565100-00IOJaMC345749.88.47Nuclear
92Os11t0134700-01IIOJaMC934135.65.24Cytoplasmic
Table 2. Details of haplotypes, single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), and the effect of SNP variations predicted in metacaspase genes.
Table 2. Details of haplotypes, single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), and the effect of SNP variations predicted in metacaspase genes.
Sr. No.Gene IDGene NomenclatureChr.Chr. PositionHaplotypesSNPs/InDelNon-Syn. SNPDeleterious Mut.Gene Diversity
Pi/BPTheta/BP
1Os03t388900OJaMC1315530630–15532454815710.150.10
2Os03t389501OJaMC2315586221–15587152811500.310.11
3Os03t0389000OJaMC4315563374–15564927616200.140.11
4Os05t0496400OJaMC6524383180–2438409738420.050.12
5Os05t0496500OJaMC8524384902–2438733748310.010.12
6Os01t799900OJaMC7133869142–338718351031300.060.11
7Os11t0134700OJaMC9111616990–16183009221400.140.11
8Os03t0389100OJaMC5315567899–155721351283724950.160.11
9Os10t0565100OJaMC31022320808–223239115250NA
Chr.—chromosome; non-syn.—non-synonymous; SNP—single-nucleotide polymorphism; InDel—insertion/deletion; Mut.—mutation.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bansal, R.; Rana, N.; Singh, A.; Dhiman, P.; Mandlik, R.; Sonah, H.; Deshmukh, R.; Sharma, T.R. Evolutionary Understanding of Metacaspase Genes in Cultivated and Wild Oryza Species and Its Role in Disease Resistance Mechanism in Rice. Genes 2020, 11, 1412. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/genes11121412

AMA Style

Bansal R, Rana N, Singh A, Dhiman P, Mandlik R, Sonah H, Deshmukh R, Sharma TR. Evolutionary Understanding of Metacaspase Genes in Cultivated and Wild Oryza Species and Its Role in Disease Resistance Mechanism in Rice. Genes. 2020; 11(12):1412. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/genes11121412

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bansal, Ruchi, Nitika Rana, Akshay Singh, Pallavi Dhiman, Rushil Mandlik, Humira Sonah, Rupesh Deshmukh, and Tilak Raj Sharma. 2020. "Evolutionary Understanding of Metacaspase Genes in Cultivated and Wild Oryza Species and Its Role in Disease Resistance Mechanism in Rice" Genes 11, no. 12: 1412. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/genes11121412

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop