Next Article in Journal
Being Merle: The Molecular Genetic Background of the Canine Merle Mutation
Next Article in Special Issue
Hybridization of Russian Sturgeon (Acipenser gueldenstaedtii, Brandt and Ratzeberg, 1833) and American Paddlefish (Polyodon spathula, Walbaum 1792) and Evaluation of Their Progeny
Previous Article in Journal
Do Genes Associated with Dyslexia of Chinese Characters Evolve Neutrally?
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Genes
Volume 11
Issue 6
10.3390/genes11060659
genes-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Sex Chromosomes and Internal Telomeric Sequences in Dormitator latifrons (Richardson 1844) (Eleotridae: Eleotrinae): An Insight into Their Origin in the Genus

by
Fabilene Gomes Paim
1,
Mauro Nirchio
2,3,
Claudio Oliveira
1 and
Anna Rita Rossi
4,*
1
Departamento de Biologia Estrutural e Funcional, Instituto de Biociências Universidade Estadual Paulista-UNESP, Botucatu 18618-689, São Paulo, Brazil
2
Universidad Técnica de Machala, Av. Panamericana km 5½, Vía Pasaje, Machala 070151, El Oro, Ecuador
3
Escuela de Ciencias Aplicadas del Mar, Núcleo de Nueva Esparta, Universidad de Oriente, Porlamar 6301, Isla de Margarita, Venezuela
4
Dipartimento di Biologia e Biotecnologie “C. Darwin”, Sapienza-Università di Roma, Via Alfonso Borelli 50, 00161 Rome, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Genes 2020, 11(6), 659; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/genes11060659
Submission received: 26 May 2020 / Revised: 11 June 2020 / Accepted: 15 June 2020 / Published: 17 June 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Fish Cytogenetics: Present and Future)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The freshwater fish species Dormitator latifrons, commonly named the Pacific fat sleeper, is an important food resource in CentralSouth America, yet almost no genetic information on it is available. A cytogenetic analysis of this species was undertaken by standard and molecular techniques (chromosomal mapping of 18S rDNA, 5S rDNA, and telomeric repeats), aiming to describe the karyotype features, verify the presence of sex chromosomes described in congeneric species, and make inferences on chromosome evolution in the genus. The karyotype (2n = 46) is mainly composed of metacentric and submetacentic chromosomes, with nucleolar organizer regions (NORs) localized on the short arms of submetacentric pair 10. The presence of XX/XY sex chromosomes was observed, with the X chromosome carrying the 5S rDNA sequences. These heterochromosomes likely appeared before 1 million years ago, since they are shared with another derived Dormitator species (Dormitator maculatus) distributed in the Western Atlantic. Telomeric repeats hybridize to the terminal portions of almost all chromosomes; additional interstitial sites are present in the centromeric region, suggesting pericentromeric inversions as the main rearrangement mechanisms that has driven karyotypic evolution in the genus. The data provided here contribute to improving the cytogenetics knowledge of D. latifrons, offering basic information that could be useful in aquaculture farming of this neotropical fish.

1. Introduction

Freshwater habitats, although covering a small proportion of the Earth’s surface (about 1%) [1], host rich biodiversity, largely represented by freshwater fishes [2]—about 40% of global fish diversity [3]. The Neotropical Region shows remarkable diversification of species and hosts more than three-quarters of the world’s fish functional diversity [4]. For the continental Neotropical Region 20 orders, 69 families and 5160 freshwater fishes have been described, accounting for about 40% of worldwide freshwater biodiversity [5]. Among the thousands of native fish, many play an important role in the economies in this geographic area as a source of animal protein for riparian communities or, on a more industrial scale, for fish farming, commercial fishing, aquarism, and recreational sports [6].
Research on fish systematics and evolution has expanded over time, including, in recent decades, molecular taxonomy, developmental biology, and new tools like 3D imaging [2]. Cytogenetic analyses join these new tools, providing new evidence of the existence of cryptic species and evolutionary divergence ([7] and references therein) and giving rise to a prosperous field focused on neotropical species [8,9].
Eleotridae fishes are distributed circumglobally, but mostly in tropical and subtropical areas. This family includes 171 valid species grouped into three subfamilies: Butinae, Eleotrinae, and Milyeringinae [10]. The species-rich subfamily Eleotrinae contains 19 genera [11], one of which, Dormitator Gill, 1861 includes amphidromous freshwater fishes distributed in the tropical and subtropical coastal waters of the Atlantic and the American Pacific coasts. Four species are known from America, three in the Western Atlantic (Dormitator cubanus Ginsburg, 1953, Dormitator levis (Eigenmann, 1918), Dormitator maculatus (Bloch, 1792)), and one in the Eastern Pacific (Dormitator latifrons (Richardson, 1844)); a fifth one (Dormitator lebretonis (Steindachner, 1870)) is endemic to the West African coastline from Senegal to Namibia [12]. The distribution of Dormitator has been interpreted as the result of vicariance that followed the break-up of Gondwana, with transisthmian differentiation of two main lineages: one composed of the species sampled in the Western Atlantic basin, and the other represented by the species from the Pacific basin. Although two morphological subspecies have been proposed in this area—Dormitator latifrons mexicanus Ginsburg 1953, restricted to the Pacific coast of Mexico, and Dormitator latifrons latifrons, present in South America—molecular data showed the absence of phylogeographic structure in the Pacific area, that is, the data did not support morphological differentiation ([13] and references herein).
D. latifrons, commonly known as the Pacific fat sleeper is distributed from southern California, USA and the Gulf of California, Mexico to Ecuador, including the Galapagos Islands [14]. This species represents a food source [15,16], and in Ecuador it is of great economic importance for coastal communities, where it is cultivated in an artisanal way for consumption and export [17]; moreover, in Mexico and Nicaragua, there is interest in developing its production by aquaculture [18]. Indeed, D. latifrons due to its high-quality flesh, fast growth rate and low protein requirements has been identified as a possible candidate to replace tilapia species [19,20] that are cultivated in Ecuador in order to mitigate the impact of these invasive cichlids on Ecuadorian biodiversity [21]. Thus, any effort made to improve basic research on the species is of great importance for the development of cultivation programs.
The inclusion of cytogenetic screening in fish biology and aquaculture, may be very informative and useful in studies on systematic and taxonomic relationships, chromosomal polymorphism, interspecific hybridization, early embryogenesis, chromosome set manipulations, and sex determination mechanisms [22,23,24]. To date, cytogenetic data on Eleotridae scantly describe the diploid number for 11 species (Table 1), barely representing 6.4% of the species ascribed to the family. The karyotype of D. latifrons was already described [25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34], but the information provided is limited to the diploid number and the karyotype composition. Data from C-bands and active nucleolus organizer regions (Ag-NORs) are limited to other two species of the family, D. maculatus and Eleotris pisoni [28,29]. In the former species, sex chromosomes were described in a population from Brazil.
Comparisons of sex determination systems between closely related fish species can provide important insights into the evolution of sex chromosomes [35,36]. Thus, in this study a cytogenetic survey of D. latrifons was undertaken, aimed to verify whether sex chromosomes could be identified in this species and to clarify whether these chromosomes represent a common feature in the genus, i.e., whether they appeared before the split of the Pacific and Atlantic Dormitator lineages [13] or, alternatively, arose recently in the Atlantic lineage. For this purpose, besides standard staining (Giemsa, silver nitrate, C-banding), the use of repetitive sequences (18S rDNA, 5S rDNA, and telomere repeats) mapping was applied. Indeed, ribosomal genes (rDNA) belong to the most investigated [37] and informative [38] repeats in fish, wherein they have extra-coding functions and take part in genome diversification associated with speciation events [38,39]. This approach allows us to highlight eventual chromosome rearrangements that could have occurred during karyotype evolution in the genus and could be associated with sex chromosome differentiation. The data will contribute to improving the knowledge of the biology of D. latifrons and Neotropical fish cytogenetics, also providing basic information that could be useful in aquaculture farming of this species.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Specimens Collection and Identification

Fifteen specimens of D. latifrons (seven males, eight females) were collected using a seine net in La Tembladera wetland (3°29′13.5″ S 80°00′00.9″ W) and transported to the laboratory in sealed plastic bags with water and a supply of pure oxygen. Sample identification was subsequently performed [40]. Voucher specimens fixed in 10% formalin were deposited in the Ichthyology Collection of the Laboratório de Biologia e Genética de Peixes (LBP) of Universidade Estadual Paulista, Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil (UNESP) (collection numbers LBP 29080) and Universidad Técnica de Machala (collection numbers UTMACH 0365, 0372, 0373, 0377, 0378, 0381, 0383, 0394, 0395). Procedures were conducted with Institutional Research Project Authorization (PR-GEN-155), following the ethical/anesthesia conduct approved by the Ethics Committee on Animal Experimentation of the Universidad Técnica de Machala (process number UTMACH-CEEA-002-2020-AC).

2.2. Cytogenetic Procedures

Twenty-four hours before chromosome preparations, the fishes were injected intramuscularly with a yeast glucose solution [41] for mitosis stimulation. Each fish received an intra-abdominal injection of 0.0125% colchicine (1.0 mL/100 g of body weight) 50 min before being sacrificed by a numbing overdose of benzocaine (250 mg/L) as recommended by the American Veterinary Medical Association [42]. Mitotic chromosomes were obtained following the conventional air-drying method from a kidney cell suspension [43].
For the conventional karyotype, slides were stained for 20 min with 10% Giemsa in phosphate buffer at pH 6.8. Active nucleolus organizer regions (Ag-NORs) and the constitutive heterochromatin distribution were revealed by silver staining [44] and C-banding [45], respectively.
Assays for mapping onto chromosome 5S rDNA, 18S rDNA (ribosomal genes), and telomeric repeats were performed via fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) [46]. Probes for 5S rDNA, 18S rDNA, and telomeric repeats were obtained and labeled by PCR using primers and procedures previously reported [7]. Biotin-labeled probes were detected with fluorescein-conjugated avidin (FITC, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and digoxigenin-labeled probes were visualized using anti-digoxigenin-rhodamine conjugate (Roche Applied Science, Basel, Switzerland). After detection, the chromosomes were counterstained with 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) included in the Vectashield mounting medium (Vector Laboratories Ltd.,Peterborough, UK).
Metaphase cells analyzed by conventional techniques were photographed using a Motic B400, equipped with a Moticam 5000C digital camera using Motic Images Plus 2.0 ML software. FISH images were captured using an Olympus BX61 photomicroscope (Olympus Corporation, Ishikawa, Japan) equipped with a DP70 digital camera using Image-Pro Plus 6.0 software (Media Cybernetics, Silver Spring, MD, USA). Images were merged and edited for optimization of brightness and contrast using Photoshop (Adobe Systems, Inc., San Jose, CA, USA) Version 2015.0.0. Chromosomes were arranged in decreasing order and classified according to centromere position [47].

3. Results

The analysis of 496 mitotic metaphase cells of D. latifrons revealed a modal diploid number of 2n = 46 for both males and females (98.7% of cells) but a clear karyotypic difference was observed between sexes. In females, the karyotype consisted of 42 metacentric/submetacentric (m/sm), and four acrocentric (a) chromosomes, whereas males presented 41 m/sm and five a chromosomes (Figure 1A,C).
Impregnation with silver nitrate showed a single pair of Ag-positive NORs terminally located on the short arms of sm pair 10 (Figure 1A,C, inset), in both sexes.
Constitutive heterochromatin appears to be distributed in the pericentromeric and telomeric regions of all chromosomes (Figure 1B,D). C-positive blocks are also recognizable on the short arms of chromosome pair 10 carrying NORs and on those of the X chromosome; in the Y chromosome, besides the short arms, heterochromatin can also be observed in the long arms, close to the pericentromeric area.
Double FISH assays with ribosomal genes showed that 18S rDNA sequences are localized on a single chromosome pair (likely the same that is Ag positive) in both males and females, whereas 5S rDNA genes have a differential distribution in the two sexes (Figure 2A,B). Indeed, in females, the minor rDNA clusters occur terminally on one of the m/sm chromosome pairs, whereas in males, positive signals are present on a single m/sm chromosome. Differences in the size of the single 5S rDNA signals were not observed between the two sexes. Thus, it is likely that these genes are localized on the X chromosome.
The sequences of repetitive telomeric DNA hybridized at the terminal portions of almost all chromosomes; additional interstitial telomeric sequence (ITS) signals are highlighted in the centromeric region of most chromosomes. In some chromosomes, both the terminal and the interstitial locations of (TTAGGG)n repeats appear as very big, bright blocks (Figure 3). No differences were observed between males and females. The big positive blocks that cover the entire short arms of a submetacentric pair correspond to secondary constriction, i.e., to NORs that are faintly stained by DAPI (Figure 3C).

4. Discussion

Cytogenetic studies performed in 11 species of Eleotridae belonging to the subfamilies Butinae (two species) and Eleotrinae (nine species) showed that in this family the diploid number 2n ranges from 46 to 52, with a predominance of uni-armed chromosomes in the karyotypes (Table 1). In Dormitator, previous cytogenetic studies reported karyotypes with 2n = 46 chromosomes, mainly composed of bi-armed chromosomes (chromosome arm number (FN) = 86−90) for both D. latifrons and D. maculatus. Our data confirm this diploid number for D. latifrons, although with a different karyotype composition (Table 1).
In addition, here we report differences in the karyotypes of males and females of D. latifrons, that suggest an XX/XY sex chromosome system not reported by previous studies on samples from Mexico [25,26]. As a total absence of phylogeographic structure was detected in Dormitator across the Pacific area [13], this difference likely does not reflect geographic differentiation but is instead due to the fact that in previous surveys only Giemsa staining was used.
The presence of cytologically distinguishable sex chromosomes (CDSC) characterizes only a minority of fish, corresponding to less than 1% of Teleosts [48,49] and about 10% of the karyotped fish species [50,51,52,53,54], as in most of them the sex chromosomes are cryptic. CDSC largely appeared independently and at various times in different fish lineages, following distinct patterns of differentiation even in closely related species ([53,55] and references herein); they can be associated to male or female heterogamety, or even to multi-chromosomal sex determination [56]. In both cases, the presence of transposable elements is crucial for the differentiation and evolution of these chromosomes [57]. The emergence of CDSC requires the suppression of homologous recombination by structural rearrangements and repetitive DNA accumulation [53,58,59,60]. In D. latifrons, the presence of an additional heterochromatic block on the Y chromosome, besides the one that covers entirely the short arm of the X chromosome, suggests a scenario of structural rearrangement that, independent of the order of occurrence, would include a pericentric inversion of the heterochromatic region of the p arm on one of the X chromosomes, a tandem duplication, and the subsequent accumulation of repetitive DNA in the Y chromosome (Figure 4). These chromosomal rearrangements are associated with a reduction/loss of the 5S rDNA sequences in males (see below). Similar XX/XY sex chromosomes were reported in D. maculatus from Brazil [29], and this makes it possible to infer their origin. Indeed, as Pacific and Atlantic Dormitator geminate lineages diverged about 1 million years ago following geological and oceanographic changes associated with the formation of the Central American Isthmus [13], the differentiation of these sex chromosomes has an ancient origin and should have occurred before the splitting of the genus between the two ocean basins. In addition, as D. maculatus represents the most derived branch of Atlantic Dormitator, the presence of sex chromosomes could be expected in the other species of the genus.
In D. latifrons, the number and location of major ribosomal genes conform to the most common condition detected in Teleosts, i.e., a single bearing chromosome pair per diploid karyotype present or associated to the terminal regions of chromosomes [37]. On the contrary, chromosomal mapping of 5S rDNA on sex chromosomes is not a common condition in fish, but rather an exception [39,61,62] that obviously determines differences in the number of bearing chromosomes between the two sexes. It remains unclear whether minor ribosomal genes are totally absent in the Y chromosome or present in reduced copy number, which does not allow their detection [61]. We might infer, in any case, an unbalance in copy number between male and female exists, and, thus, an unbalance between the copy numbers of 5S and 45S rDNA. In lower vertebrates, including fish, discrepancies between the copy numbers of these genes are tolerated and play a role in the microevolutionary processes, making these repetitive sequences good markers to trace population diversification (see [38] for a review). Meanwhile, recent research demonstrated that in fishes the role of rDNA in maintenance genome integrity can be associated to a change in copy number in response to environmental conditions [63], according to the idea of a “Musical Chair” model for rDNA copy counting [64].
The mapping of telomeric (TTAGGG)n probes in vertebrate chromosomes showed that telomeric motifs could also be located interstitially along chromosome arms (interstitial telomeric sequences, ITSs), in pericentromeric/centromeric regions, or between the centromere and the telomere [65,66]. In fish chromosomes, these non-functional telomeres allow us to better elucidate chromosomal rearrangements in specific taxonomic groups [7,62] or to disentangle the evolutionary relationships of ancient species and wider taxonomic groups [67]. In the genome of D. latifrons, many ITSs were detected in pericentromeric regions, and some correspond to heterochromatic ITSs (het-ITSs), i.e., blocks of several hundreds of kilobases within or close to heterochromatic areas [68], that have been identified in different vertebrate species [65]. Among these, we can include the large ITS signals that overlap with NORs; these are the result of the interspersion of the two types of repeated sequences, as observed in many fish species [69,70,71,72]. Heterochromatic ITSs have been proposed to originate by a four-step mechanism that involves several chromosomal rearrangements associated with the amplification and redistribution of (TTAGGG)n repeats [65], thus behaving like satellite DNA. Regardless of their heterochromatic or not, ITSs are considered very unstable microsatellite sequences, able to trigger chromosomal rearrangements [73], and in fish are generally considered as relicts of chromosome fusions [74] or of transposition events [62]. In D. latifrons the presence of a large number of ITSs without a reduction in the diploid number suggests chromosome evolution by pericentric inversions, according to what has been observed in other fish species [66,75]. This is congruent with the idea that chromosomal fusions to be stabilized require telomeric loss or inactivation in centromeric position [76], but not in the interstitial position, probably because in this case there is no problem with mitotic or meiotic fuse formation.

5. Conclusions

The data here reported provide useful information on the presence of sex chromosomes in D. latifrons and suggest an ancient origin for these heterochromosomes (before 1 million years ago), as the same XY system is shared with another Dormitator species (D. maculatus) present in the Western Atlantic. The presence of many ITSs—regions that are considered hotspots of recombination [74]—suggests the occurrence of many pericentromeric inversions during the chromosomic evolution of this genus. Chromosome localization of telomeric repeated sequences in other Dormitator and in other Eleotrinae species is necessary to get a more comprehensive picture on the role of such sequences in the karyotype evolution of this group. In addition, chromosomal mapping of transposable elements [39] could better define the contribution, if any, of these repeated sequences in the process.
Finally, the basic cytogenetics information here provided, like the presence of sex chromosomes, could open a path for studies of genetic manipulation [77,78] or marker-assisted selection [79] in D. latifrons, aimed at improving productive characteristics, in order to make this species an alternative to tilapia in the Ecuadorian aquaculture industry. Indeed, the Pacific fat sleeper, due to its high tolerance to variations in salinity and temperature and its low oxygen requirement, may prove useful as aquaculture shifts in the face of climate change [19]. At the same time, the replacement of tilapia in aquaculture could have beneficial effects on Ecuadorian biodiversity [21].

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.N., F.G.P. and A.R.R.; methodology, F.G.P., M.N.; validation, M.N., C.O.; formal analysis, M.N., C.O., F.G.P., A.R.R.; resources, M.N., C.O., A.R.R.; writing—original draft preparation, M.N., A.A.R., C.O., F.G.P.; writing—review and editing, M.N., A.R.R.; supervision, M.N., A.R.R.; project administration, M.N., C.O., A.R.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Centro de Investigación de Universidad Técnica de Machala, Ecuador (GPR-GEN-155) to MN, by Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo FAPESP (2018/20610-1, 2016/09204-6, 2014/26508-3) and Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq proc. 306054/2006-0) to C.O., and by Università Sapienza (RP11816430E2E16A) to A.R.R.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Gleick, P.H. Water resources. In Encyclopedia of Climate and Weather; Schneider, S.H., Ed.; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 1996; Volume 2, pp. 817–823. [Google Scholar]
  2. Nelson, J.S.; Grande, T.C.; Wilson, M.V.H. Fishes of the World, 5th ed.; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  3. Lundberg, J.G.; Kottelat, M.; Smith, G.R.; Stiassny, M.L.J.; Gill, A.C. So many fishes, so little time: An overview of recent ichthyological discovery in continental waters. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 2000, 87, 26–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Toussaint, A.; Charpin, N.; Brosse, S.; Villéger, S. Global functional diversity of freshwater fish is concentrated in the Neotropics while functional vulnerability is widespread. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Reis, R.E.; Albert, J.S.; Di Dario, F.; Mincarone, M.M.; Petry, P.; Rocha, L.A. Fish biodiversity and conservation in South America. J. Fish Biol. 2016, 89, 12–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Hilsdorf, A.W.S.; Hallerman, E.M. Genetic Resources of Neotropical Fishes; Springer: Cham, Germany, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  7. Nirchio, M.; Gaviria, J.I.; Siccha-Ramirez, Z.R.; Oliveira, C.; Foresti, F.; Milana, V.; Rossi, A.R. Chromosomal polymorphism and molecular variability in the pearly razorfish Xyrichtys novacula (Labriformes, Labridae): Taxonomic and biogeographic implications. Genetica 2019, 147, 47–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. de Cioffi, B.M.; Wagner, F.M.; Ferreira, A.R.; Bertollo, L.A.C. Chromosomes as tools for discovering biodiversity–the case of erythrinidae fish family. Recent Trends Cytogenet. Stud. Methodol. Appl. 2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Sember, A.; de Oliveira, E.A.; Ráb, P.; Bertollo, L.A.C.; de Freitas, N.L.; Viana, P.F.; Yano, C.F.; Hatanaka, T.; Marinho, M.M.F.; de Moraes, R.L.R.; et al. Centric Fusions behind the karyotype evolution of neotropical Nannostomus Pencilfishes (Characiforme, Lebiasinidae): First insights from a molecular cytogenetic perspective. Genes 2020, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  10. Fricke, R.; Eschmeyer, W.N.; Fong, J.D. Species by Family/Subfamily. Available online: http://researcharchive.calacademy.org/research/ichthyology/catalog/SpeciesByFamily.asp (accessed on 15 May 2020).
  11. Froese, R.; Pauly, D. Eleotrinae Bonaparte. 1835. Available online: http://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=267092 (accessed on 15 May 2020).
  12. Patzner, R.; Van Tassell, J.L.; Kovacic, M.; Kapoor, B.G. The Biology of Gobies; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  13. Galván-Quesada, S.; Doadrio, I.; Alda, F.; Perdices, A.; Reina, R.G.; García Varela, M.; Hernández, N.; Campos Mendoza, A.; Bermingham, E.; Domínguez-Domínguez, O. Molecular phylogeny and biogeography of the amphidromous fish genus Dormitator Gill 1861 (Teleostei: Eleotridae). PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0153538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Van Tassell, J. Dormitator Latifrons. Available online: https://0-dx-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2010-3.RLTS.T183257A8081686.en (accessed on 10 April 2020).
  15. Massay, S.; Mosquera, R. Presence of Chame Dormitator latifrons (Richardson, 1844) (Pisces: Eleotridae) in the Galapagos Islands, Ecuador. J. Fish Biol. 1992, 40, 815–816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Larumbe, E. Algunos aspectos biológicos de los popoyotes (Dormitator latifrons) en cautiverio. Panor. Acuícola 2002, 24–25. Available online: https://fis.com/panoramacuicola/noticias/noticia%203.htm (accessed on 15 May 2020).
  17. Freire-Lascano, C.A. Experiencias en el manejo del Chame (Dormitator latifrons) en la Cuenca del Río Guayas, Ecuador. Rev. Electrónica Ing. Prod. Acuícola 2013, 7, 1–13. [Google Scholar]
  18. de Rodríguez-Montes Oca, G.A.; Medina-Hernández, E.A.; Velázquez-Sandoval, J.; López-López, V.V.; Román-Reyes, J.C.; Dabrowski, K.; Haws, M.C. Producción de larvas de Chame (Dormitator latifrons, Pisces: Eleotridae) usando GnRHa and LHRHa. Rev. Colomb. Cienc. Pecu. 2012, 25, 422–429. [Google Scholar]
  19. Torell, E.; Tobey, J. Enterprise Strategies for Coastal and Marine Conservation: A Review of Best Practices and Lessons Learned; Coastal Resources Center, University of Rhode Island: Narragansett, RI, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  20. López-Huerta, J.M.; Vega-Villasante, F.; Viana, M.T.; Carrillo-Farnés, O.; Badillo-Zapata, D. First report of nutritional quality of the native fish Dormitator latifrons (Richardson, 1844) (Perciformes: Eleotridae). Lat. Am. J. Aquat. Res. 2018, 46, 849–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Jácome, J.; Quezada Abad, C.; Sánchez Romero, O.; Pérez, J.E.; Nirchio, M. Tilapia en Ecuador: Paradoja entre la producción acuícola y la protección de la biodiversidad ecuatoriana. Rev. Peru. Biol. 2019, 26, 543–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Fujiwara, A. Recent advancement in fish cytogenetics. J. Anim. Genet. 2005, 32, 113–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Gorshkova, G. Practical use of cytogenetics in fish biology and aquaculture. Isr. J. Aquac. Bamidgeh 2006, 58, 280–285. [Google Scholar]
  24. Ocalewicz, K.; Jankun, M.; Luczynski, M. Cytogenetic characteristics of interspecific hybrids and chromosome set manipulated finfish. In Fish Cytogenetics; Pisano, E., Ozouf-Costaz, C., Foresti, F., Kapoor, B.G., Eds.; Science Publishers: Enfield, NH, USA, 2007; pp. 289–332. [Google Scholar]
  25. Uribe-Alcocer, M.; Espinoza, J.A.; Padilla, A.T.; Pérez, A.C. Los cromosomas de Dormitator latifrons (Pisces: Gobiidae). An. Inst. Cienc. Mar Limnol. Univ. Nac. Auton. Mex. 1982, 10, 23–30. [Google Scholar]
  26. Uribe-Alcocer, M.; Ramirez-Escamilla, A. Comparación citogenética entre las especies del genero Dormitator (Pisces, Gobiidae). An. Inst. Cienc. Mar Limnol. Univ. Nac. Auton. Mex. 1989, 16, 75–80. [Google Scholar]
  27. Maldonado-Monroy, M.C.; Uribe-Alcocer, M. Karyotypical studies on Dormitator maculatus bloch and Gobiomorus dormitor Lacépède (Gobiidae: Perciformes). Cytologia 1985, 50, 663–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Molina, W.F. Intraspecific karyotypical diversity in brackish water fishes of the Eleotridae family (Pisces, Perciformes). Cytologia 2005, 70, 39–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Oliveira, C.; de Toledo, L.F.A. Evidence of an XX/XY sex chromosome system in the fish Dormitator maculatus (Teleostei, Eleotrididae). Genet. Mol. Biol. 2006, 29, 653–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Arai, R. Fish Karyotypes: A Check List; Springer: Tokyo, Japan, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  31. Uribe-Alcocer, M.; Díaz-Jaimes, P. Chromosome complements of Gobionellus microdon and Eleotris picta collected in Mexico. J. Fish Biol. 1996, 48, 796–798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Rocon-Stange, E.A. Caracterização cromossômica de Eleotris pisonis (Perciformes, Eleotrididae). In Proceedings of the IV Simpósio de Citogenética Evolutiva e Aplicada de Peixes Neotropicais, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 22–24 September 1992; p. 45. [Google Scholar]
  33. Masagca, J.T.; Sumantadinata, K. Chromosomal characters of the Indonesian sand goby, Oxyeleotris marmorata Blkr. 1874 (Eleotridae). Biotropia Southeast Asian J. Trop. Biol. 1994, 41–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Pinthong, K.; Supiwong, W.; Tanomtong, A.; Hongsachart, P.; Phaengphairee, P.; Chantarangsee, M. A first karyological analysis of the sand goby, Oxyeleotris marmoratus (Teleostei, Eleotridae) in Thailand by Ag-NOR Staining Technique. Cytologia 2014, 79, 127–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Charlesworth, B. Sex determination: Primitive Y chromosomes in fish. Curr. Biol. 2004, 14, R745–R747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Tanaka, K.; Takehana, Y.; Naruse, K.; Hamaguchi, S.; Sakaizumi, M. Evidence for different origins of sex chromosomes in closely related Oryzias fishes: Substitution of the master sex-determining gene. Genetics 2007, 177, 2075–2081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Gornung, E. Twenty years of physical mapping of major ribosomal RNA genes across the Teleosts: A review of research. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 2013, 141, 90–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Symonová, R.; Howell, W.M. Vertebrate genome evolution in the light of fish Cytogenomics and rDNAomics. Genes 2018, 9, 96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Cioffi, M.B.; Martins, C.; Bertollo, L.A.C. Chromosome spreading of associated transposable elements and ribosomal DNA in the fish Erythrinus erythrinus. Implications for genome change and karyoevolution in fish. BMC Evol. Biol. 2010, 10, 271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Jimenez-Prado, P.; Agruirre, W.; Moncayo, E.; Amaya, R.; Salazar, N.; Iván, F.; Rivera, J. Guía de Peces Para Aguas Continentales en la Vertiente Occidental del Ecuador; Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador Sede Esmeraldas (PUCESE): Quito, Ecuador, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  41. Lozano, R.; Ruiz Rejon, C.; Ruiz Rejon, M. A method for increasing the number of mitoses available for cytogenetic analysis in rainbow trout. Stain Technol. 1988, 63, 335–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Leary, S.L.; Underwood, W.; Anthony, R.; Gwaltney-Brant, S.; Poison, A.; Meyer, R. AVMA Guidelines for the Euthanasia of Animals, 2013 ed.; American Veterinary Medical Association: Schaumburg, IL, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  43. Nirchio, M.; Oliveira, C. Citogenética de Peces; Universidad de Oriente: Cumaná, Venezuela, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  44. Howell, W.M.; Black, D.A. Controlled silver-staining of nucleolus organizer regions with a protective colloidal developer: A 1-step method. Experientia 1980, 36, 1014–1015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Sumner, A.T. A simple technique for demonstrating centromeric heterochromatin. Exp. Cell Res. 1972, 75, 304–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Pinkel, D.; Straume, T.; Gray, J.W. Cytogenetic analysis using quantitative, high-sensitivity, fluorescence hybridization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1986, 83, 2934–2938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Levan, A.; Fredga, K.; Sandberg, A.A. Nomenclature for centromeric position on chromosomes. Hereditas 1964, 52, 201–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Mank, J.E.; Avise, J.C. Phylogenetic conservation of chromosome numbers in Actinopterygiian fishes. Genetica 2006, 127, 321–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Kottler, V.A.; Schartl, M. The colorful sex chromosomes of Teleost fish. Genes 2018, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Devlin, R.H.; Nagahama, Y. Sex determination and sex differentiation in fish: An overview of genetic, physiological, and environmental influences. Aquaculture 2002, 208, 191–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Oliveira, C.; Almeida-Toledo, L.F.; Foresti, F. Karyotypic evolution in neotropical fishes. In Fish Cytogenetics; Pisano, E., Ozouf-Costaz, C., Foresti, F., Kapoor, B.G., Eds.; Science Publishers: Enfield, NH, USA, 2007; pp. 111–164. [Google Scholar]
  52. Cioffi, M.B.; Camacho, J.P.M.; Bertollo, L.A.C. Repetitive DNAs and differentiation of sex chromosomes in neotropical fishes. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 2011, 132, 188–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. de Cioffi, M.B.; Yano, C.F.; Sember, A.; Bertollo, L.A.C. Chromosomal evolution in lower Vertebrates: Sex chromosomes in Neotropical fishes. Genes 2017, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Kitano, J.; Peichel, C.L. Turnover of sex chromosomes and speciation in fishes. Environ. Biol. Fishes 2012, 94, 549–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Abbott, J.K.; Nordén, A.K.; Hansson, B. Sex chromosome evolution: Historical insights and future perspectives. Proc. Biol. Sci. 2017, 284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Schultheis, C.; Böhne, A.; Schartl, M.; Volff, J.N.; Galiana-Arnoux, D. Sex determination diversity and sex chromosome evolution in poeciliid fish. Sex Dev. 2009, 3, 68–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Chalopin, D.; Volff, J.-N.; Galiana, D.; Anderson, J.L.; Schartl, M. Transposable elements and early evolution of sex chromosomes in fish. Chromosome Res. 2015, 23, 545–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Ezaz, T.; Deakin, J.E. Repetitive sequence and sex chromosome evolution in Vertebrates. Adv. Evol. Biol. 2014, 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Wright, A.E.; Dean, R.; Zimmer, F.; Mank, J.E. How to make a sex chromosome. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 12087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Crown, K.N.; Miller, D.E.; Sekelsky, J.; Hawley, R.S. Local inversion heterozygosity alters recombination throughout the genome. Curr. Biol. 2018, 28, 2984–2990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Moran, P.; Martinez, J.L.; Garcia-Vazquez, E.; Pendas, A.M. Sex chromosome linkage of 5S rDNA in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 1996, 75, 145–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Scacchetti, P.C.; Utsunomia, R.; Pansonato-Alves, J.C.; Vicari, M.R.; Artoni, R.F.; Oliveira, C.; Foresti, F. Chromosomal mapping of repetitive DNAs in Characidium (Teleostei, Characiformes): Genomic organization and diversification of ZW sex chromosomes. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 2015, 146, 136–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Da Silva, F.A.; Feldberg, E.; Carvalho, N.D.M.; Hernandez Rangel, S.M.; Schneider, C.H.; Carvalho-Zilse, G.A.; Da Silva, V.F.; Gross, M.C. Effects of environmental pollution on the rDNAomics of Amazonian fish. Environ. Pollut. 2019, 252, 180–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Iida, T.; Kobayashi, T. How do cells count multi-copy genes? “Musical Chair” model for preserving the number of rDNA copies. Curr. Genet. 2019, 65, 883–885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Bolzán, A.D. Interstitial telomeric sequences in vertebrate chromosomes: Origin, function, instability and evolution. Mutat. Res. Mutat. Res. 2017, 773, 51–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Ocalewicz, K.; Furgala-Selezniow, G.; Szmyt, M.; Lisboa, R.; Kucinski, M.; Lejk, A.M.; Jankun, M. Pericentromeric location of the telomeric DNA sequences on the European grayling chromosomes. Genetica 2013, 141, 409–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  67. Mandrioli, M.; Bizzaro, D.; Manicardi, G.C.; Gionghi, D.; Bassoli, L.; Bianchi, U. Cytogenetic and molecular characterization of a highly repeated DNA sequence in the peach potato aphid Myzus persicae. Chromosoma 1999, 108, 436–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Ruiz-Herrera, A.; Nergadze, S.G.; Santagostino, M.; Giulotto, E. Telomeric repeats far from the ends: Mechanisms of origin and role in evolution. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 2008, 122, 219–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Salvadori, S.; Deiana, A.; Elisabetta, C.; Floridia, G.; Rossi, E.; Zuffardi, O. Colocalization of (TTAGGG)n telomeric sequences and ribosomal genes in Atlantic eels. Chromosome Res. 1995, 3, 54–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Gornung, E.; Mannarelli, M.E.; Rossi, A.R.; Sola, L. Chromosomal evolution in Mugilidae (Pisces, Mugiliformes): FISH mapping of the (TTAGGG) telomeric repeat in the six Mediterranean mullets. Hereditas 2004, 140, 158–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Rossi, A.R.; Gornung, E.; Sola, L.; Nirchio, M. Comparative molecular cytogenetic analysis of two congeneric species, Mugil curema and M. liza (Pisces, Mugiliformes), characterized by significant karyotype diversity. Genetica 2005, 125, 27–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Libertini, A.; Vitturi, R.; Lannino, A.; Maone, M.C.; Franzoi, P.; Riccato, F.; Colomba, S. FISH mapping of 18S rDNA and (TTAGGG)n sequences in two pipefish species (Gasteroisteiformes: Syngnathidae). J. Genet. 2006, 85, 153–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Aksenova, A.Y.; Mirkin, S.M. At the beginning of the end and in the middle of the beginning: Structure and maintenance of telomeric DNA repeats and interstitial telomeric sequences. Genes 2019, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  74. Ocalewicz, K. Telomeres in fishes. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 2013, 141, 114–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Phillips, R.; Ráb, P. Chromosome evolution in the Salmonidae (Pisces): An update. Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. 2001, 76, 1–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Slijepcevic, P. Telomeres and mechanisms of Robertsonian fusion. Chromosoma 1998, 107, 136–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Hussain, M.G. Manipulation of chromosomes in fish: Review of various techniques and their implications in aquaculture. Bangladesh J. Fish. Res. 1998, 2, 99–108. [Google Scholar]
  78. Arai, K.; Fujimoto, T. Chromosome manipulation techniques and applications to aquaculture. In Sex Control in Aquaculture; Wang, H.-P., Piferrer, F., Chen, S.-H., Shen, Z.-G., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2018; pp. 137–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Zheng, S.; Wang, X.; Zhang, S.; Long, J.; Tao, W.; Li, M.; Wang, D. Screening and characterization of sex-linked DNA markers and marker-assisted selection in the Southern catfish (Silurus meridionalis). Aquaculture 2020, 517, 734783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Genes 11 00659 g001 550
Figure 1. Conventional Giemsa and C-banded karyotypes of male (A,B) and female (C,D) D. latifrons. m/sm, metacentric/submetacentric, a acrocentric. Heteromorphic sex chromosomes are indicated. Insets of NOR-carrying chromosomes, after silver staining, are shown in (A,C).
Figure 1. Conventional Giemsa and C-banded karyotypes of male (A,B) and female (C,D) D. latifrons. m/sm, metacentric/submetacentric, a acrocentric. Heteromorphic sex chromosomes are indicated. Insets of NOR-carrying chromosomes, after silver staining, are shown in (A,C).
Genes 11 00659 g001
Genes 11 00659 g002 550
Figure 2. Karyotypes of D. latifrons arranged after 5S (green) and 18S (red) rDNA double fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH): (A) male, (B) female.
Figure 2. Karyotypes of D. latifrons arranged after 5S (green) and 18S (red) rDNA double fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH): (A) male, (B) female.
Genes 11 00659 g002
Genes 11 00659 g003 550
Figure 3. Metaphases of male (A) and female (B) D. latifrons under FISH with telomeric probes and counterstaining by DAPI. Many interstitial positive sites are present in both sexes. Enlargement of samples of the NOR-carrying pair in DAPI (left) and under FISH with telomeric probes, (right) is shown in the inset (C).
Figure 3. Metaphases of male (A) and female (B) D. latifrons under FISH with telomeric probes and counterstaining by DAPI. Many interstitial positive sites are present in both sexes. Enlargement of samples of the NOR-carrying pair in DAPI (left) and under FISH with telomeric probes, (right) is shown in the inset (C).
Genes 11 00659 g003
Genes 11 00659 g004 550
Figure 4. C-banded enlargement and schematic representation of sex chromosomes (above) and the hypothetical mechanism of chromosomal rearrangements that allowed the origin of the, Y chromosome (below).
Figure 4. C-banded enlargement and schematic representation of sex chromosomes (above) and the hypothetical mechanism of chromosomal rearrangements that allowed the origin of the, Y chromosome (below).
Genes 11 00659 g004
Table
Table 1. Cytogenetic data in Eleotridae fishes: diploid chromosome number (2n), number of chromosomes in each morphological category (m, metacentric; sm, submetacentric; st, subtelocentric; a, acrocentric), chromosome arm number (FN).
Table 1. Cytogenetic data in Eleotridae fishes: diploid chromosome number (2n), number of chromosomes in each morphological category (m, metacentric; sm, submetacentric; st, subtelocentric; a, acrocentric), chromosome arm number (FN).
Species2nKaryotype CompositionFNSampling AreaReferences
Eleotrinae
D. latifrons4644m/sm + 2st/a90Mexico[25]
D. latifrons4644m/sm + 2st/a90Mexico[26]
D. latifrons4642m/sm + 4a (♀)
41m/sm + 5a (♂)		88/87EcuadorThis paper
D. maculatus4644m/sm + 2st/a90Mexico[26]
D. maculatus4634m/sm + 12st/a80Brazil[27]
D. maculatus4640m/sm + 6st/a86Brazil[28]
D. maculatus4614m + 28sm + 2st + 2a (♀);
13m + 28sm + 3st + 2a (♂)		90Brazil[29]
Eleotris acanthopoma4646st/a46Japan[30]
Eleotris oxycephala4646a46China[30]
E. oxycephala4646a46China[30]
Eleotris picta5252a52Mexico[31]
E. pisonis462m/sm + 42st/a46Mexico[31]
E. pisonis4646a46Unknown[32]
E. pisonis4646a46Brazil[28]
Gobiomorus dormitor486m/sm + 42a54Mexico[27]
Hypseleotris cyprinoides4848a48Japan[30]
Mogurnda mogurnda466sm + 40st/a52Australia[30]
Butinae
Ophiocara porocephala4848a48Thailand[30]
Oxyeleotris marmorata462m + 2sm + 42a50Thailand[30]
O. marmorata464sm + 42a50Indonesia[33]
O. marmorata462m + 2sm+ 42a50Thailand[34]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Paim, F.G.; Nirchio, M.; Oliveira, C.; Rossi, A.R. Sex Chromosomes and Internal Telomeric Sequences in Dormitator latifrons (Richardson 1844) (Eleotridae: Eleotrinae): An Insight into Their Origin in the Genus. Genes 2020, 11, 659. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/genes11060659

AMA Style

Paim FG, Nirchio M, Oliveira C, Rossi AR. Sex Chromosomes and Internal Telomeric Sequences in Dormitator latifrons (Richardson 1844) (Eleotridae: Eleotrinae): An Insight into Their Origin in the Genus. Genes. 2020; 11(6):659. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/genes11060659

Chicago/Turabian Style

Paim, Fabilene Gomes, Mauro Nirchio, Claudio Oliveira, and Anna Rita Rossi. 2020. "Sex Chromosomes and Internal Telomeric Sequences in Dormitator latifrons (Richardson 1844) (Eleotridae: Eleotrinae): An Insight into Their Origin in the Genus" Genes 11, no. 6: 659. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/genes11060659

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop