Next Article in Journal
Evaluating the Usefulness of Human DNA Quantification to Predict DNA Profiling Success of Historical Bone Samples
Previous Article in Journal
Being a Dog: A Review of the Domestication Process
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Genome-Wide Analysis of the Rad21/REC8 Gene Family in Cotton (Gossypium spp.)

1
Biotechnology Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
2
National Nanfan Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Sanya 572024, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work and are co-first authors.
Submission received: 6 April 2023 / Revised: 26 April 2023 / Accepted: 26 April 2023 / Published: 27 April 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Plant Genetics and Genomics)

Abstract

:
Cohesin is a ring-shaped protein complex and plays a critical role in sister chromosome cohesion, which is a key event during mitosis and meiosis. Meiotic recombination protein REC8 is one of the subunits of the cohesion complex. Although REC8 genes have been characterized in some plant species, little is known about them in Gossypium. In this study, 89 REC8 genes were identified and analyzed in 16 plant species (including 4 Gossypium species); 12 REC8 genes were identified in Gossypium. hirsutum, 11 in Gossypium. barbadense, 7 in Gossypium. raimondii, and 5 in Gossypium. arboreum. In a phylogenetic analysis, the 89 RCE8 genes clustered into 6 subfamilies (I–VI). The chromosome location, exon-intron structure, and motifs of the REC8 genes in the Gossypium species were also analyzed. Expression patterns of GhREC8 genes in various tissues and under abiotic stress treatments were analyzed based on public RNA-seq data, which indicated that GhREC8 genes might have different functions in growth and development. Additionally, qRT-PCR analysis showed that MeJA, GA, SA, and ABA treatments could induce the expression of GhREC8 genes. In general, the genes of the REC8 gene family of cotton were systematically analyzed, and their potential function in cotton mitosis, meiosis, and in response to abiotic stress and hormones were preliminary predicted, which provided an important basis for further research on cotton development and resistance to abiotic stress.

1. Introduction

Cohesion, a muti-subunit protein complex, is essential for sister chromatid cohesion and chromatin loop structure in mitosis and meiosis [1]. The loss and mutation of cohesion can cause abnormal chromosomal separation or alloploidy gamete production. Genes involved in the regulation of meiosis have been extensively studied in Arabidopsis, rice, maize and many other plants [2,3,4]. Meiotic recombination protein REC8, one of the subunits of the meiosis-specific cohesion protein complex, is conserved in functional evolution from yeast to humans. Previous studies have shown that the REC8 gene is required for correct meiosis. During meiosis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Schizosaccharomyces pombe, REC8 was found in the cohesion complex, which has homology to SCC 1/Mcd 1/Rad 21 proteins [5,6,7]. REC8 mutations in S. cerevisiae and S. pombe disrupt the cohesion of sister chromosome arms and centromeres, resulting in reduced recombination, affecting the formation of the synaptonemal complex and causing premature separation of sister chromatids during the first meiotic division [5,7,8,9]. Subsequently, proteins homologous to yeast REC8 have been found in other species, including mice, humans [6,10], Caenorhabditis elegans [11], Arabidopsis thaliana [12,13], Zea mays [14], Drosophila [15], Xenopus laevis [16], Oryza sativa [17], and Citrullus lanatus [18]. In C. elegans, RNAi of REC8 leads to univalent formation and chromosomal fragmentation at diakinesis [11]. In Arabidopsis, syn1/dif1 plants exhibit defects in chromosome cohesion and condensation during meiosis, resulting in chromosome fragmentation and the formation of microsporophyll [19,20]. In maize, absence of first division (AFD1) is a homologous protein of REC8, and mutations in AFD1 affect leptotene chromosomes [14]. Different homologs of REC8 are present in different species, and a species may even have several homologs. The first protein identified in this protein family was fission yeast Rad21, which is involved in the repair of DNA double-bond breaks [21]. REC8 is not only required for cohesion between sister chromatids [22] but also for the assembly of synaptonemal complexes [23], organization of meiotic chromatid structure [24], and homologous chromosome recombination [25]. It is also associated with the synapsis of homologous chromosomes and plays the same role in plant cells [26].
Cotton is not only a fiber and oil crop but also a high-protein food crop and important strategic material. Homologous recombination that takes place during meiosis (using the principle of homologous recombination) is a critical process for breeding and developing new varieties with traits for high yield, disease resistance, and ornamental appeal, so the study of genes related to the meiosis process is of great biological and economic significance [27]. REC8 genes have been identified in many species; however, few studies on their functions in cotton have been reported, especially in the mechanism of fertility and the development process. In the present study, 89 REC8 genes in 16 species were identified and analyzed. Among them, 35 cotton REC8 genes were characterized, and structural diversity, phylogenetic relationships, the chromosomal distribution, and expression levels in different tissues and under different abiotic stresses were investigated. Our research provides insights that will help develop a comprehensive understanding of the biological functions of the cotton REC8 gene family in fertility and responses to various stresses.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Identification of REC8 Gene Family Members in Gossypium Species

Genome sequences file of G. arboretum (CRI, version 1.0), G. raimondi (JGI, version 2.0), G. hirsutism (ZJU, version 1.0), and G. barbadense (ZJU, version 1.0) were downloaded from COTTONGENE (http://www.cottongen.org/ (accessed on 30 June 2022)) and the Cotton Functional Genomics Database (https://cottonfgd.org/ (accessed on 29 June 2022)). The Arabidopsis REC8 genome file was obtained from The Arabidopsis Information Resource (TAIR, https://www.Arabidopsis.org/ (accessed on 22 June 2022)). Genomic data for Zea mays, Oryza sativa, Sorghum bicolor, Ananas comosus, Vitis vinifera, Populus trichocarpa, Theobroma cacao, Glycine max, and Amborella trichopoda were downloaded from the Ensemble database (http://plants.ensembl.org/index.html (accessed on 6 August 2022)). Genome sequence data of Volvox carteri and Chlamydomonas reinhardtii were downloaded from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI).
We used AtREC8 amino acid sequences as query sequences to search the four cotton species’ protein databases for candidate sequences by the blastp program (E-value < 1 × 10−5). Candidate amino acid sequences were determined using the Hmmsearch program and Conserved Domain Database (CDD) in NCBI to search for the REC8 domain (PF04824 and PF04825) with default parameters. REC8s in Zea mays, Oryza sativa, Sorghum bicolor, Ananas comosus, Vitis vinifera, Populus trichocarpa, Theobroma cacao, Glycine max, and Amborella trichopoda were identified following the same process.
Then, the physical and chemical properties of REC8 genes of cotton were analyzed using the online tool ExPASy (http://web.expasy.org/ (accessed on 22 September 2022)), and the subcellular localization of these genes were predicted by Cell-PLoc (http://www.csbio.sjtu.edu.cn/bioinf/Cell-PLoc-2/ (accessed on 4 January 2023)).

2.2. Phylogenetic Analysis

The REC8 protein sequences from 16 species were aligned using MUSCLE, and the neighbor-joining (NJ) phylogenetic tree of 16 species was constructed using MEGA 7 [28], with a bootstraps value of 1000 and other parameters set to the default value. The resulting tree was then decorated using iTOL (https://itol.embl.de/upload.cgi (accessed on 26 October 2022)).

2.3. Chromosomal Locations and Collinearity Analysis of Cotton REC8 Genes

The chromosome location information of four cotton species (G. arboretum, G. raimondii, G. hirsutum, and G. barbadense) was obtained from the reference cotton database. The distribution of REC8 genes on the four cotton chromosomes was drawn using TBtools [29]. The multiple collinearity scan (MCS-scanX) in TBtools was used to analyze the collinearity of REC8 genes. The collinearity map was drawn by using Basic CIRCOS in TBtools (v1.108).

2.4. Calculation of Selection Pressure for Duplicated Gene Pairs

CDS sequences of cotton REC8 genes were obtained from the reference cotton database, and then the non-synonymous (Ka) and synonymous substitution rates (Ks) were calculated using TBtools software (v1.108). A Ka/Ka ratio > 1 means positive selection, a Ka/Ka ratio = 1 indicates neutral selection, and a Ka/Ka ratio < 1 represents negative selection.

2.5. Gene Structure, Motif, and Domain Analysis

The conserved motifs of REC8 proteins were identified using Multiple Em for Motif Elicitation (MEME) (http://memesuite.org/ (accessed on 25 June 2022)) with the p-value of each motif on each protein being lower than 1 × 10−5. The exon–intron structure of REC8 genes was analyzed using TBtools. Phylogenetic trees with motif, domain, and gene structure were visualized using TBtools.

2.6. Analysis of Cis-Acting Elements in REC8 Promoters

The 2000 bp upstream promoter sequences of REC8 genes were extracted. cis-acting elements were then predicted by PlantCare (http://bioinformatics.psb.ugent.be/webtools/plantcare/html/ (accessed on 28 September 2022)). A phylogenetic tree with identified elements was visualized using TBtools.

2.7. Expression Profile of REC8 Genes under Different Tissues and Stress

To analyze the expression pattern of REC8 genes under different tissues and stress (heat, cold, salt, and PEG), the transcriptome data were downloaded from the Cotton Omics Database (http://cotton.zju.edu.cn/10.rnasearch (accessed on 2 July 2022)) [30]. The heat map was drawn using the TBtools software (v1.108) by using fragments per kilo base of exon per million mapped (FPKM).

2.8. Plant Materials and Treatments

G. hirsutum cv. Coker 312 (R15) was grown in a chamber (28 °C, 16/8 h day/night). Plants at the third-leaf stage were treated with 100 μM MeJA, 2 mM SA, and 200 μM ABA. The leaves of treated plants were collected at 0 h, 3 h, 6 h, and 12 h and were frozen in liquid nitrogen immediately for further analysis.

2.9. RNA Extraction and qRT-PRC Analysis

Total RNA was extracted from the frozen leaves using RNAprep Pure Plant Kit (TianGen, Beijing, China). HiScript III Reverse Transcriptanse (Vazyme, Nanjing, China) was used to convert RNA to cDNA. The qPCR analysis was performed using Taq Pro Universal SYBR qPCR Master Mix (Vazyme, Nanjing, China) on the ABI 7500 Fast Real-Time PCR system (Thermo, Waltham, MA, USA). Three biological replicates were performed in all analyses. GhUBQ7 was used as the internal reference gene, and the data were analyzed using the 2−∆∆Ct method [31]. The primers are listed in Table S6.

3. Results

3.1. Identification of REC8 Genes in Cotton

To identify the REC8 genes in the 4 cotton species and the other 12 species, we selected candidate genes from a search and comparison using HMMsearch and blastp programs. Then, the obtained sequences were filtered via CDD. Listed in Table S1 are the 12 REC8 genes found in G. hirsutum, 11 in G. barbadense, 7 in G. raimondii, 5 in G. arboretum, 3 in A. comosus, 4 in Arabidopsis, 7 in maize, 4 in rice, 4 in A. trichopoda, 9 in P. trichocarpa, 6 in G. max, 5 in S. bicolor, 7 in T. cacao, 3 in V. vinifera, 1 in V. carteri, and 1 in C. reinhardtii. Twice as many REC8 genes were found in G. hirsutum and G. barbadense as in G. raimondii and G. arboretum, which indicated that the tetraploid cotton is obtained by hybridizing the diploid A genome and the diploid D genome, followed by chromosome doubling. In addition, the characteristics of REC8 proteins in cotton were analyzed, including the protein sequence size, molecular weight (MV), isoelectric point (pI), and instability coefficient (Table S2). The length of 35 REC8 proteins ranged from 529 aa to 1193 aa; GbREC8-02-D had the fewest amino acids, and GhREC8-03-D and GrREC8-02 had the most. The molecular weight was between 59,052.57 and 130,250.69 kD and was lowest for GbREC8-02-D and highest for GhREC8-03-D. The pI ranged from 4.29 to 7.32; two proteins had a pI less than 7, and 33 had a pI greater than 7, indicating that most of the REC8 proteins were alkaline. The REC8 proteins were predicted to be localized in the nucleus where the REC8 proteins worked probably (Table S2).

3.2. Phylogenetic Analysis of the Cotton REC8 Gene Family

To further study the evolutionary relationship of the REC8 gene family in plants, 89 REC8 protein sequences from 4 cotton species and 12 other species were used to construct the phylogenetic NJ tree using MEGA 7 software. In the phylogenetic tree, the REC8 proteins were clustered into 6 subfamilies (I–VI) (Figure 1) with 3 members in subfamily I, 16 in II, 8 in III, 22 in IV, 18 in V, and 22 in VI. Except for subfamilies III and VI, the other four subfamilies were composed of REC8 genes from monocotyledon and dicotyledons, indicating that REC8 proteins were highly conserved. Subfamily III comprised REC8 genes from Arabidopsis and the four cotton species, and subfamily VI comprised REC8 genes from T. cacao and the four cotton species. We found that the REC8 genes of cotton were more closely related to those of T. cacao, since the REC8 genes of cotton and cacao were closely clustered in the phylogenetic tree. In subfamilies II and IV, one TcREC8 gene corresponded to five homologous REC8 genes from three Gossypium species: one from G. arboretum, two from G. hirsutum, and two from G. barbadense. In addition, AtREC8-04 has a role in DNA repair [32], and loss of function in AtREC8-01 and AtREC8-03 affects meiosis [12,20,33]. GhREC8-06-A, GhREC8-02-D, GbREC8-02-D, GbREC8-01-A, GrREC8-03, GrREC8-01, and AtREC8-04 in subfamily III were on the same branch, indicating that they may be involved in DNA repair. GhREC8-04-D, GhREC8-05-A, GbREC8-04-D, GbREC8-05-A, and GaREC8-03 in subfamily IV may have similar functions as AtREC8-03.

3.3. Chromosomal Distribution and Synthesis Analysis of REC8 Genes in Cotton

Based on the genomes of the four cotton species, we analyzed the location of the REC8 genes on the chromosomes. One GaREC8 gene was on each of three chromosomes (Chr04, Chr05, and Chr08), and two were on Chr13 (Figure 2a). Two GrREC8 genes were mapped on each of two chromosomes (Chr02 and Chr09), and Chr13 had three (Figure 2b). The chromosome distribution of REC8 genes was highly similar between G. hirsutum and G. barbadense (Figure 2c,d). The G. hirsutum genome had 12 GhREC8 genes among 7 chromosomes (1 each on chromosomes D04 and D05; 2 each on A05, A08, A13, D08, and D13). The G. barbadense genome had 11 GbREC8 genes among 7 chromosomes (1 each on D04, D05, and D13; 2 each on A05, A08, A13, and D08).
To elucidate the relationship of REC8 orthologs in cotton, we performed a synthetic analysis on four cotton species. A total of 35 REC8 genes of cotton have synthetic relationships, including 12 from G. hirsutum, 11 from G. barbadense, 7 from G. raimondii, and 5 from G. arboretum (Figure 3, Table S3). There were 47 orthologous/paralogous gene pairs: 4 gene pairs between G. hirsutum and G. hirsutum, 20 pairs between G. hirsutum and G. barbadense, 3 between G. hirsutum and G. raimondii, 7 between G. hirsutum and G. arboretum, 4 between G. barbadense and G. barbadense, 6 between G. barbadense and G. arboretum, 2 between G. barbadense and G. raimondii, and 1 between G. arboretum and G. raimondii. These results indicated that REC8 genes in G. hirsutum and G. barbadense had a close evolutionary relationship. Then, we analyzed the collinear relationship of REC8 genes between G. hirsutum and two species (A. thaliana and T. cacao). The results showed that the number of orthologous gene pairs between G. hirsutum and A. thaliana and T. cacao was 2 and 5, respectively (Figure S1, Table S4). Very few collinear gene pairs of G. hirsutum and the two species were anchored to the highly conserved synthetic blocks.
We calculated the Ka/Ks ratio of 47 duplicated REC8 gene pairs from 8 combinations of 4 cotton species (G. hirsutum vs. G. hirsutum, G. barbadense vs. G. barbadense, G. barbadense vs. G. arboretum, G. barbadense vs. G. raimondii, G. hirsutum vs. G. arboretum, G. hirsutum vs. G. barbadense, G. hirsutum vs. G. raimondii, and G. arboretum vs. G. raimondii) (Table S5). The results showed that the Ka/Ks ratios from 2 gene pairs (GhREC8-04-D/GbREC8-04-D and GhREC8-06-D/GbREC8-03-D) were larger than 1, indicating that these gene pairs experienced rapid evolution. A total of 23 gene pairs had a Ka/Ks ratio less than 0.5, and 22 gene pairs were between 0.5 and 1, leading us to hypothesize that these gene pairs have undergone strong purifying selection.

3.4. Structure Analysis of Cotton REC8 Genes

Structural differences in genes play an important role in the gene evolution of a gene family. To better understand the structure of REC8 genes in cotton, we analyzed the sequence structure, motif, and conserved domains of cotton REC8 genes based on the phylogenetic tree (Figure 4a). Ten motifs (named motifs 1 to 10) were predicted in the REC8 proteins by using MEME. Common motifs and similar motif arrangements were found in most REC8 proteins within the same subfamily, suggesting that the structure was conserved in these proteins. Eleven motifs were found in the proteins of subfamily V and IV except for GrREC8-04 and GrREC8-07. Motif 2 and motif 4 were absent in GhREC8-06-A, GhREC8-02-D, and GbREC8-02-D in subgroup III (Figure 4b). Whether these specific motifs have an effect on the function of REC8 proteins remains to be studied. Most cotton REC8 proteins had a similar domain to Arabidopsis REC8 except that GrREC8-04, GrREC8-07, GhREC8-06-A, GhREC8-02-D, and GbREC8-06-A lacked the N-segment Rad21_REC8 domain. AtREC8-02 in subgroup IV and AtREC8-04 in subgroup III had the MDN1 domain, which was not observed in REC8 proteins from cotton in the same subgroup. In addition, PTZ00449 and N_Asn amidohyd domains were found in GaREC8-04 and GaREC8-03, respectively, indicating that these domains might confer protein different biological functions (Figure 4c). Motifs 1, 2, 3, and 4 were in the N-terminal domain; motifs 9 and 10 were in the C-terminal domain.
Then, we analyzed the intron/exon structure of the REC8 genes. The structures were similar for REC8 genes in the same subclade, especially among genes in subfamily IV with 15 exons, indicating that REC8 gene structures are conserved among 4 species. However, 1 gene (GaREC8-03) in subclade II had 22 exons, 1 (GhREC8-04-D) had 11 exons, and the other genes had 12 exons. In subclade III, 4 REC8 genes in cotton (GbREC8-01-A, GaREC8-05, GrREC8-01, and GrREC8-03) and 1 in A. thaliana (AtREC8-04) had 13 exons, and 3 in cotton (GhREC8-06-A, GhREC8-02-D, and GbREC8-02-D) had 8 exons (Figure 4d). These results suggested that genes with different exon/intron numbers might have special biological functions.

3.5. Analysis of Cis-Acting Elements of the REC8 Genes in Cotton Species

Gene expression is regulated by upstream promoters, where many cis-acting elements are found. To better understand the regulation and potential function of the target genes, we extracted the 2000 bp upstream sequence from the predicted translation start site of each REC8 gene to analyze the cis-acting elements. Cis-acting elements involved in hormone (IAA/auxin, GA (gibberelins), MeJA (methyl jasmonate), SA (salicylic acid), and ABA (abscisic acid)) and stress responses (low temperature, drought, and defense) and development were predicted using the PlantCARE tool. Promoters of 14 genes contained an IAA-responsive element, 17 contained a GA-responsive element, 16 contained an SA-responsive element, 20 contained an ABA-responsive element, and 19 contained a MeJA-responsive element. Among stress elements found in the REC8 promoters, low-temperature response elements were found in promoters of 24 REC8 genes, drought response elements in those of 18, and defense and stress response elements in those of 15. Seven genes (GbREC8-03-A, GbREC8-01-D, GhREC8-01-A, GhREC8-04-A, GhREC8-01-D, GrREC8-04, and GaREC8-01) involved in low-temperature and drought responsiveness were found (Figure 5). These results showed that REC8 genes played a role in hormone, stress, and defense responses in cotton.

3.6. GhREC8 Gene Profiles in Different Tissues of Upland Cotton

To evaluate the potential role of the 12 GhREC8 genes in growth and development, publicly available transcriptome data were used to analyze gene expression patterns in fibers, ovules, anthers, bracts, filaments, leaves, petals, pistils, roots, sepals, stems, and torus (Figure 6). Six GhREC8 genes (GhREC8-03-D, GhREC8-04-A, GhREC8-02-A, GhREC8-06-D, GhREC8-01-D, GhREC8-03-A, and GhREC8-06-A) were highly expressed in almost all tissues and stages. GhREC8-04-D and GhREC8-05-A were similar in being highly expressed during ovule development in leaves, roots, and stems. There were high levels of GhREC8-05-D expression in anthers, bracts, the filament, pistils, and torus. Compared with fiber development, GhREC8-02-D showed relatively higher expression in other issues and stages. These results indicated that most GhREC8 genes were expressed in vegetative tissues.

3.7. Expression Patterns of GhREC8 Genes under Abiotic Stress and Hormone Treatments

To explore the potential function of the REC8 genes in response to abiotic stresses in upland cotton, we used public transcriptome data to analyze the effect of stresses from high temperatures, low temperatures, PEG, and salt and treatment with hormones (Figure 7). The expression of most GhREC8 genes did not change significantly after abiotic stress treatments. GhREC8-01-A and GhREC8-05-D were upregulated after high-temperature, NaCl, and PEG treatments, especially at 12 h and 24 h after treatments. However, GhREC8-01-A and GhREC8-05-D were downregulated after exposure at 4 °C. GhREC8-05-A was induced by high temperatures, 4 °C, NaCl, and PEG with respective peaks in expression at 1 h, 12 h, 6 h, and 24 h. After MeJA, SA, and ABA treatments, most GhREC8 genes were upregulated, and the expression of three genes (GhREC8-01-D, GhREC8-02-A, and GhREC8-06-D) peaked by 6 h after treatments, and two (GhREC8-01-A and GhREC8-05-D) were downregulated. GhREC8-04-D was upregulated after MeJA and SA treatments, with respective maximum expression at 3 h and 6 h (Figure 8). These results indicated that GhREC8 might have potential functions in response to phytohormone and abiotic stresses.

4. Discussion

Cohesin is a ring-shaped protein complex that is required for sister chromatid cohesion and DBS repair [34,35]. Centromeric sister chromatid cohesion is essential during meiosis. Previous studies have shown that REC8 is crucial for meiosis. The four members (SYN1–SYN4) belonging to the Rad21 gene family in A. thaliana have been identified. SYN2/4 are involved in mitosis, while SYN1 is essential for meiosis [13], and SYN3 is essential for megagametogenesis [36]. Mutations of SYN1 (REC8) lead to male and female sterility in A. thaliana [37]. In rice, an Osrec8 mutant had abnormal homologous chromatid pairing and telomere bouquets [38]. The germination of pollen grains declined, and fruits were seedless after the knockout of ClREC8 in watermelon [18]. It can be seen that REC8 protein plays an important role in the fertility of monocots and dicots. Here, we identified 35 REC8 genes in 4 cotton species, and tetraploid cotton had twice more REC8 genes than diploid cotton, which reflected the fact that tetraploid cotton descended from the hybridization of A- and D-genome ancestors. Phylogenetic tree analysis showed that GhREC8 genes (GhREC8-05-D, GhREC-01-A, GhREC8-06-A, GhREC8-02-D, GhREC8-04-D, and GhREC8-05-A) were in the same clade as SYN1-4 (Figure 1, Table S1), indicating that these genes may have a similar function in meiosis and mitosis. Other studies have shown that REC8 genes were highly expressed in reproductive tissues [1,13,18]. Similarly, most GhREC8 genes were highly expressed in floral organs (Figure 6). However, whether it could affect meiosis and miosis needs further research.
Heterosis is widely used in agriculture and has made a great contribution to world food security. The artificial creation of apomiesis may be another effective way to achieve heterosis fixation. The production of cloned gametes is one of the key steps in artificial apomiesis. In previous studies, the REC8 gene was used to produce cloned gametes in rice and Arabidopsis [39,40]. REC8 genes in the same clade as AtREC8-01 (AtREC8) and OsREC8-02(OsREC8) may be used for cloned gamete production in cotton.
Rad21/Rec8 proteins from different species share a conserved N-terminal domain and C-terminal domain, which are involved in the interaction with Smc1-Smc3 heterodimer during cohesion establishment [40,41]. Similar N- and C-domains were observed in REC8 proteins from Arabidopsis and four cotton species (Figure 4c). Moreover, different exon/intron structures were observed in cotton REC8 genes (Figure 4d), suggesting differences in gene function and RNA splicing of REC8 gene family members. The promoters of REC8 genes contained cis-acting elements associated with phytohormone, stress, and defense responses (Figure 5). Then, we analyzed the expression of GhREC8 genes under MeJA, SA, and ABA treatments, and most were upregulated after hormone treatments, especially after SA treatment, indicating these genes might be involved in hormone regulation. ABA could interact with the JA and SA signal pathways [42]. JA acts as a defense hormone and is also involved in male sterility, root growth, leaf senescence, and other processes [43,44]. Because most GhREC8 genes were induced by MeJA, they may be related to fertility (Figure 8). The abiotic stresses tested also had different effects on GhREC8 expression. Most genes were not affected by the abiotic stresses, indicating that these genes did not have an important role in plant responses to these stresses. The expression of GhREC8-01-A, GhREC8-05-A, and GhREC8-05-D, however, was sharply induced by PEG (Figure 7), and they had drought response elements in their promoters, suggesting that these genes might be involved in drought tolerance. These mechanisms still need further research. In conclusion, our results indicated that cotton REC8 genes likely had multiple functions in the hormone and stress responses and development of plants. Our next step is to study the role of the REC8 genes in cotton fertility and responses to stresses, which may contribute to the achievement of apomiesis and a further understanding of the mechanisms of resistance to stresses.

5. Conclusions

In this study, we identified 89 REC8 family genes in 16 species, and these genes were divided into 6 subfamilies. Tissue-specific expression pattern analysis indicated that GhREC8 genes were expressed variously in cotton, indicating that they played different roles in cotton growth and development. An analysis of promoter cis-elements and expression levels under abiotic stresses and hormone treatments showed that GhREC8 genes responded to different stimuli. This study provides valuable information about the cotton REC8 gene family, which lays a foundation for further revealing the biological roles of REC8 genes in cotton meiosis, mitosis, and stress adaptation.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://0-www-mdpi-com.brum.beds.ac.uk/article/10.3390/genes14050993/s1, Figure S1: Synteny analysis of REC8 genes between G. hirsutum and two species (Arabidopsis thaliana and Theobroma cacao). Table S1: REC8 genes in different species. Table S2: Characteristics of cotton REC8 genes. Table S3: Gene pairs in collinearity. Table S4: Gene pairs between G. hirsutum and two species. Table S5: Ka versus Ks of gene pairs. Table S6: Primers for qRT-PCR.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.W. and L.Z.; Analysis and experiments, L.Z. and Y.W.; Manuscript preparation, Y.W. and L.Z.; Review and project administration, H.C. and H.G.; All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was financially supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province (grant no. C2022204205) and Nan fan special project, CAAS (grant no: YBXM14).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Zhang, L.R.; Tao, J.Y.; Wang, S.X.; Chong, K.; Wang, T. The rice OsRad21-4, an orthologue of yeast Rec8 protein, is required for efficient meiosis. Plant Mol. Biol. 2006, 60, 533–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Jing, J.L.; Zhang, T.; Kao, Y.H.; Huang, T.H.; Wang, C.; He, Y. ZmMTOPVIB enables DNA double-strand break formation and bipolar spindle assembly during maize meiosis. Plant Physiol. 2020, 184, 1811–1822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Zhang, F.; Shen, Y.; Miao, C.; Cao, Y.; Shi, W.; Du, G.; Tang, D.; Li, Y.; Luo, Q.; Cheng, Z. OsRAD51D promotes homologous pairing and recombination by preventing nonhomologous interactions in rice meiosis. New Phytol. 2020, 227, 824–839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Dorn, A.; Puchta, H. Analyzing somatic DNA repair in Arabidopsis meiotic mutants. Methods Mol. Biol. 2020, 2061, 359–366. [Google Scholar]
  5. Franz, K.; Peter, M.; Marta, G.; Buonomo, S.B.; Michaelis, C.; Nairz, K.; Nasmyth, K. A central role for cohesins in sister chromatid cohesion formation of axial elements, and recombination during yeast meiosis. Cell 1999, 98, 91–103. [Google Scholar]
  6. Parisi, S.; Mckay, M.J.; Molnar, M.; Thompson, M.A.; Kohli, J. Rec8p, a meiotic recombination and sister chromatid cohesion phosphoprotein of the Rad21p family conserved from fission yeast to humans. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1999, 19, 3515–3528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Watanabe, Y.; Nurse, P. Cohesin Rec8 is required for reductional chromosome segregation at meiosis. Nature 1999, 400, 461–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Nasmyth, K. Disseminating the genome: Joining, resolving, and separating sister chromatids during mitosis and meiosis. Annu. Rev. Genet. 2001, 35, 673–745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kitajima, T.S.; Yokobayashi, S.; Yamamoto, M.; Watanabe, Y. Distinct cohesin complexes organize meiotic chromosome domains. Science 2003, 300, 1152–1155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Darwiche, N.; Freeman, L.A.; Strunnikov, A. Characterization of the components of the putative mammalian sister chromatid cohesion complex. Gene 1999, 233, 39–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Pasierbek, P.; Jantsch, M.; Melcher, M.; Schleiffer, A.; Schweizer, D.; Loidl, J. A Caenorhabditis elegans cohesion protein with functions in meiotic chromosome pairing and disjunction. Genes Dev. 2001, 15, 1349–1360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Dong, F.; Cai, X.; Makaroff, C.A. Cloning and characterization of two Arabidopsis genes that belong to the RAD21/REC8 family of chromosome cohesin proteins. Gene 2001, 271, 99–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Bai, X.; Peirson, B.N.; Dong, F.; Xue, C.; Makaroff, C.A. Isolation and characterization of SYN1, a RAD21-like gene essential for meiosis in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 1999, 11, 417–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Golubovskaya, I.N.; Hamant, O.; Timofejeva, L.; Wang, C.J.; Braun, D.; Meeley, R.; Cande, W.Z. Alleles of afd1 dissect REC8 functions during meiotic prophase I. J. Cell Sci. 2006, 119, 3306–3315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Warren, W.D.; Lin, E.; Nheu, T.V.; Hime, G.R.; McKay, M.J. Drad21, a Drosophila rad21 homologue expressed in S-phase cells. Gene 2000, 250, 77–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Losada, A.; Hirano, M.; Hirano, T. Identification of Xenopus SMC protein complexes required for sister chromatid cohesion. Genes Dev. 1998, 12, 1986–1997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Zhang, L.R.; Tao, J.Y.; Wang, T. Molecular characterization of OsRAD21-1, a rice homologue of yeast RAD21 essential for mitotic chromosome cohesion. J. Exp. Bot. 2004, 55, 1149–1152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Cao, L.; Li, C.; Li, H.; Wang, Z.; Jiang, Y.; Guo, Y.; Sun, P.; Chen, X.; Li, Q.; Tian, H. Disruption of REC8 in Meiosis I led to watermelon seedless. Plant Sci. 2022, 323, 111394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Bhatt, A.M.; Lister, C.; Page, T.; Fransz, P.; Findlay, K.; Jones, G.H.; Dickinson, H.G.; Dean, C. The DIF1 gene of Arabidopsis is required for meiotic chromosome segregation and belongs to the REC8/RAD21 cohesin gene family. Plant J. 1999, 19, 463–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Cai, X.; Dong, F.; Edelmann, R.E.; Makaroff, C.A. The Arabidopsis SYN1 cohesin protein is required for sister chromatid arm cohesion and homologous chromosome pairing. J. Cell Sci. 2003, 116, 2999–3007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Birkenbihl, R.P.; Subramani, S. Cloning and characterization of rad21 an essential gene of Schizosaccharomyces pombe involved in DNA double-strand-break repair. Nucleic Acids Res. 1992, 20, 6605–6611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Hou, H.; Kyriacou, E.; Thadani, R.; Klutstein, M.; Chapman, J.H.; Cooper, J.P. Centromeres are dismantled by foundational meiotic proteins Spo11 and Rec8. Nature 2021, 591, 671–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Xu, H.; Beasley, M.D.; Warren, W.D.; Horst, G.T.; McKay, M.J. Absence of mouse REC8 cohesin promotes synapsis of sister chromatids in meiosis. Dev. Cell 2005, 8, 949–961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Yoon, S.W.; Lee, M.S.; Xaver, M.; Zhang, L.; Hong, S.G.; Kong, Y.J.; Cho, H.R.; Kleckner, N.; Kim, K.P. Meiotic prophase roles of Rec8 in crossover recombination and chromosome structure. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016, 44, 9296–9314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Shahid, S. The rules of attachment: REC8 cohesin connects chromatin architecture and recombination machinery in meiosis. Plant Cell 2020, 32, 808–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Lambing, C.; Tock, A.J.; Topp, S.D.; Choi, K.; Kuo, P.C.; Zhao, X.; Osman, K.; Higgins, J.D.; Franklin, F.C.H.; Henderson, I.R. Interacting genomic landscapes of REC8-Cohesin, chromatin, and meiotic recombination in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2020, 32, 1218–1239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Qi, L.; Friebe, B.; Zhang, P.; Gill, B.S. Homoeologous recombination, chromosome engineering and crop improvement. Chromosome Res. 2007, 15, 3–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kumar, S.; Stecher, G.; Tamura, K. MEGA7: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2016, 33, 1870–1874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Chen, C.; Chen, H.; Zhang, Y.; Thomas, H.R.; Frank, M.H.; He, Y.; Xia, R. TBtools: An integrative toolkit developed for interactive analyses of big biological data. Mol. Plant 2020, 13, 1194–1202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Hu, Y.; Chen, J.; Fang, L.; Zhang, Z.; Ma, W.; Niu, Y.; Ju, L.; Deng, J.; Zhao, T.; Lian, J. Gossypium barbadense and Gossypium hirsutum genomes provide insights into the origin and evolution of allotetraploid cotton. Nat. Genet. 2019, 51, 739–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Livak, K.J.; Schmittgen, T.D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods 2013, 25, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. José, A.; Capito, C.; Kozak, J.; Costa-Nunes, P. The AtRAD21.1 and AtRAD21.3 Arabidopsis cohesins play a synergistic role in somatic DNA double strand break damage repair. BMC Plant Biol. 2014, 14, 402–432. [Google Scholar]
  33. Chelysheva, L. AtREC8 and AtSCC3 are essential to the monopolar orientation of the kinetochores during meiosis. J. Cell Sci. 2005, 118, 4621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Schubert, V.; Weißleder, A.; Ali, H.; Fuchs, J.; Lermontova, I.; Meister, A.; Schubert, I. Cohesin gene defects may impair sister chromatid alignment and genome stability in Arabidopsis thaliana. Chromosoma 2009, 118, 591–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Bauerschmidt, C.; Arrichiello, C.; Burdak-Rothkamm, S.; Woodcock, M.; Hill, M.A.; Stevens, D.L.; Rothkamm, K. Cohesin promotes the repair of ionizing radiation-induced DNA double-strand breaks in replicated chromatin. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010, 38, 477–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Yuan, L.; Yang, X.; Auman, D.; Makaroff, C.A. Expression of epitope-tagged SYN3 cohesin proteins can disrupt meiosis in Arabidopsis. J. Genet. Genom. 2014, 41, 153–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Peirson, B.N.; Owen, H.A.; Feldmann, K.A.; Makaroff, C.A. Characterization of three male-sterile mutants of Arabidopsis thaliana exhibiting alterations in meiosis. Sex. Plant Reprod. 1996, 9, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Shao, T.; Tang, D.; Wang, K.; Wang, M.; Che, L.; Qin, B.; Yu, H.; Li, M.; Gu, M.; Cheng, Z. OsREC8 is essential for chromatid cohesion and metaphase I monopolar orientation in rice meiosis. Plant Physiol. 2011, 156, 1386–1396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Mieulet, D.; Jolivet, S.; Rivard, M.; Cromer, L.; Vernet, A.; Mayonove, P.; Pereira, L.; Droc, G.; Courtois, B.; Guiderdoni, E.; et al. Turning meiosis into mitosis. PLoS Biol. 2009, 7, e1000124. [Google Scholar]
  40. Mieulet, D.; Jolivet, S.; Rivard, M.; Cromer, L.; Vernet, A.; Mayonove, P.; Pereira, L.; Droc, G.; Courtois, B.; Guiderdoni, E.; et al. Turning rice meiosis into mitosis. Cell Res. 2016, 26, 1242–1254. [Google Scholar]
  41. Nasmyth, K. Segregating sister genomes: The molecular biology of chromosome separation. Science 2002, 297, 559–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Gruber, S.; Haering, C.H.; Nasmyth, K. Chromosomal cohesin forms a ring. Cell 2003, 112, 765–777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Ku, Y.S.; Sintaha, M.; Cheung, M.Y.; Lam, H.M. Plant hormone signaling crosstalks between biotic and abiotic stress responses. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 3206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Yan, Y.; Huang, P.C.; Borrego, E.; Kolomiets, M. New perspectives into jasmonate roles in maize. Plant Signal. Behav. 2014, 9, e970442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Phylogenetic relationships of 89 identified REC8 genes from 4 cotton species and 12 other plant species. Six subfamilies (I–VI) are colored in different colors. Different color shapes represent different species. The neighbor-joining (NJ) phylogeny tree was created using MEGA 7 (bootstrap value = 1000).
Figure 1. Phylogenetic relationships of 89 identified REC8 genes from 4 cotton species and 12 other plant species. Six subfamilies (I–VI) are colored in different colors. Different color shapes represent different species. The neighbor-joining (NJ) phylogeny tree was created using MEGA 7 (bootstrap value = 1000).
Genes 14 00993 g001
Figure 2. Distribution of REC8 genes on chromosomes of (a) G. arboretum, (b) G. raimondii, (c) G. hirsutum, and (d) G. barbadense. Chromosome numbers are shown on the left of the chromosomes. REC8 genes are labeled on the right of the chromosomes. Scale bar on the left indicates the chromosome lengths (Mb).
Figure 2. Distribution of REC8 genes on chromosomes of (a) G. arboretum, (b) G. raimondii, (c) G. hirsutum, and (d) G. barbadense. Chromosome numbers are shown on the left of the chromosomes. REC8 genes are labeled on the right of the chromosomes. Scale bar on the left indicates the chromosome lengths (Mb).
Genes 14 00993 g002
Figure 3. Syntenic analysis of REC8 genes from four cotton species. Chromosomes of G. arboretum are in yellow, G. raimondii in dark blue, G. hirsutum in red, and G. barbadense in light blue.
Figure 3. Syntenic analysis of REC8 genes from four cotton species. Chromosomes of G. arboretum are in yellow, G. raimondii in dark blue, G. hirsutum in red, and G. barbadense in light blue.
Genes 14 00993 g003
Figure 4. Phylogenetic relationship, motif, domain, and gene structure of REC8 genes from cotton and Arabidopsis. (a) The NJ phylogenetic tree was constructed using MEGA 7 software based on the REC8 protein sequences from four cotton species and Arabidopsis. Five clusters (I–V) are labeled in different colors. (b) Motif composition of REC8 proteins from four cotton species and Arabidopsis. The 10 motifs are displayed in different colored boxes. The scale bar at the bottom represents the length of REC8 amino acid sequences (aa). (c) Conserved domain in REC8 proteins from four cotton species and Arabidopsis. Different domains are labeled in different colors. The scale bar at the bottom represents the length of REC8 amino acid sequences (aa). (d) Intron/exon structure of REC8 genes from four cotton species and Arabidopsis. CDS and UTR are displayed in green and yellow boxes, respectively. The scale bar at the bottom represents the length of REC8 genomic sequences (bp).
Figure 4. Phylogenetic relationship, motif, domain, and gene structure of REC8 genes from cotton and Arabidopsis. (a) The NJ phylogenetic tree was constructed using MEGA 7 software based on the REC8 protein sequences from four cotton species and Arabidopsis. Five clusters (I–V) are labeled in different colors. (b) Motif composition of REC8 proteins from four cotton species and Arabidopsis. The 10 motifs are displayed in different colored boxes. The scale bar at the bottom represents the length of REC8 amino acid sequences (aa). (c) Conserved domain in REC8 proteins from four cotton species and Arabidopsis. Different domains are labeled in different colors. The scale bar at the bottom represents the length of REC8 amino acid sequences (aa). (d) Intron/exon structure of REC8 genes from four cotton species and Arabidopsis. CDS and UTR are displayed in green and yellow boxes, respectively. The scale bar at the bottom represents the length of REC8 genomic sequences (bp).
Genes 14 00993 g004
Figure 5. Cis-acting element analysis of promoters of REC8 genes from four cotton species and Arabidopsis. Different colored boxes represent different cis-acting elements. An NJ phylogenetic tree on the left from REC8 protein sequences was constructed using MEGA7.0. The scale bar at the bottom represents the length of promoters (bp).
Figure 5. Cis-acting element analysis of promoters of REC8 genes from four cotton species and Arabidopsis. Different colored boxes represent different cis-acting elements. An NJ phylogenetic tree on the left from REC8 protein sequences was constructed using MEGA7.0. The scale bar at the bottom represents the length of promoters (bp).
Genes 14 00993 g005
Figure 6. Expression pattern of GhREC8 genes in different issues. The heat map was drawn based on RNA-Seq data using TBtools. Yellow and blue represent high and low expression levels, respectively. Scale bar represents log2(FPKM).
Figure 6. Expression pattern of GhREC8 genes in different issues. The heat map was drawn based on RNA-Seq data using TBtools. Yellow and blue represent high and low expression levels, respectively. Scale bar represents log2(FPKM).
Genes 14 00993 g006
Figure 7. Expression level of GhREC8 genes under different stresses (37 °C, 4 °C, NaCl, and PEG). The heat map was drawn based on RNA-Seq data using TBtools. Yellow and blue represent high and low expression levels, respectively. Scale bar represents log2(FPKM).
Figure 7. Expression level of GhREC8 genes under different stresses (37 °C, 4 °C, NaCl, and PEG). The heat map was drawn based on RNA-Seq data using TBtools. Yellow and blue represent high and low expression levels, respectively. Scale bar represents log2(FPKM).
Genes 14 00993 g007
Figure 8. Expression level of GhREC8 genes in leaves after MeJA, SA, and ABA treatments for 0, 3, 6, and 12 h. Data represent means (±SD) of three biological replicates.
Figure 8. Expression level of GhREC8 genes in leaves after MeJA, SA, and ABA treatments for 0, 3, 6, and 12 h. Data represent means (±SD) of three biological replicates.
Genes 14 00993 g008
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, Y.; Zhou, L.; Guo, H.; Cheng, H. Genome-Wide Analysis of the Rad21/REC8 Gene Family in Cotton (Gossypium spp.). Genes 2023, 14, 993. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/genes14050993

AMA Style

Wang Y, Zhou L, Guo H, Cheng H. Genome-Wide Analysis of the Rad21/REC8 Gene Family in Cotton (Gossypium spp.). Genes. 2023; 14(5):993. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/genes14050993

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Yali, Lili Zhou, Huiming Guo, and Hongmei Cheng. 2023. "Genome-Wide Analysis of the Rad21/REC8 Gene Family in Cotton (Gossypium spp.)" Genes 14, no. 5: 993. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/genes14050993

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop