Next Article in Journal
Urbanization Paradox of Environmental Policies in Korean Local Governments
Next Article in Special Issue
Monitoring Roadbed Stability in Permafrost Area of Qinghai–Tibet Railway by MT-InSAR Technology
Previous Article in Journal
Why Did the “Missing Middle” Miss the Train? An Actors-In-Systems Exploration of Barriers to Intensified Family Housing in Waterloo Region, Canada
Previous Article in Special Issue
Study on the Carbon and Nitrogen Isotope Characteristics and Sources and Their Influence on Carbon Sinks in Karst Reservoirs
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Comparative Analysis of Temporal-Spatial Variation on Mountain-Flatland Landscape Pattern in Karst Mountainous Areas of Southwest China: A Case Study of Yuxi City

by Li Wu 1, Jing Zhou 1 and Binggeng Xie 2,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Submission received: 25 December 2022 / Revised: 4 February 2023 / Accepted: 6 February 2023 / Published: 7 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Karst Land System and Sustainable Development)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Dear authors,

I found your paper interesting, however, it needs a revision.

The title (and introduction as well) does not reflect well the addressed issue, I think that the theme of your study is based on a comparison of the landscape change in the mountains and in the flat area, and both affect the development of the city, is not it?

The abstract is too long (552 words), the limit of the journal is just 200 words, and not well structured. 

The method used is ok, but the interpretation of results should be again betters structured, especially, the conclusions. 

Therefore, I think that the major revision is needed.  

Author Response

Thank you very much for your insightful comments, which further help us in improvement of quality and innovation of the manuscript. The attachment is a point-by-point response to your concerns.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report


Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Thank you very much for your insightful comments, which further help us in improvement of quality and innovation of the manuscript. The attachment is a point-by-point response to your concerns.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

Dear authors,

thank you for the revision and changes in your manuscript.

Author Response

Thank you very much for your reply. Thank you for your help and guidance.

Back to TopTop