Next Article in Journal
Persistence Analysis and Prediction of Low-Visibility Events at Valladolid Airport, Spain
Next Article in Special Issue
A Spectral Calculus for Lorentz Invariant Measures on Minkowski Space
Previous Article in Journal
Symmetry-Adapted Machine Learning for Information Security
Previous Article in Special Issue
Difference of Some Positive Linear Approximation Operators for Higher-Order Derivatives
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

An Upper Bound of the Third Hankel Determinant for a Subclass of q-Starlike Functions Associated with k-Fibonacci Numbers

1
Department of Mathematics, Abbottabad University of Science and Technology, Abbottabad 22010, Pakistan
2
Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC V8W 3R4, Canada
3
Department of Medical Research, China Medical University Hospital, China Medical University, Taichung 40402, Taiwan
4
Department of Mathematics and Informatics, Azerbaijan University, 71 Jeyhun Hajibeyli Street, Baku AZ1007, Azerbaijan
5
Government Akhtar Nawaz Khan (Shaheed) Degree College KTS, Haripur 22620, Pakistan
6
Department of Mathematical Sciences, Faculty of Science and Technology, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi 43600, Selangor, Malaysia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 15 May 2020 / Revised: 11 June 2020 / Accepted: 16 June 2020 / Published: 22 June 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Integral Transformation, Operational Calculus and Their Applications)

Abstract

:
In this paper, we use q-derivative operator to define a new class of q-starlike functions associated with k-Fibonacci numbers. This newly defined class is a subclass of class A of normalized analytic functions, where class A is invariant (or symmetric) under rotations. For this function class we obtain an upper bound of the third Hankel determinant.
MSC:
Primary 05A30, 30C45; Secondary 11B65, 47B38

1. Introduction and Definitions

The calculus without the notion of limits is called quantum calculus; it is usually called q-calculus or q-analysis. By applying q-calculus, univalent functions theory can be extended. Moreover, the q-derivative, such as the q-calculus operators (or the q-difference) operator, are used to developed a number of subclasses of analytic functions (see, for details, the survey-cum-expository review article by Srivastava [1]; see also a recent article [2] which appeared in this journal, Symmetry).
Ismail et al. [3] instigated the generalization of starlike functions by defining the class of q-starilke functions. A firm footing of the usage of the q-calculus in the context of Geometric Functions Theory was actually provided and the basic (or q-) hypergeometric functions were first used in Geometric Function Theory by Srivastava (see, for details [4]). Raghavendar and Swaminathan [5] studied certain basic concepts of close-to-convex functions. Janteng et al. [6] published a paper in which the (q) generalization of some subclasses of analytic functions have studied. Further, q-hypergeometric functions, the q-operators were studied in many recent works (see, for example, [7,8,9]). The q-calculus applications in operator theory could be found in [4,10]. The coefficient inequality for q-starlike and q-close-to-convex functions with respect to Janowski functions were studied by Srivastava et al. [8,11] recently, (see also [12]). Further development on this subject could be seen in [7,9,13,14]. For a comprehensive review of the theory and applications of the q-derivative (or the q-difference) operator and related literature, we refer the reader to the above-mentioned work [1].
We denote by A the class of functions which are analytic and having the form:
f z = z + n = 2 a n z n
in the open unit disk U given by
U = z : z C and z < 1
and normalized by the following conditions:
f 0 = 0 = f 0 1 .
The subordinate between two functions f and g in U , given by:
f g or f z g z ,
if an analytic Schwarz function w exists in such way that
w 0 = 0 and w z < 1 ,
so that
f z = g w z .
In particular, the following equivalence also holds for the univalent function g
f ( z ) g ( z ) ( z U ) f ( 0 ) = g ( 0 ) and f ( U ) g ( U ) .
Next by the P class of analytic functions, p ( z ) in U is denoted, in which normalization conditions are given as follow:
p z = 1 + n = 1 c n z n
such that
p z > 0 z U .
Let k be any positive real number, then we define the k-Fibonacci number sequence { F k , n } n = 0 recursively by
F k , 0 = 0 , F k , 1 = 1 and F k , n + 1 = k F k , n + F k , n 1 for n 1 .
The n t h k-Fibonacci number is given by
F k , n = ( k T k ) n T k n k 2 + 4 ,
where
T k = k k 2 + 4 2 .
If
p ˜ k z = 1 + n = 1 p ˜ k , n z n ,
then we have (see also [15])
p ˜ k , n = ( F k , n 1 + F k , n + 1 ) T k n ( n N ; N : = { 1 , 2 , 3 , } ) .
Definition 1.
Let q 0 , 1 then the q-number λ q is given by
λ q = 1 q λ 1 q λ C k = 0 n 1 q k = 1 + q + q 2 + + q n 1 λ = n N .
Definition 2.
The q-difference (or the q-derivative) D q operator of any given function f is defined, in a given subset of C , of complex numbers by
D q f z = f z f q z 1 q z ( z 0 ) f 0 ( z = 0 ) ,
led to the existence of the derivative f 0 .
From Definitions 1 and 2, we have
lim q 1 D q f z = lim q 1 f z f q z 1 q z = f z
for a differentiable function f. In addition, from (1) and (2), we observe that
D q f z = 1 + n = 2 n q a n z n 1 .
In the year 1976, it was Noonan and Thomas [16] who concentrated on the function f given in (1) and gave the q th Hankel determinant as follows.
Let n 0 and q N . Than the q th Hankel determinant is defined by
H q n = a n a n + 1 . . . a n + q 1 a n + 1 . . . . . . . . . . . a n + q 1 . . . . a n + 2 q 1
Several authors studied the determinant H q n . In particular, sharp upper bounds on H 2 2 were obtained in such earlier works as, for example, in [17,18] for various subclasses of the normalized analytic function class A . It is well-known for the Fekete-Szegö functional a 3 a 2 2 that
a 3 a 2 2 = H 2 1 .
Its worth mentioning that, for a parameter μ which is real or complex, the generalization the functional a 3 μ a 2 2 is given in aspects. In particular, Babalola [19] studied the Hankel determinant H 3 1 for some subclasses of A .
In 2017, Güney et al. [20] explored the third Hankel determinant in some subclasses of A connected with the above-defined k-Fibonacci numbers. A derivation of the sharp coefficient bound for the third Hankel determinant and the conjecture for the sharp upper bound of the second Hankel determinant is also derived by them, which is employed to solve the related problems to the third Hankel determinant and to present an upper bound for this determinant.
Motivated and inspired by the above-mentioned work and also by the recent works of Güney et al. [20] and Uçar [12], we will now define a new subclass SL ( k , q ) of starlike functions associated with the k-Fibonacci numbers. We will then find the Hankel determinant H 3 1 for the newly-defined functions class SL ( k , q ) .
Definition 3.
Let P β ( 0 β < 1 ) denote the class of analytic functions p in U with
p ( 0 ) = 1 a n d p z > β .
Definition 4.
Let the function p be said to belong to the class k- P ˜ q z and let k be any positive real number if
p z 2 p ˜ k z 1 + q + 1 q p ˜ k z ,
where p ˜ k z is given by
p ˜ k z = 1 + T k 2 z 2 1 k T k z T k 2 z 2 ,
and T k is given in (4).
Remark 1.
For q = 1 , it is easily seen that
p z p ˜ k z .
Definition 5.
Let k be any positive real number. Then the function f be in the functions class SL ( k , q ) if and only if
z f z D q f z 2 p ˜ k z 1 + q + 1 q p ˜ k z ,
where p ˜ k z is given in (8).
Remark 2.
For q = 1 , we have
z f ( z ) f ( z ) p ˜ k z .
We recall that when the f belongs to the class A of analytic function then it is invariant (or symmetric) under rotations if and only if the function f ς ( z ) given by
f ς ( z ) = e i ς f ( z e i ς ) ( ς R )
is also in A . A functional I ( f ) defined for functions f is in A is called invariant under rotations in A if f ς A and I ( f ) = I ( f ς ) for all ς R . It can be easily checked that the functionals a 2 a 3 a 4 , H 2 , 1 and H 3 , 1 considered for the class SL ( k , q ) satisfy the above definitions.
Lemma 1
(see [21]). Let
p ( z ) = 1 + c 1 z + c 2 z 2 +
be in the class P of functions with positive real part in U . Then
c k 2 k N .
If c 1 = 2 , then
p ( z ) p 1 ( z ) 1 + x z 1 x z x = c 1 2 .
Conversely, if p ( z ) p 1 ( z ) for some x = 1 , then c 1 = 2 x and
c 2 c 1 2 2 2 c 1 2 2 .
Lemma 2
(see [22]). Let p P with its coefficients c k as in Lemma 1 , then
c 3 2 c 1 c 2 + c 1 3 2 .
Lemma 3
(see [23]). Let p P with its coefficients c k as in Lemma 1 , then
c 1 c 2 c 3 2 .
Lemma 4
(see [20]). If the function f given in the form (1) belongs to class SL k , then
a n T k n 1 F k , n ,
where T k is given in (4). Equality holds true in (14) for the function g given by
g k z = z 1 k T k z T k 2 z = n = 1 T k n 1 F k , n z n ,
which can be written as follows:
g k z = z + T k z 2 + k 2 + 1 T k k + 1 z 3 + .

2. Main Results

Here, we investigate the sharp bounds for the second Hankel determinant and the third Hankel determinant. We also find sharp bounds for the Fekete-Szegö functional a 3 λ a 2 2 for a real number λ . Throughout our discussion, we will assume that q 0 , 1 .
Theorem 1.
Let the function f A given in (1) belong to the class SL ( k , q ) . Then
a 2 a 4 a 3 2 1 q 3 q + 1 2 Q Q q + 1 2 + | B q | k 2 + | C q | 16 k 2 T k 2 ,
where
Q = q + q 2 + q 3
B q = 1 64 q + 1 4 1 q + 1 2 Q q 2 + 6 q 3 1 4 q 2 q 1 ( 2 q 3 )
C q = 1 16 q + 1 2 2 q 1 Q 3 + 1 2 q 2 ( q 1 ) q + 1 2
and T k is given in (4).
Proof. 
If f SL ( k , q ) , then it follows from the definition that
z D q f z f z q ˜ z ,
where
q ˜ z = 2 p ˘ k z 1 + q + 1 q p ˘ z .
For a given f SL ( k , q ) , we find for the function p ( z ) , where
p z = 1 + p 1 z + p 2 z 2 + ,
that
z D q f z f z = p z : = 1 + p 1 z + p 2 z 2 + ,
where
p q ˜ z .
If
p ( z ) q ˜ z ,
then there is an analytic function w such that
w z z in U
and
p z = q ˜ w ( z ) .
Therefore, the function g ( z ) , given by
g z = 1 + w z 1 w z = 1 + c 1 z + c 2 z + z U ,
is in the class P . It follows that
w z = c 1 2 z + c 2 c 1 2 2 z 2 2 +
and
q ˜ w z = 1 + 1 4 q + 1 p ˜ k , 1 c 1 z + 1 4 q + 1 p ˜ k , 1 c 2 c 1 2 2 z 2 + c 1 2 16 q + 1 ( q 1 ) p ˜ k , 1 2 + 2 p ˜ k , 2 z 2 + 1 4 q + 1 p ˜ k , 1 c 3 c 1 c 2 + c 1 3 4 + 1 8 q + 1 ( q 1 ) p ˜ k , 1 2 + 2 p ˜ k , 2 c 1 · c 2 c 1 2 2 + 1 64 q + 1 q 1 2 p ˜ k , 1 3 + 4 p ˜ k , 2 p ˜ k , 1 q 1 + 4 p ˜ k , 3 c 1 3 ] z 3 + = p z .
From (5), we find the coefficient p ˜ k , n of the function q ˜ given by
p ˜ k , n = ( F k , n 1 + F k , n + 1 ) T k n .
This shows the following relevant connection q ˜ with the sequence of k-Fibonacci numbers:
q ˜ w ( z ) = 1 + 1 4 q + 1 k T k c 1 z + 1 4 q + 1 k T k c 2 c 1 2 2 + c 1 2 16 q + 1 · ( q 1 ) k 2 + 2 2 + k 2 T k 2 z 2 + 1 4 q + 1 k T k c 3 c 1 c 2 + c 1 3 4 + 1 8 q + 1 ( q 1 ) k 2 + 2 2 + k 2 T k 2 c 1 c 2 c 1 2 2 + 1 64 q + 1 · q 1 2 k 2 + 4 2 + k 2 q 1 + 4 k 2 + 3 k T k 3 c 1 3 z 3 +
If
p z = 1 + p 1 z + p 2 z 2 + ,
then, by (21) and (22), we find that
p 1 = q + 1 2 k T k c 1 2
p 2 = 1 4 q + 1 k T k c 2 c 1 2 2 + c 1 4 4 q 1 k 2 + 2 ( 2 + k 2 ) T k 2
p 3 = q + 1 k T k 2 c 3 c 1 c 2 + c 1 3 4 + q 1 k 2 T k 2 + 2 2 + k 2 T k 2 · c 2 c 1 2 2 c 1 8 + c 1 3 64 q 1 2 k 2 + 4 2 + k 2 q 1 + 4 k 2 + 3 k T k 3 .
Moreover, we have
z D q f z f z = 1 + q a 2 z + q 1 + q a 3 a 2 2 z 2 + Q a 4 q 2 + q a 2 a 3 + q a 2 3 z 3 + = 1 + p 1 z + p 2 z 2 +
and
a 2 = p 1 q a 3 = q p 2 + p 1 2 q 2 q + 1 , a 4 = q 2 q + 1 p 3 p 1 3 ( q + 1 ) + 2 + q p 1 p 2 q + p 1 3 q 3 q + 1 Q
Therefore, we obtain
a 2 a 4 a 3 2 = T k 2 q 3 q + 1 Q q + 1 c 1 2 2 Q c 1 2 16 q + 1 2 + Q q 2 q + 1 2 c 2 c 1 2 4 ( 2 + k 2 ) 4 k T k n F k , n q + 1 c 1 2 2 Q c 1 2 16 q + 1 2 Q q 2 q + 1 2 · c 2 c 1 2 4 ( 2 + k 2 ) 4 x k , n + q + 1 k 2 2 · q 2 q + 1 2 2 c 1 ( c 1 c 2 c 3 ) + Q 4 c 2 c 1 2 2 2 + Q 8 q + 1 1 4 q 2 k 2 q + 1 2 c 1 4 + E q k 3 c 1 2 2 c 2 c 1 2 2 + B q k 5 c 1 4 + C q k 3 c 1 4 T k n F k , n E q k 3 c 1 2 2 c 2 c 1 2 2 + B q k 5 c 1 4 + C q k 3 c 1 4 x k , n + B q k 4 c 1 4 + C q k 2 c 1 4 ,
where
E q = 1 16 q + 1 2 ( q 1 ) Q q 2 q + 1 2 .
This can be written as follows:
a 2 a 4 a 3 2 = T k 2 q 2 q + 1 2 Q Q q + 1 2 4 c 1 4 4 + q + 1 2 2 · Q q 2 q + 1 2 c 1 2 c 2 c 1 2 4 ( 2 + k 2 ) 4 k T k n F k , n + q 2 q + 1 2 4 k 2 c 1 ( c 1 c 2 c 3 ) q 2 64 q + 1 4 k 2 c 1 4 + Q 16 q + 1 2 c 1 4 Q q + 1 2 4 c 1 4 4 k x k , n + Q k 2 4 q + 1 2 2 c 2 c 2 c 1 2 2 + 3 8 q + 1 2 1 6 k 2 + 2 Q q 2 q + 1 2 k x k , n k 2 4 · c 1 2 c 2 c 1 2 2 + E q k 3 c 1 2 2 c 2 c 1 2 2 + B q k 5 c 1 4 + C q k 3 c 1 4 T k n F k , n E q k 3 c 1 2 2 c 2 c 1 2 2 + B q k 5 c 1 4 + C q k 3 c 1 4 x k , n + B q k 4 c 1 4 + C q k 2 c 1 4 .
It is known that
n N , T k = T k n F k , n x k , n , x k , n = F k , n 1 F k , n , lim n F k , n 1 F k , n = T k .
Applying (27) together with (11)–(13), we get
a 2 a 4 a 3 2 T k 2 q 2 q + 1 2 Q Q q + 1 2 4 c 1 4 4 + q + 1 2 2 · { Q q 2 q + 1 2 } c 1 2 c 2 c 1 2 4 ( 2 + k 2 ) 4 k T k n F k , n + q 2 q + 1 2 4 k 2 c 1 c 1 c 2 c 3 1 4 q 2 q + 1 2 k 2 c 1 4 + Q 4 q + 1 2 2 c 1 4 Q q + 1 2 4 | c 1 4 | 4 k x k , n + Q k 2 4 q + 1 2 2 | c 2 | c 2 c 1 2 2 + 3 8 2 q + 1 2 2 · { Q q 2 q + 1 2 } k x k , n q + 1 2 2 k 2 | c 1 | 2 · c 2 c 1 2 2 + E q k 3 c 1 2 2 c 2 c 1 2 2 + B q k 5 c 1 4 + C q k 3 c 1 4 T k n F k , n E q k 3 | c 1 2 | 2 2 c 1 2 2 x k , n B q k 5 | c 1 | 4 x k , n C q k 3 | c 1 | 4 x k , n + B q k 4 | c 1 4 | + C q k 2 | c 1 4 | .
From (27), we obtain
q + 1 8 Q q + 1 2 Q q + 1 2 3 k x k , n q 2 k 2 | c 1 4 | > 0
and
q + 1 2 2 2 3 k 2 + 2 Q q 2 q + 1 2 k x k , n k 2 > 0 ,
which, for sufficiently large n, yields
c 1 = : y 0 , 2 .
After some computations, we can find that
max y 0 , 2 q 2 8 q + 1 4 k 2 y + q 2 8 q + 1 k 2 + Q q + 1 2 16 1 64 Q q + 1 4 k x k , n y 4 + Q k 2 q + 1 2 8 2 y 2 2 + 3 8 q + 1 2 2 2 3 ( k 2 + 2 ) { Q q 2 q + 1 2 } k x k , n k 2 y 2 2 y 2 2 | E q | k 3 y 2 2 2 y 2 2 x k , n | B q | k 5 y 4 x k , n | C q | k 3 y 4 x k , n + | B q | k 4 y 4 + | C q | k 2 y 4 = 4 Q q + 1 2 2 { 1 k x k , n } + 16 | B q | k 4 + 16 | C q | k 2 { 1 k x k , n } .
As a result of the following limit formula:
lim n q + 1 2 2 c 1 2 4 q + 1 2 2 Q c 1 2 + Q q 2 q + 1 2 c 2 c 1 2 4 ( 2 + k 2 ) + E q k 3 c 1 2 2 c 2 c 1 2 2 + B q k 5 c 1 4 + C q k 3 c 1 4 | T k n | F k , n = 0 ,
and by using (27), we get
lim n max y 0 , 2 q 2 q + 1 2 4 2 k 2 y + 1 8 q 2 q + 1 k 2 + Q 16 q + 1 2 1 64 Q q + 1 4 k x k , n y 4 + Q k 2 q + 1 2 8 2 y 2 2 2 + 3 32 q + 1 2 · 2 3 ( k 2 + 2 ) { Q q 2 q + 1 2 } k x k , n k 2 y 2 2 y 2 2 | A | k 3 y 2 2 · 2 y 2 2 x k , n | B q | k 5 y 4 x k , n | C q | k 3 y 4 x k , n + | B q | k 4 y 4 + | C q | k 2 y 4 = Q q + 1 2 T k 2 + ( | B q | k 2 + | C q | ) 16 k 2 T k 2
We thus find that
a 2 a 4 a 3 2 T k 2 q 2 q + 1 2 Q Q q + 1 2 + ( | B q | k 2 + | C q | ) 16 k 2 T k 2 .
If, in (20), we set
g z = 1 + z 1 z = 1 + 2 z + 2 z 2 + ,
then, by putting c 1 = c 2 = c 3 = 2 in (26), we obtain
a 2 a 4 a 3 2 = T k 2 q 2 q + 1 2 Q Q q + 1 2 + ( | B q | k 2 + | C q | ) 16 k 2 T k 2
This completes the proof of Theorem 1. □
Remark 3.
In the next result, for simplicity, we take the values of S q , L q and M q as given by
S q = q 3 ( 1 + q ) Q ,
L q = q 1 + q q 2 + q + Q q + 1 2 3 k 3 c 1 3 8 q 3 q + 1 2 2 k 3 c 1 3 + c 1 3 k 16 { q Q q 2 2 + q } q + 1 2 2 q 1 k 2 + 2 2 + k 2 c 1 3 32 q 3 q + 1 2 2 q 1 k 3 q 1 2 + k 2 k
and
M q = { q Q q 2 2 + q } q + 1 2 2 q 3 q + 1 2 3 q 1 k 2 c 1 2 c 2 c 1 2 2 .
Theorem 2.
Let the function f A given in (1) belong to the class SL ( k , q ) . Then
| a 2 a 3 a 4 | = 2 S q 3 4 k q 3 q + 1 2 | T k 3 | + 1 2 M q + 1 + k 2 L q k x k , n + 1 2 k L q .
Proof. 
Let f SL ( k , q ) and let p P be given in (2). Then, from (23)–(25) and
z D q f z f z = 1 + q a 2 z + q + q 2 a 3 q a 2 2 z 2 + Q a 4 2 q + q 2 a 2 a 3 + q a 2 3 z 3 + = 1 + p 1 z + p 2 z 2 + ,
we have
a 2 a 3 a 4 = 1 S q q Q q 2 2 + q p 1 p 2 + q 1 + q q 2 + q + Q p 1 3 q 3 1 + q p 3 ,
which, together with (27), yields
a 2 a 3 a 4 = 2 S q q 3 4 q + 1 2 1 4 c 2 c 1 3 2 c 1 k 2 + 1 2 c 1 c 2 c 3 3 k 2 + 4 4 c 1 c 2 k T k f k , n + 1 8 q 3 q + 1 2 c 3 2 c 1 c 2 + c 1 3 k x k , n + q 3 8 q + 1 2 1 2 4 k 2 c 2 c 1 2 2 + 3 k 2 + 2 c 2 k c 1 x k , n + q 3 16 q + 1 2 4 k 2 c 2 c 1 2 2 3 k 2 c 2 c 1 q 3 32 q + 1 3 · q 1 c 2 c 1 2 2 c 1 k 2 + 1 2 M q + 1 + k 2 L q k T k f k , n 1 2 M q + 1 + k 2 L q k x k , n + 1 2 k L q .
Now, applying the triangle inequality in (10)–(13), we get
| a 2 a 3 a 4 | 2 S q q 3 16 q + 1 2 c 2 c 1 3 2 c 1 k 2 + q 3 8 q + 1 2 c 1 c 2 c 3 q 3 16 q + 1 2 3 k 2 + 4 c 1 c 2 k T k f k , n + q 3 4 q + 1 2 k x k , n + q 3 4 q + 1 2 k x k , n + q 3 8 q + 1 2 k 4 k 2 x k , n 4 k 2 c 1 q 3 32 q + 1 2 k 4 k 2 x k , n 4 k 2 c 1 3 + q 3 4 q + 1 2 . 3 k 2 + 2 k x k , n 3 k 2 q 3 32 q + 1 3 q 1 2 c 1 2 2 k 2 c 1 + 1 2 M q + 1 + k 2 L q k T k f k , n 1 2 M q + 1 + k 2 L q k x k , n + 1 2 k L q .
In addition, by using (27), we have
q 3 4 q + 1 2 4 k 2 k x k , n 4 k 2 < 0 ( 0 < k < 2 )
and
q 3 4 q + 1 2 3 k + 2 k x k , n 3 k 2 > 0
for 0 < k 1 and sufficiently large n . Therefore, we have got a function of the variable c 1 = : y 0 , 2 and, after some computations, we can find that
max y [ 0 , 2 ] q 3 4 q + 1 2 k x k , n + 1 2 k 4 k 2 x k , n 4 k 2 y q 3 32 q + 1 2 · k 4 k 2 x k , n 4 k 2 y 3 + 1 2 M q + 1 + k 2 L q k x k , n + 1 2 k L q = q 3 4 q + 1 2 3 k 2 + 3 k x k , n 3 k 2 + 1 2 M q + 1 + k 2 L q k x k , n + 1 2 k L q .
As a result of the following limit relation:
lim n q 3 16 q + 1 2 c 2 c 1 3 2 c 1 k 2 + q 3 8 q + 1 2 c 1 c 2 c 3 q 3 16 q + 1 2 . 3 k 2 + 4 c 1 c 2 + 1 2 M q + 1 + k 2 L q k T k f k , n = 0
and, by means of (27), we have
lim n max y [ 0 , 2 ] q 3 4 q + 1 2 k x k , n + 1 2 k 4 k 2 x k , n 4 k 2 y q 3 32 q + 1 2 · k 4 k 2 x k , n 4 k 2 y 3 + q 3 4 q + 1 2 3 k 2 + 2 k x k , n 3 k 2 + 1 2 M q + 1 + k 2 L q k x k , n + 1 2 k L q = q 3 q + 1 2 2 3 k 2 + 3 k T k 3 k 2 + 1 2 M q + 1 + k 2 L q k x k , n + 1 2 k L q = q 3 q + 1 2 2 3 k k 2 + 1 T k + k + 1 2 M q + 1 + k 2 L q k x k , n + 1 2 k L q = q 3 q + 1 2 2 3 k T k 3 ) + 1 2 M q + 1 + k 2 L q k x k , n + 1 2 k L q = 3 q 3 q + 1 2 2 k | T k 3 | + 1 2 M q + 1 + k 2 L q k x k , n + 1 2 k L q
If, in the formula (20) we set
g z = 1 + z 1 z = 1 + 2 z + 2 z 2 + ,
then, by putting c 1 = c 2 = c 3 = 2 in (26), we obtain
| a 2 a 3 a 4 | = k 2 3 q 3 S q q + 1 2 | T k 3 | + 1 M q + 1 + k 2 L q x k , n + L q
This completes the proof of Theorem 2. □
Theorem 3.
Let the function f A given in (1) belong to the class SL ( k , q ) . Then
a 3 λ a 2 2 T k 2 q 2 ( q + 1 ) G 1 + q 2 2 + q 4 q 2 1 + q q + 1 2 k 2 + q q + 1
Proof. 
Let f SL ( k , q ) and let p P given in (2). Then, from (23)–(25) and
z D q f z f z = 1 + q a 2 z + q + q 2 a 3 q a 2 2 z 2 + Q a 4 2 q + q 2 a 2 a 3 + q a 2 3 z 3 + = 1 + p 1 z + p 2 z 2 + ,
we have
a 3 λ a 2 2 = 1 q 2 1 + q 1 + λ 2 1 + q p 1 2 + q p 2 .
Therefore, we obtain
a 3 λ a 2 2 = 1 q 2 1 + q ( 1 λ 2 1 + q ) 1 + q 2 2 κ c 1 T 2 2 + q q + 1 4 κ T k ( c 2 c 1 2 2 ) c 1 2 ( q + 1 16 ) ( q 1 ) κ 2 + 2 ( 2 + k 2 ) T k 2 = T k q 2 1 + q ( 1 + λ 2 1 + q ( 1 + q 2 ) 2 k 2 c 1 2 4 T k + q q + 1 4 κ c 2 c 1 2 2 + q ( q + 1 ) c 1 2 16 ( q 1 ) k 2 T k + 2 ( 2 + k 2 ) T k 2 .
Thus, by applying (27), we have
a 3 λ a 2 2 = T k q 2 1 + q G 1 + q 2 2 k 2 c 1 2 4 T k + q ( q + 1 4 ) c 1 2 4 · ( q 1 ) k 2 + 2 ( 2 + k 2 ) T k n f k , n G 1 + q 2 2 k 2 c 1 2 4 + q ( q + 1 ) 4 c 1 2 4 · ( q 1 ) k 2 + 2 ( 2 + k 2 ) x k , n + q q + 1 4 k c 2 c 1 2 2 ,
where
G = 1 + λ 2 1 + q .
Now, by applying the triangle inequality in (10)–(13), we have
T k q 2 1 + q G 1 + q 2 2 k 2 c 1 2 4 + q q + 1 4 c 1 2 4 ( q 1 ) k 2 + 2 ( 2 + k 2 ) · T k n f k , n G 1 + q 2 2 k 2 4 c 1 x k , n 2 + q q 2 1 4 k 2 c 1 x k , n 2 + q q + 1 4 · c 1 2 2 ( 2 + k 2 ) x k , n + q q + 1 4 k c 2 c 1 2 2 = T k q 2 1 + q G 16 1 + q 2 k 2 c 1 2 + q 16 q + 1 c 1 2 ( q 1 ) k 2 + 2 ( 2 + k 2 ) · T k n f k , n G 1 + q 2 2 k 2 4 c 1 x k , n 2 + q q + 1 4 ( q 1 ) k 2 c 1 x k , n 2 + q q + 1 4 c 1 2 2 ( 2 + k 2 ) x k , n + q q + 1 4 k c 2 c 1 2 2 ,
which, after some computations, yields
max y ϵ 0 , 2 G 1 + q 2 2 k 2 4 y 2 x k , n + q q + 1 4 ( q 1 ) k 2 x k , n + q q + 1 4 ( 2 + k 2 ) 2 x k , n = G 1 + q 2 2 + q q 2 1 4 + q q + 1 2 k 2 x k , n + q ( q + 1 ) x k , n ,
in which we have set y = 2 . As a result of the following limit formula:
lim n G 1 + q 2 2 k 2 c 1 2 4 + q q + 1 2 c 1 2 4 q 1 k 2 + 2 ( 2 + k 2 ) T k n f x k , n = 0 ,
which, by applying (27), yields
a 3 λ a 2 2 T k 2 q 2 ( q + 1 ) 1 4 G 1 + q 2 + q 4 q 2 1 + q 2 q + 1 k 2 + q q + 1 .
This completes the proof of Theorem 3. □
Theorem 4.
Let the function f A given in (1) belong to the class SL ( k , q ) . Then
H 3 ( 1 ) T k 6 q 4 ( 1 + q ) 3 Q [ ( 2 q + ( q + 1 ) k 2 ] { 16 B q k 4 + 16 C q k 2 } + T k 3 2 ( 2 + q ) k 3 + ( 5 q + 7 ) k 2 q 2 ( 1 + q ) Q { M q + ( 1 + k 2 ) L q } k x k , n + k L q .
Proof. 
Let f SL ( k , q ) . Then as we know that
H 3 ( 1 ) = a 1 a 2 a 3 a 2 a 3 a 4 a 3 a 4 a 5 = a 3 ( a 2 a 4 a 3 2 ) a 4 ( a 4 a 2 a 3 ) + a 5 ( a 3 a 2 2 ) ,
where a 1 = 1 so, we have
H 3 ( 1 ) a 3 a 2 a 4 a 3 2 + a 4 a 4 a 2 a 3 + a 5 a 3 a 2 2
Thus, by using Lemma 4, Theorems 1–3, as well as the formula (31), we find that
H 3 ( 1 ) 2 ( ϝ q k 6 + 4 Ψ q k 4 + 4 Υ q k 2 + Γ q ) T k 6 ,
where
ϝ q = ϰ q , λ 2 q 2 Q 1 + χ q ( 2 + q ) Q q 2 ( q + 3 ) ( q + 1 ) 2 4 q 2 + q + 1 q 3 + q + 1 4 16 q 3
Ψ q = 3 ( 2 + q ) q 3 ( 1 + q ) 2 Q + ϰ q , λ 2 q 2 ( Q + 1 ) 4 + ( 5 q + 7 ) χ q 2 q 2 Q ( q + 3 ) ( q + 1 ) 2 q + 4 q 2 + ( q + 1 ) 2 q ( Q + 1 ) 1 + χ q ( 2 + q ) q 2 Q ( q + 3 ) ( q + 1 ) 2 4 q 2 + q + 1 q 3 + q q + 1 2 q 4
Υ q = 1 q 2 + 1 ( Q + 1 ) 4 + χ q ( 5 q + 7 ) 2 q 2 Q q + 1 2 q ( q + 1 ) ( q + 3 ) 2 q + 4 q 2 + 3 ( 5 q + 7 ) 2 q 2 Q + ϰ q , λ 2 q 2 ( Q + 1 ) 2 + 4 q ( 1 + q
Γ q = 1 q 4 ( 1 + q ) 3 Q 2 q + ( q + 1 ) k 2 16 B q k 4 + 16 C q k 2 + 2 ( 2 + q ) k 3 + ( 5 q + 7 ) k 2 q 2 ( 1 + q ) Q { M q + ( 1 + k 2 ) L q } k x k , n + k L q ,
and
χ q = q 2 + q + 2 .
This completes the proof of Theorem 4. □

3. Conclusions

A new subclass of analytic functions associated with k-Fibonacci numbers has been introduced by means of quantum (or q-) calculus. Upper bound of the third Hankel determinant has been derived for this functions class. We have stated and proved our main results as Theorems 1–4 in this article.
Further developments based upon the the q-calculus can be motivated by several recent works which are reported in (for example) [24,25], which dealt essentially with the second and the third Hankel determinants, as well as [26,27,28,29], which studied many different aspects of the Fekete-Szegö problem.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.M.S. and Q.Z.A.; methodology, Q.Z.A.; formal analysis, H.M.S. and M.D.; Investigation, M.S.; resources, X.X.; data curation, S.K.; writing—review and editing, N.K.; visualization, N.K.; funding acquisition, M.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by UKM Grant: FRGS/1/2019/STG06/UKM/01/1.

Acknowledgments

The work here is supported by UKM Grant: FRGS/1/2019/STG06/UKM/01/1.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Srivastava, H.M. Operators of basic (or q-) calculus and fractional q-calculus and their applications in Geometric Function Theory of Complex Analysis. Iran. J. Sci. Technol. Trans. A Sci. 2020, 44, 327–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Mahmood, S.; Raza, N.; Abujarad, E.S.A.; Srivastava, G.; Srivastava, H.M.; Malik, S.N. Geometric properties of certain classes of analytic functions associated with a q-integral operator. Symmetry 2019, 11, 719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Ismail, M.E.-H.; Merkes, E.; Styer, D. A generalization of starlike functions. Complex Variables Theory Appl. 1990, 14, 77–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Srivastava, H.M. Univalent functions, fractional calculus, and associated generalized hypergeometric functions. In Univalent Functions, Fractional Calculus and Their Applications; Srivastava, H.M., Owa, S., Eds.; Ellis Horwood Limited: Chichester, UK; John Wiley and Sons: New York, NY, USA; Chichester, UK; Brisbane, Australia; Toronto, QC, Canada, 1989; pp. 329–354. [Google Scholar]
  5. Raghavendar, K.; Swaminathan, A. Close-to-convexity properties of basis hypergeometric functions using their Taylor coefficients. J. Math. Appl. 2012, 35, 53–67. [Google Scholar]
  6. Janteng, A.; Abdulhalirn, S.; Darus, M. Coefficient inequality for a function whose derivative has positive real part. J. Inequal. Pure Appl. Math. 2006, 50, 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  7. Khan, N.; Shafiq, M.; Darus, M.; Khan, B.; Ahmad, Q.Z. Upper bound of the third Hankel determinant for a subclass of q-starlike functions associated with Lemniscate of Bernoulli. J. Math. Inequal. 2020, 14, 51–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Mahmood, S.; Ahmad, Q.Z.; Srivastava, H.M.; Khan, N.; Khan, B.; Tahir, M. A certain subclass of meromorphically q-starlike functions associated with the Janowski functions. J. Inequal. Appl. 2019, 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Srivastava, H.M.; Khan, B.; Khan, N.; Ahmad, Q.Z. Coefficient inequalities for q-starlike functions associated with the Janowski functions. Hokkaido Math. J. 2019, 48, 407–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Jackson, F.H. q-Difference equations. Am. J. Math. 1910, 32, 305–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Srivastava, H.M.; Tahir, M.; Khan, B.; Ahmad, Q.Z.; Khan, N. Some general families of q-starlike functions associated with the Janowski functions. Filomat 2019, 33, 2613–2626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Uçar, H.E.Ö. Coefficient inequality for q-starlike functions. Appl. Math. Comput. 2016, 276, 122–126. [Google Scholar]
  13. Ahmad, Q.Z.; Khan, N.; Raza, M.; Tahir, M.; Khan, B. Certain q-difference operators and their applications to the subclass of meromorphic q-starlike functions. Filomat 2019, 33, 3385–3397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Jackson, F.H. On q-definite integrals. Quart. J. Pure Appl. Math. 1910, 41, 193–203. [Google Scholar]
  15. Özgür, N.Y.; Sokół, J. On starlike functions connected with k-Fibonacci numbers. Bull. Malays. Math. Sci. Soc. 2015, 38, 249–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Noonan, J.W.; Thomas, D.K. On the second Hankel determinant of areally mean p-valent functions. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 1976, 223, 337–346. [Google Scholar]
  17. Mishra, A.K.; Gochhayat, P. Second Hankel determinant for a class of analytic functions defined by fractional derivative. Internat. J. Math. Math. Sci. 2008, 2008, 153280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Singh, G.; Singh, G. On the second Hankel determinant for a new subclass of analytic functions. J. Math. Sci. Appl. 2014, 2, 1–3. [Google Scholar]
  19. Babalola, K.O. On H3(1) Hankel determinant for some classes of univalent functions. Inequal. Theory Appl. 2007, 6, 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  20. Güney, H.O.; Ilhan, S.; Sokół, J. An upper bound for third Hankel determinant of starlike functions connected with k-Fibonacci numbers. Bol. Soc. Mat. Mex. 2019, 25, 117–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Pommerenke, C. Univalent Functions; Vanderhoeck and Ruprecht: Göttingen, Germany, 1975. [Google Scholar]
  22. Libera, R.J.; Złotkiewicz, E.J. Coefficient bounds for the inverse of a function with derivative in P. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 1983, 87, 251–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ravichandran, V.; Verma, S. Bound for the fifth coefficient of certain starlike functions. C. R. Math. Acad. Sci. Paris 2015, 353, 505–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Güney, H.Ö.; Murugusundaramoorthy, G.; Srivastava, H.M. The second Hankel determinant for a certain class of bi-close-to-convex functions. Results Math. 2019, 74, 93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Shi, L.; Srivastava, H.M.; Arif, M.; Hussain, S.; Khan, H. An investigation of the third Hankel determinant problem for certain subfamilies of univalent functions involving the exponential function. Symmetry 2019, 11, 598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Mahmood, S.; Srivastava, H.M.; Khan, N.; Ahmad, Q.Z.; Khan, B.; Ali, I. Upper bound of the third Hankel determinant for a subclass of q-starlike functions. Symmetry 2019, 11, 347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Srivastava, H.M.; Ahmad, Q.Z.; Khan, N.; Khan, N.; Khan, B. Hankel and Toeplitz determinants for a subclass of q-starlike functions associated with a general conic domain. Mathematics 2019, 7, 181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Srivastava, H.M.; Hussain, S.; Raziq, A.; Raza, M. The Fekete-Szegö functional for a subclass of analytic functions associated with quasi-subordination. Carpathian J. Math. 2018, 34, 103–113. [Google Scholar]
  29. Srivastava, H.M.; Mostafa, A.O.; Aouf, M.K.; Zayed, H.M. Basic and fractional q-calculus and associated Fekete-Szegö problem for p-valently q-starlike functions and p-valently q-convex functions of complex order. Miskolc Math. Notes 2019, 20, 489–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Shafiq, M.; Srivastava, H.M.; Khan, N.; Ahmad, Q.Z.; Darus, M.; Kiran, S. An Upper Bound of the Third Hankel Determinant for a Subclass of q-Starlike Functions Associated with k-Fibonacci Numbers. Symmetry 2020, 12, 1043. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/sym12061043

AMA Style

Shafiq M, Srivastava HM, Khan N, Ahmad QZ, Darus M, Kiran S. An Upper Bound of the Third Hankel Determinant for a Subclass of q-Starlike Functions Associated with k-Fibonacci Numbers. Symmetry. 2020; 12(6):1043. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/sym12061043

Chicago/Turabian Style

Shafiq, Muhammad, Hari M. Srivastava, Nazar Khan, Qazi Zahoor Ahmad, Maslina Darus, and Samiha Kiran. 2020. "An Upper Bound of the Third Hankel Determinant for a Subclass of q-Starlike Functions Associated with k-Fibonacci Numbers" Symmetry 12, no. 6: 1043. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/sym12061043

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop