Next Article in Journal
A GIS-MCDM Method for Ranking Potential Station Locations in the Expansion of Bike-Sharing Systems
Next Article in Special Issue
Some Generalized Euclidean Operator Radius Inequalities
Previous Article in Journal
The Expected Value of Hosoya Index and Merrifield–Simmons Index in a Random Cyclooctylene Chain
Previous Article in Special Issue
Some Generalizations of the Jensen-Type Inequalities with Applications
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Bounds for Quotients of Inverse Trigonometric and Inverse Hyperbolic Functions

by
Sumedh B. Thool
1,
Yogesh J. Bagul
2,
Ramkrishna M. Dhaigude
1 and
Christophe Chesneau
3,*
1
Department of Mathematics Government Vidarbha, Institute of Science and Humanities, Amravati 444604, India
2
Department of Mathematics, K. K. M. College, Manwath Dist, Parbhani 431505, India
3
Department of Mathematics, University of Caen-Normandie, 14032 Caen, France
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 11 May 2022 / Revised: 27 May 2022 / Accepted: 29 May 2022 / Published: 30 May 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Current Research on Mathematical Inequalities)

Abstract

:
We establish new simple bounds for the quotients of inverse trigonometric and inverse hyperbolic functions such as sin 1 x sinh 1 x and tanh 1 x tan 1 x . The main results provide polynomial bounds using even quadratic functions and exponential bounds under the form e a x 2 . Graph validation is also performed.

1. Introduction

As discussed in [1], functions whose graphs are similar to bell-shaped curves should be studied, and one of the aspects is to investigate the bounds of such functions. For the bounds of this type of functions involving inverse trigonometric and inverse hyperbolic functions, we refer the reader to [2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20] and references therein. Chesneau and Bagul [1] investigated the sharp bounds for ratio functions cos x cosh x and sin x sinh x . These inequalities were carefully studied and generalized by Kostić et al. [21] to get several types of bounds using infinite products.
Recently, Bagul et al. [22] corroborated the following double inequalities involving exponential bounds.
Proposition 1
([22] Proposition 1). For x [ 0 , α ] , where α 0 , π 2 , the inequalities
e a 1 x 2 cos x cosh x e a 2 x 2
hold with the best possible constants a 1 = α 2 ln cosh α cos α and a 2 = 1 .
Proposition 2
([22] Proposition 2). For x 0 , π 2 , the inequalities
e b 1 x 2 < sin x sinh x < e b 2 x 2
hold with the best possible constants b 1 = 4 π 2 ln sinh π 2 0.337794 and b 2 = 1 3 .
Proposition 3
([22] Proposition 4). For x ( 0 , α ] , where α 0 , π 2 , the inequalities
e c 1 x 2 < tanh x tan x < e c 2 x 2
hold with the best possible constants c 1 = α 2 ln tan α tanh α and c 2 = 2 3 .
We contribute to the subject by establishing polynomial and exponential bounds for the functions sin 1 x sinh 1 x and tanh 1 x tan 1 x , which are motivated by these works. In the whole paper, it is to be noted that the superscript “−” for trigonometric and hyperbolic functions is used for their inverses.

2. Main Theorems

2.1. Statements

Our main results are the following theorems.
Theorem 1.
η 1 = 1 3 and η 2 = π ln ( 3 + 2 2 ) 1 0.78221397 are the best possible constants such that the inequalities
1 + η 1 x 2 < sin 1 x sinh 1 x < 1 + η 2 x 2 ; x ( 0 , 1 )
hold.
Theorem 2.
If x ( 0 , r ) and r is any real number in ( 0 , 1 ) , then the inequalities
1 + θ 1 x 2 < tanh 1 x tan 1 x < 1 + θ 2 x 2
hold with the best possible constants θ 1 = 2 3 and θ 2 = tanh 1 r tan 1 r r 2 tan 1 ˙ r .
Theorem 3.
μ 1 = 1 3 and μ 2 = ln π 2 sinh 1 1 0.57785639 are the best possible constants such that the inequalities
e μ 1 x 2 < sin 1 x sinh 1 x < e μ 2 x 2 ; x ( 0 , 1 )
hold.
Theorem 4.
If x ( 0 , r ) and r is any real number in ( 0 , 1 ) , then the inequalities
e ν 1 x 2 < tanh 1 x tan 1 x < e ν 2 x 2
hold with the best possible constants ν 1 = 2 3 and ν 2 = ln ( tanh 1 r ) ln ( tan 1 r ) r 2 .
Since η 1 = μ 1 and θ 1 = ν 1 , by the well-known inequality 1 + y e y , it is not difficult to see that the lower bounds of (6) and (7) are sharper than those of (4) and (5), respectively.
Corollary 1.
If x ( 0 , 1 ) , then we have
sin 1 x sinh 1 x < tanh 1 x tan 1 x .

2.2. Graphical Illustrations

In this part, we compare the obtained bounds by the means of graphics, with a discussion.
Figure 1 presents the bounds obtained in Theorems 1 and 3 for the “ratio sin” function defined by sin 1 x sinh 1 x .
It can be observed that the exponential bounds are sharper.
Figure 2 displays the bounds obtained in Theorems 1 and 3 for the “ratio tan” function defined by tanh 1 x tan 1 x .
Again, it can be observed that the exponential bounds are sharper.
Thus, the graphical illustrations reveal that the upper bounds of (6) and (7) are sharper than those of (4) and (5), respectively.
We end by illustrating the ratio comparison states in Corollary 1 in Figure 3.

3. Auxiliary Results

In order to prove our main results, we need the following lemmas from the existing literature.
Lemma 1
([23] L’Hôpital’s rule of monotonicity). Let f , g be two real-valued functions which are continuous on [ a , b ] and differentiable on ( a , b ) , where < a < b < and g ( x ) 0 , for x ( a , b ) . Let,
r 1 ( x ) = f ( x ) f ( a ) g ( x ) g ( a ) a n d r 2 ( x ) = f ( x ) f ( b ) g ( x ) g ( b ) .
Then,
(i) 
r 1 ( x ) and r 2 ( x ) are increasing on ( a , b ) if f g is increasing on ( a , b ) ; and
(ii) 
r 1 ( x ) and r 2 ( x ) are decreasing on ( a , b ) if f g is decreasing on ( a , b ) .
The strictness of the monotonicity of r 1 ( x ) and r 2 ( x ) depends on the strictness of the monotonicity of f g .
Lemma 2
([2] Lemma 2). For 0 < | x | < 1 , we have
( sin 1 x ) 2 = n = 0 2 2 n + 1 · ( n ! ) 2 ( 2 n + 2 ) ! x 2 n + 2
and
( sinh 1 x ) 2 = n = 0 ( 1 ) n 2 2 n + 1 · ( n ! ) 2 ( 2 n + 2 ) ! x 2 n + 2 .
The series for (sin−1 x)2 can also be found in [24]. For series expansions of powers of sin 1 x we refer to [25] and references therein.
We also prove some other lemmas that are required to prove our main results.
Lemma 3.
The following inequality is true.
sin 1 x x < 3 ( 3 + x 2 ) 1 x 2 ; x ( 0 , 1 ) .
Proof. 
Let
ϕ ( x ) = 3 x ( 3 + x 2 ) 1 x 2 sin 1 x ; x ( 0 , 1 ) .
Differentiation gives
ϕ ( x ) = 3 ( 3 + x 2 ) 2 x 1 x 2 sin 1 x + x ( 3 + x 2 ) sin 1 x 1 x 2 = x ( 3 + x 2 ) sin 1 x 2 x ( 1 x 2 ) sin 1 x 1 x 2 x 2 = x ( 1 + 3 x 2 ) sin 1 x 1 x 2 x 2 = x ( 1 + 3 x 2 ) sin 1 x x 1 x 2 1 x 2 .
Since 1 x 2 < 1 + 3 x 2 and x < sin 1 x , clearly, for x ( 0 , 1 ) , we get
1 x 2 1 + 3 x 2 < 1 < sin 1 x x ,
which results in ϕ ( x ) > 0 . So ϕ ( x ) is strictly increasing in ( 0 , 1 ) and we have ϕ ( x ) > ϕ ( 0 ) = 0 .
Note 1.
The inequality (9) is a refinement of the inequality
sin 1 x x < 1 1 x 2 ; x ( 0 , 1 ) .
See, for instance, [5].
Lemma 4.
For x ( 0 , 1 ) , the inequality
sinh 1 x x 2 > 1 x 2 · sin 1 x x
is true.
Proof. 
From Theorem 2.2 of [6], we have
sinh 1 x x 2 > 3 3 + x 2 .
Combining this inequality with (1), we get the desired inequality (10). □
Lemma 5.
For x ( 0 , 1 ) , it holds that
sinh 1 x 1 x 2 > sin 1 x 1 + x 2 .
Proof. 
A combination of inequalities (1.1) of [5] and (1.1) of [6] gives (11). □
Lemma 6.
The inequality
tanh 1 x tan 1 x < 1 + x 2 1 x 2
holds in ( 0 , 1 ) .
Proof. 
From Theorem 4 (inequality (2.12)) of [5], we have
tan 1 x x > 1 1 + x 2 ; x > 0
and from Theorem 2.4 (inequality (2.4)) of [6], we have
tanh 1 x x < 1 1 x 2 3 ; x ( 0 , 1 ) .
Since 1 1 x 2 3 < 1 1 x 2 , the above inequality can be written as
x tanh 1 x > 1 x 2 ; x ( 0 , 1 ) .
The required inequality (12) follows from inequalities (13) and (14). □
Remark 1.
It is worth noting that an upper bound of tanh 1 x tan 1 x in (12) is sharper than those in (5) and (7) as r 1 .
Lemma 7.
For x ( 0 , 1 ) , we have
x tan 1 x + x tanh 1 x < 2 .
Proof. 
By Proposition 3 of [5], we have
x tan 1 x < 1 + x 2 3 ; x > 0 .
Similarly, from Theorem 2.3 (inequality (2.3)) of [6], we write
x tanh 1 x < 1 x 2 3 ; x ( 0 , 1 ) .
By simply adding these inequalities we get the required inequality (14). □

4. Proofs of Theorems

Proof of Theorem 1.
Let us set
f ( x ) = sin 1 x sinh 1 x x 2 sinh 1 x : = f 1 ( x ) f 2 ( x ) ,
where f 1 ( x ) = sin 1 x sinh 1 x and f 2 ( x ) = x 2 sinh 1 x with f 1 ( 0 ) = 0 and f 2 ( 0 ) = 0 . By differentiating with respect to x, we obtain
f 1 ( x ) f 2 ( x ) = 1 1 x 2 1 1 + x 2 2 x sinh 1 x + x 2 1 + x 2 : = f 3 ( x ) f 4 ( x ) ,
where f 3 ( x ) = 1 1 x 2 1 1 + x 2 and f 4 ( x ) = 2 x sinh 1 x + x 2 1 + x 2 with f 3 ( 0 ) = 0 and f 4 ( 0 ) = 0 . By differentiating again with respect to x, we get
f 3 ( x ) f 4 ( x ) = x ( 1 x 2 ) 3 / 2 + ( 1 + x 2 ) 3 / 2 2 sinh 1 x + 4 x 1 + x 2 x 3 ( 1 + x 2 ) 3 / 2 : = f 5 ( x ) f 6 ( x ) ,
where f 5 ( x ) = x ( 1 x 2 ) 3 / 2 + ( 1 + x 2 ) 3 / 2 and f 6 ( x ) = 2 sinh 1 x + 4 x 1 + x 2 x 3 ( 1 + x 2 ) 3 / 2 with f 5 ( 0 ) = 0 and f 6 ( 0 ) = 0 . Then,
f 5 ( x ) f 6 ( x ) = ( 1 + 2 x 2 ) 1 + x 2 1 x 2 5 / 2 + ( 1 2 x 2 ) 6 + 5 x 2 + 2 x 4 : = ( 1 + 2 x 2 ) f 7 ( x ) + ( 1 2 x 2 ) 6 + 5 x 2 + 2 x 4 : = f 8 ( x ) ,
where f 7 ( x ) = 1 + x 2 1 x 2 5 / 2 with f 7 ( x ) = 10 x ( 1 x 2 ) 2 1 + x 2 1 x 2 3 / 2 . Now we need to show that f 8 ( x ) is strictly increasing on ( 0 , 1 ) . To demonstrate the required monotonicity of f 8 ( x ) , we must prove that f 8 ( x ) > 0 . First, we show that the numerator in f 8 ( x ) , say N 1 , is positive on ( 0 , 1 ) . We have
N 1 = ( 6 + 5 x 2 + 2 x 4 ) ( 1 + 2 x 2 ) f 7 ( x ) + 4 x f 7 ( x ) 4 x ( 1 + 2 x 2 ) f 7 ( x ) + ( 1 2 x 2 ) ( 10 x + 8 x 3 ) .
Simplifying the above expression we get the following
N 1 = 60 x + 170 x 3 + 120 x 5 + 40 x 7 ( 1 x 2 ) 2 1 + x 2 1 x 2 3 / 2 + ( 14 x 8 x 3 8 x 5 ) 1 + x 2 1 x 2 5 / 2 34 x 8 x 3 + 8 x 5 = 60 x + 170 x 3 + 120 x 5 + 40 x 7 + ( 14 x 8 x 3 8 x 5 ) ( 1 x 4 ) ( 1 x 2 ) 2 1 + x 2 1 x 2 3 / 2 34 x 8 x 3 + 8 x 5 > 74 x + 162 x 3 + 98 x 5 + 48 x 7 + 8 x 9 ( 1 x 2 ) 2 34 x 8 x 3 + 8 x 5
due to the fact that 1 + x 2 1 x 2 3 / 2 > 1 . Thus,
( 1 x 2 ) 2 N 1 > ( 74 x + 162 x 3 + 98 x 5 + 48 x 7 + 8 x 9 ) ( 34 x + 8 x 3 8 x 5 ) ( 1 x 2 ) 2 = 40 x + 222 x 3 + 88 x 5 + 24 x 7 + 16 x 9 > 0 .
So N 1 > 0 and hence f 8 ( x ) is positive. As a result, f 8 ( x ) is strictly increasing on ( 0 , 1 ) . By successive application of Lemma 1, we conclude that f ( x ) is strictly increasing on ( 0 , 1 ) . Therefore, f ( 0 + ) < f ( x ) < f ( 1 ) , where η 1 = f ( 0 + ) = 1 3 and η 2 = f ( 1 ) = π ln ( 3 + 2 2 ) 1 . This completes the proof of Theorem 1. □
Proof of Theorem 2.
Let
g ( x ) = tanh 1 x tan 1 x x 2 tan 1 x : = g 1 ( x ) g 2 ( x ) ,
where g 1 ( x ) = tanh 1 x tan 1 x and g 2 ( x ) = x 2 tan 1 x , satisfying g 1 ( 0 ) = 0 = g 2 ( 0 ) . By differentiating with respect to x, we have
g 1 ( x ) g 2 ( x ) = 1 1 x 2 1 1 + x 2 2 x tan 1 x + x 2 1 + x 2 : = g 3 ( x ) g 4 ( x ) ,
where g 3 ( x ) = 1 1 x 2 1 1 + x 2 and g 4 ( x ) = 2 x tan 1 x + x 2 1 + x 2 with g 3 ( 0 ) = 0 = g 4 ( 0 ) . Differentiation gives us
g 3 ( x ) g 4 ( x ) = x ( 1 x 2 ) 2 + ( 1 + x 2 ) 2 tan 1 x + 2 x 1 + x 2 x 3 ( 1 + x 2 ) 2 : = g 5 ( x ) g 6 ( x ) ,
where g 5 ( x ) = x ( 1 x 2 ) 2 + ( 1 + x 2 ) 2 and g 6 ( x ) = tan 1 x + 2 x 1 + x 2 x 3 ( 1 + x 2 ) 2 are such that g 5 ( 0 ) = 0 and g 6 ( 0 ) = 0 . Differentiating again with respect to x, we get
g 5 ( x ) g 6 ( x ) = ( 1 + 3 x 2 ) 1 + x 2 1 x 2 3 + ( 1 3 x 2 ) 3 x 2 : = ( 1 + 3 x 2 ) g 7 ( x ) + ( 1 3 x 2 ) 3 x 2 : = g 8 ( x ) ,
where g 7 ( x ) = 1 + x 2 1 x 2 3 with g 7 ( x ) = 12 x ( 1 x 2 ) 2 1 + x 2 1 x 2 2 . We show that g 8 ( x ) is strictly increasing on ( 0 , 1 ) . We demonstrate the positivity of g 8 ( x ) by showing that the numerator of g 8 ( x ) , say N 2 , is positive. We have
N 2 = ( 3 x 2 ) ( 1 + 3 x 2 ) g 7 ( x ) + 6 x g 7 ( x ) 6 x + 2 x ( 1 + 3 x 2 ) g 7 ( x ) + ( 1 3 x 2 ) .
Simplifying the above as in the proof of Theorem 2 and using the fact that 1 + x 2 1 x 2 3 > 1 , we get
N 2 > 40 x + 88 x 3 32 x 5 ( 1 x 2 ) 2 = 40 x + 8 x 3 ( 11 4 x 2 ) ( 1 x 2 ) 2 > 0 .
Therefore, g 8 ( x ) is increasing. By Lemma 1, it is concluded that g ( x ) is strictly increasing in ( 0 , r ) . Consequently, g ( 0 + ) < g ( x ) < g ( r ) . The inequalities (5) follow due to the limits g ( 0 + ) = 2 3 and g ( r ) = tanh 1 r tan 1 r r 2 tan 1 r .
Proof of Theorem 3.
Let us set
F ( x ) = ln sin 1 x sinh 1 x x 2 : = F 1 ( x ) F 2 ( x ) ; x ( 0 , 1 ) .
By differentiation, we obtain
F 1 ( x ) F 2 ( x ) = 1 2 1 1 x 4 · 1 + x 2 sinh 1 x 1 x 2 sin 1 x x sin 1 x sinh 1 x : = 1 2 F 3 ( x ) · F 4 ( x ) ,
where F 3 ( x ) = 1 1 x 4 is strictly positively increasing in ( 0 , 1 ) and
F 4 ( x ) = 1 + x 2 sinh 1 x 1 x 2 sin 1 x x sin 1 x sinh 1 x > 0
due to Lemma 5. We prove that F 4 ( x ) is strictly monotonically increasing in ( 0 , 1 ) . We differentiate F 4 ( x ) with respect to x to get
F 4 ( x ) ( x sin 1 x sinh 1 x ) 2 = x sin 1 x sinh 1 x x sinh 1 x 1 + x 2 + x sin 1 x 1 x 2 1 + x 2 sinh 1 x 1 x 2 sin 1 x × sin 1 x sinh 1 x + x sinh 1 x 1 x 2 + x sin 1 x 1 + x 2 .
After some calculations, we get
F 4 ( x ) ( x sin 1 x sinh 1 x ) 2 = 1 1 + x 2 x 1 x 2 ( sin 1 x ) 2 + x 2 sin 1 x ( sinh 1 x ) 2 ( 1 + x 2 ) sin 1 x ( sinh 1 x ) 2 + 1 1 x 2 x 2 ( sin 1 x ) 2 sinh 1 x + ( 1 x 2 ) ( sin 1 x ) 2 sinh 1 x x 1 + x 2 ( sinh 1 x ) 2 = sin 1 x 1 + x 2 x 1 x 2 sin 1 x ( sinh 1 x ) 2 + sinh 1 x 1 x 2 ( sin 1 x ) 2 x 1 + x 2 sinh 1 x > sinh 1 x 1 x 2 x 1 x 2 sin 1 x ( sinh 1 x ) 2 + sinh 1 x 1 x 2 ( sin 1 x ) 2 x 1 + x 2 sinh 1 x
due to Lemmas 4 and 5. Then, we have
F 4 ( x ) ( x sin 1 x sinh 1 x ) 2 > sinh 1 x 1 x 2 · ψ ( x ) ,
where ψ ( x ) = ( sin 1 x ) 2 ( sinh 1 x ) 2 + x 1 x 2 sin 1 x x 1 + x 2 sinh 1 x . Let us now consider
ψ ( x ) = 2 sin 1 x 1 x 2 2 sinh 1 x 1 + x 2 + 1 x 2 sin 1 x x 2 sin 1 x 1 x 2 x 2 sinh 1 x 1 + x 2 1 + x 2 sinh 1 x .
Therefore,
ψ ( x ) 1 x 4 = 2 1 + x 2 sin 1 x 2 1 x 2 sinh 1 x + ( 1 x 2 ) 1 + x 2 sin 1 x x 2 1 + x 2 sin 1 x x 2 1 x 2 sinh 1 x ( 1 + x 2 ) 1 x 2 sinh 1 x = 1 + x 2 ( 3 2 x 2 ) sin 1 x 1 x 2 ( 3 + 2 x 2 ) sinh 1 x .
Next, we prove that
1 + x 2 ( 3 2 x 2 ) sin 1 x > 1 x 2 ( 3 + 2 x 2 ) sinh 1 x .
Equivalently,
( 1 + x 2 ) ( 3 2 x 2 ) 2 ( sin 1 x ) 2 > ( 1 x 2 ) ( 3 + 2 x 2 ) 2 ( sinh 1 x ) 2
or
( 4 x 6 8 x 4 3 x 2 + 9 ) ( sin 1 x ) 2 + ( 4 x 6 + 8 x 4 3 x 2 9 ) ( sinh 1 x ) 2 > 0 ,
i.e.,
φ ( x ) : = ( 4 x 6 3 x 2 ) ( sin 1 x ) 2 + ( sinh 1 x ) 2 + ( 9 8 x 4 ) ( sin 1 x ) 2 ( sinh 1 x ) 2 > 0 .
Making use of Lemma 2, we write
φ ( x ) = ( 4 x 6 3 x 2 ) n = 0 1 + ( 1 ) n 2 2 n + 1 ( n ! ) 2 ( 2 n + 2 ) ! x 2 n + 2 + ( 9 8 x 4 ) n = 0 1 ( 1 ) n 2 2 n + 1 ( n ! ) 2 ( 2 n + 2 ) ! x 2 n + 2 = n = 0 4 1 + ( 1 ) n 2 2 n + 1 ( n ! ) 2 ( 2 n + 2 ) ! x 2 n + 8 n = 0 8 1 ( 1 ) n 2 2 n + 1 ( n ! ) 2 ( 2 n + 2 ) ! x 2 n + 6 n = 0 3 1 + ( 1 ) n 2 2 n + 1 ( n ! ) 2 ( 2 n + 2 ) ! x 2 n + 4 + n = 0 9 1 ( 1 ) n 2 2 n + 1 ( n ! ) 2 ( 2 n + 2 ) ! x 2 n + 2 = n = 3 4 ( 1 + ( 1 ) n 3 ) 2 2 n 5 ( ( n 3 ) ! ) 2 ( 2 n 4 ) ! x 2 n + 2 n = 2 8 ( 1 ( 1 ) n 2 ) 2 2 n 3 ( ( n 2 ) ! ) 2 ( 2 n 2 ) ! x 2 n + 2 n = 1 3 ( 1 + ( 1 ) n 1 ) 2 2 n 1 ( ( n 1 ) ! ) 2 ( 2 n ) ! x 2 n + 2 + n = 0 9 ( 1 ( 1 ) n ) 2 2 n + 1 ( n ! ) 2 ( 2 n + 2 ) ! x 2 n + 2 : = n = 3 a n x 2 n + 2 ,
where
a n = 4 ( 1 + ( 1 ) n 3 ) 2 2 n 5 ( ( n 3 ) ! ) 2 ( 2 n 4 ) ! 8 ( 1 ( 1 ) n 2 ) 2 2 n 3 ( ( n 2 ) ! ) 2 ( 2 n 2 ) ! 3 ( 1 + ( 1 ) n 1 ) 2 2 n 1 ( ( n 1 ) ! ) 2 ( 2 n ) ! + 9 ( 1 ( 1 ) n ) 2 2 n + 1 ( n ! ) 2 ( 2 n + 2 ) ! , n = 3 , 4 , 5 , .
Clearly, a n = 0 , for n = 4 , 6 , 8 , . For n = 3 , 5 , 7 , , we write
a n = 2 2 n ( ( n 3 ) ! ) 2 ( 2 n + 2 ) ! · b n ,
where
b n = n ( n + 1 ) ( 2 n + 1 ) ( 2 n 1 ) ( 2 n 2 ) ( 2 n 3 ) 8 n ( n + 1 ) ( 2 n + 1 ) ( 2 n 1 ) ( n 2 ) 2 6 ( n + 1 ) ( 2 n + 1 ) ( n 1 ) 2 ( n 2 ) 2 + 36 n 2 ( n 1 ) 2 ( n 2 ) 2 = ( n 2 + n ) ( 4 n 2 1 ) ( 4 n 2 + 22 n 26 ) + 6 ( n 2 2 n + 1 ) ( n 2 4 n + 4 ) ( 4 n 2 3 n 1 ) = 8 n 6 90 n 5 + 402 n 4 608 n 3 + 238 n 2 + 26 n 24 .
Now it is very easy to prove that b n > 0 for n 3 and hence a n 0 for n = 3 , 5 , 7 , . This shows that a n 0 for n = 3 , 4 , 5 , , implying that φ ( x ) > 0 and ψ ( x ) > 0 , which further implies ψ ( x ) > ψ ( 0 ) = 0 and F 4 ( x ) > 0 . Then F 4 ( x ) is strictly monotonically increasing in ( 0 , 1 ) , as F 3 ( x ) and F 4 ( x ) both are monotonically increasing in ( 0 , 1 ) . Thus, F 1 ( x ) F 2 ( x ) and thus, according to Lemma 1, F ( x ) is also monotonically increasing in ( 0 , 1 ) . As a result, F ( 0 + ) < F ( x ) < F ( 1 ) . The limits F ( 0 + ) = 1 3 and F ( 1 ) = ln π 2 sinh 1 1 give the required inequalities (6). □
Proof of Theorem 4.
Let us set
G ( x ) = ln tanh 1 x tan 1 x x 2 : = G 1 ( x ) G 2 ( x ) ; x ( 0 , r ) and r ( 0 , 1 ) .
After differentiation, we obtain
G 1 ( x ) G 2 ( x ) = 1 2 ( 1 + x 2 ) tan 1 x ( 1 x 2 ) tanh 1 x x ( 1 x 4 ) tan 1 x tanh 1 x = 1 2 ( 1 + x 2 ) tan 1 x ( 1 x 2 ) tanh 1 x x 3 · x 2 ( 1 x 4 ) tan 1 x tanh 1 x : = 1 2 G 3 ( x ) · G 4 ( x ) .
Consider
G 3 ( x ) = ( 1 + x 2 ) tan 1 x ( 1 x 2 ) tanh 1 x x 3 : = G 5 ( x ) G 6 ( x ) ,
where G 5 ( x ) = ( 1 + x 2 ) tan 1 x ( 1 x 2 ) tanh 1 x and G 6 ( x ) = x 3 satisfying G 5 ( 0 ) = 0 = G 6 ( 0 ) . Differentiation gives
G 5 ( x ) G 6 ( x ) = 2 3 · tan 1 x + tanh 1 x x : = 2 3 · G 7 ( x ) G 8 ( x ) ,
where G 7 ( x ) = tan 1 x + tanh 1 x and G 8 ( x ) = x with G 7 ( 0 ) = 0 = G 8 ( 0 ) . Differentiating again, we get
G 7 ( x ) G 8 ( x ) = 1 1 + x 2 + 1 1 x 2 = 2 1 x 4 ,
which is strictly increasing in ( 0 , r ) . By Lemma 1, G 3 ( x ) is strictly increasing in ( 0 , r ) . In addition, by Lemma 6 and the fact that
1 x 2 1 + x 2 > 1 x 2 1 + x 2 ,
we get that G 3 ( x ) is positive in ( 0 , r ) .
Now, consider
G 4 ( x ) = x 2 ( 1 x 4 ) tan 1 x tanh 1 x ; x ( 0 , r ) .
Then, we have
G 4 ( x ) ( 1 x 4 ) tan 1 x tanh 1 x 2 = 2 x ( 1 x 4 ) tan 1 x tanh 1 x + 4 x 5 tan 1 x tanh 1 x x 2 ( 1 x 2 ) tanh 1 x 2 ( 1 + x 2 ) tan 1 x = 2 x tan 1 x tanh 1 x + 2 x 5 tan 1 x tanh 1 x x 2 tanh 1 x x 2 tan 1 x + x 4 ( tanh 1 x tan 1 x ) > 2 x tan 1 x tanh 1 x + 2 x 5 tan 1 x tanh 1 x x 2 tanh 1 x x 2 tan 1 x = x tan 1 x tanh 1 x 2 + 2 x 4 x tan 1 x x tanh 1 x > 0 ,
by Lemma 7. Therefore G 4 ( x ) is strictly increasing in ( 0 , 1 ) . Thus, since G 1 ( x ) G 2 ( x ) is the product of two positively increasing functions, it is increasing in ( 0 , r ) . By Lemma 1, G ( x ) is strictly increasing in ( 0 , r ) . Consequently, we have
G ( 0 + ) < G ( x ) < G ( r ) .
The desired inequalities (7) follow due to the limits G ( 0 + ) = 2 3 and G ( r ) = ln ( tanh 1 r ) ln ( tan 1 r ) r 2 .
Remark 2.
From the proofs of Theorems 2 and 4, it is clear that the rightmost inequalities of (5) and (7) are, in fact, true in ( 0 , 1 ) .
Proof of Corollary 1.
It is an immediate consequence of Theorems 1 and 2, and Remark 2. □
Remark 3.
A better upper bound for tanh 1 x tan 1 x in ( 0 , 1 ) can be found in Lemma 6, as stated in Remark 1.

5. Conclusions and Direction for Further Research

Polynomial and exponential bounds for bell-shaped functions involving only trigonometric or only hyperbolic functions or their inverses are present in the literature. Recently, these types of bounds have been obtained for the quotients of trigonometric and hyperbolic functions. We contributed to the field by establishing similar bounds for the quotients of inverse trigonometric and inverse hyperbolic functions, which can be useful in the theory of analytical inequalities. The exponential bounds were sharper than the polynomial bounds.
Wilker-type and Huygens-type inequalities for inverse trigonometric and inverse hyperbolic function quotients may also be obtained.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.B.T., Y.J.B., R.M.D. and C.C.; methodology, S.B.T., Y.J.B., R.M.D. and C.C.; validation, S.B.T., Y.J.B., R.M.D. and C.C.; formal analysis, S.B.T., Y.J.B., R.M.D. and C.C.; investigation, S.B.T., Y.J.B., R.M.D. and C.C.; writing—original draft preparation, S.B.T., Y.J.B., R.M.D. and C.C.; writing—review and editing, S.B.T., Y.J.B., R.M.D. and C.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Chesneau, C.; Bagul, Y.J. Some new bounds for ratio functions of trigonometric and hyperbolic functions. Indian J. Math. 2019, 61, 153–160. Available online: http://www.amsallahabad.org/ijm.html (accessed on 1 February 2022).
  2. Chen, C.-P. Sharp Wilker- and Huygens-type inequalities for inverse trigonometric and inverse hyperbolic functions. Integral Tansforms Spec. Funct. 2012, 23, 865–873. Available online: https://0-www-tandfonline-com.brum.beds.ac.uk/doi/abs/10.1080/10652469.2011.644851 (accessed on 1 February 2022). [CrossRef]
  3. Chen, C.-P.; Malešević, B. Inequalities related to certain inverse trigonometric and inverse hyperbolic functions. RACSAM Rev. R Acad. A 2020, 114, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Chouikha, A. Sharp Inequalities for Ratio of Trigonometric and Hyperbolic Functions. ffhal02496089f. 2020. Available online: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02496089/document (accessed on 1 February 2022).
  5. Dhaigude, R.M.; Bagul, Y.J. Simple efficient bounds for arcsine and arctangent functions. South East Asian J. Math. Math. Sci. 2021, 17, 45–62. Available online: http://rsmams.org/journals/articleinfo.php?articleid=621&tag=seajmams (accessed on 1 February 2022).
  6. Dhaigude, R.M.; Thool, S.B.; Bagul, Y.J.; Raut, V.M. On simple bounds for inverse hyperbolic sine and inverse hyperbolic tangent functions. Jnanabha 2021, 51, 101–108. Available online: https://www.vijnanaparishadofindia.org/jnanabha/volume-51-no-1-2021/51_1_p14 (accessed on 1 February 2022).
  7. Guo, B.-N.; Luo, Q.-M.; Qi, F. Sharpening and generalizations of Shafer-Fink’s double inequality for the arc sine function. Filomat 2013, 27, 261–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Malešević, B.; Rašajski, M.; Lutovac, T. Refined estimates and generalizations of inequalities related to arctangent function and Shafer’s inequality. Math. Probl. Eng. 2018, 8, 4178629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Malešević, B.; Rašajski, M.; Lutovac, T. Refinements and generalizations of some inequalities of Shafer-Fink’s type for the inverse sine function. J. Inequal. Appl. 2017, 2017, 275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Mitrinović, D.S. Analytic Inequalities; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 1970. [Google Scholar]
  11. Mortici, C.; Srivastava, H.M. Estimates for the arctangent function related to Shafer’s inequality. Colloq. Math. 2014, 136, 263–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Nishizawa, Y. Refined quadratic estimations of Shafer’s inequality. J. Inequal. Appl. 2017, 2017, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Qiao, Q.-X.; Chen, C.P. Approximations to inverse tangent function. J. Inequal. Appl. 2018, 2018, 141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Shafer, R.E. Analytic inequalities obtained by quadratic approximation. Publikacije Elektrotehničkog Fakulteta Serija Matematika i Fizika 1977, 577–598, 96–97. [Google Scholar]
  15. Sun, J.-L.; Chen, C.-P. Shafer-type inequalities for inverse trigonometric functions and Gauss lemniscate functions. J. Inequal. Appl. 2016, 2016, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Zhu, L. On a quadratic estimate of Shafer. J. Math. Inequal. 2008, 2, 571–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhu, L. New inequalities of Shafer-Fink type for arc hyperbolic sine. J. Inequal. Appl. 2008, 5, 3682275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Zhu, L.; Malešević, B. Natural approximation of Masjed-Jamei’s inequality. RACSAM 2020, 114, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhu, L. The natural approaches of Shafer-Fink inequality for inverse sine function. Mathematics 2022, 10, 647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Yang, Z.-H.; Tin, K.-F.; Gao, Q. The monotonicity of ratios involving arc tangent function with applications. Open Math. 2019, 17, 1450–1467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kostić, M.; Bagul, Y.J.; Chesneau, C. Generalized inequalities for ratio functions of trigonometric and hyperbolic functions. Indian J. Math. 2020, 62, 183–190. Available online: http://www.amsallahabad.org/ijm.html (accessed on 1 February 2022).
  22. Bagul, Y.J.; Dhaigude, R.M.; Thool, S.B. New inequalities for quotients of circular and hyperbolic functions. RGMIA Res. Rep. Coll. 2020, 34, 16. Available online: https://rgmia.org/papers/v23/v23a34.pdf (accessed on 1 February 2022).
  23. Anderson, G.D.; Vamanamurthy, M.K.; Vuorinen, M. Conformal Invariants, Inequalities and Quasiconformal Maps; John Wiley and Sons: New York, NY, USA, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  24. Gradshteyn, I.S.; Ryzhik, I.M. Table of Integrals, Series, and Products, 11th ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  25. Guo, B.-N.; Lim, D.; Qi, F. Series expansions of powers of arcsine, closed forms for special values of Bell polynomials, and series representations of generalized logsine functions. AIMS Math. 2021, 6, 7494–7517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Visual comparison of the bounds for sin 1 x sinh 1 x : (a) lower bounds with x [ 0.4 , 1 ] , and (b) upper bounds for x [ 0 , 1 ] .
Figure 1. Visual comparison of the bounds for sin 1 x sinh 1 x : (a) lower bounds with x [ 0.4 , 1 ] , and (b) upper bounds for x [ 0 , 1 ] .
Axioms 11 00262 g001
Figure 2. Visual comparison of the bounds for tanh 1 x tan 1 x : (a) lower bounds with x [ 0.4 , r ] , and (b) upper bounds for x [ 0 , r ] , with r = 7 8 (arbitrarily taken into ( 0 , 1 ) ).
Figure 2. Visual comparison of the bounds for tanh 1 x tan 1 x : (a) lower bounds with x [ 0.4 , r ] , and (b) upper bounds for x [ 0 , r ] , with r = 7 8 (arbitrarily taken into ( 0 , 1 ) ).
Axioms 11 00262 g002
Figure 3. Visual comparison between sin 1 x sinh 1 x and tanh 1 x tan 1 x .
Figure 3. Visual comparison between sin 1 x sinh 1 x and tanh 1 x tan 1 x .
Axioms 11 00262 g003
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Thool, S.B.; Bagul, Y.J.; Dhaigude, R.M.; Chesneau, C. Bounds for Quotients of Inverse Trigonometric and Inverse Hyperbolic Functions. Axioms 2022, 11, 262. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/axioms11060262

AMA Style

Thool SB, Bagul YJ, Dhaigude RM, Chesneau C. Bounds for Quotients of Inverse Trigonometric and Inverse Hyperbolic Functions. Axioms. 2022; 11(6):262. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/axioms11060262

Chicago/Turabian Style

Thool, Sumedh B., Yogesh J. Bagul, Ramkrishna M. Dhaigude, and Christophe Chesneau. 2022. "Bounds for Quotients of Inverse Trigonometric and Inverse Hyperbolic Functions" Axioms 11, no. 6: 262. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/axioms11060262

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop