Next Article in Journal
Unseen Artificial Intelligence—Deep Learning Paradigm for Segmentation of Low Atherosclerotic Plaque in Carotid Ultrasound: A Multicenter Cardiovascular Study
Next Article in Special Issue
Evaluation of Depth of Invasion and Tumor Thickness as a Prognostic Factor for Early-Stage Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Retrospective Study
Previous Article in Journal
Measurement of Blood Pressure by Ultrasound—The Applicability of Devices, Algorithms and a View in Local Hemodynamics
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Case Report

Dilated Odontoma Arising in the Mandibular Third Molar Germ: Report of a Case of an Unusual Lesion in an Uncommon Site

by
Francesca Zara
1,
Giacomo D’Angeli
1,*,
Alessandro Corsi
2,
Antonella Polimeni
1 and
Gian Luca Sfasciotti
1
1
Department of Oral and Maxillo-Facial Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy
2
Department of Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 18 October 2021 / Revised: 29 November 2021 / Accepted: 30 November 2021 / Published: 2 December 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Diagnosis and Treatment of Mouth Diseases)

Abstract

:
Dilated odontoma is the most severe variant of dens invaginatus. It is extremely uncommon in the posterior mandible. It is thought to originate during the morpho-differentiation stage of dental development. However, its etiology and pathogenesis remain obscure. We report here the clinical and pathologic findings of an incidentally discovered dilated odontoma arising in the left third mandibular molar germ of an 11-year-old male and a review of the pertinent literature. As dilated odontoma is not established as an independent entity in the current WHO classification of odontogenic tumors and is the result of a well-established developmental anomaly of the tooth (that is, the invagination of the enamel organ into the dental papilla), it should be better identified as dilated dens invaginatus.

1. Introduction

Dens invaginatus, also known as dens in dente, is a tooth developmental anomaly caused by an invagination of the enamel organ into the dental papilla. It may affect either the primary or the permanent teeth and its incidence has been estimated to range between 0.04% to 10%, with a greater female predilection [1]. The maxillary lateral incisors are the most frequently affected teeth, followed by maxillary central incisors, premolars, and canines [2,3]. The anomaly, which can be also symmetric, uncommonly involves the mandibular teeth, especially in the molar region [4]. The mostly used classification of dens invaginatus is that proposed by Oehlers, who distinguished three different main types based on the depth of enamel-lined invagination [5]. In type 1, the less severe and more frequent form, the invagination is confined to the crown. In type 2 and type 3, the invagination extends beyond the cemento-enamel junction either remaining within (type 2) or penetrating through (type 3) the root, leading in the latter case to the formation of an additional apical or lateral foramen. Swelling or pain related to a local periapical infection is the main clinical feature associated with dens invaginatus [3]. In rare cases, the invagination may significantly dilate, impairing the normal development of the involved tooth [2,3,6]. In this condition, which is commonly reported as dilated odontoma, the involved tooth shows a doughnut-like circular-oval shape with a radiolucent interior [2,3,6,7,8,9,10,11]. Thus, dilated odontoma is considered the extreme and most severe form of dens invaginatus [2,3,8].
We report here an unusual dilated odontoma incidentally detected in an 11-year-old male. The lesion was associated with the left mandibular third molar germ. A review of the pertinent literature, with a special focus on the extracted type III dens invaginatus, is also provided.

2. Case Report

An 11-year-old male came to our observation for his first dental visit. His medical history was negative. No symptoms were reported by the patient or his parents. The face was symmetric and no swelling of the cervical lymph nodes was observed. Intraorally, the dentition of the permanent teeth was completed, except for the third mandibular molars and the second and third maxillary molars. Bucco-lingual expansion of the jaw bones was not evident. An orthopantomogram was performed to assess the development of third molars [12]. Unexpectedly, the analysis revealed an intraosseous doughnut-like lesion radiopaque at the periphery and radiolucent in the center associated with the left mandibular third molar germ (Figure 1a). Additional dental abnormalities were not observed. The maximum diameter of the lesion was 5.7 mm. Based on these findings, developmental abnormalities of the third molar (e.g., dilated odontoma) and odontogenic (e.g., cementoblastoma) and non-odontogenic (e.g., osteoblastoma or osteoid osteoma) tumors were considered for differential diagnoses. To better characterize the lesion, a computed tomography (CT) scan was required. The analysis established bone integrity around the lesion and its independence from the local neuro-vascular structures. In addition, it revealed, on the sagittal projection, a small gap in the proximity of the buccal surface of the mandible (Figure 1b). As the most significant clinical concern related to this condition is the risk of developing pulpal necrosis, it was decided to extract the germ of the third molar and the underlying lesion. To do this, under local anesthesia, a mucoperiosteal flap was raised posterior to the mandibular right second molar. The vestibular cortical plate was removed, exposing the ovoid mass, which was removed with the germ of the mandibular tooth. The surgical flap was repositioned and sutured. Healing was uneventful. The excised lesion appeared as an empty hard spherical mass virtually devoid of content (Figure 2). It was routinely processed for paraffin embedding after fixation and decalcification. Histologically (Figure 3a,b), the outer hard tissue was dentin. The inner part of dentin was in continuity with basophil calcified material, which in turn was focally in contact with the bone-like matrix. The basophil calcified material focally presented a rod-like structure consistent with enamel (Figure 3b, insert). More centrally, the lesion was composed of fibro-vascular tissue. The pathologic findings were considered as consistent with a dilated odontoma.

3. Discussion

We have presented here a rare incidentally discovered dilated odontoma arising in the left third mandibular molar germ of an 11-year-old male. To the best of our knowledge, dilated odontoma has never been reported to arise in association with the germ tooth. This makes the case reported here unique. In the most recently published review of the literature, sixteen extracted type III dens invaginatus cases were reported [3]. Eight of these cases were classified as dilated odontoma [1,2,3,8,9,10,11,13], while the other four cases were published by Matsumoto and Seto [14]. A clinical synopsis of these cases is reported in Table 1. In four adult patients (three females and one male, age range of 28–60 years), the dilated odontoma involved the third molar region [8,9,14]. In addition to the case reported here, the dilated odontoma was detected incidentally in two cases [3,8].
In addition to its clinical uniqueness, the case reported here offers the possibility to discuss the proper terminology to use for this type of dental lesion. In this regard, we completely agree with other authors, according to which dilated odontoma represents the extreme and most severe form of type III dens invaginatus [2,3,8]. However, in our opinion, as also recently suggested by others [15], dilated odontoma is a misnomer and this terminology should be abandoned because it tends to be confusing. Dilated odontoma is certainly a hamartoma in the sense that it reflects a defect (“hamartia”) in the development of a tooth (i.e., the invagination of the enamel organ into the dental papilla before the mineralization of the dental tissues begin) but it cannot be viewed as a tumor-like hamartomatous growth composed of a mixture of dental hard and soft tissue, as odontomas are [15,16,17]. Indeed, this invagination leads to the development of morphologically abnormal teeth and the expected final is the formation of a doughnut-like spheric or ovoidal calcified structure with a more radiolucent central portion [2,3,5,8,9,10,11,13]. This view is also strongly supported by the current WHO classification of odontogenic tumors, whereby dilated odontoma is not established as a specific entity in the general spectrum of the odontogenic tumors and within the specific context of the odontomas [17]. For these reasons, we feel that the term dilated dens invaginatus or dilated hamartoma of the teeth to identify these lesions could be more accurate than dilated odontoma.
Different theories have been suggested to explain the development of dens invaginatus or dilated odontoma. Although there is general agreement on its origin during the morpho-differentiation stage of dental development, as unequivocally proven in the case reported here, the fine etiology and pathogenesis remain to be elucidated. Proposed theories have included increased localized external pressure, inner enamel epithelium growth retardation or stimulation in certain areas of the tooth bud, infection, and trauma [2,3,5,6,7,8]. Genetic factors have also been considered but they were excluded in our case because the lesion was isolated and the clinical and radiographic evaluation failed to reveal other dental anomalies [18].
In conclusion, the case reported here represents an uncommon example of severe type III dens invaginatus or dilated odontoma incidentally detected in an 11-year-old male. The lesion involved the left mandibular third molar germ. Even though the etiology and pathogenesis of this lesion remain to be defined, its origin reflects a well-defined developmental anomaly in tooth formation that is the invagination of the enamel organ into the dental papilla. As a consequence, although the existing nomenclature is more clinically acceptable, it could be simply defined as dilated dens invaginatus or dilated hamartoma of the teeth.

Author Contributions

F.Z. and G.L.S.: conception and design of the study. F.Z., G.D., A.C., A.P. and G.L.S.: acquisition, analysis and interpretation of clinical or pathologic data. F.Z., G.D. and G.L.S.: draft preparation. F.Z., G.D. and A.C.: review and editing. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

All clinical–pathological data reported in the manuscript were obtained in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent Statement

Written informed consent for publication of data and images was obtained from the parents of the patient reported in the study.

Data Availability Statement

Data are available from the authors upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Jaya, R.; Mohan Kumar, R.S.; Srinivasan, R. A rare case of dilated invaginated odontome with talon cusp in a permanent maxillary central incisor diagnosed by cone beam computed tomography. Imaging Sci. Dent. 2013, 43, 209–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Matsusue, Y.; Yamamoto, K.; Inagake, K.; Kirita, T. A dilated odontoma in the second molar region of the mandible. Open Dent. J. 2011, 5, 150–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Galvez, P.; Garot, E.; Bres, A.; Crelier, A.; Castain, C.; Catros, S.; Fenelon, M. Dilated odontoma: An unusual case report and literature review. J. Oral Med. Oral Surg. 2021, 27, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. White, S.C.; Pharoah, M.J. Oral Radiology: Principles and Interpretation, 5th ed.; Mosby: St. Louis, MO, USA, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  5. Oehlers, F.A.C. Dens invaginatus (dilated composite odontome) I. Variations of the invagination process and associated anterior crown forms. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. 1957, 10, 1204–1218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Rushton, M.A. A collection of dilated composite odontomes. Br. Dent. J. 1937, 63, 65–86. [Google Scholar]
  7. Oehlers, F.A.C. Dens invaginatus (dilated composite odontome). II. Associated posterior crown forms and pathogenesis. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. 1957, 10, 1302–1316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Cuković-Bagić, I.; Macan, D.; Dumancić, J.; Manojlović, S.; Hat, J. Dilated odontome in the mandibular third molar region. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Pathol. Endod. 2010, 109, 109–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Almeida, B.; Silva, A.; Pereira, M.; Silva, M.; Nunes, S. Case report of a dilated odontome in the posterior mandible. Int. J. Surg. Case Rep. 2016, 20, 14–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  10. Jayachandran, S.; Kayal, L.; Sharma, A.; Priyanka, K. Dilated odontoma: A report of two cases from a radiological perspective. Contemp. Clin. Dent. 2016, 7, 107–110. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  11. Sharma, G.; Nagra, A.; Singh, G.; Nagpal, A.; Soin, A.; Bhardwaj, V. An erupted dilated odontoma: A rare presentation. Case Rep. Dent. 2016, 2016, 9750947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Dental Radiographic Examination: Reccomendations for Patient Selection and Limiting Radiatione Exposure. American Dental Association (Council on Scientific Affairs). Available online: https://www.ada.org/-/media/project/ada-organization/ada/ada-org/ada/ada/publications/ada-news/files/dental_radiographic_examinations_2012.pdf?rev=496a9ceb48a1405f9a8008abc0de745c&hash=7C8A3F99EF8E6DA58E5A2E9DF59B3FD4 (accessed on 6 November 2021).
  13. Wall, A.; Ng, S.; Djemal, S. The value of cone beam CT in assessing and managing a dilated odontome of a maxillary canine. Dent. Update 2015, 42, 126–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Matsumoto, T.; Seto, K. Histopathological Studies of Four Cases of Dilated Odontoma. Oral Med. Pathol. 1996, 1, 56–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Coria-Bello, M.; Morales-González, F.J. Dens invaginatus u odontoma dilatado, a definition controversy. A literature review. Rev. Científica Odontol. 2021, 9, e061. [Google Scholar]
  16. Patil, S.; Rao, R.S.; Majumdar, B. Hamartomas of the oral cavity. J. Int. Soc. Prev. Community Dent. 2015, 5, 347–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Vared, M.; Fowler, C.B.; Neville, B.W.; Soluk Tekkesin, M. Odontoma. In WHO Classification of Head and Neck Tumours; El-Naggar, A.K., Chan, J.K.C., Grandis, J.R., Takat, T., Slootweg, P.J., Eds.; IARC Press: Lyon, France, 2017; pp. 224–226. [Google Scholar]
  18. Sedano, H.O.; Ocampo-Acosta, F.; Naranjo-Corona, R.I.; Torres-Arellano, M.E. Multiple dens invaginatus, mulberry molar and conical teeth. Case report and genetic considerations. Med. Oral Patol. Oral Y Cir. Bucal 2009, 14, 69–72. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Panoramic dental radiograph (a) and CT scan (b) (L is for the lingual side and B is for the buccal or vestibular side) views of the lesion. It appears as an intraosseous doughnut-like lesion radiopaque at the periphery and radiolucent in the center, and is associated with the left mandibular third molar germ. The third frame of the illustrated CT scan shows a small radiolucency (arrow) suggestive of the invagination. CT was performed with a 64-slice CT scanner (Siemens Somatom Edge Plus 64, Siemens Helthineers, Germany). The acquisition was performed using the following parameters: tube voltage: 100 kVp; 13 mAs; rotation time: 1.0 s; delivered dose: 7 mGy; slice thickness: 1.25 mm; field of view: 160 mm.
Figure 1. Panoramic dental radiograph (a) and CT scan (b) (L is for the lingual side and B is for the buccal or vestibular side) views of the lesion. It appears as an intraosseous doughnut-like lesion radiopaque at the periphery and radiolucent in the center, and is associated with the left mandibular third molar germ. The third frame of the illustrated CT scan shows a small radiolucency (arrow) suggestive of the invagination. CT was performed with a 64-slice CT scanner (Siemens Somatom Edge Plus 64, Siemens Helthineers, Germany). The acquisition was performed using the following parameters: tube voltage: 100 kVp; 13 mAs; rotation time: 1.0 s; delivered dose: 7 mGy; slice thickness: 1.25 mm; field of view: 160 mm.
Diagnostics 11 02256 g001
Figure 2. Gross appearance of the excised lesion. The walls of the lesion appear focally interrupted and no content is present inside. For orientation, the occlusal surface is indicated by the arrow.
Figure 2. Gross appearance of the excised lesion. The walls of the lesion appear focally interrupted and no content is present inside. For orientation, the occlusal surface is indicated by the arrow.
Diagnostics 11 02256 g002
Figure 3. Low- (a) and high-power (b) magnification of the wall of the excised lesion. The outer wall is composed of dentin (D). The inner side of the dentin is strictly associated with a basophilic calcified dental tissue (C), which in turn is associated with an eosinophilic bone-like matrix (asterisks) at the interface with the inner fibro-vascular tissue (fvt). The insert in (b), in which the white clefts are artefactual, illustrates enamel with a rod-like structure (triangles) in the inner side of the dentin (D). Hematoxylin–eosin stain. Bars: 500 μm in a, 200 μm in b and 50 μm in the insert.
Figure 3. Low- (a) and high-power (b) magnification of the wall of the excised lesion. The outer wall is composed of dentin (D). The inner side of the dentin is strictly associated with a basophilic calcified dental tissue (C), which in turn is associated with an eosinophilic bone-like matrix (asterisks) at the interface with the inner fibro-vascular tissue (fvt). The insert in (b), in which the white clefts are artefactual, illustrates enamel with a rod-like structure (triangles) in the inner side of the dentin (D). Hematoxylin–eosin stain. Bars: 500 μm in a, 200 μm in b and 50 μm in the insert.
Diagnostics 11 02256 g003
Table 1. Clinical synopsis of the patients with extracted dilated odontoma reported in the literature.
Table 1. Clinical synopsis of the patients with extracted dilated odontoma reported in the literature.
Age/GenderClinical PresentationTooth NumberRef.
24 years/MalePain and swelling2.1[1]
14 years/FemaleUnerupted molar tooth3.7[2]
7 years/FemaleAsymptomatic4.2[3]
28 years/FemaleAsymptomatic4.8[8]
47 years/FemalePain and discomfort3.8[9]
16 years/MaleSwelling4.4 bis[10]
24 years/MalePain and swelling1.7[10]
18 years/MaleMalformed tooth and intermittent mild pain2.1 bis[11]
14 years/MaleSwelling2.3[13]
60 years/MaleNA3.8[14]
30years/MaleNA4.6[14]
49 years/FemaleNA1.8[14]
32 years/FemaleNAright maxillary molar region[14]
11 years/MaleAsymptomatic3.8 (germ tooth)Present case
Adapted from Table 1 from [3]. NA: not available; bis: supernumerary tooth.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zara, F.; D’Angeli, G.; Corsi, A.; Polimeni, A.; Sfasciotti, G.L. Dilated Odontoma Arising in the Mandibular Third Molar Germ: Report of a Case of an Unusual Lesion in an Uncommon Site. Diagnostics 2021, 11, 2256. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/diagnostics11122256

AMA Style

Zara F, D’Angeli G, Corsi A, Polimeni A, Sfasciotti GL. Dilated Odontoma Arising in the Mandibular Third Molar Germ: Report of a Case of an Unusual Lesion in an Uncommon Site. Diagnostics. 2021; 11(12):2256. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/diagnostics11122256

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zara, Francesca, Giacomo D’Angeli, Alessandro Corsi, Antonella Polimeni, and Gian Luca Sfasciotti. 2021. "Dilated Odontoma Arising in the Mandibular Third Molar Germ: Report of a Case of an Unusual Lesion in an Uncommon Site" Diagnostics 11, no. 12: 2256. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/diagnostics11122256

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop