Next Article in Journal
Expansion of the Beta-Proteobacterial Genus Ca. Ichthyocystis: A Case Report of Epitheliocystis in the Pompano Trachinotus ovatus
Next Article in Special Issue
Ovarian Filariasis in a Wild Southern Tamandua (Tamanduatetradactyla; Mammalia: Myrmecophagidae)
Previous Article in Journal
Synonymous Codon Pattern of Cowpea Mild Mottle Virus Sheds Light on Its Host Adaptation and Genome Evolution
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The European Badger as a New Host for Dirofilaria immitis and an Update on the Distribution of the Heartworm in Wild Carnivores from Romania

by
Angela Monica Ionică
1,2,
Georgiana Deak
1,*,
Radu Boncea
3,
Călin Mircea Gherman
1 and
Andrei Daniel Mihalca
1
1
Department of Parasitology and Parasitic Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine of Cluj-Napoca, 400372 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
2
Molecular Diagnosis Laboratory, Clinical Hospital of Infectious Diseases of Cluj-Napoca, 400348 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
3
Falcon Vet Veterinary Private Clinic, 021919 Bucharest, Romania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 10 March 2022 / Revised: 24 March 2022 / Accepted: 29 March 2022 / Published: 30 March 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Pets, Wildlife and Parasites)

Abstract

:
Dirofilaria immitis is an important mosquito-borne nematode, being of both veterinary and public health concern. The typical final host is represented by the domestic dog, Canis familiaris, but it is able to infect a large variety of mammalian species. During the present study (March 2016–February 2022), a total of 459 wild carnivore carcasses belonging to 17 species, from Romania, were evaluated for the presence of adult D. immitis by necropsy. Overall, 20 animals (4.36%) were positive: twelve golden jackals, C. aureus (19.05%); four red foxes, Vulpes vulpes (6.67%); one raccoon dog, Nyctereutes procyonoides; two wild cats, Felis silvestris (4.65%); and one European badger, Meles meles (0.87%). This study provides further evidence of the occurrence of the canine heartworm, D. immitis, in Romania, expanding the known host spectrum, reports a new host species for this parasite, the European badger, and a new host for Europe, the raccoon dog.

1. Introduction

Among mosquito-borne nematodes, the genus Dirofilaria (Spirurida, Onchocercidae) is important from a veterinary and public health perspective. The two main species, D. immitis and D. repens, causative agents of canine heartworm disease and subcutaneous dirofilariosis, respectively, have a wide distribution and are able to infect a large variety of domestic and wild carnivorous host species [1,2]. Furthermore, D. immitis is also of major veterinary concern, as it is associated with a debilitating and eventually fatal disease in infected carnivores [1]. Although several species of mosquitoes, mainly within the genera Culex, Aedes, Ochlerotatus, and Anopheles may successfully transmit D. immitis, the main natural vectors are represented by Aedes vexans, A. albopictus, and the Culex pipiens complex [3,4].
The most frequently infected final host and the most competent reservoir is the domestic dog, Canis familiaris, but the infection was reported in over other 30 mammalian species, including several wild canids, domestic and wild felids, mustelids, ursids, ailurids, pinnipeds, monkeys, rodents, and ungulates [5,6,7]. However, the occurrence of patent infections in hosts other than dogs has rarely been documented. Felids, particularly domestic cats, are susceptible, but inappropriate reservoirs, as indicated by the low number of adult worms and absence or short duration of microfilariaemia [5,8]. Conversely, some species of wild canids, such as the golden jackals (Canis aureus), and grey wolves (C. lupus), seem to have an important epidemiological role in the maintenance and transmission of this parasite [2].
Romania is endemic for canine cardiac dirofilariosis, with D. immitis detected in dogs originating from most regions of the country [9,10,11]. Furthermore, Dirofilaria spp. infections were detected by necropsy and/or molecular tools also in six species of wild carnivores throughout the country [12,13].
The aims of the present study were to provide an update on the distribution of the heartworm, D. immitis, in wild carnivores in Romania, to report new host-parasite associations and evaluate their potential reservoir role.

2. Results

Overall, 20 out of the 459 (4.36%) examined animals harboured at least one adult D. immitis in the right ventricle or the pulmonary artery, most of which originated from the southern region of the country (Table 1, Figure 1).
Among canids, the overall prevalence of infection was 12.88% (95% CI 7.68–19.82), with the highest value recorded for golden jackals, Canis aureus, followed by red foxes, Vulpes vulpes. A single raccoon dog, Nyctereutes procyonoides, was examined and the animal was found to be positive. Within the felids, two wild cats, Felis silvestris (4.65%; 95% CI 0.57–15.81), were positive. Of all mustelids, one European badger, Meles meles (0.87%; 95% CI 0.02–4.75), was infected.
The worm burden ranged between one and seven nematodes/animal, with an average value of 2.35, and a median of 1. The individual details of all the infected animals are presented in Table 2.

3. Discussion

The present study represents an extension of previous work [12,13], and provides data obtained during further monitoring of heartworm infection in the Romanian wildlife. Most positive animals originated from the southern and south-eastern part of the country, where endemicity in domestic dogs’ populations has been repeatedly confirmed and the prevalence of infection was up to 26% [9,10].
A relatively high prevalence of infection was found in golden jackals, C. aureus (19.05%). This value is similar to the ones reported from our previous studies [12,13], but generally higher than most reports from other neighbouring countries: 7.32% in Serbia [14], 7.4% in Hungary [15], and 4.4–37.54% in Bulgaria [16,17,18]. Furthermore, seven out of the twelve positive animals harboured both male and female nematodes, which further suggests the involvement of this species as reservoir host. The actual frequency of microfilariaemia seems to be, in fact, lower, with only three individuals positive by means of microscopy (Figure 2a) and/or PCR. However, considering the adaptation used for the modified Knott’s test, we regard the microscopical negativity as questionable, while PCR positivity serves as indirect evidence of the presence of microfilariae. In contrast, although the relative prevalence of infection in red foxes, V. vulpes, was also high (6.67%), only one out of the four positive individuals harboured nematodes of both sexes, and was positive also for microfilariae (Figure 2b). The foxes are receptive hosts, with reported infection rates ranging between 0.4% and 25.22% in Europe [18,19]. However, the few studies where patency was evaluated seem to indicate a far lower frequency of patent infections as compared to the presence of adult nematodes [15,20,21].
A single raccoon dog, N. procyonoides, was examined throughout the study period. The animal harboured a single adult female of D. immitis. The raccoon dogs are introduced species in Europe, including Romania, and can be found mainly in wet habitats [22]. Dirofilaria immitis infections have been documented in raccoon dogs in Asia [23,24], but to the best of our knowledge, this represents the first report in Europe. In living animals, a seroprevalence of 7.4% was reported in raccoon dogs in Japan [23]. In Korea, the seroprevalence of investigated living individuals was of 17.8%, but microfilariae were not detected in any of the positive animals [24]. Raccoon dogs are not regarded as relevant reservoir hosts, as experimental infections have shown that the worm burden is low, and microfilariaemia lasts for a short period, of around 120 days [25].
Data regarding heartworm infection in wild felids is still scarce. Out of 48 examined carcasses (43 wild cats, F. silvestris, and 5 lynxes, L. lynx), 2 wild cats were positive, harbouring 1 adult male nematode each. Both cases have been published separately [26,27]. The presence of a single nematode further suggests the lack of reservoir competence for this species.
Among mustelids, D. immitis infection is known to occur in ferrets, Mustela putorius furo, which also act as reservoirs [28]. Occasionally, the parasite has been reported also in Eurasian otters, Lutra lutra [13,29,30], including one case with confirmed patency [31]. During the present study, we examined a total of 237 mustelid carcasses. Among them, a single European badger, M. meles, out of the 115 collected was positive. Two adult male and one female nematode were recovered. To the best of our knowledge, this represents the first record of D. immitis infection in this host species. Whether this was an accidental infection or the badger is, in fact, a suitable definitive host is unclear; however, this finding further expands the global list of known receptive host species. The occurrence of microfilariaemia was demonstrated both by microscopical examination (Figure 2c,d) and molecular detection, which indicates at least a temporary availability of microfilariae, and therefore, potential reservoir status. The duration and intensity of microfilariaemia require further investigations.

4. Materials and Methods

Between March 2016 and February 2022, a total of 459 wild carnivore carcasses belonging to 17 species were examined by parasitological necropsy (Table 3). The animals were either legally hunted or found dead as road-kills at various locations throughout the country and were stored at −20 °C until processing. For each examined animal, the species, sex, and geographical location were recorded. Whenever possible, the age of the animal was estimated according to dentition (juvenile or adult). The heart and pulmonary arteries were longitudinally dissected in order to assess the presence of adult D. immitis. All filarioids were collected in 70% ethanol, in labelled tubes, and morphologically identified under a dissection microscope, based on descriptions and keys available in the literature [32,33].
In animals that were positive by necropsy, despite no liquid blood being available, an attempt to assess the occurrence of microfilaraemia directly was made, by applying a modified Knott’s test [34] to coagulated blood retrieved from the heart. Genomic DNA was also isolated from blood clots of the positive individuals, and screened for filarial DNA, using the “panfilaria” PCR primers and protocol, as previously described [35].
The statistical analyses (prevalence and 95% Confidence Intervals) were performed using EpiInfo 7 software (version 7.2, CDC, Atlanta, GA, USA) and the map was generated using QGIS 3.4 software.

5. Conclusions

The present study provides further evidence of the occurrence of the canine heartworm, Dirofilaria immitis, in Romania, expanding the known host spectrum of this parasite. We report a new host for Europe, the raccoon dog, Nyctereutes procyonoides, and a new host-parasite association for the European badger, Meles meles.

Author Contributions

Conceptualisation, C.M.G. and A.D.M.; methodology, C.M.G. and A.D.M.; software, A.M.I. and G.D.; validation, C.M.G. and A.D.M.; formal analysis, A.M.I., G.D. and A.D.M.; investigation, A.M.I., G.D., R.B., C.M.G. and A.D.M.; resources, A.D.M.; data curation, G.D.; writing—original draft preparation, A.M.I.; writing—review and editing, all authors; visualisation, all authors; supervision, C.M.G. and A.D.M.; project administration, A.D.M.; funding acquisition, A.D.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by an internal grant of USAMVCN nr.21659/1.10.2021.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The activities were performed respecting ethical permits and national legislation. All the animals in this study were legally collected and examined—Ethical Committee Decision no. 232/23.11.2020.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The complete dataset used and analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

We would like to express our sincere gratitude to our students and to everybody that helped with the collection and examination of carcasses.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Simón, F.; Siles-Lucas, M.; Morchón, R.; González-Miguel, J.; Mellado, I.; Carretón, E.; Montoya-Alonso, J.A. Human and animal dirofilariasis: The emergence of a zoonotic mosaic. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2012, 25, 507–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Otranto, D.; Deplazes, P. Zoonotic nematodes of wild carnivores. IJP Parasites Wildl. 2019, 9, 370–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Cancrini, G.; Scaramozzino, P.; Gabrielli, S.; Paolo, M.; Di Toma, L.; Romi, R. Aedes albopictus and Culex pipiens implicated as natural vectors of Dirofilaria repens in Central Italy. J. Med. Entomol. 2007, 44, 1064–1066. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  4. Capelli, G.; Frangipane di Regalbono, A.; Simonato, G.; Cassini, R.; Cazzin, S.; Cancrini, G.; Otranto, D.; Pietrobelli, M. Risk of canine and human exposure to Dirofilaria immitis infected mosquitoes in endemic areas of Italy. Parasit. Vectors 2013, 6, 60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. McCall, J.W.; Genchi, C.; Kramer, L.H.; Guerrero, J.; Venco, L. Heartworm disease in animals and humans. Adv. Parasitol. 2008, 66, 193–285. [Google Scholar]
  6. Lan, J.; Fu, Y.; Yang, Z.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, C.; Luo, L.; Liu, L.; Gu, X.; Wang, S.; Peng, X.; et al. Treatment and prevention of natural heartworm (Dirofilaria immitis) infections in red pandas (Ailurus fulgens) with selamectin and ivermectin. Parasitol. Int. 2012, 61, 372–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Alho, A.M.; Marcelino, I.; Colella, V.; Flanagan, C.; Silva, N.; Correia, J.J.; Latrofa, M.S.; Otranto, D.; Madeira de Carvalho, L. Dirofilaria immitis in pinnipeds and a new host record. Parasit. Vectors 2017, 10, 142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Otranto, D.; Cantacessi, C.; Dantas-Torres, F.; Brianti, E.; Pfeffer, M.; Genchi, C.; Guberti, V.; Capelli, G.; Deplazes, P. The role of wild canids and felids in spreading parasites to dogs and cats in Europe. Part II: Helminths and arthropods. Vet. Parasitol. 2015, 213, 24–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Mircean, V.; Dumitrache, M.O.; Györke, A.; Pantchev, N.; Jodies, R.; Mihalca, A.D.; Cozma, V. Seroprevalence and geographic distribution of Dirofilaria immitis and and tick-borne infections (Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato and Ehrlichia canis) in dogs from Romania. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2012, 12, 595–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Ionică, A.M.; Matei, I.A.; Mircean, V.; Dumitrache, M.O.; D’Amico, G.; Győrke, A.; Pantchev, N.; Annoscia, G.; Albrechtová, K.; Otranto, D.; et al. Current surveys on the prevalence and distribution of Dirofilaria spp. and Acanthocheilonema reconditum infections in dogs in Romania. Parasitol. Res. 2015, 114, 975–982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ciucă, L.; Genchi, M.; Kramer, L.; Mangia, C.; Miron, L.D.; Prete, L.D.; Maurelli, M.P.; Cringoli, G.; Rinaldi, L. Heat treatment of serum samples from stray dogs naturally exposed to Dirofilaria immitis and Dirofilaria repens in Romania. Vet. Parasitol. 2016, 225, 81–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Ionică, A.M.; Matei, I.A.; D’Amico, G.; Daskalaki, A.A.; Juránková, J.; Ionescu, D.T.; Mihalca, A.D.; Modrý, D.; Gherman, C.M. Role of golden jackals (Canis aureus) as natural reservoirs of Dirofilaria spp. in Romania. Parasit. Vectors 2016, 9, 240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Ionică, A.M.; Matei, I.A.; D’Amico, G.; Ababii, J.; Daskalaki, A.A.; Sándor, A.D.; Enache, D.V.; Gherman, C.M.; Mihalca, A.D. Filarioid infections in wild carnivores: A multispecies survey in Romania. Parasit. Vectors 2017, 10, 332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Penezić, A.; Selaković, S.; Pavlović, I.; Ćirović, D. First findings and prevalence of adult heartworms (Dirofilaria immitis) in wild carnivores from Serbia. Parasitol. Res. 2014, 113, 3281–3285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Tolnai, Z.; Széll, Z.; Sproch, Á.; Szeredi, L.; Sréter, T. Dirofilaria immitis: An emerging parasite in dogs, red foxes and golden jackals in Hungary. Vet. Parasitol. 2014, 203, 339–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Georgieva, D.; Kirkova, Z.; Ivanov, A. A study on the incidence and diagnosis of dirofilariosis (heartworm disease) in carnivores. Bulg. J. Vet. Med. 2001, 4, 231–236. [Google Scholar]
  17. Kirkova, Z.; Ivanov, A.; Georgieva, D. Dirofilariosis in dogs and wild carnivores in Bulgaria. In Mappe Parassitologiche 8-Dirofilaria Immitis and D. repens in Dog and Cat and Human Infections; Genchi, C., Rinaldi, L., Cringoli, G., Eds.; Rolando Editore: Naples, Italy, 2007; p. 204. [Google Scholar]
  18. Panayotova-Pencheva, M.S.; Mirchev, R.L.; Trifinova, A.P. Dirofilaria immitis infection in carnivores from Bulgaria: 2012–2013 update. Bulg. J. Vet. Med. 2016, 19, 153–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Mañas, S.; Ferrer, D.; Castellà, J.; López-Martín, J.M. Cardiopulmonary helminth parasites of red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) in Catalonia, northeastern Spain. Vet. J. 2005, 169, 118–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Marconcini, A.; Magi, M.; Macchioni, G.; Sassetti, M. Filariosis in foxes in Italy. Vet. Res. Comm. 1996, 20, 316–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Magi, M.; Calderini, P.; Gabrielli, S.; Dell’Omodarme, M.; Macchioni, F.; Prati, M.C.; Cancrini, G. Vulpes vulpes: A possible wild reservoir for zoonotic filariae. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2008, 8, 249–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kauhala, K.; Kowalczyk, R. Invasion of the raccoon dog Nyctereutes procyonoides in Europe: History of colonization, features behind its success, and threats to native fauna. Curr. Zool. 2011, 57, 584–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Kido, N.; Wada, Y.; Takahashi, M.; Kamegaya, C.; Omiya, T.; Yamamoto, Y. Prevalence of Dirofilaria immitis infection in living raccoon dogs assessed by hematological examination. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 2011, 73, 845–847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Nam, H.Y.; Kim, J.T.; Yang, D.K.; Hyun, C. Prevalence of Dirofilaria immitis in Raccoon Dogs (Nyctereutes procyonoides) in Korea. J. Vet. Clin. 2013, 30, 453–455. [Google Scholar]
  25. Nakagaki, K.; Yoshida, M.; Nogami, S.; Nakagaki, K. Experimental infection of Dirofilaria immitis in raccoon dogs. J. Parasitol. 2007, 93, 432–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Gherman, C.M.; Ionică, A.M.; Deak, G.; Chişamera, G.B.; Mihalca, A.D. Co-infection with Angiostrongylus chabaudi and Dirofilaria immitis in a wildcat, Felis silvestris from Romania—A case report. Acta Vet. Brno 2019, 88, 303–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Deak, G.; Ionică, A.M.; Pop, A.R.; Mihalca, A.D.; Gherman, C.M. New insights into the distribution of cardio-pulmonary nematodes in road killed wild felids from Romania. Parasit. Vectors, 2022; submitted. [Google Scholar]
  28. Campbell, W.C.; Blair, L.S. Dirofilaria immitis: Experimental infections in the ferret (Mustela putorius furo). J. Parasitol. 1978, 64, 119–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Torres, J.; Feliu, C.; Fernández-Morán, J.; Ruíz-Olmo, J.; Rosoux, R.; Santos Reis, M.; Miquel, J.; Fons, R. Helminth parasites of the Eurasian otter Lutra lutra in southwest Europe. J. Helminthol. 2004, 78, 353–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Saraiva, A.L.; Sousa, S.; Silva, J.; Andrade, S.; Botelho, N.; Canavarro, I.; Costa, M.; Ferreira, F.; Meier, K.; Silva, J.A.; et al. Dirofilaria immitis in an Eurasian Otter (Lutra lutra). J. Comp. Pathol. 2013, 148, 88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Penezić, A.; Moriano, R.; Spasić, M.; Ćirović, D. First report of a naturally patent infection with Dirofilaria immitis in an otter (Lutra lutra). Parasitol. Res. 2018, 117, 929–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Anderson, R.C.; Bain, O. Keys to genera of the order Spirurida. In Keys to Nematode Parasites of Vertebrates; Anderson, R.C., Chabaud, A.G., Willmott, S., Eds.; Commonwealth Agricultural Bureau: Wallingford, CT, USA, 1976; pp. 59–116. [Google Scholar]
  33. Furtado, A.P.; Melo, F.T.V.; Giese, E.G.; dos Santos, J.N. Morphological redescription of Dirofilaria immitis. J. Parasitol. 2010, 96, 499–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Magnis, J.; Lorentz, S.; Guardone, L.; Grimm, F.; Magi, M.; Naucke, T.J.; Deplazes, P. Morphometric analyses of canine blood microfilariae isolated by the Knott’s test enables Dirofilaria immitis and D. repens species-specific and Acanthocheilonema (syn. Dipetalonema) genus-specific diagnosis. Parasit. Vectors 2013, 6, 48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Rishniw, M.; Barr, S.C.; Simpson, K.W.; Frongillo, M.F.; Franz, M.; Dominguez Alpizar, J.L. Discrimination between six species of canine microfilariae by a single polymerase chain reaction. Vet. Parasitol. 2006, 135, 303–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. The distribution of D. immitis infection in wild carnivores examined in Romania.
Figure 1. The distribution of D. immitis infection in wild carnivores examined in Romania.
Pathogens 11 00420 g001
Figure 2. Microfilariae detected by modified Knott’s test in golden jackal (a), red fox (b), and European badger (c), 4× objective; and detail in European badger (d), 10× objective.
Figure 2. Microfilariae detected by modified Knott’s test in golden jackal (a), red fox (b), and European badger (c), 4× objective; and detail in European badger (d), 10× objective.
Pathogens 11 00420 g002
Table 1. The prevalence of D. immitis infection in wild carnivores from Romania.
Table 1. The prevalence of D. immitis infection in wild carnivores from Romania.
FamilySpeciesExaminedDirofilaria immitis
n%95% CI
CanidaeCanis aureus631219.0510.25–30.91
Canis lupus8000–36.94
Nyctereutes procyonoides111002.50–100
Vulpes vulpes6046.671.85–16.20
Total1321712.887.68–19.82
FelidaeFelis silvestris4324.650.57–15.81
Lynx lynx5000–52.18
Total4824.170.51–14.25
MustelidaeMeles meles11510.870.02–4.75
Mustela putorius80000–4.51
Martes foina36000–9.74
Lutra lutra21000–16.11
Martes martes5000–52.18
Mustela nivalis3000–70.76
Mustela erminea1000–97.50
Mustela lutreola1000–97.50
Mustela eversmanii1000–97.50
Vormela peregusna1000–97.50
Total26410.380.01–2.09
UrsidaeUrsus arctos15000–21.80
Total459204.362.84–6.63
Table 2. Dirofilaria immitis infection in wild carnivores from Romania: overall results.
Table 2. Dirofilaria immitis infection in wild carnivores from Romania: overall results.
No.SpeciesRegionSexAgeDirofilaria immitis
FMMicrofilariaePCR
1Canis aureusWestMJuvenile11NegativeNegative
2Canis aureusSouthFAdult12PositivePositive
3Canis aureusSouthFAdult12NegativePositive
4Canis aureusSoutheastMAdult21NegativeNegative
5Canis aureusSouthFAdult21NegativeNegative
6Canis aureusSouthMAdult41NegativeNegative
7Canis aureusSouthFJuvenile61NegativePositive
8Canis aureusSouthwestFAdult10NegativeNegative
9Canis aureusSouthMAdult10NegativeNegative
10Canis aureusSoutheastMnot recorded50NegativeNegative
11Canis aureusSouthMAdult01NegativeNegative
12Canis aureusSoutheastMJuvenile01NegativeNegative
13Vulpes vulpesSouthMAdult11PositivePositive
14Vulpes vulpesSouthFJuvenile20NegativeNegative
15Vulpes vulpesSouthFnot recorded01NegativeNegative
16Vulpes vulpesSouthMJuvenile01NegativeNegative
17Nyctereutes procyonoidesSoutheastFAdult10NegativeNegative
18Felis silvestrisSoutheastMAdult01NegativeNegative
19Felis silvestrisSouthFAdult01NegativeNegative
20Meles melesSouthMAdult12PositivePositive
Table 3. Origin of examined wild carnivores from Romania.
Table 3. Origin of examined wild carnivores from Romania.
SpeciesExaminedRegion
SESSWWNWCNE
Canidae
Canis aureus63281911311-
Canis lupus8---215-
Nyctereutes procyonoides11------
Vulpes vulpes60842-262-
Felidae
Felis silvestris4382-52251
Lynx lynx5--1-31-
Mustelidae
Meles meles115361127518-
Mustela putorius8016601-12-
Martes foina36941-2011
Lutra lutra2177-3112
Martes martes5----5--
Mustela nivalis3-1-11--
Mustela erminea1----1--
Mustela lutreola11------
Mustela eversmanii1-1-----
Vormela peregusna11------
Ursidae
Ursus arctos15----213-
Total459821421528139494
SE: Southeast; S: South; SW: Southwest; W: West; NW: Northwest; C: Centre; NE: Northeast.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ionică, A.M.; Deak, G.; Boncea, R.; Gherman, C.M.; Mihalca, A.D. The European Badger as a New Host for Dirofilaria immitis and an Update on the Distribution of the Heartworm in Wild Carnivores from Romania. Pathogens 2022, 11, 420. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/pathogens11040420

AMA Style

Ionică AM, Deak G, Boncea R, Gherman CM, Mihalca AD. The European Badger as a New Host for Dirofilaria immitis and an Update on the Distribution of the Heartworm in Wild Carnivores from Romania. Pathogens. 2022; 11(4):420. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/pathogens11040420

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ionică, Angela Monica, Georgiana Deak, Radu Boncea, Călin Mircea Gherman, and Andrei Daniel Mihalca. 2022. "The European Badger as a New Host for Dirofilaria immitis and an Update on the Distribution of the Heartworm in Wild Carnivores from Romania" Pathogens 11, no. 4: 420. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/pathogens11040420

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop