Next Article in Journal
Research on Takagi-Sugeno Fuzzy-Model-Based Vehicle Stability Control for Autonomous Vehicles
Next Article in Special Issue
Mechanical Properties and Microstructural Behavior of Uniaxial Tensile-Loaded Anisotropic Magnetorheological Elastomer
Previous Article in Journal
Whirl Tower Demonstration of an SMA Blade Twist System
Previous Article in Special Issue
Experimental Confirmation of a Controllable Transmission/Braking Element Consisting of a Functional Elastomer Pasted on a Winding Surface
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Development of Durability Test Device for Magnetorheological Fluids with Two Types of Rotors and Their Long-Term Torque Characteristics

by Takehito Kikuchi 1,*, Isao Abe 1, Yuya Ueshima 2, Shuichi Akaiwa 2 and Hitoshi Tsuji 2
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Submission received: 2 May 2022 / Revised: 13 May 2022 / Accepted: 21 May 2022 / Published: 25 May 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Smart Materials for Smart Actuators and Semi-active Components)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Authors did an excellent work on durability test device of the MRFs. The durability test equipment with two sets of rotors and stators was setup, and the MRFs with micron-sized Fe particles was also evaluated. However, some revisions are needed before it is accepted for publication in the journal. The followings are the comments or issues existing in this version.

  1. For testing the durability of the material, the material type should be a single variable. Why choose two types of rotors for the test?
  2. It is mentioned that the system is not affected by mechanical sealing and bearing, but looking at Fig. 1 and 4, these factors all seem to affect the test results.
  3. Eqs. 1 and 2 in section 3.1 are suggested to be written in piecewise function form.
  4. For "LDE" evaluation index, it is suggested that the authors give a detailed explanation. In addition, Fig. 14 is very important for the conclusion of the paper, and a detailed explanation is also required.
  5. In the introduction, it is suggested to give a more detailed description of the research status in this field. And cite more recent work, and try to cite the literature within 5 years.

Author Response

We really appreciate your kind review and valuable comments. Based on your comments, we improved our manuscript as follows. The corresponding parts of the manuscript were colored in red. I hope this revision makes the manuscript publishable. 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

My major and minor comments can be seen in the attachment.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

We really appreciate your kind review and valuable comments. Based on your comments, we improved our manuscript as follows. The corresponding parts of the manuscript were colored in red. I hope this revision makes the manuscript publishable. 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop