Next Article in Journal
Editorial for the Special Issue “Antimicrobial Resistance and Genetic Elements in Bacteria”
Next Article in Special Issue
Purified Plant-Derived Phenolic Acids Inhibit Salmonella Typhimurium without Alteration of Microbiota in a Simulated Chicken Cecum Condition
Previous Article in Journal
Association of Dengue Virus Serotypes 1&2 with Severe Dengue Having Deletions in Their 3′Untranslated Regions (3′UTRs)
Previous Article in Special Issue
Association of ISVsa3 with Multidrug Resistance in Salmonella enterica Isolates from Cattle (Bos taurus)
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Genomic Investigation of Salmonella Typhi in Hong Kong Revealing the Predominance of Genotype 3.2.2 and the First Case of an Extensively Drug-Resistant H58 Genotype

1
Department of Microbiology, and Carol Yu Centre for Infection, School of Clinical Medicine, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong SAR, China
2
Department of Microbiology, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, China
3
Department of Clinical Pathology, Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 31 January 2023 / Revised: 3 March 2023 / Accepted: 4 March 2023 / Published: 6 March 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antimicrobial Resistance and Increased Virulence of Salmonella)

Abstract

:
Typhoid fever is a notable disease in Hong Kong. We noticed two local cases of typhoid fever caused by Salmonella Typhi within a two-week period in late 2022, which had no apparent epidemiological linkage except for residing in the same region of Hong Kong. A phylogenetic study of Salmonella Typhi isolates from Hong Kong Island from 2020 to 2022 was performed, including a whole-genome analysis, the typing of plasmids, and the analysis of antibiotic-resistance genes (ARGs), to identify the dominant circulating strain and the spread of ARGs. A total of seven isolates, from six local cases and an imported case, were identified from positive blood cultures in two hospitals in Hong Kong. Five antibiotic-sensitive strains of genotype 3.2.2 were found, which clustered with another 30 strains originating from Southeast Asia. Whole-genome sequencing revealed clonal transmission between the two index cases. The remaining two local cases belong to genotype 2.3.4 and genotype 4.3.1.1.P1 (also known as the H58 lineage). The genotype 4.3.1.1.P1 strain has an extensively drug-resistant (XDR) phenotype (co-resistance to ampicillin, chloramphenicol, ceftriaxone, ciprofloxacin, and co-trimoxazole). Although the majority of local strains belong to the non-H58 genotype 3.2.2 with a low degree of antibiotic resistance, the introduction of XDR strains with the global dissemination of the H58 lineage remains a concern.

1. Introduction

Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serotype Typhi (Salmonella Typhi) is the causative agent of typhoid fever, a systemic infection with an annual case number of around 10 million globally [1]. It is an exclusively human pathogen that is transmitted via the faecal–oral route, predominantly foodborne from the consumption of foods or water contaminated with faeces from a human case or an asymptomatic carrier [2]. The infective dose has been estimated to be around 10,000 organisms in human challenge studies [3]. Patients usually present after an incubation period of 7 to 14 days (range, 3 to 60) with fever, headache, malaise, myalgia, and a varying combination of enteric, respiratory, neurologic, and dermatologic symptoms. Complications occur in 10–15% of patients, such as gastrointestinal bleeding, intestinal perforation, and typhoid encephalopathy, which can lead to significant mortality and morbidity [2]. With the availability of medical care and antimicrobial treatment, the global case fatality rate in 2017 was estimated to be 0.95%, but mortality rates were still high among people at the extremes of age and those living in lower-income countries [1].
Salmonella Typhi belongs to subspecies 1 of the broader species S. enterica. Under the Kaufmann–White scheme, the antigen formula for Salmonella Typhi is group 9 and 12 for O antigen, d for H antigen, and vi for capsular antigen [3,4]. An alternative phase flagellar II antigen was described for some strains carrying the linear plasmid, pBSSB1 [5]. The high pathogenicity of Salmonella Typhi is contributed by the presence of unique Salmonella pathogenicity islands (SPIs) encoding the Via locus (expression of the Vi capsule), a bacterial type III secretion system (T3SS), and a type IVB pili-mediating cell attachment [3,4]. A unique feature of typhoid fever is the carrier state, in which Salmonella Typhi can be shed in stool for a prolonged time without clinically apparent disease. The pathogenic mechanisms underlying the establishment of the carrier state are poorly understood, but the colonisation of the gallbladder with biofilm formation has been suggested to be the primary cause [3].
The effectiveness of antimicrobial therapy in reducing the mortality and morbidity of typhoid fever is facing increasing threat due to antimicrobial resistance. Multidrug-resistant (MDR) Salmonella Typhi, defined as resistant to ampicillin, chloramphenicol, and trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole (co-trimoxazole), first emerged in the 1970s [6,7] and has displaced drug-sensitive strains in many regions, largely driven by IncHI1 plasmid transfer [8]. Resistance to fluoroquinolones increased since the 1990s, predominantly caused by the chromosomal S83F substitution in the gyrA gene [9], which was first identified in Southeast Asia with subsequent intercontinental spread to Africa [10,11].
Phylogenetic analysis suggested that the global Salmonella Typhi population is highly monophyletic, with an evolutionary process characterised by the ongoing loss of gene function [12]. Recombination events in this serovar were relatively infrequent [12,13]. One widely adopted scheme based on the biallelic profiles of 88 SNPs within a limited set of genes classified the Salmonella Typhi population into 85 haplotypes (H1 to H85 genotypes or lineages) [13,14]. An MDR lineage, H58, has become globally dominant with multiple inter- and intra-continental transmission events [15]. In 2016, the first large-scale outbreak of extensively drug-resistant (XDR) Salmonella Typhi, defined as MDR isolates harbouring additional resistance to fluoroquinolones and third-generation cephalosporins, occurred in Pakistan [16]. The propensity for H58 isolates to acquire drug resistance is attributed to a cluster of transposon-associated resistance genes residing either on transmissible IncHI1 plasmids or on the chromosome following integration [15]. In 2016, WGS data from a global collection of ~2000 Salmonella Typhi isolates was used to develop another SNP typing scheme (GenoTyphi) [17], which used 68 marker SNPs to define 4 primary clades, 16 clades, and 49 subclades in pseudo-hierarchical nomenclature. The H58 lineage was designated as a subclade, called genotype 4.3.1 in the GenoTyphi scheme [18].
With the post-pandemic travelling boom, there is a high risk of the global dissemination of drug-resistant Salmonella Typhi, which calls for an urgent need for the development of rapid diagnostics that can accurately predict the susceptibility of the infecting strain [19]. For example, a lateral flow immunoassay for the extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) CTX-M has been shown to have excellent sensitivity and specificity for the rapid detection of CTX-M-producing Enterobacterales in blood culture [20]. Until the wide availability of rapid diagnostic tests, knowledge of the local, regional, and global distribution of antimicrobial resistance in Salmonella Typhi remains crucial for guiding empirical treatment and public health interventions.
In Hong Kong, typhoid fever has been a notifiable infectious disease since 1946. In the years between 2010 and 2015, the average annual number of cases reported to the Centre for Health Protection, Department of Health was 30 (range, 25 to 34) [21]. The annual number of cases decreased to 14–21 in 2016–2019, then further dropped to 12 in 2020 and 10 in 2021. However, two cases of locally acquired typhoid fever were reported within a two-week interval in late September to early October 2022. Both patients lived in the same region on Hong Kong Island, and their Salmonella Typhi isolates had similar antibiotic susceptibility patterns. Hence, we conducted a phylogenetic analysis of Salmonella Typhi isolates on Hong Kong Island from 2020 to 2022. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS), the typing of plasmids, and an analysis of antibiotic-resistance genes (ARGs) were performed to identify the dominant circulating strain and spread of ARGs

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Isolation and Identification of Salmonella Typhi

This is a retrospective study on cases of typhoid fever diagnosed in Queen Mary Hospital (QMH) and Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital (PYH), the two referral hospitals situated on Hong Kong Island, from 2020 to 2022. Because only blood culture isolates are routinely cryopreserved, cases of typhoid fever were identified by blood culture positivity using the Laboratory Information System. The clinical information, including patient demographics, underlying illness, symptomatology, travel history, laboratory test results, antimicrobial treatment, and disease outcomes were retrieved from the electronic patient record of the Hospital Authority. The Salmonella Typhi isolates stored in Microbank (Pro Lab Diagnostics Inc., Toronto, ON, Canada) were recovered and subcultured onto blood agar for subsequent testing. Bacterial identification on isolated colonies was performed using a combination of Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionisation Time-of-Flight mass spectrometry (Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany), which would identify the isolate to the genus level as “Salmonella spp.” Serotyping was performed by a slide agglutination test using Salmonella O, H and Vi antisera and the results were interpreted according to the White–Kauffmann–Le Minor Scheme [22]. Briefly, a dense bacterial suspension with saline was prepared from pure growth on non-selective agar. The bacterial suspension was mixed with polyvalent somatic (O), polyvalent flagella (H), and Vi antisera, respectively, and rocked gently. Agglutination was observed using indirect lighting over a dark background within one minute. Autoagglutination was checked by mixing the bacterial suspension with saline. If agglutination occurred with polyvalent O and polyvalent H antisera, further slide agglutination with specific O antigens and H antigens was performed. If serotyping with Vi antiserum was positive and O antisera was doubtful, the organism was heated at 100 °C for one hour, followed by a repeat agglutination test using O antisera. Salmonella Typhi was designated by positive reactions to O9, 12 (somatic), d (flagellar), and Vi (capsular).

2.2. Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing

Antimicrobial susceptibility was determined using the disc diffusion method (for the β-lactams ampicillin, ceftriaxone, and meropenem, the 50S ribosomal protein synthesis inhibitor chloramphenicol, and the folate synthesis inhibitor co-trimoxazole) or minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) test strips (Liofilchem, Teramo, Italy) (for the macrolide azithromycin and the fluoroquinolone ciprofloxacin) according to the standard set out by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). The following inhibition zone diameters (mm) were used to interpret disc results (sensitive, intermediate, resistant): 10 µg of ampicillin (≥17, 14–16, ≤13), 30 µg of ceftriaxone (≥23, 20–22, ≤19), 30 µg of chloramphenicol (≥18, 13–17, ≤12), 1.25/23.75 µg of cotrimoxazole (≥16, 11–15, ≤10), and 10 µg of meropenem (≥23, 20–22, ≤19). The MIC (µg/mL) was interpreted as follows: azithromycin (sensitive ≤ 16, resistant ≥ 32) and ciprofloxacin (sensitive ≤ 0.06, intermediate 0.12–0.5, resistant ≥ 1). A double disc synergy test was used for the phenotypic detection of ESBL, in which ceftriaxone discs were placed 25 mm away from a 20/10 µg amoxicillin/clavulanate disc [20]. A clear extension of the edge of the inhibition zone towards the disc containing clavulanate was interpreted as positive for ESBL production. The antibiotic susceptibility test result was interpreted according to the breakpoints set out in the 2022 CLSI M100 document [23]. Salmonella Typhi strains that are non-susceptible to ampicillin, chloramphenicol, and co-trimoxazole were considered MDR, and strains with additional nonsusceptibility to fluoroquinolones and third-generation cephalosporins were considered to be extensively-drug resistant (XDR), in line with previous publications describing Salmonella Typhi resistance [16,24].

2.3. WGS Library Preparation and Sequencing

The Salmonella Typhi isolates were first inoculated in brain heart infusion broth without antibiotics at 35 °C for 18 h and genomic DNA was extracted using the Qiagen DNeasy Blood and Tissue kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The genomic DNA of each strain was first sheared with Covaris g-TUBE (Covaris Inc, Woburn, MA, USA) to an average DNA size of 10,000 bp. WGS was then performed using both Illumina and Nanopore sequencing. In brief, the DNA library for short-read sequencing was prepared using the Nextera DNA Prep Kit (Illumina Inc, San Diego, CA, USA) with Nextera DNA CD Indexes (Illumina Inc, San Diego, CA, USA). The libraries were sequenced on the Illumina iSeq100 platform using a 2 × 150 bp paired-end configuration. DNA libraries for long-read sequencing were prepared using the Nanopore Ligation Sequencing Kit (SQK-LSK109) and the Native Barcoding Kit (NBD-EXP104) (Oxford Nanopore Technologies, Oxford, UK) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The libraries were sequenced using MinION flowcells vR9.4.1 (Oxford Nanopore Technologies, Oxford, UK) and run for 24–36 h. Basecalling and demultiplexing were performed using Guppy 6.1.2 with a super-accuracy basecalling model (dna_r9.4.1_450bps_sup) with a raw read accuracy of up to 98.3%.

2.4. Genome Assembly and Annotation

Prior to genome assembly, the quality of both the short and long raw sequencing reads was first evaluated using the FastQC software (https://github.com/s-andrews/FastQC, accessed on 25 November 2022). The Illumina short reads were then trimmed with Trimmomatic v0.39 and the Nanopore long reads were trimmed by Porechop version 0.2.4. The trimmed reads proceeded to de novo assembly using Unicycler v0.4.9, as in our previous studies [25,26]. In the case of an incomplete genome generated from Unicycler, CANU v2.2 [27] or Flye v2.9.1 [28] was used to assemble the Nanopore reads and corrected with Pilon v1.24 [29]. Quality evaluations, fixations of the start position with dnaA, and annotations of genomes were performed as described in our previous studies [25,26].

2.5. Phylogenetic Analysis and Other Genome Analysis

All the complete genomes from the present study were aligned with Salmonella Typhi CT18 (GenBank accession AL513382) using Mauve to check the recombination events [30]. Genomes from the present study were assigned to genotypes using GenoTyphi v1.9.1 [18]. To further decipher the phylogenetic relationship of our strains, they were integrated with a global dataset of 711 genotype 3 genomes, which were retrieved from NCBI and previous publications (see Supplementary Table S1) [15,17,24,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38]. All these type 3 genomes were aligned with Salmonella Typhi CT18 (GenBank accession AL513382) to call core SNPs using Snippy v4.6.0 with –mincov 10 and –minfrac 0.9 (https://github.com/tseeman/snippy, accessed on 25 November 2022). The CT18 reference genome belonged to genotype 3.2.1. The phylogenomic trees of type 3 and a genotype including our strains and 30 close strains were built using IQ-Tree v2.2.0 with a 1000-times bootstrap test and GTR + I + G model [39], and both trees were visualised using iTOL (https://itol.embl.de, accessed on 25 November 2022). The SNP matrix of 30 close strains with our genomes was generated using snp-dists with the alignment of core SNPs (https://github.com/tseemann/snp-dists, accessed on 25 November 2022). Two more phylogenomic trees of genotypes 2.3.4 and 4.3.1.1.P1 were constructed using the same pipeline above but with S7 and S3 genomes from the present study as references.
The typing of plasmids was performed using PlasmidFinder v2.1 [40] and fixed with the repA gene as a start position, as performed for the chromosomes above. The genomes were further queried for the presence of the linear plasmid, pBSSB1 which was reported to induce the flagellar phase change in Salmonella Typhi [5]. The complete plasmid pS3 of strain S3 from the present study was subjected to NCBI to search for closely related plasmids, which were aligned together with p60006 (GenBank accession LT906492.1) as a reference and presented in a circular map using BLAST Ring Image Generator (BRIG) v0.9.5 [41].
ARGs and point mutations in all strains were detected using ResFinder v4.0 [42], HMD-ARG v1.0 [43], and PointFinder [44]. CARD v3.2.5 was also run via Resistance Gene Identifier (RGI) v6.0.0 to confirm all ARGs and point mutations. All mobile genetic elements, including genomic islands (GIs), integrative and conjugative/mobilisable elements (ICE/IME), insertion elements (ISs), and prophages were identified as described previously [45].
The sequences of the isolates sequenced in this study were deposited in the GenBank database under Bioproject PRJNA910287.

3. Results

3.1. Clinical Features of Cases with Salmonella Typhi Bacteraemia

We conducted a retrospective phylogenetic study of Salmonella Typhi isolates on Hong Kong Island between January 2020 and December 2022 to identify the dominant circulating strain, the relationship between cases, and the spread of ARGs. A total of seven cases (designated S1 to S7) with Salmonella Typhi bacteraemia were identified in QMH and PYH during the study period (Table 1). There were five females (71.4%). The median age was 51 years old (range, 4–73 years). Four (57%) had no underlying comorbidities. For the three patients with comorbid conditions, one (S1) was pregnant at 12 weeks gestation on admission and had rheumatoid arthritis on observation only, one (S3) had diabetes mellitus on oral hypoglycaemic agents and epilepsy, and one (S7) had gallstones and metastatic carcinoma of the gallbladder on palliative care. Patient S6 had symptom onset on the same day of arriving in Hong Kong from the Philippines and was designated as an imported case. The other six cases did not report any history of travel outside Hong Kong in the 12 months prior to symptom onset. All cases were reported to the Department of Health for epidemiological investigation. No epidemiological relationship including common exposure, contact history, or other links was identified among the cases. There was no direct contact between any two patients. The most common presenting symptom was fever, which was present in five patients (71%), followed by (in decreasing frequency) gastrointestinal symptoms (including abdominal pain, vomiting, diarrhoea, and nausea), respiratory symptoms (including cough and dyspnoea), and headache. Patient S3 developed an infected infrarenal aortic aneurysm requiring endovascular stenting and lumbar spondylodiscitis. All patients received β-lactam antibiotics, including meropenem in two patients, ceftriaxone in four patients, and piperacillin–tazobactam in one patient; four patients received azithromycin. Patient S7 succumbed shortly following admission before the blood culture turned positive. The other six patients made full recoveries.

3.2. Antimicrobial Susceptibilities of the Recovered Salmonella Typhi Isolates

Seven Salmonella Typhi isolates were recovered from storage. All were isolated from blood culture. Stool was collected for culture in five patients, and two of them were culture-positive for Salmonella Typhi. The isolates from stool were not preserved and thus were not available for analysis. The antibiotic susceptibility patterns of the seven blood culture Salmonella Typhi isolates are shown in Table 1. Strain S3 exhibited an XDR phenotype with co-resistance to ampicillin, chloramphenicol, cotrimoxazole, ciprofloxacin (MIC 2 µg/mL), and ceftriaxone. The double disc synergy test for ESBL was positive. Strain S5 was ciprofloxacin intermediate (MIC 0.5 µg/mL) but susceptible to the other tested antibiotics. The other five isolates (S1, S2, S4, S6, S7) were susceptible to all the tested antibiotics. All isolates were susceptible to azithromycin (MIC 4–8 µg/mL) and meropenem.

3.3. WGS of the Salmonella Typhi Isolates

All seven isolates were subjected to WGS. The chromosome size ranged between 4.776 and 4.900 Mb. The mauve alignment of the completed chromosomes revealed multiple recombination events relative to the reference genome CT18 (Figure 1). Of note, the overall genomic organisations of S1, S2, and S5 were identical. Additional rearrangements were observed in the other four genomes (S6, S4, S3, and S7). SNP-based genotyping using the GenoTyphi pipeline showed that S1, S2, and S4 to S6 were of genotype 3.2.2, strain S3 was of genotype 4.3.1.1.P1 (also known as H58 lineage), and strain S7 was of genotype 2.3.4 (Table 1). The strains were further compared with genomes of the same genotype deposited in GenBank using core genome SNP analysis. A comparison with over 700 genotype 3.2.2 genomes showed that the five genotype 3.2.2 strains in this study form a cluster with another 30 strains originating from Southeast Asia (Figure 2). The SNP differences for the 35 clustered strains were compared, showing that two of them, S1 and S2, were clonally related with zero SNP difference, compared with 15 to 94 SNPs among the other three strains (S4–S6). For genotype 4.3.1.1.P1, a total of 568 genomes were previously deposited in GenBank and they originated from Pakistan in 2016–2018. Phylogenetic analysis showed that the genotype 4.3.1.1.P1 strain S3 was genetically related to the cluster of 568 genomes with 38–42 SNP differences (Supplementary Figure S1 and Table S2). For genotype 3.2.4, only a limited number of genomes (n = 16, from 1981 to 2017) have been deposited in GenBank. The genotype 3.2.4 strain S7 was most closely related to a strain from Vietnam (GenBank reference: ERR349376) in 1997 with 92 SNP, 6 insertion, and 8 deletion differences (Supplementary Figure S2 and Table S3).
All seven strains had a single copy of the chromosomally integrated aac(6′)-Iaa gene. This ARG was not associated with any IS element. Additional ARGs were detected in strain S3 in an IncY plasmid pS3 and a chromosomally integrated composite transposon-like structure. Plasmid pS3 had a size of 84,390 bp and carried six ARGs including sul2, aph(3”)-1b, aph(6)-I, blaTEM-1, blaCTX-M-15, and qnrS1. Plasmid pS3 exhibited a high degree of identity (100.00% coverage and 99.99% identity) with the prototype p60006 plasmid (Figure 3), which is widespread among MDR Salmonella Typhi isolates. Another set of seven ARGs (dfrA7, qacE, sul1, blaTEM-1, aph(6)-1d, aph(3”)-1b, and sul2) were located in a chromosomally integrated composite transposon-like structure. S3 is the only strain with a plasmid. The other six strains did not contain plasmids. In all the strains, no pBSSB1-like linear plasmid was detected. In strains S3 and S5, S83F substitution in the gyrA gene was detected. No quinolone resistance-determining region (QRDR) mutation was detected in the other five strains.

4. Discussion

In this study, we performed a phylogenetic analysis of seven Salmonella Typhi isolates from Hong Kong Island over a three-year period, including six local and one imported strains. The predominance of genotype 3.2.2 and clonal transmission between the two index cases, S1 and S2, were demonstrated. In addition, a local strain with XDR phenotype belonging to the H58 lineage was found, suggesting that this globally dominant XDR lineage has spread to Hong Kong with resulting local transmission. To our knowledge, this is the first genomic study on the Salmonella Typhi genotypes in Hong Kong.
Antibiotic-resistant typhoid fever has long been a public health concern in Southern Asia. A clonal expansion of the H58 lineage (genotype 4.3.1) has been observed since the 2000s, with most fluoroquinolone-resistant strains possessing one of six nonsynonymous mutations at codon 83 and 87 of gyrA [13]. Currently, H58 (genotype 4.3.1) is subdivided into three lineages by intra-H58 SNPs. H58 lineages I (genotype 4.3.1.1) and II (genotype 4.3.1.2) were first defined in a study on Salmonella Typhi isolates from Nepalese children [46]. H58 lineage I is further classified into different sublineages following their introduction into different geographic areas and subsequent outbreaks [18]. A recent surveillance study carried out in Kenya found that all H58 lineage I isolates belong to the sublineage EA1 (East Africa 1) with genotype designation 4.3.1.1.EA1, and H58 lineage II isolates belong to two distinct sublineages designated as EA2 (East Africa 2, genotype 4.3.1.2.EA2) and EA3 (East Africa 3, genotype 4.3.1.2.EA3). All three East African H58 genotypes had high rates of MDR, with the MDR phenotype in most EA1 and all EA2 strains being associated with the plasmid sequence type 6 (PST6)-IncHI1 plasmid, carrying a suite of ARGs, while in EA3 it was exclusively associated with the chromosomal insertion of multiple ARGs [47]. H58 lineage III (genotype 4.3.1.3) is a cluster of isolates mostly from Bangladesh. A sublineage of genotype 4.4.1.3 with fluoroquinolone resistance has been designated as genotype 4.3.1.3.Bdg [18].
In November 2016, Pakistan experienced a multi-province outbreak of an XDR Salmonella Typhi clone within the H58 lineage that harbours additional resistance genes, including the blaCTX-M-15 ESBL and the qnrS fluoroquinolone resistance gene encoded on an IncY plasmid likely acquired from other enteric bacteria [16,48]. Subsequent WGS revealed that all isolates in this outbreak were sequence type (ST)1 and were identified as genotype 4.3.1.1.P1 under the GenoTyphi scheme [48]. Within 3 years of its emergence, genotype 4.3.1.1.P1 has become the dominant genotype in Pakistan [24]. The World Health Organisation estimated that, between 2016 and 2018, more than 5000 cases occurred in Sindh province, Pakistan [49]. Imported cases of XDR Salmonella Typhi infection in patients with a history of travel to Pakistan have been reported in the United States [50], Canada [51], the United Kingdom [52], Beijing [53], and Australia [54], although genotyping was not always performed in the cases to confirm that the isolates belong to genotype 4.3.1.1.P1. In strain S3, which demonstrates a similar XDR phenotype, an IncY plasmid with a high degree of sequence identity to the prototype p6006 plasmid was found that carried ARGs including blaCTX-M-15 and qnrS1. This is the first report of XDR Salmonella Typhi of genotype 4.3.1.1.P1 in Hong Kong.
In this study, we defined the XDR phenotype as non-susceptible to fluoroquinolones and third-generation cephalosporins in addition to the three first-line antimicrobials, the same as the definitions used in the initial report on XDR Salmonella Typhi from Pakistan and subsequent publications [16,24,53,54,55]. This is different from the interim standard definitions proposed by Magiorakos et al., in which XDR is defined as non-susceptible to all but two antibiotic classes recommended for treatment [56]. However, it should be pointed out that the standard definition is only applicable to Enterobacteriaceae other than Salmonella and Shigella [56]. Hence, it is not applicable to Salmonella Typhi.
In addition, we found that one imported and four local isolates were of genotype 3.2.2. All five isolates were susceptible to the three first-line antimicrobials ampicillin, chloramphenicol, and co-trimoxazole. Only isolate S5 demonstrated non-susceptibility to ciprofloxacin, consistent with the detection of S83F substitution in the gyrA gene. Similar phenomena of the locally restricted spread of antibiotic-sensitive clones of Salmonella Typhi have been observed in other regions [57]. Using data from the WGS of nearly 2000 isolates from more than 60 countries, Wong et al. concluded that with the exception of the rapidly disseminating H58 lineage, the global Salmonella Typhi population is highly structured and includes many genotypes that display geographical restriction [17]. A recent genomic epidemiology study also revealed that genotype 3.2.2 was among four genotypes that were dominant in South Asia [24]. However, considering the frequent population movement between Hong Kong and Southern Asian countries, the risk of the importation of Salmonella Typhi strains with additional MDR or XDR phenotypes that may displace the locally predominant genotype 3.2.2 Salmonella Typhi population is substantial.
In the face of the global dissemination of MDR Salmonella Typhi, third-generation cephalosporins such as ceftriaxone have become the recommended treatment of choice for most patients with severe or complicated typhoid fever without a recent history of travel to areas with a high prevalence of XDR strains [58]. Patients with recent travel to areas where XDR Salmonella Typhi is common, such as Pakistan and Iraq [59], are recommended to receive a carbapenem such as meropenem as empirical treatment. Recently, carbapenem-resistant Salmonella Typhi isolates harbouring the carbapenemase genes blaVIM and blaGES have been reported in Pakistan [60], although susceptibility to other antimicrobials and the genotypes were not specified. The emergence of carbapenem resistance in Salmonella Typhi represents an imminent public health threat, as treatment options would be further limited.
There are several limitations to this study. First, we only included isolates from Hong Kong Island over a three-year period. A territory-wide genomic surveillance study involving other regions of Hong Kong will be needed to analyse the regional distribution of Salmonella Typhi genotypes. Second, there was only one imported case from 2020 to 2022 in this study due to greatly reduced travelling during the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. A further study spanning a longer interval and the testing of more isolates may reveal additional introduction events and more genotypes. Third, we only included isolates from blood culture since bacterial isolates from other sites were not cryopreserved. However, blood culture is only positive in 60–80% of patients and the sensitivity decreases after the first week of illness [2]. Furthermore, Salmonella Typhi clones may also be introduced and spread through asymptomatic carriage [47]. A prospective study including Salmonella Typhi isolates from all sites would provide a more comprehensive picture.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, we demonstrated a predominance of antibiotic-susceptible genotype 3.3.3 Salmonella Typhi on Hong Kong Island and clonal spread between cases. Moreover, the first local case of XDR Salmonella Typhi of genotype 4.3.1.1.P1 was detected. Although the majority of local strains had a low risk of antibiotic resistance, the introduction and local spread of XDR clones remain a public health threat.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://0-www-mdpi-com.brum.beds.ac.uk/article/10.3390/microorganisms11030667/s1, Figure S1: Phylogenetic analysis of 569 Salmonella Typhi strains of genotype 4.3.1.1.P1; Figure S2: Phylogenetic analysis of 17 Salmonella Typhi strains of genotype 2.3.4; Table S1: List of a global dataset of 711 genotype 3 genomes included for analysis in this study; Table S2: List of a global dataset of 569 genotype 4.3.1.1.P1 genomes included for analysis in this study. Table S3. List of a global dataset of 17 genotype 2.3.4 genomes included for analysis in this study.

Author Contributions

Conceptualisation, X.L. and P.-L.H.; methodology, H.C. and J.H.-K.C.; data collection, X.L, H.C., J.H.-K.C., Y.-Z.N. and K.-K.F.; formal analysis, H.C. and J.H.-K.C.; investigation, Y.-Z.N. and V.C.-C.C.; resources, K.-K.F. and V.C.-C.C.; writing—original draft, X.L., H.C. and P.-L.H.; writing—review and editing, all other authors; supervision, P.-L.H. All authors provided critical input to the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by grants from the Health and Medical Research Fund, Health Bureau, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (reference numbers: CID-HKU1-13 and 19201901).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of The University of Hong Kong and Hospital Authority Hong Kong West Cluster under the reference number UW 23-073.

Data Availability Statement

All data has been included in this manuscript and the supplementary files.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the laboratory staff at Queen Mary Hospital and Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital for performing the isolation, identification, and antibiotic susceptibility testing of the bacterial strains. We are grateful to Rodney Allan Lee for his support in the collection of the isolates. We also thank Miranda Yau and Hangshu Fang for the technical assistance.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. GBD 2017 Typhoid and Paratyphoid Collaborators. The global burden of typhoid and paratyphoid fevers: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2019, 19, 369–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Parry, C.M.; Hien, T.T.; Dougan, G.; White, N.J.; Farrar, J.J. Typhoid Fever. N. Engl. J. Med. 2002, 347, 1770–1782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Dougan, G.; Baker, S. Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi and the pathogenesis of typhoid fever. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2014, 68, 317–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Kaur, J.; Jain, S.K. Role of antigens and virulence factors of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi in its pathogenesis. Microbiol. Res. 2012, 167, 199–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Baker, S.; Hardy, J.; Sanderson, K.E.; Quail, M.; Goodhead, I.; Kingsley, R.A.; Parkhill, J.; Stocker, B.; Dougan, G. A novel linear plasmid mediates flagellar variation in Salmonella Typhi. PLoS Pathog. 2007, 3, e59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Olarte, J.; Galindo, E. Salmonella typhi resistant to chloramphenicol, ampicillin, and other antimicrobial agents: Strains isolated during an extensive typhoid fever epidemic in Mexico. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1973, 4, 597–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Anderson, E.S.; Smith, H.R. Chloramphenicol resistance in the typhoid bacillus. Br. Med. J. 1972, 3, 329–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Holt, K.E.; Phan, M.D.; Baker, S.; Duy, P.T.; Nga, T.V.T.; Nair, S.; Turner, A.K.; Walsh, C.; Fanning, S.; Farrell-Ward, S.; et al. Emergence of a Globally Dominant IncHI1 Plasmid Type Associated with Multiple Drug Resistant Typhoid. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2011, 5, e1245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Chau, T.T.; Campbell, J.I.; Galindo, C.M.; Van Minh Hoang, N.; Diep, T.S.; Nga, T.T.; Van Vinh Chau, N.; Tuan, P.Q.; Page, A.L.; Ochiai, R.L.; et al. Antimicrobial drug resistance of Salmonella enterica serovar typhi in asia and molecular mechanism of reduced susceptibility to the fluoroquinolones. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2007, 51, 4315–4323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Kariuki, S.; Revathi, G.; Kiiru, J.; Mengo, D.M.; Mwituria, J.; Muyodi, J.; Munyalo, A.; Teo, Y.Y.; Holt, K.E.; Kingsley, R.A.; et al. Typhoid in Kenya is associated with a dominant multidrug-resistant Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi haplotype that is also widespread in Southeast Asia. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2010, 48, 2171–2176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Hendriksen Rene, S.; Leekitcharoenphon, P.; Lukjancenko, O.; Lukwesa-Musyani, C.; Tambatamba, B.; Mwaba, J.; Kalonda, A.; Nakazwe, R.; Kwenda, G.; Jensen Jacob, D.; et al. Genomic Signature of Multidrug-Resistant Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhi Isolates Related to a Massive Outbreak in Zambia between 2010 and 2012. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2015, 53, 262–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Holt, K.E.; Parkhill, J.; Mazzoni, C.J.; Roumagnac, P.; Weill, F.-X.; Goodhead, I.; Rance, R.; Baker, S.; Maskell, D.J.; Wain, J.; et al. High-throughput sequencing provides insights into genome variation and evolution in Salmonella Typhi. Nat. Genet. 2008, 40, 987–993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Roumagnac, P.; Weill, F.X.; Dolecek, C.; Baker, S.; Brisse, S.; Chinh, N.T.; Le, T.A.; Acosta, C.J.; Farrar, J.; Dougan, G.; et al. Evolutionary history of Salmonella typhi. Science 2006, 314, 1301–1304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Baker, S.; Holt, K.; van de Vosse, E.; Roumagnac, P.; Whitehead, S.; King, E.; Ewels, P.; Keniry, A.; Weill, F.X.; Lightfoot, D.; et al. High-throughput genotyping of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi allowing geographical assignment of haplotypes and pathotypes within an urban District of Jakarta, Indonesia. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2008, 46, 1741–1746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Wong, V.K.; Baker, S.; Pickard, D.J.; Parkhill, J.; Page, A.J.; Feasey, N.A.; Kingsley, R.A.; Thomson, N.R.; Keane, J.A.; Weill, F.X.; et al. Phylogeographical analysis of the dominant multidrug-resistant H58 clade of Salmonella Typhi identifies inter- and intracontinental transmission events. Nat. Genet. 2015, 47, 632–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Klemm, E.J.; Shakoor, S.; Page, A.J.; Qamar, F.N.; Judge, K.; Saeed, D.K.; Wong, V.K.; Dallman, T.J.; Nair, S.; Baker, S.; et al. Emergence of an Extensively Drug-Resistant Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhi Clone Harboring a Promiscuous Plasmid Encoding Resistance to Fluoroquinolones and Third-Generation Cephalosporins. mBio 2018, 9, e00105-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Wong, V.K.; Baker, S.; Connor, T.R.; Pickard, D.; Page, A.J.; Dave, J.; Murphy, N.; Holliman, R.; Sefton, A.; Millar, M.; et al. An extended genotyping framework for Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi, the cause of human typhoid. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 12827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Dyson, Z.A.; Holt, K.E. Five Years of GenoTyphi: Updates to the Global Salmonella Typhi Genotyping Framework. J. Infect. Dis. 2021, 224, S775–S780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wain, J.; Hendriksen, R.S.; Mikoleit, M.L.; Keddy, K.H.; Ochiai, R.L. Typhoid fever. Lancet 2015, 385, 1136–1145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Fang, H.; Lee, C.-H.; Cao, H.; Jiang, S.; So, S.Y.; Tse, C.W.; Cheng, V.C.; Ho, P.-L. Evaluation of a Lateral Flow Immunoassay for Rapid Detection of CTX-M Producers from Blood Cultures. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Centre for Health Protection. Number of Notifiable Infectious Diseases by Month. Available online: https://www.chp.gov.hk/en/static/24012.html (accessed on 7 December 2022).
  22. Issenhuth-Jeanjean, S.; Roggentin, P.; Mikoleit, M.; Guibourdenche, M.; de Pinna, E.; Nair, S.; Fields, P.I.; Weill, F.X. Supplement 2008-2010 (no. 48) to the White-Kauffmann-Le Minor scheme. Res. Microbiol. 2014, 165, 526–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing, 32nd ed.; CLSI Supplement M100; CLSI: Wayne, PA, USA, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  24. Da Silva, K.E.; Tanmoy, A.M.; Pragasam, A.K.; Iqbal, J.; Sajib, M.S.I.; Mutreja, A.; Veeraraghavan, B.; Tamrakar, D.; Qamar, F.N.; Dougan, G.; et al. The international and intercontinental spread and expansion of antimicrobial-resistant Salmonella Typhi: A genomic epidemiology study. Lancet. Microbe 2022, 3, e567–e577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Cao, H.; Liu, M.C.; Tong, M.K.; Jiang, S.; Chow, K.H.; To, K.K.; Tse, C.W.; Ho, P.L. Comprehensive investigation of antibiotic resistance gene content in cfiA-harboring Bacteroides fragilis isolates of human and animal origins by whole genome sequencing. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. IJMM 2022, 312, 151559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Cao, H.; Liu, M.C.; Tong, M.K.; Jiang, S.; Lau, A.; Chow, K.H.; Tse, C.W.; Ho, P.L. Diversity of genomic clusters and CfiA/cfiA alleles in Bacteroides fragilis isolates from human and animals. Anaerobe 2022, 75, 102567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Koren, S.; Walenz, B.P.; Berlin, K.; Miller, J.R.; Bergman, N.H.; Phillippy, A.M. Canu: Scalable and accurate long-read assembly via adaptive k-mer weighting and repeat separation. Genome Res. 2017, 27, 722–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Kolmogorov, M.; Yuan, J.; Lin, Y.; Pevzner, P.A. Assembly of long, error-prone reads using repeat graphs. Nat. Biotechnol. 2019, 37, 540–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Walker, B.J.; Abeel, T.; Shea, T.; Priest, M.; Abouelliel, A.; Sakthikumar, S.; Cuomo, C.A.; Zeng, Q.; Wortman, J.; Young, S.K.; et al. Pilon: An integrated tool for comprehensive microbial variant detection and genome assembly improvement. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e112963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Darling, A.C.; Mau, B.; Blattner, F.R.; Perna, N.T. Mauve: Multiple alignment of conserved genomic sequence with rearrangements. Genome Res. 2004, 14, 1394–1403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Britto, C.D.; John, J.; Verghese, V.P.; Pollard, A.J. A systematic review of antimicrobial resistance of typhoidal Salmonella in India. Indian J. Med. Res. 2019, 149, 151–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Britto, C.D.; Wong, V.K.; Dougan, G.; Pollard, A.J. A systematic review of antimicrobial resistance in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi, the etiological agent of typhoid. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2018, 12, e0006779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Dyson, Z.A.; Thanh, D.P.; Bodhidatta, L.; Mason, C.J.; Srijan, A.; Rabaa, M.A.; Vinh, P.V.; Thanh, T.H.; Thwaites, G.E.; Baker, S.; et al. Whole Genome Sequence Analysis of Salmonella Typhi Isolated in Thailand before and after the Introduction of a National Immunization Program. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2017, 11, e0005274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Ingle, D.J.; Nair, S.; Hartman, H.; Ashton, P.M.; Dyson, Z.A.; Day, M.; Freedman, J.; Chattaway, M.A.; Holt, K.E.; Dallman, T.J. Informal genomic surveillance of regional distribution of Salmonella Typhi genotypes and antimicrobial resistance via returning travellers. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2019, 13, e0007620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Park, S.E.; Pham, D.T.; Boinett, C.; Wong, V.K.; Pak, G.D.; Panzner, U.; Espinoza, L.M.C.; von Kalckreuth, V.; Im, J.; Schütt-Gerowitt, H.; et al. The phylogeography and incidence of multi-drug resistant typhoid fever in sub-Saharan Africa. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 5094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Parkhill, J.; Dougan, G.; James, K.D.; Thomson, N.R.; Pickard, D.; Wain, J.; Churcher, C.; Mungall, K.L.; Bentley, S.D.; Holden, M.T.; et al. Complete genome sequence of a multiple drug resistant Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi CT18. Nature 2001, 413, 848–852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Pragasam, A.K.; Pickard, D.; Wong, V.; Dougan, G.; Kang, G.; Thompson, A.; John, J.; Balaji, V.; Mutreja, A. Phylogenetic Analysis Indicates a Longer Term Presence of the Globally Distributed H58 Haplotype of Salmonella Typhi in Southern India. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2020, 71, 1856–1863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Tanmoy, A.M.; Westeel, E.; De Bruyne, K.; Goris, J.; Rajoharison, A.; Sajib, M.S.I.; van Belkum, A.; Saha, S.K.; Komurian-Pradel, F.; Endtz, H.P. Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhi in Bangladesh: Exploration of Genomic Diversity and Antimicrobial Resistance. mBio 2018, 9, e02112-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Nguyen, L.-T.; Schmidt, H.A.; von Haeseler, A.; Minh, B.Q. IQ-TREE: A Fast and Effective Stochastic Algorithm for Estimating Maximum-Likelihood Phylogenies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2015, 32, 268–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Carattoli, A.; Zankari, E.; García-Fernández, A.; Voldby Larsen, M.; Lund, O.; Villa, L.; Møller Aarestrup, F.; Hasman, H. In silico detection and typing of plasmids using PlasmidFinder and plasmid multilocus sequence typing. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2014, 58, 3895–3903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Alikhan, N.F.; Petty, N.K.; Ben Zakour, N.L.; Beatson, S.A. BLAST Ring Image Generator (BRIG): Simple prokaryote genome comparisons. BMC Genom. 2011, 12, 402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Bortolaia, V.; Kaas, R.S.; Ruppe, E.; Roberts, M.C.; Schwarz, S.; Cattoir, V.; Philippon, A.; Allesoe, R.L.; Rebelo, A.R.; Florensa, A.F.; et al. ResFinder 4.0 for predictions of phenotypes from genotypes. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2020, 75, 3491–3500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Li, Y.; Xu, Z.; Han, W.; Cao, H.; Umarov, R.; Yan, A.; Fan, M.; Chen, H.; Duarte, C.M.; Li, L.; et al. HMD-ARG: Hierarchical multi-task deep learning for annotating antibiotic resistance genes. Microbiome 2021, 9, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Zankari, E.; Allesøe, R.; Joensen, K.G.; Cavaco, L.M.; Lund, O.; Aarestrup, F.M. PointFinder: A novel web tool for WGS-based detection of antimicrobial resistance associated with chromosomal point mutations in bacterial pathogens. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2017, 72, 2764–2768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Cao, H.; Bougouffa, S.; Park, T.J.; Lau, A.; Tong, M.K.; Chow, K.H.; Ho, P.L. Sharing of Antimicrobial Resistance Genes between Humans and Food Animals. mSystems 2022, 7, e0077522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Holt, K.E.; Baker, S.; Dongol, S.; Basnyat, B.; Adhikari, N.; Thorson, S.; Pulickal, A.S.; Song, Y.; Parkhill, J.; Farrar, J.J.; et al. High-throughput bacterial SNP typing identifies distinct clusters of Salmonella Typhi causing typhoid in Nepalese children. BMC Infect. Dis. 2010, 10, 144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Kariuki, S.; Dyson, Z.A.; Mbae, C.; Ngetich, R.; Kavai, S.M.; Wairimu, C.; Anyona, S.; Gitau, N.; Onsare, R.S.; Ongandi, B.; et al. Multiple introductions of multidrug-resistant typhoid associated with acute infection and asymptomatic carriage, Kenya. eLife 2021, 10, 67852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Rasheed, F.; Saeed, M.; Alikhan, N.F.; Baker, D.; Khurshid, M.; Ainsworth, E.V.; Turner, A.K.; Imran, A.A.; Rasool, M.H.; Saqalein, M.; et al. Emergence of Resistance to Fluoroquinolones and Third-Generation Cephalosporins in Salmonella Typhi in Lahore, Pakistan. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 1336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. World Health Organization Regional Office for the Eastern Mediterranean. Weekly Epidemiological Monitor. Available online: https://applications.emro.who.int/docs/epi/2018/Epi_Monitor_2018_11_52.pdf (accessed on 20 February 2023).
  50. Chatham-Stephens, K.; Medalla, F.; Hughes, M.; Appiah, G.D.; Aubert, R.D.; Caidi, H.; Angelo, K.M.; Walker, A.T.; Hatley, N.; Masani, S.; et al. Emergence of Extensively Drug-Resistant Salmonella Typhi Infections Among Travelers to or from Pakistan—United States, 2016–2018. MMWR Morb. Mortal Wkly Rep. 2019, 68, 11–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Eshaghi, A.; Zittermann, S.; Bharat, A.; Mulvey, M.R.; Allen, V.G.; Patel, S.N. Importation of Extensively Drug-Resistant Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhi Cases in Ontario, Canada. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2020, 64, e02581-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Nair, S.; Chattaway, M.; Langridge, G.C.; Gentle, A.; Day, M.; Ainsworth, E.V.; Mohamed, I.; Smith, R.; Jenkins, C.; Dallman, T.J.; et al. ESBL-producing strains isolated from imported cases of enteric fever in England and Wales reveal multiple chromosomal integrations of blaCTX-M-15 in XDR Salmonella Typhi. J. Antimicrob Chemother 2021, 76, 1459–1466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Wang, Y.; Lu, D.; Jin, Y.; Wang, H.; Lyu, B.; Zhang, X.; Huang, Y.; Shu, G.; Liu, B.; Lin, C.; et al. Extensively Drug-Resistant (XDR) Salmonella Typhi Outbreak by Waterborne Infection—Beijing Municipality, China, January–February 2022. China CDC Wkly. 2022, 4, 254–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Ingle, D.J.; Andersson, P.; Valcanis, M.; Wilmot, M.; Easton, M.; Lane, C.; Barden, J.; Gonçalves da Silva, A.; Seemann, T.; Horan, K.; et al. Genomic Epidemiology and Antimicrobial Resistance Mechanisms of Imported Typhoid in Australia. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2021, 65, e0120021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Nabarro, L.E.; McCann, N.; Herdman, M.T.; Dugan, C.; Ladhani, S.; Patel, D.; Morris-Jones, S.; Balasegaram, S.; Heyderman, R.S.; Brown, M.; et al. British infection association guidelines for the diagnosis and management of enteric fever in England. J. Infect. 2022, 84, 469–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Magiorakos, A.P.; Srinivasan, A.; Carey, R.B.; Carmeli, Y.; Falagas, M.E.; Giske, C.G.; Harbarth, S.; Hindler, J.F.; Kahlmeter, G.; Olsson-Liljequist, B.; et al. Multidrug-resistant, extensively drug-resistant and pandrug-resistant bacteria: An international expert proposal for interim standard definitions for acquired resistance. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Off. Publ. Eur. Soc. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2012, 18, 268–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Davies, M.R.; Duchene, S.; Valcanis, M.; Jenkins, A.P.; Jenney, A.; Rosa, V.; Hayes, A.J.; Strobel, A.G.; McIntyre, L.; Lacey, J.A.; et al. Genomic epidemiology of Salmonella Typhi in Central Division, Fiji, 2012 to 2016. Lancet Reg. Health. West. Pac. 2022, 24, 100488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Andrews, J.; John, J.; Charles, R.C. Enteric (Typhoid and Paratyphoid) Fever: Treatment and Prevention. Available online: https://www.uptodate.com/contents/enteric-typhoid-and-paratyphoid-fever-treatment-and-prevention (accessed on 22 February 2023).
  59. François Watkins, L.K.; Winstead, A.; Appiah, G.D.; Friedman, C.R.; Medalla, F.; Hughes, M.J.; Birhane, M.G.; Schneider, Z.D.; Marcenac, P.; Hanna, S.S.; et al. Update on Extensively Drug-Resistant Salmonella Serotype Typhi Infections Among Travelers to or from Pakistan and Report of Ceftriaxone-Resistant Salmonella Serotype Typhi Infections Among Travelers to Iraq—United States, 2018–2019. MMWR. Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2020, 69, 618–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Ain, Q.; Tahir, M.; Sadaqat, A.; Ayub, A.; Awan, A.B.; Wajid, M.; Ali, A.; Iqbal, M.; Haque, A.; Sarwar, Y. First Detection of Extensively Drug-Resistant Salmonella Typhi Isolates Harboring VIM and GES Genes for Carbapenem Resistance from Faisalabad, Pakistan. Microb. Drug Resist. (Larchmt. N.Y.) 2022, 28, 1087–1098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Mauve alignment of S1 to S7 genomes with the Salmonella Typhi reference CT18. Each coloured block (called locally collinear blocks) represents a region of homologous sequence that aligns to part of another genome and is free from internal rearrangement. Color lines indicate which blocks in each genome are homologous.
Figure 1. Mauve alignment of S1 to S7 genomes with the Salmonella Typhi reference CT18. Each coloured block (called locally collinear blocks) represents a region of homologous sequence that aligns to part of another genome and is free from internal rearrangement. Color lines indicate which blocks in each genome are homologous.
Microorganisms 11 00667 g001
Figure 2. Phylogenetic analysis of 35 Salmonella Typhi strains of genotype 3.2.2. (A) An unrooted maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree of 716 Salmonella Typhi isolates of clade 3. The red arrow indicates the branch with 35 isolates, including the 5 isolates from the present study. (B) A higher resolution diagram of the branch from panel (A). The five genotype 3.2.2 isolates from Hong Kong (S1–S2, S4–S6) are indicated in red font.
Figure 2. Phylogenetic analysis of 35 Salmonella Typhi strains of genotype 3.2.2. (A) An unrooted maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree of 716 Salmonella Typhi isolates of clade 3. The red arrow indicates the branch with 35 isolates, including the 5 isolates from the present study. (B) A higher resolution diagram of the branch from panel (A). The five genotype 3.2.2 isolates from Hong Kong (S1–S2, S4–S6) are indicated in red font.
Microorganisms 11 00667 g002
Figure 3. Alignment of the plasmid pS3 in this study with the reference plasmid p60006 using BLAST Ring Image Generator (BRIG).
Figure 3. Alignment of the plasmid pS3 in this study with the reference plasmid p60006 using BLAST Ring Image Generator (BRIG).
Microorganisms 11 00667 g003
Table 1. Clinical and microbiological details of cases with Salmonella Typhi bacteraemia.
Table 1. Clinical and microbiological details of cases with Salmonella Typhi bacteraemia.
CharacteristicCase a, b
S1S2S3S4S5S6S7
Sex/age (years)Female/39Female/23Male/54Male/51Female/4Female/51Female/73
Date of symptom onsetOct 2022Sep 2022Feb 2022Aug 2020Jul 2021Jun 2022May 2021
Presenting
symptoms
Fever, chills, rigour, nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea, abdominal painFever, chills, headacheAbdominal and lower back pain, nausea, vomitingFever, chills, cough, dyspnoea, abdominal pain, diarrhoea, vomitingFever, fatigueFever, cough, vomitingCough, dyspnoea, abdominal pain
ComplicationsNilNilInfected abdominal aortic aneurysm, lumbar spondylodiscitisNilNilNilRenal failure
Coagulopathy
Mortality
Travel outside HK in preceding 12 monthsNoNoNoNoNoYes (Philippines)No
Culture positive siteBloodBloodBlood, stoolBloodBlood, stoolBloodBlood
Susceptibility
AmpicillinSSR [blaTEM-1B, blaCTX-M-15]SSSS
AzithromycinS (8)S (4)S (8)S (4)S (4)S (4)S (8)
CeftriaxoneSSR [blaCTX-M-15]SSSS
ChloramphenicolSSR [catA1]SSSS
CiprofloxacinS (0.012)S (0.012)R (2) [gyrA S83F, qnrS1]S (0.012)I (0.5) [gyrA S83F]S (0.06)S (0.06)
Co-trimoxazoleSSR [sul1, sul2, dfrA7]SSSS
MeropenemSSSSSSS
Genotype3.2.23.2.24.3.1.1.P13.2.23.2.23.2.22.3.4
S—susceptible; I—intermediate; R—resistant. a MIC value is given inside parentheses ( ). Resistance determinant is given inside brackets [ ]. b 2022 CLSI MIC interpretative criteria (µg/mL): azithromycin, S ≤ 16, R ≥ 32; ciprofloxacin, S ≤ 0.06, I 0.12–0.5, R ≥ 1.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, X.; Cao, H.; Chen, J.H.-K.; Ng, Y.-Z.; Fung, K.-K.; Cheng, V.C.-C.; Ho, P.-L. Genomic Investigation of Salmonella Typhi in Hong Kong Revealing the Predominance of Genotype 3.2.2 and the First Case of an Extensively Drug-Resistant H58 Genotype. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 667. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/microorganisms11030667

AMA Style

Li X, Cao H, Chen JH-K, Ng Y-Z, Fung K-K, Cheng VC-C, Ho P-L. Genomic Investigation of Salmonella Typhi in Hong Kong Revealing the Predominance of Genotype 3.2.2 and the First Case of an Extensively Drug-Resistant H58 Genotype. Microorganisms. 2023; 11(3):667. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/microorganisms11030667

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Xin, Huiluo Cao, Jonathan Hon-Kwan Chen, Yuey-Zhun Ng, Ka-Kin Fung, Vincent Chi-Chung Cheng, and Pak-Leung Ho. 2023. "Genomic Investigation of Salmonella Typhi in Hong Kong Revealing the Predominance of Genotype 3.2.2 and the First Case of an Extensively Drug-Resistant H58 Genotype" Microorganisms 11, no. 3: 667. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/microorganisms11030667

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop