Next Article in Journal
Oral Administration of Lactobacillus sakei CVL-001 Improves Recovery from Dextran Sulfate Sodium-Induced Colitis in Mice by Microbiota Modulation
Next Article in Special Issue
Characterisation of Type II DNA Methyltransferases of Metamycoplasma hominis
Previous Article in Journal
The Effects of Different Feeding Regimes on Body Composition, Gut Microbial Population, and Susceptibility to Pathogenic Infection in Largemouth Bass
Previous Article in Special Issue
Atypical Pathogens in Adult Community-Acquired Pneumonia and Implications for Empiric Antibiotic Treatment: A Narrative Review
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Microorganisms
Volume 11
Issue 5
10.3390/microorganisms11051358
microorganisms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Clinical, Laboratory, and Radiographic Features Can Help Predict Mycoplasma pneumoniae Lower Respiratory Tract Infection in Children

by
Jasna Rodman Berlot
1,*,
Špela Dolenc
1,
Uroš Krivec
1,2 and
Darja Keše
3,*
1
Department of Paediatric Pulmonology, University Children’s Hospital, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
2
Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
3
Institute of Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2023, 11(5), 1358; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/microorganisms11051358
Submission received: 31 March 2023 / Revised: 11 May 2023 / Accepted: 19 May 2023 / Published: 22 May 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Mycoplasma Pathogenicity, Persistence and Virulence)
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Mycoplasma pneumoniae (Mp) is a common cause of lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) in children that is difficult to distinguish from LRTI of other etiologies. We aimed to determine if a combination of clinical, laboratory, and chest radiographic features can help identify patients at higher risk of Mp LRTI. We reviewed medical charts of children referred to our tertiary hospital with suspected acute mycoplasmal LRTI. Pharyngeal swabs obtained from patients were tested by Mp PCR. We compared epidemiological and clinical data of children with positive and negative Mp PCR results. In addition, a multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to predict Mp LRTI based on the patient’s age, duration of symptoms, presence of extrapulmonary manifestations, laboratory findings, and chest radiographic findings. We included 65 children with Mp PCR-negative and 49 with Mp PCR-positive LRTI and no viral co-detection. Children with Mp LRTI were older (median age 5.8 vs. 2.2 years, p < 0.001), had a longer duration of symptoms on referral (median 7 vs. 4 days, p < 0.001), and lower median WBC (9.9 vs. 12.7 × 109/L, p < 0.001). On chest radiograph, unilateral infiltrates were more frequently observed in the Mp PCR-positive group (57.5% vs. 24.1%, p = 0.001). Age, duration of symptoms, and chest radiographic findings had the highest predictive value for Mp LRTI in a multivariable logistic regression model. Our analysis suggests that a combination of clinical, laboratory, and chest radiographic features can be used to assess the likelihood of Mp LRTI and assist in decision-making for which children need further tests or macrolide antibiotic treatment.

1. Introduction

Mycoplasma pneumoniae (Mp) is an important cause of lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) in children and adults worldwide [1,2,3,4]. Mp LRTIs are usually mild and self-limiting, and patients are mostly managed in primary care [1]. Diagnosing Mp LRTI based on clinical and laboratory evaluation is often troublesome as it is difficult to distinguish it from LRTIs of other etiologies, especially viral ones [1,4,5]. Moreover, current diagnostic tests, including polymerase chain reaction (PCR) of upper respiratory tract specimens or serology, do not reliably differentiate between Mp infection and carriage [1,6]. Diagnostic testing is also often limited in the primary care setting. Therefore, physicians often prescribe macrolides without positive microbiology results, which results in an increase in macrolide-resistant Mp (MRMp) and a parallel rise in macrolide resistance in other respiratory pathogens, which is observed worldwide [7,8,9].
With the challenges in diagnostic testing for Mp and the emergence of MRMp, it is vital to determine clinical features to aid in diagnosing Mp LRTI in children. This study aimed to determine if a combination of clinical features, laboratory findings, and chest radiographic characteristics can help physicians identify patients at higher risk of Mp LRTI.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design

We performed an observational retrospective study to determine whether a combination of clinical, laboratory, and radiographic features can help physicians identify patients at higher risk of Mp LRTI.
Characteristics of patients with LRTI that were PCR-positive for Mp in pharyngeal swabs during an Mp epidemic period in 2014 were compared with those of patients with LRTI that were PCR-negative for Mp in a non-epidemic period in 2012 [10]. Immunocompromised children and children with chronic pulmonary disease were excluded from the study because the underlying condition could affect the presentation and severity of the disease.
The data on age, gender, disease presentation, duration of symptoms on referral, laboratory biomarkers of inflammation, macrolide susceptibility, radiographic appearance, hospital admission, duration of hospital stay, need for oxygen therapy, and data related to complications and treatment were collected for all patients.
LRTI diagnosis was made based on physical examination revealing pathological lung auscultation and radiographic appearance consistent with a diagnosis of LRTI.
The National Medical Ethics Committee of the Republic of Slovenia approved the protocol for this study (No 0120-8/2018/4 and No 0120-244/2021/3).

2.2. Study Subjects

2.2.1. Mp pneumoniae PCR-Positive LRTI Group

Children younger than 18 years, referred to University Children’s Hospital with suspected acute Mp LRTI from 1 January 2014 to 31 December 2014, were tested for Mp and respiratory viruses. All patients who were PCR-positive for Mp in pharyngeal swabs were identified from a laboratory database and included in the study. We excluded cases with viral co-detection.

2.2.2. Mp pneumoniae PCR-Negative LRTI Group

Children younger than 18 years, referred to our tertiary hospital with suspected acute mycoplasmal LRTI from 1 January 2012 to 31 December 2012, were tested for Mp. All patients who were PCR-negative for Mp in pharyngeal swabs were identified from a laboratory database and included in the study. We excluded patients who did not have a nasopharyngeal swab for respiratory viruses performed.

2.3. Methods

Pharyngeal swabs to assess Mp infection were subjected to DNA isolation using automated MagNA Pure Compact System (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany) and the MagNA Pure Compact Nucleic Acid Isolation Kit I (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany). Mp real-time PCR was performed using the commercially available kit Chla/Myco pneumo r-gene (Argene BioMerieux diagnostics, Marcy l’Etoile, France) on a LightCycler 2.0 (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany) platform according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Macrolide resistance was recognized by pyrosequencing two parts of domain V in the 23S rRNA gene [10].
Multiplex PCR using Respiratory Viruses 16-Well Assay V.17 (AusDiagnostics, Mascot, Australia) was performed on the nasopharyngeal swab specimens to assess viral co-detection, including respiratory syncytial virus, influenza virus, parainfluenza virus, human bocavirus, adenovirus, metapneumovirus, rhinovirus, enterovirus, and human coronavirus [11].

2.4. Analysis

Continuous variables were presented as mean (SD) or median (IQR), where appropriate. Categorical variables were described with counts and percentages. Continuous variables were compared using the independent samples t-test or the Mann–Whitney U-test, where appropriate. Categorical variables were compared using the Pearson Chi-Square test. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to predict Mp LRTI based on epidemiological, clinical, laboratory, and radiographic features. The differences were considered statistically significant when the p value was <0.05. Statistical computing was conducted in IBM SPSS Statistics (Version 28.0).

3. Results

In 2012 and 2014, 277 and 669 children were referred to University Children’s Hospital Ljubljana with a suspected Mp infection, respectively. Out of those, 2.2% (6/277) and 24.1% (161/669) tested Mp PCR-positive by pharyngeal swab in each study year, respectively. After applying the inclusion and exclusion study criteria, we evaluated and compared epidemiological and clinical data of 49 patients with Mp PCR-positive LRTI and no viral co-detection and 65 patients with Mp PCR-negative acute LRTI (Figure 1).
The characteristics of both groups of patients are detailed in Table 1. In the Mp PCR-negative LRTI group, 61.5% (40/65) of patients had a detected viral infection. Detected respiratory viruses included respiratory syncytial virus, influenza virus, parainfluenza virus, human bocavirus, metapneumovirus, rhinovirus, and coronavirus. Rhinovirus (40.0%, 16/40), respiratory syncytial virus (22.5%, 9/40), and human bocavirus (17.5%, 7/40) were the predominantly detected viruses. In the Mp PCR-positive group, all isolates (49/49) were macrolide susceptible.
Patients in the Mp PCR-positive group were older (median age 5.8 vs. 2.2 years, p < 0.001), with a longer duration of symptoms on referral (median 7 vs. 4 days, p < 0.001), and had higher median WBC levels than the Mp PCR-negative group (9.9 vs. 12.7 × 109/L, p < 0.001) (Table 1). After Mp LRTI was PCR-confirmed, all patients received macrolide antibiotic treatment, while in the PCR-negative group, none received macrolide antibiotic treatment. X-ray was performed in 91.1% (41/45) of patients in the Mp PCR-positive and 84.6% (55/65) in the Mp PCR-negative group. Unilateral infiltrates were more frequently observed on chest radiograph in the Mp PCR-positive group (57.5% vs. 24.1%, p = 0.001), while bilateral infiltrates in the Mp PCR-negative group were more frequent (32.5% vs. 75.9%, p = 0.001) (Table 1). The most frequent extrapulmonary manifestations in the Mp PCR-positive LRTI group were the dermatological ones, observed in 12.2% (6/49) of cases, presenting as a non-specific maculopapular or urticarial rash. In comparison, gastrointestinal symptoms, such as vomiting and diarrhea were significantly more frequent in the Mp PCR-negative LRTI group (Table 1). Ophthalmological presentation, such as bilateral conjunctivitis, was observed only in the Mp PCR-negative group. Cardiovascular and neurological presentations were rare, observed in one patient with newly identified arrhythmia in the form of monomorphic ventricular extrasystoles in the rhythm of ventricular bigeminy in the Mp PCR-positive group, one patient with Guillain–Barre syndrome in the Mp PCR-positive group, and one patient with febrile convulsions in the Mp PCR-negative group.
The characteristics of hospitalized patients are summarized in Table 2. The two groups differed in the hospital admission rate, with patients in the Mp PCR-negative group requiring hospital admission more often (75.5% vs. 90.7%, p = 0.027). When comparing the characteristics of hospitalized patients, patients in the Mp PCR-positive group were older (median age 4.9 vs. 2.2 years, p < 0.001), with a shorter hospital stay (median 3 vs. 5 days, p < 0.001), and required oxygen treatment less often (54.1% vs. 86.4%, p < 0.001) (Table 2). No intensive care treatment was required in either group.
A multivariable logistic regression model showed that age, duration of symptoms on referral, and radiographic features had the highest predictive value for Mp PCR-positive LRTI (OR 1.28, 95% CI 1.08–1.52, p = 0.005, OR 1.15, 95% CI 1.01–1.31, p = 0.038, OR 3.15, 95% CI 1.02–9.72, p = 0.046, respectively). Older children, with a longer duration of symptoms and unilateral infiltrates on chest radiographs were more likely diagnosed with Mp PCR-positive LRTI (Table 3).

4. Discussion

Mp LRTI represents a significant healthcare burden as Mp is the most commonly detected bacteria in school-aged children hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) [3,12]. Mp LRTI can be challenging to distinguish from LRTI of other etiologies, especially from other atypical bacteria and viruses, resulting in frequent troublesome diagnosing of acute Mp infection [1,2,3,4,5]. This study evaluated epidemiological, clinical, laboratory, and radiographic features associated with Mp LRTI to help physicians identify patients at higher risk of Mp LRTI.
We compared the epidemiological and clinical characteristics of 49 patients with Mp PCR-positive and 65 patients with Mp PCR-negative LRTI. All patients had a high suspicion of mycoplasmal LRTI when tested for Mp by PCR. Mp PCR-positive patients were older, with a longer median duration of symptoms on referral and lower median WBC. This is consistent with the findings from a recent study which also showed that the proportion of children aged 3–7 years was significantly higher than that of other age groups (p < 0.05), suggesting that preschool children aged 3–7 years were a high-risk group for Mp LRTI [13]. Unilateral infiltrates were more frequently observed on chest radiographs in the Mp PCR-positive group. Moreover, dermatological manifestations were the most frequent extrapulmonary manifestation in the Mp PCR-positive group. At the same time, none experienced gastrointestinal symptoms, the most frequent extrapulmonary presentation in the Mp PCR-negative group. In addition, patients with Mp PCR-positive LRTI had a lower admission rate and need for oxygen treatment than the Mp PCR-negative group. Age, duration of symptoms, and radiographic features had the highest predictive value for Mp PCR-positive LRTI in a multivariable logistic regression model, with older children, with a longer duration of symptoms, and unilateral infiltrates on chest radiograph, more likely having Mp PCR-positive LRTI.
Expectedly, we observed a high infection rate with respiratory viruses in the Mp PCR-negative LRTI group, as viral LRTI can often mimic Mp LRTI [1,4,14,15,16]. This fact probably explains why the patients in our Mp-negative group were younger than those in the Mp-positive group. Several studies showed that viruses are an important cause of pneumonia in preschool children [1,4,14,15,16]. Moreover, a recent study suggested that viruses might play a vital role in making Mp pneumonia clinically apparent in this age group due to a high rate of viral co-detection observed in young children with Mp LRTI [14]. Nevertheless, almost half of the patients in our study were younger than five years in the Mp-positive group with no viral co-infection detected, supporting the idea that Mp is an important cause of LRTI in this age group as well.
Previous studies have investigated characteristics associated with Mp LRTI [3,17]. In comparison with these studies, where patients with Mp LRTI had a high rate of viral co-infection, we excluded those patients from the Mp PCR-positive LRTI group to better assess features only attributable to Mp. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) performed surveillance for radiologically confirmed CAP in hospitalized children and adults from 2010 to 2012 (EPIC Study), using PCR for the detection of Mp [3,12]. A viral or bacterial pathogen was detected in 81% of children, with multiple pathogens detected in 26% [3,12]. Whether such co-infection involving Mp with multiple other pathogens is related to the severity of illness in these patients is mostly unknown [1,18,19]. However, co-infection with other pathogens makes attributing specific features to Mp or other pathogens challenging [1]. Moreover, a previous study showed that mixed Mp infections with bacteria and viruses tend to be associated with more severe illnesses [18,19].
Similar to our study, children with Mp LRTI presented with significantly longer duration of symptoms on first referral compared with LRTI caused by other etiology in a recent study [17]. Moreover, patients with Mp-positive LRTI had statistically lower inflammatory biomarker levels than Mp-negative LRTI [17,20,21,22,23]. However, both our study groups had low median levels of WBC, which were in the normal range for the group’s median age, thus not making it an essential indicator of Mp infection.
Mp infections are usually mild or asymptomatic but they may sometimes develop into severe or life-threatening disease with severe dysfunction of the affected organs [1,2,3,4,5]. The complex pathogenic mechanisms of Mp result in a wide range of possible clinical outcomes [24,25,26]. The pathogenesis of related respiratory symptoms caused by Mp is mainly due to adhesion and direct damage, including nutrient predation, invasion and toxin, cytokine-induced inflammation damage, and immune evasion effect [26]. The pathogenesis of extrapulmonary manifestations on the other hand includes (1) direct damage mediated by invasion and inflammatory factors, (2) indirect damage caused by host immune response, and (3) vascular occlusion [26]. Although intrapulmonary and extrapulmonary manifestations are independent of each other, they share similarities such as direct invasion, and inflammatory- and immune-mediated damage [26]. Even though extrapulmonary manifestations can occur without respiratory symptoms, they usually present with a concomitant LRTI [1,24,25,27]. It is well-recognized that Mp can cause a broad array of extrapulmonary manifestations affecting almost every organ in the body [1,24,25]. Cutaneous disease is Mp infection’s most common extrapulmonary presentation [1,28,29]. Patients usually present with non-specific maculopapular and urticarial eruptions [28,29,30]. Even though skin disorders were the most frequent extrapulmonary manifestation in our Mp PCR-positive group, we found no statistical association with Mp. Nevertheless, this manifestation seems to increase the probability of an underlying Mp infection, as shown in previous studies [17]. In addition, our study shows that concomitant gastrointestinal symptoms, when having LRTI, significantly lower the risk of Mp LRTI.
Radiologic findings in Mp LRTI are usually variable, non-specific, and do not differentiate Mp-positive from Mp-negative CAP [1,2,3,4,5,31]. The most common findings on chest radiograph are peribronchial and perivascular interstitial infiltrates [1,2,3,4,5,31]. The EPIC study found multilobar bilateral infiltrates and pleural effusion more common among Mp CAP [3]. However, a high rate of viral co-detection could influence their results. We also found a higher incidence of bilateral infiltrates in patients in the Mp PCR-negative group, who frequently had a viral infection.
Clinical practice guidelines by the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society and the Infectious Diseases Society of America recommend macrolide antibiotic treatment in patients with LRTI, with findings compatible with LRTI caused by atypical pathogens, such as Mp [32]. Therefore, physicians often prescribe macrolides without positive microbiology results [33]. The widespread macrolide usage has led to an increase in MRMp isolates and a parallel rise in macrolide resistance in other respiratory pathogens, observed worldwide [7,8,9,34,35,36]. Macrolides are primarily bacteriostatic agents that bind to specific nucleotides in domains II and/or V of 23S rRNA in the 50S bacterial ribosomal subunit, blocking protein synthesis by causing premature dissociation of peptidyl-tRNA from the ribosome [37]. Several studies have demonstrated that macrolide resistance in Mp results from single point mutations in various positions in 23S rRNA [7,8,9,36]. Over 90% of Mp isolates are now resistant to macrolides in some regions of Japan and China [1,34]. In Europe, prevalence is substantially lower than in Asia and varies from country to country, with very low levels of 1% in our country [1,35,38]. Even though these results are very encouraging, surveillance for macrolide resistance is crucial because mycoplasmas have high mutation rates, and such mutational events can rapidly accumulate in a population where selection is taking place [34,35,36]. Moreover, macrolide resistance was documented even during the course of treatment by comparing strains isolated before and after initiation of macrolide therapy and confirming the presence of new mutations in the latter [39].
The global spread of MRMp is becoming an important issue when treating Mp infections. The clinical relevance of MRMp has been debated since the interplay of disease severity and resistant strain infection has yet to be clarified [9,36]. The presence of MRMp does not change the clinical or radiographic presentation of pneumonia, so it is impossible to guess in advance who may be harboring resistant organisms [9,36]. Generally, antimicrobial resistance per se does not make a microorganism more virulent. However, it can make treatment more difficult and lead to complications when prescribed an ineffective antimicrobial agent [1,40]. Several studies have reported that individuals infected with MRMp receiving macrolide treatment can experience a longer febrile period and more extended antibiotic therapy than those infected with macrolide-susceptible strains [1,40]. All Mp isolates in our Mp PCR-positive LRTI group were macrolide sensitive, therefore not a factor influencing our patients’ clinical presentation and disease severity.
Although Mp is endemically present in the population, increases in the number of infections have been reported to occur in localized outbreaks in closed settings and community-wide or even worldwide epidemics [1,34]. Epidemics encompassing broad geographic ranges tend to occur every few years, mostly at 3- to 7-year intervals [1,34]. Since 2010, several European countries have experienced increased numbers of Mp infections, Slovenia included [1,10,34]. It is unclear why epidemics occur in cyclic patterns, but one theory links this phenomenon to an alternation of Mp genotypes [1]. Mp isolates can be classified into two major genetic groups, designated subtype 1 and subtype 2, based on sequence differences in repetitive elements RepMP2/3 and RepMP4 in the P1 protein gene [1,41]. It has been speculated that the cyclical Mp epidemics that tend to occur every few years can be related to a shift from one P1 subtype to the other since the two major subtypes are immunologically distinct and exposure to one subtype may induce transient herd immunity that suppresses infection with that subtype while allowing the other one to reemerge [1]. Indeed, the alternating predominance of subtype 1 or subtype 2 strains in a population has been documented in longitudinal studies [10]. However, this is not always the case, as recent publications have shown co-circulation of the two P1 types and multiple variants during the same epidemic period, supporting the notion that epidemics are polyclonal in nature [10]. Physicians should be aware of potential ongoing Mp epidemics and outbreaks which increase the probability of acute Mp infection in patients with findings compatible with LRTI caused by atypical pathogens. In our study, the percentage of positive results increased from 2.2% to 24.1.%, from a non-epidemic to an epidemic period, respectively.
Current diagnostic tests for diagnosing acute Mp infection, including PCR of upper respiratory tract specimens or serology, do not reliably differentiate between Mp infection and carriage [1,6]. The most sensitive approach for early diagnosis of Mp infection would currently be a combination of IgM serology and real-time PCR in symptomatic patients [1]. This approach may be less accurate in adults with age-related impairment in immunity, resulting in low antibody responses after Mp infection [42]. The same situation may occur with very young infants who may be unable to mount a vigorous humoral immune response to Mp due to a reduced innate immune response in comparison to older children [42]. Moreover, the opportunity of performing two tests is usually very limited, especially in the primary care setting, where most Mp infections are being treated. As shown in our study, a combination of clinical features can help physicians identify patients at higher risk of Mp LRTI and limit testing to this patients’ group. The results of our study can provide a good foundation for a future prediction model for Mp LRTI.
The retrospective design of our study limited data collection to the most commonly used clinical variables, most of which were recorded in all patients. A prospective design would allow for assessing other characteristics associated with Mp LRTI. All our patients were recruited from a University hospital, which may have led to a disproportionate number of cases with more severe Mp LRTI, which can explain the high hospital admission rate and need for oxygen treatment observed in our study groups.

5. Conclusions

Serologic and molecular test results for Mp are rarely available in a clinically relevant time frame to influence outpatient antibiotic prescribing, leading to a potentially higher prevalence of MRMp. Surveillance and rational macrolide prescribing is needed in the future in order to avoid macrolide resistance emergence. Our data support that although non-specific for Mp LRTI, some clinical, laboratory, and radiographic features may help physicians identify patients at higher risk for Mp LRTI and assist in decision-making for which children need further tests or macrolide antibiotic treatment. This warrants further investigations in a larger cohort of children with Mp infection.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.R.B. and D.K.; methodology, J.R.B.; software, J.R.B.; validation, J.R.B., Š.D. and D.K.; formal analysis, J.R.B.; investigation, J.R.B. and Š.D.; data curation, J.R.B.; writing—original draft preparation, J.R.B.; writing—review and editing, J.R.B., Š.D., U.K. and D.K.; visualization, J.R.B.; supervision, D.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Waites, K.B.; Xiao, L.; Liu, Y.; Balish, M.F.; Atkinson, T.P. Mycoplasma pneumoniae from the respiratory tract and beyond. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2017, 30, 747–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Atkinson, T.P.; Waites, K.B. Mycoplasma pneumoniae infections in childhood. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 2014, 33, 92–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Kutty, P.K.; Jain, S.; Taylor, T.H.; Bramley, A.M.; Diaz, M.H.; Ampofo, K.; Arnold, S.; Williams, D.; Edwards, K.; McCullers, J.; et al. Mycoplasma pneumoniae among children hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2019, 68, 5–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Blasi, F. Atypical pathogens and respiratory tract infections. Eur. Respir. J. 2004, 24, 171–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Wang, K.; Gill, P.; Perera, R.; Thomson, A.; Mant, D.; Harnden, A. Clinical symptoms and signs for the diagnosis of Mycoplasma pneumoniae in children and adolescents with community-acquired pneumonia. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2012, 10, CD009175. [Google Scholar]
  6. Spuesens, E.B.; Fraaij, P.L.; Visser, E.G.; Hoogenboezem, T.; Hop, W.C.; van Adrichem, L.N.; Weber, F.; Moll, H.A.; Broekman, B.; Berger, M.Y.; et al. Carriage of Mycoplasma pneumoniae in the upper respiratory tract of symptomatic and asymptomatic children: An observational study. PLoS Med. 2013, 10, e1001444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Li, X.; Atkinson, T.P.; Hagood, J.; Makris, C.; Duffy, L.B.; Waites, K.B. Emerging macrolide resistance in Mycoplasma pneumoniae in children: Detection and characterization of resistant isolates. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 2009, 28, 693–696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Yamada, M.; Buller, R.; Bledsoe, S.; Storch, G.A. Rising rates of macrolide-resistant Mycoplasma pneumoniae in the central United States. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 2012, 31, 409–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Principi, N.; Esposito, S. Macrolide-resistant Mycoplasma pneumoniae: Its role in respiratory infection. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2013, 68, 506–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kogoj, R.; Praprotnik, M.; Mrvič, T.; Korva, M.; Keše, D. Genetic diversity and macrolide resistance of Mycoplasma pneumoniae isolates from two consecutive epidemics in Slovenia. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2018, 37, 99–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Jevšnik Virant, M.; Uršič, T.; Kogoj, R.; Korva, M.; Petrovec, M.; Avšič-Županc, T. Evaluation of Two Broadly Used Commercial Methods for Detection of Respiratory Viruses with a Recently Added New Target for Detection of SARS-CoV-2. Viruses 2022, 14, 1530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Jain, S.; Williams, D.J.; Arnold, S.R.; Ampofo, K.; Bramley, A.M.; Reed, C.; Stockmann, C.; Anderson, E.J.; Grijalva, C.G.; Self, W.H.; et al. CDC EPIC Study Team. Community-acquired pneumonia requiring hospitalization among U.S. children. N. Engl. J. Med. 2015, 372, 835–845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Liu, B.; Chang, X.; Yan, N. Clinical analysis of the epidemiology and changes in inflammatory indexes of Mycoplasma pneumonia in acute and recovery stage pediatric patients. Transl. Pediatr. 2022, 11, 1645–1655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Han, M.S.; Yun, K.W.; Lee, H.J.; Park, J.Y.; Rhie, K.; Lee, J.K.; Lee, H.; Kwak, Y.H.; Kim, D.K.; Suh, D.I.; et al. Contribution of Co-detected Respiratory Viruses and Patient Age to the Clinical Manifestations of Mycoplasma pneumoniae Pneumonia in Children. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 2018, 37, 531–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Cilla, G.; Oñate, E.; Perez-Yarza, E.G.; Montes, M.; Vicente, D.; Perez-Trallero, E. Viruses in community-acquired pneumonia in children aged less than 3 years old: High rate of viral coinfection. J. Med. Virol. 2008, 80, 1843–1849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Rhedin, S.; Lindstrand, A.; Hjelmgren, A.; Ryd-Rinder, M.; Öhrmalm, L.; Tolfvenstam, T.; Örtqvist, Å.; Rotzén-Östlund, M.; Zweygberg-Wirgart, B.; Henriques-Normark, B.; et al. Respiratory viruses associated with community-acquired pneumonia in children: Matched case-control study. Thorax 2015, 70, 847–853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Meyer Sauteur, P.M.; Krautter, S.; Ambroggio, L.; Seiler, M.; Paioni, P.; Relly, C.; Capaul, R.; Kellenberger, C.; Haas, T.; Gysin, C.; et al. Improved Diagnostics Help to Identify Clinical Features and Biomarkers That Predict Mycoplasma pneumoniae Community-acquired Pneumonia in Children. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2020, 71, 1645–1654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Mandell, L.A. Community-acquired pneumonia: An overview. Postgrad. Med. 2015, 127, 607–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Marino, S.; Pavone, P.; Marino, L.; Nunnari, G.; Ceccarelli, M.; Coppola, C.; Distefano, C.; Falsaperla, R. SARS-CoV-2: The Impact of Co-Infections with Particular Reference to Mycoplasma pneumonia—A Clinical Review. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 1936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wallihan, R.G.; Suárez, N.M.; Cohen, D.M.; Marcon, M.; Moore-Clingenpeel, M.; Mejias, A.; Ramilo, O. Molecular Distance to Health Transcriptional Score and Disease Severity in Children Hospitalized with Community-Acquired Pneumonia. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2018, 8, 382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Jeong, J.E.; Soh, J.E.; Kwak, J.H.; Jung, H.L.; Shim, J.W.; Kim, D.S.; Park, M.S.; Shim, J.Y. Increased procalcitonin level is a risk factor for prolonged fever in children with Mycoplasma pneumonia. Korean J. Pediatr. 2018, 61, 258–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Alcoba, G.; Keitel, K.; Maspoli, V.; Lacroix, L.; Manzano, S.; Gehri, M.; Tabin, R.; Gervaix, A.; Galetto-Lacour, A. A three-step diagnosis of pediatric pneumonia at the emergency department using clinical predictors, C-reactive protein, and pneumococcal PCR. Eur. J. Pediatr. 2017, 176, 815–824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Gordon, O.; Oster, Y.; Michael-Gayego, A.; Marans, R.S.; Averbuch, D.; Engelhard, D.; Moses, A.E.; Nir-Paz, R. The Clinical Presentation of Pediatric Mycoplasma pneumoniae Infections—A Single Center Cohort. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 2019, 38, 698–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Narita, M. Classification of Extrapulmonary Manifestations Due to Mycoplasma pneumoniae Infection on the Basis of Possible Pathogenesis. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Sánchez-Vargas, F.M.; Gómez-Duarte, O.G. Mycoplasma pneumoniae—An emerging extra-pulmonary pathogen. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2008, 14, 105–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Hu, J.; Ye, Y.; Chen, X.; Xiong, L.; Xie, W.; Liu, P. Insight into the Pathogenic Mechanism of Mycoplasma pneumoniae. Curr. Microbiol. 2022, 80, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Rodman Berlot, J.; Krivec, U.; Praprotnik, M.; Mrvič, T.; Kogoj, R.; Keše, D. Clinical characteristics of infections caused by Mycoplasma pneumoniae P1 genotypes in children. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2018, 37, 1265–1272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Terraneo, L.; Lava, S.A.; Camozzi, P.; Zgraggen, L.; Simonetti, G.D.; Bianchetti, M.G.; Milani, G.P. Unusual eruptions associated with Mycoplasma pneumoniae respiratory infections: Review of the literature. Dermatology 2015, 231, 152–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Canavan, T.N.; Mathes, E.F.; Frieden, I. Mycoplasma pneumoniae-induced rash and mucositis as a syndrome distinct from Stevens-Johnson syndrome and erythema multiforme: A systematic review. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2015, 72, 239–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Rodman Berlot, J.; Mrvič, T.; Košnik, M.; Keše, D. The Association between Mycoplasma pneumoniae Genotype and Cutaneous Disease. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Cho, Y.J.; Han, M.S.; Kim, W.S.; Choi, E.H.; Choi, Y.H.; Yun, K.W.; Lee, S.; Cheon, J.E.; Kim, I.O.; Lee, H.J. Correlation between chest radiographic findings and clinical features in hospitalized children with Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0219463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Bradley, J.S.; Byington, C.L.; Shah, S.S.; Alverson, B.; Carter, E.R.; Harrison, C.; Kaplan, S.L.; Mace, S.E.; McCracken, G.H., Jr.; Moore, M.R.; et al. The management of community-acquired pneumonia in infants and children older than 3 months of age: Clinical practice guidelines by the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society and the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2011, 53, e25–e76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Bandell, R.A.M.; Dekkers, T.; Semmekrot, B.A.; de Wildt, S.N.; Fleuren, H.W.H.A.; Warlé-van Herwaarden, M.F.; Füssenich, P.; Gerrits, G.P.; Kramers, C. Macrolide prescription in Dutch children: Compliance with guidelines. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2019, 38, 675–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Oishi, T.; Ouchi, K. Recent Trends in the Epidemiology, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Macrolide-Resistant Mycoplasma pneumoniae. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 1782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Loconsole, D.; De Robertis, A.L.; Sallustio, A.; Centrone, F.; Morcavallo, C.; Campanella, S.; Accogli, M.; Chironna, M. Update on the Epidemiology of Macrolide-Resistant Mycoplasma pneumoniae in Europe: A Systematic Review. Infect. Dis. Rep. 2021, 13, 811–820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Leng, M.; Yang, J.; Zhou, J. The molecular characteristics, diagnosis, and treatment of macrolide-resistant Mycoplasma pneumoniaein children. Front. Pediatr. 2023, 11, 1115009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Vázquez-Laslop, N.; Mankin, A.S. How Macrolide Antibiotics Work. Trends. Biochem. Sci. 2018, 43, 668–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Kogoj, R.; Mrvič, T.; Praprotnik, M.; Keše, D. Prevalence, genotyping and macrolide resistance of Mycoplasma pneumoniae among isolates of patients with respiratory tract infections, Central Slovenia, 2006 to 2014. Eurosurveillance 2015, 20, 30018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Dumke, R.; Stolz, S.; Jacobs, E.; Juretzek, T. Molecular characterization of macrolide resistance of a Mycoplasma pneumoniae strain that developed during therapy of a patient with pneumonia. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2014, 29, 197–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Zhou, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Sheng, Y.; Zhang, L.; Shen, Z.; Chen, Z. More complications occur in macrolide-resistant than in macrolide-sensitive Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2014, 58, 1034–1038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Dumke, R. Molecular Tools for Typing Mycoplasma pneumoniae and Mycoplasma genitalium. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 904494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Simon, A.K.; Hollander, G.A.; McMichael, A. Evolution of the immune system in humans from infancy to old age. Proc. Biol. Sci. 2015, 282, 20143085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Microorganisms 11 01358 g001 550
Figure 1. Study flowchart. Abbreviations: LRTI: lower respiratory tract infection; Mp: Mycoplasma pneumoniae.
Figure 1. Study flowchart. Abbreviations: LRTI: lower respiratory tract infection; Mp: Mycoplasma pneumoniae.
Microorganisms 11 01358 g001
Table
Table 1. Characteristics and comparison of Mycoplasma pneumoniae PCR-positive and Mycoplasma pneumoniae PCR-negative patients with lower respiratory tract infection. Data are presented as median (IQR) or as percentage (proportion of subjects). Significant differences (p < 0.05) are highlighted in bold.
Table 1. Characteristics and comparison of Mycoplasma pneumoniae PCR-positive and Mycoplasma pneumoniae PCR-negative patients with lower respiratory tract infection. Data are presented as median (IQR) or as percentage (proportion of subjects). Significant differences (p < 0.05) are highlighted in bold.
Mp PCR-Positive
LRTI		Mp PCR-Negative
LRTI		Test Statisticp Value
Subjects N4965
Boys/girls (%)59.2/40.866.2/33.8χ2 = 0.5830.445
Age (years)5.8 (IQR 3.4–8.6)2.2 (IQR 1.3–4.5)U = 729.00<0.001
<5 years (%)
5–18 years (%)		44.9 (22/49)55.1 (27/49)76.9 (50/65)23.1 (15/65)χ2 = 4.890.027
Duration of symptoms (days)7 (IQR 5–10)4 (IQR 2–7)U = 866.00<0.001
CRP (mg/L)13 (IQR 7–28)17 (IQR 7–48)U = 1423.500.539
WBC (×109/L)9.9 (IQR 7.0–11.6)12.7 (IQR 9.3–15.6)U = 935.00<0.001
Radiographic findings
Effusion (%)22.0 (9/41)21.8 (12/55)χ2 = 0.000.988
Unilateral/Bilateral infiltrates (%)57.5/32.524.1/75.9χ2 = 10.870.001
Extrapulmonary manifestations
All (%)16.3 (8/49)21.5 (14/65)χ2 = 4.870.485
Dermatological (%)12.2 (6/49)4.6 (3/65)χ2 = 2.240.135
Gastrointestinal (%)0 (0/49)10.8 (7/65)χ2 = 5.620.018
Cardiovascular (%)2.0 (1/49)0 (0/65)χ2 = 1.340.247
Neurological (%)2.0 (1/49)1.5 (1/65)χ2 = 0.040.840
Ophtalmological (%)0 (0/49)3.1 (2/65)χ2 = 1.540.215
Hospitalization (%)75.5 (37/49)90.7 (59/65)χ2 = 4.890.027
Abbreviations: CRP: C-reactive protein; IQR: interquartile range; LRTI: lower respiratory tract infection; Mp: Mycoplasma pneumoniae; WBC: white blood cell count. Continuous variables were compared using Mann–Whitney U-test (Test statistic U), whereas categorical variables were compared by using Pearson Chi-Square test (Test statistic χ2).
Table
Table 2. Characteristics of hospitalized patients with lower respiratory tract infection with either Mycoplasma pneumoniae-positive or Mycoplasma pneumoniae-negative PCR result. Data are presented as median (IQR) or as percentage (proportion of subjects). Significant differences (p < 0.05) are highlighted in bold.
Table 2. Characteristics of hospitalized patients with lower respiratory tract infection with either Mycoplasma pneumoniae-positive or Mycoplasma pneumoniae-negative PCR result. Data are presented as median (IQR) or as percentage (proportion of subjects). Significant differences (p < 0.05) are highlighted in bold.
Mp PCR-Positive LRTIMp PCR-Negative
LRTI		Test Statisticp Value
Subjects N3759
Age (years)4.9 (IQR 3.2–8.1)2.2 (IQR 1.3–4.6)U = 542.00<0.001
<5 years (%)
5–18 years (%)		51.4 (19/37)
48.6 (18/37)		76.3 (45/59)
23.7 (14/59)		χ2 = 6.360.012
Hospital stay (days)3 (IQR 2–5)5 (IQR 4–8)U = 532.50<0.001
Oxygen therapy (%)54.1 (20/37)86.4 (51/59)χ2 = 12.38<0.001
Abbreviations: IQR: interquartile range; LRTI: lower respiratory tract infection; Mp: Mycoplasma pneumoniae. Continuous variables were compared using Mann–Whitney U-test (Test statistic U), whereas categorical variables were compared by using Pearson Chi-Square test (Test statistic χ2).
Table
Table 3. Multivariable logistic regression analysis for Mycoplasma pneumoniae PCR-positive lower respiratory tract infection in children. Significant differences (p < 0.05) are highlighted in bold.
Table 3. Multivariable logistic regression analysis for Mycoplasma pneumoniae PCR-positive lower respiratory tract infection in children. Significant differences (p < 0.05) are highlighted in bold.
Odds Ratio (OR)95% CI for ORp Value
Age1.281.08–1.520.005
Duration of symptoms1.151.01–1.310.038
CRP0.970.95–0.990.012
X-ray infiltrates *3.151.02–9.720.046
Extrapulmonary manifestations0.880.21–3.690.856
Hospitalization0.290.04–2.210.233
* Unilateral vs. bilateral. Abbreviations: CRP: C-reactive protein.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rodman Berlot, J.; Dolenc, Š.; Krivec, U.; Keše, D. Clinical, Laboratory, and Radiographic Features Can Help Predict Mycoplasma pneumoniae Lower Respiratory Tract Infection in Children. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 1358. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/microorganisms11051358

AMA Style

Rodman Berlot J, Dolenc Š, Krivec U, Keše D. Clinical, Laboratory, and Radiographic Features Can Help Predict Mycoplasma pneumoniae Lower Respiratory Tract Infection in Children. Microorganisms. 2023; 11(5):1358. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/microorganisms11051358

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rodman Berlot, Jasna, Špela Dolenc, Uroš Krivec, and Darja Keše. 2023. "Clinical, Laboratory, and Radiographic Features Can Help Predict Mycoplasma pneumoniae Lower Respiratory Tract Infection in Children" Microorganisms 11, no. 5: 1358. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/microorganisms11051358

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop