Next Article in Journal
Assessing Current Seismic Hazards in Irpinia Forty Years after the 1980 Earthquake: Merging Historical Seismicity and Satellite Data about Recent Ground Movements
Next Article in Special Issue
Geochemical Characterization and Trace-Element Mobility Assessment for Metallic Mine Reclamation in Soils Affected by Mine Activities in the Iberian Pyrite Belt
Previous Article in Journal
Climate Variability in Central Europe during the Last 2500 Years Reconstructed from Four High-Resolution Multi-Proxy Speleothem Records
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Mobility and Bioavailability of Metal(loid)s in a Fluvial System Affected by the Mining and Industrial Processing of Pb

by
Unai Cortada
1,2,
María Carmen Hidalgo
1,*,
Julián Martínez
3 and
María José de la Torre
1
1
Department of Geology, EPSL and CEACTEMA, Scientific and Technological Campus, University of Jaen, 23700 Linares, Spain
2
AFESA Medio Ambiente, S.A., Ed. San Isidro II, Idorsolo Kalea, 15, 48160 Bizkaia, Spain
3
Department of Mechanical and Mining Engineering, EPSL and CEACTEMA, Scientific and Technological Campus, University of Jaen, 23700 Linares, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 28 February 2021 / Revised: 1 April 2021 / Accepted: 4 April 2021 / Published: 6 April 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Environmental Impacts of Mining in Soils and Water)

Abstract

:
The abandoned mining district of Linares (South Spain) is marked with waste from the mining and the processing of metal ores that pose an environmental hazard to watercourses. A combined analysis of waste, sediments and water was carried out to analyse the impact of a smelter on Baños Creek. The composition of the facility waste was determined using X-ray diffractometry and scanning electron microscopy. The total contents of the metal(loid)s in the waters and sediments of the watercourse were analysed, and sequential metal(loid) extraction of solid samples was carried out. The facility wastes consisted mainly of secondary minerals, such as natropharmacosiderite and spertiniite, as well as rare metal salts, such as mopungite and NaPb2(CO3)2(OH). The leachates generated by these wastes were highly alkaline, with a pH of 10 and a total dissolved solids concentration of approximately 9 g L−1. This Na-bicarbonate-type water had an As concentration above 200 mg L−1 and elevated levels of Pb, Sb and Zn (5029 µg L−1, 841 µg L−1 and 525 µg L−1, respectively). This highly contaminated lixiviate had a significant effect on the chemical quality of the waters and the bioavailability of metal(loid)s in the creek sediments, especially in the headwaters. In this zone, the As, Pb, Sb and Zn concentrations in the most mobile fraction of the sediments reached 1035 mg kg−1, 261 mg kg−1, 45 mg kg−1 and 30 mg kg−1, respectively. By comparison, smelter slag and mining waste have a much lower impact on the waters and the mobile fraction of the sediments, while significantly increasing the total concentration of these potentially toxic elements in creek sediments.

1. Introduction

Metal mining and the associated industries are one of the main sources of metal(loid) emissions worldwide [1,2,3,4,5], largely because of the enormous quantity of waste generated during metal smelting and the elevated concentrations of potentially toxic metal(loid)s, such as As and Pb, which are produced by refining processes [6,7,8,9]. Some of these materials are released into the atmosphere as fine particles, whereas liquid wastes and larger solid materials are deposited in the vicinity of mining operations [10,11,12]. The metal(loid)s can subsequently be dispersed through runoff and the chemical or biological conversion of the waste itself [13,14]. A large portion of these mobilised elements upon infiltration through soil can reach aquifers or be carried into surrounding river channels [15,16]. Thus, metal(loid)s can disperse over long distances, even reaching 400 km downstream from the source of contamination [17].
The impact of mining, mineral extraction or metallurgical wastes on the dispersion of the metal(loid)s are determined by numerous factors, such as the mineral composition and leaching potential, physicochemical environmental conditions, dispersion mechanisms of the trace elements and characteristics of the metal(loid)s themselves, depending on the chemical form involved. Numerous studies have been conducted on this complex metal(loid) dispersion in recent years. Particularly notable are studies on the mineralogy and leaching potential of different types of smelter waste [18,19,20], as well as a review of the latest studies on the composition and potential environmental impact of slags [21]. They revealed a remarkably large heterogeneity in metallurgical wastes in terms of the variety of trace elements and mineralogical composition.
Upon reaching river courses, the mobility of dissolved metal(loid)s is influenced by the different physicochemical characteristics of the water, as different studies have shown for streams affected by mine drainage [22,23]. These outflows play an important role in the dispersion of metal(loid)s because elements can be easily stored in the sediments or remobilised downstream [24,25,26]. An in-depth understanding of the processes that influence metal(loid) mobilisation, distribution and bioavailability is vitally important to determine the potential risk of waste generated by extractive activity, mining and metallurgical facilities. Downstream spatial patterns in metal(loid)s from point sources are influenced by the dilution, storage and remobilisation of sediment in the channel and floodplain, hydraulic sorting, biological uptake and geochemical processes. The present study focused on the geochemical processes affecting both the spatial distribution of the contaminants and their bioavailability, as well as how different waste materials influenced the downstream spatial patterns of the metal(loid) concentrations, mobility and bioavailability.
The study was carried out in the middle and upper Baños Creek, within the mining district of Linares-La Carolina (Spain). The results of previous studies on this region have shown numerous remains of Pb mining and metallurgical industries along the creek banks, especially around the La Cruz smelter and the associated mining complex [27,28,29]. These mining industries were active during the 19th and 20th centuries and generated a large quantity of waste with significant metal and semimetal contents. These materials have enriched the trace elements in creek channel sediments and the floodplain [29]. The dispersal of these elements was connected with the atmospheric release of solid particles from mining waste deposits and the drainage of alkali leachates from inside the smelter. However, only the total metal(loid) content in the stream sediments was analysed. Similarly, the slag composition of the La Cruz smelter [30] did not explain the characteristics of the leachates that drained into the channel.
This oversight was addressed in this study by analysing different processes that affected the distribution of the metal(loid)s associated with the Pb industry along Baños Creek. The mobility and bioavailability of trace elements in the sediments and waters of the drainage network were studied. The impacts of different types of mining and metallurgical waste in the creek were investigated, considering both the mineral composition and the chemical form of the metal(loid)s present in the different types of smelter wastes.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area

The study area was located 2 km north of the Linares (Spain) urban centre, which is the main municipality of the mining district of Linares–La Carolina and currently has 60,000 inhabitants. This region of the southern Iberian Peninsula has a continental Mediterranean climate and is characterised by dry and very hot summers, with an average annual precipitation of 650 L m2 and average temperatures ranging between 7.2 °C in February and 28 °C in August. The seasonal rainy regime results in drying third-order channels for much of the year, as exemplified by the 13-km-long Baños Creek that runs through the study area (Figure 1).
The regional geology is characterised by a basement of metamorphic rocks (Palaeozoic phyllites and quartzites) and a granitic intrusion. These materials are richly veined with galena (PbS), chalcopyrite (CuFeS2), sphalerite (ZnS) and lead-silver (Pb-Ag) sulfoantimonides, resulting in underground mining in the district and the development of an important associated industry [31]. This basement is superposed by a sedimentary cover composed of Triassic sands and clays, through which Baños Creek flows.
Although the Pb and Ag operations in the region are known to date back to the pre-Roman era, the district only reached global importance during the 19th and 20th centuries.
The high Pb concentration (over 70% by mass of lead in the ore) made the region one of the main sites for Pb production in the world between 1880 and 1920 (144,000 t in 1918). However, the combination of the high cost of underground mining and Pb prices resulted in the decline and subsequent closure of mines in the late 1980s.
Today, the landscape of this district remains interspersed with innumerable mining remains, waste rock deposits and abandoned industries, against which the old La Cruz Smelter stands out. This facility is located at the head of Baños Creek and was operated between 1830 and 1986, where it was the last metallurgical industry to close in the region. The smelter processed 65,000 t of mineral concentrate per year over 150 years to produce Pb ingots and, to a lesser extent, Ag, Cu and Zn ingots [32]. The facility opened a secondary battery recycling line during the 1970s and 1980s to maintain the production cycle after the closure of numerous mining operations in the district.
The facility encompassed a 112,700 m2 area that was used for different industrial operations and slag storage (Figure 1 and Figure 2). The waste material is composed of a matrix of amorphous Fe and Si oxides, with traces of native wüstite, Fe and Pb [30]. Elevated Pb and Cu contents (22,890 and 4235 mg kg1, respectively) have been detected in these wastes [33].
The southwest zone of the smelter contains a settling pond for liquid waste, as well as various deposits of facility waste (Figure 2b,c). The alkaline leachates from these materials are still draining into the channel of Baños Creek. The sediments from this area at the headwaters of the creek have a pH of approximately 10 and very high contents of Sb (139 mg kg1), Zn (6263 mg kg1) and especially As (1921 mg kg1) [34].
The downstream end of the smelter contains old mine waste dumps and tailings ponds on both banks of Baños Creek. The waste dumps are composed of heterometric granitic materials produced by the re-deepening of shafts and galleries. The ponds are formed for waste material generated by the flotation recovery of galena (PbS) concentrate and have an estimated total volume of 1,400,000 m3. The tailings’ mineralogy is composed mainly of quartz, feldspar, calcite and ankerite, with traces of cerussite, lepidocrocite, melanterite and galena [35,36]. The Pb content (19,913 mg kg1) is elevated, of which, a high percentage occurs in bioavailable fractions, i.e., soluble and exchangeable fractions [37].
The San Luis smelter is located further downstream in the middle reach of the creek. San Luis was smaller than La Cruz (22,103 m2 surface area, Figure 1) and was active for a shorter period (1890–1919). The wastes from this facility have been recovered for use in the cement industry, and the reclaimed land is currently used for agriculture.

2.2. Sampling and Geochemical Analysis

Two sampling campaigns were carried out. The first event was used to obtain La Cruz waste for physicochemical characterisation and included 11 sampling points for different deposits within the smelter (samples SM, Figure 2a). The pH, granulometry and total metal(loid) concentration were determined for each sample.
The second event comprised 18 sampling points (Figure 1), where the samples were used to analyse the chemical speciation of the metal(loid)s in the sediments of Baños Creek. Four sampling points were located at the head of Baños Creek (samples L) at the foot of the smelter deposits. The remaining sampling points were located downstream, both within the channel (samples Ch) and the floodplain (samples Pl). Reference samples were collected from the creek channel (N-1) and the floodplain (N-2) of La Atalaya Creek, 12 km NE of the smelter, from materials belonging to the same geological unit but that were free from mining or industrial impact. The pH, granulometry and total and fractionated metal(loid)s contents were determined for all the samples.
The samples were collected using a flighted screw Auger over the first 20 cm below the ground surface. Five subsamples were collected at each point at a 1 m cross-spacing and then mixed in a bag to obtain a total weight of 1.5 kg. The pH and granulometry of the samples were determined at the laboratories of the University of Jaen according to the UNE 10390:2012 and UNE 103101:1995 standards.
The samples were subsequently prepared for elemental analysis. Samples were screened using 2 mm PVC sieves and ground in an agate mortar. The screened samples were then sent to ALS Minerals (ISO 9002) in Vancouver (Canada) to determine the total and fractionated metal(loid)s contents. The samples were prepared for total content analysis using microwave-assisted multi-acid digestion [38]. This process consisted of placing the samples in a Teflon reactor together with a mixture of HNO3, HClO4 and HF, followed by microwave heating under high pressure. The resulting dry residue was dissolved in HCl and diluted with deionised water (Milli-Q 18.2 MΩ cm, Millipore Inc., Darmstadt, Germany).
Sequential extraction was carried out in four steps to detect the elements associated with the mobile (F1), exchangeable (F2), reducible (F3) and oxidisable (F4) fractions of the sediment. The F1 fraction was extracted by leaching the sample with deionised water. The F2 fraction was formed by cations adsorbed by clay and elements coprecipitated with carbonates and was extracted using a solution of ammonium acetate (C2H7NO2) in acetic acid (CH3COOH). The F3 fraction was composed of Fe and/or Mn oxides and hydroxides and extracted using an HCl-hydroxylamine solution (HCl-NH2OH). The F4 fraction was formed by elements adsorbed by organic matter and/or sulfides and was extracted using a Na-pyrophosphate solution (Na4P2O7). Finally, the residual fraction (F5) was obtained by subtracting the sum of F1, F2, F3 and F4 from the total concentrations of each sample.
The obtained solutions were analysed using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) to determine the total concentrations of Ag, Al, As, Ba, Be, Bi, Ca, Cd, Co, Cr, Cu, Fe, K, La, Mg, Mn, Mo, Na, Nb, Ni, P, Pb, Sb, Sc, Sn, Sr, Th, Ti, Tl, V, W, Y, Zn and Zr.
Inductively coupled plasma atomic spectrometry (ICP-AES) was used to analyse the samples for which the contents of Ag, As, Cu, Pb, Sb and Zn exceeded the maximum allowed by the ICP-MS analytical method (100 mg kg−1 for Ag and 10,000 mg kg−1 for the other elements). The samples were analysed in duplicate as a quality control measure, and the study precision was evaluated using reference blanks and certified standards. The analytical method was validated by calculating the relative systematic error between the values obtained and those expected for the materials standards STD OREAS25A-4A and STD OREAS45E.

2.3. Mineralogical Analysis

The mineral composition of the facility wastes (SM-WAS) was analysed using X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) at the laboratories of the Centre for Scientific and Technical Instrumentation (CICT) at the University of Jaen. The SM-WAS wastes were obtained at a depth of 20 cm and on the precipitate-covered surface (Figure 2c).
The XRD analyses were performed using a PANalytical X-ray diffractometer with CuKa radiation. The samples were prepared for analysis by grinding in an agate mortar to a grain size below 50 µm. The obtained diffractograms were analysed using HighScore Plus PANalytical software (version 4.6) and standard reference powder diffraction patterns.
For the SEM analysis, a high-resolution MERLIN (Carl Zeiss SMT AG) Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscope (FESEM) that allowed for obtaining secondary electron (SE) and retrodispersive electron (EBS) images was employed. The equipment has two detectors for the elemental microanalysis, an energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy detector (EDS) (Oxford Inca Energy 350X-MAX 50) and a WDS detector (Oxford Inca Wave 500). The samples were metalized with carbon to prepare them for the microanalysis.

2.4. Hydrochemical Analysis

Five locations were used for the water sampling along the drainage network: two points were located at the head of the creek (samples L-1 and L-4, Figure 1), one point was located upstream (sample Ch-1), and two points were located downstream (samples Ch-3 and Ch-6) of the area with waste dumps and tailings ponds (Figure 1). Sampling was carried out in November, during the wet season, just after a precipitation event that was intense enough to generate runoff along the investigated length of the creek.
The temperature, electrical conductivity (EC), pH and dissolved oxygen were measured in situ at each sampling point. Three subsamples were taken to determine the major and minor constituents, bicarbonate species and trace elements. All the samples were refrigerated until analysis. The subsample taken for trace element analysis was passed through a 0.45 μm filter and preserved with ultrapure nitric acid at pH < 2.5 to prevent the precipitation of metals and semimetals.
The analyses were performed at the CICT laboratories of the University of Jaen. The major and minor constituents were determined using ion chromatography (Metrohm Compact IC Flex), bicarbonates were determined using titration, and trace elements were analysed using ICP-MS (AGILENT model 7900 quadrupole ion filter).
The quality controls included the use of certified high-purity standards and reference blanks to verify the correct operation of the equipment, along with duplicate analyses.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Characterisation of the Smelter Wastes

The smelter slags (SM-1, 2, 3 and 4) had pHs of approximately 7, with low contents of As, Cu and Sb relative to the other wastes (Table 1). These samples consisted of Ca (7–12%) and Fe (11–24%) as the major elements, together with elevated contents of Pb (50,600 mg kg−1 in SM-4) and Zn (41,600 mg kg−1 in SM-3). This composition was similar to that obtained for Pb slags in other mining districts [8,14,39].
The facility wastes (SM-6 to 10) did not have homogeneous compositions (Table 1). Samples SM-5, 6 and 8 had pH values above 10, with Na (8–10%) and Sb (6–10%) as the major elements and a high As content (3070 to 20,900 mg kg−1). These samples also had significant levels of Pb (5–6%), Zn (2–6%) and Cd (64–118 mg kg−1). In SM-10, however, the pH was approximately 3, and Fe (39%) and S (6%) were the major elements, probably from the oxidation of ferrous sulfides, such as pyrite (FeS2). In addition, SM-10 had elevated concentrations of Pb (50,800 mg kg−1), Cu (13,550 mg kg−1) and, to a lesser extent, As (3410 mg kg−1).
The SM-WAS deposits stood out at the centre of the study area because of their large size and visible alteration, manifesting as white, green and blue tones (Figure 2c). These wastes exhibited the highest contents of As (29,400 mg kg−1), Cu (46,900 mg kg−1) and Pb (71,200 mg kg−1) over the entire area, along with elevated concentrations of Na (45,300 mg kg−1) and Sb (41,600 mg kg−1). The particles varied in size, the texture was mostly sandy fines, and the macroscopic colour was greyish brown. Given the unique composition of these wastes, a mineralogical analysis was carried out.
An XRD analysis produced complex mineralogical results for the SM-WAS sample (Figure 3a). The highest intensity peaks were associated with white rust (Fe(OH)2), mopungite (NaSb(OH)6), illite ((K,H3O)(Al,Mg,Fe)2(Si,Al)4O10[(OH)2,(H2O)]) and quartz (SiO2). Phases of natropharmacosiderite ((Na,K)Fe43+(AsO4)3(OH)4·6–7H2O) and franklinite ((Fe,Mn,Zn)2+(Fe,Mn)3+2O4) were also detected with lower-intensity peaks. To a lesser extent, oxides and hydroxides of As, Cu, Pb and Fe were observed, such as arsenolite (As2O3), spertiniite (Cu(OH)2), minium (red lead) (Pb3O4) and goethite (α-Fe3+O(OH)), along with gypsum (CaSO4·2H2O) and calcite (CaCO3). The slight elevation of the central section of the bottom curve of the diffractogram indicates the presence of poorly crystallised particles.
The aforementioned materials were partially covered by precipitates, producing a weakly consolidated crust with blue, green and whitish tones (Figure 2c). The mineral composition of this crust is shown in the diffractograms of Figure 3b,c. The blue precipitates (Figure 3b) were composed of the anhydrous Na sulfate mineral thenardite (Na2SO4), basic lead salt (NaPb2(CO3)2(OH)) and spertiniite (Cu(OH)2), a Cu hydroxide that produced the bluish colour. A similar diffractogram was obtained for the greenish and whitish precipitates (Figure 3c), albeit with different peak intensities, where the peaks associated with thenardite were more intense. Trace levels of rouseite (Pb2Mn2+(AsO3)2·2H2O) were also observed. Therefore, the multiple colours were derived from the differences in the spertiniite and thenardite contents of the precipitates.
An SEM analysis of the facility wastes (Figure 4) corroborated the XRD mineralogical results. Figure 4a shows the poorly crystallised material detected in the bottom curve of the diffractogram in Figure 3a.
The SEM data showed an atomic composition that was rich in Cu (9 wt%), Na (wt 4.6%), Pb (68 wt%) and O (18 wt%) (Figure 4, spectrum 2), which may imply a mineralogy that was based on small-grained oxides. Within this matrix, franklinite crystals (spectrum 1, Figure 4) containing Sn and Mn could be distinguished as atomic substitutes for Zn and Fe, respectively.
Figure 4b,c corresponds to the precipitates that partially covered the facility waste. Figure 4b shows spertiniite (spectrum 3, Figure 4) and NaPb2(CO3)2(OH) phases (spectrum 4, Figure 4). These spectra show traces of As, Si, Pb and Ca in spertiniite and As, Ca and Cu in the basic lead salt, indicating that these elements served as atomic substituents, as in the franklinite. Figure 4c shows that the thenardite precipitates (spectrum 6, Figure 4) were composed of Na, S and O, with trace levels of As and Cu. The same figure shows the Na arsenate filaments (spectrum 5, Figure 4) were a mineral phase that was not detected in the XRD analysis.
Therefore, the SM-WAS facility wastes were mainly composed of metal oxides and hydroxides that were associated with grains of quartz, illite and thenardite. The poorly crystallised grains were mainly composed of Cu, Na and Pb oxides. However, the SEM analysis revealed that the composition of the aforementioned mineral phases was not pure, with numerous atomic substitutions.
Elemental As is mainly associated with natropharmacosiderite and arsenolite. Natropharmacosiderite is a secondary mineral that is generated in neutral or basic pH environments with elevated As, Fe and Na levels [24]. Although exact data on the solubility of this mineral are not available [40], the pharmacosiderite group has been reported to be more stable in alkaline environments than other secondary phases of As, such as scorodite and arseniosiderite [40]. Arsenolite is a compound that is associated with nonferrous metallurgical activity that precipitates sublimated As in different smelting furnaces [41]. This compound also occurs as a secondary mineral in mining and industrial deposits with a high As content [42]. The arsenolite phase has high solubility and easily releases As into water [43]. The As precipitates as Na arsenate and is adsorbed by spertiniite, NaPb2(CO3)2(OH) and thenardite, from which As can be easily mobilised.
Cu mainly occurs in spertiniite and forms oxides in poorly crystallised particles. Spertiniite is a mineral phase that redefines chrysocolla [44] and typically occurs as a secondary mineral in mining or smelting waste with a high Cu content. Spertiniite is moderately stable in alkaline environments [45].
Sb occurs in the form of mopungite, a very rare mineral phase that is found as an alteration of antimony sulfide. Mopungite is kinetically stable under ambient conditions and is generated in alkaline environments [46].
Pb forms minium, amorphous oxides and the basic Pb carbonate NaPb2(CO3)2(OH). The last one is a rare secondary mineral [47] that is related to hydrocerussite (Pb3(CO3)2(OH)2) [48], which has also been associated with the recycling of batteries for Pb extraction. Pb is a stable element at a pH of approximately 10 and is soluble under neutral or slightly acidic pH conditions [49].
Finally, Zn is associated with the mineral franklinite, which crystallises under conditions of high temperatures or pressures [50]. Franklinite was embedded in the poorly crystallised materials of the studied wastes. This compound is quite common in foundry slags with a high Zn content [8,18,51]. Franklinite is poorly soluble in alkaline environments, and Zn release is limited by the content of amorphous Fe oxides in the waste [52].
The aforementioned metal(loid)s, except for Zn, are associated with secondary phases related to the alteration of wastes under alkaline conditions. Some of these phases, such as arsenolite, mopungite or NaPb2(CO3)2(OH), are not very stable and are easily soluble in water. Therefore, these materials can release metal(loid)s in the form of leachates. Considering the characteristics of the aforementioned phases, As and Sb are the most susceptible to mobilisation.
The composition of the facility waste differs from those of the slag (which is based on a matrix of amorphous Fe and Si oxides [30] and the mining waste, which mainly consists of quartz, feldspar, calcite and ankerite [35,36].

3.2. Geochemical Speciation

Table 2 shows the results obtained from the metal speciation according to the scheme in Section 2.2. The concentrations of As, Cd, Cu, Pb, Sb and Zn in the F1–F5 fractions of the Baños Creek sediments, the facility waste (SM-WAS) and the natural soil (La Atalaya Creek) are shown. The results for the slag from the La Cruz smelter and the Arrayanes tailings pond [37], near the Pl-1 location, are also shown for comparison. These six elements were selected because they are the most enriched by the mining, mineralurgical and metallurgical activities of the region [29,34,53,54].
The facility wastes (SM-WAS) had much higher elemental concentrations than the investigated soils and sediments. Among the analysed elements, As and, to a lesser extent, Sb were associated with the F1 fraction, whereas the remaining elements mostly occurred in F2, F3 and F5. The metal(loid)s were more associated with the more mobile soil fractions (F1, F2 and F3) in SM-WAS than in the slag, tailings ponds and natural soils. This result was consistent with SM-WAS composition of mainly highly soluble secondary minerals.
Figure 5 and Table 3 show the details of the distribution of the six selected metal(loids) in the different fractions along Baños Creek.
The total As concentrations gradually decreased downstream from the sampling points at the head of the creek. The As concentration reached a maximum of 1921 mg kg−1 in L-1 and a minimum of 17 mg kg−1 in Ch-5 (Table 2). This latter value was similar to those obtained for the natural soils. The fractional analysis results for L-1 and L-2, which were affected by the leachate discharge from the facility waste, show that As mostly occurred in the most soluble fraction (F1), reaching 54% of the total content in L-1. In contrast, the As content in this fraction did not reach even 1% of the total concentration in L-3, which was obtained from the drainage channel in the perimeter of the slag deposit. This result indicates that As was less mobile in the smelter slag than in the facility wastes.
The percentage of the F1 fraction decreased with increasing distance from the leachate discharge zone, whereas the F3 fraction (associated with Fe and Mn oxides and hydroxides) and the residual fraction (F5) both increased.
A significant Cd contribution is detected from both the smelter slag (32 mg kg−1 in L-3) and facility waste (39 mg kg−1 in L-2), and the Cd content gradually decreased downstream. The Cd content was mainly associated with the exchangeable and bioavailable fraction along the investigated length of the creek, although the residual fraction increased with distance from the smelter. The presence of Cd in the exchangeable fraction largely resulted from the similarity between the cationic radii of Cd (0.97 Å) and Ca (0.99 Å), which favoured coprecipitation with carbonates and incorporation into the calcite mineral structure [55].
The total Cu concentration reached a maximum in Ch-3 from the lower reach of the channel and a minimum in L-1 from the discharge zone of leachates from the facility wastes. Therefore, the Cu distribution along the creek was very different from that of As and Cd, and would be related to the smelter slag and tailings ponds. Elemental Cu was mainly associated with Fe and/or Mn oxides and hydroxides and the residual fractions throughout the watercourse.
Pb mainly occurred in the exchangeable and bioavailable phase (F2). The highest Pb content was found in the vicinity of the smelter and the tailings ponds, similar to Cu. Around the tailings pond, Pb predominated in fraction F2, which represented up to 76% of the total Pb (Pl-3, Table 3). This result may have occurred because the Pb from the tailings ponds had an affinity towards the carbonate phase.
In contrast, Sb was generally associated with the residual and oxidisable fractions, as well as being bound to sulfides and/or organic matter (Table 3, F4). The highest Sb content occurred at the head of the creek because of the influence of facility wastes and smelter slag. Sb was also elevated in the channel in the lower reach of the creek (Ch-5 and Ch-6), in the vicinity of the former San Luis smelter. The presence of Sb in the least mobile fraction of the soil has been reported in other mine sites [56]. Generally, it confirms the low mobility of Sb in areas that are affected by mining and metallurgy.
Finally, there was a remarkable Zn percentage in the exchangeable and bioavailable fraction at the foot of the facility wastes (33% in L-2), where the maximum total Zn content was also found (6263 mg kg−1). Zn was mainly associated with Fe/Mn oxides and hydroxides, and with the residual fraction over the rest of the creek. The Zn content was also high at the foot of the smelter slags (L-3) and near the San Luis smelter (Ch-5 and Ch-6, Table 3).
These results indicate that the facility wastes, smelter slags and tailings ponds had significantly different effects on the creek sediments. In the facility wastes, As, Cd, Cu, Pb, Sb and Zn were associated with the most bioavailable fractions and were highly mobile, such that the leaching and drainage to the creek of these elements resulted in the dispersion of metals and semimetals associated with the most bioavailable highly mobile fraction, favouring their leaching and transfer to the creek. The most mobile element was As, where the F1 fraction represented more than 50% of the total concentration in L-1. In contrast, Cu and Pb had limited mobility in this alkaline medium.

3.3. Hydrochemistry

Table 4 shows the main physicochemical characteristics of the leachate from the La Cruz waste dump and the waters that flow in the Baños Creek. The maximum annual average (AA) values of the dissolved metal(loid) concentrations according to the European Union environmental quality standards (EQSs) for priority toxic elements in surface waters (Directive 2008/105/EC) are also shown.
At the foot of the La Cruz smelter, the leachates that drain into the creek (sample L-1) had a very alkaline pH of 10.4, a low oxidation–reduction potential (ORP) of approximately 50 mV and an electrical conductivity (EC) of 8864 µS cm−1, indicating a high degree of mineralisation in the waters. The influence of the leachates decreased with increasing distance along the channel from the smelter, where mixing with surface runoff significantly changed the water chemistry. At 250 m downstream of the facility (L-4), a pH of 9.5 was recorded, and the EC dropped to 2219 µS cm−1. Both the pH and EC of the creek waters decreased rapidly, where Ch-3 (sampled 2 km from the smelter) had a pH and EC of approximately 7.6 and 200 µS cm−1, respectively. This decrease was observed all the way downstream to Ch-6, approximately 3 km from the leachate runoff zone.
The Piper diagram in Figure 6 shows the characteristics of these waters. As the smelter wastes were uniquely rich in Na, the leachates had a high Na bicarbonate content with a high percentage of sulfates. L-1 had a high salinity with a total dissolved solids (TDS) concentration of approximately 9 g L−1. These brackish waters gave rise to the formation of precipitates and salt crusts on the surrounding soils, mainly constituted by Ca-Na sulfates and carbonates, together with Na arsenates [36].
Downstream, the water (Ch-3 and Ch-6) was predominantly of the Ca bicarbonate type, with low mineralisation, similar to that of other channels in this mining district [9,57,58]. However, the water in the headwater reach of the creek (Ch-1, Figure 6) was of the Na bicarbonate type, clearly reflecting the mixing between weakly mineralised natural water and the leachates from the smelter.
Table 4 also presents the concentrations of six dissolved metal(loid)s (As, Cd, Cu, Pb, Sb and Zn), which were chosen due to their high abundance and possible environmental effects. As expected, the maximum concentrations occurred in the leachates of the facility wastes (L-1), where very high contents were detected for Cu (313 µg L−1), Pb (5029 µg L−1), Sb (841 µg L−1) and Zn (525 µg L−1); the As content above 220 mg L−1 is especially alarming.
At 250 m downstream (L-4), there was a significant decrease in the contents of As, Pb, Sb and Zn, although the concentration of As remained very high at above 31 mg L−1. Cd and Cu increased slightly; this could be attributed to the leachates from the smelter slag, which joined the creek waters at that point.
The contents of six elements decreased exponentially further downstream and stabilised beyond 2 km (Ch-3), where the highest dissolved metal concentrations corresponded to Cu (47 µg L−1) and Pb (132 µg L−1). This result may indicate that the source of these metals was the mining waste located between the sampling points for Ch-1 and Ch-3 (Figure 1).
The notable reduction in the mineralisation of the stream waters from the head of the creek indicated an important dilution resulting from the mixing of leachates with the natural waters. However, this process alone cannot be responsible for the marked decrease in the sulfate, carbonate, Na, As and Pb contents; further causes included the precipitation and coprecipitation processes of the sulfates and carbonates with Na and Pb, together with the presence of Na arsenates in the waste environment. Adsorption processes onto sediments and the coprecipitation and/or precipitation of metals and semimetals along the channels are common in mining environments [59,60]. This interpretation is consistent with the As and Pb speciation in sediments. Thus, the increase in the As and Pb contents in the floodplain sediments was linked to the exchangeable fractions (cations adsorbed by clay and elements coprecipitated with carbonates) and the reducible fractions.
The leachates generated from the facility wastes at the La Cruz smelter were the main source of metal(loid) runoff in the solution along Baños Creek. These wastes were less abundant than the slag and mining waste but considerably more soluble and released significant quantities of Cd, Cu, Pb, Sb, Zn and especially As.
Secondary minerals related to the alteration of the facility wastes (mainly arsenolite, mopungite and NaPb2(CO3)2(OH)) are not very stable and are easily solubilised upon contacting water [43]. The lixiviation of these mineral phases has a strong influence on the chemical quality of the waters and the bioavailability of metal(loid)s in creek sediments, especially in headwaters. In this area, the concentrations of As, Pb, Sb and Zn in the most mobile fraction of sediments reached values of 1035 mg kg−1, 261 mg kg−1, 45 mg kg−1 and 30 mg kg−1, respectively. Considering these elevated contents, there is a risk of re-mobilisation of these elements from the sediment as a secondary source of contamination of surface water [24,41]. On the other hand, the smelter slag and mining waste had a much lower impact on the waters and the mobile fraction of the sediments, although they significantly increased the total concentrations of these potentially toxic elements in the creek sediments.
Considering the EQSs for As, Cd, Pb and Zn (Table 4), the results regarding the metal contents of the leachates released in the upper Baños Creek considerably exceeded the European regulations. The As, Cd and Zn contents were attenuated beyond the zone of mining influence to allowable levels, leaving only Cu and Pb with risk values in the middle and lower reaches of the creek.

4. Conclusions

Geochemical analyses were performed on the sediments and waters of Baños Creek and combined with a mineralogical characterisation of the facility wastes of the La Cruz smelter to reveal dispersal mechanisms of metal(loid)s for this watercourse. The results showed the high environmental impact of the different types of waste from this mining and metallurgical industry on the surrounding soils and waters.
The mineral composition of the facility wastes mainly included highly alterable secondary phases and metal salts, which facilitated the generation of alkali leachates with highly elevated levels of metal(loid)s. The materials that constituted the smelter slag and tailings ponds were also exposed to weathering but were less soluble. Thus, the reducible and residual fractions predominated in the sediments affected by the mobilisation of the potentially toxic elements from the slag deposits and tailings ponds. Therefore, the mobilisation and redistribution of metals and semimetals were mainly related to particle transport processes.
Three main sources of metals(loids) were identified and affected the watercourse differently. The facility wastes released large quantities of As, Cd, Cu, Pb, Sb and Zn into the water, where they were bounded in the most mobile fraction of the creek sediments. The alkaline conditions of the leachate, together with the high solubility of the minerals that contained As, facilitated the As release into the waters, resulting in its considerably high contents there.
The smelter slags contained large quantities of Cd, Cu, Pb, Sb and Zn in the exchangeable (F2), reducible (F3) and residual (F5) fractions of the sediments. However, the concentrations of these metal(loid)s in the waters and the soluble fraction of the creek sediments were considerably lower. Furthermore, the tailings ponds and dumps located downstream of the smelter resulted in significant Cu and Pb enrichment of the sediments and, to a lesser extent, the Baños Creek waters.
These results indicate that the elements leached from the facility wastes had the highest concentrations, mobility and impact on the creek water quality.
The case of the Baños Creek can be a reference for the other watercourses that are affected by Pb-sulphide extraction and reworking. The result obtained in this study can represent the environmental risk posed by this type of waste. In the specific case of facility waste, the high solubility and the enormous quantities of As mobilised in solution make it necessary to completely isolate such materials. They are major sources of pollution that hamper the attainment of the water quality targets established by the Water Framework Directive.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, U.C., M.C.H. and J.M.; formal analysis, U.C. and M.J.d.l.T.; software, M.J.d.l.T.; investigation, U.C., M.C.H., J.M. and M.J.d.l.T.; writing—original draft preparation, U.C.; writing—review and editing, U.C., M.C.H., J.M. and M.J.d.l.T.; project administration, M.C.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness, Project CGL2013-45485-R.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Han, F.X.; Su, Y.; Monts, D.L.; Plodinec, M.J.; Banin, A.; Triplett, G.E. Assessment of global industrial-age anthropogenic arsenic contamination. Naturwissenschaften 2003, 90, 395–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Olías, M.; Cánovas, C.R.; Macías, F.; Basallote, M.D.; Nieto, J.M. The Evolution of Pollutant Concentrations in a River Severely Affected by Acid Mine Drainage: Río Tinto (SW Spain). Minerals 2020, 10, 598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Mayes, W.M.; Potter, H.A.B.; Jarvis, A.P. Inventory of aquatic contaminant flux arising from historical metal mining in England and Wales. Sci. Total Environ. 2010, 408, 3576–3583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Bundschuh, J.; Litter, M.I.; Parvez, F.; Román-Hoss, G.; Nicolli, H.B.; Jean, J.S.; Liu, C.W.; López, D.; Armienta, M.A.; Guilherme, L.R.G.; et al. One century of arsenic exposure in Latin America: A review of history and occurrence from 14 countries. Sci. Total Environ. 2012, 429, 2–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Islam, M.S.; Ahmed, M.K.; Raknuzzaman, M.; Al Mamum, M.H.; Islam, M.K. Heavy metal pollution in surface water and sediment: A preliminary assessment of an urban river in a developing country. Ecol. Indic. 2015, 48, 282–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Piatak, N.M.; Seal, R.R.; Hammarstrom, J.M. Mineralogical and geochemical controls on the release of trace elements from slag produced by base- and precious-metal smelting at abandoned mine sites. Appl. Geochem. 2004, 19, 1039–1064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Navarro, A.; Cardellach, E.; Mendoza, J.L.; Corbella, M.; Domenech, L.M. Metal mobilization from base-metal smelting slag dumps in Sierra Almagrera (Almería, Spain). Appl. Geochem. 2008, 23, 895–913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Andrade-Lima, L.R.P.; Bernardez, L.A. Characterization of the lead smelter slag in Santo Amaro, Bahia, Brazil. J. Hazard. Mater. 2011, 189, 692–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Cortada, U.; Martínez, J.; Rey, J.; Hidalgo, M.C. Assessment of tailings pond seals using geophysical and hydrochemical techniques. Eng. Geol. 2017, 223, 59–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Nriagu, J.O.; Pacyna, J.M. Quantitative assessment of worldwide contamination of air, water and soils by trace metals. Nature 1998, 333, 134–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. El Adnani, M.; Plante, P.; Benzaazoua, M.; Hakkou, H.; Bouzahzah, H. Tailings Weathering and Arsenic Mobility at the Abandoned Zgounder Silver Mine, Morocco. Mine Water Environ. 2016, 35, 508–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kříbek, B.; Majer, V.; Knésl, I.; Keder, J.; Mapani, V.; Kamona, F.; Mihaljevic, M.; Ettler, V.; Penizek, V.; Vanek, A.; et al. Contamination of soil and grass in the Tsumeb smelter area, Namibia: Modeling of contaminants dispersion and ground geochemical verification. Appl. Geochem. 2015, 64, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Costagliola, P.; Benvenuti, M.; Chiarantini, L.; Bianchi, S.; Di Benedetto, F.; Paolieri, M.; Rossato, L. Impact of ancient metal smelting on arsenic pollution in the Pecora River Valley, Southern Tuscany, Italy. Appl. Geochem. 2008, 23, 1241–1259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ettler, V.; Johan, Z.; Kříbek, B.; Sebek, O.; Mihaljevic, M. Mineralogy and environmental stability of slags from the Tsumeb smelter, Namibia. Appl. Geochem. 2009, 24, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Domínguez, M.T.; Alegre, J.M.; Madejón, P.; Madejón, E.; Burgos, P.; Cabrera, F.; Marañón, T.; Murillo, J.M. River banks and channels as hotspots of soil pollution after large-scale remediation of a river basin. Geoderma 2016, 261, 133–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Sindern, S.; Tremöhlen, M.; Dsikowitzky, L.; Gronen, L.; Schwarzbauer, J.; Siregar, T.; Ariyani, F.; Irianto, H.E. Heavy metals in river and coast sediments of the Jakarta Bay region (Indonesia)—Geogenic versus anthropogenic sources. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2016, 110, 624–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Veado, M.V.; Arantes, I.A.; Oliveira, A.H.; Almeida, M.R.M.G.; Miguel, R.A.; Severo, M.I.; Cabaleiro, H.L. Metal Pollution in the Environment of Minas Gerais State—Brazil. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2006, 117, 157–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ettler, V.; Legendre, O.; Bodénan, F.; Touray, J.C. Primary phases and natural weathering of old lead-zinc pyrometallurgical slag from Pacibram, Czech Republic. Can. Mineral. 2001, 39, 873–888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Ettler, V.; Johan, Z.; Baronnet, A.; Jankovsky, F.; Gilles, C.; Mihaljevic, M.; Sebet, O.; Strnad, L.; Bezdicka, P. Mineralogy of air-pollution-control residues from a secondary lead smelter: Environmental implications. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2005, 39, 9309–9316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ettler, V.; Johan, Z.; Bezdička, P.; Draek, M.; Sebek, O. Crystallization sequences in matte and speiss from primary lead metallurgy. Eur. J. Mineral. 2009, 21, 837–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Piatak, N.M.; Parsons, M.B.; Seal, R.R. Characteristics and environmental aspects of slag: A review. Appl. Geochem. 2015, 57, 236–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kovács, E.; Tamás, J.; Frančišković-Bilinski, S.; Bilinski, H. Geochemical study of surface water and sediment at the abandoned Pb-Zn mining site at Gyöngyösoroszi, Hungary. Fresenius Environ. Bull. 2012, 21, 1212–1217. [Google Scholar]
  23. Omanović, D.; Pižeta, I.; Vukosav, P.; Kovács, E.; Frančišković-Bilinski, S.; Tamas, J. Assessing element distribution and speciation in a stream at abandoned Pb–Zn mining site by combining classical, in-situ DGT and modelling approaches. Sci. Total Environ. 2015, 511, 423–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Haffert, L.; Craw, D.; Pope, J. Climatic and compositional controls on secondary arsenic mineral formation in high-arsenic mine wastes, South Island, New Zealand. N. Zeal. J. Geol. Geophys. 2010, 53, 91–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Grosbois, C.; Meybeck, M.; Lestel, L.; Lefèvre, I.; Moatar, F. Severe and contrasted polymetallic contamination patterns (1900-2009) in the Loire River sediments (France). Sci. Total Environ. 2012, 435–436, 290–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Petta, R.A.; Sindern, S.; Souza, R.F.; Campos, T.F.C. Influence of mining activity on the downstream sediments of scheelite mines in Currais Novos (NE Brazil). Environ. Earth Sci. 2014, 72, 1843–1852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Martínez, J. Caracterización Geoquímica y Ambiental de los Suelos en el Sector Minero de Linares. Ph.D. Thesis, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid, Spain, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  28. Martínez, J.; Rey, J.; Hidalgo, M.C.; Luque, J.A. El georrádar como técnica de diagnóstico de presas mineras abandonadas. El distrito de Linares (Jaén, España). Geogaceta 2014, 55, 63–66. [Google Scholar]
  29. Cortada, U.; Hidalgo, M.C.; Martínez, J.; Rey, J. Impact in soils caused by metal(loid)s in lead metallurgy. The case of La Cruz Smelter (Southern Spain). J. Geochemical. Explor. 2018, 190, 302–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Sierra, C.; Martínez, J.; Menéndez-Aguado, J.M.; Afif, E.; Gallego, J.R. High intensity magnetic separation for the clean-up of a site polluted by lead metallurgy. J. Hazard. Mater. 2013, 248–249, 194–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Lillo, F. Geology and Geochemistry of Linares-La Carolina Pb-ore Field (Southeastern Border of the Hesperian Massif). Ph.D. Thesis, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK, 1992. [Google Scholar]
  32. Gutiérrez-Guzmán, F. Las Minas de Linares. Apuntes Históricos; Colegio Oficial de Ingenieros Técnicos de Minas de Linares: Linares, Spain, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  33. Hidalgo, M.C.; Rojas, D.; Benavente, J.; Rey, J.; Martínez, J.; De la Torre, M.J. Contaminación de aguas y suelos en el entorno de una escombrera de fundición (Distrito Minero de Linares, Jaén). In Proceedings of the II Congreso Ibérico de las Aguas Subterráneas, Valencia, Spain, 8–10 September 2014. [Google Scholar]
  34. Cortada, U.; Hidalgo, M.C.; Martínez, J.; Rey, J. Dispersion of metal(loid)s in fluvial sediments: An example from the Linares mining district (southern Spain). Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019, 16, 469–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. De la Torre, M.J.; Campos, M.J.; Hidalgo, M.C. Estudio Mineralógico de las Escombreras en el Distrito Minero de La Carolina (Jaén, España). Macla 2010, 13, 213–214. [Google Scholar]
  36. De la Torre, M.J.; Hidalgo, M.C.; Rey, J.; Martínez, J. Mineralogical characterization of tailing dams: Incidence of abandoned mining works on soil pollution (Linares, Jaén). Geophys. Res. Abstr. 2012, 14, 133357. [Google Scholar]
  37. Rojas, D.; Benavente, J.; Hidalgo, M.C.; Rey, J.; Martínez, J. Contenido total y fraccionamiento de metales y semimetales en las escombreras del distrito minero de Linares-La Carolina (Jaén). GeoTemas 2012, 13, 1495–1498. [Google Scholar]
  38. Rice, S. Super Trace 4-Acid Digestion &amp. ICP-MS/AES Analysis, ALS Global. Yilgarn Geochem. Semin. 2017, 1, 1–20. [Google Scholar]
  39. Morrison, A.L.; Swierczek, Z.; Gulson, B.L. Visualisation and quantification of heavy metal accessibility in smelter slags: The influence of morphology on availability. Environ. Pollut. 2016, 210, 271–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Drahota, P.; Filippi, M. Secondary arsenic minerals in the environment: A review. Environ. Int. 2009, 35, 1243–1255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Romero, F.M.; Villalobos, M.; Aguirre, R.; Gutiérrez, M.E. Solid-Phase Control on Lead Bioaccessibility in Smelter-Impacted Soils. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2008, 55, 566–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zhu, X.; Wang, R.; Lu, X.; Liu, H.; Li, J.; Ouyang, B.; Lu, J. Secondary minerals of weathered orpiment-realgar-bearing tailings in Shimen carbonate-type realgar mine, Changde, Central China. Mineral. Petrol. 2015, 109, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Nordstrom, D.; Zhu, X.; McCleskey, R.; Königsberger, L.C.; Königsberger, E. Geochemical modeling and thermodynamic properties of arsenic species. In Arsenic Research and Global Sustainability: Proceedings of the Sixth International Congress on Arsenic in the Environment (As2016), Stockholm, Sweden, 19–23 June 2016; CRC Press: Stockholm, Sweden, 2016; p. 135. [Google Scholar]
  44. Farges, F.; Benzerara, K.; Brown, G.E. Chrysocolla redefined as spertiniite. AIP Conf. Proc. 2007, 882, 223–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Gade, B.; Pöllmann, H.; Heindl, A.; Westermann, H. Long-term behaviour and mineralogical reactions in hazardous waste landfills: A comparison of observation and geochemical modelling. Environ. Geol. 2001, 40, 248–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Roper, A.J.; Leverett, P.; Murphy, T.D.; Williams, P.A. The stability of the rare sodium antimonate, brizziite, and it’s role in Sb mobility. Mineral. Mag. 2018, 82, 89–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Ibáñez-Insa, J.; Elvira, J.J.; Llovet, X.; Pérez-Cano, J.; Oriols, N.; Busquets, M.; Hernández, S. Abellaite, NaPb2(CO3)2(OH), a new supergene mineral from the Eureka mine, Lleida province, Catalonia, Spain. Eur. J. Mineral. 2017, 29, 915–922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Siidra, O.; Nekrasova, D.; Depmeier, W.; Chukanov, N.V.; Zaitsev, A.; Turner, R.W. Hydrocerussite-related minerals and materials: Structural principles, chemical variations and infrared spectroscopy. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. B Struct. Sci. Cryst. Eng. Mater. 2018, 74, 182–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Taylor, P.; Lopata, V.J. Stability and solubility relationships between some solids in the system PbO–CO2–H2O. Can. J. Chem. 1984, 62, 395–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Catlett, K.M.; Heil, D.M.; Lindsay, W.L.; Ebinger, M.H. Soil Chemical Properties Controlling Zinc Activity in 18 Colorado Soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 2002, 66, 1182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Zhang, Y.; Yu, X.; Li, X. Zinc recovery from franklinite by sulphation roasting. Hydrometallurgy 2011, 109, 211–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Lindsay, W.L. Chemical Equilibria in Soils. Clays Clay Miner. 1980, 28, 319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Martínez, J.; Llamas, J.; De Miguel, E.; Rey, J.; Hidalgo, M.C. Determination of the geochemical background in a metal mining site: Example of the mining district of Linares (South Spain). J. Geochem. Explor. 2007, 94, 19–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Martínez, J.; Llamas, J.; De Miguel, E.; Rey, J.; Hidalgo, M.C. Soil contamination from urban and industrial activity: Example of the mining district of Linares (southern Spain). Environ. Geol. 2008, 54, 669–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Ma, X.; Zuo, H.; Tian, M.; Zhang, L.; Meng, J.; Zhou, X.; Min, N.; Chang, X.; Liu, Y. Assessment of heavy metals contamination in sediments from three adjacent regions of the Yellow River using metal chemical fractions and multivariate analysis techniques. Chemosphere 2016, 144, 264–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Wilson, N.J.; Craw, D.; Hunter, K. Antimony distribution and environmental mobility at an historic antimony smelter site, New Zealand. Environ. Pollut. 2004, 129, 257–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Hidalgo, M.C.; Rey, J.; Benavente, J.; Martínez, J. Hydrogeochemistry of abandoned Pb sulphide mines: The mining district of La Carolina (southern Spain). Environ. Earth Sci. 2010, 61, 37–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Hidalgo, M.C.; Rey, J.; Martinez, J.; Benavente, J. Impact of abandoned mining works on surface water. Int. Multidiscip. Sci. Geoconf. SGEM 2012, 2, 903. [Google Scholar]
  59. Jain, C.K.; Ram, D. Adsorption of lead and zinc on bed sediments of the river Kali. Water Res. 1997, 31, 154–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Palmer, S.C.J.; van Hinsberg, V.J.; McKenzie, J.M.; Yee, S. Characterization of acid river dilution and associated trace element behavior through hydrogeochemical modeling: A case study of the Banyu Pahit River in East Java, Indonesia. Appl. Geochem. 2011, 26, 1802–1810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Study area and location of the sampling points: SM-WAS, metallurgical waste; L, leachate discharge area; Ch, creek bed sediments; Pl, floodplain sediments.
Figure 1. Study area and location of the sampling points: SM-WAS, metallurgical waste; L, leachate discharge area; Ch, creek bed sediments; Pl, floodplain sediments.
Geosciences 11 00167 g001
Figure 2. Images of the La Cruz smelter. (a) Aerial photograph of the facility (Google Earth, 2016) showing the location of different sampling points within and around the smelter. (b) Aerial photograph that was taken in 1984 of the area impacted by facility wastes. (c) Facility wastes (sample SM-WAS). (d) Leachate from the foot of the smelter.
Figure 2. Images of the La Cruz smelter. (a) Aerial photograph of the facility (Google Earth, 2016) showing the location of different sampling points within and around the smelter. (b) Aerial photograph that was taken in 1984 of the area impacted by facility wastes. (c) Facility wastes (sample SM-WAS). (d) Leachate from the foot of the smelter.
Geosciences 11 00167 g002
Figure 3. X-ray diffractograms obtained for the facility waste. (a) SM-WAS sample. (b) Blue precipitates. (c) Greenish and whitish precipitates.
Figure 3. X-ray diffractograms obtained for the facility waste. (a) SM-WAS sample. (b) Blue precipitates. (c) Greenish and whitish precipitates.
Geosciences 11 00167 g003
Figure 4. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images that were obtained by detecting the backscattered (a) and secondary (b,c) electrons. (1) Franklinite crystals; (2) vitreous matrix composed mainly of Na, Cu and Pb; (3) spertiniite aggregates; (4) NaPb2(CO3)2(OH); (5) Na arsenate filaments; (6) thenardite precipitates.
Figure 4. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images that were obtained by detecting the backscattered (a) and secondary (b,c) electrons. (1) Franklinite crystals; (2) vitreous matrix composed mainly of Na, Cu and Pb; (3) spertiniite aggregates; (4) NaPb2(CO3)2(OH); (5) Na arsenate filaments; (6) thenardite precipitates.
Geosciences 11 00167 g004
Figure 5. Graph showing the total (black line, in mg kg−1) and fractional (F1, F2, F3, F4 and F5, in %) contents of As, Cd, Cu, Pb, Sb and Zn at the different sampling points.
Figure 5. Graph showing the total (black line, in mg kg−1) and fractional (F1, F2, F3, F4 and F5, in %) contents of As, Cd, Cu, Pb, Sb and Zn at the different sampling points.
Geosciences 11 00167 g005
Figure 6. Piper diagram and hydrochemical types of the analysed water samples. L, leachates; Ch, surface waters.
Figure 6. Piper diagram and hydrochemical types of the analysed water samples. L, leachates; Ch, surface waters.
Geosciences 11 00167 g006
Table 1. Main physicochemical characteristics of the facility waste and slag obtained from the La Cruz smelter.
Table 1. Main physicochemical characteristics of the facility waste and slag obtained from the La Cruz smelter.
Heading SM-1SM-2SM-3SM-4SM-5SM-6SM-7SM-8SM-9SM-10SM-WAS
pH778711118119311
Silt (g kg−1)170101555401025352540
Clay (g kg−1)94898999184149114149213149154
Elements (mg kg−1)
Ag18622372485846469149107
Al36,80039,00035,60065,30028,70040,10035,60029,70084,800430029,100
As79038048037020,90030706807850497341029,700
Ba275400290350030603020139014407002301600
Ca109,800122,500117,50070,70031,70047,10072,60047,40031,000190029,400
Cd3156014118965164145246
Co11565103596651574332131493
Cr50354893810511630129653665
Cu3365180035402140731057302990744040213,55046,900
Fe204,250236,000236,000113,50042,70065,80052,10055,90020,500389,000124,500
K11,15011,700940014,4001100200014,7002900230052002600
Mg10,10010,70010,90095004700610011,9007000179,5004003700
Mn27608300494020907519253860866575138010,150
Na730046007500220097,10077,700300086,100800200045,300
Ni56335613412677537365219450
P9052190119010302301806503002801201680
Pb35,55015,30035,20050,60051,40055,00052,60058,500701050,80071,200
S16,800990021,100510071008800910018,100130064,1008400
Sb29913436229999,30059,700140569,50051578641,600
Sn525170270801720676023091907094010,950
Ti1750190016002200250019001200130045004001230
Tl1552010101051051016
V1051189312258494044563776
Zn36,85027,10041,600412017,70052,400538063,900823696059,400
Table 2. The As, Cd, Cu, Pb, Sb and Zn contents of the F1–F5 fractions of the Baños Creek sediments, facility waste (SM-WAS), natural soil, slag from the La Cruz smelter and a tailings pond near the creek. Max: maximum, Min: minimum, Std. Dev.: standard deviation.
Table 2. The As, Cd, Cu, Pb, Sb and Zn contents of the F1–F5 fractions of the Baños Creek sediments, facility waste (SM-WAS), natural soil, slag from the La Cruz smelter and a tailings pond near the creek. Max: maximum, Min: minimum, Std. Dev.: standard deviation.
Stream Sediments Facility Natural Slag Tailings
Mean MedianMax Min Std. Dev.Waste Soil Pond
mg kg−1%mg kg−1%mg kg−1%mg kg−1%mg kg−1%mg kg−1%mg kg−1%mg kg−1%mg kg−1%
F1107270.30.51035410.060.4280407250240.32<0.002-0.010.02
F2611534288111.4998144320150.5451171.23
AsF310226193253321428149219370321.31040133274
F41744710540.532745501.90.767224
F51072733565552295914621821028107820467819
F10.071.20.0060.50.51.2<0.002-0.11.10.60.2<0.002-0.030.02<0.002-
F23520.55020490.0745649106430.01230.930.421
CdF32260.22411270.021432873300.01190.6740.0635
F40.020.30.010.60.10.3<0.002-0.030.31.10.4<0.002-0.540.0927
F51200.3269220.064122165260.035829191.270
F140.830.7140.90.741.940.9900.20.080.51.40.030.40.1
F256114611167110.601.5441018,350390.7530.15213
CuF315831136344012620521152712,10026213601.425360
F411292393241024471.017932102
F528455211529146016402566015,91334117540779610325
F1730.5390.33050.7130.7860.81620.20.31.1120.130.01
F2896161755063296311956376146712,95018103711885586929
PbF32918202295198110182901517961627,5003913513141.45223
F4720.5590.62080.590.5440.4399060.7315497<0.002-
F52598182098178181183942117991626,598372819,827871352068
F1460.51.445210.080.71119237060.0070.6----
F2341.85840.3224132530.0040.4----
SbF3574111050.7635171540.044----
F491351425122208137341.80.218----
F54569266912659871366035,456850.978----
F160.60.70.3300.50.10.2100.61600.30.10.3120.020.10.05
F2208203413209033235112923,700400.71.3636912126
ZnF3475451204720803317296873914,35024247241.47037
F4131.262681.1351711070.2361710.31.20.6
F535033963719983238635373021,08335478944,0058610756
Table 3. The pH, silt-clay content, fractional and total concentrations of As, Cd, Cu, Pb, Sb and Zn in the facility waste (SM-WAS), floodplain (Pl-1 to Pl-6) and channel (Ch-1 to Ch-6) of Baños Creek.
Table 3. The pH, silt-clay content, fractional and total concentrations of As, Cd, Cu, Pb, Sb and Zn in the facility waste (SM-WAS), floodplain (Pl-1 to Pl-6) and channel (Ch-1 to Ch-6) of Baños Creek.
SM-WASL-1L-2L-3L-4Ch-1Pl-1Ch-2Pl-2Ch-3Pl-3Ch-4Pl-4Ch-5Pl-5Ch-6Pl-6
pH11.510.27.25.79.410.15.95.45.65.65.65.65.65.55.35.55.5
Silt and clay (g kg−1)1845903618141934666602361234124331086382951018403
F-1 (%)2454290.5121320.30.50.40.40.40.420.41.00.3
F-2 (%)1515102235181345535410587
AsF-3 (%)3211293426264829333828385234313121
F-4 (%)252321055371711539212
F-5 (%)2815303924333261585053463952545860
Total Conc. (mg kg−1)29,7001921182431977434568355565359349317472320
F-1 (%)0.271.30.4240.70.60.60.60.40.30.400.41.10.0
F-2 (%)4367524762535962464946474741433936
CdF-3 (%)307233517232616232630272819301228
F-4 (%)00000000011000113
F-5 (%)2619231719191421312322252439244833
Total Conc. (mg kg−1)246439327271.41.20.70.70.41.00.20.70.20.2
F-1 (%)0.2240.70.4260.90.40.40.20.40.40.30.30.60.50.7
F-2 (%)391006121010137815161818162414
CuF-3 (%)2634175134414016211742244426473044
F-4 (%)1.060.552631.00.90.931.320.740.98
F-5 (%)3427823850364670717440583555324534
Total Conc. (mg kg−1)46,900598297541491943548316831236609440917242557183185
F-1 (%)0.2121.10.31.230.40.10.30.20.20.20.10.20.20.30.4
F-2 (%)1856293443436364717779707822693948
PbF-3 (%)3913323226312711151314191326183127
F-4 (%)60.41.00.80.60.60.40.30.30.30.40.50.30.80.50.90.8
F-5 (%)3718373329229241410610951122824
Total Conc. (mg kg−1)71,2002149876125,0137545902716,78517,09015,37618,36523,879947337,355707722,44655168080
F-1 (%)63380.96721.10.80.70.60.60.60.80.80.70.7
F-2 (%)34466486643343342
SbF-3 (%)437397101191489236756
F-4 (%)218185122110101691310813111620
F-5 (%)8542638667627172687376776577797471
Total Conc. (mg kg−1)41,6001391311477324632234283024421303211511
F-1 (%)0.3180.40.4240.50.30.30.30.20.20.200.200.2
F-2 (%)40163310218271813859585113
ZnF-3 (%)2440336151324553504438304450375428
F-4 (%)0.241.10.90.740.91.40.924321.341.48
F-5 (%)3522322826512628364552584941543361
Total Conc. (mg kg−1)59,40017162633195770148822302308149146971962514178152962
Table 4. Physicochemical characteristics of the surface waters. T, temperature; EC electrical conductivity; ORP, oxidation–reduction potential. The maximum allowable annual average (AA) values for the selected elements are shown. Contents exceeding the AAs are bolded.
Table 4. Physicochemical characteristics of the surface waters. T, temperature; EC electrical conductivity; ORP, oxidation–reduction potential. The maximum allowable annual average (AA) values for the selected elements are shown. Contents exceeding the AAs are bolded.
L-1L-4 Ch-1Ch-3Ch-6
T (°C)1212121212
EC (µS cm−1)88642219415200184
pH10.49.38.17.87.6
ORP (mV)50160170170170
Dissolved O2 (mg L−1)108.79.59.59.5
mg L−1
Na+18645056552
K+4119754
Ca2+ 615142929
Mg2+ 27333
Cl3119932
SO42−1621438443019
HCO316967511527580
CO32−862104000
μg L−1
As (50 μg L−1 AA)22,067631,89053056
Cd (0.1 μg L−1 AA)3520.10.04
Cu (40 μg L−1 AA)313434644755
Pb (7.2 μg L−1 AA)5029787337132125
Sb 8414872812
Zn (300 μg L−1 AA)525132583644
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cortada, U.; Hidalgo, M.C.; Martínez, J.; de la Torre, M.J. Mobility and Bioavailability of Metal(loid)s in a Fluvial System Affected by the Mining and Industrial Processing of Pb. Geosciences 2021, 11, 167. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/geosciences11040167

AMA Style

Cortada U, Hidalgo MC, Martínez J, de la Torre MJ. Mobility and Bioavailability of Metal(loid)s in a Fluvial System Affected by the Mining and Industrial Processing of Pb. Geosciences. 2021; 11(4):167. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/geosciences11040167

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cortada, Unai, María Carmen Hidalgo, Julián Martínez, and María José de la Torre. 2021. "Mobility and Bioavailability of Metal(loid)s in a Fluvial System Affected by the Mining and Industrial Processing of Pb" Geosciences 11, no. 4: 167. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/geosciences11040167

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop