Next Article in Journal
Study of Social Presence While Interacting in Metaverse with an Augmented Avatar during Autonomous Driving
Next Article in Special Issue
A Systematic Review of the Effects of Nutrient Intake in Handball Players on Exercise Performance
Previous Article in Journal
Numerical Identification of Deep Muscle Residual Tensions (Tones) Based on Multi-Directional Trunk Stiffness Data
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effects of Post-Activation Performance Enhancement on Jump Performance in Elite Volleyball Players
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Applied Sciences
Volume 12
Issue 22
10.3390/app122211803
applsci-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The Effectiveness of Different Training Methods in Soccer for Repeated Sprint Ability: A Brief Review

by
Yiannis Michailidis
Laboratory of Evaluation of Human Biological Performance, Department of Physical Education and Sport Science, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 57001 Thessaloniki, Greece
Appl. Sci. 2022, 12(22), 11803; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/app122211803
Submission received: 5 November 2022 / Revised: 15 November 2022 / Accepted: 18 November 2022 / Published: 20 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Effects of Physical Training on Exercise Performance)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The purpose of this study was to systematically review the literature on the effect of exercise programs on the Repeated Sprint Ability (RSA) performance of soccer players. PubMed, Scopus and Google Scholar databases were searched for original research articles. The inclusion criteria for a study were to include different groups of intervention in soccer players and present the protocol’s characteristics and the study’s results. Twenty-one (21) studies met the criteria. For each study, the effect size (ES) and 95% confidential interval (CI) were calculated and evaluated as trivial, small, moderate or large. The results showed that in adults, the various programs showed from trivial (e.g., ES 0.185; 95% CI ± 0.089) to large beneficial effects (ES 2.92; 95% CI ± 0.29). At developmental ages, the beneficial effect was from trivial to moderate (ES 0.163; 95% CI ± 0.174, ES 0.787; 95% CI ± 0.074). Concerning the interventional programs, studies carried out by sprint and Small-Sided Games (SSG) interventions presented a large ES, while studies that carried out RSA exercises presented moderate ES. A variety of stimuli can improve the RSA performance of soccer players by causing trivial-to-large improvements. However, more effective are interventional exercises that include stimuli related to repeated sprint ability.

1. Introduction

Soccer is an intermittent sport where low and high-intensity actions occur [1,2]. In a high-level soccer match, players cover 9 to 12 km [3,4,5] by walking or running at different speeds. The distance covered by high-intensity running is crucial to the performance of players and constitutes 8 to 12% of the total [3,6]. Previous studies have indicated that the number of sprints of soccer players are between 17 and 81 in each match [6,7]. Their average duration is 2 to 4 s, while most of them (>90%) are less than 20 m [6,7].
The ability to perform repeated sprints (RSA) with short intervals in-between is crucial for soccer performance [8,9]. It has been reported that this ability varies considerably between professional and amateur soccer players [10,11].
Previous studies have shown that oxygen uptake, hydrogen ions management and muscle glycogen concentration [10,12,13,14,15,16,17] may affect RSA. Moreover, short RSA improvement programs affect the activity of the enzymes of the aerobic and anaerobic energy-production mechanism [18]. More specifically, for the anaerobic mechanism, the activity of enzymes such as phosphofructokinase and myokinase [19] is improved, which can lead to increased energy production through anaerobic processes and thus improve the performance for repeated sprints.
The fact that aerobic and anaerobic mechanism factors can affect the RSA [20] results in training programs being varied and different from each other (e.g., distances, breaks, repetitions) without knowing which of them are most effective. To this end, it would be beneficial for coaches to have a summary of their training methods and effectiveness in the ability of the RSA. However, we hypothesize that training methods that have similar characteristics to tests measuring RSA will be more effective.
This study aimed to investigate and summarize the existing literature on the effects of different training methods/protocols on the ability of RSA in soccer. In this review, the studies were categorized following the age of participants and into those that included appropriate training methods (e.g., sprints) and those using nonrelevant training methods (e.g., plyometrics, strength training).

2. Materials and Methods

The key issue was expressed in questions according to the Population, Intervention, Control, Outcome (PICO) design approach [21]. Articles for the review were collected after checking the bibliographical bases PubMed, Google Scholar and Scopus in early February 2021. Inclusion criteria: (a) include intervention program, (b) compare with different groups of intervention, (c) present the characteristics of the protocol, (d) present the results of the study, (e) participation of soccer players, (f) present the mean values of the groups and/or effect size, (g) published up to and including February 2021 and (h) published in English in a peer-reviewed journal.
Studies that used any kind of RSA tests were included in the review. Only the data for repeated-sprint mean (mean time of each sprint) were extracted and meta-analysed, as this is the most reliable measure of those reported concerning repeated-sprint ability [11,22].

3. Data Acquisition and Analysis

Studies were divided by age and intervention program. More specifically, in terms of age, they were divided into studies on adults and youths. The training program was divided into those that included sprints and those that did not include sprints (strength, plyometrics). The characteristics recorded by each study were the author, the year, the sample size, players’ level and age, the training protocols, the total number of workouts, the duration of the intervention, the number of workouts per week and the effect of the training in percentage or effect size. This review makes efforts to quantify the effects of the training protocols [23,24].
A p value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Cohen’s d was used to calculate the effect size (ES, 95% confidence limit) of each study using the following equation [25]:
ES = Mpre − Mpost/Spre ∗ [1 − (3/(4n − 5)]
where Mpre is the mean value before the intervention, Mpost is the mean value after the intervention, n is the sample size of the group and Spre is the standard deviation (SD) preintervention. Threshold values for Cohen’s ES statistics were <0.2 (trivial), >0.2 (small), >0.6 (moderate) and >1.2 (large) [26]. For each study, the percentage change after the intervention was calculated. After checking the literature, 21 studies met the criteria (Figure 1). The analysis included 530 participants with an average age of 16.5 + 2.8 years.

4. Results

4.1. Age

According to the age-based separation from the 21 studies, 6 [27,28,29,30,31,32] were performed in adults (>18 years old) and 15 in youth soccer players (<18 years old). Adult studies ranged from 3 to 8 weeks, and the total training units from 9 to 24. The level of participants was from amateurs to elite. Intervention protocols included RSA exercises, resisted sprint, speed endurance, strength training, plyometrics and small-sided games (SSG). Some studies presented no effect on the performance in the RSA [28], while others showed an improvement of up to ~9% [32]. The beneficial effect ranged from trivial to moderate. Detailed results of each study are presented in Table 1.
The studies carried out in youth soccer players are much more (n = 15) with the age of the participants, ranging from 11 to 17.3 years. The interventional programs lasted from 4 to 10 weeks and the total number of workouts was from 6 to 16. As in adult studies, interventional programs varied from the RSA to SSG and plyometrics. The improvement ranged from 0 to ~6% while the ES ranged from trivial to moderate (Figure 2). Detailed results of each study are presented in Table 1.

4.2. Training Protocol

The studies were categorized into those that included protocols where repeated sprints (specific) were applied and those that did not include sprints in their interventional programs (nonspecific). In the studies that used sprinting in the training protocol, the duration ranged from 3 to 10 weeks and the total number of training units from 6 to 14. However, many of these protocols implemented programs with a different objective from the RSA, such as generic training, anaerobic endurance training [40], speed endurance training [39], resident and no-resident sprint training [32]. The findings showed that there were studies that showed no change in RSA [28,38,40] and others with improvements of ~9% [32]. Detailed results of each study are presented in Table 1.
Studies in which the training program did not include sprint exercises were much less (n = 5). In these studies, the duration of the intervention was from 4 to 8 weeks and the total number of workouts was from 12 to 24. The training programs of these studies included plyometric training, maximum strength training, SSG and the FIFA11+ program. Their findings showed that there were studies where RSA ability did not change [45,46] but also studies where the RSA performance improved by 2.7%, but the differences were not significant [44]. Detailed results of each study are presented in Table 1.

5. Discussion

Soccer, as mentioned above, is an intermittent team sport where soccer players make ~1200 cyclical changes in activity every 3 to 5 s. Many of these actions are sprints [48], indicating RSA’s importance in high-level soccer. In recent years, more and more studies have been investigating the effect of specific programs on this capability [28,39,46], with most of them showing improvement after the implementation of the intervention program.
As mentioned above, studies on soccer players were included in this review. Although there are several studies involving various sports, studies in soccer players are relatively limited (n = 21), while research work on the effects of different training programs on RSA soccer players does not exist.
The first separation of studies was made in relation to age in this study. Of the six studies carried out in adulthood, only Campos-Vasquez et al. (2015) [28] did not notice an improvement in the RSA after the implementation of their intervention, while in five studies carried out on youth soccer players, there were no improvements in the performance of the RSA [38,40,45,47]. In adult studies, performance improvement reached ~9%, while in minors it reached ~3%, although in any case, the ES ranged from trivial to large. These studies show that interventional programs cause less percentage improvement in youth soccer players. This may be related to the characteristics of the protocols (intensity, volume) chosen in each case. Moreover, this difference may be due to the characteristics of developmental ages. More specifically, the studies included in the review include participants from 11 to 17 years of age. It has been reported in previous studies that children in their preteens have reduced anaerobic capacity and their actions are more dependent on the aerobic-energy-production mechanism [49]. In this context, they show less lactic acid production and greater oxidation of fatty acids [50,51] compared to adults. In addition, the level of biological maturation seems to affect the effectiveness of training [52,53]. The above-reasons may influence the results of the studies.
Concerning interventional programs, the studies were divided into those that applied sprint exercises (specific) and those that did not include sprint exercises (nonspecific). Of the specific studies (n = 13), in only two were no improvement in RSA observed after the program implementation, while in nonspecific studies (n = 8), no improvements were observed in three studies. Compared to the two categories, the percentage of studies where no effect occurred was ~15% for the specific and ~38% for the nonspecific. This observation may be due to the training principle of the specialization of the stimulus. Two methodologies are followed to improve the RSA. In the first, based on the above-principle of coaching, exercises are applied that include repeated sprints. The second method improves the individual factors that affect the performance of the RSA such as metabolic factors [54].
Of the nonspecific studies, two used plyometric programs, three used strength programs, two used SSG and one used the FIFA11+ program. Of the two studies using plyometric exercises, Hammami et al., (2016) [44] did not notice significant changes, as opposed to Negra et al. (2020) [41]. Looking at the protocols they used, we find that Hammami et al. (2016) [44] applied high-intensity jumps, but the total volume of the program (~700 jumps) was almost half that of Negra et al. (2020) [41] (~1300 jumps), which indicates that the volume of training can affect the effectiveness of the program, considering that the total workouts were 16 for both teams.
Of the three studies that implemented strength programs, two were conducted by the same laboratory and implemented the same program without finding significant effects on the RSA [45,46]. However, Spinetti et al. (2018) [42] noted that a complex contrast training program caused a significant improvement in the RSA performance compared to a traditional strength program. The above-differences are likely due to the different programs of Spinetti et al. (2018) [42], who had three strength training sessions for eight weeks, compared to the two of Hammami et al. [45,46]. Moreover, Spinetti et al. [42] used more than three exercises for the lower extremities (>3 in each workout) as opposed to Hammami et al. [44], who used only the half-squat exercise. As we understand, the volume of programs varies considerably. Moreover, the lack of significant differences in the RSA after the implementation of the strength program may be because the strength does not affect the important factors on which the RSA depends, such as aerobic capacity that helps in rehabilitation [55] and the increase in energy substrates (CP) necessary for repetitive sprints [56].
Studies examining SSG’s effect on the RSA observed a significant improvement in it. The characteristics of the two studies differed quite a bit. More specifically, Bujalance-Moreno et al. (2018) [27] implemented a program for six weeks, 4 vs. 4 on a field, with a ratio of ~75 m2/player, while Dello Iacono et al. (2018) [29] implemented a program for eight weeks, 5 vs. 5 on a field, corresponding to 126 m2/player. The findings of these studies show that SSG can be used to improve RSA. As we can observe, they used small-player relationships of 4 vs. 4 and 5 vs. 5 and relatively large spaces of 78 m2/player and 126 m2/player.
Finally, in the studies [47] where FIFA11+ was applied, no effect on the RSA was observed. It is well-known that this program (FIFA11+) was designed to prevent injuries to soccer players and not to affect physical abilities that are important for the RSA. The stimulus was not specific to the RSA, so the effectiveness was small.
Of the thirteen specific studies, eight used an RSA program, three an anaerobic speed endurance and interval training and two studies used programs with resisted sprint. Of the studies that included RSA, only two [28,36] did not observe any changes in the RSAmeantime. However, the study of Eniseler et al. observed an improvement in the index of % RSAdecrement. In another study, Campos-Vasquez et al. (2015) [28] used an RSA or an RSA and strength combination program. The lack of significant differences were justified by the authors as the possible fatigue of the athletes, as the study was carried out at the end of the racing season. The specialization of the training stimulus was important in improving the RSA regardless of the differences between the training programs.
Of the three studies that used interval or anaerobic endurance training, only in the study of Iaia et al. (2015) [39] was there an improvement in the RSA. The difference in these studies is likely due to the participants. More specifically, all three studies implemented programs that affected the anaerobic-energy-production mechanism. Anaerobic training is known to increase the activity of anaerobic enzymes (e.g., phosphofructokinase, myokinase) [19], increases the expression of the Na+, K+ transport pump [57], increases the muscle glycogen content [19] and enhances muscle capillarization [58]. It is known that adults have better anaerobic adaptations than youths. In two studies, no differences were observed; the participants were adolescents.
Finally, in the two studies carrying out programs involving resistance sprints, significant improvements in the ability of the RSA were observed. Reports show that resistance sprints can increase muscle capacity to store elastic energy and improve power output [59,60,61]. This can affect players’ sprint performance, as it can improve the horizontal force and rate of force development [62].
In this review, the heterogeneity of intervention programs that were used for RSA improvement is obvious. This review was intended to present the different training programs that soccer players can use to improve the RSA. Although there are several studies on the RSA, those applied to soccer players are limited. The studies were selected to clarify which programs can be applied to soccer players to affect the RSA positively.
This review has some limitations. Firstly, a reduced number of studies were available for some interventions such as resistance sprints (i.e., two studies). Secondly, a reduced number of participants were included in most studies. Finally, male studies were used, as there does not exist any female studies.

6. Conclusions

Many kinds of exercise (SSG, explosive strength training, resisted sprint training) can improve performance in the RSA. However, the results showed that programs involving RSA exercises and resisted-sprint exercises were more effective for athletes. The training principle can explain this observation about the stimulus specification. More work is needed with larger samples and interventional programs that apply to the weekly microcycle of soccer teams to draw certain conclusions about the most effective programs.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Arslan, E.; Kilit, B.; Clemente, F.M.; Soylu, Y.; Sögüt, M.; Badicu, G.; Akca, F.; Gokkaya, M.; Murawska-Ciałowicz, E. The Effects of Exercise Order on the Psychophysiological Responses, Physical and Technical Performances of Young Soccer Players: Combined Small-Sided Games and High-Intensity Interval Training. Biology 2021, 10, 1180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Clemente, F.M.; Soylu, Y.; Arslan, E.; Kilit, B.; Garrett, J.; van den Hoek, D.; Badicu, G.; Filipa Silva, A. Can high-intensity interval training and small-sided games be effective for improving physical fitness after detraining? A parallel study design in youth male soccer players. PeerJ 2022, 10, e13514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Di Salvo, V.; Baron, R.; Tschan, H.; Calderon Montero, F.; Bachl, N.; Pigozzi, F. Performance characteristics according to playing position in elite soccer. Int. J. Sport. Med. 2007, 28, 222–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Rampinini, E.; Coutts, A.J.; Castagna, C.; Sassi, R.; Impellizzeri, F.M. Variation in top level soccer match performance. Int. J. Sport. Med. 2007, 28, 1018–1024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Vardakis, L.; Michailidis, Y.; Mandroukas, A.; Mavrommatis, G.; Christoulas, K.; Metaxas, T. Analysis of the running performance of elite soccer players depending on position in the 1-4-3-3 formation. Ger. J. Exerc. Sport Res. 2020, 50, 241–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Vigne, G.; Gaudino, C.; Rogowski, I.; Alloatti, G.; Hautier, C. Activity profile in elite Italian soccer team. Int. J. Sport. Med. 2010, 31, 304–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Burgess, D.J.; Naughton, G.; Norton, K.I. Profile of movement demands of national soccer players in Australia. J. Sci. Med. Sport. 2006, 9, 334–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Chaouachi, A.; Manzi, V.; Wong, D.P.; Chaalali, A.; Laurencelle, L.; Chamari, K.; Castagna, C. Intermittent endurance and repeated sprint ability in soccer players. J. Strength Cond. Res. 2010, 24, 2663–2669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Rampinini, E.; Bishop, D.; Marcora, S.M.; Bravo, D.F.; Sassi, R.; Impellizzeri, F.M. Validity of simple field tests as indicators of match-related physical performance in top-level professional soccer players. Int. J. Sport. Med. 2007, 28, 228–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Aziz, A.R.; Chia, M.; Teh, K.C. The relationship between maximal oxygen uptake and repeated sprint performance indices in field hockey and soccer players. J. Sports Med. Phys. Fit. 2000, 40, 195–200. [Google Scholar]
  11. Impellizzeri, F.M.; Rampinini, E.; Castagna, C.; Bishop, D.; Ferrari Bravo, D.; Tibaudi, A.; Wisloff, U. Validity of a repeated-sprint test for soccer. Int. J. Sport. Med. 2008, 29, 899–905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Bishop, D.; Edge, J. Determinants of repeated-sprint ability in females matched for single-sprint performance. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 2006, 97, 373–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Bishop, D.; Lawrence, S.; Spencer, M. Predictors of repeated-sprint ability in elite female hockey players. J. Sci. Med. Sport 2003, 6, 199–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Bishop, D.; Spencer, M. Determinants of repeated-sprint ability in well-trained team-sport athletes and endurance-trained athletes. J. Sports Med. Phys. Fit. 2004, 44, 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  15. Dupont, G.; Millet, G.P.; Guinhouya, C.; Berthoin, S. Relationship between oxygen uptake kinetics and performance in repeated running sprints. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 2005, 95, 27–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Michailidis, Y.; Chatzimagioglou, A.; Mikikis, D.; Ispirlidis, I.; Metaxas, T. Maximal oxygen consumption and oxygen muscle saturation recovery following RAST in youth soccer players. J. Sports Med. Phys. Fit. 2020, 60, 355–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Karampelas, D.; Antonopoulos, K.; Michailidis, Y.; Mitrotasios, M.; Mandroukas, A.; Metaxas, T. Comparison of ergogenic effects of caffeine and nitrate supplementation on speed, power and repeated sprint performance of soccer players. Physiologia 2021, 1, 3–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Burgomaster, K.A.; Heigenhauser, G.J.; Gibala, M.J. Effect of shortterm sprint interval training on human skeletal muscle carbohydrate metabolism during exercise and time-trial performance. J. Appl. Physiol. 2006, 100, 2041–2047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ross, A.; Leveritt, M. Long-term metabolic and skeletal muscle adaptations toshort-sprint training: Implications for sprint training and tapering. Sport. Med. 2001, 31, 1063–1082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Taylor, J.; Macpherson, T.; Spears, I.; Weston, M. The effects of repeated-sprint training on field-based fitness measures: A meta-analysis of controlled and non-controlled trials. Sport. Med. 2015, 45, 881–891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Methley, A.M.; Campbell, S.; Chew-Graham, C.; McNally, R.; Cheraghi-Sohi, S. PICO, PICOS and SPIDER: A comparison study of specificity and sensitivity in three search tools for qualitative systematic reviews. BMC Health Serv. Res. 2014, 14, 579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Bishop, D.; Girard, O.; Mendez-Villanueva, A. Repeated-sprint ability—Part II: Recommendations for training. Sports Med. 2011, 41, 741–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Rumpf, M.C.; Cronin, J.B.; Schneider, C. Effect of different training methods on sprint times in recreational and athletic males. J. Aust. Strength Cond. 2014, 22, 62–73. [Google Scholar]
  24. Rumpf, M.C.; Cronin, J.B.; Oliver, J.L.; Hughes, M. Effect ofdifferent training methods on running sprint times in male youth. Pediatr. Exerc. Sci. 2012, 24, 170–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Cohen, J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, Revised ed.; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 1977. [Google Scholar]
  26. Hopkins, W.; Marshall, S.; Batterham, A.; Hanin, J. Progressive statistics for studies in sports medicine and exercise science. Med. Sci. Sport. Exerc. 2009, 41, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Bujalance-Moreno, P.; García-Pinillos, F.; Latorre-Román, P.Á. Effects of a small-sided game-based training program on repeated sprint and change of direction abilities in recreationally-trained soccer players. J. Sport. Med. Phys. Fit. 2018, 58, 1021–1028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Campos-Vazquez, M.A.; Romero-Boza, S.; Toscano-Bendala, F.J.; Leon-Prados, J.A.; Suarez-Arrones, L.J.; Gonzalez-Jurado, J.A. Comparison of the effect of repeated-sprint training combined with two different methods of strength training on young soccer players. J. Strength Cond. Res. 2015, 29, 744–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Dello Iacono, A.; Beato, M.; Unnithan, V. Comparative Effects of Game Profile-Based Training and Small-Sided Games on Physical Performance of Elite Young Soccer Players. J. Strength Cond. Res. 2019, 35, 2810–2817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Iaia, F.M.; Fiorenza, M.; Larghi, L.; Alberti, G.; Millet, G.P.; Girard, O. Short- or long-rest intervals during repeated-sprint training in soccer? PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0171462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Rey, E.; Padrón-Cabo, A.; Costa, P.B.; Lago-Fuentes, C. Effects of different repeated sprint-training frequencies in youth soccer players. Biol. Sport. 2019, 36, 257–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Rey, E.; Padrón-Cabo, A.; Fernández-Penedo, D. Effects of Sprint Training With and Without Weighted Vest on Speed and Repeated Sprint Ability in Male Soccer Players. J. Strength Cond. Res. 2017, 31, 2659–2666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Borges, J.H.; Conceicão, M.S.; Vechin, F.C.; Pascoal, E.H.F.; Silva, R.P.; Borin, J.P. The effects of resisted sprint vs. plyometric training on sprint performance and repeated sprint ability during the final weeks of the youth soccer season. Sci. Sport. 2016, 31, e101–e105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Buchheit, M.; Mendez-Villanueva, A.; Delhomel, G.; Brughelli, M.; Ahmaidi, S. Improving repeated sprint ability in young elite soccer players: Repeated shuttle sprints vs. explosive strength training. J. Strength Cond. Res. 2010, 24, 2715–2722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Chtara, M.; Rouissi, M.; Haddad, M.; Chtara, H.; Chaalali, A.; Owen, A.; Chamari, K. Specific physical trainability in elite young soccer players: Efficiency over 6 weeks’ in-season training. Biol. Sport. 2017, 34, 137–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Eniseler, N.; Şahan, Ç.; Özcan, I.; Dinler, K. High-Intensity Small-Sided Games versus Repeated Sprint Training in Junior Soccer Players. J. Hum. Kinet. 2017, 60, 101–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Ferrari Bravo, D.; Impellizzeri, F.M.; Rampinini, E.; Castagna, C.; Bishop, D.; Wisloff, U. Sprint vs. interval training in soccer. Int. J. Sport. Med. 2008, 29, 668–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Hill-Haas, S.V.; Coutts, A.J.; Rowsell, G.J.; Dawson, B.T. Generic versus small-sided game training in soccer. Int. J. Sport. Med. 2009, 30, 636–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Iaia, F.M.; Fiorenza, M.; Perri, E.; Alberti, G.; Millet, G.P.; Bangsbo, J. The Effect of Two Speed Endurance Training Regimes on Performance of Soccer Players. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0138096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ingebrigtsen, J.; Shalfawi, S.A.; Tønnessen, E.; Krustrup, P.; Holtermann, A. Performance effects of 6 weeks of aerobic production training in junior elite soccer players. J. Strength Cond. Res. 2013, 27, 1861–1867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Negra, Y.; Chaabene, H.; Fernandez-Fernandez, J.; Sammoud, S.; Bouguezzi, R.; Prieske, O.; Granacher, U. Short-Term Plyometric Jump Training Improves Repeated-Sprint Ability in Prepuberal Male Soccer Players. J. Strength Cond. Res. 2020, 34, 3241–3249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Spineti, J.; Figueiredo, T.; Bastos DEOliveira, V.; Assis, M.; Fernandes De Oliveira, L.; Miranda, H.; Machado DERibeiro Reis, V.M.; Simão, R. Comparison between traditional strength training and complex contrast training on repeated sprint ability and muscle architecture in elite soccer players. J. Sport. Med. Phys. Fit. 2016, 56, 1269–1278. [Google Scholar]
  43. Tønnessen, E.; Shalfawi, S.A.; Haugen, T.; Enoksen, E. The effect of 40-m repeated sprint training on maximum sprinting speed, repeated sprint speed endurance, vertical jump, and aerobic capacity in young elite male soccer players. J. Strength Cond. Res. 2011, 25, 2364–2370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Hammami, M.; Negra, Y.; Aouadi, R.; Shephard, R.J.; Chelly, M.S. Effects of an In-season Plyometric Training Program on Repeated Change of Direction and Sprint Performance in the Junior Soccer Player. J. Strength Cond. Res. 2016, 30, 3312–3320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Hammami, M.; Negra, Y.; Shephard, R.J.; Chelly, M.S. The Effect of Standard Strength vs. Contrast Strength Training on the Development of Sprint, Agility, Repeated Change of Direction, and Jump in Junior Male Soccer Players. J. Strength Cond. Res. 2017, 31, 901–912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Hammami, M.; Negra, Y.; Billaut, F.; Hermassi, S.; Shephard, R.J.; Chelly, M.S. Effects of Lower-Limb Strength Training on Agility, Repeated Sprinting With Changes of Direction, Leg Peak Power, and Neuromuscular Adaptations of Soccer Players. J. Strength Cond. Res. 2018, 32, 37–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Trajković, N.; Gušić, M.; Molnar, S.; Mačak, D.; Madić, D.M.; Bogataj, Š. Short-Term FIFA 11+ Improves Agility and Jump Performance in Young Soccer Players. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Mohr, M.; Krustrup, P.; Bangsbo, J. Match performance of high-standard soccer players with special reference to development of fatigue. J. Sport. Sci. 2003, 21, 519–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Boisseau, N.; Delamarche, P. Metabolic and hormonal responses to exercise in children and adolescents. Sport. Med. 2000, 30, 405–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Beneke, R.; Hutler, M.; Leithauser, R.M. Anaerobic performance and metabolism in boys and male adolescents. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 2007, 101, 671–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Riddell, M.C. The endocrine response and substrate utilization during exercise in children and adolescents. J. Appl. Physiol. 2008, 105, 725–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Lesinski, M.; Prieske, O.; Granacher, U. Effects and dose– response relationships of resistance training on physical performance in youth athletes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Br. J. Sport. Med. 2016, 50, 781–795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Lloyd, R.S.; Radnor, J.M.; Croix, M.B.D.S.; Cronin, J.B.; Oliver, J.L. Changes in sprint and jump performances after traditional, plyometric, and combined resistance training in male youth pre-and post-peak height velocity. J. Strength Cond. Res. 2016, 30, 1239–1247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Girard, O.; Mendez-Villanueva, A.; Bishop, D. Repeated-sprint ability—Part I: Factors contributing to fatigue. Sport. Med. 2011, 41, 673–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Spencer, M.; Bishop, D.; Dawson, B.; Goodman, C. Physiological and metabolic responses of repeated-sprint activities:specific to field-based team sports. Sport. Med. 2005, 35, 1025–1044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Rodas, G.; Ventura, J.L.; Cadefau, J.A.; Cussó, R.; Parra, J. A short training programme for the rapid improvement of both aerobic and anaerobic metabolism. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 2000, 82, 480–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Iaia, F.; Thomassen, M.; Kolding, H.; Gunnarsson, T.; Wendell, J.; Rostgaard, T.; Nordsborg, N.; Krustrup, P.; Nybo, L.; Hellsten, Y.; et al. Reduced volume but increased training intensity elevates muscle Na+-K+ pump alpha1-subunitand NHE1 expression as well as short-term work capacity in humans. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 2008, 294, R966–R974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Jensen, L.; Bangsbo, J.; Hellsten, Y. Effect of high intensity training on capillarization and presence of angiogenic factors in human skeletal muscle. J. Physiol. 2004, 557(Pt. 2), 571–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Clark, K.P.; Stearne, D.J.; Walts, C.T.; Miller, A.D. The longitudinal effects of resisted sprint training using weighted sleds vs. weighted vests. J. Strength Cond. Res. 2010, 24, 3287–3295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Cronin, J.; Hansen, K.T. Resisted sprint training for the acceleration phase of sprinting. Strength Cond. J. 2006, 28, 42–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Young, W.B.; McDowell, M.H.; Scarlett, B.J. Specificity of sprint and agility training methods. J. Strength Cond. Res. 2001, 15, 315–319. [Google Scholar]
  62. Petrakos, G.; Morin, J.B.; Egan, B. Resisted sled sprint training to improve sprint performance: A systematic review. Sport. Med. 2016, 46, 381–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Applsci 12 11803 g001 550
Figure 1. Study selection process.
Figure 1. Study selection process.
Applsci 12 11803 g001
Applsci 12 11803 g002 550
Figure 2. Effects of different training programs on RSA of soccer players.
Figure 2. Effects of different training programs on RSA of soccer players.
Applsci 12 11803 g002
Table
Table 1. Characteristics and results of the studies in accordance with intervention program and age.
Table 1. Characteristics and results of the studies in accordance with intervention program and age.
StudyType of ExerciseSample SizeAgeLevelWeeks of TrainingFrequency/
Week		Total TrainingsPreSDPostSDPercent ChangeQualitative Inference
Specific—with sprint exercises
Borges et al., 2016 [33]Resisted sprint916.6 ± 0.6 72147.70±0.147.57±0.15−1.69Moderate
Plyometric11 72147.55±0.227.51±0.31−0.53Trivial
Buchheit et al., 2010 [34]RSA714.5 ± 0.5El.101106.18±0.26.00±0.15−2.91Moderate
RSA7101106.35±0.26.18±0.14−2.68Moderate
Explosive strength8101106.09±0.256.08±0.18−0.16Trivial
Explosive strength8101106.28±0.226.23±0.20−0.8Small
Bujalance-Moreno et al., 2018 [27]SSG1220.9 ± 4.5Rec6212 −3.35Moderate
Control116212 −1.33Small
Campos-Vasquez et al., 2015 [28]Strength1018.1 ± 0.8 82167.40±0.187.36±0.14−0.54Small
Strength–COD–sled towing11 82167.42±0.157.39±0.16−0.40Trivial
Chtara et al., 2017 [35]Plyometric1013.6 ± 0.3El.6166.51±0.286.46±0.28−0.77Trivial
Agility106166.53±0.266.47±0.25−0.92Small
RSA126166.53±0.136.42±0.14−1.68Moderate
Control106166.56±0.226.57±0.230.15Trivial
Dello Iacono et al., 2019 [29]Game-profile-based1018.6 ± 0.6El.82165.48±0.175.24±0.12−4.38Large
SSG1082165.48±0.145.23±0.10−4.56Large
Eniseler et al., 2017 [36]RSA916.9 ± 1.1El.62127.13±0.177.13±0.210N.D.
SSG1062127.12±0.177.22±0.201.40Small
Ferrari Bravo et al., 2008 [37]RSA2120.8 ± 3.0El./Am72147.53±0.217.37±0.17−2.12Moderate
HI aerobic interval21 2147.42±0.227.40±0.22−0.27Trivial
Hill-Haas et al., 2009 [38] Generic training914.6 ± 0.9El.721442.2±1.842.3±1.50.24Trivial
SSG10721442.1±1.142.0±1.4−0.24Trivial
Iaia et al., 2015 [39]Speed end. Passive rec618.5 ± 1.0Prof33986.09±6.383.97±4.72−2.46Small
Speed end. Active rec733983.81±2.3784.65±2.271.00Small
Iaia et al., 2017 [30]RSA 15 s rest1017.0 ± 1.0Subel.52892.91±4.6690.47±4.24−2.63Small
RSA 30 s rest1052891.45±4.3588.22±4.65−3.53Moderate
Ingebrigtsen et al., 2013 [40]Anaerobic speed endurance816.9 ± 0.6El.62125.49±0.155.44±0.17−0.91Small
Control11862125.85±0.35.49±0.29−6.15Moderate
Negra et al., 2020 [41]Plyometric1312.7 ± 0.2El.821648.8±2.247.8±2.5−2.05Small
Control11821651.5±1.452.2±1.61.36Small
Speed end. Active rec7Prof33983.81±2.3784.65±2.271.00Small
Rey et al., 2017 [32]Resisted sprint1023.7 ± 4.5Am.621219.77±0.4618.30±0.74−7.44Large
Unresisted sprint9621219.53±0.9517.71±0.64−9.32Large
Rey et al., 2019 [31]RSA 1 d/w1312.3 ± 0.5 6164.2±0.174.12±0.20−1.90Small
RSA 2 d/w14 62124.2±0.204.08±0.19−2.86Small
Spineti et al., 2018 [42]Strength complex contrast1018.4 ± 0.4El.83247.430.10±7.33±0.12−1.35Moderate
Strength1283247.54±0.237.47±0.24±−0.93Small
Tonnessen et al., 2011 [43]RSA1016.4 ± 0.9El.101105.42±0.185.30±0.14−2.21Moderate
Control10101105.41±0.195.35±0.18−1.11Small
Nonspecific—without sprint exercises
Hammami et al., 2016 [44] Plyometric1515.7 ± 0.2 821646.38±1.3645.10±1.77−2.76Moderate
Control1315.8 ± 0.2 821645.64±2.3345.66±2.290.04Trivial
Hammami et al., 2017 [45]Strength contrast1616.0 ± 0.5 82167.64±0.207.46±0.13−2.36Moderate
Strength16 82167.68±0.137.60±0.17−1.04Small
Control12 82167.71±0.397.62±0.40−1.17Small
Hammami et al., 2018 [46]Strength1916.2 ± 0.6 82167.70±0.147.61±0.17−1.17Moderate
Control1215.8 ± 0.2 82167.63±0.307.53±0.30−1.31Small
Negra et al., 2020 [41]Plyometric1312.7 ± 0.2El.821648.8±2.247.8±2.5−2.05Small
Control11821651.5±1.452.2±1.61.36Small
Trajkovic et al., 2020 [47]FIFA11+1911.2 ± 0.8 431260.63±3.9861.66±8.21.70Small
Control1710.9 ± 0.8 431258.86±3.4059.29±3.40.73Trivial
Am.: Amateur; El.: Elite; Rec.: Recreational; Subel.: Subelite; Prof.: Professional; COD: Change of direction; RSA: Repeated sprint ability; SSG: Small-sided games; d/w: Days per week; End.: Endurance; Rrec.: Recovery; areas with gray highlight the studies performed with adults.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Michailidis, Y. The Effectiveness of Different Training Methods in Soccer for Repeated Sprint Ability: A Brief Review. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 11803. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/app122211803

AMA Style

Michailidis Y. The Effectiveness of Different Training Methods in Soccer for Repeated Sprint Ability: A Brief Review. Applied Sciences. 2022; 12(22):11803. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/app122211803

Chicago/Turabian Style

Michailidis, Yiannis. 2022. "The Effectiveness of Different Training Methods in Soccer for Repeated Sprint Ability: A Brief Review" Applied Sciences 12, no. 22: 11803. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/app122211803

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop