Next Article in Journal
Simulation Study of Vertical p–n Junction Photodiodes’ Optical Performance According to CMOS Technology
Next Article in Special Issue
Effect of Hemp Seed Oil Addition on the Rheological Properties of Dough and Bread
Previous Article in Journal
Plant Growth Promoting Microorganisms Useful for Soil Desalinization
Previous Article in Special Issue
Physico-Chemical and Sensory Quality of Oven-Dried and Dehydrator-Dried Apples of the Starkrimson, Golden Delicious and Florina Cultivars
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Study on Contamination with Some Mycotoxins in Maize and Maize-Derived Foods

Faculty of Food Engineering, Stefan cel Mare University of Suceava, 720229 Suceava, Romania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 17 January 2022 / Revised: 24 February 2022 / Accepted: 28 February 2022 / Published: 2 March 2022

Abstract

:
Crops can be contaminated by fungi which produce mycotoxins. Many fungal strains are responsible for producing varied mycotoxins. The research carried out so far has described over 400 different mycotoxins. They have chemical and physical properties that significantly differ, and they are produced by several different existing fungi. The intake of mycotoxins through food can be achieved directly, by feeding on contaminated food, or indirectly from foods of animal origin. The mycotoxin contamination of food and food products for certain animals is a phenomenon studied worldwide, in countries in Europe but also in Asia, Africa and America. The purpose of this study is to develop an evaluation of the mycotoxins prevalent in corn and corn-derived products produced in Romania. A total of 38 maize samples and 19 corn-derivative samples were investigated for the presence of mycotoxins specific to these products, such as deoxynivalenol, zearalenone and fumonisins. Fumonisins had the highest presence and zearalenone had the lowest. The limits determined for the three mycotoxins were always in accordance with legal regulations.

1. Introduction

Corn (Zea mays L.) is native to Central America, cultivated worldwide as a food, industrial and fodder plant and was first mentioned in Romania in the late seventeenth century. Maize is a plant of the Poaceae family. The annual harvest of maize in 2020 was 1192 million tons, as maize is one of the most commonly used cereals in food [1]. Mycotoxins infect corn in the field or during the storage stage [2]. Mycotoxin contamination is the main problem with maize production. Mycotoxins are formed by filamentous fungi of the genus Ascomycota, which affects human and animal health and causes chronic and acute diseases [3,4,5,6]. Corn is most frequently contaminated by Aspergillus sp. and Fusarium sp. [7].
The most important mycotoxins that contaminate maize throughout its development cycle and storage period are fumonisins (FUM), deoxynivalenol (DON) and zearalenone (ZEA) [8]. Fumonisins are formed by Fusarium verticillioides, F. proliferatum and F. fujikuroi; zearalenone are formed by Fusarium graminearum, F. culmorum, F. cerealis and F. equiseti; deoxynivalenol are produced by Fusarium graminearum and F. culmorum [9]. The development of fungi and, by extension, mycotoxins, is favored by high temperatures, high humidity and prolonged storage [10]. The possibility of mycotoxin production rises if inappropriate agricultural practices are applied.
Mycotoxins cannot be detected in the visible field (VIS) but can be recognized in ultraviolet (UV) light; moreover, they do not have a distinctive smell and do not change the organoleptic properties of foodstuff [11]. The consumption of corn contaminated with mycotoxins by humans or animals can generate multiple serious toxic effects [12]. Exposure to mycotoxins leads to mycotoxicosis (ergotism, food poisoning and aflatoxins), a disease affecting human organs which, under certain conditions, may cause death [11,13]. Mycotoxicosis may be acute or chronic [2]. The main ways of exposing the human body to mycotoxins are by ingestion, inhalation and contact.
The European Union has established by legislation limits on the content of mycotoxins in all categories of foodstuffs, including corn and corn-derived aliments, to protect the population’s health. Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006 [14] sets the maximum levels for aflatoxins, fumonisins, zearalenone and deoxynivalenol in food. This regulation was amended by (EC) Regulation No. 1126/2007 [15] and (EC) Regulation No. 165/2010 [16]. Prevention, detoxification and decontamination measures are needed to combat mycotoxin contamination of food [17]. The objective of this study is to assess the contamination with three mycotoxins, namely deoxynivalenol, zearalenone and fumonisins, of maize and maize-derived products from local producers in the eastern part of Romania.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Biological Material

For the study of the deoxynivalenol, zearalenone and fumonisin contamination of corn and corn-derived foods, 57 samples were taken from the Romanian market, from the local producers of corn or corn products (breakfast cereals, cornflakes, canned corn, puffs and puff pastry). The grain maize samples were taken from various producers in eastern Romania. Samples were taken after the harvesting and drying of corn kernels and before storing them in silos. A total of 38 samples of grain maize were analyzed: 16 samples for the detection of deoxynivalenol, 12 samples for the detection of zearalenone and 10 samples for the investigation of fumonisins. The samples of food products derived from corn were taken from local producers in the eastern part of Romania and all products were autochthonous. A total of 19 samples were analyzed: 5 samples for the detection of deoxynivalenol (2 samples of corn flakes and 3 samples of maize breakfast cereals), 10 samples for the investigation of zearalenone (3 samples of preserved maize, 3 samples of corn flakes, 3 samples of maize breakfast cereals and 1 sample puffed) and 4 samples for the detection of fumonisins (2 canned maize samples and 2 corn flakes samples).

2.2. Sampling Method

Mycotoxins are distributed unevenly in a product, so every measure was taken at sampling so to ensure that the sample was representative. In the case of the grain maize samples, a number of 100 incremental samples were taken, making up the 10 kg aggregate sample. For products derived from maize, 3 incremental samples were taken each, making up the aggregate sample, weighing 1 kg. The analysis of the samples was made in one replication. When selecting a sample for the determination of a particular mycotoxin, the evaluations performed by each economic operator in the previous years regarding the risk of mycotoxins were taken into account, while also taking into account the mycotoxin most frequently identified in the previous years.

2.3. Laboratory Method

ELISA (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay) kits provided by ProGnosis Biotech S.A were utilized to analyze the content of deoxynivalenol, zearalenone and fumonisins in the samples. The kits conformed to the specifications of EN ISO 14675: 2003. ProGnosis Biotech S.A is ISO 9001: 2015 was certified by TÜV Hellas (TÜV NORD). Bio-Shield deoxynivalenol, B2648/B2696, Bio-Shield zearalenone, B2748/B2796 and Bio-Shield fumonisin, B2848/B2896, are ELISA tests used to establish the content of deoxynivalenol, zearalenone and fumonisins in food and animal feed [18]. Other materials utilized include a grinding device, balance, graduated cylinder, distilled water, filter paper, filter funnel, laboratory tubes, micropipettes, mixer and spectrophotometer. The aggregate sample was homogenized and ground in the laboratory. The toxins were extracted from the sample ground with distilled water; the sample was then ground to obtain fine particles weighing 20 g and then added to 100 mL of distilled water. The mixture obtained was homogenized with the mixer, filtered and diluted 5 times with distilled water. The standards of the mycotoxin or the samples, and the detection solution, were added to padded wells. The enzyme conjugate and antimycotoxin antibodies were added to each well and incubated for 5 min at room temperature. Discard the liquid from the wells, add the wash buffer, then incubate the chromogenic substrate for 3 min in the dark at room temperature. The conjugate connects to the antibody, and the accession places padding not already occupied by mycotoxin in standards or samples. The addition of a chromogen substrate leads to the appearance of a blue complex. Sulfuric acid must be added, which stops the development of the color, which becomes yellow. The photometric reading was made at 450 nm [19,20,21]. The competitive format of the ELISA was the most used [22].

2.4. Statistical Analysis

All results are presented as mean standard deviation. The values obtained were processed by using the SPSS 25.0 (trial version) software (IBM, New York, NY, USA). The difference between the samples was established by an analysis of variance (ANOVA) using the Turkey’s test at a 5% significance level.

3. Results

3.1. Deoxynivalenol

Deoxynivalenol (Figure 1) is also named vomitoxin and it is produced by the Fusarium species, which is adapted to various pedoclimatic conditions, and found in Romania in the plateaus of Moldova and Dobrogea or in the wetlands of the Danube Delta. Fusarium graminearum can infect maize and wheat, but it was also isolated from rice, coffee, peas and tomatoes [23,24]. Fusarium culmorum can infect plants of the Gramineae family (wheat, rye, rice, oats and corn) but also plants of the Solanaceae, Leguminosae and Cucurbitaceae family. Deoxynivalenol is one of the least toxic of the trichothecenes, and its appearance is common, but in combination with other mycotoxins (fumonisins, T2 toxin and beauvericin) it can have much more serious effects [25].
Deoxynivalenol is a very stable trichothecene at high temperatures of 120 °C, and less stable at 180 °C. It may be dissolved in water, ethanol, methanol, chloroform, acetonitrile and ethyl acetate [26].
Analyzing the results presented in Table 1 and Figure 2 and Figure 3, we can say that in 25% of the analyzed samples of corn grains, deoxynivalenol was identified in 20% of the samples of corn products. The determined values do not exceed the limits established by Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006 with the subsequent modifications (for maize grains, the maximum of 1750 µg/kg, and for maize-derived foods, the maximum of 500 µg/kg). The deoxynivalenol level is 200 µg/kg in cereal-based aliments for children, 750 µg/kg in pasta and 500 µg/kg in bread [24]. The EFSA recently established a PMTDI of 1 µg/kg bw/day for deoxynivalenol and its metabolites [27,28].
The difference between the samples analyzed was significantly different (95% confidence level). In the maize category, the results obtained for samples 1, 7, 8 and 16 are not significant. The same was observed for samples 3, 5, 6, 9, 11, 13, 14 and 15. On the other hand the results obtained for the remaining four samples (samples 2, 4, 10, 12) are significantly different (p < 0.5%). The two cornflakes samples presented similar results. From the three breakfast cereals studied, only one (sample 2) was found to be significantly different (at 95% confidence level).
Deoxynivalenol is the most commonly identified mycotoxin in cereals, with a mean percentage between 50% and 76% in Asia and Africa. Higher concentrations have been identified in Europe and Asia [29]. In North America, the reported deoxynivalenol levels are similar to those in the rest of the world. Increased levels of deoxynivalenol are recorded in years of severe infections caused by Fusarium sp. [30].
Exposure to deoxynivalenol is usually made by aliments. The intake of contaminated foodstuffs may cause nausea, vomiting, inappetence and diarrhea. When foodstuffs consumed daily, for a longer period of time, are contaminated by deoxynivalenol, manifestations such as weight decline, anorexia and histopathological lesions in the liver occur [23]. In India, the intake of contaminated food has led to acute gastric symptoms, vomiting and diarrhea [4]. There is no evidence for the carcinogenic potential of deoxynivalenol, which is why the IARC classifies this mycotoxin as noncarcinogenic to humans (Group 3) [31].
For the deoxynivalenol parameter in samples in Romania, the determined values, compared to other studies in other parts of the globe, as presented in Table 2, are low. Moreover, the incidence in food samples is reduced.

3.2. Zearalenone

Fusarium fungi produce zearalenone (Figure 4), and the main species producing zearalenone are F. roseum, F. tricinctum, F. oxysporum, F. graminearum, F. moniliforme, F. culmorum, F. avenaceum, F. crookwellense, F. nivale, F. semitectum, F. solani and F. echiseti, which are spread throughout the world, especially in temperate climates [1,39]. Zearalenone infection is reduced in cereals at harvest and raises in storage conditions if humidity reaches 30–40% [1]. Zearalenone is stable at high temperatures (80 °C–120 °C) and in neutral media. It may be dissolved in methyl chloride, dimethylformamide alcohols and ethers [40].
The maximum levels of zearalenone are established by Regulation (EC) 1881/2006 for several food categories: 350 µf/kg maize, other cereals 100 µg/kg, bread, pastry, breakfast cereals 50 µg/kg and food for infants 20 µg/kg [41,42,43].
From all the maize samples, only 12 are significantly different (p < 0.05%). No significant difference was found at a 95% confidence level between the cornflakes, breakfast cereals and puffs samples. Moreover, the results obtained showed no significant difference (p < 0.05%) for the maize and canned corn samples.
The study on the presence of zearalenone was performed on 22 samples of corn grains and corn products (canned corn, corn flakes, breakfast cereals and puff pastry) produced in Romania, as presented in Table 3. Of the 12 corn samples analyzed, 8% were contaminated with zearalenone, and none of the samples of the maize-based foods were contaminated with zearalenone. The determined values did not exceed the maximum limit established by Regulation (EU) No. 1881/2006 (for maize grains, the maximum of 350 µg/kg and for food based on maize, the maximum of 50–100 µg/kg), as presented in Figure 5 and Figure 6.
Risk assessments for the intake of foods contaminated with zearalenone have been performed based on existing exposure data from countries in Europe and Asia. Studies have identified several situations where the daily intake of zearalenone exceeds the TDI as stated by the European Union [43]. According to the IARC, zearalenone is a Group 3 carcinogen [34]. Zearalenone is the lactone of resorcin acid whose chemical structure resembles that of steroid hormones. Zearalenone has nonsteroidal estrogenic action and affects the conception, ovulation and development of the fetus at concentrations over 1 mg/kg [44]. Zearalenone can cause hyperestrogenism and it primarily affects reproductive functions.
Table 4 shows the specific studies on the presence of zearalenone in maize and maize-derived foods worldwide from 2014 to 2020. The determined values, compared to other studies in other areas of the globe, as presented in Table 4, are low. Moreover, the incidence in food samples is reduced.

3.3. Fumonisins

Fumonisins (Figure 7 and Figure 8) are also called Fusarium toxins. The main producing species for fumonisins are Fusarium verticillioides, F. proliferatum, F. sacchari, F. fujikuroi and F. subglutinans. [49]. The twenty-eight fumonisin analogs identified so far are split into four groups: fumonisins A, B, C and P. Group Fumonisins B includes FB1, FB2 and FB3. Of these, FB1 is the most frequent and has the highest concentrations [50]. Fumonisins have been identified in several food categories including cereals [51], foods derived from cereals [52,53], asparagus, garlic [54], grapes, beer, milk and raisins [55].
The study on the presence of fumonisins was performed on 14 samples of maize and maize-derived foods (canned corn and corn flakes) produced in Romania, as presented in Table 5.
From all the maize samples, samples 4, 5 and 6 are not significantly different (p < 0.05%). All the other samples are significantly different from each other. No significant (at 95% confidence level) difference was found between the canned corn samples. The result obtained for the two cornflakes samples showed a significant difference (p < 0.05%) between them.
The mycotoxins identified in this research, in the largest percentage of the analyzed samples (70%), were fumonisins, as presented in Figure 9 and Figure 10. The determined values are within the allowed legal limits. In 70% of the samples of unprocessed corn, fumonisins were detected; in those of products processed from corn, only 25% indicated their presence.
JECFA has provisionally settled a PMTDI of 2 µg/kg bw/day for fumonisins alone or in combination [56]. The maximum levels of fumonisins are set by Regulation (EC) 1881/2006 for several food categories: 4000 µg/kg for maize, 800 µg/kg for breakfast cereals and 200 µg/kg for food for children [57].
The fumonisin values from the samples investigated, compared to samples from other areas of the globe, as shown in Table 6, are higher. The impact on the food samples in Romania is also higher.

4. Discussion

Strategies to prevent mycotoxin contamination prior to harvesting are particularly important. Good agricultural practices and good production practices are used by producers around the world. Crop rotation, the use of approved substances such as herbicides, fungicides and insecticides (insects are vectors for fungal dissemination) and storage in appropriate conditions for temperature and humidity contributes substantially to reducing the risk of contamination of cereals in the first stages of the food chain [62,63]. The implementation of HACCP (hazard analysis and critical control points), through clear instructions for monitoring the presence and level of mycotoxins in food, allows safe foods to be placed on the market.
One of the greatest dangers associated with food safety is mycotoxins. They have negative effects on all biological systems, from affecting clinical conditions, cellular systems and the metabolism, to decreased animal production. Mycotoxins cause major economic losses through direct action, inducing disease indirectly through damage to the immune system, or qualitatively affecting contaminated products.
The world’s need for goods commonly used in the manufacture of food for humans and animals, such as corn, has grown constantly in the last years due to higher demand from manufacturers and consumers. The RASFF annual report (Rapid Alert System for Food and Feed) for 2020 presents 400 notifications regarding mycotoxin (down by 23%) contamination of food products in the European Union [64]. Aflatoxins are the most detected mycotoxins in food in the EU (367 notifications), also detected in dried figs from Turkey (58 notifications) and followed by groundnuts from the United States (29 notifications) [64]. The formation of mycotoxins is a composite process influenced by a multitude of factors, mainly environmental conditions under the influence of climate change.
Comparing the results of this study with previous research, for deoxynivalenol, the incidence in the analyzed samples is 25% for maize, while in Hungary the incidence of deoxynivalenol is 86% [33]; in Belgium, the incidence in the studies carried out varies from 64.7% to 92.3% or 100% [34]. Studies carried out in Germany and Switzerland show a deoxynivalenol incidence of 100%, while in China the incidence is 65.9% [35,36,37]. For the analyzed products derived from maize, the incidence of deoxynivalenol was 20%, while other studies show an incidence of 40% for maize flakes and 42.9% for maize flour in Serbia, and 100% for pastry products in Brazil [32,38]. The maximum value identified for deoxynivalenol in this maize study is 152.2 µg/kg, well below the maximum values identified in other studies, while it is 9843.3 µg/kg in China and 5322.4 µg/kg in Belgium [34,37]. In products derived from maize, deoxynivalenol had a maximum of 63.99 µg/kg; other studies indicate a maximum of 931 µg/kg in Serbia and 1720 µg/kg in Brazil [32,38].
In the tested samples of maize, the incidence for zearalenone was 8%. In previous studies on maize, zearalenone had an incidence of 0% in Serbia [45], 13.6% and 94% in China [48], 33.34% in Egypt [47], 40.7%–64.8% in Belgium [34], 41% in Hungary [33] and more than 90% in Germany and Brazil [35,46]. The average value of zearalenone in the Romanian sample was 3.44 µg/kg. Other studies have identified lower average values, such as 2.39 µg/kg or higher in Egypt and 175.5 µg/kg in Belgium [34,47]. The highest zearalenone content in a tested sample was 18.565 µg/kg, while other studies indicate maximum values of 3613 µg/kg [35].
For fumonisins, the incidence in this study was 70% for maize and 25% for products derived from maize. In previous studies, fumonisin incidences ranged from 2.5% in Belgium to 100% in Serbia, Italy, Spain and Canada [34,45,58,59,60]. The average fumonisin value in the tested samples of maize was 154.55 µg/kg. Other studies have identified an average for fumonisins from 1.5 µg/kg to 10,900 µg/kg [34,58]. For the analyzed products derived from maize, the average value of fumonisins was 37.68 µg/kg. Other studies have identified an average of fumonisins between 14.2 µg/kg and 104.1 µg/kg in corn flakes [59,61].

5. Conclusions

In the present research, regarding contamination with deoxynivalenol, zearalenone and fumonisins in maize and local maize-derived foods, the levels of the three mycotoxins investigated have always been within legal limits. From the three mycotoxins investigated, fumonisins were those with the highest presence, contaminating 70% of the corn samples analyzed. Deoxynivalenol contaminated 25% of the corn samples investigated and zearalenone had the lowest percentage (8%), with the risk of contamination being minimal. Regarding the samples of maize-based foods investigated, fumonisins were detected in 25% of the samples, deoxynivalenol was detected in 20% of the samples and no sample was contaminated with zearalenone.
The investigations carried out in this study, and the comparisons with previously published studies, provide information on the contamination of maize-based foods in Romania by three of the most important mycotoxins, as well as information on their overall distribution. The low percentage of foodstuffs derived from maize contaminated by mycotoxins identified in this study shows that good manufacturing practices are essential for safe food production.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.M. and S.A., methodology, A.M. and S.A., software, S.A., validation, A.M. and S.A., formal analysis A.M. and S.A., investigation A.M., resources A.M. and S.A., data curation, A.M. and S.A., writing—original draft preparation A.M., writing—review and editing, A.M. and S.A., visualization A.M., supervision, S.A., project administration S.A., funding acquisition S.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by “Stefan cel Mare”, University of Suceava.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by “Stefan cel Mare”, University of Suceava.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Statistic Division. Available online: https://www.fao.org/worldfoodsituation/csdb/en/ (accessed on 28 October 2021).
  2. Smith, L.E.; Stoltzfus, R.J.; Prendergast, A. Food chain mycotoxin exposure, gut health, and impaired growth: A conceptual framework. Adv. Nutr. 2012, 3, 526–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Tola, M.; Kebede, B. Occurrence, importance and control of mycotoxins: A review. Cogent Food Agric. 2016, 2, 1191103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Misihairabgwi, J.M.; Ezekiel, C.N.; Sulyok, M.; Shephard, G.S.; Krska, R. Mycotoxin contamination of foods in Southern Africa: A 10-year review (2007–2016). Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2019, 59, 43–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Alshannaq, A.; Yu, J.H. Occurrence, toxicity, and analysis of major mycotoxins in food. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2017, 14, 632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Mousavi Khaneghah, A.; Fakhri, Y.; Gahruie, H.H.; Niakousari, M.; Sant’Ana, A.S. Mycotoxins in cereal-based products during 24 years (1983–2017): A global systematic review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 91, 95–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Nyangi, C.; Mugula, J.K.; Beed, F.; Boni, S.; Koyano, E.; Sulyok, M. Aflatoxins and fumonisin contamination of marketed maize, maize bran and maize used as animal feed in northern tanzania. Afr. J. Food Sci. 2016, 16, 11054–11065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Mannaa, M.; Kim, K.D. Influence of temperature and water activity on deleterious fungi and mycotoxin production during grain storage. Mycobiology 2007, 45, 240–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Chulze, S. Strategies to reduce mycotoxin levels in maize during storage: A review. Food Addit. Contam. 2010, 27, 651–657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Bennett, J.W. Mycotoxins, mycotoxicoses, mycotoxicology and Mycopathologia. Mycopathologia 1987, 100, 3–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Winter, G.; Pereg, L. A review on the relation between soil and mycotoxins: Effect of aflatoxin on field, food and finance. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 2019, 70, 882–897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. International Agency for Research on Cancer. Monograph on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risk to Humans, World Health Organization, Some Traditional Herbal Medicines, Some Mycotoxins, Naphthalene and StyreneIn Summary of data Reported and Evaluation; IARC: Lion, France, 2002; Volume 82, pp. 171–175. [Google Scholar]
  13. Ostry, V.; Malir, F.; Toman, J.; Grosse, Y. Mycotoxins as human carcinogens—The IARC Monographs classification. Mycotoxin Res. 2017, 33, 65–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. European Commission. Regulation No 1881/2006 setting maximum levels for certain contaminants foodstus. Off. J. Eur. Union 2006, 50, 8–12. [Google Scholar]
  15. European Commission. Regulation No 1126/2007 amending Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 setting maximum levels for certain contaminants in foodstuffs as regards Fusarium toxins in maize and maize products. Off. J. Eur. Union 2007, 255, 14. [Google Scholar]
  16. European Commission. Regulation No 165/2010 amending Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 setting maximum levels for certain contaminants in foodstuffs as regards aflatoxins. Off. J. Eur. Union 2010, 50, 8–12. [Google Scholar]
  17. Agriopoulou, S.; Stamatelopoulou, E.; Varzakas, T. Advances in Occurrence, Importance, and Mycotoxin Control Strategies: Prevention and Detoxification in Foods. Foods 2020, 9, 137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Amariei, S.; Mihalcea, A. Study on Ochratoxin A and Zearalenone content in corn grains from different areas of Bacau county. Food Environ. Saf. 2020, 19, 116–121. [Google Scholar]
  19. Pereira, V.L.; Fernandes, J.O.; Cunha, S.C. Mycotoxins in cereals and related foodstus: A review on occurrence and recent methods of analysis. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2014, 36, 96–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Xie, L.; Chen, M.; Ying, Y. Development of Methods for Determination of Aflatoxins. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2016, 56, 2642–2664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Dzuman, Z.; Zachariasova, M.; Lacina, O.; Veprikova, Z.; Slavikova, P.; Hajslova, J. A rugged high-throughput analytical approach for the determination and quantification of multiple mycotoxins in complex feed matrices. Talanta 2014, 121, 263–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Santos Pereira, C.; C Cunha, S.; Fernandes, J.O. Prevalent Mycotoxins in Animal Feed: Occurrence and Analytical Methods. Toxins 2019, 11, 290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. European Food Safety Authority. Deoxynivalenol in food and feed: Occurrence and exposure. EFSA J. 2013, 11, 3379. [Google Scholar]
  24. Pascari, X.; Marín, S.; Ramos, A.J.; Molino, F.; Sanchis, V. Deoxynivalenol in cereal-based baby food production process. A review. Food Control 2019, 99, 11–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Udovicki, B.; Audenaert, K.; De Saeger, S.; Rajkovic, A. Overview on the mycotoxins incidence in Serbia in the period 2004–2016. Toxins 2018, 10, 279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Ji, F.; Xu, J.; Liu, X.; Yin, X.; Shi, J. Natural occurrence of deoxynivalenol and zearalenone in wheat from Jiangsu province, China. Food Chem. 2014, 157, 393–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Joint Food and Agriculture Organization; World Health Organization Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA). Evaluation of Certain Food Additives and Contaminants (Seventy-third Report of the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Current Additives); WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2010; p. 227. [Google Scholar]
  28. European Food Safety Authority. Risks to human and animal health related to the presence of deoxynivalenol and its acetylated and modified forms in food and feed. EFSA J. 2017, 15, 4718. [Google Scholar]
  29. Lee, H.J.; Ryu, D. Worldwide Occurrence of Mycotoxins in Cereals and Cereal-Derived Food Products: Public Health Perspectives of Their Co-occurrence. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2017, 65, 7034–7051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Bianchini, A.; Horsley, R.; Jack, M.M.; Kobielush, B.; Ryu, D.; Tittlemier, S.; Wilson, W.W.; Abbas, H.K.; Abel, S.; Harrison, G.; et al. DON Occurrence in Grains: A North American Perspective. Cereal Foods World 2015, 60, 32–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). Some naturally occurring substances: Food items and constituents, heterocyclic aromatic amines and mycotoxins. In IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Rirsks to Humans; World Health Organization: Lyon, France, 1993; Volume 56, pp. 1–609. [Google Scholar]
  32. Torovi’c, L. Fusarium toxins in corn food products: A survey of the Serbian retail market. Food Addit. Contam. Part A Chem. Anal. Control Exp. Risk Assess. 2018, 35, 1596–1609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Tima, H.; Brückner, A.; Mohácsi-Farkas, C.; Kiskó, G. Fusarium mycotoxins in cereals harvested from Hungarian fields. Food Addit. Contam. Part B Surveill. 2016, 9, 127–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Vandicke, J.; De Visschere, K.; Croubels, S.; De Saeger, S.; Audenaert, K.; Haesaert, G. Mycotoxins in Flanders’ Fields: Occurrence and Correlations with Fusarium Species in Whole-Plant Harvested Maize. Microorganisms 2019, 7, 571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Birr, T.; Jensen, T.; Preußke, N.; Sönnichsen, F.D.; De Boevre, M.; De Saeger, S.; Hasler, M.; Verreet, J.-A.; Klink, H. Occurrence of Fusarium Mycotoxins and Their Modified Forms in Forage Maize Cultivars. Toxins 2021, 13, 110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Eckard, S.; Wettstein, F.E.; Forrer, H.-R.; Vogelgsang, S. Incidence of Fusarium Species and Mycotoxins in Silage Maize. Toxins 2011, 3, 949–967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Xing, F.; Liu, X.; Wang, L.; Selvaraj, J.N.; Jin, N.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Liu, Y. Distribution and variation of fungi and major mycotoxins in pre-and post-nature drying maize in North China Plain. Food Control 2017, 80, 244–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. De Almeida, A.P.; Lamardo, L.C.A.; Shundo, L.; da Silva, S.A.; Navas, S.A.; Alaburda, J.; Ruvieri, V.; Sabino, M. Occurrence of deoxynivalenol in wheat flour, instant noodle and biscuits commercialized in Brazil. Food Addit. Contam. Part B Surveill. 2016, 9, 251–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Rai, A.; Das, M.; Tripathi, A. Occurrence and toxicity of a fusarium mycotoxin, zearalenone. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2020, 60, 2710–2729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Joint Food and Agriculture Organization; World Health Organization Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA). Evaluation of Certain Food Additives and Contaminants: Fifty-Fifth Report of the JOINT/FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2001; p. 701. [Google Scholar]
  41. Zinedine, A.; Soriano, J.M.; Moltó, J.C.; Mañes, J. Review on the toxicity, occurrence, metabolism, detoxification, regulations and intake of zearalenone: An oestrogenic mycotoxin. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2007, 45, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Ünüsan, N. Systematic review of mycotoxins in food and feeds in Turkey. Food Control 2019, 97, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. European Food Safety Authority. Scientific Opinion on the risks for human and animal health related to the presence of modeified forms of certain mycotoxins in food and feed. EFSA J. 2011, 9, 2197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Calori-Domingues, M.A.; Bernardi, C.M.G.; Nardin, M.S.; de Souza, G.V.; dos Santos, F.G.R.; de Abreu Stein, M.; da Gloria, E.M.; dos Santos Dias, C.T.; de Camargo, A.C. Co-occurrence and distribution of deoxynivalenol, nivalenol and zearalenone in wheat from Brazil. Food Addit. Contam. Part B Surveill. 2016, 9, 142–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Kos, J.; Hajnal, E.J.; Škrinjar, M.; Mišan, A.; Mandić, A.; Jovanov, P.; Milovanović, I. Presence of Fusarium toxins in maize from Autonomous Province of Vojvodina, Serbia. Food Control 2014, 46, 98–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Queiroz, V.A.V.; de Oliveira Alves, G.L.; da Conceição, R.R.P.; Guimarães, L.J.M.; Mendes, S.M.; de Aquino Ribeiro, P.E.; da Costa, R.V. Occurrence of fumonisins and zearalenone in maize stored in family farm in Minas Gerais, Brazil. Food Control 2012, 28, 83–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. El-Desouky, T.A.; Naguib, K. Occurrence of zearalenone contamination in some cereals in Egypt. J. Agroaliment. Process. Technol. 2013, 19, 445–450. [Google Scholar]
  48. Han, Z.; Jiang, K.; Fan, Z.; Di Mavungu, J.D.; Dong, M.; Guo, W.; Fan, K.; Campbell, K.; Zhao, Z.; Wu, Y. Multi-walled carbon nanotubes-based magnetic solid-phase extraction for the determination of zearalenone and its derivatives in maize by ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Food Control 2017, 79, 177–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Rheeder, J.P.; Marasas, W.F.O.; Vismer, H.F. Production of Fumonisin Analogs by Fusarium Species. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2002, 68, 2101–2105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  50. Alberts, J.F.; van Zyl, W.H.; Gelderblom, W.C.A. Biologically based methods for control of fumonisin-producing Fusarium species and reduction of the fumonisins. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 201600548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Li, L.; Chen, W.; Li, H.; Iqbal, J.; Zhu, Y.; Wu, T.; Du, Y. Rapid determination of fumonisin (FB1) by syringe SPE coupled with solid-phase fluorescence spectrometry. Spectrochim. Acta Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2020, 226, 117549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Cendoya, E.; Nichea, M.J.; Monge, M.P.; Sulyok, M.; Chiacchiera, S.M.; Ramirez, M.L. Fumonisin occurrence in wheat-based products from Argentina. Food Addit. Contam. Part B Surveill. 2019, 12, 31–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Cendoya, E.; Chiotta, M.L.; Zachetti, V.; Chulze, S.N.; Ramirez, M.L. Fumonisins and fumonisin-producing Fusarium occurrence in wheat and wheat by products: A review. J. Cereal Sci. 2018, 80, 158–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Stępień, Ł.; Waśkiewicz, A.; Urbaniak, M. Wildly Growing Asparagus (Asparagus ocinalis L.) Hosts Pathogenic Fusarium Species and Accumulates Their Mycotoxins. Microb. Ecol. 2016, 71, 927–937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Mogensen, J.M.; Frisvad, J.C.; Thrane, U.; Nielsen, K.F. Production of fumonisin B2 and B4 by aspergillus niger on grapes and raisins. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2010, 58, 954–958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. World Health Organization (WHO). Safety evaluation of certain mycotoxins in food (WHO food additives series 47). In International Programme on Chemical Safety; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2001; pp. 103–279. [Google Scholar]
  57. Anfossi, L.; Giovannoli, C.; Baggiani, C. Mycotoxin detection. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2016, 37, 120–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Berardo, N.; Lanzanova, C.; Locatelli, S.; Laganà, P.; Verderio, A.; Motto, M. Levels of total fumonisins in maize samples from Italy during 2006–2008. Food Addit. Contam. Part B 2011, 4, 116–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Castells, M.; Marín, S.; Sanchis, V.; Ramos, A.J. Distribution of fumonisins and aflatoxins in corn fractions during industrial cornflake processing. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2008, 123, 81–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Tran, S.T.; Smith, T.K. Determination of optimal conditions for hydrolysis of conjugated deoxynivalenol in corn and wheat with trifluoromethanesulfonic acid. Anim. Feed. Sci. Technol. 2011, 163, 84–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Li, F.; Jiang, D.; Zheng, F.; Chen, J.; Li, W. Fumonisins B1, B2 and B3 in corn products, wheat flour and corn oil marketed in Shandong province of China. Food Addit. Contam. Part B Surveill. 2015, 8, 169–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Luo, Y.; Liu, X.; Li, J. Updating techniques on controlling mycotoxins—A review. Food Control 2018, 89, 123–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Adebiyi, J.A.; Kayitesi, E.; Adebo, O.A.; Changwa, R.; Njobeh, P.B. Food fermentation and mycotoxin detoxification: An African perspective. Food Control 2019, 106, 106731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. European Commission. The Rapid Alert System for Food and Feed (RASFF) Annual Report 2020; Publications Office of the European Union: Luxembourg, 2021; Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/food/system/files/2021-08/rasff_pub_annual-report_2020.pdf (accessed on 28 December 2021).
Figure 1. Deoxynivalenol chemical structure.
Figure 1. Deoxynivalenol chemical structure.
Applsci 12 02579 g001
Figure 2. (a) Deoxynivalenol in maize samples; (b) Deoxynivalenol percentage in maize samples.
Figure 2. (a) Deoxynivalenol in maize samples; (b) Deoxynivalenol percentage in maize samples.
Applsci 12 02579 g002
Figure 3. (a) Deoxynivalenol in maize-derived food samples; (b) Deoxynivalenol percentage in maize-derived food samples.
Figure 3. (a) Deoxynivalenol in maize-derived food samples; (b) Deoxynivalenol percentage in maize-derived food samples.
Applsci 12 02579 g003
Figure 4. Zearalenone chemical structure.
Figure 4. Zearalenone chemical structure.
Applsci 12 02579 g004
Figure 5. (a) Zearalenone in maize samples; (b) Zearalenone percentage in maize.
Figure 5. (a) Zearalenone in maize samples; (b) Zearalenone percentage in maize.
Applsci 12 02579 g005
Figure 6. (a) Zearalenone in maize-derived food samples; (b) Zearalenone percentage in maize-derived food samples.
Figure 6. (a) Zearalenone in maize-derived food samples; (b) Zearalenone percentage in maize-derived food samples.
Applsci 12 02579 g006
Figure 7. Fumonisin B1 chemical structure.
Figure 7. Fumonisin B1 chemical structure.
Applsci 12 02579 g007
Figure 8. Fumonisin B2 chemical structure.
Figure 8. Fumonisin B2 chemical structure.
Applsci 12 02579 g008
Figure 9. (a) Fumonisins in maize samples; (b) Fumonisins percentage in maize.
Figure 9. (a) Fumonisins in maize samples; (b) Fumonisins percentage in maize.
Applsci 12 02579 g009
Figure 10. (a) Fumonisins in maize-derived foods; (b) Fumonisins percentage in maize-derived foods.
Figure 10. (a) Fumonisins in maize-derived foods; (b) Fumonisins percentage in maize-derived foods.
Applsci 12 02579 g010
Table 1. Study on the incidence of deoxynivalenol in maize and maize-derived foods in Romania.
Table 1. Study on the incidence of deoxynivalenol in maize and maize-derived foods in Romania.
Sample
Number
The
Analyzed
Product
Country
of Origin
Limit of
Detection
μg/kg
Limit of
Quantification
μg/kg
Deoxynivalenol
μg/kg
Limit
μg/kg
1.Maize01Romania40.72067.198<67.198 e1750
2.Maize02Romania40.72067.19870.400 d1750
3.Maize03Romania40.72067.198<40.720 g1750
4.Maize04Romania40.72067.19877.100 c1750
5.Maize05Romania40.72067.198<40.720 g1750
6.Maize06Romania40.72067.198<40.720 g1750
7.Maize07Romania40.72067.198<67.198 e1750
8.Maize08Romania40.72067.198<67.198 e1750
9.Maize09Romania40.72067.198<40.720 g1750
10.Maize10Romania40.72067.19892.900 b1750
11.Maize11Romania40.72067.198<40.720 g1750
12.Maize12Romania40.72067.198152.200 a1750
13.Maize13Romania40.72067.198<40.720 g1750
14.Maize14Romania40.72067.198<40.720 g1750
15.Maize15Romania40.72067.198<40.720 g1750
16.Maize16Romania40.72067.198<67.198 e1750
17.Cornflakes01Romania18.61037.230<18.610 h500
18.Cornflakes02Romania18.61037.230<18.610 h500
19.Breakfast
cereals01
Romania18.61037.230<18.610 h500
20.Breakfast
cereals02
Romania18.61037.23063.990 f500
21.Breakfast
cereals03
Romania18.61037.230<18.610 h500
The differences between samples were established by analysis of variance (ANOVA) using Turkey’s test at a 5% significance level. Different superscript letters after the values indicated a statistically significant difference at p < 0.05%.
Table 2. Studies on the incidence of deoxynivalenol in maize and maize-derived foods.
Table 2. Studies on the incidence of deoxynivalenol in maize and maize-derived foods.
CountryThe
Analyzed
Product
No.
Samples
Deoxynivalenol
Incidence%
Deoxynivalenol
Mean
μg/kg
Deoxynivalenol
Range
μg/kg
Reference
RomaniaCorn 1625.0061.70n/a–152.20
Corn flakes, Breakfast cereals520.0027.69n/a–63.99
SerbiaCorn flakes1540.00255.00n/a–878.00[32]
Corn flour 5642.90101.00n/a–931.00[32]
HungaryCorn2986.001872.00225.00–2963.00[33]
BelgiumCorn10692.30449.00263.10–2777.40[34]
Corn106100.00557.50337.40–5322.40[34]
Corn10664.70186.50121.30–2110.50[34]
GermanyCorn120100.00216.50n/a–1097.20[35]
SwitzerlandCorn19100.00135.6078.00–299.00[36]
ChinaCorn4465.90831.005.80–9843.30[37]
BrazilPastry36100.00591.0060.00–1720.00[38]
Table 3. Study on incidence of zearalenone in maize and maize-derived foods in Romania.
Table 3. Study on incidence of zearalenone in maize and maize-derived foods in Romania.
Sample
Number
The
Analyzed
Product
Country
of Origin
Limit of
Detection
μg/kg
Limit of
Quantification
μg/kg
Zearalenone
μg/kg
Limit
μg/kg
1.Maize01Romania2.0602.456<2.060 b350
2.Maize02Romania2.0602.456<2.060 b350
3.Maize03Romania2.0602.456<2.060 b350
4.Maize04Romania2.0602.456<2.060 b350
5.Maize05Romania2.0602.456<2.060 b350
6.Maize06Romania2.0602.456<2.060 b350
7.Maize07Romania2.0602.456<2.060 b350
8.Maize08Romania2.0602.456<2.060 b350
9.Maize09Romania2.0602.456<2.060 b350
10.Maize10Romania2.0602.456<2.060 b350
11.Maize11Romania2.0602.456<2.060 b350
12.Maize12Romania2.0602.45618.565 ± 1.411 a350
13.Canned corn01Romania2.0602.456<2.060 b100
14.Canned corn02Romania2.0602.456<2.060 b100
15.Canned corn03Romania2.0602.456<2.060 b100
16.Cornflakes01Romania1.8603.730<1.860 c100
17.Cornflakes02Romania1.8603.730<1.860 c100
18.Cornflakes03Romania1.8603.730<1.860 c100
19.Breakfast
cereals01
Romania1.8603.730<1.860 c50
20.Breakfast
cereals02
Romania1.8603.730<1.860 c50
21.Breakfast
cereals03
Romania1.8603.730<1.860 c50
22.Puffs01Romania1.8603.730<1.860 c100
The differences between samples were established by analysis of variance (ANOVA) using Turkey’s test at a 5% significance level. Different superscript letters after the values indicated statistically significant differences at p < 0.05%.
Table 4. Studies on the incidence of zearalenone in maize and maize-derived foods.
Table 4. Studies on the incidence of zearalenone in maize and maize-derived foods.
CountryThe
Analyzed
Product
No.
Samples
Zearalenone
Incidence%
Zearalenone
Mean
μg/kg
Zearalenone
Range
μg/kg
Reference
RomaniaCorn 128.003.44nd–18.565
Corn flakes, breakfast cereals, canned corn, puffs100.00ndnd
SerbiaMaize900.000.000.00[45]
HungaryMaize2941.00267.00nd–565.00[33]
Maize10664.80100.5071.20–1085.60[34]
BelgiumMaize10640.70158.500.00–1085.60[34]
Maize10642.40175.500.00–2791.60[34]
Germany
Brazil
Egypt
Maize
Maize
Maize
120
40
30
96.00
95.00
33.34
819.00
22.20
2.39
nd–3910.00
1.80–99.00
1.13–3.70
[35]
[46]
[47]
Maize5094.00109.100.20–3613.00[35]
ChinaMaize4413.6050.8040.70–1056.80[48]
Table 5. Study on incidence of fumonisins in corn and corn-derived foods in Romania.
Table 5. Study on incidence of fumonisins in corn and corn-derived foods in Romania.
Sample
Number
The
Analyzed
Product
Country
of Origin
Limit of
Detection
μg/kg
Limit of
Quantification
μg/kg
Fumonisins
μg/kg
Limit
μg/kg
1.Maize01Romania21.72230.644163.551 ± 49.065 b4000
2.Maize02Romania21.72230.6441009.360 ± 302.804 a4000
3.Maize03Romania21.72230.64438.318 ± 11.495 f4000
4.Maize04Romania21.72230.644<21.722 h4000
5.Maize05Romania21.72230.644<21.722 h4000
6.Maize06Romania21.72230.644<21.722 h4000
7.Maize07Romania21.72230.64445.614 ± 13.684 e4000
8.Maize08Romania21.72230.644104.368 ± 31.315 c4000
9.Maize09Romania21.72230.64479.824 ± 23.947 d4000
10.Maize10Romania21.72230.64439.260 ± 12.640 f4000
11.Canned corn01Romania25.90051.810<25.900 g1000
12.Canned corn02Romania25.90051.810<25.900 g1000
13.Cornflakes01Romania25.90051.81073.000 ± 5.590 d800
14.Cornflakes02Romania25.90051.810<25.900 g800
The differences between samples were established by analysis of variance (ANOVA) using Turkey’s test at a 5% significance level. Different superscript letters after the values indicate statistically significant differences at p < 0.05%.
Table 6. Studies on the occurrence of fumonisins in maize and maize-derived foods.
Table 6. Studies on the occurrence of fumonisins in maize and maize-derived foods.
CountryThe
Analyzed
Product
No. SamplesFumonisins
Incidence%
Fumonisins
Mean
μg/kg
Fumonisins
Range
μg/kg
Reference
RomaniaCorn, canned corn, corn flakes 10
4
70.00
25.00
154.55
37.68
nd–1009.36
nd–73.00
SerbiaCorn90100.001730.00520.00–5800.00[45]
Corn1062.501.500.00–70.20
Corn10619.8061.100.00–1362.90
Corn10661.20247.4054.00–4414.90
Corn106ndndnd
Corn1064.909.000.00–412.60
Corn10624.7061.600.00–1427.40
BelgiumCorn106ndndnd[34]
Corn1067.403.400.00–90.50
Corn10618.8018.000.00–451.20
Corn1062.501.300.00–70.20
Corn10619.8073.600.00–1782.80
Corn10661.20327.0058.70–6293.50
ItalyCorn697100.0010900.0025.00–77000.00[58]
BrazilCorn40100.002338.50230.00–6450.00[46]
Spain Corn92100.002610.00337.00–10613.00[59]
SpainCorn flakes4721.0042.00nd–67.00
CanadaCorn10100.004.640.73–10.21[60]
ChinaCorn flakes 14100.00104.101.00–171.00[61]
Corn flakes 1493.0014.20<0.27–25.60
Corn flakes 1493.0017.30<0.27–31.50
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mihalcea, A.; Amariei, S. Study on Contamination with Some Mycotoxins in Maize and Maize-Derived Foods. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 2579. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/app12052579

AMA Style

Mihalcea A, Amariei S. Study on Contamination with Some Mycotoxins in Maize and Maize-Derived Foods. Applied Sciences. 2022; 12(5):2579. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/app12052579

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mihalcea, Alina, and Sonia Amariei. 2022. "Study on Contamination with Some Mycotoxins in Maize and Maize-Derived Foods" Applied Sciences 12, no. 5: 2579. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/app12052579

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop