Next Article in Journal
Modal Planning for Cooperative Non-Prehensile Manipulation by Mobile Robots
Next Article in Special Issue
Modification of Chitosan for the Generation of Functional Derivatives
Previous Article in Journal
The Role of Reverberation and Magnitude Spectra of Direct Parts in Contralateral and Ipsilateral Ear Signals on Perceived Externalization
Previous Article in Special Issue
Extraction, Structure, and Pharmacological Activities of Astragalus Polysaccharides
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effects of Ultrasonication on the Conformational, Microstructural, and Antioxidant Properties of Konjac Glucomannan

1
Department of Applied Biology and Chemical Technology, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon 999077, Hong Kong, China
2
State Key Laboratory of Food Science and Technology, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330047, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 28 December 2018 / Revised: 27 January 2019 / Accepted: 28 January 2019 / Published: 29 January 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Modification of Natural Polysaccharides for Valuable Functions)

Abstract

:
This study aims to evaluate the effects of ultrasonication (US) on the conformational, microstructural, and antioxidant properties of konjac glucomannan (KGM). US treatment with a 20-kHz and 750-W ultrasonic processor at 60% amplitude was applied for partial degradation of KGM with an average molecular weight (MW) of 823.4 kDa. Results indicated that the US treatment caused dramatic reduction in the MW, apparent viscosity, hydrodynamic radius, and z-average mean radius of gyration. The flexibility of chain conformation of native KGM was slightly increased during the US treatment. According to electronic microscopic imaging, the compact, smooth, and orderly fibrous strings formed by KGM were changed to amorphous, porous flakes and globular particles after US treatment. KGM and its US-treated fractions showed moderate radical-scavenging and ferric-reducing antioxidant activity. US degradation of KGM affected these activities either positively or negatively, depending on the US treatment period. In summary, ultrasonic degradation of KGM caused changes in its conformation characteristics, microstructure, and antioxidant activities.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Konjac glucomannan (KGM) is a water-soluble polysaccharide originated from the plant tuber of Amorphophallas konjac. The polysaccharide chain of KGM is composed of 1,4-linked β-d-mannopyranose and β-d-glucopyranose backbone with a mannose and glucose molar ratio of 1.4 to 10 [1,2,3,4]. KGM is widely used in pharmaceutical, biotechnological, fine chemical, and other fields because of its excellent biocompatibility and biodegradable activities [5]. Moreover, it is recognized as a promising dietary fiber supplement and functional food for gut health, body weight management, and type 2 diabetes treatment [6,7,8,9,10]. However, native KGM has a very limited range of functionality. Therefore, its modifications attracted increasing attention for expanding its functions and applications [11].
Chemical and physical methods are frequently applied to modify KGM [11]. Sulfated KGM was shown to have potent anti-human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) activity and moderate blood anticoagulant activity [12]. Oxidized KGM and its acidolysis products exerted immune responses to Schizothorax prenanti infected by Aeromonas hydrophila [13]. Consumption of depolymerized KGM has been shown to enhance wound healing for mice [14]. Acid-hydrolyzed KGM exhibited a greater prebiotic effect on the modulation of cecal and fecal microflora than did original KGM in mice [15]. On the other hand, physical methods such as γ-irradiation, ultrasonication (US), and extrusion were used to modify KGM. Degraded KGM prepared by γ-irradiation was demonstrated to be more effective in protecting the LO2 cell line (human hepatic cell line) against H2O2-induced oxidative damage [16]. US-degraded KGM had stronger protective effects on Bifidobacteria against antibiotic damage [17]. Extrusion modification was able to reduce the molecular weight, water absorption index, and viscosity of KGM [18].
As sonochemistry is used in several chemical, physical, and biological processes [19], ultrasonic (US) treatment was effective for partial degradation of polymer compounds, reducing the molecular weight and viscosity but not causing any significant changes in the chemical nature [20]. It has been widely explored for the modification and partial degradation of carbohydrate polymers including various natural polysaccharides [20,21]. Sonication usually breaks polymer chains at the center point or at the structurally weakest points. The polymer at a high molecular weight or with a longer chain is degraded more rapidly by US. A linear polymer chain was found more easily degraded with US than branched ones [22]. The degradation kinetics can be fitted to either a midpoint chain scission model or a random chain scission model [23].
A previous study of our group showed the effects of power ultrasound on the molecular weight and rheological properties of KGM [24]. Based on this, the aim of the present study was to further investigate the effects of US treatment on the solution properties of KGM, particularly its conformation characteristics and microstructure in water. The effects of US treatment on the bioactivity of KGM have rarely been reported except the studies reported by Mao et al. and Song et al. [17,25], the influence of US degradation on the antioxidant activity of KGM was evaluated using in vitro assays. The investigation will be helpful for a better understanding of the degradation mechanisms and the effects of US on the functional properties of KGM.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

KGM (containing about 8% acetyl groups, with a molecular weight (MW) of 823.4 kDa) was kindly provided by Hubei Konson Konjac Gum Co., Ltd. (Wuhan, China). The molar ratio of mannose (Man) to glucose (Glc) (M/G) was 1.3 (Table S1, Supplementary Materials).
Reference standards of monosaccharides and derivatives (l-fucose, l-rhamnose, d-arabinose, d-galactose, d-glucose, d-mannose, d-fructose, d-galacturonic acid, and d-glucuronic acid), and trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) were purchased from Merck Corp. (Darmstadt, Germany) and Sigma Chemical Corp. (St. Louis, MO, USA). Furthermore, 2,2′-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), 2,2′-azino-bis-3-ethyl-benzothiazoline-6-sulphonate (ABTS), and 6-hydroxy-2,5,7,8-tetramethylchroman-2-carboxylic acid (Trolox) were obtained from Sigma Chemical Corp. (St. Louis, MO, USA).

2.2. Composition Analysis of KGM

Saccharide content of KGM was determined using the phenol–sulfuric acid method [26] with Man as a standard, and the total protein content was measured using a photometric assay [27] with bovine serum albumin (BSA) as a standard. The acetyl group content was determined using a titration method [28]. Monosaccharide composition was analyzed using a high-performance anion-exchange chromatograph with pulsed amperometric detection (HPAEC-PAD) as reported previously [29]. The KGM sample (5 mg) was initially hydrolyzed in 0.5 mL of 12 M H2SO4 solution for 0.5 h at 100 °C and then diluted with 2.0 mL of ultrapure water, and further hydrolyzed for 2 h. The hydrolysate was applied to monosaccharide analysis using a Dionex ICS-5000 System (Dionex Corporation, CA, USA), which was equipped with a CarboPacTM PA20 guard column (3 mm × 30 mm) and a CarboPacTM PA20 analytical column (3 mm × 150 mm) in series [30].

2.3. Ultrasonic Degradation of KGM

KGM (~0.9 g) was mixed with distilled water (300 mL) and heated at 70 °C for 2 h, and was kept at room temperature under stirring for another 12 h to attain a homogenous solution. The KGM solution was centrifuged at 10,000 rpm (~15,344× g) to remove any undissolved residues. The final KGM solution was transferred into a 50 mL plastic centrifuge tube at 30 mL filling volume for US treatment. The US treatment was performed using a Model VCX-750 ultrasonic processor with a frequency of 20 kHz (Sonics & Materials Inc., Newton, USA) and at a fixed power controlled at 60% amplitude, as previously reported [22]. The ultrasonic probe (tip diameter: 6 mm) was submerged into the KGM solution at a fixed depth of 2 cm. The sample tube was placed in an ice bath during the US treatment.

2.4. Analysis of MW and Conformation Parameters

KGM before and after ultrasonic degradation was dissolved in 0.1 M NaNO3 containing 0.02% (w/w) NaN3 for more than 24 h, before being filtered through a 0.22 μm membrane and applied for high-performance size-exclusion chromatography (HPSEC) analysis [31]. The HPSEC instrument system consisted of a multi-angle laser light scattering (MALLS) detector (wavelength of 663.6 nm, eighteen angles) (Dawn Heleos II, Wyatt), a refractive index (RI) detector (OPTILAB T-rEX, Wyatt), and a viscometer (Visco Star II, Wyatt). Three SEC columns in series were used including an Ohpak SB-G guard column (8 × 50 mm), an Ohpak SB-806 HQ column (8 × 300 mm), and an Ohpak SB-804 HQ column (8 × 300 mm) from Showa Denko K.K. (Tokyo, Japan), with the temperature being maintained at 35 °C. The eluent was 0.1 M NaNO3 solution containing 0.02% (w/w) NaN3 at a flow rate of 0.6 mL/min. Data were collected and analyzed using the ASTRA software (Version 6.1.1.84), normalized with dextran from Leuconostoc mesenteroides (average MW: 35,000–45,000) (Sigma, St. Louis, USA). An RI increment (dn/dc) of 0.146 was used in the calculation.

2.5. Rheological Measurement

KGM samples were dissolved in ultrapure water at 55 °C with constant stirring. The sample solution was kept at 25 °C for more than 12 h before measurement. The measurement was operated with a strain-controlled rheometer (ARES-G2, TA instrument, Newcastle, DE, USA) equipped with parallel plate geometry (40 mm diameter, 1.0 mm gap) or cone plate geometry (50 mm diameter, 0.046 mm gap). A steady shear test was applied for the determination of flow behaviors at 25.0 °C.

2.6. Fourier-Transform Infrared Spectroscopy and Scanning Electronic Microscope Observation

Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectra of KGM samples were recorded using a Thermo Nicolet 5700 IR spectrophotometer (Thermo-Electron, Madison, USA) in wavenumbers ranging from 4000 cm−1 to 400 cm−1 at a resolution of 4 cm−1.
KGM was dissolved at 1.0 mg/mL and placed into liquid nitrogen for 10 min and freeze-dried. The dried samples were prepared with platinum sputter coating, and imaged using a JSM-6701F scanning electronic microscope (SEM) (Jeol Company, Tokyo, Japan) at an accelerating voltage of 5 kV.

2.7. Antioxidant Activity Assays

All samples of KGM and US-degraded fractions were dissolved in distilled water to various concentrations (0.125–2.0 mg/mL) for antioxidant activity assays. All assays were performed according to reported procedures with slight modifications [32] for DPPH radical-scavenging activity, [33] for ABTS radical-scavenging activity, and for ferric-reducing antioxidant power. The radical-scavenging activity (%) was represented by (1 − (A2 − A1)/A0) × 100, where A0, A1, and A2 were the absorbance values of the control (DPPH solution), solvent blank (ethanol), and the tested KGM sample, respectively.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Effect of US on MW Distribution of KGM

Figure 1 and Table 1 show the results from the HPSEC-MALLS-Vis-RI analysis of KGM fractions before and after US treatment. The MW of KGM was significantly reduced with the increase in sonication time. Meanwhile, the polydispersity index Mw/Mn value of KGM decreased with increasing sonication time, indicating a narrower or more uniform MW distribution. Similarly, the MW distribution of KGM became narrower upon ultrasonic degradation [34,35]. Usually, shear forces produced from the rapid collapse of cavitation bubbles in the liquid due to ultrasonication are mainly responsible for the disruption of the polymer aggregates and breakage of polymer chains in solution [20,36].

3.2. Degradation Kinetics and Chain Scission Mechanisms

The intrinsic viscosity and MW of KGM fractions decreased rapidly in the initial period of US treatment (≤20 min) and then slowly in the remaining period (Figure 2a,b). In Figure 2b, the initial value of [η] for KGM was 1803.5 mL·g−1, which was close to values reported by Kishida et al. [37] (18.6–19.9 dL·g−1), Maeda et al. [3] (12.7–23.6 dL·g−1), and Ratcliffe et al. [38] (16.0–20.0 dL·g−1), but higher than values determined by Kӧk et al. [39] (7.65–13.0 dL·g−1).
Ultrasonic degradation of polymers follows two primary chain scission mechanisms: random chain scission and midpoint chain scission [40]. The degradation kinetics for random chain scission can be represented by the classical Schmid model relating the rate of degradation to MW [41].
M e M t + ln ( 1 M e M t ) = M e M i + ln ( 1 M e M i ) k 1 c ( M e m ) 2 t ,
where Mi and Mt represent the initial average MW and the MW at time t of the US treatment, respectively, Me is the final limiting average MW, m represents the MW of the monomer, c is the initial molar concentration of the polymer, and k1 is the degradation rate constant. With this model equation, the plot of −(Me/Mt) − ln((1 − (Me/Mt) versus time t is linear. For midpoint chain scission, the degradation kinetics can be represented by the following first-order kinetic model [42]:
ln((MiMe)/(MtMe)) = kMet.
The final limiting MW Me value for the KGM fractions was attained upon US treatment of KGM for 2 h as 20.7. Figure 2c,d show the plots and linear regression results of experimental data according to the model equations, −(Me/Mt) − ln((1 − (Me/Mt) versus t for the random scission (Equation (1)) and ln((MeMi)/(MtMi)) versus t for the midpoint scission (Equation (2)), respectively. Obviously, the experimental data fitted closely to the random chain session model (Figure 2c) but not to the midpoint scission model (Figure 2d), suggesting that the US degradation of KGM was mainly achieved through the random chain scission mechanism. Similarly, random chain scission was also observed in previous studies for US degradation of KGM [22], pectin [43], and chitosan [40].

3.3. Effects of US on Rheological and Structural Characteristics of KGM

Figure 3 displays the apparent viscosity versus shear rate of KGM solutions as a function of time under US treatment. All the original KGM fractions exhibited shear-thinning flow behavior at concentrations over 0.25% (w/v) and the apparent viscosity exceeded 1000 Pa·s at shear rate of 0.01 s−1. The apparent viscosity decreased rapidly upon US treatment. As the US treatment exceeded 4 min, the apparent viscosity was flat versus the shear rate, indicating that the KGM solution was changed to a Newtonian fluid (0.5%) with a constant viscosity independent of shear rate.
Figure 4 shows the FTIR spectra of KGM fractions before and after US treatment (for 10 min and 60 min). The broad absorption peak at 3500–3000 cm−1 was attributed to O–H stretching vibration of the inter- and intra-molecular hydrogen bonds of hydroxyl groups. The band around 2889 cm−1 was due to the C–H stretching and bending vibration of methyl groups. Peaks at 1733, 1369, and 1254 cm−1 were assigned to the valence vibration of C=O, the symmetric C–H bending vibration of the methyl group, and the C–O vibration of O-acetyl groups, respectively [44,45]. Most of these characteristic peaks were preserved after US treatment, suggesting that there was no significant alteration in the functional group types of KGM before and after US treatment.

3.4. Effect of US on Chain Conformation of KGM

As shown in Table 1, the hydrodynamic radius Rh and zeta-average radius of gyration Rg of KGM fractions decreased as the US treatment time was increased, indicating the size reduction of polymer aggregates. The three-dimensional shape of polymer in liquid can be related to the ratio, ρ = Rg/Rh. Usually, ρ is about 0.77 for a uniform and non-draining sphere, 1.0–1.1 for a loosely connected hyper branched chain, 1.5–2.0 for a flexible chain in a good solvent, and >2.0 for an extended rigid chain [46]. The Rg/Rh ratio fluctuated in the initial 10–20 min and showed a notable increase after 30 min of US treatment, i.e., the ratio for KGM went from 1.74 to 1.93 (30 min).
Intrinsic viscosity [η] is related to the average MW via the Mark–Houwink equation, [η] = KMα. The exponent α value usually lies in the range of 0.5–0.6 for random-coil polysaccharide chains, while α in the range of 0.7–0.8 suggests that the polymer exists as a linear flexible chain in a good solvent. For a rigid or rod-like polymer, the chains are greatly extended in solution and the α value could be as high as 2.0 [47,48]. The α value was 0.79 for KGM. The notable increase in the α value of KGM after US treatment suggested that the polymer chains were greatly extended. KGM with a lower MW and viscosity was more homogeneous. After US treatment for over 2 min, the α values of higher-MW sections of KGM fractions increased from 0.51 to 0.95.
Persistence length (Lp) is defined as the average projection length along the initial direction of the polymer chain and it is a useful index for the linear flexibility of polysaccharide chain [39,49]. Based on the wormlike cylinder model for characterizing the conformation characteristics of polymers, Lp can be computed using the Bohdanecký plot of (M2/[η])1/3 against M1/2 according to the following equation [50]:
( M 2 [ η ] ) 1 / 3 = A 0 M L Φ 0 , 1 / 3 + B 0 Φ 0 , 1 / 3 ( 2 L p M L ) 1 / 2 M 1 / 2 ,
where Φ0,∞ is equal to 2.86 × 1023 mol−1, ML is the mass per unit contour length of 330 g·mol−1·nm−1, and B0 can be replaced by the mean value of 1.10 [39]. The Lp value was 10.3 nm for the original KGM sample, suggesting it had a flexible chain conformation, which is in good agreement with a previous study [39]. For KGM after 2 min of sonication, the Bohdanecký plot was divided into two sections according to Mark–Houwink plot (Figure S1, Supplementary Materials), with a Lp value of 7.1 nm in higher-MW sections. As the sonication time exceeded 30 min, the Lp value of KGM in the higher-MW region was still 7.5 nm.

3.5. Effect of US on the Microstructure of KGM

Figure 5 presents the SEM images of KGM fractions before and after US treatment up to 60 min. The original KGM exhibited orderly and relatively compact fibrous networks (Figure 5 and Figure S2, Supplementary Materials), which were quite different from microstructures for other glucomannans from konjac flour [51,52], probably due to different conditions for sample preparation. In the present study, the KGM sample solution for the SEM was placed in liquid nitrogen for 10 min before freeze-drying to maintain the chain structure. The microstructure of KGM fractions changed notably after sonication, from a linear morphology and orderly structure to particulate and amorphous particles. The particles were probably formed through the aggregation of shorter polymer chains of lower-MW fractions from US degradation. The microstructures shown by the SEM could partly explain the reduction in KGM viscosity and change in rheological behavior from the shear thinning fluid of the long polymer chains and large gel networks to the Newtonian fluid of well-dispersed and shorter fragments in water.

3.6. US Treatment Effect on in Vitro Antioxidant Activity of KGM

As shown in Figure 6, KGM before and after US treatment exhibited moderate scavenging activity against DPPH and ABTS∙+ radicals and ferric-reducing power. The ABTS∙+ radical-scavenging activity increased steadily with US treatment period from 2 to 60 min. However, the DPPH scavenging activity and ferric-reducing power only increased with the US treatment for 2 min (KGM-US-2), but not consistently beyond this US treatment period, similar to a previous study on some other polysaccharides subjected to US treatment [53,54,55]. Overall the results suggest that US treatment of KGM improved the in vitro antioxidant activity, probably due to the reduction in MW, as shown in previous studies [55,56,57].

4. Conclusions

The present study showed the alteration of the conformational, microstructural, and antioxidant properties of KGM caused by power US treatment. The original KGM presented a semi-flexible coil conformation and a linear morphology in water. Power US treatment of KGM led to a reduction in the average MW and apparent viscosity, as well as in the size of gel aggregates within a short period of time (<10 min). Meanwhile, in the time range of 0–10 min, the polydispersity index Mw/Mn value of KGM decreased from 1.5 to 1.2, showing a narrower or more uniform MW distribution. The reduction in MW with time during the US treatment of KGM followed the kinetic model for random chain scission. Compared with the original KGM, the US-degraded KGM had more flexible chain conformation, as well as fragmentary and particulate aggregates with a lower viscosity and Newtonian flow behavior. The US degradation of KGM in most cases resulted in higher radical-scavenging activities. Additionally, the effect of US treatment on the protection of KGM against H2O2-induced GES-1 cell apoptosis (data not shown) was evaluated, but no significant effect was observed. Overall, this study indicates that power US is a simple and effective means for rapid and partial degradation of high-MW KGM and for modification of the conformation and rheological properties, and enhancement of antioxidant activity.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://0-www-mdpi-com.brum.beds.ac.uk/2076-3417/9/3/461/s1: Figure S1: Mark–Houwink plots of KGM following different ultrasonic times. The Lp value was calculated according to the Bohdanecký method by ploting (M2/[η])1/3 against M1/2 (not shown) for each molecular-weight distribution, which was the same as Mark–Houwink plot consideration. Molecular weight distribution selected for the above calculations covered 5–95% of determined mass for each KGM. KGM treated with ultrasonication is labeled as KGM-US. For example, KGM-US-2 means KGM was subjected to ultrasonication for 2 min at an amplitude of 60%; Figure S2: SEM images of native KGM without US treatment; Table S1: Physicochemical properties and monosaccharide composition of KGM.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization and supervision, J.-Y.W.; data curation, L.-Y.M.; formal analysis, investigation, and writing—original draft, J.-Y.Y.; formal analysis and data curation, L.-Y.M.; methodology, K.-C.S.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgements

This work was financially supported by the National Key R&D Program of China [2017YFD0400104], the Hong Kong Scholars Program [XJ2016058], Hong Kong Polytechnic University, the Shenzhen Basic Research Project [JCYJ20160531184200806], and the Postdoctoral Science Foundation of Jiangxi Province [2017KY03].

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. An, N.T.; Dong, N.T.; Le Dung, P.; Van Du, N. Characterization of glucomannan from some Amorphophallus species in Vietnam. Carbohyd. Polym. 2010, 80, 308–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Katsuraya, K.; Okuyama, K.; Hatanaka, K.; Oshima, R.; Sato, T.; Matsuzaki, K. Constitution of konjac glucomannan: Chemical analysis and 13C NMR spectroscopy. Carbohyd. Polym. 2003, 53, 183–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Maeda, M.; Shimahara, H.; Sugiyama, N. Detailed examination of the branched structure of konjac glucomannan. Agric. Biol. Chem. 1980, 44, 245–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Shimahara, H.; Suzuki, H.; Sugiyama, N.; Nisizawa, K. Isolation and characterization of oligosaccharides from an enzymic hydrolysate of konjac glucomannan. Agric. Biol. Chem. 1975, 39, 293–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zhang, Y.Q.; Xie, B.J.; Gan, X. Advance in the applications of konjac glucomannan and its derivatives. Carbohyd. Polym. 2005, 60, 27–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Behera, S.S.; Ray, R.C. Konjac glucomannan, a promising polysaccharide of Amorphophallus konjac K. Koch in health care. Int. J. Biol. Macromo 2016, 92, 942–956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Herranz, B.; Borderias, A.J.; Solas, M.T.; Tovar, C.A. Influence of measurement temperature on the rheological and microstructural properties of glucomannan gels with different thermal histories. Food. Res. Int. 2012, 48, 885–892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Ho, H.V.T.; Jovanovski, E.; Zurbau, A.; Mejia, S.B.; Sievenpiper, J.L.; Au-Yeung, F.; Jenkins, A.L.; Duvnjak, L.; Leiter, L.; Vuksan, V. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of the effect of konjac glucomannan, a viscous soluble fiber, on LDL cholesterol and the new lipid targets non-HDL cholesterol and apolipoprotein B. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2017, 105, 1239–1247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Xu, X.; Li, B.; Kennedy, J.F.; Xie, B.J.; Huang, M. Characterization of konjac glucomannan-gellan gum blend films and their suitability for release of nisin incorporated therein. Carbohyd. Polym. 2007, 70, 192–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zalewski, B.M.; Chmielewska, A.; Szajewska, H. The effect of glucomannan on body weight in overweight or obese children and adults: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Nutrition 2015, 31, 437–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Zhu, F. Modifications of konjac glucomannan for diverse applications. Food Chem. 2018, 256, 419–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Surina, B.; Tegshi, M.; Taisei, K.; Hideki, N.; Takashi, Y. Sulfation and biological activities of konjac glucomannan. Carbohyd. Polym. 2013, 94, 899–903. [Google Scholar]
  13. Zheng, Q.R.; Wu, Y.L.; Xu, H.L.; Wang, H.J.; Tang, H.L.; Xia, X.J.; Feng, J. Immune responses to Aeromonas hydrophila infection in Schizothorax prenanti fed with oxidized konjac glucomannan and its acidolysis products. Fish. Shellfish. Immun. 2016, 49, 260–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Al-Ghazzewi, F.; Elamir, A.; Tester, R.; Elzagoze, A. Effect of depolymerised konjac glucomannan on wound healing. Bioact. Carbohyd. Diet. Fibre 2015, 5, 125–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Chen, H.L.; Fan, Y.H.; Chen, M.E.; Chan, Y. Unhydrolyzed and hydrolyzed konjac glucomannans modulated cecal and fecal microflora in Balb/c mice. Nutrition 2005, 21, 1059–1064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Jian, W.J.; Tu, L.Y.; Wu, L.L.; Xiong, H.J.; Pang, J.; Sun, Y.M. Physicochemical properties and cellular protection against oxidation of degraded Konjac glucomannan prepared by γ-irradiation. Food Chem. 2017, 231, 42–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Mao, Y.H.; Song, A.X.; Yao, Z.P.; Wu, J.Y. Protective effects of natural and partially degraded konjac glucomannan on Bifidobacteria against antibiotic damage. Carbohyd. Polym. 2018, 181, 368–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Tatirat, O.; Charoenrein, S.; Kerr, W.L. Physicochemical properties of extrusion-modified konjac glucomannan. Carbohyd. Polym. 2012, 87, 1545–1551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Mateus, M.M.; Acero, N.F.; Bordado, J.C.; dos Santos, R.G. Sonication as a foremost tool to improve cork liquefaction. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2015, 74, 9–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Gogate, P.R.; Prajapat, A.L. Depolymerization using sonochemical reactors: A critical review. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2015, 27, 480–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Bera, S.; Mondal, D.; Martin, J.T.; Singh, M. Potential effect of ultrasound on carbohydrates. Carbohyd. Res. 2015, 410, 15–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Ogutu, F.O.; Mu, T.H.; Elahi, R.; Zhang, M.; Sun, H.N. Ultrasonic modification of selected polysaccharides-review. J. Food Process. Technol. 2015, 6, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Pu, Y.; Zou, Q.; Hou, D.; Chen, S. Molecular weight kinetics and chain scission models for dextran polymers during ultrasonic degradation. Carbohyd. Polym. 2017, 156, 71–76. [Google Scholar]
  24. Li, J.; Li, B.; Geng, P.; Song, A.X.; Wu, J.Y. Ultrasonic degradation kinetics and rheological profiles of a food polysaccharide (konjac glucomannan) in water. Food Hydrocoll. 2017, 70, 14–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Song, A.X.; Mao, Y.H.; Siu, K.C.; Wu, J.Y. Bifidogenic effects of Cordyceps sinensis fungal exopolysaccharide and konjac glucomannan after ultrasound and acid degradation. Int. J. Biol. Macromo 2018, 111, 587–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. DuBois, M.; Gilles, K.A.; Hamilton, J.K.; Rebers, P.T.; Smith, F. Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances. Anal. Chem. 1956, 28, 350–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Bradford, M.M. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal. Biochem. 1976, 72, 248–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Han, F.; Gao, C.; Liu, M.; Huang, F.; Zhang, B. Synthesis, optimization and characterization of acetylated corn starch with the high degree of substitution. Int. J. Biol. Macromo 2013, 59, 372–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Willför, S.; Pranovich, A.; Tamminen, T.; Puls, J.; Laine, C.; Suurnäkki, A.; Saake, B.; Uotila, K.; Simolin, H.; Hemming, J. Carbohydrate analysis of plant materials with uronic acid-containing polysaccharides-A comparison between different hydrolysis and subsequent chromatographic analytical techniques. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2009, 29, 571–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Liu, X.Y.; Ma, L.Y.; Wang, L.; Wang, X.Y.; Nie, S.P.; Xie, M.Y.; Yin, J.Y. Monosaccharide composition analysis of arabinoxylan by high performance anion exchange chromatography with pulsed amperometric detection. Chin. J. Anal. Chem. 2017, 45, 415–422. [Google Scholar]
  31. Yin, J.Y.; Nie, S.P.; Guo, Q.B.; Wang, Q.; Cui, S.W.; Xie, M.Y. Effect of calcium on solution and conformational characteristics of polysaccharide from seeds of Plantago asiatica L. Carbohyd. Polym. 2015, 124, 331–336. [Google Scholar]
  32. Shimada, K.; Fujikawa, K.; Yahara, K.; Nakamura, T. Antioxidative properties of xanthone on the auto oxidation of soybean in cylcodextrin emulsion. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1992, 40, 945–948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Chen, C.; Xu, X.M.; Chen, Y.; Yu, M.Y.; Wen, F.Y.; Zhang, H. Identification, quantification and antioxidant activity of acylated flavonol glycosides from sea buckthorn (Hippophae rhamnoides ssp. sinensis). Food Chem. 2013, 141, 1573–1579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Grönroos, A.; Pirkonen, P.; Ruppert, O. Ultrasonic depolymerization of aqueous carboxymethylcellulose. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2004, 11, 9–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Yan, J.K.; Pei, J.J.; Ma, H.L.; Wang, Z.B. Effects of ultrasound on molecular properties, structure, chain conformation and degradation kinetics of carboxylic curdlan. Carbohyd. Polym. 2015, 121, 64–70. [Google Scholar]
  36. Antti, G.; Pentti, P.; Hanna, K. Ultrasonic degradation of aqueous carboxymethylcellulose: Effect of viscosity, molecular mass, and concentration. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2008, 15, 644–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Kishida, N.; Okimasu, S.; Kamata, T. Molecular weight and intrinsic viscosity of konjac gluco-mannan. Agric. Biol. Chem. 1978, 42, 1645–1650. [Google Scholar]
  38. Ratcliffe, I.; Williams, P.A.; Viebke, C.; Meadows, J. Physicochemical characterization of konjac glucomannan. Biomacromolecules 2005, 6, 1977–1986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Kök, M.S.; Abdelhameed, A.S.; Ang, S.; Morris, G.A.; Harding, S.E. A novel global hydrodynamic analysis of the molecular flexibility of the dietary fibre polysaccharide konjac glucomannan. Food Hydrocoll. 2009, 23, 1910–1917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Wu, T.; Zivanovic, S.; Hayes, D.G.; Weiss, J. Efficient reduction of chitosan molecular weight by high-intensity ultrasound: Underlying mechanism and effect of process parameters. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2008, 56, 5112–5119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Schmid, G. Zur Kinetik der Ultraschalldepolymerisation. Z. Phys. Chem. 1940, 186, 113–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Madras, G.; Kumar, S.; Chattopadhyay, S. Continuous distribution kinetics for ultrasonic degradation of polymers. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2000, 69, 73–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Zhang, L.; Ye, X.; Ding, T.; Sun, X.; Xu, Y.; Liu, D. Ultrasound effects on the degradation kinetics, structure and rheological properties of apple pectin. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2013, 20, 222–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Femenia, A.; García-Pascual, P.; Simal, S.; Rosselló, C. Effects of heat treatment and dehydration on bioactive polysaccharide acemannan and cell wall polymers from Aloe barbadensis Miller. Carbohyd. Polym. 2003, 51, 397–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Xing, X.; Cui, S.W.; Nie, S.P.; Phillips, G.O.; Goff, H.D.; Wang, Q. Study on Dendrobium officinale O-acetyl-glucomannan (Dendronan®): Part I. Extraction, purification, and partial structural characterization. Bioact. Carbohyd. Diet. Fibre 2014, 4, 74–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Burchard, W. Two-Dimensional Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy Applied to Cellulose and Paper. In Light Scattering from Polysaccharides, 2nd ed.; Dumitriu, S., Ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2004; pp. 199–202. [Google Scholar]
  47. Cui, S.W. Food Carbohydrates: Chemistry, Physical Properties, and Applications; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  48. Picout, D.R.; Ross-Murphy, S.B. On the Mark-Houwink parameters for galactomannans. Carbohyd. Polym. 2007, 70, 145–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Kratky, O.; Porod, G. Röntgenuntersuchung gelöster fadenmoleküle. Recueil des Travaux Chimiques des Pays-Bas 1949, 68, 1106–1122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Bohdanecký, M. New method for estimating the parameters of the wormlike chain model from the intrinsic viscosity of stiff-chain polymers. Macromolecules 1983, 16, 1483–1492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Tatirat, O.; Charoenrein, S. Physicochemical properties of konjac glucomannan extracted from konjac flour by a simple centrifugation process. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2011, 44, 2059–2063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Xu, W.; Wang, S.; Ye, T.; Jin, W.; Liu, J.; Lei, J.; Li, B.; Wang, C. A simple and feasible approach to purify konjac glucomannan from konjac flour-Temperature effect. Food Chem. 2014, 158, 171–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Guo, X.; Ye, X.Q.; Sun, Y.J.; Wu, D.; Wu, N.; Hu, Y.Q.; Chen, S.G. Ultrasound effects on the degradation kinetics, structure, and antioxidant activity of sea cucumber fucoidan. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2014, 62, 1088–1095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Shi, M.; Yang, Y.; Hu, X.; Zhang, Z. Effect of ultrasonic extraction conditions on antioxidative and immunomodulatory activities of a Ganoderma lucidum polysaccharide originated from fermented soybean curd residue. Food Chem. 2014, 155, 50–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Yan, J.K.; Wang, Y.Y.; Ma, H.L.; Wang, Z.B. Ultrasonic effects on the degradation kinetics, preliminary characterization and antioxidant activities of polysaccharides from Phellinus linteus mycelia. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2016, 29, 251–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Zhang, H.; Ma, H.; Liu, W.; Pei, J.; Wang, Z.; Zhou, H.; Yan, J. Ultrasound enhanced production and antioxidant activity of polysaccharides from mycelial fermentation of Phellinus igniarius. Carbohyd. Polym. 2014, 113, 380–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Zhou, C.; Wang, Y.; Ma, H.; He, R. Effect of ultrasonic degradation on in vitro antioxidant activity of polysaccharides from Porphyra yezoensis (Rhodophyta). Food Sci. Technol. Int. 2008, 14, 479–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. High-performance size-exclusion chromatography (HPSEC) chromatograms of konjac glucomannan (KGM) fractions (US-0, US-4, US-10, and US-60: ultrasonication (US) treatment for 0, 4, 10, and 60 min at a fixed amplitude of 60%).
Figure 1. High-performance size-exclusion chromatography (HPSEC) chromatograms of konjac glucomannan (KGM) fractions (US-0, US-4, US-10, and US-60: ultrasonication (US) treatment for 0, 4, 10, and 60 min at a fixed amplitude of 60%).
Applsci 09 00461 g001
Figure 2. Kinetics of ultrasonic degradation of KGM: (a) time courses of molecular weight (MW) change during US treatment; (b) time courses of intrinsic viscosity [η] change during US treatment; (c) MW time courses fitted to the random chain scission model Equation (1); (d) MW time courses fitted to the midpoint chain scission model Equation (2); H represents the value of (MeMi)/(MtMi).
Figure 2. Kinetics of ultrasonic degradation of KGM: (a) time courses of molecular weight (MW) change during US treatment; (b) time courses of intrinsic viscosity [η] change during US treatment; (c) MW time courses fitted to the random chain scission model Equation (1); (d) MW time courses fitted to the midpoint chain scission model Equation (2); H represents the value of (MeMi)/(MtMi).
Applsci 09 00461 g002
Figure 3. Apparent viscosities of original KGM and US-treated KGM. (a) Apparent viscosity of KGM; (b) apparent viscosities of US-treated KGM (KGM-US-2, KGM-US-4, KGM-US-6, KGM-US-10, KGM-US-20, KGM-US-30, and KGM-US-60). All samples were tested three times by flow sweep in the shear rate range of 0.01–1000 s−1 at 25 °C. All values are expressed as means ± SD (n = 3).
Figure 3. Apparent viscosities of original KGM and US-treated KGM. (a) Apparent viscosity of KGM; (b) apparent viscosities of US-treated KGM (KGM-US-2, KGM-US-4, KGM-US-6, KGM-US-10, KGM-US-20, KGM-US-30, and KGM-US-60). All samples were tested three times by flow sweep in the shear rate range of 0.01–1000 s−1 at 25 °C. All values are expressed as means ± SD (n = 3).
Applsci 09 00461 g003
Figure 4. Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectra of original KGM and US-treated KGM (KGM-US-10 and KGM-US-60).
Figure 4. Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectra of original KGM and US-treated KGM (KGM-US-10 and KGM-US-60).
Applsci 09 00461 g004
Figure 5. SEM images of original and US-treated KGM fractions (magnification 5000×).
Figure 5. SEM images of original and US-treated KGM fractions (magnification 5000×).
Applsci 09 00461 g005
Figure 6. In vitro antioxidant activities of original (KGM) and US-treated KGM (KGM-US-2, KGM-US-20, and KGM-US-60): (a) 2,2′-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical-scavenging activity; (b) 2,2′-azino-bis-3-ethyl-benzothiazoline-6-sulphonate (ABTS) radical scavenging activity; (c) ferric-reducing antioxidant power. All values are expressed as means ± SD (n = 2). Original KGM and US-treated KGM fractions were prepared with distilled water to various concentrations of 0.125, 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 mg/mL.
Figure 6. In vitro antioxidant activities of original (KGM) and US-treated KGM (KGM-US-2, KGM-US-20, and KGM-US-60): (a) 2,2′-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical-scavenging activity; (b) 2,2′-azino-bis-3-ethyl-benzothiazoline-6-sulphonate (ABTS) radical scavenging activity; (c) ferric-reducing antioxidant power. All values are expressed as means ± SD (n = 2). Original KGM and US-treated KGM fractions were prepared with distilled water to various concentrations of 0.125, 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 mg/mL.
Applsci 09 00461 g006aApplsci 09 00461 g006b
Table 1. Effects of ultrasonication (US) on molecular properties and conformation of konjac glucomannan (KGM) fractions derived from analysis with high-performance size-exclusion chromatography (HPSEC) equipped with multi-angle laser light scattering (MALLS) detector, viscometer (Vis), and refractive index RI detector. MW—molecular weight.
Table 1. Effects of ultrasonication (US) on molecular properties and conformation of konjac glucomannan (KGM) fractions derived from analysis with high-performance size-exclusion chromatography (HPSEC) equipped with multi-angle laser light scattering (MALLS) detector, viscometer (Vis), and refractive index RI detector. MW—molecular weight.
Sonication Time (min)Mw/MnRh (nm)<Rg>z (nm)Higher-MW Region a
αLp (nm)
01.560.0104.50.7910.3
21.333.655.90.517.1
41.322.739.60.627.2
61.319.733.30.657.4
101.216.528.70.697.4
201.213.825.40.737.3
301.212.924.90.777.5
601.211.126.90.959.1
a MW distributions selected for α values and Lp calculation were based on Mark–Houwink plots shown in Figures S2 and S3 (Supplementary Materials); α was calculated from the Mark–Houwink equation; Lp was the persistence length.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yin, J.-Y.; Ma, L.-Y.; Siu, K.-C.; Wu, J.-Y. Effects of Ultrasonication on the Conformational, Microstructural, and Antioxidant Properties of Konjac Glucomannan. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 461. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/app9030461

AMA Style

Yin J-Y, Ma L-Y, Siu K-C, Wu J-Y. Effects of Ultrasonication on the Conformational, Microstructural, and Antioxidant Properties of Konjac Glucomannan. Applied Sciences. 2019; 9(3):461. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/app9030461

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yin, Jun-Yi, Lu-Yao Ma, Ka-Chai Siu, and Jian-Yong Wu. 2019. "Effects of Ultrasonication on the Conformational, Microstructural, and Antioxidant Properties of Konjac Glucomannan" Applied Sciences 9, no. 3: 461. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/app9030461

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop