Next Article in Journal
Photonic Systems and Devices for Linear Cell Radar
Next Article in Special Issue
Graphene-Based Membranes for CO2/CH4 Separation: Key Challenges and Perspectives
Previous Article in Journal
Identification and Description of Outliers in the Densmore Collection of Native American Music
Previous Article in Special Issue
Enhanced Fouling Resistance and Antibacterial Properties of Novel Graphene Oxide-Arabic Gum Polyethersulfone Membranes
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Biomedical Applications of Polymeric Cryogels

1
Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Hacettepe University, Ankara 06800, Turkey
2
Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Hacettepe University, Ankara 06800, Turkey
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 31 December 2018 / Revised: 25 January 2019 / Accepted: 4 February 2019 / Published: 7 February 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue High-Performance Nanocomposite Membranes and Their Applications)

Abstract

:

Featured Application

This study presents the comprehensive applications of polymeric cryogels in the field of biomedicine. To the best of our knowledge, this review is one of the most pioneering paper comparatively explains the biomedical applications of cryogels in detail.

Abstract

The application of interconnected supermacroporous cryogels as support matrices for the purification, separation and immobilization of whole cells and different biological macromolecules has been well reported in literature. Cryogels have advantages over traditional gel carriers in the field of biochromatography and related biomedical applications. These matrices nearly mimic the three-dimensional structure of native tissue extracellular matrix. In addition, mechanical, osmotic and chemical stability of cryogels make them attractive polymeric materials for the construction of scaffolds in tissue engineering applications and in vitro cell culture, separation materials for many different processes such as immobilization of biomolecules, capturing of target molecules, and controlled drug delivery. The low mass transfer resistance of cryogel matrices makes them useful in chromatographic applications with the immobilization of different affinity ligands to these materials. Cryogels have been introduced as gel matrices prepared using partially frozen monomer or polymer solutions at temperature below zero. These materials can be produced with different shapes and are of interest in the therapeutic area. This review highlights the recent advances in cryogelation technologies by emphasizing their biomedical applications to supply an overview of their rising stars day to day.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

In recent years, there has been an increase in the number of studies using macroporous polymeric structures for the separation of biological molecules. High and rapid purification abilities of supermacroporous polymeric materials make them applicable in separation of different biological macromolecules. Cryogels have a wide range of applications in the biotechnology, bioseparation and biomedicine fields, taking part in many applications for the purification and immobilization of proteins, nucleic acids, and polysaccharides [1].
Cryogels are gel matrices formed by polymerization at temperatures below zero. While the polymerization process takes place in the unfrozen part, ice crystals formed act as pore forming agents. At the end of the polymerization process, after cryogels are thawed, supermacropores are formed within cryogel structure [2]. Since the interconnected macro pores provide a great advantage when working with viscous biological fluids, there has been a large increase in the number of studies using cryogels for the purification of natural source proteins over the last decade. Enzymes, nucleic acids and carbohydrates can be separated from their source without back pressure problems and diffusion restriction due to the interconnected supermacropores. Large, interconnected supermacropores provide unique spongy structure to the cryogels. Elastic and spongy structure of cryogels makes them different from rigid monoliths [3].
Supermacroporous cryogels have a great deal of interest in biomedical, biotechnology and pharmacy. Supermacroporosity of cryogels allows them to be used without any diffusion problems when working with biological macromolecules. Cryogels can be used in the purification of macromolecules such as proteins and nucleic acids, as well as in the separation of cell organelles, viruses, plasmids, microorganisms and mammalian cells. In addition, since the porous structures are suitable for cell adhesion and mechanical stability of cryogels offers applicability in in vivo processes, cryogels are also used in tissue engineering studies [4]. Cryogels have a three-dimensional structure suitable for the proliferation of cells. In particular, the surface properties of the support materials used in tissue engineering greatly affect cell affinity. Hydrophilic and porous structure of cryogels make them suitable for cell affinity. This review describes the specific features of cryogels and refers to recent applications of cryogels in biomedicine and related area [5].

2. Preparation and Properties of Supermacroporous Cryogels

Monoliths, also called continuous stationary phases, are important tools for separating biological molecules. Although the studies on monoliths were started in the early 1970s, they gained importance as a big invention in the 1990s. Monolithic materials are characterized by low mass transfer resistance. In all studies involving biological macromolecules, monoliths perform much better than conventional chromatographic systems [6].
Monolithic materials have found wide use in chromatographic applications with the immobilization of different affinity ligands to monoliths [7]. The difference of monoliths from traditional filled columns is due to the one-piece porous structure. The interconnected pores in the structure of the monolith form a cross-channel network. Since the intra-channel mass transfer occurs with the flow, the transfer between the mobile phase and the stationary phase is very rapid. As a result, even very large molecules such as proteins can be separated from monolithic columns in a very short time. In addition, it is desirable to have low pressure during liquid flow in chromatographic systems. Since monoliths have smooth flow channels, high pressure does not occur, thus preventing any back pressure and/or clogging in the column [8].
Cryogel monoliths are gel matrices prepared using partially frozen monomer or polymer solutions. The most important features of the cryogels are their porous structure, non-specific interaction due to their hydrophilic structure, minimum mechanical properties and osmotic stability. The main disadvantage of cryogels is the low surface area. Cryogels characterized by their hydrophilic properties have supermacropores and are formed by the polymerization process performed at temperatures below zero. The formation of cryogels is given in Figure 1. During cryogel formation, the polymer precursors are first dissolved in a suitable solvent such as water. In the freezing phase, the solvent freezes and forms interconnected ice crystals. The polymer precursors present in the unfrozen portion polymerize to form a network around the ice crystals. After the polymerization is completed, the frozen mixture is brought to room temperature. Then, the ice crystals melt and the porous polymer network, called “cryogel”, is obtained. Solvent crystals act as pore forming agents. The melting of the ice crystals due to the surface tension of the solvent around the pore wall allows the pores in the cryogels to have a circular shape. The shape and size of the pores depend on many factors such as monomer concentration and temperature at which polymerization takes place are the most important factors. Micropore formations are also observed in the polymeric phase of the cryogels. Thus, in addition to supermacropores, there are also micropores in the cryogel structure [9]. The supermacropores in the structure of cryogels vary in size from 10 to 200 μm.
The pore size, the thickness and the density of the pore walls are the parameters that affect the performance of cryogels. The pore size affects the flow resistance. The thickness and density of the pore walls determine the macroscopic mechanical properties of the cryogel.
The pore volume of a chromatographic material is very important. An average of 3–4% of the total weight of a cryogel that is completely swollen by water is the dry polymer weight. 4–5% of the weight consists of polymer bound water. Thus, 90% of the remaining weight of the cryogel constitutes of water inside pores. Due to the elasticity of the cryogels, 70% of the water in the large pores can be removed by mechanical compression. This feature indicates that a large part of the cryogel volume consists of interconnected pores [10].
Many advantages of cryogels make them useful in the field of biochromatography. The large pores of the cryogels interconnected with each other offer advantages when working with viscose biological fluids such as blood, plasma, plant or animal tissue extracts. Thanks to the large pores, there is no diffusion limitation in cryogels, and the back pressure is low. Thus, cryogels are more advantageous than traditional polymeric spheres in the purification of biomacromolecules from natural sources. Denizli and his colleagues have provided purification and removal of many substances such as immunoglobulins, albumin, lysozyme, DNA, and cholesterol by immobilizing different ligands to cryogels. Lectins, protein A, tryptophan, triazin dyes and various metals have been used as ligands in these studies [11,12,13,14,15,16,17]. There are also some drawbacks of cryogels besides their desirable advantages. Cryogels have lower surface area than other polymeric structures such as microbeads and nanoparticles. By this way, cryogels have low ligand density which resulted in low adsorption capacity. Composite cryogels can be prepared to overcome this problem. Particle embedding and synthesis of cryogels using nanoparticles can be performed to increase the specific surface area of cryogels to be used in the capturing of target molecules [9].

Factors Affecting Properties of Cryogels

There are many factors affecting properties of cryogels. Temperature at which cryogelation occurs, polymerization time, type of crosslinking, contents of monomers used, and freezing rate are variables determine physical properties of cryogels. Lozinsky et al. have shown the effect of temperature on pore size. According to their study, lower cryogelation temperature results in smaller pore size. Thus, cryogels with different pore size distribution can be generated by changing cryogelation temperature. However, the temperature at which cryogels with maximum pore size are obtained, are preferred [18]. In a study, 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA)-based cryogel membranes were prepared at different polymerization temperature to observe the effect on the pore size of membranes. They reported smaller pore size formation at lower cryogelation temperature [19].
Monomer contents of cryogels and concentrations of reaction constituents significantly affect the cryogelation process. Monomers with lower molecular weights are expected to form larger pores when compared to monomers with larger molecular weights. In addition, increase in the amount of reaction constituents rises the rigidity of cryogels, thickness of cryogel walls and elasticity [20]. Also, rate of cryogelation increases and cryogelation occurs more efficiently with using of more concentrated polymer contents. Water soluble monomers are usually preferred for the preparation of cryogels. HEMA, N-isopropylacrylamide (NIPA), acrylic acid (AAc), N′,N′-dimethylacrylamide (DMA), N′,N′-diethylacrylamide (DEA) and acrylamide (AAm) are some monomer types used for cryogel preparation.
Freezing rate is also an important factor for optimal cryogel production process. To produce supermacroporous homogeneous cryogels, the crosslinking speed should be slower than the solvent freezing rate. If the crosslinking speed proceeds faster than the solvent crystallizes, no macro pores will be formed. Therefore, the typical supermacroporous cryogel structure will not occur [21].
Crosslinking degree affects physical properties of cryogels. Stiffness of the cryogel, elasticity and mechanical properties are the factors affected by crosslinking degree. Crosslinking degree also has an influence on swelling degree by affecting pore size with capability of keeping water [22]. N′,N′-methylene(bis) acrylamide (MBAA) and poly(ethylene glycol diacrylate) have been used as crosslinkers for preparation of different types of cryogels in the literature. Glutaraldehyde is also used for crosslinking of proteins via amine groups of peptide chains. In addition to proteins, glutaraldehyde can crosslink polysaccharides and synthetic polymers such as poly (vinyl alcohol) (PVA) and polyacrylamide in the preparation of cryogels [23].
Cryogels can be classified as supermacroporous hydrogels which are produced by cryogelation. There are some differences between hydrogels and cryogels. To obtain macroporous structure within hydrogels, different pore forming agents which are removed after gelation can be used. Removal of porogens and insufficient interconnectivity are main difficulties of conventional hydrogels in preparation process. Furthermore, chemicals that are used to remove porogens can stay in gel structure and affect binding of target macromolecules or cells. Porogen removal process can be time consuming and creates excessive waste. In addition, porogens which are not removed properly can cause unfavorable effects on target molecules in binding process. If porogens cannot be removed properly, they stay in gel structure and can prevent interconnectivity between macropores. Thus, non-toxic and easily removable porogens are preferred for producing interconnected macroporous gel structures. At this point, cryogels are attractive options as they are formed by using water as porogen-forming agent. Because water molecules can be easily removed in thawing process, cryogelation method is simple. Thus, cryogels have gained great interest in recent years and number of publications on cryogels have steadily increased [9,22].

3. Cryogels in Medical Applications

Cryogels are good alternatives to traditional protein-binding matrices with many different biomedical applications. The advantages of cryogels such as high blood-compatibility, high water content, resistance to degradation, non-toxicity, and pressure drop properties allow them to be used without any diffusion problems when working with biological macromolecules. The main applications of cryogel matrices are immobilization of biomolecules, capturing of target molecules, controlled drug delivery, cell separation, tissue engineering, bioreactor, cell separation, and scaffolds.

3.1. Immobilization of Biomolecules

In affinity-based separation and purification of biomacromolecules a specific ligand is immobilized onto cryogel matrices. The immobilization of ligand in cryogel matrices can be applied with two approaches; (i) covalent coupling of the ligand to the prepared cryogel matrix and (ii) physical attachment of ligand in during the polymerization [24]. The low-pressure drop and lack of diffusion resistance are the main advantages of cryogels that causes to apply viscous samples.
Antibody immobilized cryogel matrices provide a selective removal of specific antigen from a complex mixture. In autoimmune diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis, plasma exchange treatment has been used to remove of autoantibodies produced during these diseases. The disadvantages of plasma exchange treatment can be altered by using affinity adsorption therapy for plasma exchange. For example, in a study, poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) (PHEMA) cryogel carrying protein A was used for the removal of immunoglobulin M (IgM) from human plasma [25]. The PHEMA cryogel was prepared by bulk polymerization, which proceeds in an aqueous solution of monomer frozen inside a plastic syringe. As seen in Figure 2a, the PHEMA cryogel has a continuous matrix with 10–200 µm pores. Pore volume in the PHEMA cryogel was 71.6%. Protein A was covalently immobilized onto the PHEMA cryogel via cyanogen bromide activation. The PHEMA cryogel was contacted with blood in vitro system for the determination of blood-compatibility (Figure 2b). IgM adsorption capacity decreased significantly with the increase of the plasma flow rate. An increase in the flow rate reduced the plasma volume treated efficiently until breakthrough point and therefore decreased the retention time of the PHEMA cryogel column. The maximum IgM adsorption amount was 42.7 mg/g. IgM could be repeatedly adsorbed and eluted without noticeable loss in the IgM adsorption amount. Separation of target molecule with high specificity and yield provide advantages to cryogels immobilized with monoclonal antibodies. Kumar et al. coupled anti-CD34 monoclonal antibodies to protein A-PVA cryogel beads for capturing human acute myeloid leukemia KG-1 cells expressing the CD34 surface antigen on the surface [26].
In another study, apoproteinB100, a ligand against the main protein component of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) was used for the selective removal of harmful LDL without decreasing useful high-density lipoprotein (HDL) in hypercholesterolemia. Bereli et al. prepared protein A immobilized cryogels carrying Anti-LDL antibody. They successfully removed approximately 59% of the initial LDL from the hypercholesterolemic plasma [16].

3.2. Capturing of Target Molecules

Capturing of a target molecule from a complex medium is an important factor in modern biotechnology. The effective separation of the target can be achieved by using supermacroporous materials and longtime physically and chemically stable sorbents. Lower mass transfer resistance and pressure drop properties of cryogels make them useful as sorbents for the separation of target molecules from a complex medium [10]. Traditional gels are delicate and fragile. Whereas, cryogels are elastic, soft, sponge-like materials without deformations. Therefore, these materials can be used in the field of biochromatography. Cryogel matrices are widely used in bioseparation technology such as separation and removal of proteins, peptides, nucleotides and even toxic metals. The removal of dominating proteins such as human serum albumin (HSA) and immunoglobulins from the biological sample is crucial to allow the analysis of less components. The promising cryogels can be used as matrices to make these minor components more accessible. Different technologies such as immunoaffinity, dye affinity, and molecular imprinting can be applied with cryogel-based matrices for the effective separation and removal of target molecules.
Avcıbaşı and co-workers used HEMA and N,N-bis (2,6-diisopropylphenyl) perylene-3,4,9, 10-tetracarboxylic diimide (DIPPER) monomers for preparation of P(HEMA-DIPPER) monolithic cryogels and used these cryogels for capturing of albumin [27]. The maximum adsorption for albumin was reported 40.9 mg/g. Monolithic cryogels are even more attractive with shorter processing times, and they have better ease use and higher overall ease of capacity. The dominant interaction between matrices and target molecules could be attributed to the hydrophobic interactions due to the hydrophobic character of DIPPER.
Bereli and co-workers synthesized supermacroporous PHEMA-based cryogel with N-methacryloyl-(l)-histidine methyl ester (MAH) as the specific ligand for purification of immunoglobulin G (IgG) from human plasma. Supermacroporous cryogels were produced by free-radical polymerization initiated by tetrametiletilendiamin and ammonium persulfate pair in an ice bath. Supermacroporous cryogels with 38.6 m2/g surface area and containing 113.7 µmol MAH/g were used in the purification of IgG from human plasma. They reported 24.7 mg/g maximum adsorption capacity of IgG. The adsorption capacity of supermacroporous cryogels was significantly improved due to the MAH incorporation into the cryogel. They obtained 97.3 mg/g IgG adsorption capacity from human plasma [28]. Also, 94.6% purity of IgG by SDS-PAGE (sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis) has been indicated in this study.
In another study, Bakhshpour et al. used immobilized metal affinity-based cryogels for the separation of IgG. They used poly(ethylene imine) (PEI) as the chelating ligand covalently coupled with PHEMA cryogels after activation and then Cu(II) ions were chelated to the PEI bound PHEMA cryogels. The separation was selectively achieved up to 72.28 mg/g cryogel. As a conclusion, they have reported that IgG separation was performed by immobilized metal affinity-based cryogel column successfully and selectively (Figure 3) [29]. In another study, they prepared and characterized two different combinations for the purification of IgG. They synthesized thiophilic PHEMA-based and thiophilic composite cryogel membranes via attachment of 2-mercaptoethanol as an affinity ligand. They reported 27.5 mg/g and 68.7 mg/g maximum adsorption capacities for thiophilic PHEMA and thiophilic composite cryogel membranes, respectively [30].
Besides immobilization-based affinity chromatography, it is also possible to separate biomolecules with molecularly imprinted cryogels and then to use them for the separation of molecules. Molecular imprinting-based cryogels (MIC) are prepared with high affinity and specificity binding sites to the target molecules. In a typical molecular imprinting process, the functional monomers and the template molecules are interacted to form complexes and then, the complexes are polymerized with appropriate crosslinkers. After the removal of template molecules selective cavities are obtained which are complementary to template molecules in dimension, shape and functional groups.
Chun and co-workers added human serum into the monomer solutions to synthesize molecularly imprinted polymers; thus, some abundant proteins were imprinted in the polyacrylamide cryogels. Albumin, serotransferrin, and most globulins were depleted with the columns packed with the molecularly imprinted polymers. Meanwhile, enrichment of less abundant proteins was carried out. After depletion, less abundant proteins were revealed by SDS-PAGE, peptide fingerprint analysis, and identified by Matrix Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization-Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry (MALDI-TOF-MS). This is an example that a “per se imprint” protocol enables to gradually dimidiate proteomes, simplify sample complexities, and facilitate further proteome profiling or biomarker discovery [30]. In Table 1 some different technologies for the separation of proteins published were listed.
Besides the separation and removal of proteins, removal of metal ions plays important role in the treatment of diseases. The toxic effects of many heavy metals are hazardous to human health. Aluminum is a known neurotoxicant which can contribute to Alzheimer’s disease [42]. Aluminum enters the brain through the blood-brain barrier, contributing to Alzheimer’s disease and other neurodegenerative diseases. Demirçelik et al. prepared Al(III)-imprinted poly(hydroxyethyl methacrylate-N-methacryloyl-Lglutamic acid) (PHEMAGA–Al(III)) supermacroporous beads by a suspension polymerization technique for removal of Al(III). They reported maximum Al(III) adsorption capacity as 0.76 mg/g. They also reported relative selectivity coefficients of the PHEMAGA–Al(III) supermacroporous beads for Al(III)/Fe(III), Al(III)/Cu(II) and Al(III)/Zn(II) as 4.49, 8.95 and 32.44 times greater than those of the non-imprinted PHEMAGA beads, respectively.
Aslıyüce et al. [43] prepared iron imprinted PHEMA cryogel to remove excess Fe(III) ions from beta-thalassemia patient plasma. β-thalassemia is an autosomal recessive disorder characterized by a deficiency in the synthesis of β-chains. Therefore, impaired production of β-chain and unbalanced synthesis of α and β-chains leads to the destruction of red blood cells (RBCs). Chronic iron overload may occur in thalassemia. Iron intoxication is a life-threating form of poisoning. They complexed Fe(III) ions with N-methacryloyl-l-cysteine (MAC) monomer and the resulting MAC-Fe(III) complex were cryopolymerized in the presence of HEMA monomer. They reported maximum Fe(III) adsorption capacity onto cryogel as 75 μg/g. The Fe(III) imprinted poly(hydroxyethyl methacrylate-N-methacryloyl-l-cysteine (PHEMA-MAC) cryogel was shown to be selective for the Fe(III) ions. They also reported relative selectivity as 10.5 and 2.3 for Fe(III)/Cd(II) and Fe(III)/Ni(II), respectively. The cryogels offer great alternatives via advantages of large pores, short diffusion path, low-pressure drop, and very short residence times for both adsorption and elution. Some different technologies for the removal of metal ions are listed in Table 2. It should be noted that there are many different approaches such as specific interactions, group-specific affinity, and molecular imprinting technology applied to remove metal ions.
Derazshamshir and co-workers synthesized novel cryogels for the depletion of hemoglobin from human blood. They synthesized MAH as a functional monomer for complexing with hemoglobin. The hemoglobin imprinted cryogel was prepared by free-radical polymerization below 0 °C. Figure 4 shows the morphology and porosity of hemoglobin imprinted supermacroporous cryogels.

3.3. Controlled Drug Delivery

Drug delivery systems (DDs) are designed to deliver various drugs by using polymeric carriers at a certain time and specific sites. DDs are methods for applying a pharmaceutical compound to achieve a therapeutic effect. DDs improve therapeutic effects and reduce the toxicity of drugs. DDs have recently gained great attention of scientists in the fields of biomedicine and pharmacy. Four types of DDs can be reported such as diffusion-controlled, swelling-controlled, erosion-controlled and stimulus-controlled. Various polymeric biomaterials have been developed to deliver drugs to human body [46]. DDs are classified as polymeric capsules, micelles, liposomes and gels according to dosage formulation of drugs. A core containing therapeutic drug and a polymer membrane outside the core are defined for a polymeric capsule. Thus, drug can be released by diffusion from the core through the membrane [47]. Supermacroporous cryogels are developed to deliver drugs to human body. The biocompatibility and controllable permeability of cryogels have caused extensively using in DDs for bioactive compounds in the last few decades. Stimuli-responsive cryogels have attracted a great deal of attention of researchers because of their sensitive response to a variety of physical and chemical changes. The structure of cryogels has been defined as smart DDs to fulfill the desired drug release profiles [19].
Supermacroporous polymeric structures have decent advantages such as high water content, non-toxicity, user-friendly, mild and efficient nature. Their reusability and easy storage offer added advantages. Therefore, these materials can be used in drug delivery due to their mechanical and chemical robustness, easy production, mechanical strength, and low cost. Cryogels offer distinctive three-dimensional structure materials for local delivery of therapeutic drugs. High blood-compatibility and resistance to degradation are great properties of these materials. These materials have good alternatives for implantable systems to deliver a large dose of drugs close to the tumor for sustained drug delivery. These materials also greatly decrease the toxic effects of the drug, and increase the therapeutic effect of chemotherapy [48].
Presently, researchers are working on the design of effective and low-cost gel-based drug delivery systems. Dinu et al. prepared three-dimensional biocomposites based on chitosan and clinoptilolite by cryogelation and investigated their potential application as drug carriers for diclofenac sodium and indomethacin. They reported the cumulative release of diclofenac sodium from the monoliths lower than 5% at pH 1.2 and higher than 70% at pH 7.4. In addition, they reported cumulative release 6% of indomethacin within the first hour in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) from composite cryogels [48]. The group of Denizli [19,49] prepared mitomycin C (MMC) imprinted cryogels for the delivery of MMC. They synthesized MMC imprinted poly(hydroxyethyl methacrylate-N-methacryloyl-(l)-histidine methyl ester)–Cu(II) [PHEMAH–Cu(II)] and MMC imprinted PHEMAGA cryogel membranes by free-radical bulk polymerization under partially frozen conditions. They synthesized these materials in different molar ratios of HEMA and MBAA at fixed amount of the template molecule for showing the effect of cross-linker in drug release rate. The increase of cross-linker ratio in the cryogel network resulted in the construction of more rigid and crosslinked polymers. They studied the release rate of MMC with different amounts of template and showed an increasing cumulative release of MMC with the increasing amount of MMC.
Caka et al. synthesized poly(hydroxyethyl methacrylate-N-methacryloyl-l-phenylalanine poly(HEMA-MAPA) membranes used for the controlled release of curcumin via UV-polymerization technique. Curcumin is used as a folk remedy and a drug for some certain diseases and cancers. They reported 7.4 optimal pH and 37 °C temperature for controlled release of curcumin. They obtained optimum values which were very compatible with in-body usage without any extreme release factors [50]. Çetin and Denizli have prepared 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) imprinted cryogel discs using a coordination complex between metal-chelate monomer MAH and 5-FU with the assistance of Cu(II) ion [51]. The complex was copolymerized with HEMA to produce PHEMAH cryogel discs. It was observed that the cumulative release of 5-FU decreased by the increasing amount of cross-linker, and 5-FU transport mechanism was found to be non-Fickian. In another study, Çetin et al. prepared an implantable and degradable molecularly imprinted cryogel for pH-responsive delivery of doxorubicin (DOX) [36]. The release rate of DOX from cryogel discs increased in more acidic conditions. Kinetic studies have shown that the general release behavior of molecularly imprinted cryogel discs was a combination of diffusion and erosion control. In another study, Kostova et al. prepared temperature-sensitive poly(ethoxytriethyleneglycol acrylate) cryogels for controlled releasing of the hydrophilic drug verapamil hydrochloride. The controlled releasing of verapamil hydrochloride reported over a period of more than 8 h [52].

3.4. Cryogels for Tissue Engineering

The extracellular matrix (ECM) is a significant part of the cells and it has a great importance in maintaining support, arranging cell-cell communication, by the way, regulating cell growth, differentiation and survival [53]. ECM mainly contains of nm-sized fibers [54] and some macromolecules such as collagen, fibronectin, laminin and elastin [55]. These fibrous proteins play an essential role in cell coordination by enabling signal delivery, matrix reconstruction, etc. Cell-ECM interactions rely on signal transmission occurs in the cell membrane, by the way, organization between cytoskeleton and related molecules. When two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) structures of the ECM are compared, it has been proven that there is a dramatic well-defined difference in cell behavior in the form of 3D. Therefore, designated matrices should mimic the 3D structure of native tissue ECM. These matrices are conducted to support cell-ECM communication mentioned above [53].
Scaffolds can be identified as 3D biomaterials fabricated to carry out many functions. Desirable scaffolds acting as an artificial ECM should have some unique properties. They must be biocompatible by allowing cell adherence and movement towards onto the surface with stimulating remissible immune response. They also should be biodegradable for maintaining the substitution of own tissue of the cells. In addition, they must possess robust mechanical feature for efficient surgical processes and their structure should be coherent with the region into which it is planned to be implanted [56]. On the other hand, their interconnected pores provide the transportation of the nutrients within the cycle of cell-ECM-scaffold and enable the removal of wastes from the scaffolds [53,56,57].
Different methodologies are assembled to construct functional scaffolds serving as a cell supportive in tissue engineering. Therefore, scaffolds have potential use in the replacement/regeneration of tissues/organs and in the meantime regenerative medicine has gained great attention providing novel treatment methods for various steps of several diseases. Recently, several attempts were made to establish in vitro fundamentally target part of the body [56].
Scaffolds could be prepared in various structures such as microbeads, cryogels, hydrogels, ceramics and nanofibers. Many of them have been explored for a wide variety of applications including bladder, airway, skin, bone, ligament, tendon, liver, kidney, pancreas, intestine, esophagus, nerve, heart muscle and valve, cartilage regeneration [53]. It is noteworthy to highlight that the chosen scaffold construction method has a crucial role in the production of effective and accomplished materials, since scaffolds have similarity to their intended tissue. In recent years, cryogelation has become a rather novel approach which aims to improve tissue engineering. Among many scaffold structures, cryogels are considered as good templates and have high potential for the regeneration of indicated tissue parts. They are interconnected supermacroporous polymeric materials with 3D and hydrophilic property. Therefore, they can absorb high volume of tissue fluids and so that they got the edge over other groups of synthetic polymer networks with the advantage of swelling character and soft biocompatibility. It should be also noted that their gel formed structure with high porosity facilitates cell penetration, contact and migration preserving the chemical and mechanical stability. In addition, the preparation step of cryogels is very simple and cost-effective [53]. Considering all these features, it is not surprising that these interesting and individual polymeric materials has come up in tissue engineering in recent decades.
Natural and/or synthetic polymers, widely used for scaffold production, have been promising tools in biomedical applications. Natural polymers such as agarose, alginate, hyaluronic acid, chitosan, gelatin, collagen and silk show biocompatibility with eliciting minimal immune response. They also stimulate cell-cell interaction and have low toxicity. On the other hand, synthetic polymers such as poly-glycolic acid, PVA, poly-l-lactic acid, poly-caprolactone, polyorthoester have intelligently tailored unique features and manageable characteristic behavior. However, their usage can be problematic in terms of injection and leading infection; besides that, harmful byproducts may occur in course of degradation. Apart from this polymeric material prepared via combination of natural and synthetic polymers, polymeric scaffolds and composites could be applied for tissue engineering applications. In this section, recent advances and current approaches in the usage of cryogels are briefly summarized by emphasizing the tissue engineering fields in which they situated: bioreactors, cell separation and artificial ECMs [53].

3.4.1. Bioreactors

Bioreactors are defined as devices which support biological reactions. They have a great importance in the cell cultivation providing control and monitoring of pH, temperature, oxygen and nutrient dissociation in microbiology. When tissue engineering was taken into consideration, bioreactors can be applied to develop new functional tissue in vitro with the production of regulatory signals in an appropriate physical environment. By this way, they stimulate cell proliferation, modification with the advantage of uniform cell distribution on 3D matrices and ECM generation before implantation step. Scaffolds are particularly well-designed candidates to store and deliver of the cells. Cryogels have an important role in the development of bioreactor matrix enabling high amount of mass transfer and have been attractive alternatives as bioreactors.
There have been several research publications highlighting the vital roles of cryogels in bioreactor platforms. A previous study regarding with the storage and transportation ability of the cells reported the application of both HEMA-agarose (HA) and gelatin cryogels for this purpose. Firstly, HA cryogel matrices seeded with C2C12 cells, after five days, it was indicated that C2C12 cells were successfully protected with high viability. In terms of gelatin cryogels, it was shown that C2C12 cells, human hepatocellular liver carcinoma cell line (HepG2), human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) were sustained by cryopreservation [58]. Efremenko, E.N., et al. were examined the capability of PVA cryogels in the storage of both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria, yeasts, and filamentous fungi. This study revealed that the viability and effective reproductive potential of the microbial cells were kept at −18 °C for two years [59].
Polymeric cryogel matrices have been prominent tools for the cultivation of a large number of cells as well. In a previous study, copolymer of acrylonitrile and N-vinyl-2-pyrrolidone and interpenetrated polymer networks of chitosan and NIPA were prepared as cryogel matrices. These two types of cryogels with supermacropores the size of 20–100 μm provided operative transportation; besides that, they were triggered in vitro cultivation of fibroblasts and HepG2. On the other hand, both hemocompatibility and biocompatibility of these cryogels were proved. Consequently, cryogels as efficient bioreactor matrices enable hepatocyte immobilization and their ability for detoxification of plasma was clinically demonstrated in acute on chronic liver failure [60]. In another study, it was aimed to establish cryogels and use them as bioreactor systems to hydrolyze starch. For this purpose, the immobilization of alpha-amylase from Aspergillus oryzae was performed by cryopolymerization of AAm monomers. The effect of different experimental conditions (pH, temperature, concentration of starch solution) on starch hydrolysis were investigated. The results obtained in this study supports that the alpha-amylase immobilized cryogels are applicable for industrial processes [61]. In a study carried out by Jain, E. et al., different cryogels consist of polyacrylamide-chitosan (PAAC), poly(NIPA)-chitosan, polyacrylonitrile, and poly(NIPA) were investigated for hybridoma cell (6A4D7, B7B10, and H9E10) growth and monoclonal antibody (mAb) production. PAAC was demonstrated better activity on mAb production and cell growth. PAAC cryogel was also prepared as monolith, disks, beads and was applied for continuous packed-bed bioreactor. The monolith one has a good performance on antibody production with markedly high concentration. The data reported by this study suggests that the productivity of these systems may be broadened by different polymeric blends [62].
Cryogels have been represented to withstand cell behavior modification and stimulation of molecule generation. In a study, incorporation of polyallylamine plasma on the polyvinyl alcohol-tetraethylorthosilicate-alginate-calcium oxide (PTAC) biocomposite cryogel surface was examined. Plasma polymerization was applied for obtaining different physical and chemical surface functionality to make changes on bone regeneration potential of human osteoblast cells [63].

3.4.2. Cell Separation

Cell separation was one of the preliminary applications of supermacroporous monolithic columns including cryogels. The accepted strategy known as fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) was used for investigating cell populations. This method relies on fluorescent labeling, by this way, the cells could be divided into sub-populations. Another alternative approach for cell sorting identified as magnetic-activated cell sorting (MACS) allows separation and capturing of targeted cells from complex media. Apart from these two cell sorting standards, affinity-based cryogels have superior efficiencies with their more portable and cost-effective properties. In addition, cryogel adsorbents provide high surface area for the cell attachment and high liquid flow with low flow resistance [53].
In a study, microbial cell (histidine tagged Escherichia coli) separation have been performed using Cu2+-IDA supermacroporous monolithic columns with continuously preserving cell viability [64]. Another example from literature consists of the ligand immobilization to the support matrices offers effective cell separation. 2-(Dimethylamino)ethyl methacrylate (DMAEMA), MBAA and AAm was preferred to synthesize of cryogel matrix using ion-exchange ligands. Amino groups of the ligands show affinity against E. coli cells with a 70–80% recovery ratio after desorption step. SEM photographs of matrices with bound E. coli cells were given in Figure 5 [65]. To give an example for virus capturing, streptavidin immobilized monolith was prepared to allow single-step capturing of biotinylated Moloney Murine Leukemia Virus (MoMuLV) from cell cultures. These matrices were synthesized using acrylamide, MBAA, and glycidyl methacrylate via cryopolymerization [66].
Supermacroporous cryogels make it easy to process human body fluids including blood. These monoliths offer a high flow rate, enabling cells to pass through the porous matrix. In a previous study, bacteriophage immobilized poly(dimethylacrylamide) monoliths were applied for von Willebrand factor (vWF) capturing from blood samples [67].
Immunoglobulins playing crucial roles in immune system functioning are attractive molecules for the development of affinity-based cryogels. Antibody-affinity-based cryogels have been known as effective matrices for cell separation due to their specificity and variety. The interactions between immunoglobulins and antigens present on the cell surface enable specific cell separation such as T- and B-lymphocytes separation. In a study conducted in our research group, poly(hydroxyethyl methacrylate)/poly(ethylene imine)-Cu(II) (PHEMA/PEI-Cu(II)) cryogels were prepared for IgG purification from human plasma with immobilized metal affinity chromatography [30].
Separation of mammalian cells considers the availability of appropriate matrices necessary. Cryogels can well serve as adsorbents for the separation of mammalian cells. In a previous study, Kumar et al. (2004) prepared PVA cryogel beads and protein A immobilized dimethyl acrylamide (DMAAm) monolithic cryogel to specifically capture human acute myeloid leukemia KG-1 cells and fractionate human blood lymphocytes. The cell capturing capacity of protein A immobilized dimethyl acrylamide (DMAAm) monolithic cryogel was found to be higher (90–95%) than that of cryogel beads (76%). On the other hand, the separation of T- and B-lymphocytes was successfully performed with high yields.

3.4.3. Scaffolds

Tissue engineering have emerged for the repair, replacement and regeneration of defected bone, cartilage and skin tissues. Scaffolds have gained popularity as promising materials for these purposes. Critical-sized bone damages have been become an important problem. Their treatment using bone grafts bring along with some challenges such as high cost, integration and rejection problems, infection risk and morbidity. Cryogels have been introduced as a good choice to bone grafts [53].
A study reported that (PTAC) biocomposite cryogels have been explored as healing tools for critical-sized cranial bone defects in Wistar rats for 4 weeks. The result of this study emphasizes the significant role of cryogels in bone regeneration and even osteoblastic differentiation [68]. In a previous study, HEMA–lactate–dextran (HEMA-LLA-D)-based biodegradable cryogel scaffolds were applied in bioreactors for the 3D ingrowth of bone cells. Osteoblast-like cell line (MG63) was used to examine the effect on cell adherence and ingrowth [69].
Bone structure mainly consists of collagen and hydroxyapatite (HA) (osteoconductive component of bone. Therefore, HA-based cryogels were used for the reproduction of bone matrix. In particular, these cryogels incorporated with collagen were constructed with the advantages of human osteoblast-like cell proliferation, human bone marrow stromal cell differentiation. In another study, HA-gelatin-based cryogels were produced and physical features were examined indicating the applicability of these materials in bone regeneration [53].
Cryogels have also been introduced as treatment agents for several bone diseases with the usage of additives. In addition, fibrous protein has been inquired into cryogelation for bone healing and they provide increasing porosity and formation of elastic scaffold structure with remaining mechanical strength [53].
Injectable cryogels have recently gained great attention due to offering appropriate matrix for the attachment and growth of the cells with the combination of physicochemical characteristics of HA and adhesion features of gelatin. To give an example research, 3T3 cell adhesion could be improved by cultivation in hyaluronic acid-co-gelatin cryogels. In addition, these matrices possess a negligible influence on bone marrow dendritic cell activation, in other words, cytocompatibility was confirmed [70].
Cartilage consists of chondrocytes, progenitor cells, and ECM, and it is essential for minimizing surface friction on the site of bone. Cartilage damages could be treated by autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) in which two operations even one is open are necessary with additional disadvantages of high cost, morbidity, iatrogenic pneumothorax atelectasis. Therefore, it is a requirement to use scaffolds including cryogels as a better alternative for the treatment [71]. In this field, cryogels could be modified by additives to enhance their applicability and they have also been implanted to observe their ability in treatment of cartilage damages.
Skin wound repair has become a critical challenge since burns, chronic wounds and accidents lead to substantial skin loss. Cryogels as tissue engineered scaffolds provide cell migration and serve as an attractive alternative to skin grafts. Furthermore, their spongy structure eliminates fluid gathering in wound. Especially chitosan and gelatin-based cryogels were mainly preferred for the treatment of skin wound. Cryogel scaffolds used in tissue engineering for bone, cartilage and skin tissues have been demonstrated in Table 3.

3.4.4. Other Tissue Engineering Applications

Cardiovascular grafts usage has not been appropriate because of donor availability. If there is a treatment process, patients can be faced with such risk factors including hyperplasia, calcification and inflammation. In addition, using heart valves brings along with some challenges in terms of degeneration in the time period and calcification. Therefore, cryogels have been received attention for these applications. In a previous study, (PVA)-gelatin cryogels were preferred as an alternative to arterial grafts due to their mechanical usefulness. It was indicated that (PVA)-gelatin cryogels were applicable for the arterial endothelialization under shear stress leading high nitric oxide (NO) levels [94]. A different study reported alginate-based cryogels seeded with rat embryo cells have promoted angiogenesis and ECM formation when they were implanted into rats. Furthermore, these findings were supported in pigs [95].
Intervertebral disc problems could be occurred when the discs were damaged resulting in prolonged pressure, lowered vascularization, degenerative diseases. Cryogel applications have become an alternative to spinal surgery. In a study, PVA cryogels were applied by their ability to mimic artificial lumbar intervertebral disc with the advantage of their mechanical property. Optimization experiments were performed, and it was shown that compressive stress relaxation and creep levels decreased in high levels of PVA [96]. In another studies, silk fibroin incorporated PVA cryogels were constructed to enhance biocompatibility and gelatin-poloxamer 407 biocomposite cryogel were produced to extend water retention [97].
Another field of cryogel usage is neural cell adhesion. In a study, incorporated laminin gelatin/dextran cryogels were examined and it was reported that laminin supported cell attachment and movement of neurons. In addition, there were no immune response during their implantation into brains of rat [98].
Cryogels have been also alternative biomaterials for muscle regeneration and functionalization. In a previous study, myoskeletal cell lines were cultured on PHEMA-gelatin cryogels and their potential on biocompatibility and cell reproduction were confirmed. Their highly porous structure and mechanical stability make them applicable in both skeletal and cardiac tissue engineering [99].

4. Conclusions

Cryogels are the polymeric materials synthesized by cryotropic gelation with the advantages of easy and cost-effective preparation. Physical and chemical parameters have significant effect on the functionalized cryogel formation. Cryogels have unique features such as interconnected and supermacroporous structure, and both mechanical and chemical stability. These desirable properties make them attractive materials for isolation, immobilization and purification of biomolecules, separation of whole cells. In addition, they have potential to be used in the field of environmental separations and even for heavy metal removal. On the other hand, there have been many well-documented studies performed regarding the construction of marketed cryogels for tissue engineering. Obtained results from those studies indicated that cryogels have been promising tools and applicable as scaffolds in a variety of tissue types. These materials also can be used in cell cultures and they are of great interest for both in vitro and in vivo applications. In such cases, they directly affect the improvement of cell migration, proliferation and differentiation with the advantage of enhanced mechanical stability. Evidently, cryogels with shape memories produced by molecular imprinting undoubtedly provide advantages for a wide range of biomedical applications.
Future trend research recently emphasized that it is possible to improve the potential of cryogels’ usability and applicability by some modifications. When viewed from this side, incorporation of some additives to gain novel cryogel structures and functionalized matrix surfaces for several purposes and applications are described above.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ertürk, G.; Mattiasson, B. Cryogels-versatile tools in bioseparation. J. Chromatogr. A 2014, 1357, 24–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Arvidsson, P.; Plieva, F.M.; Lozinsky, V.I.; Galaev, I.Y.; Mattiasson, B. Direct chromatographic capture of enzyme from crude homogenate using immobilized metal affinity chromatography on a continuous supermacroporous adsorbent. J. Chromatogr. A 2003, 986, 275–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Peppas, N.A.; Huang, Y.; Torres-Lugo, M.; Ward, J.H.; Zhang, J. Physicochemical foundations and structural design of hydrogels in medicine and biology. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 2000, 2, 9–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Lozinsky, V.I.; Plieva, F.M.; Galaev, I.Y.; Mattiasson, B. The potential of polymeric cryogels in bioseparation. Bioseparation 2001, 10, 163–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Plieva, F.; Huiting, X.; Galaev, I.Y.; Bergenståhl, B.; Mattiasson, B. Macroporous elastic polyacrylamide gels prepared at subzero temperatures: Control of porous structure. J. Mater. Chem. 2006, 16, 4065–4073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Jungbauer, A.; Hahn, R. Monoliths for fast bioseparation and bioconversion and their applications in biotechnology. J. Sep. Sci. 2004, 10–11, 767–778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Josić, D.; Buchacher, A. Application of monoliths as supports for affinity chromatography and fast enzymatic conversion. J. Biochem. Biophys. Methods 2001, 49, 153–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bencina, M.; Podgornik, A.; Strancar, A. Characterization of methacrylate monoliths for purification of DNA molecules. J. Sep. Sci. 2004, 10–11, 801–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lozinsky, V.I.; Galaev, I.Y.; Plieva, F.M.; Savina, I.N.; Jungvid, H.; Mattiasson, B. Polymeric cryogels as promising materials of biotechnological interest. Trends Biotechnol. 2003, 21, 445–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Plieva, F.M.; Savina, I.N.; Deraz, S.; Andersson, J.; Galaev, I.Y.; Mattiasson, B. Characterization of supermacroporous monolithic polyacrylamide based matrices designed for chromatography of bioparticles. J. Chromatog. B 2004, 807, 129–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Yavuz, H.; Denizli, A. A new affinity separation medium: supermacroporous cryogels, reference module in chemistry. Mol. Sci. Chem. Eng. 2015, 4, 1–12. [Google Scholar]
  12. Bereli, N.; Türkmen, D.; Yavuz, H.; Galaev, I.Y.; Denizli, A. Cryogels for Affinity Chromatography in: Advanced Separations by Specialized Sorbents. In Chromatographic Science Series; Dragan, E.S., Ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2015; Chapter 2; pp. 39–67. [Google Scholar]
  13. Perçin, I.; Saĝlar, E.; Yavuz, H.; Aksöz, E.; Denizli, A. Poly(hydroxyethyl methacrylate) based affinity cryogel for plasmid DNA purification. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2011, 48, 577–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Bereli, N.; Yavuz, H.; Denizli, A. Cryogels. In Encylopedia of Membranes; Drioli, E., Giorno, L., Eds.; Springer: Heidelberg, Germany, 2016; Volume 1, pp. 22–23. [Google Scholar]
  15. Andac, M.; Galaev, I.; Denizli, A. Dye attached poly(hydroxyethyl methacrylate) cryogel for albumin depletion from human serum. J. Sep. Sci. 2012, 35, 1173–1182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Bereli, N.; Şener, G.; Yavuz, H.; Denizli, A. Oriented immobilized anti-LDL antibody carrying poly(hydroxyethyl methacrylate) cryogel for cholesterol removal from human plasma. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2011, 31, 1078–1083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Perçin, I.; Yavuz, H.; Aksöz, E.; Denizli, A. Mannose-specific lectin isolation from Canavalia ensiformis seeds by PHEMA-based cryogel. Biotechnol. Prog. 2012, 28, 756–761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Damshkaln, L.G.; Simenel, I.A.; Lozinsky, V.I. Study of cryostructuration of polymer systems. XV. Freeze-thaw-induced formation of cryoprecipitate matter from low-concentrated aqueous solutions of poly(vinyl alcohol). J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1999, 74, 1978–1986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Bakhshpour, M.; Yavuz, H.; Denizli, A. Controlled release of mitomycin C from PHEMAH–Cu(II) cryogel membranes. Artif. Cells Nanomed. Biotechnol. 2018, 64, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ivanov, R.V.; Lozinsky, V.I.; Noh, S.K.; Lee, Y.R.; Han, S.S.; Lyoo, W.S. Preparation and characterization of polyacrylamide cryogels produced from a high-molecular-weight precursor. II. The influence of the molecular weight of the polymeric precursor. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2008, 106, 1470–1475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ozmen, M.M.; Dinu, M.V.; Dragan, E.S.; Okay, O. Preparation of macroporous acrylamide-based hydrogels: Cryogelation under isothermal conditions. J. Macromol. Sci. Part A Pure Appl. Chem. 2007, 44, 1195–1202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Henderson, T.M.A.; Ladewig, K.; Haylock, D.N.; McLean, K.M.; O’Connor, A.J. Cryogels for biomedical applications. J. Mater. Chem. B 2013, 1, 2682–2695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Okay, O.; Lozinsky, V.I. Synthesis and structure–property relationships of cryogels. In Polymeric Cryogels: Macroporous Gels with Remarkable Properties; Okay, O., Ed.; Springer International Publishing: Basel, Switzerland, 2014; Volume 263, pp. 103–157. [Google Scholar]
  24. Babac, C.; Yavuz, H.; Galaev, I.Y.; Pişkin, E.; Denizli, A. Binding of antibodies to concanavalin A-modified monolithic cryogel. React. Funct. Polym. 2006, 66, 1263–1271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Alkan, H.; Bereli, N.; Baysal, Z.; Denizli, A. Selective removal of the autoantibodies from rheumatoid arthritis patient plasma using protein A carrying affinity cryogels. Biochem. Eng. J. 2010, 51, 153–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kumar, A.; Rodríguez-Caballero, A.; Plieva, F.M.; Galaev, I.Y.; Nandakumar, K.S.; Kamihira, M.; Holmdahl, R.; Orfao, A.; Mattiasson, B. Affinity binding of cells to cryogel adsorbents with immobilized specific ligands: Effect of ligand coupling and matrix architecture. J. Mol. Recognit. 2005, 18, 84–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Avcibaşi, N.; Uygun, M.; Çorman, M.E.; Akgöl, S.; Denizli, A. Application of supermacroporous monolithic hydrophobic cryogel in capturing of albumin. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2010, 162, 2232–2243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Bereli, N.; Ertürk, G.; Denizli, A. Histidine containing macroporous affinity cryogels for immunoglobulin G purification. Sep. Sci. Technol. 2012, 47, 1813–1820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Bakhshpour, M.; Bereli, N.; Şenel, S. Preparation and characterization of thiophilic cryogels with 2-mercapto ethanol as the ligand for IgG purification. Colloids Surf. B 2013, 113, 261–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Bakhshpour, M.; Derazshamshir, A.; Bereli, N.; Elkak, A.; Denizli, A. [PHEMA/PEI]-Cu(II) based immobilized metal affinity chromatography cryogels: Application on the separation of IgG from human plasma. Mater. Sci. Eng. C. 2016, 61, 824–831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Demiryas, N.; Tüzmen, N.; Galaev, I.Y.; Pişkin, E.; Denizli, A. Poly(acrylamide-allyl glycidyl ether) cryogel as a novel stationary phase in dye-affinity chromatography. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2007, 105, 1808–1816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Andac, M.; Galaev, I.Y.; Denizli, A. Molecularly imprinted poly(hydroxyethyl methacrylate) based cryogel for albumin depletion from human serum. Colloids Surf. B. 2013, 109, 259–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Derazshamshir, A.; Baydemir, G.; Andac, M.; Say, R.; Galaev, I.Y.; Denizli, A. Molecularly imprinted PHEMA-based cryogel for depletion of hemoglobin from human blood. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 2010, 211, 657–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Gao, F.X.; Zhao, X.L.; He, X.W.; Li, W.Y.; Zhang, Y.K. A pH and temperature dual-responsive macroporous molecularly imprinted cryogel for enhanced recognition capability towards ovalbumin. Anal. Methods 2013, 5, 6700–6708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Rabieizadeh, M.; Kashefimofrad, S.M.; Naeimpoor, F. Monolithic molecularly imprinted cryogel for lysozyme recognition. J. Sep. Sci. 2014, 37, 2983–2990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. La Spina, R.; Tripisciano, C.; Mecca, T.; Cunsolo, F.; Weber, V.; Mattiasson, B. Chemically modified poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) cryogel for the adsorption of heparin. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part B Appl. Biomater. 2014, 102B, 1207–1216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Bereli, N.; Ertürk, G.; Tümer, M.A.; Say, R.; Denizli, A. Oriented immobilized anti-hIgG via Fcfragment-imprinted PHEMA cryogel for IgG purification. Biomed. Chromatogr. 2013, 27, 599–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Baydemir, G.; Andaç, M.; Bereli, N.; Galaev, I.Y.; Say, R.; Denizli, A. Supermacroporous PHEMA based cryogel with embedded bilirubin imprinted particles. React. Funct. Polym. 2009, 69, 36–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Baydemir, G.; Andaç, M.; Bereli, N.; Galaev, I.Y.; Say, R.; Denizli, A. Bilirubin recognition via molecularly imprinted supermacroporous cryogels. Colloids Surf. B 2009, 68, 33–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Baydemir, G.; Denizli, A. Heparin removal from human plasma using molecular imprinted cryogels. Artif. Cells Nanomed. Biotechnol. 2015, 43, 403–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Özgür, E.; Bereli, N.; Türkmen, D.; Ünal, S.; Denizli, A. PHEMA cryogel for in-vitro removal of anti-dsDNA antibodies from SLE plasma. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2011, 31, 915–920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Demirçelik, A.H.; Andaç, M.; Andaç, C.A.; Say, R.; Denizli, A. Molecular recognition-based detoxification of aluminum in human plasma. J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed. 2009, 20, 1235–1258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Asliyüce, S.; Bereli, N.; Uzun, L.; Onur, M.A.; Say, R.; Denizli, A. Ion-imprinted supermacroporous cryogel, for in vitro removal of iron out of human plasma with beta thalassemia. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2010, 73, 243–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Alkan, H. Poly(hydroxyethyl methacrylate)-co-N-methacryloyl-(l)-histidine methyl ester based cryogel for the removal of Fe3+ from human plasma effected with Beta thalassemia. Hacettepe J. Biol. Chem. 2015, 43, 179–185. [Google Scholar]
  45. Yavuz, H.; Say, R.; Denizli, A. Iron removal from human plasma based on molecular recognition using imprinted beads. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2005, 25, 521–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Wang, N.X.; Von Recum, H.A. Affinity-based drug delivery. Macromol. Biosci. 2011, 11, 321–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Carino, G.P.; Mathiowitz, E. Oral insulin delivery. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 1999, 35, 249–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Çetin, K.; Denizli, A. 5-Fluorouracil delivery from metal-ion mediated molecularly imprinted cryogel discs. Colloids Surf. B 2015, 126, 401–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Kost, J.; Langer, R. Responsive polymeric delivery systems. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2012, 64, 327–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Öncel, P.; Çetin, K.; Topçu, A.A.; Yavuz, H.; Denizli, A. Molecularly imprinted cryogel membranes for mitomycin C delivery. J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed. 2017, 28, 519–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Caka, M.; Türkcan, C.; Aktaş Uygun, D.; Uygun, M.; Akgöl, S.; Denizli, A. Controlled release of curcumin from poly(HEMA-MAPA) membrane. Artif. Cells Nanomed. Biotechnol. 2017, 45, 426–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Kostova, B.; Momekova, D.; Petrov, P.; Momekov, G.; Toncheva-Moncheva, N.; Tsvetanov, C.B.; Lambov, N. Poly(ethoxytriethyleneglycol acrylate) cryogels as novel sustained drug release systems for oral application. Polymer 2011, 52, 1217–1222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Hixon, K.R.; Lu, T.; Sell, S.A. A comprehensive review of cryogels and their roles in tissue engineering applications. Acta Biomater. 2017, 62, 29–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Sell, S.A.; Wolfe, P.S.; Garg, K.; McCool, J.M.; Rodriguez, I.A.; Bowlin, G.L. The use of natural polymers in tissue engineering: A focus on electrospun extracellular matrix analogues. Polymers 2010, 2, 522–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Daley, W.P.; Peters, S.B.; Larsen, M. Extracellular matrix dynamics in development and regenerative medicine. J. Cell Sci. 2008, 121, 255–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. O’Brien, F.J. Biomaterials & scaffolds for tissue engineering. Mater. Today 2011, 14, 88–95. [Google Scholar]
  57. Dhandayuthapani, B.; Yoshida, Y.; Maekawa, T.; Kumar, D.S. Polymeric scaffolds in tissue engineering application: A review. Int. J. Polym. Sci. 2011, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Kumari, J.; Kumar, A. Development of polymer based cryogel matrix for transportation and storage of mammalian cells. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 41551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  59. Efremenko, E.N.; Tatarinova, N.Y. The effect of long-term preservation of bacterial cells immobilized in poly(vinyl alcohol) cryogel on their viability and biosynthesis of target metabolites. Microbiology 2007, 76, 336–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Jain, E.; Damania, A.; Shakya, A.K.; Kumar, A.; Sarin, S.K.; Kumar, A. Fabrication of macroporous cryogels as potential hepatocyte carriers for bioartificial liver support. Colloids Surf. B 2015, 136, 761–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Guilherme, E.P.X.; de Oliveira, J.P.; de Carvalho, L.M.; Brandi, I.V.; Santos, S.H.S.; de Carvalho, G.G.P.; Cota, J.; Mara Aparecida de Carvalho, B. Synthesis of supermacroporous cryogel for bioreactors continuous starch hydrolysis. Electrophoresis 2017, 38, 2940–2946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Jain, E.; Karande, A.A.; Kumar, A. Supermacroporous polymer-based cryogel bioreactor for monoclonal antibody production in continuous culture using hybridoma cells. Biotechnol. Prog. 2011, 27, 170–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Mishra, R.; Kumar, A. Effect of plasma polymerization on physicochemical properties of biocomposite cryogels causing a differential behavior of human osteoblasts. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2014, 431, 139–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Dainiak, M.B.; Plieva, F.M.; Galaev, I.Y.; Hatti-Kaul, R.; Mattiasson, B. Cell chromatography: Separation of different microbial cells using IMAC supermacroporous monolithic columns. Biotechnol. Prog. 2005, 21, 644–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Arvidsson, P.; Plieva, F.M.; Savina, I.N.; Lozinsky, V.I.; Fexby, S.; Bülow, L.; Yu. Galaev, I.; Mattiasson, B. Chromatography of microbial cells using continuous supermacroporous affinity and ion-exchange columns. J. Chromatogr. A 2002, 977, 27–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Williams, S.L.; Eccleston, M.E.; Slater, N.K.H. Affinity capture of a biotinylated retrovirus on macroporous monolithic adsorbents: Towards a rapid single-step purification process. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2005, 89, 783–787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Noppe, W.; Plieva, F.M.; Vanhoorelbeke, K.; Deckmyn, H.; Tuncel, M.; Tuncel, A.; Galaev, I.Y.; Mattiasson, B. Macroporous monolithic gels, cryogels, with immobilized phages from phage-display library as a new platform for fast development of affinity adsorbent capable of target capture from crude feeds. J. Biotechnol. 2007, 131, 293–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Mishra, R.; Goel, S.K.; Gupta, K.C.; Kumar, A. Biocomposite cryogels as tissue engineered biomaterials for regeneration of critical-sized cranial bone defects. Tissue Eng. Part A 2013, 20, 751–762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Bölgen, N.; Yang, Y.; Korkusuz, P.; Güzel, E.; El Haj, A.J.; Pişkin, E. Three-dimensional ingrowth of bone cells within biodegradable cryogel scaffolds in bioreactors at different regimes. Tissue Eng. Part A 2008, 14, 1743–1750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Rezaeeyazdi, M.; Colombani, T.; Memic, A.; Bencherif, S.A. Injectable hyaluronic acid-co-gelatin cryogels for tissue-engineering applications. Materials 2018, 11, 1374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Gürer, B.; Yılmaz, C.; Yılmaz, Ş.N.; Çabuk, S.; Bölgen, N. A novel strategy for cartilage tissue engineering: Collagenase-loaded cryogel scaffolds in a sheep model. Int. J. Polym. Mater. Polym. Biomater. 2018, 67, 313–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Salgado, C.L.; Grenho, L.; Fernandes, M.H.; Colaço, B.J.; Monteiro, F.J. Biodegradation, biocompatibility, and osteoconduction evaluation of collagen-nanohydroxyapatite cryogels for bone tissue regeneration. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A 2016, 104, 57–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Rodrigues, S.C.; Salgado, C.L.; Sahu, A.; Garcia, M.P.; Fernandes, M.H.; Monteiro, F.J. Preparation and characterization of collagen-nanohydroxyapatite biocomposite scaffolds by cryogelation method for bone tissue engineering applications. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A 2013, 101, 1080–1094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Kemençe, N.; Bölgen, N. Gelatin- and hydroxyapatite-based cryogels for bone tissue engineering: Synthesis, characterization, in vitro and in vivo biocompatibility. J. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. 2017, 11, 20–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Hixon, K.R.; Eberlin, C.T.; Lu, T.; Neal, S.M.; Case, N.D.; McBride-Gagyi, S.H.; Sell, S.A. The calcification potential of cryogel scaffolds incorporated with various forms of hydroxyapatite for bone regeneration. Biomed. Mater. 2017, 12, 025005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Raina, D.B.; Isaksson, H.; Teotia, A.K.; Lidgren, L.; Tägil, M.; Kumar, A. Biocomposite macroporous cryogels as potential carrier scaffolds for bone active agents augmenting bone regeneration. J. Control. Release 2016, 235, 365–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Ozturk, B.Y.; Inci, I.; Egri, S.; Ozturk, A.M.; Yetkin, H.; Goktas, G.; Elmas, C.; Piskin, E.; Erdogan, D. The treatment of segmental bone defects in rabbit tibiae with vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-loaded gelatin/hydroxyapatite “cryogel” scaffold. Eur. J. Orthop. Surg. Traumatol. 2013, 23, 767–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Hixon, K.R.; Lu, T.; Carletta, M.N.; McBride-Gagyi, S.H.; Janowiak, B.E.; Sell, S.A. A preliminary in vitro evaluation of the bioactive potential of cryogel scaffolds incorporated with Manuka honey for the treatment of chronic bone infections. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part B Appl. Biomater. 2018, 106, 1918–1933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Ak, F.; Oztoprak, Z.; Karakutuk, I.; Okay, O. Macroporous silk fibroin cryogels. Biomacromolecules 2013, 14, 719–727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Mishra, R.; Raina, D.B.; Pelkonen, M.; Lidgren, L.; Tägil, M.; Kumar, A. Study of in vitro and in vivo bone formation in composite cryogels and the influence of electrical stimulation. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2015, 11, 1325–1336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Oelschlaeger, C.; Bossler, F.; Willenbacher, N. Synthesis, Structural and micromechanical properties of 3D hyaluronic acid-based cryogel scaffolds. Biomacromolecules 2016, 17, 580–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Phadke, A.; Hwang, Y.S.; Hee Kim, S.; Hyun Kim, S.; Yamaguchi, T.; Masuda, K.; Varghese, S. Effect of scaffold microarchitecture on osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells. Eur. Cells Mater. 2012, 25, 114–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Saino, E.; Fassina, L.; Van Vlierberghe, S.; Avanzini, M.A.; Dubruel, P.; Magenes, G.; Visai, L.; Benazzo, F. Effects of electromagnetic stimulation on osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stromal cells seeded onto gelatin cryogel. Int. J. Immunopathol. Pharmacol. 2011, 24, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Bölgen, N.; Yang, Y.; Korkusuz, P.; Güzel, E.; El Haj, A.J.; Pişkin, E. 3D ingrowth of bovine articular chondrocytes in biodegradable cryogel scaffolds for cartilage tissue engineering. J. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. 2011, 10, 770–779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Dwivedi, P.; Bhat, S.; Nayak, V.; Kumar, A. Study of different delivery modes of chondroitin sulfate using microspheres and cryogel scaffold for application in cartilage tissue engineering. Int. J. Polym. Mater. Polym. Biomater. 2014, 63, 859–872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Odabas, S.; Feichtinger, G.A.; Korkusuz, P.; Inci, I.; Bilgic, E.; Yar, A.S.; Cavusoglu, T.; Menevse, S.; Vargel, I.; Piskin, E. Auricular cartilage repair using cryogel scaffolds loaded with BMP-7-expressing primary chondrocytes. J. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. 2013, 7, 831–840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Gupta, A.; Bhat, S.; Jagdale, P.R.; Chaudhari, B.P.; Lidgren, L.; Gupta, K.C.; Kumar, A. Evaluation of three-dimensional chitosan-agarose-gelatin cryogel scaffold for the repair of subchondral cartilage defects: An in vivo study in a rabbit model. Tissue Eng. Part A 2014, 20, 3101–3111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Kuo, C.Y.; Chen, C.H.; Hsiao, C.Y.; Chen, J.P. Incorporation of chitosan in biomimetic gelatin/chondroitin-6-sulfate/hyaluronan cryogel for cartilage tissue engineering. Carbohydr. Polym. 2015, 117, 722–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Allan, I.U.; Tolhurst, B.A.; Shevchenko, R.V.; Dainiak, M.B.; Illsley, M.; Ivanov, A.; Jungvid, H.; Galaev, I.Y.; James, S.L.; Mikhalovsky, S.V.; et al. An: In vitro evaluation of fibrinogen and gelatin containing cryogels as dermal regeneration scaffolds. Biomater. Sci. 2016, 4, 1007–1014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Dainiak, M.B.; Allan, I.U.; Savina, I.N.; Cornelio, L.; James, E.S.; James, S.L.; Mikhalovsky, S.V.; Jungvid, H.; Galaev, I.Y. Gelatin-fibrinogen cryogel dermal matrices for wound repair: Preparation, optimisation and in vitro study. Biomaterials 2010, 31, 67–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Takei, T.; Nakahara, H.; Tanaka, S.; Nishimata, H.; Yoshida, M.; Kawakami, K. Effect of chitosan-gluconic acid conjugate/poly(vinyl alcohol) cryogels as wound dressing on partial-thickness wounds in diabetic rats. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 2013, 24, 2479–2487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Martínez, Y.N.; Cavello, I.; Hours, R.; Cavalitto, S.; Castro, G.R. Immobilized keratinase and enrofloxacin loaded on pectin PVA cryogel patches for antimicrobial treatment. Bioresour. Technol. 2013, 145, 280–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Priya, S.G.; Gupta, A.; Jain, E.; Sarkar, J.; Damania, A.; Jagdale, P.R.; Chaudhari, B.P.; Gupta, K.C.; Kumar, A. Bilayer cryogel wound dressing and skin regeneration grafts for the treatment of acute skin wounds. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 15145–15159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Vrana, N.E.; Cahill, P.A.; McGuinness, G.B. Endothelialization of PVA/gelatin cryogels for vascular tissue engineering: Effect of disturbed shear stress conditions. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A 2010, 94, 1080–1090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Cohen, S.; Leor, J. Rebuilding broken hearts. Sci. Am. 2004, 291, 44–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Wang, B.H.; Campbell, G. Campbell, G. Formulations of polyvinyl alcohol cryogel that mimic the biomechanical properties of soft tissues in the natural lumbar intervertebral disc. Spine (Phila. Pa. 1976) 2009, 34, 2745–2753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Temofeew, N.A.; Hixon, K.R.; McBride-Gagyi, S.H.; Sell, S.A. The fabrication of cryogel scaffolds incorporated with poloxamer 407 for potential use in the regeneration of the nucleus pulposus. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 2017, 28, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Jurga, M.; Dainiak, M.B.; Sarnowska, A.; Jablonska, A.; Tripathi, A.; Plieva, F.M.; Savina, I.N.; Strojek, L.; Jungvid, H.; Kumar, A.; et al. The performance of laminin-containing cryogel scaffolds in neural tissue regeneration. Biomaterials 2011, 32, 3423–3434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Singh, D.; Nayak, V.; Kumar, A. Proliferation of myoblast skeletal cells on three-dimensional supermacroporous cryogels. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2010, 6, 371–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic view of cryogel formation.
Figure 1. Schematic view of cryogel formation.
Applsci 09 00553 g001
Figure 2. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of the PHEMA cryogel (a), Flow behavior of whole blood through a PHEMA cryogel column (b) [25].
Figure 2. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of the PHEMA cryogel (a), Flow behavior of whole blood through a PHEMA cryogel column (b) [25].
Applsci 09 00553 g002
Figure 3. SEM images of PHEMA cryogels (a), and SDS-PAGE of IgG separation on the cryogel (Lane 1: Molecular mass markers, Lane 2: After adsorption of human plasma diluted (1/10), Lane 3: Before adsorption human plasma, and Lane 4: Bound eluted fractions (b) [29].
Figure 3. SEM images of PHEMA cryogels (a), and SDS-PAGE of IgG separation on the cryogel (Lane 1: Molecular mass markers, Lane 2: After adsorption of human plasma diluted (1/10), Lane 3: Before adsorption human plasma, and Lane 4: Bound eluted fractions (b) [29].
Applsci 09 00553 g003
Figure 4. Schematic illustration of preparation of hemoglobin imprinted supermacroporous cryogels and SEM photographs of hemoglobin imprinted supermacroporous cryogels [33].
Figure 4. Schematic illustration of preparation of hemoglobin imprinted supermacroporous cryogels and SEM photographs of hemoglobin imprinted supermacroporous cryogels [33].
Applsci 09 00553 g004
Figure 5. SEM photographs of matrices with bound E. coli cells [65].
Figure 5. SEM photographs of matrices with bound E. coli cells [65].
Applsci 09 00553 g005
Table 1. Some examples of cryogel applications for the separation of proteins.
Table 1. Some examples of cryogel applications for the separation of proteins.
TargetMatrixFunctional Monomer/LigandMethodAdsorption CapacityReference
Human serum albuminPoly(acrylamide-allyl glycidyl ether) [poly(AAm-AGE)] cryogelDye ligand Cibacron BlueDye-affinity- based74.2 mg/g [31]
Human serum albuminPHEMA cryogelDye ligand Cibacron BlueDye-affinity- based950 mg/g[12]
Human serum albuminPoly(glycidyl methacrylate) beads embedded PHEMA composite cryogelsDye ligand Cibacron BlueDye-affinity- based342 mg/g[15]
Human serum albuminPHEMA-based cryogelN-Methacryloyl-Lphenylalanine (MAPA)Molecular imprinting390.2 mg/g[32]
Hemoglobulin PHEMA cryogel N-methacryloyl-L-histidine methyl esterMolecular imprinting11.4 mg/g[33]
OvalbuminN-[3-(2-aminoethylamino) propyl] trimethoxysilaneN-isopropylacrylamide and p-vinylphenylboronic acidMolecular imprinting21 mg/g[34]
LysozymePolyacrylamide cryogelsN,N-Methylene bisacrylamideMolecular imprinting36.3 mg/g[35]
HeparinHEMA-based monolithic cryogelL-lysineAffinity-based40,500 IU/g[36]
Immunoglobin GPoly(GMA) beads embedded PHEMA composite cryogelsIminodiacetic acid (IDA)-Cu2+Immobilized metal affinity chromatography based257 mg/g[29]
Immunoglobin GFc fragment-imprinted PHEMA cryogel N-Methacryloyl-(l)-cysteine methyl ester (MAC)/ Immobilization of anti-hIgGMolecular imprinting86.9 mg/g [37]
Immunoglobin GPHEMA composite cryogel disksThiophilic ligandThiophilic affinity-based68.7 mg/g[29]
Immunoglobin GPHEMA cryogel Poly(ethylene imine) (PEI) -Cu2+Immobilized metal affinity chromatography based72.28 mg/g[30]
BilirubinPHEMA composite cryogelN-methacryloyl-(L)-tyrosinemethylesterMolecular imprinting10.3 mg/g[38]
BilirubinPHEMA cryogelN-methacryloyl-(l)-tyrosinemethylesterMolecular imprinting3.6 mg/g[39]
HeparinPHEMA cryogelN-[(3-dimethylamino)-propyl]methacrylamide)Molecular imprinting9.36 mg/g[40]
CholesterolPHEMA cryogelAnti-human β-lipoprotein antibodyAffinity-based129 mg/g[16]
Anti-dsDNA antibodiesPHEMA cryogelHerring testes DNAAffinity-based70,000 IU/g[41]
IgM-antibodyPHEMA cryogelProtein AAffinity-based42.7 mg/g[25]
Table 2. Some examples of cryogel applications for the removal of metal ions.
Table 2. Some examples of cryogel applications for the removal of metal ions.
Metal IonFunctional Monomer/LigandMethodAdsorption CapacityReference
Iron(III)N-methacryloyl-(l)-cysteine methyl esterIon-imprinted cryogel75 μg/g[43]
Iron(III)N-methacryloyl-(L)-histidine methyl esterAffinity-based cryogel1.79 mg/g[44]
Aluminum(III)N-methacryloyl-L-glutamic acidIon-imprinted polymer0.76 mg/g[42]
Iron(III) N-Methacryloly-(l)-glutamic acidIon-imprinted polymer92.6 μmol/g[45]
Table 3. Cryogels as scaffolds used in tissue engineering for bone, cartilage and skin tissues.
Table 3. Cryogels as scaffolds used in tissue engineering for bone, cartilage and skin tissues.
ScaffoldsOutcomeReference
Bone
Collagen-nanoHA biocomposite cryogelsIn vitro: Differentiation of human bone marrow stromal cells into osteoblastic phenotype.
In vivo: Reduced inflammatory response by new tissue production
[72]
Collagen-nanoHA biocomposite cryogelsIn vitro: Adherence and spreading of osteoblast cells along with high cell reproduction[73]
Gelatin-HA cryogelsIn vitro: Cell viability
In vivo: Biocompatibility
at the end of implantation within bone
[74]
Chitosan-gelatin composite cryogels incorporated with HAExcellent cell compatibility and high mineralization with the usage of bone char cryogels[75]
Silk fibroin, chitosan, agarose and HA with/without bioactive glass biocomposite cryogelsIn vitro: No advantage of bioactive glass
Reproduction of C2C12 myoblasts and mesenchymal stem cells.
Potential carriers for recombinant human bone morphogenicprotein-2 (rhBMP-2) and zoledronic acid (ZA)
[76]
Gelatin-HA cryogels with/without local vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)Successful grafting of critical-sized bone defects in white rabbits.
Favorable effect in early fracture healing
[77]
Gelatin and silk fibroin cryogels incorporated with Manuka honey (MH)Long-term inhibition of bacterial growth with 5% MH-silk fibroin cryogel.
Promising alternatives for chronic bone infections
[78]
Silk fibroin cryogelsShowing good performance on compressive modulus (50 MPa) and alternatives for bone scaffolds[79]
Electrically stimulated PTAC biocomposite cryogels Supporting the movement of C2C12 myoblasts towards osteogenic lineage.
In vivo and in vitro verification of osteoinductive and osteoconductive characteristics
[80]
3D Hyaluronic acid-based cryogelsRecommendable for bone tissue repair confirmed with optimization experiments[81]
Poly(ethylene glycol) diacrylate-co-N-acryloyl 6-aminocaproic acid cryogelsOsteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs)
In vitro: Cell viability and proliferation of hMSCs
In vivo: Promoted ectopic bone formation
[82]
Gelatin cryogel discsConfirmation of electromagnetic stimuli effect on mesenchymal stromal cells isolated from the bone marrow
High cell reproduction and osteogenic differentiation
Increased production of bone matrix components
[83]
Cartilage
Collagenase incorporated cryogelIsolation of chondrocytes and triggered proliferation in a sheep model
Synthesis of type II collagen
[71]
2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate–lactate–dextran (HEMA-LLA-D)-based cryogelsVerification of biocompatibility with cartilage cells
Chondrocyte attachment and infiltration
73.7 ± 3.3% cell viability after 15 days
[84]
Chitosan-gelatin cryogels incorporated with chondroitin sulfate loaded microparticlesEncouraged chondrocyte reproduction and differentiation
Elevated matrix formation
[85]
Gelatin-oxidized dextran cryogels with bone morphogenetic protein-7 (BMP-7)Improved matrix synthesis[86]
Chitosan-agarose-gelatin cryogelsIn vivo: Confirmed biocompatibility and production of hyaline cartilage in rabbits after implantation [87]
Biomimetic gelatin/chondroitin-6-sulfate/hyaluronan cryogel incorporated with chitosan Up-regulation of glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) and type II collagen (COL II) secretion[88]
Skin
Fibrinogen and gelatin containing cryogelsHigh migration of human dermal fibroblast by elevated fibrinogen concentration[89]
Gelatin-fibrinogen cryogelReproduction of fibroblasts and migration of them within the scaffolds [90]
Chitosan-gluconic acid conjugate/poly(vinyl alcohol) cryogelsHigh infiltration of inflammatory cells into wound
In vivo: Healing of partial-thickness wounds with incorporation of basic fibroblast growth factor
[91]
Keratinase and enrofloxacin loaded pectin PVA cryogelControllable release of antibiotics[92]
Bilayer cryogels,
Top layer: antiseptic layer Polyvinylpyrrolidone-iodine (PVP-I)
Bottom layer: regenerative layer Gelatin cryogel
Cell infiltration and attachment
Proliferation of fibroblasts and keratinocytes
In vivo: Regeneration ability was proven in implanted rabbits
Resembling to commercial skin regeneration product Neuskin-F
[93]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bakhshpour, M.; Idil, N.; Perçin, I.; Denizli, A. Biomedical Applications of Polymeric Cryogels. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 553. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/app9030553

AMA Style

Bakhshpour M, Idil N, Perçin I, Denizli A. Biomedical Applications of Polymeric Cryogels. Applied Sciences. 2019; 9(3):553. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/app9030553

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bakhshpour, Monireh, Neslihan Idil, Işık Perçin, and Adil Denizli. 2019. "Biomedical Applications of Polymeric Cryogels" Applied Sciences 9, no. 3: 553. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/app9030553

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop