Next Article in Journal
Special Issue Physiological and Molecular Responses of Plants to Engineered Nanomaterials
Next Article in Special Issue
Regioselectively Carboxylated Cellulose Nanofibril Models from Dissolving Pulp: C6 via TEMPO Oxidation and C2,C3 via Periodate–Chlorite Oxidation
Previous Article in Journal
Preparation of Fe@Fe3O4/ZnFe2O4 Powders and Their Consolidation via Hybrid Cold-Sintering/Spark Plasma-Sintering
Previous Article in Special Issue
Development of Processes and Catalysts for Biomass to Hydrocarbons at Moderate Conditions: A Comprehensive Review
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nanomaterials
Volume 14
Issue 2
10.3390/nano14020150
nanomaterials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Antibacterial Hydrophilic ZnO Microstructure Film with Underwater Oleophobic and Self-Cleaning Antifouling Properties

by
Yannan Li
,
Yu Xue
,
Jie Wang
,
Dan Zhang
,
Yan Zhao
* and
Jun-Jie Liu
*
School of Physical Science and Technology, College of Energy Materials and Chemistry, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot 010021, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2024, 14(2), 150; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/nano14020150
Submission received: 18 November 2023 / Revised: 22 December 2023 / Accepted: 3 January 2024 / Published: 10 January 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue From Biomass to Nanomaterials)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Super-hydrophilic and oleophobic functional materials can prevent pollution or adsorption by repelling oil, and have good circulation. However, traditional strategies for preparing these functional materials either use expensive fabrication machines or contain possibly toxic organic polymers, which may prohibit the practical application. The research of multifunctional ZnO microstructures or nanoarrays thin films with super-hydrophilic, antifouling, and antibacterial properties has not been reported yet. Moreover, the exploration of underwater oleophobic and self-cleaning antifouling properties in ZnO micro/nanostructures is still in its infancy. Here, we prepared ZnO microstructured films on fluorine-doped tin oxide substrates (F-ZMF) for the development of advanced self-cleaning type super-hydrophilic and oleophobic materials. With the increase of the accelerators, the average size of the F-ZMF microstructures decreased. The F-ZMF shows excellent self-cleaning performance and hydrophilic (water contact angle ≤ 10°) and oleophobic characteristics in the underwater antifouling experiment. Under a dark condition, F-ZMF-4 showed good antibacterial effects against Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) and Escherichia coli (E. coli) with inhibition rates of 99.1% and 99.9%, respectively. This study broadens the application scope of ZnO-based material and provides a novel prospect for the development of self-cleaning super-hydrophilic and oleophobic materials.

1. Introduction

After a long time of survival competition, the functions and structures of natural organisms have become perfect [1], for example, lotus leaves and dragonfly wings exhibit super hydrophobic structures, sharks display good anti-fouling properties, and purple leaf reed grass present super hydrophilicity. Inspired by the special wettability of natural organisms, researchers have designed several materials with unique surface structures, such as superlipophilic materials and superhydrophilic materials [2,3,4]. Superhydrophobic materials can be used for waterproofing, self-cleaning, anti-adhesion, reducing resistance, etc. However, some defects greatly hinder the realization of its function in practical applications, for instance, the surface of some superhydrophobic materials is easily absorbed by oil and has poor liquidity [5]. In contrast, the self-cleaning type super-hydrophilic and oleophobic functional materials can prevent pollution or adsorption by repelling oil, and have good circulation [6]. Nevertheless, the surface of general oleophobic materials is hydrophobic due to the larger surface energy of water than oil [7], so it is difficult to prepare self-cleaning type super hydrophilic and oleophobic functional materials. Moreover, pollution from bacteria in the water will affect or weaken the function of materials [8,9,10,11,12], thereby reducing their circularity. Therefore, it is urgent to develop self-cleaning type super-hydrophilic and oleophobic materials with advanced antibacterial, and antifouling properties through a high-efficiency and low-cost strategy.
In the past decades, researchers have found that super hydrophilic and oleophobic materials can be obtained by changing the surface structure and regulating its chemical composition [13,14,15,16,17]. Thus, the smart design and careful preparation of self-cleaning type super-hydrophilic and oleophobic materials play a vital role. Although a variety of materials have been reported [18,19,20,21,22], the scope of self-cleaning type super-hydrophilic and oleophobic materials should be branching out. More importantly, it is still significant to explore novel and excellent self-cleaning type super-hydrophilic and oleophobic materials.
Among various nanomaterials, zinc oxide (ZnO) with large specific surface area, fast electron transport rate, quantum finite domain effect, piezoelectric effect [23,24,25,26], and light diffraction has attracted great attention in the fields of nano-piezoelectric generators [27,28], dye-sensitized solar cells [29], quantum dot sensitized solar cells [30], and photoelectrochemical water decomposition [31]. ZnO has been used as a surface modifier to form fiber-based composite flexible membranes (such as carbon nanofibers, poly(arylene ether nitrile) fibrous membrane) for super-hydrophilic interface, oil-water separation, self-cleaning, antifouling, and so on [6,32,33]. Other researchers added ZnO as a filler combined with organic polymer materials to achieve superhydrophobic interfaces, antibacterial or photocatalytic self-cleaning properties [34]. However, the above strategies either use expensive fabrication machines or contain possibly toxic organic polymer materials, which may prohibit the practical application [35]. To our best knowledge, the research of multifunctional ZnO microstructures or nanoarrays thin films with super-hydrophilic, antifouling and antibacterial properties has not been reported yet [36]. Moreover, even different morphologies of ZnO (such as microrods, nanowires, nanotubes, nanosheets, nanoribbons, and their combined structures) prepared by different methods have been reported [37,38,39,40,41], the exploration of underwater oleophobic and self-cleaning antifouling properties in ZnO microstructures is still in its infancy possibly due to the difficulty in controlling morphology and the selective growth of substrate materials. In this paper, ZnO microstructured films (F-ZMF) with a flower-like structure were prepared by a simple one-step hydrothermal method using fluorine doped tin oxide (FTO) as a substrate and a mixture of zinc nitrate and hexamethylenetetramine solution as precursor solution. The microstructure of F-ZMF series samples is tuned by varying the concentration of HMTA. The water contact angle of F-ZMF series materials with super hydrophilicity is less than 10°, which shows excellent anti-fouling and self-cleaning properties underwater. In addition, F-ZMF-4 has a bacteriostatic effect of more than 99% against Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) and Escherichia coli (E. coli) under a dark condition, indicating an excellent antibacterial effect. This work provides a new prospect and an enlarged scope for the development of self-cleaning ZnO-based super-hydrophilic and oleophobic materials.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Zinc nitrate (Zn (NO3)2·6H2O, Tianjin Nankai share compounds Co., Ltd., Tianjin, China), hexamethyl tetramine (HMTA, Tianjin Nankai share compounds Co., Ltd., Tianjin, China), fluorine-doped tin oxide conductive glass (FTO, 1 × 1 cm2, Shenzhen South China Xiangcheng Technology Co. Ltd., Shenzhen, China), luria-bertani agar (LBA, Beijing Land Bridge Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China), Mueller-Hinton Broth (MHB, Beijing Land Bridge Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China), and phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, Beijing Kulaibo Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China) were of analytical grade and the experimental water was deionized water. Diesel and silicone oil are purchased from the local market in China.

2.2. Sample Preparation

During the preparation process, ZnO was prepared following the previous reported procedure with a some modification [33]. Firstly, an appropriate amount of Zn(NO3)2 and HMTA was added to 15 mL of deionized water, respectively, to prepare solution A (Zn(NO3)2 solution, 0.025 mol/L) and solution B (HMTA solution, 0.025 mol/L). Then, solutions A and B were fully mixed in proportion and added to a 50 mL hydrothermal reactor with FTO glass with conductive side up. After sealing, the reaction was carried out at 200 °C for 6 h. After the reaction, the sample is washed with deionized water and dried. Under the same experimental conditions, the molar concentration ratio of Zn (NO3)2 and HMTA was changed (1:0.5, 1:1, 1:2, 1:3, and 1:4), and the obtained samples were successively named F-ZMF-0.5, F-ZMF-1, F-ZMF-2, F-ZMF-3, and F-ZMF-4, respectively.

2.3. Characterization

The morphology and distribution of the materials were observed using a field emission scanning electron microscope (Hitachi, SU8010, Scanning Electron Microscope, SEM, Kyoto, Japan). X-ray diffraction analysis of the samples was performed using an X-ray diffractometer (RIKEN, Mini Flex 600, Diffraction of X-rays, XRD, Osaka, Japan) to determine the crystalline structure and orientation distribution of the samples. Point surface analysis was performed using an X-ray energy spectrometer (Bruker X Flash 6160, Energy Dispersive Spectroscopy, EDS, Karlsruhe, Germany) for qualitative analysis of all elements. The contact angle measuring instrument (SDC-350, Dongguan Shengding Precision Instrument Co., Ltd., Dongguan, China) was used to drop 2 μL of deionized water to measure the water contact angle on the surface of the material and take digital photos. Bacterial concentration was tested using a bacterial cell concentration meter (OD600, IMPLEN, Wetzlar, Germany). In this study, samples were tested at room temperature with an average power of around 100 mW by an in situ Raman spectrometer (HORIBA, LabRAM Odyssey, Kyoto, Japan) using a laser with a wavelength of 532 nm.

2.4. Surface Antibacterial Experiment

The antibacterial activity of the samples against Escherichia coli (E. coli) and Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) was detected by plate counting. The antibacterial experiments were carried out on an ultra-clean table, and the required supplies were autoclaved at 121 °C for 15 min before the experiments. Various samples of experimental synthesis were laid flat into 12-well plates, and the bacterial concentration OD was determined as E. coli 0.13 and S. aureus 0.06, which were diluted 10 times and 20 times, respectively. The 20 μL of diluted bacterial solution was evenly distributed on the surface of the samples and incubated at 37 °C for 2 h in a constant temperature incubator. Add the appropriate amount of PBS to wash the bacteria on the surface of the samples as the original bacterial solution, and after diluting again with PBS solution one by one, take 100 μL of this bacterial solution into a Petri dish and pour it into LBA medium, prepare agar plates of the corresponding samples for counting, and incubate them overnight at 37 °C in a bacterial incubator. The next day, count the number of colonies of each sample of the two bacteria and take representative photos. The antibacterial rate of the samples was calculated according to Equation (1)
R = N 0 − N t N 0 ∗ 100 %
where N0, Nt, are the number of surviving colonies on the surface of the control and experimental group samples, respectively.

2.5. Antifouling Test

This experiment tests the contact angle of water droplets or oil droplets on the surface of the sample and is used to analyze the wettability or anti-fouling of the sample surface. First, oil is selected as a pollutant, and the oil contact angle under the water is tested. The sample is then placed at the bottom of a beaker containing deionized water, a pipette is used to draw the 2 mL of oil and squeeze it onto the sample surface. Finally, the interaction between the sample and the oil droplets is observed and representative photos are taken. The corresponding Videos S1–S3 of the surface stability test, underwater antifouling test, and oil stain adhesion test of F-ZMF samples can be seen in the Supporting Information Part.

3. Results and Discussion

SEM, XRD, and Surface Wettability Analysis of F-ZMF

Here, ZnO microstructured films (F-ZMF) were prepared on FTO substrate by a simple hydrothermal method, and their hydrophilic, oleophobic, and antibacterial properties were evaluated (Figure 1A). Compared with the native glass substrate, the surface of FTO has a certain roughness, which will affect the growth and orientation of ZnO and enhance the bonding degree between ZnO and the substrate surface [42]. When the concentration of HMTA is low, the reaction solution is weakly alkaline, and ZnO is easy to grow radially, thus forming a large, sparsely arranged flower-like structure. With the increase of HMTA concentration, a strong alkaline reaction solution was obtained, which inhibited the radial growth of ZnO, and more dense small microstructures were formed at multiple sites (Figure 1B–E). This result is also consistent with the growth mechanism of different ZnO crystal faces whose growth rates are affected by pH in literature [43].
The XRD patterns of F-ZMF samples are shown in Figure 1G. Three diffraction peaks with high intensity appeared at 30°~40°. The peak at 36.2° shows the highest intensity, indicating that the crystals preferentially grow along the direction of the (101) crystal plane. The obtained samples are mainly composed of ZnO microstructures because of the similar diffraction peaks of hexagonal ZnO (JCPDS:36-1451). It should be noted that the intensity of diffraction peaks is higher with the increase of HMTA concentration, indicating the significantly enhanced crystallization degree of the sample [44]. In addition, the EDS and atomic percentages of F-ZMF samples also confirm the successful synthesis of ZnO microrods (Figure S1). To further verify the difference among the F-ZMF samples, the normalized Raman spectra of the F-ZMF samples are shown in Figure S2A. All samples exhibit an intense peak at 438 cm−1 and two other peaks within the bands ranging from 200 to 800 cm−1. Similar to the XRD spectra, all peaks of the Raman spectra can be matched to the phonon modes of hexagonal wurtzite ZnO [45]. The peaks located at 331, 380, and 438 cm−1 correspond to the E2(high)−E2(low), A1(TO), and E2(high) phonon modes, respectively. Moreover, E2(high) modes of the samples shifted towards higher wave number (accounted for by oxygen vibrations) of approximately 1–2 cm−1 with the increase of HMTA concentration (Figure S2B), indicating the influence of amine molecules on the lattice vibrations. Our result is also consistent with the conclusions from other scientists. For example, Ngac et al. also reported three peaks of ZnO/Ag nanoflowers at 330, 376, and 437 cm−1, which are related to the vibrations modes of E2(high)−E2(low), A1(TO), and E2(high) [46]. The most prominent peak at 438 cm−1 is related to the vibration of zinc lattices [46,47,48].
To further observe the microstructure of the samples, the morphologies of F-ZMF were observed by SEM images (Figure 2A–E). Scattered radiating rod-shaped ZnO structures can be observed, forming a multi-branched structure and a surface rich in microstructures. The formation of ZnO microrods is mainly due to the formation of crystal nuclei by Zn ions under the action of an alkaline reaction solution and surfactant. The microrods were grown along a specific crystal face direction under suitable reaction conditions. As a surfactant, HMTA can regulate the process of crystal seed formation and growth [45,49]. Increasing the concentration of HMTA will affect the chemical properties and surface tension of the solution, thus altering the growth and assembly of ZnO microrods. It has been confirmed that increasing the microstructure and specific surface area of materials can help improve the surface wettability and antibacterial properties of materials [50,51]. The diameters and lengths of zinc oxide were counted using an Image J 1.54g software based on the existing SEM images of F-ZMF. Because the structure of ZnO is thin at both ends and wide in the middle, the position with the widest ZnO structure was selected for measurement. The statistical histograms of the lengths and diameters of F-ZMF samples are shown in Figure S3. The diameters and lengths of F-ZMF with similar trends were inhibited with the increased concentration of HMTA in the reaction solution.
In Figure 2F,G, compared with the surface water contact angle of FTO (81.09°), the water contact angle of F-ZMF samples was less than 10°, showing superhydrophilicity. In Table S1, the area of water droplets diffused on the surface of the F-ZMF samples is 3.5–5 times that of the FTO surface. This implies that the superhydrophilicity of F-ZMF samples mainly comes from the diffusion of water droplets on the sample surface, rather than the penetration of microstructures. Due to the growth of ZMF structures on the surface of FTO, the water contact area and the wettability of samples were enhanced. In detail, because of the irregular accumulation of microrods, water droplets can spread on their surface and even penetrate the microstructure, forming a hydrophilic surface [52]. The crystal structure of ZnO contains both oxygen and zinc atoms, where the oxygen atoms form the oxide surface. The hydroxyl group (−OH group) on the surface of ZnO can form hydrogen bonds with water molecules [32], thus enhancing the interaction ability between ZnO and water. The unique interaction is beneficial to the formation of a small contact angle [53]. In that case, water molecules can be better wetted on the surface, thus achieving excellent hydrophilicity [32]. The F-ZMF samples exhibit good oil moisture properties and mechanical stability in air, as shown in Figures S4 and S5, and Video S1.
It is well known that the hydrophilic properties caused by most physical structures are accompanied by the lipophobic properties of the structure surface, and F-ZMF samples are no exception [54,55]. In the underwater self-cleaning experiment, FTO was used as the control group and the F-ZMF sample as the experimental group. In Figure 3A–D, the oil adheres directly to the surface of FTO when it starts to contact with FTO. In comparison, no oil adhered when the oil droplets contact with the surfaces of F-ZMF (Figure 3E–X). The F-ZMF materials exhibit excellent oleophobic properties while being hydrophilic, and have excellent self-cleaning properties, which can be attributed to the difference of surface microstructure in F-ZMF materials. The video of the underwater antifouling test for the F-ZMF samples is also supplied and further confirms the stability of the samples (Video S2).
To verify the sample’s oleophobic properties, the underwater oil contact angle test was carried out (Figure 4 and Video S3). It can be observed from Figure 4A that when the silicone oil is in contact with the FTO surface underwater, it will adhere to the surface, at which time the oil contact angle is about 100.3°. When the silicone oil touches the surface of the F-ZMF series material, the oil droplets will float to the water surface due to their buoyancy (Figure 4B–F). As shown in Figure S6, the stability of F-ZMF was confirmed by optical images before and after the underwater oil thinning experiment. This phenomenon is consistent with the results of underwater self-cleaning. This indicates that F-ZMF behaves as a superoleophobic interface in aqueous media. The excellent oil rejection performance can be mainly attributed to the special surface structure of F-ZMF materials.
Under dark conditions, S. aureus and E. coli were selected to test the antimicrobial properties of F-ZMF materials, in which the pore plate was the control group and other F-ZMF materials were the experimental group. It can be seen in Figure 5A that with the increase of the HMTA addition ratio, the number of S. aureus colonies on the agar plate gradually decreased, indicating that the antibacterial performance was improving. Compared with the control group, the antibacterial activity of F-ZMF-0.5 reached 44.5%. With the increase of HMTA concentration, the antibacterial rate of F-ZMF-4 was significantly increased, reaching more than 99% (Figure 5B). This is because ZnO with more small-size microrods structure improves the contact area with bacteria, thus improving the antibacterial effect.
Similar antibacterial activity has been observed in experiments with E. coli, as shown in Figure 6. Compared with the control group, the bacteriostatic rate of F-ZMF-4 could reach more than 99% due to the increased concentration of HMTA. The antibacterial effect of individual samples is slightly different, which may be due to the size effect of the material and bacteria. The F-ZMF samples with a smaller sharp tip of microrod and a larger contact area can cut through the cell membranes of bacteria, causing the rupture of membranes, the leakage of cell contents, and finally the death of bacteria cells [56]. At the same time, the released Zn2+ in the F-ZMF samples with bactericidal and antibacterial effects can destroy the bacterial cell membranes and the activity of intracellular enzymes, inhibiting bacterial growth and reproduction [56]. The combined actions make our samples excellent antibacterial activity (Figure 7).

4. Conclusions

In this paper, a series of multifunctional F-ZMF materials have been developed by a one-step hydrothermal method. SEM and XRD analysis confirmed that the material is mainly composed of evenly distributed hexagonal ZnO microrods with a typical hexagonal wurtzite structure. This material with a large surface contact area and special structural characteristics is beneficial to the improvement of the wettability. F-ZMF series samples exhibit excellent hydrophilic and underwater oil phobic properties, which is helpful in realizing surface self-cleaning performance. Profiting from the outstanding surface antibacterial performance (the antibacterial rate of some samples to E. coli and S. aureus exceeds 99% under dark conditions), our multifunctional F-ZMF materials can largely resist the pollution of bacteria, thus, achieving efficient and multi-faceted anti-fouling self-cleaning performance. This unique ZnO-based material may further broaden the applications for future self-cleaning, biome, and biomedicine areas.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://0-www-mdpi-com.brum.beds.ac.uk/article/10.3390/nano14020150/s1, Figure S1. Energy spectra and the atomic percentages of different elements in (A) F-ZMF-0.5, (B) F-ZMF-1, (C) F-ZMF-2, (D) F-ZMF-3, (E) F-ZMF-4. Figure S2. (A) normal and (B) enlarged Raman spectra of the F-ZMF samples. Figure S3. Statistical histograms of (A) lengths and (B) diameters of F-ZMF. Figure S4. Silicone oil contact angle of F-ZMF. Figure S5. Diesel oil contact angle of F-ZMF. Figure S6. Optical images of the samples before and after the underwater oleophobic experiment. Table S1. Water droplet diffusion area of different samples. Video S1. Surface stability test of F-ZMF. Video S2. Underwater antifouling test of F-ZMF. Video S3. Oil stain adhesion test of F-ZMF (taken with the contact angle tester underwater condition).

Author Contributions

Y.L.: Conceptualization, methodology, writing—original draft preparation, writing—review and editing, visualization. Y.X.: Conceptualization, software, formal analysis, investigation, writing—original draft preparation. J.W.: Responding to review comments and editing. D.Z.: Validation and data curation. Y.Z.: Supervision, project administration, funding acquisition and review. J.-J.L.: Supervision, project administration and funding acquisition. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work is financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52263032, 62062053, and 52061034), the Natural Science Foundation of Inner Mongolia Province (2020BS01004), and a Talent Development Fund of Inner Mongolia Province.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article and supplementary materials.

Acknowledgments

We are thankful to Hongfei Dou and Musen Du for their help in checking the manuscript during the revision stage.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Liu, K.; Jiang, L. Bio-inspired design of multiscale structures for function integration. Nano Today 2011, 6, 155–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Cui, J.; Li, F.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Ma, W.; Huang, C. Electrospun nanofiber membranes for wastewater treatment applications. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2020, 250, 117116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Su, B.; Guo, W.; Jiang, L. Learning from nature: Binary cooperative complementary nanomaterials. Small 2015, 11, 1072–1096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Zhao, X.-Q.; Wahid, F.; Cui, J.-X.; Wang, Y.-Y.; Zhong, C. Cellulose-based special wetting materials for oil/water separation: A review. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 185, 890–906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Manabe, K.; Nakano, M.; Hibi, Y.; Miyake, K. Self-supplying liquidity oil-adsorbed slippery smooth surface for both liquid and solid repellency. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 7, 1901818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zhang, L.-X.; Zhao, M.-M.; Yin, Y.-Y.; Xing, Y.; Bie, L.-J. Rich defects and nanograins boosted formaldehyde sensing performance of mesoporous polycrystalline ZnO nanosheets. Rare Met. 2022, 41, 2292–2304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Bellanger, H.; Darmanin, T.; de Givenchy, E.T.; Guittard, F. Chemical and physical pathways for the preparation of superoleophobic surfaces and related wetting theories. Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 2694–2716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Huang, Y.; Zhang, H.; Liu, X.; Ma, B.; Huang, T. Iron-activated carbon systems to enhance aboriginal aerobic denitrifying bacterial consortium for improved treatment of micro-polluted reservoir water: Performances, mechanisms, and implications. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2022, 56, 3407–3418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. More, T.; Yadav, J.S.S.; Yan, S.; Tyagi, R.D.; Surampalli, R.Y. Extracellular polymeric substances of bacteria and their potential environmental applications. J. Environ. Manag. 2014, 144, 1–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Rivas, B.L.; Pereira, E.D.; Palencia, M.; Sánchez, J. Water-soluble functional polymers in conjunction with membranes to remove pollutant ions from aqueous solutions. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2011, 36, 294–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Yang, X.; Qin, J.; Jiang, Y.; Chen, K.; Yan, X.; Zhang, D.; Li, R.; Tang, H. Fabrication of P25/Ag3PO4/graphene oxide heterostructures for enhanced solar photocatalytic degradation of organic pollutants and bacteria. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2015, 166, 231–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Yin, H.; Niu, J.; Ren, Y.; Cong, J.; Zhang, X.; Fan, F.; Xiao, Y.; Zhang, X.; Deng, J.; Xie, M. An integrated insight into the response of sedimentary microbial communities to heavy metal contamination. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 14266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Chen, C.; Weng, D.; Mahmood, A.; Chen, S.; Wang, J. Separation mechanism and construction of surfaces with special wettability for oil/water separation. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 11006–11027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Feng, Q.; Zhan, Y.; Yang, W.; Sun, A.; Dong, H.; Chiao, Y.-H.; Liu, Y.; Chen, X.; Chen, Y. Bi-functional super-hydrophilic/underwater super-oleophobic 2D lamellar Ti3C2Tx MXene/poly (arylene ether nitrile) fibrous composite membrane for the fast purification of emulsified oil and photodegradation of hazardous organics. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2022, 612, 156–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Han, Z.; Feng, X.; Guo, Z.; Niu, S.; Ren, L. Flourishing bioinspired antifogging materials with superwettability: Progresses and challenges. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1704652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Jiang, T.; Guo, Z.; Liu, W. Biomimetic superoleophobic surfaces: Focusing on their fabrication and applications. J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 1811–1827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Liu, X.; Zhou, J.; Xue, Z.; Gao, J.; Meng, J.; Wang, S.; Jiang, L. Clam’s shell inspired high-energy inorganic coatings with underwater low adhesive superoleophobicity. Adv. Mater. 2012, 24, 3401–3405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Drelich, J.; Chibowski, E.; Meng, D.D.; Terpilowski, K. Hydrophilic and superhydrophilic surfaces and materials. Soft Matter 2011, 7, 9804–9828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ghaffari, S.; Aliofkhazraei, M.; Darband, G.B.; Zakeri, A.; Ahmadi, E. Review of superoleophobic surfaces: Evaluation, fabrication methods, and industrial applications. Surf. Interfaces 2019, 17, 100340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Miller, R.H.; Hu, S.; Weamie, S.J.; Naame, S.A.; Kiazolu, D.G. Superhydrophobic coating fabrication for metal protection based on electrodeposition application: A Review. J. Mater. Sci. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 68–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Noman, M.T.; Ashraf, M.A.; Ali, A. Synthesis and applications of nano-TiO2: A review. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2019, 26, 3262–3291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Sepeur, S. Nanotechnology: Technical Basics and Applications; Vincentz Network GmbH & Co KG: Hanover, Germany, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  23. Kang, Z.; Si, H.; Zhang, S.; Wu, J.; Sun, Y.; Liao, Q.; Zhang, Z.; Zhang, Y. Interface engineering for modulation of charge carrier behavior in ZnO photoelectrochemical water splitting. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2019, 29, 1808032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Liu, Y.; Kang, Z.; Si, H.; Li, P.; Cao, S.; Liu, S.; Li, Y.; Zhang, S.; Zhang, Z.; Liao, Q. Cactus-like hierarchical nanorod-nanosheet mixed dimensional photoanode for efficient and stable water splitting. Nano Energy 2017, 35, 189–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Si, H.; Liao, Q.; Zhang, Z.; Li, Y.; Yang, X.; Zhang, G.; Kang, Z.; Zhang, Y. An innovative design of perovskite solar cells with Al2O3 inserting at ZnO/perovskite interface for improving the performance and stability. Nano Energy 2016, 22, 223–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wang, Z.L. Functional oxide nanobelts: Materials, properties and potential applications in nanosystems and biotechnology. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 2004, 55, 159–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Hu, Y.; Chang, Y.; Fei, P.; Snyder, R.L.; Wang, Z.L. Designing the electric transport characteristics of ZnO micro/nanowire devices by coupling piezoelectric and photoexcitation effects. ACS Nano 2010, 4, 1234–1240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wang, Z.L.; Song, J. Piezoelectric nanogenerators based on zinc oxide nanowire arrays. Science 2006, 312, 242–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Law, M.; Greene, L.E.; Johnson, J.C.; Saykally, R.; Yang, P. Nanowire dye-sensitized solar cells. Nat. Mater. 2005, 4, 455–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Song, X.; Wang, M.; Deng, J.; Ju, Y.; Xing, T.; Ding, J.; Yang, Z.; Shao, J. ZnO/PbS core/shell nanorod arrays as efficient counter electrode for quantum dot-sensitized solar cells. J. Power Sources 2014, 269, 661–670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Bai, Z.; Yan, X.; Kang, Z.; Hu, Y.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, Y. Photoelectrochemical performance enhancement of ZnO photoanodes from ZnIn2S4 nanosheets coating. Nano Energy 2015, 14, 392–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Akhavan, O.; Mehrabian, M.; Mirabbaszadeh, K.; Azimirad, R. Hydrothermal synthesis of ZnO nanorod arrays for photocatalytic inactivation of bacteria. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2009, 42, 225305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Gerbreders, V.; Krasovska, M.; Sledevskis, E.; Gerbreders, A.; Mihailova, I.; Tamanis, E.; Ogurcovs, A. Hydrothermal synthesis of ZnO nanostructures with controllable morphology change. CrystEngComm 2020, 22, 1346–1358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Sun, A.; Zhan, Y.; Feng, Q.; Yang, W.; Dong, H.; Liu, Y.; Chen, X.; Chen, Y. Assembly of MXene/ZnO heterojunction onto electrospun poly (arylene ether nitrile) fibrous membrane for favorable oil/water separation with high permeability and synergetic antifouling performance. J. Membr. Sci. 2022, 663, 120933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Lin, W.; Ma, R.; Shao, W.; Kang, B.; Wu, Z. Properties of doped ZnO transparent conductive thin films deposited by RF magnetron sputtering using a series of high quality ceramic targets. Rare Met. 2008, 27, 32–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zhang, X.-L.; Li, J.; Leng, B.; Yang, L.; Song, Y.-D.; Feng, S.-Y.; Feng, L.-Z.; Liu, Z.-T.; Fu, Z.-W.; Jiang, X. High-performance ultraviolet-visible photodetector with high sensitivity and fast response speed based on MoS2-on-ZnO photogating heterojunction. Tungsten 2023, 5, 91–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Chang, C.; Chen, W.; Chen, Y.; Chen, Y.; Chen, Y.; Ding, F.; Fan, C.; Fan, H.J.; Fan, Z.; Gong, C. Recent progress on two-dimensional materials. Acta Phys.-Chim. Sin. 2021, 37, 2108017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Pradel, K.C.; Wu, W.; Ding, Y.; Wang, Z.L. Solution-derived ZnO homojunction nanowire films on wearable substrates for energy conversion and self-powered gesture recognition. Nano Lett. 2014, 14, 6897–6905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Zhou, W.; Zhang, X.; Zhao, D.; Gao, M.; Xie, S. ZnO nanorods: Morphology control, optical properties, and nanodevice applications, Science China Physics. Mech. Astron. 2013, 56, 2243–2265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Wojnarowicz, J.; Chudoba, T.; Lojkowski, W. A Review of Microwave Synthesis of Zinc Oxide Nanomaterials: Reactants, Process Parameters and Morphologies. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 1086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Henssien, M. Recent progress in zinc oxide nanomaterials and nanocomposites: From synthesis to applications. Ceram. Int. 2022, 48, 22609–22628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Ghannam, H.; Bazin, C.; Chahboun, A.; Turmine, M. Control of the growth of electrodeposited zinc oxide on FTO glass. CrystEngComm 2018, 20, 6618–6628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Li, W.-J.; Shi, E.-W.; Zhong, W.-Z.; Yin, Z.-W. Growth mechanism and growth habit of oxide crystals. J. Cryst. Growth 1999, 203, 186–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Feng, W.; Wang, B.; Huang, P.; Wang, X.; Yu, J.; Wang, C. Wet chemistry synthesis of ZnO crystals with hexamethylenetetramine (HMTA): Understanding the role of HMTA in the formation of ZnO crystals. Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 2016, 41, 462–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Cuscó, R.; Alarcón-Lladó, E.; Ibáñez, J.; Artús, L.; Jiménez, J.; Wang, B.; Callahan, M.J. Temperature dependence of Raman scattering in ZnO. Phys. Rev. B 2007, 75, 165202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Tran, T.H.; Pham, N.H.; Nguyen, T.H.; Nguyen, T.D.T.; Sai, C.D.; Nguyen, Q.H.; Nguyen, V.T.; Le, M.P.; Tran, V.T.; Nguyen, T.B.; et al. Preparation of ZnO/Ag nanoflowers by hydrothermal assisted with galvanic effect and its surface enhanced Raman scattering activity. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2023, 833, 140948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Tran, V.T.; Tran, T.H.; Le, M.P.; Pham, N.H.; Nguyen, V.T.; Do, D.B.; Nguyen, X.T.; Trinh, B.N.Q.; Van Nguyen, T.T.; Pham, V.T.; et al. Highly efficient photo-induced surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy from ZnO/Au nanorods. Opt. Mater. 2022, 134, 113069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Khan, T.M.; Bibi, T.; Hussain, B. Synthesis and optical study of heat-treated ZnO nanopowder for optoelectronic applications. Bull. Mater. Sci. 2015, 38, 1851–1858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Lincot, D. Solution growth of functional zinc oxide films and nanostructures. MRS Bull. 2010, 35, 778–789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Kumar, K.M.; Mandal, B.K.; Naidu, E.A.; Sinha, M.; Kumar, K.S.; Reddy, P.S. Synthesis and characterisation of flower shaped zinc oxide nanostructures and its antimicrobial activity. Spectrochim. Acta Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2013, 104, 171–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Shen, X.; Shao, H.; Liu, Y.; Zhai, Y. Synthesis and photocatalytic performance of ZnO with flower-like structure from zinc oxide ore. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2020, 51, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Laurenti, M.; Cauda, V.; Gazia, R.; Fontana, M.; Rivera, V.F.; Bianco, S.; Canavese, G. Wettability control on ZnO nanowires driven by seed layer properties. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2013, 2013, 2520–2527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Wöll, C. The chemistry and physics of zinc oxide surfaces. Prog. Surf. Sci. 2007, 82, 55–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Gandini, A. Polymers from renewable resources: A challenge for the future of macromolecular materials. Macromolecules 2008, 41, 9491–9504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Guo, Z.; Liu, W.; Su, B.-L. Superhydrophobic surfaces: From natural to biomimetic to functional. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2011, 353, 335–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Cai, Q.; Gao, Y.; Gao, T.; Lan, S.; Simalou, O.; Zhou, X.; Zhang, Y.; Harnoode, C.; Gao, G.; Dong, A. Insight into biological effects of zinc oxide nanoflowers on bacteria: Why morphology matters. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 10109–10120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Nanomaterials 14 00150 g001
Figure 1. (A) Schematic diagram of antifouling and antimicrobial of F-ZMF. SEM images of (B) F-ZMF-0.5, (C) F-ZMF-1, (D) F-ZMF-2, (E) F-ZMF-3, (F) F-ZMF-4, (G) XRD patterns of F-ZMF samples.
Figure 1. (A) Schematic diagram of antifouling and antimicrobial of F-ZMF. SEM images of (B) F-ZMF-0.5, (C) F-ZMF-1, (D) F-ZMF-2, (E) F-ZMF-3, (F) F-ZMF-4, (G) XRD patterns of F-ZMF samples.
Nanomaterials 14 00150 g001
Nanomaterials 14 00150 g002
Figure 2. SEM images of (A) F-ZMF-0.5, (B) F-ZMF-1, (C) F-ZMF-2, (D) F-ZMF-3, (E) F-ZMF-4. Water contact angle (F) images and (G) histogram.
Figure 2. SEM images of (A) F-ZMF-0.5, (B) F-ZMF-1, (C) F-ZMF-2, (D) F-ZMF-3, (E) F-ZMF-4. Water contact angle (F) images and (G) histogram.
Nanomaterials 14 00150 g002
Nanomaterials 14 00150 g003
Figure 3. Optical pictures of F-ZMF during the self-cleaning experiments. (A,E,I,M,Q,U) the surface of the samples before contact with the oil droplets, (B,F,J,N,R,V) oil droplets in contact with different surfaces, (C,G,K,O,S,W) the surface of the sample after contact with oil droplets, (D,H,L,P,T,X) images of samples’ surfaces after contact with oil droplets.
Figure 3. Optical pictures of F-ZMF during the self-cleaning experiments. (A,E,I,M,Q,U) the surface of the samples before contact with the oil droplets, (B,F,J,N,R,V) oil droplets in contact with different surfaces, (C,G,K,O,S,W) the surface of the sample after contact with oil droplets, (D,H,L,P,T,X) images of samples’ surfaces after contact with oil droplets.
Nanomaterials 14 00150 g003
Nanomaterials 14 00150 g004
Figure 4. Underwater oil contact angle process of (A) FTO, (B) F-ZMF-0.5, (C) F-ZMF-1, (D) F-ZMF-2, (E) F-ZMF-3, (F) F-ZMF-4.
Figure 4. Underwater oil contact angle process of (A) FTO, (B) F-ZMF-0.5, (C) F-ZMF-1, (D) F-ZMF-2, (E) F-ZMF-3, (F) F-ZMF-4.
Nanomaterials 14 00150 g004
Nanomaterials 14 00150 g005
Figure 5. Antibacterial testing of different co-cultivation times of F-ZMF against S. aureus, (A) Plate counting pictures, (B) Surface antibacterial rate.
Figure 5. Antibacterial testing of different co-cultivation times of F-ZMF against S. aureus, (A) Plate counting pictures, (B) Surface antibacterial rate.
Nanomaterials 14 00150 g005
Nanomaterials 14 00150 g006
Figure 6. Antibacterial testing of different co-cultivation times of F-ZMF against E. coli, (A) Plate counting pictures, (B) Surface antibacterial rate.
Figure 6. Antibacterial testing of different co-cultivation times of F-ZMF against E. coli, (A) Plate counting pictures, (B) Surface antibacterial rate.
Nanomaterials 14 00150 g006
Nanomaterials 14 00150 g007
Figure 7. Schematic diagram of the antimicrobial mechanism of F-ZMF against bacteria.
Figure 7. Schematic diagram of the antimicrobial mechanism of F-ZMF against bacteria.
Nanomaterials 14 00150 g007
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, Y.; Xue, Y.; Wang, J.; Zhang, D.; Zhao, Y.; Liu, J.-J. Antibacterial Hydrophilic ZnO Microstructure Film with Underwater Oleophobic and Self-Cleaning Antifouling Properties. Nanomaterials 2024, 14, 150. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/nano14020150

AMA Style

Li Y, Xue Y, Wang J, Zhang D, Zhao Y, Liu J-J. Antibacterial Hydrophilic ZnO Microstructure Film with Underwater Oleophobic and Self-Cleaning Antifouling Properties. Nanomaterials. 2024; 14(2):150. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/nano14020150

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Yannan, Yu Xue, Jie Wang, Dan Zhang, Yan Zhao, and Jun-Jie Liu. 2024. "Antibacterial Hydrophilic ZnO Microstructure Film with Underwater Oleophobic and Self-Cleaning Antifouling Properties" Nanomaterials 14, no. 2: 150. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/nano14020150

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop