Next Article in Journal
Effects of Fe Contamination on the Reliability of Gate Oxide Integrity in Advanced CMOS Technology
Previous Article in Journal
An Automated Assessment Method for Chronic Kidney Disease–Mineral and Bone Disorder (CKD-MBD) Utilizing Metacarpal Cortical Percentage
Previous Article in Special Issue
Enhancing Signal Recognition Accuracy in Delay-Based Optical Reservoir Computing: A Comparative Analysis of Training Algorithms
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Evaluation of Two Digital Wound Area Measurement Methods Using a Non-Randomized, Single-Center, Controlled Clinical Trial

by
Lorena Casanova-Lozano
1,*,†,
David Reifs-Jiménez
1,*,†,
Maria del Mar Martí-Ejarque
2,
Ramon Reig-Bolaño
1 and
Sergi Grau-Carrión
1
1
Digital Care Research Group, Centre for Health and Social Care Research (CESS), Universitat de Vic–Universitat Central de Catalunya, 08500 Vic, Spain
2
Grupo Quirónsalud, Hospital Universitari Sagrat Cor, 08029 Barcelona, Spain
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Submission received: 11 May 2024 / Revised: 13 June 2024 / Accepted: 14 June 2024 / Published: 18 June 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Artificial Intelligence and Signal Processing: Circuits and Systems)

Abstract

A prospective, single-center, non-randomized, pre-marketing clinical investigation was conducted with a single group of subjects to collect skin lesion images. These images were subsequently utilized to compare the results obtained from a traditional method of wound size measurement with two novel methods developed using Machine Learning (ML) approaches. Both proposed methods automatically calculate the wound area from an image. One method employs a two-dimensional system with the assistance of an external calibrator, while the other utilizes an Augmented Reality (AR) system, eliminating the need for a physical calibration object. To validate the correlation between these methods, a gold standard measurement with digital planimetry was employed. A total of 67 wound images were obtained from 41 patients between 22 November 2022 and 10 February 2023. The conducted pre-marketing clinical investigation demonstrated that the ML algorithms are safe for both the intended user and the intended target population. They exhibit a high correlation with the gold standard method and are more accurate than traditional methods. Additionally, they meet the manufacturer’s expected use. The study validated the performance, safety, and usability of the implemented methods as a valuable tool in the measurement of skin lesions.
Keywords: wounds and injuries; body surface area; machine learning wounds and injuries; body surface area; machine learning

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Casanova-Lozano, L.; Reifs-Jiménez, D.; Martí-Ejarque, M.d.M.; Reig-Bolaño, R.; Grau-Carrión, S. Evaluation of Two Digital Wound Area Measurement Methods Using a Non-Randomized, Single-Center, Controlled Clinical Trial. Electronics 2024, 13, 2390. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/electronics13122390

AMA Style

Casanova-Lozano L, Reifs-Jiménez D, Martí-Ejarque MdM, Reig-Bolaño R, Grau-Carrión S. Evaluation of Two Digital Wound Area Measurement Methods Using a Non-Randomized, Single-Center, Controlled Clinical Trial. Electronics. 2024; 13(12):2390. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/electronics13122390

Chicago/Turabian Style

Casanova-Lozano, Lorena, David Reifs-Jiménez, Maria del Mar Martí-Ejarque, Ramon Reig-Bolaño, and Sergi Grau-Carrión. 2024. "Evaluation of Two Digital Wound Area Measurement Methods Using a Non-Randomized, Single-Center, Controlled Clinical Trial" Electronics 13, no. 12: 2390. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/electronics13122390

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop