Counter Hegemony of Cultural Art Innovation against Art in Digital Media

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The fifth section "Conclusions" could be further expanded and interconnected with the previous sections of the paper.

Although a lot of errors have been corrected and/or re-edited, the paper needs an additional language check.

No other comments.

Author Response

Dear Reviewer 1

Warm Greeting

I am very grateful for valuable suggestions that will build this paper for the development of cultural arts eroded by the digital era. I will complement the existing suggestions as well as possible; the limitations of research on culture eroded by the digital era are still minimal so that there are few obstacles in the presentation of literature. I thank you again for all of this advice. I will do extensive editing of English language and style

Best Regard

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The artile investigates an innovative theme. However, there are many points that were not taken into consideration for the second submission. Despite the fact that the topic is really interesting, the article lacks many academic conventions. Here are some of them, there are many other mistakes such as repetition, descrptive language and style, poor refrencing style and weak language. 

Grammar

Many grammatical mistakes some of them are as follows:

29 and then first changed to 

33 (Art Center) Denpasar, Bali, Indonesia are always filled with spectators

35 Many factors cause the Drama Gong to not become a favorite spectacle for Balinese people today

36 the factors that influence globalization

37 Lack of professional management of

61 the audience or society is positioned as students

109 to build culture and ideology against 

 132 many arts are considered capable of replacing this 133 show

Vocabulary and terminology

• The article should be consistent in capitalising Gong Drama 
• Misusage or unexplained terms 

27-28 What is meant by the story of "Mayadenawa" was accompanied by a gamelan gong? 

47 developing

 62 fairly effective socialization of development

113 The existence of the Drama gong is hegemonies 

Structure

• The introduction should be rewritten or omitted and to start with the Literature review as the information included in the introduction is repeated in the successive paragraphs
• The Gramscian Hegemony should be comprehensively explained and applied to the Bali society 

1-Why the Gong drama started to be popular during the 1970s and 190s, there is no mention to the reason behind that

2- how and why did I Gusti Bagus Nyoman Panji bring change to the Gong drama?

Line of argument and cohesion 

• The introduction should first explain what is the Gong Drama? Why it was published in 1960s specifically, there should be some historical background to decode its meaning, terminology, social or political (may be economic) reasons behind its invention and development
• Any technical terms should be explained 
• The literature review lacks any cohesion, no connection between ideas, noe development of argument, most ideas are repetitive 

30 who is  I Gusti Bagus Nyoman Panji?

 Vague phrases or sentences:

72-73 has hegemony in the existence of Drama Gong and arts and culture local others

83 Although the Drama Gong cannot be directly present to "greet '' its fans by involving the audience colossally as 

92 setting the  setting

120-121 the changing era demands humans to continue to transform, as well as art,  because of changes triggered by technology and global interconnectivity

122-124 Art is maybe the 122 most general of the performing expressions and is found in each general public, regularly as a basic piece of other performing fine arts and different spaces of theoretical social legacy including ceremonies, happy occasions or oral practices

Referencing and citation:

• The reference list should not be numbered
• Some points needs valid referencing 

47-49 Meanwhile, as can be seen in various news developing in the mass media that in Indonesian society there has been moral degradation, both among  parents and teenagers. The current moral degradation tends to occur in Indonesia because the younger generation is increasingly leaving the culture inherited by their predecessors.

68 According to the observations of [16],

• What do Ref [21], [26], [31] ..... mean, does the article refer to the reference number 21? That is not an appropriate reference or in-text citation 

Author Response

Dear Dear Reviewers.
Thank you very much for your valuable input. This is the knowledge that I got and it is very valuable.
I sent the revised file according to your direction.

Thank you once again

Best Regard

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

The article is of academic interest and it is presented in an appropriate way. The modifications included by the authors respond to what was requested and contribute to the enrichment of the content. 

Author Response

Dear Dear Reviewers.
Thank you very much for your valuable input. This is the knowledge that I got and it is very valuable.
I sent the revised file according to your direction.

Thank you once again

Best Regard

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

This manuscript is a resubmission of an earlier submission. The following is a list of the peer review reports and author responses from that submission.

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

This article is a rigorous study that presents a somewhat novel topic of interest to society about entertainment arts. The manuscript, which continues the adequate structure of all academic work, presents an exhaustive bibliographic review based on the most outstanding and innovative specialized literature and, later, the study of four cases (four stories of gong drama). No methodological errors are observed, and illustrations are included to illustrate the object of study.

Only, from the point of view of the structure, it is recommended to delete the last heading, called “Suggestions”, and include this information as a part of the conclusions. Likewise, it is recommended to review the final bibliography and adjust some references to the Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity normative.

For all these reasons, I recommend that the article could be accepted after minor revisión.

Reviewer 2 Report

The topic of the article is really interesting. In time of globalisation, preserving the national identity becomes one of the challenges that face the state and the nation.  Fighting back against the dominant culture of social media and gaming culture through traditional performing art is one of the channels to spread awareness of the history and cultural heritage of the country. However, and unfortunately, it is difficult to proceed publishing the article. These are some of the reasons:

1. The theoretical framework is not adequately explained, and not properly applied to the case study ‘gong drama’. A different framework might suit the topic, counter hegemony would be a good start but it is not further developed nor explained.
2. The literature review needs to be connected and cohesive, mainly it is disconnected or represented. Synthesising is better in producing a more cohesive review.  
3. It would be better if the article focuses on two samples of the gong drama and applied the theory on them so it would be much easier and clearer. For example the very first one and the latest Angling Dharma and Jayaprana story produced by Bali TV 2020.
4. The writing style is very poor. The article lacks academic style, proper grammar and sentence structure. Nearly in every sentence there is a grammatical mistake or a wrong sentence structure. I her bellow mention some: 
5. The main argument is not developed, it is repeated throughout the article. The lack of cohesion confuses the reader with so many names, dates, events, public and academic figures and characters.
6. The article lacks the adequate referencing style: the in-text citation, the figure citation and the reference list. For example:

1. The in-text link should not be included within the text, beside it does not work
2. Referencing photos, and figures should follow the same referencing of sources (books, article, etc,.)
3. The referencing list should follow the alphabetical order. Some of the references are not found on the web. 

Reviewer 3 Report

• The terms "tambul" and "janger" should be further explained.
• Extensive editing in English is needed.
• The methodology is not appropriately analyzed.
• The captions of the images present insufficient information.
• The paper does not fully emphasize on the application of (digital) technology.