Next Article in Journal
PalmitoAR: The Last Battle of the U.S. Civil War Reenacted Using Augmented Reality
Previous Article in Journal
Spatial Analysis of Seasonal Precipitation over Iran: Co-Variation with Climate Indices
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Integration of Convolutional Neural Network and Error Correction for Indoor Positioning

ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2020, 9(2), 74; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijgi9020074
by Eric Hsueh-Chan Lu * and Jing-Mei Ciou
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2020, 9(2), 74; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijgi9020074
Submission received: 13 November 2019 / Revised: 31 December 2019 / Accepted: 27 January 2020 / Published: 29 January 2020

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Please see attached. 

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

We generally don't use "we" in scientific publications. You did it 91 times! Text is bad. I'm finding we all the time. I can't read this. I don't know you are a Msc or a PhD, but your work looks strange and suspicious Why you are using "thesis" word instead of "publication" or "paper" ? It is not a thesis. It is a scientific publication.  Thesis means it is Bachelor's Thesis or Master Thesis or PhD Thesis. Examples from your paper: " This thesis also considers that the learning model of small area will be more accurate, or  "In this thesis, the main sampling [...]" I suspect that authors of the thesis?? did not corrected original work and left "thesis word" without changes, thus I suspect this work may be real a thesis before. Can you kindly comment my remarks ? Do you have patent for this? You fullfilled text in patents but there is no patent number. If there is no patent, this text should be moved to aknowledgments

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 3 Report

Please, review the entire paper with a keen editorial eye for English grammar and syntax.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

"Ground truth position" should be changed to the "ground exact position" or "ground exact reference position"

"Discussion" chapter should be changed to "Conclusions"

 

 

 

Author Response

Point 1: "Ground truth position" should be changed to the "ground exact position" or "ground exact reference position"

Response 1: Thanks for your valuable comment and advice. “Ground truth position” has been changed to “ground exact position” in Line 299 (p. 7), Line 318 (p. 8), Line 367 (p. 10), Line 427 (p. 12), Line 442 (p. 12), Line 463 (p. 13), Line 504 (p. 14), Line 515 (p. 14) and Line 748 (p. 22).

 

Point 2: "Discussion" chapter should be changed to "Conclusions"

Response 2: Thanks for your good suggestion. “Discussion” chapter has been changed the title to “Conclusions and Future Work” in Line 776 (p. 23).

Back to TopTop