Next Article in Journal
In Vitro Production and Exudation of 20-Hydroxymaytenin from Gymnosporia heterophylla (Eckl. and Zeyh.) Loes. Cell Culture
Next Article in Special Issue
Cytological Study of Cypripedium japonicum Thunb. (Orchidaceae Juss.): An Endangered Species from Korea
Previous Article in Journal
Editorial for Special Issue “Leaf Senescence” in Plants
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Plants
Volume 10
Issue 8
10.3390/plants10081492
plants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Detecting Introgressed Populations in the Iberian Endemic Centaurea podospermifolia through Genome Size

by
Jaume Pellicer
1,2,*,
Jordi López-Pujol
1,
Marc Aixarch
3,
Teresa Garnatje
1,
Joan Vallès
4 and
Oriane Hidalgo
1,2,*
1
Institut Botànic de Barcelona (IBB, CSIC-Ajuntament de Barcelona), Passeig del Migdia s.n., Parc de Montjuïc, Catalonia, 08038 Barcelona, Spain
2
Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond TW9 3AE, UK
3
c/Mossèn Manyà 15, Catalonia, 43500 Tortosa, Spain
4
Laboratori de Botànica, Unitat Associada al CSIC, Facultat de Farmàcia i Ciències de l’Alimentació, Institut de la Biodiversitat IRBio, Universitat de Barcelona, Av. Joan XXIII 27-31, Catalonia, 08028 Barcelona, Spain
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2021, 10(8), 1492; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/plants10081492
Submission received: 22 June 2021 / Revised: 15 July 2021 / Accepted: 19 July 2021 / Published: 21 July 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Genome Size Evolution of Plants)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Based on results from previous studies, populations of the Iberian endemic Centaurea podospermifolia north of the Ebro River are considered genetically pure, while those southward are introgressed, with genetic input from C. cephalariifolia. This phenomenon is particularly relevant, especially given both the endangered and protected status for the species, which can have consequences in how to best apply conservation strategies to maintain genetic resources in the species. The main goal of this study was to evaluate whether genome size assessments using flow cytometry can help distinguishing between pure, hybrid and introgressed populations, and hence become a powerful and cost-effective tool to complement comprehensive population genetic surveys. The results indicate that there are significant genome size differences between populations of C. podospermifolia, which are coincident with previous considerations of pure and introgressed populations. Given the simplicity and reproducibility of this technique, flow cytometry could become an effective tool for monitoring pure populations of this species and, indeed, become an integral part of the management plans that are mandatory for listed taxa.

1. Introduction

About a decade ago, a study revealed that populations of the Iberian endemic Centaurea podospermifolia Loscos & J.Pardo north of the Ebro River (in the Cardó Massif) were considered genetically pure, while those from the south (in the Ports Massif) were introgressed, with genetic input from the widely distributed C. cephalariifolia Willk. [1]. Despite current understanding of the limitations of allozyme markers (e.g., low polymorphisms, restricted to coding genes), this study provided the first genetic insights into a potential hybridisation occurring between these two species, which had been based solely upon morphological evidence [2]. López-Pujol et al. [1] attributed this pattern to the existence of a biogeographical barrier, the Ebro River, that would have prevented the entry of genetic material of C. cephalariifolia into the Cardó Massif. Given that C. podospermifolia and C. ×loscosii Willk., the resulting hybrid between the two species are legally protected (listed as ‘vulnerable’ [3]), the question arose as to whether efforts should be geared towards conserving the so-called by the authors pure or hybrid populations of the species [1]. Conservation management strategies of endangered species require regular population monitoring. This is particularly important in cases such as that of C. podospermifolia, where hybridisation and introgression seem to be recurrent, and could possibly lead to the genetic assimilation of the species. Whilst C. cephalariifolia plants are large and vigorous, with purple florets and the involucre bracts with fimbriate margins (Figure 1C,H,J), C. podospermifolia and C. ×loscosii are morphologically more similar (Figure 1A,B), and mainly distinguished on the basis of flower head characters [2]. The main traits that can be used to distinguish between them are (i) the presence of sessile capitula in C. podospermifolia, while being pedunculate in C. ×loscosii (Figure 1A,B). (ii) Florets are bright yellow in the former and pale yellow (sometimes purplish), with darker anthers in the hybrid (Figure 1D,E,I). In addition (iii), involucral bracts in C. podospermifolia present mostly smooth margins and terminate with an apical spine (Figure 1F). In C. ×loscosii, the bracts also terminate in an apical spine, but the margins are clearly fimbriate (Figure 1G). Based on this, it is in many cases difficult to identify hybrid and introgressed individuals in the field, especially as few individuals flower per season, making identification in the field sometimes challenging [1].
Hybridisation is a recurrent phenomenon in plants, which has been widely recognised as a key evolutionary driver [4]. It has been linked in many cases to processes such as diversification and speciation [5,6] because of its role in the rise of new species through the accumulation of biological novelties inherent to the process [7,8]. Certainly, humans have benefited for long time from hybridisation by selecting and transferring useful traits among species for agro- and horticultural purposes. In many cases, hybridisation involves changes in chromosome number and/or ploidy level (e.g., Medicago, Sorbus [9,10]). Homoploid hybrids, where no change in ploidy with respect to the parental donors occurs, are also reported at lower frequencies among plants [11], though their rate of incidence is a hot topic of debate, and might have been so far underestimated [12].
Besides the use of genetic markers to uncover the genetic signature of crosses between species, flow cytometry has been widely used at population level to detect changes in nuclear DNA contents, i.e., intraspecific and cytotype variation, which is frequently one of the outcomes of hybridisation (e.g., Sorbus, Viola [9,13,14]). Indeed, this technique has become a complementary tool to interpret output data from population genetics (i.e., allelic frequencies). To date, no genome size data are available for C. podospermifolia, C. cephalariifolia and their resulting hybrid C. ×loscosii, although we know they share a chromosome number of 2n = 40 [15], supporting that C. ×loscosii is a homoploid hybrid. With these premises in mind, the first question to address is whether nuclear DNA contents of C. podospermifolia, C. cephalariifolia and their hybrid are sufficiently different to be discriminated by flow cytometry. Theoretically, F1 hybrids are expected to have usually a genome size (or 2C-value) corresponding approximately to the mean of their parents (Figure 2A). Based on this, the present study aims at evaluating whether genome size assessments through flow cytometry could become a useful tool for population monitoring, offering a simple, cost-effective and high-throughput sampling method to assess the extent of hybridisation and introgression between these species. Several processes might account for the configuration depicted in Figure 2A, where all hybrids have a 2C-value that corresponds to the mean 2C of the parental species: (i) hybrids are infertile and are generated sporadically where the parental species coexist; (ii) hybrids are self-compatible; (iii) hybrids are apomictic, i.e., they produce seeds without sexual reproduction. In the case of self-compatibility or apomixis, one would therefore expect the hybrid to be stable (i.e., able to persist over time without genetic exchange with parent species).
Another question to answer is to which extent C. ×loscosii is a stable hybrid originating through one or few hybridisation events or if, by contrary, it is continuously generated in those areas where both parental species coexist (note that observations in the field tend to favour the latter hypothesis; J. López-Pujol and M. Aixarch, pers. obs.). In this sense, flow cytometry can also provide information on the different possible outcomes after generations of hybridisation and subsequent introgression, which would result in a diverse array of genome size patterns. For example, if a hybrid is fertile and there are no reproductive barriers with its parental species, then subsequent generations would have genome sizes that are not exactly the mean of the genome sizes of their parental species, but a range of intermediate values depending on the degree of introgression (Figure 2B).

2. Results

Flow cytometry results are given in Table 1 (mean values per population) and in Table S1 (values for each individual).
We found C. podospermifolia population from Cardó Massif to have an average genome size of 5.88 pg/2C (Figure 2D), while populations of the same species from Ports Massif have a mean value of 7.87 pg/2C (Figure 2E). In fact, the three Centaurea species from Ports Massif exhibited very similar genome sizes (Figure 3), although that of C. cephalariifolia (7.64 pg/2C) was slightly smaller than that of C. ×loscosii (7.89 pg/2C) and C. podospermifolia (7.87 pg/2C).
To confirm that this variation was genuine rather than due to a potential technical artefact, leaves from populations showing the largest difference in 2C-values were mixed and processed. This resulted in distinct peaks in the flow histogram (Figure 2F), indicative of biologically real differences in nuclear DNA contents. In line with these findings, the Tukey test evidenced statistically significant differences in genome size between C. cephalariifolia, C. ×loscosii plus C. podospermifolia from Ports Massif, and C. podospermifolia from Cardó Massif (Figure 3).

3. Discussion

3.1. Genome Size Enables Discrimination between Populations of C. podospermifolia

This study reports novel genome size data, which were missing for the species and its hybrid. The analysis of nuclear DNA contents in multiple accessions of C. podospermifolia highlighted significant differences in genome size between the populations from Cardó and Ports Massifs, which covers the main distribution area of the species. Despite the limitations highlighted in the introduction regarding the use of the allozyme analysis for population genetics, the differences in genome size observed here can be interpreted considering the work by López-Pujol et al. [1], who reported the existence of segregated genetic clusters, coincident with each of the mountain ranges. Certainly, based solely on nuclear DNA contents, it would be too speculative to conclude that C. podospermifolia from Cardó Massif is genetically pure, especially since we cannot discard ancient hybridisation events that might have happened in that area. However, we cannot overlook the fact that this population has a significant smaller genome (5.88 pg/2C) than those that coexist with C. cephalariifolia in the Ports Massif (7.85–7.88 pg/2C), and such results indicate that, at least, the populations from both mountain ranges have undergone contrasting evolutionary trajectories. There are old records indicating the presence of C. cephalariifolia in the Cardó Massif [16,17,18]; however, these records are far enough from the current populations nuclei of C. podospermifolia, and currently the species is barely present in the area (Rafel Curto, pers. comm). Based on this, hybridisation might be unlikely given the results supporting a lack of gene flow between both mountain ranges [1].
It is nonetheless important to bear in mind that C. cephalariifolia is widespread in the Iberian Peninsula, and could eventually spread in this area, meaning that efforts should be made to preserve the original genetic stock of C. podospermifolia from this area. Furthermore, C. podospermifolia is included in the Catalan national list of protected species [3], and thereupon the conservation strategies to include populations that are unlikely to have undergone hybridisation (at least recent episodes) must be guaranteed. The conservation of introgressed populations, however, could also be desirable because, as already noted in López-Pujol et al. [1], it can have beneficial effects for an endangered species. Furthermore, Thompson et al. [19] argued that the conservation strategy for Mediterranean plants should combine the protection of pure and mixed populations—the latter being the arena for adaptive evolution and speciation.
Overall, in order to contribute further to the conservation and monitoring of these species, future population genetics surveys would be desirable to tackle, as well as the potential taxonomic questions arising from the apparent recurrent introgression in Ports Massif. The use of high throughput approaches (e.g., RADseq [13,20]) has been crucial to untangle the complex backgrounds of hybridisation in plants. Such techniques combined with flow cytometry would certainly enable reaching more sound conclusions about the genetic background of Centaurea in this area, including the level of introgression within and between populations. Altogether, this information would ultimately help to apply more fine-scale conservation protocols addressed to preserve genetic clusters of interest.

3.2. Interspecific Hybridisation and Introgression: Impact on Genome Size

As highlighted above, hybridisation and introgression are recurrent in plants and have been frequently associated with the rise of new species, and the genus Centaurea is not an exception [21]. Understanding the ecological and evolutionary consequences of this puzzling phenomenon has therefore become a source of intense debate [12,22,23,24]. Part of such interest is underpinned by the fact that, despite the expectancy that hybrids would (theoretically) display intermediate genomic features concerning the parental genomes [25], several studies report that, in many cases, one of the parental genomes can become dominant and erode the signature of the other parental genome [26,27,28]. In this sense, the pattern found in C. podospermifolia, whose likely introgressed populations present genome sizes close to their sympatric congeners and quite divergent from the isolated conspecific population (Figure 1C), in a similar way than what was observed in Armeria [29], could reflect a process of genomic assimilation. In the case of Onopordum, though nuclear DNA contents of hybrid and introgressed specimens between O. hinojense and O. nervosum displayed a range of sizes that fell within that of the parental species [30], the authors provided compelling evidence of the impact of directional introgression on the extinction risk of the endangered species O. hinojense. In fact, in absence of reproductive barriers, high levels of introgression can compromise the long-term existence of parental donors through assimilation of the genome [31], showing significant outperformance of hybrids in contact zones [23].
In addition, hybridisation can also affect the composition of repetitive DNA content of hybrids (triggered by the ‘genomic shock’), such as is the case in Helianthus, where the expansion of repetitive elements resulted in the overall genome additivity observed in homoploid hybrids, although the influence of ecological conditions in promoting such patterns is unclear [32,33]. Whether the increased genome size of introgressed C. podospermifolia is a consequence of genomic assimilation, repetitive element activation or the combination of both, yet remains to be clarified with a more in-depth population genetics screening.
Our flow cytometry analyses revealed that populations of C. podospermifolia from Ports Massif present very homogenous genome size values, suggesting that their increased genome size likely arose through an ancient post-hybridisation genome restructuring event, which could be now fully stabilised. By contrast, C. ×loscosii hybrids displayed more heterogeneous genome size values compared to their progenitors, having in some cases slightly larger C-values than those of the potential parents (Figure 2; Table S1). A scenario where C. ×loscosii presents more unstable genome sizes could indeed reflect the potential impact of recurrent and recent hybridisations in those areas where both parental species currently coexist. Nonetheless, this point should be confirmed with future genetic screening at the population level. In summary, hybridisation is increasingly recognised as both a potential threat (through hybridisation swamping and genetic assimilation, or outbreeding depression), but also a chance (as it generates genetic variation) for species survival and conservation [24,34]. In this sense, improving our understanding of hybridisation processes is therefore fundamental for species management, including its impact on genome size, which is most often overlooked.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Sampling

Details of the studied populations are given in Table 1 and their location is shown in Figure 2. In total, 43 individuals were sampled, representing two populations of each species from Ports Massif, and one population of C. podospermifolia from Cardó Massif. We collected one leaf per individual, since approximately only 1 cm2 of leaf material is necessary to carry out genome size assessments by flow cytometry [35]. Herbarium vouchers from previous collections in the same area by López-Pujol et al. [1] are deposited in herbarium BC (Botanical Institute of Barcelona).

4.2. Flow Cytometry Measurements

Genome size was determined using propidium iodide flow cytometry with a CyFlow Space (Sysmex-Partec, Germany), following the one-step procedure [36] with modifications as described in Clark et al. [37]. We used Petroselinum crispum (Mill.) Fuss. ‘Champion Moss Curled’ (2C = 4.50 pg [38]) as calibration standard and the general purpose buffer GPB [39] supplemented with 3% PVP-40 [35]. The number of individuals analysed per population is depicted in Table 1.

4.3. Statistical Analyses

Data visualisation and analyses were carried out with the R package ggplot2 [40] and R v.3.2.2 [41]. After verifying assumptions of homogeneity of variances (with Bartlett’s test) and of normality on residuals (with Shapiro test and QQ-plot), we proceeded to a one way ANOVA and performed multiple pairwise comparisons between the means of groups (Tukey honest significant differences, R function: ‘TukeyHSD’).

5. Conclusions

Understanding hybridisation and the impact of introgression in plant populations is fundamental for species management, especially when it comes to endangered species. Besides the critical role of population genetics, complementary approaches can be implemented, including changes on genome size, which are most often overlooked. This study provides an example about how can nuclear DNA contents highlight potential hybridisation. Because of its simplicity and low cost, flow cytometry could become an effective tool for the monitoring of pure (and, eventually, introgressed) populations and, indeed, an integral part of the management plan that is mandatory for listed species, as illustrated here in the case of C. podospermifolia.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://0-www-mdpi-com.brum.beds.ac.uk/article/10.3390/plants10081492/s1, Table S1: Genome size data for each of the individuals of Centaurea cephalariifolia, C. ×loscosii and C. podospermifolia at Cardó and Ports Massifs (Catalonia, Spain).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, O.H., with the assistance of the remaining authors; application for collection permits, J.L.-P. and O.H.; fieldwork, J.L.-P., M.A., T.G., J.V. and O.H.; Genome size assessments, J.P. and O.H.; writing—original draft preparation, O.H. and J.P.; writing—review and editing, all authors. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the Generalitat de Catalunya (‘Ajuts a Grups de Recerca Consolidats’ 2017/SGR/1116). J.P. and O.H. benefited from a Ramón y Cajal fellowship (Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación, Gobierno de España (RYC-2017-22742 and RYC-2016–21176)).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available in Supplementary Materials Table S1.

Acknowledgments

We thank the Generalitat de Catalunya (Catalan government) and Els Ports Natural Park for granting us permission to collect samples, and Roi Rodríguez González (Sistema Nacional de Garantía Juvenil, contract MIN19_CAT_IBB_001, Botanical Institute of Barcelona) for technical assistance.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. López-Pujol, J.; Garcia-Jacas, N.; Susanna, A.; Vilatersana, R. Should we conserve pure species or hybrid species? Delimiting hybridization and introgression in the Iberian endemic Centaurea podospermifolia. Biol. Conserv. 2012, 152, 271–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Fernández Casas, F.J.; Susanna, A. Monografía de la Sección Chamaecyanus Willk. del género Centaurea L.; Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Instituto Botánico de Barcelona: Barcelona, Spain, 1985; Volume 10, ISBN 0210-8062. [Google Scholar]
  3. DARPAMN RESOLUCIÓ AAM/732/2015, de 9 D’abril, per la qual S’aprova la Catalogació, Descatalogació i Canvi de Categoria D’espècies i Subespècies del Catàleg de Flora Amenaçada de Catalunya. D. Of. General. Catalunya 2015, 6854: CVE-DOGC-A-15106031. 2015. Available online: https://www.conservacionvegetal.org/wp-content/uploads/legislaciones/121/Cataluña2015.pdf (accessed on 17 March 2021).
  4. Whitney, K.D.; Ahern, J.R.; Campbell, L.G.; Albert, L.P.; King, M.S. Patterns of hybridization in plants. Perspect. Plant Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2010, 12, 175–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Soltis, P.S.; Soltis, D.E. The Role of Hybridization in Plant Speciation. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2009, 60, 561–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Kerbs, B.; Ressler, J.; Kelly, J.K.; Mort, M.E.; Santos-Guerra, A.; Gibson, M.J.S.; Caujapé-Castells, J.; Crawford, D.J. The potential role of hybridization in diversification and speciation in an insular plant lineage: Insights from synthetic interspecific hybrids. AoB Plants 2017, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Abbott, R.; Albach, D.; Ansell, S.; Arntzen, J.W.; Baird, S.J.E.; Bierne, N.; Boughman, J.; Brelsford, A.; Buerkle, C.A.; Buggs, R.; et al. Hybridization and speciation. J. Evol. Biol. 2013, 26, 229–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Fu, P.-C.; Twyford, A.D.; Sun, S.-S.; Wang, H.-Y.; Xia, M.-Z.; Tan, C.-X.; Zhou, X.-J.; Chen, S.-L. Recurrent hybridization underlies the evolution of novelty in Gentiana (Gentianaceae) in the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. AoB Plants 2021, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Pellicer, J.; Clermont, S.; Houston, L.; Rich, T.C.G.; Fay, M.F. Cytotype diversity in the Sorbus complex (Rosaceae) in Britain: Sorting out the puzzle. Ann. Bot. 2012, 110, 1185–1193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Rosato, M.; Castro, M.; Rosselló, J.A. Relationships of the woody Medicago species (Section Dendrotelis) assessed by molecular cytogenetic analyses. Ann. Bot. 2008, 102, 15–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  11. Yakimowski, S.B.; Rieseberg, L.H. The role of homoploid hybridization in evolution: A century of studies synthesizing genetics and ecology. Am. J. Bot. 2014, 101, 1247–1258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Nieto Feliner, G.; Álvarez, I.; Fuertes-Aguilar, J.; Heuertz, M.; Marques, I.; Moharrek, F.; Piñeiro, R.; Riina, R.; Rosselló, J.A.; Soltis, P.S.; et al. Is homoploid hybrid speciation that rare? An empiricist’s view. Heredity 2017, 118, 513–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Żabicka, J.; Migdałek, G.; Słomka, A.; Sliwinska, E.; Mackiewicz, L.; Keczyński, A.; Kuta, E. Interspecific hybridization and introgression influence biodiversity-based on genetic diversity of Central European Viola epipsila-V. palustris complex. Diversity 2020, 12, 321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Levin, J.; Fay, M.F.; Pellicer, J.; Hedrén, M. Multiple independent origins of intermediate species between Sorbus aucuparia and S. hybrida (Rosaceae) in the Baltic region. Nord. J. Bot. 2018, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Rice, A.; Glick, L.; Abadi, S.; Einhorn, M.; Kopelman, N.M.; Salman-Minkov, A.; Mayzel, J.; Chay, O.; Mayrose, I. The Chromosome Counts Database (CCDB)—a community resource of plant chromosome numbers. New Phytol. 2015, 206, 19–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Font Quer, P. Flórula de Cardó; Talleres Tipográficos Mariano Clavé: Barcelona, Spain, 1950. [Google Scholar]
  17. Folch, R. La flora de les comarques litorals compreses entre la Riera d’Alforja i el riu Ebre; Institut d’Estudis Catalans. Arxius de la Secció de Ciènces LX: Barcelona, Spain, 1980; ISBN 84-7283-028-4. [Google Scholar]
  18. Aparicio Rojo, J.M. Centaurea scabiosa L. subsp. scabiosa (num. 3850). In Atlas Corològic de la Flora Vascular dels Països Catalans; Font i Castell, X., Vigo i Bonada, J., Eds.; Institut d’Estudis Catalans: Barcelona, Spain, 2008; Volume 15, ISBN 978-84-92583-25-6. [Google Scholar]
  19. Thompson, J.D.; Gauthier, P.; Papuga, G.; Pons, V.; Debussche, M.; Farris, E. The conservation significance of natural hybridisation in Mediterranean plants: From a case study on Cyclamen (Primulaceae) to a general perspective. Plant Biol. 2018, 20, 128–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Wang, N.; Kelly, L.J.; McAllister, H.A.; Zohren, J.; Buggs, R.J.A. Resolving phylogeny and polyploid parentage using genus-wide genome-wide sequence data from birch trees. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2021, 160, 107126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Font, M.; Garcia-Jacas, N.; Vilatersana, R.; Roquet, C.; Susanna, A. Evolution and biogeography of Centaurea section Acrocentron inferred from nuclear and plastid DNA sequence analyses. Ann. Bot. 2009, 103, 985–997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Gross, B.L.; Rieseberg, L.H. The ecological genetics of homoploid hybrid speciation. J. Hered. 2005, 96, 241–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Marques, I.; Nieto Feliner, G.; Martins-Loução, M.A.; Fuertes Aguilar, J. Fitness in Narcissus hybrids: Low fertility is overcome by early hybrid vigour, absence of exogenous selection and high bulb propagation. J. Ecol. 2011, 99, 1508–1519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Draper, D.; Laguna, E.; Marques, I. Demystifying negative connotations of hybridization for less biased conservation policies. Front. Ecol. Evol. 2021, 9, 268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. McCann, J.; Jang, T.-S.; Macas, J.; Schneeweiss, G.M.; Matzke, N.J.; Novák, P.; Stuessy, T.F.; Villaseñor, J.L.; Weiss-Schneeweiss, H. Dating the species network: Allopolyploidy and repetitive DNA evolution in American daisies (Melampodium sect. Melampodium, Asteraceae). Syst. Biol. 2018, 67, 1010–1024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Glombik, M.; Bačovský, V.; Hobza, R.; Kopecký, D. Competition of parental genomes in plant hybrids. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Quero-García, J.; Letourmy, P.; Ivancic, A.; Feldmann, P.; Courtois, B.; Noyer, J.L.; Lebot, V. Hybrid performance in taro (Colocasia esculenta) in relation to genetic dissimilarity of parents. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2009, 119, 213–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Senerchia, N.; Felber, F.; Parisod, C. Contrasting evolutionary trajectories of multiple retrotransposons following independent allopolyploidy in wild wheats. New Phytol. 2014, 202, 975–985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Nieto Feliner, G.; Rosato, M.; Alegre, G.; San Segundo, P.; Rosselló, J.A.; Garnatje, T.; Garcia, S. Dissimilar molecular and morphological patterns in an introgressed peripheral population of a sand dune species (Armeria pungens, Plumbaginaceae). Plant Biol. 2019, 21, 1072–1082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Balao, F.; Casimiro-Soriguer, R.; García-Castaño, J.L.; Terrab, A.; Talavera, S. Big thistle eats the little thistle: Does unidirectional introgressive hybridization endanger the conservation of Onopordum hinojense? New Phytol. 2015, 206, 448–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Rhymer, J.M.; Simberloff, D. Extinction by hybridizarion and introgression. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1996, 27, 83–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ungerer, M.C.; Strakosh, S.C.; Zhen, Y. Genome expansion in three hybrid sunflower species is associated with retrotransposon proliferation. Curr. Biol. 2006, 16, R872–R873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Baack, E.J.; Whitney, K.D.; Rieseberg, L.H. Hybridization and genome size evolution: Timing and magnitude of nuclear DNA content increases in Helianthus homoploid hybrid species. New Phytol. 2005, 167, 623–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Janes, J.K.; Hamilton, J.A. Mixing it up: The role of hybridization in forest management and conservation under climate change. Forests 2017, 8, 237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Pellicer, J.; Powell, R.F.; Leitch, I.J. The Application of flow cytometry for estimating genome size, ploidy level, endopolyploidy, and reproductive modes in plants BT. In Molecular Plant Taxonomy: Methods and Protocols; Besse, P., Ed.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2021; pp. 325–361. ISBN 978-1-0716-0997-2. [Google Scholar]
  36. Doležel, J.; Greilhuber, J.; Suda, J. Estimation of nuclear DNA content in plants using flow cytometry. Nat. Protoc. 2007, 2, 2233–2244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Clark, J.; Hidalgo, O.; Pellicer, J.; Liu, H.; Marquardt, J.; Robert, Y.; Christenhusz, M.; Zhang, S.; Gibby, M.; Leitch, I.J.; et al. Genome evolution of ferns: Evidence for relative stasis of genome size across the fern phylogeny. New Phytol. 2016, 210, 1072–1082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Obermayer, R.; Leitch, I.J.; Hanson, L.; Bennett, M.D. Nuclear DNA C-values in 30 species double the familial representation in pteridophytes. Ann. Bot. 2002, 90, 209–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Loureiro, J.; Rodriguez, E.; Doležel, J.; Santos, C. Two new nuclear isolation buffers for plant DNA flow cytometry: A test with 37 species. Ann. Bot. 2007, 100, 875–888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  40. Wickham, H. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis, 2nd ed.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2016; ISBN 978-3-319-24277-4. [Google Scholar]
  41. R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing; R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria, 2015. [Google Scholar]
Plants 10 01492 g001 550
Figure 1. Photographs illustrative of the three Centaurea studied from Ports Massif, including morphological details of the flower head: (A,D,F) C. podospermifolia; (B,E,G,I) C. ×loscosii; (C,H,J) C. cephalariifolia (Images: Marc Aixarch, Oriane Hidalgo). Note that specimens of C. podospermifolia from Cardó Massif are morphologically no different from those of Ports Massif (image available at https://twitter.com/agentsruralscat/status/1278388147324243969?lang=ca, accessed on 19 July 2021).
Figure 1. Photographs illustrative of the three Centaurea studied from Ports Massif, including morphological details of the flower head: (A,D,F) C. podospermifolia; (B,E,G,I) C. ×loscosii; (C,H,J) C. cephalariifolia (Images: Marc Aixarch, Oriane Hidalgo). Note that specimens of C. podospermifolia from Cardó Massif are morphologically no different from those of Ports Massif (image available at https://twitter.com/agentsruralscat/status/1278388147324243969?lang=ca, accessed on 19 July 2021).
Plants 10 01492 g001
Plants 10 01492 g002 550
Figure 2. (A–C) Schematic flow cytometry outputs when processing together the parental species and their homoploid hybrid. (A) Configuration expected in case there is no gene flow between hybrids and parental species, due to, e.g., reproductive barriers or sterility of hybrids. (B) Configuration expected in case there is gene flow between hybrids and parental species. (C) Observed configuration in the studied populations. (D,E) Flow histograms obtained from analysing C. podospermifolia (peak 2) using Petroselinum crispum (4.5 pg/2C, peak 1) as the calibration standard. (D) Population from Cardó Massif (OH 621-1). (E) Population from Ports Massif (OH 618-4). (F) Flow histogram obtained from coprocessing C. podospermifolia (population from Cardó Massif, OH 621-4), C. cephalariifolia (OH 616-2) and C. ×loscosii (OH 613-5).
Figure 2. (A–C) Schematic flow cytometry outputs when processing together the parental species and their homoploid hybrid. (A) Configuration expected in case there is no gene flow between hybrids and parental species, due to, e.g., reproductive barriers or sterility of hybrids. (B) Configuration expected in case there is gene flow between hybrids and parental species. (C) Observed configuration in the studied populations. (D,E) Flow histograms obtained from analysing C. podospermifolia (peak 2) using Petroselinum crispum (4.5 pg/2C, peak 1) as the calibration standard. (D) Population from Cardó Massif (OH 621-1). (E) Population from Ports Massif (OH 618-4). (F) Flow histogram obtained from coprocessing C. podospermifolia (population from Cardó Massif, OH 621-4), C. cephalariifolia (OH 616-2) and C. ×loscosii (OH 613-5).
Plants 10 01492 g002
Plants 10 01492 g003 550
Figure 3. (Left) Violin plots showing the distribution of genome size in Centaurea cephalariifolia, C. ×loscosii and C. podospermifolia from Ports Massif and in C. podospermifolia from Cardó Massif. Horizontal lines represent the mean and dots indicate the genome size values of each individual. Letters above violins indicate which groups are statistically different from one another (Tukey test, p < 0.001). (Right) Location of the sampled populations of C. cephalariifolia (pink), C. ×loscosii (orange) and C. podospermifolia (yellow) in Catalonia, NE Spain.
Figure 3. (Left) Violin plots showing the distribution of genome size in Centaurea cephalariifolia, C. ×loscosii and C. podospermifolia from Ports Massif and in C. podospermifolia from Cardó Massif. Horizontal lines represent the mean and dots indicate the genome size values of each individual. Letters above violins indicate which groups are statistically different from one another (Tukey test, p < 0.001). (Right) Location of the sampled populations of C. cephalariifolia (pink), C. ×loscosii (orange) and C. podospermifolia (yellow) in Catalonia, NE Spain.
Plants 10 01492 g003
Table
Table 1. Genome size data for populations of Centaurea cephalariifolia, C. ×loscosii and C. podospermifolia at Cardó and Ports Massifs (Catalonia, Spain), with indication of geographical coordinates.
Table 1. Genome size data for populations of Centaurea cephalariifolia, C. ×loscosii and C. podospermifolia at Cardó and Ports Massifs (Catalonia, Spain), with indication of geographical coordinates.
MassifCentaurea Species (Population)2C in pg (SD) 1N 2CVplt 3CVstd 4Geographical Coordinates
PortsC. cephalariifolia (OH 614)7.66 (0.05)53.212.8640°48′25″ N, 0°20′15″ E
C. cephalariifolia (OH 616)7.61 (0.08)52.512.3540°48′28″ N, 0°19′40″ E
C. ×loscosii (OH 613)7.94 (0.11)82.792.6140°48′23″ N, 0°20′14″ E
C. ×loscosii (OH 617)7.83 (0.06)52.672.6440°48′28″ N, 0°19′42″ E
C. podospermifolia (OH 618)7.85 (0.06)52.702.8540°48′40″ N, 0°19′50″ E
C. podospermifolia (OH 619)7.88 (0.04)52.922.8740°48′28″ N, 0°19′10″ E
CardóC. podospermifolia (OH 621)5.88 (0.05)102.912.8440°56′28″ N, 0°35′06″ E
1 SD: standard deviation. 2 N: number of individuals measured. 3 CVplt: coefficient of variation for Centaurea accessions (in %). 4 CVstd: coefficient of variation for the calibration standard (in %).
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pellicer, J.; López-Pujol, J.; Aixarch, M.; Garnatje, T.; Vallès, J.; Hidalgo, O. Detecting Introgressed Populations in the Iberian Endemic Centaurea podospermifolia through Genome Size. Plants 2021, 10, 1492. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/plants10081492

AMA Style

Pellicer J, López-Pujol J, Aixarch M, Garnatje T, Vallès J, Hidalgo O. Detecting Introgressed Populations in the Iberian Endemic Centaurea podospermifolia through Genome Size. Plants. 2021; 10(8):1492. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/plants10081492

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pellicer, Jaume, Jordi López-Pujol, Marc Aixarch, Teresa Garnatje, Joan Vallès, and Oriane Hidalgo. 2021. "Detecting Introgressed Populations in the Iberian Endemic Centaurea podospermifolia through Genome Size" Plants 10, no. 8: 1492. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/plants10081492

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop