Next Article in Journal
On the Quantitative Properties of Some Market Models Involving Fractional Derivatives
Next Article in Special Issue
The Study of the New Classes of m-Fold Symmetric bi-Univalent Functions
Previous Article in Journal
Hesitant Fuzzy 2-Dimension Linguistic Programming Technique for Multidimensional Analysis of Preference for Multicriteria Group Decision Making
Previous Article in Special Issue
Certain Integral Operators of Analytic Functions
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Bounds for Two New Subclasses of Bi-Univalent Functions Associated with Legendre Polynomials

by
Abdel Moneim Y. Lashin
1,2,
Abeer O. Badghaish
1 and
Amani Z. Bajamal
1,*
1
Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia
2
Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Mansoura University, Mansoura 35516, Egypt
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 15 November 2021 / Revised: 4 December 2021 / Accepted: 8 December 2021 / Published: 10 December 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances on Complex Analysis)

Abstract

:
In this article, two new subclasses of the bi-univalent function class σ related with Legendre polynomials are presented. Additionally, the first two Taylor–Maclaurin coefficients a 2 and a 3 for the functions belonging to these new subclasses are estimated.

1. Introduction

In 1782, Adrien-Marie Legendre discovered Legendre polynomials, which have numerous physical applications. The Legendre polynomials P n x , sometimes called Legendre functions of the first kind, are the particular solutions to the Legendre differential equation
1 x 2 y 2 x y + n n + 1 y = 0 , n N 0 , x < 1 .
Here and in the following, let C and N denote the sets of complex numbers and positive integers, respectively, and let N 0 = N { 0 } . The Legendre polynomials are defined by Rodrigues’ formula
P n x = 1 2 n n ! d n d x n x 2 1 n ( n N 0 ) ,
for arbitrary real or complex values of the variable x. The Legendre polynomials P n x are generated by the following function
1 1 2 x t + t 2 = n = 0 P n x t n ,
where the particular branch of 1 2 x t + t 2 1 2 is taken to be 1 as t 0 . The first few Legendre polynomials are
P 0 x = 1 , P 1 x = x , P 2 x = 1 2 3 x 2 1 , P 3 x = 1 2 5 x 3 3 x .
A general case of the Legendre polynomials and their applications can be found in [1,2]. Let A be the class of analytic functions in the open unit disc U = { z C : z < 1 } with the following Taylor–Maclaurin series expansion
f ( z ) = z + n = 2 a n z n ,
and let S be the subclass of A consisting of univalent functions in U. An important member of the class S is the Koebe function
K ( z ) = z ( 1 z ) 2 = 1 4 1 + z 1 z 2 1 = n = 1 n z n ,
for every z U . This function maps U in a one-to-one manner onto the domain D that consists of the entire complex plane except for a slit along the negative real axis from w = to w = 1 4 . The function
ϕ z = 1 z 1 2 z cos α + z 2 ,
is in P for every real α (see [[3] Page 102]), where P is the Caratheodory class defined by
P = p ( z ) : p ( z ) > 0 , z U ,
p ( z ) = 1 + c 1 z + c 2 z 2 + . By using (1), it is easy to check that
ϕ z = 1 + n = 1 P n cos α P n 1 cos α z n , = 1 + n = 1 B n z n , z U .
If we consider
1 ϕ z 2 = 1 2 z cos α + z 2 1 z 2 , = 1 + 2 1 cos α z 1 z 2 .
From the geometric properties of the Koebe function, the function ϕ maps the unit disc onto the right plane w > 0 minus the slit along the positive real axis from 1 cos α 2 to . ϕ U is univalent, symmetric with respect to the real axis and starlike with respect to ϕ 0 = 1 . It is well known, by using the Koebe one-quarter theorem [4], that every univalent function f S has an inverse function f 1 , which is defined by
f 1 ( f ( z ) ) = z ( z U ) ,
and
f ( f 1 ( w ) ) = w ( w U * = { w C : w < 1 4 } ) ,
where
g ( w ) = f 1 ( w ) = w a 2 w 2 + ( 2 a 2 2 a 3 ) w 3 ( 5 a 2 3 5 a 2 a 3 + a 4 ) w 4 + .
The function f S is said to be a bi-univalent function if its inverse f 1 is also univalent in U. Let σ be the class of all bi-univalent functions in U. Lewin [5] is the first author who introduced the class of analytic bi-univalent functions and estimated the second coefficient a 2 . Many authors created several subclasses of analytic bi-univalent functions and found the bounds for the first two coefficients a 2 and a 3 , see for example [6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23]. Let Ω be the class of all analytic functions ω in U which satisfy these conditions ω ( 0 ) = 0 and ω z < 1 for all z U . A function f is said to be subordinate to g, written as f ( z ) g ( z ) if there exists a Schwarz function ω Ω such that f ( z ) = g ( ω z ) . Furthermore, if the function g is univalent in U , then f is subordinate to g is equivalent to f ( 0 ) = g ( 0 ) and f ( U ) g ( U ) .
Definition 1.
A function f σ belongs to the class L σ ( λ , ϕ ) with 0 λ 1 if the following subordination conditions are satisfied
λ 1 + z f z f z + 1 λ z f z f z ϕ z z U ,
and
λ 1 + w g w g w + 1 λ w g w g w ϕ w w U ,
where g w = f 1 w .
Definition 2.
A function f σ belongs to the class L σ γ , ρ , ϕ with 0 γ , ρ 1 if the following subordination conditions are satisfied
1 γ + 2 ρ f z z + γ 2 ρ f z + ρ z f z ϕ z z U ,
and
1 γ + 2 ρ g w w + γ 2 ρ g w + ρ w g w ϕ w w U ,
where g w = f 1 w .
Remark 1.
In Definition 1, if λ = 1 and α = π , then the subclass in [15] will be obtained. If λ = 0 and α = π , then the subclass in [24] will be obtained. In addition, putting α = π , this yields to the subclass in [25].
Remark 2.
In Definition 2, taking ρ = 0 and α = π , the subclass in [26] will be obtained. In addition, putting γ = 1 , ρ = 0 and α = π , this yields to the subclass in [27].
In this paper, the estimates for initial coefficients of functions in the two classes L σ ( λ , ϕ ) and L σ γ , ρ , ϕ are found.

2. The Estimate of the Coefficients for the Classes L σ ( λ , ϕ ) and L σ ( γ , ρ , ϕ )

Lemma 1 
([4]). Let ω Ω with ω z = n = 1 ω n z n z U . Then
ω 1 1 , ω n 1 ω 1 2 n N 1 .
Theorem 1.
Let the function f L σ ( λ , ϕ ) . Then
a 2 2 1 cos α 1 + λ [ 3 λ ( cos α + 1 ) + 5 + cos α ] ,
and
a 3 1 cos α 2 1 + 2 λ i f cos α 1 1 + λ 2 2 1 + 2 λ 1 cos α [ 2 1 + 2 λ 1 cos α 1 + λ 2 ] 1 + 2 λ ( 1 + λ ) [ 3 λ ( cos α + 1 ) + 5 + cos α ] + 1 cos α 2 1 + 2 λ i f cos α < 1 1 + λ 2 2 1 + 2 λ
Proof .
Since f L σ ( λ , ϕ ) , from Definition 1, we have
λ 1 + z f z f z + 1 λ z f z f z = ϕ u z z U ,
and
λ 1 + w g w g w + 1 λ w g w g w = ϕ v w w U ,
for some 0 λ 1 , where g w = f 1 w and u , v Ω such that
u z = n = 1 b n z n ,
and
v w = n = 1 c n w n .
Then
ϕ u z = 1 + B 1 b 1 z + B 1 b 2 + B 2 b 1 2 z 2 + B 1 b 3 + 2 b 1 b 2 B 2 + B 3 b 1 3 z 3 + . . . ,
and
ϕ v w = 1 + B 1 c 1 w + B 1 c 2 + B 2 c 1 2 w 2 + B 1 c 3 + 2 c 1 c 2 B 2 + B 3 c 1 3 w 3 + . . . ,
where
B 1 = cos α 1 , B 2 = 1 2 ( cos α 1 ) 1 + 3 cos α and B 3 = 1 2 5 cos 3 α 3 cos 2 α 3 cos α + 1 .
Then, Equations (4) and (5) become
λ 1 + 2 a 2 z + 6 a 3 4 a 2 2 z 2 + . . . + 1 λ 1 + a 2 z + 2 a 3 a 2 2 z 2 + . . . = 1 + B 1 b 1 z + B 1 b 2 + B 2 b 1 2 z 2 + B 1 b 3 + 2 b 1 b 2 B 2 + B 3 b 1 3 z 3 + . . . ,
and
λ 1 2 a 2 w + 8 a 2 2 6 a 3 w 2 + . . . + 1 λ 1 a 2 w + 3 a 2 2 2 a 3 w 2 + . . . = 1 + B 1 c 1 w + B 1 c 2 + B 2 c 1 2 w 2 + B 1 c 3 + 2 c 1 c 2 B 2 + B 3 c 1 3 w 3 + . . . .
Now, equating the corresponding coefficients in (9) and (10), we get
1 + λ a 2 = B 1 b 1 ,
2 1 + 2 λ a 3 1 + 3 λ a 2 2 = B 1 b 2 + B 2 b 1 2 ,
1 + λ a 2 = B 1 c 1 ,
3 + 5 λ a 2 2 2 1 + 2 λ a 3 = B 1 c 2 + B 2 c 1 2 .
(11) and (13) yield
b 1 = c 1 ,
and
b 1 2 + c 1 2 = 2 1 + λ 2 B 1 2 a 2 2 .
From (12), (14) and (16), we have
a 2 2 = B 1 3 2 1 + λ B 1 2 1 + λ B 2 b 2 + c 2 .
By using Lemma 1, (11) and (15), we obtain
a 2 2 B 1 3 1 b 1 2 1 + λ B 1 2 1 + λ B 2 , = B 1 3 1 + λ B 1 2 1 + λ B 2 + 1 + λ B 1 .
Therefore,
a 2 B 1 B 1 1 + λ B 1 2 1 + λ B 2 + 1 + λ B 1 .
By noting that,
B 1 2 1 + λ B 2 = 1 2 ( 1 cos α ) 1 + 3 λ cos α + 3 + λ , ( 1 cos α ) 1 λ 0 ,
now substituting the values of B 1 and B 2 from (8) in (17), we obtain
a 2 2 1 cos α 1 + λ [ 3 λ ( cos α + 1 ) + 5 + cos α ] ,
which is the required estimation for a 2 .
Next, in order to estimate a 3 , subtracting (14) from (12), we obtain
a 3 = a 2 2 + B 1 4 1 + 2 λ b 2 c 2 .
By using Lemma 1 and (11), we find
a 3 1 1 + λ 2 2 1 + 2 λ B 1 a 2 2 + B 1 2 1 + 2 λ .
Case 1. If 1 1 + λ 2 2 1 + 2 λ B 1 0 , then
a 3 B 1 2 1 + 2 λ .
Case 2. If 1 1 + λ 2 2 1 + 2 λ B 1 > 0 , then
a 3 1 1 + λ 2 2 1 + 2 λ B 1 a 2 2 + B 1 2 1 + 2 λ .
Therefore,
a 3 1 cos α 2 1 + 2 λ i f cos α 1 1 + λ 2 2 1 + 2 λ 1 cos α [ 2 1 + 2 λ 1 cos α 1 + λ 2 ] 1 + 2 λ ( 1 + λ ) [ 3 λ ( cos α + 1 ) + 5 + cos α ] + 1 cos α 2 1 + 2 λ i f cos α < 1 1 + λ 2 2 1 + 2 λ
which completes the proof. □
Theorem 2.
Let the function f L σ ( γ , ρ , ϕ ) . Then
a 2 2 ( 1 cos α ) 2 1 + 2 γ + 2 ρ 1 cos α + 3 1 + γ 2 ( 1 + cos α ) ,
and
a 3 1 cos α 1 + 2 γ + 2 ρ i f cos α 1 1 + γ 2 1 + 2 γ + 2 ρ 2 [ 1 + 2 γ + 2 ρ 1 cos α 1 + γ 2 ] 1 cos α 1 + 2 γ + 2 ρ [ 2 1 + 2 γ + 2 ρ 1 cos α + 3 1 + γ 2 ( 1 + cos α ) ] + 1 cos α 1 + 2 γ + 2 ρ i f cos α < 1 1 + γ 2 1 + 2 γ + 2 ρ
Proof. 
Since f L σ ( γ , ρ , ϕ ) , from Definition 2, we have
1 γ + 2 ρ f z z + γ 2 ρ f z + ρ z f z = ϕ u z z U ,
and
1 γ + 2 ρ g w w + γ 2 ρ g w + ρ w g w = ϕ v w w U ,
for 0 γ , ρ 1 , where g w = f 1 w and u , v Ω are defined as in Theorem 1. Then, rewriting (18) and (19) as
1 γ + 2 ρ 1 + a 2 z + a 3 z 2 + . . . + γ 2 ρ 1 + 2 a 2 z + 3 a 3 z 2 + . . . + ρ z 2 a 2 + 6 a 3 z + . . . = 1 + B 1 b 1 z + B 1 b 2 + B 2 b 1 2 z 2 + B 1 b 3 + 2 b 1 b 2 B 2 + B 3 b 1 3 z 3 + . . . ,
and
1 γ + 2 ρ 1 2 a 2 w + 2 a 2 2 a 3 w 2 + . . . + γ 2 ρ 1 2 a 2 w + 6 a 2 2 3 a 3 w 2 + . . . + ρ w 2 a 2 + 12 a 2 2 6 a 3 w + . . . = 1 + B 1 c 1 w + B 1 c 2 + B 2 c 1 2 w 2 + B 1 c 3 + 2 c 1 c 2 B 2 + B 3 c 1 3 w 3 + . . . ,
where B 1 , B 2 and B 3 are defined as in (8). Now, equating the coefficients in (20) and (21) yields
1 + γ a 2 = B 1 b 1 ,
1 + 2 γ + 2 ρ a 3 = B 1 b 2 + B 2 b 1 2 ,
1 + γ a 2 = B 1 c 1 ,
1 + 2 γ + 2 ρ 2 a 2 2 a 3 = B 1 c 2 + B 2 c 1 2 .
From (22) and (24), it is easy to see that
b 1 = c 1 ,
and
b 1 2 + c 1 2 = 2 1 + γ 2 B 1 2 a 2 2 .
From (23), (25) and (27), we have
a 2 2 = B 1 3 2 1 + 2 γ + 2 ρ B 1 2 1 + γ 2 B 2 b 2 + c 2 .
By using Lemma 1, (22) and (26), we obtain
a 2 2 B 1 3 1 b 1 2 1 + 2 γ + 2 ρ B 1 2 1 + γ 2 B 2 , = B 1 3 1 + 2 γ + 2 ρ B 1 2 1 + γ 2 B 2 + 1 + γ 2 B 1 .
Therefore,
a 2 B 1 B 1 1 + 2 γ + 2 ρ B 1 2 1 + γ 2 B 2 + 1 + γ 2 B 1 .
By noting that,
1 + 2 γ + 2 ρ B 1 2 1 + γ 2 B 2 = 1 2 ( 1 cos α ) { 2 1 + 2 γ + 2 ρ 1 cos α + 1 + γ 2 ( 1 + 3 cos α ) } , = 1 2 ( 1 cos α ) { 2 1 + γ 2 ( 1 + cos α ) + [ 1 + γ ( 2 γ ) + 4 ρ ] 1 cos α } > 0 ,
now substituting the values of B 1 and B 2 from (8) in (28), we obtain
a 2 2 ( 1 cos α ) 2 1 + 2 γ + 2 ρ 1 cos α + 3 1 + γ 2 ( 1 + cos α ) ,
which is the desired estimation for a 2 .
Next, in order to estimate a 3 , subtracting (25) from (23), we obtain
a 3 = a 2 2 + B 1 2 1 + 2 γ + 2 ρ b 2 c 2 .
By using Lemma 1 and (22), we find
a 3 1 1 + γ 2 1 + 2 γ + 2 ρ B 1 a 2 2 + B 1 1 + 2 γ + 2 ρ .
Case 1. If 1 1 + γ 2 1 + 2 γ + 2 ρ B 1 0 , then
a 3 B 1 1 + 2 γ + 2 ρ .
Case 2. If 1 1 + γ 2 1 + 2 γ + 2 ρ B 1 > 0 , then
a 3 1 1 + γ 2 1 + 2 γ + 2 ρ B 1 a 2 2 + B 1 1 + 2 γ + 2 ρ .
Therefore,
a 3 1 cos α 1 + 2 γ + 2 ρ i f cos α 1 1 + γ 2 1 + 2 γ + 2 ρ 2 [ 1 + 2 γ + 2 ρ 1 cos α 1 + γ 2 ] 1 cos α 1 + 2 γ + 2 ρ [ 2 1 + 2 γ + 2 ρ 1 cos α + 3 1 + γ 2 ( 1 + cos α ) ] + 1 cos α 1 + 2 γ + 2 ρ i f cos α < 1 1 + γ 2 1 + 2 γ + 2 ρ
which completes the proof. □

3. Conclusions

In this paper, we have used the Legendre polynomials to define and study two new subclasses of the bi-univalent function class σ . Moreover, we have provided the estimations for the first two Taylor–Maclaurin coefficients a 2 and a 3 for the functions belonging to these new subclasses. Some special cases have been discussed as applications of our main results.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.M.Y.L.; Funding acquisition, A.O.B. and A.Z.B.; Investigation, A.Z.B.; Project administration, A.O.B.; Supervision, A.M.Y.L. and A.O.B.; Writing—original draft, A.Z.B.; Writing—review & editing, A.M.Y.L. and A.O.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The Deanship of Scientific Research (DSR) at King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, has funded this project, under grant no. (FP-177-43).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to express their thanks to the referees and Rosihan M. Ali for their helpful comments and suggestions, which improved the presentation of the paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kukushkin, M.V. On Solvability of the Sonin–Abel Equation in the Weighted Lebesgue Space. Fractal Fract. 2021, 5, 77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Muckenhoupt, B. Mean Convergence of Jacobi Series. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 1969, 23, 306–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Goodman, A.W. Univalent Functions; Mariner Publishing Company Inc.: Tampa, FL, USA, 1983; Volumes I and II. [Google Scholar]
  4. Duren, P.L. Univalent Functions, Grundlehren Math. Wissenschaften, Band 259; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1983. [Google Scholar]
  5. Lewin, M. On a coefficient problem for bi-univalent functions. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 1967, 18, 63–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Altınkaya, S. Bounds for a new subclass of bi-univalent functions subordinate to the Fibonacci numbers. Turk. J. Math. 2020, 44, 553–560. [Google Scholar]
  7. Altınkaya, S.; Yalcın, S. Faber polynomial coefficient bounds for a subclass of bi-univalent functions. C. R. Math. 2015, 353, 1075–1080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Amourah, A.; Alamoush, A.; Al-Kaseasbeh, M. Gegenbauer polynomials and Bi-univalent functions. Palest. J. Math. 2021, 10, 625–632. [Google Scholar]
  9. Amourah, A.; Frasin, B.A.; Abdeljawad, T. Fekete-Szego inequality for analytic and Biunivalent functions subordinate to Gegenbauer polynomials. J. Funct. Space 2021, 2021, 5574673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Caglar, M.; Orhan, H.; Yagmur, N. Coefficient bounds for new subclasses of bi-univalent functions. Filomat 2013, 27, 1165–1171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Deniz, E. Certain subclasses of bi-univalent functions satisfying subordinate conditions. J. Class. Anal. 2013, 2, 49–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Goyal, S.P.; Kumar, R. Coefficient estimates and quasi-subordination properties associated with certain subclasses of analytic and bi-univalent functions. Math. Slov. 2015, 65, 533–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Hayami, T.; Owa, S. Coefficient bounds for bi-univalent functions. Panam. Am. Math. J. 2012, 22, 15–26. [Google Scholar]
  14. Lashin, A.Y. On certain subclasses of analytic and bi-univalent functions. J. Egypt. Math. Soc. 2016, 24, 220–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Lashin, A.Y. Coefficient estimates for two subclasses of analytic and bi-univalent functions. Ukr. Math. J. 2019, 70, 1484–1492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Lashin, A.Y.; El-Emam, F.Z. Faber polynomial coefficients for certain subclasses of analytic and bi-univalent functions. Turk. J. Math. 2020, 44, 1345–1361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Magesh, N.; Rosy, T.; Varma, S. Coefficient estimate problem for a new subclass of bi-univalent functions. J. Complex Anal. 2013, 2013, 474231. [Google Scholar]
  18. Magesh, N.; Yamini, J. Coefficient bounds for certain subclasses of bi-univalent functions. Internat. Math. Forum 2013, 8, 1337–1344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Murugusundaramoorthy, G.; Magesh, N.; Prameela, V. Coefficient bounds for certain subclasses of bi-univalent function. Abstr. Appl. Anal. 2013, 2013, 573017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Peng, Z.-G.; Han, Q.-Q. On the coefficients of several classes of bi-univalent functions. Acta Math. Sci. Ser. B Engl. Ed. 2014, 34, 228–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Porwal, S.; Darus, M. On a new subclass of bi-univalent functions. J. Egypt. Math. Soc. 2013, 21, 190–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Srivastava, H.M.; Bulut, S.; Caglar, M.; Yagmur, N. Coefficient estimates for a general subclass of analytic and bi-univalent functions. Filomat 2013, 27, 831–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zireh, A.; Adegani, E.A.; Bidkham, M. Faber polynomial coefficient estimates for subclass of bi-univalent functions defined by quasi-subordinate. Math. Slov. 2018, 68, 369–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ali, R.M.; Lee, S.K.; Ravichandran, V.; Supramaniam, S. Coefficient estimates for bi-univalent Ma-Minda starlike and convex functions. Appl. Math. Lett. 2012, 25, 344–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Hamidi, S.G.; Jahangiri, J.M. Faber polynomial coefficients of bi-subordinate functions. C. R. Math. 2016, 354, 365–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Frasin, B.A.; Aouf, M.K. New subclasses of bi-univalent functions. Appl. Math. Lett. 2011, 24, 1569–1573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Srivastava, H.M.; Mishra, A.K.; Gochhayat, P. Certain subclasses of analytic and bi-univalent functions. Appl. Math. Lett. 2010, 23, 1188–1192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lashin, A.M.Y.; Badghaish, A.O.; Bajamal, A.Z. Bounds for Two New Subclasses of Bi-Univalent Functions Associated with Legendre Polynomials. Mathematics 2021, 9, 3188. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/math9243188

AMA Style

Lashin AMY, Badghaish AO, Bajamal AZ. Bounds for Two New Subclasses of Bi-Univalent Functions Associated with Legendre Polynomials. Mathematics. 2021; 9(24):3188. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/math9243188

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lashin, Abdel Moneim Y., Abeer O. Badghaish, and Amani Z. Bajamal. 2021. "Bounds for Two New Subclasses of Bi-Univalent Functions Associated with Legendre Polynomials" Mathematics 9, no. 24: 3188. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/math9243188

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop